20052163 Ver 1_Complete File_20050125

\o?oV ?? ?, tRQG
Y
Mr. Derek Lawson
MHL Development
1801 E-1 Cross Beam Drive
Charlotte, NC 28210
Subject: Garmon's Crossing
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
? P= kl-;,: ? 19, P= 0 W M P
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
January 3, 2006
DWQ# 05-2163
Union County
JAN 1 0 2006
DENR - WATER QUALITY
Yr'ETIANDS AND STOPJAVATER BRANCH
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Lawson:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to permanently
impact approximately 614 linear feet (If) of unnamed tributaries (intermittent streams) to Price Mill Creek and
0.04 acres of wetlands in order to construct Garmon's Crossing Subdivision located off Pioneer Lane in Indian
Trail, Union County, as described in your application received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on
December 6, 2005. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this project is covered by Water
Quality General Certification Number 3402. This certification corresponds to Nationwide Permit 39 issued by
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Please note that you should get any other federal, state or local
permits before proceeding with your project, including those required by (but not limited to) Sediment and
Erosion Control, Non-Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design that you described in your application (unless modified
below) and will expire with the associated USACE permit unless otherwise specified in the Water Quality
certification. Should your project change, you must notify the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) in writing and
you may be required to submit a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy
of the Certification and approval letter; and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total
wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one (1) acre, or if total impacts to streams (now or in
the future) exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC
21-1.0506(h)(6) and (7). For this approval to remain valid, you must adhere to the conditions in the attached
certification and those listed below:
Prior to construction, a final site plan must be submitted to the DWQ Mooresville Regional Office
(MRO). The submittal shall also include a breakdown of all impervious area within the subdivision,
including all roads, sidewalks, driveways, structure footprints, walking trails and any other
impervious surface. If the total amount of impervious surface exceeds 30%, the applicant will be
required to provide site specific storm water management designed to remove, at a minimum, 85%
TSS (total suspended solids) in accordance with the latest version of DWQ's Storm Water Best
Management Practices Manual.
2. If a written storm water management plan is required, it shall be approved, in writing, by this Office prior to
the construction of any permanent facilities at the site. The storm water facilities must be designed to treat
the runoff from the entire project, unless otherwise allowed by the Division of Water Quality.
Noy` Carolina
,/ aturalty
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Page 2
Also, before any permanent building is occupied at the site, the facilities (as approved by this Office) shall
be constructed and operational, and the storm water management plan (as approved by this Office) shall
be implemented. The structural storm water practices as well as drainage patterns must be maintained in
perpetuity. No changes to the structural storm water facilities shall be made without written authorization
from the Division of Water Quality.
3. The MRO shall be notified in writing once construction at the approved impact areas has commenced.
4. Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams and wetlands must be below the elevation of
the streambed by one (1) foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches, and 20 percent of the
culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches, to allow for low flow passage of water and
aquatic life, as well as to prevent headcutting of the stream(s). Design and placement of culverts and other
structures including temporary erosion control measures shall be installed in such a manner that the original
stream profiles are not altered (i.e., the depth of the channel must not be reduced by a widening of the
streambed). Existing stream dimensions (including pattern and profile) are to be maintained above and
below the locations of each culvert. The applicant may be required to provide evidence that the equilibrium
has been maintained, if requested in writing by the DWQ.
5. Riprap must not interfere with thalweg performance and aquatic life passage during low flow conditions.
Riprap placed for bank stabilization should be limited to the stream bank below the high water mark and
vegetation should be used for stabilization above the high water mark.
6. Heavy equipment must be operated from the banks rather than in the stream channel, when possible, in
order to minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other pollutants into the stream.
7. All work shall be performed during low or normal flow conditions.
8. All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters must be regularly inspected and maintained to
prevent contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
9. Erosion and sediment control practices must utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs) and be in full
compliance with all specifications governing the proper design, installation, and operation and maintenance of
such BMPs in order to protect surface water standards:
a. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most recent
version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be
maintained on all construction sites, borrow pit sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including
contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
b. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed,
operated and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Surface
Mining Manual.
C. The reclamation measures and implementation of these measures must be in accordance with the
requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
10. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent
practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands or waters is unavoidable, they
shall be removed and the natural grade restored within 30 days after the Division of Land Resources has
released the project.
11. Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality.
Page 3
12. Continuing Compliance. MHL Development (the applicant) shall conduct all activities in a manner so as not
to contravene any state water quality standard [including any requirements for compliance with section 303(d)
of the Clean Water Act] and any other appropriate requirements of state and federal law. If DWQ determines
that such standards or laws are not being met (including the failure to sustain a designated or achieved use)
or that state or federal law is being violated, or that further conditions are necessary to assure compliance,
DWQ may reevaluate and modify this certification to include conditions appropriate to assure compliance with
such standards and requirements in accordance with 15 A NCAC 2H.0507(d). Before codifying the
certification, DWQ shall notify the applicant and the US Army Corps of Engineers, provide public notice in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0503, and provide opportunity for public hearing in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H.0504. Any new or revised conditions shall be provided to the applicant in writing, shall be provided
to the United States Army Corps of Engineers for reference in any permit issued pursuant to Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act, and shall also become conditions of the 404 Permit for the project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must
act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition that
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714
Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless
you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If
you have any questions, please telephone Ms. Polly Lespinasse in the Mooresville Regional Office at 704-663-
1699 or Mr. Ian McMillan in the Central Office in Raleigh 919-715-4631.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Attachments
cc: Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville
Ian McMillan, Wetlands Unit
Angelique Crews, Eagle Engineering, Inc.
File Copy
Triage Check List
Date: 12/08/05 Project Name: Garmon's Crossing SD
DWQ#: 05-2163
County: Union
To: Alan Johnson, Mooresville Regional Office
60-day Processing Time: 12/06/05 - 2/03/06
From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone : [phone]
The file attached is being forwarded to you for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Neuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
1-1
Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks!
2 0 0 5 2 1 6 3
i
Attention: Ms. Amanda Jones
E A G L E
E N G I N E E R--- I--?-NN GG
Letter of Tr- nsmittal
US Army Corp of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
a?
r ? n ! 2005
MESA
Date: I 1AffQ0
EEI Job Number: 1780
Re: Garmons Crossing
VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
We are transmitting the following items:
f"' Prints (- Plans r Specifications
(- Copy of Letter f- Shop Drawings r Calculations
r" Application 17 Report
r Check r Other
P7Z+ Items to be Transmitted
11/11/05 Wetland Stud
1 Check #1106 in the amount of $475.00
These are transmitted as checked below:
(7 For Approval
I- For Your Use
r As Requested
Remarks:
i
(- For Review
r Corrected Prints
r Copies for Distribution
r Approved as Submitted
r Approved as Noted
r Copies for Approval
Cc:
Atlanta
1061 Cambridge Square. Suite B
Alpharetta, GA 30004
Ph 678.339.0640
Fax [phone]
Signed: Beverly Carson D D
DEC 6 2005
DENR - WA1*ER QUALITY
www.caglconline.net Chti,'t7W4DS AND STWM'ATER BRANCH
1.866.EAGLENC
310 Indian Trail-Fairview Road
Indian Trail, NC 28079
Ph 704.882.4222
Fax [phone]
r A,
L E
E N G 1 N E E R I N G
-
?4* r CF
November 11, 200
US Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville. NC 38801-006
Attention: Ms. Amanda Jones
Re: PCN
22.31-Acre Tract of Land
Indian Trail, Union County, North Carolina
Ea_de EnL*ineerini-,. Inc. Project No. 1780-E-NIC
9n()52163
Q
DEC 6 zp05
DENR • WAT?.rt OUALITY
EitRitGti
\'rETLP1iR9 ? iD STMMATE-R
Dear Ms. Jones:
Eagle En-ineering, Inc. (EEI) has conducted a jurisdictional wetland determination on an 22.31-acre tract
of land ("subject property'/"site") that is comprised of the following tracts of land: (1) 07-114-023; (2)
07-114-023A; (3) 07-114-024; (4) 07-114-024A; and, (3) 07-114-025C. The subject property is
scheduled for proposed development of a single-family residential subdivision containin, 60-lots in the
near future.
Site development activities are proposed to impact the following areas: (1) 1,833.39 square feet
(sq.ft./0.04-acres) of linear wetland areas located along an intermittent portion of Stream Channel A; and,
(2) 898.64 linear feet (LF) of intermittent and ephemeral channels associated with Channels A, B, and C.
As indicated in the revised Jurisdictional Determination report, prepared by EEI on November, 2005, a
site inspection was conducted by a representative with the North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality (NCDENT, DWQ) to verify onsite wetland
determinations and channel assessments. While EEI obtain State authorization/verification, this letter
serves as a request for approval to disturb onsite wetland areas and intermittent/ephemeral channels. If a
site visit by a representative with the US Army Corps of Engineers is warranted, please advice.
Enclosed are the following documents/forms applicable to the subject site: Jurisdictional Wetland
Determination Report, PCN form, preliminary site plan for proposed site development, and a copy of a
signed authorization form between client, MHL (aka Book Construction) and EEI.
Thank you in advance for your assistance with our project. If you have any questions or require
additional information, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
EAGLE ENGINEERING, INC.
QfL?1'
- ?w6u_v?
An-ellque Y.W. Crews
Environmental Specialist
Enclosed
cc: File
MHL Development, Mr. Derek Lawson
NCDENR-DWQ, Polly Lespinasse
Atlanta ?nr.e<<ieonline.net Charlotte
1601 Cambrid^c Square, Suite 3 310 Indian Trail-Fairview Road
Alpharetta, GA 30004 indian Trail, NC 28079
Ph 678 339 0640 Ph 704 882 4222
Fax [phone] Fax [phone]
t
O?:,w-A TFh'
N ? {
T DWQ1__11,
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
For Section 404 and/or Section 10 Nationwide, Regional and General Permits, Section 401
General Water Quality Certifications, and Riparian Buffer and Watershed Buffer Rules
This form is to be used for projects qualifying for any of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (USACE)
Nationwide, Regional or General Permits as required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, and for the North Carolina Division of Water Quality's
(DWQ) associated General 401 Water Quality Certifications. This form is also to be used for any
project requiring approval under any Riparian Buffer Rules implemented by the N.C. Division of Water
Quality. This form should not be used if you are requesting an Individual 404 Permit or Individual 401
Water Quality Certification. The USACE Individual Permit application form is available online at
www.saw.usace.army.mil/wetlands/Pcrmits.html.
The USACE is the lead regulatory agency. To review the requirements for the use of Nationwide,
Regional or General permits, and to determine which permit applies to your project, please go to the
USACE website at www.saw.tlsace.arliiy.nvl/«-ctlands/irlde-\.lltml, or contact one of the field offices
listed on page 3 of this application. The website also lists the responsible project manager for each
county in North Carolina and provides additional information regarding the identification and regulation
of wetlands and waters of the U.S.
The DWQ issues a corresponding Certification (General or Individual), and cannot tell the applicant
which 401 Certification will apply until the 404 Permit type has been determined by the USACE.
Applicants are encouraged to visit DWQ's 401/Wetlands Unit website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/newetlands to read about current requirements for the 401 Water Quality
Certification Program and to determine whether or not Riparian Buffer Rules are applicable. The
applicant is also advised to read the full text of the General Certification (GC) matching the specific 404
Permit requested. In some cases, Nvritten approval for General Certifications is not required, provided
that the applicant adheres to all conditions of the GC. Applicants lacking access to the internet should
contact DWQ's Central Office in Raleigh at [phone].
Trout Waters Coordination - Special coordination with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC) is required for projects occurring in any of North Carolina's twenty-five
counties that contain trout waters. In such cases, the applicant should contact the appropriate NCWRC
regional coordinator (listed by county on page 4 of this application) prior to submittal of the application.
Paae I of 13
Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) Coordination - If the project occurs in any of North Carolina's
twenty coastal counties (listed on page 4) the applicant should contact the North Carolina Division of
Coastal Management (DCIM). DCM will determine whether or not the project is within a designated
Area of Environmental Concern, in which case DCM will act as the lead permitting agency. In such
cases, DC-11\4 will require a CAMA Permit and will coordinate the 404/401 Permits.
The applicant may also choose to coordinate with the United States Fish and Wildlife. Service to ensure
that the proposed project will have no impact upon any endangered or threatened species or critical
habitat as regulated by the Endangered Species Act, and the State Historic Preservation Office, North
Carolina Department of Cultural Resources to ensure that the proposed project will have no impact upon
any properties listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Compliance with
these regulations is required to be eligible for any Department of the Arnly.pernlit. The addresses for
both a-encies are listed on page 3 of this application.
USAGE Permits - Submit one copy of this form, along with supporting narratives, maps, data forms,
photos, etc. to the applicable USACE Regulatory Field Office. Upon receipt of an application, the
USACE will determine if the application is complete as soon as possible, not to exceed 30 days. This
PCN form is designed for the convenience of the applicant to address information needs for all USACE
Nationwide, Regional or General permits, as well as information required for State authorizations,
certifications, and coordination. Fully providing the information requested on this form will result in a
complete application for any of the USACE Nationwide, Regional or General permits. To review the
minimum amount of information that must be provided for a complete PCN for each USACE
Nationwide permit, see Condition 13, 67 Fed. Reg. 2090 (.Ian. 15, 2002), available at
11 t1 p://ww\V.L1s7Ce.a1.111V 11111/111et/fu 11Ct1o11S/Cw/Cecwo/reg/2002nvvvps.hdF Processing times vary by
permit and begin once the application has been determined to be complete. Please contact the
appropriate regulatory field office for specific answers to permit processing periods.
401 Water Quality Certification or Buffer Rules - All information is required unless otherwise stated
as optional. Incomplete applications will be returned. Submit seven collated copies of all USACE
Permit materials to the Division of Water Quality, 401/Wetlands Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650. If written approval is required or specifically requested for a 401
Certification, then a non-refundable application fee is required. In brief, if project impacts include less
than one acre of cumulative wetland/water impacts and less than 150 feet cumulative impacts to
streams, then a fee of 5200 is required. If either of these thresholds is exceeded, then a fee of $475 is
required. A check made out to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality, with the specific name of
the project or applicant identified, should be stapled to the front of the application package. For more
information, see the DWQ Nvebsite at 11tt»://h2o.ehnnstate. iie.us/iieNvetlaiids/fees.litii-i 1. The fee must be
attached with the application unless the applicant is a federal agency in which case the check may be
issued from a separate office. In such cases, the project must be identifiable on the U.S. Treasury check
so that it can be credited to the appropriate project. If written approval is sought solely for Buffer Rules,
the application fee does not apply, and the applicant should clearly state (in a cover letter) that only
Buffer Rule approval is sought in writing. Wetlands or waters of the U.S. may not be impacted prior to
issuance or waiver of a Section 401 Water Quality Certification. Upon receipt of a complete application
for a 401 Certification, the Division of Water Quality has 60 days to prepare a written response to the
applicant. This may include a 401 Certification, an on-hold letter pending receipt of additional
requested information, or denial.
Pate 2 of 13
US Army Corps of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of En
ineers Alexander Caldwell Haywood McDowell
g
151 Patton Avenue Alleghany Catawba Henderson 1Mecklenburo

Room 20S Ashe Cherokee Iredell Mitchell

Asheville, NC 28801-5006 .Aver;'
Buncombe Clay
Cleveland Jackson
Linc
l Polk

Telephone: [phone]S0

Burke

Gaston o
n
Ma
Rowan

Fax: (82S) 291-S120
Cabari'uS
Grallanl con
Madison Rutherford
Stanley
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Franklin Na
h
US Army Corps Of Engineers
Caswell
Fors
th s
N
h Surry

6508 Falls of the Neuse Road
Chatham y
Granvill ort
ampton Vance

Suite 120
Davidson e
Guilford Oran,-,e
P Wake

Raleigh, NC 27615
Telephone: [phone]
Davie
Halifax erson
Randolph \Varren
Wilkes

Fax: [phone] Durham
Ed ccomb Johnston
L Rockingham Wilson
e ee
Stokes
Yadkin
\1'ashington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps Of En
ineer Beaufort Currituck Tones
g
s
Post Office Box 1000 Bertie
Camden Dare
Gat Lenoir

Washington, NC 27889-1000

Carteret* es

Green
Martin
Pamli

Telephone: [phone]
F
Chowan
Hertford co
Pasquotank
ax: [phone] Craven Hyde
Pcrquimans
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office Anson Du lin
p
US Army Corps Of Engineers
Blades
Harn
tt r

Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington NC 2
8402
Brunswick e
Hoke e
Pend Pendcr
R1C17111011d
-1890
Telephone: [phone] Carteret Montgomery
-
- Robeson

Fax: [phone] Columbus moor
oore
c
Sampson
Cumberland New Hanover Scotland
North Carolina State Agencies
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Division of Water Quality
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Pitt
Tyrrell
Wash in ,ton
Wayne
Swain
Transylvania
Union
Watauga
Yancey
*Croatan National Forest Only
State Historic Preservation Office
Department Of Cultural Resources
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
US Fish and Wildlife Service /National Marine Fisheries Service
US Fish and Wildlife Service US Fish and Wildlife Service N
Raleigh Field Office rational ?Marine Fisheries Service
Post Office Box Office Asheville Field Office Habitat Conservation Division 33726 160 Zillicoa Street Pivers Island
Raleigh, NC 27636-3736 Asheville, NC 28801
Telephone: [phone] Beaufort, NC 28516
Telephone: [phone] Telephone: 25-?) 72
(- 8-5090
Page 3 of 13
CAMA and NC Coastal Counties
Division of Coastal I\lanagement Beaufort Chow

1638 Mail Service Center

Berti an Hertford Pas u
q otank

Raleigh, NC 27699-1638 e
Brunswick Craven

rrit
k Hyde Pender
Telephone: [phone]
Camde uc New Hanover Perquimans

Fax: [phone] n

Carte
t Dare Onslo«'
Tyrrell
re Gates Pamlico Washington
?NC«'RC and NC Tr out Counties
«'estern Piedmont Region Coordinator
`?lleghan}'
Caldw
ll
T
'
3866 Idlewild Road
Ash e \
?
atauga

Kcrnersville, NC 27284-9180 e

Aver Mitchell

S
k Wilkes
Telephone:
p [phone] y
Burk to
es
e Surry
t\lnuntain Region Coordinator
20830 Great Smoky MM. Ex r?-.-sswa
p Y Buncombe

Ch
Henderson
Polk

Waynesville, NC 28786 erokee

Clay Jackson

M Rutherford
Telephone: [phone]
Graha acon Swain

Fax: [phone] m
Haywood Madison
M Transylvania
cDowell Yancey
APPLICATION FORM BEGINS ON PAGE 5. PLEASE DO NOT SUBIWIT PAGES 1 - 4.
Page 4 of 13
Office Use Only:
Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. D«'Q No. 2 o o u 2 1 G 3
.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter ";\Tot Applicable" or "N/A".)
f. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
? Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
?X Section 10 Permit
? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality
Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide Permit No. 39
Residential. Commercial and Institutional Developments)
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
[I
Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information aD[E @?a " D
Name:
MHL Development / Mr. Derek LawsoMpC 6 2005
Mailing Address: 1801 E-1 Cross Beam Drive
Charlotte, North Carolina 28210 DEWIk NA1r Att"
Telephone Number: 704-424-9800 or 704-506-3689
Fax Number: 704-424-9788
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority
Name: for the owner/applicant.)
An?eli ue Crews
Company Affiliation: Eazle Engineering. Inc.
Mailing Address: 310 Indian Trail-Fairview Road. Indian Trail 28109
Telephone Number: 704-882-4T2) E-mail Address. acrews( eaaleonline.net Fax iVumber: 704-882-4232
Page 5 of 13
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a deta led site Both the ng prop
local
plan shoNv
erty
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity neap
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
].Name of project: Garmon's Crossing
2.T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
.).Property Identification Number Tax PIN
(4) 07-1 14-024A• and (5) 07-1 14-025 (11 07-114-0?, (?l 07-114-023A. (3) 07-114-
024.: 4-Location
County: Union County Nearest Town: Indian Trail
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Gannon's Crossing=
) / Lots
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): HiQJ ,,ay 7
46(East), south
onto Waxhaw-Indian Trail• east onto Pioneer Lane State Route 1386. Site is situated along
northern portion of Pioneer Lane (former chicken farm)
.Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately
lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35°N
oW
6.Property size (acres): 22.3 l -Acres
7.Name of nearest receiving body of water: Price Mill Creek
8.River Basin: Lower Catawba River basin Hvdrolo2ic Unit 030 0103
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr state nc us/admin/mans/.)
9.Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project at
the time of this application: The subject ro erty consists of an undeveloped woodland
with a portion of an unnamed pond situated near the southeastern portion of the subiect cite
Pave 6 of 13
The surrounding land use consists of residential areas to the north of the site with Old
Monroe Road beyond: a mixture of agricultural and residential use to the south bevond
Pioneer Lane) and east of the subject site-, and a mixture of residential and light commercial
areas to the west of the subject property (with Waxhaw-Indian Trail Road bevond
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project is comprised of a single-family residential subdivision containing a>>roximateiv
60 lots that consist of a minimum of 6.000-square feet.
1 1. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
The n"r -ose of the nronosed work is to nrovide a mid to upscale single-family residential
subdivision and assist in the growth of the Town of Indian Trail.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have becn requestcd and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.LP, project, along with
construction schedules.
EEI was not provided information regarding the historical surveys and/or associated permits
conducted and/or issued for the subject property: consequent]), EEI is not aware of jurisdictional
determinations and/or permits that have been re uested and/or obtained for the subject property.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
A future sewer main is proposed b Union County Public Works UCPW . The proposed sewer
main will traverse along the northern portion of the site along an unnamed onsite channel. While
EEI conducted a wetland determination for the site that included the characterization of onsite
channels the request for permit discuss within the said PCN is solely for pur ores of residential
redevelopment. EEI has not been neither contracted nor authorized to provide information
regarding onsite wetlands/channels to UCPW. However, if requested, EEI will provide such
information to UCPW and assist with permitting. if requested and required.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and-
nd stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
Pa-ge 7 of 13
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
Nvetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:_ The proposed impacts consist
of disturbing 899-linear feet of intermittent and/or e nhemeral portions onsite stream channels
A -and C within Lots 11. 14. and 15 See Attached drawing C-1.0). While a walking trail is
proposed within the onsite common area of Garmon's Crossing six (6) foot long bridges are
proposed to be utilized to cross the onsite channels The two proposed bridges are an effort
to minimize impact to the onsite channels
With respect to the impact to the wetland areas the proposed impact is localized at wetland
area B. which consists of 1.833 s .ft. 0.04-acres and is less than one-acre of impact.
?. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For
dams, se aratel list im acts due to both structure and flooding.
\'?ctlmid Impact Type of wetland Distance to
Site Number Located within Nearest Area of Impact
Type of Impact (e.g ., forested, marsh, 1 00-year Floodplain
(indicate on map) herbaceous bo Stream (acres)
,,, etc.) (yes/no)
(linear feet)
Wetland A None Forested/Marsh Connected to
No N/A
stream
Wetland B Grading/Excavation Along
activities Herbaceous No intermittent 0.04
channel
Total Wetland Impact (acres)
0.04 Acres
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.385
(Wetland area A is comprised of 0.34-acres and Wetland area B is comprised of 0.04-
acres).
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify
temporary impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or
culverts, dam construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement
Nvalls, rip-rap, crib walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream
relocation is proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the
original and relocated streams must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X
width, then divide by 43,560.
Page 8 of 13
Stream Impact

Number
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or Average

Stream Width
Impact
Area of
(indicate on ma) Intermittent? Length Impact
Before Impact (linear feet) (acres)
Grading on Lots
13, 14 & Ili,

stream .A
Unnamed common area,
road/right-of-way,
Intermittent
5-Feet
438

and future sanitary 0.05 ac
seNrer line
construction
Stream B Unnamed Grading on Lots 10
&ll
Ephemeral
S-Feet
Stream C Unnamed I Lots 13 S 14 I Intermittent S-feet 175.73
I 0.03 ac
Stream C Unnamed Road/right-of-way I
Common Area Ephemeral S-feet
I
-----
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage)
I 613.73 if 0.07 ac
?. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds,
Atlantic Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not
limited to fill, excavation, dredging, floodin(,, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Water Im Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of Num (indicate on ma) (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
ocean, etc.) (acres)
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A
Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the ro'ect:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.07 ac
Wetland impact (acres): 0.04 ac
Open Water Impact (acres): N/A
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) N/A
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 613.73 if
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes © No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of Nvater (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
Page 9 of 13
S. Pond Creation (N/A)
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included Nvith this application.
Pond to be created in (cheek all that apply): ? uplands
Describe the method of construction e.Y. ? stream ? wetlands
( , dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormNvater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
In addition to stringent erosion control standards planned along the onsite channels and
identified wetland area, the developer ro,oses to only impact portions of channels that may
effect the location of the building gad on the respective lots. Areas on the respective lots where a
building pad will not be located the channel s) will not be disturbed. Furthermore while the
ma'orit of the channels and wetland area are situated within a pro nosed common area for the
subdivision the developer proposes the use of bridges to minimize the im act to the onsite
channels and wetland areas .
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
Page 10 of 13
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
htti?:/ih2o.enr.state.nc us`ncwetlandsistrm?ide html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No mitigation is required for the subject t)ropcrty due in part to the amount of proposed
disturbance to the offite channels (internuttent and ephemeral) which is 898.64 linear feet
total lenuth for the proposed project Furthermore no mitigation is required for the onsite
wetland area because the Nvetland area is less than one-acre in size; specifically, 0.04-acres.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at littp://li2o.en1-.State nc us/wrp/inclex htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
• Environmental Documentation (required by DNVQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental docu rnentation.
Yes ? No ?
PaL,e 11 of 13
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X.
XI.
IX.
Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by D«'Q)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 213.0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 0213.0243 (CataNvba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers. MA)
Zone* Impact
(square feet
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Multiplier I Required
Miti,,ation
3 (2 for Catawba)
1.5
the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 213 .0242 or.0244, or.0260. N/A
Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stornnvater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
Roadway improvements comprise 13.6% of impervious area. The potential site improvements
subject to chance) comprise 13.1%. The total preliminary impervious area is estimated to be
26.7%. Final storm« ater desicn/site design has not been finalized per the submittal of this PCN.
Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Pa?e 12 of 13
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The sanitary sewage disposal is proposed to discharge into the Union County Public Works.
Crooked Creek Waste Water Treatment facility. W Q0024812.
• Violations (required by MVQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (1 5A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No 0
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
\II. Cumulative Impacts (required by DNAIQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby do`vnstream water quality? Yes
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis accordance Nvith
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
httt?://h2o.cnr st ate nc us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XI1I. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
t- r 1n ? f l -l kC?
U Appli ant/Abent's? Siature
(Agent's signature is valid onlybn if an authorization letter from the applicant ids p ovided.)
Page 13 of 13
N
O

o n
M `
r
E \ ?` t`tl¢wv `-- - Plonecr Lane
o?? w? N
k
ftlaw
-
/ --__.
h•1
e
F
+
V CRAM0
z
M
ry ? AM db
iiYtt IRAN LYA 1ilN? Ltur yyr /q r
II '=J

n
,y C 1
0m
0..
L=J z
m?
o
o m70
p m
m
zC-)
-
1 m
-
0
* ?®
D 0
?Cr`r ? \ O ? Cn
- Y co
z m
o z
?

? D n
?r
?rtt
D

r
m m
C) m
o z
-u ?,
Om
° z
ca
; co
me
MX
<
;u m

0
c()
m
?\ ? Z °
mZ
Om
9 v= cn -zi= ci0
m z !? m -cn-i >
) t
F7 ?t1 m i
Dr ?D Z U)
-
pD • -i?
?Q? m0 ;u 0 Z 0 ?3
m icnz I _
0 0*
+qJ m d
°z
zm
^c ?m
imm r
m D
S ?y
m D .j
vZi zz
?..
m
r _?jy r
D "
m;
-3
m ^ cn
-1
0 -0
D -Z-I m y
:U Dm,
N n
S
q W Z D
I ° ? Z
E• z0m
t ? cn D
O r
l L_ D <
I
¦3 t Q
-6 a ><
s
E A G L C
FIGURE 4 F t-1 G I N F E R I PJ PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION
REVISED- PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL GARMON'S CROSSING
WETLAND SURVEY INDIAN TRAIL, UNION COUNTY,
310 Indian Trail - FairvicwRd. NORTH CAROLINA
Indian Trail, NC 28079
[phone]
www.caglconlinc.nct ProJ'. #: 1780-E
l LIE ?j f [q G
November 11, 2005
AIHL Development
1801 E-1 Cross Beam Drive
Charlotte, North Carolina 25210
Attention: Mr. Derek Lawson
Re: T,etter Report - Revised Jurisdictional Delineation
Garmon's Crossing
Indian Trail, Union County, North Carolina
Eagle Engineerina. Inc. Protect No. 1780-CES-NC
Dear Mr. Lawson:
Eagle Engineering, Inc. (EEI) is pleased to present the results of a revised Jurisdictional
Delineation survey conducted on 22.31-acres of undeveloped land situated between Old
Monroe Road (aka Old Charlotte Highway) and Pioneer Lane in Indian Trail, Union
County, North Carolina ("subject property" or "site") (Figure 1). The tax parcels which
constitute as the subject property are as follows: (1) Tax Parcel Id: 07-114-023; (2) Tax
Parcel Id: 07-114-023A; (3) Tax Parcel Id: 07-114-024; (4) Tax Parcel Id: 07-114-024A•
and, (5) Tax Parcel Id: 07-114-025C.
During the additional site assessment activities, EEI was accompanied by a representative
with the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of
Water Quality (NCDENR DWQ), Ms. Polly Lespinasse, to verify onsite wetland
determinations and stream assessment characterizations.
BACKGROUND
EEI conducted a preliminary Jurisdictional Determination survey for the subject property
on August 9 and 11, 2005. The sun7ey was conducted in accordance with the USACE
Wetlands Delineation Manual, dated 1957, as well as in accordance with the North
Carolina Division .o.f_Water Qua]ity,.Ide72tij1catio77 Methods for_the Oriogi,ls of I71te77JliltC77t
a»d Pere71)Iial Streams, version 3. 1, dated February 28, 2005-
005 and with the USACE's
:S't1•ew,'2 Qzialil),Assessmenl ilrorl-sl,eet, dated June 2003.
:.;...;:, '.ea ieonlLne.-_ Car1ou
1601 Cambrid_e Souare Suit: 1-00o.?-_GLE
Alpharetta, CA 30004 310 Indian T, ai]-Fain iew Road
Ph 678 339 0540 Inman Trail, Kc 28079
Fv. 678 339 0534 Ph 704 882 4222
Fa;; 704 8S2 4232
Mr. Derek Lawson
November 11, 200
Pane 2 of 4
As indicated in the preliminary Jurisdictional Determination survey report, dated
September 26, 2005, EEI observed the following onsite water features: (1) ingress
portion of abutting pond; and (2) tributaries of abutting pond. Furthermore, review of the
U. S. Department of Interior National Wetlands Inventory Maps, ".Iatthe«-s, N.C."
(dated 1993) indicated that the onsite, ingress portion of the abutting pond, as well as the
pond in its entirety, is designated as a Palustrine wetland, PUBHx; specifically, the
Palustrine wetland area is an area that has been determined as permanently flooded with
an unconsolidated bottom and is listed with excavation activities conducted on a the
pond. No additional wetland areas 1; ere identified on the wetlands inventory map for the
subject property.
The results of the preliminary Jurisdictional Determination survey and stream
identifications were as outlined in Tables 1 and 2, respectively:
Table 1: Summitry of Preliminary Jurisdictional ?N7,,tland Area(s)
Wetland Identification
Wetland A Approximate Size (square feet / acres)
14,976.1 sq. ft. / 0.34 acres
Total Wetland Area 14,976.1 s q. ft. / 0.34 acres
It should be noted that approximately 7324 LF of a perennial channel (Stream A) is
associated with wetland A.
Table 2: Summary of Preliminary Jurisdictional Stream Channels
Stream
Classification Approximate Size NCDWQ USACE
Identification (Linear Feet) Score Score
Stream A Intermittent 438 LF
-)
25
57
Stream B Intermittent 201 LF 22 51
Total Stream length(s) I 639 LF
ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENT ACTTNTITTES
As previously stated, EEI conducted an additional jurisdictional wetland determination as
well as stream channel assessments with a representative with the I"TCDENR DWQ, DTs.
Polly Lespinasse, on October 12 and 24, 2005. The initial site visit with Ms. Lespinasse
on October 12, 2005 was inconclusive due in part to recent rain storm events prior to the
October 12, 2005 meeting. Subsequently, 1lTs. Lespinasse requested an additional
meeting be conducted on the subject property to accurately characterize the onsite stream
channels and wetland area(s).
Mr. Derek Lajvson
November 11, 200
Page 3 of 4
COIrTCLti SIONS
The results of the onsite wetland determination and stream channel characterization with
'DTs. Lespinasse are as follo;vs:
Table 1: Summary of Preliminary,Furisdictional 'TN'etland Area(s)
Wetland Identification Approximate Size (square feet /acres
Wetland A 114,976.15 sq. ft. / 0.34 acres
Wetland B I 1,833.39 sq.ft. / 0.04 acres
Total Wetland Area 16,809.54 sq. ft. / 0.385 acres
Identified wetland areas were characterized based on the dominant species of hydrophytic
vegetation; the hydric soils that predominantly included -]eyed and low chroma
conditions; and, soils that exhibited hydrology indicators (i.e. inundated, saturated in
upper 12-inches).
Table 2: Summary of Preliminary Jurisdictional Stream Channels
Stream
Classification Approximate Size NCD«TQ USACE
Identification (Linear Feet) Score Score
Stream A Intermittent 438 LF 25 57
Stream A Pereiuval 73.24 LF
Stream B E hemeral -----
Stream C Intermttent 175.72 LF
Stream C Ephemeral 211.68 LF
Total Stream le-nuth(s) 898_6.1 T,F
The shaded cells indicate revised stream assessments made in the field between EEI
and NCDENR-MVQ.
Stream channels were identified utilizing the NCDWQ Sb•eam Ident ftcation Forms and
the USACE Stream Duality Assessmejlt U'orksheets; consequently, two unimportant,
intermittent stream channels, Channels A and C, were identified during the site
assessment activities. Per the USACE, maximum impact to intermittent and/or perennial
streams is 300 linear feet; however, per the NCDENR - DWQ, an application for
Nationwide Permit No. 39 is required prior to impact to (1) wetlands in excess of 1/10'x'
per acre; and, (2) streams, whether important and/or unimportant, that are greater than
150 linear feet.
RE COITIN'IENDATIONS
Review of preliminary engineering grading plans indicates that the intermittent and
ephemeral portions of Stream A and C will be impacted during proposed development
activities.
Mr. Derek Lawson
November 11, 200
Page 4 of 4
Notification to the USACE is required for activities that result in a loss of greater than
1/10 per acre of water of the united States via the Nationwide Permit No. 39, which
specifically addresses residential and commercial development, and '_,,ationwide Permit
No. 14 which addresses road crossings.
The US-ICE must review and annrove all delineations of jurisdictional wetland for
which permit applications are submitted to the Corps. The preliminary Jurisdictional
Delineation survey conducted by EEI was neither reviewed nor approved by the USACE
upon issuance of this report.
-000-
EEI appreciates the opportunity to provide these services to I1IUL Development. If you
have questions or require additional information in this matter, please do not hesitate to
call.
Sincerely,
EAGLE ENGINEERING, INC.
Angelique Y.W. Crews
Environmental Specialist

Frank L. Gray III, P.E.
Principal
Attachments: Figure 1 - Site Location Map
Figure 2 - US GS Soil Survey Map
Figure 3 - U.S. Department of Interior National Wetlands Inventory Map
Figure 4 - Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Survey Map
Appendix A-Routine Il/etland Determination Data Form(s)
Appendix A
Routine Wetland Deteruritration Data Fornt(.s)
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETL_ N-D DETERMINATION
(1937 COE',? 'ands De14n *.ion \;an a1;
Prof, c 'Site: G arm0n's Crossina ,
Dare: b=
_
An lic_ntl0''ner: 3001:cons- uctic
n .r
' Cour.. Li
.lion
Ins estizator(s?: AnReliaue Cre« s
State: NC
u Do Normal C, >>nls.an?es e>.is. on u
L-
Yes
No
C0M:nuni y ID: et -In C,
I file rite ;; Ili, n } ?is!lrbed (_ ?l .l ?l l ;ion)? T es No I
Transco ID: 3
G is .lie a -,ea a o .,tizl ? ?,:

G Jbielil . ?_? 2 mm-Js

V

No Ploi ID:
?I

1 I-?1
I
- -- - -- ------ _-- _-_--- --- _-- _ (13'Ickaround sample: S$-01)
`; EGETATION
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide
Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No'ecorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface 'Water: iVr/A
Depth - Sanl, L Soil:
> 12
Rtm arl:s:
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
-Inundated
-Saturated in upper 12 inches
.Water Marks
-Drift Lines NSA
S°diment D--nos-its
_Drainage Patterns lil 1getlands
(in.) Secondary L-ldicators:
0 idized Root channels in ULner 12 inches
yyL - ----... __, -----..
-----i pater-Stained-LL-eavta --- -- -- -
Local Soil Survey Data
I _FAC-Neu?raI Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
dicators Of Wetland In drologv uresent during site ascessmen
1 of 2
SOILS
(Se;;cs an ?i;c 1 alum _("raVellY cla)- loam, 2 to S 0 slopes,
Eroded (TbB?)
Cl, vev. mined. thermicT.•picHanludulte
Dais L,eCuss: ;ell drained

Dt? Jth
1

i
m1Colo-

:
I
;vioale Cc1 S

Sc:q ^ ?asnce/

c,:ar Cc i
:e:ioas

=:
i
?_..
,cn
( n ;' c 11 vn ;a
-- -
I
(\'f!?:???111v'c?,-a

Si iC ,st
..
,
S,.u 7 etc
0-12
B i 10 YR 610
1 I

I
A
I .

Cla?ep,silts
Hydric Soil Indicators:
IIistol
Histic Epipedon
_Sulfidic Odor
_Aquic Moisture Regime
-Reducing Conditions
___-Gleyed or Lox-Cltroma Colors
Remarks:
-Con creti oils
-High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
-Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
-Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
-Listed on National Hydric Soils List
-Other (Explain in Remarks
No indicators of hvdric soils nresent durinZ site assessment.
`;WETLAND DETERMINATION
i
Ilydrophytlc Vegetation Present? lres 1?r0 (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Is this Sampling Point -Within a ttland? Yes INro
Remarks'.
San;nlinQ point is --i3ical o`a non-iut•isdiction2I unland area

2 oil
DATA FORM
ROUTINE «ETLA\D DETERMINTATIO-NT
(19S % COE ;?,% :lands Dtlinta ion \ anual)
rmiect' S i i ° Garnloil ' Cry - ---- - -
s
_ Date: S'-_pie:ilJ`r'?2005
pphca uG',i';1er: ooh c-0iSt:13-im i
CO'!n`)': Union
Investi_ator(sl: Arigelinue Crews State: NC
Do ]N'o:laal Clrcums , ces e' Ist cm the site?
Yes Tvo i ConlmuniLl, 1D: Nsetland
1S ill' .-.. s7L''iiacailil}' clsrurbed (-` i<'plcal 1i7.1 iloIl)? i es 0 I lransect 1D:
Is .he area P. potential Problcm Ar°a? 2 ponds Yes N. 0 ? Plot ID`: (SB-0
VEGETATION
HYDROLOGY
X Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide
Gauge
Aerial Photographs
-X -Other
No Recorded Data Available
Field Gbservations:
-Wetland Hydrology Indicator:
p Depth of Surface Water: -"*)-, /-S,-
??' Depth to Free Water in Pit: 12
? D°oth-to-Satiara`ed-.Snil•-- -- fl-
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upp-;r 12 inches
_Y Seater Marks
-Drift Lines
-Sediment Deposits
-Drainage Patterns in Wt lands
Secondary Indicators:
;n) _X-0xidiaed Root channtIs in Upper 12 inches
In.) -'Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data _
P Other (Ex plain in Remarks
emarl:s:
Indicators of «-etland hvdrolonl present during site 2ssessment.
1 o- f'2
SOILS
Nap UnitNzme

(Series and .,...e): Tatum gravelly silty cla}' 10a111, 2 to S °,o slopes,
Eroded (Tbfi3)
Y
i.
Ta>:ono;;, (Sub r,np;: ('lavev. mixed. thermic Tvoic Hanluftlts
6
Draina_- Class: well drained
Obs?-va-.i ns
Colo:

- ... _
(?r Vn stl I Q' -s
0

q
ii i i„o;fl 1b i znc_
e o'-IJ4
c Text Concr e:io ;,

o
0-= I 0-A I Or L- a ic. dart. I N. A I './.-k I Clayey, silts
a_.- Glev 1%/10 Y, I I0YR/yn I I ?I
6-12 1 B I Glen l 7/10 I I IOYR)1616
' ?'
I; I I I I I
l' I I I I I
ti I I I I I
I? I I I I
? I I I l
Piydric Soil Indicators:
_Histol -Concretions
_Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_Sulfdic Odor _Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
-1 Gleyed or Lo;v-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks
Rcmarl:s:
Glev colors and chroma indicative of Hydric toile
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes "'To
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks:
(Circle)
Is this Sampling Point Nithin a Wetland? Yes No
Samnlina point is tvrical of a jurisdictional wetland area
- _
riQUSACE
2 Of'?
-North Carolina Division of W iter Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
I Date: bcrtcmh:r u- 12. 2005 1 Proicct: 17S0-E I Latitudt:35.05795
Ft aluator: Anccli; ue Y.'\i'. Crcws 1 Sitt: Garmhn's Crossine I Loncitude:80.666C2
?I Total Points: County: Union Other: (t. _. Quad Nam:)
n
SL am is a: Lest irt: nnittcnt 25
:010
or nnial if_30 " n4atthcws, NC" 7.5-min. topoLraphic
-
_ auadranLle n:an
Channel _1 -Garmons Crossing
A. Geomorpholow (Subtotal = 18)
I Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1. Co timmus bed and hank I 0 ( 1 2 3
2. Sinuosir.v 0 1
2
?
_ 1?: cha;nol strut tnt iffi -pool _ .?ucnce 0 1
2 3

I .Soil te>aure nr stream 0
st:bstratt sornn, 1 I
2 3
:. Actisc`rciic ;lo;,dplain 0 1 3
6. D.-Pos .ional , rs . r benches I 0 ( 1 I 2
7. Braid; d channcl 0 1 I 2 ? 3
S. RCc,,cnt:aluvi;a dcoosits
- - -- 0 1 ? I 3
4'. Notuml is ecs 0 1 _ ( 3
10. ilcadcu:s 0 1 I o I 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.3 1
?
1.5
12. ;datural valley or dmin:!Lcway 0 0.5 I 1.3
1.3 Second or arcatcr order channcl on cxistine USGS or MRCS
man or other documented evidence.
No = 0
Yes = 3
ivr<ir.-n;aac. ditcncs arc not rated; cce discusmons m manual
B. flydrolol y (Subtotal = 3)
Absent ( Wcak I Aloderate Strong,
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 I 3
15. 'Natcr in channcl and >48 hi-5 siucc rain; or
'W
ater in channcl - drv or crawinQ season
0 I
l I ? I
3
16. Leaf litter I 1.5 1 0.3 I 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 I O..S I 2 1.5
1 S. Or^_anic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0..5 2 1.5
19. I-lydric soils (rcdoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Biolw,y (Subtotal = 4)
Absent Weak
I Moderate
Stt'On?
20'. Fibrous roots in channel 3 I 2 I 1 I 0
21b. Rooted plants in channcl 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 I OS 1 I 1.5
23. Bi-, alvcs I 0 1 I 2 I 3
24. Fish 0 I 0.5 I
I
1.5
25. Amphibians I 0 I 0.5
I 1 I
1.5
26. 1-lacrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) I 0 0.5 I 1 1.5
27. Filamentous alcac; periphyton I p 1 I I 3
28. Iron c;:idi::ing bacterialfuneus I
b 0 0.5 I 1 I 1.5
-
29 . ',?,'etland plants in streatnbtd I FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
`Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Itcm'_9 focuses oil the preStnct ofaquatic or %vctland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) sketch:
Channel A(near A-01) - See Figure 4
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 3.1
I Date: Sen%mber9-12.2005 1 Proiect: 17H-E Latitudc:35.05795
Evaluator: An_elique Y.W. Crews I Site: Garmon's Crossing I Lon aitud-.M.66 5662
Total Points: Coun t: Union
Other• (e.;. Quad Name)
j Steam is a, !east inte;i7tittent 1 ?.1
i_19 0; nial if`.0 atthc;r;,l C' 7.5-min. topogr:?phic
quad- L!^ ^o
Channel A -Gnirmons Crossinc,
A. Geomorpholo*- (Subtotal = 7)
I I Absent «'eak I Moderate Sn-onR
1`. l uminuous ncd ::na Ganl: I
O I 1 I 2 I 3
2. Simms;-y 0
i 2
3. L: cna,.n l suu tu:., .rote-cool scyuence 0 I 2 3 1
4. SOil texuire or sh am substrata so: ng I 0
( 1 I 2
5. Active, e!ic Iloodplain 0 ? 1 ? TH
? _
6
. Do7osi;ionid bars or benches O I o i
7. Bridad dtanncl 0 1 1 o
2
3
o
R
.
ecent alluvial d; posits 0 I I o I 3
9''.Tiartrallevees 0 I ? I 3

I O. IIca<icu(s 0 1 2
3
_
11. Grade anttro!s I 0 I
(L5 I 1 I 1.5
12. Natura vallcy or drain:igcway I 0 I 0
5 I 1

1.3 Sccond or f•rcatc,- ordu• channel on c:iltinc USGS or MRCS .
1.5
n7an or other documented evidence. I _ 0 = 0- I Yes = 3
I-L ; aieu; sec -sct:swms in manual
B.1lvdrolouv (Crlhfnf,l = 1 ;)
Absent Weal, Aloderate Strom
14. Groundn'atcr Oot?;?ciischar=e O I

15. 'Natcr in channel and %48 hrs since rain; or I ?
y 3

'totter in channel - dn, or ro ain^ season I
0 1 I
2
J 3
16. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Scdin7cnt on plants or debris 0 0
5 1
H E
. 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrac}t lines) 0 0
5

19. Hydric soils (rcdoxin7orphic f--atures) present? .
1 1Jn = n 1
, 1.5
-
C. Biolorly (Subtotal = ?)

' -Absent Well k ? Moderate ? StronR
20
. Fibrous roots in channel I 3 I

21b. P.oot..d plants in chann_1 I
3 2
I 2 I 1 I
I 0

22. Crayfish
0
0
5 1 I
1 0

23. Bivalves I
O . 1.5

24. Fish ?
0

0
5 2

2S: Amphibians
0 .
0 5 1
1 1.5

26. Mactoo_nthos (not_ dt, r,ity and abundance)
0
0
5
I 1 1.5

27. Filamentous al-ac; periphyton
0 .
1 I
I 2 1.5
28. Iron oxidizir._ bac'rri ran- us I 0
? 0
5
? 1

219_°. '1;tetland plants in strca,nbtd r AC = 0.5; .
F.ACW 0:75;
OBL- = 1.5 SA-V-=2:0
•- 1.5
- Other-0.
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence o. upland plants, Itcm 29 focuses on the prese ,
nce of aqua*.ic or`.:eJand plan's.
Notts: (ust back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
Channel A(near A-011) -See Figure 4
North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
l Date: Sept ern I) er 9 fit'-, nos I Proitct: 1750-E
Latitude:3_.06795 aluc;c;: =,n_ei;due Y.W. Cret?s I Sit.: Cnrmon's Cmssina 2
I Lmtc;tude:S0.66,o
Total Points: Counnf: Union
Other: (e._. Quad Name)
S;: le:s:..;._:mittcnt -1
;f?19 or vC; nial ; f> 0 "ivtatthtws, NC' 7.=-;;tin. topocraphic
d::adrar.?lt mao
Channel A-Gat•mons Crossing-REVISED PER - CDE.A-'R-D«f0 SITE .ASSESS TE\'T
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 15.5)
j
i
? }'. Continuous i?od and bdn}; Absent
? ?fieah j Moderate
1 Stron;
I
I s;m,: si " 0 2 3
I
_. Ir.-citanucl structure; rifllc-pool sei)trenct I
T 0
0 j 1 I 2
j 1 I ? I 3
I

. SOII :1-11 ,I1'a Of Sii"='(; n1 SUb?irale SOri I;1^
I
0

j 1 I ,? j
2 J
?.:1cti? eirtlic floodplain
0
j 1 J

6. Depositional bars or benches
0 j 2 j 3

7.D;,lldc:d ::hnnn,l

0 1
-
1
3

S. I;cccntalluvial deposits
0 I ? I
I 3

9'. N:;u,:at letces I
0 3

j 10.1 Icddcuts

0 1
_ j
. 3

] 1. Grade controls j
0 1 2 j
I 0
5 3

12. ;\'alll]"ill 1'a11c}' OI' dl"alit??C\t'1}' j

!, .
1
I
5 I
0
1.?

1.3 Second or arcaier order' channel on e?is±irtu USGS or MRCS .
1
1.5
I
man or other documented cvid^ncc No = 0 I Yes = 0
t t ut m ,d ditch ---s alnot l.rt_d, s_. discussions in manual
B. FIydrolog}' (Subtotal = 2.5)
j
14. Groundtratcr flott/dischar--c Absent Weak I Moderate I Strong

15. \Vatcr in channel and >48 ins sine, ral»; or 0 1 I 2
J
Water in channel - drv or arowine season 0 1
16. Lcafliucr 1
5

17. Sediment on plants or debris . 1
- 0
1
0

18. Orpan;c debris li»cs or piles (Wrac}; lines)
0
0.5 1
1
I
1.5
I

19. Hydric soils (rcdoximorphic features) present? I 0 I 1
0.5
I
No =0

I.J
Yes = 1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = 5)

2Uh. Fibrous roots ill channel Absent I Weak Moderate I Strong
j
21e. Rooted plants in channel 3 j 2 I 1 I 0
I

22. CmytIsh J (
2 1
Q

23. Bivalves 0
j 0'? I 1 I
1•?
24. Fish I 1 I _ I
J
I
-5. Amphibians 0 I 0.5 I I 1.5 ?
j
26. Macrobcnthos (note dive ,ity and abundance) 0
0 I 0.5
I 1 I
I 1.?

27. F;lam-cntous algae; pcriphy on I
0 0.5 j 1 (
I 1 1.5
28. Iron oxidizing bactcria/fungus
0
0
5 j 1 3
.
j 1.5
pL%nts in streambed- FAC 0:5,- a rti
0.75;- OBL 1 SyV 0 Other 0
° 1, n s 20 nd 21 fo u n
t
r
°
l
-
n
o p
,p
cstnct
nd pl n s, T _m 29
o u.,_s o n th. p, -,ta ct of aquatic of %inland plants.
i
!NTot2s: (use back side of this ton71 for additional
1r..tCh:
Channel A- (near-A-017) See Figure 5
- orth Carolina Division of Water QualitS' - Stream identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: Seote;nber q-]2, 2U0? I Project. 1750-E
valuator: Ana-,elioue Y.\\'. Crews I Lr7i ed36 5
I Site: Gar,?non's Cressina I Lononeitude:SOS0.C6662
Total Points: Counn': Union Other: (?.;. Quad Name)
Stream is at ]east intermittent 22
ii `19 0r p--r--nnial if !:30
. Channel B -Garmons CrossiIlo,
A. Geomorpholoav (Subtotal = 14.x)
Absent Weak Moderate I Stron-
1°. GOr:LM,11OUS bed and '; ank I 0

?. Slnu O$It?'

O I 1 I

1 I 2

? I
J
J. Iii-C tanne]StrUCTIL` rllile-?o0].^3!l t•J;1;._ I.
0
1 3

?. Soil t sturo or stre::m substrat-- so:'tin,'
I 0 I I
1 I 2 3

?. Activcir° is iii odp;ain
I 0 3
6. Depositional bars or i)cnches
? 0 I
, 3

7. 3raided ehanncl
I, 0 I
1 I 3

S. Feccnt alluvial deposits
I 0 I I
1 I 2
?

9
,
r . Pdatura] Icves

I

0 I

1 -

3
10. Ilcadcuts

0 I
I
1
2 I
3

I1. Grad connols
I 0 I I
0
5 I 2 ( 3

12. Natural valley u, draicoge??ay

0
I .

0
5
I 1
I
1
1'5

1.3 Second or Lrcaler order channel on csistin? USGS or NP.CS
. I 1.5
map or other documented cvidcnc° - No = 0 Yes - 3
M m mad ditch r Viol nl d, drscussions m nt..nual
B. Hydrolo,v (Subtotal = 1.5)

14. Ground +atcr flott/dischar
e
Absent I
Weak I\Tod erate I Strom;

15. '\VMcr in chain--] and >48 firs since rain; or 0 I 1 ( I 3
\\'ater in channel - dm or crowimz season 0 1 2
16. Leaf litter

17. Sediment on plants or debris 1.5

0 1
I O'J
0

41- Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
0 0.5
0
5 2
I ? 3

19. 1lydric soils (rcdoxinxilphic features) pr--sent?
. 2 I 3
N O = O
Yes
= 1S
Bedrock a t 0-3"
C. Diolo y (Subtotal = 6)

°. Fibrous roots in channel
E Absent I NVeak Moderate I Stronz
21'.
P.ootcd plants in channel I
3.
I 3 I I
2
I
1 I
0

22 Crayfish

I 0 2 I

I 1
0
23. Bivalves O.J 1 1.5
24. Fish I 0 I 1 I 2 I 3

35. Amphibians
0
0.5
I I 1 I
1 :5

26. AQacrobcnthos(note divcrsiry
and abundance) I 0

I 0 I 0.5 I

I OJ I 1

1
I 1.J

?! rtlzm tto s zl_a , p riph; on
I 0
I 1 I 15
2S. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus I 0 I 0
5 (
. 1
1
39'. 1Vctland plants in stren-bc3 FAC = 0.5;
_ F AC]d = 0.75' L =
OB 1.J SAV ' -.O;
h 20 and 1
ro
s s cn p n ofupl nd play , It_m 29 fo_u
Otlier = 0-
sts
on ,h_ p:
--Vice

f
,auatic
l
d
_- .
or et
an plants.
Notes: (use back side Of this form for additional notes.)
S1;ciC}l:
Channel B (near B-02) - See Figure 4
USACE AID4'
(i-dicate on attached map)
STRIL-0I QUALITY ?,SSESSITENT N?"ORKSHEET
Provide the ;ollowin, information for the stream reach under, assessment:
1• A; licant's gale: )2<,1e Engine.",
in-, Inc.
Evaluator's name: _4n?elique Y.«'. Cre;;s
_. -. 2I °.Ya1 a 70n: Sepfemiber 9-12 2005
7. _ .:-- 3I0 ac; s
dear pond
4. Tilde ofevaiuation: 09;0 nnl-1500 pm
basin: Lover Cata?iba

10. Cat us
1. Sizz -_- In decimal d" 'S• 12_ sub i;'1S7 ? 1 .?_.1 1•
a 72 ?) 35.05795 Lon i`lu _1
(ex. /i.»onll):
vlt"-I-)j
•, -I -,n I_ Lt_--ri lid (Circle): CPS To o Sheet
P C )"'I'D L;al) Photo/GIS CT1S Other:
(?• L.OCatiOn of reach und_- evaluation (note nearby rods and IandmarhS and aLLach map ld°.ntir}'ln ' SiLefilil(S) locatlonl:
Ne.ir fl sTRinn: Channel _x_001 annrn--imately L000 feet southeast of the inter?c?..'-n
Indian 'frail-? ' yh. ;v Rond (L1 n of Old Monroe Road and
14. ro
r,?,sed cI1J1neI;??orl?(ifan}?): Rradin,/clearingdevelopment
1,. Recent Wc- ,htr conditions: dry, SS to 0 degrees Fahrenheit, Site conditions at time of it: Dry SO Fahrenheit
16. fdenti yany special ;=rat-_z-;,ay classifications lalow1: -Section 10 Tidal ??aters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trolit Vdate-s -Outstanding Resource J,7aters _NUtrlent S i1S7 IVe 1)73terS 'Water Supply -Wa'?;,
hed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, is imate the water surface area: )200
square feet.
1S. Does channel appear oa USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Sur Bey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 21% Residtntial_Yo Commercial o
/o Industrial 25 io Agriculblral
35 % Forested 20 % Cleared 0//0 Other (
22. Bankfull vridth: 6- S'
23. Bank height (from bed to top ofbanl:): 2,
24. Charm l slope dov.'n center of stream: _ slat (0 to 20%) X Gtntle (2 to 4%) Ivfodci ate (^ t0 10%) _StetD (>10%)
^S. Channel sinuosity:
instruct Strai_nht _ Occasional bends _
ions for completion of worksheet (loczie'd on p2pe 2)• Bt-in ]requent meander _ Var sinllOUS
d°d channel
stream clzc^ ;n by dtterrninin, the p ra _ at Blai
i.ica:ion, etc. wary characteristic must bt scortd using the most a p p,i tc, gion based on location, ttnnain,
shown for the ecoregion. Pz.gt 3 provides z descri eco:tgion. Assign the point to each SCharactt:istic within the :zn :
:m tnt of thts ^ pilon GI how 10I:S7 t'v! tn: chz;aeter istics tr eam reach un
Z: der tvaluz:ion. ii a chzrz a identified ;n
• v;orl::het:. cores should rt- ° an o?•,ali
an"t__t °" Citr:::IC ear : bt tv'lu=tl Jut Lo ,t or r
?tion in ti,e comment s_ -,t-_ zi tathtr ccnnrion_, n ` .1. w. intro : obviots r' - -s in the c7;z:0- tn:tr 0 i z,',-- cc:;ng bor. zndprovid:
idtd stet strt2m
io(ta), tat s.rczm mzy b: div into smaILr etches t at d a m under (tuft v (e.g.:ho fie trs from z ti
o a cLrta- retch rnu° ispJay more Continuity, and a sepz;ztt r^G.-7n Cs°d zsLa:-into a
>t:ant --often 0 and 100, a?i:h z scor 100 r• ng z sL e hi_ht,t o - to tv2lua:. _aci .each. Tht total score zs^i^ d
t or rt^e , - of th _ uaiity snt
_
-Total-,Score (from rep-Erse ----
-? - - ---.._ -COmmentS--.._
Int_1 mike nt Chann°I dicChaY_FS into an allUCtinQ
n_nd wirh 11 ostimated water surfa
Evaluator's signature: ?4 _j
This channc-1 ::valuation four ,s ;r.Lcnc_d(tu L_ us_d only as pm e to L?3 e: - ???
rc?aired by the lir.ited States " ..-_rm;, r or pJ
, ass7sL. 12ndo,vners 2nd environm^_nt2I profession2ls :n o2thesing the dzt2
CG,^plcti of engineers
to m2r._ 2 pre:immary z::essme ni ]i The
on of This form is subject io Uz*r'nr ov21 and doeS n9 impi ofstream qiuz ?'• total score rtsut:in;
L from the
vcsua0 /v3, toe -Lmtn`. 1t2stC=11 ?1^-&7 Y 2 Ptrekcu]ar r„iti?ztion .?tio or requirement.
>. _5. ojt_ to _hzng -
1 of 2
STREA-M QUALITY ASSESS-MENT WORKSHEET

?
CI3AR-?CTEI.ISTICS ECOREGIO POI\'T PL4NGE

Coastal
I P!edmoni: `I Mountain SCOPE
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream

(no io,v o sa -r°-:on S
= O ; l - )
ii0_n_a , DO::itS

I O J

I ,' O ?..

I O - 0
Evidence of past human alteration
-
(e:ae e _,IOn = 0: zo c'- - Ion= - a Doi ts) i
0 °
5
3 I Riparran zone
-
L?0 = O: co, rIl?uS. i '1G e Dti_. r - ,_ia?: DOIruS) I
- ° I
. O ?. I
O - J 0
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
i (c?:t" Sa% G1S - -eS = O: n0 d:SCI'rceS = -nom's)
I O - 5 I
- -
O -
Groundwater discharge I 0

(no Q:C ilia _ - 0: $Drln n'? eDS, ,ljelian ?$, etG. - 1?. a?. D.?1:?.j
)
0-3 I
0 -. I
0-1
Presence of adjacent floodplain
1
i no 1oodplahi = 0; exttmsi `l00 pIffiri = max DOlntg) O - J 0 _ I (? _ I
7 Entrenchment / fIoodpIsin access

(deems y ent enchtd = O; refill nt IZOOdin? = ma?: -Doi-Its)

0 - J I -1

0 I

O -?
Presence of adjacent w,-tlands

.. 1
(no ;?-elands = 0; lar_ce adiaret ands =max Doi.
cent i?

0-0

0=

0-2 0
Q Channel sinuosity
I 4

(txtenslve ch:elnelization = 0; natural l_eander m
= ax points) I -

075
? I

0-3
10 Sediment input
(extensii-e deposition = 0; little or no sediment = max points)
0-5 I
., 0 4.. I
0-4
1I I Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
(fine, homo•enous = 0; lar_e, diverse sizes = max points) 0 ' J I
la I Evidence of channel incision or widening ,

(deeply incised = 0; stable bed &: banl:s = max D01nts
0 -'
'j I
0 - 5 2
13 I Presence of major bank failures

-?
(severe erosion - 0: no erosion, stable banks = max points) I
0-5
o _
14 I Root depth and density on banks

(no visible roots = 0. dense roots throughout = max
oi
t
)
I
0 -'
:' 0 4 '
' I
0'- 5 3
p
n
s •
15 I Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production

(substantial impact = 0; no evidence = max Doints
I 0-5 I
0 s
'..I
0 - 5
16 I Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes

(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; vrell-developed = max points)
0 - 3
I .::
0 a '•.: I
'' .:...
,: .
0 - 6 0
17 I Habitat complexity
(Ii tIe or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max aoints I 0-6 . 0-6
1 J I Canopy coverage over streambed
'
'
^

(no sriading vegetation = 0; continuous ca-no-D' = max points) 0-5
I I" 0-?
.
... 0-5
I9
I Substrate embeddedness .

Dl e P

(dee )
mbedded = O; loose structure = max points
NA*

I I°

I
0-4

I 3
20 I Presence of stream invertebrates _(see page ^^-.)

".

..
0
(no evidence = 0; common; numerous ypes = max points) _.
0 - 4
fI : 0 - } I
r`; ?1 I Presence of amphibians .,: , ......

O
(no evidence = n- common, numerous types = may: paints '
0-4,
I
0 4 I I
0 - 4 0
O q I Presence of fish

7
o e idence = 0' c0rilm0:1, -lIlme'GLS i a%
' YJ°S=uDGiniS - 4

I O I,.

O
-I

-I--
0

-°O ----

f --k-
L? I --__ =-_= = .Evidence of ii°.IdIzfc as?--
(no evrdenc` = 0; : b'--- r:i? ei'ide?C? = 7n, ' DOintS)
?O - _
_
-
----
Q-- 5 . 1 JJI
I
i Total Points Possible 100 100 i0o
TOTAL SCORE (also en_?r on
irs pa e -- ?.1_
1: eSe CharaCteriSiiCS riot 2SS SSed n CGZSI S`ie2mS.
2of2
ti'SACE AID--." -- ?-?%Q
Slte . (indicate on attached rnaD)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSME- 'T ?V, ORKSI3FET
Provide the fOllo`ving information for the stream reach under assessment:
nai:l°. Eagle Enginee.rinz, Inc.
a ?r
lu`_or'_
Sepremhel- 9-1120(j5 4
.• I?-:i _.. 0930 am-1500 p„
. _:.._ C11ana_IA C:.ta,? iba
el- 7. :_._...:_ '10 ac, es
Yl- S: Seam ?rde.. Iii
-°• ? ° _`a _,-?__? =-. _1?:?:eu. \ear pond
10. Courr Ca1?ai, 1S
11. co (1rI _
nj: In declnla) de
:re.,. 12. Sul).Z i l 1 v ' ]e (=^- `? ?T-
35.05 1>'5
?.?.7 i- l_, :10„ J (.? j i lde (°?:. -77.556611): .0.UG?02
tt ,.I.a_.d Gr S TOrr,o Sheet
U..no ?s erial) ?nnr'GIS Other GIs Other:
13. Location Ofresell under evaluation (note nearby
roads and
N-id1 landmarks and arach man ldtntiryr,Ig str
C location):
fndian Road. esm(s)
- l??: hannel A-001 snnroyimsitely 2.000 f^et coutlteLst of the inters:>cfion of Old 1'fonroc Road an
14. Proposed channel ;,'ork (if any): riding/clearing' development
15. P c I I t ,=;eath?r conditions: dry, 85 to 90 degre e o
s Fahrenh„it, Site conditions at time of visit: Pry SO Fahrenheit
16. Idend?, any s?ecia] ;Waterway classifications l no an: _
Section 10
-Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trcrt ??'atcrs _Outstanding ResourcA i77aters
_lvutrient Sensiti, e iVaters Water Supply Watershed (1-TV)
17. Is there a pond or lake locattd upstream of the evahuation point? yE.S NO If )-es, estimate the vrater surface area: 1200
square feet.
IS. Does channel appear on USGS quad neap? YES J?T(J
21. Estimated •,,,?atershtd land use: 20 % Residential _% Conm°rcial
35 io Forested 20 % Cleared
20. Does channel annsar on USDA Soil Sum,ty? YES NO
_% Industrial 25 % Agricultural
_% Other ( N
22.
23. Bank height (from oed to top ofban}c):
24. Channel slope do-,-,,-n Center of sfream: __.. Flat (0 to 201/°) X Gentle (2 to _.%) Moderate (4 to 10:0)
-Sty°P (11050
?5. Cl.arnel sinuo _ _ )
iy: Straight _ Occasional bend
instructions for completion of worlshect (locztcd on page 2): gt - by X Yrv quVnt meander _ Ve-f Sinuous oLS -
n determining the aided channel
i'tge:2tl0n, $tl'tam e!a°S]rlCatlOn, ;- most apprOprl2te
>hown for the c ?_ rve;y characteristic must be srored using the
T ame s bzsed on location, terrain,
e oregion. ege 3 provide; z brief doscr' eYOr'=1 n _r_n points to tS07e?eachi°n charasterlstic within the range
a:.._ssm ?plion of ho ?' to revie,? the r
° ent c: the area-? reach under evaluation. ifz characteristic can, characteris.i_s identiried in the ,»orkshtet.
La e,.blanalion in the comment s_ ,I.4 be Cva!uzttd due to s„e or v.e2t r Scores should rox and-,-,) o,,rail
fort,-t) , .. }? 5e. e i - e e re obvious changes in the - c°nenter 0 in tho so .-ing box and oxide
the stream may be divided into small charaner of a ; rez unit::
review (e._. s , eam Iovr J p,-
to str°am re_ch mw. er reaches [ra*. daslzy more contimsi?j> and z s r- f ,. iD0 s :r;,m a pastor-_ into a
, _- be, , _en 0 and 100, a;th z s ep--2_- o.-n ese? to evaluate _ach rea:n. the to'zl sc.,,-_ - 2ssigntd
oo- .e of ]r 10 ror._sentina strt2m or , ._i^,ig?,e, al
a :y.
.-Total Score (from. rej erse): :57
Gc -;,,eras:
- „f ct,nl<<ent cnannel dischar_^ into an abuttina. Don d
i''ITh 2n eSitrll2ted water surface ft.
2re3 of
a,
Evaluator's SiSnature:
T;^.is channel eraluz ion forri ,s7r,t nd ?f ??~• D2te:
rcqui.*ed by the Llniic? e ?`em:,_ to ist i2
jw fl. us_d Only e,( zss n d otisners 2nd en1'!ronmcnt21 pro;cssiona?s in 'gathering the data
d States __rmy Corp? of Er,;;ncers to m2ke z preliminary assessment ofstre2:n qu2hcy. Th: total sci?re re `-
completion c,-' this fOrn is subject to I,7SACE approval and dots n,t
imnl• z rrt'^ ?- sulting
^lom the
vt.alon 05/03. to .0- ? u,?r miti_ztion ratio or requirement. 707M sub•°-t to ange-
p;ezse /25.
1 o- 2
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

CH I ECOREGIO\ POI\T RANGE j
ARACTERISTICS Coastal j Piedmont' I Mount ain
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream .' 1
1 (n0 =10 Sa 1ra:1C:i = 0: S`u On^ ilOw = i lax p0i_T:S) I 0- 5 i y 0
' I 0- 5
F_ id nc° of past human Iteration j

1 S - -

0: :16 D3111) I 0- 6
0-5 0-5
Riparian zone
=
'
-

0 - 0

0 -

O - 5 Q
no bor
er = 0: CC, nr'_uo
as deb„ =
ax o
'T T
lnts)
I
Evidence of nutrient or chemical d;schar-es T

>t n_t', C,s es = 0: n0 CISC is--es = inax po.n:s) 0-4
j Groundwater discharoe 1
=
ti

z
(n0 C. s_ Z _ = 0: S7=in_S. °0 S Wcila-nd °TC. = M2.% -MIT ) 0- 0
J Presence of adjacent floodplain 3
s

I '
r, 6
n
(0 ?C?OdDI Ifl - O: ?°I1S1?'e 700dplafn = n1aX pOlitS) I 0-5 10-4. I
0-'
_ Entrenchment /floodplain access j
(deepIv eiitrenchcd = 0::-, equcnt iloodinz = max points) j 0 - 5 I 0.- I 0-2
Presence of adjacent wetlands 2
o
(no ?, etlands = 0: lame adjacent \\-e:lands = max points) I 0-o I 4. I 0-2
9 Channel sinuosity
" 4
(e>aen: ive cha_,nelizstion = 0: natural _neander = max points) I 0 - o I 0 I 0 - 3
10 I Sediment input I 0- o L 0 4' I 0-4 I 3
(extensive deposition = 0: litti° or no sediment = max Dints)
Size & diversit-y of channel bed substrate ^
. 3
11 (n,1e, homo^cnous = 0; large, div:rse sizes = max points) I NA .
I )' 0 0-5

12 Evidence of channel incision or widening
'

;. (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max Dints) 0
_5 0-5
13 Presence of major bank failures 3 .
(severe erosion = 0: no erosion, stable barllcs = max oints)
0- 0
0
0 a

14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0
0-5 3
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max Dints

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-0
0, A
0
5
(substantial impact = 0; no evidence = max points -

16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
I
Q
(no riffles/ripples or cools = 0; well-developed = Max points) 0-3 ` 0 5. I 0-6

17 Habitat complexity

I
0-6
0 0
0-6 6
(title or no habitat = 0; froq uent, varied habitats = max points) f .
_..

t o I Canopy coverage over streambed
I
0- 5 I -
::; 0 =
'I
5:'
0- 5
( - o., a canopy
-no shading ?t,gtta ion = 0; continuous = max points .
.
Substrate embeddedness
(deeply e?nb°ddcd = 0; loos-, st uctl:re = max points
,)
0 Presence of stream invertebrates (see pale 4) Q

(no eiidence = 0; co=on, numerous iypes = ma): T)Omts) 0-4
I
' 0-5
L

I
1
I Presence of amphibians

I
0-4
I ,
0,
I ^
0-- 0
O (n0 evidence = 0; coy ? ton, numt ouS L1lDOS = max points •-,:, . ; :.:...;
p ?? I Presence of fish I I
0 I
0-4 I
H ei?id°nc0 = 0; common, 1171er0iIS i)7:) = -aX p01, tS)

f'
_
23 I _.__ --Evidence of wildlife use --

I
--_
0 I
- -- _
0 - I
--- - -
-
--?
(no .,, idencs = 0; abundan'evidence =--max points )
j Total Points Possible I 100 I 200 I 100
TOTAL SCORE (also -.ntt7i,
on rm
lii[s° characteristics are not asstssed in coastal S79a S.
2 oft
I P bC•
`L?
We trust this proposal meets your current project needs. If you have any questions or
require additional information, please feel free to call at your convenience.
Sincerely,
EAGLE E_NGrNEERitiG, [NC.
Jo n H. Ross, P.E.
rincipal
Authorization to Proceed
The scope of work referenced in the attached Proposal No. 040529 dated April 14, 2004
(revised October 11, 2004) is acceptable, and Eagle Engineering, Inc. is authorized to
proceed.
By:
Signatu Dat Printed
For: Book Construction, Inc.
Proposal for Civil Engineering and Land
Surveying Services
Helms Tract- 32 acres
Indian Trail, North Carolina
EEI Proposal No_ 040529 (revised)
LL A G L E
ENGINEERING
®44 V§®
November 11, 2006
US Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
161 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-6006
Attention: Ms. Amanda Jones
Re: PCN
22.31-Acre Tract of Land
Indian Trail, Union County, North Carolina
Earale Ens*ineerin,. Inc. Proiect No. 1780-E-NC
Dear Ms. Jones:
R Rkl_Z?15 19 ME 00
Eagle Engineering,, Inc. (EEI) has conducted a jurisdictional wetland determination on an 22.31-acre tract
of land ("subject property''/"site") that is comprised of the following tracts of land: (1) 07-1 14-023; (2)
07-114-023A; (3) 07-114-024; (4) 07-114-024A; and, (6) 07-114-026C. The subject property is
scheduled for proposed development of a single-family residential subdivision containing 60-lots in the
near future.
Site development activities are proposed to impact the following areas: (1) 1,833.39 square feet
(sq.ft./0.04-acres) of linear wetland areas located along an intermittent portion of Stream Channel A; and,
(2) 898.64 linear feet (LF) of intermittent and ephemeral channels associated with Channels A, B, and C.
As indicated in the revised Jurisdictional Determination report, prepared by EEI on November, 2006, a
site inspection was conducted by a representative ,vith the North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality (NCDENT, DWQ) to verify onsite wetland
determinations and channel assessments. While EEI obtain State authorization/verification, this letter
serves as a request for approval to disturb onsite wetland areas and internittent/ephemera] channels. If a
site visit by a representative with the US Army Corps of Engineers is warranted, please advice.
Enclosed are the following documents/forms applicable to the subject site: Jurisdictional Wetland
Determination Report, PCN form, preliminary site plan for proposed site development, and a copy of a
signed authorization form between client, MHL (aka Book Construction) and EEI.
Thank you in advance for your assistance with our project. If you have any questions or require
additional information, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
EAGLE &NGINEERING,?I.NC.tC.
Angellque Y.W. Crews
Environmental Specialist
Enclosed
cc: File
MHL Development, Mr. Derek Lawson
NCDEi\TR-DWQ, Polly Lespinasse
Atlanta

r
if 1, t?
2005
rl - x
'r ? u y{yf ??1?'1y`1
DEC 6 2005
UEIVf? - WATER QUALITY
I,VE"4DS AND STORMWATER BRAf1CH
r,; :;.ea?leonline.net Charlotte
1466.EAGLENC
1601 Cambrid_e Square, Suite B 310 Indian Trail-Fairview Road
Alpharetta, GA 30004 Indian Trail, NC 25079
Ph 678 339 0640 Ph 704 882.1222
Fax [phone] Fax [phone]
1
OF WATF
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
For Section 404 and/or Section 10 Nation,%N,ide, Regional and General Permits, Section 401
General Water Quality Certifications, and Riparian Buffer and 'Watershed Buffer Rules
This form is to be used for projects qualifying for any of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (USACE)
Nationwide, Regional or General Permits as required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, and for the North Carolina Division of Water Quality's
(DWQ) associated General 401 Water Quality Certifications. This form is also to be used for any
project requiring approval under any Riparian Buffer Rules implemented by the N.C. Division of Water
Quality. This form should not be used if you are requesting an Individual 404 Permit or Individual 401
Water Quality Certification. The USACE Individual Permit application form is available online at
ww?w.saw.usace.armv.mil/wetlands/Permits.html.
The USACE is the lead regulatory agency. To review the requirements for the use of Nationwide,
Regional or General permits, and to determine which permit applies to your project, please go to the
USACE website at www.saw.usace.army.mil/wetlands/inde?.himl, or contact one of the field offices
listed on page 3 of this application. The website also lists the responsible project manager for each
county in North Carolina and provides additional information regarding the identification and regulation
of wetlands and waters of the U.S.
The DWQ issues a corresponding Certification (General or Individual), and cannot tell the applicant
which 401 Certification will apply until the 404 Permit type has been determined by the USACE.
Applicants are encouraged to visit DWQ's 401/Wetlands Unit website at
http://li2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncNvetlands to read about current requirements for the 401 Water Quality
Certification Program and to determine whether or not Riparian Buffer Rules are applicable. The
applicant is also advised to read the full text of the General Certification (GC) matching the specific 404
Permit requested. In some cases, written approval for General Certifications is not required, provided
that the applicant adheres to all conditions of the GC. Applicants lacking access to the internet should
contact D`'JQ's Central Office in Raleigh at [phone].
Trout 'Waters Coordination - Special coordination with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC) is required for projects occurring in any of North Carolina's twenty-five
counties that contain trout waters. In such cases, the applicant should contact the appropriate NCWRC
regional coordinator (listed by county on page 4 of this application) prior to submittal of the application.
PaL,e 1 of 13
Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) Coordination - If the project occurs in any of North Carolina's
twenty coastal counties (listed on page 4) the applicant should contact the North Carolina Division of
Coastal Management (DCM). DCM will determine whether or not the project is Nvithin a designated
Area of Environmental Concern, in which case DCNT will act as the lead permitting agency. In such
cases, DCM will require a CAMA Permit and will coordinate the 404/401 Permits.
The applicant may also choose to coordinate with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to ensure
that the proposed project will have no impact upon any endangered or threatened species or critical
habitat as regulated by the Endangered Species Act, and the State Historic Preservation Office, North
Carolina Department of Cultural Resources to ensure that the proposed project will have no impact upon
any properties listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Compliance with
these regulations is required to be elig=ible for any Department of the Army permit. The addresses for
both agencies are listed on page 3 of this application.
USACE Permits - Submit one copy of this form, along with supporting narratives, maps, data forms,
photos, ctc. to the applicable USACE Rcgulatory Ficld Office. Upon receipt of an application, the
USACE will determine if the application is complete as soon as possible, not to exceed 30 days. This
PCN form is designed for the convenience of the applicant to address information needs for all USACE
Nationwide, Regional or General permits, as well as information required for State authorizations,
certifications, and coordination. Fully providing the information requested on this form will result in a
complete application for any of the USACE Nationwide, Regional or General permits. To review the
minimum amount of information that must be provided for a complete PCN for each USACE
Nationwide permit, see Condition 13, 67 Fed. Reg. 2090 (Jan. 15, 2002), available at
littp://ww«,.usace.armv mil/inet/functions/cw/cecwo/rep/2OOomvps pdf. Processing times vary by
permit and begin once the application has been determined to be complete. Please contact the
appropriate regulatory field office for specific answers to permit processing periods.
401 Water Quality Certification or Buffer Rules - All information is required unless otherwise stated
as optional. Incomplete applications will be returned. Submit seven collated copies of all USACE
Permit materials to the Division of Water Quality, 401/Wetlands Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650. If written approval is required or specifically requested for a 401
Certification, then a non-refundable application fee is required. In brief, if project impacts include less
than one acre of cumulative Nwetland/water impacts and less than 150 feet cumulative impacts to
streams, then a fee of $200 is required. If either of these thresholds is exceeded, then a fee of $475 is
required. A check made out to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality; with the specific name of
the project or applicant identified, should be stapled to the front of the application package. For more
information, see the DWQ website at litti)://ii2o.cliiii-.state.iic.us/iicNvet]aiid.g/fees.litjii1. The fee must be
attached with the application unless the applicant is a federal agency in which case the check may be
issued from a separate office. In such cases, the project must be identifiable on the U.S. Treasury check
so that it can be credited to the appropriate project. If written approval is sought solely for Buffer Rules,
the application fee does not apply, and the applicant should clearly state (in a cover letter) that on!),
Buffer Rule approval is sought in writing. Wetlands or waters of the U.S. may not be impacted prior to
issuance or waiver of a Section 401 Water Quality Certification. Upon receipt of a complete application
for a 401 Certification, the Division of Water Quality has 60 days to prepare a written response to the
applicant. This may include a 401 Certification, an on-hold letter pending receipt of additional
requested information, or denial.
Page 2 of 13
US Army Corps Of Engineei-s Field Offices and County Cove?-age
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers Alexander Caldwell Haywood I%IcDowell

151 Patton Avenue Alleghany Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg

Room 208 Ashe Cherokee Iredell Mitchell

Asheville, NC 38801-5006 Ave
D'
Buncombe
Clay
Clevel
d
Jackson
Polk

Telephone: [phone]
Burke an
Gast Lincoln Rowan

Fax: [phone]
Cabarrus on
Graham Macon

\ladi Rutherford
son Staple},
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Alamance
Franklin
Nash

US Army Corps ofEngincers
6505 Falls of the Neuse Road
Caswell
Forsyth
Northampton Surry
Vance

Suite 120 Chatham Granville Orange Wake

Raleigh, NC 27615 Davidson

Davi Guilford
1 erson
Warren

Telephone: [phone] e
Durh Halifax Randolph Wilkes

Fax: [phone] am

Edgecombc Johnston

Le
Rockingham
Wilson
e Stokes Yadkin
Washington Regulatory Field Office
US Ann ?
} Corps Of Enginee Beaufort
Currituck
Jones
rs
Post Office Box 1000 Bertie Dare Lenoir

??Vashin?
ton, NC 27889-1000 Camden

Carteret*
Gates
Gree
Martin

Telephone: [phone]
Chotvan n
Hertf
d Pamlico

Fax: [phone]
Craven or
Hyde Pasquotank

Pcrquimans
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps Of En
ineers Anson Du fin
p
Onslow
g
Post Office Box 1890 Bladen Harnett Pender

Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 Brunswick

Cart
t Hoke
Richmond

Telephone: [phone] ere
Columb Montgomery Robeson

Fax: [phone] us

Cumberland Moore

New Hanover
Sampson
Scotland
North Carolina State Agencies
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 37699-1650
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Division of Water Quality
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Pitt
Tyrrell
Washington
Wayne
Swain
Transylvania
Union
Watauga
Yancey
*Croatan National Forest Only
State Historic Preservation Office
Department Of Cultural Resources
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
US Fish and Wildlife Service / National Marine Fisheries Service
US Fish and Wildlife Service US Fish and Wildlife Service T
Raleigh Field Office Asheville Field Of National Marine Fisheries Service
Office
Post Office Box 33726 160 Zi]licoa Street Habitat Conservation Division
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726 Pivers Island
Asheville, NC 28801 Beaufort, NC 28516
Telephone: [phone] Telephone: [phone]
(Telephone: [phone]
Page 3 of 13
CAAIA and NC Coastal Counties
Division of Coastal Management Beaufort
Chow
1635 Mail Service Center
Berti an Hertford Pasquotank

Raleigh, NC 27699-1638 e
Brunswick Craven
Currit
k Hyde Pender

Telephone: [phone]

Camd uc New
Hanover
r
l
s

Fax: [phone] en
Carteret Dare
Gat OIlslow re
l
Ty
rrel]
es
Pamlico
Washin,ton
NC«'RC and NC Tr out Counties
Western Piedmont Re-ion Coordinator
3855 Idlewild Road AlleRhany Caldwell Watauga

Kemcrsville, NC 27254-9180 Ashe

Av Mitchell Wilkes
Telephone: [phone] ery Stokes
Burke Sttrry
Mnuntain Regicut Coordinator
20830 Great Smoky Mtn. Expresswa Buncombe

C
Henderson
Polk
y
Waynesville, NC 28786 herokee
Clay Jackson
M Rutherford
Telephone: (S28) 452-2546
? Graha acon Swain
Fax: [phone] m
Maywood Madison
Madison
M Transylvania
cDowell Yancey
APPLICATION FORM BEGINS ON PAGE 5. PLEASE DO NOT SUBINUT PAGES 1 - 4.
Page 4 of 13
Office Use Only:
Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. D«,Q nTo, 2 0 0 j G 1 E
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
L Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
© Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide Permit No. 39
(Residential Commercial and Institutional Developments)
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further detail, b c(}? ? ??LS?7
It. Applicant Information Is
t:1
1. Owner/Applicant Information DEC 6 2005
Name: Development Derek Law 0i Ar?ocr •O WS Eft ptJ"Ll
M y-_ -
Mailing Address: 1801 E-1 Cross Beam Drive t3„
Charlotte, North Carolina 28210
Telephone Number: 704-424-9800 or 704-506-3689
Fax Number: 704-424-9788
2. AgentJCon_ sultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: An?eli ue Crews
Company Affiliation: Eagle Enaineerina, Inc.
Mailing Address: 310 Indian Trail-Fairview Road, Indian Trail 28109
Telephone Number: 704-882-422
E-mail Address: acrews a eagleonline.net Fax Number: 704-882-4232
Page 5 of 13
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow.
The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's ,dissc e on
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1.Name of project: Garmon's Crossing
2.T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3.Property Identification Number Tax PIN):
( _. (1) 07-1 14-023• (2) 07 l 14 023A (3) 07-114-
024, (4) 07-1 14-024A• and (5) 07-114-025C.
4-Location
County: Union County Nearest Town: Indian Trail
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Gannon's Crossing
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Hi(hase I) / Lots
ghway 746(East); south
onto Waxhaw-Indian Trail- east onto Pioneer Lane State Route 1386. Site is situated along
northern portion of Pioneer Lane former chicken farm
5-Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately
lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35°N
oW
6-Property size (acres): 22.31-Acres
7.Name of nearest receiving body of water: Price Mill Creek
8.River Basin: Lower Catawba River basin Hydrologic Unit 03050103
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at htt>>://h2o.enr.state nc us/?chninhnans/.)
9.Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project at
the time of this application: The subject roperty consists of an undeveloped woodland
with a onion of an unnamed and situated near the southeastern portion of the subiect site.
Page 6 of 13
The surrounding land use consists of residential areas to the north of the site with Old
Monroe Road beyond: a mixture of agricultural and residential use to the south bevond
Pioneer Lane) and east of the subject site: and a mixture of residential and 1ig11t commercial
areas to the west of the subject property (wrth Waxhaw-Indian Trail Road bevond
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project is com prised of a single-family residential subdivision containing a poximate]
60 lots that consist of a mininnnn of 6.000-square feet.
1 1. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
The purpose of the pro -)osed work is to provide a mid to upscale single-family residential
subdivision and assist in the growth of the Town of Indian Trail.
IN'. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have becn rcqucsted and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.LP. project, along with
construction schedules.
EEI was not provided information regarding the historical surveys and/or associated permits
conducted and/or issued for the subject property: consequently, EEI is not aware of jurisdictional
determinations and/or permits that have been requested and/or obtained for the subject property.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
A future sewer main is proposed b Union County Public Works UCPW . The proposed sewer
main will traverse along the northern portion of the site along an unnamed onsite channel. While
EEI conducted a wetland determination for the site that included the characterization of onsite
channels the request for permit discuss within the said PCN is solely for Purposes of residential
redevelo Anent. EFT has not been neither contracted nor authorized to provide information
regardina onsite wetlands/channels to UCPW. However, if requested, EEI will provide such
information to UCPW and assist with ermitting if requested and required.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
Pa-ae 7 of 13
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as,
s appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:- The proposed impacts consist
of disturbing 899-linear feet of intermittent and/or enhemeral portions onsite stream channels
A and C within Lots 11. 14. and 15 See Attached drawing C-1.0). While a walking trail is
proposed within the onsite common area of Gannon's Crossing. six (6) foot long bridges are
proposed to be utilized to cross the onsite channels The two proposed bridges are an effort
to minimize impact to the onsite channels
With respect to the impact to the Wetland areas the?-)roposed irmt,act is localized at Nvetland
area B. Which consists of 1.833 s .ft. 0.04-acres and is less than one-acre ofimpact
.
?. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For
dams, se aratel list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Floodplain Nearest Area o pact
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) (yes/no) Stream ( acres)
(linear feet)
Wetland A None Forested/Marsh Connected to
No N/A
stream
Wetland B Grading/Excavation Along
activities Herbaceous No intermittent 0.04
channel
Total Wetland Impact (acres)
0.04 Acres
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.385
(Wetland area A is comprised of 0.34-acres and Wetland area B is comprised of 0.04-
acres).
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify
temporary impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or
culverts, dam construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement
walls, rip-rap, crib walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream
relocation is proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the
ori-inal and relocated streams must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X
width, then divide by 43,560.
Page 8 of 13
Stream Impact

Number
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or Average
?
Stream ?? dth Im act
p Area of
(indicate on ma) Intermittent? i Length Impact
Before Im act (linear feet) acres)
Grading on Lots
13, 14 & 15,

Stream A
Unnamed common area,
road/right-of-way,
Intermittent
5-Feet
438

and future sanitary 0.05 ac
sewer line
construction
Stream B I Unnamed Gradin` on Lots 10
& 11
Ephemeral
5-Feet
-----
Stream C Unnamed 4 Intermittent 5-feet I
175.72
0.02 ac
Stream C Unnamed toad
f-??ay
ea
Common
Ephemeral
5-feet
-----
-------- Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage)
---- ----- --
61172 If
0.07 ac
5. Individually list all open eater impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds,
Atlantic Ocean and any other Nvater of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not
limited to fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact _
Site Number Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
(indicate on ma) (if applicable) T}'pe of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay Impact
N/A ocean, etc.) (acres)
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the ro'ect:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.07 ac
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.04 ac
Open Water Impact (acres): N/A
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) I N/A
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 613.7? if
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? yes © No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
Page 9 of 13
8. Pond Creation (N/A)
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands El strearn Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment excavation, install tion dof
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormNvater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
N'I1. Impact Justification (Avoidaiice and 1llinimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to sitc constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
nancial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
fi site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
In addition to stringent erosion control standards planned along- the onsite channels and
identified wetland area the developer pro noses to only im _ act portions of channels that may
effect the location of the building pad on the respective lots. Areas on the respective lots where a
building ad will not be located the channels will not be disturbed. Furthermore while the
ma'ority of the channels and wetland area are situated within a proposed common area for the
subdivision the developer proposes the use of bridges to minimize the impact to the onsite
channels and wetland areas .
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
Pa°e 10 of 13
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
htt»://h?o.enr.state.nc us/ncwetlands/?irm?ide htntl.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No mitigation is required for the subject propcrty due in part to the amount of proposed
disturbance to the ofsite channels (intermittent and ephemeral) which is 898.64 linear feet
total length for the proposed project. Furthermore. no mitigation is required. for the ofsite
wetland area because the Nvetland area is less than one-acre in size; specifically, 0.04-acres.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at litre://li2o.enr.State nc us/wrp/index litm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
• Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No ?
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
Pate 1 1 of 13
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
I1. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by D«'Q)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 0213.0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers. (N/A)
Zone* Impact Required
(s uare feet) Multiplier
Mitigation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0244, or.0260. N/A
X. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
Roadway improvements comprise 13.6% of impervious area. The potential site im rovements
subject to change) comprise 13.1 - %The total preliminary impervious area is estimated to be
26.7%. Final stormwater design/site design has not been finalized per the submittal of this PCN.
XI. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Page 12 of 13
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The sanitary sewage disposal is proposed to discharge into the Union Countv Public Works
Crooked Creek Waste Water Treatment facility. WQ0024812.
O Violations (required by DIVQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (1 5A NCAC 2T-1.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No ?
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XII. Cumulative Impacts (required by D«'Q)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes T
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.cnr tt?te nc ushlcwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XIII. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
!/ L 1?1t ? ,?-,??
U Annlii Slbllatul e
1 i Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Pace 13 of 11
N
O
O

r ?

z
N ° C?

to L71
00 v
?
o

N
O
?cn
?omm
m D
v
> z n
•
±
aW w"".?C)/:,; f ?
nn
D
D r D
z

` m
r

r
T m
o m
® m
0 0
m:?i
O -rr1l
1
-A D
6z
c v
rr
M C
<
M
?m

PloneerLane
I ... _ X1.7 •.4gMr
AM AM A*
Aft- AM
i
o
.S? o
i
i

m
D +
om
= D W -I m f
4 mZ
m
¢ m
p
D r ?y > 7u ,
r m a
La? m= n;
O n
D
'Z O
Xo=
?z ?'z

d0 ;' Gr/
omb.

^ cf)

m?t
m ?
?D

M D
Z

d z
Z ~ h
m
D

u
O m -?
o
D -1my
D
m ;
;u
> ,
q W
r >
O T Z
9
0-?
?
D
c
I D m
?

x ?
o k

Z
0
O A
O Z Un
Un -1
m 70
p?1
C D
Z
Z n
r =
.{ D
Z
m
n
D?
Zm
z
Z
71
m 71
no
?D
Un
Z Un
O?
O
m
-a ;
00
vz
z Z
S r
mo
z
zm
m
r
E A G L E
FIGURE 4 F 1! Gi 1 ?-1 F' ?J Ci
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION
GARMON'S CROSSING
REVISED- PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL INDIAN TRAIL, UNION COUNTY,
WETLAND SURVEY
310 IndianTrail - FairvicwRd. NORTH CAROLINA
Indian Trail, NC 28079
[phone]
www.eagleonline.ncr Proj. #: 1780-E
F?-
%
November 11, 2005
_NIHL Dev=elopment
1801 E-1 Cross Beam Drive
Charlotte, North Carolina 28210
attention: ?NIr. Derek Lawson
Re: Letter Report - Revised Jurisdictional Delineation
Garmon's Crossing
Indian Trail, Union County, North Carolina
Eagle Engineering_ Inc. Project No. 1780-CES-NC
Dear Mr. Lawson:
Eagle Engineering, Inc. (EEI) is pleased to present the results of a revised Jurisdictional
Delineation survey conducted on 22.31-acres of undeveloped land situated between Old
Monroe Road (aka Old Charlotte Highway) and Pioneer Lane in Indian Trail, Union
County, North Carolina ("subject property" or "site") (Figure 1). The tax parcels which
constitute as the subject property are as follows: (1) Tax Parcel Id: 07-114-023; (2) Tax
Parcel Id: 07-114-023A; (3) Tax Parcel Id: 07-114-024; (4) Tax Parcel Id: 07-114-024A-
and, (5) Tax Parcel Id: 07-114-025C.
During the additional site assessment activities, EEI was accompanied by a representative
with the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of
Water Quality (NCDENR DWQ), Ms. Polly Lespinasse, to verify onsite wetland
determinations and stream assessment characterizations.
BACKGROUND
EEI conducted a preliminary Jurisdictional Determination survey for the subject property
on August 9 and 11, 2005. The survey was conducted m accordance with the USACE
Wetlands Delineation Manual, dated 1987, as well as in accordance with the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality, Identi-gCation Alfethods for the Orin 7is of Illtel'717itte77t
al2d Pe7"e1111ial Strea»rs, version 3. 1, dated February 28, 2005 and with the USACE's
SP-CaM Qllaliol ASSCS.5177CI7t II'orksheet, dated June 2003.
=_CLEiSC C rio: e
1501 Carnb:idge Souare Suite 3
JPharetta, GA30004 310 h?d;'an Trail-Fa:rcie,v Fo_d
Ph 678 339 0540 Indian Trail, KC 28079
Far. 678 339 0534 Ph 704 882 4222
Fax [phone]
Mr. Derek La«-son
November 11, 200
Page 2 of 4
As indicated in the preliminary. Jurisdictional Determination survey report, dated
September 26, 2005, EEI observed the following onsite water features: (1) ingress
portion of abutting pond; and (2) tributaries of abutting pond. Furthermore, review of the
U. S. Department of Interior National 'Wetlands Inventory Maps, `'Matthews, N. C.:
(dated 1993) indicated that the onsite, ingress portion of the abutting pond, as well as the
pond in its entirety, is designated as a Palustrine «-etland, PUBHx; specifically, the
Palustrine wetland area is an area that has been determined as permanently flooded -,?-ith
an unconsolidated bottom and is listed with excavation activities conducted on a the
pond. No additional «etland areas were identified on the ,wetlands inventory map for the
subject property.
The results of the preliminary Jurisdictional Determination survey and stream
identifications were as outlined in Tables l and 2, respectively:
Table 1: Summary of Preliminary Jurisdictional Wetland Area(s)
Wetland Identification A roximate Size (square feet / acres) _
Wetland A 14,976.1 sq. ft. / 0.34 acres
Total Wetland Area 1 f,976 1S sq ft / 0.34 acres
It should be noted that approximately 73.24 LF of a perennial channel (Stream A) is
associated with wetland A.
Table 2: Summary of Preliminary Jurisdictional Stream Channels
Stream
Classification Approximate Size NCDWQ USACE
Identification (Linear Feet) Score Score
Stream A Intermittent 438 LF 25 57
Stream B Intermittent 201 LF 22
?
51
Total Stream length(s) I 639 LF
ADDITIONAL ASSESSI\IENT ACTIVITIES
As previously stated, EEI conducted an additional jurisdictional wetland determination as
well as stream channel assessments with a representative with the NCDENTR DWQ, Ms.
Polly Lespinasse, on October 12 and 24, 2005. The initial site visit with Ms. Lespinasse
on October 13, 2005 was inconclusive due in part to recent rain storm events prior to the
October 12, 2005 meeting. Subsequently, _Ms. Lespinasse requested an additional
meeting be conducted on the subject property to accurately characterize the onsite stream
channels and wetland area(s).
Mr. Derek Lawson
November 11, 200
Pac,e 3 oi'4
CONCLUSIONS
The results of the onsite «-etland determination and stream channel characterization with
1v s. Lesp;nasse are as follo,?,s:
Table 1: Sunimar-y of Preliminary Jurisdictional NVetlartd Area(s)
«'etland Identification Approximate Size (s care feet /acres)
Wetland A 14,976.1 sq. Lt. / 0.34 acres
Wetland B 1,83319 s .ft. /0.04 acres
Total Wetland Area 16.809.54 sq ft / 0.3S5 acres
Identified wetland areas were characterized based on the dominant species of hydrophytic
vegetation; the hydric soils that predominantly included gleyed and low chroma
conditions; and, soils that exhibited hydrology indicators (i.e. inundated, saturated in
upper 12-inches).
Table 2: Summary of Preliminary Jurisdictional Stream Channels
Stream
Classification Approximate Size INTCMVQ
USAGE
Identification I
(Linear Feet) Score Score
Stream A Irlterntittent 438 LF ?d 57
Stream A Perennial 73.24 LF
Stream B Ephemeral -----
Stream C Internuttent 175.72 LF
.
Stream C Ephemeral ? I
211.68 LF
Total Stream length(s) I S95_6:1 T F
The shaded cells uidicate revised stream assessments made in the field between EEI
and NCDENR-DWQ.
Stream channels were identified utilizing the NCDWQ D7-ea771 IdeWiftcation Forms and
the USACE Strectm Oucrlity Assesstuent II'orksheets; consequently, two unimportant,
intermittent stream channels, Channels A and C, were identified during the site
assessment activities. Per the USACE, maximum impact to intermittent and/or perennial
streams is 300 linear feet; however, per the NCDENR - DWQ, an application for
Nationwide Permit No. 39 is required prior to impact to (1) wetlands in excess of 1/10"'
per acre; and, (2) streams, whether important and/or unimportant, that are greater than
150 linear feet.
REC0AUNI-E'-,N-D ATIONS
Review of preliminary engineering grading plans indicates that the intermittent and
ephemeral portions of Stream A and C u-ill be impacted during proposed development
activities.
Mr. Derek Lawson
November 11, 200
Page 4 of 4
Notification to the USACE is required for activities that result in a loss of greater than
1/10 per acre of water of the United States via the Nation-,vide Permit No. 39 which
specifically addresses residential and commercial development, and Nationwide Permit
No. 14, ;vhich addresses road crossings.
The US_-kCE must review and arnnrove all delineations of jurisdictional wetland for
-,which permit applications are submitted to the Corps. The preliminary Jurisdictional
Delineation survey conducted by EEI was neither reviewed nor approved by the USAGE
upon issuance of this report.
-000-
EEI appreciates the opportunity to provide these services to i1IHL Development. If you
have questions or require additional information in this matter, please do not hesitate to
call.
Sincerely,
EAGLE ENGINEERING, INC.
a- Ot ' V a&W2'
Angelique Y.W. Crews
Environmental Specialist

Frank L. Gray III, P.E.
Principal
Attachments: Figure I - Site Location Map
Figure 2 - USGS Soil Survey Map
Figure 3 - U.S. Department of Interior National Wetlands Inventory Map
Figure 4 - Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Survey Map
Appendix A - Routine 11?'e11and Deternni7?ation Data Forms)
Appendix A
Routine !1'etlandDeferminaticm Dafa Forln(s)
DATA FORM
ROUTTINE. WETLAND DETER-MINATION
(1113 J Cn l ,;ands D°11nBa'lon
t'rC? i _lii3: 1 /ISO--, Gannon's Cr•,ssing
nphcaniBooi:-ons`U^il0n
Invts-Jcator(s): AnLelioue Cre«s
Do Norinai C:.--1_1.7 _,anc J e :1., O :h°
v JII
;S Me :tie s1 :1Ii1v I1.1 r d1 1r
-} s: ?? (_,rrpical Siru ion).
Is the area a poi:ntial Pmbkern .1rea? 'Js
uoil?
VEGETATION
Date: S c p Ltni !1 20()i
CDIln?': i nion
State NC
Yes No I Coi muni-cy ID: wetly nd
I'es \ p Transect ID:
Yes No
Plot ID: PI-01
(Background sample: SB-01
Dominant Plant Sne.cies Stratum I Indicator- I Dominant Plant
1. Pious =-h an-_ I treo FACU I 9.
2 -? ?reshs t.nu s shrub FAC 10.
'.sclcpics cinu
' -
? hero
? FAC
111.
11?.
13.
o. I I -14.
7. I I 15.
E. I I 110
Percent of Donunant Species that are OBL, FAMV, or FAC
Remarks:
Dominant plant species identified are 100%, F.4Cordrie1%
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide
Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
Z No R:corded Data available
p Field Obstm,ations:
D:.uth of Surface Water: N/A (in
Depth to S'z oral d Soil: > 13 (ia.
Remarks:
NO indicators of wetland bt>drolo?v ur
es I Stratum I Uidicator
Wetland Hydrolog Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
-Inundated
-Saturated in upper 12 inches
Water Marks
_Drift Lines N/A
_Sediment Deposits
-Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators:
O,:idized Root channels in li per 12 inc es _
L ocz] Soil Sun-ey Data
F?.C isu:.zl Test
)',ht-. (Fz?)lain in Re.nzrla)
durinz site assessment.
1 of 2
SOILS
un:t
"Tatum ,rat e11? silt}' clad- loam. 2 to S °10 clones,
Eroded (TbB?)
thermic T?•nic MmAudults
D:a nape Class: well drained
Y ICid 0bst7V ItiOCS
Ycs No

r h I

it
0-13 I

E 1 I : Colo: vio Ie Co1

(f i cell t? ;a

10 Y R 610 N/, ? i,fct,l ? b 7?ancel

C? r( nr,. .pct
Tc;.:Lre, Conc.e.ioas,

Sroc,n,? etc
C1ati eS silts

_? I I
Hydric Soil Indicators:
I-Iistol
Histic Epipedon
_Sulfidic Odor
_Aquic Moisture Reryime
-Reducing Conditions
_Gleyed or Lo•,v-Chroma Colors
Remarks:
-Con creti ons
-High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
-Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
-Listed on National Hydric Soils List
-Other (Explain in Remarks
No indicators of hvdric soils present during site assessment.
WETLAND DETERI1 i\? 4TI0?'
Liydl0pl7j t1C 1?eg°tdtl0il Present? i' es ?rQ (Circle)
' Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Prestnt? Yes No is this Sain-pling Point \-vithin a etland? lies NO
aniDling noin t is " Dic:il Of a 1`1011-ill•isdictional unkind area.
l:;,;;ov=; cyA
2 O1?
DATA FORM
ROUTINE `1-ETL_ N-D DETERMINATION
(193,7 COE ?Vetla:lds Delint_tion l areal)
t7c)l I-/ S0-EE Garmon's Cro,sinla
iicontU'r,'ner' = oGl: Co S%1 tlon
p -
im e_ ti_ator(s): Angeliaue Cre«s
Do -Nlcm.,al Circumstances t ISI oil iilt Site YeS
is tilt Slte sialli Ilca-mly disturi?ed (- i1'Jlcal SitL-,-,i , )? : eS
IS the ;i,-ca a potcntlal Pr0i11tn1 _?.r'a? 2 -,)rids Yes
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Spe ics
?- I Stratton I Indicctx I Domin.^,nt P;ant
]. (?t+a'czrs uln_dlos lr I FACW- I .9.
2.Cnramyrisiiciiaa:'
ire
FAC«'- lo.
3. Smiles lcr;; i/olio
I vine I FAC?i- ? I1.
?' I I 12.
5. 13.
o. I I 114.
7. I 115
S. I I Ilo

Percent of Dominant Speci _
es that are OEL, FACW, or FAC
Remarks:
Dominant plant species identified are 100% FAC or wetter plants.
HYDROLOGY
X Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide
Caugt
Aerial Photographs
1 Other
No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Death ofSur?ace Water: I'/A
Depth to Free ?7Jater in pit: 12
- Datt. S:ptti??i er 1 2(I05
Co'.=y: Union
S t a _'\'C
No Cominuni ll, ID: we.tlanc]
,N? 0 Transt?ct ID:
Plot ID: P1-02
ecies I Stratum I Indicator
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
_) Saturated in Upper 12 inches
_Xi Water Marks
Drift Lines
-Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in'Wttlands
Secondary Indicators:
in.) _3 _Oxidized Root channels in T- pper 12 inches
Zri'ater-Stair_ed Leaves
in.) -
Local Soil Survey Data
C'1:e1: it a1-1-eSt---...
Oilier (E%plain in :?einarks)
P,emarl:s:
Indicators of wetland hvdrolonl oresent durinasite accessment.
1 0
i 2
SOILS
?yap Unit Name
(series and? --e): Tatum
RravelIv silt}' cla)' loam
2 t0 S 0"
slo
es
II D ninzceClass: well drained
-
.
_ o
p
,
Eroded (TbI;2)
Clavev. mixed. thermic T-,'D1C HanhidulTs
I;
.
li) h
I Colo:
II
( ie C rs i,:o: t 7 a:;c i e- r n e:io^,s,
I
_.^..
n?S-1 I
C /i _, tC
'III h ?c`)
Ali 0-" I O -A Orzanic, darl: I ?r/? I N/A Clavc silts
-6 I 3 I Glev 1 7/10 Y. I IOYPJd/o I
1! 6-12 i b I Glev 1 7/10 Y IOYR16/6
1
h I I 1 1
I i
I 1 1 I I

I 1 1
I 1
El
,
i
I
u 1 I 1
II I 1 1 I I
I ___ 1
FIydrlc Soil Indicators: I
_Histol -Concretions
_Histic Epipedon _Hic h Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks
Remarks:
Gle), colors and chroma indicative of Hydric soils
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophj sic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Iles No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
(Circle)
Is this Sampling Point Within a ` ttland? Yes No
Remarks:
1 SamTJlin° noint is tvnical of a jurisdictional wetland area
- ---- -- -
r, FiWsr.ca. ,2
2 of2
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: Sc7telnber 9- 1-1.2005 Proiect: 17 0-E I LatltUde:35.05795
Evaluator: An^_elicue Crc%vs Site: Garmnn's Crossin Len?itude:S0.66662
?I Total Points: County: Union Other: (e c. Quad Namc)
SL.,am s a: least i n..rmitte.nt 2-5
_I or o=rcnn:
d if >
9
30
fatthe\rs, NC" -min. topocrsphic
'
_ ouad,anule,I-,an
Channel A -Garmons Crossing
A. Geomorpholow (Subtotal = 18)
I I Absent Neal: I moderate I Strong
1'. Continuous bcd and bank 1 0 I 1 I 2 3 ?
2. Sinuosity I 0 I 1 I 2 3
_ In-., a:mcl su'uctut' rifii.-pool : ouc I 0 I 1
I 2
I 3
4. Soil tcxaurc or stream substrate sorting I 0 1 o 3
5.:?c;ive;5olic iloodnlai° I 0 I 1 2 I 3
6. D:positional hers or bcnchcs 0 I 1 I 2 I 3
7. 3raided channel 0 1 ? I 3
S. Recut alluvl:'.l d-uos;ts 0 1 I 7 I 3
Natural 1e.\'eeS 0 I
I
-.
10. 1Ioadars I 0 1 2
_
3
11. Grade controls I 0 0.3 1 I 1.3
12. Niatural valley or drair.a_,e\tay I 0 0.3 I 1 1.3
1.3 Sccond or urc -_r order channel on :xistin USGS or MRCS
man or other d-ocumcntcd evidence.
No = 0
Yes = 3
Man-made ditches arc not rated; sec discussions m manual
B. fh'Clrolo?y (Subtotal = 3)
Absent Weal: Moderate Strom,
14. Grnund\+ater flo\y/dischar,c 0 1 ? I 3
15. 'Watcr in channel and >48 hrs since rain; or
Watcr in channel - dry or gro\vinQ scnson
0 I
l
I 2 I
3
16. Leaf iittcr I 1.5
I
1
0.5
I
0
17. Sediment on plants or debris I 0 I 0..5
I
1.5
18. Oraanie debris lines or piles ('Wrack lines) 0 0..5 2 1.5
19. I-lydric soils (rcdoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes = 1.5 -
C. Biology (Subtotal = 4)
Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1
2Ob. Fibrous roots in channel 3 I 2 1 I 0
21b. Rootcd plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish (
0 I
0.5 1 ? 1.5
23. Bivalves I 0 I 1 I 2 I 3
24. Fish I 0 I 0.5 I
I
1.5
25. Amphibians
0 I
0.5 I
1 I
1.?
26. I'Aacrob mthos (note diversity and abundance) I 0 I 0.5 I 1 I 1.5
27. Filamentous alcac; pcriphyton I 0 I 1 I ? I 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/funcus I 0 I 0.5 I 1 I 1.5
296. Wctland plants in streambed I PAC = 0.5; FACW= 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = U
u°_ms >u and a locus on the presence of upland plants, item '9 focuses on the presence of aquatic or etland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) S}:°tch:
Channel A(near A-01) - See Figure 4
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: September 9-12, 2005 1 Project: 1 7SO-E I Latitude:35.05 795
Evaluator: Angelique Y.1lr. Cl.c%vs I Site: Garmon's Crossing I Lon?i:ude:S0.66652
j Total Points. Coun :Union Othcr: (e.g. Quad Name)
j Stream is at !east is;,erl^it:ent 13.55 f_19 j'
or n°renaial if-_30 fatthea:,NC" 7.5-run. tope rapitic
nuadra=ck nap
CE1a1111el A -Garmons Crossing
A. GeomorphoIo_y (Subtotal = 7)

° Absent Weak I Moderate JS troll-
1
. Continuous bed and bank 1 _
0 1 , 3
2. Stnuosiiy 0
I 1 I 2 ?
j 3. suu.tmt :. ,n:-p, of sequence j 0 I I o I 3
4. Soil tezttu'e or S:ream Substrate so:Ying 0 1 . 2 i 3
5. ACLIv'eire!ic iloodplain 0 I 2 I 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braid,-,d channel 0 1 2
S. Rec°-Ilt a1111v;al deposits 0 1
1 I 2 I 3
9'. Natural levecs 0 1 3

10.I1cad"111s 0 1 0 3

11. Grad-- controls 0 I 0.5 1 I 1.5
12. Natural vallcv or drainagc?cay Q I 0
? 1 1

1.3 Second or treater order channel on -?:istine USGS or NRCS . 1.5
man or other documented cvid--nee. I O = 0 I yes = 3
•..-.., w??u?> aic uui iM,.;U, SCL' u1scusslons in manual
B. Hydrolo(,,}' (Subtotal = 1.?)
Absent Weak Alodcmte Stroll
14. Groundwater flow/dischar_c 0 I 2 i---
15. 1Yatcr in channel and >48 ht's since :rain; nr
atcr in channel - dry or Lrowinp on 0. _ I 1 I 2 3
16. Lcaf litter I 1.? 1 1 I 0 1 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.J
18. Organic debris lines o, piles (?'rach lines) 0 0.5 1 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (rcdo,'JlnO phis features) present? 1 No = 0 Yes = LS
C. Biolo . (Subtotal = 5)
I
206
Fi Absent Weak ? Moderate I Stron,
.
brous roots in channel I I 2 I 1

216. Rooted plants in channel I
3
I 2 1
1 0

22. Crayfish I
0

0
0 0
23. Bi%,a]vcs I 0 1
1 EE? 1
?
24. Fish 1 0 1
I 0.5 1 I
1 1 3
1
5
25. Amphibians 0 0
5 1 .

26.1%4acrobcnthos (note diversity and abundance) 1
0 .
1 0
5 1 I
1 l.s

27. F;lamcntot:s al=pc; periahyton
0 .
1 1 15
20. Iron oxidizing bactc.!a'funcus 1 0
I 0
5
1

29-6. ' ;re;land plants in strca;nbed. __---I-F.i' C.= 0:5;
° .
FACW = 0:75; . 031.
= 1.5 SA-V-=.2:0
•- 1.5
- Other-=0-
Items 20 and 21 fovus on the presence of upland plants, Itcm 29 focuses ,
on the presence of p-quatic of .vefand plants.
Motes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
Channel A(neat' A-01I -.See Figure 4
I
-North Carolina Division of Water Qualit)• - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: September9tl' 200; Pr
oiect: ]1S0-E j L tin!d 057c5
711 lu o 511 Lau Y \V C 1+s j Sit,.. G-,mon s Cross,n2 Lonc,tudc:S0.66552
Total Points: County: Union I Other: (e.g. Quad Name)
S:: ,.rl ;s at East ;m :ittent 2J ?1 -
if `-19 or perennial "Nlatth,_% s, NC' 7.5-min. topo_•.r:p}l;c
I' I auadran?le mat
Channel A-Garmons Crossing-REN%ISED PER _NCDF.NR-D«7Q SITE ASSESSAfE\'T
A. GeomorpholoRv (Subtotal = 1 5.5)

1'. Continuaus iaad and back

?. Sinuas :

3. ill-CLa,IIT_I ilrU Ctn C:; nine-2001 SCC]11 e11Ce I Absent I

0
( i

0 Weak

I
1 ? Moderate I

f

1
I Strong

3

.
?- 5011 :;; ailre 01'";;:1!11 SUiSirate SO rtla? j O I 1 I 2

o.:1ctn-?rcLc floodplain
0 ?
I 3

6. Dcpositianal h:u's nr benches

0 I I ? I
J

/. Dmide d -.-

0 1

I ( ? I
3

S. I;cccmailt:vial deposits
0

I I
- 3
9'. NaturalI-vccs
0
1 2 3
]0 11 ?1 15
0 I p I 3

11. Grade controls
I 0-? 1 I Z I 3

I 12. N;Itural valley or draina?_cway

I 0
(L5 I 1 I
1.5

1.3 Second or realer order channel on cs;s?inc USGS
or NKCS
0.5 1
1.5

111,12 or other clocumcntcd cvidcnce. !?
No = 0
Yes = 0
t 1 n m de ditches a arnot, !t d, sc? a,s uss3 o m manual
ins
I3. Hydrology (Subtotal = 2.5)

14. Groundwater flow/discharge absent Weak I Moderate I Strom,

15. Watcr in channel and >48 hrs since rain; or 0 I 1 I 2
Water in cilann - d,v or rolain¢ season 0 1 2
t
73
16. Leaf litter 1
5
1

17. Seditrlcnt on plants or debris ( .
0 0.5 0

1 S. Organic debris Hncs or piles (Wrack Gnes) I

0
0.5
I 1
1.5

19. Hvdric soils (rcdoaimorphic fcatures) pewit? I
0.5
I 1
I
LS
No = 0
Yes =-1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = 5)
j
20'. Fibrous roots in channel Absent Weak Aoderate I Strom
I
21 n, p:00ted plants in channel 3
_- I I
0
I

22. Cray fish I
3
T
0 I 1 I
2 j

0
23. Bivalves I 0'5 I I 1.5
I
24. Fish 0 I 1 ( 2
3
I

25. Amphibians 0
0.5 I 1 I
1.5
I

26. Nacrobenthos (note dive.*sity and abundance)
I 0 I

0 I 0.5
I 1

OS I 1

27. Filamentous algae; periphyton I
0 I I
I 1.5
2S. Iron oxidizing

bactcr;a/fun"?s
I

0 I
2
i
0.5 I I
- - 29' Wetland !ants in strca
P robed- - - -- - -- - -I FAC = 0:5; - FAG`N = 0
0.5 ?
OBL--1
5
S
° LS
.
-
-
- -
AV = :.0
Items 20 and 21 ,"Deus on the pres_,C° o`up1and p
, la, is, ite 9 focuses on the pr_-,ence of aquatic or ., etland p -,ants.
tan
Other = 0 -
Notts: (us-2 back sidt of this Iomi for additional dolts
)
. Sketch:
Channel A - (near A-011) See FiZm-e _,"
I
I
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1

Date: September 9-12 2005
Proiect• 1780-E

Evaluator: a rigelique Y W C
Latitude 3503795
rews Site. Garmon s Crossing Lon?itude:80
66662
Total P
i
t
I C , .
o
n
ounty: Union
s: I
II Other: (e.g, Quad Name.)
Stream is at least intei.mi tent I V
if>_I9 or perennial if>_30
" Matthews, NC" topographic q
uadrangle
mao
Channel B -Garmons Crossing
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 14.5)

' Absent
l
Weak Moderate
Strom
1
. Continuous bed and bank
I 0 ? 1
2. Sinuosit)? ? 0 I I 1
1 L ,
3. In-channel structure
riffle-
l
;
poo
sequence 0 1 I 2

4. Soil texture or streait; S1bSLi'at
ti 3
e sor
ng I 0
I
1 (
5. lctiveirelic flood
lain 2 3
p 0 1 I
6. Depositional bats or bench 7 3
es 0 1

7.3raided channel
0 2
1 3

8. Recent alluvial deposits 7

1 2
3

9'. Natural levees

?
0 i
i

0. Headcuts I

.
1 I

?

3
I O I 1

11. Grade controls

0 2
I
0
5
I
-
712 . Natural valley or drainageway 0 I .
O
I 1.5
13 Second or greater order channel on existinL, USGS or MRCS 1 1'S
map or other documented evidence No=0 I Yes - 3
Man-made ditclies are not rated s discussions in
manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 1.J)

14. Groundwater flow/dischar,e Absent Weak Moderate ? Strong

I S. Water in channel and =48 hrs since rain'
or 0 1
3
,
Water in channel- dry or F
growin- season
Q
1
16. Leaf litter I I 1
I
17. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0 0

18. Organic debris lines o
il
W 0.5 2
r p
es (
rack lines) 0 0
5

19. Hydric soils (redoximorphie features) present?

No =O .
2
Yes =1:5

' Redrock at 0-3"
C. Biojoav I -
K', ems %u antl 2) tocus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focwes on the presence ofaouatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this Bonn for additional notes.) Sketch:
Channel B (near B-021.- See Figure 4
STREA I QUALITY A.SSESS]?IETTNTT ??70RKSHEET

CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGIO-N POINT RANGE {

coastal
F Pledmont
l Mountain SCONE
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
5
o -

o
= =

O -
5
(no f10',l or satlration = 0: song floe- = max , Ci, - _
.
i
J E? ldence of past human alteration
O - 0
0 - 5
I 0 - 5
i j (e ?C_ ar_ - 0 - O: no - 7a.7G?- ?iax pOin:S) i
Riparian zone I -
0 6 j -
O -
O J i
! I (no 0: contiguous, wide hllrl'vl = r_1a c oln s) I
i
A Evidence of nutrient or chemical dischaz•,es I I I
j (?} t-J 1Si? c a s,na es = 0: .o dis-a_ is = max poi s
( O - J
O -
I O -
I

5 Groundwaterdiscnarg
0-3 j'
0-4 I X
4 (no disc a°ge 0; sp_ings, se° s we7dands etc. =1nax aolnts) p .

r
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
I 075
0.=.n
I 0-2 I
r. I (n0 =100dplaIil = 0; extelSl?re 100dplaln = max pO1ntS)

I= j Entrenchment; floodplain access
-5
0 j'
-s
0

0 -
-
I
(deeply entrenched = 0; _ equent ?looding = max points)
1
I
_
Presence of adjacent wetlands
I 0 o
0
I
I 0 = 2
(no «..tlaDds= 0; lartre adjacent tia-etlands = max points] :
9 ( Channel sinuositl' 0 J

I
0^
I
I 0-3
points)
(extensive channelization = 0: natural meander = max :'..-:... „ . .

10 Sediment input
I
I 0 J
I 0 '?
I 0-4
(extensive deposition = 0; little or no sediment = max points) : >

11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
I NA
0
I
0 - 5 3
(fine, llomogenous = 0; lark; diverse sizes = max points) .

1
I Evidence of channel incision or widening
I 0 J
I 0
I 0 - 5
I
2 (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & .banks = max oints)

13 Presence of major bank failures

I
J
0
0 ?:

I
0'- 5

L 3 .
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)

4 Root depth and density on banks
;,.

0-5 3
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
(

5
1 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production

-5
A. :.,. ;

...
-
0

0
5

4
(substantial impact = 0; no evidence = max points ..
:7 .:.
:. 7

16 Presence-of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes

-
I
0
-6
Q
(no riffles/rip Ies or pools
0; w-11-developed = max points)
ry 17 Habitat complexity 0-6 0 0: -6

0
6
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points
)
;

18
I
Canopy coverage over streambed

I

I

0-5
j (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points

I
19
I Substrate embeddedness

NA*
I-
' :..
0

0-4
I
embedded = 0; loose sL,
(deeply Uc ur e = max points) .
..
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
. (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
v

I ?1

I Presence of
amphibians

I
0_^-

I
p
:I

I
0_4
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points) ' :
: -.::: : - • -

? ?
?
-- Presence offish

0=4 I

0-4 I

0-4
-?
n (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max polnTs)

I

? I --Evidence ofwildlife.use

(no evlde:?ce 0; Qbli-?dant e?vidence = max points)
j --
-. I- -- -
Total Points Possible 100 100 100 .
TOTAL SCORE !So enier 021 l;rst Pac--)
liltse C a7actenst?cs arc not assessed in coasial s?:,ea ns.
2 0 2
USACE AID= D WQ
------------- Site ' I
___,_ (iildlCate Oil ati2Ched map)
STREAM QUALITY A SSESSN1E._ T WORKSIJEET
Provide the Iollo+yina information for the stream reach under assessment:
1 A-pp1'caDlL's nails-: Eaole EnS-ineerino,, Inc.
Evaiua or's na e. _4naeIique Y.??%. Cre?xs
Da 0. eVZI:?i10? jeDtembei o- J
1J _ 2005 s
i, e o ,,alua Iv ;l09,0 arl-? 1_0.0 p
: m
6. RI- er besin: Lower Catawba
. -OT:_c,a
, II G!nl,Igr' a_ l -a. 21.0 a CIe$ b: S._ $nl 0 der. 1/2
?Anp: 21.0 acres 3; S?r!_,aam
9 Length -0 reach evah.zted: _?rear pond
10. Co ln7. 11 Cabarrus
1. Site coordinates
I (ifrs?o;?,•n): pr-ever in decimal den•ees. o ,
Meat i ode ?? . Subdivl ?> an
(e%. 872312) 3j.OJ7?J SIOnn?, ( 5'): ?T
letC10d IOcation d° LT2A.l 0 (C::rCle L or L: d 12(i 77 550011): 80 60002
GPS Topo Sheet O__no (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other:
13. Location ofreach u;lder evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map id nisi ina st*e.-
Rear ila??ing: Channel _4-001 annro?:imateJv 3.000 feet southeast of the irate se } din(s) Iocation):
Indian Trail-'Waxhaw Load. z ctzon of Old Monrnc Road and
14. Proposed channel wo k. (if any)' grading/clearznQ
development
15 Recent weather condir,'ons: dry 85 to 90 degrees Fahrenheit Site conditions at time of visit: Drj 80 fia
hrenhert
16. Trlentl ?r any sT)ecial waterway classifications kno-wn: -Section 10 _Tidal 'Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout ?A7aters -Outstanding Resource Waters -Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation. point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface ar„ma. 1200
square feet.
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad reap? T'ES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil P •? '
Sun .,y. YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use. 20 % Residential % Commercial o
35 % Forested ? ° Industrial 25 % Agricultural
- 0 /o Cleared Other
1
22- BailkfulI width:
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2'
24. Channel slope don=,,n center of stream: Flat (0 to 20%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10% o
25. Channel sinuosity: t ) -Steep (>I 0/o)
_Straight _ Occasional bends ' ^
Instructions for completion'ofworhsheef t:jGquent meander Very Sinuous
(located on Pace 2): Begin by determining - -Braided channel
anon ,n?eam classirication, etc. Every characteristic mu the most app.*o?riate ecore?
shown must be scored using the =ion based on )oithin t ter rage
y or Ah ecoregion. page ^ same ecoregion. Assign points to each characters
3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics should etlect the range
assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. Ifa characteristic cannot be evaluated due to sie or-ntather conditions, sent r 0 cores should bo/ a an overall
an e? _alana:ion in tree comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review rn the scot sng o-J. and provide
forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continui a, -et?L.w (`?°' the stream t rs horn a pasture into a
to a stream reach mu
must range betv/een 0 and 100, with a score of 100 re• resantin? y' and a separate form used to evaluate each h reach. . The total scot e assigned
a stream off the highest quality.
Total.-Score (from- re?7erse);
CCu.m eats.
The internZittent channel dischar?es into an abuttinff pond -,I,itn an estimated water surface area of 9$,4g8_ -.ea
l%7 .I?.
Evaluator's Si-,nature:
This channel evaluation form s nie* d d i
to be used only as!a'g Dare:" -?f1
cquired b the United States Army ` En.-' md. to assist landois'ner$ aad Anvsronmentai professionals in a
Corp? of neers to male z oreliminz assessment of and of stream unlit
4 The total score resulting from the
version 06/03. to eom-:ent, piezse call 9IS-$io-a'!!) r. 20, imply z ry par riculzr mitigation ratio or requirement pot„
^n subject to change -
I oft _
STREATM QUALITY ASSESS?ATE\TT 'WORKSHE•ET
T I CH
4RkCTERISTICS I ECOREGIO1tPOIt'TR4'tGE S
.
Coactal
Piedmont
`? Mountain CORE
?
1 I Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0
is

(n0 .103% Or Sa`Ar2tlOn = d; SiO__g _AvJ - ilan p0ii;1S) 0-? 0
^-
0-5 f
2 Evidence of past human alteration
(eS;tenS?'v-e c_ .,radon= 0: Do aycera _
poin s) d - 0 d. 5 I d - 5 ? J

i _
Riparian zone
(no bi er = 0; contiguous, wid-, bLfer
? = max D6 -'.7,7s)

0-6

0-4

I 0 - 5

?

0

.
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges _

(extens!ve clsch-aes = 0, no discharges = rnax p7i it$)

0-
I Q

I - 0.^

_
' Groundwater d;scharae
I

(no eiscaa_Re = 0;.s-b-
inzs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points) 0, 0_
I
0-
I ?
6
Pi esence of adjacent floodplain
-.

I I (no 'loo I
CID lain = 0; extensive f?oodplain = max points)
0 o
L` 0 -
f 0 - 2
7 Entrenchment / floodplain access ?_.

. (dee 1 % tni, enched = 0; Sequent flooding = inax points)
I 5.
0 -
0 - 2 .
J

8 Presence of adjacent wetlands . - T

(no -,?>edands = 0: lame adjacen wetlands = max points)
I
0 o
I ^
0 0
0 =?
I

9
Channel sinuosity

0 .
4

(z?:tensi?re channelization = 0; ratty-al meander = max points) I 0
IO I Sediment input
(extensive deposition = 0; little or no sediment = max points) I
0-5

(

=.. - .. _ . - .;I

-4
I
1I
I Size &r diversity of channel bed substrate i
^

(fine, homogenous = 0; larffe, diverse sizes = max points)
NA
0
;I I
0-5
1? I Evidence of channel incision or widening '

(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points
I
0 - o
I
0 4' 'I I
0 - 5

I'
points)
Presence of major bank failures
.
(severe erosion. := 0; no erosion, stable banks = max - o I :
0 5 I 0 - 5
14 I Root depth and density on banks

no visible roots = 0• dense roots throughout = max
oints) 0 3
p -
15 I Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
(substantial impact = 0; no evidence = max points) 0 - Q?'.;_.:. = 0 - S . I
16 Presence of riffle-pooVripple-pool complexes

(no ri£7es/ri ples or pools = 0; yell-developed = max points.) 0-3 0 0-6

17 Habitat complexity ' 4

1
(little or no habitat =.0; fre ue-n varied habitats = max points
0-6 -
0=6
0-6 I
1 y I Canopy coverage over streambed

(no shading ve?-etedon = 0; continuous c8n6p = max oints)
0-5
0;= ^.5 I 4
0-5 I
19 I Substrate embeddedness
I 3
(deeply embedded = 0; loose stractu e = max points) NA 0 I 0-4 I

0 I
2
Presence of stream invertebrates
(see page 4)
-
(no evidence = 0; co:_imon, numerous P
'yp..S = maX OiYitS 10- a I 0 0 :I 0- 5 I 0
U ?I ( Presence of amphibians ^
O ` (no evidenc5 = 0; common
numerous tyDeS = max points • 0-- 0 I 0=4 I
,

__ .I
??
Presence of fish

(„o evil nce - 0; cornrY!on, .1?1_•nv, oli$ L °v$ -max D -17$)

'
I I
0 _

^ _
_? _ ^
0-- I
-- O ---
-- ?? --= --Evidence of fvilctIife
(no vii' nce = 0; 2b»ndant evidence = max points)
0-6 . 0 S. - I _
0-5
'I
I Total Points Possible I 100 I 100 I 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on rirstpage)
Ti?est characteristics a'e not assessed in coastal Stuams.
2 0; 7
USAC AID- D VQ
--- --= Site -41, (indicate on attached inap)
STR.EAll7 QUALITY ASSESS?NTEM' N ORKSHEET
Provide the follow nor information for the stream reach under assessment:
L Applicant's nGine: Ea-le Engineering, Inc: ?
• Bvaluai.or's na_ne; Angelique Y.W. Cress
3 Dates ofevaluatio-,: September9-12;2005 , -
4. lime of f evaluation: 090 am-1500 pm
? Na--, Channel
o. R v .;r basin:- Lower Cata-wba
/ "^-_pp oXmate drainage area: 210 acres
se S .earn o-'-der: 1/2
9. LenJa h ofreach oval- ated: Near pond
10. county: Cabarrus
11 Sit-- coo dlinates (i luoval): ? ier, m deci
nai de?rees• 12. Subs visio s clam (11y) T
i a- la x. 34-5723 12" 35.05795 L a ??A
I??Iethod location detennined (circle): l' ongi.aU (ex -7/.SSooI I): 50:ob5b?
1PS Topo Sheet Orrho (A., ;ai) Y not:O/GI-S OtPl„r GIS Other:
13. Location of ream under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identilying \'°ar fIaaains: Chan-001 annroximateIv 3. stream(s) location):
000 feet south ast of the intersection of Old Monroe`I;oad and
Indian 1'rain- xh`nel A Road.
14. Proposed claamiel work (ifanY): grading/clearing development
15. Recent weather conditions: dry, 85 to 90 degrees Fahrenheit Site conditions at time of t: Dry BUFahrenhet
16. Idenout any spec;
Trout 'Waters al Water-way classii cations knoum: Section 10 Tidal '\?Jaters -Essential fisheries Habitat
- _Outstanding Resource Vraters -Nutrient Sensitive 'Waters 1r7at r Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. is there a pond Of lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO Ii- Yes, estimate the water surface area: 1.200
square feet.
IS. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on. USDA Soil. Sur-,%-_Y? )7ES go
21. Estimated watershed land use: 20 % Residential _% Commercial °
35 % Forested ? o _% Industrial 25 % Agricultural
_ 0 /o Cleared _% Other
12. BankfuIl a,idth:
23. Bank height ($om bed to top or"hams):
24. Channel slope down center ofstream. - Flat (0 to 20%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%
25. Channel sinuosity: -Straight - )
_ Occasional bends _?,' Frequent meander
Instructions for completion ofM'Orksheet (located on age 2): _ Very s? luous -!;raided channel
vegetation, stream clessification, etc, F Begin by determining the most ap r
Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecortg P npriate eoorech .'based on 3 thin t terrain,
shown for the ecoregion- Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the character: site or w , lon. Ads. 1 point.,C s each characteristic with
?gin therange
assessmentofthe stream reach under evaluation. !-,^a characteristic cannot be evaluated ? e Or Wteath ath ;n the worksheet. Scores should ref"sect an overall
an explanation in the comment section. Where there due toser conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide
are obvious changes in the character of a stream under moew (e.g. the str
forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that dispJay more continuity, and a Separate form used to ev?),
earn ijoas from a oas ?lre into a
ate each reach. The t
to a stream reach rrlusi range bt`ween 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing senting a stream of the highest quality. otal score assigned
Total Scorn-.(front re-?%erse _-_ -. -_-: _?
- - ---_ ----Comments. -----
e intermittent chnnn-T tTierho r --- ... _ '
Evalulator's Signature: /1 i / - - - ;zth-zlf This channel evaluation fora is nt8nded be used only as / Date: - /T y
required b the unite t aide to assist landowners and environmcnfaI professionals an ering the data
by d States army Corp of Engineers to make a
comrilctro-1 of this form is subject to TJSACE approval and does not Pm ar?ssessment of stream quality. The total score resulting
ply a particular mitigation ,from the
V rsion 06/03. to co-,men`, please call °i 9 -870-8':=.l r.36.- on ratio or requirement. Form subject to change _
1 oa" 2
46 C.
?sir. Derek Lawson
10/11/2004
Page 7 of 9
m
J[?I ,
We trust this proposal meets your current project needs. If you have any questions or
require additional information, please feel free to call at your convenience.
Sincerely
EAGLE EI GINEERING, LiNc.
f?
Jo n H. Ross, P.E.
rincipal
authorization to Proceed
The scope of work referenced in the attached Proposal No. 040529 dated April 14, 2004
(revised October 11, 2004) is acceptable, and Eagle :Engineering, Inc. is authorized to
proceed.
BY: PI
Signature Dat Printed
For: Book Construction, Inc.
Proposal for Civil Engineering and Land Surveying Serraices
Helms Tract- 32 Acres (-/-)
Indian Trail, TTorth Carolina
EEI Proposal No. 040529 (revised)
! ~
Y ~ \ \ ~ ~
O ~ 1 ~ ~ ~
~ \ \ ~ N •+•;.aw ~~ra s s 'J}'.c~'i.Ir?~?!;' r.',~1t'.'~;{)f>4 ~ ro U cv
\ ' P D ~ r ~ ,:t i r~ ' N o
~ ~ \ ~ • v \ ~y?}G~' i~ft' F~~~}'r~'`t~i;i Y 'ca 0° on 1 ti ~
~ ~ ~ ~ + T \ , t~ P ~ ~,1.. ~ q ~
t S~ 0 ~ ' o \ rfi ~ ~ ti~~+ ~ y
~ a„ .ice \ \ ~ \ ~YY M Y V \ t ~ aMl ~ 4 .t~.v~.~ .7.....9 rr...r~ ~ ~ H ~ O o
t ' ~ ~ b~r~ ,f• I-r iE m r'' t}i.J.v. ~ r~. dir. t~,.~ oCt.,W
tij \ ~L~~>'7a r'Cr~~Pt:S 1~`dCOri'P!;~~r?'lt~, c~, ~ W W t~~, ?~?tfz/~3~:..' ~~i4~-~~t~>'"J r'?, ~r V'in~r U~»'~J~%,~' s
~ \ ~ . w..,4;, „a jf)ii' !1I,3 Cr?'9~ E'l7t y' ~ n r~~, r r ~ .
R ~ '1'11:11:;:;, J l~rrr 1111.x^ \ \ \ \ 'E~ .S>^ Q / , ~x ~~r1:~F.(. ~5+(,~°-?'1l1._..C~.~Jh~ \ rtffP,77/~~ ~ ~y ' .,.t r, •;ty ~ c„ .lr CtJ.y .J:J 1, r ~r ~ ~r~~'c``~t~~ t;~-rf f~,<;`;~;rY` V'I~ ~°~,R}~'!.~ 1<<..Y r ' t:' ^ ; "F'1 7-? i ~ ~
':'i;1'' ~ t A•A' r r•q o .l r.-. , rr r?. Y e 5t), ? ~ .'t'~ .~y t'M ~ ~ ~irdr. } Lnti~i. J~rl..r3,t~r' \ ~ ` ~ G; C.) ty:. c,. ` , r
1 ,ny + \ .w,~~; 05,, f1 • ; d \ \ i ~ ~ ~ ~ R
d K'~ \ v . s ' /Cj o;;sc;:: (e+r Y'sl ,.'fT i'~tr~; n7c._r+. c.r ~ ~ ~ \ 4.,, '"r.'. .t~ -~~~,"~.r,~s }~'C~~41 (Jr ,~~,',~iLrL,~L}' (p g~/'...`ri~:...K~jrf i;:r~i~p~ \
t ,a T e A 0 ,I s~..,~ N xfr. ~m .f^ ~ yp paque Screenrn (Sect. 71..,SrP,C,. ,
\Y'Lt ;yF \ p R ~ hrR'~~ ~ ~ i• ~v ~ ~ ~ - ~ 193(a)) Appendix C , -6 ~ % ; h v
v'~sy .~tr~~'~ ' 7r~pftf~u: ~.t 10 Landscaping Easem nt - ~
\ o : ~
t _S 4675'17" W ; \ , ~ \ ~ jl M / M ~i
Nar To sca~~ S 46~456 W ~ 1• 177.92' 9260 1 .5 20.1 \ -a'- SS =r SS _ S 455 38 W S 45541 W ' ~ .44r 57.59 25.Oi
_ _ _ 80.00 8000 \ 21,97 \ 21.97 _ 7. 1 39.4 58.63' 34.93' _ . ~M .80!04 ~ _ _ ,
~ 12.5' REAR YARD g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1N3MV3SV3 SS~~ IL.D71CCAr< - , ~ 12.5 R r ~7 ~
~ ~
N' 41 40 m 45 43 N 42 0 " ~ 3 i r' ~ . , ~I~,.,cc. 39 ~ ; ~ V 34 33 y 32 ~ i~~~; ~ 1;fr~., .,y r,rs
t 17,946 si ~ 10 013 sf. 10,002 sf, ~ 9,809 sf. y. ~ ~ ' 10,015 sf. $ ~ $ 0.23. ac. $ 0.23 oa ~ 11,58 0.41 ac. $ _ 0.23 a o 11!587 Sf. ~ ~ ~ r ' ~ " 201241. sf. 81580 sf. µ W N , . ( G t J: ~o 1 n ! N w 8,413 s pp , f"i"' } . ~f ~F;~.,~~c'r:d
~ 4'1 N 023 ac. ~ ~ 0.27 w ~ \ 13,478 si, ~ 25' SETBACK m ~ 0.27 ac. h ~ E . o, 0.46 ac. 0.20 ac. ~ 0.19 c. ~ ~ .,n .:r ~ . 66 ~ rn f ! .p r 1~.}.}~.~
~ w 0.31 ac. ~ 38 ~ 35 ~ , , ; ~ I }7,157 sf. 12,282 sf. ' ! •a+ ! ~
L3evelopmenf Dafa: ; \ r \ Zy \ 1, _ , 0.39 oc. m 0.28 ac. ! t tl?` r pq{ ~ ~ . 30' SETBACK 30 SE'18AC ~ ~/.~1?yl,^1v: I:?_.. ~6 , I : 30 SETS ~
~ ! ~ ~
. N \ k6~ , a s8, j , Tax Parcel Parcel. 07-114-023, 07-114-023A, ~ ~ ~ y / ,ra~~°'•0/ N_~_+__-____,-._ ~ s ~ P ,I o s 36 34 ~ .er
8 V b $ 07-114-024, 07-114-0258, & 07-114-025C ~ o ~ $ 8 ~ 10611 sf. I ~r ~
.t N ~ ~ 61 ~ 0.24 ac. ag' ~ ~ . , i ~ (n + c O
o+` A / 69.67 ,l~.~ i k2 80.00 Current Zoning: R-20 ~ fi ~ 46 ~ ~ ~F ~ ~ $ ~ i lli? E_ +
Pro osed Zonin : R-6 CUD N ?o .16,199 sE • ~ ~ P~ M ~ p g ~ ..rr-° 15 - ?
Total Acreage: 22.31 Acres ~ ~ ~ 0.37 oa ~ 25 SETBA 4
u! ° ~ ' ° \ ~ i ° 13,696 sf. ~ ' ~...r-- ~ • 79.71 ~E' ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 9 ~ v, ~ r~ t 67.00 i • ; 2,909 f, ~
' ' ~s o _ 9,210 sf. ensity R-6. ~ ' ; a'~°• Z 7 52 w ~ << ~nw N i G ~ ~ m 0.21 ac. o~ 58 0.31 ac. / ~ 1 ~ A ~ ~ at 3 g8 ~ o.o
Acreage. 2231 Acres ~ w ~ ; ~ o /P ~ 9,073 sf. w ro aL 6 51 o o i 9,2 244 sL / -6 ti a J 96.72 ~ ~F
Minimum 6,000 sf. = z ~ ~50•~ ~ q 9945 sf, 0.21 ac. ~ ,rvi 0.21 ac. v a+'a / i~ h ~ 0.23 ac. ~ - ky :21 aC. ~ ~ ~ _ 34 ~ 100.00 OE YARD ~ curl FAf?t,...!. ~)r...r{.f...~:t.r 6 ~ ~ 10'51 t ~ ~ i N ~ ,`f'~ 1R~~ i~ i~ l.ff./ r4 ti ~ p~j
60.23 units aflawed 2.7 Units\Ac. lQ ~ ~ N ~ i 1 15 ~ 1981 af. , 4,G
60 unit a .J~~ ' i ~ s prov~d.,d 2.7 Units\Ac. n. w / ~ ~ ~ N, ~ 100.00' ~ / ~ ~ n(24 ~g ~ 8000 sf. $ i ° + t~a•r, ~ 9 '~`'9 ~ : l p oo+~ ~ 0.16 ac. ~ 0:~r,, 6,~, 'x
1r. • e ~ N t - - ~ ~ ~ 47 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " Setbacks: ~ ti ~ Z ~ ~ 9V $ ~ i ~ ! 0.17 ac. $ ~ $ ~ $ a ! ' ~
~ N 1T,142 sf. w y,6 85.00' ro a 36.96 5! 59 ~ ~ ~ p ~
Minimum got ~tidth 60 0 ~ w 97.83' ~ _ 56 ~ ' 9,031 c7i ~ ~ f0 1 sf. ~t 0.21 v 9,031 sf, ~ ~ t? . . ~ 14 ~ ! ~ t . ~ g ~ 9,731 sf. ~ 1 i ~ 0.21 ac. r ~ l ~ ~ w.~,..
Minimum Front Yard 25 ® rn ~ i I ~ ~ x s oo d o :}o0 0.23 as t , 99.81' . M......... N s a• . ~ 0.21 ac. ~ t ~ ! 100.00.
Minimum Side Yard - 10 ~ s ~ °f a `D• 'd 50 ~ a Q ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ 15 PEE
Minimum Side Street - 15 N ~ 10,049 sL ~ , 04 sf. ~ w ~ - - - ~ 0.23 ac. $ ~ 10,1 ~ .a 0 N N ~v , ~ ~ 16 I i 7989 sf
Minimum Rear Yard - 12.5 w ~ o W _0.23 ac. Q I- _ ~ ~ p0 0, z h 8,91 af, ~ . ~f. 1 ~ ' ~ ; ~ CEO R MINE ,000 sf. o , 0.16 ac. ? _ ~ 13 $
Maximum Height - 35' 130.00' ~ N 02 ac. N N ~ i 100.00 9 /~S 'CRE .16 ac. pp g Qa g w O 9 Si ~ 9 950 sf
+ l ~ 0,23 as ! ~ ~ oo+t ~
~ { ~ ! 4i
N 100.00' 100.00' M ~ ' ' ~ v\~' ~ ~ 99.90' ~ ~ ~ ~ / 1~ ~ ~ ~ i 100.0 ~
~s ~ 10,100 sf. ~ n ~ ~ Q ~ w~ , 1itz4 ~4 1ti.2 ~ i , - { ~ , ~ I 15 e+ 2 ~ ~ ` t> / { ~ ~ pal
o ~ 15,714 sf. l ~ ~ 0.23 ac. N w 49 / ~ ~ 0,36 ac. ~ ~ 54 w
10,018 sf. ~ , ~ ~ _ ~ 10,136 sf, ~ , 2$' D00 of °D o 9s sf. ~ N w12l678 sf ~ ~ ~ 8, 0 1,9 .~a QO • I• ~ 8 ~
N ~ 0.23 ac. ~ 2 ! ~ 0 0.23 ac. *~i a ~0 $ 8 ~ w 0.29 ac. 0. is as S $ 0.16 ac. V ~ ~ ~ D ; C' ' g i I ~ ~ ~ 15,398 sf. ~ ~ ! I I i ~ ~
~ ~ 25 SETBA M by P ~{''t• s~ 9 ~ ~ 1 ~ 0.35 ac. • f ,i>~ ~
E.' ~ ' 1 ' - '~o ~ ' / 4 ~ r ! rA1
_ ~ •i 99.99 ~1 ~ ` ~ 1 ~ 140.00' ao+c ~ ~ ...~77n~a,.v(,'~} ~ r1) ~,,;;~G A'
~ ,,°X r ~ /g .1 1~ ,t , ~ ~ ~ I+.,.. i ~rh?Jrt~ ~ ~ 15,398 sf. ! N i ~ ply
' ~ 1= V ~ I7~ IW I~ LC7 X1 p,~YY j~r~t~~.,~'~I Jr7...f1~....~~ ~ ~ rM' 0.35 aC. ~s'~'"! ~ oo rh~' ~ ~ ~1 1 ~ ~ o
~ R~ 043 ' ~ ~ 18 i~ ° 8,Q05 sf. ~p t~'~J~e~ (?f~ '"L~3,~~.:~?t"'i ~..Y ~ $•1 c ~P ~ ~ 3 r ;x Q a$ ~ ' ! BAR ~ a. ~ i P ~ ~ ~ > f $ 8,000 sf. irg i~ ac. w ~ i,~~ ~ ~Cdy
~ `:'rn 8 8 h ~ fk P 1 `C ~ r Lvi~ii ~e C: L~.... ~1
5 ~ ' f1 sf. _ _ x5 ~ i 511 sf. 9 44. < ~ ° W
; - - - - .53 ./P(~ . 0,29 ac. ~ 51.85 24.71 73.00 90.23 ~ 83,50' - 13 ~ 1g o ~9 ac. ~ ~ t I ~ ' 9 i' 1 i ` > ~ t~.13 00
~ ~2 y ~ a 15 398 sf. ? ` ~ 100.00 °
~ v o - - - - - - ~ 25 SETBACK 5 y~ ? 0.35 ac. 0 3o~~A~ sE. I I ~ ~ ~ N ~ h 12 536 ~ , 1~ N oo r ' U
1 1$031 sf. $ 'h 10 ~ 0 9 ac. ~ I t , 27 $ ~ 9392 sf. ~ r ~ 1 ~ 19 ; ~ .8,018 sf. $ ;n
~ 2 3 4 0.28 ac, Do ' ~2 748 s 14,834 sf. $ 1 f g 12,114 sf. $ 15,470 sf. N $000 s • ' ' 0 000 sf.~' ~ 0.22 ac. r 1 ,r ~ B, ~ $ 0.16 oc. g ~ , r $ 0.16 a~ ~ I i .
0.06 c, 0`~ ac• g 0.28 ac. ~ 0.28 ac. $ 0.36-oc. g 1so.
'i ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ o~ ~ ~ ---12 REAR Y ~ j i , BARD ~ , ~ r 0 ~ °
~ ~ v~'• 125' REAR YARD ~ - - > , S 5y t ~ ~ i ~ • ~ 1114 W r.. ' ~ ~ 100.27
'3 . 30.00' 148.00' ~ 90.23 75..1 f ?9, N u7 ~ 326.90 508', 100.00 i ~i ~
S 46'14 43 W 454. ~ ~ 37 S ea ~ 58 49 s4 . ~ ~ ~ 1 • ' ~lW ~1 l1D O
~ , 43 W v' ~ J ' W~ ~ ~ 20 0o I o Z~ G ~ ~ 0~ ~ o e,ooo af. 8,017 aE
~ , 113. , 48 ~ ~U? ~i2 ~ g o09 $ $M Z ~ + (~~b $ 0.16 ac. ~ ~ 0.16 oc. ~
t ~ x ~ ~ w
x.98,720 ~E ~ - w ' I f. ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 727.' oc. -
i ~ 'i~ 11~ ~ r° j• p. w ~ I ~ ~ , 100; ~ _L J. Jt ~
100.00 ~ , ~ ~
' ~ I` Common Area Amenltles: ~ N ~ 5 • ~ r^I, n
Th f I ~ . ~ ' ~ 21 w V 0 ~ .p id.1, 7 h..I. 'C f The common o en s aces will be ( • , • ~ << $ ~ e o01 af. , • ; • • ~ c, P A 1 V1 8,839 af. ~ t~ k , .,rnt,.,~ 1:?~? ~
~ ~ us $ $ 0.16 ac. used as passive recreation areas o.1s oc. ~ f;f.~),r, o
whe ~ a ~ ' ~ ~ ~ where suitable and wiN include such ~ ~ , ~+o a~ . ~ ~
s feat 1 ~U1~~~,. f •1 ~ d~ m features as icnic tables, bb rills, ~ ~ 1~ ~ N P 9 9 ~ ' ~ N
l ~ r I . loooo and a n areas. ~ r ! ' + o 00 , ,y
89 ~ ~ ~ ePB! z ' ~ AREA' \ 3 ~ st 3 w r t' ~ ~ Uf ~
~ •r'..~'.' i w ~ ~
' f / ~ ' a' ~,u,; x P~ ~ 8 210 sf
~f ~ 0.18 ae. ~ o i
/ 0p c N r ~ ~ ~ I!
' ~ ~ ~
/ ~ ' i a' Z i 1 ~ ~ ~ m
r ~ ~ ~`~`.~...i..7~F_r, t,c..c..r..~ ~ / ~ ~
~t yr,>~ , t.~lrw~ - ~ f• . / ~ ,q _.riir w
~ v
/ _ - i~ ~ ~ 23 ;Jet, I ~ , 0 ti
14,427 sf. tp ~aJr3 ,.1k, , ul~~~M.k~, r ~ ~ a / ~ - & X30 aG ~ ,7~~}'~Jrrlrt.,,
/ 22 / ~ - _ 11,287 sf, a, ~ti~pu+u~ut!'a
~ ~ 0.23 ac.
,r ~ ~
GRAPHIC SCALE ~ 1~Ep-g,~
D 30 tl0 .136.21, .102 _ g ° r x, ri ti ~ ;rq.~w
~ / ~ - " W 204.74 : c.,-''~ ~ ~ ; 5 43 53
/ ~s~ ~4~ , ~
(IN FEET ) i~,~; „c.~
1 inch = 80 ft. , ryri ~~~h / ~ , u,r Vr t,l`rrf%l~ t,G't~l~,, n,~~~
log
FLOOD NOTE:
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON DOES
NOT LIE WITHIN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD v `?'e IIEET
AREA PER F.E.M.A. FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL #3717900080 C, DATED r`
JULY 5, 1994 2. 0
X: Land Projects R2 1780-C-NC Book Const. Indian T \ ) \ rail\dwg\Sheet Set\C-2.0 Site plan-resldentiaLdwg 11/11/2005 4:16:43 PM EST !LIF I

\ o• ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~
~ \
\ . P o \ ~ o
~ , , ~ \ ~ ~ ~ r;'PC~1vPl+,S ~i, tQ: t~'i~'}?~~r~ f~, ~~d'E,%~>~?~ C%;Li.~:+')?a>-~ ~ `Y l N N n 44 wU~
LN. \ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P / , , r. j~~LJ~,7 f'•U'!\~~th:(~J.Y rl.~llj/,~~i~ r zN O
~(N ~ ~ E o ~r;~~'ti'l~h' ~•~~ifr~?~cr~i Y ~ ~ ..goo a f,~ • o0
~ \ ~ ~ 1 ~ «s:; q o
•xr ~ ~ rA~~ ~;~~r..`Y'i, frr~;l.~ P P ~-%.3 i , 1 ~ ~ O
n„ °;1 !1 " ~ ~ . rl..wtrc, ~1 1 c • w.34 ~ c- lH~.}P~~~a A. li4'~.}P~Pi~a A. N`.' }>1fJ^i~{c tt' O p
P 0 / i ~ x~" • . , tr r, ~
F is s`i;c; , \ r~.!!h; '~G7.i a.,~1 ` fu ' a i 1 WW s
D ':,5;; „~-r ~ N?h' Ord f~•G~4't F°~~ `;a ~ , a ~ ~ : ~ r n ~ . ~ \ rfw r \ C1 ~7 . ~ t ~f$' / ,~,>.,t:t. >~`uf ~-O.~a•A \ /~p,)r~)~ ~ Est • .s~ ~r/~~~ r r'~r~Jt~'' nn r~`Gri'PY1P;"R1 Y r,Q(,'CO>ti1 }s~P~%i~•5 ~
~~"2;i V p~•p~ r r. rA \ L'. ~J. Ylry lJ, .r ..d /_Jt 1/r`~r~rY~ Cr~{~1. Jf'i1..A~~1: \ ~ ~ ;fl i;,~ 1 s \.n f i 0r~~?tVv ;^i--~~ ~ I Nf?;-Y O,u !"'urRr':3+: h1. Y 1 r ' f,~ t~u,~~ >~k:! P i ~-.~~w~~~'/~C
.f. ~ r ~ ~ , .
t N!;;rl ,~R t Ur;k~~b1.Y ~ \ ~ jam.+,r<
Type-A, Opaque Sc~ening (Sect ` 7. r;h~1.~'f,': i3••• ~1 N l~s~ ?~iYf r
) ~ r , Y' 1 SS \ a , ~1 193(a)) APPendi~, "C", -6 a 43 % i 3
10' Landsca in Eoseml~nt ~ .'t?rvlyd;
9. -
1 - J .a~ _ 1 ' \ • rvor ro scA~E ~;i : S ; - - 1 _ ~
1. 487517. W S 4614' ~ \ - 177.92 g~ ~ w "s' SS ' i 80 .57 SS - - - -'"-T - --$S ~ . S '3B" W S 45'55'41' W ~
.201 80.00 80.00 o - - - - C- - - - 21.97 9.4 9.4 58.63 34.93' ~ = ~ _ ~ _ .8004 . ~ 57.59 25.01
1 o ~ 12.5 REAR YARD - - _ _ ( , ~1 I ~ ~ ~ 1N3Yi3SV3 STS ,OZ- ~ i . ~ - - ~ ~ 12.5' - R - - ~ ~ ~
N, <; to 45 41 ~ 40
43 N 42 e a ~ 1 11,946 af. ~ 10 15 10,013 sf, f0,002 sf. p 9,809 sf. y, 39 / ~ ~ f ~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~ ~
N ~ 0.41 oc. ~ c~? ,0 af. $ 0.23 oc, g 0.23 oc. $ 0.23 ac. ~ 11,587 si. rt 44 N 0.23 oa ~ 0 7 1 32 ~ T>~;: +~~~;~,r:~ ~f 3• 33 ~ ~ h ~
\ 13 478 s1. ~ 0.2 as h ~ G~ - 25 SETBACK X60 M \ I ' I I " 2Q24~ sf. 8,560 sf. ~ 8,413 s w cv ~iJ%--I P r-~~'Pu~~ 1~ I ~ ~ . ,off I $ I 0.19 c. ~ ~ ~ i',i~ i.. ~('r:l~It~,A 0.46~ac. 020 as
031-aa .~gP \ 38 i 38 ~ 35 ~ r
1 si \ , ~ ~ 17,151 of Develo menf Data; ~ 1 m \ \ ti~ ~ b U 39 ac. 17,151 sf 12,182 sf. ~ ' l j°,'n ~n U 39 ac. gym. U 28 oa 1 ~ ' ' I ~ ~ w :r; 5 i( ~ i
;:i'' \8?' 6; ~.?a G'~ 81.1' ; ~ • 30' SETBACK ~30' SE>'BACK~ ~ ~ ()?r'iPiG: r'?-°~P
k6% 't~P Tax Parcel Parcel; 07-114-02 - - \ 3, 07 114 023A N ~ , 36 ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~e _,61.w.} l 8x00' t' ~
025C o ~ i zo~a--_-_~ 07-114-024, 07-114-0258 & 07-114- s ~ ti - 1 - / 10,617 sf. ( ~ f' ~ ~
N 6g g 1 ~ 1 1s, / ,ter-----; - / Current Zonin R-20 0.24 ac. 8' ,
9 1 to 1 0'` P 69.61` •lx.~ 2 8. ~ 9 Pro osed Z ni ~ ~f j ~ k 000 ~p s p o ng. R-6 CUD 181 f E z / ~ \ 11,8 ~ a to ~ ' o I -
Total Acreage: 22.31 Acres o, w 0.37 oa ~ - ?
W ~ ~ ` N ~ 25 SE18A o / o ~ 1 57 w o 1 r
Density R-6: o,os• 0 9210 sf ^ \ ~g ~ i • , ~ 13,696 sf / ` ' ~ ~ f ' g 79.71 CE ~ ~ ~
52 ~ w~ Acrea e: 22.31 Acres i ~;wt'' T ~ ~ ' oo ao 0.21 as ~ ~ 0.3f ac j %j ~ ~..?ti' I (`67.00 31 ~ ~ 2,909 ~af.$• ~
Minimum ~ ~ p ~P y 9,073 sf. ~ 6,000 sf, a a /,Z6 51 of ^ .9,244 sf. ~ I , 0. ' ~ ~ ~ : ~ • ~ 99.72
5d 0.21 ac. ~ N 1 ~ ~ . / 1 / ~~h 0 9,945 s1. t~ ~ 0.21 ac. + ~ \ 60.23 units allowed 2.7 Units\Ac. ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ 0.23 oa h - ~h _s \ w 8~~1 06 ~ ~ r;. I 100.00' 1p' SIDE YARD I j TAX ~AR~;FP ~'J1....11:;...~it(; ~ $
m / units provided 2.7 Units\Ac. ..J $ cA~ 1 ~ l ~ a G7c?~~
~ ~ 1 ~ ry ~ 100_00 ~ ~ ~ AI ~ R124' /9 ,I ~ 15 0 7,981 ef. t 1 ~i y,ta A \
setbacks: ~ rr~ ~ 47 0 , - ~ 4~ cn ~ ~ ~ NI " l ~ " S +I ~ ~ o B,O~ sf ~ ac. I r..OP41,a1 t~...,,~ o, ~ ,cry f . ~ ' 8 0.17 0~. A~ m±~' ~ $
~ Minimum Lot Width - 60' ~ o 17,142 si. ~ ~,6ti I~ a 36.96 z ~ 0.39 oa 1 8500... i~ a 59 lay , $ j , I~ D.16 1 . ~ 1, ~ 14 III i ~I 1 ~ P~„r ~I M z ^
s• F w 983' = 56 9,031 af. N Minimum Front Yard - 25' 1 Q ~ o; ~ - 1 10,001 af. 0.21 ac. / .fig, 9, 737 sf i j - ~ N
Minimum Side Yard - 10 w o w io ~ , 1 ~ s ~ o ~ ~ ~ 0.23 oc. ) ~ I _ cC 0.22 as ~ I ~ 99.81' N
Minimum Side Street - 15 d, 1 50 ~ ~ Q a o ;'•y\ M N 10 049 st. ~ 53 ~V~ ~ ~ I ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 100.(10•' 15 PEE ~
1 a 10,104 sf. OI 'w ~ Minimum Rear Yard - 12.5' - 0.23 c. $ ~ N ~ ~ N ~ l o ~ ~ of Q ~ ~ ! m• 16 ~ 1,989. sf. r,
~ ~ d 0.23-ac. ~ ~ - ~ ~ Maximum Height - 35' ~ ~ ~ ~ h 8,91 sf. + 1i, 130.00 • 1s
- ~ N 0.2 ac. ~s 1 N N 1 iD0.00 9 o , _ 1 ~ ~ 13\ \ (I ' CE~J R DUNE ,000 sf, o i ~ I 0.16 ao. ~ ~ N ~ 9,950 sf, ~ CRE gl .16 ac ` ~ ~ i$ $ 00
1 ~ ~ 1 ^ I 0.23 as I . ~ I ,f ~ ~ i ~ ~ I :I'
J ~ 100.00' N + , ~ - W~l y
~ - ioaoo ~ 55 1 99.90 ~ ~ ~
w ~ ~ n ~ 1~2 cn, ~ ~ Q 1 $1 10,f00 a1. ^ ~ 111,24 r>. o ~ 15,714 st. ~ t '1 ~ ~ 0.23 ac. 15''"".,• X24 1 ,21 ~ I f . ~
N, w ~i 49 ~ 3 p~f . 1 rn 036oc. 54 6g
1 1n : ~ .10,018 sf. M 2 \ ~ 10136 sf. w 1 .0.23 oc. a s ~ 8 ' \ ~ IWt2~678 af. ~ i $ 8,000 sf, o ~ 7.996 sf. ~ ~ ~ ~ GQ
1 0 023 oc. apl, N t~ ~ 8 w 0.29 oc. ~ / $ I 0.16 QF I $ ; 0.16 ac. ~ v ~ ~ 15,398 sf, ~ ~ ~ ~y ~ ~f j i ~ ~ y
~I ~ , . ~ / 15,398 sf. ~ __J ~ E g " 25 SETBA - M y+ pS,O S ;'l ~ ~ 0.35 oc. 0.35 ac. ~ ~ ~
, ~ , pSpE..~ .15 P b ~ , ~ ~
'9?' . ~.1 • ~ y i ' ~ ~ ~ oo~r 99.99' E"I ~ y \ N'Ai~~~19CtGJ r' r O 4~
r P 7 $ ~ 15,398 sf. 1~ ~y ~ j ~ ~ 10(1.00 W ~ N r , ~ ~Z!,~~,I~ .5~ ~ O
_ ~ 0.35 ac. ~ I ~ 28 ~ ,.t r,, . „f ~t
CA , pR~ N /1 133' 18 p I~ ° I 8,005 sf. ~r , rr~~'~~• ~ r~
1 ~ 8 $ , R~/ + / • ,,~3 6 y o°, / ~ r ( f $ I~ 8000 sf. $ 0.16 ac. O kk• ' ~ > ~ 0.16 ac. ~ i • ~ ~ P f'a``~ ; irj ~ ® r C~
• ~ 13 511 s . 2• 6a / - - 2. 1 9 ~ 9~ 44. ! ~ o I ~ ~ C ~
. ' 51.85' 24.71 73.00' - ; .53 / G~ 0.29 ac. / ~ ~ ~'1 90.23 83.50 73 ~ ~•igP ~0 9 9 ~ ~ w
o,' 25~~, / 15,398 sf. 5,398 sf. ~ 111 I ~ ~ I ` ~ (00.00' 100.13 ~ I ~
25 0.35 oc. 1 SETBACK 5 pti / ~ 10 ACK 12536 st~ ~ ' ~ ~ N ~ oo r ~ ~ 27 ~ p
1 12,031 sf • C 2 3 4 ~ / s \ 0 9 ac. ~ I i 392 sL I ~ 19 ~ ~ .n
N 2,748 a 14,834 sf. $ $ 1 114 ~ 0.28 oc, 0.34 oc. 12,000 sf. 2, sf. 15,470 sf. .p y<; 0.06 c. g 0.28 ac. $ 0.28 oa $ O.J6 as ~ 0.22 a~. , ~ ,l I / ~ 8,000 af. ~ o:°s Q
~ ~ ~ 9 180 ' ~ ~ ' ~ ' ' . / $ I o.1s ac. S ~ .
1 ~ a _ 12.5' REAR YARD iD , , .~12.S~fAR YARD. I I P I I ~ I _ I r U1
- - ~ S 5211 14" 30.00 148.00. ~ ; ~ W W 326.90' -.,..t ~ ~ 100,2
90.23 75.11 ~ 520$'' ~ 100.00 s I I ~ ~ U
S 46'14 29 ~ cv • 43 W 454.37 ~ co S 58' 8~s4' d' P ~ ,'~~`~W ~ ~ ~I OD Q
1 1 Og 43 cn 1 ~w 20 $ a+ 26 $
11J48, r' ~ 2 ~ c B,000 sf. I $ oo}o ~ 8,017 sf. $ M = ~ I j $ ~ 0.t6 ac. ~ ~ 0.16 ac. ~
t ~ 98,720 tf. - ~ - ~.1 m ~ ~ w Q ~ ~ ~•72Z'oc.~ ~
1 I ~ ~ ~ r 1 100.11' A ~ U . -
! 1~.~ L J. ~ ~ O / ~ r r, ,
1 Common Area Amenit 1 , I ' i area Amenities: I~ I I ~ ir,~, i I 21 ~ ~ 25 ua • ~~!~~'.~,l,r
`'j>'<< rl'1e I common open s aces P teen spaces will be ~ , ~ / ' x`.< $ 'I ~ I soot 8r. ~ ~ ~w ~
r,.-. used as ass' 1ve recreatlol I~1? ~ f°Ar~2c,?:.t. ~c.i 1....114... Gy',1;,4 p ~e recreation ~ 6,639 of i ~ ~ ~r„•,t~f"/>! s' ~ areas ,f $ a1s a~. ~ ~ ,g a1s a~. ~ :r5ti,_. ~
,Gh~c;rr. d, c~C tar1G/u{{'i ' r a~,~ where suitable and will ,inclc 0?4 , <<1~"F , Ind will ,include such ~oo J a ? ~ I x 'v;': ~ ~
1tiU1L~~~~ features as plcntc tables, b ~ ao~o _._..J 3 00 I1'c tables, bbq grills, ~ , 1' ~ ¢ m ~
c`dv"•'~>>~ c~? ~or'rM~r~~Y and o en la ~ P p y area t ~ J ~ d. NI ~ s play areas. ~ ~ ' • ' ~ ' , ~ ~ 100,00 0 00l - ~ ~
Zrr~dr?~U..k-2~~
i ~
, ~ ' . iNahsh' ~ ~ } ,y a o
~ ~ ~ • ',a~; c~ ~u~' ~ ~ ~ 8,210 sf, ~ ~ ~ ~ JV VU 1 ~ ~ g ~ 0.16 OC. , ~7 ~ O
,
~r ~ , r
~ f Q
, ~ ~ X ~ t YIY~,>~~ ti ~ ~ ~ ~ UENR -WATER GlJALIT'Y
/ ~cl r~ ci 23 N „r,~£ ~ .~a.~~ 11.~NG1ShNl?S?tA~RB. u
i i k:~ 14 427 si. I ¢ A,~r s°~;rt' , m
~ , l~ ~I V U ~ 22 ~ 0.30 ac, ~ ' ~ 7:7~~Iw;"~~~ --20 ' ' ° 1~
~ ~ 11,Z87 sf. rn ' ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~„uwrru,''
GRAPHIC SCALE ' k1 ~ ~ ~ 0.23 QC. 1 o ~~i ~ 1 ~
-$o ~ ~ oo / / , / , ~ ,>F, , ~ _ ~ ~ 125 REa~AR~1
~ ~ `y~~~-~,~ ~ vS ~ }02.45' c ~ / u. nY~ 136.21 ~ _ ~
~ i / kF"~`k ~ ~ , _ ~ .e.~-r nn ~~r end 7d' - ~-~k t.
4+0 DO 41- ~~,1 `kXl~~`~~~~~~~~~y~~~~ ~ ivy., ~ ® f~ •
! IN FEET
1 inch - 80 ft, / GI
FLOOD NOTE: a F9 PA t f f'il
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON DOES
NOT LIE WITHIN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA PER F.E.M.A. FLOOD INSURANCE RATE Y 2005 NO
MAP. COMMUNITY PANEL #3717900080 C, DATED ~EnAQS WA
JULY 5, 1994 k`Ji Mfr, !a}tr"'l; j...? SHEET
X: \Land Projects R2\1780-C-NC Book Const. Indian Trail dw Sheet S -
\ g\ et\C 2.0 Site plan -residential. dw 11/11/2005 4:16:43 PM 9 EST