20060005 Ver 1_Complete File_20051227

pFWATF
\p? 9pG Michael F. Easley, Governor
Vj William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Q
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
October 3, 2005
Re Randleman Rule (15A NCAC 0213.0250) Surface Water and Stream Origin Determination
Park View Elementary School, High Point, N. C.
Ms. Kimberly A. Keyes
CLH Design, P.A.
125 Edinburgh South, Suite 310
Cary, NC 27511
Dear Ms. Keyes,
On August 29, 2005, Mr. Daryl Lamb of the Winston-Salem Regional Office of the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (NCDWQ) evaluated the drainage feature delineated on the attached map, received from you by
this office on September 12, 2005, and determined by observation and/or use of the current> version of the
NCDWQ Stream Classification Form that this feature does possess sufficient riparian characteristics to be
classified as surface water for the purpose of application of the requirements of 15A NCAC 02B- .0250,
Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed: Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Areas. In addition, the
surveyed point of origin depicted on the attached map, is the point at which the stream channel begins for the
purpose of application of the riparian protection requirements of 15A NCAC 02B .0250.
If you have any questions or require additional information concerning this determination, please telephone Mr.
Lamb in the NCDWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office at 336-771-4600, extension 293.
Sincerely,
a C kL7-
C ow RE, p
D Steve W. Tedder
O C T 1 3 2005 Regional Supervisor
Division of Water Quality
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
SWT/cdl
Attachments
cc: DWQ, Winston-Salem Regional Office
401 /Wetlands Unit File Copy
Central Files
NoWhCarolina
cNatgrallk
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Certification Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 Phone [phone] FAX (919)' 733-2496
2321 Crabtree Blvd. Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 Internet htto//:h2o.enr.state nc us/ncwetlands
Customer Service Number: 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

a Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
li
n
North Caro
Project:
atitude:
Date: 0 Longitude: 7?0:69 ,38
Site:
Evaluator:
Other
Total Points: County: ?a
e.g. Quad Name:
Stream is at least intermittent
3 D
if ? 19 or erennial if >_ 30 ?
Absent Weak Moderate Strong
A. Geomor holo Subtotal
0 1 2 3
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2
2. Sinuosity o 3
3. in-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
4 1 3
0
.
5. Active/relic floodplain 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 - 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9 a Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10: Headcuts 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Grade controls 0 0: 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway
Second or greater order channel on existin o = 0 Yes = 3
13
.
USGS or NRCS'map or other documented
evidence.
a Manmade ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
H drolo Subtotal
B 1 2 3
.
0
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or 0 1
Water in channel - d or rowin season 1 5 1 5 0
16. Leaflitter 0 0 5 1 1.
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) es = 1:5
No = 0
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features} present?
C. Biology (Subtotal 2 1 0
3
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21b. Rooted plants in channel 0 0.5 1 1.5
22. Crayfish 1 2 3 '
23. Bivalves` 0.5 1 1.5
24. Fish 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance} 0.5 1 1.5
1 2 3
0
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 0.5. 1 1.5
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus.
5; FACW = 0.75; 08L = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
FAC = 0
.
29 . Wetland plants in streambed
s 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Item
Sketch:
Notes: (use hack side of this form for additional notes.)
Cows" L6
1k
j N cised.
r C-)
i
I
/-
y /
1 I
jI
j
11 1 l/ /
Ill
N A
L III / / // / / ?? / / ? ?
II r l N?' / i i i%/ y
I?//\\ / I I I / / I
X, "I
/ \??\?\ II I \ II I \
?? / \ I\ 1 I \ \ \\
`------ 11 I \
_4 S
\ \ 870-1
N
I
?? \\` \ \\ \\\ 1` ?\ IV I I j I I
t \ ? ? \ I I I I i I I I
\ \ l \? \ l \? yl
a
os??
aBR \?`?
? 1d NVJ?W
i
-660,.
ea

:.? 7REgy

S ?
rv ? y

Q ?__ x MY 9 it ) 3S_ \ \ 1

PARKVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLH DESIGN, P.A.
DATE: 9-12-05 MacGregor Park
SCALE: V.=60' 125 Edinburgh South
Suite 310

N C D E N R MAP Cery, North Carolina 27511
Phone: [phone]
Fez: .[phone]
WON
Michael F. Easley, Governor
?0? W aT R4?
50 G William G. Ross Jr:, Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
a , Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
January 20, 2006
DWQ# 06-0005
Guilford County
Mr. Kevin Lear
Guilford County Schools
900 English Road
High Point, NC 27262
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Lear:
The Guilford County Schools have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to place
permanent fill in 155 linear feet of intermittent stream and in 0.08 acre of forested wetlands in order to
construct a crossing for a new access road and associated parking lot at Parkview Elementary School located
at 506 Henry Place in High Point, Guilford County, as described in your application received by the Division
of Water Quality (DWQ) on December 27, 2005. After reviewing your application, we have determined that
this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3402, which can be viewed on'our web site
at httD://h2o.enr.statenc.us/ncwetlands. This Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 39
when it is issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. In addition, you should secure any other, applicable
federal, state or local permits before you proceed with your project, including (but not limited to) those
required by Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations. Also,
this approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General
Certification.
This approval is valid only for the purpose and design ,that you have described in your application. If you
change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be required to send us a new application for a
new certification. If the property is sold, the, new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and
approval' letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fill for this
project (now or in the future) exceeds one acre, or total fill to perennial streams equals or exceeds 150 linear
feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval
to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification, as well as the additional
conditions listed below:
1. The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all other specific and general conditions of this
Certification are met. No other impacts, including incidental impacts, are approved:
Amount Approved Plan Location or Reference
Streams 155 linear feet Unnamed intermittent tributary to Boulding Branch located on the site of
Parkview Elementary School at 506 Henry Place in High Point, Guilford
County, as de cted on the Overall Wetlands Im act Map
n?,,Rh?Caro ina
dvaturaly
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Certification Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 Phone [phone] FAX [phone]
2321 Crabtree Blvd. Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 Internet hftp//:h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands
Customer Service Number: 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper.
Mr. Kevin Lear
Page 2, DWQ# 06-0005
January 20, 2005
Amount Approved Plan. Location or Reference
Wetlands 0.08 acre Forested riparian wetlands adjacent to an unnamed tributary
of Boulding Branch located on the site of Parkview
Elementary School at 506 Henry Place in High Point,
Guilford County, as depicted on the Overall Wetlands Impact
Ma included with the Pre-Construction Notification
2. Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures which equal or exceed those outlined in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual or the
North Carolina Surface Mining Manual (available from the Division of Land Resources at NCDENR
regional offices or the central office), whichever is more appropriate, shall be designed, installed and
maintained properly to assure compliance at all times with the North Carolina water quality standards
that are applicable to Class WS-IV waters as described in 15A NCAC 02B.0216 Fresh Surface Water
Quality 'Standards For Class 'WS-IV Waters. Such measures must equal or exceed the requirements
specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual.
These measures must be maintained' on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) sites,
including, contractor owned and leased borrow pits, which are associated with this project.
3. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent
practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control measures in wetlands or waters is
unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that the
project is completed or, if applicable, within six months of the date that the project is released by the
North Carolina Division of Land Resources.
4. No waste, spoils, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction activities,
including the design,, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control "Best
Management Practices" shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards,
statutes, or rules occur.
5. The proposed project must comply with the City of High Point's local water supply ordinance approved
by the N.C. Environmental Management Commission (EMC) as required under the Randleman Lake
Water Supply Watershed: Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Areas (Randleman Buffer Rule) 15A
NCAC 02B.0250.
6. The pipe required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profile is
not altered (i.e. the depth of the channel must not be reduced by a widening of the streambed). Existing
stream dimensions (including the pattern and profile) are to be maintained above and below the location
of the pipe. The pipe shall be designed and installed to prevent head cutting of the stream. If the pipe
becomes perched, the appropriate stream grade shall be re-established or, if the pipe is installed in a
perched manner, the pipe shall be removed and re-installed correctly. The Applicant must submit a plan
and receive written approval from this Office to address any head cutting that will occur as a result of
this project (e.g.,.use of cross vanes downstream of the culvert).
7. Where riprap is required for energy dissipation and scour protection, it shall be limited to the minimum
Mr. Kevin Lear
'Page 3, DWQ# 06-0005
January 20, 2006
dimensions specified by appropriate engineering calculations. Riprap may only be used below the
normal high water level. The original grade and elevation of the stream's cross-section must be
maintained. Riprap placed in the stream bottom must be inserted into the bottom matrix to a depth
sufficient to provide the thickness of riprap required for scour protection. The elevation of the stream
bottom must not be increased by the placement of riprap. Placement of riprap must not result in
destabilization of the streambed or banks upstream or downstream of any crossing.
8. All construction activities associated with this project shall minimize built-upon surface area, direct
stormwater runoff away from surface waters, and incorporate best management practices to minimize
water quality impacts. If concrete is used with any fill material, it shall" not be allowed to come in
contact with surface waters until it has cured. If any stormwater must be collected for discharge into a
stream channel, it shall not enter the stream as a point source; but shall be slowed and discharged as
sheet flow prior to entering the riparian buffer on either side of the stream.
9. Upon finishing the project, the Applicant shall fill out and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401 Certification has been completed.
This certificate should be returned to the Wetlands/401 Certification Unit of the NC Division of Water
Quality at the address listed on the form. Along with the Certificate of Completion, please send
photographs upstream and downstream of the installed pipe to document correct installation.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You
must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written, petition
which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative'
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
If you have any questions, please telephone Daryl' Lamb in the DWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office at 336-
771-4600 or Ian McMillan in the Wetlands/401 Central Office in Raleigh at 919-715-4631.
Sincerely,
,1 /
qN
006 Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Wgq
tr
AWK/cd1
Attachments
cc: Mr. Todd Tugwell, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Winston-Salem DWQ Regional Office
Central Files
Wetlands/401 File Copy
Mr. Jason Payne, Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
Triage Check List
Date: 1/05/06 Project Name: Parkview Elementary
DWQ#: 06-0005
County: Guilford
Daryl Lamb, Winston-Salem Regional Office
To:
60-day processing time: 12/27/05 - 2/25/06
From: Cyndi Karoly' Telephone: [phone]
The file attached is being forwarded to you for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
F] Stream length impacted
Ei Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
0 Check drawings for accuracy
Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
Cumulative impact concern
Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks!
r
t r,
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
6 cv
December 27, 2005
S&EC Project # 9918.W2
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Todd Tugwell
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
From: Jason Payne
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Parkview Elementary School
High Point, NC
N.C. Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
I_

On behalf of the owner, Guilford County Schools, please find attached a complete application and
supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) and the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) that the activities proposed below may
proceed under Nationwide Permit 39, and General Water Quality Certification GC3402 (per NWP
39). Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or require additional
information.
DDn ID(`T CI IKARAARV
Project Name Parkview Elementary
Project Type Public School Access Road
Owner / Applicant Guilford Count Schools
Count Guilford
Nearest Town High Point
Waterbod Name UT Bouldin Branch
Basin / Sub-basin 03-06-08
Index Number 17-3-2
Class WS-IV
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0.011
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.075
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.086
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 155
Attachments:
Pre-construction Notification (PCN) Form (9 pages)
Agent Authorization
USGS Map - from TopoZone.com
DWQ Buffer Letter (NBRRO 05-042) (3 pages)
Original Road Design
Overall Site Plan with impact insets (5 pages)
Impact justification letter (2 pages)
$475 Application Fee to DWQ
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhiltip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Office Use Only' Form Version March 05
20060005
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
Section 404 Permit M Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from`NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located- in any. of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina; Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
Yd
. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Guilford County Schools
Mailing Address: Attn: Kevin Lear
900 English Road
High Point, NC 27262
Telephone Number: (336),819-2706 Fax Number: N/A
E-mail Address: NIA
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jason Payne
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA ;
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Pagel of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 1 l by 17=inch format;
however, DWQ may `accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Parkview Elementary
T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
2.
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Guilford Nearest Town: High Point
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):
The property is located approximately 500 feet north of Kivett Drive, west of
Gordon Street, in High Point, Guilford County, NC.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.9694 ON 79.9822 °W
6. Property size (acres): ± 15 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Boulding Branch (WS-IV) (17-3-2)
8. River Basin: Cape Fear (03-06-08)
j (Note this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mgps/.)
Page 2 of 9
9. Describe the `existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application:
The site is currently in mixed use, with the western portion of the property containing
an existing school that was constructed circa 1950 and the eastern portion of the
property is forested. Land use in the vicinity of this site is primarily residential.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project consists of the expansion of an existing school facility. ` Impacts
associated with this expansion result from construction of a new access road and
parking lot. Other impacts to riparian buffers occur where the new drainage system
will junction with the existing drainage system. Heavy equipment typically used for
grading and excavation will be utilized for this project.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
,
The purpose of the proposed school expansion is to -meet the need for additional
classrooms at this facility. Due to excellence in student performance and, test scores
at this school, it has been deemed a "magnet" school under the No Child Left Behind
Act of 2002. As a result, the school is growing at an above average rate. The lack
of classroom space is evidenced by the fact that some classes actually meet in the
cafeteria. With the impending growth and insufficient classroom space, the
expansion is necessary. The purpose of the proposed road construction is to
access the new buildings and accommodate the greater number of automobiles
associated with the addition of personnel coinciding with classroom expansions.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or` obtained for this
project (including all prior phases_ of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously :issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list' and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
S&EC is not aware of any other 404 Permits or 401 Certifications approved for this
property. The stream channel (i.e., UT to Boulding Branch), wetlands in the vicinity of
the road crossing, stream buffers along the proposed `road, and stream buffers at each
culvert junction at the north and south property lines, are the only anticipated impacts to
to 404 and 401 jurisdiction. Engineering
Randleman Buffers and surface waters subject
Consulting Services, Ltd delineated wetlands on the site during ' May, 2005. A
Jurisdictional Determination was made for the site, and a delineation map approved by
Page 3 of 9
}
Mr. Todd Tugwell of the USACE on 8/12/05 (AID #200521185). Mr. Daryl Lamb of the
NC-DWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office evaluated one stream feature near the center
of the site on 8/29/05 to determine the applicability of the Randleman Buffer Rules to
this feature. Please contact S&EC if you would like to schedule another site visit.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
S&EC is not aware of any future permit requests anticipated for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. ; All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
The proposed impacts to jurisdictional waters are associated with the installation of one
road crossing. Road Crossing Impact #1 will include installation of a single RCP.
Impact #1 will require fill in wetlands adjacent to the stream channel. All other proposed
- impacts (Impact areas #2 through #5) are to zone 2 of riparian buffers on site.
2. Individually list , wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
se aratel list impacts due to both structure and flood' g.
Located within Distance to Area of
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland 100-year Nearest Impact
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, Floodplain Stream (acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) es/no linear feet
Impact #1 Fill Forested/Riparian No 0 0.075
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.075
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property:
Approximately 0.15 in the vicinity of the proposed -road crossings; the remainder of the
property was not evaluated by S&EC.
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to `placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
-must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Before Impact linear feet acres
Impact #1 UT to Boulding Br. Road Intermittent 3 feet 155 0.011
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 155 0.011
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of theU.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact

indicate on ma (if applicable)
ocean, etc.
acres
NA NA NA NA- _ NA
Total Open Water Impact (acres)_ 0
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact acres): 0.011
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.075
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.086
Total Stream Im act linear feet): 155
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? Q Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
Page 5 of 9
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands stream ? wetlands
Describe` the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, :installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VIL Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The proposed road impact (impact area #1) is necessary to provide access to the
property from the east. A copy of the original road design is attached for your
reference. The proposed road alignment has been revised to minimize impacts to
streams, wetlands, and associated riparian buffers. Kimberly Keys, of CLH Design has
addressed justification for the proposed impacts in an attached memo.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ` - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be 'required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects, involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type; of proposed impact and function and relative .value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that maybe appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining, wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring,' enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
i
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider, the application complete for processing. Any application
Page 6 of 9
r
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review, the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
hitp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnup,ide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. Thedescription should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type' and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation),' a plan view,
preservation mechanism. (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Because the proposed impacts are below the thresholds required by NC-DWQ for
mitigation, and the proposed `impacts will not occur along waters of the US with
"important aquatic function" (i.e. perennial streams), mitigation should not be
required for the proposed impacts.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at htlp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):,- NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes H No ?
2. If yes, `does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North. Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a;copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No
Page 7 of 9
II
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on -a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse),' 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and , Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please'
identify )? Yes Z No
2. If "yes"identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate.the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
ROAD CROSSING: IMPACT #1
*
Zone Impact
(square, feet
`Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 8,279 3 0 ,
2 6,097 1.5 0
Total 14,376 0
ALL OTHER BUFFER IMPACTS (#245), COMBINED
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(square feet Mitigation
1 0' 3 0
2 5,357 1.5 0
Total 5,357 0
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel, Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into -the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B.0242 or.0244, or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
Page 8 of 9
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
It is anticipated that the percent impervious surface for the project will be approximately
31 %o. A wet pond has been designed to treat storm-water runoff from the new
impervious. Please see the storm-water devices on the attached site plans.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate' treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The development will connect to an existing sanitary sewer system. The municipality
will ensure that this development does not exceed the available capacity of the facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (I 5A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
S&EC is not aware of any violations at this location.
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No E
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits: However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
27.December 2005
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA.
11010 Raven Midge Road ? Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] * Pax; [phone]
mvw.SandhC.com
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The Current Landowner
Naive: -mow 1 C'z?r?+-? ?el?sbdS
Address QQ?€?•""fib,ncl
1,4
b-r-77-6 2-
Phone: _ (lo) 2 1 n(p_
Project Name/Description: phtRkv,Ie,w El,frty- 5&EC Project #
Date:
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn:
Field Office;
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the current property owner, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA to act in my
behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental information in
support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The day of , 20_.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff.. You should call S&EC to arrange a site
meeting prior to visiting the site.
v 6 ti t2_.
Print Property Owner's 11arne operty Owner's Signature
cc: Ms. Cyndi Karoly cc: Mr. Jason Payne
NCDENR -- DWQ Soil -& Environmental Consultants, PA
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndsle Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
TopoZone - The Web's 'T'opographic Map
Page 1 of 1
9?a? aAa he-,_
f
,
?. '
1 ti?r
??y

SITE

* l

17. 1 J1? ?? ,

Q ` !A

M
0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 km G
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 4.8 1 mi
Map center is UTM 17 591914E 3981057N_(WGS84/NAD83)
High Point East quadrangle M=-7.931
Projection is UTM Zone 17 NAD83 Datum G=O. 599
http://www.topozone.com/print.asp?z=17&n-3981057.00009461 &e=591914.000000179... 12/22/2005
Michael F. I Giv k:- or
p?
??}) VJi1liacii (I Ro,ti I .. Secretary
7 North Carolina C?cpal'tinentni I_:n??irunmrnt and Xu,wral Ncsour.es
s.1
Alan W. K(im&_ PT. Dircctor
tan rst.)t? 0I' NVuter Quality
October 3, 2005
Re: Randleman Rule (15A NCAC 02B.0250) Surface Water and Stream Origin Determination
Park View Elementary School, High Pointy N. C. -
Ms. Kimberly A. Keyes
CLH Design, P.A.
125 Edinburgh South, Suite 3 10
Cary, NC 27511
Deal- Ms. Keyes
On Aulllist 29, 2005, ;Mn Daryl Lamb of the Winstotz-Salem Regional Office of the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (NCDWQ) evaluated the drainage feature delineated on the attached map, received from you by
this office on September 12, 2005, and determined by observation andlor use of the current Version of the
NCDWQ Streain Classification I-oi-m that this feature does possess sufficient riparian characteristics to be
classified as surface water for the purpose of application of the requirements of 15A NCAC 02B .0250,
Randleman Lake ffwer Suj)pIY Cl'ater•shed: Pr°otecrioll caul Maintenance of Riparian :treas. In addition, the
surveyed point of origin depicted oil the attached map, is the point at which the stream channel begins for the
purpose of application of'the riparian protection regttirements of 15A NCAC 02B .0250.
If you have any questions or require additional information concerning this determination, please telephone Mr.
Lamb in the NCDWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office at 336-771-4600, extension 293.
.Sincerely,
Steve ?V. Tedder
Regional Supervisor
Division of \Vater Quality,
SWT/cdl
Attachments
cc: DWQ, Winston-Salem Regional Office
401/Wetlands Unit File COPY
Central Files
:???i`thCarolina
North Carolina i )iron oi'ii ncrQualitr
Wedun'kCertitiartior1(.i;it Io>t) "ijltierctcct'ctrtcr Ralei h.N(''-r61)'>-I1i50 I1hnrnc(1)11)i .'-17&, 17AN 11`)19j7,3-249(,
) ) CrahTrci E31vi1. l'aicigb. ' 27, 004-22oo lnteme" h,, 1 hh2o enr state nc
Customer Scn icc Numhrr: 1-67'r-ti23-6745
Ai• Equal OppoilunityiA.`firmwive a-tionEmployer- t>0% Reeyclel/10%;Pest Consumer Paper
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1

Geomorphology (Subtotal = flD? S }
A Absent Weak Moderate Strong
.
Continuous bed and bank
1' 0 t 2 3
.
2. Sinuosity 0 2
3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 i ?? 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0
1
3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 3
7. Braided channel 0 1
1 2
2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 ?? 3
9 a Natural levees 0 1
^ 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 ,?
0 1
0'5 1 1.5
11. Grade controls 0 ( 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 .
13. Second or greater order channel on existing Yes = 3
USGS or NRCS map or other documented Now 0
evidence
a Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H drology (Subtotal = _--c ,_ .?I
14. Groundwater flow/discharge
0
1 -
2 3 -
--
15. Water in channel and > 48 Jim since rain, or 1 2 3
Water in channel - dry or growing season 5 0
_
flitter
L
16 1.5 1
_
ea
. 0 0.5 1
17. Sediment on plants or debris 5
1 1
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines} 0 0.5 .
{ es = 1.5
10. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? _ No = 0
0
C. Biology (Subtotal = __ _ ___) 1 0
20", Fibrous roots in channel 3 2
1
0
21°. Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 1
5
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 2 .
_
3
23. Bivalves 0 1
0.5 1 1.5
24. Fish __ -
0.5
1
1.5
25. Amphibians 0 5
0 1 1.5
Niacrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
26 .
.
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0

?` 1 2

1 3
1
5
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. _
p
5; FA
FAG = 0
Q5
CW = 0.75; OB
L = 1.5 SAV = 2 .
.0; Other = 0
29 °.1Netland plants in streambed .
f the resence of a quatic cr wetland pt anls.
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, item - ocuses on p -
Sketch.
Notes, (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
I N ?45e? R
-
^•� -x�a_- } � V\ter �,� a�. ,,� r,
fjJ{'f !j If j{fI if f
"} ""���� � ' :,�'`� ;�'{ �" !1 !r � ,t t r t (,�l if 11 f{� �� ,p��: fT{ I� fr !{j �� �•
\
AAA S
IN
N 't
14
\ t``, *� '� f �✓'fie a�'� jt ^s � � �'
al:
�,�• \��*'��� �� .--`� �L,,, �:. ref—^--ee.:,,, �y �
\,l
M qX,f' lM �^INs � �+.� Y 1 ' \�� �\.�yy .. •"lT> ` <'" �� C'tl
�+.Nl
f
PARKVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLH DESIGN, P.A.
IaAiE: 9-1?qS itaefira 11 Park
SCALL 1'=t:q' 10 r rgh South
Suite 310 _
NCDENR MAP Cert' :J40Wor1h Carolina19-5 1>7511
Phone: [phone]'7J®
Fant 919 319-7bi8
1
MMUFF++'
�,�• \��*'��� �� .--`� �L,,, �:. ref—^--ee.:,,, �y �
\,l
M qX,f' lM �^INs � �+.� Y 1 ' \�� �\.�yy .. •"lT> ` <'" �� C'tl
�+.Nl
f
PARKVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLH DESIGN, P.A.
IaAiE: 9-1?qS itaefira 11 Park
SCALL 1'=t:q' 10 r rgh South
Suite 310 _
NCDENR MAP Cert' :J40Wor1h Carolina19-5 1>7511
Phone: [phone]'7J®
Fant 919 319-7bi8

WNDECL AVE ---?
I ,I I
I
I II \ IMPACTC$
I SCE SHCEi P5
i A

?f B iLTUORE AVE
J?
CCDROW
DARTAOUTN ALE
h CAMDEN ALE
p? 5 4
0
2 WFNOEIL AVE
? Jp
p?
p w
K UARO A
?snE
?
W :RA1{5 A ..C.MCTC
TTAR.C
-
U cwmn TV
W
= E KNETT DR
OtOA
M

a
VICINITY MAP
IMPACT a
/ SEE SHEET P
IMPACT:
z APP, 2 b, Tw? ' ? /r y
??. SEE-SHEET PJ
1
? ? Yp.? b 1 ? / 1?
7 ,
L.
1 ?1?\\"?„ 1 1\ \ / .\ AJrM,yRp .., \ ?/^ Y/ 1` __Zl,, .?ja I I \? \` \\ // G?
0..>?? SEE-SHEET-PJ-
?? L , sA? f ? yPV noaPnN' I "?. _? I b ? `T?? ?I
-
' C
MIPACT94
SEE SHEET PA 13
OF "
i
+
BOUNDARY'
wl 15'

GRAPHIC SCALE
,DO 0 50 100 200
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 100 ft.

400

_ ?

A I
I v, •n _ •n
_
.+

v, .rA
e.rs sr ioui ronTi nAS+si iniA??rn?+
Q
N Rp
? C CO t`
v )
0p)A
Cn m? U?M
Lu 0. r
0? C)
Q ?'?p>r0»
.1r a) Dr) +. . ,
4w 71
9nn60
fL

U
¢
J Q
?
0
2
?
U

c
n Q
J
F"
Z Lu
D }
0 ?
J
U
Q
C) w

0 ?
0 oo ?
ILL. Y - II 0
J N
Q

?
CL W ..w
J I
<
U ?o a
Wi-ACT 9(NWARY MU WPACFOFAIR

05
- Q7 1
-- I
ccor
\\ \,
03
_ ? 1_ J A v °m ?.
01i L
ti ??? o ro
r --_ 1 tiC\2to?a12
U
IMPACT41
tm r-3
FEE ?, ? ?
\? l
50,
-- 2 00
R ?ZQN ?" - ' E-
?-? , l/ l - - - ? ? ? ERE _•' ? ? '
,
7 _3
J
IMPACT SUMMARY TABLE IMPACT TOTALS oO
U
Z
GRAPHIC SCALE
30 0 15 30 60 120 U ? .,
W U
LLJ
CD
LEGEND 8,279 SF TOTAL ZONE 1 11,454 SF TOTAL ZONE 2 IN FEET) 0
C H = CHANNEL V- Y
j ZONE 1 IMPACTS
J N
JW = JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND' ..........:.... /_./.. 1 inch = 30 fL.
RB = RANDLEMAN BUFFER - a w iii 1
Z1 = ZONE 1 ZONE 2 IMPACTS ?
v i C N
Z2 = ZONE 2 -
IMPACT lOCA110N TYPE
(ZONE 1) FT "2 LINEAR FT STREAM BUFFER IMPACTS
i
(ZONE 2), (CH AND JW) I (CH ONLY)
(ZONE i)
(ZONE
2)
I CH 465 I55 827g
7
609
JW J250 N/A N/A N/A
2 ? RB N/A ' N/A N/A 2525
3 P13 NIA
1 N/A N/A 265
_

4 ? ITS NIA N/A N/A 958

5 RB
N/A
N/A
N/A O ~
1609
\ O
it \ \
I \
i
Ull
IMPACT #2
SEE-SHEET P3
l \/
t, =DIVE BUFFER
.n
-- ? rE
IMPACT #3
F e - ?- --SEE--S _ EE7 P3
rn,
00
IMPACT SUMMARY TABLE
IMPACT TOTALS
IMPACT LOCATION (Z TYPE 1 NE if Fi"2 LINEAR FT STREAM BUFF ER IMPACTS
(ZONE 2), (CH AND Jw) (CH ONLY) (ZONE 1) (ZONE 2)
1 CH 465 155 8279 6097
1 JW 3250 N/A N/A N/A
2 RB N/A N/A N/A 2525
3 RB N/A N/A N/A 265 GRAPHIC SCALE
4 RB N/A II, N/A N/A 958 30 0 15 30 60

5 RB N/A N/A N/A 1609
LEGEND
CH = CHANNEL J N; ZONE 1 IMPACTS
JW = JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND
RB = RANDLEMAN BUFFER
Z1 = ZONE 1
Z2 = ZONE 2 ZONE 2 IMPACTS
8,279 SF TOTAL ZONE 1 11,454 SF TOTAL ZONE 2
( IN FEET )
l inch = 30 ft.
120
f1. ?
U o -..
Cn me VIM
m
0 GO 0C) 0)
4w v
Ll

J
0
0
I

ur)
>_ M
F_ °
z
D }
O

U z
W N
?..
°
J
W U
>
>
0 OO
Y M Q.
N ?
} Q Q
U?oV) r
IMPACT #4

30' ZONE
1 BUFFER
l
i - -
-V -A?
50' ON
BU E
1
?I
?J 1
IMPACT SUMMARY TABLE
IMPACT TOTALS
IMPACT LOC ATION (ZTYPE ONE 1) FT-2 LINEAR FT STREAM BUFFER IMPACTS
(ZONE 2) (CH AND JW) (CH ONLY) (ZONE 1) (ZONE 2)
1 CH
i 465 155 8P79 6097
1 JW 3250 N/A N/A N/A
2 RB N/A N/A N/A 2525
3 RB N/A N/A N/A 265
4 RB N/A N/A N/A 958
5 RB N/A N/A N/A - 1609 -
LEGEND
CH = CHANNEL \ ZONE I IMPACTS
JW = JURISDIC77ONAL WETLAND
RB = RANDLEMAN BUFFER
ZI = ZONE 1 iZ/ /71-J, ZONE 2 IMPACTS
Z2 = ZONE 2
8,279 SF TOTAL ZONE 1 11,454 SF TOTAL ZONE 2
GRAPHIC SCALE
30 0 15 30 60
ron
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 30 ft.
LO
L7 0 ?II
Ln
L3J
Q 4.a
2 4w v
U C\2
I

J
0
0
2
U
Cn

F..
Z
D }
0 ?

U
W
Z

W E--
p
J U

> Q.
0
LL.. M
y ? II
L

I
CL w
W J
V j a V
U ?ov)
a.
M PACT # 5
l

IMPACT SUMMARY TABLE
IMPACT TOTALS
IMPACT LOCATION TYPE FT-2 LINEAR FT
(ZONE 1) STREAM BUFF ER IMPACTS
(CH AND JW) (CH ONLY)
(ZONE 1)I
(ZONE 1)
(ZONE 2)
1 CH'. 465, 155 8279 6097
I I
1 JW 3250 NIA
NIA
NIA
2 RB N/A N/A NIA 2525
3 RB NIA N/A NIA 265
' GRAPHIC SCALE
I NIA
4 RB NIA NIA 958
5 RB N/A N/A N/A 1609 30 0 15 30 60
I I I I I
LEGEND
CH - CHANNEL ,.
ZONE 1 IMPACTS
JW - JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND i....
RB = RANDLEMAN BUFFER ?
Z1 = ZONE 1 ?/ _1-J ZONE 2 IMPACTS
Z2 = ZONE 2
8,279 SF TOTAL ZONE 1 11,454 SF TOTAL ZONE 2
I ,
I C C?
I - -----------
U
ITO
FAR ' /' +7 ' r,.
I
1 I-
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 30 ft.
120
V p II
?n m?
W 4.; ?rnm
o c? omm
t4 Co .
`W m
U ) lz
U to
?J 7 M aC
U ??vtV4?.
?l

J
0
0
2
U

z

0

U
?.
Q U

a-
0
LL M
y? II <
L
J
I
J CL .. w
W J
v < <
Ln
V?0 V a.

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
December 27, 2005
S&EC Project # 9918.W2
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Todd Tugwell
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
From: Jason Payne
Soil &'Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh; NC"27614
Re: Parkview Elementary School
,N.C'Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260

High Point, NC
On behalf of the owner, Guilford County Schools, please find attached a complete application and
supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) and the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) that the activities proposed below may
proceed under Nationwide Permit 39, and General Water Quality Certification GC3402 (per NWP
39). Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or require additional
information.
i)Dr) 1r(T CI INAAAAPV .`
Project Name Parkview Elementary
Project Type Public School Access Road
Owner / Applicant Guilford Count Schools
Count Guilford
Nearest Town Hi h Point
Waterbod Name UT Bouldin Branch
Basin / Sub-basin 03-06-08
Index Number 17-3-2
Class WS-IV
meoAr-r CI INANAARV
Stream Impact (acres):
0.011
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.075
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U'S: (acres) 0.086
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 155
Attachments:
Pre-construction Notification (PCN) Form (9 pages)
Agent Authorization
USGS Map - from TopoZone.com
DWQ Buffer Letter (NBRRO 05-042) (3 pages)
original Road Design
Ove rail Site Plan with impact insets (5 pages)
Impact justification letter (2 pages)
$475 Application Fee to DWQ
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Comrt, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
DMce Use Only Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. 'Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:- ?
5. If your project is located in,any. of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4); and the project- is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
?
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further` details), check 'here:
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Guilford County Schools
Mailing Address: Attn: Kevin Lear C, 7 ?005,
900 English Road
High Point, NC 27262
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: N/A
E-mail Address: N/A
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority. for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jason Payne
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 9
-III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surroundingproperties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities' must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Parkview Elementary
T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
2.
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Guilford Nearest Town: High Point
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):
The property is located approximately 500 feet north of Kivett Drive, west of
Gordon Street, in High Point, Guilford County, NC:
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.9694 ON 79.9822 °W
6. Property size (acres): + 15 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Goulding Branch (WS-IV) (17-3-2)
i
8. River Basin: Cape Fear (03-06-08)
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mgps/.)
Page 2 of 9
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application:
The site is currently in mixed use, with the western portion of the property containing
an existing school. that was constructed circa 1950 and the eastern portion of the
property is forested. Land use in the vicinity of this site is primarily' residential
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project consists of the expansion of an existing school facility. Impacts
associated with this expansion result from construction of a new access road and
parking lot. Other impacts to riparian buffers occur where the new drainage system
will junction with the existing drainage system. Heavy equipment typically used for
grading and excavation will be utilized for this project.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
The purpose of the proposed school expansion is to meet the need for additional
classrooms at this facility. Due to excellence in stud ent,performance and, test scores
at this school, it has been deemed a "magnet" school. under the No Child Left Behind
Act of 2002. As a result, the school is growing at an above average. rate. The lack
of classroom space is evidenced by the fact that some classes actually meet in the
cafeteria. With the impending growth and insufficient classroom space, the
expansion is necessary. The purpose of the proposed road construction is to
access the new buildings and accommodate the greater number of automobiles
associated with the addition of personnel coinciding with classroom expansions.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
S&EC is not aware of any other 404 Permits or 401, Certifications approved for this
property. The stream channel (i.e., UT to Boulding Branch), wetlands in the vicinity of
the road crossing, stream buffers along the proposed road, and stream buffers at each
culvert junction at the north and south_ property lines, are the only anticipated impacts to
Randleman Buffers and surface waters subject to 404 and 401 jurisdiction. Engineering
Consulting Services, Ltd delineated wetlands on the site during May, 2005. A
Jurisdictional Determination was made for the site, and a delineation map approved: by
Page 3 of 9
Mr. Todd Tugwell of the LISACE on 8/12/05 (AID #200521185). Mr. Daryl Lamb of the
NC-DWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office evaluated one stream feature near the center
of the site on 8/29/05 to determine the applicability of the Randleman Buffer Rules to
this feature. Please contact S&EC if you would like to schedule another site visit.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
S&EC is not aware of any future permit requests anticipated for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an -impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs maybe included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section` VIII below, If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
.1. Provide _a written description of the proposed impacts:
The proposed impacts to jurisdictional waters are associated with the installation of one
road crossing. Road Crossing Impact #1 will include installation of a single RCP.
impact #1 will require fill in wetlands adjacent to the stream channel. All other proposed
impacts (impact areas #2 through #5) are to zone 2 of riparian buffers on site.
2. Individually list , wetland `impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
se aratel list im acts due to both structure and floodin .
Located within Distance to Area of
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland 100-year Nearest Impact
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, Floodplain Stream (acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) es/no linear feet
Impact #1 Fill Forested/Riparian No 0 0.075
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.075
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property:
Approximately 0.15 in the vicinity of the proposed road crossings; the remainder of the
property was not evaluated by S&EC.'
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls,' rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name - Type of Impact Intermittent? ?
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Before Impact linear feet acres
Impact #1 UT to Boulding Br. Road Intermittent 3 feet 155 0.011
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 155 0.011
I
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes,, ponds, `estuaries; sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads,"etc.
t 'I

Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0

Stream Im act (acres): 0.011
Wetland' Impact acres : 0.075
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.086
Total Stream Im act (linear feet): 155
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? Yes No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USAGE.
8. Pond Creation
Page 5 of 9
Impact
Open
Water
Site Number Waterbody
Name of
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Area of
Impact
indicate on ma (if applicable) ocean, etc. acres
NA NA NA NA NA
cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
the
List
6.
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and, illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed useor purpose of pond (e.g, livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
_VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically` describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It maybe useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The proposed road impact (impact area #1) is necessary to provide access to the
property from the east. A copy of the original road design is attached for your
reference. The proposed road alignment has been revised to minimize impacts to
streams, wetlands, and associated riparian buffers. Kimberly Keys, of CLH, Design has
addressed justification for the proposed impacts in an attached memo.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC ,
Division of Water Quality for projects; involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams:
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative .value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring,, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
Page 6 of 9
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at ,
bLtp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strm6de.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Because the proposed impacts are below the thresholds required by NC-DWQ for
mitigation, and the proposed impacts will not occur along waters of the US with
"important aquatic function" (i.e. perennial streams), mitigation should not be
required for the proposed impacts.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. ' For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wM/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
IX.. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes No ?
2. If yes, -does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
Page 7 of 9
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated` with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must' be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's' discretion.
1. Will the, project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15ANCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer. Requirements)? or other (please
identify, )? Yes ® No ?
2. If "yes' identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate, the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
ROAD CROSSING: IMPACT #1
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 8,279 3 0
2 6,097 1.5 0
Total 14,376 0
ALL OTHER BUFFER IMPACTS (#2-#5), COMBINED
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(square feet Mitigation
1 0 3 0
2 5,357 1.5 0
Total 5,357 0
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 213.0242 or .0244, or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
Page 8 of 9
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating totalproposed impervious level.
It is anticipated that the percent impervious surface for the project will be approximately
31%. A wet pond has been designed to treat storm-water runoff from the new
impervious. - Please see the storm-water devices on the attached site plans.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The development will connect to an existing sanitary sewer system. The municipality
will ensure that this development does not exceed the available capacity of the facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes E] No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
S&EC is not aware of any.violations at this location;
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by. DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No Z
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North ;Carolina Division of Water Quality policy- posted on our website at
httn://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional);
It is the applicant's responsibility to `submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
-.. 27.December 2005
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
I I
I I I \I ( \ 1
1l IMPACT d.
SEE SHEET P5
I
\ \1 10
?Or 1 r? \

/, `l ?? vanes

?'1 \011 \0
I 1 11 1 1 M
. 1\
01v ? ?
}e• V A V 1 vnvmoninv'.
\\\ \ IMPACT :4
SEE SHEET PI
wExDEU. Atf
I

? /O III \ 1
I I1 ?_
l

131 WORE Av{
CEDRCW
DARiuAW
CAMDEN AVE
?t ,E in' ?Slrr?
o
AKS A WAq Crd:
W TRRAC
O PAR°
t
k VICINITY MAP
I
?x
IMPACI
SEE SHEET
IMPACT :2
SEE SREE f
IMPAC J
T 3 ?
SA- Aw
r- 'SEE -SHEET PJ? s corn IN I
\
BOUNDARY ?? ' - --'
I
%
1 I ? ?
GRAPHIC SCALE
00 0 50 100 200
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 100 ft.
l ? \ / ii> It \ ? ?\
I ' \ ?,?ERSR»c ?
-nn
? v. ar
/
iarrnn µAlANNV TAHLF
400

It +I
? I a I
',. is on ar
ua
_ -
WA w/A .p an

°.>9 S4101µ ZONE I I I.I51 tr I[11.4t [?N[
Ra?iwe ?l. ?/ N[ 1 Y.?[r5
Q
n
C\2
Gpt?
?
V ? II
114 V?c7

w a L.
tmec)
2
Q 4 40101
G o?
p ;s Co

v
to
J ?'o
rm
U =C3
4Co U0.G.

Q.

U
d
J

Q

Q
? J

Z IJ
}
0 ;
J
U W J
Q
J

W of
I..C
3
0 00 j
LL. 0
J

.. to
W J
<
U ?Ou
J)
a.
I I I ?l '. l l
II
it
v?
r
1
1/ 1
'
J
03
IMPACT-#I
F N
ZQ? _ ?%'` V
/ eUF? i
0 Co
CA
\ \ \ \ \ /1 ` BUFFeR 1 / I,
ZOA/ l
LNG S

IMPACT SUMMARY TABLE
IMPACT TOTALS
IMPACT LOC ATION TYPE I
(ZONE 1) FT"2 LINEAR FT STREAM BUFFER IMPACTS
;
(ZONE 2). (CH AND JW) (CH ONLY)
(ZONE 1)
(ZONE 2)
1 CH 465
i 155 8279 6097
1 JW 3250 N/A N/A N/A
2 RB N/A N/A N/A 2525
3 RR N/A N/A N/A 255
---.4 ? ftB ?'. N/A ( N/A N/A 958 ---
5 RB N/A N/A N/A 1609
LEGEND
CH = CHANNEL ' 7
? ZONE 1 IMPACTS
JW =JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND = -. Y 1_I
RB = RANDLEMAN BUFFER
Z1 = ZONE 1 T ZONE 2 IMPACTS
Z2 = ZONE 2
8,279 SF TOTAL ZONE 1 11,454 SF TOTAL ZONE 2

GRAPHIC SCALE
30 0 15 30 60
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 30 fL.
120 1

CL: rl
C
w m

L7 0 ??

LJ .I ?
IL al
a,
mm
o ?o o

u o
U ??voiU0.?
o

J
0
0

U

F-
Z
D }
0 ?
U Z

w F-
p
J U

0 300 a-
C
LL. y ? _ll

? a L,u
W J

U v ? <
?
? N
a
0 .
?il & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phono: [phone] +- Fax: (919) $46.9467
w%vw.SandFC.com
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The Current Landowner
Naive: C?cve 1 ?r,ac3 iu?±rs ?.
Address: Q rti tmkn
Phone: / Ssb) g t 9 2 R?rr
Project Name/Description: Pratt?kvge,wt'1rr`_ S&EC Froject #
Date:
The Department' of the Army
U.S. Army Corps' of Engineers, Wilmington District
P,O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn:
Field Office:
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the current property owner, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA to act in my
behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental information in
support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The day of 20
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons: is valid only for government
? p
officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&CC staff. You should call S&CC to arrange a site
meeting prior to visiting the site. ,
?o -WAis" leaA tz
Print Property Owner's ame opertyowner`s Signature
cc: Ms. Cyndi Karoly cc: Mr. Jason Payne
NCDENR - DWQ'- Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Otfice
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
TopoZone - The Web's Topographic Map Page 1 of 1
tomone
?? r
t

7?
r I

SITE

1

n ?il f
4f
f ?
? 1 ? ? f 1_ {` ? y,•

l ` p -1 r r`
-- l r \ 1 1 ](fit

I
? I

M*,
0 0.3 0.6 4.9 1.2 1.6 km G
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 mi
Map center is UTM 17 591914E 3981057N (WG584/NAD83)
High Point East quadrangle M=-7.9131
Projection is UTM Zone 17 NAD83 Datum G=O. 599
http://www.topozone.com/print.asp?z=17&n= 3981057.00009461&e=59191.4.000000179,.. 12/22/2005
4C1 T?? Michact F. Fasl<< Govctiior
wiltiar t C, RossI,.. Sccic ary
North Carolina Department oi'Fwironiiter, t anal Neutral (:esot,r?C,
P;
y rya {
Man 1k Llitre6, P.1.. Oir"u>r
October 3, 2005
Re: Randleman Rule (15A NCAC 02B .0250) Surface Water and Stream Origin Determination
Park Vievv Elementary School, High' Point, N. C.
Ms. Kimberly A. Keyes
CLH Design, P.A.
125 Edinburgh South, Suite 310
Cary. NC 27511
Dear Ms. Keyes
On August 29, 2005, Mr. Daryl Lamb of the Winston-Salem Regional Office of the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (NCDWQ) evaluated the drainage feature delineated oil the attached map, received from you by
this office on September 12, 2005, and determined by observation and/or use of the current version of the
NCDWQ Strewn C=lassification / orm that this 1-eature does Iaossess sufficient riparian characteristics to be
classified as surface water for the purpose of application of the requirements of 15A NCAC 02B .0250,
Randleman lake ff(Itcr Supj)p • Ffatershed: Protection (tilt/ lVaintenance of'Ri/)arian :Treas. In addition, the
surveyed point of origin depleted on the attached map, is the point at which the stream channel begins for the
purpose of application ofthe ripanan protection requirements of 15,A NCAC 02B .0250.
If you have any questions or require additional information concerning this determination. please telephone Mr.,
Lamb in the NCDWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office at 336-7/71-4600, extension 293.
Sincerely>
Steve W. Tedder
Regional Supervisor
Division of 'e'ater Quality
SWT/cdl
Attachments
cc: DWQ, Winston-Salem Regional Office
=101/Wetlands Unit File Copy
Central Files
;yorthCauoina
?1?irtr?r?lfy
North l'.irohna Div i,ikm of Water Quality
\Cetkirids C cttttlwa6on t-nit loytt Broil Setvwc C'eaitcr Fuld eh 3709-1O' CO I'll one 11;19 1786 1 A\ IzJl9)'?'? 9b
23?1 Crabtrcc HIMi. Ralc ,h. V, 2'76[14-2266 , Inter nethrpP,h2oenrstatenc.us?[1ewetlands
(iuiu;ner Scr? ice Ntiml!Ct: 1 -87 7 623-(z7-4
An Equal Oppotutt(tylAltirmative Action Employor- 501116 Reeyded,10,i); Post Consumer Paper
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 3.1

' Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
(Subtotal =1?•
A. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
.
ia. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2
2 3
2, Sinuosity 0 1
1 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 3
9 Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1
1 I
2 3
g' Natural levees 0 1 --
2 3
10. Headcuts _ 0
0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Grade controls 0 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainage-way 0 ,
13. Second or greater order channel on existin
USGS or MRCS map or other documented
No
= 0 Yes = 3
evidence
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =
14. Groundwater flaw/discharge
0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or 1 1 2 3
Water in channel - dry or growing season 5 0
flitter
16
L 1.5 1
ea
" 0 0.5 1 1
17. Sediment on plants or debris
5
0 -
1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) .
0
No = 0 es = 1.5

39. Hydric soils {redoximorphic features} present?
_
-
C. Biology (Subtotal = _._ _.__)
2 1 - 0
rous roots in channel
20 3 1 0?
21ated plants in channel 3 2 1 1
5
22yfish
! Q Q.5
1 2 .
3
Bivalves
23
0

0.5
1
1.5

sh
24. Fi
ns
hibi
0.5
1
1.5
a
25. Amp 0 0
5 1 1 5
26. tvlacrobenthas (note diversity and abundance) 0 .
1 ?2 3
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 1
5
.
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus p
_?
Far, = n 5 FA Q.5
CW = 0.75; 013
1 = 1.5 SAV = 2 .
.0_ Other = 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch.
Note5? (use back side of this form for additional notes-)
10
Wit,
I N G?ser?. .
r %
iii
< /
\S !"-3, It
CIA
o �i o ^• � � ,Ss, ` �`,,ti� rpt`. ,,,,' �"" � ✓' ,,,
r-
\�hj � ,
s< t
M ry
Y
PARKVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLH DESIGN, P.A.
DATE' :9.12•t)S Vavorogor Park
SCALE: 1'=6tl' u$ SdinE urgh South
suite 310
NCDENR MAI'. aaa� North caroltna 27613
Poona: 3118-7510
R."tY28 338-7678

"DELL AYE
`1 eso ?
I
I II ?? 1
IMPACTV?
I I SEE SHEET P5
\ I I I
1
V ? ? 4 rR? A
M1
/ smues \ \
IJ F x
\ \ 'a
\ \ s ?R f5? x
/ sxauas G? ? `
\BS6
`V y? S AA?GZ \

-p I o\\ \\\ \ \
71
\ \\?\ ?'' aNrR ems' 1 ? 1 \ ?
EXIST'NG SCHDDL A- I
\ BUILDING \
Ya' \ \\\ ` P NEW ADDITION ?
. aW ?.?,aa\ VA? ?? IMPACT p4 °?
SEE SHEET P4 \
a \\\\ \ \e\ 20' §AMrlar SEWF
20 \
EASEME
BOUNDA?Y i I JI
RL \
J1 I \\ ?? v? A? 1
GRAPHIC SCALE
oa D 50 100 200
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 100 ft.
400
/
0
A
2
f
rlOt.vM.' r?M1F 11 rf} it
i
7 SRWw I,w FR W+.aS
lax +) fro avo M5 s w fm,C 0 (PYI[ al
ws 1s un rwr
M o w/ RAs WA
. , RA,
/A /
M/ W. RA.
NIA W . W/.
EEUlrvu 8,279Sr IOTALZONEI 11,451RIO1AL rONk1
RMW??? awa,MWKrs
rR. ?R a WM„` T?'?1 aWW a w,.?a
Q
a
C\l

Q t,
o
;
co
z
?
4w N
J ro
q
U C\2
-vj I-) aw

6)
0
a

?i
a.

U
d
J

O
2
U Z
Q

Z w
r

Uw J
J
Q
W Q '..
W
^
'
L L
0 °0
3
L1- Y !7 =11
0
J Q C-4 -
o .. IL
W J
tl Q Q I

r
Q) M VV, a.

s

I
IMPACT
y% ?\ SS?
EEEf_TP?
es \
o R?rrrg \ /
o
k- IMPACT AiP3 2
4E r
s
a ,I
??` \, /? bra \to Y ? ? r I

r
R ?diy
r
_ 1 MG
I?
/ I P -_ - -ne
rR
I
sr E / ? / ?
??/l? sae p e
i
II
SAY." IML/MORE AVE

CEDROW
DARTMOUTH AVE

h CAMDEN AVE
`7 t WENDELL AVE
Q
p
?
pp >•
? r a "SITE BARD A
Y =
VES A WnSwVCrON!/
?/ - TERRACE '
CQIIMU it'
// i ARM
?
.. E KIVETT OR

LstLOtOL'1

VICINITY MAP
J

r gllA(-?IEYP3?// slKw.iorclcl \ \?
\ a/

L / 4
\ yp
\ I /
O
e \

- - btaw /
\J euv
/--872
\ 21" MEMSnMC
6 \ \ ?? YI" COUP
4? V (r' NEW / /
? rw.1NYo /
'so
\ 816 NEW 15' RCP
IMPACI' SUMMARY'rABLE IMI'ACr TD'rALS

I
?/ /
Zr/
IMPACT SUMMARY TABLE
IMPACT TOTALS

IMPACT LOCATION TYPE
(ZONE 1) FT"2 LINEAR FT STREAM BUFF ER IMPACTS

(ZONE 2) (CH AND JW) (CH ONLY)
(ZONE i)
(ZONE 2)
1 CH 465 155 8279 6097
1 JW 3250 NIA N/A N/A
2 RB N/A N/A N/A 2525
3 RB N/A N/A N/A 265 GRAPHIC SCALE
4 RB N/A N/A N/A 958 30 0 15 30 60
5 RB N/A N/A N/A 1609
8,279 SF TOTAL ZONE 1 11,454 SF TOTAL ZONE 2
LEGEND
CH = CHANNEL
JW =JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND ZONE 1 IMPACTS
X1
RB = RANDLEMAN BUFFER
Z1 =ZONE 1 ?ZONE 2 IMPACTS
Z2 = ZONE 2
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 30 ft.
120

CL:

Q I I

?
Q 'Ap 46101
co
..
mro
_, w v

J t4
ro`o
?Cm
U ca
? ,
V)
J
0
0

U
V)

F-
Z
r

0 rr
?
U W
w ?.
p
J
U

0 00
3 ?-
_
M
1
? II

- d
ww
J
v 4 Q N

0)
N
I
I

I
00
N ?? l CP
I / l 1 ?
1
'I
?-

Z/
/
r ?AV,
/l
4
1 \
/ / ? \
of
1
?I

1
1 /
T
\ 1
-_ -- \ -7-
t?
R
\\
50'
\ ZEN
v i B/P/
-
V v/
IMPACT\ 1 _'?/

rl 12-19-05

TO: Jason Payne
FROM: Kimberly A. Keyes
RE: PARKVIEW ELEMENTARY
IMPACT JUSTIFICATION
CC: File (1247)
U.S Army Corps of Engineers:
The proposed parent queuing lane off of Gordon St. for the Parkview Elementary project is required
for various reasons. One of the main objectives for this project is to eliminate bus and parent vehicle
mixing. With the new queuing lane, parents will enter the site from Gordon St. and the buses will
continue to enter from Boundary Ave, therefore eliminating the traffic congestion along Henry Pl.
during the morning drop-off and afternoon pick-up hours.
The queuing lane length is determined by the amount of students that will be enrolled when the new
building is constructed. According to the City of High Point requirements we have to provide 1800' If.
(min.) of queuing lane.
The location of the queuing lane was a requirement of NCDOT. This new queuing lane connects into
an existing intersection, minimizing traffic problems (City of High Point DOT - Driveway Regulations
Section 6.1).
The other options to enter the site have considerable issues. Option `A' to upgrade the service lane
(north of site) as part of a queuing lane has physical space limitations and more importantly safety
issues. This location is simply too close to the building where children enter and exit. Option `A'
would also require a buffer impact. The required 1800' if of queuing lane was not achievable with this
option. .
Option `B' to route the queuing lane along the south side of the existing building has limitations as
well. Again there would be buffer impacts. It would also increase the bus and parent vehicle mixing
problem that already exist. The required 1800' if of queuing lane was not achievable with this option.
Option `C' to locate the queuing lane farther south along Gordon St. (at the southeast corner of the
site) has its problems as well. The required queuing length could not be obtained. This location would
require off-site traffic considerations.
The queuing lane option that best fits this site and the requirements of NCDOT and the City of High
Point DOT is at the intersection of Gordon St and Morgan Pl. However we will have to impact
jurisdictional wetlands and provide a channel in a buffered stream to meet all of the design
requirements listed above (Impact 1).
CLH design, p.a.
MacGregor Park, 129 Edinburgh South, Suite 310
Cary, North Carolina 27911
Phone: [phone] Fax.• [phone]
12-15-05 Impact Justification 20051222-JD
12-15-05 Impact Justification_20051222-JD
Page 2
Impacts 2 and 3 will give the contractor sufficient space to install the drive and parking lot. It also
provides adequate space for temporary erosion control measures that are required during construction.
Impacts 4 and 5 have temporary impacts only. The reason for this impact is to demolish existing
utilities and to remove the existing play areas that are currently in Zone 2. This impact will also give
the contractor adequate room to install the new storm manhole.
The proposed design has been revised to minimize wetlands impacts and to meet all design
requirements from NCDOT and the City of High Point DOT department.
Sincerely,
Kimberly A. Keyes
12-15-05 Impact Justification 20051222-JD
0
Wis.- OR
I M PACT #2
StT--SHEET P3
f
1
------------
/ 30' ZONE ? -
=R
IMPACT #3 ,
?F e -- -SEE SCI-E-E-T'P3-
----874 ? ? \ ?\
IMPACT SUMMARY TABLE
IMPACT TOTALS
IMPACT LOCATION TYPE
(ZONE 1) FT"2 LINEAR FT STREAM BUFF ER IMPACTS

(ZONE 2) (CH AND JW) (CH ONLY)
(ZONE 1)
(ZONE 2)
1 CH 465 155 8279 6097
1 JW 3250 N/A N/A N/A
2 RB N/A N/A N/A 2525
3 RB N/A N/A N/A 265 GRAPHIC SCALE
4 RB N/A N/A N/A 958 30 0 15 30 60

5 RB N/A N/A N/A 1609
LEGEND
CH = CHANNEL
JW =JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND .......... ... ............. ZONE 1IMPACTS
RB = RANDLEMAN BUFFER
ZI = ZONE I Z//Z] ZONE 2 IMPACTS
Z2 = ZONE 2
8,279 SF TOTAL ZONE 1 11,454 SF TOTAL ZONE 2
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 30 ft.
120
Q

~
V omm

W

_ ?w v
J ?
mxm

U
?
as
????aw

J
0
0
2
U

f... Q
Z Z
D } Q
0
Z N
0 w L
f
0 w
J (
v

0
3 a-
0

LL. _0 M
1 -
Y II C

<

J ?
N
CL W W

U 7 Q Q
?o?
a.

IMPACT #4
30' ZONE
........ -- 1 BUFFER
?? . 50' oN
BU E
?QO
?l 1
I l ?' l +/
l
IMPACT SUMMARY TABLE
IMPACT TOTALS
IMPACT LOCATION TYPE
(ZONE 1) FT-2 LINEAR FT STREAM BUFF ER IMPACTS

(ZONE 2) (CH AND JW) (CH ONLY)
(ZONE 1)
(ZONE 2)
1 CH 455 155 6279 6097
1 JW 3250 N/A N/A N/A
2 RB N/A N/A N/A 2525
3 RB N/A N/A N/A 265
4 RB N/A N/A N/A 958 GRAPHIC SCALE
5 RB N/A N/A N/A 1609 30 0 15 30 60
1 1 1
LEGEND
CH = CHANNEL
JW = JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND L...X,.. ? ZONE 1 IMPACTS
RB = RANDLEMAN BUFFER
ZI = ZONE I Zj z] ZONE 2 IMPACTS
Z2 = ZONE 2
8,279 SF TOTAL ZONE 1 11,454 SF TOTAL ZONE 2
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 30 ft.
120
Q

Z G??
V o I 1
m? Uc?e?

LJ.I 0.
z
1
M ,- 0p omm
C??
?
T .,
N
p
J C

U Co
(u
?- uU ?

J
0
0
2
U
C/'l

f--
Z
D r
0 l<
U w

w ?-
p J U
0
3 a-
0
L _
0
M
II

L
Y <
J ? N =
a ^
p
tii
W J
tl Q Q I
U ?o? a.
IMPACT #5
loop
7
\ I Igo WF?R

81
x
IMPACT SUMMARY TABLE
IMPACT TOTALS
IMPACT LOCATION TYPE
(ZONE 1) FT^ 2 LINEAR FT STREAM BUFFER IMPACTS

(ZONE 2) (CH AND JW) (CH ONLY)
(ZONE i)
(ZONE 2)
1 CH 465 155 8279 6097
1 JW 3250 NIA N/A N/A
2 RB N/A N/A N/A 2525
3 RB N/A N/A N/A 265
4 RB N/A N/A N/A 958
5 RB N/A N/A N/A 1609
LEGEND

CH = CHANNEL ZONE I IMPACTS
JW = JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND (...,...Z..., X
RB = RANDLEMAN BUFFER
Z1 = ZONE 1 ?j
?j 21 ]ZONE 2 IMPACTS
Z2 = ZONE 2
8,279 SF TOTAL ZONE 1 11,454 SF TOTAL ZONE 2
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 30 ft.
120
Q
n:
C\2 ?o '.0

V o ?I?
°
W a ?
rn
?Co p?m
r??
?w
01
J '
m? m
U s
?coucl ?

J
O
O
2
U
(17

Z

O K
Z N
w

? F"
p U

3
Lr,
L.
O O
?
LL, II
y
C
J -

CL w ui 1
r Q Q L r)
U . 0 V) U r)
GRAPHIC SCALE
30 0 15 30 60
ep
12-19-05
TO: Jason Payne
FROM: Kimberly A. Keyes
RE: PARKVIEW ELEMENTARY
CLH design, p.a.
MacGregor Park, 125 Edinburgh South, Suite 310
Cary, North Carolina 27511
Phone: [phone] lax.• [phone]
IMPACT JUSTIFICATION
CC: File (1247)
U.S Army Corps of Engineers:
The proposed parent queuing lane off of Gordon St. for the Parkview Elementary project is required
for various reasons. One of the main objectives for this project is to eliminate bus and parent vehicle
mixing. With the new queuing lane, parents will enter the site from Gordon St. and the buses will
continue to enter from Boundary Ave, therefore eliminating the traffic congestion along Henry Pl.
during the morning drop-off and afternoon pick-up hours.
The queuing lane length is determined by the amount of students that will be enrolled when the new
building is constructed. According to the City of High Point requirements we have to provide 1800' If.
(min.) of queuing lane.
The location of the queuing lane was a requirement of NCDOT. This new queuing lane connects into
an existing intersection, minimizing traffic problems (City of High Point DOT - Driveway Regulations
Section 6.1).
The other options to enter the site have considerable issues. Option `A' to upgrade the service lane
(north of site) as part of a queuing lane has physical space limitations and more importantly safety
issues. This location is simply too close to the building where children enter and exit. Option `A'
would also require a buffer impact. The required 1800' if of queuing lane was not achievable with this
option.
Option `B' to route the queuing lane along the south side of the existing building has limitations as
well. Again there would be buffer impacts. It would also increase the bus and parent vehicle mixing
problem that already exist. The required 1800' if of queuing lane was not achievable with this option.
Option `C' to locate the queuing lane farther south along Gordon St. (at the southeast corner of the
site) has its problems as well. The required queuing length could not be obtained. This location would
require off-site traffic considerations.
The queuing lane option that best fits this site and the requirements of NCDOT and the City of High
Point DOT is at the intersection of Gordon St and Morgan Pl. However we will have to impact
jurisdictional wetlands and provide a channel in a buffered stream to meet all of the design
requirements listed above (Impact 1).
12-15-05 Impact Justification-2005122241)
12-15-05 Impact Justification_2005122241)
Page 2
Impacts 2 and 3 will give the contractor sufficient space to install the drive and parking lot. It also
provides adequate space for temporary erosion control measures that are required during construction.
Impacts 4 and 5 have temporary impacts only. The reason for this impact is to demolish existing
utilities and to remove the existing play areas that are currently in Zone 2. This impact will also give
the contractor adequate room to install the new storm manhole.
The proposed design has been revised to minimize wetlands impacts and to meet all design
requirements from NCDOT and the City of High Point DOT department.
Sincerely,
Kimberly A. Keyes
12-15-05 Impact Justification 20051222-JD
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
NC Division of water Quality
Tran # Invoice Type Date Reference
9403 122705 Invoice 01/01/06 9918.W2
Date: 01/01/06
Balance
$475.00
0
5
000748
Check Number: 748
Check Amt: $475.00
Discount Pay Amount
$0.00 $475.01

DE 2 2005

I II 1 ~
I ~.1 ClienUProject
1 I ~ 8 q to I \ i ~ n 12 I~ 14 15
I 1 1 z; 4 5 6 7
1 ~ \ I I ~ ~,r Hi h Point NC
I ( ` WATER QUALITY POND ~ _ ~ n I6 9
. \ 1 1 BOTTOM: 849.0' A3 _ _ _ ~ 1 ` ~ I NORMAL POOL• 853.0' ~ ~ ~ y~ 864.00 ~ ~ \ `
~ \ 'I -w~' ~ ~ ~ RIM ~ \ -
1 %rM-'!"! ~ ~ V A \ ~ _
I I ~ ~ ~ \ v v v \ \ Its
6 _ _t ---1.~ _ 4 \ \ \ 1 1R~ \ \ ~ ~ g5 ? 1 8 / /
V p A ~ ~ I I ~ \ ~ ~ ~ / gg2 \ \ \~I SEWER STORM Archlted
A4 ~ 1 I I I ~ ~ ~ n. 1 A ~ V ~ STRUCTURE RIM INV. IN INV. OUT STRUCTURE RIM INV. IN INV. OUT
854.5 ~ ~ ~ 1 1 ae}9 \ 1 F \ ~ \ 880 ~ ~ / - EX. MH ~/1 877.66 (N) 867.15 866.56 EX. YI J/1 853.82 846.8 846.8
/ \ I I I g6 i. v v wl~ I v I v ~ ~ ~ (S) 869.45 ~ ~ EX. H-WALL ~2 853.91 846.25 846.25
~ I 1 1 ~ \ ~ * ~ ~ / ~ V ~ A_-- ~ ~ (E) 866.64 EX. ?1 f/3 854.49 (INACCESSIBLE) (INACCESSIBLE)
I A ~ i EX. MH f~2 866.29 859.18 859.16 EX. YI #4 858.68 INV. 852.3
1 ` ~~2 1 I ~ ~ ~ ~ i s I ~ I 1 1 ~ ~ i~ EX. MH ~3 855.80 847.52 847.49 EX. H-WALL 5 850.13 843.76 i ~
1 \ 1 ~ ~ n ~ i ~ I I 6S t 11 1 \ ~ ~i i ~ EX. CB ~6 850.88 843.5 ~
1 l 6 1 I 1 ~ \ ° i EX. MH ,{5 854.32 845.33 845.40 EX. CB ~/7 851.01 843.2
\ k \ 857.35 I I ~ ~ 4+ \ rn % ~ r 14 The OBSIDIAN ~ EX. MH ,~6 854.53 (E) 845.70 845.13 EX. H-WALL ~/8 849.7 842.6
x ~ \ v I 67 \ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ v v I F x I I ` ~ ` ? EX CB f/9 851.31 848.3 (S) 845.34 G ro u X p
5' OAK \ 1 \ \ ` ~ \ V ~ 856.85 V ~ ~ E . CB 0 877.36 873.0 EX. MH ~'7 851.00 842.11 840.50 EX. CB //11 875.43 870.3
~ EX. MH ~8 856.07 847.50 847.50
~ ~ o 5244 TAKE EDGE DRNE
1 \ ~h 1 x \ ~ ~ ` I HOLLY SPRINGS, NC 27540
r~ ~ ~ / EX. CB ~ ~ TOP 887.45 PHONE. [phone]
I \ \ / \ 858.55 ~ V A ~ - _ ~ / ~ , ~ ~ v FAX. [phone]
F F p2 V I ~ x / i ~ 1 \ /
~ 1 1\ \ ~ 1 / GP iii _ / ~ 1 v v / 2~ R
RY g5~ ~ 58.05 858.00 I ` ~ Z'STO 856.90 56.60 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ _ - BR~CK ~ ~ ~ - - -
RIM 858.35 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 884 _ / A / ~ v ~ ~ / ~ , Consultants INLET OTE ON ) ~ _,%c > ~
856.40 i J ~ 1~~ I ` RIAi / r ~ , I 1 ~ i 4'Lx8' 15b ( ~ I \ ~ ~ CLA B RIP- ~ ~ / G~ ~
~ 856.20 / / ~ ~ / ~`-n / 1 / ~ ~ A ~
856.80 B4 • / / ~ ~ 859.20 ` ` _ - % Or / 1 ~A 86 O. 867.007 ~ n ~ ~ vl / ~ ' A MacGre or Park
I o l i, ~ ~ / 8 ro ~ I ~ / 125 Edinbur h South I ~ / t ~ / , g
/ m / / ' Suite 310
~ 861.00 _ ~~BU - \ / l X _ ~ TOP ~ ~ ~ (SO v I ~ ~ ~ / / ; Cary, North Carolina 27511
~ V ~ ~ M / 859.80 / ~ ~ ~ / I ~ , / ; Phone: [phone] ~ / i ~ ~ Fax: [phone]
A / i- ~ ~ BANk \ 85 58.907 ~ ~ ~ i 1 ~ ~ ~ /
\T 85 45 859.10 / _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ / I i V I ~ j ~ / , ~ \ I ~ l~ 1 ~ ~
\ 85.0 \ ~ 858.407 ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ V ~ 859.707 ~ ~ ~A ~ ,i ~
\ ~10~INE ~ ~ ~ 0.507 21 0.50T l ~ 1 \ , 0 ~
~ \ 861.00 ~ - Y o , B, - _ 1 ,BYOB \ \ 860.15 ~ ~ ~ . ~ / ~ i \ ~ ~i ~ ~ ~ ^ ,
1 gR~OK \ 859.707 858.407 ~ 859.107 . / \ ~ \ \ 861.00 ~ \ / 1 ~ ~ ~ I I ~ / ~ ,
\ ~i9 ~85~ / 1 ~ ~ ~ I ~ \ / I ~ ~ \ -1~ ,
~ Ssoso esl.oo ~ _ - - vv - - ~ 1 ~ \ \ 1 860.00 i 858,907 ~ AZ -`86 ~ \ ~ INLET PRO \ \ / \ ~ 8'Lx12'Wx18b ~ V A ~ / ~
V A ~ o--~ ~ ~ \ ~ 0 859.707 ~ 60.27 _ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ CLASS GRIP-R ~ ~ V / i ~ \ / , v \ 1 ~ /
~ ~ ~ ~ \ \ ~ \ \ EX. CB TOP
~ ~ A ~ V / V ~ ~ 882.98 INV. ~ ~ ~ ~ A A \ ~ / ~ ~ 7.4 ~ ~ -
\ \ ~ 861.00 / 8.58,507 s - ' - - - _ _ _ - 869.707 / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ A \ ~
~ ---SS6---- _ / ~ 1 A 5 , ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ j
864,5 i l I - - - G r EXISTING SCHOOL ~ I G ~ ~ ~ ~ / /
v rt i BS I I ~ I BUILDING ~ v ~ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ I ~ / ~ l Key Plan
1 ~ NEW Af)~ITION 858.807 - - 86&- - - Li~,it ~ ~ I ~ . ~\V I I Q/
~ FFE~ ~T.00 v / / - ~J~~ ~Mi ~ / N _ 70 - NCO"5' ~ ~~NT / ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~i~ A /
s i / ~ ~ s ~ 1 a~ / * j I 1 i ~ ~ ~ ~Fq ~F~/ ~-868'" \ / l l ~ ~ A \ ~ / , ;
~ ~ 1 V ~ I - - 2 _ ~ M~ l o l V / 1 I - ~ / ~R \ ~R ~ / ~ l v, ~ ? A
865.00 / 860.007 I - ~ ~ \ / (S 20' SAN ARY SE \ / f I I r-' ~ v d \ ~ ~ 74 ~ ~ \ / (S , a~ A / , o ~ I~ / ~ ~ / F1 ? ~
EASEMENT I I I I f ~ \ ~ \ / ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ' ~a ~ % Z 1 ,
\ Ss1.oo / I I b ~ ~ ~ \ \ - gb ~0 4 ~s--. ~ ~ ~ \ / 7iJ ~ , ~ % ~ TOP 878.30
v I _ - / / 8 g1, ~ v ~ \ 1.0o f ? ~ \ ~ \ / / r ~ FES-Fi / ~ (INACCESSIBLE)
1 I l ~ ~ ~ ~ A A ~ I / ~ ~ ~ V ~ \ ~ EXTEND
~ 8 .7 861.00 / ? ~ -8~8~ \ \ \ / ~ ~ 24 1H t12 ~ / \ / OF NEW 24' ~ i~ ~ 24
I * / ~ \ \ \ / B I 1 / / \ ~ \ / /i , \ _ J ~ CMP, INV. OUT ~ / ~ , /
V I 1 x i i/ l ~ \ ~ A \ / A / / i ~ ~SSO~ ~ A ~ V A 868.0. ~ i ~~A ~ / ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~y\ ~ /i ~ A, /
\ ~ 860.33 I 859.50 ~ ,,-i ~ / / / V 1 ~ ~ I I I ~ A \ ~ A ~ T / ~ //a ~ / i
v _ / / v Al G / 1 ~ \ \ \ \ ~ ~ / / ~ ~ 1 ~ / / i ~i i , TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE _ ~ Gf. ,
~ ~ ~ / x ~ ~ i / l / _ ~ V A i' i 1 ~ / v ~ I 660.0 ~ / \ ~ / / / i / / / a82--~ ~ ~ \ V A / ~ / / ~ EX. CB 10 ~ . / ~ ~ at Remarks
I ~ ~ 1 ) / ~ , / / / ~ ~ \ ~ ~ A / \x \ o / - ENDORSEMENT BLOCK Revisbn D e / / ,-876- ~ , ~ , ,
I \ I ~ ~ ~ ll / ~ ~ l / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v 1 ~ I ~ ~ I I I / / ~ / ~ v ~ ~ / / \ ~ Approved by the Technicol Review Committee for 2 ysors, subject to
~ / ~ roved of a s wrote land- ~ ~ app ep dJsturbing permit and/ar erosion contrd plan, ~ _ 1 _ and moy be extended fn accordance with the provision of section
ro MI / ~ ~ / / / ~ ~ ~ - 1 I I Ihl ~ / / ~ ~ / ~ - _ / 9-8-8(e) of the High Point Development Ordmonce. i / , w
I 1- . 1 I l ?NLET cnoN I ~ ~ / / l ~ v ~ v ~ ~ 1- . I I V l / ~ 12'1x1 wXt ~ / ~ / ~ ~ / / l v ~ ~ ~ NEW 15 R CP ,
I ~ / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I RIP-RAP / / i l ~ ~ / l , I \ i' _ \ ~ ~ _ ~ I ~ / / ~ \ \ ~ 4 / ~ / ~ ,
I , / / / ~ I ~ ~ I I / ll( ~ ? - / / ~ i ~ ~ P Director of Planning and Development Date C1 ~,P i ,
~ ~ l - v i i / ~ ,
~ ~ ~ INLET PROTECTION I 3'Lx6'Wx15b
I I = ' / I I A ~ ~ I ~ i ~ / , ~ / 26 CLASS GRIP-RAP DRAINAGE STRUCTURE SCHEDULE
I I y / ' S1RUCIURE N0. PIPE PIPE PIPE PIPE UPPER LOWER UPSTREAM STRUCT
I I - I / ' UP STRM DN STRM SLOPE DIA. LENGTH MA1RL INV. INV. TOP ELEV. DEPTH TYPE
I ? ~ ~ (1N) ~F~ ~F~ ,
GENERAL NOTES 882_,-~, \ LEGEND i; \ Al A2 0.58X 80 J21 RCP 85314 851.28 N A N A HW , / /
1. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS INDICATED AT CdcG ARE TOP OF CURB, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. ' ~ ~ A2 A3 0.5BX 80 359 RCP 851.18 849.10 860.27 9.09 MH
- EX1SiiNG CONTOURS I A3 A4 0.70X 60 309 RCP 848.90 846.73 864.00 15.10 MH , ~ ~ A4 IX HW 210X 80 10 EX R 848.47 848.25 854.50 8.03 MH
2 TOTAL DISTURBED AREA = 9.5 ACRES - ~ , ~ , ,
3. ALL EXISTING VAULTSs MANHOLES, STORM DRAIN STRUCTURES, VALVE BOXES: CLE4NOUiS ^ ' FlNAL CaJlOURS ~ V ' ` A5 A6 6,tOX 14 75 RCP 859.50 854.93 N/A N/A HW ' Drawing Title
EiC. SHALL BE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED 10 MATCH FlNISHED GRADES. KEY NOTES , A8 A2 1.OOX 36 165 RCP 854.83 853.18 866.70 11.88 MH ,
4. ALL BACKFlLL, COMPACTION, SOILS TESTING, ETC. SHALL BE PERFORMED BY 1HE OWNERS 270'4+ EXISi1NG SURVEY SPOT ELEVATION ; / ' GRAPHIC SCALE ~ A7 A6 280X 15 188 RCP 865.50 860.29 N/A N/A FES
INDEPENDENT iESTING LABORATORY. (SEE SPECiFlCA110NS) 270.50 PROPOSED TOP OF CURB SPOT ELEVATON A NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK l0 BE FLUSH WI1H EXISTiNG EDGE OF PAVEMENT. o ~ ~a eo Leo ITE RADING S G
5. TO MINIMIZE DAMAGE TD EXISTING TREES NEAR THE INTERIOR EDGE OF BUFFERS AND 1nC 84 85 0.50X 18 38 DIP 853.93 853.74 856.10 227 DI
STREETSCAPES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CUT 2-FT DEEP TRENCHES ALONG THE UMI15 B NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK SURFACE GRADE 1n MATCH GRADE OF EXISTING OF DISTURBANCE, SO AS TO CUT, RATHER THAN TEAR ROOiS 270.50 PROPOSED GROUND/PAVEMENT ELEVATION CONCRETE SIDEWALK. es BB 0.5oX 18 134 RCP 853.84 85247 859.80 6.18 MH PLAN ~ F,~, ~ B6 B7 0.50X 30 74 RCP 85237 85200 858.00 583 DI
6. 1REE PROTEC110N FENCING SHALL 8E MAINTAINED ON THE SITE UN1IL ALL SITE W17Rf( IS ~ NEW CLEANOUT, SEE DETAIL SHEET. CONIRACTai SHALL INSTALL NEW 4~
COMPLETED AND THE FlNAL SIZE INSPECTION PRIOR li7 THE CERTIFlCAiE OF OCCUPANCY 29 STORM STRUCTURE NUMBER PVC SANITARY SEWER SERNCE AT 2.OX MIN SLOPE AND 3' MIN COVER. 1 1nCh ~ ~ B8 B9 O.SOX 15 18 RCP 855.30 855.21 858.80 350 C8
IS SCHEDULED. THE FENCING SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR 117 FlNAL SITE INSPEC110N FOR COORDINATE W11H PLUMBING PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATION Ai BUILDING. CERDFlCAIE OF OCCUPANCY, V ~IA TEI 89 810 0.70X 15 50 RCP 855.11 854,76 858.50 338 C8 WATERSHED REVIEW COMMITTEE BiD Bii 1.ooX 24 42 RCP 854.D1 653.59 s5a4D
38 CB 811 BB 0.88X 30 140 RCP 85309 85213 859.10 6.01 C8
7. SITE IS NOT WITHIN 100 YEAR F100D PLAIN. EXISTING STORM DRAIN PIPE p CONNECT 1D BURDING 5 FEET OUT510E OF BUILDING, SEE PLUMBING PUNS FOR IXACT LOCATION. PROVIDE FlTTINGS NECESSARY FOR CONNECTIONS E ENDORSEMENT BLOCK Date ChedcBy
8. DUE TO THE EXPECTED DAiS OF CONSTRUC110N EXTENSIVE AREAS OF WET SURFACE SOILS m~ PROPOSED STORM DRAIN PIPE E REFUGE EXISTING STORM INLET WITH NEW S1ORM MANHOLE SHOULD BE EXPECTED. THE CONTRACTOR SHAH BE PREPARED TO PROTECT SUBCRADES 812 810 1.OOX 15 32 RCP 854.90 854.58 858.40 350 CB 05131!05 ARP
FROM DElERIORAlION TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE AND DRY ON-SIZE SaLS FOR PROPER SEE DETAIL SHEET C7.3. IRIS iHfS WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT PLAN (DEV. / ~ IS 813 814 1.OOX 15 103 RCP 861.45 86(142 870.50 9.05 C8 Scale n - r Drawn B Y
COMPACTION. MOISTURE CONTENT WILL NOT BE THE SOLE FACTOR IN DETERMINING RD PROPOSED ROOF DRAIN G NEW CONCRETE HEADWALL SEE DETAIL SHEET C7.4. APPR saL suiTAe?uTY. APPROVED BY THE WATESHED REVIEW COMMfT1EE; 814 815 1.33X 15 284 RCP 88Q32 856.54 887.00 6.68 CB ~ - 40 KAK
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM EXISi1NG AND NEW BUILDINGS F NEW OU11ET PROIECDON, SEE DETAIL SHEET C7.2. 815 B8 7.OOX 15 35 RCP 858.44 853.99 88250 e.0e MH
TREE PRO)EC110N/CONSiRUC110N FENCING DIREC Sheet Number DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DAZE 818 B5 Q50X 12 42 RCP 853.95 853.74 858.40 245 DI
SITE GRADING PLAN

I II 1 ~
I ~.1 ClienUProject
1 I ~ 8 q to I \ i ~ n 12 I~ 14 15
I 1 1 z; 4 5 6 7
1 ~ \ I I ~ ~,r Hi h Point NC
I ( ` WATER QUALITY POND ~ _ ~ n I6 9
. \ 1 1 BOTTOM: 849.0' A3 _ _ _ ~ 1 ` ~ I NORMAL POOL• 853.0' ~ ~ ~ y~ 864.00 ~ ~ \ `
~ \ 'I -w~' ~ ~ ~ RIM ~ \ -
1 %rM-'!"! ~ ~ V A \ ~ _
I I ~ ~ ~ \ v v v \ \ Its
6 _ _t ---1.~ _ 4 \ \ \ 1 1R~ \ \ ~ ~ g5 ? 1 8 / /
V p A ~ ~ I I ~ \ ~ ~ ~ / gg2 \ \ \~I SEWER STORM Archlted
A4 ~ 1 I I I ~ ~ ~ n. 1 A ~ V ~ STRUCTURE RIM INV. IN INV. OUT STRUCTURE RIM INV. IN INV. OUT
854.5 ~ ~ ~ 1 1 ae}9 \ 1 F \ ~ \ 880 ~ ~ / - EX. MH ~/1 877.66 (N) 867.15 866.56 EX. YI J/1 853.82 846.8 846.8
/ \ I I I g6 i. v v wl~ I v I v ~ ~ ~ (S) 869.45 ~ ~ EX. H-WALL ~2 853.91 846.25 846.25
~ I 1 1 ~ \ ~ * ~ ~ / ~ V ~ A_-- ~ ~ (E) 866.64 EX. ?1 f/3 854.49 (INACCESSIBLE) (INACCESSIBLE)
I A ~ i EX. MH f~2 866.29 859.18 859.16 EX. YI #4 858.68 INV. 852.3
1 ` ~~2 1 I ~ ~ ~ ~ i s I ~ I 1 1 ~ ~ i~ EX. MH ~3 855.80 847.52 847.49 EX. H-WALL 5 850.13 843.76 i ~
1 \ 1 ~ ~ n ~ i ~ I I 6S t 11 1 \ ~ ~i i ~ EX. CB ~6 850.88 843.5 ~
1 l 6 1 I 1 ~ \ ° i EX. MH ,{5 854.32 845.33 845.40 EX. CB ~/7 851.01 843.2
\ k \ 857.35 I I ~ ~ 4+ \ rn % ~ r 14 The OBSIDIAN ~ EX. MH ,~6 854.53 (E) 845.70 845.13 EX. H-WALL ~/8 849.7 842.6
x ~ \ v I 67 \ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ v v I F x I I ` ~ ` ? EX CB f/9 851.31 848.3 (S) 845.34 G ro u X p
5' OAK \ 1 \ \ ` ~ \ V ~ 856.85 V ~ ~ E . CB 0 877.36 873.0 EX. MH ~'7 851.00 842.11 840.50 EX. CB //11 875.43 870.3
~ EX. MH ~8 856.07 847.50 847.50
~ ~ o 5244 TAKE EDGE DRNE
1 \ ~h 1 x \ ~ ~ ` I HOLLY SPRINGS, NC 27540
r~ ~ ~ / EX. CB ~ ~ TOP 887.45 PHONE. [phone]
I \ \ / \ 858.55 ~ V A ~ - _ ~ / ~ , ~ ~ v FAX. [phone]
F F p2 V I ~ x / i ~ 1 \ /
~ 1 1\ \ ~ 1 / GP iii _ / ~ 1 v v / 2~ R
RY g5~ ~ 58.05 858.00 I ` ~ Z'STO 856.90 56.60 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ _ - BR~CK ~ ~ ~ - - -
RIM 858.35 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 884 _ / A / ~ v ~ ~ / ~ , Consultants INLET OTE ON ) ~ _,%c > ~
856.40 i J ~ 1~~ I ` RIAi / r ~ , I 1 ~ i 4'Lx8' 15b ( ~ I \ ~ ~ CLA B RIP- ~ ~ / G~ ~
~ 856.20 / / ~ ~ / ~`-n / 1 / ~ ~ A ~
856.80 B4 • / / ~ ~ 859.20 ` ` _ - % Or / 1 ~A 86 O. 867.007 ~ n ~ ~ vl / ~ ' A MacGre or Park
I o l i, ~ ~ / 8 ro ~ I ~ / 125 Edinbur h South I ~ / t ~ / , g
/ m / / ' Suite 310
~ 861.00 _ ~~BU - \ / l X _ ~ TOP ~ ~ ~ (SO v I ~ ~ ~ / / ; Cary, North Carolina 27511
~ V ~ ~ M / 859.80 / ~ ~ ~ / I ~ , / ; Phone: [phone] ~ / i ~ ~ Fax: [phone]
A / i- ~ ~ BANk \ 85 58.907 ~ ~ ~ i 1 ~ ~ ~ /
\T 85 45 859.10 / _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ / I i V I ~ j ~ / , ~ \ I ~ l~ 1 ~ ~
\ 85.0 \ ~ 858.407 ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ V ~ 859.707 ~ ~ ~A ~ ,i ~
\ ~10~INE ~ ~ ~ 0.507 21 0.50T l ~ 1 \ , 0 ~
~ \ 861.00 ~ - Y o , B, - _ 1 ,BYOB \ \ 860.15 ~ ~ ~ . ~ / ~ i \ ~ ~i ~ ~ ~ ^ ,
1 gR~OK \ 859.707 858.407 ~ 859.107 . / \ ~ \ \ 861.00 ~ \ / 1 ~ ~ ~ I I ~ / ~ ,
\ ~i9 ~85~ / 1 ~ ~ ~ I ~ \ / I ~ ~ \ -1~ ,
~ Ssoso esl.oo ~ _ - - vv - - ~ 1 ~ \ \ 1 860.00 i 858,907 ~ AZ -`86 ~ \ ~ INLET PRO \ \ / \ ~ 8'Lx12'Wx18b ~ V A ~ / ~
V A ~ o--~ ~ ~ \ ~ 0 859.707 ~ 60.27 _ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ CLASS GRIP-R ~ ~ V / i ~ \ / , v \ 1 ~ /
~ ~ ~ ~ \ \ ~ \ \ EX. CB TOP
~ ~ A ~ V / V ~ ~ 882.98 INV. ~ ~ ~ ~ A A \ ~ / ~ ~ 7.4 ~ ~ -
\ \ ~ 861.00 / 8.58,507 s - ' - - - _ _ _ - 869.707 / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ A \ ~
~ ---SS6---- _ / ~ 1 A 5 , ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ j
864,5 i l I - - - G r EXISTING SCHOOL ~ I G ~ ~ ~ ~ / /
v rt i BS I I ~ I BUILDING ~ v ~ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ I ~ / ~ l Key Plan
1 ~ NEW Af)~ITION 858.807 - - 86&- - - Li~,it ~ ~ I ~ . ~\V I I Q/
~ FFE~ ~T.00 v / / - ~J~~ ~Mi ~ / N _ 70 - NCO"5' ~ ~~NT / ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~i~ A /
s i / ~ ~ s ~ 1 a~ / * j I 1 i ~ ~ ~ ~Fq ~F~/ ~-868'" \ / l l ~ ~ A \ ~ / , ;
~ ~ 1 V ~ I - - 2 _ ~ M~ l o l V / 1 I - ~ / ~R \ ~R ~ / ~ l v, ~ ? A
865.00 / 860.007 I - ~ ~ \ / (S 20' SAN ARY SE \ / f I I r-' ~ v d \ ~ ~ 74 ~ ~ \ / (S , a~ A / , o ~ I~ / ~ ~ / F1 ? ~
EASEMENT I I I I f ~ \ ~ \ / ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ' ~a ~ % Z 1 ,
\ Ss1.oo / I I b ~ ~ ~ \ \ - gb ~0 4 ~s--. ~ ~ ~ \ / 7iJ ~ , ~ % ~ TOP 878.30
v I _ - / / 8 g1, ~ v ~ \ 1.0o f ? ~ \ ~ \ / / r ~ FES-Fi / ~ (INACCESSIBLE)
1 I l ~ ~ ~ ~ A A ~ I / ~ ~ ~ V ~ \ ~ EXTEND
~ 8 .7 861.00 / ? ~ -8~8~ \ \ \ / ~ ~ 24 1H t12 ~ / \ / OF NEW 24' ~ i~ ~ 24
I * / ~ \ \ \ / B I 1 / / \ ~ \ / /i , \ _ J ~ CMP, INV. OUT ~ / ~ , /
V I 1 x i i/ l ~ \ ~ A \ / A / / i ~ ~SSO~ ~ A ~ V A 868.0. ~ i ~~A ~ / ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~y\ ~ /i ~ A, /
\ ~ 860.33 I 859.50 ~ ,,-i ~ / / / V 1 ~ ~ I I I ~ A \ ~ A ~ T / ~ //a ~ / i
v _ / / v Al G / 1 ~ \ \ \ \ ~ ~ / / ~ ~ 1 ~ / / i ~i i , TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE _ ~ Gf. ,
~ ~ ~ / x ~ ~ i / l / _ ~ V A i' i 1 ~ / v ~ I 660.0 ~ / \ ~ / / / i / / / a82--~ ~ ~ \ V A / ~ / / ~ EX. CB 10 ~ . / ~ ~ at Remarks
I ~ ~ 1 ) / ~ , / / / ~ ~ \ ~ ~ A / \x \ o / - ENDORSEMENT BLOCK Revisbn D e / / ,-876- ~ , ~ , ,
I \ I ~ ~ ~ ll / ~ ~ l / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v 1 ~ I ~ ~ I I I / / ~ / ~ v ~ ~ / / \ ~ Approved by the Technicol Review Committee for 2 ysors, subject to
~ / ~ roved of a s wrote land- ~ ~ app ep dJsturbing permit and/ar erosion contrd plan, ~ _ 1 _ and moy be extended fn accordance with the provision of section
ro MI / ~ ~ / / / ~ ~ ~ - 1 I I Ihl ~ / / ~ ~ / ~ - _ / 9-8-8(e) of the High Point Development Ordmonce. i / , w
I 1- . 1 I l ?NLET cnoN I ~ ~ / / l ~ v ~ v ~ ~ 1- . I I V l / ~ 12'1x1 wXt ~ / ~ / ~ ~ / / l v ~ ~ ~ NEW 15 R CP ,
I ~ / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I RIP-RAP / / i l ~ ~ / l , I \ i' _ \ ~ ~ _ ~ I ~ / / ~ \ \ ~ 4 / ~ / ~ ,
I , / / / ~ I ~ ~ I I / ll( ~ ? - / / ~ i ~ ~ P Director of Planning and Development Date C1 ~,P i ,
~ ~ l - v i i / ~ ,
~ ~ ~ INLET PROTECTION I 3'Lx6'Wx15b
I I = ' / I I A ~ ~ I ~ i ~ / , ~ / 26 CLASS GRIP-RAP DRAINAGE STRUCTURE SCHEDULE
I I y / ' S1RUCIURE N0. PIPE PIPE PIPE PIPE UPPER LOWER UPSTREAM STRUCT
I I - I / ' UP STRM DN STRM SLOPE DIA. LENGTH MA1RL INV. INV. TOP ELEV. DEPTH TYPE
I ? ~ ~ (1N) ~F~ ~F~ ,
GENERAL NOTES 882_,-~, \ LEGEND i; \ Al A2 0.58X 80 J21 RCP 85314 851.28 N A N A HW , / /
1. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS INDICATED AT CdcG ARE TOP OF CURB, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. ' ~ ~ A2 A3 0.5BX 80 359 RCP 851.18 849.10 860.27 9.09 MH
- EX1SiiNG CONTOURS I A3 A4 0.70X 60 309 RCP 848.90 846.73 864.00 15.10 MH , ~ ~ A4 IX HW 210X 80 10 EX R 848.47 848.25 854.50 8.03 MH
2 TOTAL DISTURBED AREA = 9.5 ACRES - ~ , ~ , ,
3. ALL EXISTING VAULTSs MANHOLES, STORM DRAIN STRUCTURES, VALVE BOXES: CLE4NOUiS ^ ' FlNAL CaJlOURS ~ V ' ` A5 A6 6,tOX 14 75 RCP 859.50 854.93 N/A N/A HW ' Drawing Title
EiC. SHALL BE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED 10 MATCH FlNISHED GRADES. KEY NOTES , A8 A2 1.OOX 36 165 RCP 854.83 853.18 866.70 11.88 MH ,
4. ALL BACKFlLL, COMPACTION, SOILS TESTING, ETC. SHALL BE PERFORMED BY 1HE OWNERS 270'4+ EXISi1NG SURVEY SPOT ELEVATION ; / ' GRAPHIC SCALE ~ A7 A6 280X 15 188 RCP 865.50 860.29 N/A N/A FES
INDEPENDENT iESTING LABORATORY. (SEE SPECiFlCA110NS) 270.50 PROPOSED TOP OF CURB SPOT ELEVATON A NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK l0 BE FLUSH WI1H EXISTiNG EDGE OF PAVEMENT. o ~ ~a eo Leo ITE RADING S G
5. TO MINIMIZE DAMAGE TD EXISTING TREES NEAR THE INTERIOR EDGE OF BUFFERS AND 1nC 84 85 0.50X 18 38 DIP 853.93 853.74 856.10 227 DI
STREETSCAPES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CUT 2-FT DEEP TRENCHES ALONG THE UMI15 B NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK SURFACE GRADE 1n MATCH GRADE OF EXISTING OF DISTURBANCE, SO AS TO CUT, RATHER THAN TEAR ROOiS 270.50 PROPOSED GROUND/PAVEMENT ELEVATION CONCRETE SIDEWALK. es BB 0.5oX 18 134 RCP 853.84 85247 859.80 6.18 MH PLAN ~ F,~, ~ B6 B7 0.50X 30 74 RCP 85237 85200 858.00 583 DI
6. 1REE PROTEC110N FENCING SHALL 8E MAINTAINED ON THE SITE UN1IL ALL SITE W17Rf( IS ~ NEW CLEANOUT, SEE DETAIL SHEET. CONIRACTai SHALL INSTALL NEW 4~
COMPLETED AND THE FlNAL SIZE INSPECTION PRIOR li7 THE CERTIFlCAiE OF OCCUPANCY 29 STORM STRUCTURE NUMBER PVC SANITARY SEWER SERNCE AT 2.OX MIN SLOPE AND 3' MIN COVER. 1 1nCh ~ ~ B8 B9 O.SOX 15 18 RCP 855.30 855.21 858.80 350 C8
IS SCHEDULED. THE FENCING SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR 117 FlNAL SITE INSPEC110N FOR COORDINATE W11H PLUMBING PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATION Ai BUILDING. CERDFlCAIE OF OCCUPANCY, V ~IA TEI 89 810 0.70X 15 50 RCP 855.11 854,76 858.50 338 C8 WATERSHED REVIEW COMMITTEE BiD Bii 1.ooX 24 42 RCP 854.D1 653.59 s5a4D
38 CB 811 BB 0.88X 30 140 RCP 85309 85213 859.10 6.01 C8
7. SITE IS NOT WITHIN 100 YEAR F100D PLAIN. EXISTING STORM DRAIN PIPE p CONNECT 1D BURDING 5 FEET OUT510E OF BUILDING, SEE PLUMBING PUNS FOR IXACT LOCATION. PROVIDE FlTTINGS NECESSARY FOR CONNECTIONS E ENDORSEMENT BLOCK Date ChedcBy
8. DUE TO THE EXPECTED DAiS OF CONSTRUC110N EXTENSIVE AREAS OF WET SURFACE SOILS m~ PROPOSED STORM DRAIN PIPE E REFUGE EXISTING STORM INLET WITH NEW S1ORM MANHOLE SHOULD BE EXPECTED. THE CONTRACTOR SHAH BE PREPARED TO PROTECT SUBCRADES 812 810 1.OOX 15 32 RCP 854.90 854.58 858.40 350 CB 05131!05 ARP
FROM DElERIORAlION TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE AND DRY ON-SIZE SaLS FOR PROPER SEE DETAIL SHEET C7.3. IRIS iHfS WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT PLAN (DEV. / ~ IS 813 814 1.OOX 15 103 RCP 861.45 86(142 870.50 9.05 C8 Scale n - r Drawn B Y
COMPACTION. MOISTURE CONTENT WILL NOT BE THE SOLE FACTOR IN DETERMINING RD PROPOSED ROOF DRAIN G NEW CONCRETE HEADWALL SEE DETAIL SHEET C7.4. APPR saL suiTAe?uTY. APPROVED BY THE WATESHED REVIEW COMMfT1EE; 814 815 1.33X 15 284 RCP 88Q32 856.54 887.00 6.68 CB ~ - 40 KAK
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM EXISi1NG AND NEW BUILDINGS F NEW OU11ET PROIECDON, SEE DETAIL SHEET C7.2. 815 B8 7.OOX 15 35 RCP 858.44 853.99 88250 e.0e MH
TREE PRO)EC110N/CONSiRUC110N FENCING DIREC Sheet Number DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DAZE 818 B5 Q50X 12 42 RCP 853.95 853.74 858.40 245 DI
SITE GRADING PLAN