20050481 Ver 2_COMPLETE FILE_20051017

O?O? W A T ?9pG
COW7
O '<
h1ichael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
November 23, 2005
Bragg-Picerne Partners, LLC
P.O. Box 7129
Fort Bragg, NC 28307-3929
Subject Property: Fort Bragg - Hammond Hills
Beaver Creek [030615, 18-31-24-5, C]
DWQ Project # 05-0481, Ver. 2
Cumberland County
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Sir or Madam:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise impact 71 linear feet of streams for the purpose of repairing and stqabilizing a sewer
crossing at the subject property, as described within your application dated October 10, 2005 and received
by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on October 27, 2005. After reviewing your application,
we have decided that the impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3374
(GC3374). The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) NW12 when issued by the US
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other
required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited
to) Erosion and Sediment Control, Non-discharge, and other regulations. Also, this approval to proceed
with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall
expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of
wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A
NCAC 2H .0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Approved (Units) Plan Location or Reference
Stream 71 linear feet) PCN page 4 of 9
401 Oversight/Express Review Permits Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] / Intemet: In tto://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetIands
N ?e Carolina
,aturallil
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Bragg-Picerne Partners, LLC
Page 2 of 3
November 23, 2005
2. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond
the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction
activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion
control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality
standards, statutes, or rules occur.
3. Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing
the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in
order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
C. Sufficient materials required for stabilization and/or repair of erosion control measures and
stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times.
4. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent
practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is
unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that the
Division of Land Resources has released the project;
5. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached
certificate of completion to the 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit, North Carolina
Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
Bragg-Picerne Partners, LLC
Page 3 of 3
November 23, 2005
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly or Ian McMillan in the Central Office in
Raleigh at 919-733-1786 or Ken Averitte in the DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office at 9 0-486-1541.
S* c ely
?i Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AWK/ym
Enclosures: GC 3374
Certificate of Completion
cc: Beth Reed, Kimley-Horn & Associates, P.O. Box 33068, Raleigh, NC 27636-3068
USACE Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Ken Averitte, DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office
DLR Fayetteville Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 050481 Ver2FtBmggHammondHills(Cumberland)401
Kimley-Horn
O and Associates, Inc.

November 16, 2005
P.O. Box 33068
Raleigh, North Carolina
Ms. Cyndi Karoly 27636.3068
Supervisor, 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
NC Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
_
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602

Mr. Ken Averitte r'-

p t ??
9
I?
NC Division of Water Quality
llJJ
S
Fayetteville Regional Office NOV 1 7 2005
225 Green Street

Suite 714/ Systel Building CENR - WATER QUALITY
V'Z1 LN,'03 F1dDSTCR!XVIVERER?ti?:CN
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Re: DWQ Project # 05-0481 - Request for Additional Information
After-the-Fact Nationwide 12 Permit Application
Fort Bragg Hammond Hills Neighborhood
Cumberland County
Fort Bragg, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Karoly and Mr. Averitte:
On behalf of our client Bragg-Picerne Partners, LLC, this letter is in response to
the NCDWQ letter dated November 7, 2005 requesting additional information
for the referenced permit application. Our client is requesting an after-the-fact
permit for a sewer crossing of Beaver Creek. The contractor for this residential
development, inadvertently installed the sewer line crossing with an open cut and
not with a bore and jack as the plans specified. Bragg-Picerne Partners, LLC,
notified Lillette Granade (USACE) and Ken Averitte immediately upon being
made aware of this mistake and moved forward quickly to rectify the situation.
Field reviews of the project were conducted with the USACE on February 27t1i to
discuss temporary corrective action measures as well as the permanent measure
proposed in our application.
The specific responses to NCDWQ's request for additional information are as
follows:
1. Please send site plan with 1 "=50' scale. Please show all existing sewer
crossing impacts and proposed sewer crossing impacts. Response: An
overall site plan is attached (1 "=200 ) along with an enlargement of the
area of the sewer crossing at a I "=50' scale. In addition, as part of the
0
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
Kimley-Horn
O and Associates, Inc.
original permit application package, sheet EX-1 (Sewer Crossing
Location) and sheet EX-2 (Constructed Riffle Plan View Detail) also
show the location of the sewer crossing. The after-the-fact sewer
crossing is the only sewer crossing/impact associated with this project.
2. Please show the location and type of sediment and erosion control measures
that will be utilized during construction. Response: This after-the-fact
permit request is for the repair and permanent stabilization of a channel
where a sewer line was installed via an open cut. The rock silt check dam
shown in sheet EX-4 (Temporary Check Dam Detail) in the original permit
application was installed during the installation of the sewer crossing. This
device will be left in place until all permanent stabilization and restoration
is connplete pending authorization of the NJVP #12 permit and water quality
certification.
In addition to the rock silt check dart, the channel banks have been matted
with coin fiber matting and the adjacent floodplain has been seeded with a
riparian seed mix and mulched. Any banks that are disturbed (further
disturbed) during the installation of the proposed constructed riffle will be
matted. Silt fencing has been installed around the top of banks of the entire
stream segment to further protect the stream.
3. Please provide calculations or details that demonstrate that the proposed in-
stream structures will function as described in your application, eg., riffle
section, non-erosive velocities, etc. Response: As recommended by the
USA CE, the constructed riffle is intended to protect the sewer line and
provide grade control while preventing a head cut in the channel.
Calculations showing that the stone sizes are appropriate are attached.
Thank you for your assistance with this matter. If you have any questions, please
contact me at [phone].
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
, iL
bE
Environmental Scientist
Enclosures:
Cc: file w/enclosures
Bill Brewer w/ enclosures
Matt Lowder w/enclosures
4
J
.. 3a~? 3 ?? GNi,/ C
A- d
i?
7/
f1 hl
I
•
r
l

0
200
tP e
d
-1 e
!1

V
I ?. r f

?A\

GRAPHIC SCALE
100
I-
200 400
IN
1 inch = 200 ft
500
I SANITARY SEWER CROSSING

FORT BRAGG
RCI FAMILY
HOUSING
FORT BRAGG, NC
OYYI? DEVELOPER:
BRAGG BRAGG-PICERNE
CONMUNFRES,LLC PARTNERS,LIC
CONSULTANTS:

`?z CIVIL
`? Fie.9XenNNwryh
7101
n
3
l
C.,,NGC
=
79'9
MMO
f119d/IZdO
ARCHITECT
Cary CrFh

A W 3CX5 M
A Z7=
;
amzm
i1
! I
o I
llJ i !,?I
i I I
i I 1
,1 I
I
I
> ?? 3 I J k1
I I.:
g 1 Io
I
BASTOGNE DRIVE
SURVEYOR
1.P-C-k.
1. Gba
F) r K2M
7910Zt2]YA
F 91051127
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
59uEk
sent
F"I MCSJR
T91MIM1
FNa.17.1199
SEAL:
PROJECTPHASE:
HAMMOND HILLS
NEIGHBORHOOD
DRAWING TITLE:
ISSUED FOR:
CONSTRUCTION
ISSUE DATE: 9/14105
REVISIONS:
e Fwa
w. mo
a a A?
aowe
-Now
a.®.
;ww
a.A.7
uo.? am
Flea 7aowrr
. NW wsac
aw 9Ve.7aIF
7 pAAr .as s.-Am
.?rw
SHEET:
RHA PROJECT NUMBER: 012332005
PMH PROLOG ID: 2AE-4
DISCIPLINE: CIVIL ENGINEERING
and AwxktaFK

,mow
Q

Lam,` , / µ
SANITARY SEWER CROSSING
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 100
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 50 fL
FORT BRAGG
RCI FAMILY
HOUSING
FORT BRAGG, NC
Qp DEVELOPER:
r
BRAGG-PICERNE
VIRGINIA PLA- CE
ll"

Ot
t J,
^
?i7

1?????lU ttllrll
l ?• ? O
CONSULTANTS:
CIVIL
"rom.d A--s k
3001w PNn
Cr'NCT,511
SIISHl1E00
f It9SIFb0
ARCHITECT
Cow CO,k
=M1 %.1 .E..
MMGA 1 1%5
TaZ7
FN.mol
SURVEYOR
IN P-C- k
101 GAn3
Fq-6, NC
=10
F21 o
7910=
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
SWEh
"D.W Db
sm na
PW-k NC MW
S9 u
SEAL:
PROJECT PHASE:
HAMMOND HILLS
NEIGHBORHOOD
DRAWING TITLE:
ISSUED FOR:
CONSTRUCTION
ISSUE DATE: 9/14105
REVISIONS:

BASTOGNE DRIVE
1 wl wl•
•w ern

W.s.N

,na laewlr
7 1gAy1, ?,MMi A
SHEET:
NHA PROJECT NUMBER: 012072005
PMH PROLOG ID: 2AE-P
DISCIPLINE: CIVIL ENGINEERING
ad AnocbtK 42.2.5
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc. 'l
Job nIMMO?? ?????SSubject
r, 5 sneer No. of
Job No.
Designed by Date Checked by Date
JaZF_ 0
owrma l ?JC'4 ?, . 2 , S r G s ?a ?-. ?o??S?l ?y ?? ?.??
l o.? s ?_'C_ I CA s CC"/
?
?nS
ho men z 9
CIA7 S` e r) C--e riot
Ic-
S L C C', \
M ?`j c l e `/J G?f n1M
Worksheet for Irregular Section - 1
Project Description
Flow Element: Irregular Section
Friction Method: Manning Formula
Solve For: Normal Depth
Input Data
Channel Slope: 0.00900 ft/ft
Discharge: }}
330.00 L 10 7 i• 5 l?f.? t ft'/s
Options
Current Roughness Weighted Meth( ImprovedLotters
Open Channel Weighted R oughnes: ImprovedLotters
Closed Channel Weighted Roughne Hortons
Results
Roughness Coefficient: 0.022
Water Surface Elevation: 8.95 ft
Elevation Range: 6.50 to 10.00 ft
Flow Area: 40.24 ft2
Wetted Perimeter: 27.81 ft
Top Width: 26.81 ft
Normal Depth: 2.45 ft
Critical Depth: 2.64 ft
Critical Slope: 0.00629 ft/ft
Velocity: 8.20 ft/s
Velocity Head: 1.04 ft
Specific Energy: 3.50 ft
Froude Number: 1.18
Flow Type: Supercritical
Segment Roughness
Start Station End Station Roughness
Coefficient
(0+00, 10.00) (0+00,10.00) (0+00,10.00)
(0+12,6.50) (0+12,6.50) (0+12,6.50)
(0+19.6.50) (0+19,6.50) (0+19,6.50)
Section Geometry
Station Elevation
Appendices
Table 8.058
Permissible Shear Stresses
for Riprap and Temporary
Liners

Permissible Unit Shear Stress, Td
Lining Category Lining Type (lb/ft 2)
Temporary Woven Paper Net 0.15
Jute Net 0.45
Fiberglass Roving:
Single 0.60
Double 0.85
Straw with Net 1.45
Curled Wood mat 1.55
Synthetic Mat 2.00
d50 Stone Sizo (inches)
Gravel Riprap 1 0.33
2 0.67
Rock Riprap 6 2.00
9 3.00
12 4.00
15 5.00
18 6.00
21 7.80
24 8.00
Adapted From: F1IWA, IIE-C-15, April 1983, pgs. 17 & 37.
Design Procedure- The following is a step-by-step procedure for designing a temporary liner for a
Temporary Liners channel. Because temporary liners have a short period of service, the design Q
may be reduced. For liners that are needed for six months or less, the 2-yr
frequency storm is recommended.
Rev. 12/93
Step 1. Select a liner material suitable for site conditions and application.
Determine roughness coefficient from manufacturer's specifications or Table
8.05e, pg. 8.05.10.
Step 2. Calculate the normal flow depth using Manning's equation (Figure
8.05d). Check to see that depth is consistent with that assumed for selection of
Manning's n in Figure 8.05d, pg. 8.05.11. For smaller runoffs Figure 8.05d is
not as clearly defined. Recommended solutions can be determined by using the
Manning equation.
Step 3. Calculate shear stress at normal depth.
Step 4. Compare computed shear stress with the permissible shear stress for
the liner.
Step 5. If computed shear is greater than permissible shear, adjust channel
dimensions to reduce shear or select a more resistant lining and repeat steps 1
through 4.
Design of a channel with temporary lining is illustrated in Sample Problem
8.05b, pg. 8.05.14.
8.05.13
100
501
4(
3(
2(
10(
54
3
E 2
'? 1C
5
FW-
W `
73
_Q 1
z 5
i

01 .1 1 10
?.1
0
0
6 0 000 U I vj I 1 0 lU
Tc = CRITICAL SHEAR STRESS: (Ibs./sgft.)
Laboratory and field data on critical shear stress required to initiate
movement of grains (Leopold, Wolman, & Miller 1964). The solid line is the
Shields curve of the threshold of motion; transposed from the O versus Rg
form into the present form, in which. critical shear stress is plotted as a
function of grain diameter.

o:..... p . ?;•
p: Colorado Data: Power Trendline
------------------- 0--------------------
, ass
'
Dia. (mm) = 152.02 TC
2
... .
0

I .
I ;
:
.. .... .: "

'o
p

'
' , ""'
""
"
": ' Power-Trendli
Leopold, Wolman & e:
tiller 1964
..,'. ............... 0 .... ..................
oaz
Dia. (mm) = 77.966
2 c•
R = .9336

N M n 7 nz nd
0 Leopold, Wolman & Miller. 1964
Q Colorado Data (Wildland Hydrology):
Figure 11. Relation between grain diameter for entrainment and shear stress using Shields relations
(Rosgen and Silvey, 2005).
21
?0F W ATF9Q Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
OD r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
p .? Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
November 7, 2005
DWQ Project # 05-0481, Ver. 2
Cumberland County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Bragg-Picerne Partners, LLC =
P.O. Box 7129
Fort Bragg, NC 28307-3929
Subject Property: Fort Bragg Hammond Hills Neighborhood
Beaver Creek [030615, 18-31-24-5, C] '
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Sir or Madam:
On October 27, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated
October 10, 2005, to impact 71 linear feet of streams to construct the proposed sewer line
crossing. The DWQ has determined that your application was incomplete and/or provided
inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will require additional information in
order to process your application to impact protected wetlands and/or streams on the subject
property. Therefore, unless we receive the additional information requested below, we will have
to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506 and will place
this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information. Please provide
the following information so that we may continue to review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Please send site plan with 1 "=50' scale. Please show all existing sewer crossing impacts
and proposed sewer crossing impacts.
2. Please show the location and type of sediment and erosion control measures that will be
utilized during construction.
3. Please provide calculations or details that demonstrate that the proposed in-stream
structures will function as described in your application, eg., riffle section, non-erosive
velocities, etc.
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in
writing and Ken Averitte of the DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office. If we do not hear from you
within three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will
consider the project as withdrawn.
401 Ovc sight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: htti)://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands
None Carolina
Nturnlly
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
RE: DWQ it 05-0481 Ver 2 Fort Bragg Hammond Hills Neighborhood
Subject: RE: DWQ # 05-0481 Ver 2 Fort Bragg Hammond Hills Neighborhood
From: Laurie Dennison <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 07:23:38 -0500
To: [e-mail]
Please see attached the Division of Water Quality's request for more information related to
your recent application. Please note that this message is being forwarded to you
electronically so that you may expedite preparation of your response. Please do not send
your response as a reply to this e-mail or via fax. The hard copy is being sent via US
Mail. All response correspondence is to be mailed via hard copy to the 401 oversight and
Express Permits Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC, 27604 unless otherwise noted.
050481 Vcr2FtBraggHammondHills(Cumberland)On_Hold.doc Content-Type: application/msword
Content-Encoding: base64
1 of 1 11/8/2005 7:23 ANN
I
Q Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
L' E it V I-10
13
P.O.Box33068
Raleigh, North Carolina
27636.3068
October 7, 2005
Ms. Lillette Granade
US Army Corps Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Mr. Ken Averitte
NC Division of Water Quality
Systel Building,
225 Green St., Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5094
Re: Nationwide 12 Permit Application
Fort Bragg Hammond Hills Neighborhood
Cumberland County
Fort Bragg, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Granade and Mr. Averitte:

OCT 1 7 2005
DENR - WATER QUALITY
1,&TLANDS A14D STORMWATER BRANCH
On behalf of our client Bragg-Picerne Partners L.L.C, Kimley-Horn and
Associates, Inc. is applying for a Nationwide 12- 404/401 permit and water
quality certification for construction of a below-grade sewer line crossing for the
Fort Bragg Hammond Hills Neighborhood. The approximately 70 acre parcel is
located within Fort Bragg, near Fayetteville, NC. The project is located within
the Cape Fear River basin.
The sewer crossing was reviewed by Division of Water Quality staff on
September 26, 2005 and by US Army Corps of Engineers staff on September 27,
2005 in preparation of this application. The sewer line crossing crosses Beaver
Creek at a perpendicular angle and was constructed as an open cut rather than
bored underneath the stream bed. The impact totals 71 linear feet of stream
channel, and increases the cumulative impact for the project to 215 linear feet of
stream channel. The Corps Action ID Number is 200300690, and the DWQ
Project Number is 05-0481.
The construction exhibits are attached for your review, as well as a USGS Quad
map and a soils map.
13
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
Kimley-Horn
L1=Y and Associates, Inc.
r r
G
Thank you for your assistance with this matter. If you have any questions, please
contact me at [phone].
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

??'•' Beth Reed
Environmental Scientist
Enclosures:
Cc: file w/enclosures
Bill Brewer w/ enclosures
Matt Lowder w/enclosures
H.- PM0123320091SewerNIVPpennitlPCNTransniittal Letter.doc
RE; [Fwd: 1:WQ # 05-0481 Fort Bragg Hammond Hills]
Subject: RE: [Fwd: DWQ # 05-0481 Fort Bragg Hammond Hills]
From: <[e-mail]> r, 7
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 18:41:33 -0400
To: <[e-mail]>
Thanks for the update. We will have 4 additional project sets delivered
to your office tomorrow.
Beth Reed, PWS
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
3001 Weston Parkway
Cary, NC 27513 -
[phone] - office
[phone] - cell
[e-mail]
-----Original Message-----
From: Laurie Dennison [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 1:12 PM
To: Reed, Beth
Subject: [Fwd: DWQ # 05-0481 Fort Bragg Hammond Hills]
Please see attached email sent 10/17/05 requesting additional project
copies. Project remains on hold pending receipt of 4 addtional project
sets.
1 of 1 10/27/2005 10:56 AM
[Fwd: DWQ # 05-0481 Fort Bragg Hammond Hills]
Subject: [Fwd: DWQ # 05-0481 Fort Bragg Hammond Hills]
From: Laurie Dennison <1 aurie.j. dennison@ncmail. net>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:12:19 -0400
To: [e-mail]
Please see attached email sent 10/17/05 requesting additional project copies. Project remains on
hold pending receipt of 4 addtional project sets.
Subject: DWQ # 05-0481 Fort Bragg Hammond Hills
From: Laurie Dennison <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:59:18 -0400
To: [e-mail]
Please see attached the Division of Water Quality's request for more information related to your
recent application. Please note that this message is being forwarded to you electronically so that
you may expedite preparation of your response. Please do not send your response as a reply to this
e-mail or via fax. All response correspondence is to be mailed via hard copy to the 401 oversight
and Express Permits Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC, 27604 unless otherwise noted. Please
reference the DWQ # on all future correspondence.
20050481 Fort Bragg Hammond Hills Ver 2 (Cumberland) Ilold_Sets.doc Content-Type: application/msword
Content-Encoding: base64
DWQ # 05-0481 Fort Bragg Hammond Hills Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Encoding: 7bit
20050481 Fort Bragg Hammond Hills Ver 2 (Cumberland) 11old_Sets.doc Content-Type: application/msword
Content-Encoding: base64
1 of 1 10/25/2005 1:14 PM
[Fv;;: DWQ # 05-0481 Fort Bragg Hammond Hills]
Subject: [Fwd: DWQ # 05-0481 Fort Bragg Hammond Hills]
From: Laurie Dennison <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:11:49 -0400
To: [e-mail]
Subject: DWQ # 05-0481 Fort Bragg Hammond Hills
From: Laurie Dennison <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:59:18 -0400
To: [e-mail]
Please see attached the Division of Water Quality's request for more information related to your
recent application. Please note that this message is being forwarded to you electronically so that
you may expedite preparation of your response. Please do not send your response as a reply to this
e-mail or via fax. All response correspondence is to be mailed via hard copy to the 401 Oversight
and Express Permits Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC, 27604 unless otherwise noted. Please
reference the DWQ # on all future correspondence.
DWQ # 05-0481 Fort Bragg Hammond Hills Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Encoding: 7bit
20050481 Fort Bragg Hammond Hills Ver 2 (Cumberland) Hold_Sets.doc Content-Type: application/msword
Content-Encoding: base64
1 of 1 10/17/2005 1:12 PM
O?0 W A T` ?9PG
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimck, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
October 17, 2005
Cumberland County
DWQ # 05-0481 Ver 2
EMAIL ATTACHMENT
Kimley-Horn and Associates
Attn: Beth Reed, PWS
PO Box 33068
Raleigh NC 27636-3068
Subject: Fort Bragg Hammond Hills
Application Sets
Ms. Reed:
On October 17, 2005 the Wetlands/401 Unit of the Division of Water Quality received your application and fee
payment on behalf of Bragg-Picerne Partners LLC, Inc. for 401 Water Quality Certification approval in
Cumberland County, North Carolina.
The DWQ requires five (5) full application sets for the review process and it appears that only one copy of the
Pre-Construction Notice (PCN) was received. Please submit an additional four (4) application sets. We are
unable to move forward with setting up the project without the required sets.
If you have any questions regarding this letter please do not hesitate to call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
LJD
cc: File copy
Laurie Dennison
200050481 (Cumberland) Hold for-Sets
+T"
'4NA
ACULNR
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (httn:ih2o.enr.state.nc.us!ncwet1ands)
Customer Service #: 1-877-623-6748
KIMPI Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc,
Traiismittal
P.O. Box 33068
Raleigh, North Carolina
27636-3068
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
.i
Date: 10/27/05 Job Number: DWQ # 05-0481 LZ(Z 2.
Project Name: Ft. Bragg Hammond Hills
To: Laurie Dennison
NC Division of Water Quality,
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Me are sending these by
? U.S. Mail ? FedEx X Hand Delivery
? Other
rVe are sending you
? Attached ? Under separate cover via the follon•ing items:
? Shop drawings ? Prints/Plans ? Samples ? Specifications ? Change Orders
? Other
Copies Date No. Description
4 Additional copies of PCN form as requested
These are transmitted as checked below:
X For your use ? Approvcd as submitted
X As requested ? Approved as noted
? For review and comment ? Returned for corrections
Remarks:
Copy to: FILE
? Resubmit ? Copies for approval
? Submit ? Copies for distribution
? Return ? Corrected prints
Signed:
OCT 2 7 2005
I
V,'E"40 NAOSTOW S B O
s KimleyHorn
and Associates, Inc.

a
P.O. Box 33068
Raleigh, North Carolina
27636-3068
October 7, 2005
Ms. Lillette Granade
US Army Corps Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Mr. Ken Averitte
NC Division of Water Quality
Systel Building,
225 Green St., Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5094
Re: Nationwide 12 Permit Application
Fort Bragg Hammond Hills Neighborhood
Cumberland County
Fort Bragg, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Granade and Mr. Averitte:

On behalf of our client Bragg-Picerne Partners L.L.C, Kimley-Horn and
Associates, Inc. is applying for a Nationwide 12- 404/401 permit and water
quality certification for construction of a below-grade sewer line crossing for the
Fort Bragg Hammond Hills Neighborhood. The approximately 70 acre parcel is
located within Fort Bragg, near Fayetteville, NC. The project is located within
the Cape Fear River basin.
The sewer crossing was reviewed by Division of Water Quality staff on
September 26, 2005 and by US Army Corps of Engineers staff on September 27,
2005 in preparation of this application. The sewer line crossing crosses Beaver
Creek at a perpendicular angle and was constructed as an open cut rather than
bored underneath the stream bed. The impact totals 71 linear feet of stream
channel, and increases the cumulative impact for the project to 215 linear feet of
stream channel. The Corps Action ID Number is 200300690, and the DWQ
Project Number is 05-0481.
The construction exhibits are attached for your review, as well as a USGS Quad
map and a soils map.
a
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
KimleyHorn
and Associates, Inc.
Thank you for your assistance with this matter. If you have any questions, please
contact me at [phone].
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

?P•? Beth Reed
Environmental Scientist
Enclosures:
Cc: file w/enclosures
Bill Brewer w/ enclosures
Matt Lowder w/enclosures
H: TM0123320091Sewer NTVP permit1PCN Transmittal Letter.doc
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 12
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required; check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
" LP-:3 D
II. Applicant Information 0 1M ? ? D M
1. Owner/Applicant Information 0 C T 2 '7Z005
Name: Brag`Q-Piceme Partners L.L.C. r)U4R -LYATW NJAI QTY
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 7129 ?7TU,Nos A140 STORIMATER SUM]
Fort Bragg, NC 28307-3929
Telephone Number: 910-764-4502 Fax Number: 910-497-4218
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Beth Reed, PWS
Company Affiliation: Kimley-Horn and Associates
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 33068
Raleigh NC 27636-3068
Telephone Number: 919-677-2073 Fax Number: 919-677-2050
E-mail Address: Beth.ReedpKimley-Hom.com
Page I of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Fort Bragg Hammond Hills Neighborhood
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Cumberland Nearest Town: Fayetteville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):. Hammond Hills
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From Raleigh, south on US1, exit
To NC-87 S, right on Honeycutt Rd., left on Community Center Rd., right on Bastogne Dr.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 7900'20.18"W: 35°7'53.41 "N
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): -70 Acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Beaver Creek
8. River Basin: Cape Fear
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Existing conditions are wooded with paved bike paths.
Surrounding land use is military multifamily residential housing. Construction activities
have begun, and there has been construction in a perennial stream for the installation of a
sewer line crossing. The total length of impacted stream is 71 linear feet.
Page 2 of 9
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Conventional earth moving equipment and construction techniques will be used for
installation of in-stream grade control structures, and natural channel design for restoration of
the stream channel and stabilization of the stream banks.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: 'A sewer line crossing was installed via a
perpendicular open cut through the stream and stabilized with rip rap. The proposed work is
to repair and stabilize the crossing with in-stream grade control structures (upstream and
downstream), a constructed riffle section, stabilization of stream banks, and seeding and
matting for stabilization and to reestablish the buffer.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Nationwide 14 permit to impact 144 LF of perennial stream for the installation of a 99-ft CMP
culvert and 45 LF of rip rap for energy dissipation. The culvert is approximately 350 LF
upstream from the sewer crossing. The 404 permit was approved June 27, 2005 (USACE Action
ID: 200300690), and the 401 water quality certification was approved June 13, 2005 (DWQ Pd.
No. 05-0481).
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permit requests are anticipated.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
Page 3 of 9
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The sewer crossing is located in a
segment of the stream channel where there was a >3-ft. head cut prior to construction.
Therefore the channel stabilization approach between the two Erade controls (i.e. tie into the
existing stream channel bed elevations) will be to install a constructed riffle with a stable
bankfull bench floodplain. The total length of impact will be 71 linear feet (length of disturbed
area) to restore and stabilize the stream channel and banks through the sewer crossing area.
1. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres . Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center'at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.pov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolafed (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: N/A
Total area of wetland impact proposed: N/A
2. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
indicate on ma (linear feet Before Impact leasespecify)
Grade control
and constructed
1 riffle above 71 Beaver Creek 4-5' base Perennial
below-grade
sewer crossing

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
Page 4 of 9
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-500-358-9616, or online at
www.uses.eov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.toi)ozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 215
3. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres
Name Wate)
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.
N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The construction activities to restore the seament of Beaver Creek in the area of the sewer
crossing will be limited to the disturbed/impacted area (i.e. the 71 feet of existing disturbed
channel). Temporary in-stream erosion control measures will be used within the impact area
durin,g construction to minimize potential impacts downstream.
Page 5 of 9
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.htm1.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No mitigation is proposed at this time due to the nature of the existingunstable channel,
and that the proposed activities will be self-mitigating providing a long-term net benefit for
the stream system in this area. The restoration/stabilization of the stream at the sewer
crossin.g will provide for a stable channel bed (where there was an active head cut
previously), as well as stable banks with a bankfull bench.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at llttp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wM/index.htm. If use of
Page 6 of 9
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federaUstate) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Page 7 of 9
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
No buffer mitigation is required.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
As stated in urevious permittine discussions. the total moiect site is annroximately 70 acres with
a total percent impervious area being 16.9 percent. Based on the small percent of imperviousness
it appears that this project should not be required by DWQ to provide stormwater management.
However, stormwater management plans have been developed and will be installed to control the
25-year storm event. Additionally, a 50 foot forested buffer is being maintained along the stream
corridor.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ® No ?
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ® No ?
Page 8 of 9
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
The site was reviewed by DWQ staff on September 26. 2005 and subsequently by the USACE
on September 27, 2005. Regulatory agency comments have been incorporated into the
restoration plans (attached) for this area.
Seeding: The contractor has obtained a wetland seed mix for other permitted areas in the project
area and will apply the same seed mix beneath the coir fiber matting and other disturbed areas
for soil stabilization and revegetation.
Attached are the following:
1) Signed Agent Authorization Form,
2) Site Photographs
3) Figures (1-Location Map 2-USGS Quad Map, 3-Soils Map),
4) Construction Exhibits (EX-1 - Permit Area, EX-2 - Plan View, EX-3 - Constructed Riffle
Detail EX-4 - Temporary Rock Check Dam Detail)

Applicant/Agent's Signature Date -'
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
10/06/2005 17:30 FAX [phone] PICERNE MIL HOUSING
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Name: Bragg Picerne Partners, LLC
Address: PO Box 7129
Fort Bragg, NC 28307-3929
Phone: [phone]
Project Name/Description: Fort Bragg Residential Communities
Date: October 6, 2005
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attention: Lillette Granade
Field Office: Wilmington
Re: Wetland Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
Bragg Picerne Partners, LLC authorizes Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to act as our
limited agent to prepare and coordinate in the application to the U.S. Army Corp of
Engineers for Section 404 permits and Section 401 Water Quality Certifications
applications and to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of
applications, etc. from this day forward until successful completion of the permitting
process or revocation by the owner.
Authorized this the 4; day of ?L°hy6c 0'&
e-1;101 1/14 e.,41V
Print Property Owner's Name
CC: Ms, Cyndi Karoly,
N.C. Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N. C. 27699-1650

003
4
t ^ /
R
r „ ? , t r r

d

&A
rN
f' M b(Ill

-14 4

.ts????. 4 W _
_ t" 't V.
`` ;? ?` dF' rte, s11

-,Mill
Photo 1: View of stream prior to sewer line installation (Facing upstream)
7
1 r ' _ ,¢ aa
,gyp, X
j°r t t' 3 r J
r`
.
w

? f `d ? 1 a ? 1 1 ttj r Y ,
s t•_ d yr, Y tik ;. '' c a
S l! 1 b
yy P

1 + ? f
1:1 •? P
*A

V'M AR 77,
??"?'e, f n
om!

Photo 2: View of sewer crossing prior to sewer line installation (Facing upstream)
Title Site Photos
Fort Bragg Hammond Hills Neighborhood
Project Sewer Crossing Impact Area
Prepared For: Cumberland County, North Carolina
Date Project Number Photo Page
10/7/05 012332009 1
T:\pn\012332009 Ft. B.gg\Hammond Hills Pcrmit\Figures\permit_photos.doc Prepared by Tommy Cousins [? .m10"'"b..arw?

Cif
ue
m°x ? Ne ?uies'Dr ees` Sprrn9P?,
210
`?? ? y ? Pue
m a N'r n p oe
y
G
-

N ,
1 t
'Li
c,? cn
?? Pra+;ti et St gdJU{ ? A-St Gf??
e9ioPP
omb"
S
p
Rd Mac
h
ef
doip'
O R
Kerp ? `o?gs re
at`
J S7
m N j N Mo . eycutt Fed 210
to -
rmaa S
a Shaf Dr
`,'
?
p
?
t
?
,F
-S
d
u?
e /? '`? Irwin-fir -. ber,•..
d a fO9 / ???`?\ ~r ? ru
1007 ° 24
\2l !? B=S
?
St ?
o
m poaou. n ? cP
ker Sc r
a `/
Bu
?o`?
?\ 5
Jac, kda G7•??a`?e
1 t ' rod Ra Project Area
1447 ?e
d? NePtu e ' ids

Shaw Rd
e``S?
G' ? ?\\` a ? o? as ?a
??r\?
Gat`
? 1 I
t >
y
e?en
u,
t
organto ?o co c?? -trllike S2 ?? `
n- R
d 1007
Gi 1499 - 70
O
m
or9 nton
d
?/
,i4q o
Morgantro
e //
ny
Dra
Rd ox rr
dr
On Or o Legend,
' tOn Rd
? Ave

to t or G?
1596
C7 `7 N
w+e
i
o
x- d
401 to
0 2,500 5,000
3 ? ??.? O o 1 1
Rd
{d I
-'? Feet
?
?
v)
C
li(
II f ?b
Title Location Map
Fort Bragg Hammond Hills Neighborhood
Project Scwer Crossing Impact Area
Prepared For: Cumberland County, North Carolina
Date Project Number Figure
10/7/05 012332009 1
T:'pn',012332009 Ft. Bragg'1lammond 1101s Pemiffigures'Fipres.doc Prepared by Tommy Cousins Cy?1 _`,,,,d^k

0
5A,01,- f f'' ? mar I
1 r
1!

.y1`[
11N111 _
-?1 r
?f
.43M
\gm?

1
! r-
Z /_ t 1`+'`f •,'l _ r 4. ' ! f : .r r-- fL? to ? - 1rl
Ql (. 4 t; j L ?+ ??I ,
?..
`,? \. ?..J! kk \•-?t S _` 1.,.`, ` `,il 'Y
4N
C -- i1 Iry
( V ib f
? .jw,I• .171 ? ? ?'? '• ? ?+ .r '' ;?-'?" _... va ? + ,F
N
NY F
WI, 7?0? _f ?7'r4 / Yaa I MnG
S
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
Title USGS Quad Map
Fort Bragg Hammond Hills Neighborhood
Project Sewer Crossing Impact Area
Prepared For: Cumberland County, North Carolina
Date Project Number Figure
10/7/05 012332009 2
T:\pn\012332009 Ft. Rragg\Hammond Hills Permit\Figures\Figures.doc Prepared by Tommy Cousins Con N 4?.W.
I
¦
Project Area
N
W
+?
s
Title I Soils Map
Fort Bragg Hammond Hills Neighborhood
Project Sewer Crossing Impact Area
Prepared For: Cumberland County, North Carolina
Date
10/7/05
T:\pn\012332009 Ft. Bragg\Hamnrond Hills PenniffiguresTigures.doc
Project Number
012332009
Prepared by Tommy Cousins
0 500 1,000
1 I 1
Feet
Figure
3
C n k
00
c9
LA
N
X"

J l ? _ N
7
0
3
1 F.

? z
3
N ? l
1
LA

SS
S
VIKING COURT

2
hV
VIRGIN/q: p(q .:
Ge
\1 Y// V-??
61
SEWER CROSSING--"
CONSTRUCTION AREA
(SEE SHEETS EX-2,
EX-3 & EX-4)
PIPE OUTLET BURIED
PAID
I
I 12
I ?0
6 8
M
SS

S
.?P
.o t
L?
i
a
SS
k A\ \C?

/ / I
wl'
NORTH
PROJECT ?OCATi
FORT BRAGG
RCI FAMILY
HOUSING
FORT BRAGG, NC
OWNER: DEVELOPER:
", II t
BRAGG BRAGG-PICERNE
COMMUNITIES, LLC PARTNERS, LLC
CONSULTANTS:
CIVIL
Qh vF S AAS+gln
= N.A. P""
try,ICLS11
TLIATZM
FFUMM
ARCHITECT
=='
??.
MMGAZ=f0
TO=
TIOlII110,
f4kW S
SURVEYOR
T1+F-0agk
GIB Q
yo*ram
TIM22'"
TNLMI®
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
CYE1a
G G*.PDM
L?III
F - wca=
TELII7M
FVL2LYa
SEAL:
PROJECT PHASE:
HAMMOND HILLS
NEIGHBORHOOD
DRAWING TITLE:
SEWER CROSSING
LOCATION
ISSUED FOR:
EXHIBIT
ISSUE DATE:10/05105
REVISIONS:
SHEET: EX-1
KHA PROJECT NUMBER: 012172005
PMH PROLOG ID: 2AE-C- 13.00
DISCIPLINE: CIVIL ENGINEERING
O Copyright. Kimley-Horn
and A--iotes. Inc. 2005
DO NOT DISTURB
TIE TOP OF
BANK TO
EXISTING
GROUND
FLOW
TIE ELEVATION TO STREAM
BED ELEVATION OF
UNDISTURBED AREA
IMMEDIATELY UPSTREAM
BOULDER SILL TO i
EXTEND ONE BOULDER
WIDTH BEYOND TOP
OF BANK
TIE TO EXISTING @ 2:1
A
C 4' MIN.
-- --- ---------
L
4' MIN.
I--C- A'
TIE TO EXISTING @ 2:1
DO NOT DISTURB
EXISTING BELOW
GRADE SEWER
TIE ELEVATION TO STREAM
BED ELEVATION OF
UNDISTURBED AREA

z IMMEDIATELY DOWNSTREAM

?g
z
TOP OF
ANX
-------- -------- -- -' '-? ----- ----- TOE OF SLOPE
C J dC'
TOP OF BENCH
r?
TOP OF BENCH
-
______ ---- ___ _ Z
---- ----- TOE OF SLOPE
i
TOP OF BAN
B'
BOULDER SILL
EXISTING TEMPORARY
CHECK DAN TO BE
REMOVED AFTER
CONSTRUCTION
COMPLETION (SEE
SHEET EX-4)
/ FORT BRAGG
RCI FAMILY
HOUSING
FORT BRAGG,NC
OWNER: DEVELOPER:
BRAGG BRAGG-PICERNE
COMMUNITIES. LLC PARTNERS, LLC
CONSULTANTS:
CIVIL
u7.m
FrJJ"I=
irmA?O
/ ARCHITECT
tomonte
AblILCIA r
TOI= auxe
FWILp7
SURVEYOR
TWI-Gap le
104
FMMICm7
Troatri7
Fro in
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
" hL
UOwpw
mrle
fq-.k NC X=
TIIL=IM
FrWII7WF
/ SEAL:
PROJECT PHASE:
HAMMOND HILLS
NEIGHBORHOOD
DRAWING TITLE:
CONSRUCTED
RIFFLE
PLAN VIEW DETAIL
ISSUED FOR:
EXHIBIT
ISSUE DATE:, 0105/05
REVISIONS:
i
d
SHEET: EX-2
KHA PROJECT NUMBER: 012332005
PMH PROLOG ID: 2AEEG 13.00
DISCIPLINE: CIVIL ENGINEERING
®Copyright , Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc. 2005
BANKFULL CHANNEL BANKFULL
TOP OF BANK BENCH BENCH TOP OF BANK
TIE TO
EXISTING
GROUND
VARIES 4' 7' 4' VARIES
2:1 MIN. MIN. 2:1

1.5'

JJ?-- ?-- ?
NOTE:
1. BOULDERS SHOULD BE NATIVE STONES
OR SHOT ROCK, ANGULAR AND OBLONG,
WITH A MIN. DIAMETER OF 24'
TIE TO
EXISTING
GROUND
JJ JJ
HEAD OF
RIFFLE
15" NOM. THICKNESS WELL GRADED
MIX OF CLASS "B", CLASS "A",
BOULDER SILL AND NO. 57 STONE
1'00 RIFFLE BOULDER SILL
ELEVATION TOP TO BE
SAME AS UNDISTURBED
CHANNEL IMMEDIATLEY
UPSTREAM FROM
CONSTRUCTION AREA
SECTION A-A'
NOT TO SCALE
SECTION B-B'
NOT TO SCALE
3' MIN. - FILTER ??
FABRIC
3' MIN.
SECTION C-C'
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
NOT TO SCALE
15" NOM THICKNESS WELL
GRADED MIX OF CLASS "B",
CLASS "A", AND NO. 57 STONE
SHAPE LOW FLOW
CHANNEL WITH
SLIGHT CONCAVE
SHAPE IN CENTER
FORT BRAGG
RCI FAMILY
HOUSING
FORT BRAGG, NC
OWNER: DEVELOPER:
BRAGG-PICERNE
CONSULTANTS:
CIVIL
19I N?h4iq
C.I.ICC7q
Tr,Yf2W
Fr1O XW
ARCHITECT
,-0-0mmL
2q P?frylat,I E
Fares ca sF
T401ID2n
F442ST90
SURVEYOR
R.I-GMbs
14NI a
Fq6 IC Z=
TVOLUdo
1`110==
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
U F,p6
uo.pmw
F?syYLaLF
,ramlm
Fr0.="
SEAL:
PROJECT PHASE:
HAMMOND HILLS
NEIGHBORHOOD
DRAWING TITLE:
CONSTRUCTED
RIFFLE
DETAIL
ISSUED FOR:
EXHIBIT
ISSUE DATE:' 0/05105
REVISIONS:
SHEET: EX-3
KHA PROJECT NUMBER: 012332005
PMH PROLOG 10: 2AE-G 13.00
DISCIPLINE: CIVIL ENGINEERING
®Copyright. Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc. 2005
TEMPORARY CHECK DAM NOTES:
1. RIPRAP SIZE TO BE DESIGNED BY ENGINEER.
2. CHECK DAMS MAY BE USED IN SLOPING DITCHES OR
OR CHANNELS TO SLOW VELOCITY OR TO CREATE
SEDIMENT TRAPS.
RIP RAP
FLOW
4-y
J
PLAN
/ # 5 WASHED STONE
2'-0"
MIN.
SECTION A-A
# 5 WASHED
STONE
? a FLOW
H
TEMPORARY ROCK CHECK DAM
NOT TO SCALE
FORT BRAGG
RCI FAMILY
HOUSING
FORT BRAGG, NC
OWNER: DEVELOPER:
i3t` ayf?l.?ai';
1AGG BRAGG-PICERNE
OMMUNITIES, LLC PARTNERS, LLC
CONSULTANTS:
CIVIL
orMrm"AmGMM
li Wei yt
G,.IFO711
TCU77m
rnuv:m
ARCHITECT
C-WOsltha
IWV?/mlm 0
r.aa F6 id
rnlmm
rtllmmn
SURVEYOR
pIOMUIL
FQWm^ WC 21=
;VL323IO
VLMI
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
bIW.IL
[IOftpOp
um
FggI%W303
T11L=Ian
TIILVI-"
SEAL:
PROJECT PHASE:
HAMMOND HILLS
NEIGHBORHOOD
DRAWING TITLE:
TEMPORARY
CHECK DAM
DETAIL
ISSUED FOR:
EXHIBIT
ISSUE DATE: 1 0/05/05
REVISIONS:
SHEET: EX-4
KRA PROJECT NUMBER: 012332005
P61H PROLOG ID: 2AE-P 13.00
DISCIPLINE: CIVIL ENGINEERING
O Copyright, Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc. 2005
SPI WAY CREST
KI1=Y-HORN & ASSOC., INC.
P. 0. BOX 33063
RALEIGH, NC 27636-3068
919-677-2000
PAY Two Hundred And 00/100 Dollars
To The
Order Of N. C. DENR
1641 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27699
FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK
Chapel Hill, NC 000292947
66-156/531
DATE CONTROL NO. AMOUNT
10/11/2005 000292947 $200.00
Memo: ---?g '6 I
THIS DOCUMENT HAS A COLORED FACE AND CONTAINS A WATERMARK THAT IS VISIBLE WHEN HELD TO THE LIGHT. ABSENCE OF THESE FEATURES INDICATES A COPY.
11'00029291,711' 1:053LOISEiIf: 20 7998 5 3 20 339o
K=EY-HORN & ASSOC., INC.
Voucher No. Vendor ID
425710 9947
Subtotals
Totals
000292947
Invoice Number Invoice Data Invoice Amount Net Amount Paid
101005
200.001 $200.00
$200.001 $200.00
$200.00 $200.00
Check Notes
10/10/200
425710 RETURN TO CHAD EVENHOUSE
DWQ# - 6 4 L
Plan Detail Incomplete
Date Who Reviewed: ?. Ll
? Please provide a location map for the.project.
? Please show all stream impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, and bank stabilization on the site plan.
? Please show all wetland impacts including fill slopes on the site plan.
? Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan.
? Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan.
? Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overlays on the site plan.
? Please locate all isolated or non-isolated wetlands, streams and other waters of the State as overlays on the site plan.
? Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage.
? Please locate any planned sewer lines on the site plan.
? . Please provide the location of any proposed stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please specify the percent of project imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out conditions.
? Please indicate all stormwater outfalls on the site plan.
? Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan.
? Please indicate whether or not the proposed impacts already been conducted.
Avoidance and/or Minim liation Not Provided
? The labeled as on the plans does not appear to be necessary. Please eliminate the or provide additional
information as to why it is necessary for this project.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the
Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to minimi?.e the impacts to the
. . Please revise the plans to minimize the impacts..
? The stormwater discharges at the location on the plans labeled will not provide diffuse flow through the buffer because
Please revise the plans and provide calculations to show that diffuse flow will be achieved through.the entire buffer. If it
is not possible to achieve diffuse flow through the entire buffer then it may be necessary to provide stormwater management
practices that remove nutrients before the stormwater can be discharged through the buffer.
Other
? The application fee was insufficient because over 150 feet of stream and/or over 1 acre of wetland impacts were requested. Please
provide $ This additional fee must be received before your application can be reviewed.
? Please complete Section(s) on the application.
? Please provide a signed copy of the application.
? Please provide
Mitigation
copies of the application, • copies of the site plans and other supporting information.
Of compensatory mitigation is required for this project. Please provide a compensatory mitigation plan. The
plan must conform to the requirements in 15 A NCAC 211.0500 and must be appropriate to the type of impacts proposed.
? Please indicate which 404 Permit the USACE would use to authorize this project.
elect 5? ?('v? St (-? W I (?,- 50
CtA ?Kls
? ?u, rn.G?S aM-? ? r o p o ? ?l??Yit Gt'a S b + ?tr?-1. ?iC?
O
?eu?t co?aSS??is
Nuuoj? ao_? J))Col-,L? / 68tu- gto"U",o !Et
r 4
? jpjlo
? U