WQ0032899_Final Permit_20130419

LFWA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Charles Wakild, P. E.
Governor Director
April 19, 2013
David C. Coyle, Regional Environmental Manager
Terra Renewal Services, Inc.
Post Office Box 3036
Russellville, Arkansas 72811
Dear Mr. Coyle:
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
Subject: Permit No. WQ0032899
Terra Renewal Services, Inc.
Land Application of Class B
Residuals Non -Dedicated
Duplin County
In accordance with your permit application major modification request received March 13, 2013,
and subsequent additional information received April 3, 2013, we are forwarding herewith Permit No.
WQ0032899 dated April 19, 2013, to Terra Renewal Services, Inc, for the continued operation of the
subject residuals management programa
Modifications to the subject permit are as follows:
Adding a new residuals source generating facility, Valley Proteins in
Fayetteville, North Carolina.
Adding 223.3 acres of new non -dedicated land application sites in
Cumberland, Bladen and Robeson counties.
Please note that on. August S, 2009, Session Law 2009-406, entitled "An Act to Extend Certain
Government Approvals Affecting the Development of Real Property Within the State," was enacted by
the General Assembly and signed into law. The Act, known as the Permit Extension Act of 2009, extends
the expiration date of certain government approvals and permits. In addition, Session Law 2010-177
extended the Act by another year. Permit No. WQ0032899 falls within the scope of this Act and is
therefore being extended until December 31, 2016. A renewal application must still be submitted six
months in advance of the extended expiration date.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until December 31, 2016, shall void
Permit No. WQ0032899 issued June 24, 2008, and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations as
specified therein. Please pay particular attention to the monitoring requirements listed in Attachments A
for they may differ from the previous permit issuance. Failure to establish an adequate system for
collecting and maintaining the required operational information shall result in future compliance
problems.
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 512 N, Salisbury St., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] NofffiCarolitia
Internet: httR/./Wftal.nrdenr.o!gMeb/wtliaps .y q��l,�� F��
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer l/J►r/ 6L s/

Mr. Coyle
April 19, 2013
Page 2 of 2
Please note the following permit condition has been modified since the last permit issuance:
➢ Condition 1.2. — addresses compliance with the regional office notification requirements
established in Condition 111.3. within 90 days of the effective date of this permit.
Condition 1.3. — addresses compliance with the signage requirements established in
Condition M 13. within 180 days of the effective date of this permit.
➢ Condition II.8. — outlines stabilization methods that shall be utilized for an animal processing
facility that land applies residuals to control possible nuisance conditions.
➢ Attachment B includes the setback waivers referenced in the July 11, 2008 permit for the
existing fields.
If any parts, requirements or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, the Permittee
has the right to request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within 30 days following receipt of
this permit. This request shall be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings at 6714 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-6714. Unless such demands are made, this permit shall be final and
binding.
If you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact Alice M. Wessner at
[phone] or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
.
/Chwis Wakild, P. E.
cc: Bladen County Health Department
Cumberland County Health Department
Robeson County Health Department
Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Beth Buffington, Aquifer Protection Section
Permit File WQ0032899
Notebook File WQ0032899

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONEMSSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH
LAND APPLICATION OF CLASS B RESIDUAL SOLIDS PERMIT NON -DEDICATED)
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina as
amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Terra Renewal Services, LLC.
Duplin County
FOR THE
continued operation of a residuals management program for Terra Renewal Services, LLC. and consisting
of the land application of Class B residuals generated by the approved facilities listed in Attachment A to
the approved sites listed in Attachment B with no discharge of wastes to surface waters, pursuant to the
application received March 13, 2013, and subsequent additional information received by the Division of
Water Quality, and in conformity with other supporting data subsequently filed and approved by the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and considered a part of this permit. The use and
disposal of residuals are regulated under Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 503. This permit does
not exempt the Permittee from complying with the federal regulations.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until December 31, 2016 shall void Permit No.
WQ0032899 issued June 24, 2008 and shall be subject to the following specified conditions and
limitations:
I. SCHEDULES
No later than six months prior to the expiration of this permit, the Permittee shall request renewal of
this permit on official Division forms. Upon receipt of the request, the Division will review the
adequacy of the facilities described therein, and if warranted, will renew the permit for such period of
time and under such conditions and limitations as it may deem appropriate. Please note Rule 15A
NCAC 02T .0105(d) requires an updated site map to be submitted with the permit renewal
application.
2. The permittee shall be in full compliance with the regional office notification requirements
established in Condition 111.3. within 90 days of the effective date of this permit.
3. The permittee shall be in full compliance with the signage requirements established in Condition
111.13. within 180 days of the effective date of this permit.
WQ0032899 Version 1.1 Shell Version 130107 Page 1 of 12

II. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The subject residuals management program shall be effectively maintained and operated at all times
so there is no discharge to surface waters, nor any contravention of groundwater or surface water
standards. In the event the facilities fail to perform, satisfactorily, including the creation: of nuisance
conditions due to improper operation and maintenance, the Permittee shall immediately cease land
applying residuals to the site, contact the Fayetteville regional office's Aquifer Protection Section
supervisor, and take any immediate corrective actions.
2. This permit shall not relieve the Permittee of their responsibility for damages to groundwater or
surface water resulting from the operation of this residuals management program.
3. Only residuals generated by the facilities listed in Attachment A are approved for land application in
accordance with this permit.
4. Only the sites listed in Attachment B are approved for residuals land application.
5. Pollutant concentrations in residuals applied to land application sites listed in Attachment B shall not
exceed the following Ceiling Concentrations (i.e., dry weight basis) or Cumulative Pollutant
Loading Rates (CPLRs):
Parameter
Ceiling Concentration
(milligrams, per kilogram)
CPLR
(pounds per acre)
Arsenic
75
36
Cadmium
85
34
Copper
4,300
1,338
Lead
840
267
Mercury
57
15
Molybdenum
75
n/a
Nickel
420
374
Selenium
100
89
Zinc
7,500
2,498
The Permittee shall determine compliance with the CPLRs using one of the following methods:
a. By calculating the existing cumulative Ievel of pollutants using actual analytical data from all
historical Iand application events of residuals, or
b. For land where residuals application have not occurred or for which the required data is
incomplete, by determining background concentrations through representative soil sampling.
6. Residuals that are land applied shall meet Class B pathogen reduction requirements in I SA NCAC
02T .1106 (a) and (c). Exceptions to this requirement shall be specified in Attachment A.
7. Biological residuals (i.e. residuals generated during the treatment of domestic or animal processing
wastewater, or the biological treatment of industrial wastewater, and as identified in Attachment A)
that are land applied shall meet one of the vector attraction reduction alternatives in 15A NCAC 02T
.1 107(a). Exceptions to this requirement shall be specified in Attachment A.
WQ0032899 Version 1.1 Shell Version 130107 Page 2 of l2

8. When residuals from an animal processing facility are being land applied, one of the following
stabilization methods shall be completed to control possible nuisance conditions:
a. The residuals are subsurfacely injected, or
b_ The residuals are incorporated into the soil within 24 hours, or
c. Sufficient lime is added to the biological residuals to raise the pH to 12 after two hours of contact
prior to being surface land applied.
9. Setbacks for treatment and storage facilities shall be as follows:
Setback Description
Setback
feet
Habitable residence or place of public assembly under separate ownership or not
to be maintained as part of the project site
100
Property lines
50
Private or public water supply
100
Surface waters (streams — intermittent and perennial, perennial waterbodies, and
wetlands
50
Wells with exception to monitoring wells
100
10. Setbacks for land application sites shall be as follows:
WQ0032899 Version 1.1 Shell Version 130107 Page 3 of 12
Setback by application type
(feet)
Setback Description
Vehicular
Irrigation
Infection /
Surface
Surface
lucorporation
Application
Application
Habitable residence or place of public assembly
under separate ownership or not to be maintained as
400
400
200
art of thero'ect site
Habitable residence or places of public assembly
owned by the Permittee, the owner of the land, or the
0
200
Q
lessee/operator of the land to be maintained as part
of the pro'ect site
Property lines
50
150
50
Public right of way
50
50
50
Private or public water supply
100
100
100
Surface waters (streams — intermittent and perennial,
100
100
50
perennial waterbodies, and wetlands
Surface water diversions (ephemeral streams,
25
100
25
waterways, ditches
Groundwater lowering ditches (where the bottom of
25
100
25
the ditch intersects the SHWT
Subsurface groundwater lowering system
0
100
0
Wells with exception to monitoring wells
100
100
100
WQ0032899 Version 1.1 Shell Version 130107 Page 3 of 12

11. Land application areas shalt be clearly marked on each site prior to and during any residuals
application event.
12. Bulk residuals and other sources of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) shall not be applied in
exceedance of agronomic rates. Appropriate agronomic rates shall be calculated using expected
nitrogen requirements based on the determined Realistic Yield Expectations (RYE) using any of the
following methods:
a. Division's pre -approved site specific historical data for specific crop or soil types by calculating
the mean of the best three yields of the last five consecutive crop harvests for each field.
b. North Carolina Historical Data for specific crop and soil types as provided by North Carolina
State University Department of Soil Science (http://nutrients.soil.ncsu.edu/,yields/index.php).
A copy shall be kept on file and reprinted every five years in accordance with Condition IV.I I
c. If the RYE cannot be determined using methods (a) or (b) above, the Permittee may use the RYE
and appropriate nutrient application rates reported in any of the following documents:
i. Crop management plan as outlined by the local Cooperative Extension Office, the North
Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, the Natural Resource
Conservation Service, or other agronomist.
ii_ Waste Utilization Plan as outlined by the Senate Bill 1217 Interagency Group - Guidance
Document: Chapter I
(http://www.nca_gr.p,ov/SWC/tech/documents/9th Guidance_ Doc_100109.pdf).
iii. Certified Nutrient Management Plan as outlined by the Natural Resources Conservation
Services (MRCS). These plans must meet the USDA -MRCS 590 Nutrient Management
Standards (ftp://ftp-£c.se.egov.usda.gov/NHQ/practice-standards/standards/590.pdf).
d. If the RYE and appropriate nutrient application rates cannot be determined, the Permittee shall
contact the Division to determine necessary action.
13. When residuals are land applied to grazed pasture, hay crop realistic nitrogen rate shall be reduced by
25% in accordance with the USDA-NRCS 590 Nutrient Management Standards.
14. If land application sites are to be over -seeded or double -cropped (e.g., bermuda grass in the summer
and rye grass in the winter with both crops to receive residuals), then the second crop can receive an
application of PAN at a rate not to exceed 50 pounds per acre per year (lbs/ac/yr). This practice may
be allowed as long as the second crop is to be harvested or grazed. If the second crop is to be planted
for erosion control only and is to be tilled into the soil, then no additional PAN shall be applied.
WQ0032899 Version 1.1 Shell Version 130107 Page 4 of 12
Setback by application type
(feet)
Setback Description (continued)
Vehicular
Irrigation
Surface
Surface
Infection /
Application
Application
corporation
Bedrock outcrops
25
25
25
Top of slope of embankments or cuts of two feet or
15
15
15
more in vertical height
Building foundations or basements
0
15
0
Water lines
0
10
0
Swimming pools
100
100
100
Nitrification fields
0
20
0
11. Land application areas shalt be clearly marked on each site prior to and during any residuals
application event.
12. Bulk residuals and other sources of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) shall not be applied in
exceedance of agronomic rates. Appropriate agronomic rates shall be calculated using expected
nitrogen requirements based on the determined Realistic Yield Expectations (RYE) using any of the
following methods:
a. Division's pre -approved site specific historical data for specific crop or soil types by calculating
the mean of the best three yields of the last five consecutive crop harvests for each field.
b. North Carolina Historical Data for specific crop and soil types as provided by North Carolina
State University Department of Soil Science (http://nutrients.soil.ncsu.edu/,yields/index.php).
A copy shall be kept on file and reprinted every five years in accordance with Condition IV.I I
c. If the RYE cannot be determined using methods (a) or (b) above, the Permittee may use the RYE
and appropriate nutrient application rates reported in any of the following documents:
i. Crop management plan as outlined by the local Cooperative Extension Office, the North
Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, the Natural Resource
Conservation Service, or other agronomist.
ii_ Waste Utilization Plan as outlined by the Senate Bill 1217 Interagency Group - Guidance
Document: Chapter I
(http://www.nca_gr.p,ov/SWC/tech/documents/9th Guidance_ Doc_100109.pdf).
iii. Certified Nutrient Management Plan as outlined by the Natural Resources Conservation
Services (MRCS). These plans must meet the USDA -MRCS 590 Nutrient Management
Standards (ftp://ftp-£c.se.egov.usda.gov/NHQ/practice-standards/standards/590.pdf).
d. If the RYE and appropriate nutrient application rates cannot be determined, the Permittee shall
contact the Division to determine necessary action.
13. When residuals are land applied to grazed pasture, hay crop realistic nitrogen rate shall be reduced by
25% in accordance with the USDA-NRCS 590 Nutrient Management Standards.
14. If land application sites are to be over -seeded or double -cropped (e.g., bermuda grass in the summer
and rye grass in the winter with both crops to receive residuals), then the second crop can receive an
application of PAN at a rate not to exceed 50 pounds per acre per year (lbs/ac/yr). This practice may
be allowed as long as the second crop is to be harvested or grazed. If the second crop is to be planted
for erosion control only and is to be tilled into the soil, then no additional PAN shall be applied.
WQ0032899 Version 1.1 Shell Version 130107 Page 4 of 12

15. Prior to land application of residuals containing a sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) of 10 or higher, the
Permittee shall obtain and implement recommendations from at least one of the following: the local
Cooperative Extension Office; the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services; the Natural
Resource Conservation Service; a North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist; or an agronomist. The
recommendations shall address the sodium application rate, soil amendments (e.g., gypsum, etc.), or a
mechanism for maintaining site integrity and conditions conducive to crop growth. The Permittee
shall maintain written records of these recommendations and details of their implementation.
16. The compliance boundary for residual land application sites shall be specified in accordance with
15A NCAC 02L .0107(b)_ These sites were individually permitted on or after December 30, 1983;
therefore, the compliance boundary is established at either 250 feet from the residual land application
area, or 50 feet within the property boundary, whichever is closest to the residual land application
area. An exceedance of groundwater standards at or beyond the compliance boundary is subject to
remediation action according to 15A NCAC 02L .0106(d)(2) as well as enforcement actions in
accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C. Any approved
relocation of the compliance boundary will be noted in Attachment B.
17. In accordance with 15A NCAC 02L .0 108, the review boundary shall be established midway between
the compliance boundary and the residual land application area. Any exceedance of groundwater
standards at the review boundary shall require action in accordance with 15A NCAC 02L .0106.
M. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REOUIREMENTS
The residuals management program shall be properly maintained and operated at all times. The
program shall be effectively maintained and operated as a non -discharge system to prevent any
contravention of surface water or groundwater standards.
2. The Fayetteville Regional Office, telephone number [phone], and the appropriate local
government official (i.e., county manager, city manager, or health director) shall be notified at least
48 hours prior to the initial residuals land application to any new land application site. Notification to
the Aquifer Protection Section's regional supervisor shall be made from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. on
Monday through Friday, excluding State Holidays.
3. The Fayetteville Regional Office shall be notified via email or telephone, [phone], at least 24
hours prior to conducting any land application activity. Such notification shall indicate, at a
minimum, the anticipated application times, field IDs, and Iocation of land application activities. If it
becomes necessary to apply to additional fields due to unforeseen events, the Regional Office shall be
notified prior to commencing the application to those fields.
4. The Permittee shall maintain an approved Operation and Maintenance Plan (0&M Plan) pursuant to
15A NCAC 02T .1110. Modifications to the O&M Plan shall be approved by the Division prior to
utilization of the new plan. The O&M Plan, at the minimum, shall include:
a) Operational functions;
b) Maintenance schedules;
c) Safety measures;
d) Spill response plan;
e) Inspection plan including the following information:
i. Names and/or titles of personnel responsible for conducting the inspections;
ii. Frequency and location of inspections, including those to be conducted by the ORC, and
procedures to assure that the selected location(s) and inspection frequency are representative
of the residuals management program;
WQ0032899 Version 1.1 Shell Version 130107 Page 5 of 12

iii. Detailed description of inspection procedures including record keeping and actions to be
taken by the inspector in the event that noncompliance is observed pursuant to the
noncompliance notification requirements under the monitoring and reporting section of the
permit;
f) Sampling and monitoring plan including the following information:
i. Names and/or titles of personnel responsible for conducting the sampling and monitoring;
ii. Detailed description of monitoring procedures including parameters to be monitored;
iii. Sampling frequency and procedures to assure that representative samples are being collected.
Fluctuation in temperature, flow, and other operating conditions can affect the quality of the
residuals gathered during a particular sampling event. The sampling plan shall account for
any foreseen fluctuations 'in residuals quality and indicate the most limiting times for
residuals to meet pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements (e.g. facilities that
land apply multiple times per year but have an annual sampling frequency, may need to
sample during winter months when pathogen reduction is most likely to be negatively
affected by cold temperatures).
5. Upon the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission's (WPCSOCC)
classification of the facility, the Permittee shall designate and employ a certified operator in
responsible charge (ORC) and one or more certified operators as back-up ORCs in accordance with
15A NCAC 08G .0201. The ORC or their back-up shall visit the facilities in accordance with 15A
NCAC 08G. 0204, or as specified in the most recently approved O&M plan (i.e., see Condition III.
4.), and shall comply with all other conditions of 15A NCAC 08G. 0204. For more information
regarding classification and designation requirements, please contact the Division of Water Quality's
Technical Assistance & Certification Unit at [phone].
6. When the Permittee land applies bulk residuals, a copy of this permit and a copy of O&M Plan shall
be maintained at the land application sites during land application activities.
7. When the Permittee transports or land applies bulk residuals, the spill control provisions shall be
maintained in all residuals transport and application vehicles.
8. Residuals shall not be stored at any land application site, unless written approval has been requested
and received from the Division.
9. When the Permittee land applies bulk residuals, adequate measures shall be taken to prevent wind
erosion and surface runoff from conveying residuals from the land application sites onto adjacent
properties or into surface waters.
10. When. the Permittee land applies bulk residuals, a suitable vegetative cover shall be maintained on
land application sites onto which residuals are applied in accordance with the crop management plan
outlined by the local Cooperative Extension Office, the Department of Agriculture and Consumer
Services, the Natural Resource Conservation Service, or an agronomist and as approved by the
Division.
11. Bulk residuals shall not be land applied under the following conditions:
a. If the residuals are likely to adversely affect a threatened or endangered species listed under
section 4 of the Endangered Species Act or its designated critical habitat;
b. If the application causes prolonged nuisance conditions;
c. If the land fails to assimilate the bulk residuals or the application causes the contravention of
surface water or groundwater standards;
d. If the land is flooded, frozen or snow-covered, or is otherwise in a condition such that runoff of
the residuals would occur;
WQ0032899 Version 1.1 Shell Version 130107 Page 6 of 12

e. Within the 100 -year flood elevation, unless the bulk residuals are injected or incorporated within
a 24-hour period following a residuals land application event;
f. During a measurable precipitation event (i.e., greater than 0.01 inch per hour), or within 24 hours
following a rainfall event of 0.5 inches or greater in a 24-hour period;
g. If the slope is greater than 10% for surface applied liquid residuals, or if the slope is greater than
18% for injected or incorporated bulk liquid residuals;
h. If the soil pH is not maintained at 6.0 or greater, unless sufficient amounts of lime are applied to
achieve a final soil pH of at least 6.0, or if an agronomist provides information indicating that the
pH of the soil, residuals and lime mixture is suitable for the specified crop. Any approved
variations to the acceptable soil pH (6.0) will be noted in this permit;
i. If the land does not have an established vegetative cover unless the residuals are incorporated or
injected within a 24-hour period following a residuals land application event. Any field that is in
a USDA no -till program shall be exempted from meeting this vegetative cover requirement;
j. If the vertical separation between the seasonal high water table and the depth of residuals
application is less than one foot;
k. If the vertical separation of bedrock and the depth of residuals application is less than one foot;
12. The following public access restrictions apply to residual land application sites:
a. Public access to public contact sites (e.g., golf courses, parks, ball fields, etc.) shall be restricted
for 365 days after a residuals land application event;
b. Public access to non-public contact sites shall be restricted for 30 days after a residuals land
application event.
13. Public access controls shall include the posting of signs with a minimum area of 3 square feet (e.g.,
1.5' x 2'). Each sign shall indicate the activities conducted at each site, permit number, and name and
contact information, including the Permittee or applicator's telephone number. Signs shall be posted
in a clearly visible and conspicuous manner at the entrance to each land application site during a land
application event, and for as long as the public access restrictions required under RI. 12 apply.
14. The following harvesting and grazing restrictions apply to residual land application sites after each
land application event:
Harvesting and Grazing Description
Restricted
Duration
Animals shall not be allowed to graze during land application activities and
restricted period. Sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing to
30 days
prevent access after each land application event.
Food crops, feed crops and fiber crops shall not be harvested for:
30 days
Turf grown on land where residuals have been applied shall not be harvested for:
12 months
Food crops with harvested parts that touch the residual/soil mixture and are
totally above the land surface (e.g., tobacco, melons, cucumbers, squash, etc.)
14 months
shall not be harvested for:
When the residuals remain on the land surface for four months or longer prior to
incorporation into the soil, food crops with harvested parts below the land
20 months
surface (e.g., root crops such as potatoes, carrots, radishes, etc.) shall not be
harvested for:
When the residuals remain on the land surface for less than four months prior to
incorporation into the soil, food crops with harvested parts below the land
3 8 months
surface shall not be harvested for:
WQ0032899 Version 1.1 Shell Version 130107 Page 7 of 12

15. The Permittee shall acquire from each landowner or lessee/operator a statement detailing the volume
of other nutrient sources (i.e., manufactured fertilizers, manures, or other animal waste products) that
have been applied to the site, and a copy of the most recent Nutrient Management Plan (NMP) for
those operations where a NMP is required by the US Department of Agriculture - National Resources
Conservation Service (MRCS) or other State Agencies. The Permittee shall calculate allowable
nutrient loading rates based on the provided information and use appropriate reductions.
For the purpose of this permit condition, a Crop Management Plan (CMP), Waste Utilization Plan
(WUP) or Certified Nutrient Management Plan (CNMP) shall also be considered a Nutrient
Management Plan.
16. No residuals shall be land applied unless the submitted Land Owner Agreement Attachment (LOAA)
between the Permittee and landowners or lessees/operators of the land application site is in full force
and effect. These agreements shall be considered expired concurrent with the permit expiration date,
and shall be renewed during the permit renewal process.
IV. MONITORING AND REPORTING REOUMEMENTS
I. Any Division required monitoring (including groundwater, plant tissue, soil and surface water
analyses) necessary to ensure groundwater and surface water protection shall be established, and an
acceptable sample reporting schedule shall be followed.
2. Residuals shall be analyzed to demonstrate they are non -hazardous under the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA). The analyses [corrosivity, ignitability, reactivity, and toxicity
characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP)l shall be performed at the frequency specified in
Attachment A, and the Permittee shall maintain these results for a minimum of five years. Any
exceptions from the requirements in this condition shall be specified in Attachment A.
The TCLP analysis shall include the following parameters (the regulatory level in milligrams per liter
is in parentheses):
Arsenic (5.0)
1,4 -Dichlorobenzene (7.5)
Nitrobenzene (2.0)
Barium (100.0)
1,2-Dichloroethane (0.5)
Pentachlorophenol (100.0)
Benzene (0.5)
1, 1 -Dichloroethylene (0.7)
Pyridine (5.0)
Cadmium (1.0)
2,4-Dinitrotoluene (0.13)
Selenium (1.0)
Carbon tetrachloride (0.5)
Endrin (0.02)
Silver (5.0)
Chlordane (0.03)
Hexachlorobenzene (0.13)
Tetrachloroethylene (0.7)
Chlorobenzene (100.0)
Heptachlor (anal its hydroxide)
0.008
Toxaphene (0.5)
Chloroform (6.0)
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene (0.5)
Trichloroethylene (0.5)
Chromium (5.0)
Hexachloroethane (3.0)
2,4,5 -Trichlorophenol (400.0)
m -Cresol (200.0)
Lead (5.0)
2,4,6 -Trichlorophenol (2.0)
o -Cresol (200.0)
Lindane (0.4)
2,4,5 -TP (Silvex) (1.0)
p -Cresol (200.0)
Mercury (0.2)
Vinyl chloride (0.2)
Cresol (200.0)
Methoxychlor (10.0)
2,4-D (10.0)
Methyl ethyl acetone (200.0)
Once the residuals have been monitored for two years at the frequency specified in Attachment A, the
Permittee may submit a permit modification request to reduce the frequency of this monitoring
requirement. In no case shall the monitoring frequency be less than once per permit cycle.
WQ0032899 Version 1.1 Shell Version 130107 Page 8 of 12

3. An analysis shall be conducted on residuals from each source generating facility at the frequency
specified in Attachment A, and the Permittee shall maintain the results for a minimum of five years.
The analysis shall include the following parameters:
Aluminum
Mercury
Potassium
Ammonia -Nitrogen
Molybdenum
Selenium
Arsenic
Nickel
Sodium
Cadmium
Nitrate -Nitrite Nitrogen
Sodium Adsorption Ratio
(SAR)
Calcium
Percent Total Solids
TKN
Copper
pH
Zinc
Lead
Phosphorus
Magnesium
Plant Available Nitrogen
(by calculation)
4. Residuals shall be monitored for compliance with pathogen and vector attraction reduction
requirements at the frequency specified in Attachment A, and at the time indicated in the sampling
and monitoring sections of the approved O&M plan. The required data shall be specific to the
stabilization process utilized, and sufficient to demonstrate compliance with the Class B pathogen
reduction requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1106 (a) and (c), and one vector attraction reduction
requirement in 15A NCAC 02T .1107 (a) shall be met. Any exceptions from the requirements in this
condition shall be specified in Attachment A.
An annual representative soils analysis (i.e., Standard Soil Fertility Analysis) shall be conducted on
each land application site listed in Attachment B on which a residuals land application event wiill
occur in the respective calendar year. This analysis shall be in accordance with the "Guidance on Soil
Sampling" located in the Sampling Instructions section of the NC Department of Agriculture &
Consumer Services' website (http://www.neagr.gov/agronomi/pubs.hbn). The Permittee shall
maintain these results and a description of the sampling methodologies used to determine soil fertility
for a period of no less than five years, and shall be made available to the Division upon request. At a
minimum, the Standard Soil Fertility Analysis shall include the following parameters:
Acidity
Exchangeable Sodium Percenta a
Phosphorus
Base Saturation (by calculation)
Magnesium
Potassium
Calcium
Manganese
Sodium
Cation Exchange Capacity
Percent Hurnic Matter
Zinc
Copper
pH
6. Laboratory parameter analyses shall be performed on the residuals as they are land applied, and shall
be in accordance with the monitoring requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0505.
WQ0032899 Version 1 _ L Shell Version 130107 Page 9 of 12

7. The Permittee shall maintain records tracking all residual land application events. At a minimum,
these records shall include the following:
a. Source of residuals;
b. Date of land application;
c. Location of land application (i.e., site, field, or zone number as listed in Attachment B);
d. Approximate areas applied to (acres);
e. Method of land application;
f. Weather conditions (e.g., sunny, cloudy, raining, etc.);
g. Predominant Soil Mapping Unit (e.g., CbB2);
h. Soil conditions (e.g., dry, wet, frozen, etc.);
i. Type of crop or crops to be grown on field;
j. Nitrogen Application Rate based on RYEs (if using data obtained from the North Carolina State
University Department of Soil Science Website, the printout page shall be kept on file and
reprinted every five years);
k. Volume of residuals land applied in gallons per acre, cubic yard per acre, dry tons per acre, or wet
ton per acre;
Volume of animal waste or other nutrient source applied in gallons per acre, dry ton per acre, or
wet tons per acre;
in. Volume of soil amendments (e.g., lime, gypsum, etc.) applied in gallons per acre, dry ton per
acre, or wet tons per acre; and
n. Annual and cumulative totals in dry tons per acre of residuals as well as animal waste and other
sources of nutrients (e.g., if applicable), annual and cumulative pounds per acre of each heavy
metal (e.g., shalI include, but shall not be limited to, arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, mercury,
molybdenum, nickel, selenium, and zinc), annual pounds per acre of PAN, and annual pounds per
acre of phosphorus applied to each field.
Three copies of an annual report shall be submitted on or before March I". The annual report shall
meet the requirements described in the Instructions for Residuals Application Annual Reporting
Forms. Instructions for reporting and annual report forms are available at
http://j)ortal.nedenr.org/weh/wq/aps/lau/reportin , or can be obtained by contacting the Land
Application Unit directly. The annual report shall be submitted to the following address:
Division of Water Quality
Information Processing Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
9. Noncompliance Notification
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the Fayetteville Regional Office, telephone number (910)
433-3300, as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours or on the next working day
following the occurrence or first knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following:
a. Any occurrence with the land application program resulting in the land application of significant
amounts of wastes that are abnormal in quantity or characteristic.
b. Any failure of the land application program resulting in a release of material to surface waters.
e. Any time self-monitoring indicates the facility has gone out of compliance with its permit
limitations.
WQ0032899 Version 1.1 Shell Version 130107 Page 10 of 12

d. Any process unit failure, due to known or unknown reasons, rendering the facility incapable of
adequate residual treatment.
e. Any spill or discharge from a vehicle or piping system during residuals transportation.
Any emergency requiring immediate reporting (e.g., discharges to surface waters, imminent failure of
a storage structure, etc.) outside normal business hours shall be reported to the Division's Emergency
Response personnel at telephone number [phone], [phone], or [phone].Persons
reporting such occurrences by telephone shall also file a written report in letter form within five days
following first knowledge of the occurrence. This report shall outline the actions taken or proposed to
be taken to ensure that the problem does not recur.
V. INSPECTIONS
1. The Permittee shall provide adequate inspection and maintenance to ensure proper operation of the
subject facilities and shall be in accordance with the approved 0&M Plan.
2. Prior to each bulk residuals land application event, the Permittee or his designee shall inspect the
residuals storage, transport and application facilities to prevent malfunctions, facility deterioration
and operator errors resulting in discharges, which may cause the release of wastes to the
environment, a threat to human health or a public nuisance. The Permittee shall maintain an
inspection log that includes, at a minimum, the date and time of inspection, observations made, and
any maintenance, repairs, or corrective actions taken. The Permittee shall maintain this inspection log
for a period of five years from the date of inspection, and this log shall be made available to the
Division upon request.
3. Any duly authorized Division representative may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect
any property, premises or place on or related to the land application sites or facilities permitted herein
at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining compliance with this permit; may inspect or
copy any records required to be maintained under the terms and conditions of this permit; and may
collect groundwater, surface water or Leachate samples.
V1. GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. Failure to comply with the conditions and limitations contained herein may subject the Permittee to
an enforcement action by the Division in accordance with North Carolina General Statutes 143-
215.6A to 143-215.6C.
2. This permit shall become voidable if the residuals Iand application events are not carried out in
accordance with the conditions of this permit.
3. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of residuals described in the
permit application and other supporting documentation.
4. The issuance of this permit does not exempt the Permittee from complying with any and all statutes,
rules, regulations, or ordinances, which may be imposed by other jurisdictional government agencies
(e.g., local, state, and federal). Of particular concern to the Division are applicable river buffer rules
in 15A NCAC 02B .0200; erosion and sedimentation control requirements in 15A NCAC Chapter 4
and under the Division's General Permit NCG010000; any requirements pertaining to wetlands under
15A NCAC 02B .0200 and 02H .0500; and documentation of compliance with Article 21 Part 6 of
Chapter 143 of the General Statutes.
WQ0032899 Version 1.1 Shell Version 1301.07 Page 11 of 12

5. In the event the residuals program changes ownership or the Permittee changes their name, a formal
permit modification request shall be submitted to the Division. This request shall be made on official
Division forms, and shall include appropriate documentation from the parties involved and other
supporting documentation as necessary. The Permittee of record shall remain fully responsible for
maintaining and operating the residuals program permitted herein until a permit is issued to the new
owner.
6. This permit is subject to revocation or unilateral modification upon 60 days notice from the Division
Director, in whole or part for the requirements listed in 15A NCAC 02T .0110.
7. Unless the Division Director grants a variance, expansion of the permitted residuals program
contained herein shall not be granted if the Permittee exemplifies any of the criteria in 15A NCAC
02T .0120(b).
8. The Permittee shall pay the annual fee within 30 days after being billed by the Division. Failure to
pay the annual fee accordingly shall be cause for the Division to revoke this permit pursuant to 15A
NCAC 02T .0105(e) (3).
Permit issued this the 19`h day of April 2013
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
r
�;.oeharjqeWakild, P. E., Director
Div ion of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number WQ0032899
WQ0032899 Version 1.1 Shell Version 130107 Page 12 of 12

ATTACHMENT A - Approved Residual Sources
Terra Renewal Services - Carolina By -Products Rose Hill VVWTP
Certification Date: April 19, 2013
Permit Number: WQ0032899 Version: 1.1
1. Maximum Dry Tons per Year is the amount of residuals approved for land application from each permitted facility.
2. Analyses to demonstrate that residuals are non -hazardous (i.e., TCLP, ignitability, reactivity, and corrosivity) as stipulated under permit Condition IV.2.
3. Testing of metals and nutrients as stipulated under permit Condition IV.3.
4. Analyses of pathogen and vector attraction reductions as stipulated under permit Condition IVA. Permit application indicated that Fecal Coliform Density will be performed to meet pathogen
reduction requirements, 40 -Day Bench Scale Test (Anaerobic Digestion) will be performed to meet vector attraction reductions. However, other methods listed under 15A NCAC 02T .1106(b)
and .I107(a) can also be used to demonstrate compliance with this permit requirement.
5. Monitoring frequencies are based on the actual dry tons applied per year using the table below, unless specified above.
Dry Pons Generated 1,
short tons per ear(Established
Monitoring Frequency
in 40 CFR 503 and 15A NCAC 02T .1111
X319
1/Year
=>319 - <1,650
11 Quarter 4 times per ear
Monitoring Monitoring
Monitoring
=>16,500
Owner
Facility Name
County
Permit
Biological
Maximum
Dry Tons
Frequency for Frequency for
Frequency for
Pathogen &
Approved
Mineralization
Number
Residuals
per Year 1
Non -hazardous Metals and
i
Vector Attraction
Rate
Characteristics Nutrients'''
Reductions '
Valley Proteins, Inc
Carolina by Products —
Rose Hill
Duplin
WQ0000485
Yes
2,000
Annually See Table Below
See Table Below
.40
Valley Proteins, Inc.
Valley Proteins, Fayetteville
Cumberland
Yes
375
Annually See Table Below
See Table Below
.20
Total
2,375
1. Maximum Dry Tons per Year is the amount of residuals approved for land application from each permitted facility.
2. Analyses to demonstrate that residuals are non -hazardous (i.e., TCLP, ignitability, reactivity, and corrosivity) as stipulated under permit Condition IV.2.
3. Testing of metals and nutrients as stipulated under permit Condition IV.3.
4. Analyses of pathogen and vector attraction reductions as stipulated under permit Condition IVA. Permit application indicated that Fecal Coliform Density will be performed to meet pathogen
reduction requirements, 40 -Day Bench Scale Test (Anaerobic Digestion) will be performed to meet vector attraction reductions. However, other methods listed under 15A NCAC 02T .1106(b)
and .I107(a) can also be used to demonstrate compliance with this permit requirement.
5. Monitoring frequencies are based on the actual dry tons applied per year using the table below, unless specified above.
Dry Pons Generated 1,
short tons per ear(Established
Monitoring Frequency
in 40 CFR 503 and 15A NCAC 02T .1111
X319
1/Year
=>319 - <1,650
11 Quarter 4 times per ear
=>1,650 - <16,500
1/60 Das 6 times per ear
=>16,500
1/month I2 times per ear
If no land application events occur during a required sampling period (e.g. no land application occur during an entire year when annual monitoring is required), then no
sampling data is required during the period of inactivity. The annual report shall include an explanation for missing sampling data. Those required to submit the annual
report to EPA may be required to make up the missed sampling, contact the EPA for additional information and clarification.
Page 1 of 2

ATTACHMENT A - Approved Residual Sources
Terra Renewal Services - Carolina By -Products Rose Hili WWTP
Certification Date: April 19, 2013
Permit Number: WQ0032899 Version: 1.1
THIS PAGE BLANK
Page 2 of 2

ATTACHMENT B - Approved Land Application Sites
Terra Renewal Services, LLC. - Carolina By -Products Rose Hill WWTP
Certification Date: April 19, 2013
Permit Number: WQ0032899 Version: 1.1
Field/ Site
Owner
Lessee
County
Latitude
Longitude
Aet a
Dominant Soil Series
Footnotes
EW -1
Wells, Elwin
Duplin
34046'19"
78005'01"
11.80
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6% slopes
EW -2
Wells, EIwin
Duplin
3446'20"
78004'51"
11.20
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6% slopes
JD -1
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34045'32"
78002154"
14.20
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6% slopes
JD -10
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34046'16"
78002'19"
23.20
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6% slopes
9,13
JD -11
Dempsey, .Terry
Duplin
34046'16"
78002'01"
27.10
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6% slopes
JD -12
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34°46'34"
78001'49"
23.00
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6% slopes
10
JD -13
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34046'24"
78001'32"
25.40
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2% slopes
JD -14
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34°46'23"
78°01'43"
1.60
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6% slopes
JD -15
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin.
34°45'15"
78°03'31"
3.60
Pactolus fine sand, 0 to 3% slopes
JD -16
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34045'20"
78°03'46"
5.70
Kalmia loamy sand, 0 to 2% slopes
JD -17
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
3446'41"
78°03'09"
8.30
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6 % slopes
JD -18
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34046'05"
78004'27"
16.60
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6 % slopes
JD -19
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34046'08"
78004'10"
29.80
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6 % slopes
JD -2
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34045'11"
78°02'17"
27.90
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6 % slopes
JD -20
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34045'59"
78003'56"
21,90
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2% slopes
2
JD -21
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34045152"
78003'37"
17.90
Johns fine sandy loam, 0 to 2% slopes
JD -22
Dempsey, .ferry
Duplin
34'45'08"
78"01'39"
7.50
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2% slopes
JD -23
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34044'59"
78001'36"
25.20
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2% slopes
JD -24
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34046'54"
78°04'20"
2.20
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6% slopes
JD -25
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34046'44"
78004'32"
17.60
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6% slopes
JD -26
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34045'42"
78005'03"
39.70
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6% slopes
JD -27
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34043'46"
78007'26"
18.80
Noboco loamy line sand, 2 to 6% slopes
JD -28
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34'45113"
7806'57"
8.90
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2% slopes
JD -29
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34045'03"
78006'53"
8,50
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2% slopes
Page 1 of 4

ATTACHMENT B - Approved Laud Application Sites
Terra Renewal Services, LLC. - Carolina By -Products Rose Hill WWTP
Page 2 of 4
Certification Date: April 19, 2013
Permit Number: WQ0032899 Version: 1.1

ATTACHMENT B - Approved Land Application Sites
Terra Renewal Services, LLC. - Carolina By -Products Rose Hill WWTP
Certification Date: April 19, 2013
Permit Number: WQ0032899 Version: 1.1
Field/ Site
Owner
Lessee
County
Latitude
Longitude
Acret a
Dominant Soil Series
Footnotes
JD -29A
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34°44'41"
78°06'41"
50.50
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6% slopes
JD -3
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34045'58"
78°02'49"
34.20
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6% slopes
JD -30
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34045'12"
77659'40"
28.00
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6% slopes
JD -31
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34646'14"
7765924"
22.00
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6% slopes
JD -32
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34646'33"
77658'56"
16.60
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2% slopes
JD -33
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34646'23"
77°58'49"
16.30
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2% slopes
JD -34
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34647101"
78001'56"
12.70
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2% slopes
JD -36
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
3464T37"
78601'23"
6.90
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2% slopes
JD -37
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34'47'34"
7800I'29"
12.30
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2% slopes
JD -38
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
3464730"
78601'39"
27.40
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6% slopes
JD -39
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34647'29"
78601'58"
51.60
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6% slopes
JD -4
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34645'52"
78602'35"
8.60
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6% slopes
JD -40
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34647'23"
78601'51"
6.40
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6% slopes
JD -41
Dempsey, .ferry
Duplin
34647'14"
78602'09"
4.30
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2% slopes
JD -42
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34647'28"
78602'07"
2.40
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6% slopes
14
JD -5
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34°46'00"
78602'29"
33.80
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6% slopes
5,6,7,11.,12
JD -6
Dempsey, .ferry
Duplin
34646'09"
78602'39"
6.20
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6% slopes
JD -7
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34645'41"
78601'57"
.90
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2% slopes
JD -8
Dempsey, Jerry
Duplin
34645'58"
78601'08"
2.30
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2% slopes
JW -I
Wells, Joe
Duplin
34645'41"
78602'51"
16.00
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6% slopes
8
JW -10
Wells, Joe
Duplin
34646'33"
78602'51"
14.20
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6% slopes
JW -1I
Wells, Joe
Duplin
34646'33"
78602'42"
19.20
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6% slopes
JW -12
Wells, Joe
Duplin
34°46'38"
7860229"
18.30
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6% slopes
JW -13
Wells, Joe
Duplin
34646'31"
78602'29"
4.90
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2% slopes
4
Page 3 of 4

ATTACHMENT B - Approved Land Application Sites
Terra Renewal Services, LLC. - Carolina By -Products Rose Hill WWTP
Page 4 of 4
Certification Date: April 19, 2013
Permit Number: WQ0032899 Version: 1.1

ATTACHMENT B - Approved Land Application Sites
Terra Renewal Services, LLC. - Carolina By -Products Rose Hill WWTP
Certification Date: April 19, 2013 _
Permit Number: WQ0032899 Version: 1.1
Field/ Site
Owner
Lessee
County
Latitude
Longitude
Acret a
Dominant Soil Series
Footnotes
JW -2
Wells, Joe
Duplin
34045'42"
78002'43"
4.80
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6% slopes
3, 8, 15
JW -3
Wells, Joe
Duplin
34045'12"
78°02'05"
6.90
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2% slopes
JW -4
Wells, Joe
Duplin
34°45'02"
78002'07"
26.30
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2% slopes
JW -5
Wells, Joe
Duplin
34046'19"
78002'09"
16.60
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6% slopes
JW -6
Wells, Joe
Duplin
34046117"
78°01'47"
12.30
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6% slopes
JW -7
Wells, Joe
Duplin
34046'03"
77°59'54"
20.60
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6% slopes
JW -8
Wells, Joe
Duplin
34046'04"
78000'19"
22.20
Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6% slopes
JW -9
Wells, Joe
Duplin
34046'42"
78002'50"
1.50
Craven loam, I to 4% slopes, eroded
CI' -1
Tyson, Lewis Craig
Tyson, Lewis Craig
Cumberland
34056'43"
78049'49"
25.7
Altavista
LW -IA
Watts, Lennis
Watts, Lennis
Robeson
34052'46"
78055'59"
13.0
Wagram
LW -1B
Watts, Lennis
Watts, Lennis
Robeson
34052'46"
78055'59"
14.6
Wagram
LW -1C
Watts, Lennis
Watts, Lennis
Robeson
34052'51"
78056'01"
13.2
Wagram
LW -1D
Watts, Lennis
Watts, Lennis
Robeson
34052'46"
78055'47"
10.7
Wagram
1
LW -1B
Watts, Lennis
Watts, Lennis
Robeson
34052141"
78055'38"
6.7
Wagram
1
LW -1F
Watts, Lennis
Watts, Lennis
Robeson
34°52`54"
78°55'51"
8.0
Wagram
LW -2A
Watts, Lennis
Watts, Lennis
Robeson
34052'34"
79055140"
12.7
Wagram
1
LW -2B
Watts, Lennis
Watts, Lennis
Robeson
34052'35"
78055'34"
8.9
Wagram
LW -3A
Watts, Lennis
Watts, Lennis
Robeson
34052'23"
78055'30"
19.0
Wakulla
LW -3B
Watts, Lennis
Watts, Lennis
Robeson
34052'19"
78055'34"
21.8
Wakulla
1
LW -3C
Watts, Lennis
Watts, Lennis
Robeson
34052'11"
78055'37"
23.2
Wakulla
RM -1
Astrakel International, Ltd.
Morris, Rick
Bladen
34041'47"
78043`31"
40.9
Wagram
RM -2
Astrakel International, Ltd
Morris, Rick
Bladen
34041'59"
78043'19"
4.9
Blanton
Total
110.1
Page 5 of 4

ATTACHMENT B - Approved Land Application Sites
Terra Renewal Services, LLC. - Carolina By -Products Rose Hill WWTP
Page 6 of 4
Certification Date: April 19, 2013
Permit Number: WQ0032899 Version: 1.1

ATTACHMENT B - Approved Land Application Sites
Certification Date: April 19, 2013 ..
Terra Renewal Services, LLC. - Carolina By -Products Rose Hill WWTP Permit Number: WQ0032899 Version: 1.1
1. A re -defined compliance boundary has been approved for this land application site. This re -defined compliance boundary is located I00 feet from the water supply well on the
property. Note that the 100 -foot setback between wells and the land application area shall still be met.
2. A reduced setback from a residence under separate ownership has been approved for this land application site. Residuals may be land applied within 100 feet ofthe residence owned by
Ethel Kirkland (i.e., indicated by the label "BRF# 1" on the approved setback map), regardless of whether a surface or a subsurface application method is used.
3. A reduced setback from a residence under separate ownership has been approved for this land application site. Residuals may be land applied within 100 feet of the residence owned
by Robert F. Poindexter (i.e., indicated by the label "BRF#2" on the approved setback map), regardless of whether a surface or a subsurface application method is used.
4. A reduced setback from a residence under separate ownership has been approved for this land application site. Residuals may be land applied within 100 feet of the residence owned by
William J. Wells (i,e., indicated by the label "BRF#3" on the approved setback map), regardless of whether a surface or a subsurface application method is used.
5. A reduced setback from a residence under separate ownership has been approved for this land application site. Residuals may be land applied within 100 feet of the residence owned by
Mark Stampe (i.e., indicated by the label "BRF#4" on the approved setback map), regardless of whether a surface or a subsurface application method is used.
b. A reduced setback from a residence under separate ownership has been approved for this land application site. Residuals may be land applied within ## feet of the residence owned by
James Brinager (i.e., indicated by the label "BRF#5" on the approved setback map), regardless of whether a surface or a subsurface application method is used.
7. A reduced setback from a residence under separate ownership has been approved for this land application site. Residuals may be land applied within 100 feet of the residence owned by
Robin Bell (i.e., indicated by the label "BRF#b" on the approved setback map), regardless of whether a surface or a subsurface application method is used_
8. A reduced setback from a residence under separate ownership has been approved for this land application site. Residuals may be land applied within 100 feet of the residence owned by
Harry Bradshaw (i.e., indicated by the label "BRF#7" on the approved setback map), regardless of whether a surface or a subsurface application method is used.
9. A reduced setback from a residence under separate ownership has been approved for this land application site. Residuals may be land applied within 100 feet of the residence owned
by Margaret Turner (i.e., indicated by the label "BRF#8" on the approved setback map), regardless of whether a surface or a subsurface application method is used.
10. A reduced setback from a residence under separate ownership has been approved for this land application site. Residuals may be land applied within 100 feet of the residence owned
by Linwood E. Sumner (i.e., indicated by the label "BRF# 9" on the approved setback map), regardless of whether a surface or a subsurface application method is used.
11. A reduced setback from a residence under separate ownership has been approved for this land application site. Residuals may be land applied within 100 feet of the residence owned by
Edna Waddell (i.e., indicated by the label "BRF# 10" on the approved setback map), regardless of whether a surface or a subsurface application method is used.
12. A reduced setback from a residence under separate ownership has been approved for this land application site. Residuals may be land applied within 100 feet of the residence owned
by Jerry Dempsey (i.e., indicated by the label "BRF# 1I" on the approved setback map), regardless of whether a surface or a subsurface application method is used.
13. A reduced setback from a residence under separate ownership has been approved for this land application site. Residuals may be land applied within 100 feet of the residence owned
by Elwin Wells (i.e., indicated by the label "BRF# 12" on the approved setback map), regardless of whether a surface or a subsurface application method is used.
14. A reduced setback from a residence under separate ownership has been approved for this land application site. Residuals may be land applied within 100 feet of the residence owned
by Edna and Earl Wells (i.e., indicated by the label "BRF#14" on the approved setback map), regardless of whether a surface or a subsurface application method is used.
15. A reduced setback from a residence under separate ownership has been approved for this land application site. Residuals may be land applied within 100 feet of the residence owned
by Johnny H, Williams (i.e., indicated by the label "BRF# 15" on the approved setback map), regardless of whether a surface or a subsurface application method is used.
Page 7 of 4

ATTACHMENT B - Approved Land Application Sites
Terra Renewal Services, LLC. - Carolina By -Products Rose Hili WWTP
Page 8 of 4
Certification Date: April 19, 2013
Permit Number: WQ0032899 Version: 1.1

CHEC1 D BY:
DRAWN 6Y:
UAXE:
Legend
All Buffer Maps will have the following legend
Space does not allow the placement of this legend on each map
0
Soil Boring
Fields
Buf House
®
Occup_house
-- -
Parcel Lines
-----
Farm Road
ttt
Cemetary
Drainage
Mparcelbuf
occhouse_buf
bufhouse buf
Wellsbuff
drainbuf
dotpribuf
® dotsecbuf
Streambuf
® Surf_watbuf
• Wells
A, Structure
I" =660'
RTB S Rt3 NCH
5IDUALS
Feb Os & SOILS, LLC
Stream
dotprimrds
dotsecrds
Terra Renewal Services
Land Application Program
Pruita HO' 1 2007-67
N
Buffer
Map

County_ CUMBERLAND APPLICATION AREA & SETBACK MAP
Landowner(s): L. CRAIG TYSON
BUFFERS:
Farmed By: CRAIG TYSON
FEATURE SUFFER
SURFACE WATER 100 FT
Permittee: TERRA RENEWAL SERVICES
PUBLIC R.a.w 50 FT
PROPERTY LINE 50 FT
TOTAL NET
DWELLING 400 FT
WELL 100 FT
aELD # ACRES ACRES LAT. LONG.
DITCH 25 FT
CT -1 32.3 25.7 34° 56' 43" 78' 49'49"
NOTES:
- Stream and surface water locat[ons were derived from a combination of USGS blue line streams, and on-site evafv ton
Where Review Boundary does not appear, it is the same as the Camptance Rouncary
-
(oawletv=
LAI] ARPLfCATION FIEIO 80UNDARY
STREAM! SURFACE WATER
fSOLIID. a17Q_
PROPERTY BOUNDARIES
1sorloMnceNr,�z
pEVIEW BOiNOARY
tsouo-REO
COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY
BUFFER f NON-APPLICATICN AREA
OV,� ING
I4ON-HABITABLE STRUCTURE
® SCALE
SOIL EVALUATION BORING 1 Inch = 400 Feet
DITCH

APPLICATION AREA & SETBACK MAP
County: ROBESON
Landowner(s): LENNIS WATTS
Farmed By: LENNIS WATTS
Permittee: TERRA RENEWAL SERVICES
BUFFERS:
FEATURE
BUFFER
SURFACE WATER
SOFT
PUBLIC R.O.W
50 FT
PROPERTY LINE
50 FT
DWELLING (IN)
100 FT
DWELLING (CUT)
20C FT
'
100 FT
L
25 FT
NOTES:
- Sheam antl surface Water 1°ea4°ne wrre de&e4 h°m a combination of USGS brut lino etreema, an -1-u-
-V9, cue Rerlev Boundarydoes not appear. 4 is ft- as Iha Campfaoce 80undary.
KEY TO MAP SYMBOLS:
IiASHEOill—ll Vi
LAND APPLICATION FIELD BOUNDARY
IonsBeo-etu�
STREAM! SURFACE WATER
_----_ �ons"eacxAry
USGSTOPO
(SOL? -MITE)
PROPERTY BOUNUARIES
ISa LrGmA ENTAI
REVIEW BOUNDARY
(sou"ED)
COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY
BUFFER I NON -APPLICATION AREA
0
DWELLING
A
NON-HABrrABLE STRUCTURE
Q
SOIL EVALUATION BORING
WELL
SCALE:
1 inch = 500 feet
TOTAL
NET
FIELD #
ACRES
ACRES
LAT. LONG.
LW -1A
14.4
13.0
34° 52' 42" 78° 55'56"
LW -1B
14.6
14.6
34° 52'47" 78° 56'59"
LW -IC
13.6
13.2
34° 52'51" 780 56'02"
LW -1 D
10.7
10.7
34° 52'46" 78'55'47"
LW -1 E
7.7
6.7
34° 52'41 " 780 55'38"
LW -1 F
8.3
8.0
34° 52'54" 78° 55' 51"
,-
TERRA
renewal
NOTES:
- Sheam antl surface Water 1°ea4°ne wrre de&e4 h°m a combination of USGS brut lino etreema, an -1-u-
-V9, cue Rerlev Boundarydoes not appear. 4 is ft- as Iha Campfaoce 80undary.
KEY TO MAP SYMBOLS:
IiASHEOill—ll Vi
LAND APPLICATION FIELD BOUNDARY
IonsBeo-etu�
STREAM! SURFACE WATER
_----_ �ons"eacxAry
USGSTOPO
(SOL? -MITE)
PROPERTY BOUNUARIES
ISa LrGmA ENTAI
REVIEW BOUNDARY
(sou"ED)
COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY
BUFFER I NON -APPLICATION AREA
0
DWELLING
A
NON-HABrrABLE STRUCTURE
Q
SOIL EVALUATION BORING
WELL
SCALE:
1 inch = 500 feet

10; 1+ti0nc
c
APPLICATION ARBA & SETBACK MAP
County: ROBESON
Landowner(s): LENNIS WATTS
Farmed By: LENNIS WATTS
Permittee: TERRA RENEWAL SERVICES
TOTAL NET
FIELD # ACRES ACRES LAT, LONG.
LW -2A 13,9 12.7 34° 52' 34" 78° 55'40"
LW -2B 9.6 8.9 340 52'35" 78° 55'34"
NOTES:
- Ilk— and sedacv aahr"Cetlogs wen dcMd from a cowbinelion of UGGS blue Inc etraeme, end emelt, vvar-Son.
• Where R--11-1 . •.a. not appeal, 4a the same .a fie GOMplanee 8—duy.
19W W
Q vft TERRA
renewal
BUFFERS:
BUFFER rNON-APPUCAT:ON AREA
FEATURE
BUFFER
SURFACE WATER
50 FT
PUBLIC R.O.W
50 FT
PROPERTY LINE
50 FT
DWELLING (!N)
100 FT
DWELLING (OUT)
200 FT
WELL
100 FT
DITCH
25 FT
:EY TO MAP SYMBOLS:
SCALE:
1 inch = 400 feet
LAND APPLICATION FIELD BOUNDARY
IOASRL"LUEI
BUFFER rNON-APPUCAT:ON AREA
STREAM I SURFACE WATER
El
�.__. (cmmEo- RAY) _--�
DWELLING
VSGBTOPD
Q
ISOL30 VlTl
PROPERTY BOUNDARIES
NON -HABITABLE STRUCTURE
t9OLIPMA EWAI
REVIEW BCUNOARY
SOIL EVALUATION BORING
ISOUL4Eol
0
COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY
WELL
SCALE:
1 inch = 400 feet

APPLICATION AREA & SETBACK MAP
County: ROBESON
Landowner(s): LENNIS WATTS
Farmed By: LENNIS WATTS
BUFFERS:
Permittee: TERRA RENEWAL SERVICES
FEATURE
BUFFER
REVIEW BOUNDARY
SURFACE WATER
100 FT
TOTAL NET
PUBLIC R a W
50 FT
-'r-LD # ACRES ACRES LAT. LONG.
PROPERTY LINE
50 FT
V --3A 19.0 19.0 34' 52'23" 78° 5630"
DWELLING
WELL
400 FT
100 FT
LW -3B 22.1 21-8 34' 52' 11" 78' 55' 35"
DITCH
25FT
LW -3C 25.2 23.2 34'52'11" 78'55'37"
©
NOTES
SOIL EVALUATION BCRING
1 Inch = 400 feet
- Stream and surface water locations were derived from a combination of LISGS blue line
-'.reams, and an -sae evalaahon
WELL
- Whore Review Boundary does not appear, it is the same as the Compliance eot,ndaly.
LAND APPLICATION FIELD BOUNpARY
I�SnEOJf�UEI
STREAM ! SURFACE WATER
Isouaw�li E]
PROPERTY BOUNDARIES
[SOlJ61MLEMRj
REVIEW BOUNDARY
ISollpaEPl
cOMPLIANeE BODNDARY
BUFFER I MON-APPLICATIONAREP.
El
DW ELL
A
NON -F[ BITAE4E STRi1CTURE
©
SCALE.
SOIL EVALUATION BCRING
1 Inch = 400 feet
WELL

C-1
County: BL4DEN APPLICATION AREA & SETBACK MAP
Landowner(s): ASTRAKEL INTERNATIONAL, LTD
toITT LI'
LAND- APPLICATION FIELD BOUNDARY
(M HE0.9WE)
S11REAMISURFACE WATER
Ispuo-wHn'Eo
PROPERTY BOUNDARIES
ISOLIp-I.ucEHrnl
REVIEW BOUNDARY
(S4LId HCb)
coMPTANCE BOUNDARY
BUFFER! NON -APPLICATION AREA
0
DWELLING
I&
MON-HABITABLE STRUCTURE
SOIL EVALUATION BORING
DITGH
SCALE:
I inch = 500 feet
BUFFERS:
Farmed By:
RICK MORRIS
FEATURE
BUFFER
SURFACE WATER
100 FT
Permittee:
TERRA RENEWAL SERVICES
PUBLIC R.O.W
50 FT
PROPERTY LINE
50 FT
TOTAL NET
DWELLING
400 FT
-IELD #
ACRES ACRES LAT. LONG.
WELL
too 1=T
DITCH
25 FT
rI
A-1
43.2 40.9 34° 41'47" 78° 43'31"
RM -2
17.5 4.9 34° 41'59" 78° 43'19"
NOTES.
- Stream and surface water locations were derived from a combinatfon of USGS blue line streams,
and on-site evaluation
- Where Review
Boundary does nol appear, it is the some as the Compl,ance Boundary.
toITT LI'
LAND- APPLICATION FIELD BOUNDARY
(M HE0.9WE)
S11REAMISURFACE WATER
Ispuo-wHn'Eo
PROPERTY BOUNDARIES
ISOLIp-I.ucEHrnl
REVIEW BOUNDARY
(S4LId HCb)
coMPTANCE BOUNDARY
BUFFER! NON -APPLICATION AREA
0
DWELLING
I&
MON-HABITABLE STRUCTURE
SOIL EVALUATION BORING
DITGH
SCALE:
I inch = 500 feet

- � �I• r SLI-iY .. s .a•
j�_ r y -.-I �Y,� + _T }a. '+�. •�'ak 4. _ 'h�� •1_ Li '�'7�. ! t J h ..r
{a!
}'•+ e .. _ s � ?'*It'aFR a� ?' �:�. .'E � � �#-��4r;f-z.s-�"rI " y_ � -X -.�'1
r
• �+ f1 i ,i' � �:,�1s,. 1 ,� 4� � 1 f 7'�•, . 't'y yl
-�` - I`, � l� •, �! yr ori •�-`.t -Aj i
_ -•- T ,Y7 IS
r Sp.
— a _
• � \ _. ,, $ .-, .�`'a ,¢ X91 `c
j 50.FT ` . WE
PROPERTY EINE f r r •
BUFFER
✓ F
r
A
Fr ,:sy;- h ` a • 1•. w r 'a y ELL
all-
• i.r �?:r?''rrt � 3 �' s -Y 1 r b C ti.- .;r +•.� � �r-a �,,r
- .. _ � � � • F ���{� X �7 . � i r 7 r r3 '� • i ��'i.e.-fir
> 2 7 r
Fv,
• i+. '' '}'.Y�'�''. . '.sc 4 3 t r 3, ",',� �"+far' 'aS �' ( 1�'�: -.r�� ]3�iZ rte.,
- 7tl z z ,.�y1 r Y • �.. A d ?, �J'% Y'a'yy (t r�,r." 's At"s��+^~?.'`.
r g i^• ; ; y.+ f • •j S Sr -5� - t ri.�e. a� rte` .rte �--.
s " ! ��� ". � �.. • � rP � { y.TrY � r �+ �r e �r w -sit � a3 � � z r iiS f t � J.t TM '� ywrrrw � S
• } j r '. r ,f�^is• �� ,s•F :,�`a s- .car 'r�i,�..'.>''✓s ,� `P`} �� '�f �� ;-'"C1�a.._ •� � `�C<.�•'Y'
rr ° •�f D4�Farm'�f:YiC2'"
_ •�•ta .. - Pf � 2��� ,t - .�� mow: '
44
5�'O1y � 193 •y .`' ..�. i.\ r ...a: �a�:'�y 20�53,�rJ. iwB : J.��fi',84.�1N�,rIEV��•153 $, �� .. .,,..��kc