20052086 Ver 1_Complete File_20051118

O?O? W AT F9QG
_1Vw1%-0!!?S q

Ms. Melanie B. Womble
5332 Hwy 58N
Wilson, NC 27896
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
February 13, 2006
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ Project # 05-2086
Wilson County
Page 1 of 3
Subject Property: 5332 Hwy 58N, Wilson, NC
UT to Toisnoit Swamp, {27-86-11-(4-5) WSIII, NSW}
Approval of Neuse River Riparian Buffer Protection Rules Minor Variance [15A NCAC 2B
.0233(9)(b)]
Dear Ms. Womble:
You have our approval, in accordance with the conditions listed below, to impact approximately
72 square feet (ft ) of Zone 2 of the protected buffers to construct a storage shed at the subject
property as described within your variance request dated November 17, 2005, and received by
the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on November 18, 2005. This letter shall act as your
Minor Variance approval as described within 15A NCAC 213 .0233(9)(b). In addition to this
approval, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required Federal, State or local
permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and
Sediment Control regulations.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change
your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the
property is sold, the new owner(s) must be given a copy of this variance approval and is
thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. This approval requires you to follow
any conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. No Zone 1 Impacts
No impacts (except for the "exempt" uses as identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233)
shall occur to Zone 1 of the protected riparian buffers unless otherwise approved by the
DWQ. No impervious surfaces shall be added to Zone 1, unless otherwise approved by
the DWQ.
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] / Internet http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
None Carolina
NahlA lil
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
4
Melanie Womble
Page 2 of 2
February 13, 2006
2. Diffuse Flow
An additional condition is that all stormwater shall be directed as diffuse flow at non-
erosive velocities through the protected stream buffers and will not re-concentrate before
discharging into the stream as identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233(5).
3. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or
applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to
return the attached certificate of completion to the 401 Oversight/Express Permitting Unit,
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC,
27699-1650.
Requests for appeals of this decision shall be made to the Office of Administrative Hearings. If
you do not accept any of the conditions of this approval, you may ask for and adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a
hearing, send a written petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC
27699-6714. This approval and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This Minor Variance Approval shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under the Neuse River
Riparian Buffer Protection Rules [15A NCAC 2B.0233(9)(b)]. Please call Ms. Amy Chapman
at [phone] if you have any questions or require copies of our rules or procedural
materials.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AWKIasc
cc: Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Received Request #_
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources 2 0 0 5 2 0 8 6
Division of Water Quality
Variance Request- Form - for Minor Variances
Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Areas Rules
a
NOTE., This form maybe photocopied for use as an original. "
Please identify which Riparian Area (Buffer) Protection Rule Wie3.
Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy
Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Areas Rule (15A NCAC 02B
.0233)
ti
? Tar-Pamlico River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Managem jnt'
Strategy Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Areas Rule (15A PIJ` ? 2065
NCAC 02B.0259)
V?u`I!aV as :i? RJ.??9?a'.ic tG}??a'aL'FI
O Catawba River Basin: Protection and Maintenance of Existing Riparian
Buffers.(15A NCAC 0.2B :0243)
Part 1: General Information
(Please include attachments if the room provided is insufficient.)
1. Applicant's name the corporation, individual etc. who owns the property):
AQ CL, A a wfh,n b I vo
2.
Print Owner/Signing Official (person legally responsible for the property and its compliance)
Name: M e,1 v- r. • i _13, W 49-? b 1 e
Title:
Street address:
City, State, Zip: LO i I s, ') J r) (L 5. 11 SM (a
Telephone:
a C) I _q
Fax:
3. Contact person who can answer questions about the proposed project:
Name: A Telephone: (?,?_3 7 gn ? 9 10- - ?q ? -??-
Fax: Email: MQ 1anft =?t?Q
P_ a7 oro r-tss /dNa/ r0q_4. Project Name (Subdivision, facility, or establishment name -consistent with project name on
plans, specifications, letters, oper lion and maintenance agreements, etc.): 4-
Version 2: November 2002
5. Project Location:
Street address:
City, State, Zip:
County:
Latitude/longitude:
6. Directions to site from nearest major intersection (Also, attach an 8 Yx 11 copy of the USGS
topographic map indicatin the location of the sit q): %
-i-aUe_ 10-P-4. nrJ 4n S91 A/ a-* ',.) ensec-E aJ J P S1 4,41 r ad, 4- a I v d .
?2oAA 6M /,q1X+
W
7. Stream to be impacted by the proposed activity:
Stream name (for unnamed streams label as "UT" to the nearest named stream):
U T - `T D i n e o ±:5 w A-rn ?D
Stream classification [as identified within the Sche ule of Classifications 15A NCAC 2B .0315
(Neuse) or.0316 (Tar-Pamlico)]: W S e-4
8. Which of the following permits/approvals will be required or have been received already for
this project?
Required: Received: Date received:
Permit Type:
CAMA Major
CAMA Minor
401 Certification1404 Permit
On-site Wastewater Permit
NPDES Permit (including stormwater)
Non-discharge Permit
Water Supply Watershed Variance
Others (specify)
Part 2: Proposed Activity
(Please include attachments if the room provided is insufficient.)
Description of proposed activity [Also, please attach a map of sufficient detail (such as a plat
map or site plan) to accurately delineate the boundaries of the land to be utilized in carrying
out the activity, the location and dimension of any disturbance in the riparian buffers
associated with the activity, and the extent of riparian buffers on the land. Include the area
of buffer impact in ft2.]:
S4 o 2A-z P Wl A e ) 41 1 Q IC 4- / 9 Asa iC4 -
2. State reasons why this plan for the proposed activity cannot be practically accomplished,
reduced or reconfigured to better minimize or eliminate disturbance to the riparian buffers:
"Du P_ A-n oi; i 4, ACAS P.M O?J 4 eA -" I i ShP-A .hv +ke IN f 4-"arS8tA.*
,a. vw Pr-4-r" 9.,q e- s n ?- c ?Fcc.+ arh M- I& P Q-AtA-- ca I Po r a ' u'.1;
-140-2A-l
i*
Variance Request Form, page 2
Version 2: November 2000
3. Description of any best management practices to be used to control impacts associated with
the proposed activity (i.e., control of runoff from impervious surfaces to provide diffuse flow,
re-planting vegetation 9,r enhancement of existing vegetation, etc.):
4. Please provide an explanation of the following:
(1) The practical difficulties or hardships that would result from the strict application of this
Rule.
?Ue rV D ,s?aea. a a- `to s4aQe- rn _ I Awn f?A.,Ao f q ea ea.Ar-6A. Fle&-W
B sc $ 4 p. r, l t? -wh te, ems. =h AUe__c-Oo e.fz 1 A e o? ? Y
.rna 9Jt4-5? va-. ^-1A &1 A1a
(2) How these difficulties or hardships result from conditions that are unique to the property
involved.
.1 /4clG d ee,? 4,,b 1 e_ .ee- ese 'fie..-? s n ex aloo vn de r !21Y Ma Y e,"
CAf ntar?-?- 2 ez. _7 n e 9?b q k a e ei' Aer' S DAte ,4,evk. ...% A o a xal ey i OCSh

(3) If economic hardship is the major consideration, then include a specific explanation of the
economic hardships and the proportion of the hardship to the entire value of the project.
Part 3: Deed Restrictions
By your signature in Part 5 of this application, you certify that all structural stormwater best
management practices required by this variance shall be located in recorded stormwater
easements, that the easements will run with the land, that the easements cannot be changed or
deleted without concurrence from the State, and that the easements will be recorded prior to the
sale of any lot.
Part 4: Agent Authorization
If you wish to designate submittal authority to another individual or firm so that they may provide
information on your behalf, please complete this section:
Designated agent
Mailing address:
City, State, Zip:
Telephone:
Fax:
Email:
Part 5: Applicant's Certification
Variance Request Form, page 3
Version 2: November 2000

P-/ a/n 1 L 3 ? • V yn "? le- /nrinf nr hinc nmmex of ncrenn HefnA
in Part I, Item 2), certify that the information included on this permit application form is correct,
that the project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans and that the deed
restrictions in accordance with Part 5 of this form will be recorded with all required permit
condition;
Signature
Date:
Title:
Variance Request Form, page 4
Version 2: November 2000
Answer to page 3, #3
?Al
All
F

`
v

.

I have met with Marc Burke, the City of Wilson's Envir«.......
property to discuss what I could do to best control erosion of the
banks. He has made his recommendations and we have agreed t
City will plant more than 500 plants (that he has recommended)
branch banks to help to stabilize the area he feels should ; -
Specifically in the area I would like to put the building, I will no-
plants or trees to build the building and I will add additional land
the building on completion.
Z
NC GRID NNRHORIZON 1AL8FEE1
DI$1ANCE
?\ so ?
\\ LAG JAMES M. GRIFFIN AND WIFE
J` CATHERINE B. GRIFFIN D.B. 1177,
\ ;n 'p PG. 710 PIN / 3714-28-2225
?\ Gf \ mGn
\ %
I
\
J?p\?? JOE' , ?( OJ?EE,fi
•y0 ?\Qpg ?r-
0pp
BRANCH BANK & TRUST Co.
Agt for A.W. FLEMING (HEIRS)
y r r
•?? '4;??'??ai•E?l.lCT?OP?

PROPOSED
18'x14' SHED
/
EX. ASP'T DRIV `
r'`? v??\
\`I EXISTING I I ?\
\ TWO STORY I
\\` L\\FRAME DWELLING I? I I I
` O \ I \\\\ I I I ' BETTY BREWER WOMBLE
l ? D.B. 707, Pg. 501
. 501
J\EX. ASP'TI DRIVE
l? O \
1
! 30' I
UTILITY I i
I ?\??? ASEMEN7
I 1 I
MELANIE B. OMBLE I
D.B. 1443, 1tg. 654 I x
I I I ?
? ? I yI
( i I I I
NC HIGHWAY 58
(100' R/W)

GREEN ENGINEERING
WATER, WASTEWATER, SURVEYM PLAIN Na PROJECT MANAGEMENT
OW N. 0OLDE3001110 ST. P.O. BOX 009 WL K N.C. 27890
TH. (232) 207-MW FAX MW 240-7489 ottic*07*ww X;.com
JUNE 2005
11-50,
-- - - - - - - - - - - --
LOCATION OF 100 YEAR FLOOD LINE
PROPERTY OF
MELANIE B. WOMBLE
CITY OF WILSON WILSON! CO., NC

Enler Insp.ectlon Event; Affiliations Inspectors Questions ' 'umrnary
Project Number: 20052006 Version: 1.0 Status: Received SW Plan Location:
Project Name: Melanle B Womble Project Type: Other
Owner: Melanie B Womble Details
Inspectlon Date: 0112312006
Comment:
I think she can minimize the impacts by locating the building between both parking areas, that is to the left of her proposed area
of placement. I will not support this project. Michael Horan (1125106)
;Ready
f Cancel
SID: INQS

wo?? ye aVaf ?Y 2w0?V1 sYwps' I?l?
tJ
DWQ 20052086/ Melanie Womble/ Wilson County
Subject: DWQ 20052086/ Melanie Womble/ Wilson County
From: "Melanie Womble" <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:32:22 -0500
To: <[e-mail]>
CC: <[e-mail]>
Dear Mr.Dorney,
I have requested a state variance from your division to build a small storage building at my residence. I
have sent in the required paperwork and have been in touch with Ian Mc Millian regarding same. Project
code as above in the reference line.
Mr. McMillian spoke with Mike Horan who has looked at my situation and Mr. Horan suggested I might be
able to place it on my existing asphalt(it actually is concrete).
It was suggested that I write to explain why I am not able to put the storage building I need to build on my
existing concrete. That is my driveway and and where we park our cars. There is about a 2-3 foot area
that we back into to turn around so as not to have to back up the entire distance of the driveway. I do not
have a garage.
I wish I could have been there the day Mr. Horan came and I could have explained it to him, but I had no
idea he was coming or that he even had been. I have called to speak to him but he has not called me
back yet.
My family and I have lived on that property since I was three( I'm 49 now) and we have seen the erosion
over the years. I try very hard to protect the creek banks from erosion as is explained in my request.
I desperately need this storage building. As I explained in my original request, I have to use my
mothers carport next door now and that unfortunately will not always be available to me. I really feel like I
need to give her her space back now.
I hope you will be able to help me by permitting this variance. Please contact me if I can provide additional
information.
Thank You,
Melanie B. Womble

r
? Cam
Ib\

1 of 1
1`A
1/19/2006 2:45 PM

Enterln?pectlan F ent. ATllatlon nspecto_rQuestions umrni;y
Project Number: 20052036 Version: ,1.0 Status: ;Received SW Plan Location:
ProjeclName: Melanle©Womble Project Type: Other
Owner: Melanle © Womble Detalls
Inspection Date: 12121/2005
#Comment:
thinkthe building can be placed where the existing asphalt drive East of the two story frame dwelling
Cancel l
,Ready :SID: INQS
Triage Check List

Dale: l Projed Name:
DWQ#.
ti County: IA)1150Y-)
4
To: ? ARO Kevin Barnett ? WaRO Tom Steffens and Kyle Barnes
? FRO Ken Averitte ? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
? MRO Alan Johnson ? WSRO Daryl Lamb
RRO Mike Horan
From: Telephone : (919) ??.3 ?Gq?
The file attached. Is being forwardedo-. our for your evaluation.
Please call if you nee&as 'stance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface'.waters on USFW topo maps
Minimization/avoidance issues
Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings? -
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: