20061833 Ver 1_401 Application_20061127

•
~ Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
- November 22, 2006
S&EC Project # 10290.W2
To: US Army Corps of Engineers NC Division of Water Quality
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Monte Matthews Attn: Cyndi Karoly
6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd, Suite 120 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, N.C. 27615 Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
From: Debbie Edwards 2 0 0 6 1 8 3 3
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614 ~ ~ T_, _ ~,_
Re: Gregory Poole Subdivision ~ ~ ~ ~,_ (,.._ ~,_,' C~ , "
Mebane, Alamance County, NC
On behalf of the owner, Gregory Poole Equipment Company, please find attached a complete application and
supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) and the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NC-DWQ) that the activities proposed below may proceed utilizing
Nationwide Permit 39 and Water Quality Certification 3402. Please contact me at [phone] if you have any
questions or require additional information.
PR(lTF!`T CTTIVTAAARV
Project Name Gre o Poole Subdivision
Project T e Commercial Subdivision
Owner / A licant Gre o Poole E ui ment Co.
Coun Alamance
Nearest Town Mebane
Waterbod Name UT to Back Creek
Basin /Sub-basin 03-06-02
Index Number 16-18- 6
Class C; NSW
TMP A('T RT TI~TM A R V
Stream Impact (acres): 0.011
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.485
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres): 0.496
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 187
Attachments:
Pre-construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Agent Authorization
USGS Vicinity Map
Wake County Soil Survey
EEP Acceptance letter (dated November 21, 2006)
City of Mebane Justification letter (dated September 7, 2006)
Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet-feature A (southeastern comer of property)
Photo's of Feature A-Impact Area 3
Overall Layout Plan Map & Impact Maps (W 1-W4)
$475.00 Water Quality Certification Fee
~f.~~ ~ i
tt
~~~
Nov ~ '~ ~~~~
y,~Lp,ND~ ~~'
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

2006183
Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USAGE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
p~ ~
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: ~`'""'~----._
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check
D ~~
~~
II. Applicant Information
Nay 7 Z[l~~
1. Owner/Applicant Information ,.
Name: Gre or Poole E ui ment Co. (Attn: Richard ~~ `~"'' ` ` ~~ "~"' ~ `
~Y q p ~~I .y+~~ ~It~"z~aw a-~~ FyWi1
Mailing Address: 4807 Beryl Road
Raleigh, NC 27606
Telephone Number: 919-828-0641 Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Debbie Edwards
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants. PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh NC 27614
Telephone Number: 919-846-5900 Fax Number: 919-846-9467
E-mail Address: dedwards(c~sandec.com
Page 1 of 9

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps maybe included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Gregory Poole Subdivision
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): n/a
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 9804-95-6005, 9804-94-8444, 9804-84-5230,
9804-74-7244
4. Location
County: Alamance Nearest Town: Mebane
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Gregory Poole Subdivision
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): The subject site is located
northeast of the intersection of Trollingwood Road (SR 1981) and I-85/I-40 (Exit 152
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 36.0697 °N 79.3100 °W
6. Property size (acres): Approximated 40 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT to Back Creek 16-18-(6), C; NSW
8. River Basin: Cape Fear (03-06-02)
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The existing_ conditions onsite include an old commercial
building and pastureland
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Page 2 of 9

The proposed project is an industrial/commercial development with impacts resulting_from
the installation of the buildings and a road Heavy equipment typically used for construction
will be employed for this project.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed work is to supply a
Semi-truck repair heavy equipment repair and truck rental facility along with additional
commercial development for the traffic off of Interstate 85 and Interstate 40
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
On Mav 11, 2006, S&EC conducted a detailed wetland delineation and stream evaluation on
the entire site. On July 7 2006 Mr Todd Tugell _(formerly with the USACE) concurred with
an email transmittal including agent authorization site photos data forms stream forms vicinity
mans and a sketch map verifying_jurisdictional features in addition to determining important vs
unimportant jurisdictional waters. An additional package was sent to Todd Tugwell on Au ust
31, 2006 that included the above information and a wetland survey requesting_a si ng_ed
jurisdictional determination. On July 26, 2006 apre-application meeting was conducted with
Jason Payne of S&EC and Todd Tugwell of the USACE discussing road alignment alternatives
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No additional permits are anticipated at this time
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
Page 3 of 9

wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
The nronosed permanent impacts include 0.485 acre of jurisdictional wetlands for road and
lot fill (Impacts 1 & 2) and 1871inear feet of unimportant channel for road fi1l~Impact 3)
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
es/no linear feet
Impact area 1 Permanent-Lot fill and

road fill Emergent Wetlands No >1000' 0.255
Impact area 2 Permanent-Lot fill and

road fill Emergent Wetlands No >1000' 0.23
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.485
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.523 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma) Before Im act linear feet) acres
Impact area 3 UT to Back Creek Permanent-Road fill Intermittent ~2' 187' 0.011
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 187' 0.011
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) acres
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Open Water Impact (acres) N/A
Page 4 of 9

6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.011
Wetland Im act (acres): 0.485
O en Water Im act (acres): o
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.496
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 187
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USAGE.
There are no isolated wetland onsite.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It maybe useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
A portion of impact areas 1 & 2 proposes wetland fill associated with the extension of Maple
Lane. In the pre-application meeting with Todd Tugwell of the USAGE on July 26, 2006, the
ali~mnent of Maple Lane was discussed. Attached is a letter from Mr. Robert L. Wilson, the
City Manager of the City of Mebane, as this letter states, because of the existing, termination
point of Maple Lane in addition to the NCDOT tie in point to Trollingwood Road, the wetland
impacts associated with the extension of Maple Lane were unavoidable. Other road layouts
utilizing a "T" intersection and sharp turn (90°). just east of Trollingwood Road will not meet
design standards required by the City. The additional proposed wetland impacts within impact
areas 1 & 2 are associated with the proposed restaurant and pharmacy along with the parking
areas for with both. Again, because of the required alignment of Maple Lane and because of
Page 5 of 9

the commercial zoning of this property and proximity to I-85/I-40 these parcels that front the
proposed Maple Lane are a vital part of this project and therefore necessitate the proposed
wetland fill. Impact area 3 proposes fill to an unimportant stream channel these
impacts are necessary for the extension of Maple Lane and the cul-de-sac this cull-de-sac not
only provides access to the northern parcel but is also needed for large truck movements to the
main building for the drop-off and pick-up of heavy machinery and rental equipment
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The applicant proposes payment to the Ecosystem Enhancement Pro am EEP) for the
proposed permanent impacts to wetlands (impact areas 1 & 2) the EEP acceptance letter is
attached for your review In addition it has been past experience that mitigation is not
re9uired on impacts to unimportant streams so no mitigation is proposed for stream impacts
(impact area 3) however if mitigation is required the applicant will utilize the EEP
Page 6 of 9

2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wra/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.485
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and' local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Page 7 of 9

Zone* Impact
s uare feet Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 N/A 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 N/A 1.5 N/A
Total N/A N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone t.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
N/A-no buffer mitigation will be reauired because the site is not in state reQUlated
buffered basin.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
The percent impervious for the entire proiect is estimated to be >;reater than__30%.___ The
~.~licant is proposing two extended detention wetlands to treat the onsite Stormwater and has
identified adequate area for the stormwater BMP's. The applicant requests upon approval of the
application for DWO to include a condition within the Water Quality Certification that will
allow our client to submit a final stormwater mana eg ment plan to the DWQ at a later date, and
that the Stormwater mana eg ment plan be reviewed and approved by the DWO before any
impacts that have been approved tak~lace on the property
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The proposed project will tie into existin s~ a, nitar~sewer lines in the area.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
Page 8 of 9

XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
We have reviewed the "DRAFT Internal Polio Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality
Certification and Isolated Wetland Programs" document ,prepared by the NC Division of Water
Quality on October 3, 2002, version 1.6. The draft states that most small commercial
developments are unlikely to cause cumulative impacts. Gregor~Poole Subdivision does not
meet any of the three criteria of private projects that can clearly result in cumulative impacts.
We anticipate that you will advise us if a qualitative or quantitative impact analysis is required.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
~.
Applicant/Agent's Signature 1 Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9

~oz~o.
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road Raleigh, Notch Carolina 27614 Phoac: [phone] Fax: [phone]?
www.SandEC.com
Name: G'rGQo'ry po01 C ~tM-~W~-~
Address: q-QO'~] BerY
fZ.ut~~gl~ E uG --
Phone: 'Brims V.,w {~a r,,, Ofr ~$ ~titr ~~`rritiK ~ •$D1.6i'f{' g l9 • $S(-198 D
Project Name/Description: CT ~ - M ~b EKG S&EC Project # i '~ ~~~=' • ~=~'~--
Date: 1~ ~f U~
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn: ~ '
Field Office:
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the current ro owner, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA to act in my
behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental information in
support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The ~~ day of ~, 20 Ob .
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for thts protect.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC to arrange a site
meeting prior to visiting the site. /
j r ~i'~~
Grtgory p~ o~e ~i~ip. Ca. • K~cha--~ Donr,~-(7 ~ ! ,E~i'
Print Properly Owner's Name 1r7~tC.. P Property Owner's Signature
cc: Ms. Cyndi Karoly cc: Mr. Jason Payne
NCDENR - DWQ Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The Current Landowner

7

r, r y, /~__ _y ~s.
-~~ 71 •a w ~ ~~ Perk ~~~ ~~~ '-'~.~..~ ~~,~ ~~ _/'~ ~((/''-~ ~(
{ ' ~~ rye °s ~ ~~~~ ._;"'-~%~ I~' •! t ~ ~'~~., ~ ~ ~ ~ S 1 ~^`J 1 'i,, \ ~
`_~ '~. 1 i?~ ~~,a ' ~ 't ; 1 ~:i \1~ ~ =spa^~ r,
-_ ~~~ 1 ~c., \Y N. ~ -.• ~11~h1 _ a o 1 ` 1, i S ~~ k' I ` ~' 'j '' ~~ 1~:
Project N°. Flgure I - I :24K USGS
IO29O.W1
Topographic Quadrangle
Project Mgr.: Mebane Gregory Poole ~ Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Rid e R g
JP Bobb~t Design BU~Id g d.• Ralei h, NC 21614
[phone] • [phone]
s~aie: Alamance County, NC Web Page: www.SandEC.com
I " = 2,000'
Mebane Quadrangle
05/ I I /06

LaD3 ,~
F, 1 G6C3 ~ .o ~ pu m?sr - Lc ~{ ` GaD ,a ~ U a ~ ~ ~
~•o ~ pQ ~~ f Cg ?~ GaC2 ~ GaE ~ n o f3~'
Sb S GbD3 A. ~, F3 ~ . v ~ . ~ ~ [a ~ TaC2 Sb 6a02,
GbC3 '~\\ taC ~6©.r' ~\GaC ~, ',~~F3 ~6 - ~ ~' TaB i =- ~' .,~ TaC 9O ry GaC2
LaC3 n GaC2 ~ ~ ,y f o c~ a~ G
Lc G'' ~ Sb / \ ~ ~7aB ~~l Q /~ bC3 ~ GeD2GaC2~~~ G bow c~ G9 GaB GaB2
GaB2 G~ .'Hd82 GaD2 . ~ c+ • o~_ ~C .~ , c V
Ga62 o , w' ,\ .'
~~ N a L~ `J r-~ ~ \1 •..Gep 1 >/ GaB2 O GaD
faC2 Gb 3 w (GaC Ga62 'GbD3 1\~Ta62 \ 2 I 1.
d ,Ga62 GaC2 b m ~ y ~0 d dQ ,~O "'
TaC `a Tab ' ~~ 61 I G m ~
•. HeD 'GbD3 "' ~ ~ \ 6,00 / ~ 1, ~~ GaB2 c' o
y~ yCC~ G6C3 °'~n<\GaC a` Mf'~ ~~ c~ C~aC2 b03- Ob8211 ~ GaC _ Gab II GaB N
G
O a a a 1y _,_; __, i!I Lc
~~\ HaD3 ~' __ ~ w ~'~ mm, ~ { .~+~ Ga62 \\~. Ta62" s~ ~ , 'BaC2
TaB Sb Db6 ~2 C ro 1 O ,Lc_.GbD3 "~\\\ ~ C~ N
Ga ~a8~ ~ ~ ~ TaB II Tab ~ ~ faC2 aC `\1 yll EaD Ga
GbD3 lip a ~~ ~GaD ~ _ m
GaB ~ C 3'~ C2 DbC 'J Gs82 } 11 ~ 11 ~ Ea6
~ }' TaB2 ~._ tl Ga62 11 GaC2 ~~
~! TaB2 GaC2 `~ 1 TaC2 a62
l Ta62 ~ y TaC2 GbC3 11
GaC2 ~~Lc~.- ~IEaB ~ ~ Ea6 .
Ob ~ / ~ Ga62 ~ Sb i ~.:- ~~ d ~tl , Tai-
D ~fbC3 -' GbC3 ~ ~ EaB2 ~~ Ga62 Ga62 aTa62 ~ _ .
'~ T
~ j ~ ~ "' II
. ~ 5 aC2 Ea62 •'~~ . ' °•
GaC ,~~ ~,- GaB2 Cf EaC [] lGaC2 a fl
\.,f v" GaC "~7 c, /'» \~. Tab Ea GaC z (~Sb' f ~ II• EaB2
•aC2 Ga62 ~ GaC2 \ Sb ~ ' c'/ j ~ II EbC3 - EbEaC2
Ea$ t
• i p m EaB2 ~aGry GaB • ,/ 1 - ' Sn. 0662
B~ ~ ~~ m 7 ~ ag,~ Q ~ '• ~b /yo,~ atYYY,Q~ W,
G°C'ObC2 ~~ n~~.~ EbC3 .Ga62 EaB2 _ `' p HdB `~
/ ~~ {1a Ta62 Fd GaC _ _ eD ~i Q w HdD es2 ~
o - C Tkf~ 00,,~ f lc ~V`ti ~~ e i ~C,D C. 102 - ,-;EbC3 ~ H r • - -
~ -~\ `~0 6~. 1~~ ~:~~ '~C~ !- Hd82 'S'pO F EaEY- 6 <-1rd o
O O
GbC3 S~~ ~( d - b,C3 "` EaB2 ~ --J ° ~ ~ QaB. C
~~ ~ ~l ~ ~ ~s0 E~ ~@ ~1 ~ GbD3~~ ~ 0`' lid _
_ _~ ` `a6 cau~ u~ HeB2 HOB' y r '/ ~ ~ `
i .. .- ' ~~/~ Lc 1~. li ~ Ql`~p~ ~Ed >/ i-~ 6\ ~ ~~ F III
a ~ TaB2 ~ ~I T~
~~' ;' ~ % ~%` -- ~ `~ TbC3 ~ ~ `• "~a E' B Ea9 i // Lc .~ s ° ~?'b,/---~(~II` N ~ ,s'
1 aE2 / TbC3 I 14:~ ~ Tab'
/ /
:
~__~-~ ~~
_c / ~; ~ _~~ ~ ~s / / '-T~ ~~ ~ \ ; 652 Ta62 7a B Ily ! a /: F ~
_ ~ ,~ l"'
~~` ~~ B ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~~ ~ "t aB 2 L~ I~ Ea~'~
•' /~~.`~j , ~ ~\ ~~~ ~ ~ \ T 2 \-':~`~`6c ~ E.dG,1., d 8og2 \GzC
i ~`. ~ j c~~\ Gbi,3 ~~.. ~ ~f ~a EbC'S 6C2. } ti Ea62 ~Ga6 ~ v
i \. ~ ~ ~ ~/ n'/..~,~~'~ f`.\~ ~\y~\j ~ i a62 .Ta62 ~\ ' ~' EbTJ3j J~
~Jt ~ a62 /c~' co/~i ( O\i\\bp EaC2 `o \ .' N d E ~ ~ 1
i~ .. , ~ ~ ~/pr 1. I ~ ~~-l ~ a V ~ t' bs ~ -~ . ~ '~-EbC3 ~ Ta62
~ I J;~ l ~ } ~ ` ~ ` c 662 H~w~' ~ Ta62 `,dC -3 LpB~ ~~pti~
~" ~ f i~d~ i^1 E l °bp ~ ~6n ~~ w We Hdg /, ~ n ~.'~(~6~
_ ~ 7 ,~//
~ i~`fag ~l1} t ,~ `~ >~~ ~ ~ `/ j' ~~~i F 6 ' Ta62,'~~, ~<Fa °C~l~% Gb,
L / _,I~: •~ \ f F ~ \ / T.', 102A .m lj •. -~> ~ e6, Oo; c`v 62
~, j\~ ~~/ a~D2 ; '~='i ~ ~~Vve,~,~l~~ ©tu CaG~ ~F EaC2 ~ . ~ afl w ~1/ TbD ~C
~ ~/ /~y `~„ f ''~ ) \~~ ~~ O~° TaB2 ~•0~ Ta62 ~ n I ( ~~ .i~ b ~ ~.
~ ~~~~ Ga92 /5'% G"C ~ GaC2 Ta62. ~: ii J)) I~ /
~~ a n T662 ~; I~p,6~(
(:a_C~ Q G262 ~ ~ b0
.. Tab ~ Ea82 *' ~, ~ Eb
HdC I ~~~ Sb Ga62 ~~ ya EaC ,`aG gG .
/ r~VR" Ga82 ~,C`~' Sa ~ \ 6~ •EbC3 a EpC3 ~
~/ GaG~ GbC3 ~' ~ .,')Ob 2 a62 ~~ EaC2 a .F' ~a62 ~C ii• p yQo
~. 3g^o SS Sb GaC2 8 ~ EaB2 2 ~' ~~ ;~ m FdC: Fa$
~f ,/ ~ C. '~.~ Ta62 7' _ ~ -. ~ Ta62 -\ " .
Project No. F-g ure 2 - N RCS
10290.W I
Soll Survey Map
JP ~e~t Mgr.: Mebane Gregory Poole Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
•
Bobblt Design Bulid 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.~ Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
scale: Alamance County, NC Web Page: ~+~ww.SandEC.com
f " = 1666'
Alamance County Soll Survey
05/ 1 I /06 Sheet 20

11-21-'06 13:27 FFOM-DENl3 EEP
Richard Donnelly
4807 l3eryl Road
Raleigh, NC 27606
9197152001
o tee
~~ ~ . ~.:.
PRQGRAM
November 21, 2006
Project: Gregory Poole Subdivision
T-398 P02,'03 U-977
County: Alamance
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina lcosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEF) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above refcroneed project. Please note that this dxision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. Tt is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC E$P will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months frpm the date of this letter. )lY we haws not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/402 Certiffeation within this time tYayne, #his acceptance wiU expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/401/CAMA permits to NC EBP. Once NC EEP receivos a copy of the 404 Fermit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
River Basin Wetlands Stream Buffer Buffer
Cataloging (Acres) (Linear }?set) Zone 1 Zone 2
Y.1nit (Sq. )pt.) (Sq- Ft-)
R% arian Non-Ri arian Coastal- Marsh Cold Cooi Warm
Cape Fear 0 0.485 0 0 0 187 0 0
03030002
Upon receipt of payment, Elrp will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2:1 mitigation-to-impact ratio, (buffers, Zonc 1 at a 3:1 ratio and Zone 2 at a 1.5:1 ratio). The type and amount of the
compensatory mitigation will be as speeifi.od in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401 Water Quality Certification, and/or
CAMA Permit. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the U, S, Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, pleasc contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
Si eerely,
rlham .Gilmer , E
Dirtctor
cc: Cy'ndi Karoly,'Wetlands/402 Unit
Todd Tugwell, USACL-Raleigh
Daryl Lamb, DWQ- Winston-Salem
Pil®
`p~-
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1662 Mail Service Center, plaleigh, NC 27699-1 652 / 91 9-71 5.Oa76 / www.nceep-net

Robert L. Wilson
Cily Manager
Glendel Stephenson
Mayor
Council
Patty Philipps, Mayor Pro Tem
Titn Bradley
Ed Hooks
Bob Hupman
Everette Greene
September 7, 2006
Cat#g of ~tCe~r~t~E
106 East Washington Street
Mebane, North Carolina 27302
[phone]
To Whom It May Concern:
Elaine 1. Hicks
Asst. Mgr./City ClerbFinance O~rer
Marilyn Carter
Tax CoNecror
Terry Caldwell
ChieJof Police
Jimmy Jobe
PuGlic N4rks Director
Linda kloh
Warre Trearmeni Director
Dean Ray
Recreorfon & Parks 1Nrecior
Amy Pendergraph
Ares/Commrmiry Cen(er Direcfar
13ob Louis
Fire Chief
Montrrna Hadley
Planning Director
This letter is being written at the request of Bobbitt Design-Build, Inc. to document our
meeting of August 9,-2006. We understand that the U.S. Corp of Engineers has requested
Bobbitt Design-Build, Inc. to investigate alternative road alignments for the proposed
Maple Lane from its existing termination point to its intersection with Trollingwood
Road (SR 1981). Together we reviewed and discussed (Town staff, the City Manager,
Mebane Director of Public Works and Bobbitt) alternative road alignments meeting the
required intersection points. This discussion including a road layout utilizing a' T'
intersection and sharp turn (ninety degree) which would route the road around existing
wetlands located in the center of the proposed subdivision. We understand that this
alignment was suggested by the Corp of Engineers as a possible alternative to impacting
the existing wetlands; however, we find this alignment does not meet our minimum
design standards for subdivision design.
I hope this addresses your concerns, and please contact me should you have any
questions at [phone].
Sincerely,
Robe .Wilson, City Manager
Chartered in 1881

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map) j
i....... _ __.._ _.... _ ............. _....__ _ _._...__ .. ___.. __.....
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Gregory Poole Equipment Co. 2. Evaluator's name: Jason Payne
3. Date of evaluation: 6/24/06 4. Time of evaluation: 2:45 pm
5. Name of stream: UT Back Creek 6. River basin: Cade Fear
7. Approximate drainage area: 25 acres 8. Stream order: First
9. Length of reach evaluated: 100' 10. County: Alamance
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): N/A
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 36.06938 Longitude (ex. -77.556611): -79.30488
Method location determined (circle): ~ Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other GPS
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): I 85/I40
proximately 2200 feet east of exit 152 on the north side of the interstate.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): possible piping
15. Recent weather conditions: Rain within previous 12 hours
16. Site conditions at time of visit: somewhat undesturbed, relic /abandoned farm land
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters X Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES ~ , If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
70 % Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
5 % Forested
25 Cleared /Logged % Others )
22. Bankfull width: 2-feet 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1-foot
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: X Straight Occasional bends _ Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 39 Comments: Stream passes under a power line (utility easement) before entering
a forested area less than 1-acre in size. The stream passes through the forested area, then enters a lame drain-pipe passing under 85/40.
Evaluator's Signature ~~~ U Date- ~ ~ Z~ ~
This channel evaluation for is intended to be used on y as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please ca11919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
I ~ ECORF.C .ION I OII~ T RANGI'
# ~
f CHARACYI'ERIS~I'ICS ~
~ Coastal -
{ piedmont -SCORE
iVlountam _ ,
__
'._.....- T- --- - ~
~~
1 Presence of flo~~ /persistent pools in stream 0- 5 j 0-4 0-5
3

_
(no Ilow or saturation = Q; Strung iloN~ =mar pcnnts) -
- - _ - ~
I
~
i
~ Etiidcncc of past human dltcration

(extensive alteration = 0; nu allerahon = mah points) _ ~
0-6

~
0-~
_
-
0-~ 2
_ _ _ _ _
1 Riparian zone ~
3
no buflci 0; con~ikuous, ~~~ide bufTc r m ~a pomis) 0- (i 0- 4 0- 5 1

4 Evidence of nutnent or chemical discharges i
0- 5
0-4
0-4
3
(extensive dischargeti = 0; no discharges-max units)
- - -
- ~
- --- '
~
5 Groundwater discharge
0-3
0--4
0-4
1
. (no discharge = 0; spnngs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points
~
~ ,...,
6 _
Presence of adjacent tloodplai~~
0-4
0 -4
0-2
2
{'no ilood~lain = 0; extensive floodplai^ = max points) __ ~

_~ .
7 Entrenchment I floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
3
_ __- (duly entrenched = 0; fr~ueni _f<oodin~ - nia_x~oints) _ _ _
~'
S Presence of adjacent tr•ctlands

~
~
0-6
0-4
0-2
1
no wetlands = 0 3arq. e adf
acent w_eUands - n~ax
rots

9 Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
2
- (extensive channrlization = 0; natural meander max pomtti)

10 Scdimcntinput
0-5
U-4
-0-4
3
{extensive d~sition=0; little or no sediment -max pointer __

11
Size ~ diversity of channel bed substrate .,:
r t # f r.
NA

0-4

0-5

0
(fine, homogenous =0; lie, diverse sizes max points) _ ___

1? Evidence of channel incision or widening
". i
0-5 _
0-4 ~
0-5 ~
2
;r., _-_ (deeply incised = 0 stablc_b.d & banns = max pomi5
~ _ _ - -
~
13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0--5
0-S
2
~,
~,,,~ ~s_everc erosion = O;no eros~ou, stable banks = n~xpoints _ _ _
~ _
14 Root depth and density onbanks
..
0-3
0-4
U-5
4
~E-+, _ _ (no v~siblc roots - 0; dense roots ihrou~hout = max pom(s)_ ___ ; __
~'
~,:
15 Impact byahriculturc, iivestock,~or~timbcr production
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
~substantial
impact -0~ no ev~dcnee = nix points}

~
16 _
Presence ofriffle-pool/rippl~pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0 "b
1
~ (no nfflesJripplesor pools = U; well-developed. max pumts~
.~
17 Habitat complcxih
0-6
U-6
0-6
1
~~~ little or no habitat= 0; ire ucn Varied habitats -niax pints) ~
_______
1~
18 Canopy coverage over streambcd
0-5
O--S
0-5
2
,,;., ono shading vegetation
0; continuous canopy max pom[s~

~

19 _
_
-
_ - -- Substrate e-nbeddcdncss' --
, ~ ~~~*T~`~`
~ ~A ~

0- 4

0-4

2
(dceplY embedded = 0; loose stnicturc - ma-x) , r*
_
20~ ____
Presence of streaminvertebrates (see page 4)
0 - 4 _
0 - 5
0 - 5
0
~~ ono evidence Os common, ^umcrousypcs - max points ;
~
21 _
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4 _
0-4
1
O (no evidence U, common, numeroas~es=ma,r points) _

a

O

2
- --
- - - -
Presence of fish _

-4 _

---

0-4

-4

0
~ (no evidence=0; common, numeroustypcs __maxpouus)
~

~3 - _ _
Evidence of wildlife use ---
I
0-6 -

0- 5 -

0 5

0
(no c~xlcncc 0; abundant ~~td~nc.e max points) _ _
_ ___
Total Points Possible ~_
~' -100 :` , T. ~ 100 _
~i 00'~ ~=- ~ ,
? ~ TOTAL SCORE (also enter can firtit j~a~e) 39
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

Feature A
Impact Area 3
(southeastern corner

ir~rnerm tnremtnN i mvax i erncc i rrnrc"n ~~ m ~ .n:,~
AREA #1 JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS 0.20 ACRES 0.255 ACRES
AREA 2 JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS 0.23 ACRES 0,23 ACRES
REA 3 CHANNEL _ 1B7LF 0.011 ACRES ~~
_
TOTAL AREA IMPACTED __ 0.496 ACRES
rvUTN;: Irv AKEA ~l U.U86 ACHES UN' dURISDICTIUNAL 19ETLANDS HAVE BEEN PRESERVED.
ND IMPACT AREA ~Jl
SHEET W2 FOR DETAILS)
~ /:. - - -

W

W
N
W
I
~
~
a6 ~a
=
~E
S 200 6183 3=
c
s
;
y
E~
~~~ ~o`i15~"
CO

~~~~;g3' ~
EOxEO R ~ ~ ~~~
-]
zw n,~~eX ~
eu6 xc3
5~
~ I- °-~` o
U
e
~'
~ {3a9'CyY~I
~ l~ Z

~
; ~
~ ~
~

,
I ~~g~sM er ~~ ' ` ~

W~
WW g ~
P~ m
Z
;~
~
OW k VAFV ORNn'
J B3i60 PG 649
~ IS' ~ ~I'
g~
-`\y '.~.
~~% w
_ / \ ~ 0
4 F

Iy
/ i
r II
J
~ m
r. _. ~ .. ~ ~ I 6e.
L
I
~y}~ ~~/
~
~ ~ ~
q~
~ `
~
~ ON
`s
~ r. ~ ~ ~`
m
~

~ ! _ • I K
Q
~
;~ ~ ~ ~ U
6z
R"
~ ', ~ ~ ~ ~e~o N-~

sEORC~~z v Iwo ~ t
.~ ,~_ ~ •
~, 6ESSE uawRnn6AS ~ ~~ 3_ r / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ r
,r ~ 6~"w9°bc ~ou'P~ ''~ W ~~' d ~'a n4'cx , 7iP _. ~ ~ z ~` ~y~~ ~~ r
r. x "~". 4 ~' ~
k~ 1
- n ..
- _ _
r 6 k+ _ ~ _ ~
y~ ~-
/ .l.-~ $ •
rr/ ~, _ ~ , 116 ~' F`t~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~sa_mec ~En Pte. - ~ ~~ / rz .
r i p i ~. ,~ ~ ,' ~ I z6' awm unot i ~ ~ ~:
EYe
r ~ - ~ ,'~g
R '~ ~ ~
uz;uuas o tµ,-r ~ .. ,~
~ ePr~~,
tlf~ ~ ~.
~~
r / ~ ~ anmxr ~ : ) i ~ ~ r
r / I , ~~ ~n ]0 CC E4FN! / r I ~I ' {" J / .. ~ i l I ~
~` -
~~
~. ~ ';
_ ,'
/ A e ~~ /
~ ~ G' - B~Rfid$.~~e a ~ r ; - , _. ~ ~ , ?l, ! ~ i z ~ i ' ~ r ~_ ~ ~ ~w~ a~vw~ ~ ,o,. ,~ ~ i ~ e~n~cacxrna
\ i . PflOP09Ea
,t. ,
~ / r ~~ ~~~ ,_ ~ ~ _ ~ _
/ .,
~~
~ ~ ~,
., ~
¢ ~ _ ~
fir, ~~
_-
~ 0 'i ;J. ~,... ~ ~ ~ k ~~.
~ ~ ~~, _ ~ -~ - ~ I ~'
" -
y,
~.
~. ~ -
~„~ _,
.. r ., - ~, ~ ~ ; ~~
~ ~, ,~:
1~ r
o I ~ ._; ~ ~ ~ ,. ~
"0'2' ',~" 'd ~ " "reg. , r ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ' ' ~ _
~ ~- K _. ansm ~\~ ~ aY
z f-s7
.,, °
_~
a
~O 1 ~~ ~ r ~ nsyo>oy R° u ~~. ~ I ~, ~ ~ y,- -- ~ o
~s.0 ~' m ~ ~` ' ~~ ~. A ~ , A ~ ~.
d z ~ ~ - A ~ E I~ j°
.~
~d ~ a ~ B@Bia9~€°~$~f" ~, ~r a~ ~ r~ r
a ~, ~ ~,
- ,-~
a
_-
~ ~ ', -"-f a,~a a ~ ~. ~ . i - -
I ~ _ 7 ~ ,_ S ~ _ uu---
1 ' 1 ~ N ~ ~ ~~~ - _ _____- lul
- ~~~~„ ~ ,~s~6~ ~~- - _ _ _
_ ~__ -_ ~=
~ __ ~ _
~, fi I ~ ~` ~ ~ -- ~"~
~ _ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~r ~_ ^ ~ ~-- N
_ ----~
IN( p
`~-,; y Y ~ III ~~"w• Ncnorexmsc~--- -- --' -~/ _--~= CHANNEL IMPACT AREA 3
Sp.1500ppy 1-05 ~ ~ ~AgIES IN(j (SEE SHEET VP4 FOR DETAILS)
INI
....11"~~ PUBLIC ~~
e>n
cuaa oEUZ µs~c rt+uus Qac a.cE uw acwwc ~ / /
san' so.~~ roar ~ vu'RO oaoaw
cz 'w'zr "iew' ssr iess~ WETLAND IMPACT ARHA y2
c ~ asisar naz.e m,az' z6i. o~ s s asse~oow (SEE SHEET W3 FOR DETAILS)
5 04'22'S0'X W01
6~e,E eE,R~a~ nµ6l APPROVED FOR
~ 5 n aza ' w nose'
sv a yw , 0 40 200 400 800
PERMITTING
v K~ o m s E
~m~x8
m ~U ~'~aa
mg2~..Ba
~ ~ ~ m m
~c~mm~'-
p°p¢VLLa
m~
~~
0
DRAJE6 BY:
HK BY:BPP
Z
~/O
V /
~~
VJ
WQ
J Z
O Q
O
~ U
~/ z
I.L ~
~O ~ Z
VFW
W~Z
~~~I~ X W
VW~
11 X 17
1" - 200'
10 NOV OB
1469-0182
WETLAND
IMPACT PLAN
W1
OF4

0
{
.~
2
O
IN
O
~~
arcm~~8$
H~~
m ~N°np
W Ci ro aOna
x ~ m m
~0.~~rn~~
a°RW'V~a
~~
O
DRRAIEB BY:
HK BY:BPP

t
o~
/i
i / I Z ('~~~ ~ ~EC' ,~~d ;'~ /
/ ~ ~~~ ~ n, ~~/ ~~~~ ~ l~l~i ~ ~~
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~j ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~`~ /
~~ ~,i~Lt iNkflag i ~ ~ '-'
~/ ~~s / ~ ~~ / / ~ ` - ~~~ /: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "'~INV SIN X1.8,
i~ _' ~ ~ ~ SE~nkfYag-12a'a ~" ~ ; ~ i ~ ~ N~~ ~ U 6~ ~.
,~~~' / '6'~ k0a~119a '~ ~ ~ E~~ I~ 12 i ~ ~ ~
J 6j ~ ~ ,3 tky~ P 9% ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~
,, ,~s n~ ~ , , ~ j ~
. ~6`j ~~ / ~~.E~ lni ,- ~ ~'` ~C ~~ npg 119 ~ ~ , (V ~~~~ ~~`
`? ~ / ~ ~ ' Q
I ~
t~ I l ~l ~~ ~~~ ~
!IMPACT LOCATION TYPE TOTAL ACRES PRESERVED ACRES IMPACTED ACRE
AREA #I _ JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS 0.2B ACRES 0.025 ACRES 0.255 ACRES
APPROVED FOR
PERMITTING
!~

~-
0 5 20 40 80 120
~~

Z
m
r~
V
J Q
O Z
J
~ U
2
rO~z
VNW
w~Z
~,I ~Xw
~w~
11xn
r-aa
10 NOV O6
1469-0182
WETLAND
IMPACT PLAN
W2
OF 4

0
A
2
O
N
O
`os ~o
vKmorn E
~W~rs
~_
mo ~~nx
WcZimm~°a
m €t ~in ~$
O wmm °-'~
a ~ ~ m m m
n$°o~vLLa
m
0
m
DRAJE6 BY:
CHK BY:BPP
i
~~ ~
~ 67
11 ~~~
.i ~i ~ _
n ~ ~`~
~n ~~~
m ,, ~ ~ ~~ PR~p
,.
X~~ ',~ ~ ~, " DETE oSED E~~ENDED
w~~ ,6 , ~ NTION~~ETLA~~ - -
~,, ~ ~~~~
N / / \
d; a z.
IMPACT LOCATION TYPE _ TOTAL ACRES PRESERVED ACRES IMPACTED AREA
APPROVED FOR ~ ~
AREA ~2 JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS 0.23 ACRES O 0,23 ACRES 0 5 20 40 80 120
PERMITTING
Z
rO
V J
~_
~y~
W
/r~
VJ
I'J Q
z_
O~
OQ
~ U
2
~O~Z
VNW
WIZ
~~m
~w~
„X,~
,~-~~
10 NOV O6
1489-0182
WETLAND
IMPACT PLAN
W3
OF 4

_ 1_ .o ~
~~ ~ ~~-
,~
N ~
,~
T n ,~ , , -~
,X~,
x ~~~, ~~ ~ ~i ~
~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ 625
--
,'
'I
., ~ ~ ~ z~
- ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~
l-
' ~ ~ ~ I i
- ~ ,, _. - ~
x
/ i ~
~/~^
n
{
O
N
O
ua
- n ~z8
m~ryOi a~
'. wcZin °J$°a
m .ma
U'd
iloo~m~~
^ ~ ~mW~~
m fO
~,
0
DR DEB BY:
HK BY: BPP
Z
'O
V J
~_
M~
W
~~~
V/
J Q
z
J
O ~
~ U
I
~Onn°oZ
VNW
WIZ
~Q
rr~ F- [0
VW~
IMPACT LOCATION TYPE LINEAR FEET PRESERVED AREA IMPACTED
AREA #3 CHANNEL 187 0 LF 0.011 ACRES J
~, ~. „*
~ ~
CONCEPTUAL
DRAWINGS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE.
11x1
i' - ao~
10 NOV 06
1469-0182
WETLAND
IMPACT PLAN
W4
OF 4