20060001 Ver 1_Complete File_20060112

O?O? W AT ?RpG
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
January 24, 2006
DWQ EXP # 06-0001
Wake County
Evergreen-Battle Bridge LLC
Attn: Mr. Fred Williams
422 Aiken Hunt Circle
Columbia, SC 29223
Subject Property: Shoppes at Battle Bridge
UT to Neuse River [27-(22-5), C NSW]
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions-Express Review
Program
Dear Mr. Williams:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to
place fill within or otherwise impact 8,768 square feet (ft2) of Zone 1 of the protected riparian
buffers, 7,109 square feet (ft2) of Zone 2 of the protected riparian buffers, 0.036 acres of
wetlands and 38 linear feet of stream to construct the proposed Shoppes at Battle Bridge project,
as described within your application dated and received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) on January 12, 2006 and all additional information, including the revised stormwater
wetland design calculations submitted and received by the DWQ on January 19, 2006. After
reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by General Water
Quality Certification Number 3402 (GC3402). The Certification allows you to use Nationwide
Permit 39 and Nationwide Permit 18 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal,
state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to)
Erosion and Sediment Control and Non-discharge regulations. Also, this approval to proceed
with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application
shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application and revised
stormwater wetland design calculations. If you change your project, you must notify us and you
may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be
given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying
with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland
or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation maybe required as described.in 15A
NCAC 2H.0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the
attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
401 Oversight/ Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
No°i?,,Carolina
Natura!!b
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer -50% Recyded/10% Post Consumer Paper
Shoppes at Battle Bridge
Page 2 of 5
January 24, 2006
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and
general conditions of this Water Quality Certification and Riparian Area Authorization
are met. No other impacts are approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Approved (Units) Plan Location or Reference
Stream 38 (feet) Page 5 of the PCN
404 Wetlands .036 (acres) Page 4 of the PCN
Buffers Zone 1: 8,768 (sq. feet)
Zone 2: 7,109(s q. feet) Page 8 of the PCN
2. Compensatory Buffer Mitigation Using NC EEP
You are required to mitigate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers. The required area
of mitigation to compensate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers is 27,413 square
feet as required under this Authorization Certificate and 15A NCAC 2B .0233(10) (buffer
mitigation rule). We understand that you wish to make a payment into the Riparian Buffer
Restoration Fund administered by the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) to meet
this mitigation requirement. This has, been determined by the DWQ to be a suitable method
to meet the mitigation requirement. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2B .0233(10) (buffer
mitigation rule), this contribution will satisfy our compensatory mitigation requirements
under 15A NCAC 2B .0233(10) (buffer protection rule). Until the EEP receives and clears
your check (made payable to: DENR - Ecosystem Enhancement Program Office), no
impacts specified in this Authorization Certificate shall occur. The EEP should be
contacted at [phone] if you have any questions concerning payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund. You have one month from the date of this approval to
make this payment. For accounting purposes, this Authorization Certificate authorizes
payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund to compensate for 27,413 fe of
required riparian buffer mitigation for impacts to 12,066 ft of protected riparian
buffers; 03-04-02 river and subbasin."
3. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the
North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion
control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified
in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and
waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits
associated with the project.
Shoppes at Battle Bridge
Page 3 of 5
January 24, 2006
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the
North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
4. Protective Fencing
The outside wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within these
boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange
warning fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved
to infringe within the wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure
compliance with GC 3402 and the Neuse Buffer Rules.
5. Construction Stormwater Permit NCGO10000
Upon the approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control. Plan issued by the Division
of Land Resources (DLR) or a DLR delegated local erosion and sedimentation control
program, an NPDES General stormwater permit (NCGO10000) administered by DWQ is
automatically issued to the project. This General Permit allows stormwater to be
discharged during land disturbing construction activities as stipulated by conditions in the
permit. If your project is covered by this permit [applicable to construction projects that
disturb one (1) or more acres], full compliance with permit conditions including the
sedimentation control plan, self-monitoring, record keeping and reporting requirements
are required. A copy of this permit and monitoring report forms may be found at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/Forms_Documents.htm. Please note that if Parcel 4 or any
other portion of this project will be developed in the future, a sediment and erosion
control plan will need to be submitted to DLR or a DLR delegated local erosion and
sedimentation control program. Upon approval of the sediment and erosion control
plan for any additional portion of this project, -an NPDES General stormwater permit
administered by DWQ is automatically issued to the project.
6 No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas
beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All
construction activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of
sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no
violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
7. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the
maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in
wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored
within two (2) months of the date that the Division of Land Resources has released the
project.
Shoppes at Battle Bridge
Page 4 of 5
January 24, 2006
8. No Impacts to Zone 1.
No impacts shall occur to Zone 1 of the protected riparian buffers (except for uses and
activities designated as "exempt" within 15A NCAC 02B .0233), unless otherwise
approved by DWQ. .
9. Written Stormwater Management Plan
The final, written stormwater management plans (including a signed and notarized
Operation and Maintenance Agreement) dated January 11, 2006 and the amended design
specifications dated January 19, 2006, must be implemented and the stormwater
management facilities shall be constructed and operational before any permanent building
is occupied at the subject site. The structural stormwater practices as approved by this
Office as well as drainage patterns must be maintained in perpetuity. No changes to the
structural stormwater practices shall be made without written authorization from the
Division of Water Quality.
10. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or
applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to
return the attached Certificate of Completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina
Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
11. Water Quality Certification
The proposed project must comply with all the conditions of general Water Quality
Certification (GC) 3402.
12. Notification of Construction
The applicant and/or authorized agent shall contact the DWQ Express Review Program in
writing at the letterhead address within ten (10) days of the commencement of
construction.
13. Deed Restriction
The DWQ understands that the portion of the property labeled as "Parcel 4: Permanent
Open Space/Tree Save Area" on plan sheet CS-2 dated April 29, 2005; will remain
forested land in perpetuity. A deed restriction or similar mechanisms shall be placed on
this area. A signed and notarized original of this deed restriction and two copies are
required by this Office prior to impacting any wetlands or waters authorized by this
written approval.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may
result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed
impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this
Certification, shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved
wetland or stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60
days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Shoppes at Battle Bridge
Page 5 of 5
January 24, 2006
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly at 919-733-9721 or
Cynthia F. Van Der Wiele at 919-715-3473 in the Central Office in Raleigh.
Si cerely,
AWKIasc%vdw
Enclosures:
Certificate of Completion
Water Quality Certification N°. 3402
NC EEP Notification
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
cc: USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
NC EEP
City of Raleigh, Attn: Bill Brower; Construction Engineering; 222 West Hargett Street; PO
Box 590; Raleigh, NC 27602
Bob Zarzecki, S&EC, 11010 Raven Ridge Road; Raleigh, NC 27614
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 060001 ShoppesatBattleBridge(Wake)EXP+401
?A_
41
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
401 Water Quality Certification and Neuse Buffer Authorization
Summary of Permitted Impacts and Mitigation Requirements
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0500, Evergreen-Battle Bridge, LLC has permission as outlined below
to impact 38 linear feet of streams, 0.036 acres of wetlands, and 12,066 square feet of protected riparian
buffer for the purpose(s) of constructing the proposed infrastructure improvements associated with
Shoppes at Battle Bridge in Wake County. All activities associated with these authorized impacts must
be conducted with the conditions listed in the attached transmittal letter. THIS CERTIFICATION AND
BUFFER AUTHORIZATION IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ATTACHMENTS.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS-NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT
PROGRAM (NC EEP)
DWQ Project No: EXP 06-0001
LOCATION: Shoppes at Battle Bridge
COUNTY: Wake
BASIN/ SUB BASIN/ INDEX: 03-04-02/ [27-(22.5)]
As required by 15A NCAC 2H.0500, and the conditions of this General Certification and Neuse Buffer
Authorization, you are required to compensate for the above impacts through the restoration, creation,
enhancement or preservation of surface waters and riparian buffers as outlined below prior to conducting
any activities that impact or degrade the waters of the state.
Note: Acreage requirements proposed to be mitigated through the Ecosystem Enhancement Program
must be rounded to one-quarter acre increments; linear foot requirements must be rounded up to the
nearest foot according to 15A NCAC 2R. 0503(b).
Impacts:
38 linear feet of streams
0.036 acres of wetlands
12,066 square feet of riparian buffer
Mitigation:
27,413 square feet of riparian buffer
One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirement is through the
payment of a fee to the NC EEP per 15A NCAC 2R.0503. If you choose this option, please sign this
form and mail it to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program at the address below. An invoice for the
appropriate amount of payment will be sent to you upon receipt of this form. PLEASE NOTE, THE
ABOVE IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL YOU RECEIVE NOTIFICATION THAT
YOUR PAYMENT HAS BEEN PROCESSED BY THE ECOSYTEM ENHANCMENT PROGRAM.
Signature:
Date:
ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
1619 Mail Service Center
RALEIGH, N.C. 27669-1619
[phone]
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 One
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 NorthCarohna
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] / Internet: htto://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands ;V19tu4911y
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
SENDING CONFIRMATION
DATE JAN-24-2006 TUE 10:34
NAME DWQ-WETLANDS
TEL [phone]
PHONE : [phone]
PAGES : 14/14
START TIME : JAN-24 10:24
ELAPSED TIME : 08,19"
MODE : G3
RESULTS : OK
FIRST PAGE OF RECENT DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED...
OF W 4?FR 111-4 P. Earky, c+v..,,,..
V Y NnnM1 G,Mina nt?.Nro[nt ?f Cn?;irrnmrnl au?l N^n,rai Rcrrurces
7 n 11 . rA IV-Qaaht)'
EXPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
401 Qversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
Street Addreaa: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fu #: 919.733-6893
Fax To: Bob Zarzecki, S&EC Fax #: [phone]
Fred Williams, Evergreen-Ba ttle Bridge 803.462.0692
Subject: Sboppes CwBattle Bridge Date: January 24, 2006
Number of pages including cover sheet: 14
Notes or special instructions:
The oti emal will tic sent m the m1i1 It you h1 •e ouesrio a nleaae contarr Cynthia Van ller Wieie at
919-7 03473 or Amy Chapman at 919-732-9 502
IV0 94;Ep.. Zsv' WPia W'jw
:f3AM1^4Mre GeMr, RoWW. Wn1M1 1.0. 2n6 'Sm
Y21 C®bw BA-d. r,* 2:'), fury. Warn C-v 21
'b c 9 ig-733-119G I FAX 9;c.773Q91, I I Mm l nm,,,a.,,rnr?,rc_f'yy.sU:+m+s
tLMnc?mt+??
,'Vaturrfl?
4' FWA CPPrA'Ift n;'.m„P -, E,rybr-so%Rlq...v. ';PWCoorrrarP-
SENDING CONFIRMATION
DATE JAN-24-2006 TUE 10:24
NAME DWQ-WETLANDS
TEL [phone]
PHONE : [phone]
PAGES : 1414
START TIME : JAN-24 10:20
ELAPSED TIME : 03'09"
MODE : ECM
RESULTS : OK
FIRST PAGE OF RECENT DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED...
arc W AiFq r.3?tl::?a r. earkr. u?.,.s?>r
C O Hgtliam ?. F.n« 1;.. Secr•?:??i
?! r K,o hC-fl,, nj-- of t3nira:mrntand ,1.-1't.--
-w.K!1-1Y V.L. Ltirc.•.v
1111-1.'A "itc1
EXPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
Ilhvision of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Bonlevald, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh. NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #! 919-733-0203
Fax [phone]
Fax To: Bob 7arzecki. S&EC Fax tl: 346-9467
Fred Williams. Evergreen-Battle Bridge. 303.462.0692
Subject: Shoppes @Battle bWge Date: January 24. 2006
Number of pages including cover sheet: 14
Notes or special instructions:
u4c cop-inal will be sent in the mail. If you have questions, please contact Cynthia Van Der Male at
919.715-3473 or Amu Chapman at 91.9-733-9502.
11.01 OvaMphl1 Erpran n 4.. PlIftr UM
I%) VM 3",m CR'^c. Rphgh. `.y rn carema 276831650
32 1 CrJbtma B-1d. SWl M, R 119h.-Ceroimd 216W
PMm: PtP??.i31]Ci??:JISt9::t1{Af?!InMmetgitp1J'1F?ca cuxl crvalandt
A, Egttn'Orp-HYA0;va ^a!3>n EVq cr- M RWjC12/10% Wit(;gw rPipf
?'?ahrraliq

W AT
FRQG
pF
p- Michael F. Easley, Governor
y
- William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina De
artment
f E
i
t
d N
t
l R
r p
nv
ronmen
o
an
a
ura
esources
Q Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
EXPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
Fax To: Bob Zarzecki, S&EC Fax #: [phone]
Fred Williams, Evergreen-Battle Bridge 803.462.0692
Subject: Shoppes @Battle Bridge Date: January 24, 2006
Number of pages including cover sheet: 14
Notes or special instructions:
The original will be sent in the mail. If you have questions, please contact Cynthia Van Der Wiele at
919-715-3473 or Amy Chapman at 919-733-9502.
401 Oversight/ Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands
Noe Carolina
?tura!!y
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled/10%a Post Consumer Paper
01-19-'06`15;39 FROM-DENR-EEP
Bob Zarzaeld
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27587
Project: Shoppes 0 Battle Bridge
9197152219
rh ?01
-? 0 t
Me i i em
PROGRAM
January 19, 2006
County: Wake
T-782 P02 U-747
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts, It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC MP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. N we have not received a copy of the issued 404
PermlV401 CerdhcaWu w[6iln this time frame, thin acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/401/CAMA permits to NC EEP, Once NC E$P receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made,
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table,
River Basin Wetlands Stream. Buffer Buffer
Cataloging (Acres) (Linear Feet)' Zone 1 Zone 2
Unit (Sq. Ft,) (S q. Ft.)
Ri arias Non-Ri arian Coastal Marsh Cold Cool Warm
Noun .. .0,036 0. 0 0 0 8 18,627 8,786
03020201
Upon receipt of payment, BEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2:1 ratio, (buffers, Zone 1 at a 3:1 ratio and Zone 2 at a 1.5:1 ratio). The type and amount of the compensatory
mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401 Water Quality Certification, and/or CAMA Permit. The
mitigation will be peRormed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understandlog.t etween the N. C. Department of
Environment and 1Natural Resources and thc'U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at (919) 733.520$,
Sincerely,
Rain D, Chimore, PIE
irector //
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wedands/401 Unit
Monte Matthews, USACE - Raleigh
Eric KU126 DWQ Regional Office - Raleigh
File
mtor&1?5... EKAA "... Pro" ow Jta &

North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NO 27699.1652 / 919-715.0476 / www.nceep,not
! / q ars
f 4
DWQ Project No. Q 00o
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - 401 EXTENDED DETENTION (and POCKET*) WETLAND WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : St bt?_s dT MAJ r- r -_
Contact Person: u 1 r i_t_ r a &:1 ell-. ?,n tti r Phone Number.
For projects with multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet applies to:
Permanent Pool Elevation Z DD ft. (elevation of the orifice invert out)
Temporary Pool Elevation Z 74. 75 ft. (elevation of the outlet structure invert in)
Permanent Pool Surface Area Z Z; o 3 U sq. ft. (water surface area at permanent pool elevation)
Drainage Area i 4 - 7o ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
Impervious Area r S. G 17 ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
Forebay Surface Area 4 3Q1'J sq. ft. (at permanent pool elevation approximately 150/o)'
Marsh 0'-9" Surface Area 9 i Ago sq. ft. (at permanent pool elevation approximately 35%)*
Marsh 9"-18" Surface Area 8 SRO sq. ft.
* (at permanent pool elevation approximately 35%)*
Micro Pool Surface Area 4
, Z 50 sq. ft. (at permanent pool elevation approximately 15%)*
Temporary Pool Volume _!3-O, 5,12 cu. ft. (volume detained on top of the permanent pool)
SA/DA used _ Z. 8 4- (surface area to drainage area ratio)'
Diameter of Orifice 3 " in. (draw down orifice diameter)
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project
Applicants Initials
The temporary pool controls runoff from the 1 inch rain.
4 ~' The basin side slopes are no steeper than 3:1.
A planting plan for the marsh areas with plant species and densities is provided.
"Vegetation above the permanent pool elevation is specified.
An emergency drain is provided to drain the basin.
The temporary pool draws down in 2 to 5 days.
Sediment storage is provided in the permanent pool.
A sediment disposal area is provided.
Access is provided for maintenance.
A site specific, signed and notarized operation and maintenance agreement is provided.
The drainage area (including any offsite area) is delineated on a site plan.
Access is provided for maintenance.
Plan details for the wetland are provided.
Plan details for the inlet and outlet are provided.
60 D A site specific operation and maintenance agreement, signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided (see
http:/m2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/oandm.doc).
' Pocket Wetlands have different design parameters and are only assumed to remove 35% TSS - See pp. 19 and 20 of the NC DENR
Stormwater BMP Manual, April 1999.10% open water, 50% high marsh, 40% low marsh.
11rK1o 10

1/19/2006
Shoppes at Battle Bridge
Raleigh, North Carolina
BMP Stormwater Wetlands Design Calculations
SA/DA Ratios for Permanent Pool Sizing to Achieve 85% TSS Reduction
IMPERVIOUS

PERCENT

3.00 PERMANENT POOL
DEPTHS IN FEET
4.00 5.00

6.00
10% 0.59 0.49 0.43 0.35
200/0 0.97 0.79 0.70 0.59
309/c 1.34 1.08 0.97 0.83
40% 1.73 1.43 1.25 1.05
50% 2.06 1.73 1.50 1.30
60% 2.40 2.03 1.71 1.51
70% 2.88 2.40 2.07 1.79
Wetland Area (Ac.) I Description
I 19.70 Located adjacent to Battle Bridge Road
Normal Pool Surface Arco Calculations
Wetland IMP. DEPTH SA/DA POOL
AREA
1 69.12 3 2.84 2i,352
SURFACE AREA REQUIRED (SF) = 24,352
SURFACE AREA PROVIDED (SF) = 27,030
Volume to be controlled from the 1" storm
0.6721 = Rv (Runoff coefficient)
48061 = Volume to be controlled required (cf)
50,539 = Volume provided (cf)
Shoppes at Battle Bridge
BMP Design Data

Pond Report
'Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intellsolve Thursday, Jan 19 2W6,4:37 PM
Pond No. 1 - Shops at BB - Pond
Pond Data
Pond storage is based on known contour areas. Average end area method used.
Stage i Storage Table
Stage (ft) Elevation (ft) Contour area (sgft) Incr. Storage (cult) Total storage (cuff)
0.00 270.00 8,000 0 0
1.00 271.00 12,025 10,013 10,013
2.00 272.00 18,920 15,473 25,485
2.50 272.50 22,068 10,247 35,732
3.00 273.00 27,030 12,275 48,007
4.00 274.00 29,149 28,090 76,096
4.50 274.50 30,198 14,837 90,933
4.75 274.75 30,708 7,613 98,546
5.00 275.00 31,327 7,754 106,300
6.00 276.00 33,564 32,446 138,746
Culvert I Orifice Structures Weir Structures
[A] [B] [C] [D] [A] [B] [C] [D]
Rise (in) = 36.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 Crest Len (ft) = 30.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Span (in) = 36.00 3.00 0.00 0100 Crest El. (ft) = 274.75 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. Barrels = 1 1 0 0 Weir Coeff. = 3.33 0.00 0.00 0.00
Invert El. (ft) - 267.40 273.00 0.00 0.00 Weir Type = Riser - - -
Length (ft) = 125.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Multi-Stage = Yes No No No
Slope (a/o) = 1.44 1.00 0.00 0.00
N-Value - .013 .011 .000 .000
orif. Coeff. = 0.60 0.60 0.00 0.00
Multi-Stage = n/a No No No Exfiltration - 0.000 In/hr (Contour) Taliwater Elev. = 0.00 it
Stage / Storage / Discharge Table Note: CUlvertfOAlke ouHtows have been analyzed under Intel and OUM control.
Stage Storage Elevation Civ A Civ B Clv C Civ D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfll Total
ft cuft ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfe efs cfs cfs
0.00 0 270.00 0.00 0.00 - - 0.00 - - - .-- 0,00
1.00 10,013 271.00 35.84 0.00 - - 0.00 - - - - 0,00
2.00 25,485 272.00 35.84 0.00 - -- 0.00 - - - - 0,00
2.50 35,732 272.50 35.84 040 - - 0.00 - - - - 0,00
3.00 48,007 273.00 35.84 0.00 - - 0,00 - - - - 0,00
4.00 76,096 274.00 35.84 0.22 - - 0.00 - - - .-- 0,22
4.50 90,933 274.50 35.84 0.28 - - 0.00 - - - - 0.28
4.75 98,546 274.75 35.84 0.30 - - 0.00 - --- --- .-- 0,30
5.00 106,300 275.00 35.84 0.32 - - 12.49 - - - - 12.81
6.00 138,746 276.00 88.91 0.40 - - 88.90 - - - - 89.31
PROPOSED STORMWA TER WETLANDS
I" = 40' January 99, 2006

1 J
iJ \ oR.;F,
1 ?SP?P4
CB ` I
t ? PR?p 1
,.
FORE-MY

. PBOP?6?cf
SPILLWAY

FOREB lY

Hydrograph Plot
Hydratlow Hydrographs by Intellsolve
Hyd. No. 2
Post Shops Wetlands
Hydrograph type = Reservoir
Storm frequency = 2 yrs
Inflow hyd. No. = 1
Reservoir name = Shops at BB - Pond
Storage Indication method used. Wet pond routing start elevation = 273.00 ft.
Q (cfs)
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
Q (cfs)
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00 0.00
0 5 10 15 19 24 29 34 39 44 48
Hyd No. 2 Hyd No. 1 J Req. Stor = 86,344 cult Time (hrs)
Post Shops Wetlands
Hyd. No. 2 -- 2 Yr
Thursday, Jan 19 2006, 4:47 PM
Peak discharge = 0.26 cfs
Time interval = 1 min
Max. Elevation = 274.35 ft
Max. Storage = 86,344 cuft
Hydrograph Volume = 30,260 cult
i?= y oG
Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Thursday, Jan 19 2006,4:47 PM
Hyd. No. 2
Post Shops Wetlands
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.26 cfs
Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Max. Elevation = 274.35 ft
Reservoir name = Shops at BB - Pond Max. Storage = 86,344 cuft
Storage Indication method used. Wet pond routing start elevation = 273.00 ft.
Elev (ft)
276.00
275.00
274.00
273.00 -L
0
Post Shops Wetlands
Hyd. No. 2 -- 2 Yr
Hydrograph Volume - 30,260 cult
5 10 15 19 24 29 34 39 44
1. Shops at BB - Pond
Elev (ft)
276.00
275.00
274.00
- ' 273.00
48
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intellsolve Thursday, Jan 19 2006, 4:47 PM
Hyd. No. 2
Post Shops Wetlands
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.30 cfs
Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Max. Elevation = 274.72 ft
Reservoir name = Shops at BB - Pond Max. Storage = 97,684 cuft

Storage Indication method used. Wet pond routing start elevation = 273.00 ft. Hydrograph Volume = 37,467 cult
Q (cfs)
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
Post Shops Wetlands
Hyd. No. 2 --10 Yr
0 5
Hyd No. 2
10 15 19
Hyd No. 1
Q (cfs)
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
24 29 34 39 44 48
Time (hrs)
® Req. Stor = 97,684 tuft
/19 140 6
Hydrograph Plot
Hydrallow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Thursday, Jan 19 2008, 4:47 PM
Hyd. No. 2
Post Shops Wetlands
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.30 cfs
Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Max. Elevation = 274.72 ft
Reservoir name = Shops at BB - Pond Max. Storage = 97,684 cuft
Storage Indication method used. Wet pond routing start elevation = 273.00 ft.
Elev (ft)
276.00
275.00
274.00
273.00 -L
0
Post Shops Wetlands
Hyd. No. 2 -10 Yr
Hydrograph Volume = 37,487 cuft
Elev (ft)
276.00
5 10 15
1. Shops at BB - Pond
19 24 29 34
275.00
274.00
' ' 273.00
39 44 48
Time (hrs)
/19 ob
Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisoive Thursday, Jan 19 2006, 4:47 PM
Hyd. No. 2
Post Shops Wetlands
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 23.51 cfs
Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Max. Elevation = 275.13 ft
Reservoir name = Shops at BB - Pond Max. Storage = 110,399 cult
Storage Indication method used. Wet pond routing start elevation - 273.00 ft.
Q (cfs)
120.00
100.00
80.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
0.00
0.0
Post Shops Wetlands
Hyd. No. 2 --100 Yr
Hydrograph Volume - 55,083 cult
2.2 4.3 6.5 8.7
Hyd No. 2 Hyd No. 1
Q (cfs)
120.00
100.00
80.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
0.00
10.8 13.0 15.2 17.3 19.5 21.7
Time (hrs)
® Req. Stor = 710,399 cuff
Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Thursday, Jan 19 2006, 4:47 PM
Hyd. No. 2
Post Shops Wetlands
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 23.51 cfs
Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Max. Elevation = 275.13 ft
Reservoir name = Shops at BB - Pond Max. Storage = 110,399 cuft
Storage Indication method used. Wet pond routing start elevation = 273.00 ft.
Elev (ft
277.00
276.00
275.00
274.00
Hydrograph Volume = 55,083 cuft
Post Shops Wetlands
Hyd. No. 2 --100 Yr
Elev (ft)
277.00
276.00
275.00
274,00
273.00 273 00
0.0
2.2 4.3 6.5
1. Shops at BB - Pond
8.7 10.8 13.0 15.2 17.3 19.5
21.7
Time (hrs)
Project Name: Shoppes@Battt W/L 1
Project No. DWQ 06-0001
SUBMITTED DESIGN: REQUIRED DESIGN.
elevations
Permanent Pool (ft) 2 3
Temporary Pool (ft) 274.75 1.75 ft. depth ok
areas
Permanent Pool SA (sq ft) 27030 24352 sq. ft. ok
Drainage Area (ac) 19.7
Impervious Area (ac) 13.617 69.1 % -
Forebay (ft2) 4390 16.241213 % ok
High Marsh (ft2) 9800 36.3 % ok
Low Marsh (ft2) 8590 31.8 % check marsh
Micropool (ft2) 4250 15.72327 % ok
100%
volumes
Temporary Pool (cu ft) 50539 48062 cu. ft. ok
other parameters
SA/DA 2.8 2.84 -
Orifice Diameter (in) 3 0.22 cfs drawdown -
Design Rainfall (in) 1 2.6 day drawdown ok
Linear Interpolation of Correct SAIDA***
3 ft. Permanent Pool Depth
% Impervious SA/DA from Table
Next Lowest 60 2.4
Project Impervious 69.1 2.84
Next Highest 70 2.88
C,1W 1 • 23 - 0 G ?? .
k_.. ORIGINAL COPY
f`
soil & Environmental, Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 ;Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
06 jfl'?
" V o ®1 ry`':?' n
S&EC Project # 450.W3 dJ
AN 1 2 Zoo6
To: US Army Corps of Engineers N.C. Division of Water Quality
USACE Regulatory Field Office 401 Oversight and Express R?wATER Q0
Attn:Monte Mathews Attn: Cyndi Karoly & Amy Chapman 3TOR41; A y
6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120 2321 Crabtree Pa,levard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27615 Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
*EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM*
From: Bob Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Nationwide Permit & General Water Quality Certification
Shoppes at Battle Bridge, Raleigh, NC
On behalf of the owner, Evergreen-Battle Bridge, LLC, please find attached a complete application and
supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USAGE) and the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) that the activities proposed below may precede
under Nationwide Permit 39 and General Water Quality Certification 3402. Please contact me at (919)
846-5900 if you have any questions or require additional information.
PRn_TF.CT RT WMARY
Project Name Sho es at Battle Bridge
Project Type Retail Shopping Center / Commercial
Owner / Applicant Evergreen - Battle Bridge, LLC
County Wake
Nearest Town Raleigh
Waterbod Name UT to Neuse River
Basin / Sub-basin 03-04-02
Index Number 27-22.5
USES Cataloging Unit Upper Neuse 03020201
Class C NSW
TMPACT CTiMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0.007
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.036
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) , 0.043
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 38
Attachments:
Pre-construction Notification (PCN) Application Form & Supplemental Information
$3,000 Express Review Application Fee to`DWQ

Charlotte Office: - Greensboro Office: '
236 LePhilli'p Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
I, Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
• PCN Application
S&EC Project Number 8450.w3
January 11, 2006
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. .91
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".
1. Processing
JAN 1 2 2006
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: ??6i'W S ORMWATE? BRW
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ® Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 39 & 18
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: EVERGREEN - BATTLE BRIDGE, LLC; Attn: Fred Williams (Manager)
Mailing Address: 422 Aiken Hunt Circle
Columbia, South Carolina 29223
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: wi118787gbellsouth.net
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Bob Zarzecki
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC)
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: bzarzeckiksandec.com
YL,;R J?
Page 1 of 10
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
PCN Application
III. Project Information
S&EC Project Number 8450.w3
January 11, 2006
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: SHOPPES at BATTLE BRIDGE
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 1731484408
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Lots 1 to 5, George Rose Builders, Inc.
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):
The site is located on the south-east corner of Battle Bridge Road (SR 2552) and Rock
Quarry Road (SR 2542). From Raleigh take the Inner Belding (I-440) to the US-64 bypass.
Take the US-64 bypass east to S. New Hope Road. Take S. New Hope Road south (right) to
Rock Quarry Road. Take Rock Quarry Road east (left) to Battle Bridge Road. Take Battle
Bridge Road east (left) to the project site. The project site will be on the south (right) side of
Battle Bridge Road approximately 0.21 miles from the intersection with Rock Quarry Road.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.7239 ON 78.5462 °W
6. Property size (acres): 24.57
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT to Neuse River (Stream Index No. 27-22.5)
8. River Basin: Neuse River Basin (Basin & Sub-basin No. 03-04-02)
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mgp,-,./.)
Page 2 of 10
w
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge S&EC Project Number 8450.w3
PCN Application January 11, 2006
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application:
The site is approximately 50% wooded and 50% open fields. The general land use / land
class is "Acres > 10 with one or more houses on the property rural residential) and vacant
land. Battle Bridge Road is an existing two lane state road with grass shoulders.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project includes the construction of a retail shopping center and associated widening of
the south side of Battle Bridge Road to one half of a 60-foot B-B section with sidewalk.
HeM equipment typically used for site grading, parking lot and commercial/retail building
construction will be used.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
The purpose of the proposed work is to construct a retail shopping center on the property.
(The widening of Battle Bridge Road is required to safely handle traffic ingress and egress
from the proposed shopping center.)
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
There have been no wetland permits or certifications issued for this prope . or project. The
jurisdictional waters were determined by Ms. Andrea Wade of the USACE on June 27, 2005.
The surface waters subject to the Neuse River Buffer Rules were determined by Ms. Deborah
Edwards of the DWQ Express Review Program on December 6, 2004 (DWQ EXP# 04-1863).
No Section 404 Permits, Section 401 Water Quality Certifications or Neuse River Buffer
Authorization Certificates have been applied for or issued for this property or project.
(It should be noted that the DWQ determination as to the origin of the surface water subject to
the Neuse River Buffer was made higher in the drainage then the Corps determination of the
origin of the stream. The Corps did determine that jurisdictional waters and wetlands (not
streams) extended up to and beyond the D)YQ buffer determination.)
Page 3 of 10
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
PCN Application
V. Future Project Plans
S&EC Project Number 8450.w3
January 11, 2006
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
There are no future Section 404 Permit, Section 401 Water Quality Certification or Neuse River
Buffer Authorization Certificate requests anticipated for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
The proposed impacts for the required widening of Battle Bridge Road total 38 feet of stream
channel, 0.004 acres of wetlands and 3,811 square feet of buffer. The proposed impacts for the
construction of the shopping center and required stormwater management facility total 0.032
acres of wetlands and 12,066 square feet of buffer. All proposed impacts involve the permanent
discharge of fill in waters and buffers.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year
Floodplain Nearest
Stream Impact
(acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) es/no linear feet
SHEET 2
(NWP39) ROAD WIDENING Headwater Forest No 0 0.004
SHEET 3 STORMWATER Headwater Forest No 0 0.032
(NWP18) WETLAND
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.036
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.036
Page 4 of 10
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
PCN Application
S&EC Project Number 8450.w3
January 11, 2006
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
?
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Before Impact linear feet acres
3) UT to Neuse River ROAD Intermittent 6 38 0
007
(WP WID
ENING .
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 38 0.007
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma Name Waterbody
applicable) e)
(if ap
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc. Area of
Impact
acres

Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact acres : 0.007
Wetland Impact acres : 0.036
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.043
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 38
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Page 5 of 10
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
PCN Application
S&EC Project Number 8450.w3
January 11, 2006
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Expected pond surface area:
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The impacts required for the widening of Battle Bridge Road are unavoidable in that they are
required for the safe ingress and egress from the proposed shopping center and that the existing
road location dictated the location of the road widening. The impacts required for the
construction of the shopping center and stormwater management pond are unavoidable due to
site grading and stormwater management constraints due to topographic considerations.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Page 6 of 10
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
PCN Application
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnnizide.html.
S&EC Project Number 8450.w3
January 11, 2006
in North Carolina, available at
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The proposed impacts total 38 feet of intermittent stream and 0.036 acres of wetlands. As
such, the applicant does not propose any mitigation (beyond onsite stormwater management
and buffer mitigation) for the impacts. If mitigation is required the applicant proposes
payment into the Wetlands Restoration Fund administered by the NC EEP.
The proposed buffer impacts associated with the stormwater wetland are classified as
"allowable w/ mitigation". The applicant proposes payment into the Riparian Buffer
Restoration Fund for these impacts. The proposed buffer impacts associated with the road
widening are classified as "exempt" or possibly "allowable" and as such do not require
mitigation.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/vvM/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 27,413
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes E] No
*Note: The road widening is an existing state road. It will be widened onto private property.
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Page 7 of 10
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
PCN Application
S&EC Project Number 8450.w3
January 11, 2006
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify V Yes ® No ?
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
SHEET 2 - ROAD WIDENING
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
1 2,559 3 (2 for Catawba) 0
2 1,252 1.5 0
Total 3,811 I I 0 1
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
SHEET 3 - STORMWATER WETLAND
Impact Required
Zone* f-,,,,,,o V--+'% Multiplier AA;+;n„+;,,,,
1 6,209 3 (2 for Catawba) 18,627
2 5,857 1.5 8,786
Total 12,066 27,413
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
Page 8 of 10
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
PCN Application
S&EC Project Number 8450.w3
January 11, 2006
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund (NC EEP)
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
The property is 24.57 acres in size and the total built out impervious area is anticipated to be
16.62 acres (or 67.6%). A stormwater wetland designed to the current NC DENR Stormwater
BMP Manual is proposed to treat the runoff from the property. The stormwater wetland is
proposed to be located within the Neuse River Buffer and is proposed to discharge directly to the
culvert under Battle Bridge Road. We understand that this is an "allowable w/ mitigation" use
and as such have proposed payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund. The proposed
location of the stormwater wetland was determined due to topographic constraints.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sewer - The City of Raleigh will ensure that the proposed addition will not exceed available
capacity of their treatment facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
The project involves the construction of a retail shopping center to provide services to the
surrounding market and it is not anticipated that it will result in additional development that
could impact nearby downstream water quality.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
Page 9 of 10
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
PCN Application
S&EC Project Number 8450.w3
January 11, 2006
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control). .

January 11, 2006
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10
11010 Rssea Rife ltsrd
Consultants, PA
%ons [phone] • Fay (919) 846.916
Name: ffJ&I:=srLC" - ITT L-1- r-r-RZ.1 DCa L L C
Address: q-2-Z- K 1 Kt-hA B L& -4= C -t 2.C. t_ C
Gc, >r L.A.:-? Z g z Z 3
Phone: 60 S- cs!56 5. 5 Z, 0 3
PPGS ?e.-[ ?TTt..F tSt?,t CC??
Project NameMeseription:S_ CHQri- por lags c m"-rc Je S&EC Project #
Date: SILK. a 3 z 6 4 G
The Dgmftent of the Army
U.& Army Cospa of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn:
Field Office:
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom it may Concern:
I, the current landowner or municipal official, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants,
PA to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing ofpermit applications,.to firm sh upon requead supplemental
information in support of applications, etc. firm this day forward. The 3 ' day of,? ? AY z pO G .
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authortuden, for UabUlty and professional courtesy reasons, b vaUd only for government of&hh to
enter the property when aceempanled by S& EC staff. You sheald tail S&ZC to arrange a site meeting prbr to
VWdng the dte.
'V;eA a..>> I i.,Rm, s '- nA., 16AAe
Print Property Owner's or Municipal Official's Name
cc: Me. Cyndi xUbly
NCDENR-DWQ
2321 Cmbtm Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
Property Owner's or Mumo4xd Official's Signature
cc: W. Bob Zatrzedd
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
236 LAPhillip Court, Suite C
Cww4 NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
3817-E LawwWe 1.
Ck+ mboro, NC X
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
AGENT AU MORIZATION FORM
N

Project M Scale:
8450.w3 1":2000'
Project Date:
Mgr.: bz 12.30-05
Garner, NC
USGS Topo Quad
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
Wake County, NC
UTM 17 721954E 3956114N (WGS84/NAD83) I
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
N

Mgr.: BZ
Scale: Wake County Soil Survey
1":2000' Sheet 70
Date:
12.30.05
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
Wake County, NC

1 \\

111 \k

\I 4{
O
N`. a "

O
0
;.

f
a.

/

XS ,d.7
'w
/ 4
......
,

`t

rr

Y
\ ? YN p
.?
i
::::::::::::......
i :.
M
EN' TER
I

Wm.
i
e
msms
oc.
Engineering Planning
Landscape Architecture
1150 SE MAYNARD ROAD
SUITE 260
CARY, NC 27511
[phone]
GRAPHIC SCALE
0' 200' 400' 600'
CHANNEL,
WETLANDS, & NRB IMPACT MAP
FOR
BATTLE BRIDGE ROAD WIDENING
(SHOPPES AT BATTLE BRIDGE)
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE 1 If = 200' DECEMBER 22, 2005
(IN FEET)
I INCH = 200 FT PREPARED BY.- WILLIAM G. DANIEL, PE SHEET 1 OF 3
Ile
?AR OF CHANNELI
r IMPACT
TOE OF' /; - _...._
JUST C /ONAL WETLANDS 4i \ f SLOPE
`
AS FtWt
/ BEGIN INT. IMPORTANT CHANNEL
N1 TOP O Aw / T END JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
PER USACE /
\ ' I \ / ZONE 1 RIPARIAN BUFFER - -
PONE 2 RIPARIAN BUFFER
OP OF BAN I
BEGIN BUFFERED CHANNEL /
PER NCDWQ /
i
1 ? BE IN J R/SDICTIONAL i
l i WETLAND IMPACT (ROAD WIDENING)
38 LF(303 SF) - CHANNEL IMPACT /
9 LF( 004 AC) - WETLAND IMPACT /
2559 SF - ZONE 1 NRB IMPACT /
i 1252 SF - ZONE 2 NRB IMPACT /
wm• G• CHANNEL
,
I? lllel WETLANDS, & NRB IMPACT MAP
AMOCO
Engineering Planning FOR
Landscape Architecture
1150 SE MAYNARD ROAD BATTLE BRIDGE ROAD WIDENING
SUITE 260 IMPACT AREA
CARY, NC 27511
[phone]
50' GRAPHIC SCALE 100' 150' WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
._ SCALE 1 50' DECEMBER 22, 2005
(IN FEET)
1 INCH = 50 FT PREPARED BY.' WILLIAM G. DANIEL, PE SHEET 2 OF 3
°
04,6
f
\ ' \ \ TOP OF BANK
t v
BEGIN BUFFERED CHA NEL
/ PER NCDWQ
1&m . Go
Iniel
?SSoC.
Engineering Planning
Landscape Architecture
1150 SE MAYNARD ROAD
SUITE 260
Ile
wn VV'
NO,
TOE OF?SLOPE
ZONE 1 AiPAR1AN BU?FER I
ZONE 2 RIPARIAN BUFFER
JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
3 j ' ; ;! f PER USACE ;
IMPACT (STORMWATER WETLAND)
0 LF(0 SF) - COANNEL IMPACT
117 LF(032 AC) - WETLAND IMPACT
6209 SF - ZbNE 1 NRB IMPACT
/ 5857 SF - ZONE 2 NRB IMPACT
APPROXIMATE V
1PROI POSED ST/ ATER/ / WETLANDS /
WETLAND , i
ZONE 1 j'
ZONE 2
CHANNEL,
WETLANDS, & NRB IMPACT MAP
FOR
SHOPPES AT BATTLE BRIDGE
CARP, 27511
[phone] IMPACT AREA (STORMWATER WETLAND)
50' GRAPHIC SCALE l00' 150' WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE 1 50' DECEMBER 22, 2005
(IN FEET)
I INCH = 50 FT PREPARED BY.- WILLIAM G. DANIEL, PE SHEET 3 OF 3
PROPOSED STORMWATER WETLANDS
III = 40' January 3, 2006

Olt
\ V
' z
PRO
CB
4 a', \ \
PROP. \
\JB
\?ti
`a
I- A

FOREBAY

?.f
t.:
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - 401 EXTENDED DETENTION (and POCKET') WETLAND WORKSHEET
I. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name: 4-=Nor-4-ME-so ^, 3r=,AT- fl
Contact Person: Otuu a A6-M &. M&&XI F-L- Phone Number. (a 14) 4.47.9?Z-0
For projects with multiple basins, spe* which basin this worksheet applies to:
Permanent Poo! Elevation Z-7:5- 00 ft. (elevation of the orifice Invert out)
Temporary Pool Efevation z 74. o ci. ft. (elevation of the outlet structure invert in)
Permanent Pool Surface Area Z17-030 sq. ft. (water surface area at permanent pool elevation)
Drainage Area 14-76 or.. (on-site and off=site drainage to the basin)
Impervious Area VS . G t 7 ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
Forebay Surface Area (4. -get 6 _ sq. ft. (at permanent pool elevation approximately 1596)•
Marsh 0•-8" Surface Area 4 + S 0e, sq. ft. (at permanent pool elevation approximately 35%r
Marsh 9'-18" Surface Area A1 SQ O sq. ft. (at permanent pool elevation approximately 35%r
Micro Pool Surface Area 4•' z V40 sq, ft. (at permanent pool elevation approximately 15%r
Temporary Pool Volume 2-6,6!10 cu. t (volume detained on top of the permanent pool)
SAIDA used z • 8 4- (surface area to drainage area ratio)'
Diameter of Orifice z" in. (draw down office diameter)
11. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation Is attached. 9a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stornwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An Incomplete submittal package will result In a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project
Applicants Initials
?? The temporary pool controls runoff from the 1 inch rain.
? The basin side slopes are no steeper than 3:1.
? A planting plan for the marsh areas with plant species and densities is provided.
? Vegefotfon above the permanent pod elevation is specified.
? _._ An emergency drain Is provided to drain the basin.
?f:?The temporary pool draws down in 2 to 5 days.
?"? Sediment storage is provided in the permanent pool.
? mow-- rA sediment disposal area Is provided.
? Access Is provided for maintenance.
site specific, signed and notarized operation and maintenance agreement is provided.
The drainage area (including any offske area) is delineated on a site plan.
? r?Access Is provided for maintenance.
Plan details for the wetland are provided.
lan details for the inlet and outlet are provided.
ylc'-cc+c-? site specific operation and maintenance agreement, signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided (see
http:llh2o.ohnr state.nc.uslncwe0ande/oandm.doe).
• Pocket Wetlands have different design parameters and are only assumed to remove 35% TSS - See pp. 19 and 20 of the NC DENR
Stormwater BMP Manual, April 1999.1096 open water, 50% high marsh, 40% low marsh.
1/2/2006
Shoppes at Battle Bridge
Raleigh, North Carolina
BMP Stormwater Wetlands Design Calculations
SA/DA Ratios for Permanent Pool Sizing to Achieve 850/s TSS Reduction
IMPERVIOUS

PERCENT

3.00 PERMANENT POOL
DEPTHS IN FEET
4.00 5.00

6.00
100/0 0.59 0.49 0.43 0.35
20% 0.97 0.79 0.70 0.59
30% 1.34 1.08 0.97 0.83
40% 1.73 1.43 1.25 1.05
50010 2.06 1.73 1.50 1.30
60% 2.40 2.03 1.71 1.51
70% 2.88 2.40 2.07 1.79
Wetland Area (Ac.) I Desert tion
1 19.70 Located adjacent to Battle Bridge Road
Normal Pool Surface Area Calculations
Wetland 1W. DEPTH SAIDA POOL
AREA
1 69.12 3 2.84 24,352
SURFACE AREA REQUIRED (SF) = 24,352
SURFACE AREA PROVIDED (SF) = 27,030
Shoppes at Battle Bridge
BMP Design Data
12/19
Shopper at Battle Bddge SP43-05
Preliminary Pre-Development Stormwater Runoff Calculadow
(Rational Nfegx4
?Pm-Deve/onment (2 Year Event)
Q = QdxA
0.35 = C Coefficlent of Runoff (dimensionless)
4.65 = I Rainfall Intensity for a given tie to peak (in/hr)
18.7 = A Drainage Area (Ac.)
32.08 =Qz (cfs)
To = Time. of concentration =(( L"3/H)^.385)1-128 I = Intensity =. g/(h+t)
10 Tc 4.65 a I (in/hr)
2025 =L Hydraulic length of watershed 132 =g
64 =H Height of most remote point above outlet 18 =h
10 =t
From "Elements of Urban Stonnwater Desigr
by H. Rooney Malcolm, PE
Pre-Development. (10 Year Ervenf)
F Q = CxlxA
0.35 - C Coeffolen( of Runoff (dimensionless)
6.03 = I Rainfall Intensity for a given tie to peak (in/hr)
19.7. = A Drainage Area (Ac.)
41.57 =Qto (cfs)
Tc =Time of concentration =(( L"3M)^.385)/128
10 TIC
2025 =L Hydraulic length of watershed
84 -H Height of most remote point above outlet
1= Intensity a g/(h+t)
6.03 = I (1Nhr)
195 =g
29 wh
100
From "Elements of Urban Stomtiwater.Desigr
by H. Rooney Malcolm, PE
12!191'
&LRffeloWent 1100 Year Event)
Q = CxlxA
026 = C Coefficient of Runoff (dimensionless)
SM = I Rainfall Intensity for a given tie to peak (In/hr)
19.7 = A Drainage Area (Ac.)
57.02 WQ100 (0110)
Tc a Time of concentration =(( 03/W.385Y128
10 Tc
2025 =L Hydraulic length of watershed
84 =H Height of most remote point above outlet
10 Intensity = g/(h+t)
8.27 = I (in/hr)
290 =g
25 =h
104_
From "Elements of Urban Stonwa*er Design'
by. H: Rooney Malcolm, PE
Pond Report
Hydraflow Hydrosraphs by Intellsolve
Pond No. 1 - Shops at BB - Pond
Pond Data
Pond storage Is based on known contour areas. Average end area method used.
Stage I Storage Table
stage (ft) Elevation (ft) Contour area (sgft) Incr. Storage (cult) Total storage (cuff)
0.00 270.00 8,000 0 0
1.00 271.00 12,025 10,013 10,013
2.00 272.00 18,920 15,473 25,485
2.50 272.50 22,068 10,247 35,732
3.00 273.00 27,030 12,275 48,007
4.00 274.00 29,149 28.090 76,096
5.00 275.00 31,327 30,238 106,334
6.00 276.00 33,564 32,446 138,780
Monday, Jan 2 2006,4:20 PM
Culvert I Orifice Structures Weir Structures
[A] [B] [Cl [D] [A] [BI [C] [D]
Rise (in) = 36.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 Crest Lan (ft) = 30.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Span (In) = 36.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 Crest El. (ft) = 274.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. Barrels = 1 1 0 0 Weir Coeff. =3.33 0.00 0.00 0.00
Invert El. (R) = 259.00 273.00 0.00 0.00 Weir Type a Riser -- -- --
Length (R) = 125.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Muitl-Stage = Yes No No NO
Slope (%) = 1.44 1.00 0.00 0.00
H -Value - .013 .011 .000 .000
OrIE Coeff. = 0.60 0.60 0.00 0.00
Multi-Stage = n/a No No No Exfiltration = 0.000 In/hr (Contour) Tailwater Elev. = 0.00 ft
Stage I Storage I Discharge Table
Stage Storage Elevation Civ A
ft CUR ft cfs
0.00 0 270.00 0.00
1.00 10,013 271.00 104.89
2.00 25,485 272.00 104.89
2.50 35,732 272.50 104.89
3.00 48,007 273.00 104.89
4.00 76,096 274.00 104.89
5.00 106,334 275.00 104.89
6.00 138,780 276.00 133.14
Note. COveNOrifice outfiowa have been analyzed under Inlet and outlet control.
Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Total
cis cis cfs of$ cfs cis cfs cfs cfs
0.00 - - 0.00 - - - - 0.00
0.00 - - 0.00 - - --- - 0.00
0.00 - - 0.00 - - - - 0.00
0.00 - - 0.00 --- --- --- - 0.00
0.00 - - 0.00 - - - - 0.00
0.10 - -- 0.00 - - - -- 0.10
0.15 - - 99.90 - - - - 100.05
0.18 - - 133.13 - - - --- 133.31
Hydrograph Plot
HydraQow Hydrographs by intelisolve Monday, Jan 2 2006, 4:21 PM
Hyd. No. 2
Post Shops BB Pond
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 12.08 cfs
Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Max. Elevation = 274.24 ft
Reservoir name = Shops at BB - Pond Max. Storage = 83,367 cult
Storage Indication method used. Wet pond routing start elevation - 273.00 ft. Hydrograph Volume = 24,521 cuR
Post Shops BB Pond
Q {cfs}
Hyd. No. 2 - 2 Yr
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
90.00
0.00
0 10
Hyd No. 2
20 30 40 50 60 70
Hyd No. 1 ® Req. Stor = 83,367 cult
80
---1- 0.00
90
Time {min}
Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve
Hyd. No. 2
Post Shops BB Pond
Hydrograph type = Reservoir
Storm frequency = 2 yrs
Inflow hyd. No. = 1
Reservoir name = Shops at BB - Pond
Post Shops BB Pond
Hyd. No. 2 -- 2 Yr
Storage Indication method used. Wet pond routing start elevation = 273.00 ft.
Elev (ft)
276.00
Monday, Jan 2 2006, 4:22 PM
Peak discharge = 12.08 cfs
Time interval = 1 min
Max. Elevation = 274.24 ft
Max. Storage = 83,367 cuft
Hydrograph Volume - 24,521 cult

275.00
274.00
273 00

Elev 1
276.0
275.0
274.0
273 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 80
'1. Shops at 138 - Pond Time (min)

Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intellsolve
Hyd. No. 2
Post Shops BB Pond
Hydrograph type = Reservoir
Storm frequency = 10 yrs
Inflow hyd. No. = 1
Reservoir name = Shops at BB - Pond Monday, Jan 2 2006,4:22 PM

Peak discharge = 27.68 cfs
Time interval = 1 min
Max. Elevation = 274.42 ft
Max. Storage = 88,878 cuft
Storage Indication method used. Wet pond routing start elevation - 273.00 ft.
Post Shops BB Pond
Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 2 --10 Yr
90.00
-
80.00 - - ?- - Hydrograph Volume = 35,874 cuft

Q (cfs,
90.00
_ 80.00
-- -,
-

70
00 w-- - -- 70
00
. .
-
00
60
60.00 .

50
00
50.00 .

40 40
00
.00 .
00
30
30.00 .

2 00
20
0.00 .

1
0 -??- 10
00
0.
0 .
0.00
0 10

Hyd No. 2
20 30 40 50 60

Hyd No. 1 [?IS7 Req. Stor = 88,878 tuft 0.00
70 80
Time (min)
Hydrograph Plot
Hydrallow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Monday, Jan 2 2006,4:22 PM
Hyd. No. 2
Post Shops BB Pond
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 27.68 cfs
Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 1. Max. Elevation = 274.42 ft
Reservoir name = Shops at BB - Pond Max. Storage = 88,878 cuft
Storage Indication method used. Wet pond routing start elevation ; 273.00 ft. Hydrograph Volume - 35,874 cult
Elev (ft)
276.00
275.00
274.00
273 00
Post Shops BB Pond
Hyd. No. 2 --10 Yr

Eiev (
276.0
275.01
274.0(
273.01
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Time (min)
1. Shops at BB -Pond
E
Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Monday, Jan 2 2006, 4:22 PM
Hyd. No. 2
Post Shops BB Pond
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 54.44 cfs
Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Max. Elevation = 274.67 ft
Reservoir name = Shops at BB - Pond Max. Storage = 96,209 cuft
Storage Indication method used. Wet pond routing start elevation = 273.00 ft. Hydrograph Volume - 54,406 cult
Post Shops BB Pond
Q {cfs) Hyd. No. 2 -100 Yr
120.00
100.00
80.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
0.00 •?_??,????.?
0 10
Hyd No. 2
20 30 40 50 60
- Hyd No. 1 ® Req. Stor = 96,209 cult
70
Time (min)
Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by intelisolve
Hyd. No. 2
Post Shops BB Pond
Hydrograph type = Reservoir
Storm frequency = 100 yrs
Inflow hyd. No. = 1
Reservoir name = Shops at BB - Pond
Storage Indication method used. Wet pond routing start elevation = 273.00 ft
Elev (ft)
276.00
275.00
274.00
273 00
Post Shops BB Pond
Hyd. No. 2 --100 Yr
Monday, Jan 2 2006,4:22 PM
Peak discharge = 54.44 cfs
Time interval = 1 min
Max. Elevation = 274.67 ft
Max. Storage = 96,209 cult
Hydrograph Volume = 54,406 tuft
Elev (
276.0
275.0
274.0
273 0,
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Time (min)
1. Shops at BB - Pond
WETLAND OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
The wetland system is defined as the wetland, pretreatment including forebays and the vegetated filter if one
is provided.
Maintenance activities shall be performed as follows:
1. After every significant runoff producing rainfall event and at least monthly:
a. Inspect the wetland system for sediment accumulation, erosion, trash accumulation, vegetated cover,
and general condition.
b. Check and clear the orifice of any obstructions such that drawdown of the temporary pool occurs within
2 to 5 days as designed.
2. Repair eroded areas immediately, re-seed as necessary to maintain good vegetative cover, mow
vegetative cover to maintain a maximum height of six inches, and remove trash as needed.
3. Inspect and repair the collection system (i.e. catch basins, piping, swales, riprap, etc.) quarterly to
maintain proper functioning.
4. Remove accumulated sediment from the wetland system semi-annually or when depth is reduced to 75%
of the original design depth (see diagram below). Removed sediment shall be disposed of in an
appropriate manner and shall be handled in a manner that will not adversely impact water quality (i.e.
stockpiling near a wetland or stream, etc.).
The measuring device used to determine the sediment elevation shall be such that it will give an accurate
depth reading and not readily penetrate into accumulated sediments.
If the elevation of the marsh areas exceed the permanent pool elevation, the sediment should be
removed to design levels. This shall be performed by removing the upper 6 inches of soil and stockpiling
it. Then the marsh area shall be excavated six inches below design elevations. Afterwards the stockpiled
soil should be spread over the marsh surface. The soil should not be stockpiled for more than two weeks.
When the permanent pool depth reads 2.25 feet in the forebay and micro-pool, the sediment shall be
removed.
STORMWATER WETLAND DIAGRAM
Sed. Rem. 75% WETLAND
El. 270.75 MARSH
Bot. El. 270.00
POREBAY
V Permanent Pool Elevation 273.00
Sediment
Removal Elevation 270.75
Bottom Elevation 270.00
MICRO-POOL
5. Remove cattails and other indigenous wetland plants when they cover 50% of the basin surface. These
plants shall be encouraged to grow along the vegetated shelf and forebay berm.
Page 1 of 2
Wetland planting densities in the marsh areas should be maintained by replanting bare areas as needed.
Wetland plants should be encouraged to grow in the marsh areas.
6. If the basin must be drained for an emergency or to perform maintenance, the flushing of sediment
through the emergency drain shall be minimized to the maximum extent practical.
7. All components of the wetland system shall be maintained in good working order.
8. Level spreaders or other structures that provide diffuse flow shall be maintained every six months. All
accumulated sediment and debris shall be removed from the structure, and a level elevation shall be
maintained across the entire flow spreading structure. Any down gradient erosion must be repaired and/or
replanted as necessary.
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the performance of the seven
maintenance procedures listed above. I agree to notify DWQ of any problems with the system or prior to any
changes to the system or responsible party.
Print name:
Title: IlYkajo.60-A--
Address: 421- WiKe.0 S•G 29Z23
Phone: tb3 R Szo
Signature: `r ,. Zl ,
Date:
Note: The legally responsible party should not be a homeowners association unless more than 50% of the
lots have been sold and a resident of the subdivision has been named the president.
I, 6 ar+ z . MS C trx ?n , a Notary Public for the State of Mo A4-N Cero l to a ,
County of No-J61(-e- , do hereby certify that 'F« cL Vy .lac aMS
personally appeared before me this 3rd day of 1'aAuorv , Zaoto , and acknowledge the due
execution of the forgoing wet [wetland] detention basin maintenance requirements. Witness my hand and
official seal,
,9?oi4sutr?tt
4? R.y ?1C• 1 `{d.
T •
Y i
? Y ? • V
• Y • N
.
N • •
?C.a
'? ,?•re f/?S'pr1
r o V
Or-AI
My commission expires ,F f Zol o
Page 2 of 2
N YttfP IB' e0A0eD
J rx Olrvew. fxf M,Y)?
xo,[-
xpY,AYL CONOf TE O-ro
Ap %xa AANL[xI TO Lamy
OAObGw ILA'O SLIME %
wOL0.w BT 1' LpIwRO
[ac. caWx[rz SLAB MILLI x n B-eon.)
r nr,A woo re mm n.xn
1 LOWx W[ KNI
IO1WwC[LNxi.
TYPICAL ROUNDABOUT PLAN VIEW
xrs
TOMS-
lglll[WSOfiXEY1EMAPILOYEYEN7951pKNON NYJ PLWARELOCAiEp
ONTHE
101ACEN7CONMERCIAL
Y \ rteBSA.

N [ONrRD P. ' °9P
,
wx(
r
•
L
IONmPAPtfl lOlAF,gRR(
CONJ7M•
EMATION OF RNBEOINI7ENPFOW91ENI315 \ PoG1 ?
JJk]EO %
WOM
DEPENDEWNTUPONRINEACMNU AYVNALLYAOLC Np
MµOEPlE7[TWRN
PROPFRIYOWNFRREGA
yyG % ,
Sy( /yti
3,P
PHASING,
RMW ACCESB,MMNARNI,
BOF6VAE
PHASING, AND
taNie[[
?

F \

/////
i MASINOOFNNVINML BXLMNJSEQOS6YA390CA17E05f1E
xCRe L
1 / /
'
IMIROIEMENISYS[BJFCTroFExEwAApATROY,LLM71E,Gi1's
71FF. pp GSMKV ` \\ / ??
/
\
-T V11
40YAL DlAWDK \ \ /
Po 19112 BB ?.
w
LOxD[. DOHMD X

/
EIF
/, / P 1G.t_. ./ 141'
TREE SAVENOTE w NPI w 072
usD %I%E rwar
'PERMANENT OPEN SPACE/TREE SAVEAREA'SHOWN ON
THESE PLANS DESIGNATEAREAS W WHICH EXISTING \
TREES WILL BE SAVED. PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OFA
DETAILED SITE PLAN FOR PURPOSES OF PERMITTING, \ A
THESE AREAS WILL BE DEFINED GEOMETRICALLY BASED
ONA SURVEY OF TREE DESCRIPTIONS AND LOCATIONS. /
THE AGGREGATE TREE SAVEAREA SHALL, ATA MINIMUM,
EQUAL 2.46ACRIES IN CONFORMITY WITH ZONING N'r
CONDITIONS. [`"[s'TNT-La's'\? i
\ Pomrcw \ ppry i .(
Q. ux• %wE rN.T Y/ i
\ ? ?/ / / d
/. ? ytT
hR \ I /
./ roErt. aNUI c I ; ; /
UY•YYJM I
P BNP /
BUTORY / /% ???
DIRAIANGEBOUNDARY
ID•PICAU, i /
r[IIr. nAm1 c /
\ ux• vAUxr / , / / /
l/
\ \ us0 vArm / I /
\\ W
IuA,mo. NMDf W \ y ? / ? / /
/ f /
\ \ *'t//
9f wB? rcY [ a, I, ? / l
N / 7
?ENME rwar .
/ rwxwL
/ B
s .W
\? TRFCt
PROP. BMP?
CONTRIBUTORY
DRABIAGEB[MINDARY ? .
?? iA
(SL)
/
/
FUTURE
DEVELOPMEN7L
/
M-? ? nESLOIe
"1T Z
TIM)
well 'EC V•,Y[N Uq PN
0.60.DG0.•Mi m?
x ?
anvreo '?
1 W91CAL SECTON A7 0.01--Ola
xn
wx.(P Lfx[es uc
BOn 30N P4 HA)
ux• vAUx,.eLSUx,NL
* DENOTES LOCATIONS AT WHICH MIN.
BOC RADIUS OF 28' MLL BE EMPLOYED
TO ACCOMMODATE FIRE SAFETY
EQUIPMENT.
.u[x r, wae[cLA N
uwu
Po zsu r.u ,f9
usu sw.a[ ru,.r
K` 1
1 1
\ 1
1 xr
` 1 \ wocD. Bcefr u[a
1 \ Po 1wr ec )ae
1 [RU vNA[ ruYr
`\
\\, 1\ \
r l \ \ /
\ A'r
MLMX-
A vp EMWB fAlli/
\ `\ lLMS L PODIL
1V , ?\r ro mx rc uss
ux• % It rFnr
S\ \ \1 L
F-;\'1\t x

/
/ r I
/ I Py I
Il?.. A
I
GROCERY
34,928 SF
. . . .............
?. .
g r?B,eN
. ?

a n a a s k

a?
a?ia
=
e
a
$>?
X,
a
NETALL
975 Sr

'
a PA
" o 0
C
L 3 S s a
0 o p
c { f?_1 { 1 { {? -
g'AU°?91901 brexm Lsr[
?I tG srx[s w uAw x
n s°sxs ,Hutt LAZE
P
Nsn msu : mxx:
NOTES
I. ALLCONSTRUCIIGJ TOSEINACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT GTYOFRALEIGHANDORNCOOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICA77ONS.
2 SOUNDARYINFORMATION IS TAKEN FROM SURVEY ENOTLED'GEORGE ROSEBUIDERS, INC'DATED JM'UARY a BOSBYGRIFFW
LAND SURVEYING. INC.
3 CONTOURS AREA COMBINATION OF AERIAL SURVEY. FIELD SURVEY, AND CRYOF RAIDGHOIGTAL TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
4TREELNEOBTANEDFROMAERIALSURVEYAND G7YQe RALE1GHUf ALNFORWn .
S THIS SITE IS NOT CONTAINED WITHIN FEW MAPPED TOO VEARFLOW%AIN IMAP 370297, PANEL 0570EJ
0. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD VERIFICATION OFALL EdSTING UTXmES.
7. ALL DISTANCES ARE TO BACK OF CURSOR RIGHT-OFWAYUNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.
A MINIMUM CORNER CLEARANCE FROM THE CURB LINE OF INTERSEC77NG STRFETS SHALL SEATLEASTNFEETFROM iMEMNTOF
TANGENCY AND NOONVEWAY OR PARKING SPACES SHALL ENCROACH ON THIS MNIMUM CORNER CLEARANCE
9. RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED MINIM W FEET OF ALL RESIDENTIPL OR RESIDENTIAL CC/LECTORWTERSECROVS
RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED WITHNIWFEETOFALL OTHER STREETWIERSECPCNS
10. NO SIGHT OBSTRUCTING OR PARTIALLY OBSTRUCTING WALL, FENCE, FOUAGE BERM, PARKED VEHICLES, SIGN OR OMER OBJECTS
BETWEEN THE HEIGHTS OF TWO (2) FEETAND EIGHT (S) FEETABOVE THE CURB UNEELEVA770N, OR THENEAREST TRAVELED WWYIF NO
_ CURSING COSTS, SHALL BE PLACED WTMM A SIGHT TRIANGLE
X;r
ZOOM. I-0- M^
Bon nw rc w
? uxvALYl7
coign[ ?
?
QoQP PROP. BMA ?? I I I II I i
' CONTRIBUTORY \? I I i IIII Q
1n DRAINAGE BOUNDARY
? I I IIIII
p'r'GUl \ i unlL 0
I Y / I ? III I t}
i I I I IIII,`
h
RESTAURANT
4,595 SF
RESTAURANT
7,850 SF
H
I
`?I ^I I
VRi
II ? IIIII
IIII
iiiil
Illb
S.
S
IIII
1 I
ARCEL 1 I Jill
f 1
a r
RI
, IIIII
iiiil
T?

?+L •®"
n YI I I
I I BA
IIIII TTLE BRIDGE
I¢DI n', 2ofwlsn
7

ML aBMxl
TT

I ul

l

I
III

??-

I .
I
IU I I
IIII m
- I IIII
I I I I
IIII
IIII m
"g y
PARCEL 2 ? II ( I
III I I m?
Ill ll m¢

?riL'
' _ I IIIIW?
IIIIID§ s T4EI C9

', {
? IIII N
III II w otl?
?
O

[
oa
4{
? ?.
1
* II
NI w
I? II111H ??
8
k
f
L
9 srwfs
\ ? I
? 111111
} 11111,
ycNa
wYS
r 1 IIII
I IIII
/ ?
,?-x`f 1 ` IIII
I I III III
3
O
o
ROCK QUARRY ROAD WIDENING SECTION
N.rs FLOmO [1OJa aRf VNICL SLEW PAmeJlt TO MAMw E.-
SLWE TROY SOP. TO FOR OF 1pFWXG MI. SLOPE W[
0
°a rc
BATTLE BRIDGE ROAD WIDENING SECTION
MT.S
EVSMC CROSS SLOPE VARIES, NEW PAVEMENT 70 MATOI EOSTNG
SLOPE FROM [.GP. TO EDGE OF NOENING MN. SLOPE .02i

p\ t
i'
R
oA
O" v
?.
PF
i /

\ POINT 1 R ?.
#1 \
\ PAINf® ` 1 I 1 Po JON PLTt7
rloNana 1 1 1 1 x%, vewG
'1 rauYlen 1 I 1
1 1
I 1 I,1
l \ \
r
1 1 1 ?'1, 1\Q /
,? ? 1
!
\
1 1 xn
r
xILAm
,
1
1
'
I ?
1
.?
\
?, \ Po
usero T
v=r
ALw

d /.
f / FUTURE
/ DEVELOPMENT
/
SO.
POB11C Rely
UT B'B)

FOR SECTION THROUGH STORMWATER WETLANDS SEE SHEET2 OF 2.
SEDIMENT DISPOSAL NOTE.
ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM THE WETLAND SYSTEM WILL BE REMOVED
SEMIANNUALLY OR WHEN DEPTH IS REDUCED TO 75 %OF THE ORIGINAL DESIGN
DEPTH. REMOVED SEDIMENT SHALL BE DISPOSED IN THE OPEN SPACEAS
DEPICTED ON SHEETCS 2
SPECIES TYPE LOCATION SPACING TOTAL AREA TOTAL PLANTS
Juncus effuses Soft Rush Live plants 0'-6' depths 2'x2' 9.800 sq. ft 2.450 lantz
Scir us validus ul rus ropa ule '-12' de th 'x ' total below 716 lams
Pontederia cordata Pickerelweed Prop. ule 0'-12" de th 2"x2' total below 716 lams
Iris seudacorus Yellow-fla Ins Propagule 0--12' depth 2"x2' total below 716 lants
lo.5tiu sq. rt.l

0"-6" DEPTH
9,800 SQ. FT.
6"-12" DEPTH
8,590 SQ. FT.
If I
./ / - / uN O rtrro . ?? 1 >? 1 \
i
a
ti ? 6
d
t,
2 - %
•
A'
a `
1
?q 7 1- 4_
J
i
?. 1
\ t
/-
x
r
r o- ? l
A.- ,% y x. rer? ,
L Aro ?i j(( ? ` ? ; ! l ?4
• + Pa ? _' r r ly
27.?.? q• 'nr T1.
_ a Via, 1
s
+
,
1
nie
ssoc.
Engineering Planning
Landscape Architecture
1150 SE MAYNARD ROAD
SUITE 260
CARY. NC 27511
[phone]
Revisions
EVERGREENA3ATTLOWNEREBRIDGE, LLC
422AKEN HUNT CIRCLE
COLUMBIA, SC 29223
(803) 8655203
Project
Shoppes at
Battle Bridge
Stormwater Wetlands
Landscape Plan
Dote
January 3, 2006
Stole
1"=20'
Sheet
1 of 2
Plant Matenal and Fertil- Specifications
Container (Woody and Herbaceous Plants)
The soil within the root ball shall be at field capacity (1/3 atmosphere) or wetter upon delivery
to the job site. Any wilted, dry and/or light-weight plants shall be rejected. if not plented
immediately upon delivery to the job site, plants shall be stored in shade and root beds kept moist
through perrod,c watenng until t1e time of planting
The container size shad be at least as large as speo,f;ed. Plan's shad not necessarily be rejected
when supplied m containers larger than specified. However. the -1/root masses shall be the size
of the speuLee container size. If the soil/root masses are substantially smaler than the
specified container size and loose soil exists on the sides and bottom of the containers, mdlcetmg
that plants have not been in specified containers long enough to root into surrounding soil, the
plants shall be rejected.
If growing, the plants mall appear healthy with no leaf spots. leaf damage. leaf discoloration.
chlorosis. leaf wilting or curling. or evidence of msects on the leeves.
for trees and shrubs, where spiraling woody roots exist on the outside of the soil/root mass upon
the removal of the plants from the containers. the landscape contractor shall separate (cutting
where necessary) and spread them out (frazzle) prior to planting.
Flant Material and Faith-, 5peafintwn5 (Cont.)
Plua CHerb-ous Plants Woody 5eedinr or Rooted C tt e )
If rot planted immedotely upon delivery to the lob site, the pugs whether in or out or the;
growing units shall be stored out of direct exposure to the sun and wind and maintained moist
through per,od!.c watenng unit! the tame of planting. If the pugs ae not contained in the,. growing
umts upon delivery and will not be planted immediate y. they should be treated as above and their
root masses shat be protected by straw or other suitable matena!s and mamtamed moist through
periodic watering. until the time planting.
Plugs shall have solid soil/root masses with the soil in place. Roots shall appear clean and white in
coloration.
If growing, the plants shall appear healthy with no leaf spots. leaf damage. leaf discoloration.
chlorosis, leaf wilting or curling. or evidence of insects on the leaves.
If dormant (herbaceous). new healthy shoots shall be apparent. Plugs containing shoots that are
soft or mushy or otherwise appear rotten shall not be accepted.
If dormant (woody), stems shall be pliable and exhibit light green to yellowish green cambium. Plugs
containing brittle stems and having unhealthy cambium shall not be accepted.
Plugs (woody seedlings) shall have widths that are at least to the limb lines of the seedlings and
have depths that are at least one-fourth the heights of the seedlings.
Planting 5pea6catnons
1) Plants will be installed over the shallow portions ( 12' in depth Coormol pool) of
the Extended Detention Wetland system.
2) Plant material is to maintained in coo!. moist environment until plantng.
3) Live plants are to be ,nstaaed by hand using tree planting 'oars (dibble bars).
4) --ive plants are to be installed so that root ca'ar 5 at (or slightly below) soil
surface (not significantly above or below grade).
5) ?Iant,ng hole will be opened by the dibble bar, plant properly placed Cvert!-;'
with root collar at appropriate elevation) and the hole will be closed completely
(no air space around roots) with dibble bar and foot pressure.
G) Live plants should not lean more than 10 degrees from vert-1.
7) All root parts must be in ground.
5) Propagules (dormant rhizomes. etc) will be planted by hand 1'-2' into sod
surface with vegetative portions Cor buds) facing upwards.
9) Planting will not occur when soil conditions are not conducive to proper
installation (e.g. frozen ground).
10) Planting should occur during the period from March 1st through April 30th.
Notes
ride '
ssoc.
Engineering Planning
Landscape Architecture
1150 SE MAYNA.RD R0A6
SUITE 260
CARY, NC 27511
[phone]
Fiber or Peat Pot (Herb-cus Plants)
If not planted immediately upon delivery to the job site. plants shall be stored in shade and root
masses kept moist through periodic watering until the tine of planting.
The plants shall be well-rooted through the sides and bottoms of the pots and firmly contained
therein.
If the plants may be easily removed from the pots by holding the upper portion of the plant and
gently pulling on the pots, the plants shall be rejected.
If growing. the plants shall appear healthy with no leaf spots, leaf damage. leaf discoloration.
chlorosis. leaf wilting or curling. or evidence of insects on the leaves. -
The pot size shall be at least as large as specified. Plants shall not necessarily be rejected when
supplied in pots larger than specified.
The number of plats or stems Cculm6) per port as specified shall be present at the minimum, and
on the average. or the plants shall be rejected.
Dormant Prepagule (Herbaceous Plants)
If not planted immediately upon delivery to the job site. the dormant propagules shall be stored
out of direct exposure to the sun and wind and they shall be protected by covering with straw.
peat moss. compost, or other suitable materials and shall be kept mast. through periodic watering.
until the time of planting.
The bodies and shoots associated with the propagules shall have turgor or be rigid to the touch.
If the bodies and/or shoots associated with the propagules are soft or mushy. or appear rotten
or decomposed. the plant materials shall be rejected. Rhizome Cstolon) sections shall provide a
mmmum of two shoots per section or Rhizome (stolon) sections containing at least a terminal shoot
shall be a minimum of four inches (4-) in length (in order to ensure sufficient stored energy to
support the new growth). Rhizome sections containing shoots that are soft or mushy or otherwise
appear rotten shall not be accepted.
F rc t5zat.ion
Herbaceous Plantmgs
5prmg plantings - Use compressed slow-release tablets (Agriform) or Osmocote 18-6-12, eight to
nine month release fertilizer. to be placed in hole at time of planting. For Dormant propagules.
contaner/fiber pot, or plug seedlings use about 15 grams (0.5 oz.) per planting.
Potential Wetland Plant 5upplids
Mellow Marsh Farm 919-543-3532
mellowmarshwnndsorno co < altozm Iloma h• ds ingco >
J+J Transplant Aquatic Nursery 715-256-0059
800-622-5055
Environmental Concern 410-745-9620
Bobtown Nursery 757-787-8454
600-201-4714
1) Topographic information from combined field survey. City of Raleigh topographic
information, and proposed grading of 5hoppes at Battle Bridge area.
2) 5urface area of wetlands normal pool Is 27.030 sf ---- based on 5A/DA
ratio of total contributory drainage basin from Table 1.1 NODENR 5tormwater
Best Management Practices.
3) For H + H calculations associated with proposed wetlands and documentation
of peak rate of Stormwater runoff. see Stormwater Analysis for Proposed
5ho11es at Battle Bridge Extended Detention Wetlands by William G. Daniel +
Associates. PA dated 1/04/06.
43 Construction of the proposed wetlands shall be regarded as an integral part
of site improvements required to support the proposed 5hoppes at Battle Bridge.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for A.) any building within the
proposed shopping center; construction of the wetlands shall be completed. B.) a
wetlands O+M manual prepared and submitted to the City. C.) the BMP easement
established through recordation. and D.) an as-built exhibit of the constructed
wetlands submitted to the City.
7) The following general construction sequence applies to construction of the
extended detention wetlands:
A.) Following receipt of encroachment permits from NCDOT and
Notionwide Wetlands Permit from ACOE. extend existing culvert and
construct structures as shown on plans.
B.) Perform grading. prepare planting areas. and install proposed
plantings within and around proposed wetland.
C.3 Upon inspection and approval of completed wetland by the
project engineer, close drain valve.
Revisions
NER
EVERGREENAAWOTfLE BRIDGE, LLC
422 AIKEN HUNT CROLE
COLUMEIK SC 29223
[phone]
Project
Shoppes at
Battle Bridge
Stormwater Wetlands
Landscape Plan
Date
January 3, 2006
Scale
As Shown
Sheet
2of2
Stormwater Wetlands Section A-AI
PLANT LIST

5, Q.-Al

M U
w
n Ymn

Of l" MOTES
a r,r rLrwLr rrxt•rDe.-r ft .aw Lw .o.cfef rrAfD
M rpar+f0.
e .e++C..a+D..mx a?wnu Y r+dr.+.w r...w ts. waa
OYfMD.Mr[w?W?O arar ri HAM R?S?i baK
Ya bid Y.Y?0. rC RwH Swca C3M?.. b fCUwMO Nr
tl+Mf tNy1,MD M .,V Nr?C? SrSDpup d alfgfr.rfr
4 Aci fsA'tHi..f1.tY?aw?DfD.wailrp L.LLp+EO ?IWNMT
/DaaONO WSLI?L?R
s rmera • .... rf.w .s w wa..u . ra .aa ro .NN ra.rw
.a.wa nw f+w..r.aew eawwsEwur,n
4 Al 0.rH w.La Ya M YR Mff.WYy b?aY.YrW Y
?fA VMSDf M.rffEM.
' ?.??ao °W i+e+wr°?00..ve wav.vr.rar waa Y awrsr
? ,OVC?..W. V LDC?Sbr d rYA,IDtlM> YItNf r wBCC?,1,lYD
??wlr b ?1?...0
? .r,a. by ?L'Af?w fruaL
4ed PbMn)Mw
Bhviraa»xMtrl ?n
hkI4
e W" PLANTNG DETAL ORNAMENTAL CRASS PLANTNG DETAL (P» s n o? pI. plp) a -rs.2
mm to SWF NOT To SCALE MIS S. Swot
"I e a r>aw =a
(S/I) P26-Na qx IsE2) M-no

e ANNUALS PLANTNG DETAIL
NOT To scaE
SHOPPES at
BATTLE
BRIDGE
RALEIGH, NC
DEVELOM-
FMCUN-BATILBRDQ UC
122 AM KMT CRCLE
COLUMBIA, SC 29223
6ro/os
lveUaS
R/6/QS PER COR COMWWS
r....t..? ? NAD 2r1
AS 3"0" V79/GS
PLANT LIST
& DETAILS
IARfE TRH MR" TRH
E, TREE PLANTING DETAILS
HOT TO SS:ME

E GROUND COVER PLANTING DETAIL
NOT To SCALE
NORTH CAROLINA ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM, NCEEP
IN LIEU FEE REQUEST FORM
Revised 9115/45
Print this form, fill in required information, sign and date, and either mail to NCEEP, 1652 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652, or fax to 919-715-2219. Attac tmnents are acceptable for clarification purposes.
;..__._......_... ?..._......_..._....._......._......_..-_...._...._.. ?
......................................................_.............._....._...........-._...............
1. Name of Applicant or Agent %0%
?.a1?ZELK i
frt. Name of Business of Applicant or Agent ?:t ; ??v des ? GwSu ?S
1 3. Mailing Address (Street or PO lox)

t+aVSw
9A -
a: city, state; z .._....__....? ..__...._.. -_.._ ... _ _ leN C.
5. Telephone (eg, 919-555-1212) OVA) g00
.._......_..... -............................. .....-----..........._._ _
8. Fan (optional) ..:..- - ...._...._- ._...._ ._...._...._...._..._-..._._.. --
?R 1 CA) 84 ri _ Oo4 `4 ..._ ...__...
7. -E-mall (optional) s
b z^r t e0c., t9S0.0dcc . ce •?

'8. Pr Name
'
( ? ? a?>G Q ?a
- 5lnopp?s i? .Ll _
l
9. Project location (nearest town, city) L
1Zat e>,
-.._...__..__..- ......_
10...Lai-Long....Coordinates.............. .._......(op.......tiona..l} € ?? 39 " NN. bed
E oject ..... .... _.. ..._.....
1 1. Pr County ._._........._..........}.._._.. W*jG
12 River Basin S G
13. Catatogtng Unit
, 03o aoao t
?
_ _ _ _ _
l 14. Riparian W- etland impact (ac.) (e. g., 0.13) _
15. Novi-Riparian Wetland?Impact
1 16. Coastal Marsh impact (ac.) ; ?, ?
17. Stream impacts-Cold (ft.) (e.g. 1,234y
18. Stream Impact-Cool (ft.)
19. Stream Impact-Warm (ft.) i

Z0. Buffet Impact,Zotfe T(sq ft:y (e.g. 12,345)

21. Buffer Impact-Zone 2 (sq. ft.) a s
tg ? b
Check ( below If this request is a: Signature of Applicant or Agent:
revision to a current acceptance, or
_ re-submission of an expired acceptance

-_..-_....._ ..
_ ?..--.....r ................ _...... ._......

.._=
Buffer mifigation applicable orgy in the Neuse, Tar-Pandico and Catawba river basins, and the Randleman Lake
Water Supply WetershW.
For help in deterridning the Cataloging Unit, go to EPS's'Surf Your Watershed' web page:
httV://cfoub.dPa. rfllocatebndex.dm
Direct all questions to Carol Shaw at 919-733-6205 or [e-mail]
by It
C r
o <
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Mimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
December 7, 2004
DWQ EXP# 04-1863
Wake County
Page 1 of 2
William G. Daniel & Associates, PA
1150 SE Maynard Road, Suite 260
Cary, NC 27511
Subject Property: Rock Quarry Road
UT to Neuse River
On-Site Determination for Applicability to the Neuse River Riparian Area Protection Rules
(15A NCAC 2B.0233)-EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM
Dear Sir or Madam:
On December 6, 2004, at your request I conducted an on-site determination to review five
features located on the subject property for applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules (15A NCAC
2B.0233). The features are labeled as "A, B, C, E & F" on the attached maps initialed by me on
December 7, 2004.
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has determined that the features labeled as "A, B, C,
E & F" on the attached maps are subject to the Neuse Buffer Rule, the origins of these
features have been identified and flagged in the field as the following: Feature A starts at
flag it#B.5, Feature B starts at flag #E4, Feature C starts at flag #C1, Feature E starts at flag
#F1 and Feature F starts at flag #Hl. These streams and their associated buffers should be
identified on any future plans for this property. The owner (or future owners) should notify the
DWQ (and other relevant agencies) of this decision in any future correspondences concerning
this property. This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter.
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated
Local Authority that a surface water exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may request a
determination by the Director.` A request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to
the Director in writing c/o John Dorney, DWQ Wetlands/401 Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd.,
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260. Individuals that dispute a determination by the DWQ or Delegated
Local Authority that "exempts." a surface water from the buffer rule may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 60 days. of the date that you receive this letter. Applicants are
hereby notified that the 60-day statutory appeal time does not start until the affected party
(including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. DWQ recommends
that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that third party appeals are made
in a timely manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter
150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This determination is final and binding unless you
ask for a hearing within 60 days. .
, p Caro
401 Wetlands Certification Unit Qtur' !If
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: htto://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
William G. Daniel & Associates, PA
Page 2 of 2
12/7/04
This letter only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity
within the buffers. Nor does this letter approve any activity within Waters of the United States
or Waters of the State. If you have any additional questions or require additional information
please call Deborah Edwards at [phone].
Sincerely,
` Alan W
. Klimek, P.E.
AWK/dae
Attachments: Wake County Soil Survey map
USGS Garner Quad map
cc: DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Walter Cole-S&EC
Filename 041863RockQaarry(Wake)EXP+origin
S
J ,
J
r?

"A
Ru
?1uC
fUC ..
Y i.
??
.. I.

APW
A
}ovc
A
w.

•
J <x I
0
y ?>
.fin
A4 f$

1

r ?ti 5n ?_ z

47,

`p
,r •
Y?"y iva
Project No.

03345pA 1
Figure 2 -
J Soil Survey Map,

•
S
???mcz

Rock Quarry Tract t Sail & Environmental Consultatnts, PA
sc Project Mgr.. William G. Daniel & Associates, P.A_ 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
Wake County, NC [phone] • [phone]
Scale= Web Page: wwr,5andEC.com
V = 1,320'
01114104 Wane County Soil Survey
Issued 1970, Sheet 79 -
bib:d !9b69b;6:01 5689 Z5?6 SQNU-U3N-GMG:WOaA f;A:TT bRR;3-)--)qn
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
a> [phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Sumerlyn Subdivision Date: . 10-08-04
Applicant/Owner: William G. Daniels & Associates County: Wake
Investigator: Walter Cole State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? x Yes No Community ID: Mixed Pine Hardwood
Is the site signiflcantiy disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: Upland near flag F14
!f needed, explain on reverse.
VFCWTOTION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Lonlcere japonica VINE FAG 9.
Plnus Taeda TREE FAC 10.
3. Ilex opaca SHRUB FAC- 11.
14. Quercus nigra TREE FAC 12.
5. Jw*erus virginiana TREE FACU- 13.
Smilax rotundifta VINE FAC 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): Battle Bridge Road Site 50%
Battle Bridge Road Site
Remarks:
Note: The Shoppes @ Battle Bridge properties were evaluated at the same time as the Sumerlyn SID property although they are
separate properties and projects. The data forms provided here represent the typical wetlands found on both properties.

HVDROLOGY . . i
_ Recorded Data (Describe in.Remarks):
- Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
_ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) _ Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >16" (in.) _ FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks) .
Depth to Saturated Soil: >16" (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Project/Site: Sumerlyn Subdivision Plot ID: Upland near flag F14
cnu c
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Well Drained .
(Series and Phase): Appling Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? _ Yes - No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc:
0-6 Al 10YR5/2 Sand loam
6-12 A2 10YR6/4 Sand Loam
10-16 Bt 7.5YR5/6 Sand clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol... Concretions
Hisstic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils, List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
a
Note: The Shoppes @ Battle Bridge properties were evaluated at the same time as the Sumerlyn S/D property although they are
separate properties and projects. The data forms provided here represent the typical wetlands found on both properties.

WETLANDS DFTFRMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? x Yes - No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
- ,a Yes x No
-
Hydric Soils Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Sumerlyn Subdivision Date: 01-10-2004
Applicant/Owner: William G. Daniels & Associates County: Wake
Investigator: Walter Cole State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: Wetland aflag F14
If needed, ex ain on reverse.)
VFnFTOTInN
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Lonicera japonica VINE FAC- 9.
2. Acer rubrum TREE FAC 10.
3. 11ex glabra SHRUB FACW 11.
Woodwarc a virginke HgRB OBL 12.
5. Saururvs cemuus HERB OBL 13.
Smilax rotundifolia VINE FAC 14.
Boehmede cy0ndnca HERB FACW+ 15.
8. Mlcrostegium vimineum HERB FAC+ 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL; FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 87%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge :.
_ Aerial. Photographs . =
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
x Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
x Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water. WA (in.) x Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 6 (in.) _ FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 6 (in.)
.i
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Project/Site: Sumerlyn Subdivision Plot ID: Wetland Q flag F14
Qna a
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Poorl y Drained
(Series and Phase): Worsham Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Ochraqults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes _ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
0-6 A 1 QYR4/1 Sand Loam
3-12 Btg 10YR6/2 10YR 614 Common, prominent San Clay Loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol . Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in.Sandy Soils
x Aquic Moisture Regime x Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils, List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? x Yes _ No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? x : Yes _ No X Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? x Yes No
Remarks:
?%4Sao 3
01- it - 0(4
Addendum to the Pre-Construction Notification and "Buffer Rules" Application Required for
Projects Submitted Under the
"Express Review Program"
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Version 4.0
September 2, 2004
Email Address: [e-mail]
Purpose: To provide a detailed explanation of the information required by the Division of Water Quality
in order to expedite the review of applications for 401 General Water Quality Certifications, Isolated
Wetland Permits, Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plans and Riparian Buffer Approvals (Please Note: do
not leave any questions unanswered or use terms such as "N/A" without an explanation).
Fees:
401 Water Quality Certifications:
Riparian Buffer Approval:
Isolated Wetland Permit:
Wetland & Stream Mitigation Phan:
Major (>/= 150' stream or >/=1 acre wetlands) $2,000.00
Minor (< 150' stream or < 1 acre wetlands) $1,000.00
(exclusively or "in addition" to) $2,000.00
General $1,000.00
Major w/buffers (>/=150' stream or >/= 1 acre wetlands) $4,000.00
Major w/o buffers (>/=150' stream or >/=1 acre wetlands) $3,000.00
Minor/buffers only $2,000.00
Please read the entire document before attempting to determine the proper fee. Fees are additive for
particular projects.
Things to keep in mind when filling out the application:
A specific answer must be provided for each question. For instance, if a numerical answer is requested
then a numerical answer must be provided along with the supporting information necessary for DWQ staff
to verify that the number is accurate. Likewise, if explanations are presented to justify certain responses,
the explanations must be completely supported by documentation. DWQ staff cannot assume that
unsupported or undocumented information is accurate. "N/A" is not an acceptable answer for any
question since the DWQ Staff reviewing the application must have an opportunity to determine whether or
not any requested information is pertinent.
All forms, guidance, worksheets, applications, etc. used must be the current versions as posted on our
web site at http: h2o.enr.state.nc.usincwetiands. There will soon be a web site specifically for the
express review program. Please note that it will be the applicant's or applicant's consultant's
responsibility to verify that the current versions are used. The versions posted on our web site will be
considered to be the current versions.
You are a very important part of the success of this program, if you have suggestions or clarifications
please send your comments to the Wetlands/401 Unit of the DWQ (via email at
401 express@ncmai I.net).
Filling Out the Pre-Construction Notification Application:
The Corps of Engineers (USACE)IDWQ official, joint Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application
must be used as a basis for the expedited review process. The completed application should be
presented first and the supporting information tabbed and collated in the same order. Using a custom
format is not recommended. The open squares 0 are checklist items. The following items correspond to
the numbering system on the Pre-Construction Notification Form (PCN):
C;;e-
2
USE CHECK BOXES TO TRACK PROJECT INFORMATION
SECTION I. PROCESSING
X 7 & 2.The USACE determines which Nationwide, Regional, or General Permit is
required. If you have verified with the USACE which permit they intend to use for
your project or if you already have written approval from the USACE, please
indicate by adding "verified" or "verified, attached", respectively, in the blank next
to the Permit number requested.
Attach the USACE Approval if you have it.
3. It is not anticipated that the expedited process will be requested for this situation.
4. If you propose to impact 150 feet or more of perennial stream or 1 acre or more
of wetland and onsite mitigation is not proposed, it is recommended that you
either locate an acceptable private bank with available credits (with
documentation to show that the bank can and shall provide the credits needed)
or obtain approval from the EEP for the entire amount of stream and or wetland
as OWO will make the final determination as to whether or not mitigation applies.
Please note that the USACE may have different mitigation requirements and
thresholds.
)a 5. State whether your project will require a CAMA Minor, Major or General Permit
and give the status of the permit
SECTION 11- APPLICATION INFORMATION
1. 15 NCAC 2H.502(t) reads as follows. 'Who Must Sign Applications. The application
shall be considered a "valid application" only if the application bears the signature of a
responsible officer of the company, municipal official, partner or owner. This signature
certifies that the applicant has title to the property, has been authorized by the owner to
apply for certification or is a public entity and has the power of eminent domain. Said
official in signing the application shall also certify that all information contained therein
or in support thereof is true and correct to the best of his knowledge."
Please indicate how the applicant meets the above definition and provide
supporting documentation.
Please provide all of the requested contact information including a fax
number and email address.
2.X If the application is not signed by the applicant, please attach the agent authorization.
The applicant must sign the agent authorization letter. The applicant's name and
position must also be spelled out as many signatures are difficult to read.
3. X Please provide all of the requested contact information including a fax number and
email address.
SECTION III - PROJECT INFORMATION
The following is the most critical of all the information that you must provide. The quality and detail of the
information will often determine the expeditiousness of the review. The following is a checklist of the
types of pertinent information required at a minimum:

3
Maps and Plans:
The most recent version of the 1:24,000 USGS Topographic Map- Please cleanly
delineate the site boundaries, etc. on the map. If the delineation obscures any of the
features, it is recommended that a clean copy be provided. Please indicate the
quadrangle name. You can go to the USGS web site (httpJ/mac.usgs.gov/maplists) to
verify the most recent version.
The most recent version of the NRCS Soil Survey Map - (required for projects within
the Neuse River Basin, Tar-Pamlico River Basin, Randleman Lake Watershed and the
Catawba River Basin, also recommended for all projects) - Please cleanly delineate the
site boundaries, etc. on the map. If the delineation obscures any of the features, it is
recommended that a dean copy be provided. Please indicate the page or map number
from which the copy of the map was made. Copies of the current soil survey and/or soil
survey map sheets can be obtained from the local NRCS County Office
(httpJ/www.nc.nres.usda.govt).
Vicinity map - Please dearly mark the location and approximate boundaries of the
property and project on the map. Please indicate north and scale. Please include
applicable road names or State Road numbers.
The Site Plan - The most critical map to be provided is the site plan. You mu§t provide
full sized plans. The following is the minimum list of plans that are typically needed.
/Pre-constructiordPre-existing conditions - This sheet must be scaled and
include all jurisdictional and nonjurisdictionai wetland, stream, water features,
State regulated buffers, topographic contours with elevations, approximate extent
and nature of forest, field, landscaped, or other cover. Any existing strictures and
impervious area must be shown. Existing utility lines and easements must be
shown. Existing roads, culverts, and other pertinent features must be shown. North
arrow and the scale must be shown. Please note that the impact boundaries on the
/ maps should correspond to the flagged impact boundaries in the field.
Proposed conditions - These sheets must be scaled and show all existing
jurisdictional and non jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features, and State
regulated buffers must be underlain on the site plan(s). The plans must show all
built-out structures and impervious cover. The plans must include the final grading
contours with elevations. The plans must indicate all utilities and easements. It is
likely that several versions of the final built-out site plans will be necessary. The
following is a list of layers:
f Drainage Plans - Final drainage plans must be included. The plans should include
the locations and pertinent elevations and sizes of the collection system and
drainage ways. All inlets and outlets must also be shown with pertinent elevations.
Scaled stormwater BMPs must also be indicated as required by DWQ rules and
policies. In certain cases, final stormwater management plans must also be
vided, but that will be addressed later in this document.
Y/0'0
Plats - The plans must show the location and layout of all sub-divided parcels with
lot identifications. Platted parcels must be developable without further impacts to
jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetlands, streams, water features, and State
regulated buffers.
Proposed Impacts - All impacts to jurisdictional and non jurisdictional wetland,
stream, water features, and State regulated buffers must be shown and labeled on
the site plans. All excavation, fill, flooding, stabilization, and other impacts that will
be conducted in or near jurisdictional and non jurisdictional wetland, stream, water
features, and State regulated buffers must be indicated.
C?4-
4
Wettan Impacts (on the site plan):
Precise grading and final elevation contours must be provided. Existing vegetation and
any clearing must be specified.
All subsurface utility lines must indicate the location of anti-seep collars. Construction
detail for anti-seep collars must be provided.
Roadway or other crossings of riparian wetlands may require floodway culverts to
maintain existing hydrological conditions.
0
V Flooding
V Draining
Stream Impacts:
Y Stream impacts must be clearly shown on the plans. The centerline as well as the banks
of the stream must be surveyed or located by GPS for the portion of the stream to be
impacted.
Culverting:
The inlet and the outlet of the culvert should be aligned with the stream as much as
?t possible. Inlet and outlet elevations and stream bed elevations should be indicated.
`v Any widening of the stream must be shown with elevations.
The extent of and plan details for all dissipation or grade control devices should be shown
with pertinent elevations.
For shorter culvert sections, such as for road crossings, a longitudinal cross section that
shows the stream bed invert at the inlet and outlet, the existing stream bank elevations
and the invert of the inlet and outlet of the pipe(s) must be provided.
For shorter culvert sections, such as for road crossings, a vertical cross section must be
provided that shows the stream cross section at the inlet and outlet overlain with the
culvert and fill cross section.
For bottomless culverts or other spans, a vertical cross section should be provided that
shows the minimum distance from each span to each stream bank, the stream cross
section, the height of the span above the stream and the minimum distance from the
edge of each footer to each stream bank.
When surface drainage features or groundwater recharge areas that feed or would
reasonably feed wetlands that are not to be filled are made impervious, it may be
necessary to direct some stormwater runoff to those areas in order to maintain hydrology.
You must identify these areas and address them. Supporting explanations and discharge
information must be provided to show that the wetland would not be eroded or receive
too much or too little hydrology. In many cases this could help satisfy part of a
stormwater management plan.
For bottomless culverts or other spans, a plan view must be provided that shows the
location of the spans and the stream banks.
For longer culverts or culverts that will pass beneath substantial impervious cover, it will
be necessary to provide adequate plan detail to show that discharge velocity/energy will
be adequately dissipated.
0410-
5
Aquatic life passage through culverts is typically achieved by placing the invert of the
``?? ` culvert below the existing bed of the stream per the USACE or North Carolina Wildlife
Resource Commission guidelines. Other methods such as baffles may also be used.
Please be aware that such placement may require the use of grade/velocity control
measures up or down stream of culverts on steeper streams to prevent head-cuts or
stream bed erosion. The culvert placement relative to the stream bed can be indicated
on the longitudinal profile. Grade and velocity control measures must be indicated on the
plan view and typical designs should be provided.
Multiple culverts, wide culverts or sectioned box culverts typically require the use of sills,
off-setting or other means to match the cross section of the existing stream (in order to
maintain stream stability and provide aquatic life passage). A vertical cross section of the
culverts should be shown overlain with the up and downstream stream cross section
including the stream flood-prone area.
1 Impacts associated with dam construction must indicate and enumerate all fill associated
with the dam foot print, spillway and any bank stream bank stabilization. The length of
stream impounded must also be indicated and enumerated.
Stream Relocations:
NIA Stream relocations must be conducted as specified in General Certfication numbers
3402 and 3404 (available on the Wetlands Unit web site). Stream relocation plans must
include:
Morphological measurements (see Appendix B of the Internal Technical Guide for Stream
Work in North Carolina available on the Wetlands Unit web site) - not all of the
measurements are applicable in every instance.
Typical stream cross sections - Typically, a riffle cross section and a pool cross section
that includes the entire food prone area. The bankfull and flood prove area elevations
should be indicated. Similarly, a riffle cross section of the reference stream(s) should be
provided.
Plan view - Provide scaled plans that show the location of the proposed (preferably with
stationing) and the existing stream. In most instances, the bankfull contours and flood
prone area contours, in stream structures, bank revetments/stabilization, channel plugs,
planting plan, vegetation conditions, stormwater outlets, grade controls, bridges, culverts,
sewer lines, roads, fencing, and easement lines should also be provided.
Longitudinal Stream Profile - A scaled profile that indicates the thalweg, bankfull, and top
of bank elevations should be provided for the design and reference streams. In many
cases, it will also be necessary to show the existing land elevations for the design
stream.
Planting Plan - A planting and/or vegetation management plan should also be provided
that makes use of appropriate native vegetation. The plan should indicate the extent,
density, and species of plants to be provided.
In-stream structure, bank revetment/stabilization, and stormwater outlet typicals -
Detailed, typical plans should be provided for all in stream structures, bank revetments or
stabilization, and stormwater outlets. The typicals should include materials and
specifications as well as relative lengths, positions, and angles.
Sediment transport analysis - A sediment transport analysis should be provided based
on the current, relevant, accepted practices. The sediment transport analysis should be
relevant to the stream bed load type and should predict bed load transport equilibrium.
Permanent conservation easement or similar means of protection must also be provided.

6
Other Inf rmation:
1. The project should always be referred to by this name in all correspondence as well
as the DWQ # once it is provided.
.? 2. This only applies to DOT projects, which are not expected to utilize the Express
Review Program.
?3. This should be the size of the project as identified by the USACE for 404 Permits or
by the Division of Water Quality for Buffer Approvals and Isolated Wetland Permits.
V 4. Please provide the name (as depicted on the USGS topographic map and DWQ
Stream Classification Lists) of the nearest water body(iss) to which your project is a
tributary to (e.g. "Neuse River (Falls take below normal pool elevation)"). (Do not
simple state "stream", "river", "ocean", "sound" or "lake".) Please provide the "stream
index number" of the named water body or water body section (e.g. "27-(1)"). Also,
please provide the full water quality classification (e.g. "WS-IV NSW CA") of the water
body. This information can be obtained from the DWQ web site
http:/lh2o.enr.state.ne.us/bims/Reports/reportsWB.htmi.
V 5. Please state which river basin and sub-basin that your project is in (e.g. "Neuse River
Basin, NEU01"). This information can be obtained from the DWQ web site
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/bims/Reports/reportsWB.html.
V/6. Conditions should also be indicated on the existing site plan where applicable.
Photos (including aerial photos) can be helpful in describing the existing conditions.
V 7. You must provide an attachment that explicitly describes what the proposed project
will entail from the planning stage to final construction
8. This can be a simple explanation, but it is critically important because the purpose
dictates how the no practical alternatives are reviewed.
SECTION IV - PRIOR PROJECT HISTORY
Please include copies of all 401 Water Quality Certifications, Isolated Wetland
Permits, Buffer Approvals, USACE Permits, CAMA Permits for the site as well as a
copy of the final approved, site plan.
SECTION V - FUTURE PROJECT PLANS
For projects utilizing the express review process, all impacts both present and
potential future must be indicated. For instance, the location or configuration of
platted lots sometimes suggests that future impacts will be necessary to build,
access, or otherwise develop such lots. Failure to account for such potential impacts
could delay or disqualify a project from the rapid review process. If you believe that
the lot can be developed without impacts, but you anticipate that your assertion may
be questioned, it is recommended that you provide a potential building foot print
and/or grading plan to show that future impacts could be avoided.
SECTION VI - PROPOSED IMPACTS TO WATER OF THE US
It is recommended that the individual impacts be described if there are special things
to note about the impacts. Typically the most important thing is to have detailed
accurate site plans as described above. Please make sure they are clearly labeled.
KPlease include all proposed temporary impacts.
7
Also, a current, signed delineation map from the USACE should be provided (if
available) and a map locating the stream origins signed by the appropriate DWQ
Staff must be provided if applicable.
V12. Each impact to a wetland must be clearly labeled and identified on the site plan. The
type of impact must be clearly stated. If the impact is temporary, a specific plan must
be described or shown as to how the wetland will be restored. Keep in mind that the
USACE delineates some features as wetlands that DWQ calls streams. Please list
any impacts in this table that DWQ would identify as a stream. If there is any doubt,
it is recommended that the impacts be listed as streams. Please follow current DWQ
policy with respect to whether a stream is perennial or not. It is recommended that
you assume that a stream is perennial (unless you are positive that it is not) so if
mitigation is required then the appropriate amount of mitigation would be anticipated
or requested from the EEP or private bank. If the EEP or private bank has pre-
approved too short of an amount of stream or if inadequate mitigation is proposed,
then that situation will result in delays.
/3. Sometimes it is difficult to determine whether a feature is a modified natural channel
or a ditch, especially in the eastern part of the State. Soils, drainage features,
topography, and similar factors, all are important for making that determination.
4. Other items to address not specifically requested in the application include
downstream sediment starvation, thermal pollution, low flow releases from dams, and
aquatic life passage. Other important considerations are buffer reestablishment or
mitigation around ponds on buffered streams. The site plan should include the
precise elevation contour of the normal pool as well as the dam foot-print. Mitigation
is required for wetland flooding of an acre or greater and for stream fill (if over the
150 foot threshold) under the dam foot-print and any outlet stabilization.
SECTION VII - AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
Avoidance and minimization are critical aspects of an application particularly if you desire the application
to be processed expeditiously. The following is a check-list of avoidance and minimization questions that
DWQ Staff often look for in applications.
No
1?1O
xalO
01
w`o
11``IV
Are there any stream crossings at angles less than 75° or greater than 105°?
Are there any stream crossings that cross two streams above or at the confluence of those
streams?
Are there any stream, wetland, water, and/or buffer impacts other than perpendicular road
crossing near the edges of the property?
Can the stream be relocated as a natural channel design as opposed to culverted or
otherwise filled?
Is any single stream crossed more than once?
Can property access routes be moved or reduced to avoid stream, wetland, water, and
buffer impacts?
t4lo Can a building, parking lot, etc. be realigned to avoid impacts?
140 Can the site layout be reconfigured to avoid impacts?
it Can headwalls or steeper side slopes be used to avoid/minimize impacts?
ID Can a retaining wall be used to avoid/minimize impacts?

vl? -1
""-4-
o 6 #0 8
Can cul de sacs be used in place of a crossing? `
Y/
00 Can lots be reshaped or have shared driveways to avoid impac s. p
If based solely on the practicable physical possibility, the answer is 'yes' to any of the above questions
then you must have to provide substantial and convincing justification as to why the impacts are
necessary. If the impacts are required by a local government or other agency, the claim must be
supported with appropriate written documentation from the local government or other agency. Most
projects typically involve the need to justify avoidance and minimization. If this information is not readily
available, then the express review process may not be the appropriate venue to use. Providing
alternative plans (such as plans that avoid the impact, minimize the impact and the preferred plan, similar
to those used in environmental assessments) and explanations as to why the preferred plan is needed
and why the alternative plans won't work are many times helpful in the no practical altematives review.
SECTION VIII - MITIGATION
Mitigation for the Express Review Program, final mitigation plans must be presented up front. The final
plans (except for plans that propose payment into the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), Riparian
/Buffer Restoration Fund, private mitigation banks, or similar banking instruments) must contain detailed
plans, specifications, calculations and other supporting data that show that the appropriate mitigation will
be achieved at the ratios required. The design plans must be developed to at least the "90%- level.
Monitoring plans must be final and specific. Any means of permanent protection, such as a permanent
conservation easement must be provided. If you elect to use the EEP or a private mitigation bank, it is
recommended that you request the maximum possible mitigation amount that DWQ may require so that
you will not have to get further approval from them on short notice. The EEP and private banks are not
part of the expedited review process and cannot be expected to meet any such deadlines. There will be
no conditional expedited approvals that require final plans at a later date. It is not recommended that
innovative mitigation techniques or greater than 10% preservation be requested as part of an expedited
process.
SECTION IX
If your project requires the preparation of an environmental document under NEPA or SEPA and an
approval letter has not been issued by the State Clearinghouse, then you cannot apply under the
expedited review process. I t is your responsibility to find out if such documentation is required.
SECTION X
There are many aspects of the Buffer Rules that must be addressed in every application, if applicable.
The first and most important thing to keep in mind is that allowable activities that require written Approval
from DWQ triggers a review of the entire project for compliance with the Buffer Rules.
Diffuse Flow & Stormwater Management:
The most common issues that arise involve the requirement for diffuse flow of stormwater
through riparian buffers. Basically one of three things must be indicated in regards to all
"new" stormwater that is collected and subsequently discharged. First, provisions for
diffuse flow through the protected buffer must be made. This usually involves the use of
level spreading devices designed to the latest DWQ guidance on level spreader design,
which is available on our web site. Please keep in mind that it does not matter how far a
discharge point is from a buffer. The stormwater must be flowing in a diffuse manner at
whatever point it eventually reaches the buffer. If the stormwater will not be flowing in a
diffuse manner through the protected buffer at the point it reaches the buffer, then one of
the followinq o a ow
You may provide a nitrogen removing measure such as a forested filter strip,
grassed swale, stormwater wetland, etc. The measure employed should be
designed according to the NC DENR Stormwater Best Management Practices
Manual or other DWQ Guidance available at htt.*
w
9
//h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/mitresto.html. After the nitrogen is treated, the
stormwater can be directly conveyed through the buffer with written DWQ approval.
You may discharge the stormwater t an existing man-made conveyance that
currently conveys stormwater throw the prote buffer (assuming the
conveyance was not constructed in v ati the Rules) as long as that
conveyance does not need to be altered vey the flow. Please remember that
there are no other choices. The fo ng chec . t is intended to help insure that
your application will not be d ed incomplete as a result of improper stormwater
design.
Stormwater Management (for Buffer Rules compliance only - Also, see Section XI):
All stormwater out-falls must be dearly shown and label on t site plan for pro cis in
JBu ed w s. List each out-fall as labeled:
:
tIot? . Level s ading devices designed to the latest WQ e-artd
;. d that merely con locity but do such as rip rap
01 ators are not of these out-falls as labeled on the site
plan provide a D worksheet available at
Option 2: Nitrogen removing measures designed to DWQ Standards aril
proposed for discharges for which diffuse flow through a protected Buffer cannot be
met. List each of these out-falls as labeled on the site plan and provide a DWQ
workshp t vaii at tp / 2o.ehnr.state.nc.uslncwedands/mitresto. tar(
Optio & The storm ter will be discharged to an existing man-made (not
including modified natural annels ormwater
through the Buffer. T was not constructed in violation of the Buffer
Rules. List eac all as labeled:
All stormwater out-fall must meet one of the options abo (Note: if you cannot check this
box your application will likely not be accepted into the expre view process.)
Site Plans:
All applications on properties with DWQ protected buffers must dearly depict the buffers
and any impacts to the buffers on the site plans. The impact maps should clearly depict
both zones of the protected buffers and the proposed impact areas (provided in square
feet).
Surface Water & Buffer Delineations:
Any surface waters subject to DWQ protected buffers must be field located and accurately
depicted on the site plans and impact maps. The width, dimensions and pattern of the
surface water must be delineated. The surface water location must not be taken simply
from a USGS map, soil survey or local municipality's map. The buffers must be measured
from the surface water as required within the applicable buffer protection rule (e.g., all
buffers along streams subject to the Neuse Buffer Rule must be measured from the "top-of-
bank" of the stream and not the centerline of the stream). All streams must be surveyed or
located by GPS and shown precisely on the site plans.
Impact Table:
Please provide additional impact tables that clearly state the area of impact for each
corresponding impact site.
4
s
Variances:
Projects that require a Minor, Major and/or "General" Variance will not be eligible for the
use of the Express Review Program.
Mitigation:
As opposed to applications that are submitted under our regular process, final mitigation
plans must be presented up front (see requirements for Section VIII above). The mitigation
plans must comply with the applicable buffer mitigation rule.
10
SECTION XI - STORMWATER
Please provide the following information in regards to potential stormwater requirements:
The total acreage of the site. (acres)
The total built-out impervious acreage f G.4 acres)
The total area that will be disturbed fqD -- (acres)
If the total area exceeds 20% imperviousness, the development on the site is uniform in
density, and you claim that the total impervious area is less than 30%, you must provide a
complete, detailed breakdown of the assumed built-out conditions. The breakdown must
be detailed enough to show that all potential impervious areas are accounted for.
If there are concentrated areas of development such as multi-family, commercial, cluster,
club houses, etc. that exceed 30% imperviousness and the total imperviousness for the site
does not exceed 30%, a stormwater management plan will likely be required for those
SECTION )(11 - SEWAGE DISPOSAL
V Response must be clear and detailed. Any disposal method that suggests further impacts
??? may be required other than those shown must be dearly addressed on the site plans.
SECTION XIII
1vo Answering yes to either of these responses automatically precludes you from the express
review process.
SECTION XIV - SIGNATURE
The name, position and/or title of the applicant must be in type or long hand script here with
the signature. It should be the same person as described in Part II.
If you have any questions about these requirements, please email the Express Review Program at
[e-mail] and include your question and phone number and the appropriate staff will
respond as soon as possible.
Stormwater management plans must be complete with a final design and an executed
Operation and Maintenance Agreement. There will be no conditional stormwater approvals
for the express review process that allow for approval of the final plans at a later date.
Worksheets must be provided that are available at
httpJth2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/mitresto.html.
areas that exceed 30% imperviousness.
RE: Shoppes at Battle Bridge - Express Review
Subject: RE: Shoppes at Battle Bridge - Express Review
From: "William G. Daniel" <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:46:42 -0500
To: "Amy Chapman" <[e-mail]>
CC: "Cynthia Vanderwiele" <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>,
<[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, "Bob Zarzecki"
<[e-mail]>, "Fred Williams" <[e-mail]>
Amy,
At Bob Zarzecki's request, I am responding to Items 2 & 4 from your 1/18/06 e-mail.
I checked into the volume requirement for the temporary pool. I discovered that I made a mistake when
I ran through the formula initially. The volume that you cite is, of course, correct. Fortunately, it's an
easy fix. We have revised the plan to raise the top of riser by 9" (from El. 274.0 to El. 274.75). This
change results in a temporary pool volume of 50,539 C.F. as compared the required volume of 48,062
C.F.
The geometric design of the wetlands is unchanged. The change in top of riser elevation changes the
routings and draw-down-times. To ensure a draw-down time of 2 to 5 days, we changed the outlet
orifice to a 3" bipe instead of the previously proposed 2". We have rerun the routings and verified that
the the draw-down is between 2 and 5 days. We have also verified that the routings of the 2 and 10-year
storm events will result in no increase in the peak rate of stormwater runoff as compared to
pre-development conditions. The changes result in 10 pages of the originally submitted application
documentation being revised. These pages are:
-Extended Detention Worksheet (1 page)
-BMP Stormwater Wetlands Design Calcs (1 page)
,-Pond Report (1 page)
,Plan View of Proposed Wetlands (1 page)
,,Hydrograph Plots (6 pages)
I have dated and initialed each of the revised pages in the upper left hand corner for ease of
distinguishing them from the corresponding pages that were originally submitted. These revised pages
are included in the attached pdf and are intended to replace the corresponding pages in the originally
submitted application documentation.
Your second review comment/question with my response/explanation is presented below:
Comment
2) The property size is 24.57 acres with 16.62 acres of impervious surface according to page 9 of the
PCN. The stormwater calculations show a drainage area of 19.7 and the impervious area is 13.617. Is
this because portions of the site are owned by someone different from Evergreen and won't be built-out
at the same time as other portions?
Response:
The total project is 24.57 acres, but only 19.7 acres of the total project is contributory to the proposed
wetlands. The contributory area is delineated on Sheet CS-2 included in the application. The portions
of the project that are not contributory to the proposed wetlands are located along the southern boundary
of the overall project. As designated on CS-2, the non-contributory area consists of Parcel 4 and an area
of "future development" located between Parcel 4 and Rock Quarry Road. Parcel 4 is restricted through
conditional use zoning to remain wooded open space. Plans for the area designated as "future
l of 4 1/20/2006 1:37 PM
RE: Shoppes at Battle Bridge - Express Review
development" have not been formulated at this time. Evergreen does not currently own the properties
comprising the non-contributory area.
Please let me know if you need any additional information or explanation regarding the engineering
aspects of this application.
Bill Daniel
Wm. G. Daniel & Assoc., P.A.
1150 S.E. Maynard Rd, Suite 260
Cary, NC 27511
919-467-9708 ph
919-460-7585 fx
From: Bob Zarzecki [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 12:46 PM
To: Amy Chapman
Cc: Cynthia Vanderwiele; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
[e-mail]
Subject: RE: Shoppes at Battle Bridge - Express Review
Amy: I appreciate your quick response. See my comments below.
Bill: Please respond to the stormwater questions.
Thanks.
Bob Zarzecki,
Environmental Specialist
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
From: Amy Chapman [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 3:19 PM
To: Bob Zarzecki
Cc: Cynthia Vanderwiele
Subject: Re: Shoppes at Battle Bridge - Express Review
Hi Bob.
I apologize for not getting to you sooner. I was out sick yesterday, but Cynthia and I were discussing this
one this morning.
We needed to know:
1) Have you spoken with the Corps about using the wetland for stormwater detention? We'll need
verification from the Corps that the stormwater BMP location is acceptable to them;
I have not spoken to them specifically about this project. However, their current SOP is to allow the use
of NWP 18 for stormwater devices. Of course, the impacts will have to be less than 1 /10th of an acre
(which they are) and comply with all of the other conditions of the permit. This is why we requested the
stormwater impacts under NWP 18 and road impacts under NWP39. You'll of course only have to
review this under GC3402 since it covers both NWP39 and 18. Let me know if you still want their
! of 4 1/20/2006 1:37 PM
RE: Shoppes at Battle Bridge - Express Review
verification. Of course we won't have the official verification letter until they approve it (most likely 45
days from when it was submitted), but I may be able to get an email confirmation if you need it. Jean
Manuelle over there can provide you a verbal confirmation if you want to call her on it (876-8441).
2) The property size is 24.57 acres with 16.62 acres of impervious surface according to page 9 of the
PCN. The stormwater calculations show a drainage area of 19.7 and the impervious area is 13.617. Is
this because portions of the site are owned by someone different from Evergreen and won't be built-out
at the same time as other portions?;
Bill can you please explain this to Amy.
3) We will need a copy of the EEP's approval letter for the buffer mitigation credits; and lastly
I attached the EEP request form. I don't have their approval yet. However, my understanding is that
EEP is still continuing to accept any and all buffer mitigation under the Riparian Buffer Restoration
Fund, just not stream or wetland mitigation under the Wetland Restoration Fund. I can reverify this if
you like. Let me know. I'll of course send over their acceptance letter as soon as I get it.
4) Please check your calculations for the temporary pool volume for your constructed wetland. It appears
to be less than the required storage volume (Pool design:28,090cu.ft verses Required design: 48,062
cu.ft).
Bill can you double check these calculations and respond to Amy.
We're putting together a letter for this one, but we wanted you to have a heads up for what would be in
the "on hold" letter.
I understand. Thanks. We should have you the stormwater information ASAP. Let me know if you
need more on Items 1 and 3 above.
-Amy
Bob Zarzecki wrote:
Amy:
Please let me know the status of the Shoppes at Battle Bridge Express Project that I hand delivered
last week?
Bob Zarzecki,
Environmental Specialist
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
From: William G. Daniel [mailto:bdaniel(awmgda.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 8:56 AM
To: Bob Zarzecki
Cc: Fred Williams; idw.evergreendev(a),charter.net; ssexton(a),sextonconstruction.com
t. of 4 1/20/2006 1:37 PM
RE: Shoppes at Battle Bridge - Express Review
Subject: Shoppes at Battle Bridge - Express Review
Bob,
Any word from Cynthia on the permitting?
William G. Daniel, P.E.
William G. Daniel & Associates, P.A.
1150 S.E. Maynard Road, Suite 260
Cary, NC 27511
919-467-9708 ph
919-460-7585 fx
Amy Chapman
Environmental Specialist III
NC Division of Water Quality
401 /Wetlands Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: amy.chapman(ancmail.net
<!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]-->
Content-Description: ShoppesDWQ rev011906.pdf
ShoppesDWQ rev011906.pdf Content-Type: application/octet-stream
Content-Encoding: base64
4 of 4 1/20/2006 1:37 PM
RE: Shoppes at Battle Bridge - Express Review
Subject: RE: Shoppes at Battle Bridge - Express Review
From: "Bob Zarzecki" <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:22:24 -0500
To: "Amy Chapman" <[e-mail]>
CC: "Cynthia Vanderwiele" <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>,
<[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>
Amy: I appreciate your quick response. See my comments below.
Bill: Please respond to the stormwater questions.
Thanks.
Bob Zarzecki,
Environmental Specialist
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
From: Amy Chapman [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 3:19 PM
To: Bob Zarzecki
Cc: Cynthia Vanderwiele
Subject: Re: Shoppes at Battle Bridge - Express Review
Hi Bob.
I apologize for not getting to you sooner. I was out sick yesterday, but Cynthia and I were discussing this
one this morning.
We needed to know:
1) Have you spoken with the Corps about using the wetland for stormwater detention? We'll need
verification from the Corps that the stormwater BMP location is acceptable to them;
I have not spoken to them specifically about this project. However, their current SOP is to allow the use
of NWP18 for stormwater devices. Of course, the impacts will have to be less than 1/10th of an acre
(which they are) and comply with all of the other conditions of the permit. This is why we requested the
stormwater impacts under NWP18 and road impacts under NWP39. You'll of course only have to
review this under GC3402 since it covers both NWP39 and 18. Let me know if you still want their
verification. Of course we won't have the official verification letter until they approve it (most likely 45
days from when it was submitted), but I may be able to get an email confirmation if you need it. Jean
Manuelle over there can provide you a verbal confirmation if you want to call her on it (876-8441).
2) The property size is 24.57 acres with 16.62 acres of impervious surface according to page 9 of the
PCN. The stormwater calculations show a drainage area of 19.7 and the impervious area is 13.617. Is
this because portions of the site are owned by someone different from Evergreen and won't be built-out
at the same time as other portions?;
Bill can you please explain this to Amy.
3) We will need a copy of the EEP's approval letter for the buffer mitigation credits; and lastly
of 3 1/19/2006 12:25 PM
RE: Shoppes at Battle Bridge - Express Review
I attached the EEP request form. I don't have their approval yet. However, my understanding is that
EEP is still continuing to accept any and all buffer mitigation under the Riparian Buffer Restoration
Fund, just not stream or wetland mitigation under the Wetland Restoration Fund. I can reverify this if
you like. Let me know. I'll of course send over their acceptance letter as soon as I get it.
4) Please check your calculations for the temporary pool volume for your constructed wetland. It appears
to be less than the required storage volume (Pool design:28,090cu.ft verses Required design: 48,062
cu.ft).
Bill can you double check these calculations and respond to Amy.
We're putting together a letter for this one, but we wanted you to have a heads up for what would be in
the "on hold" letter.
I understand. Thanks. We should have you the stormwater information ASAP. Let me know if you
need more on Items 1 and 3 above.
-Amy
Bob Zarzecki wrote:
Amy:
Please let me know the status of the Shoppes at Battle Bridge Express Project that I hand delivered
last week?
Bob Zarzecki,
Environmental Specialist
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
From: William G. Daniel [mailto:bdaniel(cr),wmgda.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 8:56 AM
To: Bob Zarzecki
Cc: Fred Williams; idw.evergreendev(a,charter.net; ssexton(a-,)sextonconstruction.com
Subject: Shoppes at Battle Bridge - Express Review
Bob,
Any word from Cynthia on the permitting?
William G. Daniel, P.E.
William G. Daniel & Associates, P.A.
1150 S.E. Maynard Road, Suite 260
Cary, NC 27511
919-467-9708 ph
919-460-7585 fx
of 3 1/19/2006 12:25 PM
Vy/?!
Michael F. Easley, Governor
?O ?i William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
- f Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
January 19, 2006
DWQ EXP No. 06-0001
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Evergreen-Battle Bridge, LLC;
Attn: Mr. Fred Williams
422 Aiken Hunt Circle
Columbia, SC 29223
Subject Property: Shoppes at Battle Bridge
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION-EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM
Dear Mr. Williams:
On January 12, 2006, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application to impact 0.036
acres of wetland, 38 linear feet of streams, and 15,877 square feet (A) of riparian buffer area at the above
referenced site. The DWQ has determined that the application will require additional information in order
to review and provide an approval to impact the above resources. Unless we receive the additional
information requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A
NCAC 2H .0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional
information.
Please provide the following information so that we may continue to review your project:
1. Please verify that the Corps of Engineers will allow the stormwater BMP to be sited within the
jurisdictional wetland.
2. According to page 9 of the application you submitted, the property size is 24.57 acres with 16.62
acres of impervious surface. The stormwater calculations show a drainage area of 19.7 acres and
the impervious area is 13.617 acres. Stormwater management must be provided for the entire
project.
3. Please provide a copy of the acceptance letter from the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NC EEP) for the 27,413 buffer mitigation credits; and
4. Please check your calculations for the temporary pool volume for your constructed wetland. It
appears to be less than the required storage volume. Please resubmit your calculations for the
wetland pool design.
Please respond within five (5) days of the date of this letter by sending five (5) sets of this information to
me in writing. The Express Review Program is a process that requires all parties to participate in a timely
manner. If the DWQ feels the Express Review Program is the incorrect review program for your project,
then we may have to return your application and have it reviewed through our regular 401 Water Quality
Certification Program.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters
or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not
NpOne
thCazolina
401 Oversight/ Express Review Permitting Unit aturally
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncvvetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Shoppes at Battle Bridge
Page 2 of 2
January 19, 2006
authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Amy Chapman at [phone] or Cynthia Van Der
Wiele at [phone] if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss
this matter.
Sincerely,
Cyndi Karoly,
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBK/asc%vdw
cc: USACE Raleigh Field Office
Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
Bob Zarzecki, S&EC, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 060001ShoppesatBattleBridge(Wake)EXP + HOLD
Re: Shoppes at Battle Bridge - Express Review
Subject: Re: Shoppes at Battle Bridge - Express Review
From: Amy Chapman <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:19:28 -0500
To: Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
CC: Cynthia Vanderwiele <[e-mail]>
Hi Bob.
I apologize for not getting to you sooner. I was out sick yesterday, but Cynthia and I were discussing this
one this morning.
We needed to know:
1) Have you spoken with the Corps about using the wetland for stormwater detention? We'll need
verification from the Corps that the stormwater BMP location is acceptable to them;
2) The property size is 24.57 acres with 16.62 acres of impervious surface according to page 9 of the
PCN. The stormwater calculations show a drainage area of 19.7 and the impervious area is 13.617. Is
this because portions of the site are owned by someone different from Evergreen and won't be built-out
at the same time as other portions?;
3) We will need a copy of the EEP's approval letter for the buffer mitigation credits; and lastly
4) Please check your calculations for the temporary pool volume for your constructed wetland. It appears
to be less than the required storage volume (Pool design:28,090cu.ft verses Required design: 48,062
cu.ft).
We're putting together a letter for this one, but we wanted you to have a heads up for what would be in
the "on hold" letter.
-Amy
Bob Zarzecki wrote:
Amy:
Please let me know the status of the Shoppes at Battle Bridge Express Project that I hand delivered
last week?
Bob Zarzecki,
Environmental Specialist
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
From: William G. Daniel [mailto:bdaniel(a-),wmgda.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 8:56 AM
To: Bob Zarzecki
Cc: Fred Williams; jdw.evergreendev(a),charter.net; ssexton(o-),sextonconstruction.com
Subject: Shoppes at Battle Bridge - Express Review
Bob,
Any word from Cynthia on the permitting?
William G. Daniel, P.E.
William G. Daniel & Associates, P.A.
1150 S. E. Maynard Road, Suite 260
Cary, NC 27511
1 of 2 1/18/2006 3:19 PM
UP 0 6 0 0 01 _
0 ? -?° 11
Soil & En men al Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road Ralei Wokh Ta 27614 • Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
January 11, 2006
S&EC Project# 8450.W3
To: US Army Corps of Engineers N.C. Division of Water Quality
USACE Regulatory Field Office 401 Oversight and Express Review Unit
Attn: Monte Mathews Attn: Cyndi Karoly & Amy Chapman
6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 276,15 Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
*EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM*
From: Bob Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Nationwide Permit & General Water Quality Certification
Shoppes at Battle Bridge`, Raleigh, NC
On behalf of the owner; Evergreen-Battle Bridge, LLC, please find attached a complete application and
supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) and the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) that the activities proposed below may precede
under Nationwide Permit 3,9 and General Water Quality Certification 3402. Please contact me at (919)
846-5900 if you have any questions or require additional information.
PROJF.C.T Si IMMARY
Project Name Sho es at Battle Bridge
Project Type Retail Shopping Center/ Commercial
Owner / Applicant Evergreen - Battle Bridge, LLC
County Wake
Nearest Town Raleigh
Waterbod Name UT to Neuse River
Basin / Sub-basin 03-04-02
Index Number 27-22.5
USGS Cataloging Unit Upper Neuse 0302020.1
Class C NSW
IMPACT Si IMMARY
Attachments:
Pre-construction Notification (PCN) Application Form & Supplemental Information
$3,000 Express Review Application Fee to DWQ
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025, Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] _ Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Stream Impact (acres): 0.007
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.036
Open Water Impact (acres): D

Impact to waters of the U.S. (acres)
Total
0.043
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 38
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge S&EC Project Number 8450.w3
PCN Application ?1, ZOOS January 11, 2006
A, 1=RX
Office Use Only: DENR - WAT
%IWO ATERBRANCH Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(lt any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ® Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 39 & 18
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: EVERGREEN - BATTLE BRIDGE, LLC• Attn: Fred Williams (Manager)!
Mailing Address: 422 Aiken Hunt Circle
Columbia South Carolina 29223
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: will 8 78 7kbellsouth.net
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Bob Zarzecki
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC)
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: bzarzecki&sandec.com
Page I of 10
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
PCN Application
III. Project Information
S&EC Project Number 8450.w3
January 11, 2006
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: SHOPPES at BATTLE BRIDGE
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): n/a
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 1731484408
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Lots 1 to 5. George Rose Builders, Inc.
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):
The site is located on the south-east corner of Battle Bride Road SR 2552) and Rock
QupM Road (SR 2542). From Raleigh take the Inner Belding (I-440) to the US-64 bypass
Take the US-64 bypass east to S New Hope Road Take S New Hope Road south (right) to
Rock Quarry Road. Take Rock Quarry Road east (left) to Battle Bridge Road. Take Battle
Bridge Road east (left) to the project site. The project site will be on the south (right) side of
Battle Bridge Road approximately 0.21 miles from the intersection with Rock Ouarry Road
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.7239 ON 78.5462 °W
6. Property size (acres): 24.57
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT to Neuse River (Stream Index No. 27-22.0
8. River Basin: Neuse River Basin (Basin & Sub-basin No. 03-04-02)
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mqps/.)
Page 2 of 10
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
PCN Application
S&EC Project Number 8450.w3
January 11, 2006
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application:
The site is approximately 50% wooded and 50% open fields. The general land use / land
class is "Acres > 10 with one or more houses on the property" (rural residential) and vacant
land. Battle Bridge Road is an existing two lane state road with grass shoulders.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project includes the construction of a retail shopping center and associated widening of
the south side of Battle Bridge Road to one half of a 60-foot B-B section with sidewalk.
Heave equipment typically used for site grading, parking lot and commercial/retail building
construction will be used.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
The purpose of the proposed work is to construct a retail shopping center on the property.
(The widening of Battle Bridge Road is required to safely handle traffic ingress and egress
from the proposed shopping center.)
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
There have been no wetland permits or certifications issued for this property or project The
jurisdictional waters were determined by Ms. Andrea Wade of the USACE on June 27, 2005.
The surface waters subject to the Neuse River Buffer Rules were determined by Ms. Deborah
Edwards of the DWQ Express Review Program on December 6, 2004 (DWQ EXP# 04-1863).
No Section 404 Permits, Section 401 Water Quality Certifications or Neuse River Buffer
Authorization Certificates have been applied for or issued for this property or project.
(It should be noted that the DWQ determination as to the origin of the surface water subject to
the Neuse River Buffer was made higher in the drainage then the Corps determination of the
origin of the stream. The Corps did determine that jurisdictional waters and wetlands (not
streams) extended up to and beyond the DWQ buffer determination.)
Page 3 of 10
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
PCN Application
V. Future Project Plans
S&EC Project Number 8450.w3
January 11, 2006
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
There are no future Section 404 Permit Section 401 Water Qualily Certification or Neuse River
Buffer Authorization Certificate requests anticipated for this project
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
The proposed impacts for the required widening of Battle Bridge Road total 38 feet of stream
channel, 0.004 acres of wetlands and 3,811 square feet of buffer. The proposed impacts for the
construction of the shopping center and required stormwater management facility total 0.032
acres of wetlands and 12,066 square feet of buffer. All proposed impacts involve the permanent
discharge of fill in waters and buffers.
2. Individually .list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
es/no) feet
SHEET 2
(NWP39) ROAD WIDENING Headwater Forest No 0 0.004
SHEET 3 STORMWATER Headwater Forest No 0 0
032
(NWP18) WETLAND .
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.036
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.036
Page 4 of 10
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
PCN Application
S&EC Project Number 8450.w3
January 11, 2006
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Before Impact linear feet acres
SHEET2
(NWP 39)
UT to Neuse River
WIDROAD ENING
Intermittent
6
38
0.007
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 38 0.007
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma Name Waterbody
(if applicable) e)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc. Area of
Impact
acres

Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.007
Wetland Impact acres : 0.036
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.043
Total Stream Impact linear feet : 38
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Page 5 of 10
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
PCN Application
S&EC Project Number 8450.w3
January 11, 2006
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The impacts required for the widening of Battle Bridge Road are unavoidable in that they are
required for the safe ingress and egress from the proposed shopping center and that the existing
road location dictated the location of the road widening The impacts required for the
construction of the shopping center and stormwater management pond are unavoidable due to
site grading and stormwater management constraints due to topographic considerations
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Page 6 of 10
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
PCN Application
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
S&EC Project Number 8450.w3
January 11, 2006
in North Carolina, available at
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The proposed impacts total 38 feet of intermittent stream and 0.036 acres of wetlands As
such, the applicant does not propose any mitigation (beyond onsite stormwater management
and buffer mitigation) for the impacts. If mitigation is required the applicant proposes
payment into the Wetlands Restoration Fund administered by the NC EEP
The proposed buffer impacts associated with the stormwater wetland are classified as
"allowable w/ mitigation" The applicant proposes payment into the Riparian Buffer
Restoration Fund for these impacts. The proposed buffer impacts associated with the road
widening are classified as "exem tp " or possibly "allowable" and as such do not require
mitigation.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):.. 27,413
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX.
Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
*Note: The road widening is an existing state road. It will be widened onto private property.
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Page 7 of 10
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
PCN Application
S&EC Project Number 8450.w3
January 11, 2006
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
X.
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify V Yes ® No ?
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
SHEET 2 - ROAD WIDENING
* Impact Required
Zone i-,.,..o c 01 Multiplier
1 2,559 3 (2 for Catawba) 0
2 1,252 1.5 0
Total I 3,811 I I 0
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
SHEET 3 - STORMWATER WETLAND
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(sauare feetl Mitiuntinn
1 6,209 3 (2 for Catawba) 18,627
2 5,857 1.5 8,786
Total 12,066 27,413
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
Page 8 of 10
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
PCN Application
S&EC Project Number 8450.w3
January 11, 2006
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund (NC EEP)
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
The property is 24.57 acres in size and the total built out impervious area is anticipated to be
16.62 acres (or 67.6%). A stormwater wetland designed to the current NC DENR Stormwater
BMP Manual is proposed to treat the runoff from the property. The stormwater wetland is
proposed to be located within the Neuse River Buffer and is proposed to discharge directly to the
culvert under Battle Bridge Road. We understand that this is an "allowable w/ mitigation" use
and as such have proposed payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund. The posed
location of the stormwater wetland was determined due to topographic constraints.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sewer - The City of Raleigh will ensure that the proposed addition will not exceed available
capacity of their treatment facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
The project involves the construction of a retail shopping center to provide services to the
surrounding market and it is not anticipated that it will result in additional development that
could impact nearby downstream water quality.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
Page 9 of 10
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
PCN Application
S&EC Project Number 8450.w3
January 11, 2006
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control). .

January 11, 2006
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10
So 1l Inc Environme?ital Consultants, PA
14014 Rwm hide lied . Rd*% Nair Congas 27614 . Rhme: [phone] • Farr (919) 846.916
All Mada To I.ie Filled lire ft The Qaml LandownKor unto' 1 Official
Name: =FCC--K?Ei-l tit T tl- 1?tCl DC a 6 t., C
Address: q-2-7- A 1 V X-t 4 B!Af1 1 Q t rz. C. L C
Gr, t? rel. R,-% %-:S t S G Z 9 z- Z 3
Phone: 80 S- c!!56 a•5-2 0 3
SHaPPES A5 ZTTL.G 1`StZtC>(?E
Project Name/Description: Cst4g:,pn N? S&EC Project #
Date: 3?1t. 0 3 2-610 G
The Departamat of the Army
U .S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn:
Field Office:
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom it may Concern:
I, the cumo landowner or municipal official, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Eavirom mental Consultants,
PA to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit spplications,.tofiunish upon request supplemental
information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The 3 r day of, ?I,N A, YT Zn0 G .
This notification supersedes any previous eoirespondenae concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: Thb authodzation, for Usbalty and profesdond courtesy ressoas, to vaM only for government af&bk to
enter the property when accompanied by Sdt1EC staff. You should ride S& EC to arrange a dto meeting prior to
vidting the rite.
Print Property Owner's or Municipal Official's Name
:1.,00- ?.C ?ill??anu? ? M i mm - "
Property Owner's or Municipal Official's Signature
cc: Me. Cyndi Karoly
NCDENR-DWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
cc: W. Bob Zsrzocld
Soil & Environmental Consult== PA
? Su??bst?
236 tephillip Court. Suite C 3817-E tawnWo E
Cw=4 NC 28025 acembow, NC Y
Phone [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
AGENT AUMORI?.ATION FORM
N
UTM 17 721954E 3956114N (WGS84/NAD83)
ProjectM Scale: Garner, NC
8450.w3 1°:2000° USGS Topo Quad
Project Date: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mgr.: bz 12.30-05 Shoppes Battle Bridge 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
@
[phone] • [phone]
Wake County, NC Web Page: www.SandEC.com
N
Project #: Scale:
8450.w3 1":2000'
' Mgr.: BZ I 2-30.05
Wake County Soil Survey
Sheet 70
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
Wake County, NC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
%
## H `
.9 I
e \.
xl
V ? P2
... ..<1 0 ?F I - tti;
n
N=
N s
`> `F
N 70
T r
O u :.
it ^'F
D
r.
\ \J
\\ \Y
a N "%?\ u
..:, f? i a \\ 1
:? \ `??av y as Nw? J7/a ?7ri ::
J?'• ,o• ??,;?' / V, rte'
\
// V !'? 7i sE
iJJ{J ?N ?? ?I
/
i J JJ /./^Nk / \
T

m. G,
niel
ssoc.
Engineering Planning
Landscape Architecture
1150 SE MAYNARD ROAD
SUITE 260
CARY, NC 27511
[phone]
GRAPHIC SCALE
0' 200' 400' 600'
CHANNEL,
WETLANDS, & NRB IMPACT MAP
FOR
BATTLE BRIDGE ROAD WIDENING
(SHOPPES AT BATTLE BRIDGE)
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE III = 200' DECEMBER 22, 2005
(IN FEET)
I INCH = 200 FT PREPARED BY: WILLIAM G. DANIEL, PE
SHEET 1 OF 3
L: / r 1
R
-I/AREA 0<= CHANNEL
IMPACT
tJUSI C IONAL WETLANDS TOE OF % - -....._
1 i AS PEP 0SACE SL6PE / /
BEGIN INT. IMPORTANT CHANNEL
1 T j Zv TOPO BANK END JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
p \ p ' / M l PER USACE /-
I i ,
/ ZONE I RIPARIAN BUFFER
/
ZONE 2 RIPARIAN BUFFER
$f3
E GIN BUFFERED CHANNEL /
PER NCDWQ
i /
1 BEGIN JURISDICTION
' WETLAND / IMPACT (ROAD WIDENING)
38 LF(303 SF) - CHANNEL IMPACT /
9 LF(.004 AC) -WETLAND IMPACT j
i / 2559 SF - ZONE 1 NRB IMPACT /
1 \ r / 1252 SF - ZONE 2 NRB IMPACT /
t
m• G• CHANNEL,
", nle1 WETLANDS, & NRB IMPACT MAP
ssoc. FOR
Engineering Planning
Landscape Architecture
1150 SE MAYNARD ROAD BATTLE BRIDGE ROAD WIDENING
SUITE 260
GARY, NC 27 75!1
IMPACT AREA
[phone]
0' 50' GRAPHIC SCALE 100' 150' WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
- SCALE 1 50' DECEMBER 22, 2005
(IN FEET)
I INCH = 50 FT PREPARED BY.- WILLIAM G. DANIEL. PE SHEET 2 OF 3
,
, `.1 \ `PROP O \ IDEN??G \
t \ ` TOP OF BANK\ TOE OF/SL E
ZONE 1141PARIAN BU4ER -
BEGIN BUFFERED CH
` PER NCDWQ 1
I ZONE 2 RIPARIAN BUFFER
r7 r-w
/ f' ff " r JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
PER USACE
IMPACT (STORMWATER WETLAND)
/ 0 LF(0 SF) - Ct(ANNEL IMPACT
117 LF(.032 AC) - WETLAND IMPACT
6209 SF - ZONE 1 NRB IMPACT
5857 SF:- ZONE 2 NRB IMPACT
i
/ AP ROXIMATE / i
LIMITS OF/ / WETLANDS; /
PROPOSED STORMWATER
WEhAAD /
j / FF ZONE 1 j
// ! > ZONE 2 /
rm• G• CHANNEL,
I? nlel WETLANDS, & NRB IMPACT MAP
?ssoe.
Engineering Planning FOR
Landscape Architecture
1150 SE MAYNARD ROAD SHOPPES AT BATTLE BRIDGE
SUITE 260
CARP, 27511
[phone] IMPACT AREA (STORMWATER WETLAND)
0' 50' GRAPHIC SCALE 100' 150' WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE 1 50' DECEMBER 22, 2005
(IN FEET)
I INCH = 50 FT PREPARED BY.- WILLIAM G. DANIEL, PE SHEET 3 OF 3
PROPOSED STORMWA TER WETLANDS
1 " = 40' January 3, 2006

i
PROP`.
-34,

.?
1 \
.ice ?• ,
PROP
a....: PROP. \ \
JB
._e
...?........._•i \
/
FOREBAY
j
Try

i
PROP-5k10,
SPILLWAY

V/
X
XX
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - 441 EXTENDED DETENTION (and POCKET') WETLAND WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following infomnation):
Project Name : S4io?t s A-t' nr s k „tom t?
ContactPerson: Uj «. L, i,L. r-A G . 1 >"-1 t E L.- Phone Number: (!I r9) 4 47.9'y0
For projects with multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet applies to:
Permanent Pool Elevation z7 3.00 ft. (elevation of the orifice invert out)
Temporary Pool Elevation 2--7 4-- 0 c-'s ft. (elevation of the outlet structure invert in)

Permanent Pool Surface Area 7-7- d 3 4 sq. ft. (water surface area at permanent pool elevation)
Drainage Area _ to . 7b ac. (on-site and off-de drainage to the basin)
Impel vious Area t 3 . G t 7 ac. (on-site mid otl site drainage to the basin)
Forebay Surface Area Lt . 3 0 sq. ft. (at permanent pool elevation approximately 15%r
Marsh (r -r Surface Area g r Sop sq. ft. (at permanent pod elevation approximately 3596)•
Marsh 9"-18" Surface Area sQ 4 sq. ft. (at permanent pool elevation approximately 35%)'
Micro Pool Surface Area z 54 sq. ft. (at permanent pool elevation approximately 15%r

Temporary Pool Volume 2. 8.6 10- cu. IL (volume detained on top of the permanent pod)
SAIDA used 2..,04- (surface area to drainage area na llop
Diameter of Odfice z" in. (draw down orifice diameter)
11. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation Is attached. It a
regtimment has not been met, ettaCh an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An Incomplete submittal package will result In a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project
AAnMicants Initials
??? The temporary pool controls runoff from the 1 Inch rain.
? The basin side slopes are no steeper than 3:1.
? A planting plan for the marsh areas with plant species and densities is provided.
? Vegetation above the permanent pool elevation is specified.
? An emergency drain is provided to drain the basin.
? The temporary pool draws down in 2 to 5 days.
? -z-? Sediment storage Is provided in the permanent pod.
? 5?,? A sediment disposal area is provided.
? Access Is provided for maintenance.
,3 site specific, signed and notarized operation and maintenance agreement is provided.
The drainage area (including any otfsite area) is delineated on a site plan.
?`??Access Is provided for maintenance.
_. Plan details for the wetland are provided..
fart details for the Inlet and outlet are provided.
-Wp1 site specie operation and maintenance agreement, signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided (see
http./ih2o.ohnr.state.nc.uslncwe0andsloandm.doc).
• Pocket Wetlands have different design parameters and are only assumed to remove 35% TSS - See pp. 19 and 20 of the NC DENR
Stormwater BMP Manual, April 1999.10% open water, 50% high marsh, 40°k low marsh.
112/2006
Shoppes at Battle Bridge
Raleigh, North Carolina
BMP Stormwater Wetlands Design Calculations
SAIDA Ratios for Permanent Pool Sizing to Achieve 954/1a TRR Rednctinn
YWERVIOUS

PERCENT

3.00 PERMANENT POOL
DEPTHS IN FEET
4.00 5.00

6.00
100/0 0.59 0.49 0.43 0.35
200/0 0.97 0.79 0.70 0.59
30% 1.34 1.08 0.97 0.83
40% 1.73 1.43 125 1.05
50% 2.06 1.73 1.50 1.30
60% 2.40 2.03 1.71 1.51
70% 2.88 2.40 2.07 1.79
Wetland Area Ac. Description
1 19.70 Located ad'acent to Battle Bridge Road
Normal Pool Surface Area Calculations
Wetland 1W.
% DEPTH
(FM SAIDA POOL
AREA
1 69.12 3 2.84 24,352
SURFACE AREA REQUIRED (SF) = 24,352
SURFACE AREA PROVIDED (SF) = 27,030
Shoppes at Battle Bridge
BMP Design Data
12119
Shoppes at Battle Bridge SP43-05
Prallminary Pne Development Stormwater Runoff Calculatlons
(Rational Afethoo
-Pre-Develoament (Z -Year Event)
Q = CxIxA
0.35 - C Coe' ffident of Runoff (dimensionless)
4.65 = I Rainfall Intensity for a given tie to peak Cn/hr)
19.7 = A Drainage Area (Ac.)
32.09 =Q2 (cfs)
Tc '= Time. of concentration =(( LA31H)^.385)/128
10 Tc
2025 =L Hydraulic length of watershed
64 =H Height of most remote point above outlet
I = Intensity gf(h+t)
4.65 = I (in/hr)
132
18 rh
10 -t
From "Elements of Urban Stomnwater Deslgr
by H. Rooney Malcolm, PE
Pre•Developinent. (10 Year Pveno
Q = CxlxA
0.35 = C Coefflclent of Runoff.(dimensionless)
6.03 = I Rainfall Intensity for a given tie to peak (in/hr)
15.7. = A Drainage Area (Ac.)
41.57 OQio (cfs)
To = Time of concentration =(( L"3M)^.385)1128
10 Tc
2025 =L Hydraulic length of watershed
64 -=H Height of most remote point above outlet
1=Intensity a g/(h+t)
6.03 = I irdhr)
195 =g
22 =h
10 i-St
From "dements of Urban Stormwater-Design
by H. Rooney Malcolm, PE
12119x,
Pre-DeX&Ment (t 00 Year Event)
f2 = QdxA
0.36 = C C"Odent of Runoff (dimenslonless)
8.27 = I Rainfall Intensity for a given do to peak (in/hr)
19.7 = A Drainage Area (Ac.)
57.02 =01ao (Cfs)
Tc = Time of concentration =(( 03AV.385)/128
.10 TIC
2025 =L Hydraulic length of watershed
64 =H Height of most remote point above outlet
1= fntensity r 91(h+t)
8.27 = I Qr9hr)
290 =g
25 -h
10 ?. .
From "Elements of Urban Starmwater Design'
by. H: Rooney Malcolm, PE
Pond Report
Hydraflow HydrognWhs by Intelisolve Monday, Jan 2 2006, 4:20 PM
Pond No. 1 - Shops at BB • Pond
Pond Data
Pond storage is based on known contour areas. Average end area method used.
Stage I Storage Table
Stage (ft) Elevation (ft) Contour area (so) Incr. Storage (cult) Total storage (cult)
0.00 270.00 8,000 0 0
1.00 271.00 12,025 10,013 10,013
2.00 272.00 18,920 15,473 25,485
2.50 272.50 22,068 10.247 35,732
3.00 273.00 27,030 12,275 48,007
4.00 274.00 29,149 28,090 76,096
5.00 275.00 31,327 30,238 106,334
6.00 276.00 33,564 32,446 138,780
Culvert I Orifice Structures Weir Structures
[A] CBl [Cl [D] [A] 1131 IC] [D]
Rise (in) = 36.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 Crest Len (ft) = 30.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Span (in) = 36.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 Crest El. (ft) = 274.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. Barrels = 1 1 0 0 Weir Coeff. = 3.33 0.00 0.00 0.00
Invert El. (ft) = 259.00 273.00 0.00 0.00 Weir Type = Riser - - ---
Length (ft) = 125.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Multistage = Yes No No No
Slope (eh) = 1.44 1.00 0.00 0.00
N -Value = .013 .011 .000 .000
Oric Coeff. = 0.60 0.60 0.00 0.00
Multistage = n/a No No No EAltration = 0.000 In/hr (Contour) Taliwater Elev. = 0.00 ft
Note: Q dvertlOdfice outflows he" been analyzed under inlet and outlet control.
Stage I Storage I Discharge Table
Stage Storage Elevation CIV A CIV 8 CIV C CIV D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfll Total
ft cuff ft cfs cfs Cis cf$ cfs cfs cis cfs cfs cis
0.00 0 270.00 0.00 0.00 -- 0.00 --- - --- - 0.00
1.00 10.013 271.00 104.89 0.00 - --- 0.00 - - - - 0.00
2.00 25,485 272.00 104.89 0.00 - - 0.00 - - --- --- 0.00
2.50 35,732 272.50 104.89 0.00 - --- 0.00 --- - - - 0.00
3.00 48,007 273.00 104.89 0.00 - --- 0.00 - -- - --- 0.00
4.00 76,096 274.00 104.89 0.10 - --- 0.00 - - -- - 0.10
5.00 106,334 275.00 104.89 0.15 - -- 99.90 - - - - 100.05
6.00 138,780 276.00 133.14 0.18 - -- 133.13 - - - - 133.31
Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisoive Monday, Jan 2 2006, 4:21 PM
Hyd. No. 2
Post Shops BB Pond
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 12.08 cfs
Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Max. Elevation = 274.24 ft
Reservoir name = Shops at BB - Pond Max. Storage = 83,367 cuft
Storage Indication method used. Wet pond routing start elevation = 273.001t.
Q {cfs) Post Shops BB Pond
Hyd. No. 2 - 2 Yr
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0 00
Hydrograph Volume - 24,521 cult
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Hyd No. 2 Hyd No. 1 (LT?J Req. Stor = 83,367 cuft
80 90
Time (min)
Hydrograph Plot
Hydrallow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Monday, Jan 12006, 4:22 PM
Hyd. No. 2
Post Shops BB Pond
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 12.08 cfs
Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Max. Elevation = 274.24 ft
Reservoir name = Shops at BB - Pond Max. Storage = 83,367 cult
Storage Indication method used. Wet pond routing start elevation = 273.00 ft. Hydrograph Volume = 24,521 cult
Elev (ft)
276.00
Post Shops BB Pond
Hyd. No. 2 - 2 Yr
275.00

274.00
273.00 1
0
10 20 30
1. Shops at BB - Pond
Elev (
276.0
275.0
274.0
273.0
40 50 60 70 80 90
Time (min)

Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Monday, Jan 2 2006,4:22 PM
Hyd. No. 2
Post Shops BB Pond
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 27.68 cfs
Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Max. Elevation = 274.42 ft
Reservoir name = Shops at BB - Pond Max. Storage = 88,878 cult
Storage Indication method used. Wet pond routing start elevation - 273.00 ft. Hydrograph Volume = 35,674 cult
Q (cfs)
Q (cfs;
90.00
4
- 90.00
80.00 80.00 80.00

-----
70
00 - 70
00
. .
-
6 - -- 00
60
0.00 .

50
00 50
00
. .
EE
)

- 40
00
40.00 .
00
30.00 30.

20
0 00
20
.
0 .

10
0 ??- 10
00
.
0 .

0
Post Shops BB Pond
Hyd. No. 2 --10 Yr
10 20 30
Hyd No. 2 Hyd No. 1
40 50 60 70
[L7 Req. Stor = 88,878 cuft
80
Time (min)

Hydrograph Plot

Hydrallow Hydrographs by lntelisoive Monday, Jan 22006, 4:22 PM
Hyd. No. 2
Post Shops BB Pond
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 27.68 cfs
Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 1. Max. Elevation = 274.42 ft
Reservoir name = Shops at BB - Pond Max. Storage = 88,878 cult

Storage Indication method used. Wet pond routing start elevation = 273.00 ft. Hydrograph Volume = 35,874 cult
Elev (ft)
276.00
275.00
274.00
273.00
Post Shops BB Pond
Hyd. No. 2 -10 Yr

Elev (
276.0
275.01
274.01
273 0i
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Time (min)
1. Shops at BB -Pond

Hydrograph Plot

Hydrallow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Monday, Jan 2 2006,4:22 PM
Hyd. No. 2
Post Shops BB Pond
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 54.44 cfs
Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Max. Elevation = 274.67 ft
Reservoir name = Shops at BB - Pond Max. Storage = 96,209 cuft

Storage Indication method used. Wet pond routing start elevation = 273.00 ft. Hydrograph Volume - 54,406 cult
Post Shops BB Pond
(off) Hyd. No. 2 -100 Yr
120.00
100.00
80.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
0.00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Hyd No. 2 Hyd No. 1 ® Req. Stor = 96,209 cuft
70
Time (min)

Hydrograph Plot
HydraFlow Hydrographs by Intellsohre Monday, Jan 2 2006, 4:22 PM
Hyd. No. 2
Post Shops BB Pond
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 54.44 cfs
Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Max. Elevation = 274.67 ft
Reservoir name = Shops at BB - Pond Max. Storage = 96,209 cult

Storage Indication method used. wet pond routing start elevation = 273.00 ft. Hydrograph Volume = 54,406 cult
Elev (ft)
276.00
275.00
274.00
273 00
Post Shops BB Pond
Hyd. No. 2 --100 Yr

Elev (
276.0
275.0
274.0°
273 0,
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Time (min)
1. Shops at BB - Pond
WETLAND OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
The wetland system is defined as the wetland, pretreatment including forebays and the vegetated filter if one
is provided.
Maintenance activities shall be performed as follows:
1. After every significant runoff producing rainfall event and at least monthly:
a. Inspect the wetland system for sediment accumulation, erosion, trash accumulation, vegetated cover,
and general condition.
b. Check and clear the orifice of any obstructions such that drawdown of the temporary pool occurs within
2 to 5 days as designed.
2. Repair eroded areas immediately, re-seed as necessary to maintain good vegetative cover, mow
vegetative cover to maintain a maximum height of six inches, and remove trash as needed.
3. Inspect and repair the collection system (i.e. catch basins, piping, swales, riprap, etc.) quarterly to
maintain proper functioning.
4. Remove accumulated sediment from the wetland system semi-annually or when depth is reduced to 75%
of the original design depth (see diagram below). Removed sediment shall be disposed of in an
appropriate manner and shall be handled in a manner that will not adversely impact water quality (i.e.
stockpiling near a wetland or stream, etc.).
The measuring device used to determine the sediment elevation shall be such that it will give an accurate
depth reading and not readily penetrate into accumulated sediments.
If the elevation of the marsh areas exceed the permanent pool elevation, the sediment should be
removed to design levels. This shall be performed by removing the upper 6 inches of soil and stockpiling
it. Then the marsh area shall be excavated six inches below design elevations. Afterwards the stockpiled
soil should be spread over the marsh surface. The soil should not be stockpiled for more than two weeks.
When the permanent pool depth reads 2.25 feet in the forebay and micro-pool, the sediment shall be
removed.
STORMWATER WETLAND DIAGRAM
V Permanent Pool Elevation 273.00
Bed. Rem. 75% / WETLAND \ Sediment
El. 270.75 MARSH Removal Elevation 270.75
Bot. El. 270.00 N 7 \ Bottom Elevation 27
IFOREBAY MICRO-POOL
5. Remove cattails and other indigenous wetland plants when they cover 50% of the basin surface. These
plants shall be encouraged to grow along the vegetated shelf and forebay berm.
Page 1 of 2
Wetland planting densities in the marsh areas should be maintained by replanting bare areas as needed.
Wetland plants should be encouraged to grow in the marsh areas.
6. If the basin must be drained for an emergency or to perform maintenance, the flushing of sediment
through the emergency drain shall be minimized to the maximum extent practical.
7. All components of the wetland system shall be maintained in good working order.
8. Level spreaders or other structures that provide diffuse flow shall be maintained every six months. All
accumulated sediment and debris shall be removed from the structure, and a level elevation shall be
maintained across the entire flow spreading structure. Any down gradient erosion must be repaired and/or
replanted as necessary.
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the performance of the seven
maintenance procedures listed above. I agree to notify DWQ of any problems with the system or prior to any
changes to the system or responsible party.
Print name:_'?-d?_ 1A , t1 1 *,M
Title:
Address:_ 42z Wi K e-o Jl ,y-- C ,re,le. ?'r? 1 t t rY, ?a, w :S.C 25 U-3
Phone:053 9(2.'?S2073
,?,?? . G!? ?? •,,.-?
Signature:
Date: - 3 -Q?
Note: The legally responsible party should not be a homeowners association unless more than 50% of the
lots have been sold and a resident of the subdivision has been named the president.
I, 6 ar;- T. M c C lQ in _,a Notary Public for the State of Igo ri-t-N Cero t to G ,
County of _ Vto-Ke. , do hereby certify that Fred W AItaMS
personally appeared before me this 3rd day of Tanyory Zoo , and acknowledge the due
execution of the forgoing wet [wetland] detention basin maintenance requirements. Witness my hand and
official seal,
??otoi?rtrrat
a?? tlrr
*yw ?p:••(N•v•••••L?y?•??r.
r • w
•
w • •
f . ? 1 riY .T4C•1•• r ??h•(?
ece?
My commission expires $L14 f zol o
Page 2 of 2
I4
X01[
ngxiAeM GMAEI[ OMs _.
NO xa anuM TO
rAnnW
M.wAean uuo'JIML X
bKLMN er .earw]ro
uee. eaNMBerc xa svAU X `IITe
e are.r
v nsu woo rv PIm naAx
1 CORX'AK K01
ImMCR4L][NI.
TYPICAL ROUNDABOUT PLAN VIEW
Ps
PF,

NOTES / ??„
1. FON
NmnH
OX
iT
NMPR04F Y
RELOC.ITED
ONTIEAOJAOA FACEMTNfCOMCOMMERCIALLY
^ \ uSL. [PNneD r •

eA'ar
/
2O
RENOR
TO P 7NEN.
-20
FD IFRC
fl
M
COXJIWCPOWMJTAW/10N OF IIEJEQ4 REIM%NYHAEV]J!J \ O[ 4133 W YO /
OEPEK£MTV,90NRE
RU]N.NL
BI
4tV
1rWRX UY•YLI[lulr / //
O-ACE
.
A.0
NO O-E
O
PmFERTYDINNER REDAdMNDACC59 PARRWARa{
-N
, AN,
PMASIJC'I®XE
txanY
TL M
"

d

?A
]
PXAS
1 Im NIXOMWAL BIXDlmfOCLOSBLYAJSOCKIro MK
IMPm4sNExnnsuhcrmrexEwAno ASrmvuern[
ansM
s
ll s

`\
\
/ /

/
,
(
Ta Aw r<s
\ \ lY•vMaN >
`
/
/
\\?O, eSBrwreL/n{v% r
NI \ \ d`
PeA,3P,D„ ./t ,
\
\
\
\

wF /
TO'AL, ooxao x
TREESAVENOTE .-TC n b i
"PERMANENT OPEN SPACE/TREE SAVEAREA"SHOWN ON uu s>roE guar "? /
THESE PLANS DESIGNATE AREAS IN WHICH EXISTING
TREES WILL BE SAVED. PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OFA
\ a / / ? [avaP
DETAILED SITE PLAN FOR PURPOSES OF PERMITTING,
THESEAREAS WILL BE DEFINED GEOMETRICALLYB4SE0
ONA SURVEYOF TREE DESCRIPTIONSAND LOCATIONS.
THEAGGREGATE TREE SAVE AREA SHALL, ATA MINIMUM, EQUAL 2.46 ACRES IN CONFORM17YWNHZONING
[onAU ui[seA\ h /? AIL
CONDITION5.
%?roxau // / /
a 1 /
4
?d. \

/

/ I Iw I

I A
GROCERY
34,928 SF
7,aoD s F
}-
? /
/ / r[Mr. wEOx c I I J /% / 'rMrco ? h ? ? yy A A ? yy
,/BY•VI<af ? //; ?OIrnINaIf{/ ' R° ° ji
BOUNDARY 1 Y // / / ^ ??? \ ° ° y''H STALL ry ° ° "y " "1
(? i /i f? a Ax 7,375 SF A b
? tux vaAat / / kA / ???? ff StRF ' C
/ / Fl
?s
PROP. SAEP
ORINWIGEBOUNDIRY ?? Mp. m nAlLal nuX :
uxK
\ \ O6 vMMM / / 1
/
\ \, tlr/ /3
xAArun WK a FUTURE
\ guar ee¢? / DEVELOPMENT 1? 6
\ //9 / ?/? E ?? Gk
.m?r?uKn[roa[ `xT /AZ, / / -' a«AaA/ ????
wY ? uM r t* - ?"
snuE rNar ??? J / % c J? / T ar ? 4.7
fix., /
F/

' urirv>

\ mowseDlr"rm
eX lm I
UrLnI
noo.
?[?ua u
. ]
ea.P4cw¢
am
Nr yr
? K
i?PICM SECTKKA ATRO149AB01RSECPRJ ATRO149AWIR

BOA rA 1- LLL
oa Pc. ILn
usn vaav[[sD[xIML
* DENOTES LOCATIONS ATWIIICHUN.
SOC RADIUS OF 28' WILL BE EMPLOYED
TO ACCOMMODATE FIRE SAFETY
EQUIPMENT
of
0
ro?
V
jk.
TIO ?,

NOTES:
1.ALLCOMSTRUCPMTOMINACCORDWCEMTHCURRENTarYOFRAIERi M"RNCOOTSTANDARDSANDSPECIFICAPWS.
2 BOUNDARY INFORMATION IS TAKEN FROM SURVEY ENPTIEO'GEORGE ROSESUIIDERS,WC-DAMOMNUARY 13,201SSYGRIFFW
LOUD SURVEYING INC.
2 CONTOURS AREA COMBINATION OF AERIAL SURVEY, FIELD SURVEY, NMI CITYOFRALEIMOIGITAL TCPoGRAPIBCINFORWITON.
A. TREEUNE OBTAINED FROMAERML SURVEYAND GTYOFRALEGYgGRNNIFORWT)ON.
£THIS SITE IS NOT CONTAINED WTHIN FEW MAPPED LOO YEAR FLOE N(MAP 370N; PANEL 0570FJ.
& CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD VERIFXMTION OFALL EKISTING UTUIES.
7 ALLDISTANCESARETOBACK OF CURB OR RIGHTLFnhYMLE5SOTHERWSESPEGFrt0.
& MINIMUM CORNER CLEARANCE FROM THE CURB LINE MINTERSECTING STREETS SHNLBEATLEASTmFEETFRGII TMEPVNTOF
TANGENCYAND NODRIVEW,IYOR PARKING SPACES SHALL ENCROACH ON THIS AONMUM CORNER CLEARANCE
A RIGHT-0F V4YSHALL BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED WTHIN SOFEEr OF ALL RESIDENTIAL ORRES•'DFNPN COLLECTORINTERSECTIONS.
RIGHT-0FWAY SHALL BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED WTHIN IW FEErOFALL OTMER STREETWTERSECIMMS.
10. NO SIGHT OBSTRUCTING OR PARTIALLY OBSTRUCTING WALL, FENCE, FOLIAGE BERM PARKED VEMCAES. SIGN MOTHER OBJECTS
BETIAEEN THE HEIGHTS OF TKO (BI FEET AND EIGHT (8) FEETABOVE THE CURB UNE ELEVATION, M THE NEAREST TRAVELED WAY IF NO
\ CURBING EMS IS. SHALL BE PLACED WTHINA SIGHT TRIANGLE
ar. PaDIx, n
.0.x.1- W n
uX• vAUx]
\
GGC?i[ \
\
\ III I
?orcl PROP. BALM \\ I I ? VIII
CONTRIBUTORY \\ I I i VIII eP
DRAINAGEBOIINOARY V I I Illl
(TYPICAL)
\ I VIII Q
\ I VIII
I s iP I I IIII?
\_ h
/ \?I I IIII?-
I41 ? IIII?
1 n a I S Iii II
RESTAUR4Nr
4,595 SF
i1& "" I ° i VIII EPARK
m' u' } } o ° I 41 I ' IInI
s n s YI I I iiii BATTLE BRIDGE
' ?® I I VIII ?
- T2dFSfs i ?. us NL v]Jaso I Ilii? /
? . uNSS r,l ? III I
1 } {1 niii
P I I I iiiil
0 0 . usus I III II
a a s ? , RAMS s I i! n11, A? °
PARCEL2 I I iuil°$ =
J„ i 1111 m?
.? ? IIIIIO$ p °
VIII A F T??
"° ? O ? VIII ?.?
s} I + °Illu i8
I U RESTAURAM YIMt[ I I III11 N
a 7.660 SF our x M ' 1 nIII
4 1
0 o M a \ 1 1 IIIIII
p111
pll
??.' s 30' runt NAK "F' 1 1 I pI III
n uAUS , , t
ROCK QUARRY ROAD WIDENING SECTION
OATS ENSTNG MM SLOE YA¢ES• xea PAM T TO - CNSMO
SLW M LOP TO roR OF MOOMIO MN SLOE M
rc
s
a g
EMSDNG CROSS SLOPE HAMS. NEW PAVEMENT TO MATCH EMSPm
SLOPE PROM E.O.P. TO EDGY OP NDExIx M. SLOPE OOL
0\1- °r
I
pl /.. O
L
rIP?'`pc.oA?A

1
L
1
/ ? /
\
1
1
11
'
1
\ POINT 1 q
#1 t wr
NIT( re]
IMaawerr I 1 1 '?, vwar
1
L
L
1 1
1
1 11 111
.I 1
3
1 ary 1 1\c ? .
I \
a L \Y
L l
I
1
\ ,
`
1 1 N,T
enSUN
DAMN i
\ 1
.
I j \; \I 1 a:D3?`:4"u5
'\ .? 1 1 1
MX•vM.Mn
\
/' na. AtmKwu vN
FUTURE
/ DEVELOPMENT
SO.
PUBLIC Riw
C3L 8-83
euKKr u w,
1 \ SACS ,.
L1 \
\ x]
\ \ Noon. eceer Au[x
\ \ ro Asor rc >oe
\ In[• sxtae roar
'AA, \\\
` HNC A `\/WImMn oM.u /
A \ awm rc 145
} . \ u50 XIGJ roar/
wA'`? A 1\ V /
1
RpA['A \\ 1 + \\ \ / wry
\1\ 1, \\"t Pe 5]w rc nss
M uX•Ynu roar
a\
\
3
3
TA' w n
BATTLE BRIDGE ROAD WIDENING SECTION
NTS.

FOR SECTION THROUGH STORMWATER WETLANDS SEE SHEET 2 OF 2.
SEDIMENT DISPOSAL NOTE'
ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM THE WETLAND SYSTEM WILL BE REMOVED
SEMI-ANNUALL Y OR WHEN DEPTH IS REDUCED To 75 %OF THE ORIGINAL DESIGN
DEPTH. REMOVED SEDIMENT SHALL BE DISPOSED IN THE OPEN SPACEAS
DEPICTED ON SHEET CS 2
SPECIES TYPE LOCATION SPACING TOTAL AREA TOTAL PLANTS
Juncus effuses Soft Rush Live plants 0'-6' depths 2'x2' 9.800 sq. ft 2.450 plants
5cir us vahdus u"rush ropa le '-12" de th 'x ' total below 716 lams
Pnntederis cordata Plckerelweed Prop ule 0'-12" de th 2'x2' total below 716 lants
Iris pseudacorus Yellow-flag Iris Propagule depth 2'x2' total below 71G Plants
la.nyL sg. rt.l
7- T ..1v t
0"-6" DEPTH
9,800 SQ. FT.
6"-12" DEPTH
8,590 SQ. FT.

i

nie '
soc.
Engineering Planning
Landscape Architecture
1150 SE NAYNARD ROAD
SUITE 260
CARY, NC 27511
[phone]
Revisions
OWNER
EVERGREEN-BATTLE BRIDGE, LLC
422AIKEN HUNT CIRCLE
COLUMBIA, SC 29223
(803( 85203
Project
Shoppes at
Battle Bridge
Stormwater Wetlands
Landscape Plan
Dole
January 3, 2006
Scale
1"=20'
Sheet
1 of 2
Plant Matenal and Fertilizer 5paahcai
Container (woody and Herbaceous Plants)
The soli with" the root bail shall be at field capacity (1/3 atmosphere) or wetter upon delivery
to the job site. Any wilted. dry and/or light-weight plants shall be rejected. i,` not planted
immedmtely upon delivery to the lob site. plants shall be stored in shade and root bails kept most
through periodic watering until the t ome of planting.
The container size shall be at least as large as specified. Plants shat got necessarily be rejected
when supplied m containers larger than specified. However. the son/root masses shall be the size
of the sperif.ed container see. If the soil/root masses are substantially smaller than the
specified container size and loose soil exists on the sides and bottom of the containers. indicatmg
that plants have not been in specified containers long enough to root into surrounding sog. the
plants shall be rejected.
If growing. the plants shall appear healthy with no leaf spots, leaf damage. leaf discoloration.
chloross. leaf wilting or curling. or evidence of insects on the leaves.
For trees and shrubs. where spiraling woody roots exist on the outside of the sod/root mass upon
the removal of the plants from the containers. the landscape contractor shall separate (cutting
where necessary) and spread them out (frazzle) prior to planting.
Plaint Witerul and Farhlizer Specihcat- (Cont.)
Plug CHerbaceous Plan`s Woody 5eedl gig o k otad G f• )
If not planted immedately upon delivery to the lob ste. the pugs whether n or out of their
growing units shall be stored out of direct exposure to the sun and wind and me, tamed moist
through periodic watering urtd [he tine of planting. If the plugs are not contained in their growing
units upon delivery and win'. rot be planted immediately. they should be treated as above and their
root masses shall be protected by straw o.- other sortable -t-a!5 ant maintained moist, through
periodic watering, until the time planting.
Plugs shall have solid soil/root masses with the 5011 In place. Roots shall appear ,lean and white in
coloration.
If growing, the plants shall appear healthy with no leaf spots. Icof damage. leaf dscoloraGon,
chlorosis. leaf wilting or curling. or evidence of insects on the leaves.
If dormant (herbaceous). new healthy shoots shall be apparent. Plugs containing shoots that are
soft or mushy or otherwise appear rotten shall not be accepted.
If dormant (woody). stems shall be pliable and exhibit light green to yellowish green cambium. Plugs
containing brittle stems and having unhealthy cambium shall not be accepted.
Plugs (woody seedlings) shall have widths that are at least to the limb lines of the seedlings and
have depths that are at least one-fourth the heights of the seedlings.
P
land
s habons
1) Plants will be mstalled over the shallow portions < 12' in depth (normal pool) of
the Extended Detention Wetland system.
2) Plant material is to maintained in cool, moist environment until planting.
3) Live plants are to be installed by hard using tree planting bars (dioble bars).
4) Live Plants are to be "stalled so that root color o at Car slightly below) son
surface Cnot signd.cantly above or below grade).
5) Planting hole will be opened by t'ne dabble bar plait prcpeny placed (vertca:ly.
with root collar at appropriate elevation) and the hole will be closed completely
(no air space around roots) with dibble bar and foot preewre.
6) Live plants should not lean more than 10 degrees from vertical,
7) All root parts must be in ground
-
su ProPagules Cdormant rhizomes. etc) will be planted by hand 1'-2" into son
surface with vegetative portions Cor buds) facing upwards.
9) Planting will not occur when sod conditions are not conducive to proper
installation (e.g. frozen ground).
10) Planting should occur during the period from March 1st through April 30th.
Notes
Wm
6&assoc.
Engineering Planning
Landscape Architecture
1150 SE MAYNARD ROAD
SUITE 260
GARY, NC 2751;
[phone]
Fiber or Peat Pot CHerbaceous Plants)
If not planted Immediately upon delivery to the job site. plants shag be stored in shade and root
masses kept moist through periodic watering until the time of planting.
The plants shall be well-rooted through the sides and bottoms of the pots and firmly contained
therein.
If the plants may be easily removed from the pots by holding the upper portion of the plant and
gently pulling on the pots. the plants shall be rejected.
If growing. the plants shall appear healthy with no leaf spots. leaf damage. leaf discoloration.
chlorosis. leaf wilting or curling. or evidence of insects on the leaves. -
The pot size shall be at least as large as specified. Plants shall not necessarily be rejected when
supplied in pots larger than specified.
The number of plants or stems (culms) per port as specified shall be present at the minimum. and
on the average, or the plants shall be rejected.
Dormant Propagule (Herbaceous Plants)
If not planted immediately upon delivery to the job site. the dormant propagules shall be stored
out of direct exposure to the sun and wind and they shall be protected by covering with straw.
peat moss. compost. or other suitable materials and shall be kept moist. through periodic watering.
until the time of planting.
The bodies and shoots associated with the propagules shall have turgor or be rigid to the touch.
If the bodies and/or shoots associated with the propagules are soft or mushy. or appear rotten
or decomposed. the plant materials shall be rejected. Rhizome (stolon) sections shall provide a
nunimum of two shoots per section or Rhizome (stolon) sections containing at least a terminal shoot
shall be a minimum of four inches (4') In length (in order to ensure sufficient stored energy to
support the new growth). Rhizome sections containing shoots that are soft or mushy or otherwise
appear rotten shall not be accepted.
F fir in
Hera-coua Manbngs
5pring plantings - Use compressed slaw-release tablets (Agriform) or Osmocote 18-6-12. eight to
nine month release fertilizer. to be placed in hole at time of planting. For Dormant propagules.
container/fiber pot. or plug seedlings use about 15 grams CO.5 oz.) per planting.
PotentW Wetland Pant 5uwliers
Mellow Marsh Farm 919-543-3532
me4owmarshemindsoringcom <maltomellowmarshwm'ndsprngco >
JtJ Transplant Aquatic Nursery 715-256-0059
800-622-5055
Environmental Concern 410-745-9620
Bobtown Nursery 757-787-8484
800-201-4714
1) Topographic information from combined field survey. City of Raleigh topographic
information. and proposed grading of 5hoppes at Battle Bridge area.
2) Surface area of wetlands normal pool is 27.030 sf ---- based on SA/DA
ratio of total contributory drainage basin from Table 1.1 NCDENR 5tormwater
Best Management Practices.
3) for H + H calculations associated with proposed wetlands and documentation
of peak rate of stormwater runoff, see 5tormwater Analysis for Proposed
5hoppes at Battle Brdce Extended Detention Wetlands by Wiliam G. Daniel t
AssoGates. PA dated 1/04/06.
4) Construction of the proposed wetlands shag be regarded as an integral part
of site improvements required to support the proposed 5hoppes at Battle Bridge.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for A.) any building within the
proposed shopping center; construction of the wetlands shall be completed. 5.) a
wetlands O+M manual prepared and submitted to the City. CJ the BMP easement
established through recordation, and D) an as-built exhibit of the constructed
wetlands submitted to the City.
7) The following general construction sequence applies to construction of the
extended detention wetlands:
A.) Following receipt of encroachment perm.t5 from NCDOT and
Notionwide Wetlands Permit from ALOE. extend existing culvert and
construct structures as shown on plans.
B.) Perform grading, prepare planting areas. and install proposed
plantings within and around proposed wetland.
C.) Upon inspection and approval of completed wetland by the
project engineer. close dram valve.
Revisions
EVERGREEN-BATTLE LE BRACE, LLC
422 AIKEONlBER
N HUNT CIRCLE
COLUM KSC28713
(803) 8655203
Project
Shoppes at
Battle Bridge
Stormwater Wetlands
Landscape Plan
Date
January 3, 2006
Scole
As Shown
Sheet
2of2
Stormwater Wetlands Section A-A'
PLANT LIST

_?- °? -

:nom`-=?-_ -- -,.i .
- -

---
21-

G•i?kK NOTES
{ ra w f wwp ww++afN• r w n.+ tw1 wr+rra+uiG
M iwtA.u10.
E Mrflw?tls'f+tl.Vn KM++.cno?re {e5y
OAr1r.M Ywµ M Y?OMIIeOaM M naVRl6.iw
5 WD? ? M5Y M y rY? M ? OI w?A FFM
? 45t0 ?4sLUf? D.Nro{rW uO {wfa•.IO MIWKR..
s wu.n.{... w+w?s.o.awa {ro. .SE w+.unuKw
w51r4f nM Y{Mi. rfpW iN{WEer u,Wf
~ i {pnil{1 V W? M.MtiM ,K?IOy.V b.r4. yrAq M
'?+o bior'rw •+w.eer{+rr?wlxr+c.wsr
• WMC11fyV{OC{1.yw pl lyyal,yllpMp NWR?Nw{YlfywE.lp?O
?If.OR b iwru+
Y .KGr V ri .-Gill Rr6 Kw?
ww, I r_ i •^-• •••?ICN?ICfCIICICI
...e.,..,,s+v.u LARGE TREE WDIIRA TREE
TREE PLANTING DETAILS
NoT TO V&E
E6NII IILYRII 1 ULM. K.
Iat,Wpe ArebReclun
God PARA)al
?/1Wf0a/Ata(1) aK?ja
ED3 4RV nfyA &.t
hi, 4 WH/ amw mo
(D19f dtl-" Lt (910) 851- *11
m 5a s? a,r.r
U,.r A-A lk" .WW
PC) 2n-/W 1. (54) 22E-25W
SHOPPES at
BATTLE
BRIDGE
RALEIGH, NC
DEVELOPER:
FMC&A"AT71WZa UC
422 "V4 '"'T cRaE
C,X",%, x 29221
6n/as
2/29/¢5
TIMM
n/16/05 Kit COR COMMEMS
rw?
NACD LH
u sNOwe+ u?2af
PLANT LIST
& DETAILS
L-z
......m,... ,srn.ew
e SHRUB VLANTNG DETAIL
rat to svaE

? -ANNUALS PLAN NG DETAL
NOT to scut'

ORNAWNTAL GRASS PLANTING DETAIL
NOT To 5Cµ(

L7 GROUND COVER PLANTM DETAIL
NOT To 9cw
NOTFa
1.iWSa11EET RFFLECis IINDSS.%N6 WAMrtIES Fqt freeNNfoK WpW yyy ?f
TEfl111RElgFRNOCBRBt w •,wveA ?.Me.u e?.w
2 TWBBNEETw RroWEOFOR NRPoBE OF RAM a
ICEMIGICAipNAIA FlAN11NODEFNLS ? f Rnac..a..fv K,MOrtp?
S fOR SVFLHO RANT WRMIilE6ANO RACFAIf31T FOR p.? Y?iw jy?y, ?io?u Nryf
PROPoSEV sfORN.VAIFRNEilAND6sFE 8NffT f Oi ] va•
Tws srr. aruwapurfw fA..rowcnfo..,up.fR... ro.,a,v f..,.
"`?•???? f w imuw .INr.a ?,....r> Nnc. ..or...e..a..u
NORTH CAROLINA ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM, NCEEP
IN LIEU FEE REQUEST FORM
Revised 9115/45
Print this firm, fig in required information, sign and date, and either mail to NCEEP, 1652 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652, or fax do 919-715-2219. Attactxnerns are acceptable for clarification purposes.
1. Name of Applicant or Agent ¢O Q Z?Zl2-K- {
f
1 2. Name of Business of Applicant or Agent (
3. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box)
t l4 l4 ?.ave r•1? ? d?a. ?_-_--
4. City, State, Zip '
5. Telephone (eg, 919-555-1212) cot, q g 4(0 - s4o 0

-...........
s Fax .(o nab)
...;.. .... Lq' cc, 844- CtWA..-.__.
_
l

..?
._.. _..._.. _..._. . __
.
_
7. E-maif (optional) .
b Z^C tec k.. 2 SOJV-ACC- c.e+?
_
?8: Project.Narta; ..._...._......_...__...._.....__.._........... . ? 511-oPpes GO
?44?'?t ?r?id
_._..?............?
9. Project Location (nearest town' city)
_ 0.l ti m L
{ 10. Lat-Long Coordinates (optional) € 3C-04m e N - l 5'q ba °
_____ ..
11. Project County ..-- ... _ ...__ ..__. _ ... ...._ 1. - ..
12. River Basin ? S G
13. Catabging Unlt (8-digit}
oao
14. Riparian Wetland Impact.(ac-) (e.g , 0.13) O • i?3?o t3?t
15. Non-Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.)
116. Coastal Marsh Impact (ac.)-

_. ?_.._--
17. Stream Impacts-Cold ft .. ?..) (e.g.. 12.,34
-..? _._... _.._...._...._?.._._
..._....,..._.?
l-18. Stream Impact-Cool (fk}?? ? '
..19.?Stream Impacalllarm )Rj. .. ..?.. .
i ffer Impact,Z+onie 1?{sib: 12,3?45)
120.B
V
21. Buffer Impact-Zone 2 (sq. i#.) $? S r
(
Check ( below if this request is a: rre of Applicant or Agent
Signatu
_ revision to a current acceptance, or j
re-submission of an expired acceptance
Date ?? o G
Buffer nrtigation applicable only in the Neuse, Tar-Pamlico and Catawba river basins, and to Randeman Lake
Water Supply Watershed.
For help in deterrrinkV the Cataloging Unit, go to EPS's'Surf Your Watershed' web page:
htb:1/cfaub:0aa.eovfsurfllocatelindex.cfm
Direct all questions Io Carol Shaw at 919-7333205 or [e-mail]
\0?0? vV 1-11 r,9p6
_(3
17-
o ?
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
December 7, 2004
DWQ EXP# 04-1863
Wake County
Page 1 of 2
William G. Daniel & Associates, PA
1150 SE Maynard Road, Suite 260
Cary, NC 27511
Subject Property: Rock Quarry Road
UT to Neuse River
On-Site Determination for Applicability to the Neuse River Riparian Area Protection Rules
(15A NCAC 2B.0233)-EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM
Dear Sir or Madam:
On December 6, 2004, at your request I conducted an on-site determination to review five
features located on the subject property for applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules (15A NCAC
2B.0233). The features are labeled as "A, B, C, E & F" on the attached maps initialed by me on
December 7, 2004.
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has determined that the features labeled as "A, B, C,
E & F" on the attached maps are subject to the Neuse Buffer Rule, the origins of these
features have been identified and flagged in the field as the following: Feature A starts at
flag i#115, Feature B starts at flag #E4, Feature C starts at flag #C1, Feature E starts at flag
#Fl and Feature F starts at flag MI. These streams and their associated buffers should be
identified on any future plans for this property. The owner (or future owners) should notify the
DWQ (and other relevant agencies) of this decision in any future correspondences concerning
this property. This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter.
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated
Local Authority that a surface water exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may request a
determination by the Director.` A request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to
the Director in writing.p/o John Dorney, DWQ Wetlands/401 Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd.,
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260. Individuals that dispute a determination by the DWQ or Delegated
Local Authority that "exempts." a surface water from the buffer rule may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must •act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. Applicants are
hereby notified that the 60-day statutory appeal time does not start until the affected party
(including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. DWQ recommends
that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that third party appeals are made
in a timely manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter
150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This determination is final and binding unless you
ask for a hearing within 60 days. .
401 Wetlands Certification Unit . N°n6 Carolina
aatrrra!!y
1.650 Mad Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet hftp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwegands
An Equal Opportun'dy/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/100/. Post Consumer Paper
William G. Daniel & Associates, PA
Page 2 of 2
12/7/04
This letter only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity
within the buffers. Nor does this letter approve any activity within Waters of the United States
or Waters of the State. If you have any additional questions or require additional information
please call Deborah Edwards at [phone].
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AWK/dae
Attachments: Wake County Soil Survey map
USGS Garner Quad map
cc: DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Walter Cole-S&EC
Filename 041863RockQuarry(Wake)EXP+origin

in
^-LoC
Y?
BU

?t
lb
AnE

r Y
??I L WA,
,
I•?

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North.Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Sumerlyn Subdivision Dater . 10-08-04
Applicant/Owner: William G. Daniels & Associates County: Wake
Investigator. Walter Cole State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Mixed Pine Hardwood
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: Upland near flag F14
If needed, explain on reverse.
WaETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Lonkera japonica VINE FAG 9.
Pinus Teeda TREE FAC 1.0.
3. Ilex opace SHRUB FAG 11.
Quercus nigra TREE FAC 12.
5. JwzOerus *Oniana TREE FACU- 13.
Smilax rotundifolia VINE FAC. 14.
7. 15.
-
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBI., FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): Battle Bridge Road Site 50%
Battle Bridge Road Site
Remarks:
Note: The Shoppes @ Battle Bridge properties were evaluated at the same time as the Sumerlyn S/D property although they are
separate properties and projects. The data forms provided here represent the typical wetlands found on both properties.

HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in,Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water. N/A (in.) _ Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >16" (in.) _ FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks) .
Depth to Saturated Soil: >16" (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Project/Site: Sumedyn Subdivision Plot ID: Upland near flag F14
:?T-071C1
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Well Drained
(Series and Phase): Appling Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? - Yes _ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc:
0-6 Al 10YR52 Sandy loam
6-12 A2 10YR614 Sandy Loam
10-16 Bt 7.5YR66 Sandy clay loam
Hyddc Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Note: The Shoppes @ Battle Bridge properties were evaluated at the same time as the Sumedyn S/D property although they are
separate properties and projects. The data forms provided here represent the typical wetlands found on both properties.

WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? x Yes i No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No Yes x No
H.ydric Soils Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Sumerlyn Subdivision Date: 01-10-2004
Applicant/Owner: William G. Daniels & Associates County: Wake
Investigator Walter Cole State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: Wetland Wag F14
If needed, a ain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Lonfcera Jeponke VINE FAC- 9.
2. Acer rubrum TREE FAC 10.
3. ilex glabra SHRUB FACW 11. .
14. Woodwardia virginica HERB OBL 12.
5. Seururus cemuus HERB OBL 13.
Smilax rotundifora VINE FAC 14.
7. Boehmeda cylindrfca HERB FACW+ 15.
8. I icroste0um vimineum HERB FAC+ 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL; FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC=): 87%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge:.:
_ Aerial. Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
x Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
x Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water. WA (in.) x . Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 6 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
_
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 6 (in.)
.r
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By. Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Project/Site: Sumerlyn Subdivision Plot ID: Wetland flag F14
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Poorl y Drained
(Series and Phase): Worsham Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Ochraquits Confirm Mapped Type? ` Yes _ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color . Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) _ (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
0-6 A 10YR4/1 Sand Loam
3-12 Btg 10YR6/2 10YR 614. Common, prominent Sand Clay Loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol. Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils.
x Aquic Moisture Regime x Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils. List
X. Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLANDS DETERMINATION

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? x Yes _ No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? x : Yes _ No x Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? x Yes - No
Remarks:
CR,
o` - t? - oco
Addendum to the Pre-Construction Notification and "Buffer Rules" Application Required for
Projects Submitted Under the
"Express Review Program"
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Version 4.0
September 2, 2004
Email Address: [e-mail]
Purpose: To provide a detailed explanation of the information required by the Division of Water Quality
in order to expedite the review of applications for 401 General Water Quality Certifications, Isolated
Wetland Permits, Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plans and Riparian Buffer Approvals (Please Note: do
not leave any questions unanswered or use terms such as "N/A" without an explanation).
Fees:
401 Water Quality Certifications:
Riparian Buffer Approval:
Isolated Wetland Permit:
Wetland & Stream Mitigation Plan:
Major (>/= 150' stream or >/=1 acre wetlands) $2,000.00
Minor (< 150' stream or < 1 acre wetlands) $1,000.00
(exclusively or "in addition" to) $2,000.00
General $1,000.00
Major w/buffers (>/=150' stream or >/= 1 acre wetlands) $4,000.00
Major w/o buffers (>h 150' stream or >/= 1 acre wetlands) $3,000.00
Minor/buffers only $2,000.00
Please read the entire document before attempting to determine the proper fee. Fees are additive for
particular projects.
Things to keep in mind when filling out the application:
A specific answer must be provided for each question. For instance, if a numerical answer is requested
then a numerical answer must be provided along with the supporting information necessary for DWQ staff
to verify that the number is accurate. Likewise, if explanations are presented to justify certain responses,
the explanations must be completely supported by documentation. DWQ staff cannot assume that
unsupported or undocumented information is accurate. "NIA" is not an acceptable answer for any
question since the DWQ Staff reviewing the application must have an opportunity to determine whether or
not any requested information is pertinent.
All forms, guidance, worksheets, applications, etc. used must be the current versions as posted on our
web site at http: h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. There will soon be a web site specifically for the
express review program. Please note that it will be the applicant's or applicant's consultant's
responsibility to verify that the current versions are used. The versions posted on our web site will be
considered to be the current versions.
You are a very important part of the success of this program, if you have suggestions or clarifications
please send your comments to the Wetlands/401 Unit of the DWQ (via email at
401 [e-mail]).
Filling Out the Pre-Construction Notification Application:
The Corps of Engineers (USACE)IDWQ official, joint Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application
must be used as a basis for the expedited review process. The completed application should be
presented first and the supporting information tabbed and collated in the same order. Using a custom
format is not recommended. The open squares 0) are checklist items. The following items correspond to
the numbering system on the Pre-Construction Notification Form (PCN):
(Se-
2
USE CHECK BOXES TO TRACK PROJECT INFORMATION
SECTION 1. PROCESSING
X 1 & 2.The USACE determines which Nationwide, Regional, or General Permit is
required. If you have verified with the USACE which permit they intend to use for
your project or if you already have written approval from the USACE, please
indicate by adding "verified" or 'verified, attached", respectively, in the blank next
to the Permit number requested.
:1 Attach the USACE Approval if you have it.
3. It is not anticipated that the expedited process will be requested for this situation.
4. If you propose to impact 150 feet or more of perennial stream or 1 acre or more
of wetland and onsite mitigation is not proposed, it is recommended that you
either locate an acceptable private bank with available credits (with
documentation to show that the bank can and shall provide the credits needed)
or obtain approval from the EEP for the entire amount of stream and or wetland
as DWO will make the final determination as to whether or not mitigation applies.
Please note that the USACE may have different mitigation requirements and
thresholds.
)s S. State whether your project will require a CAMA Minor, Major or General Permit
and give the status of the permit.
SECTION II - APPLICATION INFORMATION
1. 15 NCAC 2H.502(t) reads as follows: 'Who Must Sign Applications. The application
shall be considered a "valid application" only if the application bears the signature of a
responsible officer of the company, municipal official, partner or owner. This signature
certifies that the applicant has title to the property, has been authorized by the owner to
apply for certification or is a public entity and has the power of eminent domain. Said
official in signing the application shall also certify that all information contained therein
or in support thereof is true and correct to the best of his knowledge."
Please indicate how the applicant meets the above definition and provide
supporting documentation.
Please provide all of the requested contact information including a fax
number and email address.
2. K If the application is not signed by the applicant, please attach the agent authorization.
The applicant must sign the agent authorization letter. The applicants name and
position must also be spelled out as many signatures are difficult to read.
3. X Please provide all of the requested contact information including a fax number and
email address.
SECTION III - PROJECT INFORMATION
The following is the most critical of all the information that you must provide. The quality and detail of the
information will often determine the expeditiousness of the review. The following is a checklist of the
types of pertinent information required at a minimum:

3
Maps and Plans:
f The most recent version of the 1:24,000 USGS Topographic Map- Please cleanly
delineate the site boundaries, etc. on the map. If the delineation obscures any of the
features, it is recommended that a clean copy be provided. Please indicate the
quadrangle name. You can go to the USGS web site (httpJ/mac.usgs.govlmaplisM to
verify the most recent version.
The most recent version of the NRCS Soil Survey Map - (required for projects within
IV/
the Neuse River Basin, Tar-Pamlico River Basin, Randleman Lake Watershed and the
Catawba River Basin, also recommended for all projects) - Please cleanly delineate the
site boundaries, etc. on the map. If the delineation obscures any of the features, it is
recommended that a dean copy be provided. Please indicate the page or map number
from which the copy of the map was made. Copies of the current soil survey and/or soil
survey map sheets can be obtained from the local NRCS County Office
(httpl/www. n c. n res. usda. govn.
f Vicinity map - Please .dearly mark the location and approximate boundaries of the
property and project on the map. Please indicate north and scale. Please include
applicable road names or State Road numbers.
f The Site Plan The most critical map to be provided is the site plan. You must provide
full sized plans. The following is the minimum list of plans that are typically needed.
/Pre-construction/Pre-existing conditions - This sheet must be scaled and
include all jurisdictional and norHurisdictionai wetland, stream, water features,
State regulated buffers, topographic contours with elevations, approximate extent
and nature of forest, field, landscaped, or other cover. Any existing structures and
impervious area must be shown. Existing utility lines and easements must be
shown. Existing roads, culverts, and other pertinent features must be shown. North
arrow and the scale must be shown. Please note that the impact boundaries on the
/ maps should correspond to the flagged impact boundaries in the field.
Proposed conditions - These sheets must be scaled and show all existing
jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetiand, stream, water features, and State
regulated buffers must be underlain on the site plan(s). The plans must show all
built-out structures and impervious cover. The plans must include the final grading
contours with elevations. The plans must indicate all utilities and easements. it is
likely that several versions of the final built-out site plans will be necessary. The
following is a list of layers:
f Drainage Plans - Final drainage plans must be included. The plans should include
the locations and pertinent elevations and sizes of the collection system and
drainage ways. All inlets and outlets must also be shown with pertinent elevations.
Scaled stormwater BMPs must also be indicated as required by DWQ rules and
policies. In certain cases, final stormwater management plans must also be
,¢rovided, but that will be addressed later in this document.
41 Picts - The plans must show the location and layout of all sub-divided parcels with
lot identifications. Platted parcels must be developable without further impacts to
jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetlands, streams, water features, and State
regulated buffers.
Proposed Impacts - All impacts to jurisdictional and non jurMicfional wetland,
stream, water features, and State regulated buffers must be shown and labeled on
the site plans. All excavation, fill, flooding, stabilization, and other impacts that will
be conducted in or near jurisdictional and nonjurisdictional wetland, stream, water
features, and State regulated buffers must be indicated.
C?4-
4
Wetlan Impacts (on the site plan):
Precise grading and final elevation contours must be provided. Existing vegetation and
any clearing must be specified.
?I All subsurface utility lines must indicate the location of anti-seep collars. Construction
detail for anti-seep collars must be provided.
Roadway or other crossings of riparian wetlands may require floodway culverts to
maintain existing hydrological conditions.
10
V Flooding
V Draining
Stream Impacts:
f Stream impacts must be clearly shown on the plans. The centerline as well as the banks
of the stream must be surveyed or located by GPS for the portion of the stream to be
impacted.
Culverting:
The inlet and the outlet of the culvert should be aligned with the stream as much as
mot` possible. Inlet and outlet elevations and stream bed elevations should be indicated.
\`'t Any widening of the stream must be shown with elevations.
The extent of and plan details for all dissipation or grade control devices should be shown
with pertinent elevations.
For shorter culvert sections, such as for road crossings, a longitudinal cross section that
shows the stream bed invert at the inlet and outlet, the existing stream bank elevations
and the invert of the inlet and outlet of the pipe(s) must be provided.
For shorter culvert sections, such as for road crossings, a vertical cross section must be
provided that shows the stream cross section at the inlet and outlet overlain with the
culvert and fill cross section.
When surface drainage features or groundwater recharge areas that feed or would
reasonably feed wetlands that are not to be filled are made impervious, it may be
necessary to direct some stormwater runoff to those areas in order to maintain hydrology.
You must identify these areas and address them. Supporting explanations and discharge
information must be provided to show that the wetland would not be eroded or receive
too much or too little hydrology. In many cases this could help satisfy part of a
stormwater management plan.
For bottomless culverts or other spans, a vertical cross section should be provided that
shows the minimum distance from each span to each stream bank, the stream cross
section, the height of the span above the stream and the minimum distance from the
edge of each footer to each stream bank.
For bottomless culverts or other spans, a plan view must be provided that shows the
location of the spans and the stream banks.
For longer culverts or culverts that will pass beneath substantial impervious cover, it will
be necessary to provide adequate plan detail to show that discharge velocity/energy will
be adequately dissipated.
C?-
5
t (pC Aquatic life passage through culverts is typically achieved by placing the invert of the
culvert below the existing bed of the stream per the USACE or North Carolina Wildlife
Resource Commission guidelines. Other methods such as baffles may also be used.
Please be aware that such placement may require the use of grade/velocity control
measures up or down stream of culverts on steeper streams to prevent head-cuts or
stream bed erosion. The culvert placement relative to the stream bed can be indicated
on the longitudinal profile. Grade and velocity control measures must be indicated on the
plan view and typical designs should be provided.
Multiple culverts, wide culverts or sectioned box culverts typically require the use of sills,
off-setting or other means to match the cross section of the existing stream (in order to
maintain stream stability and provide aquatic life passage). A vertical cross section of the
culverts should be shown overlain with the up and downstream stream cross section
including the stream flood-prone area.
Impacts associated with dam construction must indicate and enumerate all fill associated
with the dam foot print, spillway and any bank stream bank stabilization. The length of
stream impounded must also be indicated and enumerated.
Stream Relocations:
1? Stream relocations must be conducted as specified in General Certification numbers
NIA 3402 and 3404 (available on the Wetlands Unit web site). Stream relocation plans must
include:
Morphological measurements (see Appendix B of the Internal Technical Guide for Stream
Work in North Carolina available on the Wetlands Unit web site) - not all of the
measurements are applicable in every instance.
Typical stream cross sections - Typically, a riffle cross section and a pool cross section
that includes the entire flood prone area. The bankfull and flood prove area elevations
should be indicated. Similarly, a riffle cross section of the reference stream(s) should be
provided.
Plan view - Provide scaled plans that show the location of the proposed (preferably with
stationing) and the existing stream. In most instances, the bankfull contours and flood
prone area contours, in stream structures, bank revetments/stabilization, channel plugs,
planting plan, vegetation conditions, stormwater outlets, grade controls, bridges, culverts,
sewer lines, roads, fencing, and easement lines should also be provided.
Longitudinal Stream Profile - A scaled profile that indicates the thalweg, bankfull, and top
of bank elevations should be provided for the design and reference streams. In many
cases, it will also be necessary to show the existing land elevations for the design
stream.
Planting Plan - A planting and/or vegetation management plan should also be provided
that makes use of appropriate native vegetation. The plan should indicate the extent,
density, and species of plants to be provided.
In-stream structure, bank revetment/stabilization, and stormwater outlet typicals -
Detailed, typical plans should be provided for all in stream structures, bank revetments or
stabilization, and stormwater outlets. The typicals should include materials and
specifications as well as relative lengths, positions, and angles.
Sediment transport analysis - A sediment transport analysis should be provided based
on the current, relevant, accepted practices. The sediment transport analysis should be
relevant to the stream bed load type and should predict bed bad transport equilibrium.
Permanent conservation easement or similar means of protection must also be provided.

6
Other Inf rmation:
1. The project should always be referred to by this name in all correspondence as well
as the DWO # once it is provided.
2. This only applies to DOT projects, which are not expected to utilize the Express
Review Program.
?3. This should be the size of the project as identified by the USACE for 404 Permits or
by the Division of Water Quality for Buffer Approvals and Isolated Wetland Permits.
/4. Please provide the name (as depicted on the USGS topographic map and DWQ
Stream Classification Lists) of the nearest water body(ies) to which your project is a
tributary to (e.g. "Neese River (Falls Lake below normal pool elevation)"). (Do not
simple state 'stream", "river", "ocean", 'sound' or "lake".) Please provide the "stream
index number of the named water body or water body section (e.g. "27-(1)"). Also,
please provide the full water quality classification (e.g. "WS-1V NSW CA") of the water
body. This information can be obtained from the DWQ web site
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/bims/Reports/reportsWB.html.
V 5. Please state which river basin and sub-basin that your project is in (e.g. "Neuse Rorer
Basin, NEU01"). This information can be obtained from the DWQ web site
httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/bims/Reports/reportsWB.htmi.
V//6. Conditions should also be indicated on the existing site plan where applicable.
Photos (including aerial photos) can be helpful in describing the existing conditions.
v 7. You must provide an attachment that explicitly describes what the proposed project
will entail from the planning stage to final construction
8. This can be a simple explanation, but it is critically important because the purpose
dictates how the no practical alternatives are reviewed.
SECTION IV/PRIOR PROJECT HISTORY
Please include copies of all 401 Water Quality Certifications, Isolated Wetland
Permits, Buffer Approvals, USACE Permits, CAMA Permits for the site as well as a
copy of the final approved, site plan.
SECTION v - FUTURE PROJECT PLANS
For projects utilizing the express review process, all impacts both present and
potential future must be indicated. For instance, the location or configuration of
platted lots sometimes suggests that future impacts will be necessary to build,
access, or otherwise develop such lots. Failure to account for such potential impacts
could delay or disqualgy a project from the rapid review process. If you believe that
the lot can be developed without impacts, but you anticipate that your assertion may
be questioned, it is recommended that you provide a potential building foot print
and/or grading plan to show that future impacts could be avoided.
SECTION VI - PROPOSED IMPACTS TO WATER OF THE US
It is recommended that the individual impacts be described if there are special things
to note about the impacts. Typically the most important thing is to have detailed
accurate site plans as described above. Please make sure they are clearly labeled.
KPlease include all proposed temporary impacts.
X Also, a current, signed delineation map from the USACE should be provided (if
i available) and a map locating the stream origins signed by the appropriate DWQ
Staff must be provided if applicable.
2. Each impact to a wetland must be clearly labeled and identified on the site plan. The
type of impact must be clearly stated. if the impact is temporary, a specific plan must
be described or shown as to how the wetland will be restored. Keep in mind that the
USACE delineates some features as wetlands that DWQ calls streams. Please list
any impacts in this table that DWQ would identify as a stream. ff there is any doubt,
it is recommended that the impacts be listed as streams. Please follow current DWQ
policy with respect to whether a stream is perennial or not. It is recommended that
you assume that a stream is perennial (unless you are positive that it is not) so if
mitigation is required then the appropriate amount of mitigation would be anticipated
or requested from the EEP or private bank. If the EEP or private hank has pre-
approved too short of an amount of stream or if inadequate mitigation is proposed,
then that situation will result in delays.
/3. Sometimes it is difficult to determine whether a feature is a modified natural channel
or a ditch, especially in the eastern part of the State. Soils, drainage features,
topography, and similar factors, all are important for making that determination.
4. Other items to address not specifically requested in the application include
downstream sediment starvation, thermal pollution, low flow releases from dams, and
aquatic life passage. Other important considerations are buffer reestablishment or
mitigation around ponds on buffered streams. The site plan should include the
precise elevation contour of the normal pool as well as the dam foot-print. Mitigation
is required for wetland flooding of an acre or greater and for stream fill (if over the
150 foot threshold) under the dam foot-print and any outlet stabilization.
SECTION VII - AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
Avoidance and minimization are critical aspects of an application particularly if you desire the application
to be processed expeditiously. The following is a check-list of avoidance and minimization questions that
DWQ Staff often look for in applications.
No Are there any stream crossings at angles less than 75° or greater than 105°?
Are there any stream crossings that cross two streams above or at the confluence of those
streams?
Are there any stream, wetland, water, and/or buffer impacts other than perpendicular road
crossing near the edges of the property?
01
w`0
1t10
Can the stream be relocated as a natural channel design as opposed to culverted or
otherwise filled?
Is any single stream crossed more than once?
Can property access routes be moved or reduced to avoid stream, wetland, water, and
buffer impacts?
tAID Can a building, parking lot, etc. be realigned to avoid impacts? "IN
,Ad Can the site layout be reconfigured to avoid impacts?
it Can headwalls or steeper side slopes be used to avoid/minimize impacts?
f td Can a retaining wall be used to avoid/minimize impacts? /?

'-46-
6 #kj 8
Can cul de sacs be used in place of a crossing? 0 vim' - of
A tO Can Can lots be reshaped or have shared driveways to avoid impac s. p ty
If based solely on the practicable physical possibility, the answer is "yes" to any of the above questions
then you must have to provide substantial and convincing justification as to why the impacts are
necessary. If the impacts are required by a local government or other agency, the claim must be
supported with appropriate written documentation from the local government or other agency. Most
projects typically involve the need to justify avoidance and minimization. If this information is not readily
available, then the express review process may not be the appropriate venue to use. Providing
alternative plans (such as plans that avoid the impact, minimize the impact and the preferred plan, similar
to those used in environmental assessments) and explanations as to why the preferred plan is needed
and why the alternative plans won't work are many times helpful in the no practical altematives review.
SECTION Vlll - MITIGATION
Mitigation for the Express Review program, final mitigation plans must be presented up front. The final
plans (except for plans that propose payment into the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), Riparian
Buffer Restoration Fund, private mitigation banks, or similar banking instruments) must contain detailed
plans, specifications, calculations and other supporting data that show that the appropriate mitigation will
be achieved at the ratios required. The design plans must be developed to at least the "90%" level.
Monitoring plans must be final and specific. Any means of permanent protection, such as a permanent
conservation easement must be provided. If you elect to use the EEP or a private mitigation bank, it is
recommended that you request the maximum possible mitigation amount that DWQ may require so that
you will not have to get further approval from them on short notice. The EEP and private banks are not
part of the expedited review process and cannot be expected to meet any such deadlines. There will be
no conditional expedited approvals that require final plans at a later date. It is not recommended that
innovative mitigation techniques or greater than 10% preservation be requested as part of an expedited
process.
SECTION IX
If your project requires the preparation of an environmental document under NEPA or SEPA and an
approval letter has not been issued by the State Clearinghouse, then you cannot apply under the
expedited review process. I t is your responsibility to find out if such documentation is required.
SECTION X
There are many aspects of the Buffer Rules that must be addressed in every application, if applicable.
The first and most important thing to keep in mind is that allowable activities that require written Approval
from DWQ triggers a review of the entire project for compliance with the Buffer Rules.
Diffuse Flow & Stormwater Management:
The most common issues that arise involve the requirement for diffuse flow of stormwater
through riparian buffers. Basically one of three things must be indicated in regards to all
"new" stormwater that is collected and subsequently discharged. First, provisions for
diffuse flow through the protected buffer must be made. This usually involves the use of
level spreading devices designed to the latest DWQ guidance on level spreader design,
which is available on our web site. Please keep in mind that it does not matter how far a
discharge point is from a buffer. The stormwater must be flowing in a diffuse manner at
whatever point it eventually reaches the buffer. If the stormwater will not be flowing in a
diffuse manner through the protected buffer at the point it reaches the buffer, then one of
the followina oD ' a owe
You may provide a nitrogen removing measure such as a forested filter strip,
grassed swale, stormwater wetland, etc. The measure employed should be
designed according to the NC DENR Stormwater Best Management Practices
Manual or other DWQ Guidance available at htto.

9
1/h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/mitresto.html. After the nitrogen is treated, the
stormwater can be directly conveyed through the buffer with written DWQ approval.
You may discharge the stormwater tip--an existing man-made conveyance that
currently conveys stormwater throw the prot buffer (assuming the
conveyance was not constructed in v ad the Rules) as long as that
conveyance does not need to be altered vey the flow. Please remember that
there are no other choices. The fo ng chec ' t is intended to help insure that
your application will not be d ed incomplete as a result of improper stormwater
design.
Stor mwater Management (for Buffer Rules compliance only - Also, see Section )U):
All stonmwater out-falls must be dearly shown and label on the site plan for pro cts in
Buff, red s. List each out-fall as labeled:
4, le Priov --CL
tttrhat Level s ading devices designed to the latest WQ d
..d merely con locity but do such as rip rap
s are not of these out-falls as labeled on the site
plan provide a D worksheet available at
http.ehnr.state?M ado r1dmitrp9o h
Option 2: Nitrogen removing measures designed to Dft Standards aid"
proposed for discharges for which diffuse flow through a protected Buffer cannot be
met. List each of these out-falls as labeled on the site plan and provide a DWQ
workshpr?t Pyailable at / 2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/mitresto. at(
Optio 3: The storm ter will be discharged to an existing manmade (not
including modified natura annels ormwater
through the Buffer. T was not constructed in violation of the Buffer
Rules. List e - all as labeled:
All stormwater out-fall must meet one of the options abo (Note: if you cannot check this
box your application will likely not be accepted into the expres view process.)
Site Plans:
All applications on properties with DWQ protected buffers must dearly depict the buffers
and any impacts to the buffers on the site plans. The impact maps should clearly depict
both zones of the protected buffers and the proposed impact areas (provided in square
feet).
Surface Water $ Buffer Delineations:
Any surface waters subject to DWQ protected buffers must be field located and accurately
depicted on the site plans and impact maps. The width, dimensions and pattern of the
surface water must be delineated. The surface water location must not be taken simply
from a USGS map, soil survey or local municipality's map. The buffers must be measured
from the surface water as required within the applicable buffer protection rule (e.g., all
buffers along streams subject to the Neuse Buffer Rule must be measured from the "top-of-
bank" of the stream and not the centerline of the stream). All streams must be surveyed or
located by GPS and shown precisely on the site plans.
Impact Table:
Please provide additional impact tables that clearly state the area of impact for each
corresponding impact site.
ti
Variances:
Projects that require a Minor, Major and/or "General" Variance will not be eligible for the
use of the Express Review Program.
Mitigation:
As opposed to applications that are submitted under our regular process, final mitigation
plans must be presented up front (see requirements for Section VIII above). The mitigation
plans must comply with the applicable buffer mitigation rule.
10
SECTION XI - STORMWATER
Please provide the following information in regards to potential stormwater requirements:
The total acreage of the site.. 7 (acres)
The total built-out impervious acreage 16.6 acres)
The total area that will be disturbed -f-,PD (acres)
If the total area exceeds 20% imperviousness, the development on the site is uniform in
density, and you claim that the total impervious area is less than 30%, you must provide a
complete, detailed breakdown of the assumed built-out conditions. The breakdown must
be detailed enough to show that all potential impervious areas are accounted for.
If there are concentrated areas of development such as multi-family, commercial, cluster,
club houses, etc. that exceed 30% imperviousness and the total imperviousness for the site
does not exceed 30%, a stormwater management plan will likely be required for those
SECTION XII - SEWAGE DISPOSAL
( Response must be dear and detailed. Any disposal method that suggests further impacts
60.0 may be required other than those shown must be dearly addressed on the site plans.
SECTION XIII
`O Answering yes to either of these responses automatically precludes you from the express
these tide of the requirements, applicant please must be email in the type or long Express hand Review script here with
Program at
[e-mail] and include your question and phone number and the appropriate staff will
respond as soon as possible.
review process.
SECTION If you have XIV - SIGNATURE
the signature. It should be the same person as described in Part 11.
The any name, questions position about and/or
Stormwater management plans must be complete with a final design and an executed
Operation and Maintenance Agreement. There will be no conditional stormwater approvals
for the express review process that allow for approval of the final plans at a later date.
Worksheets must be provided that are available at
httpJJh2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/mitresto.html.
areas that exceed 30% imperviousness.
Project Name: Shoppes@Battf W/L 1
Project No. DWQ 06-0001
SUBMITTED DESIGN: REQUIRED DESIGN:
elevations
Permanent Pool (ft) 273 3
Temporary Pool (ft) 274, 1 ft. depth ok
areas
Permanent Pool SA (sq ft) 27030 24352 sq. ft. ok
Drainage Area (ac) 19.7
Impervious Area (ac) 13.617 69.1 % -
Forebay (ft2) 4390, 16.241213 % ok
High Marsh (ft2) 9800 36.3 % ok
Low Marsh (ft2) 8590 31.8 % check marsh
Micropool (ft2) 4250 15.72327 % ok
1
volumes
Temporary Pool (cu ft) 28090' / 48062 cu. ft check tempo
other parameters
SA/DA 2.84 2.84 -
Orifice Diameter (in) 2 s drawdown -
Design Rainfall (in) 1 4.4 ay drawdown ok C
Linear Interpolation of Correct SAIDA***
% Impervious
Next Lowest 60
Project Impervious 69.1
Next Highest 70T?
&"V V
4b
-ID 1g:
4k vtu?
3 ft. Permanent Pool Depth
SA/DA from Table
2.4
2.84
2.88
2
C4A,6"? 11(,'4"

To:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA.
11010 Raven Raleig North Carolina 27614 + Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
jffD
a yi www.SandEC.com
D p? Coo 1
JA "i
January 11, 2006
DE};rf "? ?rG ¢' `+JALITY S&EC Project # 8450.W3
U?EFLANCIa;au y'rc7htMVyp g
US Army Corps of Engineers N.C. Division of Water Quality
USACE Regulatory Field Office 401 Oversight and Express Review Unit
Attn: Monte Mathews Attn: Cyndi Karoly & Amy Chapman
6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120 2321 Crabtree Boulevard,, Suite 2,50
Raleigh, NC 27615 Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
*EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM*
From: Bob Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Nationwide Permit & General Water Quality Certification
Shoppes at Battle Bridge,'Raleigh, NC
On behalf of the owner, Evergreen-Battle Bridge, LLC, please find attached a complete application and
supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) and the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) that the activities proposed below may precede
under Nationwide Permit 39 and. General Water Quality Certification 3402. Please contact me at (919)
846-5900 if you have any questions or require additional information.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name Sho ea at Battle Bridge
Project Type Retail Shopping Center / Commercial
Owner / Applicant Evergreen - Battle Bridge, LLC
County Wake
Nearest Town Raleigh
Waterbod Name UT to Neuse River
Basin / Sub-basin 03-04-02
Index Number 27-22.5
USGS Cataloging Unit Upper Neuse 03020201
Class C NSW
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0.007
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.036
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.043
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 38
Attachments:
Pre-construction Notification (PCN) Application Form & Supplemental Information
$3,000 Express Review Application Fee to DWI Q
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip. Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
PCN Application
S&EC Project Number 8450.w3
January 11, 2006
Office Use Only: R. r=r D
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or ' i ".
1. Processing
DENR - WATER QUALITY
ft-M EM MO 00"Alm mwaj
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ® Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 39 & 18
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: EVERGREEN - BATTLE BRIDGE, LLC; Attn: Fred Williams (Manager)
Mailing Address: 422 Aiken Hunt Circle
Columbia. South Carolina 29223
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: wi118787(,bellsouth.net
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Bob Zarzecki
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC)
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:[phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
PCN Application
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/newetlands/strmgide.html.
S&EC Project Number 8450.w3
January 11, 2006
Carolina, available at
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The proposed impacts total 38 feet of intermittent stream and 0.036 acres of wetlands. As
such, the applicant does not propose any mitigation (beyond onsite stormwater management
and buffer miti ag tion) for the impacts. If mitigation is required the applicant proposes
payment into the Wetlands Restoration Fund administered by the NC EEP.
The proposed buffer impacts associated with the stormwater wetland are classified as
"allowable w/ mitigation". The applicant proposes payment into the Riparian Buffer
Restoration Fund for these impacts. The proposed buffer impacts associated with the road
widening are classified as "exempt" or possibly "allowable" and as such do not require
mitigation.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wvM/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 27,413
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX.
Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
*Note: The road widening is an existing state road. It will be widened onto private property.
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Page 7 of 10
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
PCN Application
III. Project Information
S&EC Project Number 8450.w3
January 11, 2006
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: SHOPPES at BATTLE BRIDGE
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): n/a
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 1731484408
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Lots 1 to 5, George Rose Builders, Inc.
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):
The site is located on the south-east corner of Battle Bridge Road (SR 2552) and Rock
Quarry Road (SR 2542). From Raleigh take the Inner Beltline (I-440) to the US-64 bypass
Take the US-64 bypass east to S. New Hope Road. Take S. New Hope Road south (right) to
Rock OugM Road. Take Rock Quarry Road east (left) to Battle Bridge Road. Take Battle
Bridge Road east (left) to the project site. The project site will be on the south (right) side of
Battle Bridge Road approximately 0.21 miles from the intersection with Rock Quarry Road.
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.7239 ON 78.5462 °W
6. Property size (acres): 24.57
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT to Neuse River (Stream Index No. 27-22.5)
8. River Basin:_ Neuse River Basin (Basin & Sub-basin No. 03-04-02)
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at htip://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/m4ps/.)
Page 2 of 10
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
PCN Application
S&EC Project Number 8450.w3
January 11, 2006
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application:
The site is approximately 50% wooded and 50% open fields. The general land use / land
class is "Acres > 10 with one or more houses on the property" (rural residential) and vacant
land. Battle Bridge Road is an existing two lane state road with grass shoulders.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project includes the construction of a retail shopping center and associated widening of
the south side of Battle Bridge Road to one half of a 60-foot B-B section with sidewalk.
Heavy equipment typically used for site grading, parking lot and commercial/retail building
construction will be used.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
The purpose of the proposed work is to construct a retail shopping center on the property.
(The widening of Battle Bridge Road is required to safely handle traffic ingress and egress
from the proposed shopping center.)
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
There have been no wetland permits or certifications issued for this property or project. The
jurisdictional waters were determined by Ms. Andrea Wade of the USACE on June 27, 2005.
The surface waters subject to the Neuse River Buffer Rules were determined by Ms. Deborah
Edwards of the DWQ Express Review Program on December 6, 2004 (DWQ EXPO 04-1863).
No Section 404 Permits, Section 401 Water Quality Certifications or Neuse River Buffer
Authorization Certificates have been applied for or issued for this property or project.
(It should be noted that the DWO determination as to the origin of the surface water subject to
the Neuse River Buffer was made higher in the drainage then the Corps determination of the
origin of the stream. The Corps did determine that jurisdictional waters and wetlands (not
streams) extended up to and beyond the DWQ buffer determination.)
Page 3 of 10
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
PCN Application
V. Future Project Plans
S&EC Project Number 8450.w3
January 11, 2006
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
There are no future Section 404 Permit, Section 401 Water Quality Certification or Neuse River
Buffer Authorization Certificate requests anticipated for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
The proposed impacts for the required widening of Battle Bridge Road total 38 feet of stream
channel, 0.004 acres of wetlands and 3,811 square feet of buffer. The proposed impacts for the
construction of the shopping center and required stormwater management facility total 0.032
acres of wetlands and 12,066 square feet of buffer. All proposed impacts involve the permanent
discharge of fill in waters and buffers.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
es/no linear feet
SHEET 2
(NWP39) ROAD WIDENING Headwater Forest No 0 0.004
SHEET 3 STORMWATER Headwater Forest No 0 032
0
(NWP18) WETLAND .
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.036
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.036
Page 4 of 10
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
PCN Application
S&EC Project Number 8450.w3
January 11, 2006
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Before Impact linear feet acres
SHEET2
UT to Neuse River
Intermittent
6
38
0
007
(NWP 39) W D NING .
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 38 0.007
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding,; drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma Name Waterbody
(if applicable) e)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc. Area of
Impact
acres

Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.007
Wetland Impact acres : 0.036
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.043
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 38
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Page 5 of 10
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
PCN Application
S&EC Project Number 8450.w3
January 11, 2006
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Expected pond surface area:
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The impacts required for the widening of Battle Bridge Road are unavoidable in that theme
required for the safe ingress and egress from the proposed shopping center and that the existing
road location dictated the location of the road widening. The impacts required for the
construction of the shopping center and stormwater management pond are unavoidable due to
site grading, and stormwater management constraints due to topographic considerations.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Page 6 of 10
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
PCN Application
X.
S&EC Project Number 8450.w3
January 11, 2006
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ?
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
SHEET 2 - ROAD WIDENING
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 2,559 3 (2 for Catawba) 0
2 1,252 1.5 0
Total 3,811 0
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
SHEET 3 - STORMWATER WETLAND
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
1 6,209 3 (2 for Catawba) 18,627
2 5,857 1.5 8,786
Total 12,066 27,413
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
Page 8 of 10
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
PCN Application
S&EC Project Number 8450.w3
January 11, 2006
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund (NC EEP)
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
The property is 24.57 acres in size and the total built out impervious area is anticipated to be
16.62 acres (or 67.6%). A stormwater wetland designed to the current NC DENR Stormwater
BMP Manual is proposed to treat the runoff from the property. The stormwater wetland is
proposed to be located within the Neuse River Buffer and is proposed to discharge directly to the
culvert under Battle Bridize Road. We understand that this is an "allowable w/ mitigation" use
and as such have proposed payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund. The proposed
location of the stormwater wetland was determined due to topographic constraints.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sewer - The City of Raleigh will ensure that the proposed addition will not exceed available
capacity of their treatment facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
The project involves the construction of a retail shopping center to provide services to the
surrounding market and it is not anticipated that it will result in additional development that
could impact nearby downstream water quality.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
Page 9 of 10
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
PCN Application
S&EC Project Number 8450.w3
January 11, 2006
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control). .

January 11, 2006
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10
Envkonme?atal Consultants, PA
i.Is" - RAWA No* Cm&s 2MI4 . ram 0190 546 SW . Fay (919) 546446
Name: r, _ l ?r Ct-i - T!5gV rL-e-
Address: , 4-2-Z- Aj KF.JA 1, j& t-. C. t r -C- -E

Phone: 8v - e?56 5. 5 2 0 3
SR PPE S. A?-C 'a h-r TL- S- t -W % >6G
Project NamaDescription: Cst?t?r-?r N6 C.t "IM Q S&EC Project #
Date: Z'L%1 1. c"610 Z6404:
The De mWteat of the Army
v.8. Army Corps of Engineers, Wdmingeon District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn:
Field Office:
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the cumni landowner or municipal official, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants,
PA to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing ofpmmit applications,.to fiunish upon request supplemental
information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The 3 r day of, ?Tn...?? A ZDD G .
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for Habmty and professional courtesy reasons, Is valid only for government officials to
enter the property when acoampaaled by S&EC staff. You should e dl S&EC to arrange a die meeting prior to
vidting the site.
riteA N,i II I'm mt M_,,I.,A,
Print Properly Owner's or Municipal Official's Name
cc: Me. Cyndi Karoly
NCDENR-DWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
u e,02. L ar/SCld. " m i..nl -lug-,,O
Property Owner's or Municipal Official's Signature
cc: i41r. Bob 7.arze4ki
Soil & Envirommental ConsWtaats, PA
QId=Qm= 9mmsbotoOf
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawadale 1:
Concord, NC 28025 Gmmabooo, NC Y
Phony (704) 720-M Phoac (336) $404
Fax: [phone] Fax: (336) 54W
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blames Ig Be Filled In ft no CAm and LEdMK QrNOWW 4ffcW
:\
. .

w;

'10 "t
.q

% C `S I .xa

z ,.
,..
.. _ ...... .... ... 0 Tit., qi

_Y
/

???. ?? 'v ti N e Xtr
n ?
T wv/ ?
/ w
ice/ ?/ emu'/
...kz ?

i•
Y
•

T,4/j'/fir, ?:T _S•S3• iLfA S:?....-?...u _:y?A?
/x •' .: ?f
Hfi.
2 ?wNi ,RAJ ?r?•y k';?4
NJ Js
m. Ge
nlel
soc.
Engineering Planning
Landscape Architecture
1150 SE MAYNARD ROAD
SUITE 260
CARY, NC 27511
[phone]
GRAPHIC SCALE
200' 400' 600'
?_ I
(IN FEET)
CHANNEL,
WETLANDS, & NRB IMPACT MAP
FOR
BATTLE BRIDGE ROAD WIDENING
(SHOPPES AT BATTLE BRIDGE)
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE III = 200' DECEMBER 22, 2005
PREPARED BY: WILLIAM G. DANIEL, PE SHEET 9 OF 3
/'6
°
OG
"yo
.. ... ..,......1 ??•\
N?
" AREA OF CHANNEL `
IMPACT LJ' f .
-
N TOE OF
/
,. JUSID C ZONAL WETLANDS _ / SLOPE
AS 'WACt BEGIN INT. IMPORTANTCHANNEL
TOP O ?SHNK END JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
,PER USACE /
ZONE 1 RIPARIAN BUFFER
ZONE 2 RIPARIAN BUFFER
T09 OF BANK
BEGIN BUFFERED CHANNEL
PER NCDWQ
r
I I 1 \ BEGIN JURISDICTIONAL
WETLAND IMPACT (ROAD WIDENING)
38 LF(303 SF) - CHANNEL IMPACT /
9 LF(.004 AC) - WETLAND IMPACT j
2559 SF - ZONE 1 NRB IMPACT
1252 SF - ZONE 2 NRB IMPACT /
m• G• CHANNEL,
, ntei WETLANDS, & NRB IMPACT MAP
ssoc.
Engineering Planning FOR
Landscape Architecture
1150 $E MAYNARD ROAD BATTLE BRIDGE ROAD WIDENING
SUITE 260
GARY, NC 27 7511
IMPACT AREA
<919) 467-9708
50' GRAPHIC SCALE 100' 150' WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE 1 50' DECEMBER 22, 2005
ON FEET)
I INCH = 50 FT PREPARED BY.- WILLIAM G. DANIEL. PE SHEET 2 OF 3
may- ?? \?
4\
Ile
\ \ ` _
W
?q- R
aA? NO,
I \ TOP OF BANK TOE OF/SLOPE \
''
1 I 1, ZONE 1 kPARIAN BUFFER
BEGIN BUFFERED CHANNEL F'!^
/ .PER NCDWQ ' ,'-; Y ;t; / ZONE 2 RIPARIAN BUFFER
21
JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
PER USACE /
i
IMPACT (STORMWATER WETLAND) /
i 0 LF(0 SF) - COANNEL IMPACT
117 LF(.032 AC) - WETLAND IMPACT
t ; 6209 SF - ZONE 1 NRB IMPACT
/ 5857 SF - ZONE 2 NRB IMPACT
/ u i
LIMRSOF/ / I - WETLANDS /
PROPOSED STORMWA TER
/
WE nAND
ZONE 1
A ZONE 2 ?
m• G• CHANNEL,
nlel WETLANDS, & NRB IMPACT MAP
ASSOC* Engineering Planning FOR
Landscape Architecture
1150 SE MAYNARD ROAD SHOPPES AT BATTLE BRIDGE
SUITE 260
CARP, 27511
[phone] IMPACT AREA (STORMWATER WETLAND)
0' 50' GRAPHIC SCALE
100' 150, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE 1 50' DECEMBER 22, 2005
(IN FEET)
I INCH = 50 FT PREPARED BY.- WILLIAM G. DANIEL, PE SHEET 3 OF 3
PROPOSED STORMWA TER WETLANDS
III = 40' January 3, 2006
3
/..,^{..... P OP.. J
2 \ \ ?I
P!,?Of':
9-31
FOREBAY
..::.::::..
i
? I

DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - 401 EXTENDED DETENTION (and POCKET') WETLAND WORKSHEET
I. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following Information):
Project Name : St?1o t .s tsT- aTT t_.>ir fl
ContactPerson: al??.?, dM G. rya?.at Phone Number. (!Jill 4011.9'70
For projects with multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet applies to:
Permanent Pool Elevation 7-7:3.00 ft. (elevation of the orifice invert out)
Temporary Pool Elevation z 74. o c--* It. (elevation of the outlet structure invert in)
Permanent Pod Surface Area Z7? 0 3 4 sq. fL (water surface area at permanent pool elevation)
Drainage Area tQ .76 ac. (on-sibs and oftite drainage to the basin)
Impervious Area vs . G t 7 ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
Forebay Surface Area 3 A 4 sq. ft. (at permanent pool elevation approximately 15%)'
Marsh (r4" Surface Area q r 8 oo sq. ft. (at permanent pod elevation approximately 3596)'
Marsh Ir-18' Surface Area 5-110 sq. ft. (at permanent pool elevation approximately 35%)'
Micro Pool Surface Area 4 ,2 54 sq. ft. (at permanent pool elevation approximately 15%r
Temporary Pool Volume ;L6'e g O cu. ft. (volume detained on top of the permanent pool)
SAIDA used x .8 4- (surface area to drainage area ratio)'
Diameter of Orifice z" in. (draw down orifice diameter)
11. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to Indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation Is attached. /f a
requirement has not been met, affach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An Incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional Information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project
Applicants Initials
? .r+r? The temporary pool controls runoff from the 1 Inch rain.
?? The basin side slopes are no steeper than 3:1.
? A planting plan for to marsh areas with plant species and densities Is provided.
? ...- Vegetation above the permaarent pod elevation is specified.
? An emergency drain is provided to drain the basin.
? The temporary pool draws down in 2 to 5 days.
??--`? Sediment storage is provided in the permanent pod.
?- rA sediment disposal area is provided.
? Access Is provided for maintenance.
k site specific, signed and notarized operation and maintenance agreement Is provided.
The drainage area (including any offs#te area) Is delineated on a site plan.
?' Access is provided for maintenance.
Plan details for the wetland are provided.
? ?Plan details for the inlet and outlet are provided.
site specific operation and maintenance agreement, signed and notarized by the responsible party Is provided (see
htip:/ih2o.ehnr state. nc.us/ncwedands/oandm.doc).
' Pocket Wetlands have different design parameters and are only assumed to remove 35% TSS - See pp. 19 and 20 of the NC DENR
Stornwater BMP Manual, April 1999.10% open water, 50% high marsh, 40% low marsh.
1/2/2006
Shoppes at Battle Bridge
Raleigh, North Carolina
BMP Stormwater Wetlands Design Calculations
SA/DA Ratios for Permanent Pool Sizing to Achieve AS% TSC Rednetinn
IMPERVIOUS

PERCENT

3.00 PERMANENT POOL
DEPTHS IN FEET
4.00 5.00

6.00
100/0 0.59 0.49 0.43 0.35
200/0 0.97 0.79 0.70 0.59
30% 1.34 1.08 0.97 0.83
40% 1.73 1.43 125 1.05
500/0 2.06 1.73 1.50 1.30
600/0 2.40 2.03 1.71 1.51
700% 2.88 2.40 2.07 1.79
Wetland Area (*c.) I Description
1 19.70 Located ad'acent to Battle Bridge Road
Normal Pool Surface Area Calculations
Wetland BIP. DEPTH SA/DA POOL
AREA
1 69.12 3 2.84 24,352
SURFACE AREA REQUIRED (SF) = 24,352
SURFACE AREA PROVIDED (SF) = 27,030
Shoppes at Battle Bridge
BMP Design Data
12119
Shopper at Battle Bridge SP43-05
Preliminary Pm-Development Stormwater Runoff Calculadons
(Rafionel Met hoQ
EM-Develoament (Z Year Eventl
Q = CxlxA
O.SS = C Coefficient of Runoff (dimensionless)
4.65 = I Rainfall Intensity for a given tie to peak Qn/hr)
19.7 = A Drainage Area (Ac.)
32.09 =Q2 (da)
Tc Time, of concentration =(( L^3/H)^.385)1-428 1= Intensity =. gf(h+t)
10 Tc 4.65 r I (in/hr)
2025 =L Hydraulic length of watershed 132 =g
64 =H Height of most remote point above outlet 18 =h
10 =t
From "Elemwft of Urban Stormwater Desigr
by H. Rooney Malcolm, PE
Pre-Develotiment.(10 Year Event)
F Q = CxlxA
0.35 W.0 GoeffiGien( of Runoff .(dimensionless)
6.03 = I Rainfall Intensity for a given tie to peak (in/hr)
19.7. = A Drainage Area (Ac.)
41.57 '0Qio (cis)
To = Time of concentration =(( L"3/H)^.385)1128
10 Tc
2025 =L Hydraulic length of watershed
64"=H Height of most remote point above outlet
I = Intensity a gf(h+t)
6.03 = I (101hr)
195=0
22 =2.r
10 itt
From "4ements of Urban Stormwater-Desigr
by H. Rooney Malcolm, PE
12/19/.
ate-Develavment (100 Year EyenQ
Q = CAYA
-0.36 = C Coefficient of Runoff (dmensioniess)
8.2T = i Rainfall Intensity for a given go to peak Ordho
19.7 = A Drainage Area (Ac.)
57.02 =Qtw (cfs)
Tc = Time of concentration -((LA3M)A.355)1128
10 TIC
2025 =L Hydraulic length of watershed
84 =H Height of most remote point above outlet
10 Intensity = 91(h+t)
8.27 = I (Inlhr)
290 =g
25 =h
10 =t..
From "Elements of Urban Stormwater Dsslgd
by. H: Rooney Malcolm, PE
Pond Report
_ Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intellsolve Monday, Jan 2 2006, 4.20 PM
Pond No. 1 - Shops at BB - Pond
Pond Data
Pond storage is based on known contour areas. Average end area method used.
Stage ! Storage Table
Stage (ft)
0.00
1.00
2.00
2.50
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00 Elevation (ft)
270.00
271.00
272.00
272.50
273.00
274.00
275.00
276.00 Contour area (sgft)
81000
12,025
18,920
22,068
27,030
29,149
31,327
33,564 Incr. Storage (curt)
0
10,013
15,473
10,247
12,275
28,090
30,238
32,446 Total storage (cult)
0
10,013
25,485
35,732
48,007
76,096
106,334
138,780
Culvert 1 Orifice Structures Weir Structures
[A] [Bl IC] [D] [A] [B] [C] ID]
Rise (in) = 36.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 Crest Len (ft) = 30.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Span on) = 36.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 Crest El. (ft) = 274.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. Barrels = 1 1 0 0 Weir Coeff. z 3.33 0.00 0.00 0.00
Invert El. (ft) = 259.00 273.00 0.00 0.00 Weir Type = Riser - --- ---
Length (ft) = 125.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 MUM-Stage = Yes No No No
Slope (%) = 1.44 1.00 0.00 0.00
N Value = .013 .011 .000 .000
WE COW. = 0.60 0.60 0.00 0.00
Multistage = nla No No No Exfiltration = 0.000 in/hr (Contour) Tallwater Elev. = 0.00 ft
Note. CutvolOdhoo outflow have been snalynd under Inlet and outlet cwtrd.
Stage ! Storage ! Discharge Table
Stage Storage Elevation Clv A Clv B Civ C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Total
ft curt ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cis cfs cfs
0.00 0 270.00 0.00 0.00 --- - 0.00 --- --- --- --- 0.00
1.00 10.013 271.00 104.89 0.00 - - 0.00 - - - --- 0.00
2.00 25,485 272.00 104.89 0.00 - - 0.00 --- - --- --- 0.00
2.50 35,732 272.50 104.89 0.00 - - 0.00 - --- --- --- 0.00
3.00 48,007 273.00 104.89 0.00 - -- 0.00 - -- -- -- 0.00
4.00 76,096 274.00 104.89 0.10 - -- 0.00 - - - --- 0.10
5.00 106,334 275.00 104.89 0.15 - - 99.90 - - - -- 100.05
6.00 138,780 276.00 133.14 0.18 - - 133.13 - - - --- 133.31
Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by intelisolve Monday, Jan 2 2006, 4:21 PM
Hyd. No. 2
Post Shops BB Pond
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 12.08 cfs
Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Max. Elevation = 274.24 ft
Reservoir name = Shops at BB - Pond Max. Storage = 83,367 cull
Storage Indication method used. Wet pond routing start elevation - 273.00 ft. Hydrograph Volume = 24,521 cult
Post Shops BS Pond
Q {cfs)
Hyd. No. 2 - 2 Yr
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0 10
Hyd No. 2
20 30 40 50 60 70
Hyd No. 1 ® Req. Stor = 83,367 cuft
1 0.00
80 90
Time (min)
Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisoive Monday, Jan 2 2006, 4:22 PM
Hyd. No. 2
Post Shops BB Pond
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 12.08 cfs
Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Max. Elevation = 274.24 ft
Reservoir name = Shops at BB - Pond Max. Storage = 83,367 cuft
Storage Indication method used. Wet pond routing start elevation = 273.00 It. Hydrograph Volume = 24,521 tuft
Post Shops BB Pond
Elev (ft) Hyd. No. 2 - 2 Yr
276.00
275.00
274.00
273 00
Elev 1
276.0
275.0
274.0
273 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
.1. Shops at BB - Pond Time (min)
Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intellsolve Monday, Jan 2 2006, 4:22 PM
Hyd. No. 2
Post Shops BB Pond
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 27.68 cfs
Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Max. Elevation = 274.42 ft
Reservoir name = Shops at BB - Pond Max. Storage = 88,878 cuft
Storage Indication method used. Wet pond routing start elevation = 273.00 ft. Hydrograph Volume = 35,674 cult
Q (cfs)
90.00
n nn Post Shops BB Pond
80.00 4-
70.00 60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
Hyd. No. 2 --10 Yr
0 10
Hyd No. 2
20 30
Hyd No. 1
40 50 60 70
Req. Stor = 88,878 cult
V•VV
80
Time (min)
i
Hydrograph Plot
Hydrallow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Monday, Jan 22006, 4:22 PM
Hyd. No. 2
Post Shops BB Pond
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 27.68 cfs
Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 1 . Max. Elevation = 274.42 ft
Reservoir name = Shops at BB - Pond Max. Storage = 88,878 cuft
Storage Indication method used. Wet pond routing start elevation = 273.00 ft. Hydrograph Volume = 35,874 cuft

Post Shops BB Pond
Elev (#t)
Hyd. No. 2 -10 Yr
276.00
275.00
274.00
27300
Elev (
276.0
275.01
274.01
273 Oi
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Time (min)
1. Shops at BB -Pond
Hydrograph Plot.
Hydrallow Hydrographs by Intelisolve
Hyd. No. 2
Post Shops BB Pond
Hydrograph type = Reservoir
Storm frequency = 100 yrs
Inflow hyd. No. = 1
Reservoir name = Shops at BB - Pond
Post Shops BB Pond
Hyd. No. 2 -100 Yr
Storage Indication method used. Wet pond routing start elevation = 273.00 ft.
Q (cfs)
120.00
100.00
80.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
0 00
Monday, Jan 2 2006, 4:22 PM
Peak discharge = 54.44 cfs
Time interval = 1 min
Max. Elevation = 274.67 ft
Max. Storage = 96,209 cult
Hydrograph Volume - 54,406 cult
0 10
Hyd No. 2
20 30 40 so 60
- Hyd No. 1 ® Req. Stor = 96,209 cult
70
Time (min)

Hydrograph Plot
Hydratlow Hydrographs by Intellsolve Monday, Jan 2 2006,4:22 PM
Hyd. No. 2
Post Shops BB Pond
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 54.44 afs
Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Max. Elevation = 274.67 ft
Reservoir name = Shops at BB - Pond Max. Storage = 96,209 cuft

Storage Indication method used. Wet pond routing start elevation = 273.00 ft. Hydrograph Volume = 54,406 cult
Elev (ft)
276.00
275.00
274.00
273 00
Post Shops BB Pond
Hyd. No. 2 --100 Yr
Elev (
276.0
275.0
274.0°
273 At
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Time (min)
1. Shops at BB - Pond
WETLAND OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
The wetland system is defined as the wetland, pretreatment including forebays and the vegetated fitter if one
is provided.
Maintenance activities shall be performed as follows:
1. After every significant runoff producing rainfall event and at least monthly:
a. Inspect the wetland system for sediment accumulation, erosion, trash accumulation, vegetated cover,
and general condition.
b. Check and clear the orifice of any obstructions such that drawdown of the temporary pool occurs within
2 to 5 days as designed.
2. Repair eroded areas immediately, re-seed as necessary to maintain good vegetative cover, mow
vegetative cover to maintain a maximum height of six inches, and remove trash as needed.
3. Inspect and repair the collection system (i.e. catch basins, piping, swales, riprap, etc.) quarterly to
maintain proper functioning.
4. Remove accumulated sediment from the wetland system semi-annually or when depth is reduced to 75%
of the original design depth (see diagram below). Removed sediment shall be disposed of in an
appropriate manner and shall be handled in a manner that will not adversely impact water quality (i.e.
stockpiling near a wetland or stream, etc.).
The measuring device used to determine the sediment elevation shall be such that it will give an accurate
depth reading and not readily penetrate into accumulated sediments.
If the elevation of the marsh areas exceed the permanent pool elevation, the sediment should be
removed to design levels. This shall be performed by removing the upper 6 inches of soil and stockpiling
it. Then the marsh area shall be excavated six inches below design elevations. Afterwards the stockpiled
soil should be spread over the marsh surface. The soil should not be stockpiled for more than two weeks.
When the permanent pool depth reads 2.25 feet in the forebay and micro-pool, the sediment shall be
removed.
STORMWATER WETLAND DIAGRAM
V Permanent Pool Elevation 273.00
Sed. Rem. 75% WETLAND Sediment
El. 270.75 MARSH Removal Elevation 270.75
250
..... _..... Bot. El. 270.00 Bottom Elevation 270.00
FOREBAY MICRO-POOL
5. Remove cattails and other indigenous wetland plants when they cover 50% of the basin surface. These
plants shall be encouraged to grow along the vegetated shelf and forebay berm.
Page 1 of 2
Wetland planting densities in the marsh areas should be maintained by replanting bare areas as needed.
Wetland plants should be encouraged to grow in the marsh areas.
6. If the basin must be drained for an emergency or to perform maintenance, the flushing of sediment
through the emergency drain shall be minimized to the maximum extent practical.
7. All components of the wetland system shall be maintained in good working order.
8. Level spreaders or other structures that provide diffuse flow shall be maintained every six months. All
accumulated sediment and debris shall be removed from the structure, and a level elevation shall be
maintained across the entire flow spreading structure. Any down gradient erosion must be repaired and/or
replanted as necessary.
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the performance of the seven
maintenance procedures listed above. I agree to notify DWQ of any problems with the system or prior to any
changes to the system or responsible party.
Print name: 11" a , t s - PH
,?,r, l,LtJ
Title: M&OM Lu;d..
Address:_. 42a W iKg-0 gr?1? c gZ23
Phone: IFO3 9k Sz©
Signature: -40712,
G!>
Date: 3 O?o
Note: The legally responsible party should not be a homeowners association unless more than 50% of the
lots have been sold and a resident of the subdivision has been named the president.
I, gar-{ S . M c C (a i^ , a Notary Public for the State of Klo r'I-h Cero (to G ,
County of WaKf- ,do hereby certify that fr't d Av. W , tiUAr•S
personally appeared before me this 3rd day of Tan y or 4 , zoo , and acknowledge the due
execution of the forgoing wet [wetland] detention basin maintenance requirements. Witness my hand and
official seal,
`?`g?atio?uee,etEt
• ?`./ 1 'e••
•
:s • I"" i n
? : r YO • N
{? E • y
("Of
( ,Z
`'i i I
00
ece?
My commission expires $llgI2-o10
Page 2 of 2
B? C\9\
oni <t, Y Y 1O1- OF TFEMIE1MPROVEMENI5 SHOWN..AIM-ARELOCATED - \ N.55.. —P? / x
n p1D1EABIACEMCOYYEMIN YZONPDPMC6mDEM OAwxt /a
CONS/R nOMINSr W ONOFi E0PF OMPRJYH?IS \ °e c,S> rc y0 /
OEPEMOEIIUPGNREACHINOAMMALLYAOKEAIREAARA.YGWIfMWNN vas SN4L[ I—
m SnP MEABBfi7MOPROPERIYOWNERREOARMNOACCESS,PMIKIPArOr4
?- PHASING Amo.cA®1.1E
caeBt#r. ? UYNt A \ i ? //
::? 1 PH.AbM00FMO1WWALBMIDIN0.9 iCLOS6YAS50C1ASYTIr
Q ? IAIPFDVEYENrSM SLBJEClN RENflYAIDAPIROVM BV IIE,\ 51A1P ?
USE, AGUrtS A\ \\ / j /?
Kwx cum \ \ \' // /'
\ g / ?°? FA \
»orz w<AI? tmcA ° fsa KIU) \ \ \ / d? / / /ed'd \
MgMTMU GdiCllm ORD6 Ivr \ \ Q' / \
patio SW GOWDC OaWO N\ /??, / w
R0110Ae0UT n
IIOLRIN el .' -11 W Aw Tv T
uec. caxdlEIT.Ae W:ea a I, ea nn.) \ usu vewa
I CaRK MNE KMI M ?? \ \ ? / / / Q 0
TYPICAL ROLNDABWT PLAN MEW\ // ?: / ••?,
ITS\
._ Lox ? j /? / % A //r
TREESAVENOTE:rARa!
'PERMANENT OPEN SPACE/ TREESAVEAREA'SHOWN ONi // jA IY
THESE PLANS DESIGNATE AREAS M WHICH EXISTING
TREES WILL BE SAVED. PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OFA \ / ? a+MleroN } A
DETAILED SITE PLAN FOR PURPOSES OF PERMITTING, \ a, / ;°u`""f1°"c
THESE AREAS WILL BE DEFINED GEOMETRICALLY BASED $P GROCERY
ONA SURVEY OF TREE DESCRIPTIONS AND LOCATIONS _/ 34,928 SF
THE AGGREGATE TREE SAVEAREA SHALT, ATA MINIMUM, /I % -N /
SCREENED
gUAL 2.46 ACRES IN CONFORMITY WRHZONING
E CONDITION 5. -T. cnM IS 6 A as A
cm1 N \j? ?D. tKS 1, .1 1 7,000 SF
\ q?. IMO 5111E !MILT QI` \rY/
20
9, s AL
?. A, ---- -----
/ -
viNrt. pemx c /) I (/y // Jrnm / y? ° ° Y« 9 9 -
P. Bmp IN
/ / / ?\ /? xg` Sq
ORABQAGEBOUNOARY RETAIL
?/ f\\a a 7,375 SIC o o s PAC L3 a-
1 0 0-
\.\ < / / j / / ^Ry, TRH • `';A:., 0° urx+c ? - ° _
xn e` / i / / n\ IlF
ftNV.NAKN4 / /p°'' \\ sr W C
} } } } }
c n)
I/ j / ///\\ J a?q.? li'?°sw`w°EstBex w navn LHIr 'ta?4°sw°fi°L
\' \ / / / ? / / ? \\ '(p IG Yea5 S
II Ilt Y .AI III
PROP.BAIP \\\
DRAINAGE BOUNDARY \? iesfnE°niN
nJr \ / / / (TYPICAL) \\
\ \, usn vMattc / j / I
v v or i /d ? j `v s
NeRIMEIn ew \y j ?/ / FUTURE / \( \ Macs d
\ sbGruILr DEVELOPMEN?Y (\
/ j
\ \se. / / / / Antra / \\ 9
?RrwLfyo m
LB' rc ssv ti `Y/ / / / P }` /
u3C5HMC rwv :,J / ?? I `'I
/
IT
/
IT
y Lar
/ _xnar0
I t 1f
ceFEC6TAIl) KONSFD e
c nod. I 1
° IirAOtiMTMa ?
Ro -01. I— v 7
Sd:c0.4dnc NVr
WOVIRO .,K
T ALMCIOR ATRaIADABpfT
On aAalxCAS. ac
IWI rc Hro
uuvecexvasaxiw
* DENOTES LOCA77ONS AT WHICH MIN.
BOC RADIUS OF 28'MLL BE EMPLOYED
TO ACCOMMODATE FIRE SAFETY
EQUIPMENT
S/
0 -• _
NOTES
I.ALLCOVSTRUCTI TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENTCITY OFRALEIGH MOOR NCOOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
B BOUNDARYINFORMATION IS TAKEN FROM SURVEY ENTTLEO'GEORGE ROSE BUILDERS,INC-DATEOAANUARY 13, 2005BY GRIFFIN
LAND SURVEYING, IN C.
S CONTOURS AREA COMBINATION OFAERIAL SURVEY, FIELD SURVEY, AND CITYOFRAIEIGHDIGIIAL TOPOGRAPHIICMFORM4710N.
A TREEUNE OBTAINED FROM AERIAL SURVEYAND CITY OF RALEIGH DIGITAL INFORMATION
B THIS SITE IS NOT CONTAINED WITHIN FEMA MAPPED 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN IMP 37020, PANE WOE)..
1 CON TRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD VERIFICATION OFALL E SnNG UTILITIES.
7 ALL DISTANCES ARE TO BACK OF CURB OR RIGHr-0 AY UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED
a MINIMUM CORNER CLEARANCE FROM THE CURB LINE OF INTERSEC77MG STREETS SHALL BEATLEASTWFFETFROMTME POWTOF
TANGENC Y ANO NO DRIVEWAY OR PARKING SPACES SHALL ENCROACH ON THIS MINIMUM CORNER CLEARANCE
S RIGHT-0F•WAYSHALL BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED WITHIN SOFEETOFALLRESIOENIIALORRESNENPAL COLLECTORINTERSECTIONS
RIGHT#.WAY SHALL BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED WITHIN IWFEETOFALL OTHER STRFETINTERSECTIOVS
10 NO SIGHTOBSTRUC77NG OR PAR77AUY OBSTRUCTING WALL, FENCE, FOLIAGE, BERM, PARKED VEHICLES, SIGNOR OTHER OBJECTS
BETWEEN THE HEIGHTS OF TVVO (2) FEETAND EIGHT (11) FEETABOVE THE CURB UNEEIE'/ATIOV, OR THENEAREST TRAVELED WAYIFNO
CURBING E)OSTS, SHALL BE PLACED WITHINA SIGHT TRIANGLE
NY;r
roac TOT.- N,
F '_ 14 ,N
\ USO VAUNT
`ravxci? A
°HC? \\ I I Ill!
PROP. BW
CONTRIBUTORY \\ I I IIII' a6
,: •... °R° DRAINAGE BOUNDARY
\\ IIIII
(TYPICAL) \ I IIIII Q
( I IIII
I a /? I un?
\ I I IIIII
\ I IIIII
IIII?-
M I $I ; IInI
?g4 S } 41? Jill
IIIII a
RESTAURANT IIIII Jill
ARCEL 1
4,595 SF
°. MM 1 A A IIII
$I SPARK
Jill
Jill AT
a I l I 1111 RATTLEBRIDGE
I 1 I 11111
_ s olsT A srwes iaRi sRIIK I' ,1o- tAeNMr I IIII'
__ I . sreus w ` _T Y'1 I III I
q IIII'
A A Nu[5 « « I 1 1 11111
yeas ? I j I IIIII A?
a PARCFI2 j II jjlllll mg
nll o
i Mri TIMaK» I E a- 1 III I? a
rc e } 1111 yA iYnb
n O '} I III t". :$
B RESTAURANT y `E E " 1 1 III ?1 ro
c H 7,660 SF
s? v Ls $ I ilul?
° 4 \ 1 i IIII
± } N`Lx ti
}} w n? , ?I
awx ' 1 I : 1111
wiaeva Luc ? ; %PIA I
svea5 \? ?? 1 `
/ ? y\R 1, I ?MN
QwNp1 / ? wtI 1 , eIO0
l1
NP A ( .? It
ary0 \ POINT j g
b \ aT * i 11 1( e L NT, I-1 I
( -fTTC d ° > (. 11 111 ?W-EwI mn
w° ( 1 1 1
? j - 11 11 `, 1
/ o. ,? I 5 I t I n(
1 ? A„TO ,? ?H 14

50' 30'
TB B
8
l0'
ROW
ROW
0.1E>7snx aowD
EN. PAVENi
T C. To nrcwl ¢tm, W.r T BT v 0A3. tl¢wu
\ / ' _ d ¢mI
BATTLE BRIDGE ROAD WIDENING SECTION
N.T.S.
EIoSRNC CROSS SLWE VARIES, NEW PAWMENT TO MATCH EMSTNG
SLOPE TRW E.O.P. TO EDGE 6 WDENIxG MM. SLOPE .02Z
f I `. \ Y \1 KIWW. OANO I
I I \ \1? \ 1 IT, rcw sxe
, . ° 1 sill \ \ \\ \ 1111. -T
TTY ?' 1 1 \
to '-
/ \ 1
FUTURE \ \
/ DEVELOPMENi 1 ( w .50711 ioen
\ / + \ l use sxai reKr
/ N1 ?pA\ \1 /,.
l 1 ( /
? ?\?\V 11.11 uaur ruv/SG l 1 ` 1 /
"W 01- 8-
ew' \ \ \ L['MS?Ir°a[
\\ T Wr DD 6154 14 1151
T \ \\
t \
1 NCRt . °?` \
ROCK QUARRY ROAD WIDENING SECTION
ITS EWSNN4 L ISS -E VARIES, NEW PAVEMENr m MATCH ECSnxc
sOPE m(M EDP, m L?L£ v WOFNNC, IN. S o'c o3IL
s

FOR SECTION THROUGH STORMWATER WETLANDS SEE SHEET 2 OF 2.
SEDIMENT DISPOSAL NOTE.
ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM THE WETLAND SYSTEM WILL BE REMOVED
SEMI-ANNUALL Y OR WHEN DEPTH IS REDUCED TO 75 %OF THE ORIGINAL DESIGN
DEPTH. REMOVED SEDIMENT SHALL BE DISPOSED IN THE OPEN SPACEAS
DEPICTED ON SHEET CS 1.
SPECIES TYPE LOCATION SPACING TOTAL AREA TOTAL PLANTS
Juncus effuses Soft Rush Live plants • depths
0:
-
'
!
_ 2 9.800 sq. ft 2.450 lants
5clr us validus .]]rush rope ule :
:
t1-1
e
, 'x2' total below 716 ]ants
rontedena -data hckerelweed rropa ule 0"-12' depth 2'x2' total below 716 ]ants
Ins pseudacorus Yellow-flag Ins rropagule 0'-12' depth 2'x2' total below 71G plants
l o.a7u sq. rt.l
{
0"-6" DEPTH
9,800 SQ. FT.
6"-12" DEPTH
8,590 SQ. FT.
I ? ? 1
y
j.
?. 1
W 6
.• i
113
? a
00
' i Ac
Y roar ?' II
O 67
1
62 _7 f { /r /
'i
C
bt I rraoroo? ?Nr wJMmw?
WSTi-m
PItlP.lNV ? _ ? -? I ti
i r.rr
I
e
m
1 ? W
Yl` '
2y? k,t. [avaeac ?...._ o -{
B -1
L? " _
`A 1
'XI
i
Qb' Y
_ Ac
23 J
{
y
0
.R r
?56 r 01 Ac 2 ` 1.
5
? F.
A
Mmssoeo
Engineering Planning
Landscape Architecture
1150 SE MAYNARD ROAD
SUITE 260
CARY, NC 27511
[phone]
Revisions
EVERGREENOWNER
BATTLE BRIDGE, LLC
472 AIKEN HUNT CIRCLE
COLUMBIA, SC 29223
(803) 8655203
Project
Shoppes at
Battle Bridge
Stormwater Wetlands
Landscape Plan
Dote
January 3, 2006
Scale
1"=20'
Sheet
1 of 2
Plant Material and Fertdiur 5peclBatons
Container (Woody and herbaceous Plants)
The soil wdhm the root ball shall be at field eapauty (1/3 atmosphere) or wetter upon delivery
to the job site. Any wilted. dry and/or light-weight plants shall be . elected. If not planted
mimediately upon delivery to the lob site. plants shall be stored in shade and root balls kept most
through periodic watermg until the time of planting.
The container sae shall be at least as large as specified Plants shall not necessarily be rejected
when supplied in contamers larger than specified. however. the son/root masses shall be the size
of the specified container size. If the sod/root masses are substantially smaller than the
specfied container size and loose soil exists on the sides and bottom of the containers, mdcatmg
that plants have not been in specified containers long enough to root into surrounding sod. the
plants shall be rejected.
If growing, the plants shall appear healthy with no leaf spots. leaf damage. leaf discoloration.
chlorosis. leaf wdting or curling. or evidence of insects on the leaves.
For trees and shrubs, where spiraling woody roots exist on the outside of the sod/root mass upon
the removal of the plants from the containers. the landscape contractor shall separate (cutting
where necessary) and spread them out (frazzle) prior to planting.
Plant Material and Fertilizer 5pecdiabons (Cont.)
Plug Cherbe-e- Plants Woody 5eedl,ngs or Rooted Gut ting•1
If not planted immediately upon delivery to the lab site, the 1-9s whether in or out of their
growing units shall be stored out on direct exposure to the s.; and wind and maintained moist
through periodic watering until the time of planting. If the pu(,-, are not contained in their growing
units upon delivery and will not be planted immediately. they sheeid he treated as above and their
root masses shall be protected by straw or other suitable mat-als and maintained moist. through
periodic watering. until the time planting.
Plugs shall have solid sod/root masses with the sod in place. Roots shall appear clean and white in
coloration.
If growing, the plants shall appear healthy with no leaf spats. leaf damage. leaf discoloration,
chloo-s, leaf wilting or curling. or evidence of insects on the leaves.
If dormant (herbaceous), new heelthy shoats shall be apparent. Plugs contanmg shoots that are
soft or mushy or otherwise appear rotten shall not be accepted.
If dormant (woody), stems shall be pliable and exhibit light green to yellowish green cambum. Plugs
containing brittle stems and having unhealthy cambium shall not be accepted.
Plugs (woody seedlings) shall have widths that are at least to the limb lines of the seedlings and
have depths that are at least one-Fourth the heights of the seedlings.
Planting Spe fiabons
1) Plants wid be installed over the shallow porti- < 12' in depth Cnormal pool) of
the Extended Detention Wetland system
2) Plant materiel is to maintained Iin cool, moist environment until planting.
3) Live plants are to be installed by hand using tree planting bars Cobble bars).
4) Live plants are to be installed so that root collar is at (or slightly below) son
surface (not significantly above or below grade)
5) Planting hole will be opened by the dibble bar. plant properly placed Cvertwally.
with root collar at appropriate elevation) and to hole wdl be closed completely
(no or space around roots) with dibble bar and foot pressure.
G) Live plants should not lean more than 10 degrees from vertical.
7) All .at parts must be in ground.
8) Propagules Cdormant rhizomes. etc) will be plented by hand 1--2' into soil
surface with vegetative portions Cor buds) facrg upwards.
9) Planting will not occur when sod conditions are not conducive to proper
installation Ce.g. frozen ground).
10) Planting should occur during the period from March 1st through April 30th.
Notes
niei
Engineering Planning
Landscape Architecture
1150 SE MAYNARD ROAD
SUITE 260
CARY, NC 27511
[phone]
Fiber or Peat Pot (herbaceous Plants)
If not planted immediately upon delivery to the job site. plants shall be stored in shade and root
masses kept moist through periodic watering until the time of planting.
The plants shall be well-rooted through the sides and bottoms of the pots and firmly contained
therein.
IF the plants may be easily removed from the pots by holding the upper portion of the plant and
gently pulling on the pots. the plants shall be rejected.
If growing. the plants shall appear healthy with no leaf spots. leaf damage. leaf discoloration.
chlorosis. leaf wilting or curling, or evidence of insects on the leaves.
The pot size shall be at least as large as specifled. Plants shall not necessarily be rejected when
supplied Iin pots larger than specified.
The number of plants or stems (culms) per port as specified shall be present at the minimum, and
on the average. or the plants shall be rejected.
Dormant_Prooaaule (herbaceous Plants)
If not planted immediately upon delivery to the job site. the dormant propagules shall be stared
out of direct exposure to the sun and wind and they shall be protected by covering with straw.
peat moss. compost, or other suitable materials and shall be kept moist, through periodic watering.
until the time of planting.
The bodies and shoots associated with the propagules shall have turgor or be rigid to the touch.
If the bodies and/or shoots associated with the propagules are soft or mushy. or appear rotten
or decomposed. the plant materials shall be rejected. Rhizome (stolon) sections shad provide a
um of two shoots per section or Rhizome Cstolon) sections containing at least a terminal shoot
shall be a minimum of four inches (47 in length Cm order to ensure sufficient stored energy to
support the new growth). Rhizome sections containing shoots that are soft or mushy or otherwise
appear rotten shall not be accepted.
Fertilization
herbaceous Plantmgs
5pring plantings - Use compressed slaw-release table, CAgriform) or 05in-ote 18-6-12. eight to
nine month release fertilizer, to be placed in hole at time of panting. For Dormant propagules.
container/fiber pot. or plug seedlings use about 15 grams (0.5 oz.) per planting.
PotenWl Wi Plant 5uwh
Mellow Marsh Farm 919-543-3532
mellowmarshwmindspring.com Cmaiito:mellowmarshwmindspriow.com>
J+J Transplant Aquatic Nursery 715-256-0059
800-622-5055
Environmental Goncarn 410-745-9620
Bobtown Nursery 757-787-8484
500-201-4714
1) Topographic "formation from combined field survey. city of Raleigh topographic
information, and proposed grading of Shoppes at Battle Bridge area.
2) Surface area of wetlands normal pool is 27.030 sf ---- based on SA/DA
ratio of total contributory drainage basin from Table 1.1 NCDENR 5tormwater
Best Management Practices.
3) For h + h calculations associated with proposed wetlands and documentation
of peak rate of stormwater runoff. see 5tormwater Analyers for proposed
5h.. as at Battle Bridge Extended Detention Wetlands by William G. Daniel +
Associates. PA dated 1/04/06.
4) Construction of the proposed wetlands shall be regarded as an integral part
of site improvements required to support the proposed 5hoppe5 at Battle Bridge.
Prior to issuance of a certificate of Occupancy for A.) any budding within the
proposed shopping center, construction of the wetlands shall be completed. B.) a
wetlands O+M manual prepared and submitted to the Gity. G.) the BMP easement
established through recordation and D.) on as-built exhibit of the constructed
wetlands submitted to the City.
7) The fallowing general construction sequence appies to construction of the
extended detention wetlands:
A.) Following receipt of encroachment permits from NGDOT and
Notionwide Wetlands Permit from ACOE. extend existing culvert and
construct structures as shown on plans.
BJ Perform grading. prepare planting areas. and install proposed
plantings within and around proposed wetland.
G.) Upon inspection and approval of completed wetland by the
project engineer. close drain valve.
Revisions
OWNER
EVERGREEN-BATTLE BRIDGE, LLC
472 AIKEN HUNT CIRCLE
COLUMBIA, SC 29723
[phone]
Project
Shoppes at
Battle Bridge
Stormwater Wetlands
Landscape Plan
Dote
January 3, 2006
Scale
As Shawn
Sheet
2of2
Stormwater Wetlands Section A-A'
PLANT LIST

1 +r ,

CLILM NOTES
L r•rrLrND wws +roq-r, f+l ra.+anL roroNff rxaot0
ro r+t.ww
L ware.+,or n Lax ar+..nsP r vcwr,L Lw n.n asL wawa
e?rBL?rna W?L\ U[ K?0 ,?f101LW1,{ ?BSw Rrrol at1 BDLK
E o,fb WrrP rb RMN Writ <NaON, b KFarnrD Vr
raarfN•t?,{rM Lr arrer rfroL.rM O LLruurFS,r
. xa f+ua\r wr.t rot Boaaa wrww ro l\aosr arsaNSP.
rrate..s aYxwur,a
s raHra • .,.. r...asf rlo ratu°r ..rot sa w w rL•r•rf
wlr,rP rcw f+rM. r,ON Mror111ru•WrR
4 iaw aY ft witl?iM ?•Ler?+brrwo+.W r
. •u. aoDL rxaf mown ru, errurK r.r• r ferrsn
rLBIDLI a rant\4ra
r NWCr,Y+,btDesLror or r\iBrir?w P\nsfrrCO.r.OfO
r'r,dl b rarNre
? -v b W ••w°r w fw
1
4
LARGE TIM MEGILYA TRH
TREE PLANTNG DETAILS
HOT TO SCALE
DEVELOM.
EMCAED"ATILEUMCE LLC
422 AWN EINT CRCLE
COEU A&A, SC 29223
6M/05
7/29/05
IVUUrt5
Ws/as PER coot CoMNEALEs
AAm I ro`•I
Af SEgVRI 449
PLANT UST
& DETAILS

L-21
- _ L?ldl 11Rl?{ ? IIS$CCU1?, NC.
,,••'•"• .. ""'° Lndrrape ArcMtrclly?
n..n,... ...... F rm . e a « Da .., land Phaniq
Envirou3axa(.! Dtsdn
r Wwe •rur ... r rrr. Kd Inrt M•3YB bf
Ak14 /WIS Ow 7"
/? SHRUB Pwfmc DETAIL ORNAMMTAl. MASS PUNTING DETAIL Ulq ev-nso ra (m) arno
NOT TO SCALE HOT TO SCALE t» Si Sr Snr.r
Awle JYHdt SLES
ISBQ E2E-NS1 A ISO M-nit

SHOPPES at
BATTLE
BRECE
RAIDGH, NC
E) ANNUALS PLANTING DETAIL
NOT 70 SCALE
e_ GROUND COM PLANTING DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
InrEs
,.Tw6BIEr:TBEFL¢aBLHwcAwa ow•xrmES FOa -
TH6LHDAE6HDPFNOOnREB. •,ra ....d, °?
x T,rca?6Tw v°owBDFOB wnrosE of nAar
IOEHIIFICATM>NINOPLAMINOOETNLA tT...aD,BU,t ?'. W ....,.. ?.Da...?..a,
NORTH CAROLINA ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM, NCEEP
IN LIEU FEE REQUEST FORM
Revised 9115/05
Print this form, fill in required information, sign and date, and either mail to NCEEP,1652 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652, or fax b 919-715-2219. Athadhments are acceptable for clarification purposes.
1. Name of Applicant or Agent QO Q Z0.TtZE'Z.K- '
2. Name of Business of Applicant or Agent :5,ea i ?I?v ?e sM+l?t. Tea. ?w? u?S
3. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box)
ity, fate. p '
_
-
phone (eg, 919-555-1212)
-5. Tele
{ 5400
Ceti OR S 4?0 -
;
(optonal} ..._...._..._..._....._......._....._...._- _
..
... ._... Cq 1 ?t? ??{ ?i ? a? ti ?._._.1....__._?
7. E-mail (optional) s
b z^r t cc*.; (2 or<.+tidc.c . r t.*
?8. Project Name 1
S%%opples (P tftoiz Is i?
i I
_._
9. Project Location (nearest town` city) .
IZa.t tip N L

10. Lat-Long Coordinates (optional) ?
3S ? 1231 ON - 3_b Sq6oZ °
%At
_-
Y
r
-.11. Project County .................._... _....._...-....._....
? w4?CG _._.?.
?..,., _
92 River Basin Neu
13. Cataloging Unit (8?iigit)
oa©
i 14. Riparian Wetland impact.(ac.) (e.g., 0.13)

15. Non-Riparian 1Nedanc! Impact (ac.) 0.03eo '
i
__
= 18. Coastal Marsh Impact (ac.)
C 17. Stream impacts-Cold (ft.) (e.g. 1,234) -_ 1 ??? ?
18. Stream Impact-Cool (ft-)
19. Stream Impact-Warm (fL)
?-

{ 20. Buffer Impact,Zoilie 1'(sq= if. (e. g. 12,345)
21. Buffer Impact-Zone Z (sq.1t.)
?

t
Chem ( below N this request is a. Signature of Applicant or Agent:
_ revision to a current acceptance, or
- re-submission of an expired acceptance
Hate= ella G
Buffer" tigaion appficabie only in the Neuse, Tar-Pamlico and Catawba river basins, and the Randleman Lake
Water Supply Watershed.
For help in defining the Cataloging Unit, go to EPS's `Suit Your Watershed' web page:
htb:Ncfaub.#Rg.owMurflQ tpAndox.dm
Direct all questions to Carol Shaw at 919-733-55205 or [e-mail]
?O?OF Vvn,r?wG
_co o -c
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
December 7, 2004
DWQ EXP# 04-1863
Wake County
Page 1 of 2
William G. Daniel & Associates, PA
1150 SE Maynard Road, Suite 260
Cary, NC 27511
Subject Property: Rock Quarry Road
UT to Neuse River
On-Site Determination for Applicability to the Neuse River Riparian Area Protection Rules
(15A NCAC 2B.0233)-EXPRESS REVEEW PROGRAM
Dear Sir or Madam:
On December 6, 2004, at your request I conducted an on-site determination to review five
features located on the subject property for applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules (15A NCAC
2B.0233). The features are labeled as "A, B, C, E & F" on the attached maps initialed by me on
December 7, 2004.
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has determined that the features labeled as "A, B, C,
E & F" on the attached maps are subject to the Neuse Buffer Rule, the origins of these
features have been identified and flagged in the field as the following: Feature A starts at
flag #B.5, Feature B starts at flag #E4, Feature C starts at flag #Cl, Feature .E starts at flag
#F1 and Feature F starts at flag #Hl. These streams and their associated buffers should be
identified on any future plans for this property. The owner (or future owners) should notify the
DWQ (and other relevant agencies) of this decision in any future correspondences concerning
this property. This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter.
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated
Local Authority that a surface water exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may request a
determination by the Director.` A request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to
the Director in writing c% John Dorney, DWQ Wetlands/401 Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd.,
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260. Individuals that dispute a determination by the DWQ or Delegated
Local Authority that "exempts." a surface water from the buffer rule may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. Applicants are
hereby notified that the 60-day statutory appeal time does not start until the affected party
(including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. DWQ recommends
that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that third party appeals are made
in a timely manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter
150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This determination is final and binding unless you
ask for a hearing within 60 days. .
401 Wetlands Cer6tication Unit t2ralr
1.650 Mad Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX 919-733-M / Internet httoJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal opportunity/Affnnative Action Employer - 50% Recydedl10% Post Consumer Paper
William G. Daniel & Associates, PA
Page 2 of 2
12/7/04
This letter only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity
within the buffers. Nor does this letter approve any activity within Waters of the United States
or Waters of the State. If you have any additional questions or require additional information
please call Deborah Edwards at [phone].
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AWK/dae
Attachments: Wake County Soil Survey map
USGS Garner Quad map
cc: DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Walter Cole-S&EC
Filename 041863RockQuarry(Wake)EXP+origin
70
A
w-
rJUC
/

Y-
n E_C'C

At"

;.Ap$

oC -i I,

?; ? s2•!? Ar,e2 ? a I

Ao '? l ICI
Y ?jr f • ? ray

yt ' 4 v
A? s S

4 w? x y
r iW ^
project No.
0"450.W1
Figure 2 - Soil Survey Map .
Rock Quarry Tract Soil & Environmental Const tatitz3
PA
SC Project Mgr.. William G. Daniel & Associates, P,A_ ,
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
V1'ake County, NC [phone] • (919) 84&-9467
Scale,-
Web Page: www.SandEGtom
1"=
1,320'
01114/04 Wake County Soil Survey
Issued 1970, Sheet 79 -
bib d !9t69b°r =01 ?639??Z6I6 SJNH11 ?h!-i`1Mrl:IJt??Ia F,a: TT tiraa?3 _ s - -VD.'I
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Sumerlyn Subdivision Date: . 10-08-04
Applicant/Owner: William G. Daniels & Associates County: Wake
Investigator: Walter Cole State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Mixed Pine Hardwood
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: Upland near flag F14
{f needed, explain on reverse,
VFnFTOTIAN
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Lonlcerajaponica VINE FAG 9.
Pins Taeda TREE FAC 10.
3. 11ex opace SHRUB FAC- 11.
. Quercus nigra TREE FAC 12.
5. Jw9perus vi4niana TREE FACU- 13.
Smilax rotundifolia VINE FAC. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): Battle Bridge Road Site 5M
Battle Bridge Road Site
Remarks:
Note: The Shoppes @ Battle Bridge properties were evaluated at the same time as the Sumerlyn S/D property although they are
separate properties and projects. The data forms provided here represent the typical wetlands found on both properties.

HYDROLOGY '
- Recorded Data (Describe in.Remarksy
_ Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
_ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required:
_ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: WA (in.) _ Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >16" (in.) _ FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks) .
Depth to Saturated Soil: >16" (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Project/Site: Sumerlyn Subdivision Plot ID: Upland near flag F14
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Well Drained .
(Series and Phase): Appling Field Observations .
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes - No
Profile Descriobon:
Depth Matrix Color . Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundanoe/Contrast Structure etc,
0-6 Al 10YR5/2 Sand loam
6-12 A2 10YR6/4 Sand Loam
10-16 Bt 7.5YR5/6 Sandy clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chrorna Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Note: The Shoppes @ BattlBridge properties were evaluated at the same time as the Sumedyn S/D property although they are
L[
parate properties and projects. The data forms provided here represent the typical wetlands found on both properties.

WETLANDS DETERMINATION
HydrophyGc Vegetation Present? x Yes - No Is this sampling pant within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? - Yes x No Yes x No
H.ydric Soils Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Sumerlyn Subdivision Date: 01-10-2004
AppliCant/Owner William G. Daniels & Associates County: Wake
Investigator: Walter Cole State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: Wetland @flag F14
If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Lonicera%apot*a VINE . FAC- 9.
2. Acerrubrum TREE FAC 10.
3. 11ex2abra SHRUB FACW 11. .
Woodward a vrrginica HERB OBL 12. _
5. Swum cemuus HERB OBL 13.
Smilax rotuncOolia VINE FAC 14.
7. Boehmeda cy0ndrica HERB FACW+ 15.
8. Waostegrum vimineum HERB FAC+ 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL; FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC=): 87%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge :.
-Aerial. Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Welland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
x Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patters in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
x Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water. WA (in.) x Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit; 6 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
_
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Sal: 6 (in.)
.r
Remarks:
Weiland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Project/Site: Sumeriyn Subdivision Plot ID: Welland @ flag F14
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Poorl y Drained
(Series and Phase): Worsham Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Ochraqub Confirm Mapped Type? ` Yes _ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
0-6 A 10YR411 Sand Loam
3-12 Btg 10YR6/2 10YR 64. Common; prominent Sand Clay Loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
x Aquic Moisture Regime x Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils. List
x Gleyed or Loin-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
s.
Hydrophytlc Vegetation Present? X Yes _ No
Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? . , ;... x : Yes _ No x Yes - No
Hydric Soils Present? x Yes _ No
Remarks:
4e; -4 S?o
01 - c t- o c.o
Addendum to the Pre-Construction Notification and "Buffer Rules" Application Required for
Projects Submitted Under the
"Express Review Program"
North Carolina Division of Water` Quality Version 4.0
September 2, 2004
Email Address: [e-mail]
Purpose: To provide a detailed explanation of the information required by the Division of Water Quality
in order to expedite the review of applications for 401 General Water Quality Certifications, Isolated
Wetland Permits, Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plans and Riparian Buffer Approvals (Please Note: do
not leave any questions unanswered or use terms such as "NIA" without an explanation).
Fees:
401 Water Quality Certifications:
Riparian Buffer Approval:
Isolated Wetland Permit:
Wetland & Stream Mitigation Plan:
Major (>/= 150' stream or >I= 1 acre wetlands) $2,000.00
Minor (< 150' stream or < 1 acre wetlands) $1,000.00
(exclusively or "in addition" to) $2,000.00
General $1,000.00
Major w/buffers (>/=150' stream or >/= 1 acre wetlands) $4,000.00
Major w/o buffers (>/=150' stream or >/=1 acre wetlands) $3,000.00
Minor/buffers only $2,000.00
Please read the entire document before attempting to determine the proper fee. Fees are additive for
particular projects.
Things to keep in mind when filling out the application:
A specific answer must be provided for each question. For instance, if a numerical answer is requested
then a numerical answer must be provided along with the supporting information necessary for DWQ staff
to verify that the number is accurate. Likewise, if explanations are presented to justify certain responses,
the explanations must be completely supported by documentation. DWQ staff cannot assume that
unsupported or undocumented information is accurate. "NIA" is not an acceptable answer for any
question since the DWQ Staff reviewing the application must have an opportunity to determine whether or
not any requested information is pertinent.
All forms, guidance, worksheets, applications, etc. used must be the current versions as posted on our
web site at http: h2o.enr.state.nc.us1ncwetlands. There will soon be a web site specifically for the
express review program. Please note that it will be the applicant's or applicant's consultant's
responsibility to verify that the current versions are used. The versions posted on our web site will be
considered to be the current versions.
You are a very important part of the success of this program, if you have suggestions or clarifications
please send your comments to the Wetlands/401 Unit of the DWQ (via email at
401 [e-mail]).
Filling Out the Pre-Construction Notification Application:
The Corps of Engineers (USACE)/DWQ official, joint Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application
must be used as a basis for the expedited review process. The completed application should be
presented first and the supporting information tabbed and collated in the same order. Using a custom
format is not recommended. The open squares I) are checklist items. The following items correspond to
the numbering system on the Pre-Construction Notification Form (PCN):
c3e-
USE CHECK BOXES TO TRACK PROJECT INFORMATION
SECTION I. PROCESSING
X 1 & 2.The USACE determines which Nationwide, Regional, or General Permit is
required. If you have verified with the USACE which permit they intend to use for
your project or if you already have written approval from the USACE, please
indicate by adding 'verified" or 'verified, attached", respectively, in the blank next
to the Permit number requested.
:1 Attach the USACE Approval if you have it.
3. It is not anticipated that the expedited process will be requested for this situation.
4. If you propose to impact 150 feet or more of perennial stream or 1 acre or more
of wetland and onsite mitigation is not proposed, it is recommended that you
either locate an acceptable private bank with available credits (with
documentation to show that the bank can and shall provide the credits needed)
or obtain approval from the EEP for the entire amount of stream and or wetland
as DWO will make the final determination as to whether or not mitigation applies.
Please note that the USACE may have different mitigation requirements and
thresholds.
x's 5. State whether your project will require a CAMA Minor, Major or General Permit
and give the status of the permit.
SECTION II - APPLICATION INFORMATION
1. 15 NCAC 2H.502(o reads as follows. `Who Must Sign Applications. The application
shall be considered a "valid application" only if the application bears the signature of a
responsible officer of the company, municipal official, partner or owner. This signature
certifies that the applicant has tide to the property, has been authorized by the owner to
apply for certification or is a public entity and has the power of eminent domain. Said
official in signing the application shall also certify that all information contained therein
or in support thereof is true and correct to the best of his knowledge.'
Please indicate how the applicant meets the above definition and provide
supporting documentation.
?? Please provide all of the requested contact information including a fax
number and email address.
2. K If the application is not signed by the applicant, please attach the agent authorization.
The applicant must sign the agent authorization letter. The applicant's name and
position must also be spelled out as many signatures are difficult to read.
3. X Please provide all of the requested contact information including a fax number and
email address.
SECTION III - PROJECT INFORMATION
The following is the most critical of all the information that you must provide. The quality and detail of the
information will often determine the expeditiousness of the review. The following is a checklist of the
types of pertinent information required at a minimum:

3
Maps and Plans:
f The most recent version of the 1:24,000 USGS Topographic Map- Please cleanly
delineate the site boundaries, etc. on the map. If the delineation obscures any of the
features, it is recommended that a clean copy be provided. Please indicate the
quadrangle name. You can go to the USGS web site (httpJ/mac.usgs.gov/maplism to
verify the most recent version.
Y The most recent version of the MRCS Soil Survey Map - (required for projects within
the Neuse River Basin, Tar-Pamlico River Basin, Randleman Lake Watershed and the
Catawba River Basin, also recommended for all projects) - Please cleanly delineate the
site boundaries, etc. on the map. If the delineation obscures any of the features, it is
recommended that a dean copy be provided. Please indicate the page or map number
from which the copy of the map was made. Copies of the current soil survey and/or soil
surrey map sheets can be obtained from the local NRCS County Office
(httpJ/www.nc.nres.usda.govn.
Vicinity map - Please dearly mark the location and approximate boundaries of the
property and project on the map. Please indicate north and scale. Please include
applicable road names or State Road numbers.
f The Site Plan - The most critical map to be provided is the site plan. You must provide
full sized pans. The following is the minimum list of plans that are typically needed.
/Pro-construction/Pre-existing conditions - This sheet must be scaled and
include all jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features,
State regulated buffers, topographic contours with elevations, approximate extent
and nature of forest, field, landscaped, or other cover. Any existing structures and
impervious area must be shown. Existing utility lines and easements must be
shown. Existing roads, culverts, and other pertinent features must be shown. North
arrow and the scale must be shown. Please note that the impact boundaries on the
maps should correspond to the flagged impact boundaries in the field.
Proposed conditions - These sheets must be scaled and show all existing
jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features, and State
regulated buffers must be underlain on the site plan(s). The plans must show all
built-out structures and impervious cover. The plans must include the final grading
contours with elevations. The plans must indicate all utilities and easements. It is
likely that several versions of the final built-out site plans will be necessary. The
following is a list of layers:
f Drainage Plans - Final drainage plans must be included. The plans should include
the locations and pertinent elevations and sizes of the collection system and
drainage ways. All inlets and outlets must also be shown with pertinent elevations.
Scaled stormwater BMPs must also be indicated as required by DWQ rules and
policies. In certain cases, final stormwater management plans must also be
,¢rovided, but that will be addressed later in this document.
Plats - The plans must show the location and layout of all sub-divided parcels with
lot identifications. Platted parcels must be developable without further impacts to
jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetlands, streams, water features, and State
regulated buffers.
Proposed Impacts - All impacts to jurisdictional and nonjurisdictional wetland,
stream, water features, and State regulated buffers must be shown and labeled on
the site plans. All excavation, fill, flooding, stabilization, and other impacts that will
be conducted in or near jurisdictional and nonjurisdictional wetland, stream, water
features, and State regulated buffers must be indicated.
c?4-
4
Wettan Impacts (on the site plan):
Precise grading and final elevation contours must be provided. Existing vegetation and
any clearing must be specified.
.1 I All subsurface utility lines must indicate the location of anti-seep collars. Construction
detail for anti-seep collars must be provided.
Roadway or other crossings of riparian wetlands may require fkxxiway culverts to
maintain existing hydrological conditions.
A
f Flooding
V Draining
Stream Impacts:
f Stream impacts must be clearly shown on the plans. The centerline as well as the banks
of the stream must be surveyed or located by GPS for the portion of the stream to be
impacted.
Culverting:
The inlet and the outlet of the culvert should be aligned with the stream as much as
possible. Inlet and outlet elevations and stream bed elevations should be indicated.
Any widening of the stream must be shown with elevations.
The extent of and plan details for all dissipation or grade control devices should be shown
with pertinent elevations.
For shorter culvert sections, such as for road crossings, a longitudinal cross section that
shows the stream bed invert at the inlet and outlet, the existing stream bank elevations
and the invert of the inlet and outlet of the pipe(s) must be provided.
For shorter culvert sections, such as for road crossings, a vertical cross section must be
provided that shows the stream cross section at the inlet and outlet overlain with the
culvert and fill cross section.
When surface drainage features or groundwater recharge areas that feed or would
reasonably feed wetlands that are not to be filled are made impervious, it may be
necessary to direct some stormwater runoff to those areas in order to maintain hydrology.
You must identify these areas and address them. Supporting explanations and discharge
information must be provided to show that the wetland would not be eroded or receive
too much or boo little hydrology. In many cases this could help satisfy part of a
stormwater management plan.
For bottomless culverts or other spans, a vertical cross section should be provided that
shows the minimum distance from each span to each stream bank, the stream cross
section, the height of the span above the stream and the minimum distance from the
edge of each footer to each stream bank.
For bottomless culverts or other spans, a plan view must be provided that shows the
location of the spans and the stream banks.
For longer culverts or culverts that will pass beneath substantial impervious cover, it will
be necessary to provide adequate plan detail to show that discharge velocity/energy will
be adequately dissipated.
C??-
5
a r `?'C Aquatic life passage through culverts is typically achieved by placing the invert of the
?V? ` culvert below the existing bed of the stream per the USACE or North Carolina Wildlife
Resource Commission guidelines. Other methods such as baffles may also be used.
Please be aware that such placement may require the use of grade/velocity control
measures up or down stream of culverts on steeper streams to prevent head-cuts or
stream bed erosion. The culvert placement relative to the stream bed can be indicated
on the longitudinal profile. Grade and velocity control measures must be indicated an the
plan view and typical designs should be provided.
Multiple culverts, wide culverts or sectioned box culverts typically require the use of sills,
off-setting or other means to match the cross section of the existing stream (in order to
maintain stream stability and provide aquatic life passage). A vertical cross section of the
culverts should be shown overlain with the up and downstream stream cross section
including the stream flood-prone area.
Impacts associated with dam construction must indicate and enumerate all fill associated
with the dam foot print, spillway and any bank stream bank stabilization. The length of
stream impounded must also be indicated and enumerated.
Stream Relocations:
0 10 Stream relocations must be conducted as specified in General Certification numbers
3402 and 3404 (available on the Wetlands Unit web site). Stream relocation plans must
include:
Morphological measurements (see Appendix B of the Internal Technical Guide for Stream
Work in North Carolina available on the Wetlands Unit web site) - not all of the
measurements are applicable in every instance.
Typical stream cross sections - Typically, a riffle cross section and a pool cross section
that includes the entire food prone area. The bankfull and flood prove area elevations
should be indicated. Similarly, a riffle cross section of the reference stream(s) should be
provided.
Plan view - Provide scaled plans that show the location of the proposed (preferably with
stationing) and the existing stream. In most instances, the bankfufl contours and flood
prone area contours, in stream structures, bank revetments/stabilization, channel plugs,
planting plan, vegetation conditions, stormwater outlets, grade controls, bridges, culverts,
sewer lines, roads, fencing, and easement lines should also be provided.
Longitudinal Stream Profile - A scaled profile that indicates the thalweg, bankfull, and top
of bank elevations should be provided for the design and reference streams. In many
cases, it will also be necessary to show the existing land elevations for the design
stream.
Planting Plan - A planting and/or vegetation management plan should also be provided
that makes use of appropriate native vegetation. The plan should indicate the extent,
density, and species of plants to be provided.
In-stream structure, bank revetment/stabilization, and stormwater outlet typicals -
Detailed, typical plans should be provided for all in stream structures, bank revetments or
stabilization, and stormwater outlets. The typicals should include materials and
specifications as well as relative lengths, positions, and angles.
Sediment transport analysis - A sediment transport analysis should be provided based
on the current, relevant, accepted practices. The sediment transport analysis should be
relevant to the stream bed load type and should predict bed load transport equilibrium.
Permanent conservation easement or similar means of protection must also be provided.

6
Other Inf rmation:
1. The project should always be referred to by this name in all correspondence as well
as the DWQ # once it is provided.
.? 2. This only applies to DOT projects, which are not expected to utilize the Express
Review Program.
/3. This should be the size of the project as identified by the USACE for 404 Permits or
by the Division of Water Quality for Buffer Approvals and Isolated Wetland Permits.
V 4. Please provide the name (as depicted on the USGS topographic map and DWQ
Stream Classification Lists) of the nearest water body(ies) to which your project is a
tributary to (e.g. 'Neuse River (Falls Lake below normal pool elevation)"). (Do not
simple state 'stream", "river", "ocean", "sound" or "lake".) Please provide the 'stream
index number' of the named water body or water body section (e.g. "27-(1)"). Also,
please provide the full water quality classification (e.g. 'WS4V NSW CA") of the water
body. This information can be obtained from the DWQ web site
http;//h2o.enr.state.nc. usNms/Reportr,/reportsW B.htmi.
V 5. Please state which river basin and sub-basin that your project is in (e.g. "Neuse River
Basin, NEU01"). This information can be obtained from the DWQ web site
httpd/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/bims/Reports/reportsWB.htmi.
/6. Conditions should also be indicated on the existing site plan where applicable.
/ Photos (including aerial photos) can be helpful in describing the existing conditions.
V7. You must provide an attachment that explicitly describes what the proposed project
will entail from the planning stage to final construction
8. This can be a simple explanation, but it is critically important because the purpose
dictates how the no practical alternatives are reviewed.
SECTION IV - PRIOR PROJECT HISTORY
/ Please include copies of all 401 Water Quality Certifications, Isolated Wetland
v Permits, Buffer Approvals, USACE Permits, CAMA Permits for the site as well as a
copy of the final approved, site plan.
SECTION V - FUTURE PROJECT PLANS
For projects utilizing the express review process, all impacts both present and
potential future must be indicated. For instance, the location or configuration of
platted lots sometimes suggests that future impacts will be necessary to build,
access, or otherwise develop such lots. Failure to account for such potential impacts
could delay or disqualify a project from the rapid review process. If you believe that
the lot can be developed without impacts, but you anticipate that your assertion may
be questioned, it is recommended that you provide a potential building foot print
and/or grading plan to show that future impacts could be avoided.
SECTION VI - PROPOSED IMPACTS TO WATER OF THE US
1. It is recommended that the individual impacts be described if there are special things
to note about the impacts. Typically the most important thing is to have detailed
accurate site plans as described above. Please make sure they are clearly labeled.
Please include all proposed temporary impacts.
•
7
Also, a current, signed delineation map from the USACE should be provided (if
W `vim -available) and a map locating the stream origins signed by the appropriate DWQ
Staff must be provided if applicable.
op 'A
??/2. Each impact to a wetland must be dearly labeled and identified on the site plan. The
type of impact must be clearly stated. If the impact is temporary, a specific plan must
be described or shown as to how the wetland will be restored. Keep in mind that the
USACE delineates some features as wetlands that DWQ calls streams. Please list
any impacts in this table that DWQ would identify as a stream. If there is any doubt,
it is recommended that the impacts be listed as streams. Please follow current DWQ
policy with respect to whether a stream is perennial or not. It is recommended that
you assume that a stream is perennial (unless you are positive that it is not) so if
mitigation is required then the appropriate amount of mitigation would be anticipated
or requested from the EEP or private bank. If the EEP or private bank has pre-
approved too short of an amount of stream or if inadequate mitigation is proposed,
then that situation will result in delays.
/3. Sometimes it is difficult to determine whether a feature is a modified natural channel
or a ditch, especially In the eastern part of the State. Soils, drainage features,
topography, and similar factors, all are important for making that determination.
4. Other items to address not specifically requested in the application include
downstream sediment starvation, thermal pollution, low flow releases from dams, and
aquatic life passage. Other important considerations are buffer reestablishment or
mitigation around ponds on buffered streams. The site plan should include the
precise elevation contour of the normal pool as well as the dam foot-print. Mitigation
is required for wetland flooding of an acre or greater and for stream fill (if over the
150 foot threshold) under the dam foot-print and any outlet stabilization.
SECTION VII - AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
Avoidance and minimization are critical aspects of an application particularly if you desire the application
to be processed expeditiously. The following is a check4ist of avoidance and minimization questions that
DWQ Staff often look for in applications.
00 Are there any stream crossings at angles less than 75° or greater than 105°?
Are there any stream crossings that cross two streams above or at the confluence of those
to streams?
Are there any stream, wetland, water, and/or buffer impacts other than perpendicular road
\kO crossing near the edges of the property?
011
Vko
110
Can the stream be relocated as a natural channel design as opposed to culverted or
otherwise filled?
Is any single stream crossed more than once?
Can property access routes be moved or reduced to avoid stream, wetland, water, and
buffer impacts? 1_
Can a building, parking lot, etc. be realigned to avoid impacts?
?o Can the site layout be reconfigured to avoid impacts?
Can headwalls or steeper side slopes be used to avoid/minimize impacts?
j? ?b Can a retaining wall be used to avoidiminimize impacts? /
4xvd
?71 rle to

6 ?WO 8
Can cul de sacs be used in place of a crossing? W
d 1 1A
Can lots be reshaped or have shared driveways to avoid impac s . p r?,
If based solely on the practicable physical possibility, the answer is "yes" to any of the above questions
then you must have to provide substantial and convincing justification as to why the impacts are
necessary. If the impacts are required by a local government or other agency, the claim must be
supported with appropriate written documentation from the local government or other agency. Most
projects typically involve the need to justify avoidance and minimization. If this information is not readily
available, then the express review process may not be the appropriate venue to use. Providing
alternative plans (such as plans that avoid the impact, minimize the impact and the preferred plan, similar
to those used in environmental assessments) and explanations as to why the preferred plan is needed
and why the alternative plans won't work are many times helpful in the no practical alternatives review.
SECTION Vlll - MITIGATION
Mitigation for the Express Review Program, final mitigation plans must be presented up front. The final
plans (except for plans that propose payment into the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), Riparian
Buffer Restoration Fund, private mitigation banks, or similar banking instruments) must contain detailed
plans, specifications, calculations and other supporting data that show that the appropriate mitigation will
be achieved at the ratios required. The design plans must be developed to at feast the "90% level.
Monitoring plans must be final and specific. Any means of permanent protection, such as a permanent
conservation easement must be provided. If you elect to use the EEP or a private mitigation bank, it is
recommended that you request the maximum possible mitigation amount that DWQ may require so that
you will not have to get further approval from them on short notice. The EEP and private banks are not
part of the expedited review process and cannot be expected to meet any such deadlines. There will be
no conditional expedited approvals that require final plans at a later date. It is not recommended that
innovative mitigation techniques or greater than 10% preservation be requested as part of an expedited
process.
SECTION IX
V\\V If your project requires the preparation of an environmental document under NEPA or SEPA and an
approval letter has not been issued by the State Clearinghouse, then you cannot apply under the
expedited review process. I t is your responsibility to find out if such documentation is required.
SECTION X
There are many aspects of the Buffer Rules that must be addressed in every application, if applicable.
The first and most important thing to keep in mind is that allowable activities that require written Approval
from DWQ triggers a. review of the entire project for compliance with the Buffer Rules.
Diffuse Flow & Stormwater Management:
The most common issues that arise involve the requirement for diffuse flow of stormwater
through riparian buffers. Basically one of three things must be indicated in regards to all
"newt' stormwater that is collected and subsequently discharged. First, provisions for
diffuse flow through the protected buffer must be made. This usually involves.the use of
level spreading devices designed to the latest DWQ guidance on level spreader design,
which is available on our web site. Please keep in mind that it does not matter how far a
discharge point is from a buffer. The stormwater must be flowing in a diffuse manner at
whatever point it eventually reaches the buffer. If the stormwater will not be flowing in a
diffuse manner through the protected buffer at the point it reaches the buffer, then one of
the foilowinq oa ' a ow
You may provide a nitrogen removing measure such as a forested filter strip,
grassed swale, stormwater wetland, etc. The measure employed should be
designed according to the NC DENR Stormwater Best Management Practices
Manual or other DWQ Guidance available at http.
9
//h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/mitresto.htmi. After the nitrogen is treated, the
stormwater can be directly conveyed through the buffer with written DWQ approval.
You may discharge the stormwater t an existing man-made conveyance that
currently conveys stonmwater throw the Prot buffer (assuming the
conveyance was not constructed in v ati the Rules) as long as that
conveyance does not need to be altered vey the flow. Please remember that
there are no other choices. The f ng ch ' t is intended to help insure that
your application will riot be d ed incomplete as a result of improper stormwater
design.
Stormwater Management (for Buffer Rules compliance only - Also, see Section XI):
All stormwater out-falls must be dearly shown and label on site plan for pro cts in
Buffe s. List each out-fall as labeled:
?.
Level s ading devices designed to the latest WQ d
:A that merely con locity but do such as rip rap
tors are not ?pase .h of these out falls as labeled on the site
plan provide a DWQ worksheet available at
Option 2: Nitrogen removing measures designed to DWQ Standards arse
Proposed for discharges for which diffuse flow through a protected Buffer cannot be
met. List each of these out-falls as labeled on the site plan and provide a DWQ
worksh t vai at PVlh2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwedands/mitr,esto.
Optio 3: The storm ter will be discharged to an existing manmade (not
including modified natura annels ormwater
through the Buffer. T was not constructed in violation of the Buffer
Rules. List a -alt as labeled:
All stormwater out-fall must meet one of the options abo (Note: if you cannot check this
box your application will likely not be accepted into the expre view process.)
Site Plans:
All applications on properties with DWQ protected buffers must dearly depict the buffers
and any impacts to the buffers on the site plans. The impact maps should clearly depict
both zones of the protected buffers and the proposed impact areas (provided in square
feet).
Surface Water & Buffer Delineations:
/depicted ny surface waters subject to DWQ protected buffers must be field located and accurately
on the site plans and impact maps. The width, dimensions and pattern of the
urface water must be delineated. The surface water location must not be taken simply
om a USGS map, soil survey or local municipality's map. The buffers must be measured
from the surface water as required within the applicable buffer protection rule (e.g., all
buffers along streams subject to the Neuse Buffer Rule must be measured from the "top-of-
bank° of the stream and not the centerline of the stream). All streams must be surveyed or
located by GPS and shown precisely on the site plans.
Impact Table:
Please provide additional impact tables that clearly state the area of impact for each
corresponding impact site.
10
Variances:
Projects that require a Minor, Major and/or `General" Variance will not be eligible for the
use of the Express Review Program.
As opposed to applications that are submitted under our regular process, final mitigation
plans must be presented up front (see requirements for Section Vill above). The mitigation
plans must comply with the applicable buffer mitigation rule.
SECTION XI - STORMWATER
Please provide the following information in regards to potential stormwater requirements:
The total acreage of the site. (acres)
The total built-out impervious acreage acres)
The total area that will be disturbed - +,,'?Z) (acres)
If the total area exceeds 20% imperviousness, the development on the site is uniform in
density, and you claim that the total impervious area is less than 30%, you must provide a
complete, detailed breakdown of the assumed built-out conditions. The breakdown must
be detailed enough to show that all potential impervious areas are accounted for.
If there are concentrated areas of development such as multi-family, commercial, cluster,
club houses, etc. that exceed 30% imperviousness and the total imperviousness for the site
does not exceed 30%, a stormwater management plan will likely be required for those
SECTION XII - SEWAGE DISPOSAL
V Response must be dear and detailed. Any disposal method that suggests further impacts
?v1? may be required other than those shown must be dearly addressed on the site plans.
SECTION X11!
`O Answering yes to either of these responses automatically precludes you from the express
N review process.
SECTION XIV - SIGNATURE
The name, position and/or title of the applicant must be in type or long hand script here with
the signature. It should be the same person as described in Part II.
Mitigation:
Stormwater management plans must be complete with a final design and an executed
Operation and Maintenance Agreement. There will be no conditional stonnwater approvals
for the express review process that allow for approval of the final plans at a later date.
Worksheets must be provided that are available at
httpJ/h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlandslmitresto.html.
areas that exceed 30% imperviousness.
If you have any questions about these requirements, please email the Express Review Program at
[e-mail] and include your question and phone number and the appropriate staff will
respond as soon as possible.
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
January 3, 2006
EXPRESS REVIEW ACCEPTANCE LETTER
Evergreen - Battle Bridge, LLC
Attn: Fred Williams, Manager
422 Aiken Hunt Circle
Columbia, SC 29223
Fax #: [phone]
Project Name: Shoppes at Battle Bridge
Wake County
On December 30, 2005, the 401 Oversight/Express Permitting Unit of the Division of Water Quality received a
request from Bob Zarzecki, S&EC Inc., regarding a project known as "Shoppes at Battle Bridge" for acceptance
into the Express Review Program. This letter advises you that your project will be accepted into the Express
Review Program once the following items are received:
1) The application fee of $3,000.00 [for 401 Water Quality Certification and Riparian Buffer Approval
services, made payable to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality];
2) Five (5) complete and collated copies of the PCN Application;
3) One (1) copy of the Addendum;
4) Five (5) copies of all site plan information pertaining to this project (please refer to the Addendum
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/appadd5.pdf);
Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please keep in mind that the clock for this project will not start until
receipt of the completed application package and required fee are received. If the impacts are greater than
indicated on the initial interest form and/or the services are different, you may be required to remit an additional
fee.
If you have any questions or wish to discuss these matters further please do not hesitate to call Amy Chapman at
919-733-9502 or Cynthia Van Der Wiele at 919-715-3473.
Sincerely,
Cyndi Karoly, Manager
45P?401/Express Review Oversite Unit
AWK/cbk/cvdw
cc: DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File copy
Central Files
Bob Zarzecki, S&EC, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
401 Oversight/ Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: h://h2o.enr.state.nc//h2o.enr.state.nc
None Carolina
Nturu!!y
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
f . I
EXP 0 6 0.0 1q1
INITIAL INTEREST IN PARTICIPATION IN THE EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM
WITHIN THE 401 OVERSITE/EXPRESS PERMITTING UNIT
September 1, 2004
Version 3
Applicant Name: EVERGREEN - BATTLE BRIDGE, LLC: Attn: Fred Williams (Manager)
Applicant Address: 422 AIKEN HUNT CIRCLE, COLUMBIA, S.C. 29223
Applicant's phone number: [phone]
Fax number: [phone]
Applicant's email address: wi118787(albellsouth.net
Consultant Name (if applicable):
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA (S&EC): Attn: Bob Zarzecki
Consultant address (if applicable): 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
Consultant's phone number: [phone]
Fax number: [phone]
Consultant's email address: bzarzecki(c?sandec.com
Type of action requested under the Express Review Prograr
® 401 Water Quality Certification ?
? Isolated Wetland Permit _
® Riparian Buffer Approval ?
? Stormwater Management Plan _
? Mitigation Plan
? stream ? Wetland ? Buffers (check all appropriate)
n (check all that apply):
Stream Origin Determination
# of Determinations Requested
Intermittent/Perennial Determination
# of Determinations Requested
Name of Project: Shoppes . Battlebridge County: Wake
Total project acreage: 24.57 (acres). Total built out impervious area: 16.62 acres (acres) (67.6%).
Nearest named stream (from USGS topo map): UT to Neuse River (03-04-02: 27-22.5: C NSW)
Please provide a brief description of this project (attach site plan if available):
The project involves the impacts to linear wetlands and buffers for the construction of a stormwater wetland and
impacts to a significant intermittent stream and buffers for the widening of Battlebridge Road. The impacts are
associated with a commercial / retail shopping area development.
1
F
Please attach a map of site location using USGS 1:24,000 map and county soil survey.
Location of project site - please include reference to the county, nearest name town and highway number:
The site is located on the southeast corner of Battlebridge Road (SR552) and Rock Quarry Road (SR2542) Raleigh /
Garner. NC.
Proposed impacts:
Acres of 404 wetlands: ROAD (0.004 acres) - STORMWATER WETLAND (0.032 acres)
Acres of isolated wetlands: NONE
Linear feet of streams: ROAD (38 feet) - STORMWATER WETLAND (0 - None)
Linear feet of isolated streams: NONE
Square feet of protected stream buffers: ROAD (3,811sf) - STORMWATER WETLAND (12 066sf)
Has consultant or applicant attended any DWQ-sponsored training sessions in the past two years? If so, please list
which ones. Assisted as a presenter in approx. two Express Review training classes while working for the DWQ
Has any DWQ staff visited the site? YES, if yes, please provide DWQ staff name, DEBORAH EDWARDS and
date of visit: 12/06/04
Which other environmental permits from other agencies will be needed for this project? Please list the permits and
issuing agencies below:
NWP 18 & 14 - USACE: EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PERMIT - LAND QUALITY: CONSTRUCTION
PERMITS - CITY OF RALEIGH
Does this project require approval under the State Environmental Policy Act or National Environmental Policy Act?
NO
Is this project an After-the-fact application or has this project received a previous Notice of Violation from DWQ?
NO
Does this project require approval of a Variance from the NC Environmental Management Commission? NO
Are you aware of any local controversy concerning this project? If so, please describe the controversy and any
measures that have been taken with respect to public involvement.
NO
This form must be submitted via email (c/o 401 expressO)ncmail.net), faxed (919-733-6893) or hand-delivered to the Parkview Building, 2321
Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604. Applicants who are selected to participate in the Express Review Program will be notified via email or fax
within 2 days. Successful applicants will then be instructed regarding detailed procedures for full application (Please Note: Submittals of the review
packages on Friday after 12:00 pm will be stamped as received on the next business day).
Please contact Cynthia Van Der Wiele at 919-715-3473 if you have any questions regarding this form.
2

N
Project #: Scale: Garner, NC
8450.w3 1":2000 USGS Topo Quad
Project Date: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mgr.: bz 12-30-05 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge [phone] • [phone]
Wake County, NC U3 Web Page: www.SandEC.com
N
Project M Scale:
8450.w3 1":2000'
Mgr.: BZ 1 12.30-05
Wake County Soil Survey
Sheet 70
Shoppes @ Battle Bridge
Wake County, NC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
0F W A T?, Michael F. Easley, Governor
?
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
7 - North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources

{7 Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
EXPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
Fax To: Bob Zarzecki, S&EC Fax #: [phone]
Fred Williams, Evergreen-Battle Bridge 803.462.0692
Subject: Shoppes @ Battle Bridge Date: January 3, 2006
Number of pages including cover sheet: 2
Notes or special instructions:
The original will be sent in the mail. If you have questions, please contact Cynthia Van Der Wiele at
919-715-3473 or Amy Chpman at 919-733-9502.
401 Oversight/ Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: httn://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands
NhCarolina
oce
NaturallY
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
SENDING CONFIRMATION
DATE JAN-3-2006 TUE 09:55
NAME DWQ-WETLANDS
TEL [phone]
PHONE : [phone]
PAGES : 2/2
START TIME : JAN-03 09:55
ELAPSED TIME : 00' 21"
MODE : ECM
RESULTS : OK
FIRST PAGE OF RECENT DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED...
VFWArg? pli'm'lF. !- 6'srnor
-H-11 R,;jI. 511-Y
cntwa rvm,,.n ti....•,,.8:..c
s nmah C:uctiBP nrrom?ml ore.,;tr?m
y Am„W xfi-....r.r:. LI¢¢or
O '< I>:vi--fWaret?+alily
EXPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Malting Addrwsp 1.650 mail Sorvice Centel
Raleigh. NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone i#: 919-733.0203
Fax [phone]
Fax To: Bob Zarzeeld, S&EC Fax #: [phone]
Fred Williams, Evergreen-Battle Bridge 803.462.0692
Subject: Shoppe3 @Battle Bridge Date: January 3, 2006
Number of pages including cover sheet: 2
Notts or special instructions:
The I?rip al ill l), sent in the mnil If You have questions, pl ase contact Cynthia Vau Der Wlele at
D,9_t_-ta°3 or Amy Chapman at 919-733-9502. .__-_
/.01 Dmmiphti Exoram RWin nom*V Unt
I6:: Man$!rvM em,m. Peler;h. Np'h C:.mNne 2?M-130
2&•ertil?4s 9c?i^wM. $.nk?5p, aoi M.Npfhe1W-Z/6Ja
P'.w?; ot¢r231?& IrNlF,4?}EBX:!Ir••emR. NrtQ.l?i23a_Ale.vgc,WteLanJa
N??ec. 41-
21ahrrzIlly
AnEyBI Cpp?'hnIMNPIIi.?uINa A?tm Empbyee-SOS, neOrrkQrfaHe POMP yumer Paper
SENDING CONFIRMATION
DATE JAN-3-2006 TUE 09:57
NAME DWQ-WETLANDS
TEL [phone]
PHONE : [phone]
PAGES : 2/2
START TIME : JAN-03 09:56
ELAPSED TIME : 00'43"
MODE : ECM
RESULTS : OK
FIRST PAGE OF RECENT DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED...
?p ;n!v7gq [.Ij;A -1F ea;k?. GO+ttnn
a aM NiI iam I;.k-J:. 5ttmary
`, vrrtnC,Jiva DeFart?nealn; Enmm?nCnl apd NalY.ral FCarvurc:+
EXPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and ].Natural Resources
401 Oversight/F.xpress Review Permitting Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
Fax To: Bob Z,arzccki, S&EC Fax #: [phone]
Fred Williams, Evergreen-Battle Bridge 803.462.0692
Subject: Sboppes PBattle Bridge Date: January 3, 2006
Number of pages including cover sheet: _ 2
Notes or special instructions:
The onZmit m11 be sent in the m, ail. TI you lu, egumuons, Pease contac-Lc vnthia Van Der Wicle at
910.^15-3473 or Amy Chapman at 919-733-950
eCt prytn2t _,emr uanxe anrmmxn u r
Ia59 w1Alt SAMCa CMtN. Ralpialr, M1:oRT (:arplind 4i5+J2?1650
:.?I GaF++n'I EnMnk. ,,iM?Sp. Rab3M1, taY.n Camnna <_'S1n
FM1arle: frt?•131111151 FlC?14l?-6iYA!Inlcrneta^-+?Z'
,ti'atrrmJJ?
An E?al Opw-lt,AAi-Nn Am,A, E:r;pfw - S , RK.Vda0.'S D% Poet Cam¢nar Paler
¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
¦ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Evergreen Battle Bridge LLC
Attn: Mr. Ford Williams
422 Aiken Hunt Circle
Columbia,SC 29223
DWQ# 06-0001-Wake
A.
r /,l ? Agent
B. RRe-6elved by ( Pd W Name) C. Date of Dellveq
Ti??(?t??:prms-4-06
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ? Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ? No
3. Se IceType
VCertified Mail
? Registered
? Insured Mail
? Express mail
-% Return Receipt for Merchandise
? C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee)
? Yes
2. AricieNumbw 7005 1160 0000 9954 8720
(rr VWW from service la_ ,
'1Q11 m_k-- onnn
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE' "-
P M
Sender: Please print yd?r n?rpe,
st-Class ?IL-
ost d' ?ee
dress, and.ZIP+4-in this-bex
? l
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight/Express Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
i?i»ii,,,i.,?,: itrlt?l?ltl?t??Jri?ttltiJt?!¢?l?tt?Jlt??tettllte?Jtff?trttl??i?
.7VIL C[ G17YInw1\IYIGnI/1L Vv1717V61M1V 10, rM
NC Division of Water Quality
Date: 01/12/06
Tran # Invoice Type Date Reference Balance
9604 011206 Invoice 01/12/06 8450.W3 Express Permit $3,000.00
000803
Check Number: 803
Check Amt: $3,000.00
Discount Pay Amount
$0.00 $3,000.00
EXP 06 0001
CA UTI ON NOTI CE TO CO NTR ACTOR }
THE CONTRACTOR I P S S ECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE ! ` REVISIONS BY
LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATIONS OF EXISTIN : ! NOTES RETAINING WALL G UTILITIES AS S LNG WALLS GREATER LEGEND 152 1394 THAN 4 FEET IN HEIGHT
SHOWN ON THESE PLANS I REQUIRE B S BASED ON RECORDS OF THE - UILDING PERMIT, 11NG PERMIT, DESIGN TO BE APPROVED PRIOR EXISTIN
VARIOUS UTILITY ExlsnnlG rRAFFIC s1GNAi. COMPANIES AND WHERE POSSIBLE, Iro eE LIPGaaDED, TO CONSTRUCTION, ' RE~SIGNAL PLANS) MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN .TION, G PROPOSED DE CRIPTION
THE FIELD, THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT NOTEI RETAINI L~ 85 CONTOUR LINE
OR COMPLETE, NG WALLS THE CONTRACTOR MU T S CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY - NG WALLS TO BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS, 36,2 SPOT ELEVATION
COMPANY AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEF R r ~1~~ ~ 1395
0 E ANY EXCAVATION NOTE SEE TO REQUEST EXACT FI GRADING PLAT ELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES, IT ?ADI ~ ¦ STORM DRAIN INLET ~ NG PLAN (SHEET 2) FOR FOUNDATION
SUBSURFACE PREPARATIOI SHALL BE THE RESPONS- IBILITY OF TN EPARATION NOTE. • STORM DRAIN MA ° RAIa 2 NHOLE sr~P N o
RELO E CONTRACTOR TO CATS ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WNICN CONFLi sEE 'oFF-SITE aoao STORM DR h~fNS s AIN PIPE s
PROPOSED I P CT WITH THE IMPROVEMEMS PLANS• M ROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, EXISTIN Foa DESIGN oF' RIPRAP UTILITIES BEING EXTEN G RogDwaY 3 a.PaoN n5
DED INTO THE SITE SHALL MEET ALL c THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE RESPECTIVE T
U ILITY COMPANY, THE CONTRA 158 ~ CTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO COMPLY WITH AL L la
UTILITY COMPANY P F L Rcp ° 65% S ECI (CATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS, VICINITY MAP
(APPROXIMATE SCALE 1'-5000')
2~1 SLOPE RA LPH STEPHENS ROA
I. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DE REMOVAL OF AN MOLITION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES IN L
S R 111 ' 4) 60 R W - ( Y EXISTING UTILITIES SERVING THE T C UDING REMOVED TO THE RIGHT-OF- S RUCTURE. UTILITIES ARE TO BE
WAY.
2, THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY ELEVATION OF CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/
EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON T OR OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COP HESS PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS
M ANTES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASURE ' THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT T MENTS TAKEN IN
- 0 BE RELIED ON U COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR M AS BEING EXACT OR
~ , CI-ECK DA NEV M (TYP, LEAST 72 UST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY Z NEW HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION T COMPANIES AT HIGHWAY 55 UTILITIES. IT 0 REQUEST EXACT FIELD L
/ ~ PLACE EVERY 200 _ LF WITHN DITCH) SHALL BE THE R OCATION OF BY-P EXISTIN ESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO ASS G UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT RELOCATE ALL ~
~ SOUT PLANS, WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS H SOUTH MAIN SOWN ON THE Z ~ STREET)
PERMAt~IT DIV I ~ ~H~Q~oA~. , VARIA rn VARIABLE WIDTH R W 3. ALL CUT OR FILL ~
~ ~ ~ t} (TYP) ~ ~ - SLOPE S SHALL BE 311 OR FLATTER UNLES ~ `O S OTHERWISE NOTED. ~ ~ ~
CHECK rw~a55. 'y 4, PRECAST STRUCTURE ~ ~ N S MAY BE USED AT CONT u- Q
BW~455.0 DAM (TYP( I 3 OPE RACTORS OPTION, o ~ > ~ u7
ah I IN L TWA 46.5 PERMAt~fyT 8 tDE GN Y a BW 446. a 53 Q 3~1 n n t 5, STORM PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOW N Q ~ ~ rn TYPE I ~ SUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ~ ~ rn
R DIVERSIOiQ DIT 34 a b ~ ~-Op n Q ALPH 160 43A 52 E RCP, CLASS III PER ASTM C-76,WITH FLEXIB ~ ~ ~ BITUMEN GASKETS AT LE PLASTIC Q 0 ~ o ~ ~
PERMANEN 1 ~ STEPHENS DIV IQ T ~ 1 45Q ERS N DITCJ~ JOINTS, U c Ln ~ ~ o U N
ROAD 44 3 TW~455.0 _ Tw~4~I,0 1 ,458 51 2a' t i~ J ! R~2 L. 2 ' BWi444.5~ B ~ 5.5 07 LF 2 R e Oa ~ i ~ 6. EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUT a ~ ~ ' E CURES TO BE INSPECTED AND REPAIRS ~ ~ N ~
~ I 08 CP 0 , . 133 L 24' - - - 41 44,26 aq (SR 11.14 XISTING PIPES TO BE CLEANED OUT T D AS NEEDED, AND p } ~ , ~ 0 REMOVE ALL SILT AND DEBRIS, ~ ~ ~ o ~
• ~ ~ ' " X10 ~ 2~1 LF 24' RCP O i ~ I 4 4968 ~ I 1 60 R W „ 4146 ~ 7, EXISTING GRADE CONTOUR INTERVAL
F y I, ~ ~ ~ ~ 44, , p S SHOWN AT I FOOT, ~ ~ ~ G3 x ~ o
] 1545 f, E _ 4 ~ 4 1 I CONTRACTOR TO ` ~ 0 OSED GRADE CONTOUR TNT ~ o` ERVALS SHOWN AT I FOOT INTERVALS,
10' WNSPOU OLLECT 16 INSTALL 18' BERM n'~, I ~ ~5 LF 24 (DRIVE T 45,18 OP OF n ~ 1 ~ HRU C PY) e. N p o c 9. IF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES TO RE ~ N o
SLOPE P) ~ / P ~ ~CP e oa±' Loa. T TO LN RGROIND, i 93 LF ~ 1 ,,.A" } 45.42 ' 1 \ SrORM~AIN ~ 1 MAIN A o - RE DAMAG Z SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS REP ED DURING CONSTRUCTION IT .C L S ONSIBILITY TO REP
L~ E RCP e $ ~ I 4 LF 24 I OUTPAR L ttl 8 TWO-WAY C.O. ~ pia waT STRUCTURE AS NECE AIR AND/OR REPLACE THE EXIT Q ~ ~ ~ SSARY TO RETURN IT TO EXISTING C SING ~
? NV EL 45.0 ~ '16,0 31 *l55 A~ I ~ ~ ~ RCFA ° ~ ` ` ~ " 16,1. l4, 9 i '~?S? `~~~r-, ONDITIONS OR BETTS `''r~.~, R. J W 10, ALL STORM PIPE ENTERING TR W
I 13 i N9 24 s t i V 4 36 AT T S UCTURES SHALL BE GROUTED TO S RUCTURE IS WATERTIGHT, ASSURE CONNECTION uJ
166 RC OS I ~ , ~ ~ _ ~ ` 18' 44; % ,.L \ ` 120 L 24' ~i - 124. LF 24' 1
3 _--F ~ RCP Oa RCP e ; ~ i " ~ ~ a 12 0 421-x' - - -4 - ` n II, ALL STORM SEWER MANHOLES IN PAVE
ca. Ecroa ~ ~ i n a' ca. roR a (R00~ DRAT • MIN Oa. TIE O. AND SHALL HAVE D AREAS SHALL BE FLUSH WITH PAVE sse 'oFF-siTE QoAD TRAFFIC BEARING RING MENT, u„IPaover~rvrs PLaws• SHALL BE 6" AB ~ COVERS, MANHOLES IN UNPAVED A
I ~ a MINE I,Oa P A7 ~ TO ERGRO~ND ST MDRAIN ~ a v ` ~ a. LOPE. ~ \ ~ ~ I ~ `.a Foa ~5,~ ~ OVE FINISH GRADE, LIDS SHALL BE LA REAS BELED "STORM SEWER", ROADWAY
,.1. ~ I ' ~ ti 20 LF 24' ` y / • ~ ~ ~ CP• i ; n~ { - 12, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO ALL TERMS C
I 4 ~ I ~ I ~ ) 266 ~ ~ ` - GENERAL N,P,D,E.S, P ~ ONDITIONS AS OUTLINED IN ERMIT FOR STORMWATER D THE
/ 14 A ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ 17 L 24' ~ EXTEr;D » 16.0' ~ ~ I 37 RCP Oa EXISTING B.Oa I l a ! 2.51 CONSTRUCTI ISCHARGE ASSOCIATED WIT ON ACTIVITIES. H 5~1 _~-~~~q,
PIPE 8: ~ SLOPE ~ ~ I A , , A FARCE tt2 , 12 ~ a LF (24' O 456 ! 15 i A ~j~ ~ Lope 13, CONTRACTOR SNA ~ LF LL ADJUST AND/OR C
+ 4' FREf~;H DRAI 41~ i ±1,36 ACR ~ RCP • I , / ~ 9 LF 121 LF 24' SYSTEM; (TYP., RE ~ ~ 4 15a) ~ 7 30' R 4135 AT ~ \ 51 i ; \ ~s• ASSURE A SMOOTH F ~ UT EXISTING PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY ~ ' IT AND .,ONTIN000S GRADE, TO a `I,5%
• Oa GEOT REPCR J ~ ~ / IPRAP j ~ ! 0 &j 12 LF 24' ; 14. CO NTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE POSITIVE DRAIN
I ~ ~oN ~ PRIOPOS~ RET ,Ci'~.' j a oa 25 I ' NATURAL AND PAVED A AGE AWAY FROM BUILDINGS FOR ALL REAS.
/ 34 LF 2a I ~ 0 Z1 ~ 5 + I 44 ~ I RCP . o ~ I -203,819 SF, I ; 59
/ ~ ~ ~ 1 446,00 ~ ~ ( l ~ I ie° 15. TOPOGRAP 1.55; ~ ,,;t HIC INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A TOPOGRAP
o ' / ALL S ORMpRAIN LEADER SHALL EE i ~ ~ p 5A ~ ~r - . 1 ASSOCIATES, INC., IF CONTRA( OR p NIC SURVEY BY FREELAND ~ Q ON THE PL T OES NOT ACCEPT EXI~TI'\o ;;=JGRAPH ANS, WITHOUT EXCEP; ION, HE SHALL HAVE Y AS SHOWN
c ROUT WDER(}ROLND TO THE SI E ~ ~ I FOREBAY TT ~ 42 ! ~ ST ORANA E SYSTEI~L STORNIDRAN I I 82 LF 24' ~ $ ~ 1 ~ LEADERS SHALL BE 10', Ar,D II~~', AT ~ ~ ' RCP Oa L 33 LF 2 • ~ T MADE, A T HI , RcP . 2 OPOGRAPHIC S EXPENSE A SURVEY BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEY
~ LOS S OPE tMl M). RED RCH FOQ ~ ~ ~ . ~F 24' EXAC~ D OWNER FOR REVIEW, OR AND SUBMIT IT TO THE ` IPRAP
~ aCP 1.0a O T LOC TIONS, SI t I 336 LF 30' ! q ~ - ~ i A ~ ~ LF 24' / RCP • 0.2a 5A ~ s • ` .APRON o4 ` i 16, ALL
i 125 LF 24' p Oa \ - UNSURFACED AREAS DISTURBED BY GRADI Ew a3a.o Tvv~a33,o ~ INCHES OF T P NG OPERATION SHALL RECEIVE 4 0 SOIL, CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY T
/ 3~1 ~ ~ i RCP • Oa ~ r BW~434.0 A I 5 LF 24' 'SLOPE ' I ' ~ ~ e 0a ew~a2a.5 3H~IV OR STEEPER, C N S ABILIZATION FABRIC TO ALL SLOPE 0 TRACTOR SHALL GRASS DIST S
I ~ ~ k ~ , 4 PIPE (TYP) ! k a 1 - IPRAP , WITH ORANGE COUNTY SPECIFI A URBED AREAS N ACCORDANCE APRa~ ,a C TIONS UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF
I A ~ 4 A p P 4 i 16.0' • Y1' f)OW~SPOUr a a ~ / ouECro ~ TPAR .,.g,p9-#44X--.~..~' (ROOF AIN) • I,Oa, E 42 412 ~ A ii GRASS IS OBTAINED, U rw~a33,o 17, CONSTRUCTION SHALL
p' 4sso Q sTORMD AN -+1,34 A E TPAR tt3 w~aiTb COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNI + J CONSTRUCTED TO SAME, NG CODES AND BE -1.34 A ES
BERM 44 10' DOWNSPOUT COLL OR !@ARDEfd E;ENrER °flR • n.
5 MIN I,Oa: TIE TO 6 SD 431 CONTRACT p 18, ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL NAVE A SMOOTH F ~ coNrRACT ro ~ FROM INVERT I UNI ORM POURED MORTAR •
- . - . _ - , 0 RGROLND' STORMDRAIN TC~4 76 ~ i NSTALL 18' 'E / I VEGETATIVE T~~4 ~ i ALONG TOP CIgECK DAM (TYP, TC~160 i N TO INVERT OUT, INVERT Z YVSTALL Ifi' ' M ALONG TOP ` W
3530-kSFELF' (6~1 SLOPE) 33S SLOPE R PLACE EVERY 200 i 44 4 . ~ ...,....v.,_a.,. 9 ~ LF WITHN DITCH) - - - - ~~'R TW~4 I 33.0 9, SETTLEMENT PLATES ARE REQUIRED I
~ p,~ ew~4ro.za COORDINATE WI N AREAS OF DEEPEST FILL. CONTRA T TH OWNER'S GEOTECHNICAL REPR C OR TO W ESENTAT
? I' / ~ ~ " ; ' '4360 ° oa 4l' k- / / / / ~ d 4 309 LF OF CON T IVE ON LOCATION S RUCTION, AT THE TIME ~ ~ 309 LF 30' TANNG WALL., 'A lDESK~N BY OTHFJ2Sl- RCP. 0 2,1i
f 248 LF ' 24' 46 4 &i ~ RCP • Oa I I 3~1 1 - r__.a.._ ~ ~ 43 ~ WQ 20. TEMPORARY CONSTR
I / - sL 13b`LF'Z4• ~ OUT I, 44 • Oa ~ 92 24. 4 i X ~ ±I.d OUTPARC u UCTION EASEMENT REQUIRE F ~ 4 PROPERTY OWNER TO THE D ROM DEVELOPER AND ADJOINING ~ 25;1 WEST FOR ALL -I Z J -1,29. ACR rw,; EASEMENT EXTENT WORK OUTSIDE WAL-MART PROPERTY LIN - ~
I ~J 336 LF 30' , _ 1 17 ~ D l8 ~ ~ 12 ~ Oa 4a 49 LF 24.4 . SLOPe S BEING AGREED UP E, Bw~an,o. ON AT TIME OF BID. ~ Q (V
I RCP . 0.2a STORMWATE 3650 19 ` \ 1 P • Oa v 26 LF 2a ~ R >l 3 4 ~ RCP . oa 26 LF 24' `'.p RCP • OS ~ -J Z
MANAGMENT ~ ~ _ Q 2 , _ 44 PERMaivENr 20'` DRAINAGE FACILITY 43'27 pP' 2® 116 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE TABL _ E QzU 2® 116 24` ~
DIV62SION I E A4E ~ \ ~ \ 44 ASE NT, / \ - - - - : 0 27 IO' 315 LR 30' W ' ` ' PROPERTY IMPERVIOUS A ~ ~ REA IMPERVIOUS AREA TOTAL AREA
~ ' ~ ~ I'BEIVCH ~ I 2 5 4215 285 2]5 289 42 ~ RCP • l0a ~ 1 ~ - ~ II7 LF 2 I 8 LF ~ ~ 216 285 215 KL4 1, I ~ I 1 3673 % ~ ' ~ RC? e Og ~p e I ` RCP • J II LF 24' 197 LF 24' 135 LF 4' (AC) W
I ~ / ~ \ I 2' VEGETATIVE 4 • I' RCP Oa / 36,25 / Oa RCP Oa ~r~ / LARGE (AC) OL ` RETAIL AND SHOPS Z W
l ~ ` \ ~ I ~ ~ r / ~ HELF 161 ~ 129 L 29 LF v I \ ~ j SLOPE) 3~1 61 LF 30'" 2 ' CP • 0 4 (WITHOUT POND) ±28 ±67~ + W -42,03 U
10' BENCH \ I I ! MICROPOOL OPE ~ 4, • L~ RCP • O 22 23, = • 11 ! ~ !I L\ - 21 4 ~ LAR ~ ~L O GE RETAIL AND SHOPS OUTPAR EL tt5 + _ -
I ~ 1 l 1 •31301 ~ ~ OUTLET II a 4 ~ ~ V~ TATNE 1 ~ I STRUCTURE,- ~ ~ / ~ \ .3625 ~ 1 \ • 256 1 +1.25 CRE (WITH POND) -34 ±81~ + ~p Q S w,4 0 -42,03 Z_
-.$HF~ (61 SLOPE) / \ ~ 1 ~ ' FIL ~ 6 ~ 1 I ~ \ r rE aIP~AP Bw~a2T.~ OUTLOTS m ~ ±6J + ~ N
/ 3530 ' ' 3625 I RI JG (TYP, i K) a 24 ?Jl 47 LF 30''~ \ ' l ~ / AEON 2 PERMANENT P r 5 .RCP • 02f _ ~ V ~ \ / I ~ DEEM 2b DIVERSION -90~ (ASSUMED) +7,45 ~ ~
?i / ~ ~ 34 SLOPE EGETATIVE ~ U QNp 43,0 DITCH - ~ $~ELF t6~I Sl ~ 3150 A / ~ 3a LF (7J-2a• EX EN I 4 _ - ~ RCP e oa SON 4326 '
- - - ~ ~ REA ~ . ~ ~ I 10' I. 132
I - ~ - ~ ~ ~ BERM 249 F 24' 4' FRBd DRAIN ~ J
- R • OS SYSTEM YP„ RED q . F i - . 2 LF 30' I r 07 REPORT) *43,ZOO,F, ~ ` ~~~CAUTION~~~ ~
~ . ~ RCP e 3.1a \ ~ ' . RCP a ~ 1 ® 105 LF .24' 444,00 ~I, ~ ~ ~ I R • ~ 6 0
RA PERMANENT 3 SLOPE . ~ CP Oa DIVERSION DITCH ~ ~ - W7 ' LF 24' ~ , z N.C. ONE CALL: UTILITY LOCATOR SERVICE
a30 LF 3 ~ _ _ + 129 LF 2a STEPHE 30' _ 2 RCP . o$ _ - I LF `24' 41 LF 24.RCP a Oa RCP • Oaa 3~1 SLOPE 3 DAYS BEFORE DIGGING CALL
ROAD PERMANENT LF 30' _ ~ 44 • OR i RCP • Oa DIVERSION DITCH ~ 42 4a , ~ 44 RCP • 0.2a n i q TOLL FREE 1-800-632-4949
1 (SR 1114 30' oRaINA 4 • CI-IECK DAM (TYP, EASEMENT \ _ PERMANENT
`(6O R W PLACE EVERY 200 ~ ~ ~ ~ DIVERSION' LF WIT(-IN DITCH) 204 LF 48' ~ DITCJ-I A ONE CALL SYSTEM FOR COMMUNITY AND JOB SAFETY,
RCP a O.Sa NOTES CONTRACTOR TO REFEQ 70 GEOTECI-NICAL t~
REPORT,- AS PREPARED BY SEME, INC, FQa APPROXIMATE t-- ' \ LIMIT a CI~ECIC DAM S OF OVEREXCAVATIOWUVDERCUT AND REPLACEMENT I (TYP) CAUTION m
I THE UNDERGRWND UTIl1TIES SHOWN HAVE BEEN LOCATED FROM FlELD SURVEY INfORMAl10N AND EXISTING DRANINGS. THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT THE UNDERGROUND
i ~ NOTES SEE PONA DETAILS ( E ~ SHE TS 31 AND 31A) FOR DETAILS AAD I ' I UTILITIES SHOWN COMPRISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, DRAWN I~ IPI~ A~ I~-/~ EITHER IN SERNCE OR ABANDONED. THE SUR
DESIGN NFORMATICN FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT F , AGILITY A ~ I~ O N 1/'~ VEYOR FURTHER DOES S ~ ~ D NOT WARR ULE ANT THAT THE UND ERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE IN MGL THE E%ACT LOCATION INDICATED, ALTHOUGH HE DOES CERTIFY THAT
'APRON al ~ EREMa~LMITL D AREA Tp STI.RBED DURING APRON x PIPE WIDTH AT WIDTH... AT AVERAGE MAXIMUM AVERAGE THEY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM INFORMATION CHECKED APRON ~ DIAMET LENGTH E AVAIIaBLE 1HE SURVEYOR HAS NOT PHYSICALLY LOCATED THE
~ ; CONSTRUCTKXV ACTIVfTES f ER STRUCTURE ND OF STONE STONE APRON UNDERGROUND URLITIES. ` APRON DIAMETER DIAMETER TNICKNE SKS
~ I (STR; ttp, SS - ( tt DATE STR. I) 4,0' 12,0' 26,
~ ~ ~ ~ 0 30,0 0.9' 1.4' 2,1 5/09106
~ -2 (STR, u10) (STR. u10) 3, 0 9,0 19.9' 22.9' 0, ' SCALE 6 0.9 1,4'
3 (STR, ttl2) I" 100' (STR, ttl2) 2.0' 6.0' I~ n' ~ I~ (l' n ~ ~ „ , , ~ ~ ~ ~
_
v n U.y JOB No
(T S P. >x58) 2.0' 6.0' 23.0' 25.0, 0.9' 1.4' 2J'
tt R, 63) tt DRAWIN (STR. 63) 1.5' G
4;5' 13,0' 145' 0.5' 0.81 1.2
F(STQ P. =58, u , XX) (STR. =XX) 2.0 6.0' 16.0' 19. 0 0.6 0.9'
1 1
SCALE I' 100'
OF SHEETS

MATCNLINE 'B" -NEXT SHEET
LEGEND REVISIONS BY
'y CHECK 1152 1394 - EXISTING .PROPOSED DESCRIPTION
DAM (TYP) TW ~ 455.
BW ~ 455,0 85 CONTOUR LINE
1. 3~ LOPE ET ININ W LL 1 36.2 ~ SPOT ELEVATION
„ TW ~ 46.5 ~ ~ 3.1 ~ Q 48,50 ~a ` B (DE GN Y ~ BW 446, 53 Q ? SLOPE ~ ~ ¦ STORM DRAIN INLET
PERMANE T 34 46.0 V 43:0 52 ~ 1,~~5 ~ 1395 PERMANENT ~ ~ STORM DRAIN MAN ~
: DIVERSIO SIT 4525. DIVERSION DITCH HOLE ,
~ ~ ~ 45,0 ~ 44.35 45,8 4, 45, b 44 ~ g g STORM DRAIN PIPE RAIp ti
N - 45.2 4 51 24" ~G, 46.0 3~ 5.1 „45.8 .43.9 ~ 45, S~P~fN ~ 46.0 Hwy s s~
44 TW ~ 455.0. W LO 07 LF 2 5.0 RC ®0~ 0. 2 "LF 2 B F
~ BW ~ 444,5 ~ • 5.5 CP ®0 4 44.25 , 133 L 24 445 451 44 ~ ..45,1 `
- 45,4 RCP ®0 J 45,40 I- 0 45' 2 I LF 24
44,7 2 I 'i 45.15 45,68 R P ® ~ i 44,b 4 44,6 ~ VICINITY MAP 445
~ ~ 4 ~ .45,68 - 4 45.46 44. ~ i 44,7 - , ~ (APPROXIMATE SCALES 1-5000 )
0 I M ~ 44,
45' 5 45• 45.68 , 44.9 42,8 30 ~ ~ 44 CONTRACTOR TO ` ITE GRAIN G N TE 0 44,5• INSTALL 18" BERM ~
4.4 45.45 45,8 d55 ~ 46. ~ I, CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES OP OF ~0 INCLUDING REMOVAL OF ANY EXISTING UTILITIES SERVING THE STRUCTURE,
- 46,0 10" ` OWNSPOUT` ^ OLLECTO i 4 SLOPE ( P) UTILITIES ARE TO BE REMOVED TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY,
578 5.85. .85 (DRIV , THRU CA PY) ®M N 45, F „ 3 15 LF 24 ~ 43, 1 293 L 43 " 43 43b ~ 2, THE NTRA
i L T 4b. ~ 45.85 Op ®O~, 0 TO UND „RGROUND„ RCP ® ~ _ P 3,15 ~ CO CTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION ~ - AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS
STORMD AIN ~ u , 43,45• 44.5 OUTPAR L 43,45 BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE
4I 45.92 2 .0 3,0 45 „ TW _ i F 8 0 WA C,O. , 0 4 L 24" ` + ~ POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION I N 43.4 -1,55 AC ES s oT ~ ~ TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR
46.0 46, ~ ~ INV~:EL 4 CP ®0`b ~ a 5.0 4J 44. I _44. ~ ~ MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIE U S AT LEAST 72 HOURS
45 5 (RE ~ RCN) r ~ ~ ~ 44, 43,9 , W t 44,0 5,4 45,1 .35 ~ , ~ BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD L F 426 ~ ~ OCATION 0 Z
44, C9i _ 0 • 36 ~ ~ UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO - .0 ~ ~ RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED
" ~ 45.50 ~i 119 24 ~ ~ ~ ' 44.75 43,8'. ~ p~. f24 LF 24`'= 42. ~ ` IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS,
45. I A3 120 L 24 45.4 RCP ®0~ 166 L ~ RCP OX RCP 124. LF 24`' , ~ ` z ~ RCP ® ` 3. ALL CUT OR FILL SLOPES SHALL BE 3~1 OR FLATTER UNLE OTHERWI ~ ~
44 IS" R d 45, , 4 4 ~ ! 451 422 - - - 4 - ` ~ N T SS SE ~ ~
® 1.3 ' i~ _ _ 4 432 ~ Q ~ 0 ED. t ~ 22 ~ ~ ~ ~ 4. PRECAST STRUCTURES MAY BE USED AT CONTRACTORS OPTION, ~ _ ~ _ 4, ~ ~ 7 ~ Q c
4525 h~ (~~L ~ 12" OWNSP° UT COL' ECTOR ~ ~ '44.75 45. ~ 45.25
~ ' 4" COLL CTOR ~ (R00 DRAT ®MIN 0~. TIE 45.26 2: ; ~ 4 ,25 ~ ~ ~ ~ - Q 5. STORM PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED LL - c
~ ~ ~ ~ IPE (TYP AT TO UN ERGRO ND ST ~ MDRAIN ~ .8 „ 4 - `i` 4285 ~ ~ 46.0 20 LF 24 4 .5 : IN I,O~ LOPE I "4285 ~ z TYPE I~ RCP, CLASS III PER ASTM C-76,WITH FLEXIBLE PLASTIC ~ = ~ ~ a2 ~ o ~ ~ BITUMEN GASKETS AT JOINTS, ~ ~ L ~ I
CP 46. ® ~ ~ Q 2b5 424 43.5 ~ o U c~
•15~ 4• 4 . 117. L 24 6, EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES TO BE INSPECTED AND REPAIRED AS } c~ c~ NEEDED, AND EXISTING PIPES TO BE CLEANED OUT TO REMOVE ALL SILT a ~ _ ~
9 44, 44,0 5.75 i 45, 4 37 RCP 0~ ~ AND DEBRIS. C } N ~ \ [ ~ ~ ~
/ 14 ~ ~ 45. n ~ ~ . 4 c ~ J ~ ~ 00 4 ~ 42 UTPAK CE $$2 ~ 7. EXISTING GRADE CONTOUR INTERVALS SHOWN AT I FOOT. C ~ ~
~ 16,0 ~ ~ 43,75 ~ ! 44.0 .0 ~ ~ 42, ~ ~ ~ ~ x
8.0% MAX ~ ! ~ 46. ~ ~ 44, ~ ~ ~ ~ +I,36 ACR 8. PROPOSED GRADE CONTOUR INTERVALS SHOWN AT I FOOT INTERVAL , ~ ~
5.75 442 4,4 i 12 45• , 45.6 4" FRE H DRAIN'' ~ 4 445 S rn 423 42.3 42 3.5 ~ 9. IF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES TO REMAIN ARE DAMA ~ ~ c GED DURING ~ N N
: ~ 43b 51 Wi 44,0 ~,O ~ CONSTRUCTION IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR ~ ~ 4 ~ z .C
/ 9 LF ~ 121~I LF 24" SYSTEM (TYP„ RE ~ 44 fl „ ~ AND/OR REPLACE THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AS NECESSARY TO RETURN IT ~ ~ 126 LF 24" ` ~
7 30 R ~ 4G35 AT R P ®0~ GEOTEC REPOR _ 126 tF ; ~ DRAIN ~ 45.0. 4415 44 ~ i R P m ® 1:3~ i 44,4 4 ~ TO EXISTING CONDITIONS OR BETTER, Q 25 C R P ®0~ 44, ~ ~ .J
/ OPOSE BETA L IPRAP 4,8 4.0 4.25 a2 W ~ W 10. ALL STORM PIPE ENTERING STRUCTURES SHALL BE GROUTED TO ASSURE W
Ci"~9~'S~7R'OR 44, i 44, 44,0 / AKRON a45o ~r 4QZ ~ o ` W CONNECTION AT STRUCTURE IS WATERTIGHT, 1.0 ' 44 8 4 43, ~ = W ~-p , N ~
F 15 °RPN ass + 34 L 24 -203,8~g S.F, ~ as 44.n 45,4 I ~ II, ALL ,;TORM SEWER MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE FLUSH WITH OL
RCP ®0 4538 r ~ aaoo FE = 46.00 i ~ ~ PAVEMENT, AND SHALL HAVE TRAFFIC BEARING RING ~ COVER . 43.4. - ~ _ x " S u.
aae .0 44. 4,0 44. 43. 44,6 i 45.0 46,o r' 423 42, ~ ~ - W MANHOLES IN UNPAVED AREAS SHALL BE 6 ABOVE FINISH GRADE. LIDS i Z SHALL BE LABELED STORM SEWER", _ - I
a.~e 44.5 ~ ~ ALL S~ORMDRAI(~1 LEADER,, SHALL $E 45.0 43 ! 43 5 I ~ 427 i 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO ALL TE
45 ROUTE -UNDER ROUND T THE SI E ~ 44.0 433 ! 8~ RMS b CONDITIONS AS 82 °LF 24" _ 424 ! ~ OUTLINED IN THE GENERAL N,P,D,E.S, PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DI H
~ ~ , 431 ~ STOR DRAINA E Y TE ~ ~ - R( F ~ ~ S S STOR DRAIN ~ ~ 43 ~ U AS TAT SC ARGE RCP 0~ i SOC ED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, d ,
0 EBAY ~ 4.8 3.8 ~ i i 4 LEADE~2S SHALL BE 10, I " AND 16N, AT a 45,4 .4 ~ W 13, CONTRACT R 43.1 43,4 " ~ Z 0 SHALL ADJUST AND/OR CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AS
i-,: L0~ S ~~OPE (MINI UM), RED RCN FOr 4525' F ~ 43. ~ - 24 EXACY DOWNSP UT LOC TIONS; SI E AN ~ 4 Wi ~ 4 216.. LF 24 J NECESSARY TO ASSURE A SMOOTH FIT AND CONTINUOUS GRADE. 22 Q P _
RCP ,>:0~ N 44. (~i 39 ~ C 0~ Ula . CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM BUILDINGS
336 LF 30 UMB 45.15 45,0 43,8 43,E of 43 125 LF 125 LF 24" ~ 9 ~F 42 ~ Q OR ALL NATURAL AND PAVED AREAS,
R P ® : ~i 44b RCP C 0.2~ 4.3 RCP ®0~ 42.0 ~ ~ 424 ' ~ 15. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A T P
45LF24" ~ .46,0 0, CP ®0~ ' 0 OGRAPHIC SURVEY BY FREELANU ASSOCIATE F ' ~ S, INC., I CONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT
.25 3~1 I 4 ' 25 ! EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLA 42 _43.1 ; H NS, WITHOUT EXCEPTION, HE _
fi SLOPE v I 44 ~ S ALL HAVE MADE, AT HIS EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A ~ 42 4 r ~ i REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR AND SUBMIT IT TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW,
16 2Ct~t R ~ ~ PIPE (TYP) A ~ 4.0 ~ ~ ~ !
~ 4515 ~ ~ 44.2 16.0' m 12" DOW;. SPOUT. OLLECTO 429 4 41,6 4265 ~ I. 16, ALL UNSURFACED AREAS DISTURBED BY GRADING OPERATION SHALL I RECEIVE 4 INCHES OF TOPSOIL. CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY STABILIZATION
F m - - -'~4~1A~f-._:~.. (R00 RAIN) IN I,O~. IE 4 i FABRIC TO ALL SLOPES 3H~IV OR STEEPER CONTRACTOR SHALL GRASS
Q UND RGROUN STORMD AIN 44 4 435 ~ DISTURBED AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORANGE COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS - ' UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED,
I ~ 4550 ~ - _ 0 4 4 .25 .b 43,1
BERM 45,E 10" DOWNSPOUT COLL ~ OR 4 4 , 17, CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES U
- - _ _ - ~-(~A1ZDE-Nt=~EN-AIN ® 43.2 44.6 45.2 45.16. 45,0 i 435 MIN I,O~, TIE TO 43.2 i AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME, J 424 _ J
UNDERGR UND T RMDRAIN TC~45;76 4.42 4 - - - - - 4450 Ar 0 S 0 ~ 45.3 J5 ~ 335 18, ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH UNIFORM POURED
TP~45~2b 45.6 - - - oaaN a5a ro TC~4b,0 a 3.35 MORTAR INVERT FROM INVERT IN TO INVERT OUT. ^ 44 4 435 ~
VEGETATIVE 45, 45.E ro aye 4~ ro 4550 4 TP~4 4QO 3. 44, 550 ab. 9 b"`~c 'S 19, SETTLEMENT PLATE ARE Z 42 43J 4 6 S REQUIRED IN AREAS OF DEEPEST FILL.
~ 3550 SHELF (6 ~ 1 SLOPE) 125 LF 24" ~ 449. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH OWNER'S GEOTECHNICAL W
~ 45 I - - "°9a 45.5 4550 , ,0 CP ® 0~ W 43. l11 - - - ~ ~ _ ~ ~•-45.3 i 44. REPRESENTATIVE ON LOCATION AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. 43 4 136 LF 24° - ~ W
- I a r 0 4 + TP 4550 44, pi 43.05 ~ 538 OLRB 43.05 43,2 ® 20, TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT REQUIRED FROM V P 44 A RCP 0~ DE ELO ER AND ~ (n ~
a~ 45.3 ~ 44,0 ~I ~ \ 0 4aaz 451 47 ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER TO THE WEST FOR ALL WORK OUTSIDE m 43.1 ~ 43.5._ WAL-MA W Q 3,5 4 RT PROPERTY LINE, EASEMENT EXTENTS BEING AGREED UPON AT Q
X 44 44 4.6 4 3.8 ~ \ ;.45.2 4.2 W 36.25 248 LF 24" - - - TIME OF BID. ~
Z ~ 7 44• 4 4 i 4 1 - . _ - 3,1 - - I~L~2 44• 44. i 4 z J ~ 43.5 433
8 192 L 24 ~ / 441 P ® ~ ~ 44, 4 ~ 43.4 54 - ~ Q N
SLO 44. 44 0~ ~ 44 Q RCS 0~ ~ _ I ~ 44,4 421 ~ 44,1 :44.5-~ 44 439 420 J CA TI N N TI _ z CET C F " NTRACT R 44. 49 L 24 - z
a .0 17 43.3 18 434 43,4 m ~ Q U RCP 0~ ~ THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE W
W , / „ 44, 4,0 ~ 4 , ,0 ~ ~ 19 43 0 , Z ~ 3 ~ 25 ~ ~ 2 LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS W ~
- 431 _ . _ - 4451 = STO~MWATEf~ 35•~ 4a,5 44 ~ - - -432 - ~3,?.~_ X3,25 ~3,2r 4325- - ~ 43.33 ~ SHOWN ON THESE PLAN I z ^ ~ S S BASED ON RECORDS OF THE OC
U 35 3.0 MANAGMENT ~ 44 -4325- X33-43. 43.6 VARIOUS UTILIT LLJ Z 43,0 ~ 4'~ Y COMPANIES AND WHERE POSSIBLE, W
A Q F _ ~ ~ ~ 6 315 LF 30" ~ U MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS (n ` RCP ®I.O~ 43, NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. C~ - -
~ AGILITY ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ 43,0. - _ 433 21 4285 4275 4285 4215 4285 4215 4285 42,75 42.8_! 42.75 4285 4215 - 43,4; 44, ~ al THE CONTRACT R _ ~0 Q
~ 1 10' ~ ~ 208 LF 3550 C _ a27 \ ( _ ~ I6L 4" 117LF2 I ~ IILF24" 197 ~ 135 LF 4" 0 MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY Z _ 197 LF 24" ~ ` I COMPANY AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY ~ 24 ~ RCP 0~ EXCAVATION Q( N
BENCH i ~ RCP ®0~ ® RCP R F I 3550 RCP i ~ CP 0~ C ~ O~ RCP m 0~ TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT -I ~
~ \ 36.25 ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 4 3 / / ~ \ 12' VEGETATIVE " 129 L 3 A~ SHALL BE THE RESPONS- IBILITY F TH 129 LF 4 u' ~ 0 E CONTRACTOR TO ,J
I 1 / SHELF (6 ~ I 129 L` 2 RCP 0 0 ® RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE RCP 0 ~ PROPOSED IMP
~ / ~ I 61 LF 30" ' RCP ®0 22 23 RCP \ 3550 SLOPE) 3 ~ RC m L ~ / I A ROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. EXISTING
1 / MIO~OPOOL LOPE 21 ~ 36.25 ~ 24 44,1 UTILITIES BEING EXTENDED INTO THE SITE SHALL MEET ALL J 425 THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE R P F J
~ I ~ I ~ I ~ ~ OUTLET II ` ~ - 29 ES ECTIV~ UTILITY COMPANY, THE NT
35.50 ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ 4215 42 4205 ~ ~ ~ STRUCTURE - 4255 4245 CO RACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO COMPLY WITH ALL 43.05 UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATION AN = S D REQUIREMENTS.
~ ~ .I ~ 1 4215 4211... 42~i 42A- 4211- PERMANENT
l ~ FILTER RIP AP 42 4245 4 424 P 424 42b 424 4217 4 ~ 4 .I7 24 \ - 10 tt J7 424 424 4215 .4235 4275 DIVER I N S 0 NOTE ~ SEE GRADING PLAN (SHEET 2) FOR FOUNDATION
" i ~ RING (TYP, APf~ON ,2 3625 ~ l 312 425 4 43.4 DITCH SUBSURFACE PREPARATI 3.0 ON NOTE.
35.50 \ ~ ~ ~ SEE , ~ 1 / N 45; ~ / DETAIL) O ~ 4 ~
VEGETATIVE ~ ' CAUTION**~
~ \ ~ / b / 34 LF (2)-24" EX ENSON 3550 4 4 ,2 SHELF (6~I SLOPE) ~ ~ ~ / ~ ® 325 43 43. 4325- 43. 43,2 ' 43.5
SQL 3550 RCP 0~ REA - 10' 4~ _ _ N.C. ONE CALL: UTILITY LOCATOR SERVICE cAUna+
- _ BENC 0 I 249 F 24" 4" FRENC DRAIN. _ - _ BERM R RETA~~ S~~PS 4 THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HAVE BEEN LOCATED
• ~ _ - i~ RC m 0~ SYSTEM YP„ RE~ ~PS 3 DAYS BEFORE DIGGING CALL F1E7.D SURVEY INFORMATION AND EJGSTING DRANINGS DRAWN THE SJR~EYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT THE UNDERGROUND TOLL FREE 1-800-632-4949 UTIU11E5 SHOWN COMPRISE ALL SUCH U11L1TIE5 IN THE AREA, MGL
J OTE ~ REP RT) ±43,2OO.F, O 0 . 2 LF 30" ~,F, EITHER IN SERVICE OR ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR FURTHER DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTIUIIES SHOWN ARE IN CHECKED ~^I 1HE E%ACT LOCATION INDICATED, ALTHOUGH HE DOES CERTIFY THAT
- - . I FF = 444.00 ~ ~ RCP ®3.1~ ~ 2 105 LF ; 4" +4, 6 A ONE CALL SYSTEM FOR COMMUNITY AND JOB SAFETY. TH EY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM INFORMATION SKS
_ I \ ~ RCP ®0~ AVAILABLE. THE SURVEYOR HAS NOT PHYSICALLY LOCATED THE „ 43.8 43. uNDERatwND ununES.
-~J'' - ~ 147 LF 24" 24 F DATE 129 L 24
3~1 SLOPE ~ RCP ®0~ . ~ 438 ~ 43. 3 2 4 3 l I LF 24" 0~ „RCP ®0~ 3~1 SLOPE 5/09/06 141 LF 24 SCALE
430 LF 30" ~ - ~ ~ ~ _ ' CP ®p~ RCP ®0~
4 438' RCP ®0.2~ ~ ~ 44 44 43 4 I" 60' 44 3
PERMANENT LF 30" ~ 42 i 43 43.3 43.4 4.4 45 JOB No, 3
PFPM~NFNT / I I r~ r~ T 1 \
v v v v F~ ~A 30' DRAINAGE DIVERSION
EASEMENT - - - - - _ CHECK DAM (TYP, "I Z/ DRAWING DITCH
4A= PLACE EVERY 200 E-- F E--
204 LF 48" LF WITHIN DITCH) t~ 4_
RCP ®0,5% " E• o bo rio CHECK DAM 1 1 2 A
NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL YP) NOTE: R AINING WALLS GREATER THAN 4 FEET IN HEIGHT
MAM-LINE 'D" - NEXT SHEET REQUIRE BUILDING PERMIT. DESIGN TO BE APPROVED PRIOR SCALE r • 60' TO CONSTRUCTION.
OF SHEETS 4

REVISIONS BY
1152 1394
NOTE RETAINING WALL; INING WALLS GREATER THAN 4 FEET IN HEIGHT LEGEND
REQUIRE BUILDING PERM _ LDING PERMIT, DESIGN TO BE APPROVED PRIOR EXISTING PROPOSED DESCRIPTION iD~
- TO CONSTRUCTI N, JCTION,
i 85 CONTOUR LINE
36,2 • SPOT ELEVATION ,1~5 ~ 1395
? ¦ STORM DRAIN INLET
S~gIPH
~ ~ j - • STORM DRAIN MANHOLE MPheNS s Wy, s
_I i , ° STORM DRAIN PIPE
_ +
F NDATION U8~ OU i t )ATTON SUBSURFACE PREPARATION VICINITY MAP
' ~ _ IN THE DRAWINGS AND/OR SPECIFICATIONS, THE (APPROXIMATE SCALE 1'-5000')
' ~ ! UNLESS SPECIFIC i ' OF THIS S ~ _ LIMITS S SPECIFICALLY INDICATED OTHERWISE F THI SUBSURFACE PREPARATION ARE CONSIDERED TO 8E THAT PORTION OF THE o s N TE
I CHECK DAM (TYP, i SITE DIRECTLY BE 0 RADING ITE G S )IRECTLY BENEATH AND 10 FEET BEYOND THE BUILDING AND APPURTENANCES.
E EVERY 200 ~ APPURTENANCES ?TENANCES ARE THOSE ITEMS ATTACHED TO THE BUILDING PROPER (REFER TO I. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION OF
i, - PLAC i - / LF WITHIN DITCH) _ _ _ ~ DRAWING SHEET _ - N LUDING BUT NOT LIMITED T0, THE BUILDING SIDEWALKS, EXISTING STRUCTURES INCLUDING REMOVAL OF ANY EXISTING NG SHEET SPU, TYPICALLY I C - / KS CONCRETE APRONS AT UTILITIES SERVING THE STRUCTURE. UTILITIES ARE TO BE
/ ~ ~ _ GARDEN CENTER, .N CENTER, PORCHES, RAMPS, STOOPS, TRUCK WELLS DOC v TO THE RIGHT-of-wAY. PAD ETC, THE SUBBASE AND THE VAPOR REMO ED
THE AUTOMOTIVE I ~ r ~ WHERE AUTOMOTIVE CENTER, COMPACTOR - N T EXTEND BEYOND THE LIMITS OF THE ACTUAL BUILDING 2, THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE
BARRIER, - ` • .R, WHERE REQUIRED, DO 0 LOCATION ANDIOR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS THE APPURTENANCES,
PERMANENT ~ _ ' _ AND THE APPURI DIVERSION DITCH SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE MPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE,
CHECK DAM'-- - I ESTABLISH THE F VARIOUS UTILITY CO U 3LISH THE FINAL SUBGRADE ELEVATION AT 10 INCHES BELOW FINISHED FLOOR A REMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS
(TYP) ~ CHECK----~=- - ELEVATION T AT II, INCHES BELOW THE FINISHED ME SU R 5 ING EXACT OR COMPLETE. Z ~TION TO ALLOW FORA 4 INCH SLAB, 0 NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BE _
- - - ~ FLOOR ELEVATOOf - ~ INTO ALLOW FORA 5,5 INCH SLAB TO ALLOW FOR THE SLAB THICKNESS THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY . ELEVAT 0
INE B' -PREVIOUS SHEET AND A 6 INCH MATCHL HALL CONSIST 4 INCHES OF AGGREGATE BASE COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION A 6 INCH SUBBASE, THE SUBBASE S F F AGGREGATE, TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES, IT Z ~
COURSE COVERS[ SE COVERED BY A BASE CONSISTING OF 2 INCHES 0 INE HALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO ~ p, THE REQUIREMENTS UNDER SECTION 1010, PAGES S ITIE WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE
AGGREGATE BAS' 5-9 THROUGH 5-I, EGATE BASE COURSE SHALL MEET RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTIL S 0 - 4 AND SECTION 1010, PAGES 10-23 THROUGH 10-33 OF THE NCDOT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, ~ ~ ~0 HROUGH 5 I T HALL ~ ~ ~
"STANDARD SPEC ARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROADS AND STRUCTURES;' FINE AGGEGA E S FATTER c N
- - - _ - CONSIST OF A D R 3. ALL CUT OR FILL SLOPES SHALL BE 3~1 OR L ~ Q ~ F A CLEAN GRANULAR MATERIAL WITH LESS THAN 3 PERCENT CLAY AND/0 ~ ~ ~ ST 0 N 10 SIZE AS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ~ _
~ I; FRIABLE PARTICLE LE PARTICLES THAT SATISFY AGGREGATE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 0 ~ Q ~ r` rn
DEFINED BY ASTI - F ATERIAL PASSING THE NO. MAY BE USED AT CONTRACTORS ~ O ~ .D BY ASTM D448 AND CONTAIN 6 TO 12 PERCENT 0 M 4, PRECAST STRUCTURES Q ~ ~ ~ , BRIER WILL BE REQUIRED ABOVE FINE OPTION, Q ~ c ~ Ln ~
200 SIEVE. A I SIEVE. A 15 MILLS THICK VAPOR RETARDER/BA p o 0 I ~
AGGREGATE, T4- EXTEND I NTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ACCURATE MEASUREMENTS NLE OTHERWISE ~ ~ EGATE, THE CO 5. STORM PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS U SS ~ ~ _ ~
FOR ALL CUT A EXISTING ALL CUT AND FILL DEPTHS REQUIRED, NOTED ~ ~ N ~ TYPE I' RCP, CLASS III PER ASTM C-7b,WITH FLEXIBLE ~ ~ o ~ J ~
PIPE 8 ' I DRAIN IRRIGATION IRRIGATION POND AND DITCHES AND INSTALL FRENCH DRAINS AND DITCHES PLASTIC C ~ ~ ~
LF (24" CORDING TO AC I NDERCUTTING OF SOFT SOILS AND BITUMEN GASKETS AT JOINTS, d ~ ~ ~ x )RDING TO PROVIDED FRENCH DRAIN PLAN DETA L, U ~ ~
RCP ® BILIZATION WI STA WITH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC AND CRUSHED STONE WILL BE REQUIRED WHERE TIN DRAINAGE STRUCTURES TO BE INSPECTED AND ~ LIZATION 6, EXIS G
I.S~) THE EXISTING PC - N I LOCATED WITHIN THE PROPOSED BUILDING AREA, UNDERCUTTING REPAIRED AS NEEDED, AND EXISTING PIPES TO BE CLEANED ~ O c =XISTING POD S ~ ~ N ~
AND STABILIZATIC ABILIZATION SHOULD EXTEND AT LEAST 25 FEET HORIZONTALLY OUTSIDE THE OUT TO REMOVE ALL SILT AND DEBRIS. ~ ~ ST Z .c
~ BUILDING LIMITS. I IT .REMOVE SURFACE VEGETATIONS, TOPSOIL, ROOT SYSTEMS, ORGANIC WN AT I FOOT, ~ UI NG LIM S 7, EXISTING GRADE CONTOUR INTERVALS SNO Q ~ EXI TING FILL, AND SOFT OR OTHERWISE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL FROM THE ~
FF- R AD MATERIAL, EXISTIf SEE 0 SITE 0 RIAL, S N UITABLE OR W N AREA, PROOFROLL EXPOSED SUBGRADE. REMOVE AND REPLACE U S g, PROPOSED GRADE CONTOUR INTERVALS SHOWN AT I I G HALL BE FREE OF W
VEMENTS PLANS" BUILDING AREA. IMPRO OR S UNSTABLE AREA; i ! ' ` F DE IGN OF ABLE AREAS WITH SUITABLE MATERIAL. SUBGRADE MATERIALS FOOT INTERVALS.
I I A WAY ORGANIC AND 0 ROD LL MEET THE FOLLOWING W ~NIC AND OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIALS AND SHA F EXI TING STRUCTURES TO REMAIN ARE DAMAGED 9, I ANY S
~ ~ ~ IREMENTS I REOU I ~ IREMENTS~ DURING CONSTRUCTION IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS
i T REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE THE EXISTING LL RESPONSIBILITY 0
Q ITN W TI N A 0 C LO ~ ~ I ITN RESPECT TO FINAL GRADE P.I, L,L, STRUCTURE AS NECESSARY TO RETURN IT TO EXISTING ,TION W
~ BUILDING AREA, REA BELOW UPPER 3 FEET 30 MAX> 70 MAX> CONDITIONS OR BETTER, ING A >
i ~ BUILDING AREA, ` ~ ING AREA, UPPER 3 FEET 20 MAX, 50 MAX, I .ALL STORM PIPE ENTERING STRUCTURES SHALL BE 0 GROUTED TO ASSURE CONNECTION AT STRUCTURE IS
:I ~ 2,5 SUBGRADE MATE ATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED IN LOOSE LIFTS NOT EXCEEDING 8 INCHES IN WATERTIGHT, BADE M F N TANDARD PROCTOR
' ~ SLOPE ~ AND COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 98 PERCENT 0 T E S .NESS
I ~ 97 LF THICKNESS AND ` 0 18" RC MAXIMUM DRY D ' ~ CONTENT WITHIN 3 PERCENT BELOW II. ALL STORM SEWER MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL , v1UM DRY DENSITY (ASTM D 698) AT A MOISTURE gE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT, AND SHALL NAVE TRAFFIC
~ ®1,5~ „ TO 3 PERCENT IM M, MANH LES IN UNPAVED AREAS S PERCENT ABOVE THE OPT U BEARING RING is COVERS, 0
SHALL BE 6" ABOVE FINISH GRADE, LIDS SHALL BE ATED SPREAD FOOTINGS AT COLUMNS AND LABELED "STORM SEWER', ~ ,
' THE FOUNDATION CONTINUOUS SPG FOUNDATION SYSTEM SHALL BE ISOL F TINGS AT WALLS. INUOUS SPREAD 00 12, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO ALL TERMS ~
CONDITIONS AS OUTLINED IN THE GENERAL N,P.D,E,S, PERMIT
' W 59 THIS FOUNDATIOI TION SUBSURFACE PREPARATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A COMPLETE SITE FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGE ASSOCIATED WITH FOUNDA
~ L 18" ~ ~ WORK SPECIFIC F CONFLICT, INFORMATION COVERED IN THIS PREPARATION CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. . SPECIFICATION, IN CASE 0
W~ 3 ~ W . SHALL TAKE PRI m . P I.5~ C R THE WAL-MART SPECIFICATIONS, REFER TO THE . L TAKE PRECEDENCE OVE IN THIS PREPARATION. THIS 13. CONTRACTOR SrA-- AD.,~S T ANDIOR CUT EXISTING
i N I ~ ~ SPECIFICATIO S ,IFICATIONS FOR SPECIFIC INFORMATION NOT COVERED PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY TO ASSURE A SMOOTH FIT AND
' , INFORMATION W~ I ~ p 33LF2" KEN FROM A SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION REPORT PREPARED BY SAME, C NTINUOUS GRADE, ?MATION WAS TA F R INFORMATION 0
INC., DATED FEE ~ 9 58 0' ~ ' RCP m 2. ONLY AND IS N+ ATED FEBRUARY 13, 2006 (SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION REPORT IS 0 D - I N SPECIFICATION). 14, CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY AND IS NOT A CONSTRUCT 0 FROM BUILDINGS FOR ALL NATURAL AND PAVED AREAS.
b ~ ~ U
W W 15. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A J
1 ~ i ~ ~ RIPRAP '~n ` APRON tt4 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE TABLE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY FREELAND ~ ASSOCIATES, INC., IF ~ CONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS -
YP ` CHECK DAM (T ~ 1 ~ IMPERVIOUS AREA IMPERVIOUS AREA TOTAL AREA SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WITHOUT EXCEPTION, HE SHALL
PROPS i PLACE EVERY 200 ~ ~ U ! TW, 4 TW ~ 433.0 ~ PROPERTY (AC) HAVE MADE, AT HIS EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY ~ (AC) Z
F WITHIN DITCH) ~ ~4 4,0 L / ~ BW 3 . BW ~ 426.5 LARGE RETAIL A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR AND SUBMIT IT TO THE • RGE RETAIL AND SHOPS +67~ ±42,03 OWNER FOR REVIEW. I1J
~ W W ~ ~ / ~ ? ~ (WITHOUT 28 (WITHOUT POND)
~ J RIPRAP 16. ALL UNSURFACED AREAS DISTURBED BY GRADING ~ W RGE RETAIL AND SHOPS ± 4 ±81`~ ±42.03 OPERATION SHALL RECEIVE 4 INCHES OF TOPSOIL, ~
I ` LARGE RETAIL + U' ~ APRON tt6 ~ (WITH 3 CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY STABILIZATION FABRIC TO ALL ~ ~ m (WITH POND)
~ Q ` `a TW ~ 433,0 ~ Q OUTL + SLOPES 3H~IV OR STEEPER. CONTRACTOR SHALL GRASS W + + _7,45
~ BW ~ 417.8 PAR L ~3 OUTLOTS -6.7 -90~ (ASSUMED) DISTURBED AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORANGE COUNTY ~ NTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS J ~ SPECIFICATIONS U Z
T ~ Z ~ ~ OBTAINED, ~ Q N
'I - ~ + AC ES 336 LF 30 -~.~J4 1 ~ 17. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE J Z
RCP m 0.2~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME. - z TRACT R Q CN TICS T NN
I,Q ~ 3550 A TI ~W~
~ CONTRALTO TO ~ ~ CAUTIONED THAT THE 18, ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL NAVE A SMOOTH W ~ THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY UNIFORM POURED MORTAR INVERT FROM INVERT IN TO z
20' DRAINAGE TALL 18" B M ` I INS PERMANENT A EMENT ~ ~ ' P ~ L CATION AND/OR ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS INVERT OUT. ~ Z o F E W
IT H E S ~ ~ ALONG TO ~ TW ~ 433.0 DIVERSION ~ / ~ SLOPE (T SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS 0 TH W P ATE ARE REQUIRED IN AREAS OF U
~ ~ I, ~ ~ BW ~ 419,75 ~ / ~ VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND WHERE POSSIBLE, I9. SETTLEMENT L S (n ~ THE FIELD, THE INFORMATION IS DEEPEST FILL. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH ~ - - MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN OWNER'S GEOTECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE ON LOCATION AT Q
I ~ ~ T BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE, F CONSTRUCTION. Z ~ NOT 0 THE TIME 0 - Cn
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ RETAINING WALL A , 36.25 THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY ~ N
/ ~ 1 F ~ (DESIGN BY OTHERS) 309 L 30 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION 20. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT REQUIRED FROM ~ ~ COMPANY AT LEAST 48
RCP 0 2.1~ ` ' ~ ~ ATTON OF UTILITIES, IT DEVELOPER AND ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER TO THE ~ TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOC WAL-MART PROPERTY LINE, F THE CONTRACTOR TO WEST FOR ALL WORK OUTSIDE
I NCH ~ ` X 10' BE ~ SHALL BE THE RESPONS- IBILITY 0 EASEMENT EXTENTS BEING AGREED UPON AT TIME OF BID.
I ~ 4 E TPARC OU I 36.25 'I RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE ~ ED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, EXISTING J PROPOS J
i 2,51 • I _ ±1,29 ACR Tw•433.0 V TATIVE I (TIES BEING EXTENDED INTO THE SITE SHALL MEET ALL CAUTION uT L ~
SLOPE ` ~ BW ~ 427.0- SI-~EL (6 • I SLOPE) THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANY,
35.50 ~ I ~ ~p ~ ~ 26 LF _24 ~0 WITH ALL 1 THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO COMPLY TOR SERVICE
47 LF 30"~ ~ ~ / P o 0~ ~Oi ~ RC FI ATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. N.C. ONE CALL. UTILITY LOCA UTILITY COMPANY SPECI C
~ 5 RCP ®0,2~ 3 DAYS BEFORE DIGGING CALL TOLL FREE 1-B00-632-4949
3 ~ I SLOPE ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ - _ 28 .116 24" ~ I ` ,
B _ MATCHLINE "D" -PREVIOUS SHEET - - ~ A ONE CALL SYSTEM FOR COMMUNITY AND JOB SAFETY. I
55 LF 431 ~ ,
I v 8' RCP _ ~'i ~ CAUTION a' I
L f ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ m 1,5~ 65 ~ vM HAVE BEEN LOCATED i THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHO r ! FROM FlELD SURVEY INFORMATION AND EXISTING DRAIMNGS.
4 ® - RVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT THE UNDERGRWND THE su DRAWN U1IUTIES SHOWN COMPRISE ALL SUCH UTEIIIES IN THE AREA,
F 30" I I ~ I i EITHER IN SERVICE OR ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR FURTHER DOES MGL I I NOT WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE IN I
29 m P R C • ~ ~ THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATED, ALTHOUGH HE DOES CERTIFY THAT ~ , AREA TO ! THEY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM INFORMATION CHECKED EXISTING WETL ND i
TPAR EL 5 OU PERMANENT + AVAILABLE. THE SURVEYOR HAS NOT PHYSICALLY LOCATED THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. SKS RIPRAP ~ REMAIN UNDIST~JRBED DURING
DIVERSION DITCH I ; -I,25 CRES • TW ~ 428.0 APRON ttl ~ CTION ACTIVITIES I GATE CONSTRU
BW ~ 427.5 I 5109106
I SCALE
i I'! I ~ I I" 60'
I JOB No,
1
f ' I WING ~ ~ DRA
~ ~~n R /wl ~I
_--T _ ~ I
120 o bo
I
SCALE I' 60
- OF SHEET

_ _ _ P ER PERFORATED PV PROJECT DESCRIPTION CAT OUTLET STRUCTURE' REVISIONS BY
~4 REBAR AT 12' I-- 12 THE PURPOSE OF THIS PROJECT IS TO CONSTRUCT A *-203,819 S.F, WAL-MART
OC. EACH WAY 5 PE 5" PERFORATED PVC PIPE TO BE EXTENDED FROM 5" suPERCENTER, ALONG wlrH i/-43,200 S.F, OF RETAIL SHOP SPA E A C , ND ASSOCIATED
DIAME _ _ _ _ PIPE DIAMETER ORIFICE IN THE OUTLET STUCTURE. PERFORATED OUTPARCELS, ALSO INCLUDED ARE ASSOCIATED PARKING AREAS, DRIVES, UTILITY PIPE TO BE CAPPED AT THE END, WRAPPED IN FILTER SERVICES, AND LANDSCAPING. THE PROJECT INCLUDES ONE STORMWATER
- I a REBAR FABRI FABRIC AND COVERED IN tt57 WASHED STONE. T N MANAGEMENT POND, WHICH IS SIZED TO PROVIDE WATER QUALITY IN ACCORDANCE
EXISTNG GRADE AT 12' OC. BE C ACH WAY S 0 E SHALL WITH THE STANDARDS OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA AND THE T W F BE CLEANED OUT AND/OR REPLACED AS OFTEN AS HOLLY SPRINGS. THE POND WILL DETAIN THE 2 0 N 0
/ ~ ~ ~ NECE 5, 10, 25, 50 AND 100-YR STORM NECESSARY THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION TO INSURE THE POND EVENTS TO PRE-DEVELOPED RUNOFF RATES. THE POND WILL HAVE TWO OUTLETS, THE
450 - - - DRAM _ _ - _ _ - ' 450 PIPE AT TI DRAINS PROPERLY. PERFORATED PIPE SHALL BE REMOVED FIRST RELEASING TO AN EXISTING WETLAND AREA LocarED SOUTH OF THE
_ \ / AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (UPON FIN PROPOSED RETAIL SHOPS BUILDING AND THE SECOND RELEASING TO AN EXISTING AL STORMDRAIN SYSTEM RUNNING ALONG NC HIGHWAY 87, THE POND IS LOCATED
_ ~ - - ~ _ i STABI '~--C>`OPOSED ' ~ STABILIZATION OF SITE. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSURE THAT ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERN PORTION OF THE SITE, To THE rH F SOU 0 THE PROPOSED
cuz6~ THE f ~ i - THAT THE POND BOTTOM IS FINE GRADED AND GRASSED, AND RETAIL BUILDING AND WEST of THE PROPOSED RETAIL SHOPS BUILDING. A TOTAL of THAT THERE IS POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO THE OUTLET APPROXIMATELY 50,0 ACRES WILL BE DISTURBED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS,
STRUC STRUCTURE, ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION WILL INCLUDE ADEQUATE EROSION CONTROL
_ I FRONT VIEW SECTION VIEW MEASURES.
_ _ NO' ~ ITE DESCRIPTION
6 10' BENCH NOTE
I ANTI- EEP COLLAR w THE SITE IS LOCATED ALONG NC HIGHWAY 55 BYPASS (SOUTH MAIN STREET), IN CASE OF EMERGENCY OR NEEDED MAINTENANCE, THE BETWEEN IT'S Two INTERSECTIONS WITH RALPH STEPHENS ROAD, IN HOLLY SPRINGS
DE IGN 440 lo` BERM _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ 440 STC _ _ _ _ (PERM. P N ) STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND WILL BE DRAINED VIA NORTH CAROLINA. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ENCOMPASSES APPROXIMATELY 50,0
AI FOREBAY A PORTABLE PUMP, TO BE KEPT ON-SITE. ACRES. THERE IS AN EXISTING POND AND JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS LOCATED ON
AREA PERMANENT POOL N,T,S, THIS SITE, ALL WETLAND DISTURBANCE PERMITS WILL NEED TO BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION,
'I EL. 4320 - -
TOP OF CLAY CORE 3 ' _ _ EL. 436.2 AT TOP OF BERM 50' RIPRAPPED RED GRADING PLAN THE SITE CURRENTLY EXISTS AS FARMLAND, THERE ARE SEVERAL EXISTING DRAINAGE EMERGENCY FOR EMERGENCY SWALES LOCATED ALONG THE PROPERTY ALONG WITH A POND AND SEVERAL
I_ _ _ _ 8 SPILLWAY SPILLWAY LOCATION WETLAND AREAS. THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF NE
BOTTOM OF FOREBAY EL, - 434,0 3 ACCESS DRIVE FROM NC HIGHWAY 55 AND TWO ACCE 0 SS DRIVES FROM RALPH
- - _ PROPOSED - STEPHENS ROAD TO THE DEVELOPMENT, 408.0 U
GRADE _ - / 30 THERE WILL BE A STORMDRAIN BYPASS SYSTEMS CONSTRUCTED IN ORDER TO DIVERT
_ _ _ _ .430 - _ UPSTREAM RUNOFF AROUND THE SITE. THE NEAREST RE I EL. 405,0 3~ I SLOPE AN UNNAMED TRIBUTARY TO BA A CE VING WATER BODIES ARE - (TYPJ (T w S L CREEK FOR THE OUTFACE TO THE SOUTH
0 ARD RALPH STEPHENS ROAD) AND AND UNNAMED POND FOR THE OUTFACE TO h
- _ _ EXISTING THE EAST (TOWARDS NC HIGHWAY 55 BYPASS), PLANNED OUTFLOWS FROM THE ~ STORMWATER MANAGEMENT P ~ U
GRADE _ - _ XISTING OND WILL OUTLET AS SHOWN ON THE GRADING PLAN, ~ 0~ AND EVENTUALLY FLOW TO THESE WATER BODIES, GRADE RETENTI N
2' - ~ _ _ (MIND P ND EMERGEN ~ CY
~ CLAY 'KEY' TO BE _ I PLACED IN EXISTING OIL AND UB URFACE CONDITION PILLWAY END VIEW IL ~ "
h---- 4' GRADE Q~ THE SITE SOILS, ACCORDING TO THE USDA/NRCS SOIL RV ~ ~ O ~
N.T.S. SU EY FOR WAKE COUNTY, ~ Q c ~ ~ CONSISTS OF THE FOLLOWING ~ 0 ~ ~
- _ NORFOLK LOAMY SAND (NoA) 0 TO 2% SLOPES, (NOB) 2 TO 6% PERCENT L PE ~ ~ L ~ (NoB2) 2 T % S 0 S, Q~ ~ O ~
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ NOTE 0+00 I+00 2+00 3+ + 00 4 00 5+00 6+00 7+00 0 6 SLOPES ERODED V O U~~ ORANGEBURG LOAMY SANDS (Or62) 2 TO 6% SLOPES ERODED Y ~ CO "
CLAY MATERIAL TO E3E USED FOR CORE MUST BE TYPE WEHADKEE AND BIBS SOILS (Wo) 0 TO 4% SLOPES a ~ ~ ~ ~
'CL' OR 'CH' MATERIALS, AS CLASSIFIED BY TI-E UNIFIED RAINS FINE SANDY LOAMY (Ra) 0 TO 2% SLOPES C ~ N ~ APPLIN ~ ~ G GRAVELLY SANDY LOAM (Ag82) 2 TO 6% SLOPES ERODED, (AgC2) 6 TO 10% ~ J 0 ~ ~
SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM, SLOPED ERODED C N ~ ~
MATERIAL CLASSIFICATION MUST BE DETERMINED BY, OR ~ oox
HORIZONTAL SCALE I" = 60' N THE PRESENCE OF, THE INDEPENDENT TESTING FIRM, ADJACENT PR ° PERTIES ~ y rn
VERTICAL SCALE ~ I" = 6' ~O ~ ~ CV THE PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER WILL BE BORDERED BY RALPH STEPHENS ROAD TO ~ ~
_ • ~ THE WEST, UNDEVELOP F ~ .C L ED ARMLAND AND WETLAND AREA TO THE SOUTH, AN
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ TOP OF b' x 6' CONCRETE RISER UNDEVELOPED PARCEL TO THE NORTH AND NC HIGHWAY 55 B P ~ ~ Y ASS TO THE Q EAST, ~
: TP Y I AL CLAY RE ETAIL EL. 424,0 J w PLANNED EDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL PRACTICE I
SCALES N.T.S. s W
I. E IMENT BA IN W S
'LI.Ic THE PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND WILL SERVE AS SEDIMENT BASIN LL
DURING THE MASS-GRADING OPERATIONS. IN ADDITION, A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN
~ EXISTNG'GRADE WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE SOUTHWESTERN CORNER OF TI-E PROPERTY AND MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT SPECIFIC PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. STONE FILTER RINGS
450 _ 450 WILL BE INSTALLED AROUND THE OUTLET STRUCTURES OF THE BASINS TO A HEIGHT
THAT PROTECTS THE LOWEST ORIFICES, AND THE CLEAN-OUT ELEVATIONS WILL BE
~ PROPOSED, 18" CMP RISER CLEARLY MARKED, THE SEDIMENT BASINS SHALL BE CLEANED OUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS FOUND ON THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION
DRIVE ~ PROPOSED DETAIL SHEETS, ONCE THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM IS INSTALLED, INLET PROTE TI ~ _ =s WILL BE INSTALLED AT ALL INLETS TO HELP REDUCE THE CON ;
~ CURB ~ ~ ` PROPOSED 5' SEDIMENT LOAD ON THE BASINS. UPON SITE STABILIZATION, THE BASINS WILL BE C x , OMPLETELY DRAINED,
_ _ ~ sloBwALK 83 LF 24' RCP m L0~ CLEANED OUT AS NECESSARY, AND REGRADED T 0 THEIR FINAL CONFIGURATIONS, THE TEMPORARY BASIN WILL BE FILLED IN TO THE FINAL GRADE -
~ ~ 10' BERM 3~1 SLOPE ~ ~ 10' BENCH S AS SHOWN ON THE GRADING PLAN, BOTH BASINS WILL BE STABILIZED WITH T
FINAL RE-GRADING TAKES PLACE, EMPORARY SEEDING UNTIL
2. T NE N TR TI N ENTRAN E /EXIT
..440 ' 12'' VEGETATED _ _ HEiLF WITH ~I \ _ s 6 PoNO 440
SLOPE ~ EXTENSION I ~ AREA I A TEMPORARY STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WILL BE N T ~ N Y,`. S ALLED AND OPERATIONAL THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. THE CONSTRUCTION EN'RA'VCE SHALL BE LOCATED AT
PERMANENT POOL I ~ THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED MAIN ENTRANCE DRIVE T O THE DEVELOPMENT, AS
- - - - - - - - REV 437.0 - - - - - - - - - 3 - - - - SHOWN ON THE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLANS. DURING WET 15" TEMPORARY WEATHER IT MAY BE NECESSARY TO WASH VEHICLE TIRES AT THIS LOCATION, TH
~EL. 4 2 3~1 SLOPE ~ ~ 36 5 EL. 436.25 3 EL. 435.5 MICROPOOL _ BOTTOM OF POND EXTENSION PERFORATED PIPE ENTRANCE WILL BE GRADED SO THAT RUNOFF IS DIRECTED T TH E 0 E TEMPORARY
AREA AREA (RE~NOTE, THIS SHEET) SEDIMENT TRAP, AWAY FROM ADJOINING PROPERTIES (SEE DETAIL, EROSION CONTROL DETAIL SHEETS).
EL, 436.0 INV, 01 INV, OF BARREL, EL 419,0
15,0" DIAME PROPOSED I~ U 5,0 DIAMETER ORIFICE, EL, 419,0 3. DROP INLET PROTECTION J
GRADE 430 J FABRIC DROP INLET PROTECTION WILL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT
430 45x5'xl' CONCRETE BASE CONSTRUCTION, UNTIL THE PAVING OPERATIONS ARE COMPLETED, ONCE GENERAL
PAVING IS COMPLETE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL BLOCK AND GRAVEL INLET ~ PROTECTION AT ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS, NO STORM DRAINAGE INLET SHALL BE e z
c MADE OPERATIONAL PRIOR TO ADEQUATE INLET PROTECTION BEING INSTALLED, W
NOTES THE PERMANENT POOL WAS DESIGPED TO NAVE A DEPTH OF 3.0' PER THE SA/DA CALCULATIONS, SECTION COMPACTED SUBGRADE OR CC 4, E IMENT FE L
_ - BECAUSE -THE-FACILITY-IS AN EXTENDED WETLAND _ EDIM E _ DETENTION POND, THE PERMAt~NT POOL WILL RANGE N 6" OF CRUSHED STONE NCE ~ W EDIM ~ ENT BA IN 2
DEPTH FROM 9' TO 18', PER THE DESIGN MANUAL, SEDIMENT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED A H ^ S S OWN ON THE ALL PHASES OF THE C~ EROSION AND SEDIMENTATON CONTROL PLANS, SEDIMENT FE W Q
TLE T LE NCE WILL BE REINFORCED, T TR TR E DET o AIL AS DENOTED ON THE PLANS,
ZJ
5, STONE FILTER RING J - ~ _Q N
7+00 8+00 + _ + _ + - 9 00 10 00 II 00 12+00 13+00 14+00 TO BE INSTALLED AROUND THE OUTLET STRUCTURES FROM THE SEDIMENT BA IN z
THE START OF CONSTRUCTION, IN ACCORDANCE WITH DET S S A7 _ AILS. Q Z U
~W~ SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION ~ ~
N.T,S, REFER TO THE EROSION AND W SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLANS FOR THE COMPLETE Z
450 450, SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION. W Z
HORIZONTAL SCALE I" 60' loo-YR SroRAGE EtEVArI O W MAINTENANCE PLAN 1 (n ~
VERTICAL SCALE I° = 6' 50-YR STORAGE ELEVATION • X x 25-YR STORAGE ELEVATION X UI _ -
10-YR'STORAGE ELEVATION X 5-YR STORAGE ELEVATION X ~ Q I, ALL SLOPES 3'I AND STEEPER SHALL RECEIVE A CURLEX BLANKET OR APPROVED z
TRASH RACK ~4 STEEL REBAR (GALV. 2-YR STORAGE ELEVATION X OR ASPHALT COATED), TACK WELD e ~ ~ 12' EQUAL, IN ADDITION TO HYDROSEEDING. TEMPORARY BERMS MAY BE NEEDED DAI ~ LY OC N 12'x6' CONCRETE OUTLET UNTIL ALL SLOPES ARE BROUGHT TO GRADE,
6' O,C. EACH WAY, LAID ON TOP OF RISER \ S1 _ ~ 7 STRUCTURE WITH TRASH' RACK
~ E TOP of BERM 2. TEMPORARY STABILIZATION MEASURES SHALL BE INI I TATED AS SOON AS EL 441.0 PRACTICABLE N PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES NAVE
• • • • ~ • • TOP OF 12' x 6' CONCRETE RISER cSETTLED HEIGHT) _ TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED, BUT IN NO CASE MORE THAN FOURTEEN (14)
EL. 440.0 440 (2) - 24' RCP B LS HEADWALL wiENERGr DAYS AFTER WORK HAS CEASED, UNLESS ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE ~ \SSIPATOR (SEE DETAIU 440- WILL RESUME WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (2U DAYS, _I
. **-0~ SLOPE
12' WEIR ELEV 439,0 ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ i - ~ ~ 12' WEIR ELEV 439,0 PERMANENT ppOL PVC PIPE WITH P0~1 D~ EXTENSION 0 ARE, 3. ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE INSPECTED EVERY
~ / / SIN ADDITION TO THE 4' ~ ELBOW #IN ADDITION TO THE 4' ~ / \ \ ~ / \ \ IR T ELEV 438,0 QE-LEV_ 4 , WEIR AT ELEV 438,0 1 1 - - - - SEVEN (7) DAYS OR AFTER EACH RAINFALL OCCURRENCE THAT EXCEEDS ONE-HALF - _ (0.51 INCH, DAMAGE OR INEFFECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE REPAIRED AND REPLACED
r ~ ~ ~ ` 1 ATTACH SCR N H 1NV. ouT~a36,0 ~ AS NECESSARY.
• ~ ~ I I GALVANIZED LAG E 5.75' WATER C 4 WEIR ELEV - 4 8.0 4 WE ELEV I. 438.0 WEDGE ANCHORS MICROPOOL QUALITY ORIFICE OTTOM OF POND EXTENSION AREA EL. 436,0 ' 4. PROVIDE SILT FENCE AND/OR OTHER EROSION CONTROL DEVICES, AS MAY BE
AREA 34 34 LF 36' REQUIRED, TO CONTROL SOIL EROSION DURING UTILITY CONSTRUCTION, ALL DISTURBED
\ \ ~I I/4' OPENING GALV. OR INV EL 434A ~ ALL.IMINUM EXPANDED RCP a 0,08 AREAS SHALL BE CLEANED, GRADED, AND STABILIZED WITH GRASSING IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE UTILITY INSTALLATION,
7,0' PVC TU2N-DOWN INV. OF BARREL EL. 437,0 \ ~ ~ / ~ / METAL SCREEN I ~ _ _ / / O ~ / CONCRETE ANTIfLOTATION BLOCK ORIFICE PIPE INV, 437,0 6' ~ ~ _ _ , ~ ~ _ _ ~ / 430
~ - ~ _ _ T _ 4 5. ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE PROPERLY MAINTAIN 30 PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION ED DURING ALL
FILL BOTTOM OF RISER UNTIL THE COMPLETION OF ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, AND ALL DISTURBED AREAS HAVE BEEN STABILIZED, ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL
(BEf~ATH INVERTS) WITH NON-SHRINK GROUT EXTEND RISER BELOW GRADE DEVICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION IN ORDER TO CONTROL EROSION DRAWN
AS NECESSARY TO INSLRE ADEQUATE STABILIZATION AND/OR OFF-SITE SEDIMENTATION, ALL TEMPORARY CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE MGL REMOVED ONCE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED.
. (BASE OF RISER SHALL HAVE CHECKED
' . . 0'-6' MINIMUM COVER) 6, THE CONTRACTOR MUST TAKE NECESSARY ACTION TO MINIMIZE THE TRACKING OF SKS MUD ONTO THE PAVED ROADWAY FROM CONSTRUCTION AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR
BOTTOM OF POND 434,0 SHALL DAILY REMOVE MUD/SOIL FROM PAVEMENT, AS MAY BE REQUIRED. DATE
5109/06 7, TEMPORARY DIVERSION BERMS AND/OR DITCHES WILL BE PROVIDED AS NEEDED
DURING CONSTRUCTION TO PROTECT WORK AREAS FROM UPSLOPE RUNOFF AND/OR SCALE
'x8'x0,5' CONCRETE BA TO DIVERT SEDIMENT LADEN WATER TO APPROPRAITE TRAPS OR STABLE OUTLETS, I' = 100'
JOB No.
COMPACTED SUBGRADE ORS
SECTION b* OF CRUSHED STONE ELEVATION
POND SECTION E NOTES DRAWING
DETENTION POND / TEMPORARY SEDIMENT
BASIN OUTLET STRUCTURE
SCALE: N.T.S. (SHEET U ]DW 1
~

REVISIONS BY

~ DETENTI ON WETLAND JETLAND PLANT LIST .
~ i QUANTITY SYMBOL SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME IZE U
S REQUIREMENT REQUIREMENTS SPACING PLANTING NOTES PLANT SOURCES Z
MELLOW MARSH FARM
PANICUM 7,650 ® VIRGAT SWITCNGRASS 4 POTS UM 3 1312 WOODY STORE RD. 4" POTS APART STANDARD PLANTING
SILER CITY, NC 27344 z ~ N rn
7,650. SWITCHGRASS P, 919-742-1200 U
(TOTAU I SAG TTARIA DUCK MELLOW MAR N F U o ~ 3' PLANT TUBERS 2"-3" S ARM ` ~ a.
10,730 ~ LATIF TUBERS 20 DUCK POTATO OLIA POTATO 1312 WOODY STORE RD. ~ Q ~ N TUBERS APART INTO DAMP SOIL OR IN o
WATER 12"-18" DEEP SILER CITY, NC 27344 ~ > ~
3,160 ..'WILD CELERY P, 919-742-1200 N Q ~ rn ~ orn~
VALLISNERIA WILD MELLOW MARSH FARM Q ~ ~ a c~ 5' PLANT ROOTS 2"-3" 1312 WOODY STORE RD. ~ o U ~
15,682 AMERICANA CELERY ROOTS ROOTS y } ~ N APART DEEP IN MUD SILER CITY, NC 27344 a (n L ~ '
P. 919-742-12 ~ ~ N ~ 00 D } ~
~ J ~ o ~cO
i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~0 x
N ~
t >
~ a~ ~ ~N ~
ovaavvva vvvavvvovvvvvas¢ypvovvvavoyy_gq vvv Z ~
' Q J ~
1,620 DUCK POTATO W W
\ _ ~ , W
-4- o ~vv v v~v Ev °
/ vvvva° avtvb vw~v •~v~vvva vvv l ~ovvov vv'pv vovvov ovv voo vo a vvvov vv vvvov vov dvov v~avv vvv 1
vvvov vavvvvvvv vvvvav vvvvvvva ~/~vovv vvvvav ovvo voavvvvv vvv vvvo ovvo •~v vvvo v vovvov vvv vvvo ovvvvpp ovvvvvvovv vvvo
vvvo vv vvvovv vvvgvvvvvvvvov vvav oooo ,710 DUCK POTATO"°~°
vv°°°°°v, . vvvvav•vvvvvovvvrvv ~vvavvvvv•vvvv oar 4 vovvov vvv vo ovvo vovatevvvva vvv vav~v vvvvavvavovv•ovvvvv oyvvrvvavvavvvvav ovvvv vvvo oovv vo dvvvvavvvvvvv ov
vvv ovvvvv• ° v ovv ° ~ ovvvv vvvabaavvv ova vyyv vvvvvvva v ~ v I ' vvvvvvva vvvov vv•vavdvvvvvvvvvvvv voo - ~ - _ ,
wvvvov oovvgvv~aSOOV v`v voo vvv vvvo ov ~ v i vvvo v°•vsrv 4vvv vvvov vv v vapy.vv ,.,,j~~- ovv vov vvvovv ° ~~3a g. Y'"
vovvvvvvvvv r X I \
~ , ~ri v d
~ ~ - _z... i.
o . ''`-$070' WILD< CE~.ERY ; ` i v
v H n£ ~
~ ° vvvovv vvvvvvv av vvv vvv ovvvv o ~ vv v vvv v r" v u V ~ vvtvwvv a<'a~o, 7t`,.. ~`^'~'`v'~~Y i,..Ey~ o r~c"- ' , ~ . ~i v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I I ll
V' ~.+r v v Q v v •vvv K~ vv vv vvr~r ~ X ~ ~ ~ v~ v ~ •~vvo ovvvv ~ ~ ~ ..I `jtt _
ppvv v v v v vv°v~J, v vvvov vii ~ ' ? < ' X F~ / i yvrvvar v °d, l ~r !L a r oovv vvvvvvv ivravvvov vvvvvo~v~~vovv ~ ° ~ ,J7Q'.DWS~, I ,f~ II ~vv~~~>avvv rrv rovavar•rr r•rrrr ~ ~ ) ~ ° ~ ~ ' 1/~~/ I`I! ~I
~ v4vvvvvavv oovvv~~o~ vv vvav avvv ova vvarrrvoo ~ vvvov ~Xr`.' ° '.PO.TATV'~',',~" /~,x' ~ ' DUl~l~j ~ I v ...v r .r v exa v wvs6r ~ r x ~ ~
ovvvvv '.r., •o"°' ~~~~~~o° o°~ ~ o wevvva ci X T 7 ( . avvv vvv vvav avow vv vovvov voavvvvv ~ ~01.~-1 v vvvava°r~rv~•or veavo oovv ~ oo orv vv voovo vv orv v°voo ~ vvavorrrv rvrvavvv v ~'v ~2 5 I ~ °
v vvv vvvvevtorovv vavvvvvvv ' vov va dvov aaavvvaavav ~ o Q "WLD - v orv vvv vvvva vvvov vvvava rvv,avvv rvvvvvvv X, ovvvv vvv vvv vov vvvo vvv vo } ovoeL ov vv vv vvv vvvo vv av ovvvv vvv vvv oovv ~.'GELERY. vra•sr • vvvo••• ' f I~ ovvvv vov vvvvvvvvvv _ ~~odvvv ve•s•v•••••v ~ v k
ova vvvvgqe vvvvvvv _y°v![~ avow vvvovv vv vvvov vvvvovowvov vov . v v ` F\X, vovv~l,BUQ °DUCK voavvvvv ~ vvv oovv ovvvvv vvvaSvvvv ~ ry~ ~ ~"~T v Y vvvovv vvvav~>IIQ DUCK,vv ovvvvv vvvvvvv 'r', v _ v v,~
voavvvvv vvvva val vv r o LOQ; ~ ' r vv vvvavPQTATQ vvvavvav > av vavrP TATQ ~av ( - ovvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv~ v ~ 'vX" avvv ovvvvvvvaov v• X x ~ ~~x ~ ~20 ~ DUGG \ - ~ r. 1 ovvvv°.........,., o vvv oovv ~ ov vvv..(`.~~.. ovv ~ yam. ' vvv vov vovovvvoavavvvv ~ ~ v•vvvvav ovvvv avvv ~ vvvbvvwv vww ovvvv 1 F~j~ U 'I
vavvvvvvv vv ovv vvv vab° 1. vvv vavvavv•vvovvoav vvvvvvva vvvva vvv oW vvovavv vv ovv vvv vvv vovoovv°o 1 vrvvvvaa•vvvvvvvvvrvvvvvv ovav•vvadd~vvvvvvv a vv vvvvv•vvvvvavvvvvvv ~k,' ~ avvv vo voovo avvv vvovvvvvvvvavvov ~ vovoavovovvd voovvv vvvvvvv ~ ---p- '---"---vvvov v' ~t~ .~F J J
vvvvvvv vvav vovvov vvvovv vov ovvvv ovvvodvvvvvv oovv ov`~ voovo 2+000 DUCK ovvvv v ~ r a ~ ~ ,I ~ avvv vvvvav vv vv vvvovv oovv ~ ~ voovvv o f a...a.r• ao°.oo°:.oaa°aooo ovvo °a`POTATO . ~ ~ ~,k;, I i
v vvvva ovvovovvvvvovv °O ova vvvvvvv ~ ~ . vv~oavooavoovv vov vvvvavvvvvvvvvv ~t vvovvovv ~.'~F~. ao vvvvvvvav vvvo oooo av vov ovvvvv avvavarvvv v•vvavvavvavv ovavvvvvao v ~ ~ 20~ DUrCK ~ X~ FA / I
)y d~ vovvvvvvvvv avvv f ~ X'~ vvvva vvv vvvo vvvvav ~ oovv vv ovv vvv vov vvv vov ovvo v v° ',,f7o'rA'rQ ~ v ~ r I a avvv vv vvv avvv n,E;I,l. ~k vvvovvvdvvvvvvvavv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv)~, 14, v%~Tq~ ~ vvvvvvvvvv •vv•vavvv vv avvv 1`. ovvvv ovvvvv vvv vvvvvvv av ~ i I I Z
vvvo [ vvvo vvv vo ovvvvv vvvov vo•vvavavvvvvvavvv h° F ~r pfd vo oyyw '~i vvoeo vvvo ~ av voavvvvv vvv vov voovo / Y."v fy~' ELC{7~ ~ ~ , ~ vv ` arvvvvvvvvvvavrvvrv h • ~ 1-fc.n, vv yy t oovv av voo vvav vvovavv vvvvvvvvvv oovv v v ~ k ' W i
_ ~ X ~ ~ K:', vv ovv vobav v vvvvarovavvvvvo vvvvvvv ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~'yv x 6~rx ~ v voovvv va vvv vvv ovvvvv oovv ovv ° v ~ ~ •A IOQ WILD. ~ ~ POTA 1. yam. I X 1 v v ° ~ o o v v v v a v vvvvvvv oovv o vvv va a v ' ~ ~ , , , '1~ i ~ . W
S vv o > ~ °v 4ss ov~ ovvovvvavvoprv Y .A~LLERY X~/~.A.k. X, , `F"l~,f F~'1T~;. 1 oooo vvv ,r . \•1 ° rk,. vvvvDwr ~ ` viervvssv.v (n >
_ x l ~I v ov~vOVV ti~:~. W Q
~ ~ ° \ 0
~ vvav ° Q .DUCK. ~ ~ ~ vov v ovvvv --i" ~ ~ ~a p~t4A ~ vvav v ~ v o r1?1I1~Q J ~ z~ - ~
1-- . _ - _ ~ r2~a, oooo as ~ a - v d'" ' >WILD . . ~ ~ vvav •vvvovv ~yynn " J Q N
_ ovvvvv v tii \M1!' DUCK, . ~ ° ° , ~LE~Y _ ~ I J _Z i
. ~ `POTATO ' k k ~ I x - . ~r x~ - QZU ~ W
~ . ~ ~ '~I W
~ , ~Z
~ WZ W
~ \ U ~ y
~ ~ ~ \ ~ 1 _ - ~Q
1 Z
OC N ~ ~
~ ~
J J
SCALE ~ I" = 60'
Z
DRAWN
MGL
CHECKED
SKS
DATE
5/09/06
SCALE
I" 100'
JOB No,
POND SECTION E NOTES ]OF4
(SHEET 2) 1A
I