20181345 Ver 1_PCN Application_20181005

From:
Diebolt, Linda
To:
Scarbrauah, Anthony; Standridae, Billy W CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
Cc:
fbottorff(a havelock.us
Subject:
RE: [External] RE: Emergency Permit Request - Hurricane Florence Damage, Caps Brach Bank Stabilization
Date:
Friday, October 5, 2018 9:00:55 AM
Attachments:
Email to USACE with additional information.Ddf
Oakwood Drive Emergency PCN Application for Town of Havelock.pdf
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to Report Spam.<mailto:rcport.spam(ti, c.gov>
Anthony,
My apologies. I did not realize that my email to you with the permit application did not go through to you.
Attached is the permit application and associated information, including the email of additional information that I
sent to Billy. Please let me know if you have any questions, require additional information, etc. I can be reached
via email and my cell number, provided below.
Thank you for your assistance and have a great day,
Linda
Linda Diebolt
Senior Principal Scientist I HAZEN AND SAWYER
4011 WestChase Boulevard, Suite 500, Raleigh, NC 27607
919 833-7152 (office) 1919 863-9256 (direct) 1919 906-1775 (cell)
[e-mail] I hazenandsawyer.com
-----Original Message -----
From: Scarbraugh, Anthony <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, October 5, 2018 7:33 AM
To: Standridge, Billy W CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>; Diebolt, Linda
<ldiebolt@hazenandsawyer. com>
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Emergency Permit Request - Hurricane Florence Damage, Caps Brach Bank
Stabilization
Linda,
Could you please provide the Division of Water Resources with a copy of the emergency permit application and
associated documentation?
Thanks,
Anthony Scarbraugh
Environmental Specialist II
Division of Water Resources - Water Quality Regional Operations Department of Environmental Quality
252 948 3924 office
[e-mail]

943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Standridge, Billy W CIV USARMY CESAW (US) [mailto:Billy.W.Standridgena usace.army.mil]
Sent: Friday, October 5, 2018 6:51 AM
To: Diebolt, Linda <[e-mail]>
Cc: Scarbraugh, Anthony<[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
Subject: [External] RE: Emergency Permit Request - Hurricane Florence Damage, Caps Brach Bank Stabilization
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to Report Spam.<mailto:report.spam&nc.gov>
Linda,
Please see the attached NWP-13 authorization for the emergency repairsibank stabilization for the Caps
Branch/Oakwood Drive project in Havelock. Please return the completion certification form once the project is
finished.
Thank you,
Billy
Billy W. Standridge
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Regulatory Field Office
2407 W. 5th Street
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
-----Original Message -----
From: Diebolt, Linda [mailto:ldieboltnhazenandsawyer.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 10:07 AM
To: Standridge, Billy W CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Emergency Permit Request - Hurricane Florence Damage
Billy,
Sorry for the delay. I was waiting for the engineer to come into the office.
Relative to the your questions, please see below.
1. Will the entire stream bed be hardened or just the bank? Only the stream bank will be hardened. No material
will be placed in the stream bed and no modification of the stream bed elevation will occur.
2. Do you know the average cubic yard per running foot of fill material that will be placed below the ordinary high
water mark? The average cubic yard per running foot of fill material will be approximately 0.02 CY/ft.
Please let me know if you have additional questions, etc.
Sincerely,

Linda
Linda Diebolt
Senior Principal Scientist I HAZEN AND SAWYER
4011 WestChase Boulevard, Suite 500, Raleigh, NC 27607
919 833-7152 (office) 1919 863-9256 (direct) 1919 906-1775 (cell) [e-mail]
hazenandsawyer.com
-----Original Message -----
From: Standridge, Billy W CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 3:12 PM
To: Diebolt, Linda <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Emergency Permit Request - Hurricane Florence Damage
External Email - think before you click
Hi Linda,
I just did a quick review and I have a couple of quick questions.
1. Will the entire stream bed be hardened or just the bank?
2. Do you know the average cubic yard per running foot of fill material that will be placed below the ordinary high
water mark?
Thanks,
Billy
Billy W. Standridge
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Regulatory Field Office
2407 W. 5th Street
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
-----Original Message -----
From: Diebolt, Linda[mailto:ldiebolt&hazenandsawyer.com]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 2:43 PM
To: Standridge, Billy W CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Emergency Permit Request - Hurricane Florence Damage
Billy,
Attached is an emergency permit application for the Town of Havelock to repair damage incurred during Hurricane
Florence. I am also sending a copy of the attached via UPS.

Please let me know if you have any questions, require additional information, etc.
Thank you for your assistance. Have a great day,
Linda Diebolt
Senior Principal Scientist I HAZEN AND SAWYER
4011 WestChase Boulevard, Suite 500, Raleigh, NC 27607
919 833-7152 (office) 1919 863-9256 (direct) 1919 906-1775 (cell)
[e-mail]<mailto:ldieboltnhazenandsawyer.com> I hazenandsawyer.com
<BlockedBlockedhttp://www.hazenandsawyer.com/>

Diebolt, Linda
From: Diebolt, Linda
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 10:07 AM
To: 'Standridge, Billy W CIV USARMY CESAW (US)'
Subject: RE: Emergency Permit Request - Hurricane Florence Damage
Billy,
Sorry for the delay. I was waiting for the engineer to come into the office.
Relative to the your questions, please see below.
1. Will the entire stream bed be hardened or just the bank? Only the stream bank will be hardened. No material will
be placed in the stream bed and no modification of the stream bed elevation will occur.
2. Do you know the average cubic yard per running foot of fill material that will be placed below the ordinary high water
mark? The average cubic yard per running foot of fill material will be approximately 0.02 CY/ft.
Please let me know if you have additional questions, etc.
Sincerely,
Linda
Linda Diebolt
Senior Principal Scientist I HAZEN AND SAWYER
4011 WestChase Boulevard, Suite 500, Raleigh, NC 27607
919 833-7152 (office) 1919 863-9256 (direct) 1919 906-1775 (cell) [e-mail]
hazenandsawyer.com
-----Original Message -----
From: Standridge, Billy W CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 3:12 PM
To: Diebolt, Linda <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Emergency Permit Request - Hurricane Florence Damage
External Email - think before you click
Hi Linda,
I just did a quick review and I have a couple of quick questions.
1. Will the entire stream bed be hardened or just the bank?

2. Do you know the average cubic yard per running foot of fill material that will be placed below the ordinary high water
mark?
Thanks,
Billy
Billy W. Standridge
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Regulatory Field Office
2407 W. 5th Street
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
-----Original Message -----
From: Diebolt, Linda [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 2:43 PM
To: Standridge, Billy W CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Emergency Permit Request - Hurricane Florence Damage
Attached is an emergency permit application for the Town of Havelock to repair damage incurred during Hurricane
Florence. I am also sending a copy of the attached via UPS.
Please let me know if you have any questions, require additional information, etc.
Thank you for your assistance. Have a great day,
Linda Diebolt
Senior Principal Scientist I HAZEN AND SAWYER
4011 WestChase Boulevard, Suite 500, Raleigh, NC 27607
919 833-7152 (office) 1919 863-9256 (direct) 1919 906-1775 (cell)
[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> I hazenandsawyer.com
<Blockedhttp://www.hazenandsawyer.com/>

Hazen
September 21, 2018
Hazen and Sawyer
4011 WestChase Boulevard, Suite 500
Raleigh, NC 27607 • 919.833.7152
North Carolina Division of Water Resources
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Re: Pre -Construction Notification for Emergency Stream Bank Repair and Stabilization, Oakwood
Drive Stream Stabilization Project, City of Havelock, Havelock, Craven County, North Carolina
Dear Sir/Madam:
Please find attached the Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Application for the above referenced
project. Per the Public Notice issued by the Wilmington District Corps of Engineers on September 10,
2018, the City of Havelock is proposing emergency repair of damages incurred during Hurricane Florence
to the left stream bank of an approximately 100 -foot reach of Caps Branch. The emergency repairs
include stabilization of the left bank of Caps Branch and repair of the abutting damaged roadway,
Oakwood Drive.
Prior to the Hurricane Florence, design of stream bank stabilization for the left bank of this section of
Caps Branch was underway due to the eroded condition of the stream bank and proximity of the stream
reach to roadways. However, due to excessive stream bank erosion, undercutting of the roadway and
hazenandsawyer.com

Hazen
roadway failure incurred during Hurricane Florence, the current conditions of the left stream bank of Caps
Branch immediately downstream of the culvert under US 70 pose an unacceptable hazard to life. Repair
and stabilization of approximately 100 -feet of the left bank of Caps Branch needs to be performed as soon
as possible to ensure the safety of residents of Havelock, as well as commuters traveling through Craven
County along Highway 70.
As previously stated, design of stabilization of the left stream bank for this reach of Caps Branch was
underway and at approximately 60 percent prior to Hurricane Florence. Due to the damage to Oakwood
Drive incurred during the hurricane, the design was quickly completed. Stream bank stabilization and
roadway repair will commence as soon as feasible upon receipt of authorization from the regulatory
agencies.
To accommodate the proposed stream repair and stabilization activities, impacts to Caps Branch, a non -
tidal stream, are necessary. Permanent impacts to Caps Branch will occur during streambank stabilization
activities. Temporary impacts to Caps Branch will occur in association with placement of cofferdams that
will be used for pumping Caps Branch around the area of construction. No wetlands are present within the
project site and no net loss of stream or wetlands will occur from implementation of the proposed project.
If you would like to schedule a site visit, have any questions, or require additional information, please
contact me at 919.906.1775. Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Ms. Linda Diebolt
Senior Principal Scientist
Attachments
Page 2 of 2
hazenandsawyer.com

O�OF W A -rf?
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 13 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties? If yes, answer
1 h below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Oakwood Drive Emergency Stream Bank Stabilization Project
2b. County:
Craven
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Havelock
2d.
Subdivision name:
n/a
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
n/a (roadway easement)
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: City of Havelock
4b.
Name:
Frank Bottorff, City Manager
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
City of Havelock
4d.
Street address:
1 Governmental Drive / PO Box 368
4e.
City, state, zip:
Havelock, NC 28532
4f.
Telephone no.:
252.444.6400
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Linda Diebolt
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Hazen and Sawyer
5c.
Street address:
4011 WestChase Boulevard, Suite 500
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27607
5e.
Telephone no.:
919.906.1775
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
Idiebolt(a-)hazenandsawyer.com
Page 2 of 12

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
n/a
Latitude: 34.871698 Longitude: -
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
76.901979
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c.
Property size:
acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Caps Branch
proposed project:
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; Sw, NSW
2c.
River basin: map is available at
Neuse
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/
3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
See Additional Information document.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
3c.
List the total estimated feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
117
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
See Additional Information document.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
See Additional Information document.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
El Yes ®No El Unknown
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
El Preliminary El Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or
State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 12

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments: No jurisdictional wetlands are present within the project area; therefore, no impacts to jurisdictional wetlands
will occur from implementation of the proposed project.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ® P ❑ T
Stabilization
Caps Branch
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
g
100
S2 ❑ PET
Coffer Dam
Caps Branch
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
g
20
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
120
3i. Comments: Permanent impacts are associated with bank stabilization. No net loss of stream length will occur.
Page 5 of 12

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
— Permanent (P)
or Temporary
T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑ PEI T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then com tete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose of
pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 12

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse El Tar -Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason for
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
impact
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary
required?
T
Stream
❑ Yes
B1 ❑ P ®T
bank
Caps Branch
® No
7200
4800
stabilization
B2 ❑P❑T
F-1 Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑PFIT
F-1 Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
7200
4800
6i. Comments: Buffer impacts from stream bank stabilization are allowable and are provided above. Buffer in project area
contains minimal woody vegetation and moderate to sparse herbaceous vegetation.
Page 7 of 12

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Avoidance of all impacts is possible only with a no -build alternative, which does not meet the need of the project. During
design, the limits of disturbance in jurisdictional areas were reduced to the minimum required for the proposed stream
bank repair and stabilization. The proposed stream work is required to ensure the safety and welfare of the residents of
Havelock, as well as those traveling through Craven County along Highway 70.
b.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Where feasible, the limits of disturbance have been reduced. During construction, Best Management Practices will be
adhered to such that impacts to areas and resources outside of the project's limits of disturbance do not occur. To the
extent practicable, project work will be performed from abutting upland areas, including paved roadways. Measures within
the limits of disturbance to avoid or minimize impacts include use of proper sediment and erosion control measures;
prohibition of vehicular or equipment fueling, washing or maintenance activities in proximity to the stream; and timely
stabilization and seeding of areas of disturbed soils associated with implementation of the proposed project.
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c.
Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? If yes, you will have to fill out this entire form — please
contact the State for more information.
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
Buffer mitigation is not required for project activities.
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 12

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: The project work in Zone 1 will occur within and immediately adjacent to
❑ Yes ® No
the stream and the impacts will be temporary. Stabilization and seeding of any
disturbed areas will occur immediately upon completion of construction.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Implementation of the project will not
result in new impervious areas.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project consists of stabilization of stream banks that have been severely eroded to the point that an area of roadway
has collapsed into the stream. No increase in population or additional stressors to natural resources will result from
implementation of the proposed project.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater will be generated by the proposed project.
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
IPaC was accessed 18Sep18. See attached.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA NMFS EFH online mapper was reviewed 18Sepl8. See attached.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Based on review of the NC SHPO HPOWEB GIS Service on 18Sep18, the nearest historic resource that has been
determined to be in eligible (DOE) for listing on the National Register of Historic Places is approximately 0.25 from the
project area. See attached.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA's FIRM panel 3720642000J, effective 7/2/2004,
shows the project area and surrounding land as Zone X.
Linda. Diebolt
24Sep18
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
pplicantlAgent's Signa re
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 12 of 12

Additional Information
Oakwood Drive Emergency Stream Bank Stabilization Project, City of Havelock, NC
B.3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application.
The site consists of a reach of a perennial non -tidal stream, Caps Branch, located between Oakwood
Drive, US 70, and a paved area associated with an adjacent service station, as depicted on the attached
Site Map. The project site is in an area that contains commercial and residential development.
Oakwood Drive and the gas station's paved area abut the banks of the stream. The Caps Branch
traverses US 70 via an 8' x 8' box culvert.
The condition of the stream channel in the project area prior to Hurricane Florence was determined to
be severely degraded and design of restoration of the left stream bank was underway prior to Hurricane
Florence. However, before stream restoration could occur, stormwater from Hurricane Florence further
eroded the left stream bank and undercutting of Oakwood Drive and a partial collapse of the roadway
occurred. Repair of the roadway to avoid potential injury to commuters cannot be performed without
restoration of the left stream bank occurring due to the proximity of the stream to the roadway.
As previously stated, design of stabilization of the left stream bank for this reach of Caps Branch was
underway and at approximately 60 percent prior to Hurricane Florence. The design was expedited the
week following the hurricane and the drawings are attached. Pictures showing the current condition of
the stream reach are provided below.

B.3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project.
The purpose of the project is to restore and armor the left stream bank for stabilization, prevention of
further degradation of the stream banks, avoidance of future roadway collapses, and prevention of
injury to commuters. Repair of the collapsed roadway will also be performed as part of the proposed
project.
R
PAI H s
.a
9/16/2018
4
B.3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project.
The purpose of the project is to restore and armor the left stream bank for stabilization, prevention of
further degradation of the stream banks, avoidance of future roadway collapses, and prevention of
injury to commuters. Repair of the collapsed roadway will also be performed as part of the proposed
project.

13.3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used.
The proposed project will repair damages present prior to and either inflicted or exasperated during
Hurricane Florence by stabilizing the left stream bank and repairing Oakwood Drive. The proposed
project involves reconstruction and armoring the left bank of the stream reach, grading to reconstruct
the damaged portions of Oakwood Drive, and paving of Oakwood Drive.
Stream bank repairs and stabilization are proposed within approximately 100 feet of stream channel
downstream of the culvert under US 70 along the left bank of the stream. The proposed measures
include removal of roadway debris (asphalt) and sloughed bank material from the stream channel,
construction of a sheet wall along approximately 60 -feet of the left stream bank, installation of
approximately 30 -feet of imbricated riprap to protect the stream bank section between the culvert
under US 70 and the constructed sheet wall, and backfill and finish grading with clean fill material to
replace the stream bank material that has been eroded over time. A sanitary sewer line traverses Caps
Branch downstream of the US 70 culvert. The sewer line is proposed to be replaced during stream bank
stabilization activities.
All stream work will be performed in the dry with a coffer dam and a pump around system being
implemented. Upon completion of the stream bank stabilization, grading and repair of Oakwood Drive
will be performed and a guardrail will be installed along the edge of Oakwood Drive to prevent
accidental deposition of commuters into the stream. Equipment expected to be used to construct the
project includes, but is not limited to, trac-hoes, front end loaders, dump trucks, rollers, pile -drivers, and
paving equipment.
F.Scl. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered
Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
The USFWS IPaC tool was referenced to determine the protected species that are expected to occur in
the vicinity of the project area (September 18, 2018). NC Natural Heritage Program data relative to
documented occurrences of rare and protected species indicates two historical records of fauna in the
area. Both records are shown for the entire county, not a specific location within the county. Onsite
habitat is not suitable for the reptile, bird, plant, or mammal species listed by IPaC. Potential habitat for
the threatened northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) is present in the vicinity of the project
site, but no trees are present within the project area and tree removal is not anticipated to occur during
project activities.

s5, r t
o -
s
L
�. -�.ir 1 .
} - _ foIVA-BtuQ � ,e, STATE rdst`,
Y 101 `' l304— Cpl] r
314
_ 1 Project Site
308
,�.
jo
f� Sty
4' a
� d
. 0.1
M • Z
-Wf
SCALE "
SITE LOCATION MAP CITY OF HAVELOCK
0 0.25 0.5 1
Miles HazenOAKWOOD DRIVE STREAM
1 inch = 0.5 mile S — BANK STABILIZATION PROJECT

O`Scp�0�
OD �O� 97
24.36 y J
6-067-004 O�� �'� o�, ti%c �°ti \ �°
� ss o
NOW OR FORMERLY � OAF o�/>0
JOHN COLOQU H OU N �a F� �� �A �o
d,/ c0�c6 24.19
DB. 2294 PG. 933 �,o \ ss
LOT 10 — ROBERT R. BULL SUB. '''2��� �y \00 X23.52 2� 0+85 N o \
M B. 6 P G. 21 ° \ 24.02 G
Fo y- \ o
SMH
RESIDENTIAL" �� TS '� \ �C' RIM=23.41
s
0 \\ � INV=9.02 \
0Ao s c&�e 23.85 � � � y �
R \ !z
NZZZZ
\LP......23.18 \\ o o -7 Vol
22.93
8.5oNE 20
\ 22.64
22 \ 22.87
/X17.1 .9 \ 20 2
CL SWAB X19.4
20.0 20.8
X
X20.9
50�
KW00
p pR oN�
OP
>E�
20.64
60 LF OF WALL
NEW GUARDRAIL
sTRip of
of
GR
6-067-008
NOW OR FORMERLY
GENE & SUZANNE BELL
DB. 1075 PG. 817
LOT 4 — ROBERT R. BULL SUB.
MB. 6 PG. 21
GENE'S AUDIO"
PROJECT T. SCHUELER
ENGINEER:
DESIGNED BY: T. SCHUELER
DRAWN BY: S. KANE
CHECKED BY:
IF THIS BAR DOES NOT
MEASURE 1" THEN DRAWING 0 1/2„ 1
REV ISSUED FOR DATE
BY IS NOT TO FULL SCALE
PRELIMINARY DRAWING
DO NOT USE FOR
CONSTRUCTION
Q L I. U L
RMA 1/v/FT A FFR w X�M�
/GHT23 20.92
MONS
NTS
PLAN VIEW
1"=10'
METAL SAFETY RAIL
ALONG EDGE OF WALK
30 LF OF IMBRICATED RIPRAP
REMOVE AND REPLACE SANITARY SEWER
21.75
Ha en
HAZEN AND SAWYER
4011 WESTCHASE BOULEVARD, SUITE 500
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27607
LICENSE NO. : C-0381
8 X 8 eoX CUL VER
\\ W 23.90
21.66 Fj°30\
___s
VIM=22.24
H
CITY OF HAVELOCK, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPPS BRANCH/OAKWOOD DRIVE
25
20
15
10
5
m
-5
-10
-15
-0+50
0+00
PROFILE VIEW
H: 1” = 30'; V:1"=3'
CONCEPT SITE PLAN
25
20
15
10
5
w
-5
-10
-15
1+00
10 5 1 J38 30 15 1
DATE: MAY 2016
HAZEN NO.: 30906-006
CONTRACT NO.: 1
DRAWING
NUMBER:
EXISTING GRADE
:�
TOP OF WALL: 20
FILL MATERIAL
z
0
0
a
0
W
0
x x
W
40-
z
0
0
a
0
a
a
D
U)
0
N
jL/—
BOTTOM OF WALL: -15
0+00
PROFILE VIEW
H: 1” = 30'; V:1"=3'
CONCEPT SITE PLAN
25
20
15
10
5
w
-5
-10
-15
1+00
10 5 1 J38 30 15 1
DATE: MAY 2016
HAZEN NO.: 30906-006
CONTRACT NO.: 1
DRAWING
NUMBER:

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
The City of Havelock proposes to perform stream bank stabilization in and adjacent to the road
easement associated with Oakwood Drive and Highway 70 in the southern portion of Havelock,
Craven County, North Carolina.
STREET ADDRESS: N/A — project site is a stream that parallels an existing roadway
PROPERTY OWNER: Multiple
The undersigned, Frank Bottorff, City Manager for the City of Havelock, do hereby authorize
Linda Diebolt of Hazen and Sawyer
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached, excluding any
and all financial obligations.
SIGNATORIES ADDRESS:
City of Havelock
1 Governmental Drive / PO Box 368
Havelock, NC 28532
Telephone: [phone]
I hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Authorized Signature:
Date:

IPaC: Explore Location Page 1 of 11
IPaC Information for Planning and Consultation U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat
(collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS)
jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list
may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be
directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and
extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site-
specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed
activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS
office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that
follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI W Ian foadditional
14,
information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.`
Location
Craven County, North Carolina
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
t. [phone]
1B [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, INC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/YA6AWYKFLFATXGBSF6XAEGHCDM/resources 9/18/2018

IPaC: Explore Location
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
Page 2 of 1 I
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/YA6AWYKFLFATXGBSF6XAEGHCDM/resources 9/18/2018

lPaC: Explore Location Page 3 of 11
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project
level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species.
Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the
species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam
upstream of a fish population, even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly impact
the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move, and site
conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project
area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site-specific and project -specific
information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the SecretarytSN
information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of
such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal
agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can only be
obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see
directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/rPvi0 le e -return to the IPaC website and
1. Draw the project location and click CONTI10
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and descri `°' r your project.
5. Click REQUESTS PE E IS
Listed species
'- and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA-Fisheries?).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list.
Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows
species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more
information.
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/YA6AWYKFLFATXGBSF6XAEGHCDM/resources 9/18/2018

IPaC: Explore Location
Mammals
NAME STATUS
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the Marine mammal
critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4469
Page 4 of 11
Birds
NAME STATUS '4�t4\4ra,
Red Knot Calidris canutus rufa Threatene
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1864
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis angered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws. og v/ecp/species/7614 5
Reptiles
NAME 40STATUS
o-
American Alligator or mis sippiensis SAT
No critical habita a e esignated for this species.
htt s://e s. o ` c /s ecies/776
rea rtle Chelonia mydas Threatened
X'14%ritical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6199
Leatherback Sea Turtle Dermochelys coriacea Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the
critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1493
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/YA6AWYKFLFATXGBSF6XAEGHCDM/resources 9/18/2018

INC: Explore Location
Sensitive Joint -vetch Aeschynomene virginica
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/855
Critical habitats
Threatened
Page 5 of 11
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered
species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act
and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act?.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities th t Vd
t in impacts to migratory
birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriateioconsider implementing
appropriate conservation measures, as described b to
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 191
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act ef19" 0.
Additional information ca ing the following links:
• Birds of Conserv toOn http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds -of -c, ervat n-concern.php
• Mea f ) voiding and minimizing impacts to birds
ht r)'./ww .fws.gov/birds/management/oroiect-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
etion-measures.php
• ationwide conservation measures for birds
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of
Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more
about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This
is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be
found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted
birds in and around your project area, visit the E -bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location,
desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional
maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are
available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information
about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report,
can be found below.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/YA6AWYKFLFATXGBSF6XAEGHCDM/resources 9/18/2018

lPaC: Explore Location
Page 6 of 11
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to
reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at
the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project
area.
NAME
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus
BREEDING SEASON (IF A BREEDING
...............................................................................................
SEASON IS INDICATED FOR A BIRD
.............................................................................................
ON YOUR LIST, THE BIRD MAY
.................................................................................
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA
....................................................................................
SOMETIME WITHIN THE
................................................................
TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED, WHICH IS A
...............................................................................................
VERY LIBERAL ESTIMATE OF THE
.......................................................................................
DATES INSIDE WHICH THE BIRD
.....................................................................................
BREEDS ACROSS ITS ENTIRE
............................................................................
RANGE. "BREEDS ELSEWH
....................... ..........
INDICATES THAT TH
.. .
NOT LIKELY B YOU
.... ......
PROJECjA
Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird
Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Henslow's Sparrow Ammodramus henslowii L Breeds May 1 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) th g is ge in the
continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3941
Prothonotary Warble oto is citrea Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of C s ncern (BCC) throughout its range in the
continent A an laska.
P o b'lity of Presence Summary
Th raphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities
to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ "Proper
Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this
report.
Probability of Presence ( )
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4 -week months.) A
taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be used
to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the
presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/YA6AWYKFLFATXGBSF6XAEGHCDM/resources 9/18/2018

lPaC: Explore Location
Page 7 of 11
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week
where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For
example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of
them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is
calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence
across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted
Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week
of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is
0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of
presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its
entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is
expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all
years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
American Kestrel
BCC - BCR (This is a
........................................
Bird of Conservation
..........................................
Concern (BCC) only in
............................................
particular Bird
..............................
Conservation Regions
..............................
(BCRs) in the
..........................
continental USA)
..................................
Henslow's Sparrow _
BCC Rangewide (CON)
..............................................
(This is a Bird of
.................................
Conservation Concern
..............................................
(BCC) throughout its
range in the
.........................
continental USA and
..........................................
Alaska.)
................
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/YA6AWYKFLFATXGBSF6XAEGHCDM/resources 9/18/2018

lPaC: Explore Location
Prothonotary
Warbler
BCC Rangewide (CON)
.......hi.......................................
(Ts is a Bird of
.................................
Conservation Concern
..............................................
(BCC) throughout its
..........................................
range in the
.........................
continental USA and
..........................................
Alaska.)
................
Page 8 of 11
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any
location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in
the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding
their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be
breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/orep rmits may be
advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species es t
on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specific 'on.
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Co LBOther species that
may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by Avian Knowledge Network
(AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried
and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects,
and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle
(Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includeso y a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not
representative of all birds that may occur Mlyour project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your
project area, please visit the.E-bird Explore Data Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in
my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science
datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn
more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of
Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-
round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you
are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird
on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area,
there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the
bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/YA6AWYKFLFATXGBSF6XAEGHCDM/resources 9/18/2018

IPaC: Explore Location Page 9 of 11
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range
anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the
continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of
the Emile Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain
types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid
and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more
information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and
requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bir
species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Port I: Th'Port' I a15o
offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your,,
our W jec
Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps h h t N NCCOS
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including
migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird
tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to distd7b or Al eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle
Act should such impacts occur
Proper Interpretation andJse our Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern.
To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project
area, please_ see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified
location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey
effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high
survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as
more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of
concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which
means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in
knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project
activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about
conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your
migratory bird trust resources page.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/YA6AWYKFLFATXGBSF6XAEGHCDM/resources 9/18/2018

lPaC: Explore Location Page 10 of 11
Marine mammals
Marine mammals are protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act. Some are also protected
under the Endangered Species Act
I and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora?.
The responsibilities for the protection, conservation, and management of marine mammals are shared
by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [responsible for otters, walruses, polar bears, manatees, and
dugongs] and NOAA Fisheries
3 [responsible for seals, sea lions, whales, dolphins, and porpoises]. Marine mammals under the
responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list; for additional information on those species
please visit the Marine Mammals page of the NOAA Fisheries website.
The Marine Mammal Protection Act prohibits the take (to harass, hunt, capture, kill, or attempt
harass, hunt, capture or kill) of marine mammals and further coordination may be neces ry
................................ .. .
project evaluation. Please contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Field Office sh2e.
1. The Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973. -< N
The Convention on International Trade in Endangered
treaty to ensure that international trade in plants and a
nNand Flora (CITES) is a
reaten their survival in
the wild.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine isherie Service (NMFS), is an office of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following marine mammals under the responsibility of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service are
potentially affected by activities in this location:
NAME
West Indian
Facilities
us manatus
Wildlife refuges and fish hatcheries
REFUGE AND FISH HATCHERY INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/YA6AWYKFLFATXGBSF6XAEGHCDM/resources 9/18/2018

INC: Explore Location
District.
Page 11 of 11
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update our
NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual extent of
wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
RIVERINE
R5UBH
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information
on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude +wmagery—,
Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error.is inherent in the use
of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of thewetlarid
boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the
amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata
should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be
occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classics ors b4RVeen the information depicted on the map and the
actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats areclu rom he National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery
as the primary data so ce s to 'etect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic
vegetation that foun n the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters. Some
deepwater of, c munites (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory. These
habitats, eca e o their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a
different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this
inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the
geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities
involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or
local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such
activities.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/YA6AWYKFLFATXGBSF6XAEGHCDM/resources 9/18/2018

McCotter Canal Stabilization Project
January 18, 2018
NR Points
0 NR Individual Listing
0 NR Listing, Gone
-.w NRHD Center Point
NR Boundaries
INational Register Boundary
1:48,000
00.4 0.8 1.6 mi
1 .1 . I . , 1 .1 . I . I I I I
0 0.5 1 2 km
Sources: Esd HERE, Del-orme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan
Esri Japan, Esd,
Esd China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esd (Thailand),
Mapmylndia, NGCC, @ OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User
Community
ry
McAz C harry
PQlni
416
92
f DnIanA, a Iva
E
TP
E
AlhkAlc
compta.
IL
11
if
4:1
CRAVEN -2
Z
01
January 18, 2018
NR Points
0 NR Individual Listing
0 NR Listing, Gone
-.w NRHD Center Point
NR Boundaries
INational Register Boundary
1:48,000
00.4 0.8 1.6 mi
1 .1 . I . , 1 .1 . I . I I I I
0 0.5 1 2 km
Sources: Esd HERE, Del-orme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan
Esri Japan, Esd,
Esd China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esd (Thailand),
Mapmylndia, NGCC, @ OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User
Community

EFH Mapper
Page 1 of 1
EFH Data Notice: Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) is defined by textual descriptions contained in the
fishery management plans developed by the regional Fishery Management Councils. In most cases
mapping data can not fully represent the complexity of the habitats that make up EFH. This report
should be used for general interest queries only and should not be interpreted as a definitive
evaluation of EFH at this location. A location -specific evaluation of EFH for any official purposes
must be performed by a regional expert. Please refer to the following links for the appropriate
regional resources.
Query Results
Map Scale = 1:144,448
Degrees, Minutes, Seconds: Latitude = 34051'39" N, Longitude = 76053'53" E
Decimal Degrees: Latitude = 34.86, Longitude = -76.90
The query location intersects with spatial data representing EFH and/or HAPCs for the following
species/management units.
https://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/ 9/18/2018