20030880 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20060207

t.-
\O?or r , cRQG
Mr. Ronnie E. Petty
A-1 Sandrock, Inc.
3011 County Clare Road
Greensboro, NC 27407
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Q
MAR 9 2006
f1ENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS A0 STORNTNATER MNCH
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Petty:
March 6, 2006
DWQ# 03-0880, Version 2
Guilford County
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to place permanent fill in, or otherwise
impact, 75 linear feet of perennial stream in order to construct a road crossing for access to your property
located on the south side of Bishop Road (SR 1116), south of Greensboro, in Guilford County, as described in
your application received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on February 7, 2006. After reviewing
your application, we have determined that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number
3404, which can be viewed on' our web site at http://www.ncwaterquality.org/wetlands.html. This
Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 14 when it is issued by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers. In addition, you should secure any other applicable federal, state or local permits before you
proceed with your project, including (but not limited to) those required by Sediment and Erosion Control,
Non-Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations. Also, this approval will expire when the
accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is valid only for the purpose and design that you have described in your application. If you
change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you maybe required to send us a new application for a
new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and
approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fill for this
project (now or in the future) exceeds one acre, or total fill to perennial streams equals or exceeds 150 linear
feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval
to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification, as well as the additional
conditions listed below:
1. The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all other specific and general conditions of this
Certification are met. No other impacts, including incidental impacts, are approved:
Amount Approved Plan Location or Reference
Streams 75 linear feet Unnamed tributary to Hickory Creek, located south of Bishop Road (SR
1116), near Greensboro, in Guilford County as depicted on the project
location map

None Carolina
?atura!!r?
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Certification Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 Phone [phone] FAX [phone]
2321 Crabtree Blvd. Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 Internet hftp//:www.ncwaterouality.org
Customer Service Number: 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Mr. Ronnie E. Petty
Page 2, DWQ# 03-0880, Version 2
March 6, 2006

2. Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures which equal or exceed those outlined in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual or the
North Carolina Surface Mining Manual (available from the Division of Land Resources at NCDENR
regional offices or the central office), whichever is more appropriate, shall be designed, installed and
maintained properly to assure compliance at all times with the North Carolina water quality standards
that are applicable to Class C waters as described in 15A NCAC 02B.0211 Fresh Surface Water Quality
Standards For Class C Waters. Such measures must equal or exceed the requirements specified in the
most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. These measures must
be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) sites, including contractor
- owned and-leased-borrow pits,-which-are-ssociated-with_this_project_- -_.
3. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent
practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control measures in wetlands or waters is
unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that the
project is completed or, if applicable, within six months of the date that the project is released by the
North Carolina Division of Land Resources.
4. No waste, spoils, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction activities,
including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control "Best
Management Practices" shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards,
statutes, or rules occur.
5. Where riprap is required for energy dissipation and scour protection, it shall be limited to the minimum
dimensions specified by appropriate engineering calculations. Riprap may only be used below the
normal high water level. The original grade and elevation of the stream's cross-section must be
maintained. Riprap placed in the streambed must be inserted into the bed matrix to a depth sufficient to
provide the thickness of riprap required for scour protection. The elevation of the streambed must not be
increased by the placement of riprap. Placement of riprap must not result in destabilization of the
-- - ----strnambed or banks upstream-or downstream of any crossing.
6. All construction activities associated with this project shall minimize built-upon surface area, direct
stormwater runoff away from surface waters, and incorporate best management practices to minimize
water quality impacts. If concrete is used with any fill material, it shall not be allowed to come in
contact with surface waters until it has cured. If any stormwater must be collected for discharge into a
stream channel, it shall not enter the stream as a point source, but shall be slowed and discharged as
sheet flow prior to entering the riparian buffer on either side of the stream.
7. Upon finishing the project, the Applicant shall fill out and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401 Certification has been completed.
This certificate should be returned to the Wetlands/401 Certification Unit of the NC Division of Water
Quality at the address listed on the form. Along with the Certificate of Completion, please send
photographs of the culvert installation to document correct construction.
Mr. Ronnie E. Petty
Page'3, DWQ# 03-0880, Version 2
March 6, 2006
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You
must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To' ask for a hearing, send a written petition
which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
If you have any questions, please telephone Daryl Lamb in the DWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office at 336-
771-4959 or Ian McMillan in the Wetlands/401 Central Office in Raleigh at 919-715-4631.
Sincerely,
?F_
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AWK/cdl
Attachments
cc: Mr. Todd Tugwell, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Central Files
Wetlands/401 File Copy
Mr. David Garret, David Garrett, PG, PE, Inc., 5105 Harbour Towne Drive, Raleigh, NC 27604
David Garrett, P.G., P.E. 03-D990
Engineering and Geology
February 6, 2006
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Att: Ian McMillan
Ey; ,
RE: Letter of Transmittal
A-1 Sandrock PCN Amendment
Dear Sir:
Per our telephone conversation, I am pleased to present the enclosed documents for your review.
The documents pertain to a Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) amendment for a proposed
roadway stream crossing for access to A-1 Sandrock, Inc., a planned mine and C&D landfill
located in Guilford County. The site is within the Randleman Reservoir watershed. The
crossing received approval in 2003 as a triple-pipe culvert, with an authorized 150 linear feet of
stream impacts, per Certificate DWQ #03-0880 dated September 8, 2003 (three year expiration).
That certificate included a Nationwide-14 certificate from the US Army Corps of Engineers,
#200220692, dated October 3, 2003. The subject stream crossing has not yet been built.
The project owner, A-1 Sandrock, Inc., has selected a bottomless pipe-arch culvert instead of the
triple-pipe culvert. This change will reduce the stream impacts to 75 linear feet, as well as
narrowing the embankment footprint to reduce the buffer impact. No wetlands are present at the
proposed stream crossing. Tentative design information is presented on the enclosed drawings.
The foundations for the pipe-arch culvert will be set outside the stream channel, above the mean
high water line, so that wildlife passageways will be maintained on both sides of the stream. The
pipe-arch culvert will safely accommodate a 100-year flood event. The stream bottom will not
be modified, as it would have been required for the triple-pipe culvert.
The construction narrative in the enclosed plans details protective measures for the stream, i.e.,
the stream flow will be diverted via sandbags placed down the center of the channel and/or a
temporary stone cofferdam (covered with a flexible membrane) and a creek pump. The final
design of the crossing is from a well-known manufacturer/supplier (Contech), and an
experienced contractor, who is familiar with local regulations pertaining to stream work, will be
hired to build the crossing. This project is necessary for the economic development of the site,
and restrictions by local ordinances and natural topography limit access to the project from any
other corridor. The design of the proposed crossing has been structured to minimize impacts on
water quality. Please note that previous sewer line construction ca. 2003 has already altered the
stream channel and buffers in close proximity to the proposed road crossing.
5105 Harbour Towne Drive - Raleigh - North Carolina - 27604
919-231-1818 (Office and Fax) - 919-418-4375 (Mobile) - E-mail: david @davidgarrettpe.com
i
A-1 Sand rock PCN Amendment Transmittal Letter, Page 2
Please find enclosed the following documents:
1. North Carolina Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application Form (5 copies)
i
2. Construction plans with tentative culvert design information, protective measures,
and narrative (4 folded full-size copies and one 11x17 inch copy for USA COE)
3. Letter from the president of A-1 Sandrock, authorizing David Garrett, P.G., P.E.
to submit this application on their behalf (affixed to original)
4. A check for $200 for the application fee (affixed to original).
Please contact me with any questions that might arise pertaining to this project. My offices are
conveniently located in proximity to the regulatory agencies, or I will gladly meet Agency
representatives at the site. I look forward to your reply at your'earliest convenience.
Very Truly tours,
i.
G. David
Project C
enclosure
cc: Ronnie E. Petty - A-1 Sandrock, Inc.
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or °N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
? Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:
3.- If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastaLcounties (listed-on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coasta(',Managemerit Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details);; check here: ? 9
FL-% 7 ZCIG6
II. Applicant Information _
vii
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Gene Petty/Ron Petty
Mailing Address: 3011 County Clare Road
Greensboro NC 27407
Telephone Number: 336-852-9107 Fax Number: 336-852-9180
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: David Garrett (Consultant)'
Company Affiliation: David GarrettPG PE Inc.'
Mailing Address: 5105 Harbour Towne Drive
Raleigh, NC 27604
Telephone Number: 919-418-4375 Fax Number: 919-231-1818
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 5 of 13
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The site
has been permitted by NC DENR for sandrock minim and inert debris landfill reclamation
(solid waste permit pending), heaves earthwork equipment and dump trucks will use the
crossing
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Amended ' application to provide permanent
crossing for access to mine and landfill area, located south of unnamed tributary from main
paved road (Bishop Road)• unnamed tributary is approximately 3 feet wide and drains
approximately 450 acres; previous impacts to buffers have occurred due to recent sewer line
construction; due to local government restrictions there is no practical alternative to
accessing the site commercially by any direction that does not involve a stream crossing; this
implication pertains to a proposed plan amendment to reduce stream impacts, i.e., a
previously approved (but not built) triple-pipe culvert is being substituted with a bottomless
pipe-arch, stream impact reduces from max allowable of 150 linear feet to 75 feet maximum
with new design
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
USACOE 404 certification completed in MM 2002 (Todd Tuawell) Action ID 200220692,
following evaluation of wetlands and endangered species (none at proposed crossing); site was
inspected by NC DENR Division of Water Quality personnel (Jenny Rankin) for jurisdictional
buffer determination circa April-MM 2002 (all jurisdictional streams shown on maps); approval
of mine permit application by DENR Division of Land Resources 041-22) included site-wide
Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan, with protective measures for tributary crossing; stream
crossing was approved by NCDENR per DW # 03-0880 dated September 8, 2003; said
approval included US Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide 14 Certificate 4200220692, dated
October 2 2003
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
None anticipated i
Page 7 of 13
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet. i
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Construction of earthen embankment
(Uproximately 14 feet in height and single-span bottomless pipe arch culvert to convey runoff
from 100-year storm; cast-in-place reinforced concrete foundations for culvert will be located
outside the mean high water mark, i.e., outside the channel on sloping stream banks: protective
measures during construction will include diverting the stream and placing silt fence and other
appropriate measures (silt fence, temporary sediment traps) to limit siltation; an experienced
reputable contractor will be utilized; no permanent rip-rap will be left in the stream
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
None

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, 611,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.tema.QQo_v.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: NA
Total area of wetland impact proposed: NA
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name**' of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on ma) (linear feet Before Impact (please seci )
Page 8 of 13
1 Pipe-arch culvert 75 UT - Hickory Creek 3 feet Perennial
2 Temp. diversion 75 UT-Hickory Creet 3 feet Perennial
k List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. impacts mciude, out are not Hunted to: cuivcris and assot;uaied tip-iap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wail, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation,'ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at I-800-358-9616, or online at
wwwmses.aov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 75 feet max.
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of '
Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)
NA

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. impacts mciude, but are not umtted to: nH, excavadou, ureugH,g,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Page 9 of 13
i
i
i
Stream crossing was selected at narrowest point, with steep topography (minimal wetlands
outside channel banks)-, topographic constraints and local government prohibitions restrict site
access from other directions but must have access to paved road for economic development;
once site was selected approach grades for roadwgy and embankment height and slope ratios
were optimized for smallest possible embankment footprint, also previous sewer construction
had already altered riparian buffers (other potential locations would be wooded)
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project;' establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
i
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Owner has granted a conservation easement (dedication by plat) on approximately seven
acres of 100 year floodplain along Hickory Creek to Guilford County (downstream of this
project) for drainage and open space; Owner has agreed (and is under obligation) as a
Page 10 of 13
IX.
X.
provision of the mining permit to maintain riparian buffers within the property boundaries,
i.e., a preservation mechanism which totals approximately ten acres, no wetlands outside
the stream channel and banks are affected by this project per the USACOE Jurisdictional
Determination thus no further mitigation for this project is proposed at this time
Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http•//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
2
Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes El No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers; (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Page 11 of 13
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify)? Randleman rules
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 4,500 3 13,500
2 3,000 1.5 4,500
Total 7,500 18,000
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
Please refer to Section VIII-1 -- Please note buffer impacts reduced from initial approved
application
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Anticipate 3.12 acres of impervious surface on the 75 acre site including 1.95 acres of roadways,
approx. 0.14 acres of buildings and approx. 1.03 acres of gravel parking areas- currently none;
an approved sedimentation and erosion control plan has been implemented, including a large
future sediment pond and numerous traps and ditches; all surfaces shall be vegetated;
sedimentation basins will double as storm water ponds (extended dry detention basins)
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No waste water will be generated by the mine or landfill operations; application shall be made to
connect future offices and buildings onto the sanitM sewer, which runs on-site
Page 12 of 13
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
EXPLANATION: timberin activities in 2003 disturbed buffers in a few areas, which were
repaired under the supervision of the DENR Land Quality Section and Guilford County
Planning and Development (Storm Water and Erosion Control); all conditions were met
and the site is no longer in violation; the stream crossing is not associated with the
previous violations, i.e., the violations had not occurred at the proposed stream crossing
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Owner desires to proceed with this work as soon as possible to take advantage of the summer
construction season and to facilitate commencement of the permitted mining activities, access
restrictions from other roads will hinder construction of the sedimentation basin, which is among
the initial planned construction activities
14-
App lent/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 13 of 13
Triage Check List
Date: 2/09/06 Project Name: A-1 Sandrock South Mine & C& D Landfill
DWQ#: 03-0880, Ver. 2
County: Guilford
Daryl Lamb, Winston-Salem Regional Office
To:
60-day processing time: 2/07/06 - 4/07/06
From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone: [phone]
The file attached is being forwarded to you for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern

Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks!
David Garrett, P.G., P.E. .Xy? P, D Z- D8 8 D
Engineering and Geology
February 6, 2006
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
F
Att: Ian McMillan
RE: Letter of Transmittal
A-1 Sandrock PCN Amendment
Dear Sir:
Per our telephone conversation, I am pleased to present the enclosed documents for your review.
The documents pertain to a Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) amendment for a proposed
roadway stream crossing for access to A-1 Sandrock, Inc., a planned mine and C&D landfill
located in Guilford County. The site is within the Randleman Reservoir watershed. The
crossing received approval in 2003 as a triple-pipe culvert, with an authorized 150 linear feet of
stream impacts, per Certificate DWQ #03-0880 dated September 8, 2003 (three year expiration).
That certificate included a Nationwide-14 certificate from the US Army Corps of Engineers,
#200220692, dated October 3, 2003. The subject stream crossing has not yet been built.
The project owner, A-1 Sandrock, Inc., has selected a bottomless pipe-arch culvert instead of the
triple-pipe culvert. This change will reduce the stream impacts to 75 linear feet, as well as
narrowing the embankment footprint to reduce the buffer impact. No wetlands are present at the
proposed stream crossing. Tentative design information is presented on the enclosed drawings.
The foundations for the pipe-arch culvert will be set outside the stream channel, above the mean
high water line, so that wildlife passageways will be maintained on both sides of the stream. The
pipe-arch culvert will safely accommodate a 100-year flood event. The stream bottom will not
be modified, as it would have been required for the triple-pipe culvert.
The construction narrative in the enclosed plans details protective measures for the stream, i.e.,
the stream flow will be diverted via sandbags placed down the center of the channel and/or a
temporary stone cofferdam (covered with a flexible membrane) and a creek pump. The final
design of the crossing is from a well-known manufacturer/supplier (Contech), and an
experienced contractor, who is familiar with local regulations pertaining to stream work, will be
hired to build the crossing. This project is necessary for the economic development of the site,
and restrictions by local ordinances and natural topography limit access to the project from any
other corridor. The design of the proposed crossing has been structured to minimize impacts on
water quality. Please note that previous sewer line construction ca. 2003 has already altered the
stream channel and buffers in close proximity to the proposed road crossing.
5105 Harbour Towne Drive - Raleigh - North Carolina - 27604
919-231-1818 (Office and Fax) - 919-418-4375 (Mobile) - E-mail: david @davidgarrettpe.com
Please find enclosed the following documents:
2
1. North Carolina Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application Form (5 copies)
2. Construction plans with tentative culvert design information, protective measures,
and narrative (4 folded full-size copies and one 11x17 inch copy for USA COE)
3. Letter from the president of A-1 Sandrock, authorizing David Garrett, P.G., P.E.
to submit this application on their behalf (affixed to original)
4. A check for $200 for the application fee (affixed to original).
Please contact me with any questions that might arise pertaining to this project. My offices are
conveniently located in proximity to the regulatory agencies, or I will gladly meet Agency
representatives at the site. I look forward to your reply at your earliest convenience.
Very Truly tours,
G. David
Project C
enclosure
A-1 Sandrock PCN Amendment Transmittal Letter, Page
i
cc: Ronnie E. Petty - A-1 Sandrock, Inc.
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(if any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "loot Appiicame" or
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
? Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details?, check here: ?
I :X:
II. Applicant Information 1 ;
FEB 7 = visa -,
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Gene Petty/Ron Petty €
Mailing Address: 3011 County Clare Road
Greensboro. NC 27407
i
Telephone Number: 336-852-9107 Fax Number: 336-852-9180
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: David Garrett (Consultant)
Company Affiliation: David GarrettPG PE Inc.
Mailing Address: 5105 Harbour Towne Drive
Raleigh NC 27604
Telephone Number: 919-4184375 Fax Number: 919-231-1818
E-mail Address: david?a david arrettpe.com
Page 5 of 13
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The site
has been permitted by NC DENR for sandrock mining and inert debris landfill reclamation
(solid waste permit pending)' heavy earthwork equipment and dump trucks will use the
crossing
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Amended application to provide permanent
crossing for access to mine and landfill area, located south of unnamed tributary from main
paved road (Bishop Road), unnamed tributary is approximately 3 feet wide and drains
approximately 450 acres, previous impacts to buffers have occurred due to recent sewer line
construction, due to local government restrictions there is no practical alternative to
accessing the site commercially by any direction that does not involve a stream crossin this
application pertains to a proposed plan amendment to reduce stream impacts, i.e., a
previously approved (but not built) triple-pipe culvert is being substituted with a bottomless
pipe-arch, stream impact reduces from max. allowable of 150 linear feet to 75 feet maximum
with new design
IV. Prior Project History
if jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
USACOE 404 certification completed in May 2002 (Todd Tugwell) Action ID 200220692,
following evaluation of wetlands and endangered species' (none at proposed crossing); site was
inspected by NC DENR Division of Water Qualily personnel (Jenny Rankin) for jurisdictional
buffer determination circa April-May 2002 (all jurisdictional streams shown on maps); approval
of mine permit application by DENR Division of Land Resources 041-22) included site-wide
Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan, with protective measures for tributary crossing; stream
crossing was approved by NCDENR per DWQ# 03-0880 dated September 8, 2003; said
approval included US Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide 14 Certificate #20022069.2, dated
October 2 2003
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
None anticipated
i
Page 7 of 13
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Construction of earthen embankment
(gpproximately 14 feet in height) and single-span bottomless pipe arch culvert to convey runoff
from 100-year storm, cast-in-place reinforced concrete foundations for culvert will be located
outside the mean high water mark, i.e., outside the channel on sloping stream banks; protective
measures during construction will include diverting the stream and placing silt fence and other
appropriate measures (silt fence temporary sediment traps) to limit siltation; an experienced
reputable contractor will be utilized, no permanent rip-rap will be left in the stream
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
( es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
feet)
Type of Wetland***
None

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, till,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://Nv%vw.femaaov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: NA
Total area of wetland impact proposed: NA
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on ma) (linear feet) Before Impact (please seci )
Page 8 of 13
I Pipe-arch culvert 75 UT- Hickory Creek, 3 feet Perennial
2 Temp. diversion 75 UT-Hickory Creet 3 feet Perennial
List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.sov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., w,vw.tooozone.com,
www.mapqueSt.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 75 feet max.
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres)
Name p Watble)

(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,

bay, ocean, etc.
NA

* List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. impacts mciuae, our arc nur 11111LLGU V. 1111, CXCavat-., 5,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Page 9of13
Stream crossing was selected at narrowest point with steep topography (minimal wetlands
outside channel banks), topographic constraints and local government prohibitions restrict site
access from other directions but must have access to paved road for economic development;
once site was selected approach grades for roadway and embankment height and slope ratios
were optimized for smallest possible embankment footprint; also previous sewer construction
had already altered riparian buffers (other potential locations would be wooded)
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
t
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Owner has granted a conservation easement (dedication by plat) on approximately seven
acres of 100_year floodplain along Hickory Creek to Guilford County (downstream of this
a
project) for drainage and open space; Owner has agreed (and is under obligation) as
Page 10 of 13
provision of the mining permit to maintain riparian buffers within the property boundaries,
i.e., a preservation mechanism which totals approximately ten acres; no wetlands outside
the stream channel and banks are affected by this project, per the USACOE Jurisdictional
Determination thus no further mitigation for this project is proposed at this time
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
IX.
X.
Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federa /state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Page 11 of 13
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify)? Randleman rules
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
i
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 4,500 3 13,500
2 3,000 1.5 4,500
Total

7,500
1 J

j

18,000
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0242 or .0260.
Please refer to Section VIII-1 -- Please note buffer impacts reduced from initial approved
application
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Anticipate 3.12 acres of impervious surface on the 75 acre site including 1.95 acres of roadways,
approx. 0.14 acres of buildings and approx. 1.03 acres of gravel parking areas, currently none-,
an approved sedimentation and erosion control plan has been implemented including a large
future sediment pond and numerous traps and ditches-, all surfaces shall be vegetated;
sedimentation basins will double as storm water ponds (extended dry detention basins)
X1I. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No waste water will be generated by the mine or landfill operations-, application shall be made to
connect future offices and buildings onto the sanitary sewer, which runs on-site
Page 12 of 13
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No ® j
is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
EXPLANATION: timbering activities in 2003 disturbed buffers in a few areas, which were
repaired under the supervision of the DENR Land Quality Section and Guilford County
Plannins and Development (Storm Water and Erosion Control); all conditions were met
and the site is no Ioneer in violation; the stream crossing is not associated with the
previous violations, i.e., the violations had not occurred at the proposed stream crossing
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Owner desires to proceed with this work as soon as possible to take advantage of the summer
construction season and to facilitate commencement of the permitted mining activities; access
restrictions from other roads will hinder construction of the sedimentation basin, which is among
the initial planned construction activities
-Z?/ 7
0Z r 5_0
Apphc Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signs a is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 13 of 13
FROM :D FAX NO. :2949800 Feb. 06 2006 12: 59PM P2
r)3-o88o VT
1
Art Sandrrock Inc, Gr'Gf"CtSDOOW t? 4007
February 6, 2006
To whom this may concern:
I hereby as Ronald Eugene Petty 111, president of A-1 Sandrock Inc give David Garrett P.E. P.G.
authority to act on my behalf In signing any documents or applications as my agent.
Sincerely,
Ronald Petty II
President
r
zO
I ~a
~n / , N DATE N0, REVISION
1. B FFERS ON BOTH SIDE`, x ~ TH SIDES OF 1RI8UTARY AT CR059NC ARE ALREADY NOTE:
DISTURBED, / \ EXIST. RIP..-RA AT SEWER CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT MR. T0~1 WEST Z~4/os ' wa~'wc~ c~~r oar w~r~ou~T
x - x,..-_------` CROSSING BY THERS 2 TOTAL LENGTH OF BUFFI LENGTH OF BUffER/STREAM IMPACT IS lESS THAN 150', oR HESS. WITH COLONIAL PIPELINE, 336-931-6039 PRIOR
/ \
/ ~ 3. TRAPS R-1 THROUGH R~ f IMLL REQUIRE FIELD ADJUS R-1 7HRWGH R-4 AND SILT FENCE L~A710N5 ARE APPROXIMATE, TO ANY WORK IN THE GAS LINE RIGHT OF WAY JIBE FlELD ADJUSTMENT. E
/ 4. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT T RARY SEDIMENT TRAPS R-1 1HR000H R-4 N1LL BE LOCATED IN
ZONE 2 OF THE BUFFERS / \ / 8E ASSESSED IN THE FIELD IF THE BUFFERS, NOT ZONE 1, AS ~OUIRED. ACNAL NEED ri1LL USED IN THE FlELD N17H NC DENR PERSONNEL
i
/ ' f / ~ ~~i rig
\ ` ~
'1~ / / \ .
fl ll~\
\
/
\ x 0
k z
/ R-3 BA Flll RWN ALL IPES TH w 790 ~ Cn o
M w - ~
/ .
- EXIST. SANITARY i A-1 b, OR A-2 4), C PAC TO ~ o z ¢ ~ a~~~
SEWER EASEMENT
f p m -Zoo N~~ (STA DARD PROC OR) AS ~$o ~ c
/ BY OTHERS
\ n U + ^ i~ MAN FAC RER ~ o~ o ~
TEMPORARY STONE (n U
COFFERDAM COVER ED > m ~w
\ m WITH FLEXIBLE PVC ~ ~ 5 ° APp ~ ~ N ~ o
\ 5a v 50 VC W > ; G ~ s~
MEMBRANE RE UIR ~ / Q ES / \ f%1
_ / - SUFFICIENT PUMPING TO w +1.5 o APPR X. ~ ~ ~ 9
\ , \ MATCH STREAM FLOW P I ELEV 78, P EIEV 762. ~ W ~ W
R-4 / A.D. = 3.00 \ A.D. = 3.00
/ - _ P I STA 13+50 73 760
\ + / n.o._ 6-48ii UMINI ED S 0.
R-2 - \
_ x 30,
r /
i . '-7"RI E C TECH 3A1 REI FORC CO CRE Aso
\ ~ / - - --TEMPORARY SAND 6A FO TER, OCKE IN 0
CO PE T R
? CHANNEL DIVERSIO 0
FLOW PPO5ITE / ALL WORK IS TO OCW 20,
SIDE OF CHANNEL .FROM. AB ~E AN OUT TOE E
ACTIVE-WORK -SITE N HI A RUN OF Sao ~
/ TH TRIBUiARY ANN °
NAP 1 aaa'~
f l O' e U

R-1 /
d'pN'
. /
~ _ 1+50 12+00 72+50 13+00 13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00 15+50 16+00 16+50 17+00 17+50 Q
x X 1' = 100' VERT.
sl
x k
- , ~x 0 50' 100' 150' U
J Z
/ 1' = 50' ~
V ~
X Y Z
a EXISTING' SED. TRAP G
NSTRUCTION NOTES: o 0
/ ~ APPR4X. LOCA110N ~ U
0 ZO' 40' 60' CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT STREAM FROM SILTATION AT 10. CONSTRUCTION OF THE CROSSING SHALL BE PERFORMED
TIMES. THE WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED DURING IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S OR SUPPLIER'S ¢ ~
1"=20' - N-FLOW PERIODS, IF POSSIBLE. ENGINEERING GUIDELINES. cn o
SEDiMENTTRAP DESIGN SCHEDULE Based on 25-year, 24-hour storm ca~ulations J
Sediment Trap No. D R1 R2 R3 R4 INITIAL STAGE OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONSIST OF 11. FOUNDATIONS SHALL BE SET OUTSIDE THE ACTIVE
~ Disturbed drainage area, saes 2.83 0.11 O.OB 0.06 0.12 'FRYING CHANNEL FLOW TO OPPOSITE SIDE FROM WORK CHANNEL AND TOPS SHALL BE ABOVE THE MEAN HIGH -
0 E WITH SAND BAGS AND INSTALLING OTHER MEASURES. WATER LINE
Min, Req' Soil Volume (1800 f"31ac}, cf 5,094 198 144 108 216
w ~ Design Soil Storage Volume, cf 5,180 224 147 126 224
~ ' IT MAY BE NECESSARY TO BUILD A TEMPORARY COFFER 12. ALL DIRT SPILLED INO THE DRY CHANNEL SHALL BE ~
~ Design Stann Event Q25 425 42t3 425 425 0 N
N (AS SHOWN) AND PUMP THE STREAM FLOW AROUND REMOVED PRIOR TO RESTORING FLOW; ALL RIP-RAP AND Z
0 24-hour Precipitation, inches 6.41 6.41 6,41 6.41 6.41 v WORK SITE. SAND BAGGING SHALL BE REMOVED FROM CHANNEL ~ v~ w
o Peak Runoff Intensity, irUhr 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 o ~
W Peak Runoff Flow, Q, cfs 13 1 1 1 1
P a EXCAVATIONS FOR PIPE ARCH FOUNDATIONS SHALL BE 13. ALL EARTHWORK SHALL BE VEGETATED AND MULCHED ° ~
3 Basin Bottom Dimensions, length, ft. 40 8 7 6 8 FORMED FROM HIGHER GROUND (NOT FROM THE IMMEDIATELY UPON COMPLETION AND SUPERVISED AND ~ ~
width, ft. 37 8 6 6 8 0
° Basin Bottom Elevation" 730.0 742.0 742.0 742.0 742.0 ' 4NNEL). CERTIFIED BY THE PROJECT ENGINEER. ,z ~ ~
° Maximum Basin Depth 3,5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 cn STOCKPILE EXCAVATION SPOILS WITHIN SILT FENCE AWAY 14. EXISTING SEDIMENT TRAPS AND SILT FENCE SHALL BE ° ~ z
Q Stone Filter Weir Length, feet " 12 4 4 4 4
w )M THE CHANNEL. CHECKED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, REPAIRED AS NEEDED, w m z
5tone Finer Weir Elevation'"' 733.5 745.5 745.5 745.5 745.5 z AND MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION AND Q ~ Q
Y. Q Perimeter Rim Elevation"" 735.0 747.0 747.0 747.0 747.0
w POUR FOUNDATIONS AND RESTORE GROUND COVER AS REVEGETATION STAGES
NOTES: i )N AS PRACTICAL (DO NOT ALLOW STREAM TO CONTACT ~ ~ J
'Anticipated based on site geometry, may be adjusted to reflect actual field conditions
N ~URED CONCRETE). ~ cwn
~ "'Minimum length required to pass design storm 0
""'Provide minimum 1.5 feet of freeboard MAINTAIN TEMPORARY MEASURES DURING CONSTRUCTION ~ o
o
~ Maximum allowable Soil storage depth is 3.5 feet per NC Division of Land Quality regulations PIPE AND EMBANKMENT. - ~
Bottom geometry may be adjusted to reflect field conditions, but must provide minimum volume
a at maximum allowable height 0 CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR ONLY THE MINIMUM AREA °ES'~E° BY °RA~ eY
i n Use 2H:1V side slopes inside and outside basin, vegetate slopes as soon as practical G.D.G. A.W.H.
v lNG STREAM BANKS AND WITHIN THE RIPARIAN BUFFER, IT ~E~KEO B~ PRO~E~, No.
~ Make width of berm and weir at crest minimum 3 feet, compact all soil per technical specifications 4 v _ BE PREFERABLE NOT TO GRUB THE DISTURBED AREAS. o o c i i n n i n i n n ~ G.D.G. SANDROCK-2
= Construct stone filter weir with rip-rap (d50 =12 inches), underlain by geotextile with water stops I I\LLIIVIIIVHI\ I scne onrE.
' Clean traps once every 6 months as required. Basin shall be inspected after 9. ALL SLOP w each rainfall event. Side slope vegetation shall be maintained in good condition. LARGE STONI ALL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3H:1V SHALL BE FACED WITH FILE NAME
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION "SS"o~ FEB. 2D06 'GE STONE (D50 = 24"), PLACED IN TWO INTERLOCKING SHEErNOROCK-ooaeN No
Line temporary ditches leading to traps with high velocity excelsior or TRM CONC(
LIFTS, -S, CONCURRENTLY WITH SOIL PLACEMENT.
2 SX2

~ ~ k X ~ ? DATE N0. RENSION
/ SIDE OF TRI U A B 1H SSE OF 1RIBUTARY ALREADY DISTURBED.
i ~ ~ ~ x ~ 2. TOTAL LENGTH OF BUFFER~STREA' lF BUFFER/SIREAM IMPACT IS LESS THAN 150', OR LESS.
/ , ~ .
_ _r_ X ' 3, TRAPS R-1 THROUGH R-4 AND S X , CONTACC .SNAIL CONTACT MR. TOM WEST / ~ WGH R-4 AND SLT FENCE LOCAl10NS ARE APPROXI~IAIE,
WILL REQUIRE FlELD AD~ISTMENT. OR MRr ROB.. ~ARGR VE WITH Ol i / 0 C UN AL i ADJUSTMENT.
4. TEMPORARY IM NT / ~ ~>~IPELINE 336, 3a-6039 PRIOR TO AMY VIf~K sED E TRAPS R-~ IMENT 1RAPS R-1 1HR000H R-4 YALL BE LOCAlEO M
' ZONE 2 OF THE BUFFERS, NOT ZONE IFFERS, NOT ZONE 1.
PROPOSED 25 ACCESS ~ / IN TH GA E S LINE... RIGHT OF WAY
ROAD UNPA / VED /
, - , , ~ ~l l% , i

~i . ~ ; 60' VC ~
~ x ; /
. , PVI STA = 15+89.91 g
SEAM OS NG TRIBUTARY TR ~ CR S1 R- ~ - . 3; o! w PVI ELEV = 766.13
k SEE SCHEDULE . - ~ , ,n ~ A.D. = 4.50
_ .y u+, K = 13.33
ro 770 mM
/ W ' N rTl ~ N m m t0 1~ F~1 T ~~J..S~~ 8 O~
,
_ ~ a ~
/ ' EXIST. SANITARY SEJ~ &
-7.00 ~ >p+~
, ~ ~ EASEMENT BY OTHERS , O
~ REFERENCE NOTE 4 ~ / / ~ ~v
~ / \ ~ \ RIP-RAP SLOPE FACE ~ ~
- /
, x R-4 ~ ~ ~
~ k ~ ~ ~ \ 1 760 ~
.r
/ - /
. - . R~2 : ' , ~ T ~

~ A W~
_ BACKFILL AROUNC (FlLL AROUND ALL PIPES ~
WITH SELECT Flll SELECT FlLL (AASHTO _ _ -
s a ,
X ~ - s A-~ q, A ~ a, ~ -a, A-1-b, OR A-2-4), 30
F , COMPACT TO 95~ - , PACT TO 95XMDD BY ASTI~I 7 5 0
~r D-648 STANDAR 48 (STANDARD PROCTOR) 8'~yp TRIPLE 72" IPE CULVERT
~ , ~ R-1 ,n ~ . ~ ~
, X
, (ALUMINIZED STEEL) PLACED 20~
. AT VARYING ELEVATIONS
- M
_ - , ,'~,,P' ,,1,~°., 4
10' ? ~ P ~d~a o
~ , STAK STRAW...... S - .a: :c~
-TEMPORARY _ 740
9 ~ ~ ; DO~ISTI~E
B 0 10' 20' 30' ~.PC'°
,
. ~ , 0
_ _ _ _ _ 1' = 10' 1' = 100' VERT.
_ _ , LT FENCE ~1'`IP. k
~ _ , w ,
. - . , ~ _
. _ _ n n n R n n n n n J
. , . - .
x . 'J - ,
_ x . - 15+50 16+00 16+50 ~
- _
j~ Y
_ _ , µ ~~~III
~ . . t
. ~ ~ ~ yyETLANDS 1401 GROUP wA~
t~Y~
0 20' 40' 60' OCT 1 7 2003 Z p ~nON
1"=20' ~ WATER QUALITY SECTION ((a O
r. J
ALACE d5o= PLACE d5~i2' STONE PoPR .~J ~ ~
IN TWO INTE IN TWO INIERLOCgNG LIFTS ~ Q ~
~ SED~ENT TRAP DE810N SCHEDULE Based at 26~yar, 24~Itotor storm ~ r
ci Sedhrbrd Tap No. D R1 R2 R3 R4
w Dietrrrbed dnimpe area, acne 263 0,11 ao6 0.08 0.12
EL 150 75p PROPOSED 72'0 PIPE
Min. Req' Soil Vakene (1800 M3hc), d 5,094 188 144 108 218 0
° Deelgn $dl Stooge Vohrnte, d 8,180 224 147 126 224 eTMAM CIlOgele CllIUeRT ab>low eC111DIILe N
~ Storm Evert Q28 tn0 q28 l#i8 t276 ern. tlyearorae 0100 ~ oww. ~ too, esbwnbrwom brlMetuatrn Owtat eteuoan nano e10 Mv.and Fuynd ~ tmrodwrwt ~ ?
~Dn barreewr Aaeo ah Ty/e Mahn toot e,IR Floghb hot MrwR Type twoR Tye tndwn YYktlr, e, YYldlh,>x R ClMrrana, tt , R c~ ~
° 24~haor Precipibtiort, krcttae 8.41 8.41 6.41 8.41 6.41 mw.y ~ ne row n too ~.o~ to 7~.4 baareaera i~,o beleredondwl to to µ ~ ~.t t.2
~ o Peck RunoB tnterrody, kVhr 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 STREAM PROFILE LONGITUDINAL VIEW
Hoar. hM1 groao on tpM a*nrt M tibuhy oroNYq ohwl aanwreo; Mono ohd b.1Nd ha rodq Mrorn bolbm; e~ravea ooe oobo ~ noodoe Peak Rundl Fbw, Qp, de 19 1 1 1 1 , ~ w ~e n a mhhMww e~obnooo d Z NN ow>tlon nYnhwm a o.o~ . nomw~own N.T.S. m ~
Ueo Choo rq~rnp wpocMd; M~ ~P p~ a bMnar ( y, 1 urdorrNeer Halo, Z
~ Bakt Bottom Dirrenaone, k+rpth, ft. 40 6 7 8 6 "'a''~~ P~ M ~ e1101"M" pwhhoam d onok wear Mopo thM bo M loeol t1 hdno rtko end t2 hdNO eoop; llealde weMr MoF towloh wNh oruohod Mae ° o vridth,A. 37 6 6 8 6 ,~,,,,~,,,,,,~,~,a~,~a,,,~,,,,,,,,,r,u~„~„d,q,,,h,d,,,~,~. CHANNEL, MIN, CIE FAT
TIN. ONE FOOT BELOW STREAM BOTTOM. ~ (n
o Basin Bottom Elevation' 790.0 7420 742.0 742.0 742.0 MhMMrm wMdway Mores Y Ile ponn~ore Yntoedbn, pa NC t>OT ryldoe~oo; mhhwm ampaafy erwnnq AsripAle M 1Z t~cMo 2. PLACE TWO PIPES IN BOTTOM, ONE OF WHICH NJE OF WHICH IS EXTENDED ONE FOOT BELOW STREAM BOTTOM, ~ ~
AL1t~lATNEOrs~r+eFatl~ltWTANrt~tose~NOtMreecorasio~oroLesser+u~F~cr~we~u~eru.uTioat,t=..a„aorrobtltsa~~act+cte.vetr THIRD PIPE AT BANKFULL Alaxinttett Bak? Depth 9.6 3.5 3.8 3.6 3.6 ~ (AOOrtIONAI DE610N Wet 1E RECUeIID) W ~
~ortei=leerWeirt.erpth,feet" 12 4 4 4 4 3. DO NOT ALTER CHANNEL CHARACTERISI1CS. Q W 1CTERISTICS. O U
~ StoneFlltert!tMirElevedort"' 733.8 7466 745.5 745.5 746.6 uM~oaaMaetanaawya~wrMonhrateM.y,eaeea~pprmenMofyon~a?tridtM+Mdti, 4, PLACE RIP-RAP AROUND PIP :NDS EXTEND UP SIDE SLOPE OF EMBANKMENT MIN. 1' ABOVE ~
~ mMeBedryrnaaaMe?dMobrewA E ENDS EXTEND U PerimeOerRlmEkrvefbn"` 735.0 747,0 747.0 747.0 747.o HIGHEST PIPE.
t',xanrea a torah h lutbern began rrr ehrorweonooproprMto a ono dew viPo oulwAo
N°~' ura>Mt.~~we~nan.«N,~rop~etalawr«noannteaN~,+om~t+e.roraaware~eaa«M«t 5. PLAC ARMORF X C CR E LE ON ETE REVETMENT ALOP EVETMENT ALONG CHANNEL BANKS (iY10 8'x 20' PANELS PER ~
Y ~ ~ SIDE NOT IN STREAM BOTTOM. ArfiapaMd t~aeod on site geometry, be eti~rettd b Mkct actual t1eW oondNiom brrlA hr anon ash Na to Mown, hr'aedN~ U
O ~ "MktYnum fenph nqutred 10 peN deeiprt Mona FamM1gM aerorM, oMer 1tM ourrt rN ooaw wNhMaelnl ly roquYeq by ahooblq rw Mdoo ~ rook o01, aoMr memo
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR BANKS OF EXISTIN( tUaoeathewwvorarraw«aara~eaawaneM~e.ntrwrw~nme*stoa«~«t NOT GRUB}} IKS OF EXISTING ROCKS, VEGETATION (q1T OFF AT GROUND, DO
""Provide nrniRw,m 1.5 het of lreebcerd 1~ w Pnor1 eMo e>rra roars was sent Fps aMrrr M w whrlr wwnnar
Q MaKinwrmalbxableeofletaepedeptlrie3.ShetperNCDiviebnofLrodaue6lynguletiorn 1, PLACE REVETMENT PANELS (EA. WEIGHS APPRf WEIGHS APPROX. 6000 7HEN FlLL OPEN SPACE W/SOIL AND oesicnEO er: oeawN ev
ttwaaeMnaaaoiwar,atn~ewwFaerpawnea,waeaaanMawreaownebreaaMpoa VEGETATE. Bol6om 9eonrMrY mey be e~led to rwlkwt tiedd oatdMbm, but ntuet provide ntlnNnum vokune ueo a ~errd renew>tr ire G.D.G. A.W.H.
°a et mtuirman eYowrable trelpht ~ b" aeu ype ealoena wnd «wn bwMpoeN~lo aompwM~on CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO.:
''~'"~""""t °""~'°~°"'~'"aM1 8. CONSTRUCT ANCHOR TRENCH AS SHOWN IN DE o Use 2HaV aide elopes ku~de end ouaide halo, vegelMeektpa a soon a paetlal Floeorol oowyeeteolbed~h 13tdrrw.rnuwRthidaoaf lra~mpeaaq GEOTEXIILE ALONG SLOPE THEN PLACE ARTICULA i SHOWN IN DETAILS AND PLACE 12 O.S.Y. NON-WOKEN G.D.G. SANDROCK-2
v REVETMENT WITH SOIL ANA VEGETATE W{TH A NAl LACE ARTICULATED BLOgf REVETMENT PANEL; FlLL HOLES IN ~lE NATH A NATIVE HERBACEOUS SPECIE TO PR01107E STABILITY. ru ~ ~ ~ SCALE: DATE
~ aar~e uvrAlh of hero, enA uric sR Mw? rnirJrm m. 4 aeei Mrre,eri .r.nw ne.?.d~wb.l r..r~lwrillrrn Ceiee.et,a W N sear darned aedrwndnrr~ dN rndv- wow. dY.ehe dhrWr by Mu EneYrr
~„a,~„~,,,~~~(~.1z~) underlain yygootoft ~,~p~ rr.raj r.~r..rrw~~.ve.a. T WjTM REGARD TO CONCRETE BLOCK REVETMENT SH, REVELMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S DETAILS rIIVHL AS SHOWN OCT, 2oa3
rw of a.oMarwr wr pw.d eyw[ryhw Clean Ow once wwysmonths riapiaE, Sam shall be inspected after anrw~r~owrmw~eww+M n w a~w
a.a,ralnW «.m. aa.dope ..o uuan wewm.M.e¦aagood omanan. Rap~Irtrd*n wW ryeyrwnroesift 10. ALL EARTHWORK SHALL BE VEGETATED AND M ~°RI"G. DESIGN REVIEW "`E "A~`SROCK-oo85 ~ETATED AND MULCHED IMMEDIATELY UPON COMPLETION AND sheer No. oRnxrnc No.
Line wroa.yaeywraV byaw „dy,high ,elxip,excelsior «TIRM wes~nrrr~~.s...~.warp~w.n~r.re9 SUPERVISED AND CERTIFIED BY PROJECT ENC>INEE )JECT ENGINEER.
1 SX1 A

~
o~y

o ~ o \
l ~e ~3 GI~EENSBORO
b
\ \ \ 2~`'~~ 21k
t ~
/ \ ~ \ ~ t
~o~JO / ~ 29 85 \ ~ ~ $
N ansoo , 1 ~ i
T _ - - - - - - - _ - /~l - per- ~ I W
X/~~ T- ~
M
~ I-

NOWT ' ~ ~ 1a' ~gc~
1HE S0-FONT PROPERTY LINE BU ALONG EXIS TEMPORARY DRIVEWAY CESS / ~ ~ fA1GORpQ~CHUI2LH p
BISHOP ROAD IS'REQUIREO BY TH MINING PERMIT AP O~trED BY NC D07 SHOWN. GRADES MAY ~ / ~j \ STA: 19+78.67. BISHOP RD, y-o°~ ~
c viEwMONr Ro 85 ?`~f~ ~4~,'
AND SHALL NOT 13E DIS1lYRBE~ THOUT ADVANCE IRE ADJUST1~iEN,T TO FlT DOSED ~ ~
PERMISSION FROM NC DIVISIOw LANG QUALITY ERgAL DRIVEWAY CONN TIQN, PENDING ~ ~k°c' ~ j ~ W
- P MIT APPLICATION APPRO / ' /
_ ~ ,--/~j a a a ~
oo' STA 15+x6.36 BISHOP RD. ,~6x / ~
= S7A. 1U+00 ENTfi ANf,E ~ ~y ~ ~
~ .
UNQERGROUND TELEPHONE CAE3LES AND FlBER ANTI 1RAgCING AD 30' x SO' xoo l I J ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ o ~
.OPTIC ALONG SOUiH SIDE OF ISHOP f~OAU. 6° MIN.. DEPTH ~ ~ / ~ c~
(APPkOXIMATE LOCATION), CALL TILJTY LOCATi~ 2"-3' DIA. AGGRE TE STONE ~ , , , c ~ ~
~ ,e 9 VICINITY MAP ~ 09
SERVICE ('NO CUTS) 1-800-632-4 9) 48 HRS. W/ GEOTEXTILE UND YU T ~4}0~
PRIOR TO CONSTRtJCTIdIN IN NtEA. 3+0~ f ' / / SCALE: 1"=2.000' ~ W ,-n w
, f 4
DATE NV. REVISION _
2/4J06 9 PIPE Mqf gILNERT tlE9CN NIBIDNENT
/
"~0~ 11,16 ~6 R'W ' U~~' I' I ~ ~ ' a /
Boa p0 I ~~io'' ' ~ ' _ FUTURE SCALES /tN0 CALF HOUSE.. ~
- ' ~ (TENTATIVE LOCATION)._ a iewe's farpoAln Acccun! Mensger / _ ~911'lMvWRe DAM ~ ($M9115bOfOw NC ~'.9~07 ,,,,.~~uu I.,.
~ % ' ~ ~ ~ ~ GRADING AND FUTURE IEVELOPMENT / ON wG r.9sawsin ws.ssz-2zst t?o~r
J~~ r ''r OF THIS PORTION OF E PROPERTY CONTECM d~gworli Dw~Iq~nwN pregyp~ ~~"~°^~'at.aen 3~
~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ IS SUBJECT TO NC DI SION OF LANO ~~9rowARwr~M~wn+N ~p wMw.roMMaregam •'v.'"~{,~':
~ ' QUALITY RESTRICTIONS PERTAINING roum~n¢oi u~rru~tta~ebm MwrhWUe? i~akn cwMw at~ ( hWU? ,
, - 1"uRE BUILDING ~ 2 - TO MINING PERMIT 1 22 snmw+pw n.wiwr Mirn~ ~ 7RNMIIOOe1e~M e v itn
_ TATIVE LOG~ITION~` I' ~
s•.,~ ~sce A•t S~t..o~.re noa~c;aa - - sn~r i o~ ~ i ;~,o~ud aP~.c
~acana~r 6~,,,r~w ~+..t~ Cw~.r ve,.ti wee u - e • saa~ I N
I I x o DO NOT qS 50' PROPERM BUFffR
TEMP. SEDIMENT
~ ~
1RAP fi' {EX,j a' I _ ~
'G~. ~
Nsn r; p
~ ~1 J z
X X - X x - - - : i ~a~w ~~s«w V r
Su e
r---- Y z
100 YEAR APPR. XIMATE LOCATION ASfMENT -PROP05ED U AVE FUR COLONIAL PIF i a- CONTRkCTOR SHALL CONTACT COL AL PI NE, PARALLEL GA LIN LINEATION {Fl OVER PETROLEUM PIPEIJNE TEL [phone] PRIOR 1'0 WORK IN THE 5ED U A1~D (ACCESS. ROAD a,» , U ~
Q D
LEL GA LINE (NO EMCROACHMENT) .s~~s 33~oaw. ~~'H+c, ~~y, ~ U
_ GAS LINE RIGHT OF WAY Quu. 4wrer -a.rc ~~w ~
- - - i~ -
Q
TEMP. IMENT - _ 1EMP. SERI ENT
IP. SEDI ENT _ _ NOl~ O
TRA A-3" (EX.) TRAP ,~-1. W ',8-1° ) _ _ WORK ON THIS PRO~CT SIZE IS REGULATED UNDER r-
FUTURE BUILDING. - k PR 25' ACCESS _ ~ NQRiH CAROLINA NIMNG PERMIT X41-22 ANO SOLID ~ ~
(TENTATIVE LOCATION) AD (U PAVED x WASTE PERMIT #41-17 (PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT), ALONG ~ `L ~
2 x ~
MATH GUILFORD COUNTY STQRM WATER ORDINANCES.
Q / \
SEDIMENT TRAPS R-1 THROUGH R-4 WERE SFIU ~ TR~UIpRT Sll CROS57NG / / 50' STREAM BUFFER LINES (TYP.) THE S1REA11 CROSSING WAS gtIqNALLY AUTHORIZED 6
IN THE ORIGINAL STREa1M CROSSING APPt1CAT10 k g / ~ A~ A TRIP1E-72' PIPE CULVERT (NOT CONSTRUCiEO) t~
g AND ARE TYPICAU.Y REQUIRED BY NG IDENR ~~~1SI-Y.PERYI TO ,r/ UNDER A d01 CERIIFlCATION FROM NIXt1H CAROLINA Z
M BE FACEQ YN1H MIN. 0 a DINSION OF LAND QUALITY CRITERIA. THE _ ~ R-3. ~ 24~ STONE RIP RAP
DENR DIVISION OF WATER QUAUTY~ ~WU 03-0880. ~ I---
PROPOSED CROS~NG SIZE IS STEEP AND RO Y, ~ ` ~ THUS THE NEED FOR 1NESE MEpSWRES SH BE . S€DIMENT ~ ~ ~ ISSUED SEPIEWIBER 8, 2003. 1HE CROSSIBNG CS ALSO ~ ~ ~
d% - L SANITARY SEWER AUTHOPoZm BY 7HE US ARMY CUBS OF EMgNEERS ~ ~
RF-EVALUATED IN THE FlELD IMTH NC D R _ „ UNDER NA710NhN~ PERMIT 14, ISSUED OCTOBER 8, ~ ~
PI~RSQNNEL AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUC ~!I: ~ , ~R-4 ~ \1 EASE (BY 0 EPIS ` U ~ ft~ 2x03. 1HE OkIgNAL DWQ PERWT IS VAUO F0~ 1FAtEE
o f YEARS FROM 7HE DAIS aF ISSUE. g ~ ~
o \ ~ x / R-2\ ~ ~ Q
x -TEMP. SEDIMENT THIS DRAYNNG IS PART OF AN APPl1CATI0N TO MIEND Z w U

x ~ 1RAP '°B-2" (EX.) THE 401 CERIIGFATION TO SUBS111UiE A SINGLE ~ PINE-ARCH CULVERT IN L~U OF THE 1RIPLE PIPE Q ~
Z / /
~ ` X ~ ~ CULVERT. IENTAi1VE PRODUCT AND DESIGN Ise
I~TE CRIi~RIA NOTES: ~ ~ ~ SCI` FEN ~ ~ ~ ~ INFORMATION FROM THE SUPPLIER ARE SHOWN ABOVE, h- w a-
v I. THERE ARE NO ARCHAEOLOGIAL OR CUUURAL SIGNIFlI;ANT SITES VN7HIN j ~ ~ \ ~~H~ SUBJECT TO I~NOR RE~ASION. ~ O ~
~ THE FACILITY BOUNDARY. / ~ - /C x
0 2. THQiE .ARE NO ENDANGERED SPEgE3 NITNIN 1HE FAgUTY BWNDARY. ~ O _ f %
\ NOTES: ~ ~ O s
3. TIiERE ARE NO PARKS, SCENIC, Oft'RECREA?ON AREAS NITHIN THE FAgUTY / / / - - ~ 1. BUFFER 4N NORTH SSE Of TRIBUTARY AUREADY DISTURBED.
BWNDARY. ~ j i '--1F.~IP. S IMENT ~
4. NO WE7LAN05 E%IST AT THE PROJECT SITE. - "f ~ \ ~ ~ 2. TOTAL LENGTH OF BUFFER/S7REAN 161PACT IS LESS THAN 150'.
v ~ / X ~ G ~ ~ \ DESIGNED B'/: Dft4V,7J BY:
o REFERENCE NOTES: ~ ~ ~ 3. TRAPS R-1 7HRWGH R-4 ANO SILT FENCE LOCATIONS ARE FINAL G.D.G. A.W.H.
¢ 1. GUILFORD COUNTY TAX MAP FOR BUNTER TONNSHIP: ACL-3-185-7555-7, ` y \ APPROXIMATE, WIf1 REpUIRE Fl0.D A0.A1S1MENT. cwi:cKeo er: eao~ecr No.
D.B. 4459. PG. 7&1. ~ /j/~-,
\ \ DESIGN RFVIFW G.D.G. SANDROCK-2
2 TOPOGRAPHY WITHIN PROPERTY BOUNDARY FROM AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY / - o 4 -zi 4. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAPS R-1 7HROU6FI R-4 WILL BE I ~ scare onre
~ DATED 3-27-01, BY SPATIAL DATA. 1 LOCATED IN ZONE 2 OF THE BUFFERS, NOT PONE 1. 1"= 50' FEB. 2006
3. BOUNDARY INFORMATION FROM BOUNDARY MAP PREPARED BY L. DENNIS "o IN
U-1, P.A., DATED NOV. 14, 2002. ~ 0 50' 100' 150" FILE NAME
w SANITARY SEWER FIELD LOCATED BY L. DENNIS LEE P.A. DATE 11-14-02. - 5. DRIVEWAY CONNECTION AT BISHOP ROAD IS FOR TEMPORARY sROCK-DO82n s~ ,yJ Sifj50
c OWN SOAP ROVAL BYENC ND/OR AGENTS (COMMERCIAL ACCESS DESIGN SHEET NO, DRAWING NO, DOT). 1" = 50' 1 SXl