20060028 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20060103

oto? w A rF9??
o -c
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
February 14, 2006
DWQ# 06-0028
Mecklenburg County
Mr. Chris Triolo
Continental Company, LLC
8311 Prince Charles Rd.
Charlotte, NC 28210
Subject: Salvage America, Inc. Hebron Rd.
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Trioli:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to fill 0.05
acre of wetland (wetland BB) and impact 104 linear feet (If) of perennial and 285 If of intermittent unnamed
stream to Kings Branch in order to construct the recycling center in Mecklenburg County, as described in your
application received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on January 3, 2006. After reviewing your
application, we have determined that this project is covered by Water Quality General Certification Number
3402, which can be viewed on our web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. The General Certification
allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 39 once it is issued to you by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Please note that you shouldget any other federal, state or local permits before proceeding with your project,
including those required by (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge, and Water
Supply Watershed regulations.
The above noted Certification will expire when the associated 404 permit expires unless otherwise
specified in the General Certification. This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described
in your application. If you change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be required to send
us a new application for a new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the
Certification and approval letter; and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions.
In addition to the requirements of the certification, you must also comply with the following conditions:
1. The Mooresville Regional Office shall be notified in writing once construction at the approved impact areas
has commenced.
2. The base flow stream channel shall be maintained (reconstructed) immediately above and below the
proposed stream crossings. This may be accomplished through the construction of flood plain benches or
similar measures. These measures must be approved, in writing, by this office prior to construction.
3. Stormwater discharge_structures at this site shall be constructed in a manner such that the potential receiving
streams (of the discharge) will not be impacted due to sediment accumulations, scouring or erosion of the
stream banks.
4
The intermittent channel connecting wetland AA with wetland BB shall be relocated along the southwest
boundary of the facility. Soft stabilization and Native vegetation shall be used to stabilize the new channel.
Nom` Carolina
?tura!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Intemet h2o.enr.state.nc.us FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
5. All wetlands, streams, surface waters, and riparian buffers located on the pr sect site where impacts are not
allowed shall be clearly marked (example- orange fabric fencing) prior to an land disturbing activities.
6. No waste, spoils, solids, or fill of any kind shall be placed in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the impacts depicted in the Preconstruction Notification applicati n. All construction activities
associated with this project shall meet, and/or exceed, those requirements s ecified in the most recent
version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual and shall be conducted so that no
violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
7. Sediment and erosion control devices shall not be placed in wetlands or waterrs to the maximum extent
practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetland' and waters is unavoidable,
they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within two months oft the date the Division of Land
Resources has released the project.
8. Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Qual ty. Please send photographs of
the upstream and downstream sides of each culvert site to document correc installation, along with the
Certificate of Completion form.
9. Continuing Compliance. The applicant (Salvage America, LLC/Mr. Chris Tri lo) shall conduct all activities in
a manner so as not to contravene any state water quality standard (including, any requirements for
compliance with section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act) and any other appropriate requirements of state and
federal law. If DWQ determines that such standards or laws are not being met (including the failure to
sustain a designated or achieved use) or that state or federal law is being violated, or that further conditions
are necessary to assure compliance, DWQ may reevaluate and modify this certification to include conditions
appropriate to assure compliance with such standards and requirements in accordance with 15 A NCAC
2H.0507(d). Before codifying the certification, DWQ shall notify the applicant and the US Army Corps of
Engineers, provide public notice in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0503, and provide opportunity for public
hearing in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0504. Any new or revised conditions shall be provided to the
applicant in writing, shall be provided to the United States Army Corps of Engineers for reference in any
permit issued pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and shall also', become conditions of the 404
Permit for the project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You
must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition that
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714
Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless
you ask for a hearing.
s
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
If you have any questions, please telephone Mr. Alan Johnson in the Mooresville Regional Office at 704-663-
1699 or Ms. Cyndi Karoly in the Central Office in Raleigh 919-733-9721.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Attachments ?.' , f f , a
z
cc: Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville
Ian McMillan, Wetlands Unit
Central Files _

- r A aC.a'`;x..?..e.? ., a .a3... ,..w... .. ...
Impacts., Mitigations Fees Affiliations Events Inspections Comments History
? ?. G.. ! ?
T
Detailsl Details2 Permits and Certs 1 Cross Refs
Project Number: 20060028 Version: 1 Status: Issued Last Action De sc: Project issued
`Project Name: Salvage America Inc `Pr oject Type.'Industnal I Commercial J Business
Project Desc: recycle center site driveway
'Owner: Triolo, Chris M. Details...
'Received From: Applicant COE ID: 200531493 'Primary County:
DOTTIP: °Admin Region: Mooresville
Received Dt: 01!0312006 Reviewer: Galan Johnson
Issued Dt: 0 211 412 0 0 6 S
- - 'Secondary County j
Statutory Dt: 010412006 -
CAMA NEPA! SEPA Received Dt:
DCM Office: SW Plan Received Dt:
COE Office: ieville Regulatory Field Office S'JU Plan Approved Dt: Public Notice Published Dt:
Last Updated By: Iaurie.dennison SW Plan Location: Public Notice Received Dt:
Last Updated On: 0110 512 0 0 6 Sewage Disposal: P.N. Comment Period Ends Dt:
< Back! Close
Triage Check List
Date: 1/06/05
Project Name: Salvage America, Inc.
DWQ#: 06-0028
County: Mecklenburg
Alan Johnson, Mooresville Regional Office
To:
60-day Processing Time: 1/03/06 - 3/04/06
From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone : [phone]
The file attached is being forwarded to you for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks!

«S c3? C- j ?t.?r?c'??'?8??1 lac\? n-t-?on T??o ??'
c-r QvG<<? ?? e- c.r ?'1 ? G??'j D!1
t
-?G AgL???4

#4@44,4w
'141V 3
o
?t ' ?666
'gyosr t Q

?r ?e fie- t,3 <e--
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. ? ?? t7 Q 0 n 9 P
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
?. 4
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
? Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s). Requested: A 3
p,?? µ?-? ano?31 y 9 3
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Mana? D
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), c
n
H. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant
Mailing
11
Ghr1 ) r ?a f a
o- L. L
JAN `3 2006
WETL D3 AND ST WAfEROWWATER BRANCH
-c
"?'_ r r. I r 10 as
telephone Number: ' - 5I? Fax Number: 316"'f41614/ 13_
E-mail Address: '1' r 1 c) l S G? ?i G r'i k i K• h
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Page 5 of 12
M. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1, Name of project: GS I yG -e. A ru, - _ , - , 4 ?-???
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): ?? S _? S ?' 6 t?s? f?zbra n S?
4. Location
County: ?h1L\?nby r t12, Nearest Town:
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):_i2tc G•.tL_S?G
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet th
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.).<c `
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): ON °W
6. Property size (acres): I ?,,>
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: 1<1k n?
8. River Basin:
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
q0e time of this application: 7h't 1 4e*.A--k I
---17 -a\ T k ." I G R i -, r-, bJi` CLA e-r re M I v ?1i,?Ll raoi.
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: 4ah5?"rvL?
?-?v e-?K c?00 '-t a "f h ` w l1 l ?t a ronu- k-?-
'`h r-C'e._ 4-L> l y e r-i's. fib be- m 4k) t p ?=? 5 S Laf ? S ? e-ttz' , = 7G
H,:.4Ju t/ uy u 1 p k-1 cn t r--.s?? \ bc. L>SGaQ La^A,,.e • 4Wkp -1't-c-? c K,
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: L- e??t r c+?[' cti?f V ??.?c? .??
IV.
V.
Vi.
Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. C -?.? e- cs CU l? c-n't y ?-e?? +)Nea y i% cc

.4
Future Project Plans M --V 14:4
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
? i l 1 %r\ i t v to e- SG I t i A-,,, %--C4 ?- 4-k-Z- c_zn. tic-! e i c f Lv? C>t c ?
Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written descri tion of the proposed impacts: a n ?.?_ L?Gcc c? r? rX
a F p- ?1 bGGU t Lb!? //r '. ? ' yln, ?y c y) y r.?r j i An a?

Page 7 of 12
2. Individually- list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
senarately-Hst impacts dne to hnth ctnich,re. and flnnrlinv r

3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: •?`1 R
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation,' stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls,'gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for boththe original and relocated streams
mugt'he inebuipA =9"n t•a}r+nlatss ---_ w.,,142..1., te.,,.+L 'V : -:AL . aL, _ fI _' 1 L__ ?"% el-
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, m ,
herbaceous, b9K etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
es/no Distance to
Nearest
Stream
linear feet Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Wetland Impact (acres)

Stream Impact
Number
indicate on ma

Stream Name ----- -?-----

Type of Impact + ??-+ k.r
Perennial or
Intermittent? +.. sw. raa,wa-.aa ra
Average
Stream Width
Before Im act a?1YVV TJ,J
Impact
Length
linear feet) VV..
Area of
Impact
acres

1

.yew y , `eP

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage)
5 . }
5.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean etc.)
Impact
acres

-
Total Open Water Impact (acres)
177
tea C;IVA
Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, floodin , drainage, bulkheads; etc. -
Area of
Page 8 of 12
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the proiect:

Stream Imp act (acres):
Wetland Impact acres):
Open Water Impact (acres :
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
Total Stream Impact (linear feet):
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ? No
??` Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques,,to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.htm1.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
7 7
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/w!p/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information: /
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):A/ a
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 7Y
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No ?
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
-' 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes
? _ No ?
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total ELEEEE?
Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
I)Age I I of 12
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. 4
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
a
Xl<II. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of W etland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No 2
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No)<
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No~Z
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our,website at
tltt?://h?ci - ?t??t;:.r- .?i,!r c_ etl n s. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
M- 0 4kl -T
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates -to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outsi_CJ?.e?. of the applicant's control)
rr
c_-3 .LLAI-t n,7/1sn, n?4 ?.c_?? l f1
I
/; ?/, -lb
Applicant/Agent's Signature ' Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
17
CWS
?, Carolina Wetland Services
October 28, 2005
Ms. Amanda Jones
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers no ma C
151 Patton Avenue
Asheville, NC 28801
Subject: Jurisdictional Delineation Report and Request for Verification
418 Hebron Street Site
Charlotte, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2005-1184
Dear Ms. Jones:
On behalf of Salvage America, Inc., Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) is requesting written
verification from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers of the extent of jurisdictional features on the
subject project. The 418 Hebron Street Site is located in Charlotte, North Carolina, approximately 0.40
mile west of the intersection of South Boulevard and Hebron Street (see location maps, enclosed).
Salvage America, Inc. has contracted CWS to provide a jurisdictional delineation report and request for
verification on this property.
Applicant Name: Salvage America, Inc., Mr. Chris Triolo
Mailing Address: 3001 Holts Chapel Road, Greensboro, NC 27401
Phone Number of Owner/Applicant: 336-215-5228 p [9
Street Address of Project: 418 Hebron Street, Charlotte, NC k 110
Waterway: Kings Branch JAN 3 2006
Basin: Catawba River (HU# 03050103)
City: Charlotte
UR
County: Mecklenburg lNET1ANDENR DS N0.S • ?I? '?AV'l o STOP pURTTa!M t?
Decimal Degree Coordinate Location of Project Site: N3517' 28.8", W80° 53' 12.4"
USGS Quadrangle Name: Charlotte West, Fort Mill-NC, dated 1996, Charlotte East, dated
1991 and Weddington, North Carolina, 1988
Methods
On October 24 and 25, 2005, CWS's Ron Johnson, WPTT delineated jurisdictional waters of the U.S.
within the project area. Jurisdictional areas were delineated using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) Routine On-Site Determination Method. This method is defined in the 1987 Corps of
Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.' Routine On-Site Data Forms representative of Wetlands AA
and BB and adjacent upland areas are enclosed.
Jurisdictional stream channels were classified according to USACE guidance. These classifications
included sampling with a D-shaped dip net, taking photographs, and defining approximate breakpoints
(location at which a channel changes classification) within each on-site stream channel. NCDWQ
'Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual", Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army
Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
CHARLOTTE: COLUMBIA CHAPEL HILL:
550 E WESTINGHOUSE BLVD. 322A SOUTHLAKE DRIVE, SUITE 3 88 VILCOM CIRCLE, SUITE 170
CHARLOTTE, NC 28273 LEXINGTON, SC 29072 CHAPEL HILL, NC 27514
704-527-1177 (v) 803-358-0102 (v) 919-932-2197 (v)
704527-1133 (fax) 803-358-9392 (fax) 919-932-2198 (fax)
W44W.CWS-1NC NET
f
October 28, 2005
Ms. Amanda Jones
Page 2 of 3
Stream Classification Forms and USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets representative of
Streams A - D have been enclosed.
Results
The results of the on-site field investigations conducted by CWS indicate that there are four potential
jurisdictional stream channels (Streams A - D) and two potential jurisdictional wetland areas
(Wetlands AA and BB) located within the property (Figure 1). Potential jurisdictional waters include
Kings Branch (Stream A) and unnamed tributaries to Kings Branch. Kings Branch is within the
Catawba River basin (HU# 030501032) and is rated "Class C waters" by the NCDWQ. Potential on-
site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. total approximately 0.84 acres (36,590 square feet), summarized as
follows:
Potential
Jurisdiction
Classification Approximate Length Aliproaimate
Ac e.., -
Stream A Perennial (Kings Branch 1,850 0.43
Stream B Perennial 240 0.03
Stream C Unimportant Intermittent 580 0.03
Stream D Unimportant Intermittent 250 0.02
Channel Subtotal: 2,920 0.51
Wetland AA Herbaceous 0.28
Wetland BB Forested 0.05
Wetland Subtotal: 033
On-Site Total: 2,920 0.84
Perennial Streams
Stream A (Kings Branch) and Stream B were evaluated to be perennial (SCP 1 and SCP2). These channels
exhibited average ordinary high water widths of 10-15 feet (Stream A) and 3-5 feet (Strewn B) and displayed
significant aquatic life, perennial flow, and diverse stream substrates. The average ordinary high water width
forthese streams ranged from 3-10 feet. DWQ Stream Classification scores were 49 and 34, respectively,
indicating perennial status. USACE Stream Quality Assessment scores were 49 and 40. There are
approximately 2,090 linear feet of Perennial stream channels within the property boundaries.
Intermittent Streams
Streams C and D were evaluated to be Unimportant Intermittent (SCP3). These channels exhibited
average ordinary high water widths of 2-3 feet, no aquatic life, no flow, and homogenous stream
substrates. Both channels are contiguous with on-site wetland areas. Streams C and D were similar in
characteristics and were represented with one data form taken on Stream C. Stream C rated 19 out of
70 on the DWQ Stream Classification Form and 42 out of 100 on the USACE Stream Quality
Assessment Worksheet. There are approximately 930 linear feet of Unimportant Intermittent stream
channels within the property boundaries. A photograph of Unimportant Intermittent Stream C has been
included as Photograph A.
2 "HU#" is the Hydrologic Unit Code. Hydrologic Unit Map, State of North Carolina U.S. Geological Survey. 1974.
October 28, 2005
Ms. Amanda Jones
Page 3 of 3
Wetlands
Wetland AA is a herbaceous wetland approximately 0.28 acre in size and is located within the existing
utility line right-of-way (Figure 3). Wetland AA is hydrologically connected to Unimportant
Intermittent Stream C. Dominant vegetation within Wetland AA includes jewel flower
(Impatiens capensis), arrowleaf tearthumb (Polygonum sagittatum), various sedges (Carex spp. ), straw
colored flatsedge (Cyperus strigosus), and soft rush (Juncos e„fusus). Wetland AA exhibited low
chroma soils (5Y 5/2), mottles (1 OYR 4/6), and saturation within the upper 12 inches of the soil profile.
A Routine On-Site Determination Form for these areas is enclosed (DP2). A Routine On-Site
Determination Form representative of on-site, non jurisdictional upland areas has been included (DP1).
A photograph of Wetland AA has been included as Photograph B.
Wetland BB is a forested wetland approximately 0.05 acre in size and is located in the southern portion
of the site (Figure 3). Wetland BB is contiguous with Unimportant Intermittent Streams C and D.
Dominant vegetation within Wetland BB includes jewel flower (Impatiens capensis), Chinese privet
(Ligustrum sinense), box elder (Acer negundo) andgreen ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica). Wetland BB
exhibited low chroma soils (5Y 4/2), mottles (1 OYR 4/6), and saturation within the upper 12 inches of
the soil profile. A Routine On-Site Determination Form for these areas is enclosed (DP3).
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 704-527-1177 or [e-mail] should you have any
questions or comments regarding this request.
Sincerely,
Gregg C. Antemann, PWS
Principal Biologist
Enclosures:
Ron G. Johnson, WPIT
Project Biologist
USGS Site Location Map
NRCS Mecklenburg County Soil Survey
Figure 1. Wetland Boundary Survey
Request for Jurisdictional Determination Form
Agent Certification of Authorization Form
NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms (SCP1- SCP3)
USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets (SCP1- SCP3)
Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms (DP 1- DP3)
Representative Photographs
cc: Mr. Chris Triolo, Salvage America, Inc.
Y-.U0X9mjeds=0Cr1171 142 acre Pope Road SdWD rmporNU Ledw.doo
October 28, 2005
Ms. Amanda Jones
Page 3 of 3
Wetlands
Wetland AA is a herbaceous wetland approximately 0.28 acre in size and is located within the existing
utility line right-of-way (Figure 3). Wetland AA is hydrologically connected to Unimportant
Intermittent Stream C. Dominant vegetation within Wetland AA includes jewel flower
(Impatiens capensis), arrowleaf tearthumb (Polygonum sagittatum), various sedges (Carex spp.), straw
colored flatsedge (Cyperus strigosus), and soft rush (Juncus e?fusus). Wetland AA exhibited low
chroma soils (5Y 5/2), mottles (1 OYR 4/6), and saturation within the upper 12 inches of the soil profile.
A Routine On-Site Determination Form for these areas is enclosed (DP2). ARoutine On-Site
Determination Form representative of on-site, non jurisdictional upland areas has been included (DPl).
A photograph of Wetland AA has been included as Photograph B.
Wetland BB is a forested wetland approximately 0.05 acre in size and is located in the southern portion
of the site (Figure 3). Wetland BB is contiguous with Unimportant Intermittent Streams C and D.
Dominant vegetation within Wetland BB includes jewel flower (Impatiens capensis), Chinese privet
(Ligustrum sinense), box elder (Acer negundo) and green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica). Wetland BB
exhibited low chroma soils (5Y 4/2), mottles (1 OYR 4/6), and saturation within the upper 12 inches of
the soil profile. A Routine On-Site Determination Form for these areas is enclosed (DP3).
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 704-527-1177 or [e-mail] should you have any
questions or comments regarding this request.
Sincerely,
C.
gg C. Antemann, PWS
Principal Biologist
Enclosures:
-10L??
Ron G. Johnson, WPTT
Project Biologist
USGS Site Location Map
NRCS Mecklenburg County Soil Survey
Figure 1. Wetland Boundary Survey
Request for Jurisdictional Determination Form
Agent Certification of Authorization Form
NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms (SCP1- SCP3)
USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets (SCP1- SCP3)
Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms (DP 1- DP3)
Representative Photographs
cc: Mr. Chris Triolo, Salvage America, Inc.
Y:12 WPn*cfs12005a-1171 142Aae Poplin Road SWJD mpoAVD Udw.doc'
Image Courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey
7.5 Minute Topographic Map Series, Charlotte West, Charlotte East,. Fort Mill and Weddington, North Carolina,
dated 1996, 1991, 1996 and 1988, respectively.
Approximate Scale P = 2000'
418 Hebron Street Site October 28, 2005
Jurisdictional Delineation Report and Request for Verification Protect No. 2005-1184
418 Hebron Street Site October 28, 2005
Jurisdictional Delineation Report and Request for Verification Project No 2005-1184
•?+? ? •IrBPO?•? ???`.?? S"? CuD'" ? ? ?, ??.. ? k i ? ee ? d? ?fi /{ M B,,`A"` { ?-. ?-Cti -
• ? MeD ^g?`egx' r? ??. r- J0 • *' 3 `'? `? Cl m ? i ? w ?l .c?' `_ 3 -, C s C
?? ?k'/rO?;r ? 3, ?v, ,? • ?,%4 eBZ O ? ? 4 CuB
spa, Me8
'f ••-.? \ ' ? - ` t eat ?' ir'' f 4. ii6 `- O s•:?O,L. 2lc-. s b i a: " i? Cfj t ?-? • _ - -
,3 ?" ..? n(? e0 Gu - .: .` ;` `• 1 Day
? /r eDf Y?° ! R, ,: .:r•' ??QP G ? ' CeB2.. /.-. ? k8 wlk6 ?,F ? '-t tq = -
i ? x Cub Ge _ s c• d ?. MµB ? „ -•k Cub t
?= ? ? ??(??, ? Ce 2 ie Z ? ???,1 GEQ2 a"+?°g ?? • `-` 1r Ce62 ? ? k? WkB <}}??c+ M d 2?`
,?+ -•x,,,,f - t_-. ,?- ? •$Xe62 CeD2 "° ?kljk ""?, `P??>" 1. ?.O~ '°?+ r ? /?
4 • K ??: ?/gym MO yk?M ? Y 9
,I:,uB. a?? '»O" x .? ?? F "! ?y MkB-C ?#G (\
7 a t`aMe e Fxa
' ,,,?xs"a x . .? • _ ? ? ? h . M„r ,rte pa
PIP
,
-?" " µa' Y O '? Qj •3' UB• 'VJk
? ? M o ? e6
Me8 `bL «"CeD2' O y/_9 ^CuB
•
?^ Uf W
PE
I - om
,. Me r ..: .• ,. . .. - } ,?' j,S a'y ? -w yrkE WkE
4
-MO _
V ;111: MeD . w, uD, : +. O CuD
>Jr ?? - -
C/i
1 ? MeD CeD2. 1 Ce8 c? ` C? -
t MeD Me MO% 1 r` +I n ':r WkB ,??Q MS m u ? ? -
ee C e CeB2;, t. e02 •-??'t w
PaE Ur MkB yVkB h W`1??? MO (? MkB
MeB ". '"` w m- y - _ -
Cu j t n. ?Y4e :
`?k i M? Z, Cub Ce82- WkD f} w WkB
Pa C? •Ce62 O?
i :DaB
K / m WkE Wk.D.. + CuB ??
U
?• a S paB ?', q O -CuD Mk MO
tip.' Ur d? Od MeD y s "CeD2 PaE
F MeD ?. c' WkB 3 m 0 / rrno-
e Y
}i.' s DaB ceg - CeD2 r7a /(1f Men CeB2
r' 4 PaE' yq?
DaB B
_ MeB Me6 0L P . CuB MO
MeD t M 00 Ir6
1 CUD CuB G0 a Wk6
C
CuB ?O uB GO` '- ?y0
` MO Ktri CeB2,
eB
,CeCeD2 L „t_ >- MeB ?',o
MeB eD PaE DaB \#. Wk6?. o?ry `?`?
?? CeB2 v
PaE CeD WkB
Od CeB2 CeD2 WkD O
Ire 3
' e Pt Ur CeB2 ` ?_ DaD M MO t
D a B . ' CeB2
erg MeD CeD2 L CuB' 63 WkB
a
-Me6 IrB Me6 IrA
MeB DaD i. .
* MeB DaB Ir8 1
„IrB
DaD O q
MeB 1\
MO?n Ur UL
c? IrR WkD MeD
MeS 4'
> ?- IrA DaB? IrA_
: MeB B IuB
'WkD MeD .mod 1IrA y?,.
MeD. 1?`\ \
?JVJ
;rB MeB i
J MO
?? c - s Ir8 y M0 CeD2' - -CeD2
m
IrA• 'a ^. ?O IrA, -' EnD
MeB Q f
0 0
[rA (p Ir
6 Ir
Me '? ,.r
!'--\1" { 1\ = ? y. q,..u (Q Eby: F /I r 1 na z %??.x CE62'
w4R
Soil Survey Courtesy of the USDA-NRCS
NRCS Soil Survey of Union County, North Carolina, Sheet Nos. 6, 7, 11 and 12, dated 1980.
Approximate Scale P = 2000'
LEGEND
JURISDICTIONAL STREAM CHANNEL
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREA
?•--?? PROPERTY BOUNDARY
UTILITY RIGHT OF WAY
100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN
SCP STREAM CLASSIFICATION POINT
DP DATA POINT
PHOTO LOCATION AND DIRECTION
TE SCALE: I"=200'

? z7i=

i
?t f 1 1
f i1
1
.,c
SOP 1
i
jwet? a 1
%:. !? SC P3 I.
f 0.28 acre i}
r Un?mp
j ?DP3 r
? Stream i
L \
,

/ r 1

i t ? ? Jff 1(/ f/\j
?
R
erennial Stream R
?k?
r16wtant Intermittent i ' W?tlanct-BB?
?Stream C - 580 If (0.04 acre) A5?4cre
Carolina Wetland Services
1? r "__ ?I r (;? 550 East Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
t t `tits
t

C
REFERENCE: GIS DATA PROVIDED BY MfECKLENBURG COUNTY G1S DEPARTSIENT, DATED
2002.

j DOTE: JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U-S. WERE DELINEATED, CLASSIF'ED, AND SURVEYED ;
USING A SUB-METER GPS UNIT BY CAROLINA ?t'ETLAND SERVICES, INC. (CWS) ON OCTOBER 25, 2005.
JL'RLSDICTIONAL FEATURES HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USAGE.

% 1,0
` NFeR ( Ir

f ,
Figure 1. Wetland Boundary Survey
418 Hebron Street Site
Charlotte, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2005-1184
CHECKED DATE
REQUEST FOR JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
DATE: October 28, 2005
COUNTY Mecklenburg County, North Carolina TOTAL ACREAGE OF TRACT 11 Acres
PROJECT NAME (if applicable) 418 Hebron Street Site
PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT (name, address and phone):
Salvage America, Inc.
POC: Mr. Chris Triolo, at [phone]
3001 Holts Chapel Road
Greensboro, North Carolina 27401
NAME OF CONSULTANT, ENGINEER, DEVELOPER (if applicable):
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
POC: Mr. Gregg C. Antemann, at [phone]
550 East Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
STATUS OF PROJECT (check one):
( ) On-going site work for development purposes
(X) Project in planning stages
(Type of project: industrial development )
( ) No specific development planned at present
( ) Project already completed
(Type of project:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED:
Check items submitted - forward as much information as is available. At a minimum, the following fast two items must be
forwarded.
(X) USGS 7.5-Minute Site Location Map
(X) NRCS Mecklenburg County Soil Survey
(X) Wetland Boundary Survey (Figure 1)
(X) Agent Certification of Authorization Form
(X) NCDWQ. Stream Classification Forms (SCP 1-SCP3)
(X) USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets (SCP 1- SCP3)
(X) Routine On-Site Data Forms (DP 1-DP3)
(X) Representative Photographs
2i,-- C
Signature of Property Owner or
Authorized Agent
Mr. Gregg C. Antemann
11401:2005 06:10 FAX. [phone] PAGE CONSTRUCTION
., .t '7 '_?05 4 'LPN
C
AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION
10 002
L Chriq Triolo, repro-seuting Salvage America. Inc., hereby certify that I have authorized
Gregory C. Antemann of Carolina wetland Services, Inc. ,co act on my behalf and take all
actions necessary to the processing, issuance-, and acceptance of this Jurisdictional
Delineation and any anal rill standard and special conditions attached.
We hereby certify that the above information submitted iti this application is true and
accurate to the best of our kaowiedge.
Applicant's signature
Agent's signature
10.2
Date
lv s OS?_
Date
Comptetiop of this form will allow the agent to sign All future application cormspeadence.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date' 10/25/2005 Project. 418 Hebron Street Site Latitude: N 35° 7' 28.8"
Evaluator RGJ Site: SCP1 Longitude: W 80° 53' 12.4"
Total Points: Other Perennial Stream A
County.
St earn is of feast intertn Rent 49 0 0 Mecklenburg
Xt 19 of perennial it z 30 e.g. Quad Name:
}
A. Geortiorph?y (Subtotal = .?1 * A6sent VStea{c Ntoderate Strong
__
-
13 Continuous bed and bank
- __- -
3,Q 1
0 + - ----------
1 ---•+-
2
- -
- 3
2. Sinuosity 2.01 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
----- ------
1 2,0
--- 0 1 2
- 3
- -
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting --
2,01 0 1 2
_ 3
5_ Activefrelic floodplain 3,01 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1

--------------------------------- + 1
i.
... 2

.._.._.............

. ... .,........ 3

......
7. Braided channel -
1.0 0 1 2 3
Recent alluvial deposits
$ 3.0 ;` ` 1
1 2 3
:._
..
-__......... ---•--•--•-••--- - - -
9' f?€atural levees
2.01 --- -
- - -

0
• •-
---- - - ----- .
--

1 ... - --------

----
_ 2 --•--- -
-
-
_
-10. Headcuts 2.0 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 1.51 0 0.5 1 '• 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainagev<fay 1.5 • 0 0.5 1 1.5
1 13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or MRCS map or other documented No= 0 Yes = 3
evidence. 3.01
" Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrolociy (Subtotal = 10.5 )
14. Groundwater flo-oddischarge 3,0
- - 0
--- `• 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or 0 1 2 3
Water in channel -- dry orrowin0 season
r _._......_ - - _... 3.0 1
.._....... -E..
- -
- ..
-------- ..--•------ ---+
'
16.l_eaflitter 1.5 1_ 0.5 0
•
17. Sediment on plants or debris 1.0 i- 0 - 0.5 1.5
1 18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 1.0 0 1 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hvdric soils iredoximortlhic featuresl mesent?i i 1 No= 0 Yes= 1. 5
C. Biology (Subtotal = 9.50 )
20". Fibrous roots in channel 3,0 3 2 1 0
1 21'. Rooted plants in channel 3.01 3 2 0
' - - _ __ - - - °.... - -- - --....................... +.
2? 2. Crayfish 1.41 ............. ........... -.... }.-.-.---•••••----••-•--••-• + - - -r...........
0 0.5 1- . ................. •3
1.5
23. Bivalves 0.01 0 1 2 3
r 24: Fish - T 1.01 0 0.5 1 - 1.5_
25. Amphibians
1 0.5 0 0.5
' 1
. 1.5
- - - - -- - -- .......... --_......... -...............
1 26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) .... ._...:•-- • ---- -_- -----
1,01 0 - ------
---------- --•.-----•----------- ........... -..
0.5 ........... ......
............
1 .....................
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
! 0,01
? 0 1 2
-
--- 3
------ •--•-•
...............................................................-.....-----.........................._.
128_ Iron oxidizing bacterlalfungus. .........__.
.
0.0': ....................
0 ..... ................................. --------------------------------- ---
-
-
-
0.5 9 `• 1.5
29- . Wetland plants in streambed 0.00 FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; 08L = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.

motes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: 10/25/2005 Project: 418 Hebron Street Site Latitude' N 35° 7' 28.8"
Evaluator- RGJ Site' SCP2 Longitude: W 80° 53' 12.4"
Total Points: Other Perennial Stream B
Sveamis of teest interrnfteri 34.00 Cu"' oMecklenburg e,g. Quad Atame:
if? 19 or Perennial if >_ 30
A. Geomorpholog?uatotat =
8 =) : Absent Weak h lV€oderate Strong
- -
-
13. Continuous bed and bank --}
3.0 0 1 - _ 2
_ y 3
2. Sinuosity 2 0 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure. riffle-pool sequence .
2.0 0 1 - 2
- 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrata sorting 2.0 0 1 2 3
5. Activelrelic floodplain 2,0 0 1 2 3
6, Depositional bars or benches 2.01 0 1 2 3 i
...................................................................................................•__..}.._..............................}._..._..._............._..._.....}............._..._"'___._........{.............__................._.7
.
...
.
....
..
.
7. Braided channel 0.0 0 2 3
i 8. Recent alluvial deposits 2.01
- - -- -- -- ............. --.............................
.
.
.
- 0 1
-
- 2
- ° -
-- - 3
;
9 Natural levees _...
.
.
..
0.0 .
_.--- --_....
0 .. _.. -
1 V 2
? 3
10. Headcufs 1.0; 0 _ 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0
5 i 0 . 0.5 1 : 1.5
_
--_-- -? _
. ? ? F
12. Natural valley or drainagey;ray 1.51 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or MRCS map or other documented No= 0 Yes = 3
evidence. 0.0 i
titan-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
8. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8.0 )
14. Groundwater flovj/discharge 2.01 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or l 0 1 2 3
Water in channel --dry orrovvinc season 2.0 i
--------
----
-
+
----
16. Leaflitter 1.51 ---• -.... ..
1.5 ............... .................
1 ........... --•-----------•- -
0.5 -•-.---• -
--
0
17. Sediment on plants or debris-- -?? 0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5
i$_ Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0.51
----------------- +_..- 0 i 0.5 1
----- ---------------------- --• ----------------------- -•----------------------- i
-........ _..__?_. 1.5 i
... _:
1 19. Hvdnc soils (redoximomhic features) bresent?t 5 i No = 0 Yes= 1-5
C. Biology (Subtotal -= - _840

------------- _
----- - --------- -
?- -
-_

............ ...._-...

... ....

.... - _.......

........ ...... __._.... •
.
20°. Fibrous roots in channel 3,0 3 2 1 3
i 21'. Rooted plants in channel 3.0 3
: 2
- .. ..
......... -... 1
.......... _ -- }- -- 0 i
-
_ _.....__.... - -- - - -...... ----..... ............ -
22. Crayfish -- -
0.51 - ....
0 ............ .
- ..
0.5 i 1 1.5
23_ Bivalves -? 0.01 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0
0 0 0.5 1 1.5
.
i 25_ Amphibians 0
51 0 0.5 1 1.5
.
_.................................................. -....... :._..._..._
26. Nlacrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 1.01 ._... -

0 ° _-_---- ------ ----- °------------- -------------

0.5 ---- .............
.._
1
_ -- - -+
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0.0 i 0 1 2 's 3 i
.
...
.
.....
._..___---_-__ _..
__
.__.._
__
_.
__--
'_-_........._......................--....--__-.._..-•.._....-.._.}............._..._......_.._..... }------ .------ ............. _......
___
--•-"--"..__.._... _..__
....................
..........
.
.
.
.
.....
.
.
'
28_ iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. }
..
.
0.0 0 0.5 1 1.5
29'. Wetland plants in streambed 0.00 FAG = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; CBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0. Other = 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.

Notes; (use back side of this form for additional notes.
) Sketch:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date. 10/25/2005 Project: 418 Hebron Street Site Latitude: N 35° 7' 28.8"
Evaluator. RGJ Site: SCP3 Longitude: W 80° 53' 12.4"
Total Points: Other Unimportant Intermittent
Stream is of least inferm;ftent County;
if? 19 or perennial if >:30 19.00 Mecklenbur e.g. Quad Name: Stream C
A. Georrmorpholog (subtotal=.... ---7.5 _-) --rt :Absent Zliieak moderate Strang
.... .......... }.......................... } •-
----} ---•••••-
_13 Continuous bed and bank 1.0 0 1 2 3
- - -
2. Sinuosity 1.0 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool
sequence 0.0i 0 1 2 3_ i
_
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 1.01 0 1 _ 2 3 - - }
5. Activelrelic €€oodptain 2.0 i 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0,0 i 0 1 ' 2 !• 3
:................._............................................................................................ -___}__-______-________-_-__-. --------------------------------- ................................. ------------------------------- }_-___-__-_--__ ---------------------------------
7. Braided channel 1.01 0 3 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 1.0 i
0
7
2
3
- --
9' Natural levees
0.01 -
-
-
0 - -
_
1

-
2 _ 3
_--:
_
_
10. l-feadcuts 0 0-- ? 0 1 _ 2 3
11. Grade controls 0.01 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainagevvay 0.51 0 0.5 - _w -1 1.5
13_ Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or MRCS map or other documented No= 0 Yes= 3
evidence. 0.0
z Evian-made ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 5.5
-
14. Groundwater floyddischarge
1
0
0
1
2
3
_
15. Water in channel and } 48 hrs since rain, or
'• .
i
!
0
1
2
3
LNater in channel -- dr
prowinc season
or l !
-
-
-----...
y
16. Leaflitter -

1.51

1.5

0.5
1 -_-_-•- ------
. __.- _-_-_---

0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0.5 i -
0 0.5 _ 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
- ---•-------- 0.0 ! ---------- _0.__..
------}- 0.5
_. ----___
- --- ---.--.._ _1...
-•- - 1.5---._-
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present?i _S l No = 0 Yes - 1. 5
C. Biology (Subtotal=
6.00 )
20 Fibrous roots in channel 3.01 3 2 1 0
21'. Rooted plants in channel 3.0 i 3 2 1 0
.............. ---- _
22. Crayfish 0,01 0 ----- -- - - } -
0.5 _.... -
1 1 _
1.5
23_ Bivalves 0.01 0 1 2 3
} 24. Fish 0.0 i 0 0.5 1 1.5
1 25_ Amphibians 0.01 0 0.5 1 1.5 '•
- - - ------------------------ ............................ ___ -
28. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) -:
0,01 - - - --------
0
0 5 .... _--•
1 ..................
?1
27. Filamentous algae-, periphyton 0.01
1 ... ..................................• •---.................--•-------•-------•...-_.............._.......--_. 0 1 ! '• 2 1 3
................................. ................................. ................................. .......................
Lii. Iron oxidizing bacterialtungus. 0.0 i 0 0.5 1 ! 1.5
i 29'. Wetland plants in streambed 0.001 FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
' Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland giants.

Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
OFFICE USE ONLY: USACE AID#
SCP1- Perennial Stream A
DWQ#
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

1. Applicant's. Name: Salvage America, Inc. 2. Evaluator's Name: Ron Johnson, WPIT
3. Date of Evaluation: 10-25-05 4. Time of Evaluation: 1:00 pm
5. Name of Stream: Kings Branch 6. River Basin: Catawba
7. Approximate Drainage Area: 220 acres 8. Stream Order: Fourth
9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 1,8501f 10. County: Mecklenburg
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): From downtown Charlotte, travel south on US 77 to
the Nations Ford Exit - Exit 4. Turn right off the exit and continue on Nations Ford Road to Hebron Street. The site is located at 418
Hebron Street, adjacent to a utility substation.
12. Site Coordinates (if known): N 35°7'28.8" W 80°53' 12.4"
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any): N/A
14. Recent Weather Conditions: no rain within the past 48 hours
15. Site conditions at time of visit: sunny 70 degrees
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 9.41 ac.
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map?(YE NO 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ?YE NO
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 20 % Ressiidenrial _% Commercial 20 % Industrial ??_% Agricultural
60 % Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
21. Bankfull Width: 10-15' 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 6-10'
23. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep "(>10(/1o)
24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight -Occasional Bends X Frequent Meander Very Sinuous -Braided Channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each
characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the
worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or
weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character
of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more
continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score
of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 49 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 46Ile6 6,
This channel evaluation form is in ded to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of
stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 05/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
SCP1- Perennial Stream A
ECOREGION POINT RANGE'

#
CHARACTERIS
ICS .
SCORE
T
Coastal Piedmont Mountain
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0-5 0-4 0-5
3
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 3
(extensive alteration= 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 3
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer. = max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-S
0-4
0-4
2
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
.?,
5 Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
3
? (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
U
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
2
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
Entrenchment / floodplain access:
0 = 5
0 - 4
0 - 2
2
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding= max points) .
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0- 6 0-4 0-2 1
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 3
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points}

10 Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
1
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)

11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
2
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)-
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-s 2
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)

13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
2
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks= max points)
14 Root depth and density on banks 0-3 0-4 0 - 5 2
(no visible roots= 0; dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact by agriculture or livestock production
0-5
0-4 °
5 '
0-
4
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points) 1
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0- 5 0-6 2
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)

Q

17 Habitat complexity

0-6

0-6

- 6
,
(little or no habitat= 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
Q
18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 - 5
0 - 5
4
x (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)

19 Substrate embeddedness`
NA*
0-4.
0-4
2
(deeply embedded.= 0; loose structure = max):

2Q Presence of stream invertebrates
0 -4
0 - 5
2
(no evidence = 0; common; numerous types = max points).

21 Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0 .4 .
1
0 (no evidence= 0; common, numerous types = max points)

0
22 Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
1
(no evidence= 0; common; numerous types = max points)

23 Evidence of wildlife use
0.-'6
0-5
0-5
1
(no evidence= 0;. abundant evidence --max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 49
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
._..._._..
_._.-...... ..._.._._..... _....... __........ .._... ..._.-.......... _......... __._.._.__._.... ...... -------.. _..... ..._...._..._---__...-..._...._......._...._........_...._...............
OFFICE USE ONLY: USACE AID# DWQ #
SCP2 - Perennial Stream B
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
1. Applicant's Name: Salvage America, Inc. 2. Evaluator's Name: Ron Johnson, WIT
3. Date of Evaluation: 10-25-05 4. Time of Evaluation: 1:30 pm
5. Name of Stream: Kings Branch 6. River Basin: Catawba
7. Approximate Drainage Area: 20 acres 8. Stream Order: First
9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 2401f 10. County: Mecklenburg
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): From downtown Charlotte, travel south on US 77 to
the Nations Ford Exit - Exit 4. Turn right off the exit and continue on Nations Ford Road to Hebron Street. The site is located at 418
Hebron Street, adiacent to a utility substation.
12. Site Coordinates (if known): N 35°7'28.8" W80053'12.4"
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any): N/A
14. Recent Weather Conditions: no rain within the past 48 hours
15. Site conditions at time of visit:-- sunny 70 degrees
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 -Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES ( If yes, estimate the water surface area:
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 20 % Residential _% Commercial 20 % Industrial Agricultural
60 % Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
21. Bankfull Width: 3-6' 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 5-7'
23. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight X Occasional Bends -Frequent Meander -Very Sinuous -Braided Channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each
characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the
worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or
weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character
of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more
continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score
of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 40 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature ADate tie) / ZGa-r-
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and oire vnvn mental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of
stream quality.. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 05/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
SCP2 - Perennial Stream B
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS SCORE
.
- Coastal Piedmont
_ Mountain
1
Presence of flow /persistent pools in stream 0-5 0-4 0-5 2
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 1
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
3
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical' discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
2
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)

5' Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
2
U (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)

v1
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
i
0
4
0'-4
0-2
2
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain'=max points) -
a Entrenchment / floodplain access
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 2
1
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)

8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
0 - 6
0-4
0-2
0
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)

9 Channel sinuosity

(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
0-5
0-4
0-3
3
10 Sediment input
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
0-5
0'- 4
0-4
1

11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
N
*
'

(fine; homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points) A 0-4 0-5 2

12 Evidence of channel incision or widening

(deeply incised= 0; stable bed & banks= max points) 0-5 0-4 0-5 2
0.4 13; Presence of major bank failures 0-5 0-5 0-5 2
F-i (severe erosion= 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)

14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0`-5
2
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact.by agriculture or livestock production
0

(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points) -5 0-4 0=5 4

16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes.
0-3
0-5
0-6
1
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
d
E" lZ Habitat complexity
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points) 0-6 0-6 0-6 2

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0 - 5
0-5
0 - 5
3

x no shading. vegetation = 0; continuous canopy max poirits)
=
(

19 Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0
4
0-4
1
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure ='max) 7 .

20 Presence of stream invertebrates
-

(no evidence 0; common, numerous types , max points), 0.-4 0-5 0
5 1

21 Presence of amphibians
0'- 4
0-4
0-4
1
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points) .

22, Presence offish
0- 4
0-4
0-4
1
(no evidence .= 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 1
(no evidence = 0 abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 40
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
OFFICE USE ONLY:
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
USACE AID#
DWQ#
SCP3 - Unimportant Intermittent Stream C
a
1. Applicant's Name: Salvage America, Inc. 2. Evaluator's Name: Ron Johnson, WPIT
3. Date of Evaluation: 10-25-05 4. Time of Evaluation: 2:00 pm
5. Name of Stream: Kings Branch 6. River Basin: Catawba
7. Approximate Drainage Area: 6 acres 8. Stream Order: First
9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 5801f 10. County: Mecklenburg .
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): From downtown Charlotte, travel south on US 77 to
the Nations Ford Exit - Exit 4. Turn right off the exit and continue on Nations Ford Road to Hebron Street. The site is located at 418
Hebron Street adiacent to a utility substation.
12. Site Coordinates (if known): N 35°7'28.8" W 80°53' 12.4"
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any): N/A
14. Recent Weather Conditions: no rain within the past 48 hours
15. Site conditions at time of visit: sunny 70 degrees
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES (!?) If yes, estimate the water surface area:
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 20 % Residential _% Commercial 20 % Industrial _% Agricultural
60 % Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
21. Bankfull Width: 2-3' 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 1-2'
23. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight X Occasional Bends -Frequent Meander -Very Sinuous -Braided Channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each
characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the
worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or
weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character
of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more
continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score
of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 42 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature ?&Ull Date /I &Z( &r
This channel evaluation form is inten d to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of
stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 05103. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
SCP3 - Unimportant Intermittent Stream C
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
SCORE`
CHARACTERISTICS
Coastal'-
Piedmont:`
Mountain ,
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0-5 0 -4 0-5 1
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
2
2 (extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0. 6 0-4 0-5 4
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
2
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)

5 Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
2
d (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4

0-2

3
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
a
7 Entrenchment 1 floodplain access
0-5
0'-4
0-2'
3
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0- 6 0-4 0-2. 2
(no wetlands= 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)

9 Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
3
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 2
(extensive deposition-- 0; little or no sediment = max points)

11 Size && diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*'
0-4
0-5
0
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0- 4 0-5 3
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)

i3 Presence of major bank failures
0-5 -
0-5
0-5
3
'a (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)

14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
3
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact by, agriculture or livestock production
0-5
0=4
0-5
4
(substantial impact =0; no evidence= max points)

16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
0
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed= max points)

17 Habitat complexity
0
6
0-6
0 - 6
1
(little or no habitat .= 0; frequent; varied habitats = max points) -

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
-
0-5"
0-5
0-5
3

x (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points),

19 Substrate embeddedness .
NA*
0-4
0-4
0
(deeply embedded= 0; loose structure = max)

20 Presence of stream invertebrates
"
0-4
0 - 5 .
0-5
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points) 1

21 Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
O (no evidence= 0; common, numerous types= max points)

O
22' Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types= max points)

23 Evidence of wildlife use
0
-6
0-5
0 - 5
1
(no evidences= 0 abundant. evidence = max points) ,
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 42
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
OFFICE USE ONLY:
t t
t ??1 t
USACE AID#
SCP1 - Perennial Stream A
DWQ#
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

1. Applicant's Name: Salvage America, Inc. 2. Evaluator's Name: Ron Johnson, WPIT
3. Date of Evaluation: 10-25-05 4. Time of Evaluation: 1:00 pm
5. Name of Stream: Kings Branch 6. River Basin: Catawba
7. Approximate Drainage Area: 220 acres 8. Stream Order: Fourth
9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 1,8501f 10. County: Mecklenburg
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): From downtown Charlotte, travel south on US 77 to
the Nations Ford Exit - Exit 4. Turn right off the exit and continue on Nations Ford Road to Hebron Street. The site is located at 418
Hebron Street, adiacent to a utility substation.
12. Site Coordinates (if known): N 35°7'28.8" W 80°53' 12.4"
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any): N/A
14. Recent Weather Conditions: no rain within the past 48 hours
15. Site conditions at time of visit: sunny- 70 degrees
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point?? J° NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 9.41 ac.
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? (D NO 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey?(D NO
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 20 % Residential % Commercial 20 % Industrial ??-% Agricultural
60 % Forested _% Cleared / Logged % Other
21. Bankfull Width: 10-15' 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 6-10'
23. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight -Occasional Bends X Frequent Meander Very Sinuous -Braided Channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each
characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the
worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or
weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character
of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more
continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score
of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 49 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature -- Date 116LZ6 Aar
This channel evaluation form is in ded to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of
stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 05/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
SCP1- Perennial Stream A
ECOREGION POINT RANGE

#
CHARAC
RISTICS .
SCORE
TE :;
- Coastal Piedmont 'Mountain

1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 3
(extensive alteration= 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0- 6 0- 4 0- 5 3
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer= max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
- 4
0
0-4
2
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points) `
a
5 Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4`
0-4
3
U (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
?.+
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
2
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
a
7 Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4

0-2

2
(deeply entrenched.= 0; frequent flooding = max points) .
8 Presence of adjacent' wetlands 0- 6 0-4. 0-2 1
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)

9 Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
3
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 . 0-4 1
(extensive deposition-- 0; little or no sediment = max points)

1L Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
2
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0 - 5 0-4 0-5 2
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)

13 Presence of major bank failures
0 -5
0-5
0-5
2
(severe erosion= 0; no erosion, stable banks= max points) .

14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3 '
0-4
0 - 5
2
F (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
U0 .

15
Impact by agriculture or livestock production
'

0-5

.0-4 '

0-5

4
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max
points)'

16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0 - 5
0 - 6
2
(no riffles/ripples or pools= 0; well-developed = max points)

17 Habitat complexity 0-6 0-6 0-6 3
? (little or no habitat= 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0 - 5
0 - 5
0 - S"
4
x (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)

19' Substrate embeddedness'
NA*
0 - 4
0 - 4
2
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)

20 Presence of stream invertebrates
0-4
0-5
0 - 5`
2
(no evidence = 0;. common, numerous types= max points)
Presence of amphibians
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types= max points)

O
22 Presence of fish
0-4
0-4-.
0-4
1
(no evidence = 0; common; numerous types = max points)

23 Evidence of.wildlife use
0 = 6
0-5
0 - 5
1
(no evidence = 0;.abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100- 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page), 49
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
OFFICE USE ONLY: USACE AID# DWQ #
SCP2 - Perennial Stream B
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
1. Applicant's Name: Salvage America, Inc. 2. Evaluator's Name: Ron Johnson, WPIT
3. Date of Evaluation: 10-25-05 4. Time of Evaluation: 1:30 pm
5. Name of Stream: Kings Branch 6. River Basin: Catawba
7. Approximate Drainage Area: 20 acres 8. Stream Order: First
9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 240 if 10. County: Mecklenburg
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): From downtown Charlotte, travel south on US 77 to
the Nations Ford Exit - Exit 4. Turn right off the exit and continue on Nations Ford Road to Hebron Street. The site is located at 418
Hebron Street, adiacent to a utility substation.
12. Site Coordinates (if known): N 35°7'28.8" W80053'12.4"
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any): N/A
14. Recent Weather Conditions: no rain within the past 48 hours
15. Site conditions at time of visit: sunny 70 degrees
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES (T) If yes, estimate the water surface area:
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 20 % Residential _% Commercial 20 % Industrial _% Agricultural
60 % Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
21. Bankfull Width: 3-6' 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 5-7'
23. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight X Occasional Bends -Frequent Meander -Very Sinuous -Braided Channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each
characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the
worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or
weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character
of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more
continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score
of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 40 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature -114 Date I?C)
This channel evaluation form is inten ed to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of
stream quality.. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 05/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
SCP2 - Perennial Stream B

#
CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE
SCORE

Coastal Piedmont` Mountain
I Presence of now / persistent pools in stream 0-5 0-4 0-5 2
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points).
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 1
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 3
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
2
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
.a
5" Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
2
(no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0
-4
0
-2
2
(no floodplain = O; extensive floodplain = max points)
; 1 1
a Entrenchment / floodplain access
0 - S
0 - 4
0 - 2
1
(deeply entrenched = 0• frequent flooding = max points)

8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
0- 6
0-4
0-2
0
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 3
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)

10 Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0 -4
1
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)

11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
2
(fine, homogenous=. 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)

12 Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
2
y+ (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)

13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
2
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points) -

14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
2
E? (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout= max points)

15 Impact by. agriculture or livestock production
0- 5
0-4
0-5
4
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)

16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool 'complexes .
0 - 3
0-5
0-6
1
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
Q
17 Habitat complexity
0 - 6
0 - 6
0 - 6
2
(little or no habitat= 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
,18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0 - 5
0 - 5
0 - 5
3
x (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)

19 Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-74
0 - 4
1
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure= max)

20 Presence of stream invertebrates
0-4
0 - 5 `
0 - S
1
(no evidence = 0• common numerous -
types.- max points)

21 Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
1
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)

O
22 Presence of fish
0-4
0 4
0-4
1
(no evidence= 0; common, numerous types = max points)

23 Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
1
(no evidence = 0 abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 40
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
1. Applicant's Name: Salvage America, Inc. 2. Evaluator's Name: Ron Johnson. WPIT
3. Date of Evaluation: 10-25-05 4. Time of Evaluation: 2:00 pm
5. Name of Stream: Kings Branch 6. River Basin: Catawba
7. Approximate Drainage Area: 6 acres 8. Stream Order: First
9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 580 If 10. County: Mecklenburg .
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): From downtown Charlotte, travel south on US 77 to
the Nations Ford Exit - Exit 4. Turn right off the exit and continue on Nations Ford Road to Hebron Street. The site is located at 418
Hebron Street, adiacent to a utility substation.
12. Site Coordinates (if known): N 35°7'28.8" W 80°53' 12.4"
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any): N/A
14. Recent Weather Conditions: no rain within the past 48 hours
15. Site conditions at time of visit: sunny 70 degrees
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES (5 If yes, estimate the water surface area:
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 20 % Residential -% Commercial 20 % Industrial _% Agricultural
60 % Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other
21. Bankfull Width: 2-3' 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 1-2'
23. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight X Occasional Bends -Frequent Meander -Very Sinuous -Braided Channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each
characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the
worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or
weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character
of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the'stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more
continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score
of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):
Comments:
Evaluator's Signature 2 yj=:n:1 Date- /O &. /03 -
This channel evaluation form is inter d to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of
stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 05/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
SCP3 - Unimportant Intermittent Stream C
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
# CHARACTERISTICS SCORE
Coastal Piedmont. Mountain

1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
1
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 2
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0- 6 0-4 0-5 4
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
2
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)

5 Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
2
U (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplain.
0-4
0-4
0-2
3
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
Cx Entrenchment / floodplain access
d
, entrenched = 0; frequent. flooding (
eeply =max. points)
8 . Presence of adjacent wetlands 0-6 0-4 0-2, 2
(no wetlands= 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9. Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
3
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max poin
ts)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 2
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)'

I 1 Size & diversity, of channel bed substrate
NA*'
0-4
0-5
0
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 3
>4 (deeply incised= 0; stable bed & -banks = max points)

i3 Presence of major bank failures
0 - S
0-5
0-5
3
a (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)

?
14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
3
(no. visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact; by agriculture or livestock production
0-5
,0-4
0=5 _
4
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 ` Presence'of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0 -3 0-5 - 0-6 0
(no riffles/ripples.or pools = 0; well-developed = Max points)
l Habitat complexity
0 - 6 "
0-6
0-6
1
(little or no habitat= 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
.0-5
0-5
3
x (no shading vegetation = 0;. continuous canopy = max points)

ri 9 Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0 - 4
0
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max) 1

20 Presence of stream invertebrates
0 - 4
0-5.
0-5
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)

21 Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
O (no evidence= 0; common, numerous types = max points)'

O
` 22' Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
(no evidence= 0; common, numerous types= max points).

23 Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
1
(no evidence .= 0, abundant; evidence= max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 , 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 42
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 418 Hebron Street Site Date: 10/25/05
Applicant/Owner: Salvage America, Inc. County: Mecklenburg
Investigator(s): Ron Johnson, N WIT State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: upland
is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: DPI
I
If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
1 Ligustrum sinense Stratum
tree Indicator
FAC Dom inant Plant Species tr t I dica or
9
2 Acer negundo tree FACW 10
3 Lonicera japonica vine FAC- 11
4 Liriodendron tulipifera tree FACU 12
5 Fraxinuspennsylvanica tree FACW 13
6 Platanus occidentalis tree FACW- 14
7 15
8 16
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
67%
Remarks:
re to than ° o
the dominant an s
pecies are F
AC or wetter.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits (on leaves)
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water. N/A (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: >12 (in.) ?- FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
dica s o wetland hydrology are p resent.
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 1 of 2 10/28/2005

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Monocan Drainage Class poorly drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic luva untic Ent ochre t Confine Mapped Type? Ye No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moistl (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-2 A 2.5Y 4/3 N/A N/A silt loam
2-12 B 2.5Y 4/4 N/A N/A silt loam
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (Inclusions)
Reducing Conditions -? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
No indicators of hydric soils are present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No (Circle
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No (Circle)
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
Data of i representative of a non-jurisdictional land area.
Approved by HQUSACE 2/92
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 2 of •2 10/28/2005
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 418 Hebron Street Site Date: . 10/25/05
Applicant/Owner: Salvage America, Inc. County: Mecklenburg
Investigator(s): Ron Johnson, WPIT State: . NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: DP2
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
1 Carex spp. at
herb Indicato
- Dominant Plant Species S turn Indica or
9
2 Juncus effusus herb FACW+ 10
3 Andropogon virginicus herb FAC- 11
4 Cyperusstrigosis herb FACW 12
5 Impatiens capensis herb FACW 13
6 Polygonum sagittatum herb OBL 14
7 15
8 16
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
80%
Remarks:
Greater than 50% of the do
minant plant s
pecies are FAC or wetter.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits (on leaves)
-? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
X Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) --X-Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: <12 (in.) _X_ FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: _
Indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 1 Of 2 10128/2005
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Monocan Drainage Class poorly drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic luva untic Eutrochre t Confirm Mapped Type? Yes(No)
Profile D riti n•
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moi stl (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-12 B 5Y 5/2 10YR 4/6 many/ silt
N/A prominent
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (Inclusions)
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
-T_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Indicators of hydric soils are presen t
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Ye No (Circle)
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Ye No
Remarks:
Data point is representative of a jurisdictional wetland area
Approved by HQUSACE 2/92
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 2 Of 2 10/28/2005
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 418 Hebron Street Site bate: 10/25/05
Applicant/Owner: Salvage America, Inc. County: Mecklenburg
Investigator(s): Ron Johnson, WPIT State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: DP3
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant 2p c'
1 Impatiens capensis Stratum Indicator
herb FACW Dominant Plant Species Stratum In icator
9
2 Ligustrum sinense tree FAC 10
3 Acernegundo tree FACW 11
4 Fraxinus pennsylvanica tree FACW 12
5 13
6 14
7 15
8 16
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
100%
Remarks:
tote dominant plant s
pecies are AC or wetter.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
-Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits (on leaves)
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0-1 (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
X Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) _-K-Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: <12 (in.) ?- FAC-Neutral Test
- Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland 4drology are present.
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 1 of 2 10/28/2005
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Monocan Drainage Class poorly drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic Fluva untic Eutrochre t Confirm Mapped Type? Ye No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moistl (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-2 A I OYR 3/2 N/A N/A silt loam
2-12 B 5Y 4/2 10YR 4/6 few/ sandy silt loam
prominent
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
-? Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (Inclusions)
Reducing Conditions ?-Listed on National Hydric Soils List
?- Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Indicators of h dri it are present,
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Ye No (Circle)
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Ye No
Remarks
at int i representative of a jurisdictional wetland area
Approved by HQUSACE 2192
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 2 Of 2 10128/2005
.4 18 IJebron Street Site October 28, 2005
Jurisdictional t)elineation Report and Request for Verification Project No. 2005-1184

Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
06?'
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)

I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project*
Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s). Requested: N??wn t?)?.? c 3
pry µ?-? aoo531 y 9 3
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Managemean
_ Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), c
D
H. Applicant Information JAN ?3 2006
1. Owner/Applicant Informafon o?rr?-wATt?oAt?A?w
Name•? r Gh ) r o D u p stORMW
Mailing Address: C n1' n u? + , t_ L
(Sr e-
42 311 P r\ ?e-
G1?A ?'p L AL D
A-An 4r r%/ P64C- Tr o
Telephone Number: ' - 5z? Fax Number: 33G' ?a6 -/4t -13
E-mail Address:- -r c" i y( e> C, G c. r-k t i A K Adc--
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Page 5 of 12
M. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1, Name of proj
Le,\ -31-rv4
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
<L?ar'!at-1:,_ NG a.8'??3
4. Location
County: ?k?\ e-n by r- ! , Nearest Town: 4:?:k G. ric?'t't L
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): i2tc- Se e.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.).<e e- A
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): ON °W
6. Property size (acres): I e D " 6.-- (` ,-S,
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: N-OA C'N E
8. River Basin: C . t?'lsv.
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at littp://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/neaps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
aloe time of this application: 7h i -n, 1 r? ( ?z ????s? c-? •??
-?17 -a\ ) L.. ,I- 1 G .. _Q i <1 r-- d.l rY /?1 I ?? ?Ll rani .
Page 6 of 12
La>\Srrv??
9.,-'v 10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
6L ,e1LI J? 2-- C7z:>o Ff le .,.A 4? ` 4 0. GoI?Gr" ?'
' -.e- Lu I V4x-ts j'a be- th 1 l , 42nky S Syr ?t?t tl? s 70
He-&v ty a cf u , p n-Ne-vi t I\ be. c>s4ak e--;a ee • eW?-p
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: g Rr, V t?uj 4
IV. Prior Project History
V.
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. 4? e. c? C r c n?tl y c ?? ?? h 1?. *r x
,a
Future Project Plans

Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and rovide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
?L? 1 t 1 ,-J ek? G 1 1 k 1? F I
(?,a?C/dD canGr?'tL,?
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet. n
1. Provide a written descri tion of the proposed impacts: S e> ? c- e-??.r t' e,, e+,_?X
t
-A AA.a1'_I nf e-- , -rz-i ?n,fV, 4i. as an
r. PlAJ'
cre-
Page 7 of 12
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
senarately list imnacts due tn hoth Onieture and flnndino
Wetland Impact
Site Number

(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, m

herbaceous, bo , etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
es/no Distance to
Nearest
Stream
linear feet Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: •®`? l? u. i_ 5
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. ` Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening; etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate aereaee_ multinlv length X width. then divide by 43:560_
Stream Impact
Number
indicate on ma
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or

Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
linear feet Area of
Impact
acres

r& eZ r

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) fi
4
5.
Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill vvravatinri AroArr/ncr flnnAinr Arainanr+ tm,ltrt,PnAo -fn
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc. Area of
Impact
acres

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
Page 8 of 12
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the vroiect:

Stream Imp act (acres):
Wetland Impact acres :
Open Water Impact acres :
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
Total Stream Impact (linear feet):
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ? No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques,,to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands o? greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams. A I /
Page 9 of 12
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://112o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stmigide.htm1.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/Nvrp/index.htni. If use of the NCEEP is pro osed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): _
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (fedeml/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No El _
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify V Yes ? No ?
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone" Impact Multiplier Required
(square feet Mitigation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
' Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
Page 11 of 12
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. A 1 4n
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of P? tland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No 9
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No)<
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No-.Kl
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
htt://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/iicwetlands. If n11o,--please pr vide a short narrative description: Ih
C__
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control):
`1.11-lb
. Applicaut/Agent's Signature 'irate
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
CWS
Carolina Wetland Services
October 28, 2005
U.S F T
Ms. Amanda Jones
U.S. Arm Corps s of Engineers ??„i)) ?uuuoUUUj % 151 Patton Avenue
Asheville, NC 28801
Subject: Jurisdictional Delineation Report and Request for Verification
418 Hebron Street Site
Charlotte, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2005-1184
Dear Ms. Jones:
On behalf of Salvage America, Inc., Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) is requesting written
verification from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers of the extent of jurisdictional features on the
subject project. The 418 Hebron Street Site is located in Charlotte, North Carolina, approximately 0.40
mile west of the intersection of South Boulevard and Hebron Street (see location maps, enclosed).
Salvage America, Inc. has contracted CWS to provide a jurisdictional delineation report and request for
verification on this property.
Applicant Name: Salvage America, Inc., Mr. Chris Triolo
Mailing Address: 3001 Holts Chapel Road, Greensboro, NC 27401 0 r=
Phone Number of Owner/Applicant: 336-215-5228 (?•" D
Street Address of Project: 418 Hebron Street, Charlotte, NC D
Waterway: Kings Branch JAN '3 2006
Basin: Catawba River (HU# 03050103)
City: Charlotte WET1ANDSAND TORMlATERBRANCH
County: Mecklenburg
Decimal Degree Coordinate Location of Project Site: N35° 7' 28.8", W80° 53' 12.4"
USGS Quadrangle Name: Charlotte West, Fort Mill-NC, dated 1996, Charlotte East, dated
1991 and Weddington, North Carolina, 1988
Methods
On October 24 and 25, 2005, CWS's Ron Johnson, WPI T delineated jurisdictional waters of the U.S.
within the project area. Jurisdictional areas were delineated using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) Routine On-Site Determination Method. This method is defined in the 1987 Corps of
Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.' Routine On-Site Data Forms representative of Wetlands AA
and BB and adjacent upland areas are enclosed.
Jurisdictional stream channels were classified according to USACE guidance. These classifications
included sampling with a D-shaped dip net, taking photographs, and defining approximate breakpoints
(location at which a channel changes classification) within each on-site stream channel. NCDWQ
'Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual", Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army
Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
CHARLOTTE: COLUMBIA: CHAPEL HILL:
550 E MS77NGHOUSE BLVD. 322A SOUTHLAKE DRIVE, SUITE 3 88 VILCOM CIRCLi~ SUITE 170
CHARL0771Z NC 28273 LEXINGTON, SC 29072 CHAPEL HILL, NC 27514
704-527-1177 (v) 803-358-0102 (v) 919-932-2197 (v)
704-527-1133 (fax) 803-358-9392 (fax) 919-932-2198 (fax)
WVW..CWS-1NC.NET
October 28, 2005
Ms. Amanda Jones
Page 2 of 3
Stream Classification Forms and USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets representative of
Streams A - D have been enclosed.
Results
The results of the on-site field investigations conducted by CWS indicate that there are four potential
jurisdictional stream channels (Streams A - D) and two potential jurisdictional wetland areas
(Wetlands AA and BB) located within the property (Figure 1). Potential jurisdictional waters include
Kings Branch (Stream A) and unnamed tributaries to Kings Branch. Kings Branch is within the
Catawba River basin (HU# 030501032) and is rated "Class C waters" by the NCDWQ. Potential on-
site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. total approximately 0.84 acres (36,590 square feet), summarized as
follows:
Potential
Jurisdiction
Classification Approximate Length Approximate
Acreage
Stream A Perennial (Kings Branch 1,850 0.43
Stream B Perennial 240 0.03
Stream C Unimportant Intermittent 580 0.03
Stream D Unimportant Intermittent 250 0.02
Channel Subtotal: 2,920 0.51
Wetland AA Herbaceous 0.28
Wetland BB Forested 0.05
Wetland Subtotal: 033
On-Site Total: 2,920 0.84
Perennial Streams
Stream A (Kings Branch) and Stream B were evaluated to be perennial (SCP 1 and SCP2). These channels
exhibited average ordinary high water widths of 10-15 feet (Stream A) and 3-5 feet (Stream B) and displayed
significant aquatic life, perennial flow, and diverse stream substrates. The average ordinary high water width
for these streams ranged from 3-10 feet. DWQ Stream Classification scores were 49 and 34, respectively,
indicating perennial status. USACE Stream QualityAssessment scores were 49 and 40. There are
approximately 2,090 linear feet of Perennial stream channels within the property boundaries.
Intermittent Streams
Streams C and D were evaluated to be Unimportant Intermittent (SCP3). These channels exhibited
average ordinary high water widths of 2-3 feet, no aquatic life, no flow, and homogenous stream
substrates. Both channels are contiguous with on-site wetland areas. Streams C and D were similar in
characteristics and were represented with one data form taken on Stream C. Stream C rated 19 out of
70 on the DWQ Stream Classification Form and 42 out of 100 on the USACE Stream Quality
Assessment Worksheet. There are approximately 930 linear feet of Unimportant Intermittent stream
channels within the property boundaries. A photograph of Unimportant Intermittent Stream C has been
included as Photograph A.
2 "HU#" is the Hydrologic Unit Code. Hydrologic Unit Map, State of North Carolina U.S. Geological Survey. 1974.
October 28, 2005
Ms. Amanda Jones
Page 3 of 3
Wetlands
Wetland AA is a herbaceous wetland approximately 0.28 acre in size and is located within the existing
utility line right-of-way (Figure 3). Wetland AA is hydrologically connected to Unimportant
Intermittent Stream C. Dominant vegetation within Wetland AA includes jewel flower
(Impatiens capensis), arrowleaf tearthumb (Polygonum sagittatum), various sedges (Carex spp.), straw
colored flatsedge (Cyperus strigosus), and soft rush (Juncus effusus). Wetland AA exhibited low
chroma soils (5Y 5/2), mottles (1 OYR 4/6), and saturation within the upper 12 inches of the soil profile.
A Routine On-Site Determination Form for these areas is enclosed (DP2). A Routine On-Site
Determination Form representative of on-site, non jurisdictional upland areas has been included (DP 1).
A photograph of Wetland AA has been included as Photograph B.
Wetland BB is a forested wetland approximately 0.05 acre in size and is located in the southern portion
of the site (Figure 3). Wetland BB is contiguous with Unimportant Intermittent Streams C and D.
Dominant vegetation within Wetland BB includes jewel flower (Impatiens capensis), Chinese privet
(Ligustrum sinense), box elder (Acer negundo) and green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica). Wetland BB
exhibited low chroma soils (SY 4/2), mottles (1 OYR 4/6), and saturation within the upper 12 inches of
the soil profile. A Routine On-Site Determination Form for these areas is enclosed (DP3).
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 704-527-1177 or [e-mail] should you have any
questions or comments regarding this request.
Sincerely,
Gregg C. Antemann, PWS Ron G. Johnson, WIT
Principal Biologist Project Biologist
Enclosures:
USGS Site Location Map
NRCS Mecklenburg County Soil Survey
Figure 1. Wetland Boundary Survey
Request for Jurisdictional Determination Form
Agent Certification of Authorization Form
NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms (SCPl - SCP3)
USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets (SCPI - SCP3)
Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms (DP 1- DP3)
Representative Photographs
cc: Mr. Chris Triolo, Salvage America, Inc.
Y:WWVr*ds=5-1171 142 Me Poplin Road SWD mpotUD LeWdoc
October 28, 2005
Ms. Amanda Jones
Page 3 of 3
Wetlands
Wetland AA is a herbaceous wetland approximately 0.28 acre in size and is located within the existing
utility line right-of-way (Figure 3). Wetland AA is hydrologically connected to Unimportant
Intermittent Stream C. Dominant vegetation within Wetland AA includes jewel flower
(Impatiens capensis), arrowleaf tearthumb (Polygonum sagittatum), various sedges (Caret spp. ), straw
colored flatsedge (Cyperus strigosus), and soft rush (Juncos e„f'usus). Wetland AA exhibited low
chroma soils (5Y 5/2), mottles (10YR 4/6), and saturation within the upper 12 inches of the soil profile.
A Routine On-Site Determination Form for these areas is enclosed (DP2). A Routine On-Site
Determination Form representative of on-site, non jurisdictional upland areas has been included (DP1).
A photograph of Wetland AA has been included as Photograph B.
Wetland BB is a forested wetland approximately 0.05 acre in size and is located in the southern portion
of the site (Figure 3). Wetland BB is contiguous with Unimportant Intermittent Streams C and D.
Dominant vegetation within Wetland BB includes jewel flower (Impatiens capensis), Chinese privet
(Ligustrum sinense), box elder (Acer negundo) and green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica). Wetland BB
exhibited low chroma soils (SY 4/2), mottles (I OYR 4/6), and saturation within the upper 12 inches of
the soil profile. A Routine On-Site Determination Form for these areas is enclosed (DP3).
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 704-527-1177 or [e-mail] should you have any
questions or comments regarding this request.
Sincerely,
C .
regg C. Antemann, PWS
Principal Biologist
Enclosures:
USGS Site Location Map
NRCS Mecklenburg County Soil Survey
Figure 1. Wetland Boundary Survey
_4?L?
Ron G. Johnson, WPIT
Project Biologist
Request for Jurisdictional Determination Form
Agent Certification of Authorization Form
NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms (SCPI - SCP3)
USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets (SCP1- SCP3)
Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms (DP 1- DP3)
Representative Photographs
cc: Mr. Chris Triolo, Salvage America, Inc.
Y:120DSWrojedW005-1171 142 Aae Popfn Road SWD mporND Lo doc
Image Courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey
7.5 Minute Topographic Map Series, Charlotte West, Charlotte East,. Fort Mill and Weddington, North Carolina,
dated 1996, 1991, 1996 and 1988, respectively.
Approximate Scale P = 2000'
418 Hebron Street Site October 28, 2005
Jurisdictional Delineation Report and Request for Verification Project No. 2005-1184
418 Hebron Street Site October 28, 2005
Jurisdictional Delineation Report and Request for Verification Protect No 2005-1184
ieD
3 a Me6 Ir6 4 f yy ' Cu[r" ? E c / + it e , M Bad c , ' ` > ?? S?`
?rt 7 t MeD r r ??$' jai ? '?O f rt f? PO z- 4s:t s t? ya i? a G?
'ty O ?tk8. S?i?' e c ? G .+t?t`. ? V0 , Z 2 ^` ? _ A _
rr ?yr>".i s? r i•0 r-?. h- .'t ^?rCe Z:, Q ,? 't C;uB CuB _ ;V _ --
e
Mk8 ' s? CuD r t pa } jp lxk MeB q r.
c' b w' M t
rh'? \ yl? .,r, .N[e$t „ f s-tie-c3- •..•+ ? v0 e' ' i?'y F•. .?. ? ?; 't CuD? .?- _
3c,,:_... «,,' ?,-..- .x.,.f•.°• Dad ?e0 G :Y fy , ...
?i??e 4 ~ { a `r`, CC `?OO(? ?eG Qa ? CeB2 ? aw k6• Mks, - ? ?
` i? W f, O ?? GeO? ? ,? W, K$ '? 7 rl m 'tis mot{ S
ry e , Ce 2/ 2 ?Cu6 e Y 9 F>\ !1 " t w CUB Y MS ' '
rev Z CeB2 a? t e't i
CeB2 CWD2
k ?'? w •?? \,s,.q Sri _
P4
SrXex o `? MkB '
#c +'s ??: MO /7 ep?i ?g _E.uB `'?' ?'? ?`,_ ?` Ck0 f ` M• .: ? ? _
' :Q, 34 /., 4 ? r' ?J ?? 9wr.. . !'q r??,? l fl. ? ?' ?B rti+?" Pa? 3 •'?
{ ?@ ? r? rC } tf;t ?r x WkB G • E Y '
"?.. `"..Ye. W y tr- U ` o x •,+. La's s ? ?;4 w -° - -
k? "1 •, Mk6 i• MeB . 4t-„ ., ? o ?,, f?%~? ??k r ?- ep2 4- -
Ur t, s r`
-n
K: p t z, 3
ia_ 4 - -. •k6 r e
:.. Ge: Y Oi ^' WR
\O U6 '"
t ?aE sn ,nr? a rz : .rye 0 -d c0 _.
B n CeB2 e
Me * .'f m?" xCeD2, y OMe6 ,, dL y =u; WkB -
Me8 ?,°i 1 ti PaE" ?`9 Ur w Cu8 a 'l win`
.Q Me 1-? r {t t,. ? '.I ` tIt ..WkE WkE -? { v? ? r =
MO l MeD ' 1 W uD? : _ . ?. O CuD
s.? 1..n - 1? '?"'•.MeO - 4 CeD2J; 4 ,1Jr 'mom .' Cu ; :-
e( MeD CeB c
-'rMO e9 a WkB .;?
` lie6 2 CeB
K Od9 .14 ° PaE Ur MkB tiYkQ W ?µ? MOM U MkB
.??- f ?? Me6 ' eD Q w +a~ yPt , Cu t ??e
t r' e e?2 3 M Cu8 .CeB2.. WkB
r- .db` Pe O 21 - WkD F w F
w CeB2 O
?. fC, - ?.DaB m WkE Wk O ? Cu8 ? 1
rp' Uri Dab I O ?u G paB MeD ! U y??? s CuD ' Mk8 Mk MO 3?
? ? MeD ?. WkB ' 3 •CeC2 ' PaE ? ?. -
w. m Q
?:' ,' Dab cP6 CeD2 ?, !? MeB CeB2. \? _ kO
?.. f q
MeB \ MeB DaB QL e' CuB, Q MO tr6 ?_
-- MeD 5 e ( M CuD? Cub G? Ge Wkb `-
?` ltitt9/ O Cu8
M0 CeB2 Cub O GQ ?- ?e0
}M e6 l?,CeD2 S t'
MeB A
MeB MeD PaE DaB \ Wk8?. ew l?a
e0 , - CeB2 ' o V? ,
PaE CE! WkB -
? w a ?Od Ce82 CeD2: t WkD O i
Y
kk 6. x
e Pt Ur CeB2 DaD M MO IrB 3 Ir8
DaB. Cee?
MeD 'Ce02 Cu8' 63 ?? WkB
1r[B MeB
' MeB i IrA ?.
Meb DaD
s - - Ir8 -
4.r r MeB DaB M
t\ Ir8 ?•>
- DaD w 0
' MeB` MOUr UUL
4 ` WkD%, MeD
?? Ir8 McB
IrA Dab IrA
MeB B IuB ". -'t..
I rA
a! MeB
WkD MeD
MeD
IrB :,;:
0 M 0 r /??
r,: F Ir8 MO CeDZ CeD2
MeB IrA D ?O IrA y - EnD w
#? IrA II'0 Ur _ --
QI Ir8 Ir (??
'?C`Me.. (Q ?0r { /! e + %ni?R 1 a?' ..Ce82`,
` Soil Survey Courtesy of the USDA-NRCS
NRCS Soil Survey of Union County, North Carolina, Sheet Nos. 6, 7, 11 and 12, dated 1980.
Approximate Scale P= 2000'
LEGEND
• JURISDICTIONAL STREAM CHANNEL
f
JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREA
°
PROPERTY BOUNDARY

UTILITY RIGHT OF WAY
100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN
SCP STREAM CLASSIFICATION POINT
DP DATA POINT
PHOTO LOC
ATION AND DIRECTION
APPROXIMATE SCALE: I"=200'

NOTE: JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S. StiTRE DELINEATED. CLASSUMM, AND SL'RVEYED
USING A SUB-SIETER GPS UNIT BY CAROLINA WETLANM SERVICES, INC. (CWS) ON OCTOBER 25, 2005.
JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES HAVE NOT BEEN MHEED BY TILE USACE.
t _

1 \ 1 r'
Perennial Stream A `r SC 2 Id,
i!= 850 erennial Stri
TM -
1 240 If
Scp
_..• `' ?t11/ ?? F ? ... ref ? ? ?`??/? /?° \ ??!
/
--D P
Wetland
*i -- ?? /'.mss 0.28 ai
Unimportant Intermittent
r
?- Stream C - 5801f (0.04 acre),,`
?--=-
M It
portant Interrr?itterif
?-
UnimStream D'(- 250 If'(0.03'acr`e
77
JVlletland?-BB t'
! 0.0
-kcre
f,l( t
,,am B\
? (I
Carolina Wetland Services
C1 550 East Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
REFERENCE: GIS DATA PROVIDED BY \SECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT, DATED
2002.
Figure 1. Wetland Boundary Survey
418 Hebron Street Site
Charlotte, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2005-1184
P PARE Y DA E CHECKED DATE
6 (? 2G (oS ?,?,e ro zs u?
REQUEST FOR JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
DATE: October 28.2005
COUNTY Mecklenburg County, North Carolina TOTAL ACREAGE OF TRACT 11 Acres
PROJECT NAME (if applicable) 418 Hebron Street Site
PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT (name, address and phone):
Salvage America, Inc.
POC: Mr. Chris Triolo, at [phone]
3001 Holts Chapel Road
Greensboro. North Carolina 27401
NAME OF CONSULTANT, ENGINEER, DEVELOPER (if applicable):
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
POC: Mr. Gregg C. Antemann, at [phone]
550 East Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte. NC 28273
STATUS OF PROJECT (check one):
( ) On-going site work for development purposes
( X ) Project in planning stages
(Type of project: industrial development )
( ) No specific development planned at present
( ) Project already completed
(Type of project: )
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED:
Check items submitted - forward as much information as is available. At a minimum, the following fast two items must be
forwarded.
(X) USGS 7.5-Minute Site Location Map
(X ) NRCS Mecklenburg County Soil Survey
(X) Wetland Boundary Survey (Figure 1)
(X) Agent Certification of Authorization Form
(X) NCDWQ.Stream Classification Forms (SCP1-SCP3)
(X) USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets (SCP 1- SCP3)
(X ) Routine On-Site Data Forms (DPI-DP3)
(X) Representative Photographs
C.
Signature of Property Owner or
Authorized Agent
Mr. Gregg C. Antemarm
11/U1/ZUU5 UU:1U YA3 133099ULJUU rA(>h C:UNbTKUVfiUN
AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION
wl uuz
lip )Ij0V r- ..
I, Chris Triola, represeuting Salvage America, Inc., hereby certify tizit I have authorized
Gregory C. 4nternann of Carolina Arctland Services, In%. to act on my behalf and take all
actions necessary to the processing, issuance, and acceptance of this Jurisdictional
DeLs?eation and ary and ull strndard and special conditions attached.
We hereby certify that. the above information submittal in this application is true and
accurate to tho best of our knowledge.
&4?? ? - ?
Applicant's signstlr<e
Agent's siSn turc
1© 2
I?atc
_lu s D
Date
Compkdon of dais fury will allow the ageat to sign All future application correspoodence.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: 10/25/2005 Project: 418 Hebron Street Site Latitude: N 35° 7' 28.8"
Evaluator: RGJ Site' SCP1 Longitude: W 80° 53' 12.4"
Total Points: Other Perennial Stream A
Steam is of ieesf intertn Rent County;
if 2: 19 or perennial if z aft L9. 0 MCCklenbur e.g_ Quad Name:
A. Georrto phholog
(subtota3..... :Q,.Q_} bsenf Stiieak Moderate Strong :
_
13 Continuous bed and bank ??, --, -- -- 3.01 0 _ 1 - - 2 3
2. Sinuosity 2.01 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure. riffle :pool sequence 2
0 0 1 2 3
. _
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 2,01 0 1 2 3
5. Activeirelic €Eoodplain 3,01 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 3.01 0 '•
.. 1 '
+ 2 1 3
?
.............
............................................•-----......._..............._......._.._.............
. Braided channel .. + ......
7
1.01
.. .......0.........
. .....?........
_....--;?---•------
....
-----
...........2_...
...........?--...._..-•----•3----•---••-•---
8. Recent alluvial deposits 3.01 0 1 2 3
--- •-------------•----- - - --••------.................................. __.._. --
9 ? Natural levees 2.O

- -- - -
0 ---- - - - - -
1 2 - -•-- ----. ..... -....
3- '•
--?
10. Headcuts -- - 2.01 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 1.51 0 0.5 1 1.5
12_ Natural valley or drainagevmy 1.51 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or N€ZCS map or other documented No= 0 Yes = 3
evidence. 3.01
" frlan-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _ 10.5
14. Groundwater flovWdischarge 3.01 0 1 l
- 2
- 3
1 15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or - l
0 1 t 2 3
Water in channel -- d or rowin season 3.01
..............._...._......_.._..__.._.._.__....._____._____._-._.._.........__._......_......... ........... _....... -------- - _-._ __..__.. .__ ____ ___. --------- --- __ _ .... ......
16. Leaflitter 1.0i 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris --_- 1.01 0 0.5 1 1-5
18. Organic debris lines or piles OvVrack lines) 0 1 0.5 1 1
-------- ----•--- •------ +-------------- --------
------------- - -- -- -
---------..:.. 1.5 i
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present?1.51 _
No= 0 Yes= 1. 5
C. Biology (Subtotal = 9.$0 }
- :: ------------------ --------------------- .......... ........

20°. Fibrous roots in channel
I .............

3.01 .... ........... -....

3 _------------ -- ----------- ----

2 ---- ----- ------ ---

1 --------- ----- - - --------
-
0
21`. Rooted plants in channel 3.01 3 2 1 1 0
-----------
22. Crayfish
-?- ---------+-------------------------- ------------
1.0 0 0.5 ------- -- --......... * .......
1 _ .............
1.5
23. Bivalves 0.01 0 1 2 3
-24 Fish 1.01 0 0.5 1 1.5
1 25. Amphibians 0.5 1 ? 0.5 1.5
----•-•--• _ ._....

1 26. Maacrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) - -_ -
-
--------
1.01 0

0.5

1

1.5 - _,
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
' 0.01 0 '• 1 1 2 1 3
'
• ..............•---••----..._..................................--.---------•---•--..._..........__.......
1 28_ Iron oxidizing bacteriaffungus. .....__...+-
0.01 •-•-•---_-------. ----
0 -------.............
1 .._........._.......}._....................
0.5 1 1 ...........j...---..-.-•---••---•----•--••--•-
1.5
29 ". Wetland plants in strearnbed 0.00i FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; 06L = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
n Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence o€ upland plants, item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch-.
(dotes: (use back side of this form for additional notes,)
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Forms Version 3.1
Date: 10/25/2005 Project: 418 Hebron Street Site Latitude: N 35° 7' 28.8"
Evaluator: RGJ Site: SCP2 Longitude. W 80° 53' 12.4"
Total Points: Other Perennial Stream B
Sbeam fs of feast intermittent _34.001 county. Mecklenburg
if? f 9 or erenniar ff ? 3£7 e.g. Quad Name:
av,arrrnaue aucnes are not razeo; see oiscussons on manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8.0
14. Groundwater flo4discharge
15. Water in channel and } 48 hrs since rain, or I 0

Water in channel -- dry or growing season
r - ----- 1 2

_ 3

;

': 1S. Leaflitter -------- - -------
1.5 1
._.._.__...
. -- -____.___.__.._
o-5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0.5 0 0.5 _ 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles 00.frack lines) 0.51
+ 0 0.5 1 1.5
.-_..
-_- -----
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present?1.5
------------------
----------
------ _.._....... _------------------ ------- --•--
No = 0
----_-•.__...-
Yes = 1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal:
8.
0
- - -
--)
_
.. -
...
........
ZQ°. Fibrous roots in channel ............. -..
3.01 ..... ----......
3 ............... ................... ................... _..
2 ...... _•-•-- -------
1 ----
0
-21'. Rooted plants in channel
-- - - -- - - - - -------- --- 3.0
-- - 3
2 1
j 0
i
* ............. - - -
0.5 .._------ ---- --------------
-
22. Crayfish . 0 0.5 '• 1 '• --
1.5
23_ Bivalves
0.0!
0
1
2
3
' 24. Fish 0.0 0 0.5 1 1.5
i 25. Amphibians 0.5': 0 0.5 1
T^t
1-5
- - - ... ........... ..-._..

l 28. lbiacrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) ......... -

1,0

0
_
OS
-'
1

1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0.4 0 1 2 3
'
.._......- .............................•-----........_.............._._..__.........•---..........-
..
28_ Iran oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0,0; ................................ a.................................. ;.................................. ;...-....._....................__.:
0 0.5 1 1.5 l
29'. Wetland plants in streambed 0.001: FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
" Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes (use back side of this form for additional notes-) Sketch'.
North Carolina Division of Waiter Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: 10/25/2005 Protect: 418 Hebron Street Site Latitude: N 35° 7' 28.8"
Evaluator: RGJ Site: SCP3 Longitude: W 80° 53' 12.4"
Total Points: Other Unimportant Intermittent
Sb-eam is of feesf inferrivftent GaUrity:
if-a 19 or perennial it a 30 19.00 Mecklenbur e.g. Quad Name: Stream C
A. Georrlorphofog (Subtotal= 7.5 } :Absent Weak Ntoderate :Strong

r __ +
13 Continuous bed and bank 1.0 i 0 + 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 1.01 0 1 2 3
3, In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0.0 i _0 1 2 3_
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 1.0 i 0 1 2 3
5. Activeirelic floodplain 2.01 Q ) 2 3
6: Depositional bars or benches
-------------- *11,1___._.__. __ _.._._____. _.____ 0,0 i
? 0 1 ' 2 3
....._....._._....._.._.____.---_---___________
----•-
7. Braided channel 1.0 -•------------•-•••
0 ••-•-••--- --------

-------- -----------------------
1
----------- -- .... ..................
2 ........... ....__.-......._....._....__._._...
3

' 8- Recent alluvial deposits 1,0 i 0 1 2 3 '•
•• --------•----••---•-•-- - .... --.............. ----------- -----------------

9 .,Natural levees
p
pi -

0 - - --------------------- --

1
--

2
_

.j_
_ .
-_ - ?- -
10. Headcuts
0.0:: 0 2 3
11. Grade controls
_ __ -__ _ _ -____-_----------__-+ - 0
- + 0.5
-
+- 1
----- i
-- - - - 1.5
i
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0.5 i 0 0.5 1 1.5
i 13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented No = 0 Yes = 3
evidence. 0.0 i
z Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 5.5
14. Groundwater floWdischarge 1.0) 0 lr 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or i
0
1
2
Water in channel -- d Y or rowin season 1.0 i ................... ...... . -•-
-_
- _
i
? 16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0.5 -
0 _
0.5 _--
1 1.5

:- 18. Organic debris lines or piles (%Track lines) .0 i 0
- .
.._.. - ------------------ •••-•_-- -•----•---
•
' 0.5 1
+ 1.5
i
i :
19- Hydnc soils (redoximorphic features) present?1.5 - -----
--
No= 0 -........ ••---_ •-
- - - - - .. __ -
Yes = 1-5 - - -
C. Biology (Subtotal = 6.00 )

z; - --------------------------------------- -- -
20 .Fibrous roots in channel
_
- - - -

3.0
- ---

3 - - ..............

2 ....... ...............

1 .................... - ......

0 0
21'. Rooted plants in channel
- - -- 3.0 3 2
A 1 0
-•
Crayfish ------
0.0E ---- - --- - - - - ---
0 -
0.0
1
1.5
23. Bivalves 0.0 i 0 1 2 3
'• 24. Fish 0.0 E 0 0.5
------ --------
i 1 1.5 '•

--?
i 25. Amphibians 0.0 0 0.5 ; 1 1.5
i 28. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0.01 0 0.5 1 1.5

.. 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
.........................................................
--- 0.01 0 1
{ 2
+ 3
.........._.._-•-•----.._-...--•-•-----•-
••
i 28. Iran oxidizing bacterialfungtts_ -•---••--- -

0.0 l 0
.....................
0.5
----
...
----- .............
1
............
----••--••-
•--•-••----••••-•--•--
1.5 ?
29°. Wetland plants in streambed 0.00i FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL= 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
° Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, item 25 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: {use back side of this lam for additional notes. )
Sketch'.
OFFICE USE ONLY:
t t
t ??1 t
USACE AID#
SCP1 - Perennial Stream A
DWQ#
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

1. Applicant's Name: Salvage America, Inc. 2. Evaluator's Name: Ron Johnson, WPIT
3. Date of Evaluation: 10-25-05 4. Time of Evaluation: 1:00 pm
5. Name of Stream: Kings Branch 6. River Basin: Catawba
7. Approximate Drainage Area: 220 acres 8. Stream Order: Fourth
9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 1,8501f 10. County: Mecklenburg
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): From downtown Charlotte, travel south on US 77 to
the Nations Ford Exit - Exit 4. Turn right off the exit and continue on Nations Ford Road to Hebron Street. The site is located at 418
Hebron Street, adiacent to a utility substation.
12. Site Coordinates (if known): N 35°7'28.8" W 80°53' 12.4"
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any): N/A
14. Recent Weather Conditions: no rain within the past 48 hours
15. Site conditions at time of visit: sunny- 70 degrees
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point?? J° NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 9.41 ac.
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? (D NO 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey?(D NO
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 20 % Residential % Commercial 20 % Industrial ??-% Agricultural
60 % Forested _% Cleared / Logged % Other
21. Bankfull Width: 10-15' 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 6-10'
23. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight -Occasional Bends X Frequent Meander Very Sinuous -Braided Channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each
characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the
worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or
weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character
of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more
continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score
of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 49 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature -- Date 116LZ6 Aar
This channel evaluation form is in ded to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of
stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 05/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
SCP1- Perennial Stream A
ECOREGION POINT RANGE

#
CHARAC
RISTICS .
SCORE
TE :;
- Coastal Piedmont 'Mountain

1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 3
(extensive alteration= 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0- 6 0- 4 0- 5 3
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer= max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
- 4
0
0-4
2
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points) `
a
5 Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4`
0-4
3
U (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
?.+
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
2
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
a
7 Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4

0-2

2
(deeply entrenched.= 0; frequent flooding = max points) .
8 Presence of adjacent' wetlands 0- 6 0-4. 0-2 1
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)

9 Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
3
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 . 0-4 1
(extensive deposition-- 0; little or no sediment = max points)

1L Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
2
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0 - 5 0-4 0-5 2
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)

13 Presence of major bank failures
0 -5
0-5
0-5
2
(severe erosion= 0; no erosion, stable banks= max points) .

14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3 '
0-4
0 - 5
2
F (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
U0 .

15
Impact by agriculture or livestock production
'

0-5

.0-4 '

0-5

4
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max
points)'

16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0 - 5
0 - 6
2
(no riffles/ripples or pools= 0; well-developed = max points)

17 Habitat complexity 0-6 0-6 0-6 3
? (little or no habitat= 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0 - 5
0 - 5
0 - S"
4
x (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)

19' Substrate embeddedness'
NA*
0 - 4
0 - 4
2
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)

20 Presence of stream invertebrates
0-4
0-5
0 - 5`
2
(no evidence = 0;. common, numerous types= max points)
Presence of amphibians
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types= max points)

O
22 Presence of fish
0-4
0-4-.
0-4
1
(no evidence = 0; common; numerous types = max points)

23 Evidence of.wildlife use
0 = 6
0-5
0 - 5
1
(no evidence = 0;.abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100- 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page), 49
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
OFFICE USE ONLY: USACE AID# DWQ #
SCP2 - Perennial Stream B
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
1. Applicant's Name: Salvage America, Inc. 2. Evaluator's Name: Ron Johnson, WPIT
3. Date of Evaluation: 10-25-05 4. Time of Evaluation: 1:30 pm
5. Name of Stream: Kings Branch 6. River Basin: Catawba
7. Approximate Drainage Area: 20 acres 8. Stream Order: First
9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 240 if 10. County: Mecklenburg
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): From downtown Charlotte, travel south on US 77 to
the Nations Ford Exit - Exit 4. Turn right off the exit and continue on Nations Ford Road to Hebron Street. The site is located at 418
Hebron Street, adiacent to a utility substation.
12. Site Coordinates (if known): N 35°7'28.8" W80053'12.4"
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any): N/A
14. Recent Weather Conditions: no rain within the past 48 hours
15. Site conditions at time of visit: sunny 70 degrees
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES (T) If yes, estimate the water surface area:
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 20 % Residential _% Commercial 20 % Industrial _% Agricultural
60 % Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
21. Bankfull Width: 3-6' 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 5-7'
23. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight X Occasional Bends -Frequent Meander -Very Sinuous -Braided Channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each
characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the
worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or
weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character
of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more
continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score
of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 40 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature -114 Date I?C)
This channel evaluation form is inten ed to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of
stream quality.. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 05/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
SCP2 - Perennial Stream B

#
CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE
SCORE

Coastal Piedmont` Mountain
I Presence of now / persistent pools in stream 0-5 0-4 0-5 2
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points).
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 1
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 3
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
2
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
.a
5" Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
2
(no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0
-4
0
-2
2
(no floodplain = O; extensive floodplain = max points)
; 1 1
a Entrenchment / floodplain access
0 - S
0 - 4
0 - 2
1
(deeply entrenched = 0• frequent flooding = max points)

8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
0- 6
0-4
0-2
0
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 3
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)

10 Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0 -4
1
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)

11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
2
(fine, homogenous=. 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)

12 Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
2
y+ (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)

13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
2
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points) -

14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
2
E? (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout= max points)

15 Impact by. agriculture or livestock production
0- 5
0-4
0-5
4
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)

16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool 'complexes .
0 - 3
0-5
0-6
1
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
Q
17 Habitat complexity
0 - 6
0 - 6
0 - 6
2
(little or no habitat= 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
,18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0 - 5
0 - 5
0 - 5
3
x (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)

19 Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-74
0 - 4
1
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure= max)

20 Presence of stream invertebrates
0-4
0 - 5 `
0 - S
1
(no evidence = 0• common numerous -
types.- max points)

21 Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
1
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)

O
22 Presence of fish
0-4
0 4
0-4
1
(no evidence= 0; common, numerous types = max points)

23 Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
1
(no evidence = 0 abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 40
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
1. Applicant's Name: Salvage America, Inc. 2. Evaluator's Name: Ron Johnson. WPIT
3. Date of Evaluation: 10-25-05 4. Time of Evaluation: 2:00 pm
5. Name of Stream: Kings Branch 6. River Basin: Catawba
7. Approximate Drainage Area: 6 acres 8. Stream Order: First
9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 580 If 10. County: Mecklenburg .
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): From downtown Charlotte, travel south on US 77 to
the Nations Ford Exit - Exit 4. Turn right off the exit and continue on Nations Ford Road to Hebron Street. The site is located at 418
Hebron Street, adiacent to a utility substation.
12. Site Coordinates (if known): N 35°7'28.8" W 80°53' 12.4"
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any): N/A
14. Recent Weather Conditions: no rain within the past 48 hours
15. Site conditions at time of visit: sunny 70 degrees
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES (5 If yes, estimate the water surface area:
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 20 % Residential -% Commercial 20 % Industrial _% Agricultural
60 % Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other
21. Bankfull Width: 2-3' 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 1-2'
23. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight X Occasional Bends -Frequent Meander -Very Sinuous -Braided Channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each
characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the
worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or
weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character
of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the'stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more
continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score
of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):
Comments:
Evaluator's Signature 2 yj=:n:1 Date- /O &. /03 -
This channel evaluation form is inter d to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of
stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 05/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
SCP3 - Unimportant Intermittent Stream C
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
# CHARACTERISTICS SCORE
Coastal Piedmont. Mountain

1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
1
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 2
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0- 6 0-4 0-5 4
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
2
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)

5 Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
2
U (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplain.
0-4
0-4
0-2
3
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
Cx Entrenchment / floodplain access
d
, entrenched = 0; frequent. flooding (
eeply =max. points)
8 . Presence of adjacent wetlands 0-6 0-4 0-2, 2
(no wetlands= 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9. Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
3
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max poin
ts)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 2
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)'

I 1 Size & diversity, of channel bed substrate
NA*'
0-4
0-5
0
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 3
>4 (deeply incised= 0; stable bed & -banks = max points)

i3 Presence of major bank failures
0 - S
0-5
0-5
3
a (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)

?
14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
3
(no. visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact; by agriculture or livestock production
0-5
,0-4
0=5 _
4
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 ` Presence'of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0 -3 0-5 - 0-6 0
(no riffles/ripples.or pools = 0; well-developed = Max points)
l Habitat complexity
0 - 6 "
0-6
0-6
1
(little or no habitat= 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
.0-5
0-5
3
x (no shading vegetation = 0;. continuous canopy = max points)

ri 9 Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0 - 4
0
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max) 1

20 Presence of stream invertebrates
0 - 4
0-5.
0-5
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)

21 Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
O (no evidence= 0; common, numerous types = max points)'

O
` 22' Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
(no evidence= 0; common, numerous types= max points).

23 Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
1
(no evidence .= 0, abundant; evidence= max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 , 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 42
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 418 Hebron Street Site Date: 10/25/05
Applicant/Owner: Salvage America, Inc. County: Mecklenburg
Investigator(s): Ron Johnson, N WIT State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: upland
is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: DPI
I
If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
1 Ligustrum sinense Stratum
tree Indicator
FAC Dom inant Plant Species tr t I dica or
9
2 Acer negundo tree FACW 10
3 Lonicera japonica vine FAC- 11
4 Liriodendron tulipifera tree FACU 12
5 Fraxinuspennsylvanica tree FACW 13
6 Platanus occidentalis tree FACW- 14
7 15
8 16
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
67%
Remarks:
re to than ° o
the dominant an s
pecies are F
AC or wetter.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits (on leaves)
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water. N/A (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: >12 (in.) ?- FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
dica s o wetland hydrology are p resent.
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 1 of 2 10/28/2005

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Monocan Drainage Class poorly drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic luva untic Ent ochre t Confine Mapped Type? Ye No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moistl (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-2 A 2.5Y 4/3 N/A N/A silt loam
2-12 B 2.5Y 4/4 N/A N/A silt loam
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (Inclusions)
Reducing Conditions -? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
No indicators of hydric soils are present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No (Circle
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No (Circle)
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
Data of i representative of a non-jurisdictional land area.
Approved by HQUSACE 2/92
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 2 of •2 10/28/2005
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 418 Hebron Street Site Date: . 10/25/05
Applicant/Owner: Salvage America, Inc. County: Mecklenburg
Investigator(s): Ron Johnson, WPIT State: . NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: DP2
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
1 Carex spp. at
herb Indicato
- Dominant Plant Species S turn Indica or
9
2 Juncus effusus herb FACW+ 10
3 Andropogon virginicus herb FAC- 11
4 Cyperusstrigosis herb FACW 12
5 Impatiens capensis herb FACW 13
6 Polygonum sagittatum herb OBL 14
7 15
8 16
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
80%
Remarks:
Greater than 50% of the do
minant plant s
pecies are FAC or wetter.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits (on leaves)
-? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
X Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) --X-Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: <12 (in.) _X_ FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: _
Indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 1 Of 2 10128/2005
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Monocan Drainage Class poorly drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic luva untic Eutrochre t Confirm Mapped Type? Yes(No)
Profile D riti n•
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moi stl (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-12 B 5Y 5/2 10YR 4/6 many/ silt
N/A prominent
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (Inclusions)
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
-T_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Indicators of hydric soils are presen t
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Ye No (Circle)
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Ye No
Remarks:
Data point is representative of a jurisdictional wetland area
Approved by HQUSACE 2/92
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 2 Of 2 10/28/2005
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 418 Hebron Street Site bate: 10/25/05
Applicant/Owner: Salvage America, Inc. County: Mecklenburg
Investigator(s): Ron Johnson, WPIT State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: DP3
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant 2p c'
1 Impatiens capensis Stratum Indicator
herb FACW Dominant Plant Species Stratum In icator
9
2 Ligustrum sinense tree FAC 10
3 Acernegundo tree FACW 11
4 Fraxinus pennsylvanica tree FACW 12
5 13
6 14
7 15
8 16
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
100%
Remarks:
tote dominant plant s
pecies are AC or wetter.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
-Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits (on leaves)
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0-1 (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
X Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) _-K-Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: <12 (in.) ?- FAC-Neutral Test
- Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland 4drology are present.
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 1 of 2 10/28/2005
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Monocan Drainage Class poorly drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic Fluva untic Eutrochre t Confirm Mapped Type? Ye No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moistl (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-2 A I OYR 3/2 N/A N/A silt loam
2-12 B 5Y 4/2 10YR 4/6 few/ sandy silt loam
prominent
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
-? Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (Inclusions)
Reducing Conditions ?-Listed on National Hydric Soils List
?- Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Indicators of h dri it are present,
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Ye No (Circle)
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Ye No
Remarks
at int i representative of a jurisdictional wetland area
Approved by HQUSACE 2192
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 2 Of 2 10128/2005
.4 18 IJebron Street Site October 28, 2005
Jurisdictional t)elineation Report and Request for Verification Project No. 2005-1184
r
?r
1 1 ?!?

f
7J

apS?c.) ,Mp?#e

,i

1

?.O
i
r

A` .
O/IS'AC.)1
Construct on Se uence
q Erosion C ontrol f~otes 1. Obtain Grading/Erosion Control Plan approval from the City of Charlotte Storm ~ r a ~ n a e Notes
Engineering Department. 1. Total Site Area: 10.19 acres 1. All storm drainage pipe to a reinforced concrete class as 2. Set up an on-site pre-construction conference with the Erosion Control 2. Disturbed Area: 3.2 acres ' Drainage Schedule, or Ultra-Flow, by Contech, noted in Storm Le end ted in Storm
inspector of the Clty Engineering Dept. (ph. 704-336-674D) to discuss erosion 3. Soil types. Monacan loam, Wilkes loam 2. Provide minimum 2 feet cover over class 3 storm drama e i e in sued area: sus le in paved areas EXISTING CONTOUR ~ TEMPORARY SILT DITCH
4. Construction of the followingg items shall be in accordance with the current and 18 inches cover in grassed areas. Provide minimumg12pinches cov control measures. Failure to schedule such conference 48 hours prior to City of Charlotte Land Develo m er over any land disturbing activity is a violation of Chapter 18 of the City Code p ent Standards. See Detail sheet. All Standard numbers class 4 storm pipe. Iches cover over 78
and is subject to fine. refer to the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Land Development Standards Manual. 3. Pipe invert elevations have precedence over i e slo es. H PROPOSED CONTOUR -X-X-X TEMP. SILT FENCE 'ver, slopes
P P P owever, slopes 3. Install erosion control measures, clean nl ne es ar t in t II these measures: CMLDS 30.02 & 30.03 Gravel and riprap sediment basins shall not be decreased from those shown on plan without prior approval from (Do not import dirt on site until hese measures are In pace CMLDS 30.D5 Temporary silt ditch the landscape architect. approval from
A. Install construction entrance, double row silt fence with orange fabric. CMLDS 30.06 Temporary silt fence 4• Contractor to verify that storm drainage pipe does not conflict with sanitary se + 61.8 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION ~ ROCK CHECK DAM with sanitary sewer /
B. Install diversion ditches and sediment basin. CMLDS 3D.09 Silt fence inlet trap pfpe elevations. Verfiy elevations prior to laying pipe. Notify landscape archite~ C. Install pipe culvert from HW 3 to HW-4 so that it is functional. CMLDS 30.10 Temporary rock check dam conflicts exist. Do no proceed with pfpe construction until conflicts ore reso andscape architect ~ DIRECTION OF SURFACE FLOW o - - CATCH
4. Call 704-336-6740 for on-site inspection by Engineering inspector. When approved, 5. Pipe lengths indicated in schedule are approximate only, and include FES length CMLDS 30.11 Stabilized construction entrance where a licable. :onflicts ore resolved. CB BASIN W/ INLET FILTER ~ / Iclude FES length, - - - LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION - - ~ 6
Engineering Inspector issues the Grading Permit. Begin clearing and grubbing CMLDS 30.12 Stone inlet filter PP FES ~ FLARED END SECTION WITH RIPRAP APRON ~ 0~
after permit issuance. 6. Construction of the following items shall be in accordance with the followin 5. Additional erosion control measures may be required by the City inspector City of Charlotte Land Development Standard Details: 9 5. Complete site construction. depending upon field conditions. the following 100' SWIM BUFFER LINE
6. On-site burial pits require an on-site demolition landfill permit from the County 20.05 Slab type drop inlet (CB) 6. The contractor shall diligently and continuously maintain all erosion control Zonin Adm' ' 20.12 Dr ' - - - STORM DRAINAGE PIPE n ~ TOP OF BANK o V'
devices and structures. g Inlstrator. Any on-site demolition landfills or stumpholes shop amage structure steps ^ r Y V l EXISTING TREELINE a ~
be no closer to any exterior property lines than that permitted by code. 20.25 Trench detail for storm drain pipe 7. Stabilize site as areas are brought to finished grade. 7. Grading more than one acre without an approved Erosion Control Plan is a 7. If recas hs KINGS BRANCH
violation of the City Erosion Control Ordinance and is subject to a fine. to allow f boxes are used at inlets and manholes, the top 16" must be masonr 8. The contractor shall maintain close contact with the City of Charlotte Erosion A grading plan must be submitted for an I or field adjustments, must be masonry _ . V
inspector so that periodic inspections can be performed at appropriate stages that was not previous) a roved. Y of grading exceeding one acre of construction. Y PP \ o
8. Any grading beyond the limits of grading shown an plan is a violation of the G ra ~ n Site will be roec Cit Erosion Con Note s i \ y9o
p fed by double row of silt fence if Kin s Branch leaves its bank. Con Y trot Ordinance and is subject to a flue. developer Is to notify City Erosion Control Inspector if this condition exists to tractor/ g, Remove and spread accumulated sediment from e 1. Boundar informs ' determine if roslon control devices as y tlon from a survey by Jack, R. Christian, NC Registered Surve 0 ~ ~ \ S I~
additional measures need to be taken to protect site and Creek. required. dated June 21, 2004. 10. Contractor is fully responsible for maintaining all erosion control devices 2. Existin contours from i Registered Surveyor, ~ a ~ c 5y'l
9. All erosion control measures shall be constructed in accordance with the NC throughout construction. Devices shall be inspected by the contractor after g C ty of Charlotte digitol information. Accurocy cannot I ~ccuroc cannot be verifi E \ Y ed. I
Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual, US Dept, of each rain and repaired as needed. The contractor shall ensure that diversion ditches 3. All proposed contours and spot elevations are finished surface grade. Agriculture, US Soil Conservation Service, City of Charlotte Erosion Control are functioning to divert water to basin, as shown an plan. 4. Existing and proposed contours are at two foot intervals. grade.
Ordinance, and the City of Charlotte Engineering Dept. 11. City inspector shall be given 48 hours advance notice prior to beginnin 5. All cut and fill slopes are to be 3:1 maximum grade, unless otherwise noted it SILT 10 ~ h9b Itherwise noted in Ions FENCE L-4 FES-2 I r
of construction. g or details. Sediment basin embankment to be 2:1 slo e. 10. At the completion of the project and at the direction of the Inspector, P p 1 I Ii /
remove all temporary erosion control devices. Remove sediment basins and 12. All slopes must be seeded and mulched within 15 working days or 30 calendar days, 6. No soil disturbance or compaction, construction materials, traffic, trenching, or whichever is shorter. All other areas, 1 working days or 90 calendar days, whichever land disturbing activity shall be permitted beyond limits of grading without prio restore areas. Stabilize these areas. is shorter. Refer DouelE Row ALONG 'fic, trenching, or other ENTIRE LENCrH. ADD LIMITS OF ~ \ , \ ~gb
to Erosion Control Ordinance far additionol requirements. from the Owner. dmg without prior approval GRANGE FABRIC aLONG CONSTRUCTIO - I j TOP OF UPHILL ROW TO BE MINIMUM f I ~ ' ` ~ i
13. All cut and fill slopes are to be 3:1 maximum grade, unless otherwise noted 7. Approval of this plan is not an authorization to grade adjacent properties. Wh OF SILT FENCE. 10 FEET FRO OP 88 ~ 99 t propertleS. When BANK. FI• VERIFY.F I I ~ I
'~J ~ in plans or details. No slope shall be graded steeper than 2:1. FIII slopes greater than field conditions warrant off-site grading, permission must be obtained from off S VVIIVI J t r 10' require adequate terracing. property owners. eam Buffer N btalned from affected ~ ~
otes 14. Any land-disturbing activity greater than or equal to 1 acre requires compliance with all 8. No grading allowed within ten feet of top of bank of Kings Branch. 1. This project contains S.W.LM. stream buffers which are under the jurisdiction conditions of the General Permit to Discharge Storm Water Under the National Pollutant 9. Communit Encroachm ~ f inch. e . ~ / 8 oc
of Mecklenburg County Department of Environmental Protection. Discharge Elimination System (Permit No. NCG010000). Any permit noncom Hance is a maintained until final er t Line to be field staked/marked prior to construction to construction and ~i,;ij ~
II S. W.I.M. buffers within this project are a width of 100 feet from the top of y q violation of the Clean Water Act and ma re uire enforcement action by the North Carolina g ading is completed. bank plus 509 of the floodway fringe beyond 100 feet, as shown on these plans. Dept. of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. ~i
The lower 30 feet is the streamside zone, the middle 45 feet is the managed 15. Site will be use zone, and the upper 25 feet plus 509 of the floodway fringe beyond 100 feet proected by double row of silt fence if Kings Branch leaves its bank. Contractor/ ~ I
is the upland zone. developer is to notify City Erosion Control Inspector if this condition exists to determine if ~ ~ r. ~ 3j0 / \
additional measures need to be taken to protect site and Creek. S e e d i n S c h e Jule 3. The streamside zone of the buffer must be left complete) undisturbed exce t J
y ~ P 1. All open areas shall be seeded with Kentucky 31 fescue. where needed for driveway crossing and associated grading, as shown on plan. 2. Lime shall be a lied at 4000 oun In the managed use/upland zone, a limited number of trees can be removed PP p ds per acre. v,x~y
3. Fertilizer shall be applied 10-10-10 at 1500 pounds per acre. provided that the tree density remaining is a minimum of 8 healthy trees 4. Seed shall be applied at 250 ounds er acre. I - t ~
Storm Drains P P of a minimum 6 inch caliper per 1000 square feet. Removal of existing e ~ c h e u ~ e 5. Straw mulch shall be a lie - g pp d at 1 1/2 tons per acre and as alt tacked vegetation must be performed in such a manner as to prevent damage to at 225 gallons per acre. p ~cked I r
the roots of remaining trees. No fill material can be brought into any of Structure Rim PIPE OUT 6. Add 30 pounds per acre annual rye grain to KY 31 fescue if s No. Elevation Invert In Invert Out Len th Size T e Sla a Detail Reference No. eeding the buffer zones, except as required for driveway crossing, as shown on grading plan. between November and February. m~ / ~ ~ ~ ~
4. Grading and other land disturbing activities are allowed only in the CB-1 580.0 574.5 72 LF 15" Class 3 RCP ® 2.08% CMLDS 20.05 7~ Ditch banks to have Lespedeza and Bermuda rass added to seed mix at s :l ~ i ~ :r i / i
upland zone; however, these activities must be performed in such a manner FES-2 573.0 1/2 rate if seeding in May through August (1~2 KY 31, 1 4 Les edeza 1 4 RIPRAP APRON NCDOT 310.01 Bermuda). / P / as to prevent damage to the roots of existing trees. Grass or other HW-3 562.0 34 F mix at RIPRAP i / I leza, 1/4 APRON ~ ; t-~ ~
suitable ground cover can be applied to the upland zone. L 66" Class 3 RCP ®0.589 NCDOT 838.63 DITCH L-4 ~ ~ ~ / i.
5. No occupied structures can be placed in any of the buffer zones. HW-4 561.8 RIPRAP APRON NCDOT 838.63 Non-commercial buildings for storage can be placed in the upland zone FES-5 570.5 44 LF Class 3 RCP ® D T1P. AT EACH OUTLET ~ ~ 0
provided they do not exceed 150 square feet. .689 NCDOT 310.01 I 1. oa° ~oin~ ~ , / i ? 1. fE~µGE ~ . J/ I ~ ~ /
6. The outside buffer boundary must be clearly marked by orange fabric 1x36" (center pipe) & 2x30" (outside pipes) fencing prior to any land disturbing activities at the site, and this fencing FES-6 570.2 RIPRAP APRON NCDOT 310.01
mUSt be Called OUt On the plans. CMLDS =CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 7. The outside boundary of the stream buffer must be permanently marked NCDOT =NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ~i~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cs ~r•
with an iron pin or other acceptable property corner marker at street RCP =REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE ~ r , / ~ ~1;~t~~
crossings, and this marker must be called out on plans. ~ / °~s~'q
8. Top of bank locations, as shown on plan, have been field verified by TEMPORARY a registered land surveyor. DIVERSION 9 ~ . r ~ ~ 1a' / !J
SILT 1 C DITCH L-4 FENCE L-4 ~ 1 W-4 ~ # ~ , 1,
vF P `"~,7 ,t ~ , / i 0 Np<<,. r` i I ~ 5~~~ ~ tvr, r-
DOUBLE ROW ALONG DIRECT TO SEDIMENT BASIN ENTIRE LENGTH. ADD \ KEN/ KIN ~ ~ FJ .
SEDIMENT 1 6 ORANGE FABRIC ALONG " 11 BASIN L_3 TDP of UPHILL Row L-4 OF SILT FENCE.
RESTORE TO ORIGINAL N~RU ~ ' ' GRADE AT COMPLETION GREEK „i ;,r ~ -
OF PROJECT ~ i - ~ i ~ ~
~ ~ i 2 3
/ I
/ ~ ~ - i / - ~ t i l ~CREf S CLEARING FOR ~ b( i ~ i~ ~ -
~ Cery~ SANITARY SEWER ~N ~ _ / LATERAL /i ~ I ~ / ~ - I
i \ ~ - TREAMSID ZONE ~ ~ X' }G S Os ~ / A
~ w,r - . _ _ _ ~ ~ _ ~ I
- --l \ k ~ ~ ~i o~d{ - ~ - ~ ~
~ ~ 570 - ~ ~ ~ FEc ` 45 MANAGE ~ ~ X ago FES-6
k ~ ~ US ZONE .i ~ ~ ~ - i ~ ~ i O ~ _ i I ~ J ~ y~o
N
~
\ E ~ _ ~ _ ~~1 x / ~ I
~ FER / - - -X- ~ ~ I I \ 'SWIM BUF ~ . ) X X X X _ _ ~ ~ 100 ~ X 10 ~X ~ \ i 1 .X
~ 10 ~
~ N / FE
~OJti/ 5 N I_ a~ y1~
~ P _ _ E SE e~~eV/ uN ~ F DQ~aG ~ ~ S'aNE SPILLWAY
1 0 / A 51
X ~ 516
/ 1~ /~~~N,. 110 ^k / ' k / ~
i ~ ~ y9o ,
_ ~6 " \ 1 ~ ~ I / 9m o~ -
/ ~ ~ ~ 1~~k / \ k 110 k '(D _ TOP 0• ;~l = 600 A F
m ~ + 68.5
\ 5 f
x 160 l ~ J ~ 1 p~6 ~ k1N 1a~ ~ Ja i
1~5 ~,P
~ ~51Q4D~1 ~ p Oa 57p 1 ~tGW~y
'I ~y~l~,Q~~G 13 GRASSED
~ G~ L-4 DITCH A ~ /
\ ~
0 10 1~ J ~ /1 ~
~2 k ~ LIB LIMITS OF 1p
~ ~ ~ CC CONSTRUCTION ~ 5 I
a
~ ~ G I NOTES
~ / y8o y TEMPORARY PORARY 1. Np GRADING WTHIN SWI
L-4 DIVERSION DITCH iRSION j 2. AT COMPLETION OF WOF
DIRECT TO STDRM DRAINAGE PIPES j 3. SEE DETAIL X/L-4 FOR M ORANAGE PIPES
INSTALL JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE (SHORN BEYOND PROPERTY LINE FOR SIDE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE FOR ~
~ GRAPHIC CLARITY ONLY). 0 f ONLY).
13 GRASSED i
L-~ DITCH B 1 TE
L-3 SCA
CALL NC CALL NC ONE CALL I) CONTRACTOR IS FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING
BEFORE ' BEFORE YOU DIG APPROPRIATE PARTIES AND ASSURING THA? EXISTING UTILITIES ARE LOCATED PRIOR TO BEpNNINC CONSTRUCTION.
2). CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PLAGNC BARRICADES
USING FLAGIAEN, ETC., AS NECESSARY TG INSURE SAFETY TO THE PUBUC, /
O r~ n' i
3). ALL PAVEMENT CUTS, CONCRETE OR ASPHALT, ARE TO u u 12U BE REPLACED ACCORDING TO STANDARDS OF THE NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND CMUD SPECIFICATIONS.
4). SHORING WILL BE ACCORDING TO OSHA TRENCHING
1-800-8; 1-800-632-4949 STANDARDS PART 1926 SUBPART P, OR AS AMMENDED.
AVOID UTILI' AVOID UTILITY DAMAGE 5). CONTRACTOR S REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH ALL OSHA "
SCALE. 1 = 60'

General Notes
1. Boundary survey by Jack R. Christian, NCRLS, dated June 21, 2004. ~ N
2. Building footprint from architectural information provided by Owner.
3. City Inspector shall be given 48 hours advance notice prior to beginning of construction. ZOnin Code Summar ~ Np nmary ~ ~ o
9 Y 4. The location of the subject property has been checked against area FEMA/FIRM maps, and it has been determined that it IS N a
located in a special flood hazard area. (Community Panel number 37119C0245E, effective date: February 4, 2004). PROJECT NAME: Hebron Street Industrial Site 5. Grading more than one acre without an approved Erosion Control Plan Is a viclation of the City Erosion Control Ordinance and is OWNER: Page Construction Co. Inc I ~ ~ I~ Industrial Site ~ cs7
subject to a fine. SITE PLANS PREPARED BY: Site Design Studio I nc. PHONE: [phone] ~ r Design Studio PHONE: [phone] ~ ~ Z
ZONING: 11=2 6. On-site burial pits require an on-site demolition landfill permit from the County Zoning Administrator. Any on-site demolition landfills / U _~u
or stumpholes shall be no closer to any exterior property lines than that permitted by code. JURISDICTION: Citv of Charlotte 7. Subsurfoce drainage facilities may be required in the street right-of-way if deemed necessary by the Inspector. TAX ID NO.: 205-151-16 _ ~ \ N O
PROPOSED USE: Warehouse 8. Provide handicap ramp curb depressions at ramp location{s) per CMLDS standard detail 10.33, latest revision. MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT: 30 ft.
9. No new dumpster shall be required for proposed development. Trash collection shall occur through existing screened dumpster EXISTING BUILDING COVERAGE: 0 s.f. GRC STORIES: 1 \ ~ N ~ - / ~~~c
on adjacent nightclub property or through other private arrangements. s.f. GROSS FLOOR AREA: 0 s.f. ~ / I'`D C7 0
10. Construction of the following items shall be in accordance with the following Charlotte Land Development Standard (CMLDS} details: NEW BUILDING COVERAGE: 440 s.f. GROSS 10.31A Accessible handicap ramp EXISTING CONC. ~ ~ S I .f,_ GROSS FLOOR AREA: 440 s. f. DRIVEWAY Ln (n U ~ L
50.t0A Accessible parking and signage standards SITE AREA FROM SURVEY: 10.19 AC. MINIMUM ADJUST EX / ~ ~ ~ 3 AC. MINIMUM OPEN SPACE. N A (STING GUARDRAIL EXISTING 5' CONCRETE ,
50.108 Supplemental accessible sign NUMBER OF UNITS SUITES: 1 / 11. Gravel area to consist of minimum 6" CABC over compacted subgrade. - --L EXT N d' E D 50 ALONG PROPOSED 7\ \ p, ~ ~ SIDEWALK AT BACK OF i CURB ALONG HEBRON GRAVEL DRIVE. LOCATE 6' / / A ~ STREET
YARD REQUIREMENTS: 12. No road improvements along Hebron Street are associated with this project. SETBACK (FRONT): 20 ft. FROM EDGE OF PAVING ~ G~ O ~Q
13. No offsite grading is required for this development. SIDE YARD {N): 5 ft. \ ~ s ~ o' TYPE II V, \ ~ 1 ~
14. Loading area is not required for this project. SIDE YARD {S): 5 ft. DROP CURB L Q) ~ !y ~ L-4 W
REAR YARD: 10 ft. 15. All proposed utilities shall be underground. RE UIRED BUFF R DR r F \ ~ \ IVEWAY I ~ LOCATE AT EXISTING CURB !
Q E S. 16. The developer shall maintain each stream, creek, or backwash channel in an unobstructed state and shall remove from the FRONT: NO YES REAR: NO /YES h ~ / \ ~ \ CUT -MODIFY TO 26 MIN. 'EAR: NO /YES ~~1 ~ / ~ WIDTH AND CMLDS 70.258.
channel and banks of the stream all debris, logs, timber, junk and other accumulations, O SIDE (N): NO /YES 17. Any construction or use within the areas delineoted as Floodway Encroachment Area is subject to the restrictions of the SIDE (S): NO /YES ~ 20:1 TAPER (EACH SIDE) o~ ~ ~2 TO 22' WIDTH BEYOND 20'
City of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County. ~ ~ S s J~~ SETBACK
18. PE sealed shop drawings for retaining walls must be submitted to City Engineer prior to construction. REQUIRED SCREENING: 6\ ~y f q ' ~
19. Non-standard items (i.e.: pavers, irrigation systems, etc.) in the right-of-way require aRight-of-Way Encroachment Agreement FRONT: NO ES REAR: NO YES with the Charlotte Department of Transportation/North Carolina Department of Transportation before installation. 510E (E): NO /YES SIDE (W): NO / ' fAR: NO YES ~ ~"I ~ p O v EXISTING 25' CMUD IDE (W): NO /YES SAN. swR. R w ~ I
PARKING ONLY: NO /YES y c ~ ~ EXISTING GRAVEL
EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA: 0 s.f. M Stream Buffer Notes . Q ~ f I DRIVEWAY f.
NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA. 70,000 s.f. TOTAL I PARKING DATA: ~ ~ II ~ \ S >.f. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA: 70,000 s.f. ~ ' ~ ~ - I
1. This project contains S.W.LM. stream buffers which are under the jurisdiction PER ZONING ORD. SECTION 12.202 FOR BUSIP ~ 12.202 FOR BUSINESS USE. 1 t ~ ~
of Mecklenburg County Department of Environmental Protection. MINIMUM REQUIRED SPACES IS AS FOLLOWS: 2. All S.W.I.M, buffers within this project are a width of 100 feet from the top of PROPOSED BUILDING HAS 440 SF. IS AS FOLLOWS: 1 SPACE PER 250 SF ~ ~ , f ~ i0 SF. f ~ ~ \
bank plus 50% of the floodway fringe beyond 100 feet, as shown on these plans. REQUIRED: 2 PROVIDED: 2 ACCESSIBLE: 2 ACC / ~ f ~ ? _ ESSIBLE: 1 COMPACT: 0 Z..;, / 1 ~ \
The lower 30 feet is the streamside zone, the middle 45 feet is the managed CARPOOL: 0 use zone, and the upper 25 feet plus 50% of the floodway fringe beyond 100 feet - is ~:~i f / I ~ ~ s
is the upland zone. !f / / /
3. The streamside zone of the buffer must be left completely undisturbed, except where needed for driveway crossing and associated grading, as shown on plan. r~
In the managed use/upland zone, a limited number of trees can be removed X82 . ,f /
provided that the tree density remaining is a minimum of 8 healthy trees of a minimum 6 inch caliper per 1000 square feet. Removal of existing ,,'~~~5, , ~ f
vegetation must be performed in such a manner as to prevent damage to i ~ , j ~ ~ \ ~~~>r ~ a ~
the roots of remaining trees. No fill material can be brought into any of the buffer zones, except as required for driveway crossing, as shown on grading plan. r QPp,~ ~T~IS~r~I /
4. Grading and other land disturbing activities are allowed only in the 1 I \ \ L/Nf
upland zone; however, these activities must be performed in such a manner 1 ! _ ~ q.. l ~ I2'r \ ~ ~ v aa
as to prevent damage to the roots of existing trees. Grass or other suitable ground cover can be applied to the upland zone. 11' ~ 1 Q - ~ m r c~ P ~
5. No occupied structures can be placed in any of the buffer zones. Non-commercial buildings for storage can be placed in the upland zone R ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ / T
provided they do not exceed 150 square feet. / ~
6. The outside buffer boundary must be clearly marked by orange fabric fencing prior to any loud disturbing activities at the site, and this fencing 'u ~,,y~r„rr / - E AWING ~ h y ~ _ / 5 ~ L-4 WALL ° o z
must be called out on the plans. i ~ / ~ ~ E_o 1 ~ ~ Ns SEE GENERAL ~ o
7. The outside boundary of the stream buffer must be permanently marked with an iron pin or other acceptable property corner marker at street i , ~ ~ anJNE / ~ N : v ~ f ~ Fti dt co" / ~ OTE 18 ~ ~ v
crossings, and this marker must be called out on plans.
8. Top of bank locations, as shown on plan, have been field verified by 5 / ~ ~ ti ~~d S I ~ ~ / 2~.'~ a a ~
a registered land surveyor. ,rf ~ ~ ~ aoo
j ~ ~ - - . M z .IIf / ~ ~ ~ O n~ O OON ~ / / ~ G V 4mF ~ rn \ \ \
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
f DEED 12815 PG. 861
MAPBOOK 35 P.9O1 861 ~ J . ~ ~ I ~ JP~P ~ ~,R ~ ~ Q i F ~ ~ ~
1 01 ? ~ ~ Q 2 r::.: ? , . ,i Cx
TIE LATERAL TO VULCAN LANDS INC. EXIST. SEWER LINE
DEED 11147 PG. 600 8„ E N 4'3, / / Q „ E N 634259 E ~ ~ Q~ 3 ~ i ~ ~ ; a~° ~
53~~ - j ~ k
N 2Z~~ - 1 - - ~ ~
r _ - ~ - - ~ i,..... E ~ ,DS.r - - EXISTING 25' CMUD ' ~ ~ 7-:Q~~, ~--z~~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ / \
--f - , ` sAN. swR. R/w N 66°53'0 52 _ _ _ _ - _ ~ _ ~ S / / S- /
~ ~ 128.23 _ ~Y _ ~ 'n1 - ~ - ~ A.;. 'K/1 \ _ - - _ - - ' i.~ ~yA p~~NT LINE' ~ S . - ~ / l
ti ~ 32 ~ _ ~a s i ~ , ~ ~
E s . - 1 ~ - - ~
~ _ O°2 ~ - ~ ~ ~ STREAMSIDE Z i ~ ~ ~ . _ - ~ ~ ~ ~ -
i ~ 1 ` - ~ ~
55° ~ err ~ 5 y _ _ , ? ~ _ - _ - ~ ~ o . ~ L end
\ \ Z - ~ -yam S ? • i - . _ ~ ~ ~ • AGE ~ . - ' ~ i ~ y I A x
~ 5 ~ 'I 45 MZONE ~ ~ ~ t~ -r - - ? / ~ USE ? ~ L/--- Am L ' - - - f ~ PROPOSED
_ o Q~ GRAVEL - AVEMENT~DRIVE / ExisnNC
POWER / \ J TOWER \ _ _ o _
\ ~ \ - ~ \ 5 /ice / PROPOSED
~ \ ~ ER _ ~ - - CONCRETE PAD ~
\ ~ ~ ~ 4 22' WIDE HANDICAP PARKING SPAC
/ L-4 GRAVEL DRIVE E
Q \ EXISTING~15' CMDD F w . ' x v~ ~ SAN SWR.RW ~ O/ ,c~ ~ PowER G ~ ~ 1 ~ , - ~0 ~ ti / r+c HANDICAP P n ~ ARKING SPACE SIGN
~O TOWER ~n ~ \ \ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ 0 O / ~ / OZ n 1
n ~ I oo ~ e~/ _ - ~ C~ ~ F'~ 1 P~1~Qvi ~ vN~ / - _ - W ~r4 - - EXISTNG UTILITY POLE AND OVERHEAD LNE
V / - - - - - - 100' SW1M BUFFER LINE
-0 ~ %~ra~E ~ , GRAVEL
~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ _ ~R~~~`~ ~ ~ AREA ~ 70POFBANK n
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / _ i _ _ L.L. / KINGS BRANCH
" i _ ;CONCR TE'P,4D: / ~ ~ PROPOSED BUILDING _ _ _ _
/ SEE ARCHT. PLANS ~ Q~--
/ ~ \ - G~ G
/ ~ ~ f / \ ~ P / G~ ~ ~ P ~G
~ ~ ~ ~ ~,P ~g
S . ~ ~ / ~ \ / ~ ~0
s ~ 0 ~ ~
GRAVEL AREA:
~ Z ACCES 2 ACCESSIBLE ~ ~
L-4 PARKIP \ 5 L-4 PARKING SIGN S
~o- \R y ~ i o
~ r / q\ m o ~ I
o / ~o ~ !
~ ARROWOOD D~ I ~ I 77 r
0
/ 2~ x ~ f
~ a ~a ~ yP~~ ~ n\ _ ~
\ 4 ~ 5~0, ~ ~
~ N pp \ p< tieeR 521 0 oN ~ ~ sr ~ 0 i
C1 B ~ N U
4 SITE ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~
V 1 ~ ~ I
F o NORTH 0 ~
VICINITY MAP ~ z NOT TO SCALE ~ ~ (
0~~ I ~ N~ I
=oC
x~
~x~' ~ T ~iiiiiui~~ x ~ 1
L1N~ ~ ABLE Z x U L ~N CARD
1 ~nl~ 1 ~nlr_u o['nr~~n,n ~ _a _ ~ ~
L1 25.4 '.PNDSC4,o'., -y % N16'13'36"E F L2 44.20' N17'25'17"W 60 20 240 December 17, 20
L3 51.001 N19'58'11 "E
447 L4 51.69 N80'25'O1 "E C) -
L5 40.59 y N15'S3'S2 "E L6 38.29. N4227'30"W ' i
L7 38.17N07'39'42"E ';~F•'~ GF
RT EG L L8 48.48 N38'28'40"E SCALD: 1 - 60' ~0\ sHEEr of
L9 56.65 N0923'52"E
COMM. NO. 04
I

D
~ N
~ Np
U moo N ~
/ ~ I~ ~ c~ o
U~ ~ / ~r
EXISTING TREES WITHIN 30' TREE ~ z ~
~ ~ \ PROTECTION ZONE TO SATISFY v ^ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ PERIMETER PLANTING REQUIREMENTS ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ALONG HEBRON STREET. X ~
0 ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~
~ti v
U W O F
\ z_ ~ ° ~ 1/2" WATER METER BY CMUD rn - _ ~ ~J ~ /1j LOCATE AT RIGHT-OF-WAY
-O Jo s ~ / n w
REDUCED I':: \ ~ V J~ Q PRESSURE 3 V 'p ~
BACKFLOW PREVENTOR L-4 ~ \ ~ ~ ~ W~ o Fj~ \ Z
LOCAT ~ ~ ~ ~ a E OUTSIDE SETBACK ~ ~ 0~ \ V 0~ ~
SEE WATER AND SEWER NOTES i F~ ~ N0. 7 ON THIS SHEET. \ i ~
sn~ I j lq Z +t'~e~u. ~aiaz~ h \ ~0~, Q
~i \ J
\ ~ a EXISTING 25~ CMUD ~ ~ ~n \ o
SAN. SWR. RAW ~ V ~
11 P' \
I I ° ~ I ~ ~
~ ~ \ 1I
r, \ ~ ~ ' \ \
i~ , /
; ~ ~ ~ ~ 8
r ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
l / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v
~ ~ ay - °~o, E
" ` 1 ~ ~ parr oro ~ ~ ~ ~ .1. Y w
N I~ 1N G ~ ~ / ~ m ,
P ~ o ~ i ~ , ~ ~ / ~ o ~ 7~ ~ ~ y
~ 8 / ~ ~ _ ~ P
r ~ i v
/ S i o 1 / 5
\ \ ~ / i ° J ~ ~ ! ` RAISE EXISTING MANHOLE. SET RIM ELEVATION ~
. i ~ MATCH PROPOSE D GRADE. 5EE GRADING \ \ ~ / _ , ~ ~.AN. ALL CONSTRUCTION TO COMPLY
~ti TH CMUD STANDARDS. m S j ~ ~ 5 ~ o i ~ ~ ~ a
/ / a
__J / / N
/ I,{ ~ ~ f / ~ N \ / / ~N / - N
/ / / , ~p~ ~ (t 'N K
~ / 25 , 'JFE~ ~ I / / ~~Vt~` 9 f
TIE LATERAL TO EXIST. SEWER LINE it i/ 7r.:\~ ~ iOQ S / ~ ~ ~ 1
~ ~ li % EXISTING TREES
/ ~ r TO REMAIN i _ - ~ s~ ~
o EXISTING 25' CMUD _ ~ r 1 ~ ,~.4"' SAN. SWR. R/W - - - - - - - ~ `l l ~ - / ~ \
/ ~ . s ~ ~,4 I
~ _ _ ~ ~ M V'_ ~ - - _ ' / ~ f- FEMA FLp00WAY ~ ~ A ~ i- . ~ ENfFOACNUENT UNE S T s ~ ~ ~I ~ I -s _ - i
~N N _ _ = _ ~ N ,3a , _ /
_ , - _ S ~ ~ - ~ _
i ~ ~.~gbti°~\ \ - ~ ~ _ : 30~ 5?REAMSIDE ZON ~ ! I ' _ ~ \ ~
\ ~ G ~
~ ~m ~ T~ - ~ a~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ a P S ~ ~ ~ a5' MANAGED ~ ~ d~ ~co i 0 i / / m o
~ sr`~/- u5E ZONE ~ i' j -
~ _ - _ ,A k ;9 S~ ~ . c9A E%IS*INC ~F.R ~0oa
k / - ~ ~ ' ~ ~ / AND Z E ~ ~ I ~ P~pWER ~ J
O ~ \ ~ \ 25' UPS / , I Z 0 ~ ~ ~ r I Z I _ _ ~ Irv / -
~ \ _ m ~ ~ F FR ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ \ v W,M, B~ o ~ - ~ I~ - i I
- ~ ~ o I m Ekl TING IS' CMUD v ~ ~ ~ - Im
EXISTING ~ \ SAN. SqR R/W ~ i ' ~ ~ ~~Q~ ~ ~m POWER ~ Q~ J ~
TOWER m - 0 0 ~ J G' \ ~ Q i i
1 0° - ~ P r WHEELSTOP ~ _ ~ i - I AR L end
~ ~ i ' + Q~
_ ~ ~ ~ GRA L rn ~ ~ Y1 EXISTI v 1 NG TREEJNE
v / ~ ~ AR A ~ ~ y E ~ i~ ~
A \ ~ / ~ \ ~ Y1 PROPOSED TREELINE
~ ~ ~ / CONCRETE PAD ~ -
/ - - J \ / ~ I i _ AR PROPOSED LARGE MAT ° - I
\ ~ ~ r i i URING TREE
~ ~
,i \ / ~ J /
PROPOSED SMALL MATURING TREE CP
EXISTING TREES GRAVEL AREA
TO REMAIN - i WHEEL STOP
- PROPOSED SEWER LINE W/ CLEANOUT ~
C
~ Q - - - EXISTING WATER LINE Q
PROPOSED WATER SERVICE ~ c
C - - v ~
~ / EXISTING UTILITY POLE AND OVERHEAD LINE
~ C3 ~
Water and Sewe r Notes ~
F 1. Water and sewer connections to comply with all CMUD specifications and requirements. Contractor is to a I for ~ - U 0 ~
service connections, as appropriate. PP y all Q~ ~~C3 ~
2. Sanitary sewer lateral shall be 4"pvc pipe at minimum 1.07 slope. Provide cleanouts at 75' o.c. maximum, ~ cn I
3. There shall be no taps, piping branches, unapproved bypass piping, hydrants, fire dept. connection oints or other water-using apurtenances connected to the supply hne between any water meter and its CMUD-required~backflow rev ~ c
p enter. 4. Each CMUD-required BPA is required to be tested by aCMUD-approved certified tester prior to lacin the wat r ~ o
P g e system in service. 5. Any adjustment of the BPA locations shown on these plans requires CMUD approval. o U
6. Woter and sewer connection points to building are approximate only, See plumbing plans for recise infor ~ ~ oz L N
P motion 7. Provide 3~4" reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly installed above-ground within insulated en I 0 ~ ~
per CMUD requirements. Assembly to include 7.4-R rated cover with heater capable of mointaining min. tem . of 40Fe Provide electrical connections for heater as required. Enclosure to include drain port(s) for dischar e waterP er ~ ~ = 0 ~
CMUD requirements. See detail sheet. g P \1 X ~
8. Contractor shall provide all valves, reducers, tees, and blowoffs along water line per state plumbing code and owner's re it W X ~ ~ ~~I I I I IIII 0
qu ements. ~pR I x U LL
~
/ \ n _ _ ~ ~ A ,
F. b U" 1 2U 240 W y _ December 17, 2004
447
SCALE. - 60'
SHEET 2 OF 4
COMM. NO, 0414
I

m Draina e Notes ~e end
Stor ion Control Notes Eros C o n s t 1. All storm drama a pipe to a reinforced concrete, class as noted in Storm ruction Se uence `1 9 storm sus
1. Obtain Grading/Erosion Control Plan approval from the City of Charlotte 1. Total Site Area: 10.19 acres Drainage Schedule, or Ultra-Flow, by Contech. EXISTING CONTOUR T~ TEMPORARY SILT DITCH wed areas
Engineering Department. 2. Disturbed Area: 3.2 acres 2. Provide minimum 2 feet cover over class 3 storm drainage pipe in paved areas 2. Set up an on-site pre-construction conference with the Erosion Control 3. Soil types: Monacan loam, Wilkes loam and 18 inches cover in grassed areas. Provide minimum 12 inches cover over over over TEMP. SILT FENCE PROPOSED CONTOUR -X-X-X
inspector of the City Engineering Dept. (ph. 704-336-6740) to discuss erosion 4. Construction of the following items shall be in accordance with the current class 4 storm pipe. )pes ~
48 hours riot to Cit of Charlotte Land Development Standards. See Detail sheet. All Standard numbers elevations have recedence over i e slopes. However, slopes control measures. Failure to schedule such conference p Y 3. Pipe invert p P P an land disturbin activity is a violation of Chapter 18 of the City Code refer to the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Land Development Standards Manual. shall not be decreased from those shown on plan without prior approval from wal from + 61.8 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION ~ ROCK CHECK DAM i
Y 9 and is subject to fine. CMLDS 30.02 & 30A3 Gravel and tiptop sediment basins the landscape architect. sanitary sewer ACE FLOW - - CATCH BASIN w INLET FILTER ~ ~ /
Install erosion control measures, learin nl ne ar o in tall se mea res: CMLDS 30.05 Temporary silt ditch 4. Contractor to verify that storm drainage pipe does not conflict with sanitary sewer 3 (Do not import dirt on site until ese measures ore In pace CMLDS 30.06 Temporary silt fence pipe elevations. Verfiy elevations prior to laying pipe. Notify landscape architect e architect ~ DIRECTION OF SURF Cg o / I
nstall construction entrance, double row silt fence with orange fabric. ilt fence inlet tra If conflicts exist: Do no proceed with pipe construction until conflicts ore resolved. A I CMLDS 30.09 S p sore resolved. \ e6 FES len th, - - - LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION FES - - FLARED END SECTION WITH RIPRAP APRON / 5 9
B. Install diversion ditches and sediment basin. S 30.10 Tem orar rock check dam 5. Pipe lengths indicated in schedule are approximate only, and include FES length,
C. Install i e culvert from HW-3 to HW-4 so that it is functional. CMLD P Y P P CMLDS 30.11 Stabilized construction entrance where applicable. 4. Call 704-336-6740 for on-site inspection by Engineering inspector. When approved, CMLDS 30.12 Stone inlet filter 6. Construction of the following items shall be in accordance with the following ollowin 100' SWIM BUFFER LINE - - - STORM DRAINAGE PIPE o \ 9
Engineering Inspector issues the Grading Permit. Begin clearing and grubbing City of Charlotte Land Development Standard Details: TOP OF BANK ! Y Y ~ EXISTING TREELINE , ~ 566
after permit issuance. 5. Additional erosion control measures may be required by the City inspector de ending upon field conditions. 20.05 Slab type drop inlet (CB) I'`.::.
6. On-site burial pits require an on-site demolition landfill permit from the County 20.12 Drainage structure steps 5. Complete site construction. P 'I' entl and continuous) maintain all erosion control Zoning Administrator. Any on-site demolition landfills or stumpholes shall 20.25 Trench detail for storm drain pipe 6. The contractor shall dl ig y Y KINGS BRANCH \ o
devices and structures. be no closer to any exterior property lines than that permitted by code. r without an a roved Erosion Control Plan is a 7. If precast boxes are used at inlets and manholes, the top 16" must be masonry 7. Grading more than one ace PP to allow for field adjustments. be masonry \ 9°
7. Stabilize site as areas are brought to finished grade. violation of the City Erosion Control Ordinance and is subject to a fine. \ h
The contractor shall maintain close contact with the City of Chorlotte Erosion A grading plan must be submitted for any lot grading exceeding one acre 8 that was not previously approved. r ~ yeti
riodic ins ectians can be erformed at appropriate stages he t-7 r a d i n I V o e s inspector so that pe p P 8. An radin be and the limits of grading shown on plan is a violation oft g tend Surveyor, \
of construction. Y g g Y City Erosion Control Ordinance and is subject to a fine. 1. Boundary information from o survey by Jack, R. Christian, NC Registered Surveyor, I \ b
Site will be proected by double row of silt fence if Kings Branch leaves its bank. Contractor/ g, Remove and spread accumulated sediment from erosion control devices as dated June 21, 2004. developer is to notify City Erosion Control Inspector if this condition exists to determine if required. 9 Icy cannot be verified. 5
t rotect site and Creek. ntractor is full res onsible for maintaining all erosion control devices 2. Existing contours from City of Charlotte digital information. Accuracy cannot be ve additional measures need to be taken o p 10. Co y p throughout construction. Devices shall be inspected by the contractor after 3. All proposed contours and spot elevations are finished surface grade. e. - a ~ SILT 10 FES 2
9. All erosion control measures shall be constructed in accordance with the NC each rain and repaired as needed. The contractor shall ensure that diversion ditches 4. Existing and proposed contours are at two foot intervals. FENCE L-4 {:ia ~ ~ ~i noted in Ions ~ i, l \ 596 se p ~
Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual, US Dept. of are functioning to divert water to basin, as shown on plan. 5. All cut and fill slopes are to be 3:1 maximum grade, unless otherwise noted in plat Agriculture, US Soil Conservation Service, City of Charlotte Erosion Control 11. City inspector shall be given 48 hours advance notice prior to beginning or details. Sediment basin embankment to be 2:1 slope. DOUBLE ROW ALONG LIMITS OF r I ENTIRE LENGTH. ADD CONSTRUCTION -
6. No soil disturbance or compaction, construction materials, traffic, trenching, or o e Ordinance, and the City of Charlotte Engineering Dept. of construction. renchln Of Other ORANGE FABRIC ALONG g5 9 TOP OF UPHILL ROW TO BE MINIMUM ~ ' ' 8~ 5 WIthOUt prl0r OpprOV01 OF SILT FENCE. 10 FEET FRO OP OF 1 /
10. At the coin letion of the project and at the direction of the Inspector, 12. All slopes must be seeded and mulched within 15 working days or 30 calendar days, land disturbing activity shall be permitted beyond limits of grading without prior app P BANK. FI VERIFY. ~ \
remove all temporary erosion control devices. Remove sediment basins and whichever is shorter. All other areas, 1 working days or 90 calendar days, whichever from the Owner. restore areas. Stabilize these areas. is shorter. Refer to Erosion Control Ordinance for additional requirements. 7, Approval of this plan is not an authorization to grade adjacent properties. When 1 erties. When i
13. All cut and fill slopes are to be 3:1 maximum grade, unless otherwise noted field conditions warrant off-site grading, permission must be obtained from affectec ed from affected ~ ` / 8 6°° z ~
in plans or details. No slope shall be graded steeper than 2:1. Fill slopes greater than property owners. 1D' require adequate terracing. 8. No grading allowed within ten feet of top of bank of Kings Branch. !'i ~~i i
Buffer I V o t e S 14. Any land-disturbing activity greater than or equal to 1 acre requires compliance with all g, Community Encroachment Line to be field staked/marked prior to construction and SWIM Stream rant ion and ' .r ~ ;onstruct ~
conditions of the General Permit to Discharge Storm Water Under the National Pollu maintained until final grading is completed. 1. This project contains S.W.I.M. stream buffers which are under the jurisdiction Discharge Elimination System (Permit No. NCGO10000). Any permit noncompliance is a ~ .
of Mecklenburg County Department of Environmental Protection. violation of the Clean Water Act and may require enforcement action by the North Carolina s'~ r ~ \ r i /
2. All S.W,I.M. buffers within this project are a width of 100 feet from the top of Dept. of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. bank plus 50% of the floodway fringe beyond 100 feet, as shown on these plans. ~ , ice... ~ i ~~n ~ /
The lower 30 feet is the streamside zone, the middle 45 feet is the managed 15. Site will be proected by double row of silt fence if Kings Branch leaves its bank. Contractor/ wa frin a be and 100 feet develo er is to natif Cit Erosion Control Inspector if this condition exists to determine if S e e ~ n S c h e u e I ~ A / ~N
use zone, and the upper 25 feet plus 50% of the flood y g y P Y Y g is the upland zone. additional measures need to be taken to protect site and Creek. 1. All open areas shall be seeded with Kentucky 31 fescue. 1'a ~
r inside zone of the buffer must be left completely undisturbed, except 2. Lime shall be applied at 4000 pounds per acre. 3. The st ea "I I J /
r sin and associated radin , as shown on plan, 3. Fertilizer shall be applied 10-10-10 at 1500 poun s per acre. where needed for driveway c os g 9 9 4. Seed shall be applied at 250 pounds per acre. In the managed use/upland zone, a limited number of trees can be removed 5. Straw mulch shall be applied at 1-1/2 tons per acre and aspalt tacked ~ ~ d a.J I m , /
rovided that the tree density remaining is a minimum of 8 healthy trees r m Draina e S c h e d u I e at 225 gollons per acre. P Sto existin J o KY 31 fescue if seedin 1 ~ / ~ ~r ~
of a minimum 6 inch caliper per 1000 square feet. Removal of g 6. Add 30 pounds per acre annual rye grain t 9 vegetation must be performed in such a manner as to prevent damage to Structure Rim PIPE OUT between November and February. /
the roots of remaining trees. No fill material can be brought into any of No. Elevation Invert In Invert Out Len th Size T e Sloe Detail Reference No. 7. Ditch banks to have Lespedeza and Bermuda toss added to seed mix at RIPF crossin as shown on radin plan. _ 574.5 72 LF 15' Class 3 RCP ®2.08% CMLDS 20.05 1 2 rate if seedin in Ma through August (1~2 KY 31, 1/4 Lespedeza, 1/4 APR of RIPRAP ~ t -a :r 1/4 APRON ~ /
the buffer zones, except as required for driveway g, 9 9 CB 1 580.0 / 9 Y 4. Grading and other land disturbing activities are allowed only in the FES-2 573.0 RIPRAP APRON NCDOT 310.01 Bermuda). DITC DITCH L-4 r. / ~ °
upland zone; however, these activities must be performed in such amanner ~,,wHE ~ I TYP. AT EACH OUTLET ) r ~ ~ j
revent lama a to the roots of existing trees. Grass or other HW-3 562.0 34 LF 66" CI°ss 3 RCP ® 0.58% NCDOT 838.63 TYP. as top g suitable ground cover can be applied to the upland zone, HW-4 561.8 RIPRAP APRON NCDOT 838.63 ? ~ ~i~~ '3
5. No occupied structures can be placed in any of the buffer zones. FES-5 570.5 44 LF Class 3 RCP ®0.68% NCDOT 310.01 Non-commercial buildings for storage can be placed in the upland zone 1x36" (center pipe) & 2x30" (outside pipes) ~~,a~
provided they do not exceed 150 square feet. NCDOT 310.01 ! ~ ~ ' ~
6. The outside buffer boundary must be clearly marked by orange fabric FES-6 570.2 RIPRAP APRON fencing prior to any land disturbing activities at the site, Ond this fencing CMLDS =CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARD ,r~, ~
must be called OUt On the pIOnS. NCOOT =NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION \ ~ / # ~ , ti ti,
7. The outside boundary of the stream buffer must be permanently marked RCP =REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE with an iron pin or other acceptable property corner marker at street r rr 1 W-4 / ~ ~ i ~F F e~
crossings, and this marker must be called out on plans. TEMPORARY 9 ~ /~6 r ~ / ~ 4
To of bank locations, as shown on plan, have been field verified by 10 DIVERSION L-4 P SILT DITCH a registered land surveyor. FENCE L-4 ~ rr _ ~ NO
DIRECT TO SEDIMENT BASIN KIN ~ DOUBLE ROW ALONG f r / KIN
ENTIRE LENGTH. ADD ' / s~° ~ ~
SEDIMENT 1 6 aAaNCE FABAic ALONG TOP OF UPHILL ROw BASIN L-3 L-4 of siLT ~ENCE. RLI yj /
i N~.r CREE ^ % _ _ ~ / ~
RESTORE TO ORIGINAL GRADE AT COMPLETION - ~ 2 3 I
OF PROJECT
/ II
1 \ yam; . • QHAIENT ENE' . I ~ ~
~ ~ 15 CLEARING FOR - " aF SANITARY SEWER , - ~ , ~
A RAL ~i ~ `ReE ~ ~ / L TE bC ~ ~
CeN>F ~ SID ZONE I RLiN ' _ ~ 30' STREAM QS ^ . ` \ \ _ - ~ - / \
- i ISTURBED) i \ ~ ~ / (LINO ~ i 4 } ~ 1 \ cr,~,~~Rc},\~ - ~ - _ ~ ---~G i' H 570 - _ _ i
\ w, . FES- \ ~ r ~ i' ~ fJ' ~ sic FES-6 _ ~
~C ~ - ~ ANAGE ~ ~ / ~ / ' x ~ ~ 45 M I \ \ i' ~ ~ ~ US ZONE ~ ~ / 5 ~ a
k ~ ~ L ~ ~ / \ ~
\ ~ ~ ~ ~ IX X ~ / 7 0 - ~ _ ~ XI i/
~ ~ ~ ~ / i- i/~' ~ i \ >r i
~X
~ ~ ER / ~ _ X X X X X X-X~ ~ ~ I ~ ,SWIM BUFF ~ x 100 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ a
~ / FE N ~
\ ~w i ~ . ' N ti~ ~ I e~ti~i FF. 5Q' y~2 STONE SPILLWAY
~ ~.`~0J0 i F GQQ~G / i ~ ~
Q~~Q~/ ~ Jc~' 0 0 ~ 1a 5
i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~6
~ J off o ~ ~ - /
i r,j>~ r!" ~1 i ~ 1 _a 5~ ~
~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ r,AA = 71.`. ~ 59 0 ~ TOP OF ~ ~ ~ ~
~ i ~ ti~x 6 ~ ~ ~ F
~ ` 1~~k 600 £ + 68.5
i ~ k~~o
~~5 0 1
\ 6. 6~ \ ~ o~~
~ \ x ~~~~oQ~~
~5 Q~
\ ¢ y ~ 0~ \ s70 Jas 0~ P~\ 13 GRASSED ~
\ A ~gP5~,0~G ~ ~o~E ~ PQ L-4 DITCH A
~ ~o~~ 0
~
,yo ~ 1 5~0
x / ~ LI LIMITS OF
\ C CONSTRUCTION
~ ~ ~ NOTES
~ a 1. No GRADING WITHIN swl
TEMPORARY MPORARY 2. AT COMPLETION OF WOF
~ ~ e° 9 DIVERSION ~ i L-4 DITCH JERSION 3. SEE DETAIL X/L-4 FOR TCH
DIRECT TO STORM DRAINAGE PIPES )RM DRAINAGE PIPES
INSTALL JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE (SHOWN BEYOND PROPERTY LINE FOF INSIDE PROPERTY LINE JD PROPERTY l1NE FOR
GRAPHIC CLARITY ONLY). ITY ONLY). ~ TE
0 L-3 SCA
13 GRASSED L-4 DITCH 8
CALL N CALL NC ONE CALL 1). CONTRACTOR IS FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING APPROPRIATE PARTIES AND ASSURING THAT EXISTING
BEFO6 BEFORE YOU DIG UTILITIES ARE LOCATED PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.
2). CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PLACING BARRICADES USING FLAGMEN, ETC., AS NECESSARY TO INSURE SAFETY O 6~' 20
TO THE PUBLIC.
:1 cl I vnVFMENT CUTS. CONCRETE OR ASPHALT, ARE TO
BE REPLACED ACCORDING TO STANDARDS OF THE NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND v CMUD SPECIFICATIONS.
4). SHORING WILL BE ACCORDING TO OSHA TRENCHING
1-801 STANDARDS PART 1926 SUBPART P, OR AS AMMENDED. 1-800-632-4949 _ 60
AVOID I. AVOID UTILITY DAMAGE 5). CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH ALL OSHA

l

0 I I®~
I ~ I ~
~ i
General Notes ' G) O ~
1. Boundary survey by Jack R, Christian, NCRLS, dated June 21, 2004. CSI O ~
2. Building footprint from architectural information provided by Owner. Zonin bode Summer g Y 3. City Inspector shall be given 48 hours advance notice prior to beg'mning of construction. pry v I I ~~I I
a The location of the subject ro ert has been checked against area FEMA/FIRM maps, and 't has been determined that it IS PROJECT NAME: Hebron Street Industrial Site 1 P P Y trial Site Z ~ I~
~ located In a special flood hazard area. (Community Panel number 37119C0245E, effective date: February 4, 2004). OWNER: Pane Construction Co Inc PHONE, _ PHONE: [phone] ~ U 1 ~ n Studio PHONE: [phone] ~ ~
5. Grading more than one acre without an approved Erosion Control Plan is a violation of the City Erosion Control Ordinance and is SITE PLANS PREPARED BY: Site Design Studio PHONE subject to a fine. ZONING: I_2
6. On-site burial pits require an on-site demolition landfill permit from the County Zoning Administrator. Any on-site demoliticn landfills JURISDICTION: City of Charlotte ~ F ~ ~ LiJ ~
1 or stumpholes shall be no closer to any exterior property Imes than that permitted by code. TAX ID NO.: 205 151 16 - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ X I
I 7. Subsurface drainage facilities may be required in the street right-of-way if deemed necessary by the Inspeator. PROPOSED USE: Warehouse ressions at rum location s) per CMLDS standcrd deteii 10.33, latest revision. MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT: 30 ft. S STORIES: ? ~ ~ ~ I ^ ONC. CO ~ ~ i ~ I
8, Provide handicap ramp curb dep p ( i f ro osed develo men t. Trash cohection shall occur through existing screened dumpster EXISTING BUILDING COVERAGE. G s.f. GROSS Fl 9. No new dumpster shall be requ red or p p p GROSS FLOOR AREA: 0 s.f. EXISTN~ C - ~ '~~DRIVEWAY , ~ U L{? I GROSS FLOOR AREA: 440 s,f, ~
on adjacent nightclub property or through other private arrangements. NEW BUILDING COVERAGE: 440 s.f, GROSS FLOOF RTE ADJUST EXISTING GUARDRAIL ~ ~ -EXISTING' 5' CONC E ~ I ~ ~ \ S,DEWALK AT BACK OF ~ ~ 0
10. Construction of the following items shall be in accordance with the following Charlotte Land Development Standard (CMLDS) detains; 10.31A Accessible handicap ramp SITE AREA FROM SURVEY: 10.19 AC. MINIMUM OPEN MINIMUM OPEN SPACE: N A EXTEND 50' ALONG PROPOSED ~ 0' CURB ALONG HEBRON ~ ~ F ~ A ~ a GRAV_L DRIVE. LOCATE 6' ~ ~ ~ STREET D i
50.10A Accessible parking and si~nage standards NUMBER OF GNITS/SUITES: 1 FROM EDGE OF PAVING : ~ GB ~ r~n a
50.108 Supplemental accessible sign ~ 11. Gravel area to consist of minimum 6" CABC over compacted sabgrade. YARD REQUIREMENTS: SETBACK (FRONT): 20 ft. 6~ ski ~ V1~a A, ~ ~ T1P~ it o ~ ~ ~ DROP CURB ~
12. No road im rovements along Hebron Street are associated with this project. SIDE YARD (N): 5 ft, P r'-~: ~ V ~ L-4 LL~ o DRIVEWAY ~ (1 _ z ~3: a
13. No offsite grading is required for this development. SIDE YARD (S): 5 ft. ~ LOCATE AT EXISTING CURB ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ CUT -MODIFY TO 28' MIN. I ~
' ct. REAR YARD: 10 ft. 14. Loading area is not required for this probe REQUIRED BUFFERS: WIDTH AND CMLDS 10.256. \ ~ ~ i ~ ~ (n ~ ~ ~ 20. } TAPER (EACH SIDE) I z
15. All proposed utilities shall be underground. r to and sha!I remove from the FRONT: NO YES REAR: NO /YES NO YES ~ ] TO 22' WIDTH BEYOND 20 z O~ ~ s z I ~ ~ SETBACK
16. The developer shall maintain each stream, creek, or backwash channel in an a^obst acted stn SIDE (N): NO /YES channel and banks of the stream all debris, logs, timber, junk and other accumulations. ~ li S c , a I~'~: ~ ~~9 i a i'>
I Way Encroachment Area is subject to the restrictions of the SIDE (S): NO /YES 17. Any construction or use within the areas delineated as Food y 1 I ~ 9~, r' ~ z I ~`,I>' i
I City of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County. REQUIRED SCREENING: I r ainin walls must be submitted to City Engineer prior to construction. FRONT: NO ES REAR: NO YES i 18. PE sealed shop drawings for et g Y EXISTING 25' CMUD _ ~ ¢ NO ES e, ~ O A W r A S.N. SWR. R/ ~ .n.y EXISTING GR
19. Non-standard items i. e.: avers, irrigation systems, etc.) in the right-ot-way require aRight-of-Way Encroachment Agreement SIDE (E): NO /YES SIDE (W): NO / YE5 ( P ~,W): NO ~ YE5 ~ DRIVEwAr / ~ 0 I l~
with the Charlotte Department of Transportation/North Carolina Department of Transpor,at,o~~ before installation. PARKING ONLY: NO /YES EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA: O s.f. _ o , ~ s
NEW IMPER'dIOUS AREA: 70,000 s.f. TOTAL IMPER~ TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA: 70000 s.f. ~'E I I ~ ~ ~I 1; ~ / ~ I
SWIM Stream Buffer Notes PARKING DATA: PER ZONWG ORD. SECTION 12.202 FOR BUSINESS 12 FOR BUSINESS USE, f~:.~ I ~ \
1. This project contains S.W.I,M. stream buffers which are under the jurisdiction MINIMUM REQUIRED SPACES IS AS FOLLOWS: 1 SF S FOLLOWS: 1 SPACE PER 250 SF l~ r~ i ~ . Z ' ~1 ~ I
of Mecklenburg County Department of Environmental Protection. PROPOSED BUILDING HAS 440 SF. < < A I 1 1 ACCESSIBLE: 1 COMPACT: 0 / i ~ s I - ~ ~ I ,i ~I
2. All S.IN.LM. buffers within this project are a width of 100 fees from the top o. REQUIRED 2 PROVIDED: 2 CCESSBLE _ bank plus 50% of the floodway fringe beyond 100 feet, as sr~own on these plans. CARP00'_: 0 f~~r. I
The lower 30 feet (s the streamside zone, the middle 45 feet is the managed use zone, and the upper 25 feet plus 50% of the floodway fringe beyond 100 feet ~ i 1, ; ~ ~ I
is the upland zone. ~N ' 8- / ~
3. The streamside zone of the buffer must be left completely undisturbed, except Aso' ~ ` ~ l ~ ~ ,~~;t 4~" ~ , A
where needed for driveway crossing and associated grading, as shown on plan. to the managed use/upland zone, a limlked number of trees can be removed
provided that the tree density remaining is o minimum of 8 healthy trees I ~ _ ~ ~ ~ , t ~ - I i ~ _
of a minimum 6 inch caliper per 1000 square feet. Removal of existing i vegetation must be performed in such o manner as to prevent damage to wow i i U 1 ~ i, ~ ! \ hz' #
the roots of remaining trees. No fill material can be brought into any of the buffer zones, except as required for driveway crossing, as shown on grading pe^. ~ 1 , ~ / 5 Ir ~ ~ G, `;b l I _ ~ ~ v
4. Grading and other land disturbing activities are allowed on~~Y ~n the I e I 1 m I~ 4 ~ ~
upland zone; however, these activities must be performed ~n such a manner as to prevent damage to the roots of existing trees. Grass or other P 1 ~ a~ / ~ Q~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ V l / / ~~a
suitable ground cover can be applied to the upland zone. ~ C. ~ I ~ I~ n"~ i _ _ ~ 1 12 RETAINING ( = v
5. No occupied structures can be placed in any of the buffer zones, Non-commercial buildings for storage can be placed In the upland zone J. - ~ i ~ / ~ ~-t-1 0 „ ~ f i ~ WALL ~ ~o z I
provided they do not exceed 150 square feet. ! ~ y E op ~ ~ / ~ 1 SEE GENERAL ~ °
6. The outside buffer boundary must be clearly marked by orange fabric fencing prior to any land disturbing activities at the site, and this fencing t ~ l -~~a~'E I aorE Ia ` v ~ i r~
must be called out on the plans. ~ fR ~~~apD ~ 'z a v ~ tom. ~ ~ *~b,~ a d K
I 7. The outside boundary of the stream buffer must be permanently marked with an iron pin or other acceptable property corner marker at street \ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ 2`L or S ~ i r ~v~~ ~ ~ ~ o00
crossings, and this marker must be called out an plans. / / ~ ~~q ~ Z ~ N 17 / ~ ~ ~ ~~`R, O O O N i
8. lop of bank locations, as shown on plan, have been field verified by a registered land surveyor. / ~ m`k t - fN M
~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ I / / ~ O ~ .-NM ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ oN~ , e- ~
I 1v1ECKLENBU,RG COUNTY ITY r i ~,a R ~ Q F ~ i
I DEED 12815 PG. 861 1 - r ~ ~ ;5 , iO~F 5~ ~ Q 4,. ~ II / ~ a~ ~ a3'~ 5 w/ {v (k
~ MAPBOOK 35 P. I ~ 901 ~n' ~i ~ ~ i p I
TIE LATERAL TD ~ EXIST. SEWER LINE ~i 6,'
.3g" E i ~'S9 E ~ - / ~ ~ E h 63 4~ i ~ r~, w I
VULCAN LANDS INC. 314 0 ~ - - - - ~ I / ~ ~ f--- _ - ? ~ ~
LJEED 11147 PG. 60 _ - " - - ~ ~ - ~ ~
~ _ - ' ~ - r ~ f~
_ - EXISTING 25 CMUD 2 S , _ ` _ _ u - r _ ~ sAN. swR R/w~ S - - _ s ~ ~ r--
- - ~ ~ 128.23' _ ~ ' - , rcMe e~oooweY~irre s ~ s ~ ~ i ~ ~ ! ti ~ ~
_ _ _ - ~N N _ ~ - 4 - K G _ ~ - - ~ ti~ _ _ X ~
I V 7j i - - top ~ S ~ ' ~ ~ _ T I I
i \ ~ ~ -,C ~ I NE - i L ~G E ~ ~ ~ / i ~
\ ~ ~ _ ~ n u ~ AMSID i ~ ~ ~ - w ~~G~,~/~ _ : , ~ ~ 30 SIRE S - ~ ~ ~ °cy. ~ ~ - - _ _ -,-k\ ~ REED) - / ~ ~ ~ Le end 0
- ~ ~ / ABC li
FJ 'fir ~ i' c ~ ~ . ~ ~ N 8 Tj' ~ _ ~ .AGE . ~ - ~ .w- ~ i~ ~ ~ ' ~ _ I PROPOSED I ~ I
\ ~ ~ ~ - - I _s= i - ~ I I 4 j GRAVEL. ~A1~EMENT/DRi`,~E I i I
~ \ 5 ~ II EXI; V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ I TON I EXISTING / o
I rowER ~ ^ ~d~ ~ PRO?OSED / V CONCRE'E PAD
k ~J ~J °J ~ % ` ZONE ~ _ - ~ ~ ~ I
\ l _ - ~ ~ - ~ ~ \ 22' ~~~~E ~ HANDICAP PARKING SPACE ~ I
GRAVt.L DR~~VE I / HANDICAP PARKING SPACE SIGN
\ - - ~ ~ 1 ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ i' vl~~~.`ir ~ v - /
Q - EX 9~~G ~'S' CMUO ~ ~ f ~ ~ 02 - - / EXISTING UTILITY POLE AND OVERFEAD LINE
POWER a ~ ~ O O ; ~ ~ ~O Z TOWER ~m ~ _ P~~ ~ . 6~' / ~ - 100' S>MM BUFFER LINE I '
~ / - QVy~ v. ~ ucE " ` ~1 i ~ O I I
~ s Q 0 I 4~ ' - i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ 6R VEL TOp 0% BANK
l n ~ o~E ~ AREA ~ ~E r.,c- /
ti ~ ~ ~ _ _ _ - _ _ _ dNGS 9RA_~'Ch /
?ROPOSED BUILDING I i SEE ARCHT. PLANS
~ ~ ~ coNQR~T_ A~ i
" , ~ ~ / Pr H~ 1
v ~ ~ ~ , ~~~t, l ~ / Q~ r
P ~ g \ / ~ Nv ~ ~P ~ 9
i A ~,p A ~ /(,Q I „2 ° ~ ~ \ / ~w j 0 ~
c ~
~ ~ GRA`iE. AREA. ~ ~ ~ \ ~ 0 I I
~ ~ ` ~ I L \ ACCESSI 1 ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ 5~ L-4 PARKING ACCESSIBLE ~ I ' ~ ~ j I i ~ I L-4 PARKING SIGN
I, Z 0 ~ I ~ I i
\ R~~ \'~A ~ I ~ ROVJOOD R0. 12 ~ O I ` 'Qj AR i,W I _ ~
Y~\ \ ~r- ~ IC i I
I ~ \ I I ~'i
~ / z -a ~ ~ Q I ~r~ ~ ~ ~ • -
~ ~ ~ i \ 1 Q I . _ ~ I j I ~ _ ~
c Nee,~oh, 000 ~ nn 11 L~ j
. `7~ ~al~ a~4 i Sr W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C.~ I
~ ` ~ ~ ~ 51TE r L
~ `6 ~o / ( ~ ~ I
n u~ ~ o ,l NoRv 0 ~
, F o \ \~T ~ Iy1AP ~ ~ Z SGq~E ~ L O ~
u O
-a-' Q) ~ ~ ~
n Z O ~ i 11 - I I
X L ~ X~
li x~
~ ~ Z x U LL LINE '~~_E CARQ~,~'~ I
~ ~ ' ~ tJ D S C ~ , F 9~ _A~ I LENGTr :~~ARING ~ P qA'~
4' / ~ > > :gyp P ~ December 77, 2004 u. 25. Nis•~3'ss"E, , 0 60 120 240' - ; ~ =
i L2 44.2C N17'25'97"W ~ = ; a 7 ~ ' 1' 4 4 _ w _
r~ I ~
/ ~ v v V I? J(J I I L 'L4 51.69 %80'25'01"E 0 y ;
_5 40.59 %15'53'52"E
38.29 %42'27'30"W -
38.' 7 %07'39'42"E C' SHEET 1 OF 4 48.48 %38'28'40"E sC?L
_ 9' 56.65 N09'23'52"E
COMM. NO. 0414

~._.._.~__._._~.___.___._._.._.~__.~___e__.___~.___~_.~_____.___________.__~__
~ I
i
~ c;
~ CC) N d
~ C~1 I~ C~ ~ U cti' o
I CS; i C) ~
~ ~ U~ ~ i i ~ r~
~ ~
~ ~ - EY15T'NG =r',EES WITFIIPi 3C' TRc:E ~ U ~ E'ROTECiICJPd 'ZONE ?O SAI~SFY _ ~ U) u~ ~J ~ ~
~ ~ ~ rE:R1~GETEF'. PLANTING REQUIRk.MEI~iiS I ~ ~
~ c• ! j ~ ALONG HEBRON' `~TREEi:;. I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Lf) Q) _ ~
i ~ ~ k., ~ ~ i C) x
[XJ _3 ~ s. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l17'i~ C.J CL l.~
i ~ ~ i IM1~ ,J l.n H
I 1r ~ \ ~ - 1,';Y' WAILR f~ETER BY tJIUI~IL~ ~ ~
~ V ~ r~,'. ~ f ! OCATE ~ ~ RIGN'~OF'-VJAY ~ ~ ~ .1 °z i
q ~ ~ S ' o I ~ r''
RELJ~ICE~ ~'~RkS~ihRE / 3 _ ~ , V ! ~ ~ s ~l- \ r < ~ A ~ I r~ i
aFCk~L.O1h' PIREVEPJiCiR 1,L-4 ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~e \ j L~ ~
Lu"~r+ E GU~SlGE SvTBAGK ~I F~, r ~ - IA ~ . / i ~ SEE VIAT± ,AND SEWER NOES ~ (i ' '"l7 T
NC. r J~ TNIS SI~aEET. `4 4, ~ ~ z ~I sECnoN „ ~ ~
~ar~srwoiu~w ~ ~~I \ \ d _e'NR a7Aa ~ ~ r, v'. ~ A V
11 ~II 11 --~1 ~ \ z
EXio,,NG 15~ l;~IUD ~ ~ a SAN, SWR. RjW---~. D ~ ~ X am.~ /i i ~ ~
~ S r~ o f I ~ 7/ ~ ~ I i ~ :-fi,~ I, I ~ ~
i I I ' ~ ~ J 1; r ~ ~ i ~ ~ N\
I ,1 I; / ~ \
,f ' J
j F i ~ ~ I \ s t ~l i ~ 1 ~ ~T
~ ~ j ~
~ l ~ ,
i~ % ~ J , ~ a , 'err
~ ~
~ I i r d 'J it 4
~J 4 N ~ QT t.,. t ~ ~ \ N~ f'v''" i// \x/ / 1~ ~ inn
G ~ ~ ~ rye ~ a V ` I ¢ A ~ m G p
i ~ /Oi I / ti..J ~ ~ \ , ~ ~ ~ ~
i ij / ~ ~ ~ ~ k~Ia~ 'YIS' VG MANNU SEr R1+ E~"4A''!v~V ~ ,o
j l ~ ~ ^t 'U M?"CH ?ROPOScD GRADE SEE GRAUiNG = ~ j ~ ~ r-' PLC 4LL CONSTRUC;TIC)N TO i;GMPLY ~ ~
~ ~ r-' ~ ,V ili ~~^„D S?ANDARDS. I n
1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S' ~ ~ l / i \ ~ ~ ;Y / / i V1
~ ~ ~ _ ~ o sy ~ ,r-+ r-- ~ ~
-1 / -
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ / ~
~ a^~0 ~ ' i 5 i ~F ~ -
~ ~ ~ 1 ~ i / cvN ~
~ li i ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i
~ j -i_ _;-ERa_ ra I EXIST. SEWER LNE-~ I,y i ~ EX STIR, ~L~S \
~ r rx. TO RE1~niN / m~ >
_ r'~, ~
~ ~ ,r ~ , ~
~ i _ _ - - - - _ ~ ~ ,
ExiSwG 25' CNJD T_ _ _ _ _ ~ ~ _ _ SAN. SWR. R/W-i - ~ ~'`~i i i s ~
~6~ f . f . S ~ ~ i i ~ - /
1/ ~ 4 ICJ:~ _ .-.-..,.6 l _ ~CRPA~7MENP l+1dE ~ S ~ ~,n, ~N t i _ ~
I - ~ _
i i RP _ , ~ ~ ~ i ~ o - n ~
~ ~ i ~ ~ c 2 ~ 5' ~ - _ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' r - i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Iron ~.1
-~J , ~ ~ _ - ~ ~ ~Ty - 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ I _ I
~ / a ~ m A ~ ~
~y:`~' y V ~ ~ i' ~pN. ~ / ~ I ~
~ ~ ~ i EX'STiM1G t~ p s^CI I I i POWER ~ . ~ ~
p z _ - TOWER k ~ /1.I ~ ~ i
i I n? i ~ ~ ~ i ~I
~ ~t CO A~ ( ~
\ Le end
i ~ ~ ~ r ~ ' ~ / ~ ' ~ ~ U~
~ ~ / \ SPN. S'wR\ A /W ~ ~ ~ 0 EXIS1lNG ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ , POWER ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ - ~ N'___STO° ~ R U~ cX15~~~VG TREELi~sE 4,.~
~ rowee m ~ ~ ~ _ ~~~f ~ A ~ ~~I F ~ ~~t ~ / ~ - 1 / ~
i ~ ~ - ~ r v i / ~ r ~ ~~Rn ~ ~ ~ _ ~ J ~ ~ `rr~ °?OFGSE'l TRE~~INE ~
~ ~ - ~ r ~ EA / ~
,~V ~ ~ . _ ~ _ - ~ n~, . ~ - ~1 AR °RUrbSti~ I ARC=~ t1A~.,RNG rR~E ~ .-i--1
i ~ _~v-T , ~ ~ ~
~ ~ , ~ cc c~E-_ =AD ~ U ~ ~ / ~ li I ~
~ .-~®_a
1 ~ , ~ ~ + PRO~'O::ED S41a~~ tvfa"',.? v~ ?REE:"'', ,1~ i
'
~ ~ ; ~ i - WHc L S`fOf' ~
i ,
~ ~ ~ GRAbE_ AREA ~ cXIS'TING ~TF'EES 4JPO~, a ,FINE. '._INF y ~ ~ i
TC RE4~fAifJ \ A r _ _ ~ ~ i - ~XS ~ ~~N G WA?c,R i.iNE ~ I i
~ I
~ ~ i ~RJPOSEC~ 'r4ATER ~tRIiCE. ~ I u ~7
'I ~ \ i ~ / i - EXISTING I,J~f;LIIY PO;.E A~J UGERr1~h% _NE ~ I
~
~ ~ ~ ~ , r~ ~ ~
~-1 ~ i ~
~ l ~ ~ 1 I nl . _ W ~ 0
~ ~1
} ~ ~
~ , , , _ ~ i(/~
Water anc fewer Notes ~ AJ l ~ 4_ C)
Woter and sewer connections to comp~~- with all ~EM„E saec'-~Icatians and req~~~ements. Co~'ra: toy is to app~y `o~ c ~ ~ c; C.;' ~
\ ~ service caanections, as eppropriate. L ~ I
Sanitar sewer lateral shol'~ 5e <"ova pipe at min'r~cm 1.0% s ope. provide c~eano„`.s rat 75' maximum, F ~ \ Y i ~-~n
3, ~~°here shall be no lops, piping brar•chas, unapproved py~~ass pG~ing, Y~.ydran;s, `~~e cep:. ponne:~cr points, or o:re~ water-usin apurtsnances connected tc the supply 're eet~een any rooter rnete~ crd its C!~LE-requre~d '~aackflow pre~.e^:e~. 9 L-- + ~
„ ~ ~n~ i. 4. Each CMUD-required E3PA is required ;o be tes~ed dy ~ ~tiuu approved cerf,f~ed tes:e~ prlo~ p ca~y ~he wc'.e' s:err se~~lce. = o C? !i ~
1 nt. of lhr:; BPA loco=ons spawn on these pans reGu~~~es CMUD approve. ~ 5. Any ~d~~stme n ;~C ~ ~ ~ ~
6, Water and sewer connection points to k~uilding are apprcximote only. See plumbing p~ar.s for precise inf~~rvnatio~ ~ x ~ = x tiJ LL
7 Pre~~ide 3J4~ ~educec pressure princlpe da•Kflow preven;lon asse~c ~nslalfed obore-g G d wl'~~n ~ st,let~.a enc~,os.,~e CAR~~ I I i'
per CM!JD requrements. Assembly to nu,ude 7.A_R noted cover N~tr renter capable pf main,a~~~ng *.errp, of ?rovide electrical aanneetions for reefer as requiFec. Erclos~~re '.c 'ncl,~de drpin por~;s} fen Cs:,^a~ge water peg ~ tio~c ,
CMUD requirements. See deta'~I sheet. ~ Decem~er 17, 2004 ~ 0 ~ ~ 120 2 : ~~u ~ : _ .m_._ i
S. Contractor shall provide ell voives, reducers, tees, and biowoffs c'~onG ,voter ;ne per store p u~bLng cone ana owna•'s Fec;uireme^-s. ~ Z - e~ w 44? ~
~ i 2
v ~
711 SHEE' 2 OF d
COMM. NO, 0414 i
i