20050431 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20060720

\o?CF W ATF9PG
n
?lV_wvA=?
D 1;?? I,C
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
October 12, 2006
DWQ Project # 05-0431, Ver. 2
Dare County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
T. A. Bramble
P.O. Box 785
Niwot, CO 80544
Subject Property: T.A. Bramble Site
Albemarle Sound [030154, 30, SB]
WAIVER of 401 Water Quality Certification
Dear Sir or Madam:
Your application for a 401 Water Quality Certification was received in the Central Office on July 20, 2006. According to our
rules [15A NCAC 2H .0507 (A)], if final action is not taken within 60 days, the Certification is waived unless DWQ has
objected in writing to your application. Therefore, DWQ has waived the requirement for a 401 Water Quality Certification for
your plans to shade 0.0025 acres of vegetated wetland-coastal wetland to construct an elevated walkway, dredge 0.904 acres of
non-vegetated wetland-shallow bottom/estuarine and public trust water of a canal and channel, fill 0.2569 acres of non-
vegetated wetland-shallow bottom, estuarine and public trust water (0.188 for bulkhead fill, and 0.0689 acres for rip rap fill),
and shade 0.0155 acres of non-vegetated wetland-shallow bottom, estuarine and public trust water, on the Albemarle Sound as
described in your application dated May 26, 2006.
However if additional impact occurs or your development plans change, this waiver is no longer valid and a 401 Water Quality
Certification will be required.
Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly or Mr. Ian McMillan at 919-733-1786 if you have any qu tions regarding this waiver.
Sinc e ,
91/ yndi Karoly, Supervisor
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBI{lijnt
cc: Quible & Associates, P.C., P.O. Drawer 870, Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
Kyle Barnes, DWQ Washington Raleigh Regional Office
USACE Washington Regulatory Field Office
Rich Weaver, DCM, 1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth City, NC 27909
File Copy
Central Files
Paul Rawls, DWQ, Archdale Building
Mike Street, DMF, P.O. Box 769, Morehead City, NC 27557
Filename: 050431Ver2TABRamble(Dare)Waiver_401 CANIA
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
4'?4
h66 E Ni
A"; va,05--ot?3I
f /
HCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources ?uj
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor Charles S. Jones, Director William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
July 17, 2006
MEMORANDUM:
TO: Cyndi Karoly
Environmental Biological Supervisor
Division of Water Quality
FROM: Doug Huggett
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
n
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Revi p ??^ l•v???? U
JUL 2 0 2006
Applicant: T. A. Bramble DENR - WATER QUALITY
11'ETLANOS AW STORMWATER BRMMCH
Project Location: 200 Tower Road, Colington Island, Dare County
Proposed Project: Dredging, bulkhead, riprap, walkway/dock/foot bridge, mooring pilings
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this
form by 08/07/06, to 400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, NC 28557. If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Lynn Mathis at [phone]. When
appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
SIGNED DATE
1367 U.S. 17 South, Elizabeth City, North Carolina 27909
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: wvrvr.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer - 30% Recycled by Fiber Weight
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
APPLICANT'S NAME: T. A Bramble
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: The property is located off Tower Lane, a recently paved street,
adjacent to the water tower on Colington Road, in Dare County. Tower Road is also the entrance to
Carlyle on the Sound, a newly platted 73 lot residential subdivision. Access to the property is via a dirt
road off Shingle Landing Road within the subdivision.
Photo Index - 2000: 183-2144 G 16 & 17, H 16, 17 & 18,1 17 & 18, J 19 1989: 1 44-18 14 & 5, J 4 & 5, K 5
&6,L5&61984: 137-497S 10& 11,T 10& 11,U 10, 11 & 12 1978:93-4180,P,Q&R7&8
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2970472 Y:836407
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/D&F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - August 9, 2005 April 6, 2006
Was Applicant Present - Yes No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received -June 23, 2006
Office - Elizabeth City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Dare County
Land Classification From LUP - Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: CW, EW, ES, and PT
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended-Use: Private
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - Septic system
Planned - None
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - House, remnant dock, bulkhead and a storage building
Planned - Bulkhead, riprap, breakwater, walkway, foot bridge and dock
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: 3' (along the Albemarle Sound)
Source - Applicant and on site verification
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION:
DRED-GED
[AREA]
EILUED
OTHER
(A) Vegetated Wetlands:
Coastal Wetlands
0,1% aG 110sf Shading Elevated
Walkway 0, 00 2 S
(B) Non-Vegetated Wetlands: 39,400sf Canal & Channel ,213sf Bulkhead Fill 678sf Shade in Canal
Shallow Bottom-Estuarine &
P
bli
T
W
0.904 3,004sf Riprap Fill
0 155
0
u
c
rust
ater aC, ?, ?(p$ ar- .
a?
(C) High Ground: 1,989sf Boat Slips 1,512sf Riprap 7,397 Grading
728sf Sand Shoal 11,056sf Cut & Fill Spoil Areas
1,282 Shading
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 75,369sf (1.7 acres)
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SA Open: Yes
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant, T. A. Bramble, proposes to dredge an existing man-made canal and
access channel, construct a bulkhead along the Albemarle Sound and canal, place riprap along the Sound and the
entrance of the canal, construct a walkway/dock/foot bridge around the existing basin, and install mooring pilings
to delineate five boat slips.
T. A. Bramble
July14, 2006
Page 2
PROJECT SITE DESCRIPTION
The applicant's property is located off Tower Lane, a recently paved street, adjacent to the water
tower on Colington Road, in Dare County. The road is also the entrance to Carlyle on the Sound, a
newly platted 73 lot residential subdivision. Access to the property is via a dirt road off Shingle
Landing Road within the subdivision. While the formal address of the property is listed as 200
Tower Road, recent changes to the road system have not been addressed by Dare County at this
time. Structures on the property include a single-family dwelling, a small pile supported storage
building, a gravity feed septic system, 375' of bulkhead, and a small dock.
Carlyle on the Sound was purchased and developed from three parcels, part of which was divided
out of the Bramble tract. Currently the Bramble tract consists of 39.4 acres fronting on the
Albemarle Sound and a small unnamed canal off of the Sound. The shoreline of the property begins
at the southeast corner following along the Albemarle Sound for approximately 1,682', curving
around a peninsula and running in an easterly direction up the canal approximately 852' to its
approximate end through a Coastal Wetland, and back around in a westerly direction for
approximately 835' along the northern bank of the canal, terminating at a bulkhead in Colington
Harbour Subdivision, at the northwest corner at the mouth of the canal. The average depth in -the
canal is approximately 2' below NWL. A small amount of submerged aquatic vegetation (widgeon
grass and milfoil) was found within the basin at the mouth of the canal. The canal formed by the
tributary is completely within the Bramble property running in an east to west alignment forming a
peninsula on the south side of the tract abutting the Albemarle Sound. The north side of the Bramble
property abuts the Carlyle on the Sound.
Mr. Bramble's property has a total of approximately 3,500 linear feet of estuarine shoreline along
the Albemarle Sound and the canal, with 375' of existing bulkhead along the Sound adjacent to an
existing residence. No other shoreline control structures are located on the applicant's property.
Beginning at the mouth of the canal and traveling along the shoreline in an easterly direction, along
the sound, there is evidence of extensive erosion forming a one to two-foot escarpment that drops
from a heavily vegetated shoreline to a sandy beach littered with downed trees. Upland vegetation
includes, but is not limited to, loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), live oak (Quercus virginiana), diamond
leaf oak (Quercus laurifolia), red bay (Persea borbonia), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua),
catbrier (Smilax glauca), wax myrtle (Myrica. cerifera), groundsel tree (Baccharis haliinifolia),
switch cane (Arundinaria gigantea), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), Virginia creeper
(Parthenocissus quinquefolia), and false nettle (Boehrneria cylindrical).
The shoreline along the canal is primarily wooded with some Coastal and Section 404 Wetlands
intermixed. The northwest end of the canal shoreline opens into a Coastal Wetland that transitions to a
high ground berm along the canals edge created from dredge spoil prior to the implementation of
regulations limiting the placement of such spoil material.
Along the south side of the canal the shoreline transitions from a high ground berm to a low area that
forms clear hydrological connection from the canal to a Coastal Wetland. Located on the south side of
the peninsula this Coastal Wetland area opens, through a less well-defined connection, to the Albemarle
Sound.
T. A. Bramble
July 14, 2006
Page 3
The center of the peninsula and the eastern section of the property located on the east side of the
access to the property is vegetated with a variety of Coastal and Section 404 Wetland vegetation
including, but not limited to, saltgrass (Distichlis spicata), salt meadow hay (Spartina patens),
cattail (Typha spp.), giant cord grass (Spartina cynosuroides), sawgrass (Cladium janiaicense),
bulrush (Scirpus spp.), black needlerush (Juncus roemerianus), soft rush (Juncus effusus), sedge
(Carex spp.), spikerush (Eleocaris spp.), and sea oxeye (Borrichia frutescens). See the enclosed
site plan for wetland locations.
The Albemarle Sound, and its tributaries adjacent to the applicant's property are classified as
coastal waters by agreement between the Marine Fisheries Commission and Wildlife Resource
Commission. The Division of Environmental Management's water quality classification for
Albemarle Sound, at the location in question, is SA (shell fishing). Additional review indicates
that there are no unusual geological formations associated with the applicant's property. While
several archeological sites have been identified on Colington Island, staff does not know of any
identified sites within the immediate vicinity of the applicant's property.
Previous permits issued for development on the property include: 1) USACE Nationwide #14
Action ID 2005510744 on April 19, 2005, 2) NCDWQ Water Quality Certification #05-0431 on
April 11, 2005, and, 3) NC DCM CAMA Major Permit #193-89 on October 24, 1989. Copies of
the referenced permits are enclosed in the application packet.
CAMA Major Permit #193-89 was issued for the construction of a bulkhead and dredging part of
the canal and a section of channel. Originally the dredge portion of the permit included a 100' x
50' area within the basin and 450' of channel. The permit was modified later to include additional
dredging totaling 650' (not including the basin).
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant Toby Bramble proposes to dredge 880' of existing channel and canal, excavate high
ground to create two boat slips and set pilings for three additional slips within the existing basin,
construct a walkway and pedestrian bridge over a small tributary at the end of the canal, and
bulkhead, riprap breakwater the entire shoreline of his property. An existing dock located within
the basin will be removed. The following is a complete breakdown of the proposed development
activity on the Bramble property:
I. SHORELINE STABILIAZATION
The applicant has approximately 3,500 linear feet of shoreline along the Albemarle Sound
and a canal, most of which will be stabilized with the following methods.
a. Riprap: Three sections of shoreline are designated as having riprap.
1) The first begins on the southeast corner along the Albemarle Sound the applicant
proposes to install 388' linear feet (LF) of rock riprap with an 8' base width.
According to the drawings approximately 5' of the base will be placed below normal
water level (NWL).
T. A. Bramble
July 14, 2006
Page 4
Riprap Fill:
388' x 3' = 1,164sf High Ground Fill
388' x 5' = 1,940sf Shallow Bottom/ Estuarine Water Fill
2) The second location being proposed is around a small section of Coastal Wetlands
along the Sound on the south side of the peninsula waterward of the proposed
bulkhead. A small patch of Juncus and a large live oak are being eroded, and the
applicant would like to preserve them by placing 73' of riprap around the vegetation.
The riprap will be placed at NWL and extend 8' waterward of NWL.
Riprap Fill:
73' x 8' = 484sf Shallow Bottom/ Estuarine Water Fill
3) The third location is a 116' section beginning at the northeast corner of the shoreline
near the mouth of the canal, adjacent to Colington Harbour Subdivision. The riprap
will have a base width of 8' with approximately 5' of the base below NWL. This
section will tie into an existing bulkhead at Colington Harbour.
Riprap Fill:
116' x 3' = 348sf High Ground Fill
116' x 5' = 580sf Shallow Bottom/Estuarine Water Fill
Total impacts from riprap fill from 1,2,and 3 above are as follows:
1,512sf High Ground Fill
3,004sf Shallow Bottom/Estuarine Water Fill
b. Bulkhead: Approximately 1,863' of the applicant's shoreline would be bulkheaded under
the proposal submitted. The total length will comprise of four sections of vinyl bulkhead
as follows.
1) The first section of bulkhead being proposed will begin with a 10' return wall at the
end of the first section of riprap along the Albemarle Sound and extend 406' and tie
into the east side of the existing 357' bulkhead in front of the residence and will be
constructed at NWL and landward of a small area of Coastal Wetlands. High ground
disturbance to install tiebacks and grade associated backfill is addressed on page 8.
2) The second section will be 673' long and begin on the west side of the existing
bulkhead on the Sound, and follow along the shoreline to the west, around the mouth
of the canal and terminate at a 75' opening that connects to an adjacent Coastal
Wetland. The proposed bulkhead will be constructed at NWL along the mouth of, and
in the canal, and an average 2' waterward of NWL for the whole alignment. No
backfill is proposed in conjunction with the interior of the canal along this alignment.
T. A. Bramble
July 14, 2006
Page 5
The area along the Sound, as previously noted, has sustained severe erosion over the
past several years resulting in the felling of numerous trees along the shoreline that
must be removed prior to installing the proposed bulkhead. This section of bulkhead,
as proposed, will cross two small openings approximately 8' and 10' wide where
overwash also feeds the adjacent Coastal Wetland noted above. This opening
provides minimal hydrology during heavy (non-tropical) storm events. The primary
hydrological connection is on the north side of the peninsula in the canal. There are
two areas noted on the plans as Reclamation Area #1 and Reclamation Area #2 in and
adjacent to the Sound. The bulkhead along Reclamation Area 41 will be an average of
approximately 24.93' waterward of NWL for a distance of 250', and the average
water depth within the fill area is 0.5'. The bulkhead along Reclamation Area #2 will
be an average of approximately 10' waterward of NWL for a distance of 200', and the
average water depth within the fill area is 0.5'.
250' x 24.93' = 6,233sf Shallow Bottom/Estuarine & Public Trust Water
200' x 9.9' = 1,980sf Shallow Bottom/Estuarine & Public Trust Water
Fill: 8,213sf Shallow Bottom/Estuarine & Public Trust Water
It is anticipated that there will be approximately 18,630sf of high ground disturbance
in association with the bulkhead installations.
3. A third section of bulkhead is proposed on the north side of the house in the basin and
canal. Beginning at the east end of a slotted breakwater (addressed below) in the
canal the applicant proposes to install a 196' bulkhead that will extend around the
basin to a Coastal Wetland adjacent to the small tributary feeding into the canal. The
bulkhead will parallel the coastal Wetlands along the tributary for approximately 40'
and terminate. As proposed this bulkhead will be constructed at NWL with no
proposed backfill. A proposed elevated walkway will be constructed over the
bulkhead and in the canal if approved.
4. The fourth and final section of bulkhead will be constructed on the north side of the
canal beginning at a proposed pedestrian bridge (See Page 7) and run in a westerly
direction and terminate at a return wall at the proposed riprap alignment described in
subsection 3. On page four of this report, for a total of 588'. The bulkhead will be
constructed as close to NWL as possible and will not include any back fill. There is
little to no evidence of erosion along the north shore of the canal where this bulkhead
is being proposed.
Breakwater: The development proposal includes the construction of a 344' slotted vinyl
breakwater along the south side of the canal beginning on the east side of the 75' opening
that connects to an adjacent Coastal Wetland (See Subsection b.2. on Page 4), and
following along the shoreline at NWL and terminating at the west comer of the basin
directly behind the house. Access to the shoreline during construction will be from the
water. The land adjacent to the proposed breakwater is a mix of high ground and Section
404 Wetlands. No back fill is proposed in conjunction with the breakwater.
T. A. Bramble
July 14, 2006
Page 6
II. DREDGING
The applicant is proposing to dredge an area 650' x 50' within the canal and basin
and a 230'x 30' channel into the Albemarle Sound to a depth of four feet below
NWL. The total length of the proposed dredge alignment will be 880'. According to
the application the area to be dredged will be in line with a previously approved
alignment under CAMA Major permit # 193-89. Review of the permit and permit
modifications indicates that the length requested was 650', not 880', but a comparison
of the drawing and aerial photography revealed that the proposed alignment closely
approximates the alignment shown in the drawing submitted and approved for the
original permit and modification. However, the width of the proposed channel does
not appear to be consistent with the dimensions previously requested and approved.
The channel widths requested and approved were 20' in the channel and canal.
In addition to maintenance dredging, the applicant would like to excavate 1,989sf of
high ground adjacent to the basin on the north side of the canal for two 40' x 14'
stern-to boat slips. The approximate area will be 120' x 16.5' (ave.) and will be
excavated to a depth of 4' below NWL. The average existing grade is approximately
3' above NWL within the area to be dredged is approximately. Material removed
from this site will be placed in an above ground retention area to be addressed below.
Excavated Boat Slips From High Ground:
1,989sf x 7' = 13,932cf = 516cy
Excavation of a Small Sand Shoal in Canal to Existing Surrounding Depth:
728sf x 2' = 1,458cf = 54cy
Dredge Spoil From Canal and Channel:
650' x 50' = 32,500sf
230' x 30' = 6,900sf
39,400sf x 2' = 79,800cf = 2,955.5cy
According to the application it is estimated that the total amount of material to be
hydraulically dredged will be 2,963cy. For the purpose of calculating dredge spoil
total this higher amount will be used.
As reflected in the second set of calculations above, a 728sf area of shoaling has
occurred within the canal and will be dredged bringing the total of clamshell and
hydraulic dredge material up to approximately 3,533cy.
III. SPOIL SITES
The applicant proposes to use a hydraulic dredge and a clamshell dredge at the site.
The clamshell will be used on a small barge in the canal and trucked from the
shoreline a short distance to a small 1,256sf retention area approximately forty feet
T. A. Bramble
July 14, 2006
Page 7
from the Albemarle Sound on the southeast side
placed around the spoil site until the material
material has been dried it will be used as back
abutting the Sound.
of the house. A silt fence will be
is dry enough to move. Once the
fill behind the proposed bulkhead
Two additional spoil retention areas will be excavated along Soundside
approximately forty feet from NWL for the placement of hydraulically removed
material. The retention areas will be excavated to a depth of three feet below grade
with a two-foot high berm five feet wide around the perimeter. A two-foot freeboard
will be maintained around each spoil site to prevent material from leaving the site. A
silt fence will be placed around the perimeter of each retention area for added
precaution. Retention Area #1 interior dimensions will be approximately 4,160sf, and
the interior dimensions of Retention Area #2 will be approximately 3,040sf.
Excavated material will be used to create the berm around the excavated spoil sites
and to backfill the reclamation areas behind the proposed bulkheads along the
Albemarle Sound. Dredge spoil will also be used in the back fill process as needed,
with the remaining material to be trucked off site.
Excavated Spoil Retention Areas:
130' x 32' = 4,160sf x 3' = 12,480cf = 462.22cy
95' x 32' = 3,040sf x 3' = 9,120cf = 337cy
799cy
Surface Storaize area for Clamshell Excavation Areas:
(40' diameter are set aside)
202 x 3.14 = 1,256sf x 3' = 3,768cf = 140cy
The total given does not take into account the amount of water that will entrain the
spoil material being removed. Based on this it is anticipated that the total amount of
water and solids entering the spoil retention site will be double. Based on this
assumption it is anticipated that each site will be filled four times. Some of this
material, once decanted, will be placed behind the proposed bulkhead with the
remaining material being trucked off site.
IV. WALKWAY, PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE, FINGER PIERS & MOORING PILINGS
The total length of the proposed structure will be 296', and of that 266' will be a
walkway, and 30' will be a pedestrian bridge. The walkway will wrap around the
basin to the east, cross a small tidal creek, Coastal and Section 404 Wetlands and high
ground to access a total of five boat slips with a total of eleven mooring pilings and
two 12' long finger piers 3'-0" wide at the shoreline and tapering to a width of P-0".
The walkway will be 6' wide and a small area will extend over the water. Estimated
impacts from shading are as follows.
Walkway over High Ground: 1,282sf
Finger Piers (Over Estuarine and Public Trust Water): 48sf
Walkway/ Dock over Estuarine and Public Trust Water: 450sf
T. A. Bramble
July 14, 2006
Page 8
Walkway over Coastal and Section 404 Wetlands: 110sf
Pedestrian Bridge over Estuarine and Public Trust Water: 180sf
Five boat slips are proposed within the project area. Three 24' x 14' slips are to be
located at the south end of the basin adjacent to the two proposed finger piers, and
two stern-to slips 40' x 14' will be placed in the area to be excavated on the north side
of the canal.
V. In addition to the disturbance listed in the previous sections it is anticipated that an
additional 7,397sf of grading and incidental fill will be undertaken at the proposed
bulkhead installations along the Albemarle Sound.
Grading and Fill:
406' x 18' (approx.) = 7,397sf High Ground Disturbance
ANTICIPATED IMPACTS
• Localized turbidity is anticipated during installation of the bulkheads and during
excavation and dredging.
• The loss of 11,217sf of sandy shallow water bottom and Estuarine and Public Trust
Water.
• Shading of 110'sf of Coastal Wetlands.
• Shading of 678sf of shallow water bottom and the loss of navigation due to the
construction of a small area of dock and finger piers.
• Creation of 2,717sf of shallow bottom, and Estuarine and Public Trust waters, from the
excavation of high ground for two boat slips and the removal of a small sandy shoal
within the canal.
• The disturbance of 39,400sf of water bottom during the dredging of the canal and
channel.
• Temporary impacts to adjacent wetlands during construction of bulkheads and
breakwater.
• New habitat created by the placement of riprap below NWL.
• Increased intensity of use based on the number of boat slips being created may result in
secondary impacts to the adjacent water body from oils and trash associated with
recreational uses.
Submitted By: Lynn Mathis
Date: July 14, 2006
MAJOR PERMIT FEE MATRIX
Applicant: T. A. Bramble
Selectlon Development Type Fee DCM % DWQ %
(14300 1601 435100093 1625 6253) (24300 1602 435100095 2341)
1. Private, non-commercial
E development that does not $250 100%($250) 0%($0)
involve the filling or
excavation of any wetlands
or open water areas:
II. Public or commercial
El development that does not $400 100%($400) 0%($0)
involve the filling or
excavation of any wetlands
or open water areas:
III. For development that
involves the filling and/or
excavation of up to 1 acre
of wetlands and/or open
water areas, determine if A,
B, C, or D below a lies:
III(A). For Private non-
commercial development, if $250 100%($250) 0%($0)
General Water Quality
Certification No. 3301 (see
attached can be applied:
III(B). For public or
commercial development, if $400 100%($400) 0%($0)
General Water Quality
Certification No. 3301 (see
attached can be a lied:
III(C). If General Water
E Quality Certification No. $400 60%($240) 40%($160)
3301 (see attached) could
be applied, but DCM staff
determined that additional
review and written DWQ
concurrence is needed
because of concerns
related to water quality or
aquatic life:
III(D). If General Water
Quality Certification No. $400 60%($240) 40% ($160)
3301 (see attached) cannot
be applied:
IV. For development that
® involves the filling and/or $475 60%($285) 40% ($190)
excavation of more than
one acre of wetlands and/or
open water areas:
2 ?_o 4 T
C/
r f_

- 7517
QUIBLE & ASSOCIATES, PC
P.O. DRAWER 870 PH. 252-261-3300
L KITTY HAWK, NC 27949 66-679-531
DATE f?JJ
TO THE
ORDER OF
DOLLARS u-
?ywa,,y v
`ECG
FOA
1120000 7 5 1 711' I:0 5 3 106 7991:
69 29051 2,1'

`"O"',? f ail N`?fVi?; =
BRAMBLE PROJECT NARRATIVE- November 2, 2005, Revisions December 28, 2005, +?LlZaBCTH Clry
March 17, 2006, May 26, 2006 and June 20, 2006
The subject property is located on Tower Lane, a currently gravel and dirt road on the south
side of Colington Road beside the Dare County Water Tower on Colington Island. The property
is a 39.4 acre parcel that has been recently been separated from a previously larger tract that is
being developed into a residential subdivision. The subject property is and has historically been
owned by the Bramble family. The property front on the Albemarle Sound and includes the
Bramble homestead. It is the intention of the family to preserve the remainder of their property.
This would include some water dependent improvements. No additional upland development is
proposed at this time. Included on the property are uplands, wetlands (Section 404 and
coastal), a canal and small boat basin. Section 404 wetlands have been delineated by Quible
and confirmed by USACE on 8-17-04. Since the subject property was part of a larger tract that
is currently being developed as a residential subdivision, it was necessary to receive a USACE
Nationwide #14 Permit and 401 Water Quality Certification for roadway impacts to Section 404
wetlands. These permits include driveway improvement leading to the Bramble homestead,
where retaining walls and driveway fill and surfacing are currently taking place outside AEC's.
The subject property has received CAMA Permits and renewals under 193-89 (enclosed) for
maintenance dredging and shoreline stabilization. The CAMA Permit has since expired. The
proposed work includes maintenance dredging to the previously permitted depth of -4 ft. The
material will be hydraulically dredged and clamshell excavated by a local dredge service. On
the current site plan and application, there are two hydraulic dredge soil retention areas
indicated, both of which are outside of the 30 ft vegetative buffer. There is also a designated
clamshell dredge spoil staging location. We have met representatives from Cape Dredging to
discuss and plan the logistics behind getting this job completed. The best and most efficient
way to complete the work is to perform a combination hydraulic dredge and clamshell
operation. As shown on the site plan, the clamshell operation via barge will occur inside the
canal after completion of the hydraulic dredging connecting to the 4 ft water depth contour. See
also, the new cross-section of the hydraulic dredge retention areas. The two dredge retention
areas will be excavated to create bowl-like earthen structures down to 3 ft below existing grade.
Excavated material will be used to construct a berm around the perimeter that will be
approximately 1 ft above existing grade. The additional material from creation of the retention
areas will be directly used for bulkhead backfill. For hydraulic dredging, berms will be
constructed with an influent and effluent pipe for the dredge slurry. On the site plan, influent
pipes are depicted on the Albemarle Sound side of the berm. If during the hydraulic dredge
procedure it is found that placement of the influent pipes inside the canal is more efficient,
placement will be adjusted as needed. The clamshell dredge material from inside the canal will
be transported from small barge to a dump truck that will be backed up near the small existing
dock. See truck route to and from canal identified on the site plan. The material will
immediately be transported to the dredge material stockpile location that is now indicated on the
site plan. This application also proposes excavation of highground in the boat basin area for
two side-to slips, and the creation of three additional stern-to slips. The stern-to slips (1-3) are
proposed to be 14 ft x 24 ft and include two triangular finger piers. The side-to slips are
proposed to be 14 ft x 40 ft for safe maneuvering. These slips do not include any excavation or
disturbance to wetlands. There is an existing dilapidated dock shown on the site plan that will
be removed prior to any proposed improvements. Shoreline stabilization is proposed in this
application and includes a total of 1,863 If of vinyl bulkhead, 366 If of vertical slotted sheetpile -- ?2. 4t
for areas within the canal and basin that are adjacent to wetlands, and 577 If of granitic rip-rap.
Page 2- Bramble Narrative
Construction of the bulkhead will be strategically timed to coincide with the dredge activity.
Therefore, suitable (sand dominated) dredge material can be used for bulkhead backfill as it
dries out instead of having to stockpile. This is a cost-efficient approach that is commonly
employed to avoid "double-handling" of material when possible. A cross-section of the
proposed vertical sheetpile/breakwater design is included on the site plan. This design has
been provided and is endorsed by UNC Sea Grant. This is essentially a free-standing bulkhead
structure with piles, whalers and sheathing with gaps so that the hydrologic connection is not
lost. There is a location along the canal where DCM has identified a coastal wetland
connection to a significant interior area of coastal wetlands. In this location, there will be no
stabilization structures proposed to maintain this connection (See "open area" designation on
the site plan). There are two proposed reclamation areas where the shoreline has significantly
eroded in recent years and erosion escarpments have formed. In this area, many mature trees
have been lost due to this erosion and the applicant simply wants to preserve the integrity of his
property. The downed trees will be cut and carried out of this area prior to any shoreline
stabilization and fill. Reclamation Area 1 is 6,233 sq ft and Reclamation Area 2 is 1,992 sq ft.
Bulkhead is proposed at the waterward edge of the proposed reclamation areas. For
reclamation Area 1, the average distance is 20 ft and the maximum is 37 ft. For reclamation
Area 2, the average distance is 9 ft and the maximum is 12 ft. The bulkhead will be backfilled
with sand material from maintenance dredging. The material from the canal is sand dominated
from the outer third to the existing connecting depth of -4 ft. The inside of the canal is silt
dominated and will not be used for bulkhead backfill except for where the material is dominated
by sand. The enclosed photographs include existing conditions as well as depictions of
permitted hydraulic dredge events from the past. Also proposed is a 308 If x 6 ft wide water
dependent walkway in the basin area. Where the walkway crosses wetland or tidal creek, the
pile supports will raise the decking a minimum of three ft above normal water level.
This revised application package (site plan and MP forms) has specifically addressed
deficiencies identified by DCM from written correspondences and from meetings.

Form DCM-MP-1
-rr 4-1 ?ON
(To be completed by all applicants)
1. APPLICANT
a. Landowner:
Name T.A. Bramble
Address PO Box 785
City Niwot State CO
Zip 80544 Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
b. Authorized Agent:
Name Quible & Associates P.C.
Address PO Drawer 870
City Kitty Hawk State NC
Zip 27949 Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
c. Project name (if any) T.A. Bramble
NOTE: Permit will be issued in name of landowner(s), and/or
project name.
p;,E 4LOL
r
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction?
X Yes No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, sound, bay) Albemarle Sound
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
Maintenance Dredging within man-made canal out to 4 ft of
water, upland excavation for creation of 2 boat slips,
mooring structures for 5 boat slips total, shoreline
reclamation in two locations because of erosion, shoreline
stabilization consisting of bulkhead, vertical slotted
sheetvile and rock rip rap elevated pervious wood walkway
(elevated 3 ft above wetlands and tidal creek). See the
attached site plan and project narrative for detail.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? New
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? Private
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed project.
If more space is needed, please attach additional
pages. See proiect narrative
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
4. LAND AND WATER
a. County Dare
b. City, town, community or landmark
Kill Devil Hills (Colinaton Island)
c. Street address or secondary road number
200 Tower Lane Colington Island, Kill Devil Hills
n I nn Inc
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract 39.4 acres
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A
Form DCM-MP-1
f r a ?
r hill W 1 20i)6
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or NWL
5 ft NGVD
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Fripp fine sand (FrD) and Conaby muck (CnA) (from
1992 Soil Survey of Dare County)
e. Vegetation on tract Typical upland: Pinus toeda,
Ouercus virQiniana, Ouercus laurifolia, Arundinaria
aig
, gantea; Typical wetland: Juncos roenterianus,
Spartina patens, persea borbonia, Sciptts spp.
f. Man-made features now on tract Site is currently
undeveloped
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land classification
of the site? (Consult the local land use plan.)
Conservation
-Developed
Rural
X Transitional
Community
Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
Residential
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? X Yes No
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
j. Has a professional archaeological assessment been
done for the tract? Yes X No
If yes, by whom?
k. Is the project located in a National Registered Historic
District or does it involve a National Register listed or
eligible property?
Yes X No
1. Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes _No
Coastal (marsh) X Other Section 404
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? Yes,
confirmed by USACE on 8-17-04
(Attach documentation, if available)
m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
There is currently a conventional on-site septic treatment
system to serve the Bramble residence.
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters of
the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
S i:l:'• tir•.. !yif;IVrllal:o N f
I-Z'NEETH CITY
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges.) Surface runoff
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
Dare County Water Department
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the following
items must be submitted:
A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other
instrument under which the applicant claims title to the
affected properties. If the applicant is not claiming to be the
owner of said property, then forward a copy of the deed or
other instrument under which the owner claims title, plus
written permission from the owner to carry out the project.
• An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and
cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black ink on an
8 V2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to Coastal Resources
Commission Rule 710203 for a detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and only
high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line prints or
other larger plats are acceptable only if an adequate number
of quality copies are provided by applicant. (Contact the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding that agency's use of
larger drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to guide
agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
Include highway or secondary road (SR) numbers,
landmarks, and the like.
• A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed
return receipts as proof that such owners have received
a copy of the application and plats by certified mail.
Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the
Division of Coastal Management. Upon signing this form,
the applicant further certifies that such notice has been
provided.
Name Carlyle on the Sound, LLC
Address 821 Ocean Trail, Suite 4
Corolla, NC 27927
Phone
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-1
-'
?k-1',. - 1 ZnijU
Name William & Gladys Beadlina
Address 613 Harbour View Drive
Kill Devil Hills. NC 27948
Phone

This is the 26 day of May , 2006.
® A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
USACE Nationwide #14 Act. ID 2005510744 (4/19/05),
NCDWO Water Ouality Cert.#05-0431(4/11/05)
NCDCM CAMA Major #193-89
O A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources (DEHNR)
to cover the costs of processing the application.
O A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
O A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S.113A -1 to 10)
If the project involves the expenditure of public funds
or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting
compliance with the North Carolina Environmental
Policy Act.
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application
will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to conditions and restrictions
contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed activity
complies with the State of North Carolina's approved Coastal
Management Program and will be conducted in a manner
consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact, grant
permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies
to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this permit
application and follow-up monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application
is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Print Name T.A. Bramble
Signature1 t
Landowner or Authorized Agent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
X DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3 Upland Development
X DCM MP-4 Structures Information
X DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE: Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-2

€. . 1 2006
.:TRH CITE
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all other
sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or
fill activities. All values to be given in feet.
Average Final
Existing Project
Leneth Width Denth Denth
Access
channel
Approx.
(MLW) or (NWL)
Canal
Boat
basin
(additional
excavation for
slip4-5
Sand Spit in
Canal
Bulkhead
Backfill
Other
Reclamtion area
fill
2 ft -4 ft
230 ft 30 ft
650 ft 50 ft 2 ft -4 ft
-4 ft
irreg. currently
Shape uplands
Area=
1,989
sq.ft
Area= Vol.=
728 54
sq.ft cu.yds.
.5
1,8631f yd3/ft
932 yd3
Area 1= Area 2=
6,233 1,992
sq.ft sq.ft
576yd3 184 yd3
1. EXCAVATION N/A
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below
MHW or NWL in cubic yards 2,963 cu vds
b. Type of material to be excavated silt and sand
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? _ Yes X No
d. Highground excavation in cubic yards 597 cu vds
(Includes 54 cu.yds. of sand spit material above
nwl)
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL N/A
a. Location of disposal area There are two dredge spoil
retention areas depicted on the site plan. Both areas
are located outside the 30 ft vegetative buffer.
Containment will be achieved by excavating the
containment areas approximately 3 ft from the
existing surface to create a containment bowl. Also
a small berm t 1-2 rr mgn) wm be bunt from some of
of the containment areas to maintain 2 ft freeboard
during the hydraulic dredge procedure. After the
material dries out. the sand dominated material will he
hell
on area fil
e the
buffer. Sandy material will be used for bulkhead
backfill and organic dominated material will be
hauled off site.
b. Dimensions of disposal area Both areas area
approximately 130 ft X3?- ft AN,, X,-32ft.
c. Do you claim title to disposal area?
X Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-2
E-WcCr??V?Tg01?1
]F1L.1-d
AND (Except bridges and culverts)

d. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? X Yes No
If yes, where? The same locations will be available
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes X No
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water?
Yes X No
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a. Type of shoreline stabilization
X Bulkhead X RipRap X Vertical Breakwater
b. Length Bulkhead = 1, If, RipRap= 577 If, Vertical
Breakwater= 366 If
c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL
--2 ft avg.
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL
Max. 37 ft within Reclamation Area I: Most areas
of proposed shoreline stabilization are at NWL
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
Un to 2-3 ft ner/vear alone Soundfront shoreline not
currently stabilized
(Source of inforn:nuon)_field observation, client photo-
documentation
f. Type of bulkhead or riprap material
H (Ili _P'11
Wood and vinyl bulkhead, wood breakwater and
eranitic-type rock riprap
Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below water
level
Reclamation Area 1: 115 cu vds (This is an area of
6,233 sa.ft. and the average water depth based on nwl
here is 0.5 ft); Reclamation Area 2: 37 cu vds (This is
an area of 1,992 sa.ft. and the average water denth here
is 0.5 ft
h. Type of fill material dredge sand material
i. Source of fill material dredge material
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization) N/A
a. Will fill material be brought to site?
_ Yes No
If yes,
(1) Amount of material to be placed in the water
Revised 03/95
o
(2) Dimensions of fill area
(3) Purpose of fill
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes No
Section 404 area as delineated by Raleigh Bland,
USACE
If Yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area
(2) Purpose of fill
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and
erosion controlled? Silt fencing and
seeding/planting- Each drege spoil area will be
surrounded by silt fencing.
b. What type of construction equipment will be used (for
example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Barge w/ clamshell-type dredge machinery, backhoe,
auger
c. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to
project site? Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
T.A. Bramble
A licant or Project Name
Signature
5-26-06
Date
Form DCM-MP-2
N/,
?j• ! o lU
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-3
TUr?t 2 3 2006
U L A N1 3" 00 a1$tL)Z?a llLti-1?(VlliaLR4' !VJ°
T ?a?%H Clry?
?3 N
-1 E J V 'E L 0 P
(Construction and/or Iand disturbing activities)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all other
sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Type and number of buildings, facilities, units or
structures proposed N/A
Yes X No (No impervious surface
proposed)
If yes, date submitted
i. Describe proposed method of sewage disposal.
Existing on-site conventional septic treatment
system
b. Number of lots or parcels One
c. Density (give the number of residential units and the
units per acre) One existing residence (0.03 units per
acre)
d. Size of area to be graded, filled or disturbed including
roads, ditches, etc. 22,452 sq.ft. (0.52 acres) Areas to
be graded include, snoil retention areas, bulkhead
backfill, excavation of high ground, reclamation areas
and walkwav over land
If the proposed project will disturb more than one acre
of land, the Division of Land Resources must receive
an erosion and sedimentation control plan at least 30
days before land disturbing activity begins. If
applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion control
plan been submitted to the Division of Land
Resources? Yes X No N/A
If yes, date submitted
f. List the materials (such as marl, paver stone, asphalt,
or concrete) to be used for paved surfaces.
N/A
g. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet of
MHW or NWL, or within 575 feet in the case of an
Outstanding Resource Water, to be covered by
impervious and/or built-upon surfaces, such as
pavement, buildings, rooftops, or to be used for
vehicular driveways or parking. There is an existing
1.21 90 of the area within the 75 ft AEC covered with
impervious surfaces. There is no prposed impervious
surface addition within the AEC
h. Projects that require a CAMA Major Development
Permit may also require a Stormwater Certification.
Has a site development plan been submitted to the
Division of Environmental Management for review?
j. Have the facilities described in Item i. above received
state or local approval? _Yes- existing system
(Attach appropriate documentation)
k. Describe location and type of proposed discharges to
waters of the state (for example, surface runoff,
sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent,
"wash down" and residential discharges).
There may be minor surface runoff
1. Describe proposed drinking water supply source (e.g.
well, community, public system, etc.)
Existing water supply from Dare County Water
Department will remain
m. Will water be impounded? Yes X No
If yes, how many acres?
n. If the project is a oceanfront development, when was
the lot(s) platted and recorded? N/A
T.A. Bramble
Applicant or Project Name
Signature
6-20-06
Date
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-4
STRUCTURES
(Construction within Public Trust Areas)
.i,-{^? -fat
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all other
sections of the Joint Application which relate to this (4) Width of water body
proposed project. (5) Distance buoy(s) to be placed beyond
shoreline
a. Dock(s) and/or Pier(s)
(1) _ Commercial -Community X Private
(2) Number 1
(3) Length 308 linear ft
(4) Width 6 ft
(5) Finger Piers X Yes No
(i) Number 2
(ii) Length 12
(iii) Width 3
(6) Platform(s) _Yes X No
(i) Number
(ii) Length
(iii) Width
(7) Number of slips proposed 5
(8) Proximity of structure to adjacent riparian the
nearest riparian property line to the proposed
pier is 540 linear feet. The proposed rip-rap
runs to the adiacent riparian property lines
(9) Width of water body Albemarle Sound: 6
miles
(10) Water depth at waterward end of pier at
MLW or NWL 2.5 ft
b. Boath ouse (including covered lifts) N/A
(1) Commercial Private
(2) Length
(3) Width
c. Groin (e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.) N/A
(1) Number
(2) Length(s)
f. Mooring structure (boatlift, mooring pilings, etc.)
(1) _ Commercial Community X Private
(2) Number 11 pilings
(3) Length
(4) Width
g. Other (Give complete description)
Walkway partial shading over surface water: 450 sq.ft.
Walkway shading over wetlands: 211 sq.ft.
Walkway shading over high around: 1,250 sq.ft.
T.A. Bramble
Applicant or Pro?eec't Name
Signature ?
5-26-06
Date
d. Breakwater (e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.)
The vertical slotted sheetpile breakwater proposed is
considered to be a shoreline stabilization measure where
Section 404 wetlands meet the canal. See enclosed
cross-section
(1) Length 366 ft
(2) Average distance from MHW, NWL or
wetlands at NWL
(3) Maximum distance beyond MHW, NWL or
wetlands -2 ft
Mooring buoys N/A
(1) _Commercial -Community _Private
(2) Number
(3) Description of buoy
(Color, inscription, size, anchor, etc.)
Revised 03/95
Fofha DCM-MP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all other
sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
1. BRIDGES
a. Public Private X
b. Type of bridge (construction material)
wood
c. Water body to be crossed by bridge
UT- This is an unnamed tidal creek that runs into
the man-made canal
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL
ranges from 0.5 to 1.25 ft
Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge?
Yes X No
If es,
?1) Length of existing bridge N/A
(2) Width of existing bridge N/A
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge N/A
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain) N/A
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)?
Yes X No
If es,
?1) Length of existing culvert N/A
(2) Width of existing culvert N/A
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL N/A
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain) N/A
g. Length of proposed bridge 30 ft
h. Width of proposed bridge 6 ft
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
T minimum
j. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
Yes X No
If yes, explain

k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
There will be a minimum of 3 ft clearance from the
decking to the normal water level This tidal creek
is not navigable. The water depth is too shallow for
canoes/kavaks and the creek is intermittent -
1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
reducing or increasing the existing navigable
opening? Yes X No
If yes, explain
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? X Yes No
If yes, explain The water depth is too shallow for
canoes/kavaks and the creep is intermittent This
is essentially a drainage feature through wetlands
n. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard
concerning their approval?
Yes X No
If yes, please provide record of their action.
2. CULVERTS N/A
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
b. Number of culverts proposed
c. Type of culvert (construction material, style)
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
Yes No
If es,
M1) Length of existing bridge
(2) Width of existing bridge
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
Yes No
If es,
?1) Length of existing culvert
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-5

(2) Width of existing culvert ?.? ?- "`,r.. ,... yes No
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above t 1 r.'..
the =i Y If' no, attach a letter granting permission
MHW or NWL from the owner.
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be (4) Will the disposal area be available for future
removed? (Explain) . maintenance? Yes No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
£ Length of proposed culvert Yes No
dimensions yes, give if different from (2)
g. Width of proposed culvert
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHW or NWL
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
Yes No
If yes, explain
Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
potential? Yes No
If yes, explain
3. EXCAVATION AND FILL
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL?
Yes X NoF .
If yyes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated N/A
(2) Width of area to be excavated N/A
(3) Depth of area to be excavated N/A
(4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards N/A
b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation within: No
Coastal Wetlands SAVs Other Wetlands
If es,
?1) Length of area to be excavated N/A
(2) Width of area to be excavated N/A
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards N/A
c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any highground excavation?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated N/A
(2) Width of area to be excavated N/A
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards N/A
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves
an excavation, please complete the following: N/A
6) Location of the spoil disposal area
(2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
above.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area
below the MHW or NWL? Yes No
If yes, give dimension if.different from No. 2
above.
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed below MHW
or NWL? Yes X No
If yyes,
(1) Length of area to be filled N/A
(2) Width of area to be filled N/A
(3) Purpose of fill N/A
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed within: No
Coastal Wetlands SAVs Other Wetlands
- _
es,
U Length of area to be filled N/A
(2) Width of area to be filled N/A
(3) Purpose of fill N/A
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on
highground? Yes X No
If yyes1) , _
( Length of area to be filled N/A
(2) Width of area to be filled N/A
(3) Purpose of fill N/A
4. GENERAL
a. Will the propose d project involve any mitigation?
If yes, explain in detail
b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existing utility lines? Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
c. Will the proposed projectrequire the construction of
any temporary detour structures?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
Revised 03/95
Form-DCM-MP-5
d. Will the proposed project require any work
channels? Yes X No
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? Silt fencing and seeding
f. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe or hydraulic
dredge)?
Backhoe, dump trucks, auger
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes X No
If yes, explain. steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
Yes X' No
If yes, explain in detail
T.A. Bramble
App nt or Project Name
Signature
Date
Revised 03/95

'
n
l
f
Stoop
J?Iar

? ;
agieton
?
Point _ :.

.?
Li ht r y

Liglik s ?' * >-r

i. i
:t
e
1 I ?r"CEI
?, .? `tea ?` ..a.
JAN ° 3 200E
OASTAL PY,iANAGEMENT
ELIZABETH CITY
s
M A R L S
U N D
I
EXISTING BULKHEAD AND EROSION

NATURAL SHORELINE AND COASTAL
WETLANDS TO BE PRESERVED

??lflV .? .: 200
4eOW`w 1:, 11 •.i'?iyt.7 Sri\JIi.?IV u
?? ,pe tt
EROSION OF THE PROPOSED RECLAMATION
AREA I
ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION OF THE EXISTING
BULKHEAD
BRAMBLE PROPERTY PHOTOS
;2 iz

G 1 ELL-I 1? 'IS t`
EXISTING BULKHEAD AND EROSION
NATURAL SHORELINE AND COASTAL ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION OF THE EXISTING
WETLANDS TO BE PRESERVED BULKHEAD
BRAMBLE PROPERTY PHOTOS
EROSION OF THE PROPOSED RECLAMATION
AREA I

Impact '; Mitigations ' Fees A illatlcns ' Events Inspections Comments li -terf 1
Detallsi I - Deta1l32 Permit, and Ce is Cro s Fe(
I
ProjeclNumbec 20050431 Version: 1 Status: Issued Last ActionDesc: Projectissued ( eve J
'Project Name: Bramble-West -ProjeclType: IRoad maintenance[repairtimprov...
Project Desc: Access Roadways
Finish Cancel
P
'Owner: Bramble,Tom Clear I__Delails...
'Received From: Applicant L : Anorthe fact COE ID: 200510743
II
'Primary County j Dare
DOTTIP: I 'Adman Region t Washington
Received Dt. 0 310 912 0 0 5 ! f 7 Courtesy copy I Involves public land Reviewer: tom.stertens
IssuedDt 041112005 Express INEPAISEPArequired
'SecondaryCounty__ Add J
Statutory DI 0 510 812 0 0 5 ;. EEP - I Slate Clear. finalized
I : CAMA NEPAL SEPA Received Dt:
DCM Me: DCM Elizabeth City Field Of.. - I SW Plan Received Dt (-
COE Office: COE Washington Regulato... -' SW Plan Approved Dt Public Notice Published EX
Last Updated Dy: laurle dennlson SW Plan Location: Public Notice Received Dt: F_
j
Last Updated On. 0 912 612 0 0 5 Sewage Disposal: I _ P.N. Comment Period Ends Dt:
05-0431 Ver 1 BIMS print screens; could not locate
file ...I d
.01

Impact= I blltiptions ' Fces A IMIon, [rents Inspectlons Commr-nt, I History i
pelaii 1 f DetdIIs2 F[nm ;ndC 1 Cu .;F.':
Project Number. 20050431 Version: 1 Status: Issued LastActlonDesc: Projectissued Save
i
Project Name: Bramble - West Project Type: Road maintenancelrepairlmprov Primary County. Dare
Location: Albemarle Sound Kill Devil Hills
-.2ap- Decimal DD:MM:SS Accuracy. I Unknown
Latitude: 36.005556 3600.20 I Method: Unknown
Longitude: 175.716112 75.42.58_ Datum: (Unknown ?J
Subbasin J Name J streamindez Ctas ifca5o UnnamedT I, - -
PA554 - IALBEMARLE SOUND 30 SB
1 Add
FJ -J
l i
I
Prior Project History.
Future Project Plans:
i
Finish Cancel

r,riti?St i?'P!P*`i? :' a., ., its IJy'*1
Impacts 1 Mitigations Fees Aftlllatlons Events Inspection I cc t 11 111 1 Ili--I ,ry
j
Details' Detalls2 Permits and Certs -pro-- l3
j
Project Number. 20050431 Version: i Status: Issued Last ActionDesc: Projectissued Save
Project Name: Bramble-West Project Type: Road maintenancelrepalrllmprov Primary County: Dare
'TYpe Number ]Statutory Date Issued Date Comments:
General 401 General 600003404 0510812005 0411112005
104 Nationwide NW14
_ - - --- -- - ? ---- - - I Add
I
Number
Individual ______'Type___ _JStalutoryDatellssuedData_] Add
Create Individual...
Buffer 'Buffer Rule _StatutoryPate .. f_ _IssuedDate jEMCHear!UDate l Add
Finish Cancel
_ '„
117) ".Ppfl
impacts_ M:t:gations Fees P'nllat!ons ' Events Inspection. r' Climni-nl. I II it'-' ry
D taII;1 Cetails2 Pcrmi, d,ijcoiG Clw;i?a'?
ProJoctNumbe[ 20050431 Version: 1 Status: Issued Last ActionDesc: Projecllssued Save j
- II
Project Name: Bramble-West ProJectType: Road malntenancelrepalr7lmprov PrlmaryCounry: Dare
WeKland Sttc:
Sate F Impact Type I Perm,. Re st.a.. Ap r.acr.. Flood.!_Subbas!n Dist.near YetIandType Last U. Last_..P -----
CONY Converted from -11 0 31 10 31 _ rJ?PAS54J 30! SBlA Converted from FM?walt.s.. 06724... P.dd
Stream Site:
Site* •Im actT e Perm. ]*Re st R A r roved.. Subbasln Stre-im Perennlal 303D Lalt. Last. ----- -
- - __ P YP 9 _ (?.. PP_ (10-Tim P __ ? P' L- Add
Open Water Sit
•Slte* •ImpactTypa _ _Perm.?'Regst(acres Appr(acres) _ •Subbasin ____J!vv terbodyTy LastUpdat.:LastUpdat
Add
Buller Site:
'SiteJ _ 'Zone Buffer Rule i Perm
J_ ,JRegst,(sq ]Appr(sgR)? _ Subbasin LastUpdatJLastUpdat
Add....--
Unit Conversion Totals
- - - 111 -
Finish I Cancel
ent I K-tory
Impacts Dct3iltUons Fees- ARI?cEvents In_pectiorul Comm
Dtalis2
'-..,Pemri..andCcil= ._.-i Cfcssl7rL - -
1 I
Project Number: 20050431 Version: 1 Status: Issued Last ActionDesc: Project Issued Save j
Project Name: Oramble - West Project Type: Road malntenancelrepairlimprov PrimaryCounty: Dare
'Event Type Event_Date Due Date Category Comment ?LastUpdat=-..iLastV
Application received in CO 0 310 912 0 0 5 Rl1 Wetland Converted Ev...:wait .scheper061241
Application senlto Region 0 311 512 0 0 5 R11 Wetland Converted Ev._ wall scheper-'061241
Project issued ___,04_11_11200_5_ R11 Wetland Converted Ev... wait scheper 061241
i
i
Ada - -1
I
I
I
i
Finish Cancel
. • Z~ N Z . _ Z ~ I
~ g
~ ~ N - ly M N N C
I n * v Y
BLoUNr ~~r ~ ~ z N x ~ W 4 t
0 ~ JU ° Z • ~ 0
m I ~ N W L ~ Z V a 0 ~ G 0 ON o~
~ ~ ~ p~ U M
O J M. * Q O ~ ~ ~ p
ID' ASPHALT ROAD ~T VJ ~ W N ~ Z n W
~ (TrP1 N\U ~ ~ m \ ~ W Z .N.
~ NOTE: WO O 0 Z -
A AN I LL L D D STURBANCE PRPOSED WILL BE OUTSIDE ~o~ AREAS OF SECTION 404 WETLANDS V O ~ c 5 NDP/PFP DR. W W r

1 ~ 1 ~ 1 _ ~ W ~
~ 0 ~
\ / ~ i ~ \
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ \ v z
/ - ~ \ ~ ~LB~MA~L~ g 1 J t-
~ ~ q 50UND a I z ~
r ~ \ N \ ~ IN/ TY - ~/IG M~~
CT / ~ BRAMBLE PRIVATE ROAD ~ IMPROVEMENT AREA, _
~ SECTION 404 WETLANDS HAVE BEEN DELINEATED BY QUIBLE 5EE CROSS-SECTtoN ~ AND CONFIRMED BY USACE ON 8-17-04 ~ ~ ~F h ~NrS~ W \ U
0 ~ ~
/V W Z
75 „ _ fT ASG ° I OW~(~yU ~ NOTES: ~<~~OJ;~
GoASTAL ~rL,ardDS _ \ ,o ~ W .>mZ~a~ \ od D~ap~~pN
r ; ~ \ ~ 1. OWNER: T.A. BRAMBLE N vi da .a'-^awmor
` coASTAI hE7LAND5 ~j ~ P.O. BOX 785 ~ WNpO~Np~c~ =W~ WWZJa v rrW~,a~p NIWOT, CO 80544 ~o g g_~
~ 5~ ~ N/F DEP05mowu. i~ATU?><J _ \ ~b ~ _ ~ ~ ~ m v~oW~~o~Z~ ~ 2. SUBJECT PROPERTY: 39.4 ACRES = ~ ~g=~soopW
Q'`.. ~ , . WILLIAM ~ GLADY5 TO BE REMOVED / \ \~i ~ DARE CO. TAX PIN # 987309068980 } ~ W~WpiiQsgo 3, PROPOSED MAINTENANCE DREDGING: o ~ =~~o=~W°-''
BEADLlNG ~ 5 MAINTAIN OPEN AREA X75 x I \ FOR HYDROLOGIC C ~ , ~ / ~ \ PRO OSED Lill- - U" 0. , DREDGING E / _ om ~ WF 1 - WITHIN XISTING BASIN CANAL AND A 30 FT ACCESS ° ~ ~~=~=~1=
EX.. W00~f ~ PRO S D ~ DIRT AND BULKHEAD RI -RAP 16 LF) ~ ~S . ~ 1.2 ULKHE 196 LF VEL ROAD l-~f~ N7Kp ~Z j-~ 75t7' ~ CHANNEL TO EXISTING -4FT OF WATER 40,000 S4. FT./ 2,963 CU.YDS. MAX.). o -`~O~m'"g
x 2.Ox 0, . - - ,P~b 8~ x ) 2.25 x - HEA 1 , ~ THIS IS TO BE A CLAM-SHELL DREDGE ND HYDRAULIC DREGDE OPERATION. a °O J T 1 - AN 1 - ~ ~ PREVIOUS DREDGE PERMITS INCLUDE PERMI S 93 89 D 93 90
.5' 1. ~ 8,~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n~ 4. PROPOSED UPLAND EXCAVATION FOR CREATION OF 2 BOAT SLIPS (4 AND 5):
1.25 ~ ~ x,`2.~x 2.5 . x 1 / v ~ x 1.0 , GO {"LEYLAND ~.0 ~ ,v 1- - ~ ~ ~ (1,989 SO.FT./ 516 CU.YDS.)
PA ?fly x .D x ~,.25 x ~p x x x ~ ~ \ 1. 1 x .25~ _ 3.4 25 x ~ C~ ~ 2' ass ~ 2,7 \ i ~ 5. PROPOSED SHORELINE RECLAMAl10N: 8,225 SO. FT. TOTAL 762 CU.YDS. ~ ~ ( ~ AREA 1: 6,233 S4. FT (576 CU.YDS.), AREA 2: 1,992 (184 CU.YDS.) SH RELINE EROSION HAS
2.75 2.0 x 5 ~ ,75 x +`l` cn~ s~.4 . 5,, 1.0 ~ 0 2.25 _ vER~ 30 FT x X. ' F G0,45T,4L r' CREATED EROSIVE ESCARPMENTS; THIS APPLICATION PROPOPSES NEW BULKHEAD
x ~ PROP• 0/L 2, \ , ~ ~ ~ A06 AREt GOtlSTAI. N~TL4ND _ N...~~~~~ ON THE WATERWIDE EDGE OF THE RECLAMATION AREAS WITH DREDGE SPOIL BACKFILL
x D.25_' . ~ 0 ~ 1 2.5 x 11~ - _ A5 PER IJG 1~ 0 X 2 5 _ ~ ~ \ .25 CK Rbl}T~ 6. DREDGE SPOIL RETENTION: EACH RETENTION AREA TO BE FILLED APPROX. 4 T1MES ; ~ A5 PER DGM (&9-05) PROPOSED o 3 RETENTION AREA 1: APPROX CAPACITY 464 CU,YDS.
x 1 , ~ ~ _ - ~~YAND f~tOM ~ 0~ RIP-RAP (388 LF) m ~ N RETENTION AREA 2: APPROX CAPACITY 339 CU.YDS. ~ ~
1: - KHEAD ~ ~ 0 ` x _ ,5~ COASTAL 1.0 E BACK ~ 0~ • o O 7. SHORELINE STABILIZATION ~ ° a ~
hE7LAl~5 E11. SEPTIC 5. TEM ~ 1,y~ . A R ~ x 1; x 1.25 ~ ~ SWPE ~ ~ pD A. VINYL BULKHEAD: 1,863 LF WITH 0.5 CU,YDS. OF BACKFILL PER LF W < ' S NOTE: LAND DISTURBANCE ASSOCIATED WITH THE BULKHEAD CONSTRUCTION WILL BE 18,630 SOFT. ~ Z w
~0~' COASTAL {^E'TLAND - 10 SOFT. PER LF ~ w a ~ -SURFACE WATER ( ) s rc N
X- x ESGARPh~M' SURFP ,1. 1.25 ~ 11 Q L=RlNGE AS PER DGM (8-9-05) ~T' x B. VINYL VERTICAL BREAKWATER. 366 LF (GAPS ALLOW FLOW TO AND FROM ADJACENT WETLANDS) a ~ v v ~ ~
1. 1 kD:~ 1.75 _ x r i' r C. ROCK RIP-RAP: 577 LF (CONSTRUCTED OF GRANITIC ROCK) ~ o ° ° ° Z ° ° NOTE: ALL SHORELINE STABILIZATION PRESERVES WETLAND AREAS ; < a a a y a a
15 30 x .75 pR POSED -PROP( -PROPOSED MAINTENANCE DREDGE AREA (40,000 SO.FT.) 8. BOAT MOORING: < ~ a N ~ W N m
BULWF1fAl6 673 LF ) COASTAL N,E7ZAND p1V~ 1.75 PROPOSED {-RIIJGE t.Oxi TO A DEPTH OF -4 FT (2,963 CU.YDS. MAX.) ~ ~ a a a ~ a a SLIPS 1-3: 24 FT X 14 FT m ~ N~ m a rn m
x 1.75 R CLAMATION AREA 2 A5 PER DGM (&4-05) - JURIS[ - JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS AREA 8 MOORING PILJNGS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 TRIANGULAR FlNGER PIERS (12 LF EACH) ° s s s s B s s
x 1.~5 , 1,992 SO•FT.) ~ E.r BULKHEAD CONFIf x 1.75 PROPOSED PROPOSED rlr=E 357LF CONFIRMED BY USACE ~ SLIPS 4-5: 40 FT X 14 FT SIDE-TO SLIPS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~
x;2 p RIP-RAP 73 LF) RECLAMATION AREA 1 ;(REPAIR PROPOSID) 3 MOORING PILINGS b
AROUND OINT (6,233 SO.FT.) ~~~tGGE ~POiL -PROP( x ~ .0 x 2.25 TM_ETEtITION AREA 1 (1,989 - PROPOSED UPLAND CUT FOR BOAT SLIP 4-5 CREATION ~ a n 9. ELEVATED WOOD WALKWAY: 308 LF X 6 FT (ELEVATED MIN. 3 FT OVER WETLANDS AND SURFACE WATER) ~ a ~ o m 8 (1,989 SO.FT./ 516 CU.YDS.) ° ~ ~ I I 8 ~ o I ~
x 5.5 ~ Ja W N N ~ ~ n N N Q .
4.75 x 2 25 x 5.75 ~ -PROP( -PROPOSED RIP-RAP (577 LF) o „ o ~ ~ N M ~ F
- ~4L~FM~~L~ 5.75xx x 2.25 p0
5.5 x 4.25 x 3. 5~(JN~ _ X2.5 • • • • - IDENTI ? 1? 4 n N M ? t h m O -IDENTIFIED AS COASTAL WETLANDS BY DCM Z
4.~ 4.D GRAPHIC SCALE •
x 4.75 x 4.5 too o so ,00 zoo goo , _ BLOW-UP 1 "=50' Q
- PILE-, PILE-SUPPORTED WALKWAY (308 LF) z
0
' 4 PT Hl4TER DEP]N GONTGYAZ - PROPOSED RECLAMATION AREAS OF NON-WETLANDS a
W,4 P lT! T I (IN FEET) -PROP( 1FR DEF7fl5 AY~D 05 ON5 E5 ABL Sf~D BY 5URVE1'-GRADE GP5 TEGHNIG~ES _ 1 AREA 1 inch - 100 it. AREA 1: 6,233 SQ.FT,, AREA 2: 1,992 SOFT. U
x 3.75 - EXISTI PROPOSED WALKWAY 308 LF = _ ( ) ~ 3.75 EXISTING WATER DEPTH ~ ~M1N: ~ .py~ WETLANDS ~
AND SURFACE WAR. ~ z
PROPOSED 1 / BULKHEAD
1
PROPOSED\ ~ BULKHEAD
UPLAND EXCAVATION FOR SLIP 1r PAVFD SURFACE 4 AND 5 CREATION ~
atrnwm EX. DOCK
I4' Fr 14' Ff 1 4' Ff e, (ro BE ~MOUEDJ
6:1 vpoo ~rAHNC weu ~ ~ ~ NOCD REfAINNG WALL 6 Z
~ ~ Q
PROPOSED GROUND SURFACE 'HOOD DECKING OPo1f1 DPoIEIYAY INPRDVFlIFN15 ARE PERNIf1fD l U AND UNDER CONSIRUC110N
.ris.s. W PROPOSED ~
\ VERTICAL BREAKWATER ~y~m ® ~ o YPICAL DRNBwAY SBC!'ION
20' TIDAL CREEK SURFACE j 1 rl1r~lJ.~ L ~0 FT r- to' -t \ ~ ® 4~ 0 \
A.o. 6.. o . _~,~0, _ I
aUl_. ~ ~
\ ~ ~JeNR wAiEr<~lUAl1, ~
EX. GRADE ' . ` ~ 20' OF FREEBOARD ; ~ 3.0' ABOVE M : \ ~ Y~TIAHDS ~Ni} STQR1dWATER 9Pv
. > 4 ~ ~ ~ Y~ , rs.. TYP. I ~ i ~ E r [ ` ~ i TO BE MANITAINm j~~A ~~Jy ,
WOOD PILE EwDRAI~uC _ SP(><t. SLURRY ; a z
WOOD AND NNYL BULKHEAD
PII,B SUPPORTED WALS~VAY B o
TYPICAL SECTION OF BULS~IDAD
1 "=5' OVER TIDAL. CREEK „ TYPICAL SECTION OF DRBDCIE SPOIL CONTAII~Tl1~NT ~~~~r~+ U \lrl~l\ i F
1 =10 1 "=5' Z a
a
WETLAND VEGETATI
EXIy~hG qt ~
ADE ~ ~ I, ~1~1, ~ . ,.f.,~ w_: _ _ _ COMMISSION NO. 04066
- t.s NWL ~0 FT ASL AVG. I DESIGNED BY
~t.5' ti4,p^ - RIP RAP NOT 1 , ~ _ _ OTHERS EXISTING BOTTOM
TO EXCEED 1' `J 2 \ / ABOVE ...,.y . - F.i.:~ sniwPS/DDW?rED>AEES ~ _ DRAWN BY
\ / 8.0' WETLANDS BOX Box cur ~ S?IGREU~ I ~ BDR PROPOSED SAND BAL161LL
.o' GRADE E~EAD At Nw~ ~ ~ CHECKED BY
.11' 30' EROSION ESOP j .
DREDGED BOTTOM EXI5IMIG WATER OEPTH N aEaAUAna+ I,..__.. _ r___ ISSUE DATE
/ ~~~~pp~~ ~ A~ RANGES ~ a~ ~ TO,.D ~ ~ - , i ~ 9~22~05 li
WOODEN PRO~ii~?1~IJ ~r~11\1\r~L bV 1 UT SHEET N0.
rGAPS BCETwEEN SHEATH~ING1 TYPICAL SECTION OF RIP RAP 1 5' r'- , i ~ ~
TYPICAL SSCPION OF VERTICAL BREAKWATER l
T 7 i
TYPICAL RECLAMATION AREA FILL
OF 1 SHEETS