20060082 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20060106

Impacts Mitigations 1 Fees Affiliations Events Inspections Comments History
Detailsl Details2 Permits and Certs , Cross Refs-.,. 4
Project Number: 20060082 Version: 1 Status: Issued Last Action Desc: Project issued
*Project Name: Kenneth R. Hammond 'Proje ct Type: ',Road Crossing I Driveway
Project Desc: driveway
'Owner: Hammond, Kenneth R. Details...
*Received From: Applicant COE ID: *Primary County: - _-_
DOT TIP: *Admin Region: liAsheville
Received Dt 01 10 612 0 0 6 n >v.::??+i ' - Reviewer: jkevin barneff ! ?
Issued Dt 02117!2006
-*Secondary County
Statutory Dt:
CAMA NEPA1 SEPA Received Dt:
DCM Office: SW Plan Received Dt:
COE Office: ieville Regulatory Field Office SW Plan Approved Dt: Public Notice Published Dt
Last Updated By: rob.ndings SW Plan Location: Public Notice Received Dt:
Last Updated On: 01!1212006 Sewage Disposal: - _, - P.N. Comment Period Ends Dt:
<Back ., - Close
Triage Check List
F 1, L
Date: 1/13/06
Project Name: Kenneth R. Hammond
DWQ #:06-0082
County: Henderson
Kevin Barnett, Asheville Regional Office
To:
60-day Processing Time: 1/06/06 to 3/07/06
From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone: [phone]
The file attached is being forwarded to you for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
F-i Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks!
A
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: FE17-
The purpose of this letter is to inform all concerned agencies that I'am trying to obtain
the necessary permits to install a culvert pipe for a drive-way access across Hominy
Branch in order to gain entrance to the property located at 67 Hominy Branch Road in
Bat Cave, North Carolina.
Hominy Branch borders the entire length of this property, and in order to gain access, the
Branch will have to be crossed.
The proposed culvert installation is approximately 15 feet in length, and the pipe will be
corrugated galvanized metal. A local Grading Company suggested that we use either a
48" or 60" diameter pipe in this area.
Your assistance in obtaining all necessary permits, in order to begin construction, would
be greatly appreciated.
If any further information is needed, please do not hesitate to call.
Thanks in advance for your assistance and cooperation with this matter.
Best gards,
V_0
Kenneth R. Hammond
1338 Banks Road
Fort Mill, SC 29715
Home: 803-547-7193
Work: 704-644-5060
E-Mail: [e-mail]
20080082
Q
JAN 6 - .2006 -TeR QUALITY
Wnpg AND SIMMArER
Attached you will find:
PCN Form
Survey Maps
Septic Permit
Well Permit
Perc Test
Henderson County Soil Survey
Topographical Maps
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 200 600 82
(it any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: !
3. If this notification is solely a c rtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?1
II. Applicant Information 11Ngy ``?'
1. Owner/Applicant Information JAN - 2006
Name: T'.y? 1fa??3+?G?taa
5gRpNCH
Mailing Address: 13;F /'?eI,4 Z' h Not ,
,?e-o n7 44 /ZGL _.;7 9 '?,i h
Telephone Number: ?03- _,;"'7--7/>3 llo,% Fax Number:
E-mail Address: ?,Z CSZ,9S.477, ?fOy
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
Updated 1 I / 1/2005
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 1 I by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
?y
1. Name of project:
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 06136 D 9739
4. Location
County: -)oy Nearest Town: Zf¢/ e;¢IIZ
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): xl _
Directions to site (include road nOurmbers/names,/landmarks, etc.):.Vc ,?t vv ,1,,'v /.s •,J,2c•
f?G+'? ;? ? !"v i'34??9iJ?i'!/? G-? T x°01'/.?,i•/G'?y ? %2 ?r :? l?.Mrvy ??•farG/[
???• /ir?,?? d.??a ?D2r/:+,? 1??QO:Jz`ILly r6I?J/ICYi.?+.z?Gy ?? l?r?C D.v %L,
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line,
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): ON
attach a sheet that
ow
6. Property size (acres): q3 -- It i,
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: ?`7` 11t1/,VV ZIA?Iel
8. River Basin:
__iG????0't?•?-t7
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http:Hli2o.enr.statc..iic.us/'adrnin/neaps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: 'A
/2A,° Sbae-ftd- :?; I? ?J z:'t'l.?? .?. ?? /r?/G"S"?L v >a 1?>s,?i Ols ?c
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: ??,">
7,;?, A5 losccl
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
1 /
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed imr acts:
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 12
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
se aratel list impacts due to both structure and floodin .
Wetland Impact
Site Number

(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,

herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property:
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multi 1 !en h X width, then divide b 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage)
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, floodin , drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact Name Waterbodv Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number
plicabblele) )
(if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) (acres)

I
Total Open Water Impact (acres)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 12
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resultine from the nroiect:
Stream Impact (acres): C.
Wetland Impact (acres):
Open Water Impact (acres): ,a
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
Total Stream Impact (linear feet):
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes 9No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation A IA
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to b/e' followed du/ring construction to reduce impacts. -'ft&u
?r?i,2? ??yf? t?i-??'dJGxltSr . ?vLiJt:iP7` L$.??1?k's.r°9?/?'-_+ iS N?G?SS.i?zy' ?id ????/v ?QGG:C?» .?

VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 12
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http ;'l?2ct_cnr..state,.nc.zis'nc? ctiail is/strli? e.litml.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
d / L
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http:-%h2c).enr.stite.nc,us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): )
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): ' r
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): /
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ) N4
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No ?
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of ;mpact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
* Impact Multiplier Required
Zone
(square feet) Mitization
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0244, or.0260.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 1 I of 12
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
., 71
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. /
AW 41fs7-4? IJ*rey- W iZZ /,Ae ?'?'N?,( ?6 1Yy '7R? C/ZZl,'4t' .1.?/?i 741Z-1/-'1Y0,1 /5CirurGYi Jf?_IILJdvL'?
Y ScrO?IC JY?? .?? ? 3t!*l f ftl? S 17c'? r? C'l?f?i r??d TO1' t^.?6k/r ?d /tz: .
45, :•Y Z4
--T?-T
4-6 "r- i7's 7
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (I 5A NCAC 214 .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No [!/?
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No ?
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
ht]2:,!jh2o.enr state.nc.usincwetlands. If no, phase provide a short narrative description:
!it -
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 12 of 12
• Map Output
Page 1 of 1
http://www.hendersoncountync.org/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap'?ServiceName=www ... 1/4/2006
JAN-04-2006(WED) 13:49 HICKORY NUT DEVELOPMENT (FAX)8286252036 P.002/007
LFTL W7
??M1• cpUmTDUPWI ''3d?,1V'P•OtrPr Em"TH /?clola o 11
Aumo T-. G:4QN3MUGT' ,
FOR OPER TYQ?ITS"pBR1 692-4= y BEN ??_-Sw? _
•.ONm ' ? t?_ ?1? `?i. ?1M? >aat?e' ;?#" 16"0,? . ? Asso?ated,?!et?mits-?.
- : ? : "l?xa wr1d?: afs.? %?o,li it l+'??? Nil ' Rl? , ? • ? ;, ? .. ? . ..-. .... ?.., ' ,; .; ; ,
y NBwCOpBiLl2CLlbl?,l? RCp ;
QRt Lot No. ;
•' I •? E• .?`?'A ..?o!!+tn?l? ?I?ArV? ??pR?P "?'re-E?osting?ank•1? AddidonO?' • ;'•,
I ' ?atibnr' - .
LTA'
. sys m Elaaaificationr I. :. ;
Resident R!?tity/Linear Foatage;
?viola.HAme Business
~ ;Ae?' ' , . Tank Size '
D;ainfield' 7 EQ S4,
FG..
'IJb PDwip R W OD __, ? _ > Tr i,Radom Dopth '1 L?'. ??
dol.
Ror 5 a from daEa'of,
?sekneo, Y'BS Ct N0I B - I I a , , I 111 Yes'O );io 0 P?mic Wild
?Va[ex'SdPSdY' ?tY ?' Yz{c;lirrid rd O lt?ir8,to b: owap?e d wttMl?
Ca :Qthr; 3ndsxs• 1': .
,$ ¢t
;;: ;*!V EA!TY t>1.-D?tA,1A?l!TGIVTDBCA?]G Em!j[o?meAtalH" ''$pe?iahst.`:
Pool-
i ''r0 BSII?IS'l i?t d _ C] 6A?7tOLii8SY81'1 ? ? SSnitTl' ED>1?T C MDLUTBB:
'.: .
?- • - •'.? ; ?. ?.. ??!'-?.SYsrr?*•e GFifi?' oN..?,?.0'K7'v';?.?.; ?, ??,G[1l?t?' '.-;-?: ?.?
Pk
(?+t mow. ;,K ,,.s?p u nl?l p ! G ?+? k"L. ~rf, wit i
.7µ+w'. „? .. - _ 1 • ' .. . ? ? ? '
i'' • r.. 1 S ?" ?,,?,r K err :..
1'r ' ' • - „?_ ? 1, ? ? " , ?T , ? . ' • ? , , ? , f '
7n-a W Af) q)n? W OUT 177.Sb-)fi6j-R7.R:xej Uj-i28H0?tAN Jd2(I•pu@H
SAN-04-2006(WED) 13;50 HICKORY NUT DEVELOPMENT (FAX)8286252036 P.003/007
;,; m?•?•1' fig- ,? ??i
•rnoMASIXB ao s' ?aoeeso?rrn,ca:r?An+aw•'o•' uw?alrr?a• . MC?Nr.
rat aa.ezz?
o R ' WELL INSTALLATION 'OR REPAIR' P ER M1T=,
. .\. • UU?.?? 1'.x•.1
PEI' WT
BE17UPM IN t3Y APPUCA•NT '
mar ' ?. vt? t ---- -
isiling Addri ss of Owner '146 t'' 1 • ' f?+w ' a. ' Rhone'
.i ot't a 3: •;i4,cr? r '' _ bdivislon/Paric tot Pin'#: 40 ! a S` ?- • Oil tank on p'roperifrt - Xes ?.00.
Yvstl'inigl;,be,tased to a" wh'g type of taduty?. - _,,?'
I'c>ditridual (wall ecrviag ano: hom9) ""r °' Yes ` No
jR
,,; Shared (w elresrvving'more-than one home), Maw 'Mad
Fostar Care' Yes No f,
410
ti rectlons to.t?roperty Ca ?s ?•.., t r 5 ?"'? ?''. o
4 _ gn of Applicant.
bdiVOT1NRiTE BELOW THIS•LINE
14,000
Sir
'.?
'' . 'Permit Mid fi>t'•5, flee" providad alto conditions do not chpng9,
:1NQll.toc k*o): Pnttali?afton.-*nd p on mim-r i e& state and IoCal reguiAi". and most be'li'kspeded'and approved:
• of m r?preseritetive of'ti Henditsgn County OepsetmdnC of Public He?ith betgFa any ,Portion of tlae InsEe11a1idn.iS:put
.a: >lnaq ase. ' 1'hs sil(np'o?'fhe weil:by :HSatth Pepar M11 Stan Is to providi pt+ptediort'trorn :kriQwn possible sourcea,. -
ot coifZarrti nnti0ra. No vdyme -a# Wiste., is WWrentsed, al,any, alte by, the HsiM Department..
CANjVOT_1131k;U3CA i RWAY:
Z
'Date Issued : ?!" ??'• Envimnmenfai`Health spwii
4.k .
Pormit RwAhmd By 6z
TO'd 5 :60 SOOL 62;)8Q 4ZSt7-Z69-8Z8:xPA uTIEaHoIIGnd jd00'puaH
50 0 50 o &EGEHD:
E>nYnrlc n u _ ? I,
??.T, o O1cPClE 4vNrJ[rll ?? I ?_
1 3t1 - 0 l?atd o v (cm n '"
CI / rT
.. _ I151c 1 E
EIP
o.?. 74,, r9 c+4 i" p X01 G - _ _ ;
? ? \ ' 79'00'26??C5 \ c I `%
a• ?
r• ? - uarro e:: I F
CP .G9? ?6a ? f r(
s; sE ?., 7 7fl,J0 \\ I_I:_Fr. ?? S 7i_e61J ? Sal i.''? -
cP cP e - L_ r
. [r 1 J EIP 1[
5 7^' I OT y ' ?\ I r l J I I t I I I -ly
?'`cI t (L d J p1 J d B I S -.f i it
* of IIP \ n4 V'3944"E b d I? d or 1 I I W pt d [I 4`I+e:.l
1 f I'
5 '0" eeL.? l M1 94
C i F F 9 IhpR`?I?
F. I - 1 10 DDO tl l u idy
505 r8 /. Ct` O'? - e II C. tj, 4 30 ,?la 1 t V i
Yr61i
CM, CP' ;0? 4fl'3[ E \ gnulurc, r _ rollon nun t er and sr nl t11
2.98 Acresi:
_ cr d_ o'e5 os-EV A? _ F nor-LU ? e
l rl
-I C 11\ i t ) / l V
A
bF II City f 11 d II IJr r
CP J\
?_ sos. Tc o •E. cP\\ \ ?/ C' I, oun rl w? v lmr,.q RI t Ir ; tr--ti y-
i-iCIn1ill Etr?nc.i Road R PI 1 D-d, If
Pr 1{.
rub `'\ \ I5"12 e r I In 0 I will
\ \\ SiY
" s/a' ReBn? l` ?s?r ?, ?.. e 1 I m°a° - -- J 'r?• ?
Ell, 6
k / ?cr Div \
V OT
177.42' (lR" t_?\
?P S"
- FIE - -
.oath a. c°I r? I f 11 11
a
y 5 t Jail' i. ? ?. ?- r7r?l?.^o c..rl ora°r.c ?.rl !. ou a •a4 ?rr ?,?,:
s? B. ?^. II • -i.
Ob ,9
I'I "p s u 51.1, au.rn
1.52Aclest cnraun. I.. ,.
1 . 1..13 r, _. e _ \lr Cn olir7 eI n?rrd<r9,,,
( includes Ovollay )
GP ?V JET J. ?. 1 r? Ql ry>:7 j?11s
P Oe lls c.rl lr Inut ll- roar rl t I ?f1 `i, f 1.
^iI ` ? \ \)/ is alli;.J moels ulI slalulor) rnqulr ^r 411 IJ
Ell, ono zc , a", hT? f
cP
.I 99 l r r[I
A / J
4q) '`?p
oQ _h J/F'^ /OP
._ EIP C3 Se9V]'13't __F? 569"11'01"tr! ? ? % / / r (?I i/ Ij?CP 59'3^•2e"1!
10f°3' Ell O 210-03' C1
LEijl I' OT
III OT EP r eT z
3/4' OT ? s / / S09'27 21"r9
(A 2758' Ipn9 e.`/ / / % ,ftI cP I ..57' -
0.74' c
T- J
P SO1 Ja It
,;'IN J/r IIIL II 1?
n.e.stm+ r..n9 0 .a.?l °I I. z;.4s
I dP 1`I lm; Par cal 9372
111 e G TU Y T i l i PItJPEP i'f SH01cld 0 III ,?w
u.EU11[117- -IYO9E1
I
iviinoF Stibuivisi'on I GTE
1 ROAD FRONTAGE PER 0.17. 1075 4-05 R T I , J?yl,-f i,
1 °rso State of Morth Carolina ?fl
4 n '`' i hlendorson County, Edn.yvllle T1 p. Ir` - 'A
S of IT ARE NOT surer., I°r y
OR AY.91.1G 4110/OR AL_ OF PIE PLATT ED 5 LG6? I
II. =W.?EA11'
E TO Aar Fuji RE o•a4C aLUlao vroN 6Y RHUL JEFFREI SLTIERFIELG u JD SI IALL tl(r1 lii USrU NTATI?ES FOR 1JAP.II' JENNIFER T=01ER(Sl AIJO/OR (FlEllt PEt IE PItOFE5SI0L 10UT WRITTEN RELEP.SE E IIEN T UI5cr9:no ?; s rerrua.:•?r,, rs n-.;'
527-A 1104111'i ERA,Ul R0. ,,, 11.
Ad iesses;
Ric MEr4'.address OL[?-
lAddrE
1 07 HOMINY BRANCH RD I 1
This is after
the road (4} all
curves back to l
11211
the right after 11
--
ZoornPower Y .*?] C????„?I?° ?' ?c ° ?? mI `1°??
,A)
142-0
r
i° L-_-
t
4 1 .4 -rl? ` E2e1 I_
(1 464A)
2 2
the parking
pull off on the y 1;.2.t
' left` r,
39117 1 ff
X922: c 1
!' f 1 1 I?. t.Fi?y 7826 f
(Z 74 A) 4 70 7
/29 1
t
1.; F?
_7:2
27 26
t ??~
9372 ?!? 28
L21,X7 118
a F fy ;'i \\t
51U11 `\ y. ?;\ d LT.? 0
'4u'-,earch'=
- PJe
Help M
r M p: 1017263,83, 530517,14 - 1rriage; 114, 369 ScaleFattor: 2.896139852637134
F-j This is where-
'EJ the small
11
waterfall is
l
L -1
Th
Corr,
?4?

HENMRSON COUYM DEPAR7MENTOF PUBLIC F_rM CCy,{.;;
Ab'THORI7AnONTO MNSMUCt PERM[T
w; _rmit,Ynmhcr
I.OR OPEIL? TIONS PFBbl7T CAT-L. 6o,4-ng:HEC
, -.ur8;w
1
Ch-er !s ,t? W I Cd n Dete I!' in V9.
.? sornnt.d Permits
.[1 ",s??cu t.7i_
;adrec dc?%????
rAC
4rJ _
_
1
: i
h _riuGan ll" R-i:a-?
D-Ippmnt - It Na. _j rJ?tiF ?a 7
-
.
t=' t.1w= 1 t -- - --
- -. - t cias: t? _
t
i-
?t I
uti`,r
? -
Ilednxuns - ? ? lininf ]d__ ___ esq. Pi.
:t f•.hiylGC2fi Dv"I,••=Fl-GYD _s 1??. Tr?n;h 3?.t :,m (1,1h

- ? ? . ? l?' Sucment Plumbing s .i :n ?1 _ .end r - r ?,,,o F.r'
u?.t mph_C'i[? J I dnidu.?ared _. mna- pieta .a hh

"t" V 1 ?.,NL4 FOR LSCLS DESCRIBED .IBCVE DRAt IvC.:.( lSCUI
F•Cnn?, I kIY^.1 Sptcall?t
Ea,
/i._s1 ?, 1:: 'St JISDF:$y?l ?IS?PR(?Si1 •?Ta __ JfF.E. . _tiit??s? T:F??.

1-7
,1t1Pt111 ); L; IT?L ?t"1T11tn C^IE}T??, 1'+l llrllf ?y ?t1T171tY \a'll'Ltllll
L?J? srnai.rrooparcaliAnr
?ri?N,?, h. EFT`-`? - uENDEfvO'Nll IL IJ ()91H Cn?70lINA2t 7<72
11PHOIgcC iOA
WELL INSTALLATION OR REPAIR PERMIT
rl.x f
t
T0 HK FlLLrD IN BY ApF! ICAttj PERAITT AU
'
M,-- inc Addr"- a of 0,4-hei a" /yc--z't', _ ??? ?,? / t I??c. ?? S• ?honP
Lol91?e ?G=s 5 GuErJlvinion/Fark ?ti?1?' LOT
Pirl k Q ( i x v 011 teak an prapsdy? ys -
4ti?ll ??Ilf b? dse J t s? T That n5 of fncillt"4
i
!r2Nividudf re,bll sbrvina dfu? horse) YeT Mb
`;hawed [ire'I servlnp more than onE, home) Ffplw Ahsrty? _
Fast ,r a-e 'rc I}o
?. 1
?rcnoto nrnpcrt-;y
L
DO NOT WRITE BrLCW THIS UNE ignat re of Applicant
_` I r
y
Par " ?- d for s=r< pr ,.,fJLJ site ccndiLrcris do not chgrlpe. _
efl I -.Gor1 Ids n!!etlcn; Rr,d pret9Gtl0 ntUSt meet hate And local repul2do s, snd n.u be Inspod, ed t
bfi c reorc^?nidtht cf ti7n He11 c'?ccon County DhpaATnhnt of Public Hentth oo,`?r9 inv. pcitloh of the lhgtnll
intn i, o- Thn iiiino at the well trr;he Heallh Der)nrtment staff Ict to pruyitl3 protectlori Iron knovm'possil
of co' to"inaticr, NO r? nne of v.nter }S auarantged at any site by the HvalBrDenartrrr!W,
vEt I ,I NNOT EE LOCATED fN A RfOHT-0F-'J?AY.
Da'e ,s,u^d r r _ Envirrmm(,rtal Hor)J715p^aalfsr. rr ter--+--- t;
JAN-04-2006(WED) 16:11
tssificcdtion of the Soils
-.4
HICKORY NUT DEVELOPMENT (FAX)8286252036 P.003/005
http:/Avww.hendemon.lib.ne.ug/county/soil/ClassificatiorLhtrt
(SOIL SURVEY OF HENDERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA)
This section desenbes the soil series of the survey area, defines the current system of classifying soils, and classifies the soils
of the area according to that system.
Soil Series and Morphology
On the following pages each soil series in the survey area is described in detail. The series descriptions are presented in
alphabetic order by series name.
For each aeries, some facts about the soil and its parent material am presented first. Then a pedon, a small three dimensional
alas of soil typical of the soil series in the survey area, is described. The detailed descriptions of each soil horizon follow
standards in the Soil Survey Manual (3). Unless otherwise noted, colors described are for moist soil.
Following the pedon description is the range of important characteristics of the soil series mapped in this survey area. Phases,
or mapping units, of each soil series are described in the section "Soil Maps for Detailed Planning."
Ashe Soles R h G
Tle Ashe series consists of somewhat excessiv* drained, moderately ra -)idly permeable, moderately steep to very steep
soils that formed in residuum wead=cd dominantly from granite and gneiss but in some places from arkose and graywacke.
Slopes are 15 to 70 percent.
Typical pedon of Ashe stony sandy loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes, about 2 miles east of But Cave, in a wooded area, 1.1
miles south of N.C. Highway 9 and 50 feet cast of State Road 1609:
01-2 inches to 1 inch, fresh leaves and twigs.
02-1 inch to 0, black mat of live fine roots and decayed vegetation.
Al 1-0 to I inch, dark brown (10YR 413) stony sandy loam; weak fine granular structure; very friable; many fine and medium
roots; 5 percent stones; very strongly acid; abrupt smooth boundary.
A12-1 to 7 inches, yellowish brown (10YR 5/4) stony sandy loam; weak fine granular structure; very friable; many fine
roots; 5 percent coarse quartz fragments; very strongly acid; clear smooth boundary.
132-7 to 21 inches, yellowish brown (10YR 5/4) sandy loam; weak medium subangular blocky structure; very friable;
common fine roots; few flakes of mica; about 10 percent coarse fragments; very strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary.
C-21 to 30 inches, gray (10YR 611) saprolite that crushes to sandy loam; rock controlled structure; friable; few fine roots;
about 30 percent coarse fragments; very strongly acid; abrupt smooth boundary.
R-30 inches, moderately hard granite-gneiss rock; hardness increases with depth.
The solum is 20 to 36 inches thick Depth to bedrock is 20 to 40 inches. About 5 to 15 percent of the surface is covered with
stones. The profile is very strongly acid or strongly acid throughout, unless limed
The A horizon is very dark grayish brown, grayish brown, dark brown, brown, or yellowish brown loam or sandy loam.
The B2 horizon is yellowish brown, strong brown, or brownish yellow loan or sandy loam.
The C horizon is gray, brownish yellow, or pale brown granite gneiss saprolite that crushes to sandy loam and is 15 to 30
percent coarse fragments.
Bradson Series
The Bradson series consists of well drained, moderately permeable, gently sloping to strongly sloping soils that formed in
colluvium and alluvium derived from a mixture of crystalline rocks. Slopes are 2 to 15 percent.
Typical pedon of Bradson gravelly loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes, in a field 0.5 mile southwest of Etowah Post Office and 200
feet south of U.S. Highway 64 and State Road 1205 intersection, 50 feet west of State Road 1205:
Ap-O to 6 inches, reddish brown (SYR 4/4) gravelly loam; weak coarse and fine granular structure; friable; many fine roots;
few fine flakes of mica; 20 percent smooth rounded quartz gravel; medium acid; abrupt smooth boundary.
B2 It-6 to 24 inches, red (2.5YR 4/6) clay; moderate medium. subangular blocky structure; firm; sticky and slightly plastic;
few fine roots; thin continuous clay films on faces of pods; about 10 percent smooth quartz gravel; strongly acid; gradual
smooth boundary.
B22t-24 to 40 inches, red (2.SYR 418) clay loam; moderate medium subangular blocky structure; friable; sticky and slightly
plastic; few fine roots; common fine flakes of mica; thin continuous clay films on faces of pods; few smooth gravel; strongly
)f 11 1/4/20061:26 PM
Classification of the Soils
JAN-04-2006(WED) 16;12 HICKORY NUT DEVELOPMENT (FAX)8286252036 P.004/005
die soils nap:uwww nenoerson llo.nc.uv?uwuyrbu?u? ?aiu?auvu iii
f
yellowish brown.
The Bl horizon, if present, is yellowish brown or brown. The B2t horizon is yellowish brown, dark yellowish brown, strong
brown, or brownish yellow sandy clay loam or clay loam. The B3 horizon is yellowish brown, strong brown, or brownish
yellow.
The C horizon is granite-gneiss saprolite that crashes to sandy loam or fine sandy loam.
Fisinboro Series
The Elsinboro series consists of well drained, moderately permeable, nearly level and gently sloping soils that formed in
unconsolidated old alluvium from areas of crystalline rock that contains much mica. Slopes are 0 to 3 percent:
Typical pedon of Elsinboro loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, in a cultivated field about 14 miles west of Hendersonville, 600 feet
east of intersection ofN.C. Highway 280 and State Road 1328, and 250 feet east of State Road 1328:
Ap-0 to 9 inches, brown (10YR 4/3) loam; weak fine and medium granular structure; friable; 4 percent small picas of
gravel; strongly acid; abrupt smooth boundary.
B21 t-9 to 22 inches, yellowish brown (1 OYR 516) clay loam; moderate medium subangular blocky structure; friable;
common fine flakes of mica; 3 percent small pieces of gravel; strongly :.cid; gradual smooth boundary.
822t-22 to 32 inches, brownish yellow (10YR 616) clay loam; moderate medium subangular blocky structure; friable;
common fine flakes of mica; 3 percent small pieces of gravel; strongly acid; gradual smooth boundary.
B3-32 to 38 inches, yellowish brown (10YR 5/4) sandy clay loam; weak medium subangular blocky structure; friable;
common fine flakes of mica; 10 percent small pieces of gravel; strongly acid; clear smooth boundary.
TIC-38 to 55 inches, brown (10YR 4/3) gravelly loamy sand; single grained; loose; common tine flakes of mica; 20 percent
small pieces of gravel; strongly acid.
The solum is 28 to 40 inches thick. Depth to bedrock is more than 72 inches. The profile is strongly acid or very strongly
acid throughout, unless limed. Flakes of mica range from few to common throughout the solum. CTmvcl content ranges from
0 to 20 percent on the surface a throughout the solum.
The Ap horizon is brown or dark brown.
The 132t horizon is yellowish brown, brownish yellow, or strong brown clay loam or loam. The B3 horizon is sandy clay
loam or loam,
The C horizon is unconsolidated sandy and gravelly alluvial material.
Evard Series E Lb F
The Evard series. consists of well drained, moderate permeable, sloping to very steep soils that formed residuum weathered
from granite or gauss. Slopes are to 70 percent
Typical pedon of Evard sandy loam in an area of Evard soils, 25 to 45 percent slopes, in a wooded area, 3/4 mile south of the
Buncombe County lint, and on the north side of a logging road 0.3 milr, east of State Road 1423:
01-11/2 inches to 1/2 inch, partially decomposed leaves and twigs.
02-1/2 inch to 0, black-mat of humus and fine live roots.
A1-0 to 2 inches, dark brown (10YR 4/3) sandy loam; weak fine granular structure; friable; many fine and medium roots; few
fine flakes of mica; 5 percent gravel fragments; strongly acid; abrupt smooth boundary.
A2-2 to 6 inches, dark brown (7.5YR 414) sandy loam; weals medium granular structure; very friable; many medium roots;
common fine flakes of mica; 5 pemcnt gravel pieces; strongly acid; clear smooth boundary.
B2t-6 to 18 inches, yellowish red (5YR 416) sandy clay loam; weak medium subangular blocky structure; friable; few fine
roots; common fine flakes of mica; 15 percent gravel fragments; strongly acid gradual wavy boundary.
B3-18 to 30 inches, yellowish red (SYR 4/8) sandy loam; weak medium subangular blocky structure; very friable; few fine
roots; common fine flakes of mica; 20 percent gravel fragments; strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary.
C-30 to 53 inches, yellowish red (SYlit 4/8) saprolite that crushes sandy loam; rock controlled structure; about 50 percent
hard coarse fragments of gravel, cobble, and stone size; strongly acid.
R-53 inches, hard quartz mica gneiss that has small amounts of soil material in
frnctures.
The solum is 20 to 40 inches thick. Depth to bedrock is more than 48 inches. The profile is strongly acid or verystrongly
acid throughout, unless limed.
The A 1 horizon is very dark grayish brown or dark brown sand loam, fine sandy loam, or loam. The A2 horizon is dark
brown, brown, or yellowish brown sandy loam or fine sandy loam.
The B2t horizon is yellowish red or red. The B3 horizon is yellowihi red or red sandy clay loam or sandy loam.
]Fannin Series
The Fannin series consists of well drained, moderately permeable, sloping to steep soils that farmed in residuum weathered
mainly from mica schist and mica gneiss, and to a lesser extent from chlorite schist, phyllites, and other rocks that have a
high content of mica. Slopes are 7 to 4 percent.
Typical pedon of Fannin silt loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes, about 0.5 mile west of Fletcher, in a wooded area 0.3 mile west of
U.S. Highway 25, 50 feet east of St. John Road:
5 of 11 1/4/2006 1:26 P
JAN-04-2006(WED) 16;13 HICKORY NUT DEVELOPMENT (FAX)8286252036 P.005/005
the Dour uwor..... ?.IIb??Vblovu.¦/V.uv.uwvv,ul?i/*V14V16ADiLjV LLUU. IJ
C39-53 to 65 inches, gray (N 6l ) sandy clay loam that has lenses of sandy loam; massive; friable; slightly sticky and slightly
plastic; common fine flakes ofmiea; medium acid; clear smooth boundatv.
C4g-65 to 72 inches, gray (N 610) loamy sand; single grained; loose; common fine
flakes of mica; medium acid.
The profile commonly is 40 to 60 inches thick over sandy layers. Depth to bedrock is more than 60 inches. The profile is
strongly acid or medium acid throughout, unless limed.
The A horizon is very dark gray, very dark grayish brown, or black silt loam or loam.
The C horizon is stratified alluvial scdim=t of sandy loam, sand, sandy clay loam, and loamy sand.
.-? Tu"Wtee Series -
The Tuaquitee series consists of well drained, moderately permeable, sloping to steep soils that formed in colluvium derived
from schist, gneiss, and granite. Slopes are 7 to 45 percent. T
Typical pedon ofTusquitee loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, in a wooded area in Pisgah National Forest, 1/4 mile north of
Yellow Gap and 100 yards north of Yellow Gap Road:
01-linch to 0. fresh leaves and twigs.
Al 1-0 to 4 inches, very darn grayish brown (10YR 3/2) loam; weak fine granular structure; very friable; slightly sticky;
many fine roots; 5 percent gravel size fragments, few fine flakes of mica; strongly acid; abrupt smooth boundary.
A12.4 to 10 inches, dark brown (7.M 3/2) loam; weak fine and medium granular structure; very friable; slightly sticky;
common fine roots; few fine flakes of mica; strongly acid, clear wavy boundary.
B21t-10 to 23 inches, brown (7.5Y1L 5/4) clay loam; weak medium subaugular blocky structure; friable; sticky and slightly
plastic; few fine roots; few thin clayfilms on faces of pods; common fine Flakes of mica; strongly acid; gradual smooth
boundary.
B22-23 to 44 inches, dark brown (7.5YR 414) clay loam; weak medium subangular blocky structure; friable; sticky and
slightly plastic; few fine roots; few thin clay films on faces of peas; common fine flakes of mica; strongly acid; gradual
smooth boundary.
B344 to 51 inches, yellowish brown (10YR 514); weak medium subangular blocky structure: friable; slightly sticky; few fine
roots; many fine flakes of mica; strongly acid; gradual smooth boundary.
C1-51 to 61 inches, brown (10YR 5/3) fine sandy loam; weak medium subangular blocky
structure; very friable; many fine flakes of mica; strongly acid; gradual smooth
boundary.
C2-61 to 70 inches, pale brown (1 OYR 6/3) sandy loam; weak medium subangular blocky
structurc; very friable; many fine flakes of mica; strongly acid.
The solum is morothan 40 inches thick Depth to bedrock is more than 60 inches. The profile is strongly acid or medium
acid throughout unless limed. Gravel and stones cover 0 to 15 percent of the surface.
The A horizon is very dark grayish brown, dark brown, very dark brown, or dark yellowish brown loam, stony loam, or fine
sandy loam.
The 132t horizon is brown, strong brown, yellowish brown, dark brown, dark yellowish brown, or yellowish red loam, sandy
clay loam, or clay loam.
The C horizon is colluviat material of fine Sandy loam and sandy loam that contains coarse fragments in places.
Classification
The system of soil claseif cation currently used was adopted by the National Cooperadve Soil Survey in 1965 (4). Readers
interested in further details about the system should refer to the latest literature available. See the unpublished working
document "Selected Chapters from the Unedited Text of the Soil Taxonomy," available in the SCS State Office, Raleigh,
North Carolina.
The system of classification has six categories. Beginning with tho broadest, these categories arc order, suborder, great
group, subgroup, family, and series. In this system, the bases for classification are the different soil properties that can be
observed in the field or those that can be inferred either from other properties that are observable in the field or from the
combined data of soil science and other disciplines. The properties selected for the higher categories are the result of soil
genesis or of factors that affect soil genesis. In Table l 6 the soils of the survey area are classified according to the system.
Classes of the system are briefly discussed in the following paragraphs.
ORDl3R. Ten soil orders are recognized. The properties used to differentiate among orders are those that reflect the kind and
degree of dominant soil-forming processes that have taken place. Each order is identified by a word ending in sol. An
example is Entisol.
SUBORDER. Each order is divided into suborders based primarily on properties that influence soil genesis and that are
important to plant growth or that were selected to reflect the most important variables within the orders. The last syllable in
the name of a suborder indicates the order. An example is Aquent (Aqu, meaning water, plus ent, from Entisol).
GREAT GROUP. Each suborder is divided into great groups on the basis of close similarities in kind, arrangement, and
degree of expression of pedogenic horizons; soil moisture and temperature regimes; and base status. The name of a great
group ends with the name of a suborder. A prefix added to the name suggests something about the properties of the soil. An
10 of 11 1/4/2006 1:26111
JAN-04-2006(WED) 16:11 HICKORY NUT DEVELOPMENT (FAX)8286252036 P.002/005
WP Vutput http://www.hc=dcrsoncountync.org/(JutpuVMapVicwor/MapF'raTne.hto

1"m
?epsod .
? armed Fa?tuwir
w.:prr?.da
j 0 .
?i ? 1 breeriner
i
1 jv! w?wwiw.
? ? rdwwieiw
(7;17A j. 1
Mca111wupw-
i
1 TAId?YINlwnOefa
4TpT ' Pe14'ldinsnei4na
Lotlumbei
f? ?l rmlv?0awmerfem

A6G-
F1sh J 5-NXe-c 15aujctc JL-Mm 14,51-107o slopes
TLt- E-
Tvs u,i?ee. Sfrn,e? Loam is Jas, sloes
EQ F
EVard, as)q,57o sloes
1 of 1 1/4/2006 2:56 PNd
Map Output Page l of 1
http://www.hendersoncountync.org/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=www ... 1/4/2006
Query/Selection Results
Please enlarge this window to see all results.
Parcels
Rec PIN PID Name _1 Name 2 Acres
1 0613609738 9975810 WATSON, JENNIFER R 2.93
Zonin Districts
Rec Zoning District
1 OPEN USE
Votin Precincts
Rec Voting Precinct
1 Bat Cave
Hi h and Middle School Districts
Rec High School District Middle School District
1 NORTH HENDERSON APPLE VALLEY MIDDLE
Elements School Districts
Rec Elementary School District
1 EDNEYVILLE
Fire Tax Districts
Rec Fire Tax District
1 15 Bat Cave
Page 1 of 1
Soil Types
Rec SOII Type Description HYPERLINK
1 TuE Tusquitee stony loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes http://www.hendei'son.Iib.nc.us/county/soil/Detailed_PIanning.litni#TuE
Census Tracts
Rec POPULATION TRACT
1 3451 990100
Census Blocks
Rec Block TRACT SENATE HOUSE CONGRESS TOTAL VOTING-AGE REGISTERED
1 1023 990900 42 68 i ll 24 19 17
Coun Ma Grid
Rec Map Sheet
1 0613
Ehttp://www.hendersoncountync.org/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=www ... 1/4/2006

. Map Output
Page 1 of 1
Henderson County GIS Online
1420
f 1
` f
I ? Y
'?'r I4
xr :f
15 X17 ,
http://www.hendersoncountync.org/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=www ... 1/4/2006
x ew
Map Output

Page 1 of 1
http://www.hendersoncountync.org/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?Servi ceName=www_... 1/4/2006
Lo c..r I r,?'/
Z
PROPERTY RECORD CARD
Henderson County Property
Record Card PAGE v1 Next DATE 01104/2006;

nWNERSRIP ,
PID _
NEIGHBORHOOD
SALES INFORMATION

9975810

1015 BAT CAVE REVENUE DATE
DEED

WATSON JENNIFER R STAMPS TRANSFERRED BOOK
1
AND
FIN CYCLE STATUS PAGE
PMB308
_
_
931 MONROE DR SUITE 102 60-9T38-55
16-061
j A ACTIVE 64.00 12110./04 1208709
ATLANTA GA 30308 ANCESTOR ZON{NG LAND USE VERIFIED SALE DATE , VALIDITY

,a
_63
5009

OU
SALE CODE ,
110
PROPERTY ADDRESS
.
.
. TAX DISTRICT
W?... __. ACCOUNT BLDG # N ?^
. _
_.._ .
_ _._
?. - _-m,.
67 HOMINY BRANCH RD 15 BAT CAVE FIRE 304770 NULL VISITATION DATA
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION CLASS DOC ACRES APR. ACRES t DATE ID 1
VISIT
SOURCE
DE i
07110/97 LS
LTi/SLD5291 R1 2.74 2.93 ESTIMATE
LAND INFORMATION
...
aa- ?
..- BUILDING INFORMATION
_
.
.
.
v
s
:
a
. v

SEG s_...__. _ _.. a. ..

1 2 3 w
.
A
4 5 SECTION ...r ...B._ _p
_
E
C _
..
. ...... _
G_
.
J
.....
H.-.'_
F .
l
TYPE 4 36 TYPE
ACRE 1.00 1.93 SOFT 9
SOFT STORIES BUILDING SKETCH Open Full Page)
RATE 18500 9000 WALL
SOIL YEAR
USE E. AGE
ADJ CDU

EFERRED
AMOUNT D "
$0.00 GRADE -
_
MARKET VALUE $35,900.00 MKT F
OUTBUILDINGS PHYS
BLDG
TYPE a
j._ FUNCT
BSMT A
e
USE
. $ BSMT F ;
SIZE _. _...... _.
_ g ATTIC A p _
n ,
GRADE
ATTIC F
? ` t
YEAR f BEDROOMS` I
CDU
VALUE
000.6 FOR 2005
GENERAL REMARKS
FULL
HALF
HEATING
F OPEN
F STACK
DISCLAIft+IER AC
...__..... . . __
i TOTAL BUILDING VALUE I LAND
information on this site is current as of January 25, 2005. This information is collected for I BUILDING REMARKS
ntory of property found within this juristiction,and is compiled from recorded deeds,plats, and j
r public records and data. Users of this information are hereby notified that the aforementioned
ces should be consulted for verification of the information contained in this report.
TAX VALUE SUMMARY
-COST MARKET
435-'-960.0b 1?$0 00
€ TOTAL i
MARKET $35,900.00
VALUE 3
TOTAL
AMOUNT $0.00
DEFERRED
TOTAL TAX f $35
900.00
VALUE ,
$0.00
INCOME
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00 $0.00
fi1e://C:\Documents and Settings\mccormbs\Loca1 Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK1555\BuildingSketch.htm
Page 1 of 1
1/4/2006
F-

Map Output

Page 1 of 1
http://www.hendersoncountync.org/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=www ... 1/4/2006
F1 ?IY
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
The purpose of this letter is to inform all concerned agencies that I'am trying to obtain
the necessary permits to install a culvert pipe for a drive-way access across Hominy
Branch in order to gain entrance to the property located at 67 Hominy Branch Road in
Bat Cave, North Carolina.
Hominy Branch borders the entire length of this property, and in order to gain access, the
Branch will have to be crossed.
The proposed culvert installation is approximately 15 feet in length, and the pipe will be
corrugated galvanized metal. A local Grading Company suggested that we use either a
48" or 60" diameter pipe in this area.
Your assistance in obtaining all necessary permits, in order to begin construction, would
be greatly appreciated.
If any further information is needed, please do not hesitate to call.
Thanks in advance for your assistance and cooperation with this matter.
Best Regards,
Kenneth R. Hammond
1338 Banks Road
Fort Mill, SC 29715
Home: 803-547-7193
Work: 704-644-5060
E-Mail: [e-mail]
200h00B2
aa??
g , 146
J PN 4,r
R-p Sje?N
Y??
i
Attached you will find:
PCN Form
Survey Maps
Septic Permit
Well Permit
Perc Test
Henderson County Soil Survey
Topographical Maps
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 3 0 0 1; 0 0 8 2
(It any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
[0401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: A ?/"w/ 37
3. If this notification is solely a o rtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: 7
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Co 1 / of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), D
II. Applicant Information JAN 6 -.2006
Owner/Applicant Information DENR - WATER QUALITY
Name: }?eNy: ? T'H A? .4,?,,,,v WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
Mailing Address: lfb,4 D
Telephone Number: ?03- 5q'7- 71 i 3 lk.w Fax Number:
E-mail Address: 4f) C'SZhf -,, -, 60V
Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
4
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 1 1 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: 1y
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): '4114
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 061316-0773e
Location / _
County: ??e2 x7s10I / Nearest Town: Lam/ ?,4G?G
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): 14.11 r
6. Property size (acres): 22, /
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water:
C'?i'?,tiv
8. River Basin:
.I????+ro..??
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.iic.us/a(dmin/n7aps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity o the project
at the time of this application: F
15
/?44s°
Updated 11/1/200
Page 6 of 12
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): ON °W

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
.-60 '5 ?SGt i? ?ia? /."•??/ ?; ??+ ??iti ?cc3s x,
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
4
IV. Prior Project History

If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Provide a written description of the proposed imI acts:
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 12

2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and floodine.
Wetland Impact

Site Number
(indicate on map)

Type of Impact Type of Wetland

(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
00-year r
1 Floodpla
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)

i

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property:
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43.560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or Intermittent?
ittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(Iinea feet) Area of
Im act
(acmes)
SIIEE M *CA&' Aewltyv /:g-yLIA

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 0,VC.0 0
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
till, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact Name
Wat Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) )
Type of impact
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
Impact
indicate on ma)
(
ocean, etc.)
(acres)

r
i
Total Open Water Impact (acres)
Updated I IM I /2005
Page 8 of 12
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the proiect:
Stream Impact (acres): V1
Wetland Impact (acres):
Open Water Impact (acres):
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0 eva
Total Stream Impact (linear feet):
Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes 9No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation I V
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. St1.4LL !3/?r,v?, l&-
ZVX/ Z?-'?'V// G' rd'CiJGU1?5r CirLL'?.77` L rs?ila lie- I '!/''CiyS "'1C'a
Si L?vccr .>>:/1 :?s •?l%:?.% /I? .,.,.._.> ??.v';.r.z -? .. /:a....,,c'r.. _..1... ?,?? e,t'
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 12
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
Ijttp_ / h2o_enr._state.,nc us/ncc%vctl9nds/strmaide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at h_/ h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 1
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Updated I 1/ 1 /2005
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No ['
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ) N4
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No ?
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(square feet) Mitigation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0244, or.0260.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 11 of 12
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
a 1/1 ;.I?. -? ).JaTrv :7? 4-1- c-A4d h?'v '7'41 u' (:::I L114,1 y> L?• ?iL!rJ //?L'i LAG 1
X //I'- fi'e'?AY C'!d't?r r/
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of D-WQ Wetland Rules (I 5A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No I
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No 19
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No ?
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http_/!U2 .enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
,W e9l-
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)

Updated 111112-005
Page 12 of 12
Map Output Page 1 of 1
http://www.hendersoncountync.org/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=www ... 1/4/2006
JAN-04-2006(WEO) 13;49 HICKORY NUT DEVELOPMENT (FAX)8286252036 P.?0002/007
?yl?-?•?' '?'?Lt?y, :.. • • • : . qi.?. ?'.1 • . !. ?' +.•' ... '.' :•:?. ;. •/' - ..rl ! ±• Y.• , .?•^,R,: ",'f A,?'„?', `r+7Y
dvDEizSbiir ?Cp>tFtPi'Y D t7r?tiE1?TT of p? >FS ALTH
,'?. -'--- ,•, ,• -'? Ai71?#O '1'?:•CANSTRUCT' :TT , ?•?? -
FOR OpSow" ' ;x. 692-42E6BEN 7 -8wet Permit Num]I?er
wVati rl,~ l6?0? Assodated•)Pertnite
New Conaxtuctftis`<,
1QRt ' y " Lot No. i're-?dgtingTank'O Addition O''
tj &Y
E
>r
o?: ' 'rl?t' I?loMtivi? rPA?v ?:, WOO
Diil Ik ?l ".' p?.ra LTA*'
on daasifiiati
'$*? n Type -61
° .
4111WL?wM`°4?:? y
• '''• RCSidM1t , '. Quantity/
" ?lvio>?lS.Home fiusiness ? ?? ?; .
;Aa, ; Tank Sze
_• ' ; ?.' $Dras... ' ? r . ? • ; ., ' • • - , ', .. Dtainfield• • ? ?? Sq• ?? .
IJb Einplo'i'ees I?esiga F1pW°GFD ? ?- Marc TrwaCli,Rnl m Dopth"
Lpt:Si 7 * ; '
Pm mlt." for
$ ?ea? from da4e af. '
?setneuti: Y'es D . Nd .. `Basea?eut,Pl • ?ing::Yea'O ' lvo ?
WBCeI'56pplytCity0''Yri(cfvid 'I hgredD =olbmoomWoeelc!wlthlii
Co Qthr; 3a ": .
Emi?n?mentalH' Specialist.
ony
*!D t 1?f:1r (?R bAfsdVs-DRA,1KR4GNWTDSC!?1.
?'' ? '1'iYl'88lriS1;A>d C]6Aplt?o[SI8sYS1?„ ?•SEgA1'l?A,l',j?DIIIT'
e
1!yf`T-c??.ilt•`, `G*1 OJK. • ?' K'?U N+IP?y I/f ti'+GC11v+?d %^r ?i ` r'
3Ctt?.?.Il ,'le•r o,.?,r,. •,1. •ti,,'?: ?1"r - ??__jj??//?? ,.` ?i.. .??;•.tf., n•' I' ?•, ?j?;-;.
•'i?l'h,.'?f')._,Ar?4l'?71KG?-.R11'?tl.rW''? t,,?.,'? ?.i .••I.? '
r- 0 Lk.*. IL
.

7n ',4 W! An CfV1T. W 3acf s7ct?-JFiq-R7.R;X?? L4ll?aH01igne4 ldaa'PU@H
JRN-04-2006(WED) 13;50 HICKORY NUT DEVELOPMENT (FAX)8286252036 P.003/007
/-', .'?.Id .. ,::c?';..t'C. T: 1.. '.?_ ,' _.,?...: . .;,mar r•L' •W rr •r.•i,..
THOMASQ.,BM0pft, r - " HENOWWWRAa,MRTN 0,01101-WAm!9Q- 1?.EPNQNB, VV
..WELL INSTALLATION OR REPAIRp A M1T PERMFr.
7D l R1Lt.l D IN BY APPUCAUr . '
mallipg'Address of owner' Phono;
SijbdivislpNPark VIA?1 e= .Lot #
Pin V: Qo !? !'? .(o a 9 ?'S'3"S Oil tank an' property? yep No
'..."""
1Alelf'wpl',6,ued tosvwtwypeofWH .
;
I'ndtWdual (vrsll:ierving :home)No
,.; Sheted (welreming'more'than one home) How Many?
_No :
J Faster Caro' Yes
d one Do,f'ropsrtyLs •,., t i? S ""'a ?''. Q m' "? '
nit
don
gnaft" of Apply
bo'Nkw WRITE BELOW THIS LINE;
'. •1• is •• , . ,;,: .
' era, :?'!'•. _
It'
''P ermit tralid 1brA Yems'Pf d
' '.tlllpil.'I; ?nstallatlon.•snd
.a: IrtDq use. 'Th sil(rtg'9-thetue
- . of co in?w
1
FkL'irANNO
sum=
Pormie Received By
I0'cl 9£:60 9
Iita canditiOnS do nat Owme. 5
ftwon miM,Meet ststp and local regutattoi?. and minsi 6s'li-spected!" approved
Bgn,County 6epwWw1 at Nbli6.He0th betgro.any,partion at tiae Inafelwon.is'put
I 'Hpelth pownihi stets 1s to prirAd6 protectlort-tom: kgawn pos>:s-ibie sources..
Is gdsrantsed,at-iny sltelry,tho Health Dppartrrient.--. ;.
EnWfOnnlenaty'1681th $pecralusR
6Z c,I £ZSb-Z69-8Z8:xPj 41I?aHuIIGnd jd2a'puaH
- C 3
- ---------
LEG ND;
? 0 1>.51,1 o cll calcnci[pu?+u n¢In - I c-i., ?I I
5 0 ?' o cr cn n a mou _,
15.31T
-- LLJ?n,rf?l,C[ I.
• _b?rn,r )?B, o ? - I ,
\ .` sl a ?' -
LI °t
1 OT
Oc. s Pq,r,Jn Yli"KIEL ?I -
- ? S
'IF
CP.
?IL cP A\ ? ltijf,, v?lQ? 611a ,y 1}f
cr= cP
\
c T
?',p
,ye ryvOv em ZIL"
I DT ?P 1• rullm, P Cila-tt,-v, J", -ill) 11,
C'P ' "? , nde n,% slPcr?l.-nn I,cn, 1. I s ??w {r
b ` VI \ \) (I e?J Jeuc ,1.1 nu rec.. rJnJ B I ?r R S :e 4L,+
11
??? y IIP ?\ I140'38'?t l"C L,urdar,^a ,ul s, ,e)?J or I I? IIJir 1 fA 1 r.a
. 5'D" r-bo?i J.p^' I- lou, .I Y Ceol, P g I t ? F R1 -
CP , 7 P: colc,.la lPr In 1 JOODD 11 GE'i 1,- ^-?• -1
505 ,p 3' Cf' I ? _ I co,dacce ,'Ih G 17 30 o amcr?? t.l a evil m if 41i
Z.96 \ slq, inure , nllon n„n s^ol t1I
,r '05 '4O'3fi E h -d
2.P3 Aclest ----- -
/ I\ 3G 04 _ Fullo C J
11 \ L-2614
t)' I CI 1 II tl 11 E P
CP ??.\ \ Devclaln,e„ G P 1 I, 1 d l
\ SFC \ _ 200 ov,C JJ1 rltl jhrl !'
y rlorniin') f Brame: Road
?n o1 ,c al I,c r -1 1 nu J , 11en?? r r. t,:i
SfT 15'i? - , I-, ?, J l U- D I J
5%D Pebar ?:\ ?? ? 6? - C y I I m,tl? I n L "P ry?,p7 ii?`c U5'
EP - 156 m
1" 0T !'! CP D1?
fRN,IE ''
?IS?y ?,' ?0` ? ? ll a c )1" of on?U.? col gory, avcl ? L ?-F.':li{ IIt !„
Fo Jt, 2(j nV ?? \ p?rral :, n courl CP '..13f
,la I
I 1f R -,,,- rt Ca,o lna
f I,E. 7,1 =qs-J, u 1.52 Acfest "I\ En DD, ra', ry J D?„aer.r,
includes avelley) >> V e '
- CP
"? l ?E?? \ .?1jJ Cou I)' cerl llr Il,ut it c ,nur PI 1 F I t f
\ ^^h?, 01 \\, L" oll,ucJ ,r gels all slolulor) loqulto,n^ril C?',Y3
tl ,f' UP
^ f }v 1" OT -o° / J= s r h 1 /' '0.55
' -- r
Icp (?, f rl l
1/ 1
em o ------- sB9-lt cl-„ cP % 523" 2'•rov
44 is i
1" or IB.1.23 Ell 210,03• ycaA, (
r" OT EIP O I OT A%> /f
3/1 /?
" Cl `zJ i. 6 0_272I"V
F 027.5
IO.7n c8 CP
\
1. ?r un1L 2` :I
y sCIalIOTI f: lJ SUl 355 i
?I't 1I `? D.U. t4 Pa.CG 4, otlac al o..P ,olt ? - '.
(FIIIIIIr 1' lc,: Ya-t 9372
11115 IS TO CER11"' 11 l ME PR,°PLrrl 51-u4 a 1 fll
l _? - ( ! '.U i:L TL UI [CR 1"f. U Ec, -•..FER 1'UII.
)1/III'lOr ?t,I?TCt[VISIC?11 I MOTE ,
ROAD FROIJIACE PER D.D. 1075-40.3 1 T I -i .y.
III I u state of Noah Cgi-ofirla
p a 4
r I londorson ('ou ty, CAnuy ik Tv,: p I fr -YUf,
m - 5 OF IT ARE NOT I , S E A !
OF 1FIE PL.4Tl ED 2ELIED !POIJ e'i PkUL JEf"FREI S! TfCRFIELG IJTATI\ES FOR h111' I ° w 1
c r un2`6 JENNIFEP, Wr.1:Dl`! P• 4
n W ttJ
IE PROFESSIONAL p
ItcDUI c
I DisC/j!I tF; e - r_ LIl- '?,"'?'?•°
=1
527-I, IIOIJIID DRAOCII RD, li __y r l
i Addresses Hoorn Poaver °
10
ra-FIF
? Rec ? -NE1-b 4',idresa OL[L- '-_? t r ry^_f
-Addr 1 +f K t if
s I
1 i67 HOtOINY BRANCH RP 1F i,9<i6
' 142 / n
This is after f(
the road
yay LJ
4- T4-A0
curves back to 0201 Ezs3
the right, after
the parking
8181 a y •? ?? _
i pull off on the ???i is wh r?-
This e
r
left 30; the small
I 1,922 D waterfall is
! 7V.3 _
' i? 74 A) 4707
2851
4-? PO
t t ?,` rf f 4571 t it
L t
.r 7272
1 -7-
1'63 2GA0
?6yJ (1.?5."t? 1 = ? I
9372
ice, s,; il
= 1f P
4217 r `v 1? t
1'?t'r f f $ s ?r 711, F -7:7
?-
New Searcf-? Hd 'i E ° r 31
N1ap 1fl1 E30
517,14 Irt>3ge; 914,9--ScaleFat[ar.-1896195 6

14ENDLRSON:COUNIY DEPARTMENTOF PUBLICA:AUI-h
-
- :tL'MOR17ATIONT000NSTRRC.1'PERM[T ------
FOR OPERAT7Oh5P£HMTI CALL 692-4228 BEMT"
U.aer rs.:n >,Jf[ o aE I r?l.C.% Latr-. ;? ??-iry. ,1ss,rdnmd Permit=
; rc'c? n`E ?(-., u1#tr?u !af
?Y
'r
??
_iY
1'?• I?pm^-?[ _ __ I.at No. - 1.. tin F. Tan,L r, idiN,?s7
Imo.. K :fX / - __-
- ?.??

utl
-?edmonu _ ? 7miutreld_-' _ oy. Pl.
N.. -.olow,s Dmm Fl- CPD - `
,1i-. Tr?n_h Jir r. .,r t)aV?b _
Lot
Cyc }?.?]] 3' Bicmeot Y?utitD nS, 1e?.J ?b? ?. '?'Jf n rtrmdatn nf.:

t.
.V 1 Y OKL4 FOR DSEPS DF_y HLTD_aBOVL-F)R.+%} GVOTTOSCaII Ep,i nni? [ H^.?ln J?.r';?{c[
:s! , i?.>ti rn ..ch'4r V?IT FTtA 1?. ?65? n}-..'t ?-c... vt JS£5.r ???:n ?+sr t,rt-r:?2{1Ffit?'cl

.-t.A;,-iz f

?Ci PLI?L-L"x'Ltttl?ClCltfrt?:1C?c i'!111r11fD1 ?171S1Tr ?'??ZTii?l
-.1 ?.?, 91'AnT?fipuq(?NAI?F A't
7t1711?RS tl. Eillrl:I'- urr?D?L CWVIIlE, N r)FN GA ?IMW A 2Bn2
?utirola?cmnn
WELL. INSTALLATION OR REPAIR PERMIT
ro H? FIurn IN RY Aaat Iraut PERMIT l
"r
e.
Loi q(>r ?. /?<-?'?'? GuErdb?ICtonIF`1rk ;'4,.ti.1.? LOT'
Fin icnk on piapetty? Yep
Ltr_il wilF bo useC] to s nn dlRxt typ'l n.f hirvllt)/2 i'
111dlvldurtl fwl-fl nor-Ana one ha*le1 Y05 Pib
Shar9d (n ell sPrvlnrj r DFe than one home) How T-Anrtyo
Fc5tnr t:Farg Yee, t10
r
!'JJ?II:ra??tIcInlto Prnpcrty.?? f-.J
,Si3nstcze of Applicant
DO MOT WPITE BELOW THfS CINE
r.
l i r ! i k
77
r
Pnrrlr , 4J ter s=r5 F ;id Sita ccnd'Llc;i; dona" chnngr,
e!I I ,?tiorl; I,,.stn 'lfl0n; And rct?ttldn rnU3i'mnet rato and local rvgulntlons, and mua be Ipspoc;ed an
b/ e reore-2envKt , of tiio Henccroon County Dbparlrntnt of Public He3tifi botDre any poi-ion of thi ingtiill
ntn ,a. ?he 7lbn;7 of ihn ni I b- the Healthd3epa}thlent §taff is to rravW2 proloctiari from knOw7 po66ll
'oi oontay- ma;inn. fJO voltnne o(>r?ter lfi?ji?aramtpal zt In_v slfe by the Hi alth l??nartrrI?nk
V?Et L Cf' f JNUT EE LOCATED ifJ hAf^H1.,UF=rYAI':
? l _ ?nv,rr?nn:enfal HV"3)ttT 5p?cl=U6C t =?^?
JAN-04-2006(WED) 16;11
fassification of the Soils
HICKORY NUT DEVELOPMENT (FAX)8286252036 P.003/005
http:/Avww.hendemon.h"b.ne-us/county/soil/Classification.htn
(SOIL SURVEY OF HENDERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA)

This section describes the soil series of the survey area, defines the current system of classifying soils, and classifies the soils
of the area according to that system.
Percent coarse fragments.
Bradson Series
Sell Series and Morphology
On the following pages each soil series in the survey area is described in detail. The series descriptions are presented in
alphabetic order by series name.
For each series, some facts about the soil and its parent material are presented first. Then a pedon, a small three dimensional
area of soil typical of the soil series in the survey area, is described. The detailed descriptions of each soil horizon follow
standards in the Soil Survey Manual (3). Unless otherwise noted, colors described are for moist soil.
Following the pedon description is the range of important characteristics of the soil series mapped in this survey area. Phases,
or mapping units, of each soil series are described in the section "Soil Maps for Detailed Planning."
Ashe Series F} h &
"1'he Ashe series consists of somewhat excessively drained, moderately rapidly permeable, moderately steep to very steep
soils that formed in residuum weathered dominantly from granite and gneiss but in some places from arkose and graywacke.
Slopes are 15 to 70 percent.
Typical pedon of Ashe stony sandy loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes, about 2 miles east of But Cave, in a wooded area, 1.1
miles south of N.C. Highway 9 and 50 feet east of State Road 1609:
01-2 inches to 1 inch, fresh leaves and twigs.
02-1 inch to 0, black mat of live fine roots and decayed vegetation.
Al 1-0 to 1 inch, dark brown (IOYR 413) stony sandy loam; weak fine granular structure; very friable; malty fine and medium
roots; 5 percent stones; very strongly acid; abrupt smooth boundary.
A12-1 to 7 inches, yellowish brown (10YR 5/4) stony sandy loam; weak "me granular structure; very friable; many fine
roots; 5 percent coarse quartz fragments; very strongly acid; clear smooth boundary.
132-7 to 21 inches, yellowish brown (10YR 514) sandy loam; weak medium subangular blocky structure; very flyable;
common fine roots; few flakes of mica; about 10 percent coarse fragments.; very strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary.
C-21 to 30 inches, gray (IOYR 611) saprolite that crushes to sandy loam; rock controlled structure; friable; few fine roots;
about 30 percent coarse fragments; very strongly acid; abrupt smooth boundary.
R-30 inches, moderately hard granite-gneiss rock; hardness increases with depth.
The solurn is 20 to 36 inches thick. Depth to bedrock is 20 to 40 inches. About 5 to 15 percent of the surface is covered with
stones. The profile is very strongly acid or strongly acid throughout, unless limed
The A horizon is very dark grayish brown, grayish brown, dark brown, brown, or yellowish brown loam or sandy loam.
The B2 horizon is yellowish brown, strong brown, or brownish yellow loam or sandy loam.
The C horizon is gray, brownish yellow, or pale brown granite gneiss saprolite that crushes to sandy loam and is 15 to 30
The Bradson series consists of well drained, moderately permeable, gently sloping to strongly sloping soils that formed in
eolluvium and alluvium derived from a mixture of crystalline rocks. Slopes are 2 to 15 percent.
Typical pedon of Bradson gravelly loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes, in a field 0.5 mile southwest of Etowah Post Office and 200
feet south of U.S. Highway 64 and State Road 1205 intersection, 50 feet west of State Road 1205:
Ap-O to 6 inches, reddish brown (SYR 4/4) gravelly loam; weals coarse and fine granular structure; friable; many fine roots;
few fine flakes of mica; 20 percent smooth rounded quartz gravel; mediuia acid; abrupt smooth boundary.
B2 1t-6 to 24 inches, red (2.5YR 4/6) clay; moderate medium subangular blocky structure; firm; sticky and slightly plastic;
few fine roots; thin continuous clay films on faces of peds; about 10 percent smooth quartz gravel; strongly acid; gradual
smooth boundary.
B22t-24 to 40 inches, red (2.SYR 418) clay loam, moderate medium subangular blocky structure; friable; sticky and slightly
plastic; few fine roots; common fine flakes of mica; thin continuous clay films on faces of pods; few smooth gravel; strongly
)f 11 11412006 1:26 PM
Classification of the Soils
JRN-04-2006(WED) 16:12 HICKORY NUT DEVELOPMENT (FRX)8286252036 P.004/005
,to soils nap://www WWWnCnUCrS0n. 110.11U. U'
yellowish brown.
The Bl horizon, if present, is yellowish brown or brown. The 152t horizon is yellowish brown, dark yellowish brown, strong
brown, or brownish yellow sandy clay loam or clay loam. The B3 horizon is yellowish brown, strong brown, or brownish
yellow.
ne C horizon is granito-gneiss mprolite that crushes to sandy loam or fine sandy loam.
Elsinboro Series
The Elsiaboro series consists of well drained, moderately permeable, nearly level and gently sloping soils that formed in
unconsolidated old alluvium from areas of crystalline rock that contains much mica. Slopes are 0 to 3 percent:
Typical pedon of Elsinbom loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, in a cultivated field about 14 miles west of Hendersonville, 600 feet
east of intersection of N.C. Highway 280 and State Road 1328, and 250 feet cast of State Road 1328:
Ap-0 to 9 inches, brown (IOYR 4/3) loam; weak fine and medium granular structure; friable; 4 percent small pieces of
gravel; strongly acid; abrupt smooth boundary.
B21t-9 to 22 inches, yellowish brown (l OYR 5/6) clay loam; moderate medium subangular blocky structure; friable;
common fine flakes of mica; 3 percent small pieces of gravel; strongly acid; gradual smooth boundary.
B22t-22 to 32 inches, brownish yellow (10YR 616) clay loam; moderate medium subangular blocky structure; friable;
common fine flakes of mica; 3 percent small pieces of gravel; strongly acid; gradual smooth boundary.
B3-32 to 38 inches, yellowish brown (10Y1t 5/4) sandy clay loam; weak medium subangular blocky structure;, friable;
common fine flakes of mica; 10 percent small pieces of gravel; strongly acid; clear smooth boundary.
W-38 to 55 inches, brown (10YR 4/3) gravelly loamy sand; single grained; loose; common fine flakes of mica; 20 percent
small pieces of gravel; strongly acid.
The solum is 28 to 40 inches thick. Depth to bedrock is more than 72 inches. The profile is strongly acid or very strongly
acid throughout, unless limed Flakes of mica range from few to common throughout the solum. C,ravcl content ranges from
0 to 20 percent on the surface a throughout the sohun.
The Ap horizon is brown or dark brown.
The 92t horizon is yellowish brown, brownish yellow, or strong brown clay loam or loam. The B3 horizon is sandy clay
loam or loam.
The C horizon is unconsolidated sandy and gravelly alluvial material.
Evard Soles ELb F
The Evard series. consists of well drained, moderate permeable, sloping to very steep soils that formed residuum weathered
from granite or gneiss. Slopes are to 70 percent
Typical pedon of Evard sandy loam in an area of Cvard soils, 25 to 45 percent slopes, in a wooden area, 3/4 mile south of the
Buncombe County line, and on the north side of a logging road 0.3 mile east of State Road 1423:
01-11/2 inches to 1/2 inch, partially decomposed leaves and twigs.
02-1/2 inch to 0, black mat of humus and fine live roots.
Al-0 to 2 inches, dark brown (10YR 4/3) sandy loam; weak fine granular structure; friable; many fine and medium roots; few
fine flakes of mica; 5 percent gravel fragments; strongly acid; abrupt smooth boundary.
A2-2 to 6 inches, dark brown (7.SYR 414) sandy loam; weak medium granular structure; very friable; many medium roots;
common fine flakes of mica; 5 percent gravel pieces; strongly acid; clear smooth boundary.
B2t-6 to 18 inches, yellowish red (5YR 416) sandy clay loam; weak medium subangular blocky structure; friable; few fine
roots; common fine flakes of mica; 15 percent gravel .fragments; strongly acid gradual wavy boundary.
B3-18 to 30 inches, yellowish red (SYR 4/8) sandy loam; weak medium subangular blocky structure; very triable; few fine
roots; common fine flalres of mica; 20 percent gravel fragments; strong-,y acid; gradual wavy boundary.
C-30 to 53 inches, yellowish red (SYR 4/8) saprolite that crushes sandy loam; rock controlled structure; about 50 percent
hard coarse fragments of gravel, cobble, and stone size; strongly acid
R-53 inches, hard quartz mica gneiss that has small amounts of soil material in
fractures.
The solum is 20 to 40 inches thick. Depth to bedrock is more than 48 inches. The profile is strongly acid or very strongly
acid throughout, unless limed.
The A 1 horizon is very dads grayish brown or dark brown sand loam, fine sandy loam, or loam. The A2 horizon is dark
brown, brown, or yellowish brown sandy loam or fine sandy loam.
The 332t horizon is yellowish red or red. The 83 horizon is yellowish red or red sandy clay loam or sandy loam.
Fannin Series
The Fannin series consists of well drained, moderately permeable, sloping to steep soils that formed in residuum weathered
mainly from mica schist and mica gneiss, and to a lesser extent from chlorite schist, phyllites, and other rocks that have a
high content of mica. Slopes are 7 to 4 percent.
Typical pedon of Fannin silt loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes, about 0.5 mile west of Fletcher, in a wooded area 0.3 mile west of
U.S. Highway 25, 50 feet east of St. John Road:
5 of 11 1/4/2006 1:26 P
JAN-04-2006(WED) 16:13 HICKORY NUT DEVELOPMENT (FAX)8286252036 P.005/005
..me app ..?•y. w ? ?'.114V V VlOVL. \, 4..a,.. u.,r vv.....y / pV 1L 41f?D111L641VU.LL W
C3g-53 to 65 inches, gray (N 61 ) sandy clay loam that has lenses of sandy loam; massive; friable; slightly sticky and slightly
plastic; common tine flakes of niea; medium acid; clear smooth boundary.
C4g-65 to 72 inches, gray (N 610) loamy sand; single grained; loose; common fine
flakes of mica; medium acid.
The profile commonly is 40 to 60 inches thick over sandy layers. Depth to bedrock is more than 60 inches. The profile is
strongly acid or medium acid throughout, unless limed.
The A horizon is very dark gray, very dark grayish brown, or black silt loam or loam.
The C horizon is stratified alluvial sediment of sandy loam, sand, sandy clay loam, and loamy sand.
.--? Tusquitee Series -7 1:7-
The Tusquitee series consists of well drained, moderately permeable, sloping to steep soils that formed in colluvium derived
from schist, gneiss, and granite. Slopes are 7 to 45 percent. T
Typical pedon ofTusquitee loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, in a wooded ; -ca in Pisgah National Forest, 1/4 mile north of
Yellow Gap and 100 yards north of Yellow Gap /toad:
01-linch to 0, fczsh leaves and twigs.
Al 1-0 to 4 inches, very dark grayish brown (IOYR 3/2) loam; weals fine granular stueture; very friable; slightly sticky;
many fine roots; 5 percent gravel size fragments; few fine flakes of mica; strongly acid; abrupt smooth boundary.
A12-4 to 10 inches, dark brown (7.M 3/2) loam; weak fine and medium granular structure; very friable-, slightly sticky;
common fine roots; few fine flakes of mica; strongly acid; clear wavy boundary.
B21 t-10 to 23 inches, brown (7.SYR 5/4) clay loam; weak medium subangular blocky structure; friable; sticky and slightly
plastic; few fine roots; few thin clayfilms on faces of pods; common fine flakes of mica; strongly acid; gradual smooth
boundary.
B22-23 to 44 inches, dark brown (7.5YR 414) clay loam; weak medium subangular blocky structure, friable; sticky and
slightly plastic; few fine roots; few thin clay films on faces of pods; common fine flakes of mica; strongly acid; gradual
smooth boundary.
B3-44 to 51 inches, yellowish brown (IOYR 5/4); weak medium subangular blocky structure: friable; slightly sticky; few fine
roots; many fine flakes of mica; strongly acid; gradual smooth boundary.
C1-51 to 61 inches, brown (10YR 5/3) fine sandy loam; weak medium subangular blocky
structure; very friable; many fine flakes of mica; strongly acid; gradual smooth
boundary.
C2-61 to 70 inches, pale brown (I OYR 6/3) sandy loam; weak medium subangular blocky
structure; very friable; many fine flakes of mica; strongly acid.
The solum is more than 40 inches thick Depth to bedrock is more than 60 inches. The profile is strongly acid or medium
acid throughout unless limed. Gravel and stones cover 0 to 15 percent of the surface.
The A horizon is very dark grayish brown, dark brown, very dark brown, or dark yellowish brown loam, stony loam, or fine
sandy loan.
The 132t horizon is brown, strong brown, yellowish brown, dark brown, dark yellowish brown, or yellowish red loam, sandy
clay loam, or clay loam.
The C horizon is colluvial material of fine sandy loam and sandy loam that contains coarse fragments in places.
Classification
The system of soil classification currently used was adopted by the National Cooperative Soil Survey in 1965 (4). Readers
interested in further details about the system should refer to the latest literature available. See the unpublished working
document "Selected Chapters from the Unedited Text of the Soil Taxonomy," available in the SCS State Office, Raleigh,
North Carolina.
The system of classification has six categories. Beginning with the broadest, these categories are order, suborder, great
group, subgroup, family, and series. In this system, the bases for classification are the different soil properties that can be
observed in the field or those that can be iuferrcd either from other properties that are observable in the field or from the
combined data of soil science and other disciplines. The properties selected for the higher categories are the result of soil
genesis or of factors that affect soil genesis. In Table 16 the soils of the survey area are classified according to the system.
Classes of the system are briefly discussed in the following paragraphs.
ORDER. Tent soil orders are recognized. The properties used to differentiate among orders are those that reflect the kind and
degree of dominant soil-forming processes that have taken place. Each order is identified by a word ending in sol. An
example is Entisol.
SUBORDER Each order is divided into suborders based primarily on properties that influence soil genesis and that are
important to plant growth or that were selected to reflect the most important variables within the orders. The last syllable in
the name of a suborder indicates the order. An example is Aquent (Aqu, meaning water, plus en1, from Entisol).
GREAT GROUP. Each suborder is divided into great groups on the basis of close similarities in kind, arrangement, and
degree of cxprescion of pedogenic horizons; soil moisture and temperature regimes; and base status. The name of a great
group ends with the name of a suborder. A prefix added to the name suggests something about the properties of the soil. An
l0 of 11 1/4/2006 1:26 P1
JAN-04-2006(WED) 16:11 HICKORY NUT DEVELOPMENT (FAX)8286252036 P.002/005
Map output http://www.h=dcrgoncountync.orb/OutpuVMapViewor/MapFrAme.hto
Aeadonon County CTS Qnlinc
t
sr, =m - V
p
r
!?1
}
1 Chi
}
l
11:644 1.

ei+r.
_ ........... ...
eq

' . ? ..
..u?OQAJ ...
und
?
Erkdra FaYN111Y

+bWnw
V!
/
+
.

. w?lAawpn•
t rimom"W"On
*TOT i aldill?Wnn
Lot t"Hfbm

.,._.. 2 1.06
a 0 "

4 d. t
VIA
j
_
_
34
., a
P?hG-
FISK J'S?Me-? 150.14d? Jq,5/-707, Slopes
TLt- E
Tc?s u. ? ?e-1 S ?tm e Loam 15) a s h slopes
Ev'aH 696jy97o slc ae$
1 of 1 1/4/2006 2:56 PM
Query/Selection Results
Please enlarge this window to see all results.
Parcels
Rec PIN PID Name 1 Name 2 Acres
1 0613609738 9975810 WATSON, JENNIFER R 2.93
Zonin Districts
Rec Zoning District
1 OPEN USE
Votin Precincts
Rec Voting Precinct
1 Bat Cave
Hi h and Middle School Districts
Rec High School District Middle School District
1 NORTH HENDERSON APPLE VALLEY MIDDLE
Elementary School Districts
Rec Elementary School District
1 EDNEYVILLE
Fire Tax Districts
Rec Fire Tax District
1 15 Bat Cave
Page 1 of 1
Soil Types
Rec Soil Type Description HYPERLINK
1 TuE Tusquitee stony loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes http://www.henderson.lib.nc.us/county/soil/Detailed_Planning.litni#TuE
Census Tracts
Rec POPULATION TRACT
1 3451 990100
Census Blocks
Rec Block TRACT SENATE HOUSE CONGRESS TOTAL VOTING AGE REGISTERED
1 1023 990900 42 68 11 24 19 17
Coun Ma Grid
Rec Map Sheet
1 0613
Fhttp://www.hendersoncountync.org/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=www ... 1/4/2006

Map Output Page 1 of 1
http://www.hendersoncountync.org/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=www ... 1/4/2006
Map Output Page 1 of 1
Henderson Countv GIS Online
1.4`
r
I'
?i
'y.
47
7.
/Pill RE Z-
f f/
? i
- /?
http://www.hendersoncountync.org/servletlcom.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=www ... 1/4/2006
Map Output
r! i n J
% i'?{1
Page 1 of 1

Y?

a
720-
http://www.hendersoncountync.org/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=www_... 1/4/2006
PROPERTY RECORD CARD
Page 1 of 1
Henderson County Property Record Card PAGE a 1/1 Next s DATE =01104/2006
.,
OWNERSHIP __ s_. ... ,
PID ?,.._ t ?.m .,.,,,y.
NEIGHBORHOOD ? SALES INFORMATI ON
9975810 1015 BAT CAVE DATE
S DEED
WATSON JENNIFER R
F,,..= STAMP
TRANSFERRE D BOO
OK

PIN
CYCLE
STATUS AND
PAGE
PM B308 -
931 MONROE DR SUITE 102 0613-60-9738-,55
16 A ACTIVE 64.00 12110/04 1208/709
ATLANTA GA 30308 ANCESTOR ZONkNG LAND USE VERiF1ED SALE DATE VALIDITY
500639 OU 110 SALE CODE
PROPERTY ADDRESS TAX DISTRICT ACCOUNT BLDG ;F
67 HOMINY BRANCH RD 15 BAT CAVE FIRE 304770 NULL VISITATION DATA
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION CLASS DOC ACRES APR ACRES DATE ID SOURCE
VISIT
CO
DE

LT1/SLD5291
R1
e 2.74 ?07/10/97 LS
2.93 !
ESTIMATE

LAND INFORMATION BUIL DING INFORMATION
SEG i 2 3 4 5 SECTION 1 A B t C D E F F G H I J
TYPE 4 36 _ Y TYPE
ACRE 1.00 1.93 t j SOFT
SOFT STORIES BUILDING SKETCH O en Full Pa e
RATE 18500 9000 WALL
SOIL
_ YEAR
USE E. AGE
ADJ CDU
AMOUNT DEFERRED $0.00 GRADE
MARKET VALUE $35,900.00 MKT F
OUTBUILDINGS PHYS
BLDG r FUNCT

T
YPE y

<

BSMTA

]
IL
USE ? t A BSMT F I ?
SIZE ATTIC A
- i

GRADE e. ?.... _..
, .. .
ATTIC F .. ,,a
x
YEAR BEDROOMS
CDU FULL
VALUE HALF
GENERAL REMARKS HEATING
F OPEN
02-05 000.6 FOR 2005
F STACK TAX VALUE SUMMARY
DISCLAIMER AC COST I MARKET INCOME
TOTAL BUILDING VALUE LAND $35,900
00 $0 00 $0.00
$0.00 _
BUILDINGS $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
TOTAL
The informati on on this site is current as of January 25, 2005. This information is collecte d for BUILDING REMARKS MARKET $35,900.00 k $0.00 $0.00
inventory of pr operty found within this juristiction,and is compiled from recorded deeds,plats, and VALUE
other public re cords and data. Users of this information are hereby notified that the aforementioned TOTAL
sources should be consulted for verification of the information contained in this report. AMOUNT $0.00
DEFERRED
TOTAL TAX $35
900.00 $0.00 $0.00
,
VALUE
file://C:\Documents and Settings\mccormbs\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK1555\BuildingSketch.htm 1/4/2006
} Grant Mtn
a
� .
}
� T
•
� 4
r,?i[
� I
7IM
a' r
•
i
V
i
t
_
t
1
B3 rriw6ll
Mtn
•
P�' dWhim
AKS,
2Ss c N�IPAIT
r
,
e
r
Y T
1
3
a
t2
_
t
t

Map Output
Page 1 of 1
http://www.hendersoncountync.org/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=www ... 1/4/2006