20050596 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20051025

OF w A?FR
? Q
.v
Nlichael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
February 17, 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
7005 0390 0001 3553 0094
Theodore C: Morlock
T & T Properties, Inc.
1202 North Main Street
Anderson, SC 29621
Subject Property: Water Dance Developement
Hwy. 107 South of Cullowhee
Project Return
Dear Mr. Morlock:
DWQ Project # 05-0596
Jackson County
p BCC LE5
FEB 2 8 200G
,_ , Wrst > 0! AL IT'f
On November 21, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) mailed you an additional
information request in regards to your request to construct a pond within the proposed
Water Dance Developement. As of today, the DWQ has not received a response to this
request. Therefore, we are returning your application as incomplete in accordance with
15A NCAC 2H .0506.
As you have no authorization under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act for this activity,
and work within waters of the state would be a violation of North Carolina General
Statutes and Administrative Code. Please call Mr. Kevin Barnett at 828-296-4657 if you
have any questions this matter.
Sincer ,
Kevin H Barnett, Environmental Chemist
Surface Water Protection
C Klkhb
cc: Jennifer Robertson, WNR, Inc.
Post Office 882
Canton, NC 28716
Cyndi Karoly, DWQ, Wetlands / 401 Permitting Unit
USACE Asheville Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 05-0596.Ver#2.WaterDance.returned
401 Wetlands Cert,fication Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX [phone] / Internet: htto://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
NotihCarolina
'AalrtrallY
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
F
Wetland and Natural Resource
Consultants, Inc.
November 29t', 2005
To: Mr. Roger C. Edwards
NC Division of Water Quality
2090 U.S. Highway 70
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Re: Water Dance Development
Hwy. 107 South of Cullowhee
Jackson County, North Carolina
DWQ Project # 05-0596 Ver. #2
Dear Mr. Edwards:
DEC 2 2005
DENS N10 STORt ATER BRAN{

We have been in contact with Mr. Ted Morlok concerning your on hold letter. This is
the first project that Mr. Morlok has undertaken in North Carolina and he is interested in
talking with your agency to determine how he can better proceed with future
projects as related to environmental regulations. Mr. Morlok has requested a meeting
either on site or at your office with yourself and Kevin Barnett to discuss and finalize his
WaterDance/River Rock project. Please respond by email or phone with your
availability. Thank you in advance for your attention to this project.
Please contact us if you have any further questions.
Best regards,
ennifer obertson
828-712-9205
cc: Mrs. Cindi Karoly
Canton Office
PO Box 882
Canton, NC 28716
828-648-8801
828-648-8802 Fax
wnrinc.com
Newton Office
PO Box 224
Newton, NC 28658
828-465-3035
828-465-3050 Fax
OF W A TF
9Q Michael F. Easley, Governor
ZO./ W G y
Cq D l William G. Ross Secretary
\ r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural al Resources
4 Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
•• Division of Water Quality
November 21, 2005
DWQ Project # 05-0596 Ver. #2
Jackson County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 7005 0390 00013552 8329
Theodore C. Morlock
T & T Properties, Inc.
1202 North Main Street
Anderson, SC 29621
Subject Property: Water Dance Developement
Hwy. 107 South of Cullowhee
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Morlock:
A
On October 25, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application to
modify your existing Water Quality Certification to include additional impacts of 40
linear feet of streams in the form of 2 new road crossings, a reduction of length of
impacts at 2 road crossings, and the impoundment of 50 linear feet of streams. The
DWQ has determined that your application was incomplete and/or provided inaccurate
information as discussed below. The DWQ will require additional information in order to
process your application to impact protected wetlands and/or streams on the subject
property. Therefore, unless we receive the additional information requested below, we
will have to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506
and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional
information. Please provide the following information so that we may continue to review
your project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Under Section VII of your application you did not provide a "justification" for the
impoundment as requested within this section. Additionally, as this unnamed
tributary to the West Fork Tuckasegee River is classified WS-III, B, Tr (Water
Supply 3, B, Trout), you must also prove that there is "no practicable alternative
exists" as required by 15A NCAC 02B .0215 (3)(b)(i)(H). As this Office
understands that the structure has already been constructed prior to the issuance
of the original Water Quality Certification, if "no practicable alternative" can be
provided, then some form of alternative authorization must be presented. One
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncvvetlands
One
No thCarolina
,/ afrrrallIf
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
T & T Properties, Inc.
Page 2 of 2
November 21, 2005
possibility which this office would consider is payment into the Ecosystem
Enhancement Fund for the length on the "fill" (culvert and spillway) and the
impounded water at a 3:1 ratio for this unauthorized impact. Additionally, as this
structure has not been authorized, T & T Properties, Inc. may be subject to civil
penalties of up to $10,000.00 per day, per incident, as per N.C.G.S. 143-251.1(a).
Please respond within 10 business days of receipt of this letter by sending this
information to me in writing and Cyndi Karoly of the DWQ Central Office. Failure to
respond within 10 business days will cause the package to be returned as incomplete
and for this office to forward a recommendation for enforcement to the Division Director
for the above mentioned violation.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to
wetlands, waters or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested
within your application are not authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Mr.
Kevin Barnett at 828-296-4657 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set
up a meeting to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
Roger C. Edwards, Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
RCE1khb
cc: Neill Yelverton, WNR, Inc.
Post Office Box 882
Canton, NC 28716
DWQ 401 Central Office
USACE Asheville Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 05-0596.Ver#2.Waterdance.Jackson.Addinfo
M, !1"V7 7
I.mpacls Mitigaton? Fees Affiliations Events Inspectlons Ccmmtwnts ' History
Detailst Detalls2 Perin t5 and Certs_ Cro55 Hers
ProjeclNumber: 20050596 Version: 2 Status: On Hold Last ActionDesc: Incomplete App- Additional Info I,
'Project Name: Waterdance CJO T&T Properties "PrcjectType: -:Residential Subdivision
Project Desc: residential development
'Owner. T&TPropedies Details...
'Received From: Applicant - COE ID: 200531500 'Primary Countf.
DOTTIP: 'Admin Region: Asheville
Received Dt: 1012512005 Reviewer: ikevin barnelt
Issued DC _
'Secondary Couny_ __ j
Statutory DL
CAMA NEPAI SEPA Received Ot:
DCM ORue: SW Plan Received Dt
COE Once: ieville Regulatory Field Office SW Plan Approved Ot: Public Notice Published DI:
Last Updated 8y laurie.dennison SW Plan Location:
Public Notice Received Dt I
Last Updated On: 10/2712005 Sewage Disposal: P.N. Comment Period Ends Dt:
`Back Close
,Ready Page 111 SID:WPDI
Triage Check Dist
Date: 10/28/05 Project Name: Waterdance/River Rock, Ver. 2
DWQ #:05-05969 Ver. 2
County: Jackson
Kevin Barnett, Asheville Regional Office
To:
60-day Processing Time: 10/25/05 to 12/23/05
r-
From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone: [phone]
The file attached is being forwarded to you for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
n Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks!

Wetland and Natural Resource
Consultants, Inc.
October 191h, 2C05
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Mr. Dave Baker
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
RE: WaterDance/River Rock
404/401 Permit Application
Jackson County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Baker:
?'-J
?N
OG-? `?1 Fj ?0?5

The purpose of this letter is to request written authorization for an additional 40 linear
feet of stream channel impacts by T&T Properties under Nationwide Permits 39 for the
project known as WaterDance/River Rock in Jackson County, North Carolina. The
developer has already received approval for impacts on the site totaling 260 linear feet
(Corps Action ID 2CO531580 / DWQ Project # 05-0596). This permit application is
requesting impacts for 2 new road crossing and it reduces impacts at two previously
permitted road crossings. These crossings are in the separate subdivision known as River
Rock. Existing roads and road crossings were used to minimize impacts, and pipes will
be upsized to handle the flow regimes present in these channels.
This permit also requests approval from DWQ of a small impoundment previously
requested and not approved by DWQ (this impoundment was improved by USACE).
The attached USGS topographical maps show the location of the project. Impacts are
shown on the site plan map. Hard channel impacts will total 250 linear feet under
Nationwide Permit 39 for the construction of nine permanent road crossings to facilitate
access across the property. Channel flooding will total 50 linear feet under Nationwide
Permit 39 for the construction of a small aesthetic trout pond located along the main
entrance road.
Mitigation is proposed in the form of stream restoration of 220 linear feet of on site
stream channel, and preservation of buffers along 24,303 feet of remaining channel.
This is 1:1 restoration compensatory mitigation for 220 feet of impacts and 3C0:1
Canton Office
PO Box 882
Canton, NC 28716
828-648-8801
828-648-8802 Fax
wnrinc.com
Newton Office
PO Box 224
Newton, NC 286,58
828-465-3035
828-465-3050 Fax
preservation compensatory mitigation for the remaining 80 linear feet of impact. Six
previously existing road crossings on old logging roads on site, totaling 220 linear feet,
have been removed and restored according to the Channel Restoration Plan outlined
in the original permit. Restoration efforts have been completed at all six locations and
are documented in the enclosed Channel Restoration Completion Notification. Also
included in that letter are the restrictive covenants that protect the remaining streams,
wetlands, and buffers.
The following is a summary of the jurisdictional stream and wetland impacts and
proposed mitigation:
Project Site Data
-Total Project Area:
425 acres
Jurisdictional Waters of the US / Jurisdictional Wetlands
-Streams: 25,073 linear feet
-Wetlands: 0.196 acres
Jurisdictional Impacts
-Pipe Impacts (NW 39) (in place): 140 linear feet
-Pipe Impacts (NW 39) (proposed): 110 linear feet
-Flooding Impacts (NW 39) (in place): 50 linear feet
-Table of Impacts (seen in PCN)
-Total Permanent Stream Impacts: 300 linear feet
-Total Permanent Wetland Impacts: none
Summary of Mitigation:
-Avoidance:
-Total Streams Avoided: 24,303 linear feet
-Total Wetlands Avoided: 0.196 acres
-Preservation (On-Site Restrictive Covenants):
-Jurisdictional Streams: 24,303 linear feet
-Jurisdictional Wetlands: 0.196 acres
-Stream Buffers: 32.31 acres
-Compensation
-Channel Restoration (On-Site) 220 linear feet
-Total Stream Preservation:
-Total Stream Buffer Preservation:
-Total Stream Restoration:
-Total Wetland Preservation:
Canton Office
PO Box 882 wnrinc.com
Canton, NC 28716
828-648-8801
828-648-8802 Fax 2
24,303 linear feet
32.31 acres
220 linear feet
0.196 acres
Newton Office
PO Box 224
Newton, NC 28658
828-465-3035
828-465-3050 Fax
See the attached site plan sheets for impact and restoration locations. All streams cre
considered to be either perennial or intermittent and important in aquatic function.
Typical data forms for the streams and wetlands on site are included within this
application for your reference. The North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NC DWQ)
classifies the West Fork Tuckasegee River (below Thorpe Dam) as WS-III, B, Tr; all
unnamed tributaries to the West Fork Tuckasegee River receive the same classification.
Grassy Creek is classified as WS-III; all unnamed tributaries to Grassy Creek receive the
some classification.
If you have any questions concerning this proposed action, please call.
Sincerely,
?.
Neill Yelve n
Cc: Cyndi Karoly, NC Division of Water Quality (7 copies)
Kevin Barnett, NC Division of Water Quality (1 copy)
David McHenry, NC Wildlife Resource Commission (1 copy)
Canton Office
PO Box 882
Canton, NC 28716
828-648-8801
828-648-8802 Fax
wndnc.com
3
Newton Office
PO Box 224
Newton, NC 28658
828-465-3035
828-465-3050 Fax
03,'10;2005 12: 5i 3642609039 J,*IES 6ELK. PAGE 01
:?.
Wetland and Natural Resource trek y r
Consultants. Inc,,; r
Department of the Army
Wlimingwn CL-trirt, Corps of Friginecrs
Attn: Kcn Jolley, Chief Regulatory Divizion
PO Box 1690
Wilminpton, Nortn Carolina 28402-1890
-and-
NC Divi=n of water Quality
A= Cyndi Karoly
2321 cr-abtree Blvd.
Raleigh, North Cardin 276042260
I, the current landowner of the ptrooerty idc tbfled below, hereby authorire Wetland and Natural
R curt ° Consultant5, Inc. to act an my bChalf as my 3cmt during the Rr> 3irlg of perm s to
Impact Wottands and Watars of the u5 that are re quI try the Clan water Act and the
Rhv= and I1arinors Act.
Federal and State agcrtts are authorized to tw on said property when atcompanled by Wetland
and Natural R=urm Consultants, Inc. staff.
wetland and Natural Resource Ccn:ultants, Inc. Is authorized to provide 2up0ementzl
information needed for permit pressing at the request of the Corps or DWQ.
Property Owner of Record: C, _
Addres3: Address:
Address:
Phone Number: ?? a - s7 J
Property L.ocaticn: c ear J\' C.
Owners Signature: -'z ?
Date: ?',?/?f? ?'"
Nrwrnn )tee Zwe fRe
°O 9wr 224 wnrinc.c" 217 Nr4cn Parkway, 4142
Newton. NC 2USS Clyde. NC 29721
828-65-3033 r.3-640-=!
029.46S-3050 Fax I 1II8.64&8a32 F.rx
,.
'IT 167b
F - 9 '..? 4 f. cft t6Fl F :. r ? _.
Lao : Z_* 316{>I ICCdYOiff
- ?? / ,• 3 , , r i.- - - - t - r is
-C" Kr-b
?.. I t r t I ; /? I .i I r- °fe i ` t( P.ITOP
c /- / t rY ? yw J. .. \ w ? r / / I ?-J s? I a
/
/•/? BrovmMtnr 'High 7SP
:> \ 1 ?i I z / t / w s ?% r. J r ° +'a' :1 Hultc o "
?. tbWG?dn6 - --r ,
e.s\ r Pdtkty A6h i ?. / r r ( P -
F k 7 V i .:.? Mtn _ It 1 \ 1
NIP,
mt.
_ t S
n 1 'r l l r. t ? l t} t ?? ?? '
r ? ?.- / ? ` -„??> Csv adnvdr t/r ?.6y-- ?-`?. s:4' -_ O _ ;,;
O , .Y.I ? 1' - ? ?. ?r? r r _> o _ HtotM `b t ??? \Fb I f
"oMM ,?vI r t? ?t--v„
J r / $ 8 ) 4 e
r, Fr /?%` ' l ?;?' 'M?. ?? \ A i ; •?`... ,l\ .\,-fir r _. r., __ da \ r..
\ 1 v s6lSnanE 1. `. I ?`1 :. 1 i
I 1 bi dp
/ +' /> .? _ I /. r'ar y? I r ague Pllo? - r ?, rowo?
-'?' < K \ NY6. F.ib?
a.o '? 3 t I _ jz`/ 1
t 1 1
rr?«,r??m v t cnoskM.t 1 nw.i ( ( , _ 1 / ""r.`
s{nc ° -
t 1 l - r ?•?
a. >
f y'
V -V
.7 7,
r'
uN 'N" Knob. ?•:? V + `?/ .. / /J.. ." /(? 5 _ ? `: Fia'LESruke. t y ? '' ?` - C 1 ?J ' ;?_°.
•-t , •l I, r ?i ?? °' .?? .... , , -Mtn
st?
Ntrt, •\= ` O°a'.?m
`' I r ' Pntato + '? I GIa59yrOLIL F'
_ Knob! Mtn
, c ?- ,H Win, ?` a, 'Piney Clt "F -'J +J a ? ? a
f ? 7, ; be rAtn' .
',ter
rJo W / - ?.t1 . ?-? 12-Ger `-'?..•,<`! r'.+h \?? J ,/
av,
Name: GLENVILLE Location: 035.2097599* N 083.1321795* W
Date: 4/5/2005 Caption: WaterDance Vicinity Map
Scale: 1 inch equals 4000 feet

I ..C

1
j ':J
t1'
f,t
'?
i
y

r

.. r

`
"
f ? y f
Pry - sh

F' tom- - r f 1` :7
- •
l ? f , ; .
y?
t
y

'M LH T 164,`-
•

J T:

I _
?
•
4
5'W
.. i
le # ..
?
?
- _ _ #
. + , r ?
J
.
y,
Name: GLENVILLE
Date: 4/5/2005
Scale: 1 inch equals 800 feet
Location: 035.2282653°N 083.1435568°W
Caption: WaterDance Boubdary
Office Use cniy: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. VIVI/Q No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from. DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:NWP 39 for both completed
and proposed road crossing impacts and for channel flooding impacts.
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
12. Applicant information
1. Owner/Applicant Information 1 ?k?5L a t -EJ
Name: T&T Properties
Mailing Address: 1202 North Main Street, Anderson, NC, 29621 OcT ?Q16
?_ car;ft
Telephone Number: 364-261-9001 Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Neill Yelverton
Company Affiliation: Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc
Mailing Address: PO Box 332
63 Poplar Street
Canton, North Carolina 23716
Telephone Number: 323-643-3301 Fax Number: 323-643-3301
E-mail Address: wnrinc(_i?aol.com
111. Firoject Information
Page I of 9
Attach a ^vicinhy map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed en hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: WaterDance/RiverRock
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCD®T Only): Not a DOT project.
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): Jackson Co. 47566-34-1695
4. Location
County: Jackson Nearest Town: (Renville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): WaterDance/RiverRock
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):Starting in Cullowhee, NC,
head south on Hwy 107. Apprx. 10 miles south of WCU look for a covered bridge on the
right, this is the main entrance.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.2309354°N 83.1406796°W
6. Property size (acres): 425
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: West Fork Tuc'.casegee River
8. River Basin: Little Tennessee
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is forested.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: This project
is a residential develoDment. HeM equipment will be used for construction.
Page 2 of 9
Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The project will provide a housing community to
the surrounding area.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCD®T project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. Corps Notice of Unauthorized Activity and NC DWQ Notice of
Violation were initially issued for pine replacements and extensions that occurred without a
404/401 permit. Corps and DWQ permits were issues for March 30, 2005 application . Corps
Permit Action ID 200531530 was issued July 15, 2005 & DWQ Water Quality Certification
Project # 05-0596 was issued June 3 2005. Previously permited impacts were 260 linear feet,
see attached nermit for details.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
All other stream crossings will be spanned or bridged.
VJ. Proposed Imnpnets to lv' Vaters of the Uiraated States/Water, of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: All hard impacts will result from
piping/filling the stream channel for road crossings; the majority occur at previously existing
road crossings The small pond resulted from instillation of a riser ape to one of the culverts at
one of the road crossing. Impacts will total 250 linear feet of hard impact and 50 linear feet of
flooding.
Page 3 of 9
1. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
none

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
2. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.156
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
#1 UT to Tuckasegee pipe extention perennial 3' 20 0.0014
#2 Grassy Creek pipe perennial 6' 60 0.0083
#3 UT to Tuckasegee pipe extention perennial 4' 20 0.0018
#4 UT to Tuckasegee pipe extention perennial 3' 20 0.0014
45 UT to Tuckasegee pipe extention perennial 2' 20 0.0009
96 UT to Tuckasegee pipe perennial 5' 40 0.0045
#7 UT to Tuckasegee pipe extention perennial 5' 10 0.0011
#8 UT to Tuckasegee pipe extention perennial 5' 20 0.0022
#9 UT to Tuckasegee pipe perennial 5' 40 0.0045
#10 UT to Tuckasegee flood perennial 6' 50 0.007
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 300 0.033
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
rpen Water Impact Name of Waterbody Type of Impact Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if a licable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
Page 4 of 9
indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) (acres)
none
Total Open Water Impact (acres)
5. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.04
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.04
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 300
6. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
7. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ® stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): A pond was constructed upstream of a road crossing by
installinu a riser mine on the road culvert to dam up the area upsream or the road/dam.
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): aesthetic, trout pond
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: forested
Size of watershed draining to pond: 450 acres Expected pond surface area: 2439 sq. ft.
VIE. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.Hard impacts are for road
construction, and are necessary to access hit;h_around for development of the site. Existing roads
and road crossings have been used to minimize impacts. The impoundment is proposed as an
aesthetic trout pond it is the only proposed impoundment on the site. There is no practible
alternative on site for such an amenity, as another location would require hard impacts for
construction of a dam and would also impede aquatic passage This is the most logical and least
Page 5 of 9
impactive location using the existing road crossing as the dam, and placing the pond below a
waterfall where aquatic passage is already naturally impeded. No Bractible alternatives for a
pond with minimal impact exist on site.
VIH. Adatigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USAGE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Mitigation will take place on site and will be a combination of channel restoration and buffer
and stream preservation. The mitigation plan is attached to the original permit, which shows
restoration sites. On site stream restoration is comple; enclosed is a the Stream Restoration
Completion Notification. Also attached are the restrictive covenants which establish a 30
foot buffer of no disturbance on all remaining streams ans wetlands.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
Page 6 of 9
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DW,Q)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federaUstate) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
M Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 ('Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone` Impact
(s uare feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Page 7 of 9
2 1.5
Total
Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B.0242 or .0244, or .0260. None required
'U. Stormwater (;required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Impervious below 20%.
MI. Sewage gDispGsal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
On-site septic.
i 1. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ® No ?
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
MV. Cu mutative 'Am pacts (required by MVQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://112o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Otaer Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Page 3 of 9
fi t1r
AppRic:a at/A,7cat!s Signature Date
tip (Agent's signature is valid-only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)

Page 9 of 9
Delineation Performed by: Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc.
217 Paragon Parkway, #142
Clyde, North Carolina 28721
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Mobile: [phone]
WETLAND DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: WaterDance Date: 12/04
Applicant/Owner: T&T Properties, LLC County: Jackson County
Investigator: Neill Yelverton (WNR Staff) State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes Community ID: Channels
Is the site significantly disturbed? No
(Atypical situation) Transit ID: Channels
Is the area a potential problem area? No Plot ID: Channels
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
1. 9.
2. 10.
3. 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8, 16.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-): N/A
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
X_ Recorded Data (describe in remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs X Inundated
Other X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: _0 - 60 (in.) Secondary Indicators: (2 or more required)
Oxidized Root Channels in
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC Neutral Test
Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Various Centerline Averages, Unnamed Tributaries to/and Tuckaseegee River, Unnamed
Tributaries to/and Grassy Creek
WLdata.frmTTP-1000
Project # TTP-1000
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Cullasaja sandy loam

Taxonomy (Subgroup): Humic Dystrudepts
Drainage Class: well drained
Field Observations: field survey
Confirm Mapped Type? Jackson County
Soil Survey
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(ins. Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
0-12 Al 10YR 3/2 10YR 4/2 moderate fine cobbly sandy clay loam
12-19 A2 10YR 3/3 10YR 4/4 moderate fine cobbly sandy clay loam
19-34 Bw 7.5YR 416 cobbly fine sandy loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soil
_X Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_X_ Aquic Moisture Regime _X_ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List **
_X Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_X_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Bottom of Streams
Wetland Determination
(yes or no)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? NIA
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Hydric Soils Present? YES
Is This Sampling Point Within a Wetland? YES
Remarks:
WLdata.frmTTP-1000
Delineation Performed by: Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc.
217 Paragon Parkway, #142
Clyde, NC 28721
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Mobile: [phone]
WETLAND DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: WaterDance Date: 12/04
Applicant/Owner: T&T Properties, LLC County: Jackson County
Investigator. Neill Yelverton (WNR Staff) State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstances exist on the site?
Is the site significantly disturbed?
(Atypical situation)
Is the area a potential problem area?
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Yes Community ID: Vegetated Wetlands
No Transit ID: Vegetated Wetlands
No Plot ID: Vegetated Wetlands
1. Juncus spp. grass FACW+ 9.
2. Carex spp. grass FACW+ 10.
3. Alnus serrulata shrub FACW 11.
4. Salix nigra tree OBL 12.
5. Polygonum sagittatum herb OBL 13.
6. Arundenaria gigantea grass FACW 14.
7. Smilax spp. vine FAC 15.
8. Rubus spp. shrub FAC 16.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-): - 90 %
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_X Recorded Data (describe in remarks)
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water _0 to 4_ (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 10 to 14_ (in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: _8 to 9_ (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Hvdrologv Indicators:
Primarv Indicators:
Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondar y indicators: (2 or more required)
X Oxidized Root Channels in
Upper 12 Inches
X Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
X FAC Neutral Test
Other (explain in remarks)
W Ldata. frmTTP-1000
Project # TTP-1000
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Cullasaja sandy loam

Taxonomy (Subgroup): Humic Dystrudepts Drainage Class: well drained
Field Observations: field survey
Confirm Mapped Type? Jackson County
Soil Survey
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture. Concretions,
(ins. Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
0-12 Al 10YR 3/2 10YR 4/2 moderate fine cobbly sandy clay loam
12-19 A2 10YR 3/3 10YR 4/4 moderate fine cobbly sandy clay loam
19-34 Bw 7.5YR 4/6 cobbly fine sandy loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soil
_X_ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_X Aquic Moisture Regime _X_ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List **
_)CReducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Wetlands at Headwaters of Streams and Adjacent to Streams
Wetland Determination
(yes or no)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YES
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Hydric Soils Present? YES
Is This Sampling Point Within a Wetland? YES
Remarks:
WLdata.frmTfP-1000

) ?-
=tE w ? f U
?
,,
?
C
O 1
,?
Q0
) O

0 U
CJ
cR
Ta
CJ
0
Ufa
CL
CD
C.9
e
a
s
i

to

C
p U
j CJ
O C- U
W ?J

`1T (D CA 11? -zi. co 0

,II

r
I
r* C' CO
r+f? cn
i CD © Q

c 0 U
O' IL
1
tT 1 >, I _
r• 1 l

f -
i

it
A
CO nn
61
r,

L' I G>
Q)
0 IM
'l

Wetland and Natural Resource
Consultants, Inc.
Cctober 17t', 2005
To: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Cfmcce
Attn: Mr. David Baker
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
Re: Water®ance/River Rock Site - Stream Restoration Completion Notification
Flwy. 107 South or Cullowhee
Jackson County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Baker:
The stream restoration totaling 220 linear feet proposed as compensatory mitigation for
stream impacts at the WaterDance Site has been completed. All Lccations (1-5) have
been restored to their natural channel conditions and a vegetated buffer has been
planted adjacent to them, as laid out in the mitigation plan.
Following are pictures of some of the restored sections. Please contact us if you have
any questions or would like to visit these sites.
Also, attached is a copy of the restrictive covenants protecting o 30 foot buffer on the
remaining streams and a,4jetlands on site.
Best regards,
:r
Neill Yelverton
828-712-9613
cc: Mr. Kevin Barnett, NC DWQ
Canton Office
PO Box 882
Canton, NC 28716
828-648-8801
828-648-8802 Fax
wnrinc.com
Newton Office
PO Box 224
Newton, NC 28658
828-465-3035
828-465-3050 Fa;
10/18/2005 13:22 8G42G09038 JAMES BELK PAGE 02
(a) 25 feet from the .Property/Unit line along the road unless shown otherwise on
the property plat.
(b) 25 :feet from read right-of-way lines unless shown otherwise on the property
plat.
(e) 25 feet from the rear Property/Unit line unless shown otherwise on the prcpcrty
plat.
(d) 15 feet from the side Property/Unit line unless shown otherwise on the property
plat.
(e) 50 feet from the Tuckasecgee River and 30 feet from all other streams, ponds
and wetlands. In addition to governmental delineation, wetland boundaries
shall be defined and observed by the Owner, Designer and Builder according to
the.DRC.
3.4 Limits otFDistnrbanee ?®al???a?t ctio? of E.%dstan_g_yegetatiosn
The Owner/builder is required to delineate a "Limits of Disturbance" line on the plans to
indicate the extents of disturbance to existing vegetation and topography.
(a) No disturbance shall occur outside of the approved Limits of Disturbance line.
(b) Site disturbance shall not extend more than 15' beyond the front and rear
setback lines (toward the property lines) nor extend more than 5' beyond the
side setback lines (toward the property lines.)
(c) Disturbance within the minimum setback limits shall be restored per methods
and plans approved by the DRC_
(d) There shall be no disturbance within 30 feet of any stream channel or wetland,
including, but not limited to, grading, excavation, fill, alteration of existing
vegetation and building of structures. In addition to governmental delineation,
wetland boundaries shall be defined and observed by the Owner, Designer and
Builder according to the DRC.
(e) There shall be no disturbance to the flow of water in any stream channel,
including, but not limited to, diversion and pumping.
(f) At the discretion of the DRC, trees within or adjacent to the Limits of
Disturbance shall be assessed by a. professional arborist for active tree
preservation measures. The arborist's assessment report and recommendations
shall include an implementation schedule and be submitted to the DRC for
approval as part of the site plan submittal. Active tree prescrvadon will be
conducted to ANSI standards and will include measures such as root pruning,
supplemental feeding, boring insect prevention and canopy pruning. These
measures are intended to provide the Owner with assurance that those trees
intended for protection and preservation will indeed be preserved and will
thrive long after construction. The D.RC shall require additional protective
measures for active tree preservation if it deems necessary.
Warta0ance Design Rtricw Guidelines 9 12!149/2003
Water®anca am Restoration Pictures
a
J.
t .,
_ ,t

"?-? r . ;mss

IV-
r`

Li
2
Location #4
i
'::"?
_3 ?:
J
t re.,
- ?S ?SqL
•f N
Wetland and Natural Resource
Consultants, Inc.
iy::°r??+:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Mrs. Rebekah Newton
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
October 20, 2005
WNR, Inc. Project # WL&TCI-1000
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Asheville Regional Office
Attn: Mr. Kevin Barnett
2090 US Hwy 70 _
Swannanoa, North Carglinq-,2873>
RE: WaterStone (Summerset at Bear Wallow Mountain) VY b '10?
DWQ # 05-1072 / Action ID # 200532162-3 0?401 / 404 Nationwide 3/39 Permit Application
Hendersonville, Henderson County, North Carolina
Rebekah / Kevin:
I would like to withdraw the above referenced 404 Permit and corresponding 401 Certification.
A new application is enclosed for Corps approval. A courtesy copy is enclosed for NC DWQ.
The previously proposed mitigation has begun and will be completed as presented, even though
the mitigation previously proposed was above and beyond that required. The developer has
also pin flagged the trout buffer area within the pastures, some of which are on features that
are dry and overgrown with fescue. No mowing or weed-eating is occurring within these
buffer areas.
If you have any questions concerning the enclosed information, please call.
Best regrads,
PJennifer obertson
Cc: Cyndi Karoly, NC Division of Water Quality (I copy)
David McHenry, NC Wildlife Resource Commission (I copy)
Canton Office Newton Office
PO Box 882 wnrinc.com PO Box 224
Canton, NC 28716 Newton, NC 28658
828-648-8801 828465-3035
828-648-8802 Fax [phone] Fax
r ? ? 1
Wetland and Natural Resource
Consultants, Inc.
October 20, 2005
WNR, Inc. Proiect#WLC'XTCI-1000
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Mrs. Rebelcah Newton
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
R E: WaterStone (Summerset at Bear Wallow Mountain)
404 Nationwide 3/39 Permit Application
Hendersonville, Henderson County, North Carolina
Rebelcah:
The purpose of this letter is to request authorization for stream impacts at the project known as
WaterStone. Impacts include 90 linear feet of perennial channel and 58 linear feet of intermittent
channel under NW 39. One road crossing is being requested under NW 3 for replacement of an
existing impact.
Supporting documentation is included with the application form that should help with your
review process.
If you have any questions concerning this proposed action, please call.
Sincerely,
iennifer Robertson
Cc: Cyndi Karoly, NC Division of Water Quality (I copy)
Kevin Barnett, NC Division of Water Quality (I copy)
David McHenry, NC Wildlife Resource Commission (1 copy)
Canton Office Newton Office
PO Box 882 wnrinc.com PO Box 224
Canton, NC 28716 Newton, NC 28658
828-648-8801 328-465-3035
828-648-8802 Fax I 828-465-3050 Fax
Wetland and Natural Resource
Consultants, Inc.
Department of the Army
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Attn: Ken Jolley, Chief Regulatory Division
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
-and-
NC Division of Water Quality
Attn: Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-2260
I, the current landowner of the property identified below, hereby authorize Wetland and
Natural Resource Consultants, Inc. to act on my behalf as my agent during the
processing of permits to impact Wetlands and Waters of the US that are regulated by
the Clean Water Act and the Rivers and Harbors Act.
Federal and State agents are authorized to be on said property when accompanied by
Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc. staff.
Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc. is authorized to provide supplemental
information needed for permit processing at the request of the Corps or DWQ.
A.
Property Owner of Record:
Address: e) ;0 •(a,'
Address:
Address:
Phone Number:
j?f?tiix?.?a?
Property Location:
Owners Signature:
Date:
Newton Office
PO Box 224
Newton, NC 28658
828-465..3035
828-Y465j-3050 Fax
www,wnrinc.ccm
Clyde Office
217 Pcragon Parkway, # 142
Clyde, NC, 28721
828627 X0051
828u627?0052 Fax
www.wnrinc.com
a (
i
_ ',rI i \ _ "fit , ` I ?,.°..?. ?'` ?/ _ - --.??1 ?\? -•r,-?. f
4
f f T -' J.? ? ?\~ Y... _ 1 `'..._,.??.? ".`v ?+••o./' \ _ _ e x o?? 4 k" v x
r.:
t a o _
t I, ' ?'re f aPProxima`re Property Boundary
+ r J \
m '
-4 F.? .;1111. } ? '?• ? -
Name: BAT CAVE Location: 035° 27'28.38" N 082° 22'27.64" W
Date: 6/13/2005 Caption: WaterStone
Scale: 1 inch equals 1.515 miles Westside Land Timber Co, Inc.
WNR, Inc. Job#WLTCI-1000
Coovriaht (Cl 1998. Maotech. Inc.
Name: BAT CAVE
Date: 6/13/2005
Scale: 1 inch equals 1000 feet
Location: 035° 27'28.38" N 082° 22127.6411 W
Caption: WaterStone
Westside Land _Timber Co, Inc.
WNR, Inc. Job#WLICI-1000
1998. Maotech. Inc.
Map Output Page 1 of 1
Henderson County GIS Online
,
n v rti r;1"<p
327
} r ?'rr 1 ?i ?,;7
,p;. +
57n
?F7.?r s 7A?,
12,74
4 1. 1'1.x? 1 '? j Y•? 4 ]iJ?
:w tax T. pi,.tl, ,? •,+ yr ti. ?.. s r.T t ,
coo,
Y?
JCJa??! t ti s o
http://www.hendersoncountync.org/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=www ... 2/3/2005
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACIE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1.
II.
Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:NWP 3/39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
Applicant Information
a
ocT =?a ? Z??ca?
E-mail Address:
Mailing Address: Attn: Mr. Scott Shirley ot??: ?.,"' "? ` ` ?` " ` `f? ?+
210 Birchtree Drive Greenwood, South Carolina 29649
Telephone Number: 828-648-8801 Fax Number:
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Westside Land & Timber Company, Inc.
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jennifer Robertson
Company Affiliation: Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants. Inc
Mailing Address: PO Box 882
68 Poplar Street
Canton, North Carolina 28716
Telephone Number: 828-648-8801 Fax Number: 828-648-8802
E-mail Address: wnrinc(&aol.com
Page 1 of 3
111. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: WaterStone
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): n/a
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): Henderson County
4. Location
County: Henderson Nearest Town: Hendersonville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): WaterStone at Bear Wallow Mountain
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):Bearwallow Mountain
Road, See Attached USGS maps.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.272833 °N 82.222764 °W
6. Property size (acres): +/- 288 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Hooper Creek and Cox Creek (Both Class "C,Tr" )
8. River Basin: French Broad
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Site is approximately 80% meadow (pasture) and 20%
forested.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project
will consist of a planned communi development The lots sizes are large ranging from 1 11
Page 2 of 3
acres to 5.70 acres. There will be seven stream crossings. Three of these crossings are on
perennial streams and four crossings are on intermittent streams. One of the intermittent
stream crossings will be arched. The stream crossings are necessary to access to high ground
for site development.
Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The project will provide housing opportunities
and jobs on a local and national level.
IV. Prior Project Mstory
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. No permits have been applied for previously.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No additional permits are anticipated at this time.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The proposed impacts are results from six
road crossings. No wetland impacts are proposed.
1. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Type of Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number (e.., forested, marsh, 100- ear Nearest Imp act
Page 3 of 3
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
(yes/no) (linear feet
Total Wetland Impact (acres)
2. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.4
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
91 UT to Cox Creek culvert perennial 4 25 0.004
#2 UT to Cox Creek culvert perennial 4 35 0.004
#3 UT to Cox Creek culvert perennial 6 20 0.006
#4 UT to Cox Creek culvert perennial 4 35 0.004
#5 UT to Cox Creek culvert intermittent 2 33 0.002
#6 UT to Hooper Crk arch intermittent .5 0 0
97 UT to Hooper Crk culvert intermittent .5 0 (NW3) 0

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 148' 0.02
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water hnpact (acres)
Page 4 of 8
5. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.02
Wetland Impact (acres): none
Open Water Impact (acres): none
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.02
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 148
6. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
no isolated waters exist on the property_
7. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): no pond proposed
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): no pond proposed
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: no pond proposed
Size of watershed draining to pond: no pond proposed Expected
pond surface area: no pond proposed
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.Road impacts are necessary to
access hiah around. We have minimized stream impacts by using rock headwalls and buildine
one road above the stream end point and one road above the wetland end noint. We are also
utilizing one arched span.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 5 of 3
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
230 linear feet of perennial stream retoration and 40 linear feet of intermittent stream
restoration
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/i?-Lidex.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): none proposed
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): none proposed
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): none proposed
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): none proposed
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): none proposed
IN. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Page 6 of 3
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts oin Riparian and Watershed Huffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213.0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 0213.0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify-_)? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* I Impact I Multiplier I Required
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 213 .0242 or.0244, or.0260. No buffer mitigation proposed.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
Page 7 of 3
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Impervious surface does not exceed 20% for the
entire site nor for the ameni areas.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Septic Systems
X111. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
October 20, 2005
Appli t/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 3 of 3

u
y a
a
o N ?p` tR m
N
1
A
n O Z

.?I
w
C/)

Q
0V?ii >?

O?z Az ?OU
.
.
l?
y
p
¢ a0. 1 p131
006 22 1-V

w Q 3 z

_.,
i
30
`
I
o
f
w W

°
mmm

z 3 $
L
i
}
s
01
alt M
? p
N
d
If'r--?? N
w * ' tDY ?? /
+ g 1 1
? • `? ' / IOL14 I 1 Y` / /
11 r ? ? r 1 1 ?a ? "
•O r? If ? a 1 1 to ? d
` O O o to " i/ Y N? ?~•
?
?4Ito
4
a / ` I d / /j / DI 'un
1 / U a
[! 1 Y 'L}.. / ° _
cq Lo
N U1 1 / i ?_
•? dry ?_- il?Y ??'j i ?I I r/ C7 ?, i \ ~? ///i'/ q , r
- dN a I I ?? 1 1p?/ (PAM
Ij 41
a 1 _
+ 1(/ _ J. 111/ ?!\ .. !?
to
d
,1/ \\? V N' ; I?J 1 da v A y ?? 1 V•'' 1!=-/' ?°C+y 1
1 / ? a 1 1 / ?r
1 ,r\
1 \
• 1 ? 14 \ 1 I 1 hl/ a 1 N
1 m ?N \ ,?i U"' IM tV '? 1?1 y
co 00,
4 / 1 --? / V. N 1 / Y? p .
y _ y
to A
1 ~
Vas o cf)
Y .`? ??i' \ \I,
' Y M
./ `q \ 1 N a F
" 11 M ` _?-- r 11 a? u? N
N co
4 co
14
tit S • a
I \
jA4
r s M« n ?? a 1 a o, \\??\?
% C4
Oth
N y, 1 \
C4 C4
C41 CA
CO n O : N N cnY \??; :? ?? ti \
r
41 PN N Na. da ?? I • \
\ ? ?/ N (gym l\\? ? 1* \ o
N
I \ I O ??
1
1
Qo
Name: BAT CAVE Location: 035° 27'27.61" N 082° 22'26.57" W
Date: 6/14/2005 Caption: WaterStone
Scale: 1 inch equals 667 feet Westside Land Timber Company, Inc.
WNR, Inc. Job#WLTCI-1000
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM, QUALITY ASSESSMENT WO T SEEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name:Westside Land & Timber Company, Inc. 2. Evaluator's name: Jennifer Robertson / Neill Yelverton
3. Date of evaluation: 01/21/2005 4. Time of evaluation: All Day
5. Name of stream: Perennial UT's to Cox Creek 6. River basin: French Broad River Basin
7. Approximate drainage area: +/- 60 Acres 8. Stream order: Second Order
9. Length of reach evaluated: Approx. 300 LF 10. County: Henderson
11. Site coordinates (if known): 035 27 27.61N 082 22 26.57 W12. Subdivision name (if any): WaterStone
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):-
Bearwallow Mountain Road See Attached Topo Map
und
lib. Proposed channel work (if any): Culverts for Road Access to High Gro
15. Recent weather conditions: Snow and Rain
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Cloudy
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 25 % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial 15 % Agricultural
40 % Forested 20 °% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 6' 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): V to 2'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) X Moderate (4 to 10%) X Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends -Frequent meander -very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 84 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature 3?1 r Date 6,7 - 9- 0?
'T'his channel evaluation fa is inte d to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data requir by the nited States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACEE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
SC
RE
# CHARACTERISTICS O
Coastal Piedmont Mountain

1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
4
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)

2 Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
4
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 5
no buffer = 0, contiguous, wide buffer = max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
4
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
a 5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 3
U no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
2
no flood lain= 0; extensive flood lain= max points)
7 Entrenchment / floodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 2
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
3 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0-6 0-4 0-2 2
acent wetlands = max points)
no wetlands = 0; large ad
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 2
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 3
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment= max points)

11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
5
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 4
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)

13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
4
severe erosion= 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)

14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
4
E no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout.= max points) 1

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0
5
0
4
0
5
4
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points) - - -
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0- 3 0- 5 0- 6 5
F no riffles/ripples les or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
17 Habitat complexity , 0-6 0-6 0-6 5
little or no habitat= 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
iYl
18 Canopy coverage over streambed

' no shadin vegetation = 0;. continuous canopy = max oints 0 - 5 0-5 0-5 5

19 Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)

no evidence = 0• common, numerous types = max points) 0-4 0-5 0-5 5
1 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 3
O no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
aO 21 Presence offish 0-4 0-4 0-4 1
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max oints
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 4
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100 84
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* 'niese characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
i
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT ` ORXS E'If'
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Westside Land & Timber Company Inc. 2. Evaluator's name: Jennifer Robertson / Neill Yelverton
3. Date of evaluation: 01/21/2005 4. Time of evaluation: All Day
5. Name of stream: Intermittent UT's to Hooper Creek 6. River basin: French Broad River Basin
7. Approximate drainage area: +/- 20 Acres S. Stream order. First Order
9. Length of reach evaluated: Approx. 300 LF 10. County: Henderson
11. Site coordinates (if known): 035 27 27.61N 082 22 26.57 W12. Subdivision name (if any): WaterStone
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):-
Bearwallow Mountain Road See Attached Topo Map
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Culverts for Road Access to Hied Ground
15. Recent weather conditions: Snow and Rain
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Cloud
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-M
13. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 25 % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial 15 % Agricultural
40 % Forested 20 % Cleared / Logged _% Other (
22. Bank-full width: 1' 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):.25' to .5'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) X Moderate (4 to 10%) 2L-Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of wor ashcet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 24 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature a a. , i Date This channel evaluation f is in nded to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data requi ed by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USAGE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06103. To Comment, please call 919-376-3441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
CORE
# CHARACTERISTICS S
Coastal Piedmont Mountain

1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
1
no flow or saturation = 0; strop flow = max ousts
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 0
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 1
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
1
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
04 5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 2
14 no dischar e = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
1
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max points)
7 Entrenchment / floodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 1
Q+ (deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
3 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0-6 0-4 0-2 1
acent wetlands = max points)
no wetlands = 0; large ad
9 Channel sinuosity 0- 5 0- 4 0- 3 1
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 2
extensive deposition-- 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0-5 1
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 o-4 0-5 1
>+ (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
?-4
13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
2
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14 Root depth and density on banks 0-3 0-4 0-5 2
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
0
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 1
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
E
17 Habitat complexity 0-6 0-6 0-6 1
little or no habitat = 0; frequent. varied habitats = max points)
02 Canopy coverage over streambed 1
18 no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points) 0-5 0-5 0-5
19 Substrate embeddeduess NA* 0-4 0-4 2
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5 0
>+ no evidence = 0• common, numerous types = max points)
C7 21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 0
O no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max oints
04
O
22 Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
no evidence = 0; common, numerous t?pes = max points)
Evidence of wildlife use
23
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points) 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 2
Total Points Possible 100 100 100 24
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
USACE AID#,
DWQ4
Site # (indicate on attached map)
i j STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT N-VORXSEEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name:Westside Land & Timber Company, Inc. 2. Evaluator's name: Jennifer Robertson / Neill Yelverton
3. Date of evaluation: 01 /21 /2005 4. Time of evaluation: All Day
5. Name of stream: Perennial UT's to Hooper Creels 5. River basin: French Broad River Basin
7. Approximate drainage area: +/- 35 Acres 3. Stream order- Second Order
9. Length of reach evaluated: Approx. 300 LF 10. County: Henderson
11. Site coordinates (if known): 035 27 27.61N 082 22 26.57 W12. Subdivision name (if any): WaterStone
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):_
Bearwallow Mountain Road, See Attached Topo Map
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Preservation
15. Recent weather conditions: Snow and Rain
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Cloud
17. Identify any special waterway classifications ]mown: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters - Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
13. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point2 YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 25 % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial 15 % Agricultural
40 % Forested 20 % Cleared / Logged _% Other
22. Bankfull width: 8' 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):.5' to 3'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 21/o) -Gentle (2 to 4%) X Moderate (4 to 10%) XSteep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of workshect (located on- page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 76 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature +JY, a •a J t ,?.? Date -- ??i -
This channel evaluation fo /. is inters d to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data require by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06103. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
I'JCOR+ GION POINT RANG
SCORE
# CHARACTERISTICS
Coastal Piedmont Mountain

1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
5
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)

2 Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
2
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 3
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
3
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 4
U no discharge = 0, springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max oints
0 6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0- 4 0- 4 0- 2 2
(no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max points)
7 Entrenchment / floodplain access 0- 5 0- 4 0- 2 2
a+ (deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0-6 0-4 0-2 1
no wetlands = 0; large ad
acent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 2
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 3
extensive deposition- 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0-5 4
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 4
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)

13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
Q
14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
4
H no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
3 '
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripplo_pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 5
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max oints)

17 Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
5
?•r (little or no habitat = 0; fre uent, varied habitats = max points)
13 Canopy coverage over streambed 0-5 0-5 0-5 3
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5 4
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max points)
21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 4
O no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)

O
22 Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
1
p no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max oints
Evidence of wildlife use
23
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points) 0-6 0-5 0-5 5
Total Points Possible too 100 100 76
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
Delineation Performed by: Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc.
PO Box 882
Canton, NC 28716
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Mobile: [phone]
WETLAND DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Prcject/Site: WaterStone Date: 01/05
Applicant/Owner. Westside Land & Timber Company, Inc. County: Henderson County
Investigator: Jennifer Robertson (WNR Staff) State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes Community ID: Linear and Headwater Wetlands
Is the site significantly disturbed? No Transit ID: Linear and Headwater Wetlands
(Atypical situation)
Is the area a potential problem area? No Plot ID: Linear and Headwater Wetlands
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
1. Juncus spp. grass FACW+ 9.
2. Carex spp. grass FACW+ 10.
3. Alnus serrulata shrub FACW 11.
4. Salix nigra tree OBL 12.
5. Polygonum sagittatum herb OBL 13.
6. Arundenaria gigantea grass FACW 14.
7. Smilax spp. vine FAC 15.
8. Rubus spp. shrub FAC 16.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-): - 90 %
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_X Recorded Data (describe in remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water. _0 to 4_ (in.) Secondary Indicators: (2 or more required)
X Oxidized Root Channels in
Depth to Free Water in Pit 10 to 14 (in.) Upper 12 Inches
X Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil: _8 to 9_ (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
X FAC Neutral Test
Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Wetlands associated with unnamed trib utaries to Cox Creek and Hoopers Creek
W Ld ata. f rm W LuTC I -100 0
Project # WL&TCI-1000
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Cullasaja sandy loam

Taxonomy (Subgroup): Humic Dystrudepts Drainage Class: well drained
Field Observations: field survey
Confirm Mapped Type? Henderson County
Soil Survey
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture. Concretions,
(ins. Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
0-12 Al 10YR 3/2 10YR 4/2 moderate fine cobbly sandy clay loam
12-19 A2 10YR 3/3 10YR 4/4 moderate fine cobbly sandy clay loam
19-34 Bw 7.5YR 4/6 cobbly fine sandy loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soil
X Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_X_ Aquic Moisture Regime _X_ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List **
_X Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Wetlands at Headwaters of Streams and Adjacent to Streams
Wetland Determination
(yes or no)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YES
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Hydric Soils Present? YES
Is This Sampling Point Within a Wetland? YES
Remarks:
W Ld ata. frm W L&TC I-1000
Delineation Performed by: Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc.
PO Box 882
Canton, North Carolina 28716
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Mobile: [phone]
WETLAND DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: WaterStone Date: 01/05
Applicant/Owner. Westside Land & Timber Company, Inc. County: Henderson County
Investigator. Jennifer Robertson (WNR Staff) State: North Carolina .
Do normal circumstances exist on the site?
Is the site significantly disturbed?
(Atypical situation)
Is the area a potential problem area?
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Yes Community ID: Perennial Channels
No
Transit ID: Perennial Channels
No Plot ID: Perennial Channel s
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-): N/A
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_X_ Recorded Data (describe in remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs X Inundated
Other X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water. _0 - 8_ (in.) Secondary Indicators: (2 or more required)
Oxidized Root Channels in
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC Neutral Test
Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Various Centerline Averages, Unnamed Tributaries to Cox Creek and Hoopers Creek
W L d ata . frm W L &TC I-1000
Project # WL&TCI-1000
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Cullasaja sandy loam
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Humic Dystrudepts
Drainage Class: well drained
Field Observations: field survey
Confirm Mapped Type? Henderson County
Soil Survey
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle
(ins. Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast
0-12 Al 10YR 3/2 10YR 4/2 moderate fine
12-19 A2 10YR 3/3 10YR 4/4 moderate fine
19-34 Bw 7.5YR 4/6
Texture, Concretions,
Structure etc.
cobbly sandy clay loam
cobbly sandy clay loam
cobbly fine sandy loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
_X Sulfidic Odor
_X Aquic Moisture Regime
X_ Reducing Conditions
X_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soil
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
X_ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List **
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Bottom of Streams
Wetland Determination
(yes or no)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? N/A
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Hydric Soils Present? YES
Is This Sampling Point Within a Wetland? YES
Remarks:
WLdata.frmW L&TCI-1000
Delineation Performed by: Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc.
PO Box 882
Canton, North Carolina 28716
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Mobile: [phone]
WETLAND DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: WaterStone Date: 01/05
Applicant/Owner. Westside Land & Timber Company, Inc. County: Henderson County
Investigator. Jennifer Robertson (WNR Staff) State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstances exist on the site?
Is the site significantly disturbed?
(Atypical situation)
Is the area a potential problem area?
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Yes Community ID: Intermittent Channels
No
Transit ID: Intermittent Channels
No Plot ID: Intermittent Channel s
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-): N/A
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_X_ Recorded Data (describe in remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs X Inundated
Other X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water. _0 - 4_ (in.) Secondary Indicators: (2 or more required)
Oxidized Root Channels in
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC Neutral Test
Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Various Centerline Averages, Intermittent Unnamed Tributaries to Cox Creek and Hcopers Creek
W Ldata. frm W LTC I-1000
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Cullasaja sandy loam
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Humic Dystrudepts
Profile Description:
Project # WL&TCI-1000
Drainage Class: well drained
Field Observations: field survey
Confirm Mapped Type? Henderson County
Soil Survey
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture. Concretions,
(ins. Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
0-12 Al 10YR 3/2 10YR 4/2 moderate fine cobbly sandy clay loam
12-19 A2 10YR 3/3 10YR 4/4 moderate fine cobbly sandy clay loam
19-34 Bw 7.5YR 416 cobbly fine sandy loam
ydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soil
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List **
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed. or Low-Chroma Colors Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Bottom of Intermittent Streams
Wetland Determination
(yes or no)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? N/A
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Hydric Soils Present? YES
Is This Sampling Point Within a Wetland? YES
Remarks:
W Ldata. frm W L&TC 1-1000
1
5 6g qa~ 3g• 1~' S 8f 45'E '153b2' b~
E Ibo.~, k~, ad E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ry
7~~' S7" E I N'Id ~ 211' Z 90.48' y30' p0 - - ~ s
• NTY ~ ' - ~ • rROP~TY EA~DARY
UN 0 /CON c n ~ B /RSON , s . FtTO9Z°iOiN GOUHIY, EUNGOh~E GOUNIY LRE
1 Ac ~ / DE - • ~ `'s ms's . 3.42 N ~ C-- - . \ ~ z E rb PROrOr.~ LOT LItE
_ ~ ~sa• - - - - PROP068~ RDAD RI6Mf OF WAY LIIE
g5 Ac r ' ?is' 5 pc I 1• ~ ~ ~
! 2.8 I I o pc / ~ I,1 ~ - PROrOJED RDAD GBRHtLI1~E
' TYPICAL 918NT 7RIANBLE AT RDAD IlR~t5EGT10N 9@ DETAIL 2, 9FEL'T LS
c 1 I / 2.56 A ~ \ 7.19 ass; _ 1~4, 2.9g A - RDAD GBIiE1LIDE 9TAT10N
~ •~v,, - J I$~, ~ o 0 ~ 5 82' Ib'03'E 523.00' ~-~T/h~ N~'~R ~ ~ g
_ ` 532' ~ ~ ~ ~ 1.56 AG `dry ~ ~ ~ IBg, \ ' PY Iql ~ Y ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ' 22° W 125'x, is 9F~T L4 ~ 4'12 y od 55
~ ~ Gu.V1'!tT
a 7 my ~ ~ / I - 0 0 Rid '1 ve - ~ le - ~ 180' ~ ~ - - Da9TM9 9TREJW
2.14 A ?~s,Z ~ 3~ r ~ ~ 5 6721' - - - - GLA96 G TR4Ur MNTEiL'4 9TREAM EUFTIR ss'
' Ac ~ 2.80 \ / • ~ , e ~ _ n~or+ Tor or eANC, EACH 9mE NATURAL RESOURCE CONSULTANT: ? ~
I ~ 345 _ _ ~ ry oe' a3• ~ - ~ ~ tcY Tux Wetland and Natural Resource 1 34g- N 8a a~~ NGDOf IPPIPOV® 9Eg DETAIL 2, 9F~T LD !2, _-1 Consultants, Inc.
1 I- 4 ' \ p a 2.32 1 I pc PO. Box 882
_ 1 ~ / ~ 4 Ac 4 Ac ~ .19 , pc 4.01 , o" •19 ~ 1,76 Ac y'i Canton, NC 28716
n°, ~ 2.35 Ac ~ / ~ I I 9y
n I ~ ~ \ \ 6 pc / c , / moo' - 5.0 ~ 2A h ~ ~ / Tq-~ ~ 1. W 141.00'
w 1.9 d° 1 N ~bti ~ y 48 0 „ SURVEY PROVIDED BY:
' ° ' ° a~D' - 3.28 0 .52 Ac I ~ ~ n o / ~ 1 2 ~ 08' p1" w jp0~ David C. Huntle & Associates y sa Y
~ ' r I 209' I I 204' ~ - - _ and urveying
i~~ 2.0 - _ n~ cu. ~ ~ _ 3 Ac 200' - 675 Maple Street 200 63 Ae Hendersonville NC [phone]
3. ~
ry~
~ ~ µ i i~ ~ ~ a I ~ s~ D~ \s, 0~ , 0
p \ ~D0
2 pc e . 2.2 y
~ - 5' .53 Ac 4.32 A ~ I r " 2 Ac - >s, o, / \ ~t ~ ~ ~ 2 0\ 130' I I rn 1,1 a ~P', z>5' jog
,;i~ 1 \ 1 - - - I ~ \ 1.94 4 pc o ,9
~,~'~i a g' 1 I A I 4t~ ~ 1
/ ~ I
~ m .49 f~ ' 1 c 7+ .I ~ I 2 i so' s°' I 1 - 42 A c - I I J ~ 1• I \ 1 2,25 A ry ry 3 38' ol" w j31.~' OWNER:
I I ~ I ~ , In / ~ I ~ ~ 1 _ / , • ( 1 11.63 Ac / y 8 ~P.
' ~ ~ • pc 1 I,,cnl~ Westside Land & Timber Company / 1
' ~'~;~.~,~1~~~~11~1~ ~ 1 ~ 1 % ~ 1 ~ 1.75 'i 'i ~ ~ - / it I 2 / ~ ry ~M1 ~ 210E Birchtree Drive
/ / ~ ~ / \ fl I ~T ~ 1,86 A~ \ ~ ~ \ \ ~ ~ 1 20-s' _3ir M1ti I Greenwood, SC 29649 I 91T8'~
1 ~ ~9 ~
/ _ I ~ _ ~ n` - - 90' DID s I sis,
/ / JI I If ~ ~1 1~ 1 18 pc
i~ ~ , i~ / 213' ! I ~ ~ GuLV~ - ~ ~ ~ / / pc •23 Ac 3 Ac \ \ 1. ? R
~ ~ ~ ~ , S I - / 1.15 12 ~1~ + 'J•`'II 2 ~ /
. ~~II _ ~ of . i ~ ~ a 2bs x ,o \ g~2~''---~ ' ~ pry , wm 9o n / ~ r' ?e.~ ~ r t~, i?
o, ne4% / ~ ~ 2,4 'J6 ~ 4
.~~4,( i ~ c J ~ tee. ~ ~
- - ~ ~ I' ~ \ - \
- - 2.4 a / / \ M ~ lr
~ / 1 1 / ~ I - 12,39 Ac I ~ ~ / ~ g° \ 4 ~ ~ R s.l ~ I I dl
Zr, ~ - ~ 1 r / .i\ ~ / / i \ c esi n rou \ ~ , ~ v 30 A ? , g p Z ~ ~ ~ 1. v
3 ( ~ l \ l \ ~ 2.39 Ac I ~ . ~ \ .A.
1 3,49 A ~ ~ ~ / / ! \ t ~ r
~ e I ~ t S _ _ ~ \ ~ ~ 91 . Landsca e Architecture ~ aF ~ 1 .53 Ac
exbt"~ a• / g pc• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / 30.3 nR \ / ~ Ss. P ~ 1 n Land Planning
1 1 ~ ~F
/ l~~ \ ~ 1 \ \ ,a 6 Ac ~ spa Environmental Desi n
~ 1 ~ ~ g pc / / / i 3"4 c ~ c „ ~ o I A \ ~ 1.g5 A 1 ~eeo on a ~ at _ ~ , Q pe 56 White Oak Road
~ \ o' _ iy ~ 1.11 ~ ~ - - - , `@ .37 pc Arden, North Carolina 28704
e / a ~ 1 1 1 ~ ~ e / / / \ ~ - Q 1 no ~ ~ ~ 1 , ' - i' ~ Phone [phone]
i / ~ 266' - / p°` ~ ~ \ I I \ ?a,~ ~ Fax [phone]
I~ -I \ 13~'
n I ~ ~ c "r 3 pc .n / / / 1 / - 2.72 A y \R 2.7 1 ~ ~ ~ 0.99 Ac 1q- -
r / ~ ~ / / - r ? / / C M 1qk - ~ i I ~ ~i 1 c l °I a Ac ~ \ 1.34 A ~ , 1.12 ~ 1 1 1 1 I
/ 3.14 A - - ~ ~ + Q ~ 1 ~ 'I 2.04 Ac \ / 1 1 220' _ I h°~
~ / ~ ~ _ a'~ 4 / ~ \ ( 1 I .71 A ~
/ ~ ~ ~ 1, 39 pc / ~ ~ 2• _ / / ~ 1 o I 1 I I I I I I g pc
~ u 1.7 $ 5 pc z~ 1 \ a 1 1¢ 2.0 " N ~ ro
1 , . w<
. ` ~ ~ 0 / 1 1 h o~
~ Ac Ac ~ ~ ~ ®n ~ ~ 1.54 Ac e, ~ 4.01 - 1.61 , I ~ \ d „ pc \ ~ o 1.43 ~ AT ~ ~
~ ~ ,11„ ~ - I _ Tv ~ 1 /
_ \ x,43 A
/ ~ ' / S ~ ~ 1 'F , Ac d~ Ac 3 % ~ ~ ' 1.25 Ac \
~ i ? 11.35 1.92 ag, 1 ~ ~ 1 ky3 i ~ \ \ ss ~ i ~ I
~ , ~ 2.17 A
a as' ie w 32'1.22' 4 / r / ~ \ 0' A / ~ \ / - ~ pc
w~~~~1 ~ f \ \ / , a~ 5~, 41 ~ ~ \ i % ~ i \ A
5 ~ - _ d Ac W ' \ ~ 1.35 Ac \ ~ \ ~ ,,o
I 12.03 c I ~ 1 r~ •25 A ~ \ pp ~ 1 1 h, ~ ~ I
10 ~ ~ I 1- c ~ 1 Ac Ac ~ I 1 pc ~ 1.20
,J',W~' ? I 1 ~ 2,10 pc W 1 ~ 1.3 ua y~ l yl I 0 , i.3 ~ I -o uNl . / b c I
/ ? 1, 1 ~ ~ I ~ / ' .69 A ~ / 1 i
/ ~ ~ II ~ \ 9 pc / 2.7 a / 1 1 - ~ ~ r$ \ \ / 1
\ 1 ~ ~l ~
1 ' a,,, , 3 1.9' 3 \ 1,94 Ac m ; ~ y
2.13 Ac \ ~ . ' 1.30 Ac ~
\ ~ ~ ~ R 1.a1 A~ ~ ~ ~ ~F,
~ % ~ \ ` ~ - ~ ~ q \ ~
~ s \ ~ ~ ~ c ~ g \ n \ \ ~
3.66 p '`b, . / ~ ~ \ i, ~ ~ / 2.67 Ac \ \ \
~ ? w - ~ \ 1 ~ 1,29 pc a \ ~ g Ac ro~ c a 1 •a ry~ ry 1.29 A I ~
~ ~ ~ / ~ 1 ~ l ~ l 1 ~ ~
\ \ z~ - - - l pc \
i ~4a 1 2aP ~81~ 2,41 1 1
~ O pc \ ~ 5.7 ~ aa' ISSUE DATE : JUNE 14, 2005
1I I 1
I C ~ 2.03 A 2.03 Ac I I ~ ~ REVISIONS
~ l 2.99 Ac ~ / ~1 \ ? 9 ~i \ 1 \ 6~
• i'1 3a, ~ \ \ ~I ~ ~
~M o Zoo 400 , 2.3 r
If, s~18 ~~oy°'
E ~ - ? \ ` i I~ob
~ .u ' ~ ? \ 1 ..r n
A to y ~r
/ _ -200 -0n to ALE : 1 "=200'-O" / DESIGNED BY SHEET NUMBER
SC I ~ DRAWN BY
/ I
S ~ THIS PLAN ILLUSTRATES A GENERAL PLAN. WHICH 15 SUBJECT TO FUTURE CHANGE AND REVISION. 10 APPROVED BY
DIMENSIONS. BOUNDARIES. AND P051TION LOCATIONS ARE FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY AND
ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE EXACT. / Copyright © 2005, Melrose Design Group, P.A.
A