20050007 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20050103

Mr. Bob MacLeod
R & L MacLeod Investments
P O Box 320
Denver, NC 28134
Project:
County:
DWQ #:
USACE Action ID:
EEP No:
Amount Paid:
Check Number:
Mirror Lake
Catawba
05-0007
2005-30965
ILF-2005-3888
$84,315.00
1073
RECEIPT
December 8, 2006
Slit
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) has received a check as indicated above as payment for the
compensatory mitigation requirements of the 401 Water Quality Certification/Section 404 Permit issued for the above
referenced project. This receipt serves as notification that the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project have
been satisfied. You must also comply with all other conditions of this certification and any other state, federal or local
government permits or authorization associated with this activity.
The NCEEP, by acceptance of this payment, acknowledges that the NCEEP is responsible for the compensatory mitigation
requirements associated with the project permit and agrees to provide the compensatory mitigation as specified in the permit.
The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the NC Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the US Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998, as indicated below.
River Basin Stream Credits Wetlands Credits Buffer I Buffer II
CU (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Ri anan Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh
Catawba 0 0 385 0 '0 0 0 0
03050101
Please note that a payment made to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program is not reimbursable unless a request for
reimbursement is received within 12 months of the date of the receipt. Any such request must also be accompanied by letters
from the permitting agencies stating that the permit and/or authorization have been rescinded. If you have any questions or
need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
Sincerely,
cc Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Amanda Jones, USACE - Asheville
Alan Johnson, DWQ Mooresville
1
14-a"
William D. Gilmore, PE
Director
File
PV'Ot-P.Gt' Oafs' Statv'
AM
RUNRR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net
r F WA
4OT?9
QG
r
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Apri124, 2006
Mr. Bob MacLeod
R & L MacLeod Investments
P.O. Box 320
Denver, NC 28134
Re: MacLeod Lake, Catawba County
DWQ #20050007; USACE Action ID. No. 200530965
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification
Dear Mr. MacLeod:
Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. 3566 issued to Mr. Bob MacLeod, of the R & L
MacLeod Investments, dated April 24, 2006. In addition, you should get any other federal, state
or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Solid
Waste, Sediment and Erosion Control, Stormwater, Dam Safety, Non-discharge and Water
Supply Watershed regulations.
If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.
AWK/cbk
Sincerely,
(p, "
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
//7 Attachments: Certificate of Completion
NCDWQ 401 Certification EEP Mitigation
cc: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Wilmington District, USACOE
Alan Johnson, DWQ, Mooresville Regional Office
DLR Mooresville Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Jennifer Robertson, WNR, P.O. Box 224, Newton, NC 28658
Filename: 050007MacleodLake(Catawb a)401 IC
401 oversight/Express Review Permits Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Intemet: http://h2o.enr.state,nc.us/ncwetlands
None Carolina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer -50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
R & L MacLeod Investments
Page 2 of 6
April 24, 2006
NORTH CAROLINA 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401 Public
Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) Regulations in 15 NCAC 2H, Section.0500 to Mr. Bob MacLeod of the R & L
MacLeod Investments, to fill 385 linear feet of stream in the Catawba River Basin, associated with
the construction of the MacLeod Lake ski lake and residential development located on the east side
of Buffalo Shoals Road (SR 1003), approximately 2 miles north of its intersection with NC Hwy
16, southeast of Newton, Catawba County, North Carolina, pursuant to an application filed on the
21s' day of March of 2005, and in additional correspondence received April 18, 2005, June 13,
2005, June 28, 2005, April 7, 2006 and April 13, 2006.
The application and supporting documentation provides adequate assurance that the proposed
work will not result in a violation of applicable Water Quality Standards and discharge
guidelines. Therefore, the State of North Carolina certifies that this activity will not violate the
applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306, 307 of PL 92-500 and PL 95-217 if
conducted in accordance with the application, the supporting documentation, and conditions
hereinafter set forth.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design submitted in the application materials and
as described in the Public Notice. If the project is changed, prior to notification a new
application for a new Certification is required. If the property is sold, the new owner must be
given a copy of the Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying
with all conditions of this Certification. Any new owner must notify the Division and request the
Certification be issued in their name. Should wetland or stream fill be requested in the future,
additional compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6)
and (7). If any plan revisions from the approved site plan result in a change in stream or wetland
impact or an increase in impervious surfaces, the DWQ shall be notified in writing and a new
application for 401 Certification may be required. For this approval to be valid, compliance with
the conditions listed below is required.
Conditions of Certification:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and
general conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other
impacts are approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Approved Plan Location or Reference
(Units)
Stream 385 (linear feet February 22, 2006 Narrative
R & L MacLeod Investments
Page 3 of 6
April 24, 2006
Sediment and Erosion Control:
2. Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the
North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion
control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified
in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and
waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits
associated with the project.
c. Sufficient materials required for stabilization and/or repair of erosion control
measures and stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times.
3. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas
beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the 404/401Permit Application. All
construction activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of
sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no
violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur;
4. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to. the
maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in
wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored
within six months of the date that the Division of Land Resources has released the project;
5. Protective Fencing - The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the
construction corridor within these boundaries approved under this authorization shall be
clearly marked with orange warning fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the
areas that have been approved to infringe within the buffer, wetland or water prior to any
land disturbing activities to ensure compliance with 15A NCAC 2B .0233 and GC 3404;
Continuing Compliance:
6. Mr. Bob MacLeod and the R & L MacLeod Investments, shall conduct construction activities
in a manner consistent with State water quality standards (including any requirements
resulting from compliance with section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act) and any other
appropriate requirements of State law and federal law. If the Division determines that such
standards or laws are not being met (including the failure to sustain a designated or achieved
use) or that State or federal law is being violated, or that further conditions are necessary to
assure compliance, the Division may reevaluate and modify this Certification to include
conditions appropriate to assure compliance with such standards and requirements in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0507(d). Before modifying the Certification, the Division
shall notify Mr. Bob MacLeod and/or the R & L MacLeod Investments, NC and the US
R & L MacLeod Investments
Page 4 of 6
April 24, 2006
Army Corps of Engineers, provide public notice in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0503
and provide opportunity for public hearing in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0504. Any
new or revised conditions shall be provided to Mr. Bob MacLeod and/or the R & L MacLeod
Investments, NC in writing, shall be provided to the United States Army Corps of Engineers
for reference in any Permit issued pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and shall
also become conditions of the 404 Permit for the project;
Mitigation:
7. Compensatory Mitigation Using the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP)
Mitigation must be provided for the proposed impacts as specified in the table below. We
understand that you wish to make a payment to the Wetlands Restoration Fund
administered by the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) to meet this mitigation
requirement. This has been determined by the DWQ to be a suitable method to meet the
mitigation requirement. Until the EEP receives and clears your check (made payable to:
DENR - Ecosystem Enhancement Program Office), no impacts specified in this
Authorization Certificate shall occur. The EEP should be contacted at [phone] if
you have any questions concerning payment into a restoration fund. You have one month
from the date of this approval to make this payment. For accounting purposes, this
Authorization Certificate authorizes payment into the Wetlands Restoration Fund
to meet the following compensatory mitigation requirement:
Compensatory Mitigation
Required River and Sub-basin
Number
Stream 385 linear feet) Catawba/03050101
Placement of Culverts:
8. Culvert Installation
Culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream
profiles are not altered. Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section
dimensions, pattern, and longitudinal profile) must be maintained above and below
locations of each culvert. Culverts shall be designed and installed to allow for aquatic life
movement as well as to prevent head cutting of the streams. If any of the existing pipes are
or become perched, the appropriate stream grade shall be re-established or, if the pipes
installed in a perched manner, the pipes shall be removed and re-installed correctly.
Culvert(s) shall not be installed in such a manner that will cause aggradation or erosion of
the stream up or down stream of the culvert(s). Existing stream dimensions (including the
cross section dimensions, pattern and longitudinal profile) shall be maintained above and
below locations of each culvert.
Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands must be placed
below the elevation of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater
R & L MacLeod Investments
Page 5 of 6
April 24, 2006
than 48 inches, and 20 percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less
than 48 inches, to allow low flow passage of water and aquatic life. Design and placement
of culverts and other structures including temporary erosion control measures shall not be
conducted in a manner that may result in dis-equilibrium of wetlands or streambeds or
banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream of the above structures. The applicant is
required to provide evidence that the equilibrium shall be maintained if requested in writing
by DWQ.
The establishment of native, woody vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization
techniques must be used where practicable instead of rip rap or other bank hardening
methods. If rip-rap is necessary, it shall not be placed in the stream bed, unless specifically
approved by the Division of Water Quality.
Installation of culverts in wetlands must ensure continuity of water movement and be
designed to adequately accommodate high water or flood conditions.
Upon completion of the project, the Applicant shall complete and return the enclosed
"Certificate of Completion" form to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401
Certification has been completed.. The responsible party shall complete the attached form
and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality upon
completion of the project. Please send photographs upstream and downstream of each
culvert site to document correct installation along with the Certificate cf Completion form.
Deed Notifications:
9. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all lots with remaining
jurisdictional wetlands and waters or areas within 50 feet of all streams and ponds. These
mechanisms shall be put in place within 30 days of the date of issuance of the
401 Certification letter or the issuance of the 404 Permit (whichever is later). A sample deed
notification format can be downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands . DWQ shall be sent copies of all deed restrictions
applied to these lots;
10. Construction Stormwater Permit NCGO10000
Upon the approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan issued by the Division of
Land Resources (DLR) or a DLR delegated local erosion and sedimentation control program,
an NPDES General stormwater permit (NCGO10000) administered by DWQ is automatically
issued to the project. This General Permit allows stormwater to be discharged during land
disturbing construction activities as stipulated by conditions in the permit. If your project is
covered by this permit [applicable to construction projects that disturb one (1) or more acres],
full compliance with permit conditions including the sedimentation control plan, self-
monitoring, record keeping and reporting requirements are required. A copy of this permit
and monitoring report forms may be found at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.uslsu/Forms Documents.htm.;
R & L MacLeod Investments
Page 6 of 6
April 24, 2006
11. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or
applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to
.return the attached certificate of completion to the 401 Oversight/Express Review
Permitting Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts, or to conduct impacts to waters
as depicted in your application shall expire =-Ipon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If this Certification is unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon
written request within sixty (60) days following receipt of this Certification. This request must be
in the form of a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. If modifications are made to an original Certification, you have the
right to an adjudicatory hearing on the modifications upon written request within sixty (60) days
following receipt of the Certification. Unless such demands are made, this Certification shall be
final and binding.
3566
This the 24th day of April 2006
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
( ?' e
Alan W. Klimek, P.E..
AWKlcbk/Um
?0 WAT X94
?O
?? r

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
401 Water Quality Certification
Summary of Permitted Impacts and Mitigation Requirements
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0500, Mr. Bob MacLeod of the R & L MacLeod Investments has permission as
outlined below to impact 385 linear feet of stream for the purpose(s) of constructing the proposed MacLeod Lake
Project on the east side of Buffalo Shoals Road (SR 1003), approximately 2 miles north of its intersection with NC
Hwy 16, southeast of Newton, Catawba County, North Carolina. All activities associated with these authorized
impacts must be conducted with the conditions listed in the attached Permit transmittal letter. THIS PERMIT IS
NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ATTACHMENTS.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS, ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
LOCATION: Newton, NC
COUNTY Catawba
BASIN/ SUB BASIN Catawba/03050101
As required by 15A NCAC 2H.0500, and the conditions of this Permit, you are required to compensate for the above
impacts through the restoration, creation, enhancement or preservation of wetlands and surface waters as outlined
below prior to conducting any activities that impact or degrade the waters of the state.
Note: Acreage requirements proposed to be mitigated through the Ecosystem Enhancement Program must be
rounded to one-quarter acre increments and linear foot requirements must be rounded up to the nearest foot
according to 15 2R.0503(b).
Impacts Mitigation
385 linear feet of stream 385 linear feet of stream
In correspondence dated November 30, 2005, the EEP indicated that up to 860 linear feet of mitigation will be
conducted by EEP if necessary for the 401 Water Quality Certification and 404 Permit.
One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirement is through the payment of
a fee to the Wetlands Restoration Fund per NCAC 2R.0503. If you choose this option, please sign this form and
mail the form along with a copy of your 401 Certification or Buffer Approval to the Ecosystem Enhancement
Program at the address below. An invoice for the appropriate amount of payment will be sent to you upon receipt of
this form. PLEASE NOTE, THE ABOVE IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL YOU RECEIVE
NOTIFICATION THAT YOUR PAYMENT HAS BEEN PROCESSED BY THE ECOSYTEM ENHANCMENT
PROGRAM.
Signature
Date
ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
1652 Mail Service Center .
RALEIGH, N.C. 27699-1652
[phone]
Filename: 050007MacleodLake(Catawba)401-IC_EEP
401 Oversight/Express Review Permits Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Ralegh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
No`" Carolina
&ra!!y
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
•••*•so•m•ive•esse849 11
,••ii••••i•f•T• it•••:•
NCDENR MRO
a[Arr_11 [ROW ?p
APR - 7 2006
DENR -WATER QUALITY
WETWO AND STORMWATER BRANCH
Fax:[phone] Apr 7 2006 8:54 P.01
November 30, 2005
AND HL'-J"J,
OFFICE
DEC 0 8 200:
Bob MacLeod -
R & L MacLeod Investments
PA_ Boy, 320 XTE QUA TY SECTION
Denver, NC 28134,
r.. sk V6G
Project: Mirror Labe Estates County: Catawba
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement program (NC EEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the )permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC EEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification wiifta this tbue frame, this acceptance wW expire. 'It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/401/LAMA permits to NC EEP. Once NC EEP receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
River Basin Wetlands Stream? Buffer Buffer
Cataloging (Acres) (Linear Peet) Zone 1 Zone 2
Unit (Sq- Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
lti an Nora-Pi arias Coastal Marsh Cold Coci Warm
Catawba 0 0 0 0 0 860 0 0
03050101
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2:1 ratio, (buffers; Zone 1 at a 3:1 ratio and Zone 2 at a 1.5:1 ratio). The type and amount of the compensatory
mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401 Water Quality Certification, and/or CAMA Permit. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C_ Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U_ S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998
if you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone]_
Sincerely,
Z?7 Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Amanda Jones, US.A,CE. - Asheville
Alan Johnson, DWQ Regional Office - Mooresville
File
Rrstor<rxg... E --- PYOt Oar St I?CRN
??
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-'16521919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net
APR-7-2006 FRI 07:30 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 1

r . ?1 r
f,
12,

Wetland and Natural Resource
Consultants, Inc.
February 22, 2006
Mrs. Amanda Jones Mr. Alan Johnson
US Army Corps of Engineers Mooresville Regional Off ice-NCDENR
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 610 East Center Avenue
Asheville, NC 28801 Mooresville, NC 28115
RED MacLeod Lake Project u ? ?
Catawba Count, North Carolina L!
Action ID No. 200530965 / DWQ 05-0007 APR 1
7 2006
Mrs. Jones and Mr. Johnson: DENR - WATER QUALITy
WETLANDS AND STOKNATER BRANCH
Attached please find revised information concerning the Mirror Lake Estates project.
Please review this information in conjunction with the supporting data in the original
individual permit application.
The applicant has further reduced proposed impacts by repositioning the lake on the
project site. In doing so the applicant has avoided the two largest wetlands on site and
several additional hundred feet of stream channel. All remaining streams and wetlands on
site will be preserved as before to prevent future impacts, however, additional streams
and wetlands will be preserved now due to the decrease in impacts. The applicant has
ended discussions with the Catawba Country Club regarding possible off-site restoration.
Avoidance and minimization is an acceptable form of mitigation, especially in watersheds
which contain endangered species and high quality wetlands. The applicant has minimized
and avoided impacts to the maximum extent practicable while still meeting the project
goals. These actions paired with the preservation proposal will mitigate for the loss of
aquatic functions due to any permitted impacts.
Please call with any questions that you may have.
Best regards,
V nnifer Robertson
j Canton Office Newton Office
PO Box 882 wnrinc.com PO Box 224
Canton, NC 28716 Newton, NC 28658
828-648-8801 828-465-3035
828-648-8802 Fax [phone] Fax

4
.-1
1
N
O
Ol
i .0
E N
4-
IA

•,p d t - t 4- y- v-
0
O LO Lin ,, LO
} 00 M co
M M M Co

O
O .2 7! r!
1 ?
LQ
LO \
.
i O O

_

• N
Q
O
p a a
V a
O in
TJ

L
L
W ^ O Q
p O? 0% 0%
0 3 N N N
s
Q .

T
2
Q

-o

L
L
3 } ? \ \ M M
O

a-

Q
s
+-
in
00
M
o
(-
NO
v
O%
-
LO
co
M 0%
d-
N
p?
-a _0
p N iz \
G C
Q O O O
H p U- U-
4-
d
N

?
? v 0
L d

? V
°F-
a
0 'o
U
U
O •L Q C Q

M ? M
} O O

O
O
O ?

•? L
O Cf O
O
O d
C
V
_
.!
L

O W NO %0
} M M
O

.a
N N
Q x
4- a
C S
Q

L
L
d p
0 3 0

I;
s
f-

Q
d

O n
M ? M
u O O
INC

H LL
c
cA %n cn
O ? v n-
L cr
.?
3

N
O
}
N
3
F
1
J
=v
o N
0 0
.2 91
L
y_
y.
y.
y 4-
4- in ? %0 M
3L
D V

O O o O o O O O
C -p
o d
} N
O
y

0
} 4- N- w ?`- `' `F 4-
`F
-
E
d .0-
c d'
W) oo
C%j ?O
N
N ao
.
-?
N M %O
N C
O
~
t:
N m
O L
V V
i
-4 eel
p CI
V Ct tC)
N •
.
to
to tL)
N O
... Lq
N Lq
N Lq
N

N d
'O
7-0
d d
72 T
d d
'?
?_ -0 d
m
-gyp
L
> VI
3w V) V)
31:
U
L V) 0
n
ZV)
w
U (n In
ZU)
a `nZ Zu) oo tn tn oLn
M
00 !0 oo
w n N oo
N N o
m o
0 O N •Mi
..a
4-

I 0 O O O O
\
SO C9 U? Q
4 U V v
X
W X
W X
W
t M
to 0
M m
q- NO
O LO
'o
°D
J h %0 N In M
E c ?
E Q co V o w lL (a 2 }
N N H
C _
O d
c o
L
CL a
c v v
c v a a
4-
d
p V
L
C O
N
O
O V
a
h
O a 4- a a 4-
`!--

C N

C

C

?t

?O
CL Q
?- d
V L N
V
L
C O
N
}
O
!;,O V
W
N E
H a a o a a
}
L
"v M
O --+
N 4t
O ON
O a
v
m
NC L p 0 0 0 0 O
o
d
V =„ 3
V
OI .4 .-4 H N N a
Cf .-+ .-r .-? .y . •?

•
O
O v
d O d
X d
X

w w
ad N
L M
O O\
t, I'
0 O\
0 qt
! O\
%D
Q 0 0 6 0 0 .4
N
a a M V n w c
3 ?

Wetland and
h Cain ote
4 PO Box 882
Natural Resource Canton, NC 28716
w
. , ;,,.
Consultants Phone: [phone]
Fax: 828 / 648-8802

1 w/?
To- Ian McMillan From Jennifer Robertson
Fax- 919-733-6893 Pages- 11
PlI919-715-0631 Oahe: 413/2006
Re: MacLeod Mimor Lake Project CC-
? urgent ? For Renrlew ? Mesa Comment O Please Reply O Please Recycle
Ian,
Here is the information you requested. A harm copy will go in the mail today to you.
Thanks,
Jennifer
?O-V
?S w2? ?I,sc.vtr Wks Q4,
baet-. 1-2?wc-ta -b 3&5
APR-13-2086 THU 07:39 TEL:[phone]
Q ?Akeacpy l?a?r Q..
6?' O-Vs S 0-ce2r
NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS
P. 1
Wetland and Natural Resource
Consultants, Inc.
February 22, 2006
Mrs. Amanda Jones Mr. Alan Johnson
U5 Army Corps of Engineers Mooresville Regional Office-NCDENR
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 610 East Center Avenue
Asheville, NC 28801 Mooresville, NC 28115
RE: MacLeod Lake Project
Catawba County, North Carolina
Action ID No. 200530965 / DWQ 05-0007
Mrs. Jones and Mr. Johnson:
Attached please find revised information concerning the Mirror Lake Estates project.
Please review this information in conjunction with the supporting data in the original
individual permit application.
The applicant has further reduced proposed impacts by repositioning the lake on the
project site. In doing so the applicant has avoided the two largest wetlands on site and
several additional hundred feet of stream channel. All remaining streams and wetlands on
site will be preserved as before to prevent future impacts, however, additional streams
and wetlands will be preserved now due to the decrease in impacts, The applicant has
ended discussions with the Catawba Country Club regarding possible off-site restoration.
Avoidance and minimization is an acceptable form of mitigation, especially in watersheds
which contain endangered species and high quality wetlands. The applicant has minimized
and avoided impacts to the maximum extent practicable while still meeting the project
goals. These actions paired with the preservation proposal will mitigate for the loss of
aquatic functions due to any permitted impacts.
Please call with any questions that you may have.
Best regards,
?- In
enn?fer Robertson
Canton Office
M Box 882
Canton, NC 28716
828-6485801
828-648-8802 Fox
wn inc,com
Newton Office
FO Box 224
Newton, NC 28658
828-465-3035
828-46x5-3050 Fax
APR-13-2006 THU 07:39 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 2

O
N
n

ti

M
.

O
: `1-
to r, ko r-
? c°+°n m m 0

b
+
to

. N
a CL a- 4 = c
C
IO

L

0 ? N N N
.,
4 s

f z
qc
? -v

L
w
v Cf 0
o

V i

Lf)
0
qt
LO o?
00 i %% Q% 00 N
(1r) .o ~ m

E-
0 0
0 4
2
?
H A3 LL

0 d G C
L m V ?r
p O
+? O
Q 70
L to
C
? V
SI
w c a

} V4

d L
o = t

c
CL

O } m
N N
s

L
Q t

m ?
4-

0

u ? Q

y p c
Q c ?
H u-

-

t
d
APR-13-2006 THU 07:40 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 3

N
IC1
M

R h+ +O R N off C3 Ch
V
D
•
?
?. O
rl C)
..? O
?1 C7
r-1 ©
W O
ra O
-1 G
N G
o -0
t as
N cm
cu
N
N

~
vl ?
a
V V
rN
IC'f
tf'f
IL'! C
?
V R1C ?
?y tf1 off ?
cu Q CQ N N
O_ d Q .N 0 of d 'da_
?? u9Z zw zw w V) 2N

v %n Z
Cy
u)
00 m 0C)

join C)O

? ? o2

? N ©O

N N z

-I ? ?O

a0
R Mm

N ...
.
.4

0
o
cQ
o
?u C ?
of 4-
w

d
4 L L W
U U
9 10 1 0 0 " m o In ago

1+•
R
40
R
N
IL)
?* ,

y E c cn [a D Lki u- tb o
E-
U)
APR-13-2006 THU 07:40 TEL:[phone]
NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS
P. 4

I
I
4 ?
m
t

-is
cv
L
c ?

$ ?
N
4» ? b N-. O Q ?'- ?F-

d N st .b
N
t
L
U r

O
?- 7
_ '?
t E
H g a o a
1 a
, , sr C% t -
0 O O O

O Y
U
`
V
Mo
. -4
- -4
. Cm
4 (M
-1 a
G
.
4 4
. - ,

d ?g 0 w w
c3 " to 0% 0% d- v,
ti o r; o o I? .a
+K 0 0 01 0 0

+[ ov V m w c

APR-13-2086 THU 87:48 TEL:[phone]
NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS
P. 5
i
0
N
-f-•
-F-
Y.
N f
LLJ F/
N ^1e rp 41 .
..... An

APR-13-8006 THU 07:40 TEL:[phone]
NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS
ti• ;lP
t'
.f . .
F
r -
ti
3 ?1'r ?r
a,
P. 6
w» ??"1?15 r-yn• `? ' _ h? MFG,
f
:Y

APR-13-2006 THU 07:41 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 7
b7
rr,o r
Lake
Impact
Estates
map
Scale-1 150"
an Segment 8 = 6701f
1r-?g-
-r-
f
eiii t A 385H

APR-13-2006 THU 07:41 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 8
?r i ll? ?.r l
..4.,,`.? ?\'\\ \? ,. ,y , ? \ ? 'rte ``? ??
art, ' . ? • , ,` ? _,_ ?-?. ?-?y_ ???t .?- ?
TOTAL) _ \ ffr.yx-?` ??
/
L-z., ?... ?.;• 1
APR-13-2006 THU 07:41 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 9
APR-13-2006 THU 07:42 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 10
i
J ? J
- O ?
r')-T
7
to r

APR-13-2006 THU 07:42 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 11
OF W ATF9 Michael F. Easley, Governor
?0 ti William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
.,C. Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Cl)
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
July 11, 2005
Mr. Bob MacLeod
R & L MacLeod Investments
P.O. Box 320
Denver, NC 28134
Subject: MacLeod Property
DWQ 05-0007
Catawba County, NC
Dear Mr. MacLeod:
On July 5, 2005, the Division of Water Quality received your modified application for the proposed
development of the subject site. It was noted that the ski lake had been moved to preserve the headwater
wetland that was of concern. In doing so, the stream impacts were also reduced. It was also noted that you
still propose restoring a stream at the Catawba Country Club as mitigation for impacts associated with the
construction of the ski lake. In order for this office to conduct a proper review, a more detailed conceptual plan
is needed. Be advised that once the conceptual "idea" has been accepted, a detailed wetland/stream
restoration plan must be submitted prior to any stream impacts at the site.
Until a mitigation plan has been submitted and approved, this project will remain on hold pursuant to
15A NCAC 2H .0506. If you have further questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Alan Johnson at
[phone] or Ms. Cyndi Karoly in Raleigh at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Surface Water Protection
Regional Supervisor
cc: Cyndi Karoly - Wetlands Unit
Amanda Jones - USACOE
Wetland/Natural Resources
Land.Quality -- MRO
Central Files
allc??odr?D
JUL 1 9 2005 NR. WETLANDS AND ST?ORM1NATERtt NCH

NortbCarolina
Naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
July 11, 2005
Mr. Bob MacLeod
R & L MacLeod Investments
P.O. Box 320
Denver, NC 28134
Dear Mr. MacLeod:
Subject: MacLeod Property
DWQ 05-0007
Catawba County, NC
On July 5, 2005, the Division of Water Quality received your modified application for the proposed
development of the subject site. It was noted that the ski lake had been moved to preserve the headwater
wetland that was of concern. In doing so, the stream impacts were also reduced. It was also noted that you
still propose restoring a stream at the Catawba Country Club as mitigation for impacts associated with the
construction of the ski lake. In order for this office to conduct a proper review, a more detailed conceptual plan
is needed. Be advised that once the conceptual "idea" has been accepted, a detailed wetland/stream
restoration plan must be submitted prior to any stream impacts at the site.
Until a mitigation plan has been submitted and approved, this project will remain on hold pursuant to
15A NCAC 2H .0506. If you have further questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Alan Johnson at
[phone] or Ms. Cyndi Karoly in Raleigh at [phone].
Sincerely,
Z" j'? G?Gey1
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Surface Water Protection
Regional Supervisor
cc: Cyndi Karoly - Wetlands Unit
Amanda Jones - USACOE
Wetland/Natural Resources
Land Quality -- MRO
Central Files
D @? Q !@§
JUL 1 9 2005
WE W6i STT Q ;Ty
?T'?R 8k4W,H
Nt` Carolin
oa
Ntura!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
July 8, 2005
Mr. Bob MacLeod
R & L MacLeod Investments
P.O. Box 320
Denver, NC 28134
Subject: MacLeod Property
DWQ 05-0007
Catawba County, NC
Dear Mr. MacLeod:
On July 5, 2005, the Division of Water Quality received your modified application for the proposed
development of the subject site. It was noted that the ski lake had been moved to preserve the headwater
wetland that was of concern. In doing so, the stream impacts were also reduced. It was also noted in the
application that you still propose utilizing the stream at the Catawba Country Club. Please provide a more
detailed conceptual plan so that a proper review can be conducted. Be advised that once the conceptual
"idea" has been accepted, a detailed restoration plan must be submitted prior to any stream impacts at the site.
a) Payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), provided EEP will
accept the responsibility for conducting this mitigation work, or
b) Preparing and implementing an approved stream mitigation plan (stream preservation,
enhancement, and/or restoration).
Until a mitigation plan has been submitted and approved, this project will remain on hold pursuant to
15A NCAC 2H .0506. If you have further questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Alan Johnson at
[phone] or Ms. Cyndi Karoly in Raleigh at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Surface Water Protection
Regional Supervisor
cc: Cyndi Karoly -Wetlands Unit
Amanda Jones - USACOE
Wetland/Natural Resources
Land Quality -- MRO
Central Files
None Carolina
?turally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Triage Check List
Date:
6/30/05
? ??
b?
Project Name: MacLeod Lake oS-
DWQ#: 95=68?6Cr'
Doc?7
County: Catawba
To
Alan Johnson, Mooresville Regional Office
60-day Processing Time: 6/28/05 - 8/26/05
From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone : [phone]
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Neuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks!

a
FILL
Wetland and Natural Resource
Consultants, Inc.
Mrs. Amanda Jones
1 US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801
RE: MacLeod Lake Project
Catawba County, North Carolina
Action ID No. 200530965 / DWQ 05-0007
Mrs. Jones:
June 22, 2005
Attached please find revised information concerning the MacLeod lake project. Please
review this information in conjunction with the supporting data in the original individual
permit application.
Please call me at 828 / 712-9205 with any questions that you may have.
d0r+ 1'sali'AR'a
Best regards,
9'd
} Jennifer Robertson r--3 g
® yR!
Cc: Bob MacLeod, Project Proponent JUN 2 2005
Cyndi Karoly, NC Division of Water Quality (7 copies)
RENR «WAlk?;
4YETLwQ3NND Mt VN VMEli 1-Nklir-M
Alan Johnson, NC Division of Water Quality - Mooresville Office
Bryan Tompkins, US Fish and Wildlife Service
Becky Fox, Environmental Protection Agency
Ron Linville, NC Wildlife Resource Commission
Newton Office Clyde Office
PO Box 224 wnrinc.com 217 Paragon Parkway, #142
Newton, NC 28658 Clyde, NC 28721
828-465-3035 828-648-8801
828-465-3050 Fax [phone] Fax
or
Mitigation Discussion and Proposal
Please review the Tables enclosed in conjunction with the.information below
while considering the mitigation proposal.
Streams:
On-Site Preservation:
Based on the overwhelming concern from the regulatory agencies about the
headwater streams and wetlands, the design team and project proponent
have designed two ski lake site plan alternatives since the original permit
c " application was submitted in order to completely eliminate impacts to the
resources everyone was concerned with protecting. Not only have we
avoided these areas but we have buffered these streams and wetlands quite
significantly. The revised plan reduces the length of the lake by 150 feet
and positions the lake in a more perpendicular orientation to the stream as
opposed to an absolute parallel orientation. We feel that the current
proposed site plan reduces impacts to the greatest extent possible and
protects those resources on site that have quality worth protecting.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission mentions that the lower
portions of the stream to be impacted are geomorphically and biologically
diminished due to livestock activity and I completely agree. Those portions
of the streams are the only reaches being proposed for impacts under the
revised site plan. I feel that the project proponent has now completely
avoided the higher quality streams on the property and has minimized
impacts to the streams of lesser quality.
The ratios for preservation and restoration proposed were taken from the
joint federal and state stream mitigation guidelines. The recommended
l priority areas for channel preservation include streams in a watershed that
is adjacent to, or within a unique wetland; streams in a watershed that is
known to provide habitat for state or federally listed endangered or
threatened species; and streams in a watershed that contain unique and/or
high quality habitat (stream and/or wetland) that is adjacent or within an
area experiencing a rapid increase in population or development trend among
others. The Fish and Wildlife Service does mention in their letter that the
}
surrounding area is becoming developed and urbanized and I think we would
all agree with that statement.
I am proposing that the preservation of 3,153 linear feet of streams be
accepted as mitigation for 721 linear feet of Corps impact. Even though a
strong case could be made that some of the preservation serve as DWQ
impact mitigation, none of the preservation is being proposed to off-set any
DWQ impacts. The preservation areas will be included within the recorded
Covenants and Restrictions for the development that will outline the common
space rules and regulations and will be maintained by the Home Owners
Association. An annual common space monitoring report can be completed to
ensure the continual integrity of the preserved areas.
Please see the attached Mitigation Map for a location of the preservation on
site. Since Channel E flows through two lots this reach of stream is not
being proposed as mitigation. Please see the attached tables for a summary
of the ratios used and buffers provided on each stream segment. The
quality of the streams preserved versus those streams impacted and the
buffers offered along the preserved streams warrants a higher mitigation
ratio for preservation.
Off-Site Restoration:
The 860' of off-site restoration will be conducted at the Catawba Country
Club. This mitigation site is located within the same HUC Code (Catawba 39
03050101 Upper Catawba) as the impact site. Due to the concerns regarding
run-off from the commenting agencies about conducting the mitigation at a
golf course, we have revised the location of where the restoration will be
conducted at the course. Please see the attached CAD file for the location
of the restoration efforts. There will be 75 foot vegetated buffer on
either side of the restored stream. The existing pond will be removed to
allow for the restoration of the stream through the old pond bottom. More
detailed restoration plans will be provided once the Corps, DWQ, and other
agencies have approved the site.
Wetlands:
Hard impacts have been reduced to less than 1 acre therefore the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality does not require mitigation.

On-Site Preservation:
I am proposing to compensate for the 0.79 acre of poor quality grazed
(cows) wetland that will be impacted by dam construction with the avoidance
and preservation of 0.84 acre of unique, high quality wetlands at the
headwaters of the drainage basin on site. The average buffer width
surrounding these two wetlands is 110 linear feet.
Even though some of the commenting agencies had concerns with mitigating
wetland impacts with a littoral shelf around the ski lake, I am still proposing
to compensate for the 0.37 acre of poorer quality heavily grazed (cows)
wetland that will be flooded by the ski lake with 0.04 acre (wetland within
Lot 25) of wetland preservation and approximately 3.6 acres of littoral
wetlands that will be created around the ski lake. This acreage was
calculated by multiplying the 5200 linear feet of shore around the lake and
around the two islands by 30 linear feet (the width of the littoral shelf)
then dividing by 43560 (the number of square feet in an acre).
The vegetation in Wetland 8 is completely composed of Tuncus effusus and
has been extremely degraded by the cattle. I believe that the current size
of the wetland has also been affected by the cattle in that it is larger than
it would naturally be due to compaction of the soil and alteration of the
drainage patterns through this wetland to the stream. The wetland impact
is a secondary impact due to flooding: The littoral shelf will be a higher
quality wetland and a more diverse wetland void of cattle.
Pond:
I do not agree with requiring an upland undisturbed vegetated buffer
surrounding the lake. There will be a wetland undisturbed vegetated buffer
30 feet in width surrounding the lake. There will also be an upland buffer
adjacent to the wetland buffer for lake maintenance of 10-20 feet. These
two areas will allow for 40 - 50 feet of buffer that the property owners will
not be allowed to disturb.
The project proponent is only proposing 12 lots around the lake. These 12
lots consist of a total of 3,115 linear feet of shoreline with an average of
260 feet per lot. There are two large common areas surrounding the lake
consisting of 1,725 linear feet of shoreline. One of these common areas is
where the dam will be located and it consists of 1,500 linear feet of the
4,840 total linear feet of shoreline where no trees will be allowed to
establish in order to ensure that the dam is structurally sound. So the dam
itself makes up almost 1/3 of the shoreline around the lake mostly due to
t the fact that we have re-designed it to reduce stream impacts and planned
the lake in a more perpendicular orientation to the stream than previously.
The two common areas adjacent to the lake consist of approximately 25
acres of woodlands. Half of the lots adjacent to the lake will require
grading along the shoreline. The smallest lake lot is over 2 acres. There will
not be 2 acres of manicured lawn adjacent to the lake. There will be trees
and other vegetation immediately adjacent to the lake within the lots. Mr.
Bob MacLeod will be able to dictate the amount of disturbance allowed
within the lots and he has as much if not more interest in keeping the lake
clean and free of pollutants as anyone else.
Summary:
Upon completion of the project and the associated proposed mitigation 4,013
linear feet of streams, 3.6 acres of littoral wetlands, and 0.88 acres of
vegetated wetlands will be under some form of protective covenant.
As almost all agencies have suggested a 7Q10 rate of flow will be maintained
during the construction process and after construction. Temperature and
dissolved oxygen content will be measured prior to construction
commencement in order to ensure that the water released from the ski lake
mimics those attributes that are currently characteristic of the stream.
1

ri

%0
O
N

0
F'
In

L

U)
4-
u
n
c
O
L 4 y" `I- 4- al.. 4- 4-
o •O
C)
o
o
cm
0
0

~
00
00 't -D Lq
(\I 00
.?
c
O

2
p
7i
~
+

-
LO
LO .-i c3 0
4: c; ci

. y O O O O o
O V O O
O O O
O O
O O
O tZ a a kb
o M

L
O d t\ O M O 0
\0 o c-i G\ 0\
a 00 0 %0
0 .0 .o

Q s

F S
Q

? v
w
L
L
V t-I 0 0 o Cf o ^ f'-
C C N N Lid O\ O?

m
r
}

Q
}
O O O ? ao 0 0 C*j
q, 00 q 00 m
V- %0 00
N ?.i N `
1 00

N LL E E a O C
O O O
~
t L1 AO M LL LL LL
N

L E
Q
Q
co
V
D
U- v c3
F- V F-

c

01 O?

O O O V
C
O
.2
1
+- 0!

• 0 a
? to ?O
o of

O M
o
c
.0 a o n,
?
> r- 0

Q r

E 2
Q

L
L

3 O M ? ? M

i
m s
4-1 -Cyl
2
Q
d
0\ 0\
?
L ? M •
-+
v c; O O •"?
Q

v E -p O Q
? ?
~
H Q LL
8
VI N
rL Cy
} O O O
p
j o H V 1-
3
v
Z
c
c
0
3
t c
}
0

N O ?{-

O
` ° o 0 ? %

W co

= D:
O
c
o c
d H 4- 4- 4- 4- 4-
O C L O Q co
Q
4
a 00 co V
Lo
?
OC N .
4
_ O:
O
Q?
8
0
:a
4-
4-
O
y-
\
O
\

oo
q-
r-
4_ 4-

E } -
O u t- Z5 Z5
00 o
? N
N a..
M 0
V co •.i
d D V V'
J
G
}O
y ? .-? .-1 .-a Q C3 d C1 Ci
L } ?
F
N L
O
O d 4-
N
0 , a 7!
N

.-+
0 c } O
V c; O

F

N c
c
.? N
L
L
L

L

\

\

o V O O O O O O
M
i d
h
0 o 0 V Go o 0 ao
w
-4 W a-.
-4 %0
W
C
O
V N N N
} d LL LL LL
L
~ O O O C
N H Q Q Q LL LL LL

! }
° d F Q < CO U A3 LL 3+ L' }
o?° v0
4
o ?
n

12
: 11 o u
N
0

L.

0 X
} ti
c
S
L
7 Q \
C \ \ \ \ \
N C
L d
a cf
c
0

c

y--
L 'fl o p o
Lo 0 W)
o to O
LO N
LO
d d V N v ~ ' N M .-i
LLB

O X
3 N
4- C
y'
4-
`F
4-
4-
4- 4_
`
N 0 C3 0
0 to C)
7 0

V 0

CID
0

O\
0

N
?

-cli
4
ON

V
O
c?

O
d
a O:

3 A G O 4

ON tl?
} 00 w v N
N ? 00
.-i

0
C
oc 3 -4 -4 -4
4- c

O
h
Q:
t [-
V ~
N .-a ~ t[7
O LLB
O .-?
.-? \
IC \
a

N
O L
I L L L L -0
O O
\ C3
\
V
S O
(D d
O a
O a
O d
O kD
S N

= O
N O
00 O
V V
00 a0
01 0
d 0 w
NO
00

u d ? ? 0
iz i i c v
E E E 0 0 0
H ~ D 6 lo LL LL LL
C
y E tq
U' c N N
c
L '? Q CO U LL 3 4- L.
+-
tn m U

I
C
o d
a o

- C C C C C

3L
aV
C
0
N
}
a
p

& `I- `L-

` 4-

- 4-

- 4- 4-

- 4-

-
v-
_
a-
LO 00
N
O
th 00
M
?
%O
N %0
to & .-i I" .-ti N r

V V
p
LO
LO
to
?
? rl
Lq -4
Lq .-4
Lq
?
N N N
} a
? O
L p
t IL.
4-
4-
4-
4-
a
4?
4-
4-
0
4-- V
v
L 00
N 00

.-a M 0
N
a C
a .-1 .-a 1-4 N
C

W

N d
t
't3
d d
d d
'C '?Q pl
'C -13
-?
iT)
In In
C5 LA
o
Ln
(5
N
a
V NZ c ui 3: zv In
zo
Z oz zon w
z

d
m
Lon
LO OO

QOtc? OO

LTL+7

LO O

0O0 0LO

N .M-?
? M LLB
m

_
. 'd "L3 '? '"C3 'G d d N a
a
p O
C? O O
UL O
C? O
C? d
U d
Q d
U
X X X
W W W
S

}
LO
M
I?
0

f?
0
I-
%O
10-
O
N

\
C

Nr
LC)

0

NO c
h
L[7
y
_! M

E Q co U A3 LL LL (a = O

t
C -p
o d
4-
0
20 O
}m w
-v
3 L
ov
C?
O y
a c
L O O
} 0%0 %0
0 co
h
V U
Lx .? 2
} Q
N
N O
L p
V LL 4- 4-
p N O O
a m m
O
,INC
4-N pl d
a '[3 Z3
s' In in a
? z V) C
to LO
OL1 ? ?
m
L a
O
7 LL C
S
+-
%D %0
d -9ao ao
J
c N
L E ¢ c
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Revised Impact Map
s
t
q
MAP NOT TO SCALE
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Revised Impact Map -Section
Stream Segment A' = 1801f
Stream Segment A = 2401f
A ego ??? ?-
VVet d A .79
?, \FMV USE
q
00
9
960 G... _. 'flcs 990 `T O
F
I
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Revised Impact Map - Section 2
i
it B = 4401f
u
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Revised Impact Map -Section 3

'c
132
nt 1981f
c9
Lo
0

MAP NOT TO SCALE
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Revised Mitigation Map
e

MAP NOT TO SCALE

MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Revised Mitigation Map - Section
Channel Segme
MAP NOT TO SCALE
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Revised Mitigation Map -Section 2
I
rn
i
MAP NOT TO SCALE
L
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Revised Mitigation Map - Section 3
r
N
C h"a n n
950
?`; 9? 94
'
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Revised Mitigation Map - Section 4
543'
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Revised Mitigation Map - Section 5

f
r1
j?
7-
b-harm -

egment
f -
i
(405) ? .,. 10
-hanhel Se ent Pre rvation
E
1
-\PR\cosr
3
P?r-Ds vatio., _-06'
s ry
9
`• O
1000 - ,^
`a
anne Seg ent
w '. 960

Stream Restoration Summary
We are continuing to present the stream at the Catawba Country Club as
off-site restoration for 860 linear feet of unavoidable impacts at the
MacLeod site. The stream restoration at the Catawba Country Club will be
conducted on stream reach W and on a portion of stream reach LPfrom the
enclosed map. The MacLeod Ski Lake project does not require any off-site
wetland mitigation so we are not proposing any wetlands adjacent to stream
segment W as a part of this mitigation proposal.
Mr. Mickey Henson of Appalachian Environmental Services will continue to
work with the Catawba Country Club to get approval to conduct additional
restoration/enhancement work on the stream funded by the Club. These
additional efforts could be conducting upstream and downstream of our
proposed restoration area and will be conducted during the same time
period.
V
C/o
j
d CL 1.%
U
4 d d
3::p - E L
(5 :3
i-' UI U1 U
d x S U
U W F- d

MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Hexastylis naniflora Map Populations 1, 2, and 3

Ii'

MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Hexastylis naniffora Map - Population 4

MAP NOT TO SCALE

4 ? {
1

Wetland and Natural Resource
Consultants, Inc.
Mrs. Amanda Jones
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801
RE: MacLeod Lake Project
Catawba County, North Carolina
Action ID No. 200530965 / DWQ 05-0007
Mrs. Jones:
June 22, 2005
Attached please find revised information concerning the MacLeod lake project. Please
review this information in conjunction with the supporting data in the original individual
permit application.
Please call me at 828 / 712-9205 with any questions that you may have.
Best regards,
Jennifer Robertson
Cc: Bob Macleod, Project Proponent
Cyndi Karoly, NC Division of Water Quality (7 copies)
Alan Johnson, NC Division of Water Quality - Mooresville Office
Bryan Tompkins, US Fish and Wildlife Service
Becky Fox, Environmental Protection Agency
Ron Linville, NC Wildlife Resource Commission
r= 17:?, M3 --35
JUN 2 8 2005
DENR - WMER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STaRtAWATER BRANCH

h
?'?:i• Ji a?w
Newton Office - Clyde Office
PO Box 224 wnrinc.com 217 Paragon Parkway, #142
Newton, NC 28658 Clyde, NC 28721
828-465-3035 828-648-8801
828-465-3050 Fax I 828448-8802 Fax
Mitigation Discussion and Proposal
Please review the Tables enclosed in conjunction with the information below
while considering the mitigation proposal.
Streams:
On-Site Preservation:
Based on the overwhelming concern from the regulatory agencies about the
headwater streams and wetlands, the design team and project proponent
have designed two ski lake site plan alternatives since the original permit
application was submitted in order to completely eliminate impacts to the
resources everyone was concerned with protecting. Not only have we
avoided these areas but we have buffered these streams and wetlands quite
significantly. The revised plan reduces the length of the lake by 150 feet
and positions the lake in a more perpendicular orientation to the stream as
opposed to an absolute parallel orientation. We feel that the current
proposed site plan reduces impacts to the greatest extent possible and
protects those resources on site that have quality worth protecting.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission mentions that the lower
portions of the stream to be impacted are geomorphically and biologically
diminished due to livestock activity and I completely agree. Those portions
of the streams are the only reaches being proposed for impacts under the
revised site plan. I feel that the project proponent has now completely
avoided the higher quality streams on the property and has minimized
impacts to the streams of lesser quality.
The ratios for preservation and restoration proposed were taken from the
joint federal and state stream mitigation guidelines. The recommended
priority areas for channel preservation include streams in a watershed that
is adjacent to, or within a unique wetland; streams in a watershed that is
known to provide habitat for state or federally listed endangered or
threatened species; and streams in a watershed that contain unique and/or
high quality habitat (stream and/or wetland) that is adjacent or within an
area experiencing a rapid increase in population or development trend among
others. The Fish and Wildlife Service does mention in their letter that the
surrounding area is becoming developed and urbanized and I think we would
all agree with that statement.
I am proposing that the preservation of 3,153 linear feet of streams be
accepted as mitigation for 721 linear feet of Corps impact. Even though a
strong case could be made that some of the preservation serve as DWQ
impact mitigation, none of the preservation is being proposed to off-set any
DWQ impacts. The preservation areas will be included within the recorded
Covenants and Restrictions for the development that will outline the common
space rules and regulations and will be maintained by the Home Owner's
Association. An annual common space monitoring report can be completed to
ensure the continual integrity of the preserved areas.
Please see the attached Mitigation Map for a location of the preservation on
site. Since Channel E flows through two lots this reach of stream is not
being proposed as mitigation. Please see the attached tables for a summary
of the ratios used and buffers provided on each stream segment. The
quality of the streams preserved versus those streams impacted and the
buffers offered along the preserved streams warrants a higher mitigation
ratio for preservation.
Off-Site Restoration:
The 860' of off-site restoration will be conducted at the Catawba Country
Club. This mitigation site is located within the same HUC Code (Catawba 39
03050101 Upper Catawba) as the impact site. Due to the concerns regarding
run-off from the commenting agencies about conducting the mitigation at a
golf course, we have revised the location of where the restoration will be
conducted at the course. Please see the attached CAD file for the location
of the restoration efforts. There will be 75 foot vegetated buffer on
either side of the restored stream. The existing pond will be removed to
allow for the restoration of the stream through the old pond bottom. More
detailed restoration plans will be provided once the Corps, DWQ, and other
agencies have approved the site.
Wetlands:
Hard impacts have been reduced to less than 1 acre therefore the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality does not require mitigation.
On-Site Preservation:
I am proposing to compensate for the 0.79 acre of poor quality grazed
(cows) wetland that will be impacted by dam construction with the avoidance
and preservation of 0.84 acre of unique, high quality wetlands at the
headwaters of the drainage basin on site. The average buffer width
surrounding these two wetlands is 110 linear feet.
Even though some of the commenting agencies had concerns with mitigating
wetland impacts with a littoral shelf around the ski lake, I am still proposing
to compensate for the 0.37 acre of poorer quality heavily grazed (cows)
wetland that will be flooded by the ski lake with 0.04 acre (wetland within
Lot 25) of wetland preservation and approximately 3.6 acres of littoral
wetlands that will be created around the ski lake. This acreage was
calculated by multiplying the 5200 linear feet of shore around the lake and
around the two islands by 30 linear feet (the width of the littoral shelf)
then dividing. by 43560 (the number of square feet in an acre).
The vegetation in Wetland 8 is completely composed of Auncuseffusus and
has been extremely degraded by the cattle. I believe that the current size
of the wetland has also been affected by the cattle in that it is larger than
it would naturally be due to compaction of the soil and alteration of the
drainage patterns through this wetland to the stream. The wetland impact
is a secondary impact due to flooding: The littoral shelf will be a higher
quality wetland and a more diverse wetland void of cattle.
Pond:
I do not agree with requiring an upland undisturbed vegetated buffer
surrounding the lake. There will be a wetland undisturbed vegetated buffer
30 feet in width surrounding the lake. There will also be an upland buffer
adjacent to the wetland buffer for lake maintenance of 10-20 feet. These
two areas will allow for 40 - 50 feet of buffer that the property owners will
not be allowed to disturb.
The project proponent is only proposing 12 lots around the lake. These 12
lots consist of a total of 3,115 linear feet of shoreline with an average of
260 feet per lot. There are two large common areas surrounding the lake
consisting of 1,725 linear feet of shoreline. One of these common areas is
where the dam will be located and it consists of 1,500 linear feet of the
4,840 total linear feet of shoreline where no trees will be allowed to
establish in order to ensure that the dam is structurally sound. So the dam
itself makes up almost 1/3 of the shoreline around the lake mostly due to
the fact that we have re-designed it to reduce stream impacts and planned
the lake in a more perpendicular orientation to the stream than previously.
The two common areas adjacent to the lake consist of approximately 25
acres of woodlands. Half of the lots adjacent to the lake will require
grading along the shoreline. The smallest lake lot is over 2 acres. There will
not be 2 acres of manicured lawn adjacent to the lake. There will be trees
and other vegetation immediately adjacent to the lake within the lots. Mr.
Bob MacLeod will be able to dictate the amount of disturbance allowed
within the lots and he has as much if not more interest in keeping the lake
clean and free of pollutants as anyone else.
Summary:
Upon completion of the project and the associated proposed mitigation 4,013
linear feet of streams, 3.6 acres of littoral wetlands, and 0.88 acres of
vegetated wetlands will be under some form of protective covenant.
As almost all agencies have suggested a 7Q10 rate of flow will be maintained
during the construction process and after construction. Temperature and
dissolved oxygen content will be measured prior to construction
commencement in order to ensure that the water released from the ski lake
mimics those attributes that are currently characteristic of the stream.

C
It;
I-C
v
F

F L

C u

}
C
o
.F,
cJ •? O O O N O O 00 00

s:
O
} o
C7 .-+ .-?
c3
C
Lo
; Lo
c ci

• L
0 O Q
? 0 0 0 0 0 0

L
O d N O M
?
+- 10 O N ci Q Q C)\
; ? ?r -J? c c
3 .0 %0

a r
}
2
a

c 'O
=v
L

O L
} N O O 10 Q c
o O N N lt) O? Q?
d ,
co s
4-
S
S
a
s
+" O O 0 ,4* o0 0 0 N
-9
0! N ? d' w %0

0 0 0

40 AO JO LL U- LL
f-
N CL
L Q g m V a ti
?
N V

s:
0

a
O
L Cf Q ?
o rn r-, 0\ NO
r- cy) V-4
O O

0
:p 0
Q .1

• O O C Q
O CL a

'p
L

d M v a M

a r

Q 2
i
cv,

=v
L L

0 CY)

m r

a
d
ON %0

v O O O .?
a

17L -0 ?
E o
C3 0

ts

C
j H
'L
I
: INC co -
3t + L.

3 o
o F-- O O
v ?--
0
Z
s
c
a
3
0

CC

c
o
°> ? 3 o a a a a a a a
N 7 Q C fC
L N
CL
C
O
y
a

-

±-

!-

LC')
LC)
d N V N •~-? N M ~
CL

0
N
4 -
4-
4-
4-
4-
4-
4-
y L 0 O C) 0 Lo O \ O
N? (j 00 O N N O? O
h M
O
r,
a
y
• •? 4- 4- 4-
° a a a
3
1 °
N O
co \ \ \ 4-
N 4-- 4- 4\- 4 - 4- 4- ° co
Lo
t l O
co O
00 O N M 0 00 •
.;

i

o
t
0
10 0
{'. D

i
o
+_
? .? ., LO LO a a

H
L
a o

O 0 0 0 0 0
a
\
a
\
p
V O
a O
CL O
CL O
a O
t c c
v
N 0
00
~ 0
-q- V
co co
a% 0
V
~ 0
%0 co
N 00
.-i

F ?"I Q O 4 0 0 0
H A3 Ao 40 LL LL LL
C

} E

Q

Q

co

V

An

LL
to
3 4--
y cn
a ia-
N N i- V f-

c
c
c
J
1
F
i
i
d
i
i
e
s
a
f
c
e
u
a
u
C
C -0
o d
v o
°
?
- c c ? c ? c ? c c

V
3L
a v
_ -0
0 N
}
Ci
O
4- 4- 4-
- ?F-
- 4-
- 4- 4-
- 4-
-
CL a' LO N O
M = 00 M
d .O
N
N .-? rr .-i N
O L
vV
r Lo LO LO
oe LO to LO 1-4 - N N N
} N
O
d
L p
c CL
4-
4-
4-
o
?-
4-
4-

4-
d LO N M co --4

? m so

N %0
s?

O -4 .-i N

Q
4-

O d
}
D -0
'
-
'd
_
-0
'O p)
-0

-dp
jn 0
0 0
p V) U) V)
3 o
= Z Z
INC v
jZ ZV) Z Ztn 3

d

1? M

O
LO 0 0

00 LO O O

A M O

W) O O

co O
LO
m Mi
In
m
C ? C
? 'O 'd 'C "d d d d C
O
7 O
V( O
? O
? O
? O
VI d
U d
U d
U
?
X X X
W W W
}
LO

O
0
M
%0

0

LO
M
LO
•-•
y

J h 10 N L .. %0
,
M
y
Ci d
L E q co V W U- C?J 2 c

_ -v
o d
0 0
.2 91
L O O
}? %0 -0
ao
3 L
av
_ -o
O
d
a O
f= 00 O
-.0 10
} o
o 00
vl
° vL
} d
N O
L p
V a 4-
c -
O O
.2 w G C 00 Go
Q
d d d
CI "O "C)
L ? ? G
q Z ?n ?
L n
4-
L
•? O
CL
S
?-
d -9000 00
C) d N
L C q p
N
'El 4
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Revised Impact Map
l

r
MAP NOT TO SCALE
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Revised Impact Map - Section
\ Stream Segment A' - 1801f
Stream Segment A = 2401f
1
Wet -n A .79
\F" USE
No ? ? ? l
\ \
00
dip
s
} 9 J
', A 960 ? ,o °O
MAP NOT TO SCALE
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Revised Impact Map -Section 2
?t B = 4401f
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Revised Impact Map -Section 3
MAP NOT TO SCALE

? ' 910

MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Revised Mitigation Map

d

MAP NOT TO SCALE
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Revised Mitigation Map - Section I
Ch n e Se
f?
li,
f \ it
©,0
19-0
serv®fion 735'
ent B
Channel Segme
eserv=o
0'

gQ ? v

41
I
i
MAP NOT TO SCALE
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Revised Mitigation Map - Section 2

MAP NOT TO SCALE
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Revised Mitigation Map - Section 3
Chann
MAP NOT TO SCALE
' 943
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Revised Mitigation Map - Section 4
543'
MAP NOT TO SCALE
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Revised Mitigation Map - Section 5

j
r
MAP NOT TO SCALE

\3R\cosr
,?O 6/
ent
Stream Restoration Summary
We are continuing to present the stream at the Catawba Country Club as
off-site restoration for 860 linear feet of unavoidable impacts at the
MacLeod site. The stream restoration at the Catawba Country Club will be
conducted on stream reach W and on a portion of stream reach LP from the
enclosed map. The MacLeod Ski Lake project does not require any off-site
wetland mitigation so we are not proposing any wetlands adjacent to stream
segment W as a part of this mitigation proposal.
Mr. Mickey Henson of Appalachian Environmental Services will continue to
work with the Catawba Country Club to get approval to conduct additional
restoration/enhancement work on the stream funded by the Club. These
additional efforts could be conducting upstream and downstream of our
proposed restoration area and will be conducted during the same time
period.
VJ
a. "
d
.4 m
3 -
+' -

E d

i
C5
? U1
U1 :3
U
C3 X S U
() W F- 0
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Hexasty is nani flora Map - Populations 1, 2, and 3

z?.
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Hexastylis naniflora Map - Population 4

i
MAP NOT TO SCALE

a5' 000x1
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
,?,00 sr4PO REGION 4

Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center

61 Forsyth Street, S.W.
??
!!
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 - 8960
MAY
G 2005
Colonel Charles R. Alexander
District Engineer

Attn: Ms. Amanda Jones
i
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
U.S. army %orps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 All
JUN 10G5
SUBJ: R&L MacLeod Investments
Action ID No. 200530965 WETLAND RANps XV1- ,L r

Catawba County, NC
i ' ?U
Dear Colonel Alexander:
This letter is in response to the above referenced Public Notice to impact wetlands and
streams for the construction of a 20 acre recreational/water ski lake and its associated residential
subdivision. The applicant (R&L MacLeod Investments) proposes to impact 2,984 linear feet of
stream and 2.04 acres of wetlands. The stream impact will consist of 714 linear feet of fill and
2,270 linear feet of excavation and flooding impacts. The wetland impacts consist of 0.79 acres
of fill and 1.25 acres of excavation and flooding. The applicant proposes to mitigate for the
stream impacts by preserving 2,300 linear feet of onsite streams with a 50 foot buffer on both
sides of a 1,410 linear feet reach and a 50 foot buffer on one side of a 735 linear feet reach of
stream. The applicant proposes to mitigate for the wetland loss with the creation of littoral
wetlands around the shoreline of the lake. The applicant is also considering an additional
j mitigation proposal which would potentially provide 2,500 linear feet of restoration/enhancement
Hof stream channel and 2 acres of wetland mitigation at an offsite location on a golf course at
Catawba County Club. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 4, have the
following comments on the proposed project.
Approximately three quarters of an acre of the wetland loss will be to a good headwater
system located at the origination of the main channel. This system is one of the better headwater
wetlands we have encountered in the Piedmont physiographic province of North Carolina. Based
on conversations with the applicant, in order to meet the minimum length requirements needed
for a slalom competition ski lake course, there are no available options to reconfigure the
proposal to avoid impacting this headwater system. Although EPA appreciates the fact the
applicant has seriously looked at options to try to avoid this impact, we are still recommending
the project be redesigned to avoid this impact. We believe it will be difficult to provide
appropriate mitigation to compensate for the loss of this system. We do not believe' either of the

2
currently proposed wetland mitigation areas will provide an adequate replacement of lost
functions if this headwater system is excavated and flooded. Due to the wake actions from the
ski boats, we do not support the use of the 3 acre littoral shelf area for mitigation for impacts to
any of the onsite wetlands and we do not support the use of the golf course pond/wetland/stream
option as appropriate mitigation for this headwater system.
EPA has evaluated the stream mitigation proposal numbers and they appear to be on the
low side. In evaluating the numbers, we considered the stream fill impact to be to a good quality
sticain (2:1) which left dir, icinai ing ul die impact (flooding) to a coInDlnatlon of both good and
poor/fair quality streams. We considered the good quality streams to require a 2:1 compensation
level and the poor/fair quality to require a 1:1 compensation and that the mitigation requirement
be reduced by half for the' streams to be impacted due to flooding. We then used the mitigation
activity compensation ratios in the Stream Mitigation Guidelines to evaluate the adequacy of the
proposed mitigation. Even being generous with the mitigation activity ratios and allowing one
half of the filling impact requirements for flooding impacts, the mitigation currently be proposed
(onsite and offsite) is less than would be indicated by the Stream Guidelines. At the onsite
meeting there was some discussion by the consultant that the golf course would provide a surplus
/ of mitigation but according to our evaluation this will not be the case. It is difficult to evaluate
the proposal, at this time, because we have not actually sden the mitigation plan but according to
our rough calculations, this project will require both the onsite mitigation and all of that proposed
at the golf course. To further compensate for impacts we also recommend the applicant provide
a vegetated buffer around the proposed lake.
EPA has concerns about the proposed stream mitigation at a golf course due to the
significant usage of turf chemicals (herbicides/fertilizers/pesticides) for golf course maintenance.
For this reason, we support the use of stormwater treatment through biofilters, etc to remove
some of the chemicals prior to entering the restored/enhanced streams. We would need to review
the plans for restoring the stream through the pond before we can adequately evaluate that as a
--viable option for compensation for wetland impacts. If it will essentially have the effect of
turning an offline stream into an online system then we would not support this proposal. The
stream would need to remain a distinct stream with riparian wetlands and then it still could be
problematic if there are not offline stormwater controls. Although wetlands provide good
treatment for runoff chemicals, if this wetland essentially became a treatment wetland for golf
course runoff then, in our opinion, it would-not be appropriate as compensatory mitigation for
wetlands impacted due to this project. We also recommend this project be designed to have a
cool water, minimum flow (7Q10) release. This minimum flow should be maintained at all
times, including during drought conditions.
In summary, EPA recommends the project not be permitted as currently proposed. We
recommend either reconfiguring the lake design or shortening the lake to avoid both direct and
indirect impacts to the headwater wetland system. If the determination is made the above
suggestions are not "practicable" alternative options, we recommend more appropriate functional
y,

3
replacement wetland compensation be provided for the impacts to the headwater wetlands. We
alsorecommend the proposed project mitigation proposal be supplemented to include vegetated
buffers for the proposed impoundment.
EPA appreciates the opportunity to comment on this project. If you have any questions
regarding these comments, please contact Becky Fox of my staff at 828-497-3531 or
[e-mail].
- Sincerely,
Rork d J. kulak Chief
Wetland Regulatory Section
cc: USFWS, Asheville, NC
NCDWQ, Raleigh, NC
NCDWQ, Mooresville, NC
NCWRC, Waynesville, NC
j
Wetland and Natural Resource
Consultants, Inc.
June 7, 2005
i
To: North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Attn: Mrs. Cyndi Karoly
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Re: Proposed MacLeod Lake
DWQ Project # 05-0007
I received your request for more information letter on May 26. The design team is currently
redesigning the ski lake to try to reduce stream and wetland impacts. We have produced two
alternatives to date that still allow for skiing on the lake. The new site plan, impact totals, and
mitigation proposal will be forwarded to you as soon as it has been completed. The project is
moving forward and should not be withdrawn.
I might be requesting an office meeting in the near future to discuss our mitigation proposal.
Please call with any questions.
Best regards,
Jennifer Robertson
Mobile: [phone]
cc: Alan Johnson, DWQ Mooresville Regional Office
Amanda Jones, USACE Asheville Regulatory Field Office
ac?c??oe?p
JUN 1 3 2005
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STOFWWATER BRANCH
Newton Office Canton Office
PO Box 224 wnrinc.com PO Box 882
Newton, NC 28658 Canton, NC 28716
828-465-3035 828-648-8801
828-465-3050 Fax [phone] Fax
00? W A ??RQG Michael F. Easley, Governor
y William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
> r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
O `< Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
May 16, 2005
DWQ Project # 05-0007
Catawba County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Bob MacLeod
R&L MacLeod Investments
P.O. Box 320
Denver, NC 28134
t
Subject Property: Proposed MacLeod Lake
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. MacLeod:
On April 18, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated April 14, 2005
to impact 2.04 acres of wetlands and 2,984 feet of streams to construct the proposed water ski and
recreational lake. The DWQ has determined that your application was incomplete and/or provided
inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will require additional information in order to
process your application to impact protected wetlands and/or streams on the subject property. Therefore,
unless we receive the additional information requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your
application as required by 15A NCAC 2H.0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we
receive this additional information. Please provide the following information so that we may continue to
review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
y
1. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
The Division believes that your proposed lake can be reduced in size and still be an effective ski
lake in order to minimize impacts to streams and wetlands. In particular, we believe that the lake
could be designed so as not to impact streams and wetlands upslope of Wetland B. This would
reduce wetland impacts to less than one acre that would then no longer require wetland mitigation
from the 401 Certification. This reduction in size of the lake would also reduce the amount of
stream impact and mitigation. We have read the discussion regarding the need for a lake of 2000
feet in length in order to make it effective for water skiing but believe that an effective water skiing
lake can be created with a length of approximately 1500 feet (as outlined above) which will greatly
reduce the impacts to wetlands and streams. This reduction would eliminate the impacts to the
highest quality wetlands on the site as well as high quality streams.
2. Compensatory Mitigation
Stream mitigation: The proposed stream mitigation does not follow the ratios outlined in the joint
federal and state stream mitigation guidelines. In particular, the proposed preservation does not
N,p?thCarolina
401 Oversight/Express Review Permits Unit l1tllCQ
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: htto://h2o.encstate.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
R&L MacLeod Investments
Page 2 of 2
May 16, 2005
conform to those guidelines. In addition, we are uncertain as to the availability and practicality of
the proposed mitigation site at the nearby golf course. Once the impact of the project is reduced (as
outlined above), you will need to modify the stream mitigation plan accordingly in order to address
these issues.
Wetland mitigation: Littoral shelf creation has never been credited by DWQ as compensatory
mitigation since the uses that these wetlands provide are very different from the uses of the wetland
proposed to be impacted. DWQ staff believe that the minimization of impacts discussed above will
remove the need for DWQ to require wetland mitigation. If wetland mitigation is still required by
DWQ rules, a different wetland mitigation plan will need to be provided.
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in writing
and Alan Johnson of the DWQ Mooresville Regional Office. If we do not hear from you within three
weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project as
withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters
or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not
authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Mr. John Dorney at 919-733-1786 if you have any
questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
CBKljrd
rDomey
cc: Alan Johnson, DWQ Mooresville Regional Office
Amanda Jones, USACE Ashville Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Jennifer Robertson, Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, 217 Paragon Parkway, Sute 142,
Clyde, NC 28721
Cyndi Karoly, DWQ
Filename: 050007MacLeodLake(Catawba)ONHOLD
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Alan Johnson
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor: Rex Gleason
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name MacLeod Lake
Project Number 05 0007
Recvd From APP
Received bate 1/3/05 Recvd By Region
Project Type 18 ac recreational lake
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp.
County Catawba
County2
Region Mooresville
Acres Feet
Basin Req. ` . Req.
Stream Impacts (ft.)
NW-39 Stream O Y O N r_- 11-97-(2) WSIV CA 30,832. 1.58 2,161.00 2,161.0 F-
?? O Y O N I I????
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet

Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? O YO N Did you request more info? O Y O N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? Q Y O N
Is Mitigation required? Q Y O N Recommendation: O Issue O ISSue/Cond ODeny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 353735 Longitude (ddmmss) 810523
Comments:
Staff visited the site on May 102005 The applicant request approval for the construction of a ski
lake for a private development The lake is to be designed to meet the requirements for com tide five
skiing Lake Norman and Lake Davidson, due to public use, have become incompatible for such
activity (per the applicant). A fifty foot dam is required to meet the size requirement, Total stream
impact is 2984 linear feet 502 feet will be flooded (no mitigation required) . the remaining 2482 ft will
be im icted due to dam construction or excavation to obtain the necessary water depth. This will be-
an IP
The eject is located in an area of forest and pasture. A nice wetland is located at the
heaLVV aL 'twatG LI LIIC - - -- - - the -- rs of the stream 0 diversity of??er•ies re ohserved in the wetland(s): River Birch,
.1L
Possum Haw- Elderberry, eSp'cebush , Tag Alder, Highbush Blueberry; Silky Dogwood- Impatiens,
Cardinal Flower, Climbing Hem Wee , Cinnamon fern. among others. The upper wetland and
stl eam appear to b reiativelyuntouched, Except for the mid section of the stream which flows
through cow pasture- (CONTINUED)
cc: Regional Office Page Number 1
Central Office
Facility Name MacLeod Lake County Catawbh
Project Number 05 0007 Regional Contact: Alan Johnson
Date:
Comments (continued from page 1):
But even in that arcs the stream is not as degraded as other streams that ha ve been observed in
Other Pastures
The a lipf? cant ProPoses to mitigate for the impacts with onsite preservation , littoral shelves on the
lake
and restoration/enhancement at a local golf course
,
-Onsite preservation: On site preservation (with 50 buffer on the remaining stream channel) is
located in an area where no construction is proposed in the first place (locate d downstream of the 50
ft dam). Also, area must be set aside to allow for the tmn.pl anting of endang er Ip ant specie found
onsite.
--Littoral shelves: To any mitigate for the loss of wetland. Staff does not feel that this is an even
trade off for the wetland being lost- It is believed that the littoral shelve serve a better purpose of
mitigating the wave action
thus erosion along the shoreline.
,
---Golf course site: Staff does not disagree that stream restoration/enhancem ent at the golf course
would not benefit water quality. however, age, the proposal does not offset o r equal that of which is
being impacted. Much of the work is to be located in fairways, therefore the b uffer will have to be
minimized and the vegetation limited in height. Also, what is to prevent the go lf course at a later date
from iml- a? ctina the restoration once complaints from the members of the club beam pond
downstream of the streamwork is proposed to be closed and a stream "re-relo cated" to discharge into
the wetland. I beleive this portion of the plan has merit. It will help filter nutrie nts that may enter the
stream due to the course maintenance. The stream leaves the wetland flows approximately 300 ft
and enters another natural wetland before leaving the prop.
cc: Regional Office Page Number 2
Central Office
„i ,
M US Army Corps PUBLIC NOTICE
Of Engineers
Wilmington District
Issue Date: 14 April 2005
Comment Deadline: 13 May 2005
Corps Action ID #: 200530965
All interested parties are herby advised that the Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers (Corps)
has received an application for work within jurisdictional waters of the United States. Specific
plans and location information are described below and shown on the attached plans. This
Public Notice and all attached plans are also available on the Wilmington District Web Site at
www.saw.usace.ami mil/wetlands
Applicant: R&L MacLeod Investments
P.O. Box 320
Denver, NC 28134 C jF
AGENT (if applicable): Wetland & Natural Resource Consultants, IncAR??
217 Paragon Parkway, #142 p?? - `, t e VAV
Clyde, NC 28721 ?mAtCN
Authority
The Corps will evaluate this application and a decide whether to issue, conditionally issue, or
deny the proposed work pursuant to applicable procedures under Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (33 USC 1344).
Location
The site is located on the east side of Buffalo Shoals Road (SR 1003), approximately 2 miles
north of its intersection with NC Hwy 16, southeast of Newton, Catawba County, North Carolina
(35.6234445°N -81.0877766°W). The site contains tributaries of the North Fork Mountain
Creek, which flows into the Catawba River. The Catawba River ultimately enters the Atlantic
Ocean through the Santee-Cooper River system in South Carolina.
Existing Site Conditions
The property is approximately 123 acres in size and consists of wooded and open pastureland.
The site contains headwater tributaries and adjacent wetlands. The stream channels and wetlands
are adjacent to the North Fork Mountain Creek, which is located in the Upper Catawba River
Basin (HUC 39 03050101). The main stream channel running the length of the property was
determined to be a perennial headwater stream with varying degrees of quality. A portion of this
channel (approximately 750 linear feet) has been impacted to due ongoing cattle access and lack

of riparian buffer. This section was considered of poor quality due to the lack of aquatic
habitat/life, presence of bank erosion, lack of sinuosity, and lack of riparian buffer. The upper
reach and lower reach of the main stream channel (approximately 1,350 linear feet) was
determined to be of good quality based upon the presence of a riparian buffer, presence of
aquatic habitat/life, and presence of adjacent wetlands. There are two small tributaries (Stream
D and E) to the main channel that are approximately 198 linear feet and 294 linear feet. Stream
D was determined to be of poor quality due to its short length, lack of aquatic habitat/life, and
lack of riparian buffer. Stream E was determined to be of fair quality due to the presence of
aquatic habitat, moderate sinuosity, riparian buffer and its relatively short length.
Several wetland areas are located along the main channel. Wetland E is where the main stream
channel originates and is approximately 0.74 acres in size. Wetland E is considered a headwater
wetland and contains the following vegetation: Red Maple (Acer rubrum), Holly (Ilex opaca),
Sweetgum (Liquidambar styrac j7ua), Black Gum (Nyssa sylvatica), Possum-Haw (Viburnum
nudum), Silky dogwood (Cornus amomum), Spicebush (Lindera benzoin), Netted Chain-Fern
(Woodwardia areolata), Cardinal Flower (Lobelia cardinalis), Microstegium (Eulalia viminea),
Jewelweed (Impatiens capensis), and Cinnamon Fern (Osmunda cinnomomea). The main source
of hydrology in this area is groundwater with supplemented overland flow during rain events.
This area has been relatively undisturbed and is considered of good quality. Wetland B is located
in the pasture immediately adjacent to the main stream channel. This area is approximately 0.37
acres in size and is largely dominated by the following herbaceous vegetation: Juncus (Juncus
ef?usus), False-Nettle (Boehmaria cylindrical), and Microstegium (Eulalia viminea). The
dominant source of hydrology in this area is groundwater and overbank flooding from the main
stream channel. This area has been disturbed due to on-going cattle access and is considered of
poor quality. Wetland A is located near the southern boundary of the property adjacent to the
lower reach of the main stream channel. This area is approximately 0.79 acres in size and has
had some minor disturbance due to cattle access. Vegetation composition is similar to that of
Wetland E. Dominant sources of hydrology for this area are a combination of groundwater,
overbank flooding, and overland flow. This area was determined to be of good quality.
Applicant's Stated Purpose
The purpose of this project is to construct a 20-acre recreational and water skiing lake with an
associated residential subdivision. The lake is considered a central amenity to the subdivision
and will provide practice opportunities for competitive water skiers.
Project Description
The applicant is proposing to construct a dam on an unnamed tributary to North Fork Mountain
Creek in order to construct an open water lake. The dam will be approximately 50 feet tall with
a 25-foot wide crest at 3.5:1 side slopes. The trapezoidal base of the dam will be approximately
550 feet wide. The outlet structure of the lake will utilize a low-flow cool water design.
Approximately 5,632 cubic yards of fill will be used to construct the dam. The applicant is
proposing to fill approximately 714 linear feet of the main stream channel in order to construct
the dam (Figure 6). The applicant is also proposing to excavate and flood approximately 2, 270
linear feet of the main stream channel upstream of the dam. Total proposed impacts to stream
2
channels associated with this project are 2,984 linear feet. The applicant is proposing to fill all of
Wetland A (0.79 acres) in order to construct the dam (Figures 8 and 9). The applicant is also
proposing to excavate and flood approximately 1.25 acres of wetland upstream of the dam. Total
proposed wetland impacts associated with this project are 2.04 acres. The applicant is also
proposing to construct an access road to residential lots located on the east side of North Fork
Mountain Creek (Figure 5). The applicant is proposing to construct the road crossing with a
bridge or bottomless arch culvert and does not anticipate any impacts to North Fork Mountain
Creek.
The applicant is proposing to mitigate for stream channel impacts by preserving 2,300 linear feet
of on-site stream channels (see Figures 10 and 12) and potentially restoring approximately 2,500
linear feet of off-site stream channels. The applicant will preserve a 50-foot vegetated riparian
buffer on both sides of stream channels B and C, which total approximately 1,410 linear feet of
stream channel. A 50-foot vegetated riparian buffer will remain along the south side of Stream,
A' which totals approximately 735 linear feet. Stream A is the property line therefore no buffer
preservation is proposed on the north side of the stream. The applicant is proposing to mitigate
for wetland impacts through the creation of 3 acres of littoral wetlands around the shoreline of
the lake (Figure 11). The applicant is currently researching potential stream and wetland
restoration opportunities on a golf course at the Catawba Country Club in Newton, Catawba
County, North Carolina (35.6549383°N -81.3050312°W), which will be subject to Corps review
and approval. The potential mitigation site is located within the same hydrologic cataloging unit
as the impact site. The applicant is investigating the potential to restore 2,500 linear feet of
stream channel and 2 acres of wetlands at this site (Figures 13 and 14).
Other Required Authorizations
This notice and all applicable application materials are being forwarded to the appropriate State
agencies for review. The Corps will generally not make a final permit decision until the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) issues, denies, or waives State certification
required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (PL 92-500). The receipt of the application and
this public notice in the NCDWQ Central Office in Raleigh serves as application to the NCDWQ
for certification. A waiver will be deemed to occur if the NCDWQ fails to act on this request for
certification within sixty days of the date of the receipt of this notice in the NCDWQ Central
Office. Additional information regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be reviewed at
the NCDWQ Central Office, 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit, 2321 Crabtree Boulevard,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-2260. All persons desiring to make comments regarding the
application for certification under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act should do so in writing
delivered to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ), 1650 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 Attention: Ms Cyndi Karoly (all other projects) by
May 13, 2005.
3
C +
Essential Fish Habitat
This notice initiates the Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) consultation requirements of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. The Corps' initial determination
is that the proposed project will not adversely impact EFH or associated fisheries managed by
the South Atlantic or Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Councils or the National Marine
Fisheries Service.
Cultural Resources
The Corps has consulted the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places
and has determined that registered properties, or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion
therein are located within the project area and/or may be affected by the proposed work. By
copy of this Public Notice, the Corps is requesting comments from the North Carolina State
Historic Preservation Office to determine the type of effects if any.
Endangered Species
The Corps has reviewed the project area, examined all information provided by the applicant and
consulted the latest North Carolina Natural Heritage Database. Based on available information,
the Corps is not aware of the presence of species listed as threatened or endangered or their
critical habitat formally designated pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA)
within the project area A final determination on the effects of the proposed project will be made
upon additional review of the project and completion of any necessary biological assessment
and/or consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or National Marine Fisheries
Service."
Evaluation
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts,
including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will
reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The
benefit which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against
its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be
considered including the cumulative effects thereof; among those are conservation, economics,
aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife
values, flood hazards, flood plain values (in accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use,
navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water
quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of
property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving
the discharge of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, the evaluation of the
impact of the activity on the public interest will include application of the Environmental
Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) guidelines.
4
Commenting Information
The Corps is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local agencies and officials;
Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this
proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps to determine
whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision,
comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality,
general environmental effects and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are
used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) and/or an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Comments are also
used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the
proposed activity.
Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a
public hearing be held to consider the application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with
particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. Requests for a public hearing shall be
granted, unless the District Engineer determines that the issues raised are insubstantial or there is
otherwise no valid interest to be served by a hearing.
Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will be received by the
Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, until 5pm, May 13, 2005. Comments should be
submitted to Ms. Amanda Jones, 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208, Asheville, North Carolina
28801-5006.
5
._.. M.tl
x? f ?' t.if ???- ` J •\ I J \tt? ?1 ;?? ,m?`I' ??C J\ ?` r'rx -\If
} d , I1 ? ? ? C ; s r ) t t,._• ??/rte /I
/ ' gyp,
}?. .]Z\` ( jF?/1?.'^??"`?•r /41,??\?? ?'- a!°?i C ?/%',? _ `.7t?// `41-14,
. .•- 1-- c? - _ . i? _.., . •- \ ' ?, ' `CS`'- _ S , I -,l' . \. Jj? 7, ,
3.-yam/'j y_?pl?}??.-`?-si/.-"e . ? ? ? '1.'.: , :?\ J sr ? / ? < \, ?\ t ` ? ? ''?
N 14*
71
y rl ??_ ' ?? ?_? ? j•, - ` ?? i { l ?„ - rte, ? r"< `l, •?._? •• ? /
Al-
140
St.
L a .?• _ ? - t•? ` ?.? - `, ?'' `? ) lei •c 1
I -N
:?
?.z 06
g' pr
-, _ -
?,..? .
.11 Name: CATAW13A Location: 035° 37' 35.46° N 081 ° 05'23.73" W
Date: 3/24/2005
inch equal Caption: Macleod Lake Project
Scale: 1 inch equals. 4000 feet Buffalo Shoals Road
WNR, Inc. Job # MEC-1001
Copy kjM (C) 1M, WVWh. Inc. Figure 1

000

C7
dr
,L
ell,
6

f ,.
• •.,?,? -'`..jai ..., ,i /'r f.• f.: ??? .,•
Athldc
7"W 1 .?-.
54
Name: CATAWBA
Date: 3/244/2005 /2005
Location: 035137'35.46" N 081 ° OF 23.73" W
Scale: 1 inch equals 1000 feet Caption: MacLeod Lake Project
Buffalo Shoals Road
WNR, Inc. Job # MEC-1001
cc> 1998, Maptech, Ino. Figure 2
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Catawba County Aerial Map
Buffalo Shoals Road

MAP NOT TO SCALE
F}
MOW
r ?
?T
Figure 3
Figure 4
MacLeod Investments, LLC
.??
S 2z C) a o7w
Zr-p - ,B .fit
...f c i
r= s
? w
100
4FJ
?E offnq
t ! I?
>x b co
? y
d
?yys?® s
NCfI NG N
mb
a txj
m
d
H
loo
oz-
cgw0
x
onco?
,F Noo
co oo n.
CO
w 0
CA m
m m
o C?
El
m
t7d
a?
0>0
x?x
0
o r
%
r ` - 40
.0i
t' Y
N
y ?? t tA. !
1! f ? z
1
r
l f ? ?? ? l
41 AP,
CD
Figure 6
1 i
149.61
R & L MacLeod Investments 2
Buffalo Shoals Lake Project a!° ' 6 J
1 B8A `
Catawba County
2371 ` 01 ?JS
Impact Map
(Shit 1) NO ?+ 5.47A
R 0103 SO
o iaa eoo sr\FR\cos7
r72APHXAL SCALE G= H
(Z) Gj
t 3018 p9
1-10
1
Q L? Ory l2902?bp
Q ? h+? Y 14, p?ya° W
o %
A .? 1flQ
I _ 9
R & L MacLeod Investments
Buffalo Shoals Lake Project
Catawba County
Impact Map
Stream Segment A' = 18OW
950
Figure 8 ?J
{ r
Matchline "A"
Stream Segment, A
= 5341
' 925
fg =°0.79 -Acre `S E `\
e?ti j: r r 1? I -
- ? !! - - ,- FARM USE tai
t \ j i :*
e
? 111E
C USE
f
j ?
_ 9s
h
O
- - - - ? - - - - `rte` - - - ? -
MOUNTAIN -
s5fl 41% "41
?•.
t - - - A.
U
C
s
v
a
- \ Figure 9
Figure 10
R & L MacLeod Investments
Buffalo Shoals Lake Project
Catawba County
Mitigation I1iaP
(Sheet 1) N
n
R
4 100 200 T
CRAP ,EC.M_ SULE O-EED N
c'?wMrrao=r © ^?'1

E:J
6 f61s, ??
g
oins SO
J 8+\FR\COSr v JO .
r ?
1 ° 1g'
5 ?? \ \COSI
J lots; e°jpb'
1
2WI
romT
0
02
?K
CQ
C)
O
0 0
Littoral She(f Cr
O
0
_N
Q
Matchline "A"
,4VAN USE
Figure 11
(1
? ?, "y -?'• r? P c,x<l` - t - ?y _ 17 f Y /..? '??4a r, 4,` _ ,? t \
{,'^<s , 03' ice`--/s -erf. 'r/ f S\ -•.i?. ! + , ?'SY`T iii r??n. L ( ./ r ???
"r .. l' l P": \?• Mtm+v- - , +y ?, 'i. -: l`
,. ? ,t ,'t..?s ??BIt• ?- 1 T?r - /? ?? ? \ /' ??. ? L.r.4F ? 1 t
>f
?\?~`•`i t.%`t ? /1'• _ /.. ` ?,:. J/ i ` J'1 1,`\t???. ??? 1 .tJ ? Nr'? .:?: C.! i
1 ix91
,
\r ?,%_- ??' ?. .r ._ ?`-; ?` - .?•[•p ?A,
Z_ ltt __N_1
0-
ry-s
ty,
f F h
`4.. /
14
JJ?
\
gzz'
r ?C4 t r' t t f f f - \?
f f ?^-.?.5, ? ,? ;? • ?- •? '4 ?I... `??? ? ? - a i.. - It J \o\ 4;
(k, U
s
_Xk
\ V 1 1
.t * _ -_' -. - `, •`? !•? -_ lam/ .1: ;.` •,(
7' w
Name: HICKORY Location: 035° 39' 16.75" N 081° 18' 17.57" W
Date: 3n8l2Q05
Scale: 1 inch Caption: MacLeod Lake Project inch equals 4000 feet Potential Mitigation Site
Catawba Country Club
CoWgM (c) 1998. Maptech, Inc.
Figure 13
o W+ ,
' (// //L •? p 6 l f?? a J
)/ po 0 1 •
?. •i F6 ? . f i
/ r• { /j j 1 171P ?ls' ? t off`
? 'i?t \ ,? 1, `' •\ , nuuli ? ?
i ` uu tilt
1111 tltitl
III rd
Ilmill
` ltl
tllllttil
it
ttuuuuu
• ? ? :) 1 ., I lt?ttttutttttutt
- , J '• ,? •` + ??' ?`.iJ ml ttnununuu
\ , + '+ • ? ` ,;. . • ; uut uuuuuuuul
+ !fill iltlilllltlillll
i \ i \ ??• t lllll?lllllllllllltl
/ i 1 -? + ?`• \ t \ 111111111?lltllll i

l=1 b b

C. O y
co 0 to
0.CL 0.

gag
?++
Q
i ? \ \ \ • i •a \ ; `\ r ; + nun uut ; .' /
YV p"
Figure 14
WN;t
Wetland and Natural Resource -
•

Consultants
Inc ;
,
:?Ax.?
,
.

1 arch 21, 2004
Mrs. Amanda Jones APR 1 8 ?m
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 V4E11N?sarros rr? TM
Asheville, NC 28801
j,.
RE: MacLeod Lake Project
Catawba County, North Carolina
Action ID No. 200530965 / DWQ 05-0007
Mrs. Jones:
Attached please find an application for a Department of the Army Individual Permit to
construct a 20 acre ski lake on an unnamed tributary to North Fork Mountain Creek in
association with a residential subdivision. North Fork Mountain Creek is classified by the
NC Division of Water Quality at WS-IV C (Index No. 11-97-(0.5)). The project area is
currently either wooded or in pasture and has a residence within the parcel. Data such as
Catawba County tax maps, U5G5 topoquadrangles, Catawba County Soil Survey map, and
data forms are included for your reference. The quality of streams and resulting
mitigation ratios were determined by the Army Corps during our site visit on February 1,
2005 and are reflected as such in this application package. The mitigation ratios for
wetland impacts were also determined by the Army Corps in a February 3, 2005 letter and
during a subsequent meeting with Amanda Jones on March 18, 2005.
The construction of the dam will require 134 cubic yards of earthen fill below the ordinary
high water within Wetland A (0.79 Acre) and 46,731 cubic yards of earthen fill above the
ordinary high water within Wetland A. The dam and outlet structure impacts 714 linear
feet of perennial stream (Stream Segment A- linear feet of poor quality stream
mitigated at a 1:1 ratio and Stream Segment A - 534 linear feet of good quality stream
mitigated at a 2:1 ratio). There will be 59 cubic yards of earthen fill placed within Stream
Segment A (534 linear feet of good quality stream) below the ordinary high water and
4,153 cubic yards of fill above the ordinary high water. There will be 20 cubic yards of
earthen fill placed within Stream Segment A' (180 linear feet of poor quality stream)
jbelow the ordinary high water and 1,400 cubic yard of fill placed above the ordinary high
water.
Newton Office Clyde Office
PO Box 224 wnrinc.com 217 Paragon Parkway, # 142
Newton, NC 28658 Clyde, NC 28721
828-465-3035 828-648-8801
828-465-3050 Fax [phone] Fax
t Y i
The applicant proposes to construct the dam in a manner that will maintain cold water base
flow to down stream reaches. The application package includes narratives that describe
the proposed impacts to Water of the US. Also, included in the narratives is an
assessment of avoidance and minimization as well as a mitigation proposal for unavoidable
impacts. An alternatives analysis is also included that describes the other sites that were
researched by the applicant prior to contracting on the proposed parcel.
The applicant is proposing to mitigate for stream impacts by preserving 2,300 linear feet
of streams on site and restoring 2,500 linear feet of streams off site. Wetland impacts
will be mitigated through the creation of 3 acres of littoral wetlands around the ski lake
and the restoration of 2 acres of wetlands off site. The applicant is currently researching
conducting the restoration efforts on a site in Newton, NC. Additional information on this
site will be forwarded once it has been provided to us. The ski lake will be stocked with
game fish and will provide habitat for waterfowl and other aquatic animals and plants.
There are topographical USES maps, an aerial photograph, a soil survey, and mitigation
photographs for your reference. Also included within the package are copies of data
forms for the wetlands and streams that have been delineated and surveyed on the
property. You will find wetland impact maps and a mitigation map within the application.
Included with the package is a full size copy of the wetland delineation map and the
wetland impact map for your review.
Please call me at 828 / 712-9205 with any questions that you may have.
Best regards,
44"
Jennifer Robertson
Cc: Bob Macleod
PO Box 320
Denver, NC 28704
Mansour Edlin
Mansour Edlin Consulting
1515 Mockingbird Lane, Suite 802
Charlotte, W 28209
Cyndi Karoly
NC Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Raleigh, NC 27604
New= Oft e Clyde Office
PO Box 224 wnrinccom 217 Paragon Parkway, # 142
Newwn, NC 28658 Clyde, NC 28721
828-465-3035 828-648-8801
828-465-3050 Fax [phone] Fax
IJ:C:-UO" UR (PI'/!VI 14: lY L/J LUKKV "-
12106/20ad 09:14 1(04gb-"o,a - -
? Ald and Ni fti Rt6ou?.
PQl ow ;
wow -mil- • ' . , • • , . '
:..
1VL of waw
Affirt: 3tiW Ddl*r .
.
2313 CabbW Md.
To ft 1 of # id b, +e?g?'aLO'cdM wed a
tiatUrd'Mal 6b ozwswt?r im 0 ad an my bdral!'tm rw,e 0lie .
ejf own& to kr psa waleo old wal n-bf the t!5 dslt mad b??
Act ter w aid ft OWN arrd MutaM ACL
?F??;1.t?Es c apm se ? to to an seed pr N• en
•)eaw acrd r1C ?? C• s ff, ,
VROW and CAr?ulr IrrC. le i
kd? lar'd' p rwea i at the requ st a tfi !'! S'dr OWQ •
AddiftL-
- - -
Addrem-
Phom Number.
v(?
i
Yl - 0 3 ?
i
Ole NOWML W2%0
217 Ww"A 0142
7A^ 1
$2 6 427a 2 Pant
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT I OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-0003
/33 CM 3251 Expires December 31, 2004
The Public burden for this collection of information is sestinated to average 10 hours per response. although the majority of applications should require
5 hours or less. This includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of
infonr abon, includng suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information
Operations and Reports. 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway. Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management arid Budget,
Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC 20503. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law,
no taerson shall be subject to any penalty for fai£ng to eorrpfy with a collection of Information If it does not display a currently valid OMB control
number. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having
jiri?wn over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authariries Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection , Research and
Sanctrraries Act. 33 USC 1413, Section 103. Principal Purpose: Information provided on this form wig be used in evaluating the application for a
paast. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies.
Submission of n %ruested information is voluntary. however, if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit
be ssaved
One ast of original drawings or good reproducible copies which slow the location and chmaFter a#,th a proppsed,,activky must be attached to this
appication tree sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the DimictEngineet, havi0g jurisdiction. over' the location of the proposed
activity. An application that is not completed in fuR will be returned.
1. APPLICATION NO.
my-Ais RFf o w Tn RF Frr 1 Fn RY EPP11rAAM
5. APPLICANTS NAME S. AUT14ORIZED'AGENTSS NAM j4ND TITLE /ensperxisrrorravui?edl
R&L MacLeod Investments Bob MacLeod Jennifer Robertson President
6. APPLICANTS ADDRESS 9. AGENTS ADDRESS
PO Box 320 Denver, NC 28134 217 Paragon Pkwy, #142 Clyde,'NC 28721
T. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS. WlAREA CODE 10. AGENT'S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE
a. Residence a. Residence 828-648-8801
b. B asiness 704-483-3580 a b. Business 828-712-9205
11. STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
1 hereby authorize, Jennifer Robertson to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to
iumish, upon request. supplemental information in support of this permit application.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
DATE
NAME. LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE lseenmucaixm.
MacLeod Lake Project
13. NAME OF WATERBODY. IF KNOWN rd,.*.wr 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS rUeppwmakl
North Fork Mountain Creek 1914 Buffalo Shoals Road Catawba, NC 28609
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Catawba County North Carolina
COUNTY STATE
OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN, rsee:scucaaw
Tax Parcel ID: 367802899458, State Road: 1003, Township: Caldwell, Fire District: Bandy's
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
Take Hwy 16 East from Newton. Turn Right onto Buffalo Shaols Road. Site is East of Buffalo
Shoals Road. See Attached USGS. Location: 035 37' 38.57" N 081 05' 25.50":W
2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
ENG FORM 4345, Jul 7 EDITION OF FES 94 IS OBSOLETE. (Proponent: CECW-OR)
aa. IVawre of ACtIVity Ioesc,0-ofprgea,kW deeNfeerrres/
}
19. Project Purpose (Desa o_- the reason or purpose of Vie prujea, see /nsrru¢Wm)
To provide a residential area with a ski lake.
USE BLOCKS 0-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
To construct a waterskiing lake. A total of 2,984 linear feet of streams and 2.04 acres of
wetlands will be impacted in order to construct the lake.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Tvoe in Cubic Yards
Earthen fill, rip-rap dissapaters, and pipe. There will be 79 cubic yards of stream fill
and 134 cubic yards of wetland fill associated with the construction of the dam.
22. s Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Otter Waters Riled famknamcrfonsl
0.79 acres for dam fill and 1.25 acres for lake flooding / excavation.
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes Q No " IF YES. DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
24. Addresses or Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody I f more than can be entered here,
please attach a supplemental fist).
See Attached List.
25. List of Other Certifications or ApprovaWDeniais Received from other Federal, State or Local Agencies for Work Described in This
Application.
A?trvcr TYPE APPROVAL' IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
'Would include but Is not restricted to zoning, building and flood plain permits
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I
appication is certify that the information in this
complete and accurate- I further certify that 1 Possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the
duly' authorized agent of the applicant.
03/21/2005
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNA E O AGENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that; Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or Imprisoned not more than five years or both.
z <
Property Owners Immediately Adjacent to Parcel:
1. Joe B. Stewart, (MacLeod Lake Parcel)
Tax Parcel ID=367802899458
1711 Kennerly Road, Irmo, South Carolina 29063-8692
2. Balls Creek Camp Ground
Tax Parcel ID=367904602447
2039 Buffalo Shoals Road, Catawba, North Carolina 28609
3. Richard E. and Rebecca B. Hewitt
Tax Parcel ID=367802981217
3037 NC Hwy 16 S, Neewton, North Carolina 28658-9698
4. Daniel T. and Michael C. Long
Tax Parcel ID=368801187078
PO Box 24, Newton, North Carolina 28658-0024
5. Dan Alan Hunsucker
Tax Parcel ID=368903012848
3216 John Daniel Drive, Conover, North Carolina 28613-8972
6. Jeffrey Scott Lail
Tax Parcel ID=367904811716
2128 Demoor Road, Catawba, North Carolina, 28609-8073
7. Danny Charles Lail
Tax Parcel ID=367904719982
1850 Buffalo Shoals Road, Catawba, North Carolina 28609-8028
8. Hubert Jr and Brenda C. Lail
Tax Parcel ID=367904820103
1848 Buffalo Shoals Road, Catawba, North Carolina 28609-8028
Property Owners Across Buffalo Shoals Road from Parcel:
1. Tony Jerome and Gwendolyn D. Rivers
Tax Parcel ID=367904722371
1855 Buffalo Shoals Road, Catawba, North Carolina 28609-8028
2. Mary Karen Seale
Tax Parcel I0=367904623277
1274 33rd St SE Conover, North Carolina 28613-8015
3. Stephen Vance and Kathy H. Seale
Tax Parcel ID=367904623134
1895 Buffalo Shoals Road, Catawba, North Carolina 28609-8028
4. Janice Hildebran Loftin
Tax Parcel ID=367904610503
1937 Buffalo Shoals Road, Catawba, North Carolina 28609-8029
Project Puraose and Need
Mr. Bob MacLeod, the project proponent, proposes to construct a 20 acre
recreational and water skiing lake for the purpose of developing a subdivision
in Catawba County. The proponent needs the lake to provide the central
amenity for the project. The lake needs to be long enough and wide enough
to provide the competitive skier opportunities to practice their skills.
The impacted streams will be diverted while the clean fill/pipe is discharged
into the stream to construct the dam. The 714 linear feet of impact at the
base of the dam will be completed concurrently with above the high water
mark bank stabilization. The 50 foot tall dam will be constructed with a 25
foot wide crest and approximately 3.5:1 side slopes. The trapezoidal base of
the dam is approximately 550 feet. The front of the dam (water side) will
include approximately 275 feet of fill/pipe while the back side will
necessitate approximately 439 feet of fill/pipe/rip-rap energy dissipater.
Approximately 79 cubic yards of discharge will occur below the ordinary
high water mark in the stream to be impacted by the dam. Approximately
134 cubic yards of discharge will occur below the ordinary high water mark
in the wetland to be impacted by the dam. The outlet of the pond will utilize
low-flow cool water design strategies.
The subject stream is mapped as an unnamed intermittent tributary to the
North Fork of Mountain Creek within the Catawba River Basin; it has
approximately 80 acres of drainage. The NC Division of Water Quality has
classified the North Fork Mountain Creek as Class WS-IV C Water (11-97-
(2)). The subject stream has been assessed by the Army Corps using the
Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet (USACE Wilmington, Version
06/03). There were three reaches of the stream classified as good in the
upper reach, poor in the middle reach, and good in the lower reach by the
Corps and are reflected as such in the application. The entirety of the
stream has excess sediment load.
The attached Impact Summary Table for streams describes each stream
segment, the impact length, cubic yards of impact (where applicable), the
quality of the stream, the mitigation ratio determined by the Army Corps,
and the required mitigation. The wetland table describes each wetland, the

type of impact, amount of impact, cubic yards of impact (where applicable),
quality of wetland, mitigation ratio, and required mitigation.
Avoidance and Minimization
The proponent has avoided hard impacts to the greatest extent practicable
by eliminating one of two previously proposed lakes described in the original
Nationwide Permit application and by proposing to construct the dam with a
low-flow cool-water riser-pipe structure. Impacts requiring discharges to
Waters of the US are limited to the construction of the dam to create
additional Waters of the US. All other access to high ground will be
completed with spanning structures. This will include one road crossing to
access the remainder of the property across North Fork Mountain Creek.
The predominant impacts of the project to streams are secondary in nature.
The proponent considered alternative development concepts and determined
that the uniqueness of the current proposal provided the best potential for
success. During the pre-development planning the proponent considered
constructing two lakes on the project. Though more favorable in terms of
economic returns one lake has been eliminated to avoid further impacts and
because that parcel of land is no longer for sale. The lake is designed for
recreation and competitive water skiing and therefore further reduction in
size is not practical. The lake must be at least 2000 feet long and at least
250 feet wide to meet its intended purpose.
Cumulative impacts resulting from the proposed project are minimized
through the reduction in scope and through design considerations including
an engineered low-flow cool-water discharge orifice.
Alternatives Analysis
There were four other parcels that the proponent researched as potential
parcels for a ski lake community. Information on two of these parcels is
attached for your reference. The third parcel sold before it could be
evaluated in depth. The fourth parcel is the parcel adjacent to the current
site that is no longer for sale that was presented in the original Nationwide
Permit application.
The 250 acre tract attached as Parcel # 56262 is in Lincoln County. The
proponent worked on this site for two years and planned for two lakes but
could not get a conditional use permit through Lincoln County. We were
scheduled to begin the wetland delineation when the proponent got word
from the county that the zoning would not be approved. The 78 acre tract
attached as Parcel # 5979176 is also in Lincoln County. The topography on
this parcel was not suitable.
Mitigation Proposal
Please review the Impact Summary Table in conjunction with the information
below while considering the mitigation proposal
Streams:
On-Site Preservation:
Approximately 2,300 linear feet of streams on site will be preserved for
mitigation credit. Please see the attached Mitigation Map for a location of
the preservation on site. A 50' vegetated buffer will remain along both sides
of Stream Segments 8 and C. A 50' vegetated buffer will remain along the
property side of Stream Segment A. The property line on the other side of
this reach is too close to allow for a 50' vegetated buffer.
Off-Site Restoration:
There is a potential mitigation site in Newton, NC that we are exploring to
compensate for the remainder of stream impacts. We will explore the
possibility of restoring 2,500 linear feet of degraded stream on this site.
As additional information becomes available on this site it will be forwarded.
The potential mitigation site is located within the same HUC Code (Catawba
39 03050101 Upper Catawba).
Wetlands:
On-Site Creation:
Approximately 3 acres of littoral wetlands will be created around the ski
lake to compensate for some of the unavoidable wetland impacts.
t c
Off-Site Restoration:
There is the potential for wetland restoration at the same site in Newton,
NC discussed earlier for stream restoration efforts. We will explore the
possibility of restoring 2 acres of vegetated wetlands to compensate for the
remainder of unavoidable wetland impacts.
Within 120 days of the issuance of the requested permit and prior to the
commencement of any work within Waters of the US the applicant will
provide to the US Army Corps of Engineers a Stream/Wetland Restoration
Plan in accordance with applicable guidance..
Within 220 days of the approval of the mitigation plans the applicant will
provide to the US Army Corps of Engineers a plat that depicts the
preservation areas and the restrictive language.
Upon the completion of the project and the associated proposed mitigation
4,800 linear feet of streams, 3 acres of littoral wetlands, and 2 acres of
vegetated wetlands will be under a protective covenant.
As an additional mitigation measure as previously mentioned the dam
incorporates design elements that ensure that water quality will be
protected through a low-flow cool-water / aerating discharge.
ACLE0b CONSTRUCTION, INC.
PO BOX 864
DENVER, NO 28037
PHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]
I his fax is intended only for tire use of the individual oe entity to which it is
addressed, and may contain information that is priAeged, confidentiol and exempt
from disclosure under applicable law. If you ore not the intended recipient, any
dissemination,, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. if
you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by collect
telephone call and return the original fax to us at the above address by US mail. We
will reimburse you for postage. I
BATE: 3 /-ZA lar
TO:
hN ??
FAX: 12-?y
FRC?AA: ?? - - -
RE: L ee;-J S
F CES: (INCLUDING THE COVER PAGE)
NOTES:
KC ?-u
G ?
A \so Atv We 6A

f 3 ? ? -0iF!SY. MS1t." YfiYMYlY? ,.k, ? X P f
F '

1

?-F, s
?
srss

-.9

its

a 6
p
z_e+ F
-
? ? sfis s?
? l
t S
?II
C `mo
`}`
v -r 3 o

? ?F ? t'

N ?• -
't n
l
. ,w
i
1 , ??NI 1?'Ja

c! - 1 1 7 Vi

!
Ni
,E
:tilt
coil 141ll
P 1=1? ' i I I

e
y
Y g
ifa0?;

,97129/2003 1.1:5]. FAX [phone].sis RE
LoopNet - #1 in Con== W Real Estate Online
REALTY WORLD - Lake & City
01.6, le.
AL WORLD-LAKF. & CITY 005
Page 1 of 1
+/-76 acres - SF Land 0 Lake Normani
offering Suminairy
LUUng SWUM: Active
Property lot 5979176
Property Type: Land
Subtype: Residential (Single-Family) (land)
Property: +1-78 acres - SF Land 0 Lake
Norman)
Addrem., 2700 Highway 16 N.
Denver, NC 28037. United States
I i Price: $1,265,000
p Down Pena N/A
lily, 84.reett 3,397,680
tit j Lot Slaaot 70,130 acr.
Use 7vpe: Vacant/Owner-user
Proforma
Facbars: Proforma
Price/ Acre: $16,217.95
Currency: USD
Date Lest Verified, 6 Feb 2002
Property Detllcri on
+/- 76 acres on Lake Nomtan's beautiful west sldet Excellent single family development opportunity. Sewer and water
available at site! 2-3 lot9/acre zoning. May also purchase 60' R.O.W.0 Hwy 16 for excellent access and visibility from
this growing corridor. Frontage on Westport Golf Course, and across road from lake. (take view tots probable). Cali for
maps and deta
Lematitlnw Descrtptlon
The west side of Lake Norman offers some of the Lake's best investment opportunity. Fairly priced with excellent return
potential. Good county services and zoning, with relatively fast and fair approval process.
Contact Informatlon
REALTY WORLD Lake & City ? DY-KO MIQ Phone: [phone]
5979 76 12/212000
The Information above Nei; been obtained from Mmes belleved reliable. While wa do not doubt Rs acCuracy we have not vertned It and make na
guarantee, warranty or reprpgntatlon about It. It ts you' mWondblllty to Independently =Arm Its accuracy and Completeness. Any profcctlors,
otNnlana. aSPAVNOns, or estimates used are for example only and do not represent tho currert or future performance of the property. The value of
this tranaaMon W You deDends on tax and other factors whk:h shovid be evaluated by Your tax, fManciai and kraal advisors. You and your advisors
should conduct a careful, ladeDSndent Invexttpation of the propetttr to determW to your satlsractlon the sultobillty of the property for your reeds.
eo CAS
hq://www.loopneLcomlProfile/profile l.asp?L1D=5979176&STD=&LL-
U t L- C.J ?__
SotVCU-e-
C-.o v"
2/6/072

f .. v
?1 f d
_ f
d
a
v
a
H

LO ON %0 LC) to

a
.F w
O
00
N
O
lt

CM

?

%D
N

O

:F- a

OC N ~
0
0
0
`~
~
~

Z7 L L L L O Z7 ti

O O O O
Q LL d 0-

a cr)
V

L
0
L CV)
to C) LO
LO
? ?

Q s

? S
Q
L

-Q
L
O L
o?
3 a Lo N
n
0
d
m s
?-
E S
Q
r ?
w w w M NO to
_ M w O N O% O, w O 'O a`

N
W
o W E E W W W W W W
O
o v v -o -v
F- 5 g ° 0 0 _ 0 0 0
H tL 0- ao ao a ao ao

d "'
a
L Q Q M V M W [L S H o

H
a
L
O
p. 0 0 0 0 0 0
M I-. as O 00 N
I? M O N ? ON
}
? 0 0 0 0 •-+ N
?

O
} O
O .-+ N N N
De

• L L "D "C 'U ti
?
d d
L
a co
V

L
o C- V" V-4
fn a a a a 0)
O

3 .D %0
.0 ?- ?-
Q s

L S
Q
L

_ ?
'v
L
? L
of d' Q a d c? d'

d
m s
t

INC
d
a O\ o
L I` M O .i O
u O O O O O N
Q
- X X X X
Ol
a
E
h- cs
H a a a a
M
N

: Q co V n W c

It
c
c
d
3

%
.. :? ? y ti ?...?y.?„` ? .\ , 1 I ??s?? ,+ :s `• ?rl.,/cam/ "`•'?'' I ?,'/ t'??\.? ?" O `?} IJ?/ ? ?? ?/?.? 4 ;. i /'?a ,.? `-!`t"' ? /?C.??'`i't
t t i ,?f r ?' ill ?f
?',? '`? L / _.???? )- /? ?w.`\ ``C+?? \. =J % i_•\?? ? . _? ?_?-, ?!J ?? ?? t-Q ?C`? J/f fi ? ? / ?. S" ,li ?"
Y.i
V M1 ? ?c c
?11 I ? 1 J ? ?tir1 ••i ?\ , 1, ) .?
t A t ,
J ?! j^ h l °, rr? l x
l ?\^ !1t<! ? •\ ?? ? ?? f ??? \1 ?` ? it '+../ ;,,n"'/ ;?)?? ???^-)-s1 , /?? •? ( ,s
r 7 ?/
.s?[. ? /?. .. ?• .. ? r, i^? r"_.-?wroo•. 7 `A pp0 1 I?/ _ y ? y ? ) JL? f/ -?, ? / • ( / .,` `(?. \`\?I--???J( ?/ ? / -.I? •?
._;` ?/y iirijiZ.. ?-?\\???' ,J r , r? ?a/ _.??f„«: ?`?y?.?'•z / 1\ 1..` J /? {'-((5 ?.;-Ill ??'•. 1 ^? ?1 l i L (1 `I vi
? \? ? ,? _ u+ /<- (` ? ? _ ; ,\\ ?' RAJ>z? .x? 1 _ ?'•?,?? o? i (' ,
-f"??? \S• ? ? t `?, ,??? a :!'' ,, . d ?r...rdr+\e.`.?q.?..r _ t?r • / ?' 1 ' 1" ?(l al ,+, r ` i; `\? t ? ? ?? ?J
F.K....u""..b.?Rto;_w.
dom./t?D
i, r ! / S y/ t Y 1 ? }
!l ? Os ) I I N I t ' ^ /J
49 _J
,ry??'?_' ? r 1 / a ?-? ?`:-"r for.- .?•,. ?`? , '
<> . I ' X,
NL*
Vo- t"f•. ./ ,a ?. , ?. 11 1/1t V'?' ?-? p ?ti
0 t R 1% \\
?. i
, .? I ?, .? Cc `•, ?. I 1 ?? , /? 1 it o
cox-
Name: CATAWBA Location: 035° 37'35.46" N 081° 05123.7311 W
Date: 3124/2005 Caption: MacLeod Lake Project
Scale: 1 inch equals 4000 feet Buffalo Shoals Road
WNR, Inc. Job # MEC-1001
Copyright (C) 1998, Maptech, Inc. Figure 1 -
r Ira
` ? + ,, - f •,? ? ply ???? ? ry rf"?\
t t 4•?4. tom'
its °;? ,s ? +.S ?J •? ? •?? i +`•.._ ?'.. ?
1
. 16
jr? _ x
Illy
41
7'W 4" = j Field
Name: CATAWBA Location: 035° 37'35.46" N 081° 05'23.73" W
Date: 3242005 Caption: MacLeod Lake Project
Scale: 1 inch equals 1000 feet Buffalo Shoals Road
WNR, Inc. Job # MEC-1001
Figure 2
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Catawba County Tax Parcel Map
Buffalo Shoals Road

MAP NOT TO SCALE
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Catawba County Aerial Map
Buffalo Shoals Road

MAP NOT TO SCALE

Figure 3
MacLeod Investments, LLC
Lake Project
Figure 4
Garawba County boil 5urve 5heet ZS5
_ r
,r a
2
f?
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Lake Grading Map
Buffalo Shoals Road

flzz?
= _
-- -

WAM;t
MAP NOT TO SCALE
R & L MacLeod Investments
Buffalo Shoals Lake Project
Catawba County
Lake Grading Map
0 200 500 1000 1500
GRAPHICAL SCALE
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Impact Map
Buffalo Shoals Road

R& L MacLeod Investments

-
- 4e
Buffalo Shoals Lake Project
` .
Catawba County

- Str Segment F = 603f f • - _ + T_____ _ t Mv
4etla 74 Aeft
sa n s 1 = cslr

t

St'.

Seghent C = a F
0 200 500 1000 1500
et?nd
a"" GRAPHICAL SCALE
- Vetlond'C = 044 !free ... "a ` -_-
. ; ' Strut SkgnerR E .29a1f - - • .. trean Segment B = 5021i
N -; _ •.. , : ._ ,-. -. , _ _ .
e ,
-
Vet nd Av
. e t
Streo Segm A' = 18 iT H
i
W#4;t
MAP NOT TO SCALE
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Mitigation Map
Buffalo Shoals Road
n{
4
m
littoral Ae+t G
f

Chy..4 t 4 Weservntim = 735'
__ _ _ _ _ _ - Cror..l Seg+rnt_ Y Yrest tia+ •-70 Be
WvtYed
Q,.. ennr 77! dad on 1.5C5 01-.0
7H
FIiOC lOJ1TAIM -
t Chomel Seg--t C PreSpr Uon =640'
R & L MacLeod Investments
Buffalo Shoals Lake Project
Catawba County
Mitigation Map
0 200 500 1000 1500
GRAPHICAL SCALE
0
7
WN;t
MAP NOT TO SCALE
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: MacLeod Lake Date: 11/2004
Applicant / Owner: R&L MacLeod County: Catawba
Investigator: Robertson. Bandy State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ® NO E] Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ? No ® Transect iD:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ? No ® Plot 113:4700 series
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species l ndk:at Stratum Dominant Plant Species ndI ?cator rstaut m
1. Acer rubrum FAC sapling 9. Comus amomum FACW+ sapling
2. Acernegundo FACW sapling 10. A/nussemdata FACW+ sapling
3. Salix nigra OBL sapling 11. Juncus effusus FACW+ herb
4. Fraxinus pennsylvanica FACW sapling 12. Boehmada cylinddra FACW+ herb
5. Betula nigra FACW sapling 13. Eu/alia viminea FAC+ herb
6. Prunus serotina FACU sapling 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 82
Remarks: Pasture areas with g razed wetlands. More mature specimens are located adiacent to
drainage features.
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
? Other ? Inundated
® Saturated In Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
Field Observations: ? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit: +5 In.) ® Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
® Water-Stained Leaves
Data
E
Depth to Saturated Soil: +5 (in.) ? FAC
-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain In Remarks)
Remarks: Hydrology present at evaluation and ve get ation supports that the area is wet.
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Worsham variant Drainage Class: Poorly drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): f Wo) Typic Endoaquults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ? No ?
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
gnches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) Wunsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-10 A 10YR 4/1 / sandy loam
10-15+ B 10YR 6/1 few/distinct sandy clan

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosoi ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer In Sandy Soils
El Suffidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Solis
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Soils are strongly sulfidic.
"1=1r
LAND DETERMINATI N
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ?
Hydric Soils Present? Yes [Q No ?
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes ® No ?
Remarks: Currently grazed wetland to left and
showing CH 400 in center.
PH T /U /NR
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: MacLeod Lake Date: 11/2004
Applicant / Owner: R&L MacLeod County: Catawba
Investigator: Robertson. Bandy State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ® No ? Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ? No ® Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ? No ® Plot ID:4900-5200 series
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indic g Stratum Dominant Plant Species Indicator SbyWrn
1. Acerrubrum FAC tree 9. Sambucus canadensis FACW- sapling
2. Ilex opaca FAC- tree 10. Mikania scandens FACW+ vine
3. Uquidambarstyraciflua. FAC+ tree 11. Woodwardia areolata OBL herb
4. Nyssa sy/vatica FAC tree 12. Lobelia cardinalis FACW+ herb
5. Viburnum nudum FACW sapling 13. Eulalia viminea FAC+ herb
6. Comus amomum FACW+ sapling 14. Impatiens capensis FACW herb
7. Alnus serru/ata FACW+ sapling 15. Osmunda cinnomomea FACW+ herb
8. Lindera bermoin FACW sapling 16. Ludwigia palustds OBL herb
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 100
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
? Other ® Inundated
® Saturated in Upper 12"
? No Recorded Data Available ® Water Marks
? Drift Lines
Field Observations: ? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 1_2 (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit:pz5 in.) ® Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
® Water-Stained Leaves
0 Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0-5 (in.) ? AC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Some morphological adaptations including buttressing and root modifications / lenticles.
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Worsham Drainage Class: Poorly drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): (Wo) Typiic Endoaquults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ? NO E]
Profile Descriotion•
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-10 A 10YR 411 ! sandy loam
10-20 B 10YR 6/1 ! sandy clay

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Eplpedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
® Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
0 Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions p Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors 0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ?
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ® No [j
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes ® No[:]
Remarks:
PHOTO / USGS / NRCS
t
t
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: MacLeod Lake Date: 11/2004
Applicant / Owner: R&L MacLeod County: Catawba
Investigator: Robertson. Bandy State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ® NO E] Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ? No ® Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ? No ® Plot ID:Highnround
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species I ndicr Stratum Dominant Plant Specter Indicator Stratum
1. Acer rubrum FAC tree 9. Vitis spp. FAC vine
2. Liquidambar styraciflua FAC+ tree 10. Toxicodendron redicans FAC vine
3. Lidodendron tulipifera FAC tree 11. Eulalia viminea FAC+ herb
4. Quercus alba FACU tree 12
5. Comus flordda FACU shrub 13.
6. Ilex opaca FAC- shrub 14.
7. Rosa mu/tiflora UPL sapling 15.
8. Ligustrum sinense FAC sapling 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 63
Remarks: Midslope co mmunity classifies as a mesic mixed forest. Some areas are crazed.
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
? Other ? Inundated
? Saturated in Upper 12"
® No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
Field Observations: ? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit:+40 (in.) ? Oxidized Roots Channels In Upper 12"
? Water-Stained Leaves
0 Local Soil Survey
Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: +40 (in.) ? AC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: No hydrology present.
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Hiwassee Drainage Class: Well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Rhodudult Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ? No ?
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munseli Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-6 A 5YR 4/4 / loam
6-35 B 2.5Y 316 2.5Y 4/6 common/faint clay

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosoi ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Suft'idic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Not a hydrlc soil.
W E I LAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ? No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ? No
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes ? No
Remarks: Typical conditions at and below
mid-slope. At times extending into floodplain.
PHOTO / USGS / NRCS ,
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: MacLeod Lake Date: 11/2004
Applicant / Owner: R&L Macleod County: Catawba
Investigator: Robertson. Bandy State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ® No ? Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ? No ® Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ? No ® Plot 113monreaulated
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indtcato Stratum Dominant Plant Species ndl icator Stratum
1. Acerrubrum FAC tree 9. Sambucus canadensis FACW- sapling
2. Ilex opaca FAC- tree 10. Twdcodendron redicans FAC vine
3. Nyssa sylvatica FAC tree 11. Viburnum nudum FACW+ sapling
4. Liquidambar styraciflua FAC+ tree 12. Eulalia viminea FAC+ herb
5. Fraxinus pennsylvanica FACW tree 13.
6. Betula nigra FACW tree 14.
7. Lindera benzoin FACW sapling 15.
8. Asimina triloba FAC sapling 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 1100
Remarks: Typical of floodplain areas that are seasonally wet.
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
? Other ? Inundated
? Saturated in Upper 12"
® No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
Field Observations: ? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: NIA (in.) Secondary Indicators:

Depth to Free Water In Pit:+14 in.) ® Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
? Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: +14 (in.) ? FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: No strong indicators of hydroloav are pres ent thouoh the area appears wet Soils likewise are
not characteristic of wetland areas.
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Worsham variant Drainage Class: Poorly drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): (Wo) Typic Endoaquults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ® No El
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc.
0_7 A 10YR 4/2 5YR 4/4 many/distinct sandy loam
7-20 B 10YR 6/2 2.5Y 4/4 few/distinct sandy clay

Hydric Soil Indicators:
0 Histosol ? Concretions
? I istic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Solis
0 Suifidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Solis
0 Aquic Uoisture Regime ? Listed On Local Hydric Solis List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or tow-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain In Remarks)
Remarks: Soils seem to be stratified with overwash from eroded gullies in the vicinty of the proiect
WFTI MR. P1GT000?uwri u

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ? No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ® No[-]
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes ? No
Remarks: These areas are located within the
Iloodolain of CH 100 and are positively drained
by the streams which are entrenched These
areas are being drained under the existing
conditions.
rnv ! V / USGS / NKG5
Mitigation Proposal Information
Conceptual Plan at the Catawba Country Club in Newton
Zle -11
Al- V
4, Z'
el. 7. ,,ytT ?•.t 1? ^ \1'_? \C1 t?
*' / ";??,• ? -?` '"?-. ? /^.l L. ?.. onk 1 ??' - ..mss ? ? - Y r? l\ ? ? ?r ?! `lJ?
¢J.
t.s _ E? Nl
a r t ` > ??? r ...rf /1 1r`
..ice, ?; s ` ?t? ?? - ? ('. t f??_ / l /,? i < ? ?-i \`; ??. i ? a j J . - j• ? 1".\ - t?, ,.n iii" ? ?? ?. ?k??/_ j
??' _f?! :.t.:?'r V??_._- 1 / `.? /-?. S,?C• x.??L?J/?+1 /'. I.1?.',/(?\? /,F'r?lR.
-? F - s t _ti
%
.
\! V / Lvx?? ??-
_ 1?? \ -- ti/'-'- •-... ter: 7? ?r ?/s `? \ < _ \? _?.? '?/"..? ? / .; cif)" . 1 ? ? /;
?- 1 a 6i \
1
1. Al
_ l
ltt'.. _ ?x< n
A ,'A
_ 1S
`\ n` l.?? P I?
11 ( J
N' V1,
%
?/;1 _ s Vii. ` - ? . I,? -Ll ? • ? , ?,. J i-i ? \; t 1, ? ?..1.? r 1?--?L?
7* W
Name: HICKORY Location: 035° 39' 16.75" N 081° 18'17.57" W
Date: 3282045 Caption: MacLeod Lake Project
Scale: 1 inch equals 4000 feet Potential Mitigation Site
Catawba Country Club
Copyrigtd (C) IM, Maptech, Inc.
Figure 13
VJSJ /?? J J r f /
is
Eav
% .:?.
Mir
- - i
?-• '; ?/ '\\ \ 1 `!;'.?/ \ till,,, +
\ ) ?;?, ? ? • -? \ \ ,,,till l
auu 1 I
all Will
it
uu
I Mill
• _ 11 uutuaul
?• ? ?''?? `, ' ? !? t., ? • ui1auuuluuu
_ ? ? •. + ? ,-, • `. ?. 1t• ? tut unuaaalal
lilt, uauattulall
illil?llttllitlllliltll
( '+ { ? { \, • ? llilllllllillllltllll y)
\ 1 ltlllllllilllilil
I i t
x ?ro
A 'U b
Q O y
p• ?f ?. O. by
mz
d
a
lull, ttlll
;
_ 1 c
C.. ?. _ \J _ _ , `i'ii `? ,? sR• ? ? ? ,? r/
Figure 14

Yawn

`
` ; ??' ?:
?
• 4 t
l
-
'
?:
-
_
1, F
?_ - _
?
?
_

\ J-
1
u

Y 1 1,11111111
-
- ?
•
- -
?
, ?
?
` 111tf1111111111,1
? l • , tb111111111„
`
-.? - ? - • _ a -,
, iiiiiiunonunmu
`` _ _ ultuununuunu
uannnunnnm
?
.
Y, 1
1
Va .t \ ?i l.• ?-
11- , `' \ i

Ep
e aa£ coxc?ruat. MacLeod Lake Project
Water Resources Project ®ll,
-?''? egp? PLAN
i=' Catawba County, NC s ?' ?§
�\ �\ \ \ �� �� � \
Mi
�\ �\ \ \ �� �� � \

N
LL
L•_'
C
C
Q
r�
r�
R
4
L
t
u

0
U
N
ri)
OS- DID 09

US Army Corps PUBLIC NOTICE
Of Engineers
Wilmington District
Issue Date: 14 April 2005
Comment Deadline: 13 May 2005
Corps Action ID #: 200530965
All interested parties are herby advised that the Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers (Corps)
has received an application for work within jurisdictional waters of the United States. Specific
plans and location information are described below and shown on the attached plans. This
Public Notice and all attached plans are also available on the Wilmington District Web Site at
www.saw.usace.artny.mil/wetlands
Applicant: R&L MacLeod Investments
AGENT (if applicable):
Authority
???
P.O. Box 320 0 ? ? ? r=n
Denver, NC 28134 D
Wetland & Natural Resource Consultants, Inc. APR 2A 2005
217 Paragon Parkway, #142
Clyde, NC 28721 WETLANDS AN- WATER DSTORMWA'tERBRM
The Corps will evaluate this application and a decide whether to issue, conditionally issue, or
deny the proposed work pursuant to applicable procedures under Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (33 USC 1344).
Location
( The site is located on the east side of Buffalo Shoals Road (SR 1003), approximately 2 miles
north of its intersection with NC Hwy 16, southeast of Newton, Catawba County, North Carolina
(35.6234445°N -81.0877766°W). The site contains tributaries of the North Fork Mountain
Creek, which flows into the Catawba River. The Catawba River ultimately enters the Atlantic
Ocean through the Santee-Cooper River system in South Carolina.
Existing Site Conditions
The property is approximately 123 acres in size and consists of wooded and open pastureland.
The site contains headwater tributaries and adjacent wetlands. The stream channels and wetlands
are adjacent to the North Fork Mountain Creek, which is located in the Upper Catawba River
Basin (HUC 39 03050101). The main stream channel running the length of the property was
determined to be a perennial headwater stream with varying degrees of quality. A portion of this
channel (approximately 750 linear feet) has been impacted to due ongoing cattle access and lack
I
of riparian buffer. This section was considered of poor quality due to the lack of aquatic
habitat/life, presence of bank erosion, lack of sinuosity, and lack of riparian buffer. The upper
reach and lower reach of the main stream channel (approximately 1,350 linear feet) was
determined to be of good quality based upon the presence of a riparian buffer, presence of
aquatic habitattlife, and presence of adjacent wetlands. There are two small tributaries (Stream
D and E) to the main channel that are approximately 198 linear feet and 294 linear feet. Stream
D was determined to be of poor quality due to its short length, lack of aquatic habitat/life, and
lack of riparian buffer. Stream E was determined to be of fair quality due to the presence of
aquatic habitat, moderate sinuosity, riparian buffer and its relatively short length.
Several wetland areas are located along the main channel. Wetland E is where the main stream
channel originates and is approximately 0.74 acres in size. Wetland E is considered a headwater
wetland and contains the following vegetation: Red Maple (Acer rubrum), Holly (Ilex opaca),
Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), Black Gum (Nyssa sylvatica), Possum-Haw, (Viburnum
nudum), Silky dogwood (Cornus amomum), Spicebush (Lindera benzoin), Netted .Chain-Fern
(Woodwardia areolata), Cardinal Flower (Lobelia cardinalis), Microstegium (Eulalia viminea),
Jewelweed (Impatiens capensis), and Cinnamon Fern (Osmunda cinnomomea). The main source
of hydrology in this area is groundwater with supplemented overland flow during rain events.
This area has been relatively undisturbed and is considered of good quality. Wetland B is located
in the pasture immediately adjacent to the main stream channel. This area is approximately 0.37
acres in size and is largely dominated by the following herbaceous vegetation: Juncus (Juncus
efcsus), False-Nettle (Boehmaria cylindrical), and Microstegium (Eulalia viminea). The
dominant source of hydrology in this area is groundwater and overbank flooding from the main
stream channel. This area has been disturbed due to on-going cattle access and is considered of
poor quality. Wetland A is located near the southern boundary of the property adjacent to the
lower reach of the main stream channel. This area is approximately 0.79 acres in size and has
had some minor disturbance due to cattle access. Vegetation composition is similar to that of
Wetland E. Dominant sources of hydrology for this area are a combination of groundwater,
overbank flooding, and overland flow. This area was determined to be of good quality.
Applicant's Stated Purpose
The purpose of this project is to construct a 20-acre recreational and water skiing lake with an
associated residential subdivision. The lake is considered a central amenity to the subdivision
and will provide practice opportunities for competitive water skiers.
Project Description
The applicant is proposing to construct a dam on an unnamed tributary to North Fork Mountain
Creek in order to construct an open water lake. The dam will be approximately 50 feet tall with
a 25-foot wide crest at 3.5:1 side slopes. The trapezoidal base of the dam will be approximately
550 feet wide. The outlet structure of the lake will utilize a low-flow cool water design.
Approximately 5,632 cubic yard o ll will be used to construct the dam. The applicant is
proposing to fill approximate) 714 j ear feet of the main stream channel in order to construct
the dam (Figure 6). The applic is also proposing to excavate and flood approximately 2, 270
linear feet of the main stream channel upstream of the dam. Total proposed impacts to stream
2
channels associated with this project are 2,984 linear feet. The applicant is proposing to fill all of
Wetland A (0.79 acres) in order to construct the dam (Figures 8 and 9). The applicant is also
proposing to excavate and flood approximately 1.25 acres of wet . d upstream of the dam. Total
proposed wetland impacts associated with this project ar 2.04 res. The applicant is also
proposing to construct an access road to residential lots loc _ on the east side of North Fork
Mountain Creek (Figure 5). The applicant is proposing to construct the road crossing with a
bridge or bottomless arch culvert and does not anticipate any impacts to North Fork Mountain
Creek.
t
The applicant is proposing to mitigate for stream channel impacts by preserving 2,300 linear feet
of on-site stream channels (see Figures 10 and 12) and po?ntial_ ly restoring approximately 2,500 r'9? f
linear feet of off-site stream channels. The applicant will preserve a 50-foot vegetated riparian -'- )11+
buffer on both sides of stream channels B and C, which total approximately 1,410 linear feet of
stream channel. A 50-foot vegetated riparian buffer will remain along the south side of Stream,
A which totals approximately 735 linear feet. Stream A is the property line therefore no buffer
preservation is proposed on the north side of the stream. The applicant is proposing to mitigate
for wetland impacts through the creation of 3 acres of littoral wetlands around the shoreline of
the lake (Figure 11). The applicant is currently researching potential stream and wetland
restoration opportunities on a golf course at the Catawba Country Club in Newton, Catawba
County, North Carolina (35.6549383°N -81.3050312°W), which will be subject to Corps review
and approval. The potential mitigation site is located within the same hydrologic cataloging unit
as the impact site. The applicant is investigating the potential to restore 2,500 linear feet of
s
stream channel and 2 acres of wetlands at this site (Figures 13 and 14).
Other Required Authorizations
This notice and all applicable application materials are being forwarded to the appropriate State'
agencies for review. The Corps will generally not make a final permit decision until the North _? uu
Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) issues, denies, or waives State certification
j required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (PL 92-500). The receipt of the application and
this public notice in the NCDWQ Central Office in Raleigh serves as application to the NCDWQ
i for certification. A waiver will be deemed to occur if the NCDWQ fails to act on this request for
certification within sixty days of the date of the receipt of this notice in the NCDWQ Central
Office. Additional information regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be reviewed at
the NCDWQ Central Office, 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit, 2321 Crabtree Boulevard,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-2260. All persons desiring to make comments regarding the
application for certification under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act should do so in writing
delivered to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ), 1650 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 Attention: Ms Cyndi Karoly (all other projects) by
May 13, 2005.
Essential Fish Habitat
This notice initiates the Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) consultation requirements of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. The Corps' initial determination
is that the proposed project will not adversely impact EFH or associated fisheries managed by
the South Atlantic or Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Councils or the National Marine
Fisheries Service.
Cultural Resources
The Corps has consulted the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places
and has determined that registered properties, or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion
therein are located within the project area and/or may be affected by the proposed work. By
copy of this Public Notice, the Corps is requesting comments from the North Carolina State
Historic Preservation Office to determine the type of effects if any.
Endangered Species
The Corps has reviewed the project area, examined all information provided by the applicant and
consulted the latest North Carolina Natural Heritage Database. Based on available information,
the Corps is not aware of the presence of species listed as threatened or endangered or their
critical habitat formally designated pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA)
within the project area. A final determination on the effects of the proposed project will be made
upon additional review of the project and completion of any necessary biological assessment
and/or consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or National Marine Fisheries
Service."
Evaluation
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts,
including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will
reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The
benefit which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against
its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be
considered including the cumulative effects thereof, among those are conservation, economics,
aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife
values, flood hazards, flood plain values (in accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use,
navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water
quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of
property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving
the discharge of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, the evaluation of the
impact of the activity on the public interest will include application of the Environmental
Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) guidelines.
4
Commenting Information
The Corps is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local agencies and officials;
Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this
proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps to determine
whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision,
comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality,
general environmental effects and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are
used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) and/or an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Comments are also
used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the
proposed activity.
I Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a
public hearing be held to consider the application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with
particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. Requests for a public hearing shall be
granted, unless the District Engineer determines that the issues raised are insubstantial or there is
otherwise no valid interest to be served by a hearing.
Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will be received by the
Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, until 5pm, May 13, 2005. Comments should be
submitted to Ms. Amanda Jones, 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208, Asheville, North Carolina
28801-5006.
5
.`t-J _ f?i??.-? [,: v ? \`?•r i?"`?i.? I: ?XS? t.? .?????;? t??1\ ?? ' i;ivp? ? ? ??Y: ri - r t
.!
v?j
tN,
3 ?J
O ?C_`i ? .e.^ ?.q rte/ ??? J/( / .7 ••' ? 1, - /Uj-
74
1 i -•.•,?-_ (/?1 _ \"? t?' ?? j 1 , r? 1 ilv \?r?,?t ' ?? / :l_? j•C--c-!::.i ?i ;,??I?
fl!
V fl!
N. f
'\-? NW'
St Is. ".i\ 1-101
?I? /t?1? v
CITN
\ v ,
f ] ( 1
-? ?Lr -:fit iy ?^?;.., --'s-?.°--? ?, ? ? }? ? .?•. r,r„/; J) .:,1- r?. .,? `=
4 C "I
P-P J + 1 I
F ! s _ ! _ L ?k r ti \ ?„ i ?7
t: '
-?:- , - •?'- fir'; \'-T?? ?-??! :. ,,11 `,`: °? -? 1 ,i, l .-?;,
%
\ \
r i s\ Y 7 /
. If
5P
`r .?
? `?". -- ^?/' ,'.: ??'? ? rte . ` `li! ??,• ? „?.
7'W
Name: CATAWBA Location: 035° 37' 35.46" N 081° 05' 23.73" W
Date: 3/24/2005 Caption: MacLeod Lake Project
Scale: 1 inch equals 4000 feet Buffalo Shoals Road
WNR, Inc- Job # MEC-1001
Copyright (C) 190. Wptech, Inc- Figure I
h
s
41
10 -11
`-.?- i Est ? t ? /??
prproximat' B ` z
???, I 1 f
NIL }* t
r /r
/ /0145
s°
y?N s - ? - Y ?k 5?'M P s? , 4 {y ?t.• 'x-. t -ate. _
r' ?? ^'"./ a j .fir 3 ? ?Y-" '?"'?=?r•l4?lfr'-`Yy" ? ", ^^• .•'"`""?i
r
r !`
?r"'?r err f rs ? fP ? Rf t e*' ?
??}+ °? ?" _..,..•...? b? ? i +?"'. yam.. ? -..
j
P ?s `? ` . , fp d l?..
' J
fI Athletic
field .rte
7* W
Name: CATAWBA Location: 035° 37'35.46" N 081 ° 05'23.7311 W
Date: 3124/2005 Caption: MacLeod Lake Project
Scale: 1 inch equals 1000 feet Buffalo Shoals Road
WNR, Inc. Job # MEC-1001
- Inc.

Figure 2
i
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Catawba County Aerial Map
Buffalo Shoals Road

Figure 3
MAP NOT TO SCALE
MacLeod Investments, LLC
Lake Project
Catawba Countv Soil Survev Sheet 35
P.s6 Mgc1 MgE2 CATAWBA COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 1 3:-t MT

Mk XM
At C7 t yy ?T HAE2

C2 C-2
?
?
cmcY ?
? Gm?2 ° . +f r
r

i. I
,i
i°

? ?' z '' <?..9 1 r:y ? ?• '?,? _?' r'. 'S?fiod Mtf
7 M¢C2
1 `
?
?
?
??
?
ttjj CmC1
?MtE2
.
cC

4 fs_s O M4Cj f cp
1 HC? NS O S
?111F3Z ^
?+
?*
Y 7
Project Area
-
-
?
?
C
E
3 p
n
AsC2 _ A Cm61
?' ?:"'N ?' r ? r a F
rc .? s"
?'
?- `? MTez
? ? Mge? ?' E
H
;
? ?
r
z
? E ?<
,
c ez
b
' C .B2 'Miu

I RaC2 (?? .`. ¢B2 CmC1 FsB \ :? ° Hs02 y r -?i
`? "'
??
f l HaC
i?p2 ?
'.. Ha 82 .%, ft5 H X #
\ 45B"Y r1y.
HsC1

4
?-? C rf' H:C N
fl2
[
C
B
?
?
m
2
?, ppp
Y` McH1 ea..
Ail Calla '?Z'
? ? ?
-

?? rJ"-- CmCi - ( M¢82? n' e r- ?n? a
h:' ? M
3? F S
?
'
,
.
pE2
:
H PcE j,, ?,g t- {L
Cat1i CmBC HcBi

Figure 4
nrnrz
zo
a
z -
c
O 7
E 3L

`p ' OQ
0 \
J
N•
CD
th
Figure 6

2
R & L MacLeod Investments e {' L? r6jSL??i
Buffalo Shoats Lake Project ay
Catawba County ~ '? €
2371
Impact'M--p 5.47A l
(Sheet 1) a psa T S.O
-0103
R j
0 100 200 H - - I J 84\iR\COSi 11b
ORARUCAL SCALE QrM)
s
NI
RI
T
H

- Figure 8
1
SR 1003
01
* ID,
%
"s e
13
ftb
r) tz let
Figure 10
.? r,?. n;
r,
I
CQ --
N
R
crV
_ rG

Q

323 ? eYd
? .
?' Figure 12
r \-r"?? ?`c- jai ??(.?':'rr: - _ \•? }`s17
?/'' wry%? ` ?.?F-? / A 1`? - I.
!Ak
P Ll
v `' - E ( ti /
"?'??'
:' rC , - ) 7 1? _ r r i.\\. f77 t r 7 xR 4;: i 4 r} fcR •?
X
l`'J'?
' •?i ?- r? ? ,?, t - ? ?`- ? i /- . ; L :. s '??-? r i ri ? ??s-f? ?`? ? r - - i ?? ? \ . ? j??f ?: ?5,) SS
A\ fi ' Cpl J.
` •- r ? ?_ \ -_\i? ? ?Y ? ?,E?? i ?" t ? t\ i r 1 f ? f ? ? t- 1 T^' I.? I ?" n?a. ? ?? i .•
01
U V,
Lam---s ???t \ti?S 4.. -•? _ ("' _? i .: -? .i/r r'• r - ; r
/
(. i' C`F-'--'-?
z x;14 r ur?? _?1? °g'' a
/. i.y-+ l ! -> .ts' ?f, i 1- t 1 1 _...?.•_Nf r Ir ,t" 7 Z y l ru?•?•
E? ?, ? •t'.1-?-• ? \ ` f -??y?? rv,/ >?'-/lil •\ } i L (r i a l'YJI r r--?? .,?
--._-, ? ?.`,? ?L S - ? ?_ ? ? i /? ?? !r/? ?,%?• :i - f ?? sir ??? jr ?k??t r ? I ? ???t ??.
C` O
tN V,
TZN
Oaf- ?a?
As si?ws?, l f \ \ U l f/ '
A9
Name: HICKORY Location: 035° 39' 16.75" N 081° 18' 17.57" W
Date: 32 Caption: MacLeod Lake Project
Scale: 1 inch ch equals 4000 feet Potential Mitigation Site
Catawba Country Club
Copyright (c)1998, kbptech, Inc.
Figure 13
p ?f m°g
ENV
i ,d? low `1 .. .? wa
9 93
93
-_ ( ,?- /? / 1, `, ?• i ? `? ?\ ' \ \?.? r. ' `•- !_
( )? ? ../-?•' 'A ! .. •) [Ito or i:; r? , /?
J, 0:4
? i
I I I

n
? b
'U
N N N
?
P6
. " Q
.
till
,• ??/
lam,

CL
. i
4 4
4 4
• `
4 .1
r ='? f
N No
,\ - ? ` '` \ ' ? ,? •'. I •;-mot) - , . ?_ • - 111 '?
A. I '_' lllllllll I
till lull
lllllllll
. - _ . ? ? : 1 ?-?. ? •`? ` , ; .\ \ '.r `\? J ? till !"'TTTfffttttttllllilt
\! `? \ ` y t \ ` 1111IIlUl1
?\' ? ,1 ll lllllllll
? ? ?'? ' ? \ ? ?r l lllllltllli
? % ?_ \ till Illltilltilil (
I• ? ??1` ?, ? ,?1±? ?• ill lllltltilllltlll
, ? 1 ?-? -i \. `l? ?•.i/ lillllililllilillllil '
' , ? ?, ? lull lllllllllllllllll
1 \ \ `\ .- lltll?ltlllilillllllltl
' t ? l II,\ ?, • ? Iltlllllllllllllitlll
\ ` , lllitllll11111111 , i " ,
S ` \ t ' ? - `\-. { \ Iltill Milli )i 1
\?`, _ rye` ? '? 1 r ? ? ;,?\: ?. ••\ r ?'- jrt ? r
? __ .../ 7 ? l .tea' '-? `• ` ? /
.r
A, L
Figure 14
?rll ? ?0-

D5 -Q ofli

March 21, 2004
Mrs. Amanda Jones
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 MAR 2 9 2005
Asheville, NC 28801
WERM AW MIRRMWAM BRIWCH
RE: MacLeod Lake Project
Catawba County, North Carolina
Action ID No. 200530965 / DWQ 05-0007 L
Mrs. Jones:
Attached please find an application for a Department of the Army Individual Permit to
construct a 20 acre ski lake on an unnamed tributary to North Fork Mountain Creek in
association with a residential subdivision. North Fork Mountain Creek is classified by the
NC Division of Water Quality at WS-IV C (Index No. 11-97-(0.5)). The project area is
currently either wooded or in pasture and has a residence within the parcel. Data such as
Catawba County tax maps, USGS topoquadrangles, Catawba County Soil Survey map, and
data forms are included for your reference. The quality of streams and resulting
mitigation ratios were determined by the Army Corps during our site visit on February 1,
2005 and are reflected as such in this application package. The mitigation ratios for
wetland impacts were also determined by the Army Corps in a February 3, 2005 letter and
during a subsequent meeting with Amanda Jones on March 18, 2005.
The construction of the dam will require 134 cubic yards of earthen fill below the ordinary
high water within Wetland A (0.79 Acre) and 46,731 cubic yards of earthen fill above the
ordinary high water within Wetland A. The dam and outlet structure impacts 714 linear
feet of perennial stream (Stream Segment A'- 180 linear feet of poor quality stream
mitigated at a 1:1 ratio and Stream Segment A - 534 linear feet of good quality stream
mitigated at a 2:1 ratio). There will be 59 cubic yards of earthen fill placed within Stream
Segment A (534 linear feet of good quality stream) below the ordinary high water and
4,153 cubic yards of fill above the ordinary high water. There will be 20 cubic yards of
earthen fill placed within Stream Segment A' (180 linear feet of poor quality stream)
below the ordinary high water and 1,400 cubic yard of fill placed above the ordinary high
water.
Newton Office Clyde Office
PO Box 224 wnrinc.com 217 Paragon Parkway, #142
Newton, NC 28658 Clyde, NC 28721
828-465-3035 828-648.8801
828-465-3050 Fax [phone] Fax
4
The applicant proposes to construct the dam in a manner that will maintain cold water base
flow to down stream reaches. The application package includes narratives that describe
the proposed impacts to Water of the US. Also, included in the narratives is an
assessment of avoidance and minimization as well as a mitigation proposal for unavoidable
impacts. An alternatives analysis is also included that describes the other sites that were
researched by the applicant prior to contracting on the proposed parcel.
k
The applicant is proposing to mitigate for stream impacts by preserving 2,300 linear feet
of streams on site and restoring 2,500 linear feet of streams off site. Wetland impacts
will be mitigated through the creation of 3 acres of littoral wetlands around the ski lake
and the restoration of 2 acres of wetlands off site. The applicant is currently researching 6,
conducting the restoration efforts on a site in Newton, NC. Additional information on this
site will be forwarded once it has been provided to us. The ski lake will be stocked with
game fish and will provide habitat for waterfowl and other aquatic animals and plants.
There are topographical USGS maps, an aerial photograph, a soil survey, and mitigation
photographs for your reference. Also included within the package are copies of data
forms for the wetlands and streams that have been delineated and surveyed on the
property. You will find wetland impact maps and a mitigation map within the application.
Included with the package is a full size copy of the wetland delineation map and the
wetland impact map for your review.
Please call me at 828 / 712-9205 with any questions that you may have.
Best regards,
Jennifer Robertson
Cc. Bob MacLeod
PO Box 320
Denver, NC 28704
Mansour Edlin
Mansour Edlin Consulting
1515 Mockingbird Lane, Suite 802
Charlotte, NC 28209
Cyndi Karoly
NC Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Raleigh, NC 27604
Newton Office Clyde Office
PO Box 224 wnrinc.com 217 Paragon Parkway, # 142
Newton, NC 28658 Clyde, NC 28721
828-465-3035 828-648-8801
828465-3050 Fax [phone] Fax
c i)FC-06' 04 (MI)NI 13:19 LVO LU41MU 1 803 732
12/??6f2P? 09:14 lft3aae?ss?ro
v Ll - - MS.
?i1F8?il?ts?,
r
i/ l ?4yt? one,
.'M Arnw,
"U"M 110
VVdittlrinl? ?' •?,d3?3A '.. .
>?'of w omovi 1tft. ,ihi+ i 1r
. cabbw ..
8 r I'm to so an ffw Pas rw, dud"9
:pomwM ejf p&vnb to and won-of s ghat M* Mca ty
,
awn War Act aai d We Rhrx HNtom ACL
F c,d aid 6C apm am sawma m be an mid p? ?! t;?? hY
4AWthe and d nd PmmxW CaMftftr IM. 0 ,
WeMnd wd N84*;?'.AM6u , Int is aWolied. ,, to
teef?r?'i tmd®cted {?P' a? t t?q?t'?Pt?!!G'?r' biM4 •
Addax: .? - - --
Aftew. • - -
Phone Numbert L W). , ` 0 3 _•7 14 - -7 7 '. t a• ,?) v 3 Y!
'?' da>n _??llV? S? ?cse. ?s• .. ?:,?:::..???,1Ar_t . ? 6 0 5
'
Dow
"
OM ,
ta??wswrr>t?. '
0142
qz
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710.0003
(33 CFR 325) Expires December 31, 2004
The Public burden for this collection of information is sestimated to average 10 hours per response, although the majority of applications should require
5 hours or less. This Includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of
information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information
Operations and Reports. 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway. Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget,
Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC 20503. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law,
no person shell be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of Information If it does not display a currently valid OMB control
number. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having
jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act. Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research and
Sanctuaries Act, 33 USC 1413, Section 103. Principal Purpose: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application.for a
permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies.
Submission of requested information is voluntary, however, if Information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit
be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed
activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned.
1. APPLICATION NO. 12. FIELD OFFICE CODE 13. DATE RECEIVED 14. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
,, rFA/C Rri n im rn RF C// r Fn RV Apol M_ aAm
5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE ran va" is norrwuiredl
R&L MacLeod Investments Bob MacLeod Jennifer Robertson President
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
PO Box 320 Denver, NC 28134 217 Paragon Pkwy, #142 Clyde, NC 28721
7.. APPLICANT'S HONE NOS W/AREA CODE 10. AGENT'S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE
a; Residence a. Residence 828-648-8801
b'. Business 704-483-3580 i b. Business 828-712-9205
11, STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
1 hereby authorize, Jennifer Robertson to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to
iurnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
DATE
NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE fseeuutruvwmI
MacLeod Lake Project
13. NAME OF WATERBODY. IF KNOWN aannwr.*i&l 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS /if eppi,,b,?e!
North Fork Mountain Creek 1914 Buffalo Shoals Road Catawba, NC 28609
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Catawba County North Carolina tt
COUNTY STATE 1
1:8. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN, Beekatrucvonsl
Tax Parcel ID: 367802899458, State Road: 1003, Township: Caldwell, Fire District: Bandy's
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
Take Hwy 16 East from Newton. Turn Right onto Buffalo Shaols Road. Site is East of Buffalo
Shoals Road. See Attached USGS. Location: 035 37' 38.57" N 081 05' 25.50" W
ENG FORM 4345, Jul 7 EDITION OF FEB 94 IS OBSOLETE. (Proponent: CECW-OR)
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
LAND QUALITY SECTION
P, 5 --0001
James D. Simons, PG, PE Michael F. Easley, Governor
Director and State Geologist William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
MEMORANDUM
DATE: 4/18/2005
TO: CORPS OF ENGINEERS, WILMINGTON DISTRICT
151 PATTON AVENUE, ROOM 208
^ ASHEVILE, NC 28801-5006
FROM: G. DOUGLAS MILLER, PE
LAND QUALITY SECTION
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
RE: PUBLIC NOTICE #200530965
R&L MACLEOD INVESTMENTS
CATAWBA COUNTY
REPLY
No comment.
-X- An erosion and sedimentation control plan is required.
X Comments on this project are below.
D
APR 2 2 2005
DENR - WATER QUALITY
wETLANDSAtVD STORMWATER BRASH
Comments on this project are attached.
This office objects to the project as proposed.
Comments: Project will also require submittal under the North Carolina Dam Safety Act as the
proposed dam is of sufficient size and impoundment to require permitting. Such
permits require the dam to be designed by a licensed Professional Engineer. This
information is also being provided to NCDWQ.
SIGN Z/ DATE
Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 • Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled \ 10% Post Consumer Paper
Date: 3/31/05
Triage Check List
Project Name: MacLeod Lake
DWQ#: 05-0007
County: Catawba
To: Alan Johnson, Mooresville Regional Office
60-day Processing Time: n/a until PN received
Note this is an IP. Clock won't start unit Public Notice received in
Central.
From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone : [phone]
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks!
18. Nature of Activity (Deuriptlon of projec?,;rrrJude etr features!
19. Project Purpose (Desorthe r e reason or purpose o: the pro)ect, see wWn, mW)
To provide a residential area with a ski lake.
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
To construct a waterskiing lake. A total of 2,984 linear feet of streams and 2.04 acres of
wetlands will be impacted in order to construct the lake.
21. Type(s) of Material Beinp Discharged and the Amount of Each TVDe in Cubic Yards
Earthen fill, rip-rap dissapaters, and pipe. There will be 79 cubic yards of stream fill
and 134 cubic yards of wetland fill associated with the construction of the dam.
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled lseeinstruc7;erasl
0.79 acres for dam fill and 1.25 acres for lake flooding / excavation.
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes No x IF YES. DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody Of more than can be entered here,
please attach a supplemental list).
See Attached List.
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AUENCY TYPE APPROVAL` IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
`Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building and flood plain permits
28. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. 1 certify that the information in this
appiication is complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the
duly authorized agent of the applicant.
03/21/2005
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT ? DATE -- JSSIGNAT'
LIM
E OF AGENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proPosad activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing some to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
k

Property Owners Immediately Adjacent to Parcel:
1. Joe B. Stewart, (MacLeod Lake Parcel)
Tax Parcel ID=367802899458
1711 Kennerly Road, Irmo, South Carolina 29063-8692
2. Balls Creek Camp Ground
Tax Parcel ID=367904602447
2039 Buffalo Shoals Road, Catawba, North Carolina 28609
3. Richard E. and Rebecca B. Hewitt
Tax Parcel ID=367802981217
3037 NC Hwy 16 S, Newton, North Carolina 28658-9698
4. Daniel T. and Michael C. Long
Tax Parcel ID=368801187078
PO Box 24, Newton, North Carolina 28658-0024
5. Dan Alan Hunsucker
Tax Parcel ID=368903012848
3216 John Daniel Drive, Conover, North Carolina 28613-8972
6. Jeffrey Scott Lail
Tax Parcel ID=367904811716
2128 Demoor Road, Catawba, North Carolina, 28609-8073
7. Danny Charles Lail
Tax Parcel ID=367904719982
1850 Buffalo Shoals Road, Catawba, North Carolina 28609-8028
8. Hubert Jr and Brenda C. Lail
Tax Parcel ID=367904820103
1848 Buffalo Shoals Road, Catawba, North Carolina 28609-8028
Property Owners Across Buffalo Shoals Road from Parcel:
1. Tony Jerome and Gwendolyn D. Rivers
Tax Parcel ID=367904722371
1855 Buffalo Shoals Road, Catawba, North Carolina 28609-8028
2. Mary Karen Seale
Tax Parcel ID=367904623277
1274 33rd St SE Conover, North Carolina 28613-8015
3. Stephen Vance and Kathy H. Seale
Tax Parcel ID=367904623134
1895 Buffalo Shoals Road, Catawba, North Carolina 28609-8028
4. Janice Hildebran Loftin
Tax Parcel ID=367904610503
1937 Buffalo Shoals Road, Catawba, North Carolina 28609-8029
Project Purpose and Need
Mr. Bob MacLeod, the project proponent, proposes to construct a 20 acre
recreational and water skiing lake for the purpose of developing a subdivision
in Catawba County. The proponent needs the lake to provide the central
amenity for the project. The lake needs to be long enough and wide enough k?
to provide the competitive skier opportunities to practice their skills.
The impacted streams will be diverted while the clean fill/pipe is discharged
into the stream to construct the dam. The 714 linear feet of impact at the
base of the dam will be completed concurrently with above the high water
mark bank stabilization. The 50 foot tall dam will be constructed with a 25
foot wide crest and approximately 3.5:1 side slopes. The trapezoidal base of
the dam is approximately 550 feet. The front of the dam (water side) will
include approximately 275 feet of fill/pipe while the backside will
necessitate approximately 439 feet of fill/pipe/rip-rap energy dissipater.
Approximately 79 cubic yards of discharge will occur below the ordinary
high water mark in the stream to be impacted by the dam. Approximately
134 cubic yards of discharge will occur below the ordinary high water mark
in the wetland to be impacted by the dam. The outlet of the pond will utilize
low-flow cool water design strategies.
The subject stream is mapped as an unnamed intermittent tributary to the
North Fork of Mountain Creek within the Catawba River Basin; it has
approximately 80 acres of drainage. The NC Division of Water Quality has
classified the North Fork Mountain Creek as Class WS-IV 4 Water (11-97-
(2)). The subject stream has been assessed by the Army Corps using the
Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet (USACE Wilmington, Version
06/03). There were three reaches of the stream classified as good in the
upper reach, poor in the middle reach, and good in the lower reach by the
Corps and are reflected as such in the application. The entirety of the
stream has excess sediment load.
The attached Impact Summary Table for streams describes each stream
segment, the impact length, cubic yards of impact (where applicable), the
quality of the stream, the mitigation ratio determined by the Army Corps,
and the required mitigation. The wetland table describes each wetland, the
type of impact, amount of impact, cubic yards of impact (where applicable),
quality of wetland, mitigation ratio, and required mitigation.
Avoidance and Minimization
The proponent has avoided hard impacts to the greatest extent practicable
by eliminating one of two previously proposed lakes described in the original
Nationwide Permit application and by proposing to construct the dam with a
low-flow cool-water riser-pipe structure. Impacts requiring discharges to
Waters of the US are limited to the construction of the dam to create
additional Waters of the US. All other access to high ground will be
completed with spanning structures. This will include one road crossing to
access the remainder of the property across North Fork Mountain Creek.
The predominant impacts of the project to streams are secondary in nature.
The proponent considered alternative development concepts and determined
that the uniqueness of the current proposal provided the best potential for
success. During the pre-development planning the proponent considered
constructing two lakes on the project. Though more favorable in terms of
economic returns one lake has been eliminated to avoid further impacts and
because that parcel of land is no longer for sale. The lake is designed for r
recreation and competitive water skiing and therefore further reduction in ?
size is not practical. The lake must be at least 2000 feet long and at least
250 feet wide to meet its intended purpose. 1
go
Cumulative impacts resulting from the proposed project are minimized V
through the reduction in scope and through design considerations including
an engineered low-flow cool-water discharge orifice.
Alternatives Analysis
There were four other parcels that the proponent researched as potential
parcels for a ski lake community. Information on two of these parcels is
attached for your reference. The third parcel sold before it could be
evaluated in depth. The fourth parcel is the parcel adjacent to the current
site that is no longer for sale that was presented in the original Nationwide
Permit application.
The 250 acre tract attached as Parcel # 56262 is in Lincoln County. The
proponent worked on this site for two years and planned for two lakes but
could not get a conditional use permit through Lincoln County. We were
scheduled to begin the wetland delineation when the proponent got word
from the county that the zoning would not be approved. The 78 acre tract
attached as Parcel # 5979176 is also in Lincoln County. The topography on
this parcel was not suitable.
Mitigation Proposal
Please review the Impact Summary Table in conjunction with the information
below while considering the mitigation proposal.
Streams:
On-Site Preservation:
Approximately 2,300 linear feet of streams on site will be preserved for
mitigation credit. Please see the attached Mitigation Map for a location of
the preservation on site. A 50' vegetated buffer will remain along both sides
of Stream Segments B and C. A 50' vegetated buffer will remain along the
property side of Stream Segment A. The property line on the other side of
this reach is too close to allow for a 50' vegetated buffer.
Off-Site Restoration:
There is a potential mitigation site in Newton, NC that we are exploring to
compensate for the remainder of stream impacts. We will explore the
possibility of restoring 2,500 linear feet of degraded stream on this site.
As additional information becomes available on this site it will be forwarded.
The potential mitigation site is located within the same HUC Code (Catawba
39 03050101 Upper Catawba).
Wetlands:
rr`?
On-Site Creation: ?l' lr
Approximately 3 acres of littoral wetlands will be created around the ski
lake to compensate for some of the unavoidable wetland impacts.
Off-Site Restoration;
There is the potential for wetland restoration at the same site in Newton,
NC discussed earlier for stream restoration efforts. We will explore the
possibility of restoring 2 acres of vegetated wetlands to compensate for the
remainder of unavoidable wetland impacts.
Within 120 days of the issuance of the requested permit and prior to the
commencement of any work within Waters of the US the applicant will
provide to the US Army Corps of Engineers a Stream/Wetland Restoration
Plan in accordance with applicable guidance. .
Within 120 days of the approval of the mitigation plans the applicant will
provide to the US Army Corps of Engineers a plat that depicts the
preservation areas and the restrictive language.
Upon the completion of the project and the associated proposed mitigation
4,800 linear feet of streams, 3 acres of littoral wetlands, and 2 acres of
vegetated wetlands will be under a protective covenant.
As an additional mitigation measure as previously mentioned the dam
incorporates design elements that ensure that water quality will be
protected through a low-flow cool-water / aerating discharge.
03/21/2005 12:14 17044833570
MAULLUU UUNZD I muk, 1 4U11
,ACLE0b CONSTRUCTION, INC.
PO BOX 864
t)ENVER, NO x8037
PHONE: [phone] FAQ:: 744-483-3570
This fax is intended only for the use of the individual or, entity to which it is
addressed, and may contain information shot is privileged, confidential and exempt
from disclosura under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is vHctly prohibitcd.:-f
you have received this communication in error, please notify us Immediately by collect
telephone call and return the original fax to us at the above address by US snail. We
will reimburse you for postage.
DATE: 3 /ZJ IreS-
TO: ? tl:
FAX: 52 ?T50
FROM..
E: ?a?.e C-e Ia??S
PACES:? (INCLUDINru TH6 CODER PAGE)
NVTES.?-.
c)Lt we

03/21/2005 12:14 17044833'.
^ ..gym m?a!ama • My
V

Y
o
Q
J
a
C'xJ
o
.,.J

19
N

ll
?i

.? d

MACLEUD f.AJNS I KUU !
> ?: 03 t,Ctcnun
?` •? AlicN?nl.'?.tssli;YQVALYdva
i
b
2 f
p *t?
o
I
I t
sty
A !
e
40- s
r
fill
C-a
1 a'aRea ?` f ? • eteR? M
s.4., a? I ? , ii?i•tt??
• ? 111 ?? tl? i
" ?Y r
f?E i lpr ` 11?i i?Ig? 1t r
p i r-
it ? R, ` tai 't
•! ! i ?I ? t?9 Y•M' P
. ?i j'i 6 wrn M mull i
a?
p, a4i,''a
rcj
?e
I
rMVL VV
E ``1 14
Y
a ?1. t
is
Ell Ill
b R ll?
?o
f

?' ,lt?f
,
sl9i
", ,1 Or ',? 6igA
all, L".4'l"' t iII

I.?
t
l?lft

• tC
? ?Fi o
t
W r i
;;G9 spy ;

,w m a r r ne w, r, .,ungmn..wgrq IPLVlhH
03/21/2005 12:14 17044833570 MACLEUD UJN5IKU?j i1Uri
0729/2003 3.1:191 FAX [phone] RBALTY WORLD-LAHF. & C1't'Y 1 005
Page 1 Of 1
LoopNet - #1 in COMMercisl Real Estate Online
REALTY WORLD - Lake & Qty +/-7g ,eras - SF LAnd 0 Lake Normans
Offering summary
Listing 9tattaat Active
Q? property lot 5979176
< D .rM. :. $
i PrifpertY TYpet Land
?lld?.i suifttyype: Resldentla{ (Single-Family) (land)
' - SF Land 0 Lake
l Property: +/-78 acres
Norman!
Address: 2700 Highway 16
pertver NC 28037, United States
Price:
i ? Down Pent:
sq.Feeti
Let Size
Use Type,
xnveatmant:
Factors:
CurrelaGyl
Date Lost Me
$1,265,000
N/A
3,397,680
78.00 acr.
Vacant/Owner-User
Preforma
Proforma
Price/ Acre: $16,217.95
USD
tifiedt 6 Feb 2002
Property Descri tiara
+/- 78 acres on Lake Norman's beautiful west sldel Sxcellent single family development opportunity. Sewer and water
available at sitel 2-3 Ivts/acre zoning. May also purchase 60' R.O.W.O Hwy 16 for excellent access and visibility from
this growing corridor. Frontage on Westport Golf Course, and across road from lake (lake view lots probable). Call fur
maps and Beta
Location Description
The west side of Lake Norman offers some of the Lake's best. Investment opportunity. Fairly priced with excellent return
potential. Good county services and zoning, with relatively fast and fair approval process.
Contact Information
REALTY WORLD -' Lake & City TQDy-M atlLaQ Phone: [phone]
E97917?+ l212/20D0
The Information above has been obtained from sources believed reliable. While we do not "douot ft accuracy we have not verined It and make no
ouarantee, warranty or representation about it. It is your responsibility to Independently Wrdlrm Its accuracy and completeness. Arty protections,
oplolons, assumptions, or estimates used are for example only and do not represent the current or future performance of the property. The value of
this transaction to you deoends on tax and other factors which should be evaluated by your bK linanclal and legal advftm. You and your advisors
should conduct a careful, Independent Inveftabon of the property to determine to your satisfaction the sultablUty of the property for Your needs.
, i 1
hV://www.loopnet.conVProf'ile/profilel.asp`tLID=5979176&STID=&LL= 2/6102
d
o
0
7
N
0
H
} 'CO
I 4-
L
'=1
0 -
o"
M
%
0 - ti
00 w)
N N 0%
N %O 0
r, ?O
N
c
0

`-' `-• to In 6 ` 1
a
?= CM W-1 V-4 W-1 V-4
CC

• ? L L L L "O V '? T7 C3
a
O O O O O O O O O
Vi a a a a VD 0 V' VD
L
t
a
L
O d M o M
O LO
a LC)
00 ? -+ Its
?
Q s
I
E F
E
Q
L
CV)
AM

L
O L
d
n
°
?
c 3
d
CA

Q
s
00
O N N co w M NO LC) 0
0
_ cn Go O N O\ 0% co p 10 cp
Y I •-? If! -+ N %O •-+ N
W
a W W W W W o

E O -v 'v 'o 'o 'O
f" O CS O
H U- a a a a a a

Q d

a ?
N
0
v
d
L

C 'v
0
+-2. 0 0 0 0 0 0
? rn t? 00 0 00 N
M O N d- O?
0 0 0 O •-+ N

0

O
' .=+ W-+ N N N
+- CL

L L "O 'tl "O C3

L
c
V

d
?
„ ^ d C3 C3 t3 ?

E _
Q
L

.0
L
O L
d

d
m s
?-
? S
Q
d
cs rn ? d- O d- d-
L
V O O O O o cm
Q
- X X X X

o
E

a a a a

} Q m V ? W o

3 ?
v
d
3
y ?..r
!f lj °
00
w R
!5 ?,
,•.,, , l SwF _ ,} 4pproxima B a
f ?/ T 4? Y t? `6'k ?' 4? ¦fF?/r?{S/?6 l?
11 a
f
1441 ? / ^ 't•, ?•5: § { ? 7? S ? 4
d??t k. 4_Y? { ,"?,•'.? ? ?",-...+?--'_..? ??'? f- ,k a`tt , swi ii ? "?' ?p'? r ?4? ?.
`?y f
.+y i. : ? j Fi R Ja ? F. •' f. r
+=.,? F `-4
letic
r
Name:,CATAWBA Location: 035° 37'35.46" N 0810 05123.73" W
Date: 3/2412005 Caption: MacLeod Lake Project
Scale: 1 inch equals 1000 feet Buffalo Shoals Road
WNR, Inc. Job # MEC-1001
Copyright (C) 1998, Maptech, Inc.

MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Catawba County Tax Parcel Map
Buffalo Shoals Road

/I--, A
MAP NOT TO SCALE
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Catawba County Aerial Map
Buffalo Shoals Road

MAP NOT TO SCALE
MacLeod Investments, LLC
Lake Project
Catawba County Soil Survey Sheet 35
CATAWBA COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
AsB MCC2 1 3 0 A r aT MEE2
1 3 to ' Lrr?t cw p?? { l
' ?m01 `-rte i{7
Maw
411,
M3 A MICE/ ,; E ,:. r 7
. l1 Me?2 ?G
? >>? 9 ? ? _ ? E tt /9 t
h-h
A58 ns rAs6 Ab.. ?ErwJ .? ?'/=
IN-
"aII Cm6; t Cmflf} tix r u - ?` N ??? t. Scholl M?tE A
'?-.s91 +F... , Y 7" a a y • :i' j err,
?Y ?. ? Cm L2 ? MCC2 .Y Prj'a .t M? 1//
U9 k
Project Area Y ?s : _ ';r K: MaBg (?y4
AsL2 ' MCC2 /' l LnE3 ? f
CmB1 . ? / ?? > ? v„y
C.82 ,E M02 r MCB2 ? HsD t. ' f
f As8 ?? ?^^ ? ?? lam`' CmB ? MCCZ ? 4 ` ? ?'? H 82 `? ?
r MCC2 ?
AsC1 - e-? LmL2 As8 -
MCB2 .i rp HaD2 ?;? 6 ;
F ? M r i Julia -s HsCZ. -?. ? tr
? ? _ SJ? ? AaB? I ? . HSL2 ? ? Ho82 ?. H6j, ?.,? H^?-:
? - Cmt2 ? ?CTC7 ? ?? - I ?o = EAB2 _ e
1J., P
ICJ} 1 .?.r ., e. 82 . - '` N k y l r Y A fg} r F-.
eRCB2 rrr 1C12 ' 2?. p .? x H 3li
fjF.y,B-? MCC1 J c t AsB I. F ?Z - LN3C2 3.
ems . -kA
zme2 ? - ? ,
?? MQ LmB2 / CmC2 ?:; ?' - `? ' lts _ ?'?' e r
mt /
EmCZ ? 6 • L ]4 -
71.SB' Cm82 A4d _?.t.. r .•? CmB2 CmB2 • Hc82 HwC2.. Pei f. ,
u nE / ?t
?t .
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Lake Grading Map
Buffalo Shoals Road
E,
t4o',_
_t e
tai - t,
4 a
To Q DM
P\

W";t
MAP NOT TO SCALE
R & L MacLeod Investments
Buffalo Shoals Lake Project
Catawba County
Lake Grading Map
200 500 1900 1500
GRAPHICAL SCALE
.l
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Impact Map
Buffalo Shoals Road
?. 0
--8 R & L MacLeod Investments
Buffalo Shoals Lake Project
r
Catawba County
- ilil? t ' S Se9nen1 H = 1061f -
v e a
Stre n Segneni F = 6031F impact * {
If ?? v, 1\4S _
Wetland E = 0.74 ACFe \ -
stream Seg?nt 1651F - 0 200 500 1000 1500
_ r ??Skre Segment 0 = 4221f .
._-Wel d D B.1 Acr s - GRAPHICAL \CALE
Vetla d CP 0.04 Acre - ??
St&-14 Segne t E 294if, tr- Segment B = 5021f H - -
p
,. ? "-Strean nt D = 1901f
Wet ndB=037 Acre
! H
v--C--- Strewn Segment A' = 1801f
1
off. Streon Se t A = 534V
r (f; i a _F f 3 a- TEWNSHII
Wetland' A0.79 Acre II+11+i? ?d? tiREEK T .
a t ,. o
- ti? ? a
MACLEOD LAKE PROJECT
Mitigation Map
Buffalo Shoals Road
e?
00? ,
a ,
N
Litt orol Shelf Cr.
row' - ?f
a
li)!
a
Chonnel See;ge-t A Preservation = 735'
'?? -Chonnel Segment B Prese ot!on =. 1, Be S-eyed i
lLvreMty. 770' sed on USGS Chonneo
1'IOR7H
FORK MOUNTAIN
c Chonnel Segment C Pre5ertltion v, 640'
R & L MacLeod Investments
Buffalo Shoals Lake Project
Catawba County
N Ligation Map
0 200 500 1000 1500
rRAPHICAL SCALE
3 jpWNSHIP
£ .e r ydt?, CREEK ? T ? Ip
.? a
?. x
z
3
d ? d
e

MAP NOT TO SCALE
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: MacLeod Lake Date: 11/2004
Applicant / Owner: R&L MacLeod County: Catawba
Investigator: Robertson. Bandy State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ® No ? Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ? NON Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ? No ® Plot 113:4700 series
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum
1. Acer rubrum FAC sapling 9. Corns amomum FACW+ sapling
2. Acer negundo FACW sapling 10. Alnus serrulata FACW+ sapling
3. Salix nigra OBL sapling 11. Juncus effusus FACW+ herb
4. Fraxinus pennsylvanica FACW sapling 12. Boehmaria cylindrica FACW+ herb
5. Betula nigra FACW sapling 13. Eulalia viminea FAC+ herb
6. Prunus serotina FACU sapling 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 82
Remarks: Pasture areas with c razed wetlands. More mature specimens are located adiacent to
drainage features.
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs
? Other
? No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: +5 Lin.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: +5 (in.)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators:
? Inundated
® Saturated in Upper 12"
? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns In Wetlands
Secondary Indicators:
® Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
® Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
? FAC-Neutral Test
Remarks: Hydrology present at evaluation and vegetation supports that the area is wet.
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Worsham variant Drainage Class: Poorly drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): (Wo) Typic Endoaquults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes El No ?
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) - Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Muns ell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-10 A 10YR 4/1 / sandy loam
10-15+ B 10YR 6/1 few/distinct sandy clay

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosoi ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
® Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
0 Reducing Conditions p Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Soils are strongly sulfidic.
WETLANU Ut:I LKMINAI IVN
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ?
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ®' No ?
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes ® No ?
Remarks: Currently grazed wetland to left and
showing CH 400 in center.
r+nl ) I I) i I ??I?? i MMI.--%
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: MacLeod Lake Date: 11/2004
Applicant / Owner: R&L MacLeod County: Catawba
Investigator: Robertson. Bandy State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ® NO E] Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ? No ® Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ? No ® Plot 113:4900-5200 series
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Ind at r Stratum Dominant Plant Species Indic ator Stratum
1. Acer rubrum FAC tree 9. Sambucus canadensis FACW- sapling
2. Ilex opaca FAC- tree 10. Mikania scandens FACW+ vine
3. Liquidambar styraciflua FAC+ tree 11. Woodwardia areolata OBL herb
4. Nyssa sylvatica FAC tree 12. Lobelia cardinalis FACW+ herb
5. Viburnum nudum FACW sapling 13. Eulalia viminea FAC+ herb
6. Cornus amomum FACW+ sapling 14. Impatiens capensis FACW herb
7. Alnus serrulata FACW+ sapling 15. Osmunda cinnomomea FACW+ herb
8. Lindera benzoin FACW sapling 16. Ludwigia palustris OBL herb
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAG). 100
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs
? Other
? No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: 1-2 (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit:2-5 in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0=5 (in.)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators:
® Inundated
® Saturated in Upper 12"
® Water Marks
? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns In Wetlands
Secondary Indicators:
® Oxidized Roots Channels In Upper 12"
® Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
? FAC-Neutral Test
Remarks: Some morphological adaptations including buttressing and root modifications / lenticles.
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Worsham Drainage Class: Poorly drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): (Wo) IVic Endoaquults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes E] No ?
Profile Descriotion:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-10 A 10YR 4/1 / sandy loam
10-20 B 10YR 6/1 / sandy clay

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
® Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
W t 1 LANIJ Llt 1 tMM11VA I IUN
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes [D No ?
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ® No ?
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes [D No ?
I Remarks:
tlr7U 1 V / ubub / lmhu,
i
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: MacLeod Lake Date: 11/2004
Applicant / Owner: R&L MacLeod County: Catawba
Investigator: Robertson. Bandy State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ® No ? Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ? No ® Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ? No ® Plot ID:Highground
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species I ndicator Stratum Dominant Plant Species In is or Stratum
1. Acer rubrum FAC tree 9. vids spp. FAC vine
2. Lfquidarnbarstyraciflua FAC+ tree 10. Toxicodendron redicans FAC vine
3. Liriodendron tulipifera FAC tree 11. Eulalia viminea FAC+ herb
4. Quercus alba FACU tree 12.
5. Comus flodda FACU shrub 13.
6. Ilex opaca FAC- shrub 14.
7. Rosa multiflora UPL sapling 15.
8. Ligustrum sinense FAC sapling 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAG). 63
Remarks: Midslope community classifies as a mesic mixed forest. Some areas are grazed.
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
? Other ? Inundated
? Saturated In Upper 12"
® No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
Field Observations: ? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit'+40 in.) ? Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
? Water-Stained Leaves
0 Local Soil Survey
Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: +40 (in.) ? FAG eutral Test
O Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: No hydrology present.
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Hiwassee Drainage Class: Well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Rhodudult Confirm Mapped Type? Yes El No ?
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-6 A 5YR 4/4 / loam
6-35 B 2.5Y 3/6 2.5Y 416 common/faint clay

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content In Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking In Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Not a hydric soil.
WY C 1 L.ANU Ur- 1 CnM1114A 1 IvN
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ? No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ? No
I Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes ? No
I Remarks: Typical conditions at and below
mid-slope. At times extending into floodplain.
rr iv 1 v / U,Ua / IV Mvzi
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: MacLeod Lake Date: 11/2004
Applicant / Owner: R&L Macleod County: Catawba
Investigator: Robertson. Bandy State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ® No ? Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ? No ® Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ? No ® Plot ID:nonreaulated
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species 1ndWWo r Stratum Dominant Plant Species Indlcator Stratum
1. Acer rubrum FAC tree 9. Sambucus canadensis FACW- sapling
2. Ilex opaca FAC- tree 10. Toxicodendron redicans FAC vine
3. Nyssa sylvatica FAC tree 11. Viburnum nudum FACW+ sapling
4. Liquidambar styraciflua FAC+ tree 12. Eulalia viminea FAC+ herb
5. Fraxinus pennsylvanica FACW tree 13.
6. Betula nigra FACW tree 14.
7. Lindera bermoin FACW sapling 15.
8. Asimina triloba FAC sapling 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 100
Remarks: Typical of floodplain areas that are seasonally wet.
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs
? Other
® No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: +14 Lin.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: +14 (in.)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators:
? Inundated
? Saturated in Upper 12"
? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators:
® Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
? Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
? FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: No strono indicators of
not characteristic of wetland areas.
4
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Worsham variant Drainage Class: Poorly drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): (Wo) Typic Endoaguults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ® No ?
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
00=7 A 10YR 412 5YR 4/4 many/distinct sandy loam
7-20 B 10YR 6/2 2.5Y 4/4 few/distinct sandy clay

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Soils seem to be stratified with overwash from eroded gullies in the vicinty of the project
fA/rTM AA\!? ear-T?w?????
¦. a- . A-AIw va_ r ?.nmrnr? r wl?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ? No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ® No ?
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes ? No
Remarks: These areas are located within the
floodDlain of CH 100 and are Dositively drained
by the streams which are entrenched. These
areas are being drained under the existina
conditions.
r'r7V 1 V / U?hS / IV"u-N
Mitigation Proposal Information
Conceptual Plan at the Catawba Country Club in Newton

.`, 'Af uno 1emL a 0
Pa,o.zd sao nosag xal 1K Nrid of W ?-
®' :.. 'IHRILd3DNIO0 ;"II x
40af0ad a)E'I PoaZasW d?
- ?!? a ';?? .III ?.•\, ',, •
4 ? ? .1?"i t i? .? 101: +•`\J,? I'?, ? l _: \ ?
' l
i _ ?•\ 8888iiiiSSSS
\ - 1
l.a.

\
lllllllllll 11 ,
'
-
, .
-
`
1111111 llllllll ,
,
uauanuwun
l
i ' -

\
llI
lllliltl1l1l1l1i1l1l11lltl1l1l1!lll1
l
+
\ l •'
i
v
,
Il1111111111111111111 ,• ?l , + -• '
lllllllltllllt111111 - l `f'
-
\ , ' , ? '
`
,
_
llllttitllll 11 - ` {
\
\ \
II llllW
- Illy I' 1111
(fill(

lllt , .
iiMl
••
'Mill

_
???pqq
it:

Mill itilll
' llitlltlliltltllil ,
litlllititlllt ttittt '
/ Illlilttllilllit?tlitll `? .I ? / , i, \ t ? \
i
lilt 111111
ll1tI111illlltl111it1 / t'y I ,'1 ? \ `\/ • ?"? ~ ? _
lliilllllllllltl tll \i?\ - ? ,
i untiltllililtt ;1 `.I \ 'i ; _ \ \
utttutttt t ,;?; • , \ ? •_? \ ?? ? t
1 llttllti111ttt ?f ? ?\;-•-, \ '-.,.?`', •• \ \!`?-.!y t' i' ` f \
lilll?itll ; _ ? t
. lllil tilt ;
ttmm 4?\ \ ?.? t '?
\ ? o ? llillii \ M1 `\ \
t till ,\ •?\ t?? } I, '? \ \, ' ?-? .?
Z.j
v
716
m it
?" m m
03
} s•,. :� i ' ham, a .��',. �#' +'���'.,w .
R
ZE
r€
7., �{;�l Ki�i�r'�.. , �-� '� yi � x�+ .' t 4;t s•'��, t+'r� � � � �` , a;
"'J' .. � i �e trt�Ki j�"<a'Y�.:��-{ +i � t ��. �4 �yl x �^ 9 a , �i••�3 .,', � �
_ .+ t` 'i�4��• _ •, ti.Ki ,�` � '�-v`c�'Y4t,r '..', 3+��,� � jr ��.
s r X$
d � a
- d t - � y , ! '�S %'nit "f� �'�` �` � ��_ - / ,• ' '. ' s- ,1 � '5.'�
){iz
:.4
fit
-
/ h 'k
+ � _ yam+ .� X =, t� '�`—�•v-x 1 � �° �• at � � i« �>. i,; � R'S e,. � � �" p •�'i _
_ ' t . �,s %' 4 � d'"y '( . ! �•'. y y,:, � � ass ?- '. � t �tj• P� V r '� fi .� -
g� 1;. � •fro s � - r � � V �i�P � � �� � j
�` !;, �� r :, � y R i�Rr ' J.« t L. � `•S�� � t �,4�i� _y _ar,�. { a�y���'y-' �: '� �"t' ,
I & ✓ / ��yi � •��� '. �';l'G���'"r� �.a�'�+q:�b �� } � er �',,•+YY�_m �Y�,ti -
t 4
twi
J �=
, qq
Y . Q.

s�,11 - %/�t•,`� �'�'�� y [��JI �y{ �r X32 ��," �i �y.� :�yF h.S�;r
t
lit
77
NR
._� , ��' i��'lr�.c`� � , �'"' -: ` , yY' .+ tj4'.,l�F. ►`.�f..',a. �1„Is.yrs"'��PF"-' - _ . �-.�� r'.
Nv
j
F q
+'..'� £ 4 j` '�Ii57 i- •ham �'. 11 k i
• 4
fill
At
9 • ;7FA
sm-
- km
tiP b• � � 3 }� ...yam. ,.^ a 3 � �

J
CO
0
U
N
U)
r?
C
9 f,!
J7 /?
k A- 10
tr'.j .mot ;`?t?,? ??` VV ?? ; ??-??, ,?
1
' ?? 1:lJ ^) r J+si
NN,
1 :
i _ f/ 1 1? UI
L k??t
Al,?
71
c
ti ?
r1
(? J `\ '-?\?.ewL^J" 1 Res ? I ? ? ) `/ ,'? fiJ`'?? ? ? ? ?b \ \„ r ?? I c ? \ Y`
tt r
e4?
7°W
Name: HICKORY Location: 035'39'16.75' N 081'18'17.5T' W
Date: 3/28/2005 Caption: MacLeod Lake Project
Scale: 1 inch equals 4000 feet Potential Mitigation Site
Catawba Country Club C)O C)l
Copyright (C) 1998, Maptech, Inc.
i
O?O? W A T?9QG
r
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
February 24, 2005
Mr. Bob MacLeod
R & L MacLeod Investments
P.O. Box 320
Denver, NC 28134
Dear Mr. MacLeod:
Subject: MacLeod Property
DWQ 05-0007
Catawba County, NC
On January 3, 2005, the Division of Water Quality received your application for the proposed
development of the subject site. The development plan included the construction of a ski lake, which entailed
approximately 1556 linear feet of impacts to streams and 1.6 acres of wetland. Both will require mitigation.
The following options are available for satisfying the mitigation requirement associated with this project:
a) Payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), provided EEP will
accept the responsibility for conducting this mitigation work, or
b) Preparing and implementing an approved stream mitigation plan (stream preservation,
enhancement, and/or restoration).
Until we receive notice that the EEP has accepted responsibility or a mitigation plan has been submitted
and approved, this project will be placed on hold pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0506. If you have further
questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Alan Johnson at [phone] or Ms. Cyndi Karoly in
Raleigh at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Surface Water Protection
Regional Supervisor
cc: Cyndi Karoly - Wetlands Unit
Amanda Jones - USACOE
Wetland/Natural Resources
Land Quality -- MRO
Central Files
@ I.1 s..•
MP'R 2 @
t?Dl:;q[-; _ r
"`yLt11,s3 F,s 1 7 t 1 V
(tt(C"!:'Att'
CH
dne
N Carolina
Naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us FAX [phone]
An Equal 0pportunitylAffirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper
FW: MacLeod, Catawba
Subject: FW: MacLeod, Catawba
From: "Ron Linville" <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:53:32 -0500
To: "Cyndi Karoly" <[e-mail]>
FYI
-----Original Message-----
From: Jones, Amanda D SAW [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 9:47 AM
To: Ron Linville
Subject: RE: MacLeod, Catawba
we've told them they need to submit an IP. Most recent news is that the seller pulled out for the tract that he was
proposing to use for mitigation so not sure what the future movement will be. Will keep you posted. You may just
want to send some general comments and then we can follow up with more specific after a meeting. Contact
Jennifer Robertson (consultant) at wnrinc(aD_aol.com to make sure she includes you for any upcoming meetings.]
think she's trying to schedule one with USFWS.
Amanda D. Jones
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
828-271-7980 ext. 231
fax: [phone]
-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Linville [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 9:43 AM
To: Jones, Amanda D SAW
Subject: MacLeod, Catawba
Is there any movement on this permit? I've been holding off WRC comments until we do joint site meeting.
Didn't you change permit to IP?
1 of 1 2/20/2005 1:03 P
Re: Combined Tracking and Tardy Notice for Regional Offices, 2/2/05
I
Subject: Re: Combined Tracking and Tardy Notice for Regional Offices, 2/2/05
From: Alan Johnson <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 16:10:22 -0500
To: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
05-0007 Macleod Lake. The COE is going to have them submit as an IP.
will look for 04-2060. Not sure if it is here or not. If it is it should go out
in the next couple of days.
Cyndi Karoly wrote:
Good afternoon folks. First of all, I'd like to tell you about a new
employee here in the Central Office. Her name is Laurie Dennison and as
of Feb 1, 2005 she has filled the position Mike Horan vacated. She will
be assuming the administrative duties he handled, including creation of
new files, logging in of information into the Filemaker database, will
be a member of our BIMS design team, and many other tasks. She has
tremendous organizational skills and I'm really excited she's here now
to help us get the house in order. She is getting up to speed very
quickly thanks to Rob Riding's assistance. Unfortunately for us, Laurie
won't be able to attend our annual meeting in two weeks due to a
long-standing conflict. (Fortunately for her, however. Have fun in the
tropics Laurie, and pity us poor fools sitting in a conference room
during the gray days of February.)
Below is the list of tracking and tardy projects for this week. The
tardy projects are in bold and labeled as Tardy. Based on my anecdotal
obervations of the file volumes in the cabinets, it appears that under
our trial triage delegation the RO's are churning through the
applications more efficiently than Central did. Please check over the
list of projects for your region and advise me if you have not received
any particular application, or if there are other project updates we
should be apprised of in Central. Please continue to keep me in the
loop on these files. Eventually when I get my old position filled, I
expect to transfer some of my old duties on to the new person, once
he/she has a chance to get through the learning curve.
Raleigh:
none (although theres a wave on your way next time...)
Mooresville:
05-0016, Riverwalk Subdivision, Phase 2A, Cabarrus Co., NW12 1/5/05
3/5/05
05-0007, MacLeod Lake, Catawba Co., NW39 1/3/05 3/3/05
04-2060, Klaus E. Krueger, Gaston Co., GP30 12/29/004 2/26/05
i
;Wilmington:
05-0015, Hidden Shores, Brunswick Co., CAMA 1/5/05 3/5/05
04-2058, Juniper Creek Tract, Brunswick Co., NW39 12/29/04 2/26/05
Asheville:
04-2057, Maggie Valley Resort, Haywood Co., NW33 12/29/04 2/26/05
Washington:
04-2050, Carolina Colours, Craven Co., NW14 12/29/04 2/26/05
05-0004, Pine Island Dune Restoration, CAMA 1/3/05 3/3/05
04-2052, Otter Point, Dare Co., NW14 12/28/04 2/25/05
05-0003, Hattie Creek Landing, Dare Co., NW14 1/3/05 3/3/05
04-2062, Coastal Land Development, Perquimans Co., CAMA 12/29/04 2/26/05
*Winston-Salem:*
*Tardy***04-1994, Jeffery Baker, Ashe Co., IP with Public Notice recd
12/16/04, goes statutory 2/13/05***Please advise of conditions you would
of 2 2/2/2005 4:16 P
Combined Tracking and Tardy'Notice for Regional Offices, 2/2/05
like added to the Individual Cert
Fayetteville:
Tardy***04-1995, Pope AFB, Manchester Road Spill Gates Repair,
Cl:...berland Co., 21v,,118 12/15/04 2/13/05
*
Alan Johnscn - Alan. ucl•zson?r_cmail.net
%TITLE%
North Carolina Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources
Div. of 'rater Quality
919 1. Main St-
Mooresville, ::C 28115
Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Alan Johnson <Alan.Johnson?°ncmail.net>
°`oTITLE°.'a
Div. of NVater Quality
NC DE\R - Mooresville
Z of 2 2/2/2005 4:16 P
Triage Check List
Date: 1i4i05 Project Name: MacLeod Lake
DWQ#: 05-0007
County: Catawba
To: Alan Johnson, Mooresville Regional Office t
60-day Processing Time: 1/3/05 to 3/3/05
From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone : [phone]
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks !
IHAUS Your Hometown
Print, Copy & Sign Shop!
ThePrintNaus. corn ?
r
Aw D LP i\ l 2 S CJ"? ?' t ?'?
co VD?- J?Dr
" Yoo res'J. K?
?Ia3t713c VlEle ?xaV Va
641 North Main Street 509 Asheville Hwy., Suite B
(3x10 mile North of Courthouse) (in the New NAPA Auto Parts Center)
Tel: 828-456-HAUS Tel: 828-586-HAUS
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
FILE COPY
46 S•y# 'ji F
Wetland and Natural Resource
'Consultants, Inc.
December 28, 2004
Mrs. Amanda Jones
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801
RE: MacLeod Property DEC 0 3 2005
Catawba County, North Carolina
DENR - WATER QUALITY
1rYETUJdDS AND STORFRWATER BRAPICH
Mrs. Jones: .Q 5000
!
The project proponent, Mr. Bob MacLeod, has directed us to compile and submit the
attached Pre-Construction Notification for Nationwide Permit 39. The application package
includes narratives that describe the proposed impacts to Water of the US. Also,
included in the narratives is an assessment of avoidance and minimization as well as a
mitigation proposal for unavoidable impacts.
There are topographical USGS maps, an aerial photograph, a soil survey, and mitigation
photographs for your reference. Also included within the package are copies of data
forms for the wetlands and streams that have been delineated and surveyed on the
property. You will find wetland impact maps and a mitigation map within the application. -
Included with the package is a full size copy of the wetland delineation map and the
wetland impact map for your review.
Please call me at 828 / 712-9207 with any questions that you may have.
Best regards,
JAN ®.? 4
®Eti ?oG,y
innifer Robertson P 6V r?s'osTQy
wgrFRB?
RECEIVED
Cc: Bob MacLeod Cyndi Karoly
PO Box 320 NC Division of Water Quality
Denver, NC 28704 2321 Crabtree Blvd
Raleigh, NC 27604
Newton Office Clyde Office
PO Box 224 wnrinc.com 217 Paragon Parkway, # 142
Newton, NC 28658 Clyde, NC 28721
828-465-3035 828-648-8801
828-465-3050 Fax [phone] Fax
111 U I I "YMA UJ: 4?-' 1 f«4q0J.:?7lq r'u?t?tsu? wi+aircu? zuy - -
1 t R03 732 7701 l'. uu1
pFC-06' 04 (4P)N1 1 S : 19 L•'JD LI]A1N1J ..
i`2?06?20? 09.14. l ?tl44e?ss?tu
VLM&v I- b..
WSU a.. Q! and ?dq?I Ira1 mo4ourca.
4?a st? tallto, Inc.
DePOW9 Of ft I''•
Wutn
Nola Km 30wr ow , owsion
Po' am xw
WA?t11i tip" '.
NC 1 msw cP
A &r. 30 , %10 MO,dy?yryyr?
NMwd mmits CwmAvMr Im w m* an wl as ry. MdurltV the
pmmmft Of own& w 1mpmt w0ards aid Won of We US dot am r"uMed by
own Warr Act w id Vm Mom t MeMS A=
raww a rw SWft m tins an**w w be an said
aaum C,owa Mes, Yom. is
• 1?I?ih tMt?®L1?d ?aIP'pt?tf'Nk? ? ' r?q+11tffit t?P t? ±'{? Ca' 2
Adder; 14 t c hxp? ,? .°, ;L , q u t, ,. Z
Adds :
IPA NumbW,. ? {}Z 7}// ' ,,? ?/?
Dem.
(?"c".Woo
ho4M. F! 27 rce"APA #142
NWD.W
21
74-
4128.649 ®g .
Fat 4.
Fox
3
1-
r

office Use Only: nn Fom Version May 2002
057
JSACE Action ID No. DWQ No. V 0
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
L Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
H. Applicant Information
L Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Bob Macleod
Mailing Address: R & L MacLeod Investments
PO Box 320
Denver, NC 28134
Telephone Number: 704 / 483-3580 Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation: Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants Inc
Mailing Address: 217 Paragon Parkway #142
Clyde, NC 28721
Telephone Number: 828 / 648-8801 Fax Number: 828 / 648-8802
E-mail Address:[e-mail]
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps maybe included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: MacLeod Lake
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): Not a DOT Project
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): Catawba #36780288458
4. Location
County: Catawba Nearest Town: Bandy
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Take Highway 10 east from
Newton Turn right on Buffalo Shoals Road Site is east of Buffalo Shoals Road
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):35.6274569 N and 81.0925407 W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 211 acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): N. Fork Mountain Creek (WSW
8. River Basin: Catawba
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Site is approximately 40% open field and 60% is forested.
Currently grazed 'The site has two major drains with numerous small wetland polygons.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Proposed construction of a 18 acre recreational and waterskiing lake that must be 2000 feet
long and 260 feet wide The proposed discharges are limited to 246 linear feet of streams
and 0.396 acres of wetlands with secondary adverse impacts resulting from flooding. The
project is further detailed in the narratives.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
The project will provide a recreational lake and an area to practice competitive waterskiing
maneuvers to the residents of the proposed community.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Nothing has been previously requested for this project.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future plans for site besides those outlined in this application.
V1. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream

evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Proposed impacts will result from filling a stream and wetland to construct the dam and from
floodiniz of the same channel Single handled wetland excavation is not assessed as an impact.
Excavated streams and wetlands will however be mitignted for as an additional mitigation
measure.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Imp eating, gig,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at httn://www.fem&Pov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.938 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.396 acres fill (1.182 acres excavation)
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
lease specify)
Site #2 pipe for dam 246' UT to N Fork Mtn Crk 4' perennial/cows
Site #3 flooding 605' UT to N Fork Mtn Crk 4' perennial/cows
Site #5 excavation 1280' ITT to N Fork Mtn Crk 3' perennial/part cows
Site #6 energy dissipator 30' UT to N Fork Mtn Crk 4' perennial/cows

List each impact separately ana taenury temporary unpac:u. IMP=U5 1LW1UL c, vut aia UUL iuiuLcu w. u.rc.w au -.- -k - k,,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100 year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
Site #1 fill for dam 0.396 no < 10' vegetated (cow impacted)
Site #4 excavation 1.182 no <10, vegetated

* acts include but are not limited to: me chanized cl fill,
t
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
• • Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usas.eov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www,!gpozone.com,
www.mapguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 881' X1280' excavation)
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U. S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma) Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Water
Name of ody
(if applicable) body Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
, ocean, etc.)

List each unpact separately ana iaenury temporary impacts. unpacw mc,uuc, uw Q,o „Ut u„LLtcu w. UU, vA%,avauvu, ...11-15-15,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ® stream ® wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Dam/emnbankment
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): recreation and competitive waterskiing course
Size of watershed draining to pond: 30 Expected pond surface area: 18
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the' desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Reduced scope from two lakes down to one and design measures as detailed in the attached .
narratives. Drawdown structure will use low-flow and cool-water drawdown.
F
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strm,gide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or-map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Preserve 1885' linear feet of stream and 0.756 acres of wetlands
Restore 276' linear feet of stream and 0.4 acres of wetlands
Create 1.182 acres of littoral areas
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): Not proposing payment at this time
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): Not proposing Payment at this time
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): Not proposing _payment at this
time
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): Not proposing payment at
this time
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): Not proposing payment at this
time
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
if yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify Catawba)?
Yes ? No 0 If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. Lf buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 N/A 3 N/A
2 N/A 1.5 N/A
Total N/A N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
No Regulated Buffers Impacted
XL Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Large lot subdivision, Average lot in excess of 2 acres
XH. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
On-site septic
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
-14 In IA-
$-
-YPO - a4
??AMAA" ? A ,
pplic t/Agent's Signature' Date
(Agen s signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
i
Pro iect Purpose and Need
Mr. Bob MacLeod, the project proponent, proposes to construct an 18 acre
recreational and water skiing lake for the purpose of developing a subdivision
in Catawba County. There are no other property owners that adjoin the
water body that will be impacted. The existing pond will be retrofitted with
littoral areas and thereby provide diverse habitat for terrestrial and semi-
aquatic wildlife.
The proponent needs the lake to provide the central amenity for the
project. The lake needs to be long enough and wide enough to provide the
competitive skier opportunities to practice their skills.
The impacted streams will be diverted while the clean fill is discharged into
the stream to construct the dam. The 276 linear feet of impact at the base
of the dam will be completed concurrently with above the high water mark
bank stabilization. The 50 foot tall dam will be constructed with a 20 foot
wide crest and approximately 2:1 side slopes. The trapezoidal base of the
dam is 246 feet. The front of the dam (water side) will include 90 feet of
pipe while the back side will necessitate 136 feet of pipe. Approximately
100 cubic yards of discharge will occur below the ordinary high water mark.
The outlet of the pond will utilize low-flow cool water design strategies.
The subject stream is mapped as an unnamed intermittent tributary to the
North Fork of Mountain Creek within the Catawba River Basin; it has
approximately 80 acres of drainage. The NC Division of Water Quality has
classified the North Fork Mountain Creek as Class WSIV CA Water (11-97-
(2)). The subject stream has been assessed using the Stream Quality
Assessment Worksheet (USACE Wilmington, Version 06/03) based on prior
land use and forested cover. The entirety of the stream has excess
sediment load. The stream is generally in good condition.
Hard impacts will be limited to 276 linear feet of streams and 0.396 acres
of wetlands. Considered as an exemption, additional streams and wetlands
will be single handled excavated to create open water at the upper half of
the lake.
Avoidance and Minimization
The proponent has avoided hard impacts to the greatest extent practicable
by eliminating one of two proposed lakes and by proposing to construct the
dam with a low-f low cool-water riser-pipe structure. Impacts requiring
discharges to Waters of the US are limited to the construction of the dam
to create additional Waters of the US. All other access to high ground will
be completed with spanning structures. This will include two road crossings
to access the remainder of the property. The predominant impacts of the
project to streams are secondary in nature.
The proponent considered alternative development concepts and determined
that the uniqueness of the current proposal provided the best potential for
success. During the pre-development planning the proponent considered
constructing two lakes on the project; see attached development plan
(Original Plan) depicting the lakes. Though more favorable in terms of
economic returns one lake has been eliminated. The lake is designed for
recreation and competitive water skiing and therefore further reduction in
size is not practical. The lake must be 2000 feet long and 260, feet wide to
meet its intended purpose.
Cumulative impacts resulting from the proposed project are minimized
through the reduction in scope and through design considerations including
an engineered low-flow cool-water discharge orifice.
Mitigation Proposal
Summary:
A portion of the wetlands and streams not impacted by the proposed
development as well as those areas restored and created under this proposal
will be preserved under a permanent protective covenant.
Wetland impacts are below the mandated threshold for mitigation as
required by the NC Division of Water Quality. Though there is no specific
mandate for the mitigation the applicant will be off-setting the losses from
flooding with the littoral areas that will be created around the existing pond
and with the creation of the surface area of the impoundment.
t
Stream impacts can be separated into two separate classes that merit
differing mitigation ratios based upon the effect of the discharge and
subsequent flooding. Impacts resulting from the construction of the
impoundment result in a permanent loss of waters while impacts associated
with flooding result in a net increase in regulated Waters of the US.
Potentially more faunal diversity will be achieved by the construction of
littoral areas around the existing pond. Furthermore, the classification of
the reach into two separate quality ratings based on site conditions supports
that the mitigation ratios be adjusted based on the functional attributes of
the impacted stream.
The quality ratings further supports that mitigation is available, through
preservation, downstream of the proposed dam and results in a functional
lift that will increase stream quality. Mitigation for impacts will be
conducted along the 100 series stream which is the stream below the
existing pond. The reach is in the same drainage basin as the proposed
impacts and is within the project boundaries.
The dam incorporates design elements that ensure that water quality will be
protected through a low-flow cool-water / aerating discharge.
Proposal for Flooding Impacts:
Impacts to 605 linear feet of stream will result from the flooding of a fair
quality stream. There is currently a cow pasture within this reach of the
stream. The stream is not fenced off from the cows and there are
numerous access places within the stream where the cows actively drink and
defecate. The flooding will alleviate sediment load from failing banks.
Stream preservation is proposed at a 1 to 1 ratio for the flooding impacts
because they are secondary impacts to lower quality streams. The low ratio
is in consideration of additional mitigative measures such as design
considerations and a reduction in project scope.
The mitigation proposal for flooding streams is for 605 linear feet of
stream preservation on site.
Within 120 days of the approval of the mitigation plans the applicant will
provide to the US Army Corps of Engineers a plat that depicts the
preservation areas and the restrictive language.
Proposal for Impoundment Structure Impacts:
Hard impacts to 276 linear feet of stream and 0.4 acres of wetlands
resulting from the impoundment, structure will be mitigated at a 1:1 ratio.
The applicant proposes to restore 276 linear feet of straightened, ditched
channel below the existing pond and to restore 0.4 acres of wetlands
adjacent to this degraded stream. The applicant will also preserve 0.76
acres of wetlands on site. The wetland to be filled by the dam has also been
impacted by the cows because they have full access to this area as well.
The mitigation proposal for impoundment structure impacts to streams and
wetlands is for 276 linear feet of stream restoration and 0.4 acres of
wetland restoration on site. An additional 0.76 acres of wetlands will be
preserved as an additional mitigative measure for impoundment impacts.
Within 120 days of the issuance of the requested permit and prior to the
commencement of any work within Waters of the US the applicant will
provide to the US Army Corps of Engineers a Stream Restoration Plan in
accordance with applicable guidance. It is anticipated that the plan will call
for the following treatments and present the required technical
specifications in support of the proposed work:
Installation of J Hooks and Cross Vanes and other techniques to
reduce erosive energy along steep banks on channel 100
• Establishment and/or protection of a 50 foot wide forested riparian
buffer along all remaining streams
• Removal of an earthen berm that separates wetland series 1600 from
the adjacent channel which will both restore wetland hydrology and
stream functions where they currently exist in a degraded condition.
Within 120 days of the approval of the mitigation plans the applicant will
provide to the US Army Corps of Engineers a plat that depicts the
preservation areas and the restrictive language.
Proposal for Excavation:
The proponent proposes to preserve 1280 linear feet of streams as
mitigation for excavation. Mitigation for the 1.2 acres of wetland excavation
will result in the establishment of a littoral bench around the existing pond.
The littoral area will be an average of 40-50 feet wide with an average
depth of 12 inches at 15 feet from the shoreline. The littoral area will be
undercut and backfilled with 4-6 inches of floodplain topsoil to provide an
organic base for aquatic and semi-aquatic plants. The littoral area will total
approximately 1.2 acres of wetlands.
The mitigation proposal even though it is not assessed as an impact is for
1280 linear feet of preservation of streams on site and 1.2 acres of wetland
creation in the form of a littoral shelf around the existing pond.
Within 120 days of the approval of the mitigation plans the applicant will
provide to the US Army Corps of Engineers a plat that depicts the
preservation areas and the restrictive language.
E
Within 120 days of the issuance of the requested permit and prior to the
commencement of any work within Water of the US the applicant will
provide to the US Army Corps of Engineers a Wetland Creation plan for the
construction of the littoral benches.
Upon the completion of the project and the associated proposed mitigation
2161 linear feet of streams and 2.36 acres of wetlands and 1.5 acres of open
water will be under a protective covenant.
?t! ! , _ ?i Y
.c
i
w,. a r
a r-?
ca? rOr
o Co 19
t _
ail; Icy' 4
k t

?Ns
1
? ," ? sro ar1 ?, ?? • ,ara ? -1i I ?c= .:? \ ?' i ti? ( . ;l J1 ???
? -> ?' Vim.. A? ? •? / I .?lv ?_ i ./ r? ? ?? ?i 1 it ?i rl i /(l `•.?",? S (?-?
t >ti
era
L?i? \. p / ,/ O /?:ylli?w•?'i 2
? \
a `
V; I
t°
i
f ---I;L/ ?.1+>,•???? ? ?1 ? _ f l ? ! /?. ??p? v?i:I?? ft r` ,a, 1 1?
a 4 `+ i' f f D ? l ?? iv = ?I v r. rwJ ??}:?( ('i ?1 /{ ( J\
?...\\ r \?) .?r? ?' r `Ir - y'yy,l c \?•.` ?l i?\I, j// . _ ?` C \ f%
?v'?='1 /r ? _! •'?^'A? ? !? ? ?? ?t? ?. ?I IiS?lr i? t v1` li ,,. ?/II? ????
s ` 1 ?i ? ?' ` r r 11? /.? .?\?'?\?-? ?`? \\\ ?\?Y rr ?p?S?r 1?7?•'.j1 t ??` t-' ?" 1 _1?/,
??[[ ) ( I -ate ?? \.
`r
G 10. ,: 1 /i r 9 ?) ?I \• ' f IP ?}'' r/? d f i0
\ ••.? i^ y -. -__ ?I .._1 i1? \? 1 ? ? Ili ./! ? /\ i? 1 1,\` f 1 `l
JJ ,,\ ? - ?.._.._. ? 'I ?'' ? . fs'\? ?-? ,) ,??"? ? i ? ( c ?(! I l?/r ? \ `\tiJF v??-yl I ?.
r
? IIff((
LJ
X-V
'?l' i [:.? //? / 1•.?1?. t ? .. 1'I j?//-. ?. ll ?. ?l r/ ?,/? •t \`J f .\.? \ 1 !
,?l ?,? Bob F? ?\ J } .?- '.4? "'? \\L? `, ( 7 `r\) \? ? •iP ?r?l .? ? ?. _ l :.i9} ; _"_ i ??"
LT,
U !y.
?? i .r ? `` ??I ' I ? • ?_"??? .-- f fork _. /.? _ ,? )

v?,c r i rr!t1?'? tip' JN
Name: CATAWBA Location: 035° 37'38.57" N 081° 05'25.50" W
Date: 12/2912004 Caption: R _L MacLeod Investments
Scale: 1 inch equals 4000 feet Buffalo Shoals Lake Project
Catawba County, NC
WKIP Ins Ini° O RAC(°_•I nnl
V r? ? V
1\ Sif l ? f '?+
arday
.. * i ..".r"„" • .
r'' ? ti? ` ??''• ' • /437 ?.J ?
pproxima>?e B n
fj ? r
i
l t
t? J -_?11045
g
i' ,' ? f .'',.•? ..mss-"".- '`. ? j ?i• 1 ? ? +' { ?"v
r i
¦ ??. t{.,
eld
l P ``I j ,,,p' ? ? `? / f 111 I ?' f' '! 1'• 1 _- / ?? ti 1
7 *W
7 y ? r ( t:1 i{ i
Name: CATAWBA Location: 035° 37'38.57" N 081° 05'34.86" W
Date: 12/29/2004 Caption: R -L MacLeod Investments
Scale: 1 inch equals 1333 feet Buffalo Shoals Lake Project
Catawba County, NC
5n/n}o i.,.. },.ti * near-4 nn1
Copyright (C) 1998, Maptech, Inc.
Copyright (C) 2102, Maptech, Inc.
'' � ��, �� r•,if' *�— #, ' s. Y 'a p, a+=`ak������l �#�-'t45a � ����,4*,+t' �1 �
_ �,�, �`N "' -T S'ra ,R �..�°+ �'� ��� �' },p� �'�y �r'Y:..sfi" ... �g�'�s +� � �:�s "C• � •P �' # as , 4 t�'.
j # a
h. E,Tk.4 �•" Py, ��'�{'{ f`�F �hZ� Y�'r s1 .
SW
TW
Name: CATAWBA SW Location: 035° 37'38.64" N 081' 05'25.3" W
Date: 12/29/2004 Caption: R _L MacLeod Investments
Scale: 1 inch equals 332 feet Buffalo Shoals Lake Project
Catawba County, NC
Copyright (C) 2002, Maptech, Inc

MacLeod Investments, LLC
Lake Project
Catawba County boil Survey SneeT 3D
AsB CATAWBA COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
?MgC?2? _ 3? 7rU 'EC T ^ MgE2 '
i
c
Cw
30
A a a? ? ? r? l'i' a c2
411 A?L
A,6 Ak
MiC2
V j ?i? '? fL y i Y J mar J r - s"
6 -? ? ?? ,.?-_?ir . ? 3 x „? ' ? ?, ,?? ?? Ch ch '1 1 F_ `• * ?r s. :_
cme2
V c c2 _
mcx .? A ,B
A:e.
W ~ '
met
-1 -y mC2` b. ?? ?y C ./"?(?
? ? 1 !x
- - , ? - - Cm62-pi` d "? ! ?? • ti Bendy
f; g 62? Jy } tk. s<w i mYt 2
CmC2. McC2 • 1 lwCC2 ?...
:ALB e2 Isn ?;? mcu .,fx aacz v Metz °,? k ?tia` P
IV.
Moo
Project Area r r> «g?z "YBZ \~: s r
CnQ `-,
h
P
mc82 * ?l H D2 '_ / ?
Ase ? "-?s' Cm8 ?. 2
Cm82 ?, 4 K- ?.?'1 -?-
J. MCC" ?
kIC2 12 CmC As8 ?' \ I HsDZ `?. ' i R
f'e s- xp? ,,.., .T 11 A18. - Iry ?? HSC = 102 N6E,?'\ - Mw ..
\ mC2 , ? nE$ CmG ? \ ? _ ? ?' Hs L+2 ? } ."k ? " C
F
CnE3 .?`? ? ?? ,a Gmtl2
t !.- " . y` ra J d HsC24P y H f"1f
P? '{' CmB2 `}? CYn82 Mg82 '• ,. A' ( 0
?J ) lL? VO ,? ..? .C'' MY42 '"? ! 32 `S f f r '-\?>
Lm92 b . ~Y Rf? CmB2 /; CmC[ y? N5 ! Y, 7/
? 4( S
(4 GR,9.!' GnC1 1?,? MC821
4 ? F' .Cw cme2 ?:?,? ??\ 4z 8?' ? CrrBi Cme2? `.S He62 H?t9rE'{.. ' P
;Cnp[v.?*-t AsB -? •X ?_ nE3 J ?, f
r
?rj
N O
CC)
a,
N N I '_?"?? •-. ? ? ( 1 ` .`, - ?. . _'s.,k ? • 4F (v'? :D Di i ?r, ? J
I _j
x Q \ \? GK_. Jr M1
LJ , • • _ -7
e ate } Y A' ?•» }' r? '? t ( ?> i 7 ±11 4 1 I ,f'.j + f ` ?.
Ir ' it f?/ri \ , y+:??i+ RdLri{ .I1 :? I
IP
J4a , u , t 1
t - • t r W'? ?? :4J' O' \ , ??? t I.t r: 1 r ?{
uk111o V ?
F / 111 i ?*?/r y" _. 51,141
s} rd
71
"V } 4µf * rZ S t? / ?,4+? .'< ,? J
Ilk / ? t f _-
1 1 ( 1 r, ? ? t j r J^GO:
zz?
?? ? ! r w ? Air rr
u
r < IN A
it
If' U ,T U' m ?- _ 1 l?.l ? r!v 1 1 1 - ? - ??? , ~ , i t • r
L ire ? ?? < ? ? .? ? } \ \:. i. 1 r ?r-..-N-i r . 'y •' 11 ? t?
xi,
' QQ Q$
W W ,.
r?
i 1 r
??? 1/?' ??,) ??'.i / at` ?"'•3 ?,F. ? ,!/f!l ris ?(r{?tl Iiil it l???. ??i ? { -
L / • n ? i ,?jS?ji i
+r ? I 1N
..? ?? "•,? ?? ? ! r Ifs.
r//-.?? r1 i ?• ! III r. L k
v
47
M ,
-I ?\ ,11 ?r?,f i ;` 'R/f}? rq``• l l t?i?llt, ?? ? /? 11 'f t _ ?
1?: it
w _
_ I
5 x
? -_ ?fi 6 t I i r ` ,1f ,; .ry ?, % ?? r t •.,+ i i e 1 '- t `?"'' • ?? ?!
d
N
"Q U ?
l.J ?
Z06'i-S o ?1 'I. /
• I ? I
-t J . Ir =6 j
? A H 753 ; i
V1
Q ( .
M j
mmL7
let
r sm a f.
! o
or
4z!) 14
?r 4 Q
Lr) ?' -
N ? -? kn
CL j u +>
rl- d/? k u
.10
H \J
CL c E:
C? Ln d 0 !?.
i
Q) d ' ''-
? d %
d u
S X
l s ?.
(f 1 i a
too
44?

O
i
i o aA
.?•' see _
ooar
Vol,
•d
Cy-
d
N
? h
? s
N •d
o
•W• 4 G
? Op

..
j wI
-y
/ /it
-? l a #
w
3
_
?
`W
S i
8r f ? • ? i
'2
?yf? a
q/ / ?•?
it i ?? i ?1 ? ?•??!i
i r ! f ,
R[0 too[ w ° ff1`
C,
0
0
o ,
0
?Inj?? • „ r 'kj t
40,i !%X
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: MacLeod Lake Date: 11 /2004
Applicant / Owner: R&L MacLeod County: Catawba
Investigator: Robertson. Bandy State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ® No ? Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ? No ® Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ? No ® Plot ID:1400-1600 series
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicato r Stratum Dominant Plant Species Indicato r Stratum
1.Acerrubrum FAC tree 9. Alnusserrulata FACW+ sapling
2. Ilex opaca FAC- tree 10. Lindera benzoin FACW sapling
3. Lidodendron tulipifera FAC tree 11. Woodwardia areolata OBL herb
4. Liquidambar styraciflua FAC+ tree 12. Osmunda cinnomomea FACW+ herb
5. Ouercus phellos FACW tree 13. Eulalia viminea FAC+ herb
6. Salix nigra OBL sapling 14. Boehmada cylinddca FACW+ herb
7. Sambucus canadensis FACW- sapling 15.
8. Vibumum nudum FACW+ sapling 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAG-). 100
-Remarks: Vicinity of 1600 series photo showing CH 100.
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
? Other ® Inundated
® Saturated in Upper 12"
® No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
Field Observations: ? Sediment Deposits
® Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 01 (in.) Secondary Indicators:
® Oxidized Roots Channels In Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit:2-4-fln.) ® Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0_4 (in.) ? FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Worsham Drainage Class: Poorly drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): (Wo) Typic Endoaquults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ? No ?
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Inches Horizon (Munseli Moist) (Munse ll Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-7 A 10YR 4/1 / sandy loam
7-18+ B 10YR 6/2 / sandy clay

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
® Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wt: 1 LAND Ut 1 t:KMINA I IUN
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ?
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ® No ?
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes ® No ?
Remarks: Weland in upper left corner of the
photo. Stream does no go through the wetland;
it is adiacent to wetland with a berm in between
the stream and the wetland.
rnu I U / Uauz) i IWILOZ)
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: MacLeod Lake Date: 11/2004
Applicant / Owner: RK MacLeod County: Catawba
Investigator: Robertson. Bandy State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ® No ? Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ? No ® Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ? No ® Plot 113:4700 series
(explain on reverse if needed)
V FG FTATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum
1. Acer rubrum FAC sapling 9. Cornus amomum FACW+ sapling
2. Acernegundo FACW sapling 10. Alnus serrulata FACW+ sapling
3. Salix nigra OBL sapling 11. Juncus effusus FACW+ herb
4. Fraxinus pennsylvanica FACW sapling 12. Boehmada cylindrica FACW+ herb
5. Betula nigra FACW sapling 13. Eulalia viminea FAC+ herb
6. Prunus serotina FACU sapling 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 82
Remarks: Pasture areas with a razed wetlands. More mature specimens are located adjacent to
drainage features.
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
? Other ? Inundated
® Saturated in Upper 12"
? No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
Field Observations: ? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) Secondary Indicators-
® Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: +5 Lin.) ® Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: +5 (in.) ? FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydrology present at evaluation and vegetation supports that the area is wet.
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Worsham variant Drainage Class: Poorly drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): (Wo) Typic Endoaquults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes El No ?
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Muns ell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-10 A 10YR 4/1 / sandy loam
10-15+ B 10YR 6/1 few/distinct sandy clay

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon. ? High Organic Content In Surface Layer In Sandy Solis
® Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking In Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed On Local Hydric Solis List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Soils are strongly sulfidic.
Wt I LAND Ut 1 I:KMINAI IUN
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ?
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ® No ?
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes ® No ?
Remarks: Currently grazed wetland to left and
showing CH 400 in center.
NR
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: MacLeod Lake Date: 11/2004
Applicant / Owner: R&L MacLeod County: Catawba
Investigator: Robertson. Bandv State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ® NO E] Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ? No ® Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ? No ® Plot 113:4900-5200 series
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum
1. Acerrubrum FAC tree 9. Sambucus canadensis FACW- sapling
2. Ilex opaca FAC- tree 10. Mikania scandens FACW+ vine
3. Liquidambar styraciflua FAC+ tree 11. Woodwardia areolata OBL herb
4. Nyssa sylvatica FAC tree 12. Lobelia cardinalls FACW+ herb
5. Vibumum nudum FACW sapling 13. Eulalia viminea FAC+ herb
.6. Comus amomum FACW+ sapling 14. Impatiens capensis FACW herb
7. Alnus serrulata FACW+ sapling 15. Osmunda cinnomomea FACW+ herb
8. Lindera benzoin FACW sapling 16. Ludwigia palustris OBL herb
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 100
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
? Other ® Inundated
® Saturated In Upper 12"
? No Recorded Data Available ® Water Marks
? Drift Lines
Field Observations: ? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 1_2 (in.) Secondary Indicators:
® Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit:O-5 in.) ® Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: Q-55 (in.) ? FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Some morphological adaptations including buttressing and root modifications / lenticles.
------------
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Worsham Drainage Class: Poorly drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): (Wo) Typic Endoaguults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ? No ?
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munse ll Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-10 A 10YR 4/1 / sandy loam
10-20 B 10YR 611 / sandy clan

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
® Sulfidlc Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Solis
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed On Local Hydrlc Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
W t I LANU Ut 1 WIMINA I IUN
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ?
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ® No ?
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes ® No ?
Remarks:
O
rnll I L1 / lJ?l7J / IV IV I.?
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: MacLeod Lake Date: 11/2004
Applicant / Owner: R&L Macleod County: Catawba
Investigator: Robertson, Bandy State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ® No ? Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ? No ® Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ? No ® Plot 113monregulated
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum Dominant Plant Species Indic or Stratum
1. Acer rubrum FAC tree 9. Sambucus canadensis FACW- sapling
2. Ilex opaca FAC- tree 10. Toxicodendron redicans FAC vine
3. Nyssa sylvatica FAC tree 11. Viburnum nudum FACW+ sapling
4. Liquidambarstyraciflua FAC+ tree 12. Eulalia viminea FAC+ herb
5. Fraxinus pennsylvanica FACW tree 13.
6. Betula nigra FACW tree 14.
7. Lindera benzoin FACW sapling 15.
8. Asimina hiloba FAC sapling 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 100
Remarks: -typical of Iloodplain areas that are seasonally wet.
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
? Other ? Inundated
? Saturated in Upper 12"
® No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
Field Observations: ? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) Secondary Indicators:
® Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit:+14 in.) ? Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: +14 (in.) ? FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: No strong indicators of hydrology are Dres ent though the area appears wet Soils likewise are
not characteristic of wetland areas.
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Worsham variant Drainage Class: Poorly drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): (Wo) Typic Endoaquults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ® No ?
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
00=7 A 10YR 4/2 5YR 4/4 many/distinct sandy loam
7-20, B 10YR 6/2 2.5Y 4/4 few/distinct sandy clay

1
Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer In Sandy Soils
? Suifidic Odor ? Organic Streaking In Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Soils seem to be stratified with overwash from eroded Gullies in the vicinty of the Droiect.
Wt 1 LAND Ut i C111M11VAI IUM
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ? No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ® No ?
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes ? No
Remarks: These areas are located within the
floodolain of CH 100 and are positively drained
by the streams which are entrenched. These
areas are being drained under the existing
conditions.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
VEGETATION
Project / Site: MacLeod Lake Date: 11/2004
Applicant / Owner: R&L MacLeod County: Catawba
Investigator: Robertson. Bandy State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? yes ® NO O Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ? No ® Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ? No ® Plot ID:Higharound
(explain on reverse if needed)
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum Dominant Plant Species Indt or Stratum
1. Acer rubrum FAC tree 9. vids spp. FAC vine
2. Liquidambar styraciflua FAC+ tree 10. Toxicodendron redicans FAC vine
3. Lidodendron tulipifera FAC tree 11. Eulalia viminea FAC+ herb
4. Quercus alba FACU tree 12.
5. Comus flodda FACU shrub 13.
6. Ilex opaca FAC- shrub 14.
7. Rosa multiflora UPL sapling 15.
8. Ligustrum sinense FAC sapling 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 63
Remarks: _ Midsloee community classifies as a mesic mixed forest. Some areas are grazed.
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
? Other ? Inundated
? Saturated In Upper 12"
® No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
Field Observations: ? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) Secondary Indicators:
? Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit:+40 Lin.) ? Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: +40 (in.) ? FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain In Remarks)
Remarks: No hydrology present.
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Hiwassee Drainage Class: Well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Topic Rhodudult Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ? No ?
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-6 A 5YR 4/4 / loam
6-35, B 2.5Y 3/6 2.5Y 4/6 common/faint clay

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed On Local Hydrlc Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain In Remarks)
Remarks: Not a hydric soil.
VVC 1 LANU UM 1 CMMINA11UN
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ? No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ? No
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes[--] No
Remarks: Typical conditions at and below
mid-slope. At times extending into floodDlain.
1. "I 519 J I I IKI?\ / NFiI a
Above and below are photos of degraded stream channels that will benefit
from restoration required as part of the permit request.
kV '
?' „, a
) kA
~ I 1 I'+9.81 ~1 V ` V 1 ~ vv ~ ~ ~ I ~ 1 ~ \ v v\~`Sd ~ A I I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ \ 1 ~ 1 ~ l 1 ~ A ~ ~
\1 ~ 1 v V ~ ~ ~ I ~ I 1 V ` v ~ 1 ~ ~ 6 D I I ~ 1
~ I ~ i 9p 1 1 ~ J 1 ~ \ ~ ~ V b I ~ ~ 1 I ~ 1 v e ~ ~ ~ 0 1 1~ ~ ~
~ ~ ` tit i.a6A v I I A- ' ~ \ ~ t ~ ~ A ~ I ISM 1 I I 1 I `v ~ 1 ~
1 ~ ~ I v f ~ ~ 7.61A I A ~ \2771 ~ l ~ ~ I ` ~ ~ _ - - I \ I v ~ ~ I i vvv v
/ 5. 7A ti _ 1 V A ice, A ~ C\ Y\MARKET I II / ~ ) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V 1 V ` ~ V A V ~ 3 7 ~ A \ (355 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ \
~ il~v S ~ ~ v ` 103 / ~ ~ 1 ~
~ ~ / r ~ ~ \ A / I / / , ~ / ~ V 1 ~ ~ ~ \ ~ L+ R CO ~ ~ IS / ~ ~ 1 1-~ e.2iA ~ / ? I I A~ \ ~ / ~ o / / / / ~ V ~ ~ 1 1 ~ v ~ \ ~1~~
~ ~ s I i t o ~ i l l, ~ O ~ 1 I I o ~ / / ~ I v ~ I 1 1 ~ '
14 ~ J ~ i ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ / I I ~ ~ ~ V A,COST I I I / ) I l r A I I I I ~ _ I 1 I I m ~ ~ I , i ~l ~ ~l
I ~ / ~ ~ip~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ l~ i 1 ~ aot~ a°'~~ V ~g~~. ~ Avg ~ I / I ~ I ~ r-~__ v ~ Iii I ~ \ I / ~ I \ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I~, ~ ~
/ / ~ r / I ~ / v . ~ ~ ~ r 1 I ~ I I i I / ~ I I \ I I I '~i ~ l ~ i i
~ ~ I I I ~ v ~ I r~ ~ sa I I ~ ~ ~ v ~ I I ~ 1 I 1 / • ~ ~ l I o I ~ \ v A v /i~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~
/ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ / ~ ~
\AV\ KET ~ ~ ~ / 0 \ ! ~ \r _ ~ / i / \ r f \ 1 v ~ i / / 299z o~ ~ I I \ C ~ / ' I .i~ ~ / ~ I ~
I i ~ - I ~s v Ao ~ ~ ~ A\ _
l \ O - / o / ~ vA V - / ? iA ~ / ~ I vV ~ v ~v
~ ~ v ~ / I , ~ v ~ v v , V A A L / A / ~ J APR\C0~ ~ I ~ A V ~ ~ A ~ - ~J ti~ _ ,-.~...r, ,
\ ~ \ 1 / / 5 ? 171 V \ \ ~ ` \
\ I , i i Jas , ! \ . \
I ~ \ 1 ~ ~ ~ I I I i ~ ~ ~ I l ~f
I ~ I / ) 1
I I ~ ~ I 1 1 ~ ~ i l ~ / / ~
I V l ~ ~ -1 ~ ~ ~ I ~V ' r / ' ~ G I / ~ i ~ ~ / / , f l -v ~ ~ / - A ~i ~ / ~ _J ~
i / ~ ~ / ~ t ~ • I r _ / v ' ~ i I II~/I v, r ? ,
/ / / I Y F . / / / / ~ I I r I ~r ~ , ' 1 ~ _ ~ ~ \
~ ~ ~ ti ~ y ~ / A ~ ~ ~ ~
\
i F ~ I \ \ I ~ I ~ I ` ti ~ ~
/ r ~ ~ 1 - I ? ~ I 1 ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ( ( ~ v ~l ---~1 ~
~ v A 1 ~ ~ ? , I v ~ r ) ~ ~ ti \ ~ \ \
n 1 ~ ~ ~0 J . ~ ~ / ~ I ~ \ \ ,
I l ~ 1 ~ I Q5) V ~ \ \ ~ V A ~ \ 9n I ~ \ I A\ \
\ I l 1 ~ t. l \ \ ti ? ~ \ ,
\ J ~ 1 ~ ~ ~
i
i 1
\ / I ~ 1 r I ` \ / ~ 1 ~ ! - \ / s ~ \ 1
i ~ \ / / / / / , ~ ~ / . TGP GF DAM , t ~ ~ 1 i ~ I ~ ~ / / / ~ ~ I Avv - n ~ ~ ~ 1 1
l ~ / / / / / / I i ~ ~ V ~ + - ~
I \ v v ~ , / / , ~ ~ ~ v v v U ~ v 1 ~ I ~ u 1~ ...J 1 \ \ \ 1 ~ V ~ / ~ - ~ ~ A ~ ~ \ V
v \ ~ ~ ~ - A _ ~ ~ v~ ~ v ~
1 ~ \ \ 1 ~ ~ f ~ A ~ v A ~ v
\ r-
~ \ \ \ ~ \ 1 . I 1 ' \ \ \ - 0 TL~ET ~TRUC~RE 1 ~ A M~ ~J AN ~ ~ ~ A
~~~I~T ~ r L ~ I ~ ! i'' ~ L I L \ ~ J I ~ t ~ 1 ~ 1 \ / I ~ ` . v - 1 \ \ ~ 1 Y ~ R IN T v ~T N U ~ N N
/ / I r / ~ I - 1 l~ ~ vvv ,vvv ~ v ~ ~ I A ~ 1 A v / I v / A~
/ ~ / ~ ~ I I ~ I ~ v ~ _ J,, D N N R ,AMY ~ Y .
A RE~/K C P RUN I i ,~2 ~ ~ V v ~ ~ 1 ~v ; ~ ~ / ~ R
/ I o ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~v 0,~ ~ v ~ \ ~ , i \ ? / ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ v I 1 50~9A / ~ ~ / ~ 1 ~ ~ U I 1 ~ ~ V ~ ~ V T ~ R A F A N W ~ N AN ~ T
v v, / 1 ~ ~ 1 v v9 J' 1 \ vv ,v I ~ ~ ~ I r I ~V 9 t ~ ~
1 \ ~ v ~ t \ I ~ ~ v v C' d v I ~ H
~ 0 ~ r i ~ ~ , I r I ! , , / / ~ ~ 'y ~ v ~ ~i I ~ ~ \ \
J I I I ..i\AV\FARM LSE 'Y \ \ ~ \
I ~ 1 ~ ~ I I ri I I I I ~ / ' ~ ~ \ \ ) \ I A ` ~ I ~ ~ I I I i I _ / / ~ _ 1 _ ~V ~ ~ V ~ v I / \ ~ v
~ ~ l ~ i 1 I ~ I I ~ I I ~ ~ ~ / i Q 1 ~ f ~ A I , 1 r I I I ~ I ~ / I I , IN ~ 1 ; ~VI \ v ~
- V ~ I , , I ~ 1 ~ \ ~ 1 v t 1 ~ I I I 1 F I ~ ~ ~ ~ t~ ~ ~ ~ i t I O 0 ~ v v I~ I I I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ t . l
~v 1 ` ~ I ~ I r I I. ~ ~ ~ A ~ ~ ~ I I I ~ I ~ ~ \ v v 9 ~y ~ ~ 1
I ~ v C' +Q r 1 ~ / ~ v, i l / r r l ' I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PRINCIPE; ~U ,~T PIP•_ ~v / / ~ I I M 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_-i / ~ r r rl ~ ~ v v ~ ~ v ~ Ir ~ ~~_J
/ ~ / ~ r ~ I 1 " ~ \ I I I \ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ , ~ / , I , i I ~ I ~
/ t t ~ r 1 / ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ L IT GF DING FQ / / i ( 1 1 \ ~ ~ GRADING FC)l~ DAM
QO 9s~ \~\FARM U9E r I ~ ~ r TGE QF DAM EV. + iAM NEV. 915 , ~ -
V ~ %72 ~ ~ L.- _ T ~ ~ ~ I , I 1 ~-50 FTH1GHDA'M T N1GH D ~ ~ I ~ ~p ~
I 6 v ~ / / ~ r ' ' I ) 1 I ~ I I ~ ' `v I ~ 1 ~ ~,,p y ~ l i~ i~ I~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~ W I 3.5 ~ 1 S E l~ ~ ~ J ~ y ~ g 5 l i i I
v I I ~ / 1 / ~ . ~ I ~ I ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ,s ~ 7 l I~~ i~ ,l , l ~ ~ ~ 1 \ J ~
~ ~ ~ ~ i r 1' I ~ ~ ~ ~ / / \ 4 ~ST i' ~ / I \ \ I / / / ~ 1 / ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ A I i i ~ ~
~ - ( ~ /~I I v ~ ~ seat v ~ i I ~ _ A - _ _r „ a ~ ~ ~ i ~ . ~ ~ ~
e ~ I I ~ ~ ~ I V ~ 1 ~ I ~ \FARM USE ro I ~ / t ~ - I ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 • ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ / ~ ~ I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ f i ~ ~ I ~ ~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ I ~ i 1 ~
~-v ~i I ~ ~ / I ~~v ~ V T1NG EHANNEL L b 7A3~ ~ ~ I 1 I ' , I I ~ \ ~ A \ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ I ~ A > ~
v ~ r I ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ A 1 A v ~ A r I I 1 ~ v t ~ ~ ~ i ~
I ~ ~ I ~ • A v ~ - I A 1 11 \ v~ ~ V ~ ~ i ~ ~ , i
o / I ~ I ~ v ~ ~ ~ ,.1 V A ~ ~ v • ~ ti ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , i t ~ ~i - ~ l ~ 1 1 r i i i ~ ~ i ~ l/i, ~ v i ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ \
:OST ~ m J ~ ~ I V 1 ~ \ ~ A V~ V v V ~V v V ~~-i~~ ~ti ~~8p Op ~ , cw ~ ~1 ~ 1 - i ~ ~ v v ~ ~ v A ~
~ ! ~ y ~ 1 ~ ~ v v v v A A Vt ~ I 1 ~ ~ l~ ~ ~ i r ~ i ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ i i ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ /ll ~ ~ 1 ~ r ~ l ~ ~
AAY\MMKET ~ I / ~ ~ ~ \ \ \ \ ~f y I i ! ~ ~ ~ V A, ~ v A ~ ~ v v V A~ v i ` ~A
1504 9 .6 A ET ~ / I 1~ • ~ ~ 23 \ ~ ~ ~ ~ V A A ~ ~ A f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i/ I 1 • ~ A v ~ V ~ V ` \ ~ V V \ II wc` ~ \ f
~ o v ~ ~ r I I ~ ~ \ \ v~
' ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ , 1 v \ ~ ~ v . ~v v ~i ~J v ~ / ~ V ~ ) v ~ ~ ~ ~ v o sa ~ / 1 ~ ~ ~v v ~~v i / ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ r i i/ i ~ k-i 1 ~ 1
l J ~ ~ , / I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ v ~ \ \ n / ~ ~ ~ i T~ ~ \ \ ~ v v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~
y i l / 1.194 AV MARK ~ / l ~ / n I 1 ~ I ~~BS i~ ~ ` ~V ~ ~ ` ~ V A ~ \ / A \ \ i ; / / ~ / ~ r / ~ s ~ ~~~v / + - ~ V ~ 1 ~ t
i o ~ / / l / ~ , I ~ i .J ELE 0 v v ~ OJ3J / r ~ - / ~ /J ~ I I ~ \ ~ I fp / N I / / ~J 1 I ~ ~ ~ i / ~ 1 I ~ i ~i I ~ I ~ A 1
~ / ~ I C 1 I / _ I 1 e ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ I i I ~ 11 ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ i i ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ 11 ~
I s ~ ~ , / ~ i / i ~ ~ I I I o ~ ~ I I I A~p ~ / ~ / , "v ~ / ~ / I ~ I I I iii / / ~ ~ ~ ~ I i ~ ~ ~ ~ l i ~ ~~i ~ ~ ~ I ~ I I ~ V
I cVAV\COST I c ~ / ~ ~ I N ~ . / ~ --v/ ~ / ~ v J / ~ I / ~ V ~v ~ ~ I I ~ ! I ~ i
~ 2179 I ~ / / /i ~ ? ~ I 1 ~ / ~ ~ i~ ~ / __1 ~ ~ ~ ~ / • ~ ~ I I I l 1 I ~ - / , ~ i ~ ~ / A ~ ~ I ~ 1 ~ / ~ , I , ~ ~
/ _ ~ ~ v i--~ I a - , J ~ I ~ - ~ , , l _ ~ ~ _ / ~ ~ I ~ 1 ~ I ~ / r ~ ~ f
~ ~ t ~ l - ~ ~ / ~ ~ r l ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ l i ~
~os ~ V ~ / ~ r r / I 2.t ~ V i ~ i' ~ \AV\uARKEr ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ , ~ / ~ ~ / J ~ ~ 1 ~ / n / ~ ~ ~ ,L ~ / / / I ~ ~
IS! MARKET ~ \ \ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ , \ ~l / J 1 I ~ ~ \ \ i / _ 2050 ~ / ~ ~ ~ 1 / / ~ i l / i? I ~ r ~ ~ - ~ ~ 1
/ ~ \ ~ \ ? ~ I / / / ~ ~ ~ / / ~ ~ / ~ ~ , l ~ i,~ ~ ~ ) I , ~ i
i t ~ 1 i / i
/ ~ 1 \ ~ A ` r ~ v ~ v / ~ J / / / r l i ~ x v~pTie ~~,a TILE ~ v v ~ ~ ~ ~ , ..v , ~ ~ ~ / / / ' ~ ~ / is / ~ ( i ~ I / ~ I ~ I I i~~ / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i
>p 9o THE \ ~ \ ~ t i i i l
R~ -f- ~ v 1 I ~ 1 ~ ~ l~' A l I ~ ~ - \ 1 ~ ~ i~~ ~.,--~1~• / / ~ _ ~ v 1 ~ ~ \ 1 / ~ / / / ~ i I / i ? , i ~ ~ / ~ \ \ ~ ~ i I / ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ - ~ , / ~ 1 1 \ ~ / I ( i ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ / / ~ ~ ~ ~ \ v 1 ~ I ~ ~ /
a'°e l ~h ,725 ~ ~ ~ 1 1 I , v ~ \ P~1,! ' ~ ~ ' ~N / ~ ( I ~ ~ ~ ~ v 1 I ~ v \ ~v F ~ ~~~N - ~ / / /
0 \ I ~ \ ` ~ ~ X23_ J `J ~ .A R FT I I ~ ~ - ~ ~ , ~ ~ / / i
/ ~ ~ ~ ~ i 1 I I ~ i , / / ~ ~ i ~ ~ / ~ ,+v &:u use i i ~ ~ i / i / ~ i / ~ / , A~ / ~ e ~ J ~ i i ~ l / / i
NCO 7522 I I 1~ ` 1 1 ` ` \ I ~ \ ~ _ 1 _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t .a5\ I ~ /
I 1 \ I \ I \ } ~ I 1 ~ ^ ~ - ~ \ / / 0 I 1 ~ ~ V I ~ \ I ~ ~ A ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~v A ~ 1 A ~ ~ II r ~ 1
~ ~ ~ ~ v v, ~ ' v ~ 1 1 ~ 1 1 ,1 l 1 ~v ~ - - i (l020~ ~ so2 ° ~ ~ ~ 2a~ / ~ v ~g58_-.v ~ V v, ~ 1 1 i I I I ! ~ ~ / / ( 1 v ~ _ I , I / ~ i
~ / l ~ I ~ A ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ \ I ! I / i l ~ 1 I I l 6 ~ - v _ - ~ 1 I III ~ ~ / ~ ~ i ~ji ~ / _ it ~ ~ i / ~ r ~ I ~ \ \ ~ ~ , , / - i
/ r / / ~ I ~ ~ ~ - v)~ , I ~ , / / / I ~ I ~ \ \FMM USE\ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~n ~ ~ I I I ~ f ~ 1 ~ / ~ i /
l I ~ ,-v ,1 ~ I I
~ V ~ v ~ j ~ ,2,r 1 v v 1 I ~ ~ , 1 1 ~ ~ A v ~ I . I I ~ vv A I~ I 1 ~ / ~ i / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-1 / i
1 v y~ T ~ \ ~ ~ \ i 1 ~ I I \ i / ~ i ' U I ~ . ~ ~ / ~ / ~ I i l ~ i~ / \ r ~ ~ l ~ ro ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ i cos ~
~ ~ 1 1 1 v. v, ~ I 1 / ,1 ~ / , ~ v, , I , I I , ~~v. 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 • $ / 1 A 1 J l- / 'l L
95
I I 1 \ I l / I J I l /70 / i l 1 i
V I ~ r f ~ ~ 1 i 1 \ 1

~ I ~ ti~v ~ I I ~ ~ 1 1 - v ~ v+ v
1 I ,.68A ~ ~ . ~ ~ , ~ t use ~ ~ ~ \ I , ~ ~1 % l I I I ~ I ~ ~ \ V A I \ I I v ~ v S 1 1 -vim vv v
2371 / I I ~ ~ ~ \ ~ A ! ~ A \ \ i l ~ ` ~ ~ \ I I ` ~ ~ ri I a7A I I ~ ~ v ( ~ 1 I ~ \ v~v \
\ \ \ ~ti s I I I / \ 1 1 , \ l \ , W55J S / ~ ~ \ , \
\ ~ ' I / / / / ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ , 3 ~ ~ ~ 0 ! / / ~ ~ ~ V ~ \ \ ~ 1 , ~ ~ I I I I o v ~ ~ ~
\ ~ ~ I 1 ! I ~ a / ~ ~ v ~ 11 ~-I I ~ 4' ~ ~ \ ~ I ~ 1 I I I ~ r I OST / V I I
/ ~ ~ , I , ~ ~ ^i ~ \ I I I / , - ~ Li / ~ r ~ ~ I I I J I / r I I ~ II
I r r I ! ~ ! i . / r I ~ 9-13 ~ / ~ J, t I I I ~ , \ ~ ~ / I \ ~ I
I ~ ~ / ? / I ~ ~ ~ v ~ i ! I 1 I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ . \ / I ~ / / I / I /SQ ~ , V I I I ~ ~ v t so I 1 I ~ ~ A v~ v ~ ~ 1 1 1\
V I I I / ~ ~ ? / mm F ~ ~I o Q ~ V ~ V ~ ~ / A ~i ~ I I \ ~ I I I / / ~ 1 9 0 V . ~nl /
~ \ I ~ / -\PR OSy~ \A \NARK ` ~ ~ ~ i \ \ J ~ JI
~ \ ~ ~ ? I / 299 ~a OI I ` i ;
~ ~ v \ / ~ \ ~ ~O ~ ~ / /DSO / /0 i I ~ v vA ~ ~
~ v ~ Z ~ _ ~ ~ - a. ~ kg80 - ~ ~ ~ \ vA v •
\ ~ - / \PR\CO T / ~ ~ ~ \ \ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ V i / 5 ~t 171 ~ l ~ / ~ ~ v ~ ' - ~ ~ ~ \ ~ I / i „I r / ~ \ \
I 1 r'9 / ~ \ ~ I
f I / / J
/ ~ , ~ - i / / I ~
-v / / / r ~ , ~ , / / - ~ ~ ? / i , ~ c-~
~v / ~ 1 ~ . - v, / I ~r ~M rye ~ ~ ~ ~ i I I I ~ ~ . r ~ 9 ~v ~ ,'1 .I. ~ ~ l i ~
I ~ • / r ~ ~ / I 1 I ~ ~ / ~ v v \ v
~\i l I / ~ ~ I / ~ ~ ~ ~ v
i -E~--~~ / i ~ v ` ~ Str S M t F = 6831f
~ . I ~ , ~ ~ ti ~ , , v
1 ( ( \ ~
~ l I \ \ / \ 1 ~ \ \
\ ~ r-> .
_ ~ v ~ I ~ v \ \ ~ ~ .74 ,AC e ~ v v v ~ . ~ v ~ - , ~
~ / :°7 !r(i~
1 / A \ ~ ~ v / ~ ~r ~ ~ - 'r~rl;: i
Str M~ S ~ = ~Stf I ~ ~ ~ I -
~ o ~ r ent' I - 4221f r-- \ t S~ ~ ''r wi1 ~~n 4i~ y it„tir.
- - ~ ~ ~ ~'~+wnr~~, 's~
r_ / i ~ v I d - 0.1,Ac~ / , ~ ~ ~ ~
Rt ~'1 / ~ I I , ~ . - ~ ~ l~
V ~ ~ ~ A - v ? v V v m ~ v ~ ~ ~ \ 1
v ~ _ l ~ ~ v ~ - - ~ \ \ v ! ~ ~ V ~ I I ~ y V ~ ~ v
nd C . 4 cry ~ \ , ~ I ~ v___ - ~ ~ \ v v
\ I ! r~ ~ 1 ~ ~ v ~ I - ~ • _---1. I v ~ v
~ _ ' ~ ~ ~ \ ~ - treQM e M nt = ~ 50 f
t a $ end E\ ~ ~ \ 9 _ ~ ~ _ \ ~ \
_ ~ \ L \ \ N N
4 ~ ~ ~ \ ~ r~
ROUN reaM D n , \ ~ \ R
/ 1 / I ~ ~ ~~.v \ v / I l , ~ ~ ~ , T
f ~ / ~ I ? ' /I ' ~v ` vvv I A ~ ~ v ~ ~v ~ ~ ~ - ~ y I \
I ~ , rti ~ 1 ~v ~ . . A v ~ H - .3~ A ~ v I I v et d B H
C v ~ ~ I r M M Q if I I I\ a e t~ ~ 180 1 I r - / ~ v v~ 9 I I I I I I / ~ ~ V A \
/ I i I I ~ c+\AV\rARU dse ~ ~ ~ v
I I +I I I I I I ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ \
~ , i , ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ A N
1 ~ I I I I r I ~ 1 v I I I r < ~ I I , v I q I I i( i ~ v v v. ~ \ ~
I I I \ . ~ \ / I , \ /
~ . ~ v2 I l ~ r l I I ~ ~ v ~ v ~ ` ~ ' ' I ~ ~ ` v I I 1 v
I I v I ~ ~ ~ v D ~ ' / ~ ~ ~ ' I I 'v ~ + ~ y ~ v ~
aoBi / , r I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ V I ~ B86 r r I ~ - ~ ~ , ~ St~eaM ~ Ment A-= 5341f
o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I > `~9 / Q~ 95) \~\FAftN USE ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ q I / 1 ~ \ 772.2 ~ / r ~ I L ~ / r ~ ~ ~--/'V ~ l V A ~ r , ~ ~
/6 ~ r ~ , I , v, v ~
(/~o / ~ / / , ~ l . m . / ~ I I , v ~ ~ r. ~ ~ a s ~ , ~ ~ 5 ~ ( ,a~ 1 ~ l ~ \
pl ~ //1~ i / / ~ ~ I ! ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ .i J ~ ~ti ~ ~ / r T ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ \ , ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ l; I ~ r ~ r 1 ' ~ ~ ~ I / I ~ i i ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ) ~ 1
SST ~ ~ ~ l - ~ ~ ~ / ~ / ~ Wiet arrpl - .79 cre ~ ~ ; I ~ ~ / / A , ~ ~i
~ / ~ / / ' r ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ` l
h~ I I 1 ~ I ~ ~ ~ / N I ~ I / / i ~ ~ ~ I I A ~ \ v 1 ~ ~ \eeRU use _ ~ / - r I ~ ~ ~ r ,~/i ~
I ! ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ , /3 I I I \ ~ . ~ A V ~ A ~V ~ , l ~ i 1 J I B ~ ~ ~ Ali ~ i/ i 1 ~ 1 ~ c ~
~ , I ~ I I ~ I ~ ~ ~ r I I I I , ~ ~ ~ . v ~ ~ ~ l J ~ ~ 1 ~ I 1 ~ / ~ ~ ~~~1 ~ ~ / , 1 I ~ I ~ ~ ~~,a ~ r ~ ( \ ~ 1 ~ , ~
c\AV\wsr I I I v ~ / v r I v v v v , ~ ~ ~ 1 I I ~ I 1 r ~ ~ \ , ~ ~ ~ / , , i ~ li 1 ~ ~ ~ / ~ i 1 P , _ / ~ I I ( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ i ~ I r ~ s
1 ! ~ I v ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ( C Yv FIRM USF ~ ~ v v ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ 1 ? ~ ~ v ~ ~ v, 'v ~ , ~ r I t ~ v / / ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / , / ~ 1 ) / I 1 , r ~ I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ I ~,i i / i
I ~ / ~ i ~i A
I ~ _ \ \ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ J / ! ~ 1 / , , , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I
/ ~ ~ r 1 ~ , / / ~ / I i ~ I l ~ 1 i~'111~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ I I I ( ~ ~ (
f ~ / / I I ~ \ \ • ~ I ~ / ~ i I ~ ' ~ ~ A ~ ~ Av v ~ v vv \A~ /
~ 1 v v , / / ~ i / ~ ~ i ~i r ~ /
/ ~ ~ - ~ / I r / „ / / 1 1. 1,
/ ~ ~ / / ~ ~ 1 ~ -r / ~ ~ 1 1 1 ~
` \ \ ` \ \ \ 1 I I ~l , i ~ I ~ ~ it ~ ~
/ _ / ~ 1 I I ? A ~ 1 ~ i t~ -
~ ~ ~ / ~ i / / ~ ~ ~ \ \ ~ ~t / ~ / / , ~ A ~ i I I I ~ 1 1 ~ t i ~ i ~ r i 1 / ~ 1~ ~ 1 ~ ~ r l ! ~ I 1 ~ A
_ ~ ~ l ~ .l J ~i ll, ~ ,~~i,
/ i - I I ~ \ I
~ / ~ I / ( I ~ ' I ~ / 1 i r / i / I I
i ~ l ? _ _ ~ ( , I I ~ ~ , ~i / _ ! ~ l 1 r I
t ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~,/rye I I 1 til l l!~; i ~ - ~ , ~,1 ~ ~
v \ ~ `vim ~ ~ - - _ / 1 v ~ I ~ ~ ~ / . ~i9 v . A.~ ~ ~ / i i I des a ~ ~ ~ ! / r ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ \ ~
1 \ ~~\v~e ~ ~ r ~ / ~ l - - ~ / , ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ I I I . ~ i . i r i r l r~ ~ X20 ~ ~ ~ i / ~ rr l ~ / I ~ - X15'
N 1 ~ ~ , ~ ~ _ v . , I I i t r ~ r ~ A// L-' ~ , I i ~ ~ / / ~ i ~ / u < i ~ ~ I r ~ 1 ~ / / ~ ~
I r . v \ - ~ ~ / ~ / / - ~ ~ v ~ - ~ l / l I ~ ~ / / 1 , ~ / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , I ~ ~ ( , , i ~
, ~ ~ 1 i r I / ~ ~ 11~ ~I / ~ ~ J~ I I , ~ ( r ~ ~ / / ~ ~ ~ ~ / / / I ! . / / ~ r ~ / i 1 I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , V ~ ~ ~ ~ J ~
THE TILE , ~ v ~ v ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i i v ~1 - R~ ~ ~ iC - ~ i I l / / / ~ / ~ ~ ' I r ~ i ~ ~ \ ~ A ~
~ ~ , I . i , v ~R / / 1 \ 1 1 ~ ~ - l~ / / ~ / ~ ~ I I I / / / / / / ~ ~ ~ /1 ~ / / I ~ ~ / / ~ 1 \ ~ ~ v ~ l i / ~ / / / ~ / r I / i 1 1 ~ ~ i
o~ ~ >>I ~ ~ ~ ~ ,rl/ ~ I ~ fi~N - ~ ~ I I l ~ / / ~ ~ / I / . .l / / i / ~ /i ~ % ~ ~ ~ l i
r ~ ~ r / / ~ / ~ / ~ ~ ~ i / / ~ ~ l r// / , ~ / , \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ( / r ~ ~ / , a I ~ / ~ / r ~ i
T __1 / / ,cos I I I ~ ~ __-v-- T., , / ~ ~ ~ i , \ _ ~ - r , / / ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ r / ~ ( l i ~ / / 1 1 ~ 1 / / ~ yp~ ~ ~ / ~ / /
/ ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ 01 ~ /
/ / ~ ~C+ AV 1~R~ USE / / } rv I I / / ~ ~ / ~ / o / I / ~ / ~ i / J ~ i / ~ / ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ , / / ~ / / ~ / +1 / ~ ~ / / r ~ ~ /
- _ \ .:r / i i / ~ ~ / ~ i i ~ ~I ~ ~ / ~ ~ i ~ / i / / i- rl ~ -
1 1 \ e r - ~ \ 1 I
1 86A ~ V ~ f ~ - ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ I ~ / / I / ~ I r ~ r r i i, - 1V ~ ~ ~ /r
i - - ~ I ! . . ! ~ ~ j ~ ~ , , J \ i i - ~ ' . / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ i /
/ / ~ f - ~ I Q/ , l y I \ ~ ~ \ ~ I I I I 1 ~ / ~ ~ I ~ `v I Ali l l l ! ~ / ~ ( ~ / ~ / r /
/ r w ~ ~ \ ~ ~ I l ~ ! ~ ~ ,1 \ Vvktu use\ i'~ v--~ ~ - ~ 2A ~ v\ Vl ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ \ i r ~ ~ ~f~ ~
~ I ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ I 1 l i I r 1 I I I • ~ ~ I ~ ~ / ~1(" i
I / ~ 2r ~ I I ~ ~ I r ~1 / v v I ~ v ~ ~ ~ ti v ~ ~ ~ I ~ vAV 1 ~ ~ r ~ ~ I - 1. / I I A . v ~ 1 I I / I v ~1 I~ I ~ r/ ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ r ~ i
I r A / ~ ~ \ / I vv ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ / \ v v ~ 1 _ / 1 I / I II v~~ ~ ~ ~ r 1 a I • / ~ ' 1 ~ ~ / ~ l ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ stir- ~ ~ ~ ~ ' r~ I 1 / I ,y~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ A` ~ I/ ~ l r r ~ / i ~ I~ ~ i~
~ w ~ ~ ~ i ~ 1 ~ / ~ _ ~ / ~wsy / / / l ~ ~ i ~ , r r , ~ - > , i / r ~ r / ~ i l~ i
I I I A ~ ~ , I v 1
I I I . ~ ~ I V ~ / ~ ~ r ~ ~v ! I I~ I 1 1 1 v V I I I I r~ l l~~ ~ l
I I I ! i 14 ~ / ~ ~ \ 1 I I V
1 617
s i \ 1 v
I l
I I ( \ \ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ i I s I
r--- - i r I 1 .g I I A FFA~ l 435.Sg I ! / FM USE

v ~ ` v 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ li I ~ r} ~v ~ \ ~v
v ti ~ I ~ t. v ~ ~ s ~ 61 0 v ~ J 1
1 7S ~ , ~ / ~ I 1 1 ` \ \ I \ 8.7 A ~ ~ ~ ~ I ISM i I I 1 ~ ~ \V A \ I v ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~i ~ v ~ • I I I ~ I I ! \ ,~v ~ ~ l
CV V\MARKET I / ~ I ~ ~ _ _ A A ~ ~ V (355 ~ / r I 1 \ ~ ~ ~
\ It• i / \ ~ ~ \ ~
~ r , I / ~ / , ~ / I ~ ~ 1 i v
I I I I - / ~ I ~ wf I ~ ~ 1 1 ~J I r I ~ ~ \ \,cosr I I I I
I ~ , ~ • I ~ I I ~ ~ ~ r' ~ r I I ~ 1
~ I~ i ~ ~ I i I, , A I I ~ ~ ~ r s ISO ~ v v~ v A J ~ I
-VPR Osy'~ \A \NARK ~ I ~
A ARKEf ~ \ / ~ ~ / v rs ~ qv Vv o ? ~ _ ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ - /
30 ~ 99 ~ 29 ~ ~ ~ i ~ V ~ I ~ ~v q / I A / v r . , ~ r ~ v ~ ~ / /
v C o I 7 ~ , ~ ~ ~ , \ ~ / / / _ h ~ r _ ~ ~ ~ , ro ~ A ~ ~ ~ _
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ iq ~ i / I V ~v vv \ is ~ ~ }g9B ~ ~ V~ v
? PR` CO /T ~ I ~ \ ~ \ / ? A F ~ ~ V A \ ~r-
~ \ ~
\ ~ I - ~ ors ti, i ~ ~
) r ~ ~ / ~ i ~ / I / i i a I ~ / ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~
V / ~ / ~ ~ ~ a ~ / ~ - i ~ ~ 1 i ? / / /
~ , 1 i ~ ~ / ~ - i I ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ r r
• ~ ~ - i ~ r { ~fp'~',/,
:1', I
~ ~ / ~ 1 ~ ~ • I ~ - ~
Y ~ i r , - \ I / S ~ ~ Iy
~AiF,i' VvATfz~~
~ryW $T~, ~u 1..
i VV . ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ . \ , _ ~ ~r~; I'fL~l~k
? \ ~ ~ I 1 ~ \ I ~ ~ \ ~l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ C ~ ~ `2
t \ I~
~ ~ ~ vJ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ i \ ~ I 1 i
I
J / \ v v~ i ~ ~ ~ \ v ~ 1 - v ~ ~v 1
A 1 - ~ / ~ ~ ~ \ v V ~ r i ~ I 1- ~ - A / l I ~ v l
--V r Ui r-I i v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v.
~ ~ / , / t ~ ? ~ ~ I ,v ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ / I I , ~ ~ v - ~ , ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ \ 1 ~ - ~ ~ ~ \ V ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / / ~ 1 ~ _ ~ \ ~
f~ ~n ors ~ ~ t-~ \ ~ Lit orQl ~ c ~ v
I ` I
1 ~ v ~ v ~ _ v ~ \ v ~ v, N v ~ v v~ ~ ~ i ~ V t ~ ~ ~ v N
/ M ~ ~ v-r ~ - \ 7: ~ ti J \ v D
\ / _ 1 - \ I o ,i l ~ ~ v v ~ v, \ ~ ~ R -
~ I I~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ I I I ~ v~ I ~ `v v T T ~ ~ I
H ~ ~
! I I ! I ~ ~ _ ~ ' ~ ~ , 1 ~ A vy~~. _ : v ~ ~ ~ v r _ I ( , / \ f , ~ 1 I 1 ~ ~ J ~ ~v ~ \ ~ ~ ~v ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ 1 J
~ , , I I r I I ~ I ~ ~ ~
~ ~ i , i I ~ / \ v 'vim i 1 I ~ I / c+\AV\FIRlI use ~ } \ ~ A ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~I i I ~ / \ v ? ~ ~ \
I I I I I I I - ^J / / i ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 v ~ v ~ J \ i
~ I I ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~i / 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ \ v A~ ~ I' ~ ~ i' i I l ~ I ~ I ~ ~ v
1 ~ \ I r I v I l l s ~ I ~ v\ 1 v I I , l v i , ~ ~ ! I ~ v ~ \
~ I ~ ~ v

~ / I ~ ~ I I ~ i ~ I v~ A
~ esl A~Ver~M use / / i r ~ ' ' v I r ~ r \cos~ rns r ~ I ~ 1 ~V / / , ~ ~ / P ~ ~ I
I ~ / l . ~ v I I 1 ~ l 6- \ ~Asr r / / / r~ I I ~ I i I I 1 1 v I ? ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ / r I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ v I ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ 8 5 5 i IJ, ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 1
r~ / / / ~ ~ I ~ I •oj I / , ~ ~ / , n. ~ I I ~ ~9~5. ~ / / i ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ 1 ~ i I ~ 1 \ I / / - - ~ I ~ ~ ~ I / 1 / ~ l I ~ 18 ~ I ~ ~ ~ I 1 / I I I ~ / i l ~ r ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ I
~ti ~ ~ ~ T ~ ~ \ 1 / ~ ~ / I ~ r r ~ I r ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I v z,, ~ I 1 I ~ i
~ ~ ~ ~ / ~st ~ i~ J , I I ~ 1 / / ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ l 1 I
/ I ' ~ v ~ - ~ r 5887 ~o V ~ ~ I 1 ~ \ \ _ _ ~ A ~ e~5 r ~ J _ ! I I ~v ~ / / r ; ' y~ ~ v I I I ~ ~ ~ 11 \ ~
p' rv I I / ~ ~ ~ ~ I A ~ \ ~ v ~ v AFARM use _ I ! I ~ i ~ ~ V ~ ~ t / \ `V l r I \ ~ i ~ 1 ~ ~
I ~ v v ~ ~ 1 ~ ~r ~ i ~ . v ~ 1 , •t ~ ~ ~ l I 1 I ~ \ I I ~ ~ / ~ ~ X11 ~ ` C A ~ ~ I~ ~ 1 t ~ ~1 ~ / ~ ~ r' J ~ I I, / ~ A ,A
I ~ ~ v v1 / I 1 ~ , I / ~ ~ v v v ~ v ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ i I I ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~ ~ I l ~ ~ 11~ ~ ~ A ~
C A COST I 1 ~ ~ I f ~ I ~ ~ ? '~v / / \ \ ~ ~ \ / 1 \ ~ C+ V FARM USf \ \ \ ~ ~ ~!t ~ \ / I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ 1 ~ V I ~ ~ I I / ~ ~ ~
/ I ~ I ~ v 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 \ ~J `v A ~ ~ v V ~ ~ ~ V A V i a m / I ~ ~ - _ 1 ~ l ~ 1 / ~ I ~
\ Q~0 _ ~ s, ~ v \ \ \ ~ i \V _ ~ \ v ~ ~ A ~ ~a ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ l / / ~ ' v / / ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~1, ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 1 I , , ~
of r \ ~ ( I A v v A ~ ~ ~t ~ ~ 1 1 _ I v v ~ v ~ ~ / 11/ ~ ~ ~ 1 I I r 1 11 ~ / / I I I / / / / / 1 I / / l \ ~ 1 I \ ~J / / / ~ I / l i \ I 1 " ` \ \ ~ r / I I I ; ~ l/, ~i , ~ ~I iii v / II~ , _ ~ / / / ~ ~ , ) ~ l I ~ ~ ~ ~
i ~ ~ I ~ ~ ' v V ~ ~ v ~ ~v v v, ~ ~~g0-y , ET I ~ \ ? A V A V~ v A ~
/ I l ~ • X58 ~ \ ` A A t ~ \ ~ ~ ~ / , / ~ ~ I r / / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ , i ~ i ~ I ~ I I / I I ~ ~ / / ~ ~ ~ ~
Y ~ , ~ ~1 1 I l 1
/ ~ A ~ / / / I / ~ 1 ~ I ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ , / / I i r f ~ r /i// / ~ 1 1 ~ ~
~ ~ ~ , ~ , .~t ~ I ~ \ / ~ ~ / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / /i/ ~ , ~ 1 I ~ v ~ I I~ ~ I I I I ~ / ~ 1 1 0~ ~ / / ~ / ~ ~ ~ l ~ I ( / / ~ I I I ~ ~ A \ ~
r s/ ~ , 9 _ ~ A r s9 / ~ ~ I ~ ~ v ~ V ~ / / r / ~ , I . / \ A 1A t - i/~ /i ~ I I ~ / / / ~ ~ I I I i~ / / I ~
I - \ I \ / / / i ~ r ~ \ / \ ~ C / I I ~ ~ ~ I / 1 ~ ~ I I ~ I i~ ~ ilk i/ i v~ ~ ~ r ~ l l; / I~ 1 ~ I / ~ % I ~ / / / ~ ~ I ~ ~
i / / ~ ~ / / I I . ) ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~i / i / i~/~ . ~ I ~ i / i ~ r ~ / l ~ l / i I ~ I 1 \ ~ ~ J / / Il ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ I I ~ I / ~J / << ~ i I I I - , , , / / / ' ) / ~ I ~ ~ / , ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ I I I , I III , A 9
/ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ( ~ - t I ~ i t -"V ~ i~- ~ I II f~~ r / / v A~ / ~ ~ i / ~ ~ ~ I / / / ~ ~ III ~ ~ ~ / ~ - - ~ J / ~ ~ ~ ~ r I , / , ~ / ~ ! I I ~ I I l/
m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I h l t Preservation - 735 ~ I ~ / ~ ~ i ~ I _1 ~ ~ I i i ~ ~ - - - - ~ I ~ i ~ ~ - ~ / / I ~ ~ 'LJ / / / / ~ ~ / ~ I ~ I ~ /i / I / I ~ 1 ) / / / ~ / l I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
/ i I ~ I ? , ~ J I • / / / / / 1 ~ ~ I I I r I / / ' ~ / / ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ J 1 I ~r / ~ / ~ / / ~
~ I ~ ~ I I / ~ , , l _ A- ~ ~ ! ~~r I ~ / / ~P~ ~ / / / 1 I I / / ~ ~ / / I I j i / / ~ / ~ ' ~ / / v-- ~ ~ ~ ~ / / / / / I I ~ I ~ i~// / ~ ~ ~ \ I(( ~ t~~ I l// ~ / ~ ~ I / ,
~ ~ ~ r J I ~ r~ i l I s ~ v r, i I r r I ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ / I / ~ I ti~~~
~ \ v ~ ~ r I l ~ ~ ~ vv ~ r ~ ~ v ~ ~ l ~ I l ! ~ i ~ i i / /ate ~ I I } 7 I / / / i ' ~ I I ~ ims / I ~ ~ i ~ / , ~ r ~ / / ~ j ~ / / I ) ~ /~j~ 2~ - ~ / j ~ y / ~ I I ~ / / / ~
~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ - ~s~n l e nt B Pros ~ o~ie~n - $e ve ed ~ , ~ ~ i ~ ~ I / ) I G ~ r ~ ~ I ~ / / / ~ ' / / / ~ ~ ~ III ~s ~ ~ , ) i ~ ~ . l 1 ! 1 i / / l ~ ~ / ~ / / / ~ I ~ ~ ~ r I i ~ 1, / / / / ~ ~ / ~ i
~ ~ Y Y - i ~ r l / i I r e tt I i ~ l / ~ / A ~ ~ I ~ / ~ / / ~ l 1 i ~ I r r. _ , , ~ ~ ~ , , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I r l ~i/ F M ~E ' < I I i I ~ ~ / ~ ~ / / ~ ~ \ ( - I ~ ~
\ r n 77 sed o U~ 'a 8 l r -ti.~ ~ \ ~ v ~ v`~ ~ - ' _ dpi ~ - ~ i~ i / / ~ ~ ~ r / I . ~ n ~ ~ 1 l / / I \ , _ ~ ~ 1 , l ~I 1 / ~ I, I ~ I / i ,i J I/, / / ~ , ;A ~ ~ i ~ ~
r ~ I ~ / / / ~ ~ ~ I ~ l~ ~ I / ~ ~ , / / ~ /
_ ~ ~ r / / / ~ v \ ~ ~ _ _ i r / THE TILE \ v ~ 1 ~ / - - l l r ~ / ~ I I I / ~ / / ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ ' I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , J / /
R~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~R~ , ~ - - ~ r / ~ I I ~ r i i ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ I 1 / / / ~ ~ A ~ A r / / / ' / / / / ~ !
v ~ 1 1 ~ . ~ ~ / , ~ 1~~ i ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ , / ~ / / / l ~ . , / / ~ / / ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ / / ~ / ~vv r ; ~ ~ V ~ ~ v / / / ~ / / I / ~ ~ ~ / r ~ / / ~ l / ~ / ~ ~ ~ / / ~ / / / ( I i i \ ~ / / i / l ~ l / / / ~ ~ / i I i ~ -
i ~ ~ / ~ / / I ~ i I , / / i ~ ~ i / ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ / r ~ / i / i l / / / / / ~ / A i / i ~ ~ / / i i i ) ~ ~ I / / / / ~ / I ~ /
Q I I ~ ~2~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ / f ~ / ~i / ~ ~ ~l,'// / ~ ~ l/,, / / / ~ ~ , , ~ / r ~ ~ ~l / / ~ / ) ~ f / / ~ / ~ l ~ / / ,-~A / / / ~ ~ / ~ , ~ , , ~ ~ I ~ / ~ / \VA~ ~
~i ~ ~ ~ / ~ / l ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ \ ~ A ~ ~ \ ~ ~ / / ~ / ~ I ~ ~ / / / / / / ~ / / / / / / i / ~
,'E \AV~ / / / i / / I / / / / l / ~ / / i ~ ~ ~ / /
- - - ~ ~ 1` ! ~ ~ V ~ \ ~ \ ~ ~ A .a5 ~ /
v o V ~ , , -.f - A I ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ - ~ 1 ~ l ! r I I / / / / / ~ I / ~ / 345 1 / / / ~ ~ ~ ` / ~ i _ .
86A ~ \ f ~ - 1~ ~ I ~ l ~ ~ V A ~ ~ A ~ ~ I I I I _ 1 ~ ~ _ , i / / ~ l l / / i / / i / ~ i l ~ / ~ - ~ ~ ~ / ~ ` ~l / / ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ - / / ~ \
( - - ~ r , I ~ / 1 ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ I I~ ~ I , ~ A / ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / / ice/ ~ ~ / ~ ~ - - . , ~ / ~ / ---i.~~ / / j ~ ~ ~ / ~ i . / ~ ~ _ / - / 1 / / ~ ~
7 n r r t~ n l 4 ~ I t r / ~ Se rye C ese v Q _ v v I o I ~ ~ ~ a el\ ;t 1 r I ~ ~ r , r r ~ / i \ \ - ~ ~ - _ ~ \l~~ i I i i III r ~ ~ I / l ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / _ / ~ ~ ~ l l I / / ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ / / / / / / ~ ~ / ~ ~ , ~ / _
r FARM USE\ ~ \ ~ ~ X90 7A ~ - - A \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I
' I I ~ v ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ - ~ ~ ~ I I I I I , I I ~ ~ ! v~ v v \ ~ ~ ,~~r~ ~ v v i t ~ ~ I ~ / \ ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ - 11 ~ ~ . f / r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ I V ~ V / / / / ~ / / /
I~ v ~ I - ~ I ~ v ~ v r 1 ~ / I I ~ \ ~ v I I ~ I I ~ I Ii vA I I ~ ~ I ~ r ~ 1 ~ / ~ ~ 1 I I i / 1 ~ I I ~ r, / i ~ I ~ r / / /
v ~ A ~ i i ~ \ ~ 1 1 , / l, I 1 vve r ~ \ ~ ~ i I I I ~ ~A 1 r r 1 ~ ~ v v - / \ ~ , II l v ~ / / / ~ ~ ~ v~ ~ 1 / I ~ v I ~ / i ~ I ~ ~ I r l~~ i ~ ~ i ~ I/ ~ ~ ~cosi ~ v a! / 1 1 1 I / -1 i- - ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / / ~ ! r / ~ ~ / / ~ / i \
I 1 ~ v. ~ A ~ I A. / 1~ i 7 ~ \ I I i I I v,v A ~ I t ~ ~ r ~
63
/ / /70?~ r 1 0
I ~ ~ _ 1 1 I
1 v - ,I l l l 1 \COSTJ
1617

~ ~~v X61 LO ti~ s T ~
N g se.e~ 1
o, S
ti~
0
~O e+~r~~wsr
' Ao 0
q y^° ~ \ lcasr
ptp~ O ap
" ~I \ . Y~ ~ 0 i
0 \ ~ 0 re ~u" I, ~ 0 ~_i Ili J v / o i J ~
9 r i' ~j m
~ o D~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ 0 ~ ~ . it ;'i , ~ ~ ~r~ ; ' i~~r ~ , ~ ~

p

a o ,~oti ~ooo i' i F'

o u, 0 D 0
l~N'! R IDCS
° o ~ D
/ ` i..`.. ~ Q ~ - II I ,i
< ~Z rr~x
?
o
_ ~ - _ r.
o~, S r e e n t F- 1401 f ~ ~
1
O - o a e m n t C- 4 8 41 f 4
, g Isoo iooo isoo
r" ~ i`
\ e ~ ~ -
~ ~ ~ GRAPHICAL SCALE
? ~
~ _ i1` ~ -
o ~ \ ~ _ Se ment B - 4401f 9 u,
~ \
~ ~ ~ `
N,"•,Y' WET~~,ND DFUNEATION:
, o ~ - _ ~i ~
o ~ IuINGS SUBJECT ~J VERIFICATION
~
~ tream Se ment A = 1801f ~ _ ~ g
~~-E~~~ _ a ~ u ~ -..:',1Y i;ORPS OF ENGINEERS AND
, p
VISIC7N CF WATER QUALITY~~..
O ~ 1, \ ~

~ ~ Stream Se ment A = 2401f ~ ~ 9
~ _ . 1
~ ~F ~ (eeo) 980 ~ \ ~ ~ \ ~
9 ~ ~ \FARY USE ~ ~ ~ ~ S ti ~ nzs
~ ~ ~ \ `I ~ ~ ,
\~I~{' ~ i 3 n
\ 1
I\l'85r '9~d`'~G~~ CREEK
a, \ ~ ~~~~A
" N ~ FARM USE A ~ \ ~~~1 ~ A \ ~ 9...
i1i~~~ \ ~ 1 a ~ Z
~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.:t~
~
~ r
N ~~11
V 1 11 1 11
r._~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ o ~ .i ~ ~9 \ ~ ~ . ~ 900
1 ~ 9 \ 920
960 ~ ADS ~ 0\.
~ o ~ m ° ~ 1.

y s
a~ i
((r~ .
~TLEWOOD
i R n
RT d ~ H
AIN / ~ UNT ~ ~
<< ,
i ~ ~ , j / d'
e~
h
~ ~FARN USE
_
\COSf i`~y~ 'tire' 9l ~ - 1' `i:~`_ ~ it lit
i i r, 1 ~
i i ~
1817
528
lfh,, R .

~ X61 tib S ~
M1 g se.a7 1
o~ S
ti~
c~~'"'~F S 0
~o
e+\FR\cosr s o ~
ti ~ \ 1~
(+~o~ O ee 0~.

~ ~ \ Q ~ ~
c w~cEr ~ \ ~ ~ 0 v D ~ ob
o ~
1 Pr 'so 0
cosy
r Cha e -
o ~
~ 0 D
o D D o
,oti iooo 1~_ ~ -7 ~ ~ J
~ i . ,
o ~ ~ ~ _ _ ~ U ~ r o~
. D o ~ a ,4 ',Iii
o o
D ~ ~ - , ~ a o a

~ r - ~ o 0 0
en Pre t o = 543 D o 0 _ ~ ~ o C
0 C Channel , ~
~ ~
~ - 9~ 1
~ ~ \D\
i ~,,i . ~ V
a i
~ r. ~ tp i
D ~ ~ - ioao isoo

.
o P i ~ _ \ - ~ _ ~
D l'-' ~I ,b ~ ~ ~ 1D ~ ~ ~ it
S C,Q~t
V` ~11~` ~ 3p 1` ,
-D . , Q \ ~ , _
D,,, o ~ ~
~ \
~ - g r;, pp~ D~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ I 9 ND ^rLINEATION:
~

~ ~~o ~ III " 1 o-. I 1 1 6 u ECT TO `!ERIFIr,gTION
~ 1 ~ ~ ~
~F ~~~JGINEERS AND ~
~ ~
S ~ ~ ~ - ~
~ A ~ -s~ a 9 1 ~ \ 80 \ 1 1 L 1751"ER''QUN~~. i.
1 ~O 9 \ \FMM USE \ 1 I 1
\0~ 772.2 ~ ~ \11
n 3
+o~ ' I ; I l_ \ I 1 9~d.~GZ~REEK
o I\~ 0 _ ` _
M O A ~
F \ 11 FARtl USE " \ ~ ~~~1 1, \ \ ~ 9..,
111 ~~1~\~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V ~

9 ~ ~ \V ~V \
A ~ Z
10 ~ I ~~~II r
~ "~"~1~ ~ ~ ~ 11 SIII I I ~ 11~\
- D~' ~i i
/
1 0
~ Y p\ 960 ~ _ ~ ~ ~G~o D
h n e Se ~ a serval
~
0~O \ _ \
,~_v
~TLEWOOD
?R h RT ~ N
1 N ~ NT AI U
f,
i ~ ~ ~ ,

0
w
\ \F~ ~
7 /
~ a' I
~I(~ ~~~~lG/I~J/f i
4, -44
1877
528
WU_-
AMPS

~ `"~v X61 LO S T
~ry J h
58.87 , 41S
ti
(355~~ S
e+~cosr ~ s
O r o „e° ~ J •,`0 ~ \ lcosr
' ~ ~ ,a~ Q

Gj
~ O ~ 0 ~ o
~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ r, ~ _ o ~ ~
~ D
~
- ~ o ~ _
J ~ih Iii ~ ,,i~,~, ~~I
ti~ 1000 ,~o ,-i ,
~r \ r
I,~ ' ~ai~
~
QM 0
- o ~ ro D ~ ~ ~ \ ~
` ~ o ;
~ o
C, ~ C \ - - -
S r e ment F - 1401f
; ~ ~
\ 9eo f 1 J
f'
o ~ , , a e m nt C - 4841f ~ ~ 9 soo i
~ ~ L ~
V I n ~ - \ i / r"-_-:' \•~Y \ ~ Leif
~ ~ t ` ~ GRAPHICAL SCaLE

^ ~ Se ment B = 4401f o ~ \ - 9 , .
~
\ ` \ ~
` _ t ~ ~ 4~. ,~~~~~0~~~ V VARY WETLAND DELIN~ATIOi~:
m ~ ~ ~ - ~ fl
o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , DINGS SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION
\ ~ _ _ \ _
A ~ ~ - ~a~-=~., tream Se ment A - 1801f
- 9 ~ a ~ ARf~r+" CARPS OF ENGINEERS AND

1 ~ \ ?ISION OF WATER QUALITY.
0 ~
\ ~ \ ~

\
~ ~ \ ~
(aea~ seo ~ ~ < < ~ 9 \ \FMM USE \ ~ ~ 1
1~ ~a rya 7722 \ \ }
3
~de~c~REEK
~
r m 1
o a$ ~ ~ ~ \ \ rv \ ~ ~ ~ \ \FM81 USE
~ 9r
~~~i~~~t ~~~1~1\ ~ \
~ ~
~
a Z
\ r
~ ~ ' \ (1,1`1 ` \ ~ ~ ~
Ca' ~ ~ ` \ ~ ~
, I
yl 4 ~ r ~ p~ 9
/ S 940 960 sp
° ~
1.
i

h ~

~TLEWOOD ~
?R R 1 ~ ~ H ~J ~
NT AIN z U
~f<<
i ~ ~ ,
e~ j%~' %
h
~ \FARM USE
! /
~ ~J ~
~~~T
~ ?Sn I~
s i
'144
1617
528
717717 M

III~~,~~~ I ~h,w~~l r61 ZO
m L T ti vJ ry~.
ss.e~ 41S O~ 1~
ti
(~\ev\wmcEr
O
e+\FR\cwsr ~ s
O P ~ .a° ~ 1 4 ~ \ lA~
r< ~ ,a, ~ 0~.
Gj
O ~ 0 ~ o
~ 0 ~ ti D
~ rr o
ti \casr
~ ~ Cha e , _
o
0 D o 0
o _ 0 a
,oti ~aoo .
o , . ~ ~i
o ~ D D ~ ~ o
D o ~ a

o ; - o
D
a a a
I o
se. en Pre v t o = 543 U~ D _ \ Z Z a ~ ~ O
Q Q ~ ni i I' I
Channel , ~ ~ ~ ~ QI~C~C~~PML~
9eo 1
,.,,~',v
_ ~ 00o isao

-ti
o P i
- ~
ALE
Vv ~1~ \ u ~ `
_ -
D., 0 1 1~
\ ~ R
~ \ l~ ice,' J DELINEATION:
i ~ ~ . .
~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 u ~ \ i1 ;T TO VERIFICATION
O ~ p
~ ! ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ nr ~ (;INFERS AND
~ _
s ~
~ TE"R nUu.~i, r.
(eeo~ sao ~ ~ (1 ~O \ \FMM USE \ \ y
1 ~a nz.z 1 ~ ~ \ `1 ,
\ ~ 1 ~ \ \ 1 j \ ~1~ 3 J
9~ ~~GZ~ CREEK
M ~ y O \ \ \ 0 ~
ro~ ~ \ ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~V ~ A \F/YtM USE ~ 9....
~ ~~~i~iil
\1,,, ~ ~
'1 , A ~ 1 2
~ 11
II 1~~A111`11`~ 1~\ ~~111111~;, r 1 1
i ~ ~h III ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1\\1\111~~ \ \FARII USE _.i. ~ ~ A 1~1~ 1~ l ~ ,.V ~~~~1~~1
i ~ ` ~ ~ o 1 v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
` 1 ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~1 A 1 ~ 1 ~ \ ~
_ \ , ~ ~ A ~ I I \ ~ ~ ~
1 `\\1 ~ \ \
r` ~ \ ~ 0 D . g9
1 `'rl~' ' 9 I I I ~Saq ~ 8A 9~0 2
9 / ~ : ms 0 6p ~
0 1 I ~ h n e Se ~ serval ,1 1
~ i
;I ~;~~I II
I ~I ~I~, I
~ I~~~ i
f~

`qo
i
~TLEWOOD
iR g RT a H
I~ IN / UNTA J ~~~i~
i
~
~ / i

h
p~
\ \FAfgl USE
7
f \ \COSf r r f. ° S I i•
:V IjJ

q- W.T-
1617
528 LLLL~-
%
I
ij