Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20051715 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20050912O.Sep? 9.?20053. 49AN104JREELANDVAUFFMAN. inc ?armMru?a r No. 0280 Pr?. e2/e2 AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I/we, the undersigned, hereby authorize Lazed Management Group, Inc, to act as our agent in the 4 Preparation and representation of information related to the individual Permit application for the J Wal-Mart Store: #3798-00. All questions in regards to this project should be directed to band Management Group, Lac. Sincerely, Owner/Applicant Date yewdalcr??zayeme)d ?61w fi, cv) ZC. ?9zzd2d9z9?ae9z?a? ??d?a?at?cc?zf? , a.3l Cll cc &.L 2522 Wil iiiegfcia, ?/I' iIM ?C'atclijza 28402 !7crcrrcy. Xwnch CIJ'ce Yat/ 3s0.> OhrJlfvillyslierrreYr le J, Wilm6tykii, 41628 03 TO: Ms. Cyndi Karoly Division of Water Quality 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 J1oxe: 910-/52-0009 Jar: 910-X52-0000 rcrcrc. t r?? 1or?. Pict 20051715 RE: 401 Water Quality Certification Application for the Wal-Mart Store #3798-00 Wilmington; New Hanover County, NC Dear Cyndi: Enclosed is a 401 Water Quality Certification Application for your review. This application is submitted on behalf of Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust for the construction of a Wal-Mart Supercenter within the northern part of New Hanover County, NC. The proposed project will impact 1.04 acres of 404 wetlands. The majority of the impacts will be from the entranceway, which will cut through a wetland pocket. The location of this road was dictated by the NC Department of Transportation, which determined that the entrance into Wal-Mart would need to line up with an existing intersection off of Market Street. To compensate for these impacts, the applicant proposes to create 1.1 acres of 404 wetlands on site by excavating uplands to adjacent wetland grade. All remaining wetlands (4.26 acres) will be preserved in perpetuity through proper legal covenants. The application form, project narrative, associated maps, and $475 application fee are enclosed for your review. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Thank you for your assistance with this project. Sin erely, r m Williams Wetland Scientist Encl. C: Mr. Alan Johnson, Freeland & Kauffman Ms. Jennifer Frye, Corps Ms. Noelle Lutheran, DWQ Mr. Stephen Rynas, DCM September 8, 2005 ?? ? O?=Jl =-' f SEP ! 2, 2005 VVFTL/V; ,,,' I'D 5TCriLS'1J,?i [? EtViNCH ti APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT Privacy Act Statement 5 1 Authority: 33 USC 401, Section 10: 1413, Section 404. Principal Purpose: These laws require permits authorizing activities in, or affecting, navigable waters of the United States, the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, and the transportation of dredged material for the purpose of dumping it into ocean waters. Routing Uses: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating this application for a permit. Disclosure; Disclosure of requested information is voluntary. If information is not provided however, the permit application cannot be processed nor can a permit be issued. One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned (ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS) 1. APPLICATION NO. 1 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 13. DATE RECEIVED 14. DATE APPL. COMPLETE (ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BY APPLICANT) 5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENTS NAME AND TITLE (an agent is not required) Kim Williams Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust Environmental Consultant Land Management Group, Inc. 6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS 702 SW Eighth Street Land Management Group, Inc. Bentonville, Arkansas 72716 P.O. Box 2522 Wilmington, N.C. 28402 7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE 10. AGENT'S PHONE NO. W/AREA CODE a. Business (479) 273-4000 (910) 452-0001 b. Fax Number (910) 452-0060 (fax) 11. STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION I hereby authorize Land Management Group, Inc. to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application. APPLICANTS SIGNATURE DATE NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY 12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE - Wal-Mart Store #3798-00 (Ogden) 13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable) 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable) N/A 7241 Market Street 15. LOCATION OF PROJECT Wilmington, NC New Hanover North Carolina COUNTY STATE 16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN 17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE From Wilmington, take Highway 17 N towards Ogden. Pass through intersection with Middle Sound Loop Road. Site will be on the left, next to Ogden Volunteer Fire Station (see vicinity map). 18. NATURE OF ACTIVITY (Description of project, include all features) - To construct a Wal-Mart Supercenter with associated parking and a gas station (See Project Narrative) 19. PROJECT PURPOSE (Describe the reason or purpose of the project) - To provide access to a proposed Wal-Mart center. (See Project Narrative) USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED 20. REASON(S) FOR DISCHARGE - To construct an entranceway that is lined up with an existing intersection off of Highway 17 that will provide access to a proposed Wal-Mart center. 21. TYPE(S) OF MATERIAL BEING DISCHARGED AND THE AMOUNT OF EACH TYPE IN CUBIC YARDS -Clean, compacted sub-grade soil materials, clean ABC aggregate, pavement etc all above street reinforced concrete culverts at map specified locations. 22. SURFACE AREA IN ACRES OF WETLANDS OR OTHER WATERS FILLED 1.04 acres 23. IS ANY PORTION OF THE WORK ALREADY COMPLETE? no IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK 24. ADDRESSES OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS, LESSEES, Etc., WHOSE PROPERTY ADJOINS THE WATERBODY (see attached sheet) 25. LIST OTHER CERTIFICATIONS OR APPROVALS/DENIALS RECEIVED FROM OTHER FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL AGENCIES FOR WORK DESCRIBED IN THIS APPLICATION AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL- IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED 26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the applicant. 4, a(,- - ?..? I- N5 Ir, c . SIGNATURE OF APPLI ANT DATE 18. U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations o r makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both. PROJECT NARRATIVE September 200 `Val-Mart Store (#3798-00) Ogden New Hanover County, NC INTRODUCTION Wal-Mart is proposing to construct a Wal-Mart Supercenter in the northern part of New Hanover County, NC, off of US Highway 17 (Market Street). The proposed project will impact 1.04 acres of 404 wetlands. The majority of the wetland impacts will be from.the entranceway, which cuts through a wetland pocket. The location of the entranceway has been dictated by the NC Department of Transportation and New Hanover County officials. These agencies detennined that the entrance to Wal-Mart would need to line up with an existing intersection off of Highway 17. To compensate for wetland impacts, the applicant proposes to create 1.1 acres of 404 wetlands on site by excavating uplands to adjacent wetland grade. These areas will then be planted with native wetland plant species. All remaining wetlands (4.26 acres) will be preserved in perpetuity through proper legal covenants. EXISTING CONDITIONS The 31.13-acre project site is located off of U.S. Highway 17, in the northern part of New Hanover County, NC (Figures 1 & 2). According to the New Hanover County Generalized Soil Survey, the site consists of Murville fine sand, Seagate fine sand, Leon fine sand, and Dorovan soils (Figure 3). Land use to the west of the tract consists of the Jacob's Ridge Subdivision (Figure 4). The Ogden Volunteer Fire Department and the KOA Campground are located to the north. Commercial development exists to the south and the east. The old Seaboard Coastline Railroad formerly ran through the tract, parallel to Highway 17. Approximately 4.2 acres of freshwater wetlands exist in the northeastern part of the tract, between Highway 17 and the abandoned railroad right-of-way (Figure 5). The site is currently undeveloped. Most of the uplands within the site have been cleared of woody vegetation and support various herbaceous species such as dog fennel (Eupatoritrm capillifolium), lespedeza (Lespedeza spp.), and goldenrod (Solidago spp.). A small fringe of vegetated uplands exists along the edge of the wetland pocket and supports water oak (Ouercus nigra), sweetgum (Liguidambar styraciflua), privet (Ligustrum sinense), and honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica). Wetlands within the tract contain bald cypress (Taxodiu n distichirnz), black gum (Nyssa sylvatica), red maple (Ater rubrum), titi (Cyrilla raceniflora), privet, wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera) and royal fern (Osmunda regalis). On October 6, 2004, staff of Land Management Group, Inc. evaluated the tract for its potential to support federally-listed threatened or endangered species (Table 1). Most of the uplands within this tract are maintained in a mowed condition with no woody vegetation. Wetlands are densely vegetated, containing bald cypress, black gum, and red maple in the canopy. Because no pines exist within the property, it would not provide suitable habitat for the red-cockaded woodpecker. This species requires large stands of mature pine trees in which to nest and forage. The tract does not contain and is not connected to any water bodies. Therefore, it would not provide adequate habitat for the American alligator or the shortnose sturgeon. Finally, because wetlands within the site are densely vegetated, the site would not support rare plants such as rough-leaf loosestrife or Cooley's meadowrue. Table 1. Federally-listed endangered and threatened species known to occur in New Hanover County, NC, excluding coastal and marine species. Common Name Scientific Name Status Animals American alligator Alligator mississi iensis T S/A Red-cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis E Shortnose sturgeon Aci eraser brevirostruni E Plants Coole 's meadowrue Thalictrum coole yi E Rough-leaf loosestrife L hnachla as erulae olia E KEY: Status Definition Endangered A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range." Threatened A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range." T(S/A) Threatened due to similarity of appearance - a species that is threatened due to similarity of appearance with other rare species and is listed for its protection. 2 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS The alternatives that were evaluated are no-action alternative, off-site alternatives, on-site alternative site layouts, and the preferred project. No-Action Alternative The no-action alternative would keep the site in its current undeveloped condition and is not considered feasible for several reasons. This site is located in a part of Wilmington that is predominantly developed. It is one of the few developable pieces of land that can support a retail center of this magnitude. The tract is located off of a major road (US Highway 17) that receives a great deal of traffic and is in an expanding location (northern part of New Hanover County). This site is economically valuable because of its location. The inability to develop this tract of land would be a significant loss of return for the applicant. A Wal-Mart shopping center in the northern part of the County would also contribute secondary benefits to the community. This Supercenter would provide approximately 420 jobs and significant tax revenue to the County. Furthermore, Wal-Mart stores typically have budgets to give donations away locally throughout year. The no-action alternative would prevent these benefits to the community. Alternate Sites An evaluation of alternative sites similar in size and vicinity was conducted. It should be noted that early on in the development process, Wal-Mart representatives spoke with officials of New Hanover County and the NC Department of Transportation regarding zoning requirements and access into a potential shopping center. It was immediately determined that this site would require a traffic signal at its entrance to function properly and that the entrance drive must line up with an existing intersection. These factors dictated where the driveway could be located within a potential property. Accessibility is critical and in order for adequate access to occur, an entrance would be needed along US Hwy 17. Other factors considered when searching for a tract included size and zoning. The applicant needed at least 25 acres on which to build and a zoning classification that was consistent with the proposed development. Potential tracts that were evaluated include: 1. 7910 Market Street This 39.74-acre tract is owned by Bayshore Estates LLC (Figure 6). It is zoned residential and is surrounded by the Marsh Oaks Subdivision. It would likely be very difficult 3 to obtain a zoning change from the County in order to build a Wal-Mart, especially with an existing subdivision directly adjacent to it. Therefore, this site was not considered further. 2. 8101 Market Street This 28.77-acre site is. owned by New Hanover Regional Medical Center and is currently being developed for an expansion of their medical facilities (Figure 7). According to maps of the site, there are wetlands located on the eastern part of the property. Because of potential wetland impacts and the existing building plans, this site was not pursued. 3. 9000 Market Street This 153.31-acre site is owned by SENCA Properties (Figure 8). This site is already under development by its current owners and was not available for purchase. On-site Alternatives The preferred site was ultimately selected because of its availability, location (7241 Market Street; northern part of the County, direct access off of Highway 17), size (31 acres), and zoning classification (O & I). Once the site was determined, Freeland and Kauffman Inc, the engineers working on this project, evaluated several different site plan layouts. 1. Alternate Driveway Location Wal-Mart initially attempted to design the driveway to line up with Wendover Lane, which would have allowed the main road to completely avoid wetlands. The only impact would be to approximately 0.2 acre of wetlands to provide access to the back of the building (Figure 9). However, Wal-Mart would have needed to purchase an additional tract. After many discussions with the current landowner of this tract, Wal-Mart was unable to acquire the property needed for this access. 2. Development of the Entire Tract Wal-Mart evaluated the potential to develop all of the property, including that which is adjacent to Market Street, since it has good visibility off of a high traffic street. This would include a Wal-Mart Supercenter, a gas station, and up to seven additional buildings (Figure 10). Although lucrative to the applicant, this development scenario would require impacting the entire wetland pocket within the 4 tract, approximately 4.2 acres. Because of the large amount of wetland disturbance, this scenario was not considered to be feasible. 3. Development of a Gas Station and an Out-Parcel The applicant also evaluated a slightly smaller development scenario, including a Wal-Mart Supercenter, a gas station, and one out-parcel (Figure 11). This would disturb 1.76 acres of wetlands for the construction of the gas station and the entranceway (the out-parcel would be located in uplands). Although this additional out-parcel would have been profitable for the applicant (proposed sale ° $800,000), it was ultimately deleted from the site plan because of the significant amount of wetland disturbance. Preferred Project The preferred project is to construct a Wal-Mart Supercenter that is 4.67 acres in size, associated parking, a gas station, stormwater pond, and an entranceway within the selected tract (Figure 12). Most of the proposed Supercenter and parking will be located outside of the wetlands, except for a small area needed to access the back of the building. It should be noted that the designers of the site plan have left a 50' setback along the western property boundary in order to give the adjacent residents of Jacob's Ridge subdivision a buffer from the development. The majority of the wetland impacts can be attributed to the entranceway, which cuts through the wetland pocket (Figure 13). The location of the entranceway was dictated by NC Department of Transportation and New Hanover County officials. These agencies determined that the entrance to Wal-Mart would require a traffic light, especially on the already heavily traveled Market Street. In addition, this entrance would need to line up with an existing intersection on the opposite side, which ultimately determined its location. The number of ingress and egress lanes of the entrance was determined by a NCDOT traffic study. POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Several tracts and site plans were evaluated in order to select the option that minimized environmental impacts. The developer was unable to completely avoid impacts to wetlands because of NCDOT requirements regarding the location and dimensions of the entranceway. The proposed project will impact 1.04 acres of 404 wetlands. Because the site does not contain appropriate habitat to support federally-listed species, this project will not affect protected plants or animals. 5 Secondary impacts to wetlands and water quality could occur during and after construction of the project through erosion and stormwater runoff. These potential impacts will be minimized by the development and implementation of a Stormwater Plan and a Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan. These plans will reduce the potential for erosion or runoff into wetlands and other water bodies located off site. Furthermore, this project will tie into the local sewer system. Therefore, no septic tanks will be installed within the site, which eliminates the possibility of groundwater contamination from failing septic tanks. MITIGATION To compensate for wetland impacts, the applicant proposes to create 1.1 acres of 404 wetlands on site by excavating uplands to adjacent wetland grade (Figure 12). These areas will then be planted with native wetland plant species. All remaining wetlands (4.26 acres) will be preserved in perpetuity through proper legal covenants. In addition, culverts will be installed under the road to ensure continued passage of aquatic life (Figures 13 & 14). 6 ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS OGDEN VOL FIRE DEPT 7375 MARKET ST WILMINGTON, NC 28405 CAMELOT CAMPGROUND INC (owns two adjoining properties) 1900 EASTWOOD RD 10 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 JACOBS RIDGE WEST BAY HOA INC C/O CENTURY 21 SWEYER 1630 MILITARY CUTOFF RD #108 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 WALLACE, MARY L PO BOX 893 WILMINGTON, NC 28402-0893 WALLACE CHARLIE M JR 7239 MARKET ST WILMINGTON, NC 28405-9448 SHANNON, MARY J (owns two adjoining properties) 7225 MARKET ST WILMINGTON, NC 28405-9448 SHANNON, JOSEPH E 802 SPRING VALLEY RD WILMINGTON, NC 28405-1211 NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 300 DIVISION DRIVE WILMINGTON, NC 28401-8883 7 List of Figures Figure 1. Vicinity map Figure 2. Topographic map Figure 3. SCS Soil Classification map Figure 4. Aerial photograph of site Figure 5. 404 Wetland survey Figure 6. Off-Site Alternative #1. 7910 Market Street Figure 7. Off-Site Alternative #2. 8101 Market Street Figure 8. Off-Site Alternative #3. 9000 Market Street Figure 9. On-Site Alternative #1: Alternate Driveway Location Figure 10. On-Site Alternative #2: Development of the Entire Tract Figure 11. On-Site Alternative #3: Development of a Gas-Station and an Out-Parcel Figure 12. Preferred Site Plan Figure 13. Cross-Section of Entranceway Figure 14. Culvert End View 'A' .`t. (. I .. + 1. IYKlr wX (ice ?4 1; )??,f•. ? k?? ._, ', + ti I `s) ti ?? 11 4 Pr 11 i fir . ( f ?F % _ . rys ; 1 '? len 5 Gc rrl J ` _ i `_' (V an r l?h?t ,I t? .C ..} J x j y _ ?Ji r'' t{f(? 4Jt Xti, i I .-..__.1 ??; t ( -(_?} " i i ??!! ? 4 ?; • 1t5. r `- /'rtf;•''? .,.. ? ,..'• ., '? a?-, y it ??y?" I '`?. 1 ti'ti .•Y-r? I -- ? ! 5.55 I 1 i"ti ! ? ? ?' ' r ?, 5 6 ,w j ?I ; ! p n w 4 P 5' fJ r ?v l? tti =. I'. `'""` ?':Jl'iI+ 'll i•,`?S5 1_'j+5 `'''f`.+ Y•-' '''` ?J'r.I ._ ;.`4 •'1. I.?P 55ti .I e n, ''. ,. -'.•:` J`' ,? s-- errs' : ! 1 \ sti ? 1 1 ? „, 1 r 1 t? ? I+? { ., i{ ? .. -? • 1- d ' ?. /r,l ?,, ,l °'' J??JJ ' _ y ? I. i II -.. -it ti. e. ,q,.-^_ I n \F _ t l I y1_S. •"t ?? f ' \ _. j ?t 17 tir ( lr, fa r r`? ?,. f ?l J. f''? ? ?.`t 5+ P? ; r..f '1 ..T.,,r ! ? .r• ? 'w?'` y,, +? s I .a r' 1J `C T I) ,, SCALE 1" = 2 miles 1 SITE I Map Source: DeLorme: North Carolina Atlas and Gazetteer., 2003 p. 84. WALMART STORE #3798-00 Land Management Group, Inc. Ogden, NC Environmental Consultants Figure 1. Site Location Map Wilmington, N.C. Individual Permit Application 03-04-556 August 2005 'til f.r? .? ! ; y •. ? ; A ?' r.l • .... `?. ' ?i ? R! -- ti a?,.j• •. K? ? i ire •`? •?_ 1?:?,-,,,,,r ,?f t ` ?r„ ? ( - -tea _+ r (r .';=°-. ? • •-! !?`I ' ,. ?. ?-•- L , 1, -', "?,sl. ., - ? '? 4•.1 r 1 "•? vet ?'- CIJn Al 1 `•.. 1 f +*. K•. '' 1? ?.ti '? ?`. 1... f `.ti,,? - f l ? , {yam [t?? •. r ?ti i •,` - !{ ? ^.'?• `; ' =r b _ '-., "ti, •??.• • 5, 1? ; q.?. ,Pl'- 1. 14 61 • i I _ 1 4A 1'' r a 1 f • a •t • ' ?. r`? '?? ? ? f'?, ,,4 ?..11' • r?A rr + l ' .1' rr si . ,, y ? y .,i 1 `I? t ?' ?} -f: ?- .`? t r/ <}v •{ . l I tit,, 1 1 ti f ?I ? t ,6 . t.f f o f 1 ,f.` 1 '?, ? ,' li.. ? ',•.if'? fi •F •.? ? ? •?? ??•y _'W ? ???"•'i ,/1. yyI y } ..•v' C-?. e : . x 17 w _ 3 Cni.S` :, 1 'ZI Y .:' 1. ?y l .fl 7 ti}.( ?• r : `+, ?1 ! .+y?1'{.?4 } f J, '1} ?`W- f -J4.y •a?". `?1?/. ?b ?a•._._ 4 ?.^i A!}' I1,1. i'r ?.'.i' Y T1 •4 -1? J `l i?1 tiiJ,vr ..,?'.?'?. .f • r r.' NP. `'• 4( If- -f"r ?,J .? I.i tiy',, 1. L•?,.' 7`1 ')i S `rte., ,.1 t a• yTT II + }f+?'R (+ 1?? 1 r:4:'IT 5 ,1' /?f.Mil?!isl I'JjK? 4 ?Irl". .iL •it? ?r .'Yil 1I, 71 •I r+4? ?a ?'ti i'ti.? it r•'. ?Q`' ''J1 Fr`, '1!?? ?!• 'Jti 'ek '{ld?ti?I?ti? ?? 1'. ?,afri' r 1+, f?t?` ?I ?I, Ju'' ?'?*?J ,. r? +. •5t,•e?,?` ? t'. i?? *.J ?Y., r rf.•p'l1 C,1\y-ti? I ?-•4.1? -?s+c v ? ) l?:f ?l ?'' ?I? ? ?,` .aa'{ i.? :..-"4-?i..-?I 'a I- r':- I?t?t-'•:>Lril fS`\....,?u•`..s...f..:'.?1.1`.? SCALE 1" = 2000' Ma Source: Scotts Hill N.C. 1997 USGS 30'T o o ra hic uadran le. WALMART STORE #3798-00 Land Management Group, Inc. Ogden, NC Environmental Consultants - - Figure 2. Topographic map Individual Permit Application Wilmington, N.C. 03-04556 August 2005 i•' ?i ? fi e fit. r J AJ i 1 . \ Map Source: Soil Survey of New Hanover County, Sheet 12 SCALE 1" = 1000' WALMART STORE #3798-00 Land Management Group, Inc. Ogden, NC Environmental Consultants - -- -- - -- Individual Permit Application Wilmington, N.C. Figure 3. SCS Soil Survey 03-04-556 August 2005 t rt4 1 ? ' ? A .r ? ?' - tF < t "yr ? ??1 1•v., e t ?''?9 t r? 4 ,r fR" r t•? J?, ? ,1 e ?t _ r Jr f I -,- `r r_ R .' Y I•iE1? ;y; y+ I r4 'r+ .,F 'a'r'y r -K`:iv ?,•F ',R t V •J_?F ?Y T ? T •+;i r •+ r S?'I .Y'dr.n tt?h 1-..14 ?Y ?, G'k -' r? r-,'{ ' vti• •,r i P sy.` t :a-'j i F ...a• •, c, J i t '" ?' j_ irl9 ?P tF._J ? f : )r,la t J. ?F? ,+,jtf__ T? ?, •?? :'^ t P ? fif ?:{r "JJ , .!?' '>.-- ?f i ,? ?? ? - •6?? ?'t ?4 r!: ? \ BSI i ??.-a ''. [• i?`i' a T F ` 11Jt I'`F.,, ""Sk '? 'ly ?:-_`'a ?i,?'' _j q • ??#. - f.?f r?t td, ???.?.? ?5?. ? 1??s4 .??' r I? __?r-a' ? rt e?.?-t I J t S.rfl le, 414, 1 p^. V ,err s 1 'r Il -5 r ' ,.+ r FF Jr r•r 7 ','r' r r t r Jfi ?'. _41 4 ? r O a .t?? _ ?_ j"r S t.?€ r ..!t ?+*'`t !. j4 '•it?;J ,?? ?.l 4 r. '!. S , 1' I -A 6 a fM •R. } r J!? '.f va". ??rt:;+,?" „'c f -._•.Y ^t- 'L,1 'k. ? ?? t • I ? I ? f' r. - l.? •! ;' .?r a ro rw_.'€°r<L 1 I? - n I ~:j'?' 41 iT n *r r .y t_ i+ i•Rr ?, .? T, 117r, t r t F} F s s C nt t«• N SCALE 1" = 1000' WALMART STORE #3798-00 Land Management Group, Inc. Ogden, NC Environmental Consultants Figure 4. Aerial photograph Individual Permit Application Wilmington, N.C. of site 13-04-16 August 2005 U.S. ARMY CORPS Or ENGINEERS WILMINGTON DISTRICT Action Id. 200500058 County: New Hanover U.S.G.S. Quad: Scotts Hill NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION Property Owner/Agent: Coswald, LLC Address: PO Box 3215 Wilminrton. NC 2840 Telephone No.: Property description: Size (acres) 31.127 Nearest Town Wilmington Nearest Waterway Pages Creels River Basin AiCWW USGS HUC 03030001 Coordinates N 34.2785 W 77.8159 Location description The tract is located along the ivestside of Market Street (Hwy 17), south of the Op-den Fire Department, in headwater wetlands to Paues Creek, northeast of Wihnin2ton, North Carolina. Indicate Whicli of the Following Apply: Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331). There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. X There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps. _ The wetland on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years. X The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on 3/29/2005. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. _ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. X The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Wilmington, NC, at (910) 395-3900 to determine their requirements. Page 1 of 2 Action ID: adZlS'0060" Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Jennifer S. Frye at 910-251-4923. Basis For Determination: This site exhibits wetland criteria as described in the 1987 Corns Wetland Delineation Manual and is adiacent to an unnamed tributary to Pages Creek, a tributary to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. This site also contains a waterbody at the NW property boundary and one at the SE boundary that exhibit an Ordinary High Water Mark as indicated by changes in soil characteristics and the absence of terrestrial vegetation and are hyrdologically connected to an unnamed tributary to Smith Creels, a tributary to the Cage Fear River. This determination is based on information submitted by Land iylanagement Group, Inc., and a site inspection by Jennifer Frye on 10/6/2004. Remarks: Copy furnished: Kim Williams, LNIG, Inc., PO Box 2522, Wilmington, NC 28402 Freeland & Kauffman, Inc., 209 West Stone Avenue, Greenville, SC 29609 Noelle Lutheran DENR-DWQ Wilmington Regional Office, 127 Cardinal Drive Ext, Wilmington, NC 28405-2845 Corps Regulatory Official: - Date 03/29/2005 Expiration Date 03/29/2010 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: • A plat or sketch of the property and the wetland data form must be attached to the file copy of this form. • A copy of the "Notification Of Administrative Appeal Options And Process And Request For Appeal" form must be transmitted with the property owner/agent copy of this form. • If the property contains isolated wetlands/waters, please indicate in "Remarks" section and attach the "Isolated Determination Information Sheet" to the file copy of this form. Page 2 of 2 ?° • '?? ) _: a?': ?- ? ? ?d l? it°? ! )A? ?? a Y i i; t-??D ?•t 3 kr?r? r•3 ?s' s? _t_ ?;a O Y x ), ? .? ati? : ? 1 ?3 h ? ppyp?_a ryya j?Z? ? z ? ? tier ? ?F•• lda8' E , d i P alt a !. s • ? E y z: i a a t--:..?...+"'.• $ rr 3 \ ? ?a + ` \ MV. i/1} ?? ?-• Aso j a,a, 9 3 E4 - a .J is 'li lfl! . J_Sfl ;l.: ? ?7 :A ry y aFi• 9^7 ? ?.1? . . ii ' ?J_J J J? ?'.•1? ". ?? J?? ?^.J ?.. ?= e b N iltx? x"33 w ?t??a7 s' D a8 .G?d ???// 3ro X61 e? bl. !q!qa ? SS r l??? is 8 ea?? ? 7 • S 4' sg -4y 2? ? fs ; e i 7 ? ? F 7 5?• iPs ;a a d n I W n 5g Y ? ? pi) sag91 ji 1 6a! glx p9Y? .??? db ? ??S:Yx gB;yr? ???l,p?YSp a? E"ree ei0s P?:tt ibi,s qsele?4 er•e: ? PillMsx"eFdi)98 y4Fi aeq?c;-'a 6 W ,D Vl 0 z Q F- W d' O V' W rr SCALE 1" = 600' WALMART STORE #3798-00 Land Management Group, Inc. Figure 6. Ogden, NC Environmental Consultants -Site Individual Permit Application Wilmington, N.C. Of 910 Alternative #1: 03.04_ August 2005 7910 Market Street SCALE 1" = 600' WALMART STORE #3798-00 Land Management Group, Inc. Figure 7. Ogden, NC Environmental Consultants Off-Site Alternative #2: Individual Permit Application Wilmington, N.C. 03 August 2005 8101 Market Street 17 WALMART STORE #3798-00 Ogden, NC Individual Permit Application 03-04-556 Land Management Group, Inc. Environmental Consultants Wilmington, N.C. August 2005 SCALE 1" = 1000' Figure 8. Off -Site Alternative #3: 9000 Market Street FIGURE 9. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS WITH T ENTRANCE ACROSS FROM WENDOVER LANE WAL-MART STORE s?37?9J 8'-00 FZ: EE -AND and KAUFFMAN INC. OGDENI \NC 1 4 CAPOLINA E11?111G&rj w Lfyl??,C:rM &Jto,:ls 209 YYost 51rne AVC4'Ja WAL-MART STOK'-S. Ir`C GsGwvw. SGr:h Cachrb A;604 702 50 D?11-1 S7 Ct7+864-J233-5497 f=:M4-233-8915 EENTOWLLE. AP:Al3aS 727f6 MCrC-L 479-273-4000 DRAWN: ASJ DATE: d/26i05 I • IYLapRf L? WETLANDS AS DELINEA' BY LAND MANAGEMZNT GROUP t N . o; i ? . LENDIRE ROAD 60' RrMT Ki1T-O7-RAY rr lip o j ILRDIR( ROAD / W RIONT-07-RAY FIGURE 10. 0 0 " "" ::,,:ter. .•.,,•. \,?-, J ?J`' IY7h U.S. VH"WAT 17 (MARR[T STR[(» IOD' RKG1T-Of-RAY J? !4.06 AC. OP WETLANDS TO DE DISTLRSED . lawmT 17 R%OT SMUT) ROO-OF-RAY WETLANDS AS DELINEATED BY LAND MANAGEN104T GROUP PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS VV/GAS LOT AND MULTIPLE OUTLOTS 3A WAL-MART STORE =3798-00 FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC. OGDEN, NORTH CAROLINA 2009 9 `? a` • West t Sto Stoapo Architects nO Avanue WAL-MAWT STORES. INC. Groonvillo. South Carol na 29609 702 SW EIGTH ST oh,864-233-5497 tox,864-233-8915 B:NTONVUE. ARKANSAS 72715 PHONE, 479-273-4000 SCALE, 1'-250' DRA'AN: ABJ DATE 7/13/05 11 ; 1. LEKOpRE ROAO v 60• RYili-D<'-MAY `h _ / f, "A, -? als, LENDIRE ROAD 60' FbDiT-or-MAY FIGURE 11. •?a w MKtlART R3tr%?tW 1;1 V ?O Y ( . •hti a ETLAND3 AS DELJNEATED BT LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP U.S. NIQIMAY 17 (MARKET STREET) 100' RIGHT-OF-WAY -L76 AC. OF HIE-TLANDS TO Be D:STURDED . O •• ``` , '/// "?,??1 Gyro •dtrV .' ILLS. KOH=Y IT (MARKET STREET) 100• RGHT-Or-MAY T PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS W/GAS LOT AND ONE OUTLOT WAL-MART STOQE =3798-00 FPEELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC. OGDEN, NORTH CA20LINA E"9 09g Westc StoneeAAoowhQects WAL-MART STORES, NC. Greenville, South CErolino 29609 702 5W EiGTA ST ph-864-233-5497 fox-864-233-8915 B-ENTONVILLE. ARKANSAS 72716 PHONE- 479-273-4000 SCAL :, 1'-250' DRAWN ABJ DATE- 8/26/05 ,w0 ?G. f 11 1 r J 5 • / . U.S. W_4WAT 17 .... . •.-.• / (MMRET STREET) - i.'. j / 00 R1pIT-D<-147 'y ..?'. 3 AO. OF REATED ON-SITE `. ..... WETLANDS % LENDRE R= !b' RLptS-a-rIfAT j LEADRE ROAD 60' R7CMT-Of-MAT \ J FIGURE 12. PREFERRED PROJE(C 0 ?`` <? •1.04 AC. OF WETLANDS TO BE DISTURBED WETLANDS AS DELINEATED BY LAND MANAGEMENT C2OLP -052 AC. OF CREATED ?'''•.. ON-SITE WETLANDS 'LAY PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS I NU. VV/GAS LOT AND NO OUTLOTS WAL-MART STOQE =3798-00 FQEELANQ and KAUFFMAN, INC. OGDEN, NOQTN CA-)OLINA (=ngIf acts La oapo aocis 209 West St ono Avonuvonua WAL-MART STORES, LNC. Groonvill©, South Coro'ina 29609 702 SW EIGT1-1 ST ph,864-233-5497 tox-864-233-8915 BENTONVILLE. ARKANSAS 72716 PHONE- 479-273-4000 SCALE, 1'-250' DQAWN- ABJ DATE- 8/26105 40 INISHED GROUND PROPOSE EXISTING WETLAND PR P E GR UND FILL ARE CULVERT FIGURE 14. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS b",=I NIJ. CULVERT END VIEW WAL-MART STORE =3798-00 FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC. OGDEN, NORTH CAROLINA 2 En909 West Stone Stone Architects 209 Avonua WAL-MART STORES. INC. Greonvill3, South Corolino 29609 702 SW EIGTN ST 0,864-233-5497 tox-864-233-8915 BENTONVILLE. ARKANSAS 72716 PHONE- 479-273-4000 SCALE, N.T.S. D2AWN- ABJ DATE- 8/26/05 a.Sep. 9.?20053. 49AM104,FREELANWAUFFMAN. inc L? Ammer No. 0280 PH?. 02/02 AGENT AUTHORIZATTON FORM TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Uwe, the undersigned, hereby authorize Land Management Group, Itw, to act as our agent in the PrcParatfon and representation of information related to the Individual Permit application for the Wal-Mart Store: #3798-00.1111 qucstiona in regards to this project should be directed to Land Management Group, lac. Sincerely, Owner/A,ppli eant Date. 0 0 0 ? w) ?n a. C C O O u U u o ?o Q ? a y 1 ,? v) ' 0 o vi 1 m a 'C p C o Ucn ZZ O J OZ z° W J WZ Ow Z2 Q Z C L Q Z zZ J W C a C a y ? U V u :7 N Q V c a? ? H R1 ai U s v? 0 0 [i ?o s Q o ycc)Ic??illccliclyenIej (60'10 [VI, '?)' c. elizv hd117)2eI21cll'&)i:Srcllct)ik Wilninylon, '4'atl/ c?r?tol?tct2S/02 9oaVncy, d)lcuac/ C??ce "Jail JS6 'Miylrfseilleslecnae %'aife l5 Wilmington, vh6'2s403 TO: Ms. Jennifer Frye U. S. Army Corps of Engineers P.O. Box 1890 Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 .J/one: 910-/.;2- 0001 Jax:910- 52-0060 e; f 11 qr? December 2, 2005 DEC 7 z'UQ?j 7 DEt1 bStG;t?,iv%AmLi1F?yJCH RE: Withdrawal of Individual Permit Application for the Wal-Mart Store 93798-00 Wilmington; New Hanover County, NC Action ID# 200500058 Dear Jennifer: On behalf of Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, I am formally withdrawing the Individual Permit application that was submitted to your office on September 8, 2005. The applicant is currently exploring alternative site plans that may reduce the total amount of wetland impacts to below the threshold for the Individual Permit. Thank you for your assistance with this project. We will contact your office if wetland permitting is still required once this alternative design analysis has occurred. Sincerely, Kim Williams Wetland Scientist C: Mr. Mike Ranks, Freeland & Kauffman Mr. Alan Johnson, Freeland & Kauffman Ms. Cyndi Karoly, DWQ Ms. Noelle Lutheran, DWQ Mr. Stephen Rynas, DCM GGCG12da,la ay.eineiLG VkO(Vt, chile. 6tvho)z97ze)z&I rCrcjbwlfctjd4 %o.S I CI lice Gov 2.722 OVII)I nYfam,'larU r&,?,1 n,,2S402 !7eaaicy, J3wnc/r Cyce Jut/ 380, 96 /Jvi&,s/venfie 0irife AT 91i1nin,qfon, ,/V 62S403 TO: Ms. Noelle Lutheran Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension los@g%sl DEC 7 2005 viATERQUALITY STpiUS'N R5 ai D? AftiD 1'?CN+t December 2, 2005 Jl cne: 910-452-0009 fix: 910-,.52- 0060 ccccra.l nrJ for/a. /let RE: Withdrawal of 401 Water Quality Certification Application for the Wal-Mart Store #3798-00 Wilmington; New Hanover County, NC DWQ Project # 051715 Dear Noelle: On behalf of Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, I am formally withdrawing the 401 Water Quality Certification Application that was submitted to your office on September 8, 2005. The applicant is currently exploring alternative site plans that may reduce the total amount of wetland impacts to below the threshold for the Individual Permit. Thank you for your assistance with this project. We will contact your office if wetland permitting is still required once this alternative design analysis has occurred. Sincerely, ??? U? Kim Williams Wetland Scientist C: Mr. Mike Ranks, Freeland & Kauffman Mr. Alan Johnson, Freeland & Kauffman Ms. Cyndi Karoly, DWQ Ms. Jennifer Frye, Corps Mr. Stephen Rynas, DCM Red Wal- Mlart Ogden Subject: Re: Wal-Mart Ogden From: Ed Beck <Ed.Beck@ncmail.net> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:35:51 -0500 To: Cyndi Karoly <cyndi.karo ly@ncmai 1. net> CC: Noelle Lutheran <Noelle.Lutheran@ncmai1.net>, Ian McMillan <ian.mcmillan@ncmail.net> Cyndi Attached is the text that I have sent in response to six emails that were only addressed to me or Rick. I have seen four others that are addressed to you and Rick and others and have not responded to these. I am sure there are many more. Are we sure at this point that there will be no public hearing? I suggest adding the information about Noelle's request for additional info to give them a sense of the process and the status. While many respondents have expressed concerns that are outside our area of responsibility, many have pointed to concerns about wetlands and stormwater impacts. We need to acknowledge that some emails point to valid issues. Thanks Ed Cyndi Karoly wrote: Ed/Noelle - please see the attached draft version of my response. I'm actually giving them a 30-day opportunity to provide me more comments specific to the 401 review. Reason being is an attempt to avoid a public hearing, as we were forced to do with Briar Chapel. Please advise of improved word-smithing or other local sensitivity issues I may have stepped upon. I tried to tactfully remind them that we can't break the law just because they don't like the project. I'll wait to hear back from you before sending. Will also run by Tom Reeder. Ed Beck wrote: Cyndi I am glad we are having this discussion. I looked at the emails that Rick asked me to respond to and realize that eight out of thirteen sent to him are also addressed to you. How about if I send the response to the ones that just addressed me or Rick, and you respond to the ones that are addressed to you. We should let them know about all interaction required with this agency including.401 and stormwater. I can review and contribute to a response but if you and Noelle are happy with it I am sure that I will also be happy with it. This coordination is certainly best so we don't send multiple and different responses to people. Thanks Ed Cyndi Karoly wrote: Works for me. When I get my draft I'll provide it for Ed's review. Ed - do you have any preference on the official sender (you, me, Alan?). I have no agenda or preference. Noelle Lutheran wrote: Attached is the request for additional information for DWQ Project 4051715. Ed, is attempting to write a similar response to e-mails that he and Rick have received. Perhaps we should collaborate? Cyndi Karoly wrote: Noelle - We've been directed to enact a new policy whereby projects generating public comments/objections are to have a generic response letter prepared and sent to all those writing to comment. This Ogden 1 of 2 12/5/2005 11:49 AM Re: Wal-Mart Ogden Wal-Mart is one example. So I'll have to send out a response to everyone who's emailed or written to me about it. Basically we'll thank them for their interest, note that the comments will be taken into consideration, note that we're not leaning toward a hearing, etc. To that end, when you write your hold letter, will you please e-mail it to me directly. I'll need to note that we've placed it on hold for avoid/min, stormwater, etc, and should reference the date your letter was sent. Also - we got a letter from a law firm representing adjacent properties, objecting to the location of the driveway. I'll fax this to you for your consideration in your overall review perhaps it will be of some use in avoid/min analysis, perhaps not. Any comments, you know my number. Content-Type: application/msword WalMart in Ogden.doc Content-Encoding: base64 I- 2 of 2 12/5/2005 11:49 AM t Proposed Wal-Mart in Ogden An application has been submitted to the US Anny Corps of Engineers for a 404 permit to impact 1.04 acres of wetlands, and to the Division of Water Quality for a 401 Water Quality Certification. The review of the 401 Certification application revealed the need for additional information in several areas. Further consideration needs to be given to the ability to avoid wetlands impacts by evaluating alternative locations for the entrance road. The proximity to Class SA waters must also be provided since this determines the type of stormwater control systems that can be utilized for high density developments. The review is currently on hold awaiting requested additional information. The review will continue when additional information is received. A State Stormwater Permit must also be issued by the Division of Water Quality prior to construction of impervious surfaces. A permit application has not yet been submitted. Through the 401 Certification program and the State Stormwater Program, the Division is charged with limiting impacts to water quality from proposed development activities. Traffic congestion, property values and general quality of life are not issues that are directly considered when permit applications are reviewed by the Division of Water Quality. 1? Regulatory Division Action ID No. 200500058 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS PO BOX 1890 WILMINGTON NC 28402-1890 November 10, 2005 Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust 702 SW Eighth Street Bentonville, Arkansas 72716 Dear Applicant: 05 -I I is NOV 1 Q 2005 DENR - iVAIER CJ 'At JY 1YtTLMDsANDsTci;u A-1ERBRANCH Please reference your request for the Department of the Army (DA) authorization permit to discharge fill material into 1.1 acres of Section 404 wetlands adjacent to an unnamed tributary to Pages Creek, a tributary to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. The proposed discharge would be associated with the construction of an access road for the proposed Wal-Mart Center (Store #3798-00) located at 7241 Market Street (U.S. Highway 17), northeast of the City of Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina. After review of your proposal, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, and the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management have submitted comments and recommendations in a letter and Memoranda dated October 25, 2005, October 4, 2005, September 22, 2005 and October 18, 2005. We have enclosed a copy of these documents for your reference. The Corps also has the same concerns. We have also received many comments and objections from the public in response to the Public Notice. We have included copies of all of the letters, electronic-mail messages and petitions we have received for your consideration and information. Please be aware that we will consider the public's concerns (that include but are not limited to traffic, stormwater, and property values) during our permit-decision process pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Our administrative process provides you the opportunity to propose a resolution and/or rebut any and all objections before a final decision is made. In this regard, I would appreciate a written response of your intentions on or before December 2, 2005. Od -2- I am responsible for processing your application and available to assist you in coordinating with the review agencies. If you have any questions you may call me at (910) 251-4923. Enclosures Copies Furnished (with enclosures): Ms. Kim Williams Land Management Group, Inc. Post Office Box 2522 Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 Mr. Alan Johnson Freeland and Kauffman, Inc. 209 West Stone Avenue Greenville, South Carolina 29609 Copies Furnished (without enclosure): Sincerely, Jennifer S. Frye Regulatory Specialist Wilmington Regulatory Field Office Mr. Steven H. Everhart, PhD N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission Division of Inland Fisheries 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Ms. Noelle Lutheran N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Mr. Pete Benjamin U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Raleigh Field Office Post Office Box 33726 Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726 Mr. Stephen Rynas N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Coastal Management 400 Commerce Avenue Morehead City, North Carolina 28557-3421 Is. Cyndi Karoly ivision of Water Quality N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-2260 YaJI(A /MCII]zay,e»Ze)zl ? 6ri0l VI, 1 9) 1C. e,)iv 7d72»tejz(a1'(cwrtMrt)i 6 d1wl6f1ce % v2,22 91MI161 yfaJt, ?larl? Yatoli?rca2S,,',02 Veu^neJ Xiajicl Tlice Aih 3s05 Wir /lj ville ?sAcittic Jirile 1j Wilxiuylcn, ?106284,0,Y November 15, 2005 TO: Ms. Noelle Lutheran Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405 RE: Wal-Mart at Ogden; New Hanover County, NC DWQ# 051715 Dear Noelle: Jlr cne: 910-/52- 0001 a.r: 9104s2-0060 ! \) J '? D9. NOV 1 8 2005 _ CENR -'V .TE QU;iLITY :itll?d,.,,;i??`f!iJlCitil""• i'us(,!{ :,:?r,TER GI We received your letter dated November 8, 2005, in which you request additional information for the Wal-Mart at Ogden project. We are in the process of gathering this information and plan to respond after the inter-agency meeting (tentatively scheduled for December 7, 2005). We ask that you please do not withdraw the permit application. Thank you for your assistance with this project. Sincerely, , -?- w Kim Williams Wetland Scientist C: Ms. Cyndi Karoly, DWQ Mr. Alan Johnson, Freeland & Kauffman ?OF W ATE9Q Michael F. Easley, Governor ?O G William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources > Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director Division of Water Quality November 8, 2005 DWQ Project # 051715 New Hanover County CERTIFIED MAIL: 7004 2890 0002 3418 1975 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 0 W Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust D 702 SW Eighth Street NOV 1 5 2005 Bentonville, Arkansas 72716 DENR - WATER QUALITY Subject Property: Wal-Mart Store 43798-00 (Ogden) WETLANDS AND STORIAVATER BRA14CH 7241 Market Street, Wilmington REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION To whom it may concern: On September 12, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated September 8, 2005 to impact 1.04 acres of wetlands to construct the proposed Wal-Mart Supercenter with associated parking and gas station. The US Army Corps of Engineers published the Public Notice on September 29, 2005, officially starting the Division of Water Quality's review process. The DWQ has determined that your application was incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will require additional information in order to process your application to impact protected wetlands and/or streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive the additional information requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information. Please provide the following information so that we may continue to review your project. Additional Information Requested: 1. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization) The project narrative for the Wal-Mart Store #3798-00 (Ogden) states that the NC Department of Transportation (NCDOT) and New Hanover County (NHC) Officials have dictated the location of the entranceway. This office has recently been informed that NCDOT has not dictated where the entrance must go and the NHC Planning Department has submitted comments that state, "the proposed entranceway needs to be relocated to avoid unnecessary crossing of these important wetlands." Please demonstrate that further avoidance and or minimization of impacts to wetlands cannot be accomplished by relocating the entranceway currently proposed on Market Street. 2. Stormwater Management Please provide the naive of the receiving waters and the location of the discharge from the proposed wet detention pond with regard to the receiving waters. In addition, please provide a topographic quad map with a''/z mile circle around the project site to assist this office in determining if the project is within %z mile of and draining to SA waters or an unnamed tributary to SA waters. High- density projects that meet these criteria require the use of a non-discharging control system in response to the design storin (1.5"). Please also explain how the stormwater system will meet New North Carolina Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Phone (910) 796-7215 Customer Servicel-877-623-6748 One Wilmington Regional Office Wilmington, NC 28405-3845 FAX (910) 350-2004 Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us NorthCaro/l/i n An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50". Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper orthCar l ina Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust November 8, 2005 Hanover County's Stormwater Ordinance. It must be demonstrated that the proposed actiNity provides for adequate protection of downstream water quality standards. Once the receiving stream and distance to is determined, please provide a conceptual stormwater treatment plan. 3. Agent Authorization A letter authorizing Land Management Group to act as the agent for the Individual Permit application has been provided; however, the signature is not legible and it does not clearly state who the owner/applicant is. Please reference 15A NCAC 2H .0502(3) for information that must be submitted with a project where the applicant is a corporation and submit the necessary information accordingly. Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in writing and Cyndi Karoly of the DWQ 401 Oversight Office at 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699- 1650. If we do not hear from you within three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project as withdrawn. This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly at 919-733-1786 or me at 910-796- 7405 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this matter. Sincerely, Noelle Lutheran Environmental Specialist III cc: Kim Williams, Land Management Group Alan Johnson, Freeland and Kauffman, Inc. (209 West Stone Ave, Greenville, SC 29609) Cyndi Karoly, DWQ 401 Oversight Unit Edward Beck, DWQ Wilmington Regional Office Jennifer Frye, USACE Wilmington Regulatory Field Office Stephen Rynas, Division of Coastal Management, Morehead City Doug Huggett, Division of Coastal Management, Morehead City File Copy Central Files Filename: 051715.nov SHANKLIN & NICHOLS, LLP ATTORNEYS AT L Aw 214 MARKET STREET POST OFFICE BOX 1 347 WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1347 TELEPHONE (910) 762-9400 • TELEFAX (910) 251-1773 E-MAIL: SHANKLAW@EARTHLINK.NET KENNETH A. SHANKLIN* MATTHEW A. NICHOLS** STEPHANIE L. KIMBRO *BOARD CERTIFIED SPECIALIST IN REAL PROPERTY LAW - RESIDENTIAL, BUSINESS, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL TRANSACTIONS **ALSO ADMITTED IN NEW YORK October 21, 2005 VIA TELEFAX #(919) 733-6893 AND U.S. MAIL N.C. Division of Water Quality 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 Attention: Cyndi Karoly Reference: Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust Application for work within 404 wetlands 31.13 acre tract - 7241 Market Street ("Project") Wilmington, New Hanover County, NC Our Clients: Rochelle Family Owner of property at the intersection of Market Street and Middle Sound Road (Jones Seafood) Our File No. 00045.001 Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: OCT252005 Al iR QUALITY We represent Pearl Rochelle, as Trustee of the O. P. Rochelle Testamentary Trust, which Trust owns the property across the street from the western terminus of Middle Sound Loop Road, where the existing traffic light is on Market Street (the "Rochelle Property"). The street address for this property is 7201 Market Street, Wilmington, N.C. 28411. A copy of the New Hanover County Tax Map showing the Rochelle Property is enclosed and marked as Exhibit "A." We write on behalf of Ms. Rochelle in response to written comments requested for the above referenced Project involving the elimination of wetlands as outlined in a Public Notice issued September 29, 2005 by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Corps Action ID # 20050058, a copy of which Notice is attached and marked as Exhibit "B." My client has been contacted over the last several years by developers to purchase the Rochelle Property or for a grant of a right-of-way across the Rochelle Property for a westward extension of Middle Sound Road at the stop light adjacent to the Rochelle Property. Several N.C. Division of Water Quality October 21. 2005 N.C. Division of Water Quality October 21, 2005 Page -2- months ago, Ms. Rochelle decided to sell the Rochelle Property paving the way for Middle Sound Road to be extended from the western right-of-way line of Market Street over to Lendire Road (in front of the Project). A drawing demonstrating this proposed extension of Middle Sound Road is attached and marked as Exhibit "C." This offer to sell was made to several developers, including a representative of the Wal-Mart Project. However, the official representing the developer of the Project never responded to our proposal to sell. We have spoken with Allen Pope, P.E., of the North Carolina Department of Transportation ("DOT") regarding the Rochelle Property and the need for a traffic light for the road to service the proposed Super Wal-Mart because of the anticipated extensive traffic created by such a big box commercial development. The Rochelle Property would provide a better access site to Market Street as opposed to the destruction of or interference with wetlands, which have been reduced in this area of New Hanover County with development over the last twenty years. The sole purpose of the interference and destruction of the wetlands for this Project is access to Market Street to a traffic light. See Page 2 of the Notice. If this is the sole purpose of the destruction of the wetlands with this Project, then the more desirable and environmentally sound approach is to construct a new access across the Rochelle Property to the Project-thus eliminating the need to destroy fragile wetlands. Tile developers of the Project can purchase the Rochelle Property and additional property to create this alternate access option. The law mandates nothing less than this. In 1972, Congress enacted the Clean Water Act, also known as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 86 Stat. 816, as amended, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. for the protection of the Nation's wetlands and waters. The proposed Project fails to comply with the Clean Water Act and regulations adopted by the Environmental Protection Agency. The current process is for consideration of the adverse consequences of the Project and alternatives. The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq. requires a Federal agency to take a "hard look" at the potential environmental consequences of proposed projects before taking action." Baltimore Gas & Elec. Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 462 U.S. 87, 97, 76 L. Ed. 2d 437, 103 S. Ct. 2246 (1983). "The alternatives analysis of § 102(2)(E) (42 U.S.C.S. § 4332(2)(E)) of NEPA requires agencies to study, develop, and describe appropriate alternatives to recommend courses of action in any proposal which involves unresolved conflicts concerning alternative uses of available resources." Surfrider Foundation v. Dalton, 989 F. Supp. 1309, 1317 (D. Cal. 1998) (emphasis added) Accordingly, this alternative option suggested above should be pursued as a viable alternative under NEPA and the Clean Water Act. N.C. Division of Water Quality October 21, 2005 Page -3- Based upon our review of the Public Notice, this viable alternative for access has been completely ignored. With best regards, I remain KAS/pcc Enclosures cc: Ms. Pearl Rochelle Mr. Robert Rochelle Mr. Dexter Hayes Planning Director for New Hanover County Allen Pope, P.E., NCDOT Mr. Jim Gregson, DCM M 4--i O N N bA cd a N O O N O N H u 0 U W U I I O W b cd I I z U N C?• O bA U A N b i US Army Corps Of Engineers Wilmington District PUBLIC NOTICE Issue Date: September 29, 2005 Comment Deadline: October 29, 2005 Corps Action ID #: 200500058 All interested parties are hereby advised that the Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers (Corps) has received an application for work within jurisdictional waters of the United States. Specific plans and location information are described below and shown on the attached plans. This Public Notice and all attached plans are also available on the Wilmington District Web Site at www.saw.usace.army.mil/wetlands Applicant: Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust 702 SW Eighth Street Bentonville, Arkansas 72716 AGENT (if applicable): Land Management Group, Inc. Attn: Ms. Kim Williams Post Office Box 2522 Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 Authority The Corps will evaluate this application and decide whether to issue, conditionally issue, or deny the proposed work pursuant to applicable procedures of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Location The 31.13-acre tract is located at 7241 Market Street (also known as U.S. Highway 17), which is immediately southwest of the Ogden Volunteer Fire Station, northeast of the City of Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina. The site contains approximately 4.2 acres of jurisdictional wetlands adjacent to an unnamed tributary to Pages Creek, a tributary to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, a navigable water of the United States. The site also contains a linear Water of the United States along the northwest property boundary that is hydrologically connected to an unnamed tributary to Smith Creek, a tributary to the Cape Fear River, a navigable Water of the United States. Site coordinates are 34.2785N, -77.8159W. Existing Site Conditions The proposed project area is currently undeveloped. The majority of the uplands on the tract have been cleared of woody vegetation and support herbaceous species such as dog fennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), lespedeza (Lespedeza sp.), and goldenrod (Solidago spp.). A small fringe of vegetated uplands exists along the edge of the wetland area and supports water oak (Quercus nigra), sweetgum (Liquidambar styracijlua), privet (Ligustrum sinense), and honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica). Wetlands within the tract contain bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), black gum (Nyssa sylvatica), red maple (Acer rubrum), titi (Cyrilla racemijlora), privet, wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera) and royal fern (Osmunda regalis). According to the United States Department of Agriculture Soil Survey of New Hanover County (April 1977), the site is underlain by Murville fine sand, Seagate fine sand, Leon fine sand, and Dorovan soils. Land use to the west of the tract consists of the Jacob's Ridge residential subdivision; to the north are the Odgen Volunteer Fire Department and the KOA Campground. Commercial development exists to the east and south. Applicant's Stated Purpose The purpose of the project is to provide access to the proposed Wal-Mart Center (Store #3798- 00). Project Description The applicant has proposed to construct a Wal-Mart Supercenter, a gas station, associated parking, stormwater pond, and an entranceway at the subject location. The majority of the development would be located in the upland area. Proposed wetland impacts consist of an entranceway to the Supercenter from NC Highway 17/Market Street and access drive to the rear of the Supercenter building. No impacts are proposed to the Waters of the United States located along the northwest property boundary. According to the application submitted, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) and New Hanover County dictated the proposed location of the entranceway. These entities determined that the entrance would require a traffic light at US 17/Market Street and would have to line up with an existing intersection on the opposite side of US 17/Market Street. The number of ingress and egress lanes of the entrance was determined by a NCDOT traffic study. The applicant has also submitted an Alternatives Analysis that includes both on-site and off-site alternatives. This information has been included with this Public Notice. The applicant has also submitted a mitigation proposal with their application that includes on-site creation of 1.1 acres of wetlands by excavating upland areas adjacent to the existing wetlands and planting with native wetland species. Also, the applicant has proposed to preserve the 2 ?r. - • t`1 Tf% '? ;.: ,? i { I?.i4?•?''LI ,t.?af _--`?' `'dN 'ih ?3r:w3Yt,? ?Ytk Jam. remaining wetlands (4.26 acres) in perpetuity with a legal covenant. Finally, the applicant has proposed to install culverts under the entranceway for aquatic life passage. Other Required Authorizations This notice and all applicable application materials are being forwarded to the appropriate State agencies for review. The Corps will generally not make a final permit decision until the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) issues, denies, or waives State certification required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (PL 92-500). The receipt of the application and this public notice in the NCDWQ Central Office in Raleigh serves as application to the NCDWQ for certification. A waiver will be deemed to occur if the NCDWQ fails to act on this request for certification within sixty days of the date of the receipt of this notice in the NCDWQ Central Office. Additional information regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be reviewed at the NCDWQ Central Office, 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit, 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-2260. All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application for certification under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act should do so in writing delivered to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ), 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 Attention: Ms Cyndi Karoly by October 21, 2005. The applicant has certified that the proposed work complies with and will be conducted in a manner that is consistent with the approved North Carolina Coastal Zone Management Program. Pursuant to 33 CFR 325.2 (b)(2) the Corps is, by this notice, forwarding this certification to the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM) and requesting its concurrence or objection. Generally, the Corps will not issue a Department of the Army (DA) permit until the NCDCM notifies the Corps that it concurs with the applicant's consistency certification. Essential Fish Habitat This notice initiates the Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) consultation requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. The Corps' initial determination is that the proposed project will not adversely impact EFH or associated fisheries managed by the South Atlantic or Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Councils or the National Marine Fisheries Service. Cultural Resources The Corps has consulted the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places and is not aware that any registered properties, or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion therein are located within the project area or will be affected by the proposed work. Presently, unknown archeological, scientific, prehistoric, or historical data may be located within the project area and/or could be affected by the proposed work. Endangered Species The Corps has reviewed the project area, examined all information provided by the applicant and consulted the latest North Carolina Natural Heritage Database. Based on available information, 1.i.4 the Corps has determined pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, that the proposed project will have no effect on federally listed endangered or threatened species or their formally designated critical habitat. Evaluation The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefit that reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be considered including the cumulative effects thereof; among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, flood plain values (in accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving the discharge of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, the evaluation of the impact of the activity on the public interest will include application of the Environmental Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) guidelines. Commenting information The Corps is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps to determine whether to.issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) and/or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity. Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a public hearing be held to consider the application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. Requests for a public hearing shall be granted, unless the District Engineer determines that the issues raised are insubstantial or there is otherwise no valid interest to be served by a hearing. Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will be received by the Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, until 5pm, October 28, 2005. Comments should be submitted to Jennifer S. Frye, Post Office Box 1890, Wilmington, North Carolina, 28402- 1890, at (910) 251-4923. 4 ??i?,ar.'R3?M+1?4.^i.t{"D?i.+?..?-.'t '?, d??, ?"??? ?3? t t?.? ? i;.:ft:..k ,?G: -':i w.Y e,y '?• `t rr?:'r' "x»?? `•'r'r?.' jZ " t ?' _" 01 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS The alternatives that were evaluated are no-action alternative, off-site alternatives, on-site alternative site layouts, and the preferred project. No-Action Alternative The no-action alternative would keep the site in its current undeveloped condition and is not considered feasible for several reasons. This site is located in a part of Wilmington that is predominantly developed. It is one of the few developable pieces of land that can support a retail center of this magnitude. The tract is located off of a major road (US Highway 17) that receives a great deal of traffic and is in an expanding location (northerh part of New Hanover County). This site is economically valuable because of its location. The inability to develop this tract of land-would be a significant loss of return for the applicant. A Wal-Mart shopping center in the northern part of the County would also contribute secondary benefits to the community. This Supercenter would provide approximately 420 jobs and significant tax revenue to the County. Furthermore, Wal-Mart stores typically have budgets to give donations away locally throughout year. The no-action alternative would prevent these benefits to the community. Alternate Sites An evaluation of alternative sites similar in size and vicinity was conducted. It should be noted that early on in the development process, Wal-Mart representatives spoke with officials of New Hanover County and the NC Department of Transportation regarding zoning requirements and access into a potential shopping center. It was immediately determined that this site would require a traffic signal at its entrance to function properly and that the entrance drive must line up with an existing intersection. These factors dictated where the driveway could be located within a potential property. Accessibility is critical and in order for adequate access to occur, an entrance would be needed along US Hwy 17. Other factors considered when searching for a tract included size and zoning. The applicant needed at least 25 acres on which to build and a zoning'classification that was consistent with the proposed development. Potential tracts that were evaluated include: 1. 7910 Market Street This 39.74-acre tract is owned by Bayshore Estates LLC (Figure 6). It is zoned residential and is surrounded by the Marsh Oaks Subdivision. It would likely be very difficult 3 to obtain a zoning change from the County in order to build a Wal-Mart, especially with an existing subdivision directly adjacent to it. Therefore, this site was not considered further. 2. 8101 Market Street This 28.77-acre site is. owned by New Hanover Regional Medical Center, and is currently being developed for an expansion of their medical facilities (Figure 7). According to maps of the site, there are wetlands located on the eastern part of the property. Because of potential wetland impacts and the existing building plans, this site was not pursued. 3. 9000 Market Street This 153.31-acre site is owned by SENCA Properties (Figure 8). This site is already under development by its current owners and was not available for purchase. On-site Alternatives The preferred site was ultimately selected because of its availability, location (7241 Market Street; northern part of the County, direct access off of Highway 17), size (31 acres), and zoning classification (O & I). Once the site was determined, Freeland and Kauffman Inc, the engineers working on this project, evaluated several different site plan layouts. 1. Alternate Driveway Location Wal-Mart initially attempted to design the driveway to line up with Wendover Lane, which would have allowed the main road to completely • avoid wetlands. The only impact would be to approximately 0.2 acre of wetlands to provide access to the back of the building (Figure 9). However, Wal-Mart would have needed to purchase an additional tract. After many discussions with the current landowner of this tract, Wal-Mart was unable to acquire the property needed for this access. 2. Development of the Entire Tract Wal-Mart evaluated the potential to develop all of the property, including that which is adjacent to Market Street, since it has good visibility off of a high traffic street. This would include a Wal-Mart Supercenter, a gas station, and up to seven additional buildings (Figure 10). Although lucrative to the applicant, this development scenario would require impacting the entire wetland pocket within the 4 tract, approximately 4.2 acres. Because of the large amount of wetland disturbance, this scenario was not considered to be feasible. 3. Development of a Gas Station and an Out-Parcel The applicant also evaluated a slightly smaller development scenario, including a Wal-Mart Supercenter, a gas station, and one out-parcel (Figure I1).'This would disturb 1.76 acres of wetlands for the construction of the gas station and the • entranceway (the-out-parcel would be located in uplands). Although this additional out-parcel would have been profitable for the applicant (proposed sale = $800,000), it was ultimately deleted from the site plan because of the significant amount of wetland disturbance. Prefcrred Project The preferred project is to construct a Wal-Mart Supercenter that is 4.67 acres in size, associated parking, a gas station, stormwater pond, and an entranceway within the selected .tract (Figure 12). Most of the proposed Supercenter and parking will be located outside of the wetlands, except for a small area needed to access the back of the building. It should be noted that the designers of the site plan have left a 50' setback along the western property boundary in order to give the adjacent residents of Jacob's Ridge subdivision a buffer from the development. The majority of the wetland impacts can be attributed to the entranceway, which cuts through the wetland pocket (Figure 13). The location of the entranceway was dictated by NC Department of Transportation and New Hanover County officials. These agencies determined that the entrance to Wal-Mart would require a traffic light, especially on the already heavily traveled.-Market Street: In addition, this entrance would need to line up with an existing intersection on the opposite side, which ultimately determined its location. The number of ingress and egress lanes of the entrance was determined by a NCDOT traffic study. .'S?-+.... ti!:'?-^ ?',?-' 4,?F=+4..?Tr2 ,4t'+-? ,? ??•.LS;?fa??lri?"?!"'"N _pvk:?-b'?rL ,-rf + ?'' "'S?,c' ?,Y .:F !..its.; ..` it ?•S?t?- j???:? 'f L yy?.F( €`??, cif,',-] r?: List of Figures Figure 1. Vicinity map Figure 2. Topographic map Figure 3. SCS Soil Classification map Figure 4. Aerial photograph of site Figure 5. 404 Wetland survey Figure 6. Off-Site Alternative #1.7910 Market Street Figure 7. Off-Site Alternative #2. 8101 Market Street Figure 8. Off-Site Alternative #3.9000 Market Street Figure 9. On-Site Alternative 41: Alternate Driveway Location Figure 10. On-Site Alternative #2: Development of the Entire Tract Figure 11. On-Site Alternative #3: Development of a Gas-Station and an Out-Parcel Figure 12. Preferred Site Plan Figure 13. Cross-Section of Entranceway Figure 14. Culvert End View 8 1r R.tS?.`?:"1n4 1 Ytr.,? ??.??..?.r. ?'.4? °•L? YiE? l?/+1???4i Jj ?r 3!; l.t'?y.-.. SCALE 1" = 2 miles e ; I SITE- Map Source: DeLorme: North Carolina Atlas and Gazetteer., 2003 p. 84. WALMART STORE #3798-00 Land Management Group, Inc. Ogden, NC_ Environmental consultants Figure 1. Site Location Map Individual Permit Application Wilmington, N.C. osss August 2005 Ma Source: Scotts Hill N.C. 1997 USGS 30' To o ra hic quadrangle. SCALE 1" = 2000' WALMART STORE #3798-00 Land Management Group, Inc. Ogden, NC Environmental Consultants Individual PermitApplication Wilmington, N.C. Figure 2. Topographic m ors August 2005 Map Source: Soil Survey of New Hanover County, Sheet 12 SCALE 1" = 1000' WALMART STORE #3798-00 Land Management Group, Inc. _ Ogden, NC_ Environmental Consultants Individual Permit Application Wilmington, N.C. Figure 3. SCS Soil Survey ems. August 2005 a3y :a.f.Y '?_3 '?'.`?-__i?c_.?:. •_'. _?._-?_??:?lr wt. ?tcl'?' ?,+??;f3tisct?,i L.7??. .. y,:.?,1-J?.! ? n .?} ?i?ri .y44i ,},..?+f i 4 ? . pry. y r.?.C N• ? y ?•f??} v ? r-S ,. a jet 71..}t i A ,. i?,t.r ?Xx u ?-4.1 ..-. ?` :r+?'r a f, "-?4 •'.._ !'??'3'x-T?7f?,?-"?+.}`'?'ij?r+•?•LI'#?`x?". -. ? it".11N?'?'?`) y?+r+(?{?MY?-05(,?'••'S '?r? ,S ?x. ('t ?+f?t )T ? : ?!? ?r?-l"e ry 4 ?'r• J/?i i:? ?;r l?C '?.},?Y7 ?}'r,n ?Jet "; "+ tE`: t r CA y;,? yJF ?{ of n ,F' ' n ; r ?? Nr?? ?,?,{,??'L?,•?=•r fFt ?Sf ?+?? i?{? ?'???? {;Fx?-??? ??'}.it rw t1 t..,.y?? V",? .ry ? .7; . r•a r}t ?. ?'+? P yx?yr tiF ?!C' (? '? L g? ??? X13. t{??I ?,tr ?ry-??7?d11f1?.?j!?i}7?,? ?y„t$^•rjt"? ' ? ; t ?{ ? _ u {? ?:" -,p F°J4 ??+2.11 ? ?'isi? ????f? -?t??.?"1{?,yf?ti?f.,i?7?F? •. ?"T?-.?yy-t.?7Y???1 ?? ?.Itpl .e - yC. ttf.?_ rY'C`.T '" Y ?1:: ?0`?';?C^$??,`' ?•'. ?. C(,l ..r {+ j?r `irk. i -" .,-n: 7 -? 1 t ? . -. n,: '+,h, ? . 1 ?rr .?. - z? ? `lax R >• ` - ???: -. 14t,, F iW?"7 ?f y;? $A?: 11}* ? Mji -?'°. x? ?? a •.. i ?. j : {tom ??.??',b R i ._. j °' • } i-?J}?7 4, VY 1'104 r ,'.?•. ? ? ??i???s??tk ? ru?»?`" r ? ?G?' - r "? ?? . 1" , J.'?3`.'... ??n,rr?c;•:n....aa?.sras?crx,xrrwaw:w.r n a SCALE 1" = 1000' WALMART STORE #3798-00 Land Management Group, Inc. Ogden, NC _ Envlronmental Consultants Figure 4. Aerial photograph Individual Permit Application Wilmington, N.C. of site ?s August 2005 M.;,..3?.? -?r_. •''r ?K???? ? c., ? ?_ .??? +?;.x t y,?..t:'Sf` r r , ?! .._ .,. -.,iS'?if'+v ??.,'? r J?l. } { '.;y,.r '. rl E y ?., ., 11 E z ,? . ,? ? {: i,? 1? JE °sl 1, 1 ? li • E i ? yi i ? ? ???I? 11 ! 3 r? ? P .,i'`i?{1. 1 1? ?? t?11S it t F j 1. =€!r3 [I <? 71 ? I I ml? I Err ? sa__. ;.r /2, Z i 16 \ s I ?\ V mks ? ?+` ???ae ' 1 , FIGURE'S: 404 WETLAND SURVEY i i r o it ? aE b3f 1 ° pill PP r E?` ' E a r t 1 rr{ r? 1, • ?iiiiiil{{IIr19i?ii1lEilll?? .N=.n.¢. ••N•.II I111•.• i ?!'??'llf,4a; y{F' ylil Fe r 111111 ? ?:o r 1 I:ppifPi ??1. e N !I?E!!71'E5E??1:SrfISPE?II:.'•? R iE? li i'Y{' 1 J P -kl o3t 1c' isYn...rr SCALE 1" = 600' WALMART STORE #3798-00 Land Management Group, Inc. _ Ogden, NC Figure 6. Environmental Consultants - - Off-Site Alternative 91: Individual Permit Application Wilmington, N.C. August 2005 7910 Market Street k &":4 s? ® I SCALE 1" = 600' WALMART STORE #3798-00 Land Management Group, Inc. Ogden, NC Environmental Consultants Figure 7. Individual Permit Application Wilmington, N.C. Off-Site Alternative #2: 03-04-5,% August 2005 8101 Market Street .? is ....,{•-see T°' t``' j`a'a}..?. '_ ?.s:?iT=t,±ilr"yt ?'t.-.-? -.?'r Si'S"?'-?z SCALE 1" = 1000' WALMART STORE #3798-00 Land Management Group, Inc. Ogden, NC Environmental Consultants Figure 8. Individual Permit Application Wilmington, N.C. Off-Site Alternative #3: 03-04. August 2005 9000 Market Street t-1s.. tx -iU?4 ?..-vi ? m.. ?.._: ?+?. i'i??",',. saiiai£?ti•_?r,K? ..-4- ? `:.?.- .?k,?;+?w a jr ,J r awj? .\ / ?? ? .moo;Qa?r :gbh o4 ?- •! '+?..'}}?? ?y, / ?1'' /t/'I Ilk, u `\ I r FIGURE 9. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS WITH si:r r? . ENTRANCE ACROSS FROM WENDOVER LANE WAL-MART STOP U3798'-00 FREE-AND and KAUFFMAN INC. OGG I, "'NORTH CAQCLINA E?i;?noera * c(T,, crlra (s 409 wort Stm4 Avorua. VIAL-MAQ7 STC;drS. CSC, G Ql;nV;Q. SC J.h Caaltrb 2';6C9 702 50 E3--7W SZ Gh+86 #'Z33 5447 fm,864-233-8915 BENTO YILLE. AZ:AN AS :2-A6 1 .. o,- WMANDS AS DELMA BY LAND MANAGEMENT GROLF' Loan ROLE i llp i uwaa aa0 \ s' i 67 R=O-a-rwY _ ?L VI7S IYb14? 11 IOG' Rxi(f-01-MAY -J FIGURE 10. O - u40 ,14.06 AC. CF YVETLAPOS TO Be DLSTLRem ILS "Wwr IT N?LT V.Mn +cC awi-w-"T WETLANDS AS DMMATED Bl' LAND MANAGl MEW GZOLP PPOPOSED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS SHEET 1 VV/GAS LOT AND MULTIPLE OUTLOTS 3A WAL-MA2T STORE u3798-00 FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC. OGDEN, NORTH CAROLINA Engineers • LoWscopa Afahltaats 209 West Stono Avorxra WAL-MART STORES, N(O. Greonvllie, South Corotlna 29609 702 SW E1GTH ST ph-864-233-5497 tax-864-233-8915 SENTONVLLE, ARKANSAS 72716 PHONE, 479-273-4000 SCALE. F-250' DRAWNs ABJ DATE 7/13705 o; r i? t I ?{ WORE R04 GC CGWT-or-"Y 4. J0, O ?. LDdDW ROW • I 60' poll-ar-rAr J FIGURE 11. w?s.+uRr ear-pm?ro7 .1 Y : _ ?. y 0 tr s? L.TLAM5 A? DEiI•JEATID DY LAM MAIdAGENEW CROLP uA. H-v 17 (WIRI((7 sump W ma7-tf-r.7 K76 AC. OP W'E?s TO BE DiSTU=- J 0.i A::-T 17 (uNbctT S1ifEET) ?// `` 100' WAIT-OF-uY ' T P OPOSED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS SHEET r VV/GAS LOT AND ONE OUTLOT WAL-MART STORE u3798-00 FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC. °'S ?a °r9 ' st StonSlona g© A vowa OGDEN. NORTH CAROLINA 2p9 West erxra WAL-MART STORES, UvC. Groonvillo. South Corouna 29609 702 SW EG114 ST ph'864-233-5497 tax-864-233-8915 OENTONVll Z ARKANSAS 72716 PHO Z1 479-273-4000 SCALE, P-250' DRAWN- ABJ DATE- 8/26/05 tt r:?K1 4k?+m x4 rJ ii L*1 j ["! t. l V `xfy17!''} ?'L I 1 of l rus+..n nnmantp .` rf O i• .X?' ?it j / ? 17 1•. s1S NT STRLEY) Ar- OF E LAND ON-SriE ; .` ?a/ Lp4 AG OF WETLANDS TO DE DSTLRBED // ?• BY LAND MANAGEMENT / GQoLp OL2 AC. OF CREATID r / ON-Si[E WETLANDS rENORE R= t ,,'\\ IA' 0`1 .011? i ham, ?•?\ rcwe[ aa+? . aa' IllplT-n.rnr ' J FIGURE 12 PREFERRED PROJ s? C (MA MT KCWWAV v [u,sACH sn+[CT) 100' H?WT-Or'-wr ' ` J PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS SHEET r VV/GAS LOT AND NO OUTLOTS WAL-MART STORE =3798-00 FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC. v Lon est t Sto 5fogpo Architects OGDEN, NORTH CAROLINA 2 Engi09 W 204 ne Avenue WAL-MART STORES, NC. Greonville, South Carolina 29609 702 SW EIGTH ST ph-864-233-5497 faxtB64-233-8915 8E:WaJVILLE,' ARKANSAS 72716 PHONE, 479-273-4000 SCALE) 1'-250' DRAWN ABJ DATE, 8/26/05 Y,. t ? ,? Y? ??'4f+ ?.. t dy.? -.•i a '! k r. } E ._ yt: ,.. '[ • J `jt y.:+ A?,! _ '„y4;ct_..?.?,?• x ,(r .N? ? .{ r:gr `'. ,. t. ..-. S'-' 1?5. i. ' •???? ? -sue ,r ii;tu?'? :.,iSi£'*q? ?5:'liyv'[ ?? _. - .,? T i INISHED GROUND PROPOSE W TING TVET-L-A-N-D PR E GR UND FILL ARE, N CULVERT FIGURE 14. PPOPOSED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS SHEET NO. CULVERT END VIEW WAL-MART STORE tt3798-00 F2EELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC.- Engineers • Londsoope Architects 209 west Stona Avenue WAL-MART STCRES. INC. Greenville, South Carolina 29609 702 SW EIGTP ST ph,864-233-5497 tox,864-233-8915 ?TONV?LE, ARKANSAS 7271b PuOt?'? ,479-273-ao0o SCALES N.T,S. DRAWN ABJ DATE 8/26/05 ff 4-??i a 5 r ih'r?(? P i, -?a "? a ? 2 ti r ?.:, ? 5"?F`'l.i r` 'tilt ? _`-` '?tK ?"a?7r?i .tl i .I . I 'e.?l 9 r:. a 8 ' I i 9 g a r ?o I ? I r 1 J I o? I I ?' I I I ??9 i I { i QJ T? I l ?L I I I / I J r7 -\ I I I [ 9I'I rl ;!I i^+ 4f) I!? G E yY T21147 tiit I w k 4617.24' b M. ??1r ? I I I ' I i I u; I I i I ?I III I 6e°q I I I I ' I I 1.70 I" r I - ? ?yIII III I ?• I ? i'??\ I I I? QA ?i ,: ? \ tl I 1 1?3? I I 1lo- C, 3 • ? A ? I Imh I e g I l l n l ? o {??? III iv7 '? }? 2 I I I I %d • ` I I - If . - III I I I .', 4'JS E, I I I 3.1 4'' o I I `K ?` I I a ml G_ j? v > F- a\ I ? I I? ? 3--- I $ N I y? - g I I ?u - .I I I I I - I I I III I 1' ?mr hl ? ?" - - r 612 72' T ?? ?? III I I i_ _- ? \ I I I I I I I I ' I ? I I I ' 1 Q .. 4S S. 3 ?r? ` ' V h f? F v p? xP '.S r'1 r G r o? ? ?. wHpaR1 ? M v a :z -? "IfnC R1Q-? D Ir1? p6 l SgE?. V1 ,?' 0 1q \W ?N ..rte Ing s s 653 I I I I I I r ?? I I j fl I 1 ?' I? I I ILJ I II I I I I I ?? keo i E d I \/ y I / II z ° a pop I I \ - I \ I _ I I I S mam !-N?n C7CS? z Sao D z 0 S. O M - o 4 L Ln m m °o 0 Letter from concerned citizens Subject: Letter from concerned citizens From: "Yvonne Edwards" <yedwards@ec.rr.com> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 17:04:20 -0400 To: <tomw@ncleg.net>, <dannym@ncleg.net>, <carolynju@ncleg.net>, <juliab@ncleg.net>, <bgreer@nhcgov.com>, <bcaster@nhcgov.com>, <tdavis@nhcgov.com>, <bkopp@nhegov.com>, <npritchett@nhcgov.com>, <jennifer.s.frye@us.army.mil>, <rick.shiver@ncmail.net>, <cyndi.karoly@icmail.net>, <apope@dot.state. nc.us>, <lanny73763@aol.com> Hello fellow residents, As a lifelong Wilmington resident, I can not protest strongly enough about the absurd thought of constructing a Super Wal-Mart store in the Ogden area. As everyone knows, traffic in this area is already at a standstill several times per day. The northern end of New Hanover County has grown by leaps and bounds with new neighborhoods popping up everywhere. The notion that a Wal-Mart in this area could be a good thing is outrageous. The only ones who could support such a thing are the ones who are not directly negatively affected by it, but perhaps see $$$$ signs that the multi-billion dollar company have flashed in front of them. If this is the priority of our city, I am embarrassed to be a Wilmingtonian. I thought the well being and safety of our citizens was important. There is a neighborhood which backs up to the proposed site of the unwanted development. These New Hanover County residents have made this area home. They are raising children, paying taxes and living in an area they chose way before Wal-mart had ever taken interest. If a Wal-Mart is built on this site, many residences will be a stones-throw away. How would you like to raise your children in the back lot of a Wal-Mart? This would not be a pretty sight, I assure you. The traffic pollution, noise pollution, sanitation pollution (have you ever smelled a Wal-Mart dumpster?-not a nice aroma) would be too much to bare. I urge anyone with a say in this matter to drive down Market Street from the Porter's Neck area, going South, at about 7:30AM. Then please try going North on Market Street from S.Kerr around 5:OOPM. Also try traversing Military Cut-Off going North from Mayfaire around 5:OOPM. Can you imagine another 8,000 cars on this roadway????!!!! Add a traffic accident to the mix and you are looking at a 2-3 hour 4 mile commute. Please help our citizens in the Northern part of the county and deny this unwanted and un-needed desecration to our property. PS. Did I tell you there is a Super Wal-Mart 4 miles down the road? Thank you for your time, Jimmy Edwards Yvonne Edwards Concerned life-long New Hanover County Residents 1 of 1 10/28/2005 10:42 AM WalMart at Odgen Subject: Wa1Mart at Odgen Froth: gwdrew@att.net Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:26:41 +0000 To: carolyju@ncleg.net (Carolyn Justice), juliab@ncleg.net (Julia Boseman), bgreer@nhcgov.com (Robert Greer), bcaster@nhcgov.com (William Caster), tdavis@nlicgov.com (Ted Davis), bkopp@nhcgov.com (William Kopp), npritchett@nhcgov.com (Nancy Pritchett), Jennifer. s.frye@us.anny.mil (Jennifer Frye), rick.shiver@ncmail.net (Rick Shiver), cytidi.karoly@ncmail.net (Cindy Karoly), apope@dot.state.nc.us (Allen Pope), lanny73763@aol.com (Lanny Wilson), dannym@ncleg.net (Danny McComas), tomw@ncleg.net (Thomas Wright) CC: hillj@uncw.edu, ahlorenz@att.net, maureen247@vebtv.net Please be informed that I am against the proposal for WalMart to build a store at the Odgen site. Odgen is located north of Wilmington on Market Street at the Middle Sound Loop Rd. This particular location has a high potential to cause a very large traffic-hazard on the Market Street entrance as well as the surrounding communities of Jabocs Ridge, Rockport as well as others. Rockport has the only road (Torchwood Road) that has a traffic light for access for crossing the Market Street Hi-way. The Torchwood Rd is a street in an very active community where children live and play and is used extensively for pedestrian traffic, such as walking pets and jogging and the only one that services these communities. This road is being discussed as an entrance / exit for the Wa1Mart traffic. A bad plan! Everyone knows of the traffic problem including accidents and deaths that already exist on the Market Street from Wilmington for 30 miles north. This traffic problem will be compounded to such an extent that there will no hope of ever recovering. The connection from Proters' Neck to I-40 is the only hope we have that the traffic will ever be relieved any time soon. Adding the Wa1Mart at Odgen will certainly cause a permanent traffic problem that will never to fixed, never! I•am not addressing the wetlands issues in this letter even though it is also very important. , Also, property values are also of great concern. Property values will fall like a rock in pond, to the bottom. Nobody wants parking lots lamps shinning into our bedrooms all night every night. The combinations of traffic problems and the parking lot lights will have a major impact on property values! It is very important to all that receives this email that my community, and others surrounding this area, are very upset about the possibility of WalMart moving into this neighborhood. We are hoping that any or all of those addressed here will help provide a forum to discussed our concerns! Best Regards, Glenn Drew Rockport 7421 Coket Ct Wilmington, 28411 910-470-0646 1 of 1 10/28/2005 10:35 AM yemeid '5"wvl' 'Yjec. C CClZd'-1(lCllle-t (?irr?riojr»reieled'('ojrsrrll'(uelj ?SZZ 'We.I - Ali/min (7/.rw 10 i/% '(a? .r)AI"r 2,Y'' >> 20051715 September 8, 2005 TO: Ms. Cyndi Karoly Division of Water Quality 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 RE: 401 Water Quality Certification Application for the Wal-Mart Store #3798-00 Wilmington; New Hanover County, NC Dear Cyndi: 4a.r: 9/0-//.i1-0060 Enclosed is a 401 Water Quality Certification Application for your review. This application is submitted on behalf of Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust for the construction of a Wal-Mart Supercenter within the northern part of New Hanover County, NC. The proposed project will impact 1.04 acres of 404 wetlands. The majority of the impacts will be from the entranceway, which will cut through a wetland pocket. The location of this road was dictated by the NC Department of Transportation, which determined that the entrance into Wal-Mart would need to line up with an existing intersection off of Market Street. To compensate for these impacts, the applicant proposes to create 1.1 acres of 404 wetlands on site by excavating uplands to adjacent wetland grade. All remaining wetlands (4.26 acres) will be preserved in perpetuity through proper legal covenants. The application form, project narrative, associated maps, and $475 application fee are enclosed for your review. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Thank you for your assistance with this project. Sin erely, r I I( G W U`? m Williams Wetland Scientist Encl. SEP ?. r?, Z?(i5 Yr?SU ^' C: Mr. Alan Johnson, Freeland & KaufPinan Ms. Jennifer Frye, Corps Ms. Noelle Lutheran, DWQ Mr. Stephen Rynas, DCM 9?ajzd 1c"mt Zen? &w1z, Zv. wait /M'i'ce &x 2522 uy(e) a, Az i& V,a2ahaa 28402 !7orvncy X?ancl yrce,'a2/ y/f?5uil(eiluejrrre J'rrile 115 3805 CMW ?zinylon, 1re2S40,Y September 8, 2005 TO: Ms. Jennifer Frye U.S. Army Corps of Engineers P.O. Box 1890 Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 RE: Individual Permit Application for the Wal-Mart Store 93798-00 Wilmington; New Hanover County, NC Dear Jennifer: Ylicne: 910-452-0001 lax: 910- 452- 0060 LG6Crr?.Im /pC IVI. nd Enclosed is an Individual Permit application for your review. This application is submitted on behalf of Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust for the construction of a Wal-Mart Supercenter within the northern part of New Hanover County, NC. The proposed project will impact 1.04 acres of 404 wetlands. The majority of the impacts will be from the entranceway, which will cut through a wetland pocket. The location of this road was dictated by the NC Department of Transportation, which determined that the entrance into Wal-Mart would need to line up with an existing intersection off ofMarket Street. To compensate for these impacts, the applicant proposes to create 1.1 acres of 404 wetlands on site by excavating uplands to adjacent wetland grade. All remaining wetlands (4.26 acres) will be preserved in perpetuity through proper legal covenants. The application form, project narrative, and associated maps are enclosed for your review. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Thank you for your assistance with this project. Sincerely, W 0 Kim Williams Wetland Scientist Encl. C: Mr. Alan Johnson, Freeland & Kauffman Ms. Cyndi Karoly, DWQ Ms. Noelle Lutheran, DWQ Mr. Stephen Rynas, DCM 9?c"zda4mwye)l en16wrVi, J?2C. &I,V 0,11) 11 e) allat'e,0.,m /&IIA ,91osI Cllice 013o. v 2522 1)(ihziny1aia,?/1'A catahra28/02 _qorcxey Amich 611ice Ja?h 3505 1)2ryA6vrlle s2uentie Jrrife 15 91Mnuykn, IW28403 September 8, 2005 TO: Stephen Rynas Federal Consistency Coordinator NC Division of Coastal Management 400 Commerce Avenue Morehead City, NC 28557 RE: Request for concurrence; Wal-Mart Store #3798-00; New Hanover County, NC Dear Mr. Rynas: 110ne: 310-?52-0001 Jax: 910-452-0060 rcrcrvAllpoarIr.nel On behalf of Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, Land Management Group, Inc. requests concurrence from the Division of Coastal Management of the applicant's consistency certification. The applicant plans to construct a Wal-Mart Supercenter within the northern part of New Hanover County, NC. The proposed project will impact 1.04 acres of 404 wetlands. The majority of the impacts will be from the entranceway, which will cut through a wetland pocket. The location of this road was dictated by the NC Department of Transportation, which determined that the entrance into Wal-Mart would need to line up with an existing intersection off of Market Street. To compensate for these impacts, the applicant proposes to create 1.1 acres of 404 wetlands on site by excavating uplands to adjacent wetland grade. All remaining wetlands (4.26 acres) will be preserved in perpetuity through proper legal covenants. The applicant has applied for an Individual Permit and a 401 Water Quality Certification for this project. We have reviewed the State's coastal program regulations (ie.15A NCAC 07M) and the local Land Use Plan for New Hanover County. The proposed project complies with the enforceable policies of North Carolina's approved coastal management program and will be conducted in a manner consistent with such program. Enclosed is a copy of the Project Narrative and the Individual Permit application, which describe this project's compliance with the coastal program regulations, specifically avoidance and minimization of wetland impacts, water quality protection, and mitigation. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance in this process. Thank you. Sin ercly, . W? Kim Williams Encl. Cc: Ms. Jennifer Frye, ACOE Ms. Noelle Lutheran, DWQ Ms. Cyndi Karoly, DWQ Mr. Alan Johnson, Freeland & Kauffman APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT Privacy Act Statement 2 U 0 5 1 7 1 5 Authority: 33 USC 401, Section 10: 1413, Section 404. Principal Purpose: These laws require permits authorizing activities in, or affecting, navigable waters of the United States, the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, and the transportation of dredged material for the purpose of dumping it into ocean waters. Routing Uses: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating this application for a permit. Disclosure; Disclosure of requested information is voluntary. If information is not provided however, the permit application cannot be processed nor can a permit be issued. One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned (ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS) 1. APPLICATION NO. 12. FIELD OFFICE CODE 13. DATE RECEIVED 1 4. DATE APPL. COMPLETE (ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BY APPLICANT) 5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENTS NAME AND TITLE (an agent is not required) Kim Williams Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust Environmental Consultant Land Management Group, Inc. 6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS 702 SW Eighth Street Land Management Group, Inc. Bentonville, Arkansas 72716 P.O. Box 2522 Wilmington, N.C. 28402 7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE 10. AGENT'S PHONE NO. W/AREA CODE a. Business (479) 273-4000 (910) 452-0001 b. Fax Number (910) 452-0060 (fax) 11. STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION, I hereby authorize Land Management Group, Inc. to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application. APPLICANTS SIGNATURE UA TE NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY 12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE - Wal-Mart Store #3798-00 (Ogden) 13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable) N/A 15. LOCATION OF PROJECT New Hanover North Carolina COUNTY STATE 16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable) 7241 Market Street Wilmington, NC 17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE From Wilmington, take Highway 17 N towards Ogden. Pass through intersection with Middle Sound Loop Road. Site will be on the left, next to Ogden Volunteer Fire Station (see vicinity map). 18. NATURE OF ACTIVITY (Description of project, include all features) -To construct a Wal-Mart Supercenter with associated parking and a gas station (See Project Narrative) 19. PROJECT PURPOSE (Describe the reason or purpose of the project) - To provide access to a proposed Wal-Mart center. (See Project Narrative) USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED 20. REASON(S) FOR DISCHARGE - To construct an entranceway that is lined up with an existing intersection off of Highway 17 that will provide access to a proposed Wal-Mart center. 21. TYPE(S) OF MATERIAL BEING DISCHARGED AND THE AMOUNT OF EACH TYPE IN CUBIC YARDS -Clean, compacted sub-grade soil materials, clean ABC aggregate, pavement etc all above street reinforced concrete culverts at map specified locations. 22. SURFACE AREA IN ACRES OF WETLANDS OR OTHER WATERS FILLED 1.04 acres 23. IS ANY PORTION OF THE WORK ALREADY COMPLETE? no IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK 24. ADDRESSES OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS, LESSEES, Etc., WHOSE PROPERTY ADJOINS THE WATERBODY (see attached sheet) 25. LIST OTHER CERTIFICATIONS OR APPROVALS/DENIALS RECEIVED FROM OTHER FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL AGENCIES FOR WORK DESCRIBED IN THIS APPLICATION . AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL" IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED 26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the applicant. IL - I . -6 I rl CL . SIGNATURE OF APPLI ANT DATE 18. U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations o r makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both. PROJECT NARRATIVE September 2005 Wal-Mart Store (#3798-00) Ogden New Hanover County, NC INTRODUCTION Wal-Mart is proposing to construct a Wal-Mart Supercenter in the northern part of New Hanover County, NC, off of US Highway 17 (Market Street). The proposed project will impact 1.04 acres of 404 wetlands. The majority of the wetland impacts will be from the entranceway, which cuts through a wetland pocket. The location of the entranceway has been dictated by the NC Department of Transportation and New Hanover County officials. These agencies determined that the entrance to Wal-Mart would need to line up with an existing intersection off of Highway 17. To compensate for wetland impacts, the applicant proposes to create 1.1 acres of 404 wetlands on site by excavating uplands to adjacent wetland grade. These areas will then be planted with native wetland plant species. All remaining wetlands (4.26 acres) will be preserved in perpetuity through proper legal covenants. EXISTING CONDITIONS The 31.13-acre project site is located off of U.S. Highway 17, in the northern part of New Hanover County, NC (Figures 1 & 2). According to the New Hanover County Generalized Soil Survey, the site consists of Murville fine sand, Seagate fine sand, Leon fine sand, and Dorovan soils (Figure 3). Land use to the west of the tract consists of the Jacob's Ridge Subdivision (Figure 4). The Ogden Volunteer Fire Department and the KOA Campground are located to the north. Commercial development exists to the south and the east. The old Seaboard Coastline Railroad formerly ran through the tract, parallel to Highway 17. Approximately 4.2 acres of freshwater wetlands exist in the northeastern part of the tract, between Highway 17 and the abandoned railroad right-of-way (Figure 5). The site is currently undeveloped. Most of the uplands within the site have been cleared of woody vegetation and support various herbaceous species such as dog fennel (Eupatorium capillifolizan), lespedeza (Lespedeza spp.), and goldenrod (Solidago spp.). A small fringe of vegetated uplands exists along the edge of the wetland pocket and supports water oak (Ouercus nigra), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciua), privet (Ligustrum sinense), and honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica). Wetlands within the tract contain bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), black gum (Nyssa sylvatica), red maple (Ater rubrum), titi (Cyrilla racemiflora), privet, wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera) and royal fern (Osmunda regalis). On October 6, 2004, staff of Land Management Group, Inc. evaluated the tract for its potential to support federally-listed threatened or endangered species (Table 1). Most of the uplands within this tract are maintained in a mowed condition with no woody vegetation. Wetlands are densely vegetated, containing bald cypress, black gum, and red maple in the canopy. Because no pines exist within the property, it would not provide suitable habitat for the red-cockaded woodpecker. This species requires large stands of mature pine trees in which to nest and forage. The tract does not contain and is not connected to any water bodies. Therefore, it would not provide adequate habitat for the American alligator or the shortnose sturgeon. Finally, because wetlands within the site are densely vegetated, the site would not support rare plants such as rough-leaf loosestrife or Cooley's meadowrue. Table 1. Federally-listed endangered and threatened species known to occur in New Hanover County, NC, excluding coastal and marine soccies. Common Name Scientific Name Status Animals American alligator Alligator mississi»iensis T S/A Red-cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis E Shortnose sturgeon Aci eraser brevirostrum E Plants Coole 's meadowrue Thalictrum coole •i E Rough-leaf loosestrife L simachia as erulae olia E KEY: Status Definition Endangered A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range." Threatened A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range." T(S/A) Threatened due to similarity of appearance - a species that is threatened due to similarity of appearance with other rare species and is listed for its protection. 2 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS The alternatives that were evaluated are no-action alternative, off-site alternatives, on-site alternative site layouts, and the preferred project. No-Action Alternative The no-action alternative would keep the site in its current undeveloped condition and is not considered feasible for several reasons. This site is located in a part of Wilmington that is predominantly developed. It is one of the few developable pieces of land that can support a retail center of this magnitude. The tract is located off of a major road (US Highway 17) that receives a great deal of traffic and is in an expanding location (northern part of New Hanover County). This site is economically valuable because of its location. The inability to develop this tract of land would be a significant loss of return for the applicant. A Wal-Mart shopping center in the northern part of the County would also contribute secondary benefits to the community. This Supercenter would provide approximately 420 jobs and significant tax revenue to the County. Furthermore, Wal-Mart stores typically have budgets to give donations away locally throughout year. The no-action alternative would prevent these benefits to the community. Alternate Sites An evaluation of alternative sites similar in size and vicinity was conducted. It should be noted that early on in the development process, Wal-Mart representatives spoke with officials of New Hanover County and the NC Department of Transportation regarding zoning requirements and access into a potential shopping center. It was immediately determined that this site would require a traffic signal at its entrance to function properly and that the entrance drive must line up with an existing intersection. These factors dictated where the driveway could be located within a potential property. Accessibility is critical and in order for adequate access to occur, an entrance would be needed along US Hwy 17. Other factors considered when searching for a tract included size and zoning. The applicant needed at least 25 acres on which to build and a zoning classification that was consistent with the proposed development. Potential tracts that were evaluated include: 1. 7910 Market Street This 39.74-acre tract is owned by Bayshore Estates LLC (Figure 6). It is zoned residential and is surrounded by the Marsh Oaks Subdivision. It would likely be very difficult 3 to obtain a zoning change from the County in order to build a Wal-Mart, especially with an existing subdivision directly adjacent to it. Therefore, this site was not considered further. 2. 8101 Market Street This 28.77-acre site is _ owned by New Hanover Regional Medical Center and is currently being developed for an expansion of their medical facilities (Figure 7). According to maps of the site, there are wetlands located on the eastern part of the property. Because of potential wetland impacts and the existing building plans, this site was not pursued. 3. 9000 Market Street This 153.31-acre site is owned by SENCA Properties (Figure 8). This site is already under development by its current owners and was not available for purchase. On-site Alternatives The preferred site was ultimately selected because of its availability, location (7241 Market Street; northern part of the County, direct access off of Highway 17), size (31 acres), and zoning classification (O & I). Once the site was determined, Freeland and Kauffman Inc, the engineers working on this project, evaluated several different site plan layouts. 1. Alternate Driveway Location Wal-Mart initially attempted to design the driveway to line up with Wendover Lane, which would have allowed the main road to completely avoid wetlands. The only impact would be to approximately 0.2 acre of wetlands to provide access to the back of the building (Figure 9). However, Wal-Mart would have needed to purchase an additional tract. After many discussions with the current landowner of this tract, Wal-Mart was unable to acquire the property needed for this access. 2. Development of the Entire Tract Wal-Mart evaluated the potential to develop all of the property, including that which is adjacent to Market Street, since it has good visibility off of a high traffic street. This would include a Wal-Mart Supercenter, a gas station, and up to seven additional buildings (Figure 10). Although lucrative to the applicant, this development scenario would require impacting the entire wetland pocket within the 4 tract, approximately 4.2 acres. Because of the large amount of wetland disturbance, this scenario was not considered to be feasible. 3. Development of a Gas Station and an Out-Parcel The applicant also evaluated a slightly smaller development scenario, including a Wal-Mart Supercenter, a gas station, and one out-parcel (Figure 11). This would disturb 1.76 acres of wetlands for the construction of the gas station and the entranceway (the out-parcel would be located in uplands). Although this additional out-parcel would have been profitable for the applicant (proposed sale ° $800,000), it was ultimately deleted from the site plan because of the significant amount of wetland disturbance. Preferred Project The preferred project is to construct a Wal-Mart Supercenter that is 4.67 acres in size, associated parking, a gas station, stormwater pond, and an entranceway within the selected tract (Figure 12). Most of the proposed Supercenter and parking will be located outside of the wetlands, except for a small area needed to access the back of the building. It should be noted that the designers of the site plan have left a 50' setback along the western property boundary in order to give the adjacent residents of Jacob's Ridge subdivision a buffer from the development. The majority of the wetland impacts can be attributed to the entranceway, which cuts through the wetland pocket (Figure 13). The location of the entranceway was dictated by NC Department of Transportation and New Hanover County officials. These agencies determined that the entrance to Wal-Mart would require a traffic light, especially on the already heavily traveled Market Street. In addition, this entrance would need to line up with an existing intersection on the opposite side, which ultimately detennined its location. The number of ingress and egress lanes of the entrance was determined by a NCDOT traffic study. POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Several tracts and site plans were evaluated in order to select the option that minimized envirorunental impacts. The developer was unable to completely avoid impacts to wetlands because of NCDOT requirements regarding the location and dimensions of the entranceway. The proposed project will impact 1.04 acres of 404 wetlands. Because the site does not contain appropriate habitat to support federally-listed species, this project will not affect protected plants or animals. 5 Secondary impacts to wetlands and water quality could occur during and after construction of the project through erosion and stormwater runoff. These potential impacts will be minimized by the development and implementation of a Stormwater Plan and a Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan. These plans will reduce the potential for erosion or runoff into wetlands and other water bodies located off site. Furthermore, this project will tie into the local sewer system. Therefore, no septic tanks will be installed within the site, which eliminates the possibility of groundwater contamination from failing septic tanks. MITIGATION To compensate for wetland impacts, the applicant proposes to create 1.1 acres of 404 wetlands on site by excavating uplands to adjacent wetland grade (Figure 12). These areas will then be planted with native wetland plant species. All remaining wetlands (4.26 acres) will be preserved in perpetuity through proper legal covenants. In addition, culverts will be installed under the road to ensure continued passage of aquatic life (Figures 13 & 14). 6 ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS OGDEN VOL FIRE DEPT 7375 MARKET ST WILMINGTON, NC 28405 CAMELOT CAMPGROUND INC (owns two adjoining properties) 1900 EASTWOOD RD 10 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 JACOBS RIDGE WEST BAY HOA INC C/O CENTURY 21 SWEYER 1630 MILITARY CUTOFF RD #108 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 WALLACE, MARY L PO BOX 893 WILMINGTON, NC 28402-0893 WALLACE CHARLIE M JR 7239 MARKET ST WILMINGTON, NC 28405-9448 SHANNON, MARY J (owns two adjoining properties) 7225 MARKET ST WILMINGTON, NC 28405-9448 SHANNON, JOSEPH E 802 SPRING VALLEY RD WILMINGTON, NC 28405-1211 NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 300 DIVISION DRIVE WILMINGTON, NC 28401-8883 7 List of Fibures Figure 1. Vicinity map Figure 2. Topographic map Figure 3. SCS Soil Classification map Figure 4. Aerial photograph of site Figure 5. 404 Wetland survey Figure 6. Off-Site Alternative #1. 7910 Market Street Figure 7. Off-Site Alternative 92. 8101 Market Street Figure 8. Off-Site Alternative #3. 9000 Market Street Figure 9. On-Site Alternative #1: Alternate Driveway Location Figure 10. On-Site Alternative #2: Development of the Entire Tract Figure 11. On-Site Alternative 43: Development of a Gas-Station and an Out-Parcel Figure 12. Preferred Site Plan Figure 13. Cross-Section of Entranceway Figure 14. Culvert End View rr . I - I l 1 _ ?tiS{iitt?;ind, r, i ' + A 0 ?? r' f r l? •3 t7 J ? I 1 ?,, f' I .. .t r rr ? r,. ,. - II - A 1 I i r 3den , f } ?` Killg$ do` ?.o !r. 1 X110 1/f n,?(v Grant iv izinvor- inly Affj`{?fl- .i _e'+/ r 1 ff ._ r'; r'f! ; 4 ?rr ` 'r _w'ti /.¢?fd I _1?' v S r'-', 171 rt v 132 1_ 'r ?. ?4UtIlC#G?1}Qir? t - - ?'`. J- 74 '1 Jk I- LIn'v, NI trGin-i`??j/??c `. ? I ,5,) "`. ? ??. mot. ~ .f? t 7K t J 1 ? r ii '? +il'??.'t+sta i?3 ;:S .r ? k? r' ? • i, 1 •_- l ??? r/ t' 'l11 k1 ta??`JL'??aV. 411 w? ?r ,tf i? SCALE 1" = 2 miles SITE Map Source: DeLorme: North Carolina Atlas and Gazetteer., 2003 p. 84. WALMART STORE #3798-00 Land Management Group, Inc. Ogden, NC Environmental Consultants Figure 1. Site Location Map Individual Permit Application Wilmington, N.C. 03-04_54% August 2005 IS, \\! I?l`_ i J/}'?' e 'O` ?? fl •'ti' t •• ?J a•??1 ?, ???pr 1 % S's 47 I- ? ' y I`-t ?f ('ff- ?._ I .ter ll/'?.nf ? / t •' ? .i?Y /^ f i / F ' •• 4I r - - '.. I\ • ?. , t Jill, f.'a+C'w\ .' I t OQ,deli / i I .1 J 1"` 1 il; ' `_`• y`? •r'? f ijt i ^ n •1 ` -`, r- „ ( ?/ • " ` 1 l ? ? ?'?? "*,. ? : J 1' ? ? • . i ` ? i ' ?( \ ?. ?1, . 4,?i \ I ''? ^- `;1.. r ?. _\ ,?'fff /" r? 1 tE }. : 1 'r•,.\TJ . '`•ltlyr`??ti :n {i? ±, r; 1, I • .,J 1 , ?? S :,.?Y t? c?Cl / w..__• ; , `? 4- r ?' I..-? _ J SCALE V = 2000' Maa Source: Scotts Hill. N.C.. 1997. USGS 30' ToooaraDhic auadranale. WALMART STORE #3798-00 Land Management Group, Inc. Ogden, NC Environmental Consultants Figure 2. Topographic map Wilmington, N.C. Individual Permit Application 03-04-5556 August 2005 1 Lft Le t_y Lo % r. i:. ?`- Z, LF! ? f •411 J Map Source: Soil Survey of New Hanover County, Sheet 12 SCALE 1" = 1000' WALMART STORE #3798-00 Land Management Group, Inc. Ogden, NC Environmental Consultants Individual Permit Application Wilmington, N.C. Figure 3. SCS Soil Survey 03-0,s56 August 2005 Sig , 1110 SCALE 1" = 1000' WALMART STORE #3798-00 Land Management Group, Inc. Ogden, NC Environmental Consultants Figure 4. Aerial photograph Individual Permit Application Wilmington, N.C. of site 03-04-556 1 August 2005 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WILMINGTON DISTRICT Action Id. 200500058 County: New Hanover U.S.G.S. Quad: Scotts Hill NOTIFICATION Or JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION Property Owner/Agent: Coswald, LLC Address: PO Box 3215 Wilmington, NC 28406. Telephone No.: Property description: 20051715 Size (acres) 31.127 Nearest Town Wilmington Nearest Waterway Pages Creels River Basin AICWW USGS HUC 03030001 Coordinates N 34.2785 W 77.8159 Location description The tract is located along the westside of Market Street (Hivy 17), south of the Ogden Fire Department, in headwater wetlands to Pages Creel:, northeast of Wilmington, North Carolina. Indicate Which of the Following Apply: Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331). _ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. X There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. _ We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps. _ The wetland on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years. X The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on 3/29/2005. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. . _ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. X The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Wilmington, NC, at (910) 395-3900 to determine their requirements. Page 1 of 2 Action ID: LQOMS'000 SS" Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Jennifer S. Frye at 910-251-4923. Basis For Determination: This site exhibits wetland criteria as described in the 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual and is adincent to an unnamed tributary to Pages Creek, a tributary to the Atlantic Intracoastal WaterwaV. This site also contains a waterbody at the NW property boundary and one at the SE boundary that exhibit an Ordinary Ilieh Water Mark as indicated by changes in soil characteristics and the absence of terrestrial velletation and are liyrdoloaically connected to an unnamed tributary to Smith Creek, a tributary to the Cape Fear River. This determination is based on information submitted by Land Alanaeement Group, Inc., and a site inspection by.Iennifer Frye on 10/6/2004. Remarks: Copy furnished: Kim Williams, LMG, Inc., PO Box 2522, Wiluninj!ton, NC 28402 Freeland & Kauffman, inc., 209 West Stone Avenue, Greenville, SC 29609 Noelle Lutheran, DENR-DWQ Wilmington Regional Office, 127 Cardinal Drive Ext, Wilminp_ton, NC 28405-2845 Corps Regulatory Official: - Date 03/29/2005 Expiration Date 03/29/2010 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: • A plat or sketch of the property and the wetland data form must be attached to the file copy of this form. • A copy of the "Notification Of Administrative Appeal Options And Process And Request For Appeal" form must be transmitted with the property owner/agent copy of this form. • If the property contains isolated wetlands/waters, please indicate in "Remarks" section and attach the "Isolated Determination Information Sheet" to the file copy of this form. Page 2 of 2 ?s\J ? ?! ?4 r't l,! ? [t?6! H i ?i ?j!° ? H p r FQ y ? S ! ? /d ? ?? .??• ? ? ? tg as i?3?? ,¢i ,? ? I ? QS';$ ?? ? .?g? . i A ? ? a a ?? ? ? ? t4 1.1, : i° a 1 .t ar 12. .s s 71 id "? l x .1' y } r a . . a lg . i F P r I i, 'P P i ?i. 3?; i 4P ?\ Y, `???T`\ `$°?Y sel °: `'`?a \ '_' S?°Y§ •? cafe ri. °i ?vn isgd8?'. a`n i Wnn •? +.4???. .i i? iO? aS?W is yy H?'roT'7?1 FI-o? 12 ?bY us. tcCC , . pi eao..it'?p•111?1i j? JIM E! ele? i i r 71 5e5 l? '?4'ip G Hleps? ? ?;:? FC 9+ ?g7i'y H ! !li$ ,`c? R a? ,7e?i; ? FI ??c SH 'a H ! yy w cc D 0 Z J w 'a. O Lri w cc: V U- F } P 9 °,,, `. i ' ?? y ' a.M ! I".. ' #? ?t' wa-,« 1 `. w P 1 Y:. i ?.,_.. r T;. / r • e ''y t• y ?' e1 .'??1°' ?' .Ki?h WMf'rU 40 • ; ."'e ' ?. y??°Yy iR i' Y Tom' , y. A?. P,aly 4as T-T JA? '_k r b,i s s r r' ad .. r gyp r, 04. k ..:w ?. M. •^ y?{g`' ! r 1 ??eS' 1 _L "4°#?grrfi r r?', I- • jn4h ; 17 _7 if' 'O-fP?4Tl ?« 1 .xf`Sn •.,* ?!.r' s s? •. r.,i r ` z,:•, ' ~ « .s A*p , .. `us •k Y f -4 _ g 's , ? `? ` + -fin r i .a •_` qtr s•? s?, F,« L i Y en ' ?. , 7 ' s.."4 k??x?? • ?R1.t``? 1"`4 t rt *i: 4'}, .? i +`• aLi? a `t„3.;#?r??. Y'• '.?l P' ?'.?? ?. ..y ,? ?f C? ,Y4'? .`!rr<r?. i?5 ?i? ..?'/ i ' 1. ?4f / 1 /?R.'7t'?'i R `a"?-?r.} C ;e ? L{ l ??I-• f, ? Y. t *j ?"''. pL Created 01101105 T .. ¢" ,?30 0 SCALE 1" = 600' WALMART STORE #3798-00 Land Management Group, Inc. Figure 6. Ogden, NC Environmental Consultants Individual Permit Application Wilmington, N.C. 07910 Alternative #1: o?5,% August 2005 7910 Market Street t s fjz t?ar 9` ON, ?rv .fir' . 49 { 9 k .' ''fr t " . ?. ? ; `• t a •# _ ., ry?i < ?f # ?s $? -? p-t ?'p,•-.F, ? f 1 r k.{r ,? yr?r ? Py1,s?V11F=,•.: • °?ya r :a Ei. ' r`.• ?. `? ' c 3 ? i - ? iR ?',, y? ? ? ryi! ? ', ' h • i 7° a „ r'1 4 ? f . ? 7 ? ?: s ,it w? r r ? ,t'!y'? t 1 f'?, y'' ,•h' sti i ,? r? ? ? `'.,?1? {" rt'?g1M1?? .r?'? 'T?} 64yp??f l 'd t 17 1 a ' ?S w c v 7% y .!. - CIF 1 t <?. . 1 # b• 4 i,,• ?.ti _ , ...: ?F 1. '.? 1. ? #??. j' 4S 9 - - h f • `i Ra'drm- !5 S Lsm- T• 'LL iP •V Ir ? r y 4Cr a: ?•? '?.JI TihtV-?;t „f• '.?,li ,a ?, i IN 3. kF -;q •;y - r' sr ,f ',' r1 L r _' -i a„h b r1lk . F' ,lam. Y ?? [_ ah? P 1 ? # '{4 rra ra4'' -ow AL a. SCALE 1" = 600' WALMART STORE #3798-00 Ogden, NC Individual Permit Application Land Management Group, Inc. Environmental Consultants Wilmington, N.C. August 2005 Figure 7. Off-Site Alternative #2: 8101 Market Street oaaas:? IT T: ze E E. g 't rl? A bit RI sb "?. .4 d 14.•• .? J? ?tiG ?. s i?,ls ?.'. ,'? ,s, -a ? •?1 ?. K ?'/ '`tl 'q.r .-._ 'r? iF' s i`. AI.. t u , ,?i? .lti t , >le' 4 ih! y ! i • t . al 44 Ilk, f: ,a .z? ' ` 1, a .. ?, ? ?I M•.'P `y 11.,E ? . ? ?. - . -. ti.'. .e Y L . 1 ?i L A" a Zkw f q i ] )?17 111; tl it ?i a1 11? 16, a ~ i "r 't 3 1 1• r L 6 a1 j d T+ J S i x „Y E `l r. ! e,'h 0 1 lay '4. ?,',? .4 `- %.r a?;W,w ? • "1 .? .cx '? ? ?,?pi, en, '? E P ?'" '? - C 1q'1 t t V. ?,l l " 7.w -k i r 1 ? r 3 • r t .. • 'M.a f? - ` 1 _ pf":w 1 ' %.i•{ *16 y.?_ . ji 1t._?4 y taf' i k ...[( 11 { s' t iK 1 i?° 9' +'tlryl i. 1-.r '?';,M j ?• d 'A'- y IL ,?-'}?C 7 !ice i . 3i, ?> 2? .L•. 1 iL ? , 1 .C? sa ?' ?y fy D ;? 1 1 t'i , SCALE 1" = 1000' WALMART STORE #3798-00 Land Management Group, Inc. Ogden, NC Environmental Consultants Figure 8. Individual Permit Application Wilmington, N.C. 09000 Alternative #3: o August 2005 9000 Market Street h Cot 71 L, 7J FIGURE 9. t ` ,'J gOYo `"'' J < ' Y.l4r ? -•? /' , "44, -\ / i ?/! . may, , ,II lill PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS WITH T ENTRANCE ACROSS FROM WENDOVER LANE WAL-MART STOKE =3798•-00 FZ)EELAND and KAUFFMAN INC. QGQEN, \NCRTN CAROLINA &L, iiGeo . ??? chtozfs 209 tiVDSt 5!m© AVC4'WO WAL-MART STGIt`S. 2G. Graenvm 5cu:h Cuuhra 22,7609 702 SO D--TH S7 ch'864-233-5497 fulP264-2'33-8915 TgitJlll E. A2144X ?AS 72715 MONC-' 47:-273-40Co KALE: r-z°c" OPIA- N! ASJ nATE: a/26/OE O; nAtaAAPF ¦f?.b/i91 WETLAN03 AS DELNEATt BY LAND MANAGEMEM GROLP 1 ?. .a LENWE ROAD '4 f W RIGHT-DF-WAY , w? •v4 j IENdRL ROAD W RIg1T-OF-WAY FIGURE 10. V Vus R04rAr 17 (MARKET STREET) I OW RIGHT-OF-WAY / l4.06 AC. OF WETLANDS TO E D %BE-D O.S NIGHMV 17 ^ (MAWCT STREET) too' WHY-OF-WAY WETLANDS AS DELINEATED ©T LAND MANAGEMOIJ GROLP PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS VV/GAS LOT AND MULTIPLE OUTLOTS 3A WAL-MART STORE =3798-00 FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC. ects OGDEN, NORTH CAROLINA 2 E"g09 West t Sto Stono opo Avorue 209 prxip WAL-MART STORES. INC. Greonvilto, South Carolina 29609 702 SW EIGTN ST oh:864-233-5497 tax:864-233-8915 BF_MONVILLE. ARKANSAS 72716 PHONE: 479-273-4000 SCALE: 1'-250' DRAWN: ABJ DATE: 7/13/05 l ? ? :Cti o: tN. 4?a eo' awrT-o<-WAY ? LDADIRE ROAD 80' WD1T-Of-WAY FIGURE 11. / ?7 X, WE y? 11 > C/ t NCHwAY 17 (wiMET STREET) 10W WGHT-Or-WAY PHONE- 479-273-4000 SCALE, I'-250' DRAWN ABJ DATE= 8/26/05 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS W/GAS LOT AND ONE OUTLOT WAL-MA(2T STORE *798-00 FQEELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC. OGDEN, NORTH CAROLINA Engineers - Lonosc°"° Architects 209 Wost Stone Avorwo WAL-MART STGR.=S, WC. Groenvillo, South Corolino 29509 702 SW EIGTN ST ph,854-233-5497 fox-864-233-8915 BENTOf?fJILLE. ARKANSAS 72715 ' w ?a 100'RIGHT OF-WAY ETLANDS AS DE-L.WEAT® f3Y LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP u.i nxaHwAr 17 • ryARrEr STREET) !L7 6 AC. OF TLANDS S TO WE EE D:STURDED o: ? tel. nL IENORE ROAD 4. ao' woKT-a-ur ? ?, i / r< w IENORE ROAD sC watt-or-.Ar Y wA?aror npesmrte 0 / VS. NCNrAY I) (.MRKET STREET) i.'. 00• R"T-OF-WAY 3 AC. OF .' _ QEATED ON-SITE / WETLANDS '1.04 AC. OF _ >. WETLANDS TO e2 ?.. DISTLIZOED i WETLANDS AS DELINEATED BY LAND MANAGEMENT c 2cCp 11052 AC. OF CREATED ON-SITE WETLANDS l .f AF / VIAS Hb"AY IT IRA =T STREET) 100• RK71T-OF-WAY s FIGURE 12. PREFERRED PROJEoD??f?- PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS ?HCC I INV. VV/GAS LOT AND NO OUTLOTS WAL-MART STORE =3798-00 FQEELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC. dscapo OGDEN, NORTH CAROLINA Engi,2Oe95 Wos onStone Avonueects WAL-MART STORES. INC. Greonvillo. South Corolino 29609 702 SW EIGTH ST ph-864-233-5497 tax,864-233-8915 BENTONVILLE. ARKANSAS 72716 PHONE- 479-273-4000 SCALE, 1'-250' DRAVVN, A9J DATE, 8/26/05 WISHED GROUND PROPOSE EXISTING WETLAND PR P SE GR UND !9 FILL ARE CULVERT FIGURE 14. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS ShCC I IVV. CULVERT END VIEW 1NAL-MA12T STORE =3798-00 F12EELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC. oruo°°'s OGDEN NORTH CAROLINA 209 9 En9nWost Sto Stonenp° Avoru© WAL-MART STOW=S. INC. Greonvillo, South Camino 29609 702 SW EiGTN ST ph-864-233-5497 tox-864-233-8915 BENTONVILLE, ARKANSAS 72T6 PHONE- 479-273-4000 SCALE, N.T,S. DRAWN ABJ DATE, 8/26/05 Walmart Project in Odgen area of New Hanover County Subject: Walmart Project in Odgen area of New Hanover County From: "Paige Crews" <pcrews29@hotmai1.com> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:05:28 +0000 To: tomw@ncleg.net, dannym@ncleg.net, carolynju@ncleg.net, juliab@ncleg.net, bgreer@nhcgov.com, bcaster@nhcgov.com, tdavis@nhcgov.com, bkopp@nhcgov.com, npritchett@nhcgov.com, Jennifer.S.Frye@us.anny.mil, Rick.Shiver@ncmail.net, cyndi.karoly@ncmail.net, apope@dot.state.nc.us, lanny73763@aol.com Hello Everyone, My name is Paige Crews and I live in Hollyfield, directly behind Jacob's Ridge, off of Market street in the Odgen area. I'm sure you've heard Walmart is trying to set up shop in our peaceful neighborhood. There are many people in this area who oppose this contruction in their back yards. The increase in traffic, the distruption of wetlands and water runoffs; and the general noise', light and the increase of people around our neighborhood. We're also afraid crime-will increase because I assume this Walmart will be open 24 hours. This Wialmart is just way too close to residential homes. A 50 foot buffer, which is what Walmart is willing to give us, is not enough. The traffic in this area is horrible. From Gordon Rd to Middle Sound Loop Rd there is a 76000 annual average daily traffic count (see attached emails). In the attachments you are looking at the larger hand written numbers. To put a Walmart will only increase that at least four fold!!!! My other concern is water runoff after a heavy rain or a hurricane.'I know, personally, our neighborhood floods tremendously and this Walmart will have to connect to our drains and cause an even worse back up! It takes 10-12 hours for the water to receed already. The amount of runoff Walmart will create will be catastrophic. I don't beleive Walmart has even looked at the property to address all these, and many more issues. Nor have they contacted anyone in Jacob's Ridge or any other neighborhood. They have completely ignored us! This is the first home I have EVER purchased and I want to raise my children in this house. I can look out ever night and see the stars and the moon and they are beautiful. I DO NOT want to look out my window and see a Walmart sign over the night sky! A group of us are doing everything we can to put a stop to Walmart coming into our neighborhood. Your voices will only resound louder in their ears. All of you work for the local or state government, you are supposed to speak out for us when we can't be heard. Please come spend an evening with us in our neighborhoods and we will show you why we don't want Walmart to intruide! Thank you for you cooperation! Paige Crews 405 Foxfield Ct Wilmington, NC 28411 910-686-0183 Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/O1/ 1 of 1 10/24/2005 9:23 AM vslla FOr *3=- IxblolIY CL art .r? E amwbrar h Ct. ILL g mh " w. i 1 o ? fleck l V CL f t r on Ct- 3 Om kyo c otchh ct. Carp 1 nrt Ct. 4LT. Taoo 1 o CL Plainflold Ctt1. ?Ibd-? ct. u.lbcarra Ct z rvwrrir"za" 01oarmbry CU3. wortntrtatcn v 0"a101d L'!.,. 112y [Sio . :Qy alAS? C:td?. ptrchCMc C, 4fa W Won Cr. i OGCEN (UNINC.) PCF.=l yqeo / 430D0 1?1 •v . 1 Im 8 103 Hoop a Pont 31 = 4 F1 in oQdw Pmt A I a5a?o V: ly I ? utd« ct• `fir 1 tJ31 t?? yM7? v tr}?I .Q? I'm PPA, J 17 F ?M t9d1 191+ % 2003 AADT NEW HANOVER CO, WILMINGTON URBAN, SHEET 2 US 17 AND GORDON RD GOING NORTH TOWARDS PORTERS NECK RD l o. ,),Annn 2003 AADT NEW HANOVER CO, WILMINGTON URBAN, SHEET 2 US 17 AT PORTERS NECK RD (NORTH OF GORDON RD) Fwd: Walmart store in OgderLAVilnrington Subject: Fwd: Walmart store in Ogden/Wilmington From: HTede009@aol.com Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 16:26:48 EDT To: cyndi.karoly@ncmail.net, Jennifer.S.Frye@us.army.mil Subject: Walmart store in Ogden/Wilmington From: HTede009@aol.com Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 16:22:37 EDT To: Rick.Shiver@ncmail.net, carolynju@ncleg.net, bcaster@nhcgov.com, tdavis@nhcgov.com, bkopp@nhcgov.com, Jennifer.S.Frey@us.army.mil, cyndiKaroly@ncmail.net, apope@dot.state. nc.us, Lanny73763@aol.com Now that I have gotten through typing the E-mail list of our officials to whom I am writing this material, the rest of my thoughts will be easy going since they are just plain "COMMON SENSE" Market Street, as it passes through the Ogden area between Porters Neck to Gordon Road, is by far the most traveled and congested road in our county. I moved here six years ago and have noticed the traffic increase dramatically on Market Street in this area to the point of near grid-lock. From my home development in West Bay Estates we have only one way to leave our developments and reach the rest of the world....... that is to travel out on Market Street. It is also the main thoroughfare for traffic coming south from Porters Neck area and Hamstead. As I mentioned, it often reaches nearly grid-lock during many parts of every day. It is inconceivable that this section of Market Street would ever be considered for a Walmart super center. Any large addition to the current traffic will tie up Market St to a dead stop. I notice that the Ogden firehouse is right there next to the proposed Walmart. This would be devastating for our Fire engines and would hamper their ability to provide the fast service needed from a fire emergency. I know that locating a Walmart store here would be a bad venture. One need only approach this area at any time of day or night to see the existing serious traffic congestion. Further south (two miles) of this area, drivers are now offered an alternate route off Market Street with the recent opening of the Martin Luther King Expressway.... but this doesn't help in the Torchwood area where the proposed additional bottleneck will be created by a Walmart store. We have three Walmart stores already in our small metropolitan area, so I don't think a declination of this project could be conceived as a negative position by Walmart. Rather, it is a good judgement decision that would benefit the entire community, residents, store keepers, firemen, travelers, safety records etc. A PLUS for everyone. The DOT has already declined an additional street light for this project which is a good indication of the folly of selecting this location for a super store of any kind. May I ask each and everyone of you to please review this matter and after doing so, I am sure you will agree that this project would be a terrible detriment to our local community and overall to our entire New Hanover County. There was a movie that stated, W you build it they will come". That's for sure, but in their coming they will destroy the quality of life here and the character of our community. Thanks for reviewing this very serious subject. Sincerely, Harold Eckhoff 7412 Countywood Way, Wilmington, NC 28411 910-686-6739 Walmart store in Ogden[Wilmington.eml Content-Type: message/rfc822 1 of 2 10/28/2005 10:40 AM Eq ? G No Rt>• ?pP Allen O'Neal County Manager Wanda M. Copley County Attorney Sheila L Schult Clerk to the Board Maureen Preciose 606 Acquarius Drive Wilmington, NC 28405 Dear Ms. Prcciose: Robert G. Greer New Hanover County Chairman Board of Commissioners William A. Caster Vice-Chairman 320 Chestnut Street, Room 305 lVilmington, North Carolina 284014093 Ted Davis, Jr. Telephone (910) 341-7149 Commissioner Fax (910) 341-4130 William A. Kopp, Jr. }4'ffmitcgo_L.com Commissioner Nancy H. Pritchett Commissioner October 19, 2005 In response to our phone discussion concerning the proposed construction of Wal Mart on Market Street in the Ogden area, I am enclosing copies of a letter and memorandum sent by the County Planning Director to the NC Division of Coastal Management. This correspondence expresses County concerns about locating a Wal Mart store in a traffic-congested area of the County which also contains substantial wetlands. As we discussed, this property is currently zoned for this type application, and the Board of Commissioners will not have to be involved with any rezoning. I hope this information is helpful to you. I will keep you informed on this issue as I receive updates, and please feel free to call me in the meantime if I can be of further help. Sincerely, ?l William A. opp, Jr. County Commissioner WAKjr:mlp s ?aN R Cp 24? y< oQ A'ORT X40 Dexter L. Hayes Director October 13, 2005 New Hanover County Planning Department Mr. Stephen Rynas, AICP NC Division of Coastal Management 400 Commerce Avenue Morehead City, NC 28557 DCM # 20050082 Wal-Mart Center Dear Mr. Rynas; County Annex Building 230 Marketplace Drive, Suite 150 Wilmington, NC 28403 P 910.798.7165 F 910.798.7053 W ttpt?o??ES tpo1CRS Our Department has reviewed the application to construct a Wal-Mart Center in the 7200 Block of Market Street and would like to offer the following comments: While this tract is part of a larger commercial district in the Ogden Community the front portion of the property along Market St has a considerable amount of wetlands. This area is regulated by the New Hanover County's Conservation Overlay District which purpose is to protect these important environmental resources within the County. Protection of these resources is necessary to maintain the County's diverse and ecologically important natural systems as well as to provide open space. The proposed entranceway needs to be relocated to avoid the unnecessary crossing of these important wetlands. This is a highly congested area along Market St. with traffic movements already failing at many locations. Alternative designs for the entrances to the site have been discussed with NCDOT and New Hanover County. However, this wetland crossing has not been dictated by anyone that I'm aware. Certainly the opportunity to utilize an existing signalized intersection has merits in protecting the flow of traffic along US 17. The Planning Staff supports the realignment of Lendire Rd with the signal at Middle Sound Loop. We would also encourage interconnectivity with neighborhoods and properties to the north and west in order to eliminate as many trips as possible from utilizing Market St as an access point. It is the Planning Staff's position that this segment of Market St cannot accommodate the 7,000 - 8,000 trips projected for this project. The approval of any large traffic generator at this location should be delayed until the completion of Military Cut-Off extension. Development activities along Market Street have already been the subject of numerous discussions and several meetings concerning ongoing projects. Because of the cumulative impacts of a project of this size, our Department respectively request that a public hearing be held to consider the: application. In addition to the reason cited above various policies adopted in the City and County CAMA Land Use Plan are pertinent to the environmental and transportation impacts of the proposed project. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this project. Sincerely, 1 ? Dexter Hayes Cc Dave Weaver, County Manager Board of County Commissioners Y NC®EN North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Coastal Management Michael F. Easley, Govemor Charles S. Jones, Director William G. Ross Jr., Secretary MEMORANDUM September 22, 2005 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: County of New Hanover 320 Chestnut Street Wilmington, NC 28401-4027 F I t 1 S EP 2 6 2005 Stephen Rynas, AICP; Federal Consistency Coordinator Proposed Impact to 01.04 Acres of Wetland to Facilitate the Construction of a Wal-Mart Supercenter (DCMi120050082) LOCATION: West Side of US 17 Near the Intersection of US 17 and Wendover Lane, Ogden, New Hanover County Please review and continent b ctober 14, 2005. ur responses will assist us in determining whether the proposed project would be, conststen wi i e State's Coastal Management Program. If the proposed project does not conform to your requirements, please identify the measures that would be necessary to bring the proposed project into conformance. If you have any additional questions regarding the proposed project you may contact me at 252-808-2808 or e-mail me at: "stephen.rynas&cmail.net". P V-2 - 2 `17• x'"33 REPLY No Continent. This office supports the project as proposed. Comments to this project are attached. s office objects to the project as proposed. Signed: x. ??- x? ? t'c?YV Date: t 0 3 C)5 CORRECTIONS Please identify any corrections, additions, or deletions that should be made in terms of contact information. RETURN COMPLETED FORM to Stephen Rynas, Federal Consistency Coordinator NC Division of Coastal Management 400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City Morehead City, NC 28557-3421 Ms. Cyndi Karoly North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 October 20, 2005 Dear Ms. Karoly, We understand that the Division of Water Quality is accepting comments regarding an application by the Land Management Group on behalf of Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust to develop the Wal-Mart in Ogden, North Carolina (Corps Action ID# 200500058). Please find, following this fax, petitions expressing the deep concern of the residents of Ogden regarding the construction of a Wal-Mart in our area. A larger volume of petitions will be submitted to the USACE as their date for closure of comment period is not until October 29, 2005. Beverly Strickland of the DWQ just informed me that, given the short period of time until the DWQ comment closure, faxes of the original petitions could be date stamped and would be acceptable and could be legally entered into the public record. We will also send you, by mail, photocopies of the petitions, as well. Development of this commercial center will undoubtedly have detrimental effects upon the .quality of life for residents of northeastern New Hanover County and is certainly not in the public interest. We are therefore opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart in Ogden. Given the size, intensity and location of development, this project appears to be a threat to water quality and aquifers, increases storm water runoff due to additional, impervious surfaces, increases runoff into Pages Creek and Smith Creek, and may prove to diminish well water quality in Bayshore Estates and other local residential areas serviced by.wells. Further, the impact of increased traffic on existing congestion, increased truck traffic, decreased air quality,: and diminished public safety from fire and rescue services of the Ogden Fire Department are not in the public interest. And of course the quality of life for residents' homes surrounding the development itself will be severely negatively affected, not to mention the decrease in their property values. This development adds to the urban sprawl we are experiencing in New Hanover County. We are witnessing the loss of even more open space and natural areas, contributing to the deterioration of historic commercial centers in Wilmington and experiencing the loss of commerce for local businesses with the resultant loss of jobs. Permitting this development opens the door for further large-scale commercial development in Ogden which is inconsistent with the current land-use in the area. We therefore wish to enter our objection to this certification into public record by way of this letter and the following petitions. I further hope that the Division of Water Quality will recognize the detriment this will have upon the public and thereby deny the developer's request. We also hope that this will suggest to the Division of Water Quality that a public hearing regarding this issue is in the best interest of all parties. Thank you for your consideration. <:`4`VA)? J ff H 604 quarius Dr. Wilmington, NC 28411-9404 910.686.9718 hillj@uncw.edu vd ? T1 pip Ptpgjp?.t?,nrltt?U1 r? Petition to Halt the Construction of a Wal-Mart in Ogden, NC We, the undersigned, are concerned citizens who are opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart store in Ogden, North Carolina. Given that there is an existing Wal-Mart SuperCenter less than 5 miles away on Market St., this project is clearly not in the public interest and will significantly diminish the quality of life for Ogden residents. Our specific concerns are: Traffic- the impact of increased traffic and potentially additional traffic lights on existing congestion, increased truck traffic, decreased air quality, and diminished public safety from fire and rescue services of the Ogden Fire Department Water quality- the threat to water quality and aquifers, increased of stormwater runoff due to additional impervious surfaces, increased runoff into Pages Creek and Smith Creek, and diminished well water quality in Bayshore Estates and other local residential areas serviced by wells Urban sprawl- the loss of even more open space and natural areas, contribution to the deterioration of historic commercial centers in Wilmington, the loss of commerce for local businesses and resultant loss of jobs, and opening the door for further large-scale commercial development in Ogden which is inconsistent with the current land-use in the area Therefore, we, the undersigned, as concerned citizens, are opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart store in Ogden, North Carolina. We do not think a Wal-Mart in Ogden will promote the thoughtful growth that will enhance and benefit the local community as a whole. Therefore, I do not support the construction of a Wal-Mart in the Ogden area and I support any actions necessary to prevent this from occurring. Printed name Si nature Address Comments Date a3p-teS ?- 2r.1,? llI?1?C-S 67371 Cl-'j l2.MC-1. TRW ! "1 "?'6) A) C? 7a? livctt -ra/1fP'c W;tfC-0- P/ b9L,{ ,a)? / ldf J?L-i + A ?? S S??.? iJu l?n( BtSCAYN? ?2• 44(? BAAtS??o?? ?cta'? ns?f? `ttt? z2 ? 09-vaK1 P2a8?A.s w r??? /-f 4f WAtSo?J' 4? C 71Vvi a/coq fug RoGC/'o .Tva kum )I/'kAii f 70o clvte A36 wenci'?ue? 1.Q (A,, ?.gLtx y ro/?g?? ? Oaj // I IL' J / IN / 70,0,47t / a??Vq I r?al?F_,L a 3 6 h/F dF,21 /LMiAl vN e 40 tvAfc? G;vgi? 1 r? 1S 67 r )CO ? dyu re -Z--5?- tA a-4-, b' IV n ti ?? ?4a1 COQ, c*'? ,cK o R.r J L MX9 <CA, ?? C?JL I I c Z) 1, {?` ! at h that the above are accurate and valid to the best of my ability. Petition to Halt the Construction of a Wal-Mart in Ogden, NC We, the undersigned, are concerned citizens who are opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart store in Ogden, North Carolina. Given that there is an existing Wal-Mart SuperCenter less than 5 miles away on Market St., this project is clearly not in the public interest and will significantly diminish the quality of life for Ogden residents. Our specific concerns are: Traffic- the impact of increased traffic and potentially additional traffic lights on existing congestion, increased truck traffic, decreased air quality, and diminished public safety from fire and rescue services of the Ogden Fire Department Water quality- the threat to water quality and aquifers, increased of stormwater runoff due to additional impervious surfaces, increased runoff into Pages Creek and Smith Creek, and diminished well water quality in Bayshore Estates and other local residential areas serviced by wells Urban sprawl- the loss of even more open space and natural areas, contribution to the deterioration of historic commercial centers in Wilmington, the loss of commerce for local businesses and resultant loss of jobs, and opening the door for further large-scale commercial development in Ogden which is inconsistent with the current land-use in the area Therefore, we, the undersigned, as concerned citizens, are opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart store in Ogden, North Carolina. We do not think a Wal-Mart in Ogden will promote the thoughtful growth that will enhance and benefit the local community as a whole. Therefore, I do not support the construction of a Wal-Mart in the Ogden area and I support any actions necessary to prevent this from occurring. Printed name Signature Address Comments a 44 41,411,yd?ll 1111?k AA /1 0 t C :wYe A;e 41 X r4 ?. El I. Zrye_ de ` 1IL'd A?41i, I , a C7' 4r (An. C r r J o ?-rl ?.?f ric;l C4T- cc c- L I, U l ! attest that the above are accurate and valid to the best of my ability. Y _ZI Petition to Halt the Construction of a Wal-Mart in Ogden, NC We, the undersigned, are concerned citizens who are opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart store in Ogden, North Carolina. Given that there is an existing Wal-Mart SuperCenter less than 5 miles away on Market St., this project is clearly not in the public interest and will significantly diminish the quality of life for Ogden residents. Our specific concerns are: Traffic- the impact of increased traffic and potentially additional traffic lights on existing congestion, increased truck traffic, decreased air quality, and diminished public safety from fire and rescue services of the Ogden Fire Department Water quality- the threat to water quality and aquifers, increased of stormwater runoff due to additional impervious surfaces, increased runoff into Pages Creek and Smith Creek, and diminished well water quality in Bayshore Estates and other local residential areas serviced by wells Urban sprawl- the loss of even more open space and natural areas, contribution to the deterioration of historic commercial centers in Wilmington, the loss of commerce for local businesses and resultant loss of jobs, and opening the door for further large-scale commercial development in Ogden which is inconsistent with the current land-use in the area Therefore, we, the undersigned, as concerned citizens, are opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart store in Ogden, North Carolina. We do not think a Wal-Mart in Ogden will promote the thoughtful growth that will enhance and benefit the local community as a whole. Therefore, I do not support the construction of a Wal-Mart in the Ogden area and I support any actions necessary to prevent this from occurring. Printed name Signature Address Continents Da ti ?h 1Z?? 98/J 617 -1 P -'?.-31r r.'- M/2 ?J ?t ?:? ?Zd ?- cf-e? ? Ll???L?S l 1, Q 41. f kt1e Aat the above are accurate and valid to the best of my ability. ) _fn il to Petition to Halt the Construction of a Wal-Mart in Ogden, NC We, the undersigned, are concerned citizens who are opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart store in Ogden, North Carolina. Given that there is an existing Wal-Mart SuperCenter less than 5 miles away on Market St., this project is clearly not in the public interest and will significantly diminish the quality of life for Ogden residents. Our specific concerns are: Traffic- the impact of increased traffic and potentially additional traffic lights on existing congestion, increased truck traffic, decreased air quality, and diminished public safety from fire and rescue services of the Ogden Fire Department Water quality- the threat to water quality and aquifers, increased of stormwater runoff due to additional impervious surfaces, increased runoff into Pages Creek and Smith Creek, and diminished well water quality in Bayshore Estates and other local residential areas serviced by wells Urban sprawl- the loss of even more open space and natural areas, contribution to the deterioration of historic commercial centers in Wilmington, the loss of commerce for local businesses and resultant loss of jobs, and opening the door for further large-scale commercial development in Ogden which is inconsistent with the current land-use in the area Therefore, we, the undersigned, as concerned citizens, are opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart store in Ogden, North Carolina. We do not think a Wal-Mart in Ogden will promote the thoughtful growth that will enhance and benefit the local community as a whole. Therefore, I do not support the construction of a Wal-Mart in the Ogden area and I support any actions necessary to prevent this from occurring. Printed name Signature Address Comments Date Anr\ C(i'n c 1-4 Gnat, r?q 4s a < /6 -7 / ?- ?% G?t/ t //O ?. v w.\rn Vc, mac. -a•a*-M U(I tV M T 1 -D©nj 7,433 PIPU S?rr- U.?}?? W Iuu C, Zwtt LZr n? CLYY) ?M0n i N t44MC tnrOT ip,?8lbr c c t nC lc5a r\ '1? HUMP-cam - OU44AI-C ?LZ 4o.p- •' a.e-c o?St?o 17 'o V I, Y%fi st that the above are accurate and valid to the best of my ability. D Petition to Halt the Construction of a Wal-Mart in Ogden, NC We, the undersigned, are concerned citizens who are opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart store in Ogden, North Carolina. Given that there is an existing Wal-Mart SuperCenter less than 5 miles away on Market St., this project is clearly not in the public interest and will significantly diminish the quality of life for Ogden residents. Our specific concerns are: Traffic- the impact of increased traffic and potentially additional traffic lights on existing congestion, increased truck traffic, decreased air quality, and diminished public safety from fire and rescue services of the Ogden Fire Department Water quality- the threat to water quality and aquifers, increased of stormwater runoff due to additional impervious surfaces, increased runoff into Pages Creek and Smith Creek, and diminished well water quality in Bayshore Estates and other local residential areas serviced by wells Urban sprawl- the loss of even more open space and natural areas, contribution to the deterioration of historic commercial centers in Wilmington, the loss of commerce for local businesses and resultant loss of jobs, and opening the door for further large-scale commercial development in Ogden which is inconsistent with the current land-use in the area Therefore, we, the undersigned, as concerned citizens, are opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart store in Ogden, North Carolina. We do not think a Wal-Mart in Ogden will promote the thoughtful growth that will enhance and benefit the local community as a whole. Therefore, I do not support the construction of a Wal-Mart in the Ogden area and I support any actions necessary to prevent this from occurring. Printed name Signature Address Comments Da _Y rac e oN - 3 ye a 0- 'I s 1,7 k4,?, Cr e,wf 14 Q'o"I a L& I U Oil Q?- pm?f A 0 ?pj?` ula? Lb ` hek7q r rb r3 A2tt t_tz__ m- ?3 7 a m to pe4 k T - Tf d ????? s ?2 k l f <?? C ?f Cola f? C_ t?C r Uk k/ p s </ ?o ?f v J ' v J 1: ?\ A /'. /7' a, 1, h at the above are accurate and valid to the best of my ability. ) V I*' / .te IT i .r r? , 1 ' -0. Petition to Halt the Construction of a Wal-Mart in Ogden, NC We, the undersigned, are concerned citizens who are opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart store in Ogden, North Carolina. Given that there is an existing Wal-Mart SuperCenter less than 5 miles away on Market St., this project is clearly not in the public interest and will significantly diminish the quality of life for Ogden residents. Our specific concerns are: Traffic- the impact of increased traffic and potentially additional traffic lights on existing congestion, increased truck traffic, decreased air quality, and diminished public safety from fire and rescue services of the Ogden Fire Department Water quality- the threat to water quality and aquifers, increased of stormwater runoff due to additional impervious surfaces, increased runoff into Pages Creek and Smith Creek, and diminished well water quality in Bayshore Estates and other local residential areas serviced by wells Urban sprawl- the loss of even more open space and natural areas, contribution to the deterioration of historic commercial centers in Wilmington, the loss of commerce for local businesses and resultant loss of jobs, and opening the door for further large-scale commercial development in Ogden which is inconsistent with the current land-use in the area Therefore, we, the undersigned, as concerned citizens, are opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart store in Ogden, North Carolina. We do not think a Wal-Mart in Ogden will promote the thoughtful growth that will enhance and benefit the local community as a whole. Therefore, I do not support the construction of a Wal-Mart in the Ogden area and I support any actions necessary to prevent this from occurring. Printed name Signature Address Comments Date ?.?tRSoN 7?? ?kcd • V 0 L=(Z ? RL- ?D1o'u- ?c,.<SZurny? ?ti ? ('c KA-MM?_'i Q . W i 1_l,+ J\ G r' -17-1-7 HA s G j 1 a ! g 14 .4. u E 2uA ? ? oo C??ic?s ?F? ??t ,? G? ?Cx? c%?s _7L NhN C N 14 9 'Se'a 10? Apso,r) 6Y1 ?? '' (l v//? ?S??Cr Gai.CSMA?J ,,,_.` Zz 8?,eS{f of?Ks to 1 I, 7dt[est that the above are accurate and valid to the best of my ability. I \J ?s ?s 7S 1S Petition to Halt the Construction of a Wal-Mart in Ogden, NC We, the undersigned, are concerned citizens who are opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart store in Ogden, North Carolina. Given that there is an existing Wal-Mart SuperCenter less than 5 miles away on Market St., this project is clearly not in the public interest and will significantly diminish the quality of life for Ogden residents. Our specific concerns are: Traffic- the impact of increased traffic and potentially additional traffic lights on existing congestion, increased truck traffic, decreased air quality, and diminished public safety from fire and rescue services of the Ogden Fire Department Water quality- the threat to water quality and aquifers, increased of stormwater runoff due to additional impervious surfaces, increased runoff into Pages Creek and Smith Creek, and diminished well water quality in Bayshore Estates and other local residential areas serviced by wells Urban sprawl- the loss of even more open space and natural areas, contribution to the deterioration of historic commercial centers in Wilmington, the loss of commerce for local businesses and resultant loss of jobs, and opening the door for further large-scale commercial development in Ogden which is inconsistent with the current land-use in the area Therefore, we, the undersigned, as concerned citizens, are opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart store in Ogden, North Carolina. We do not think a Wal-Mart in Ogden will promote the thoughtful growth that will enhance and benefit the local community as a whole. Therefore, I do not support the construction of a Wal-Mart in the Ogden area and I support any actions necessary to prevent this from occurring. Petition to Halt the Construction of a Wal-Mart in Ogden, NC We, the undersigned, are concerned citizens who are opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart store in Ogden, North Carolina. Given that there is an existing Wal-Mart SuperCenter less than 5 miles away on Market St., this project is clearly not in the public interest and will significantly diminish the quality of life for Ogden residents. Our specific concerns are: Traffic- the impact of increased traffic and potentially additional traffic lights on existing congestion, increased truck traffic, decreased air quality, and diminished public safety from fire and rescue services of the Ogden Fire Department Water quality- the threat to water quality and aquifers, increased of stormwater runoff due to additional impervious surfaces, increased runoff into Pages Creek and Smith Creek, and diminished well water quality in Bayshore Estates and other local residential areas serviced by wells Urban sprawl- the loss of even more open space and natural areas, contribution to the deterioration of historic commercial centers in Wilmington, the loss of commerce for local businesses and resultant loss of jobs, and opening the door for further large-scale commercial development in Ogden which is inconsistent with the current land-use in the area Therefore, we, the undersigned, as concerned citizens, are opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart store in Ogden, North Carolina. We do not think a Wal-Mart in Ogden will promote the thoughtful growth that will enhance and benefit the local community as a whole. Therefore, I do not support the construction of a Wal-Mart in the Ogden area and I support any actions necessary to prevent this from occurring. Printed name Signature Address Comments Date 00CLCW\ IA-IK ?sca u? Dh. 1 0.1ti,. ? ? rfx Qe/34'_-`h' ?Itl I, attest that the above are accurate and valid to the best of my ability. .)J( J / I Fwd: Wilmington: Walmart on Market Street Subject: Fwd: Wilmington: Walmart on Market Street From: javanderf@aol.com Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 15:33:45 -0400 To: cyndi.karoly@ncmail.net Jo Ann -----Original Message----- From: Javanderf To: Lanny73763 Sent: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 15:27:45 -0400 Subject: Wilmington: Walmart on Market Street I beg you to reconsider allowing a Walmart Super Center to be built at the intersection of Market Street and Lendire Drive. As a new resident of Wilmington, I can see where more planning in our town would make it safer and nicer to live in. I am afraid we will end up with a nighmarish debacle like the one in front of Mayfaire Town Center on Military Cut Off where so many accidents ;lave occurred. There are many other areas for sale further down Market Street that would be lots safer and Walmart would have a quality store, not one shoved in behind other stores. I appreciate anything you can do to help us. Thank you. Jo Ann Vanderford 1 of 1 10/24/2005 9:33 AM Fw: WAL-MART OGDEN Subject: Fw: WAL-MART OGDEN From: "James Barnes" <jfbilmnc@bellsouth.net> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 21:29:51 -0400 To: <tomw@ncleg>, <juliab@ncleg.net>, <bgreer@nhcgov.com>, <bcaster@nhcgov.com>, <tdavis@nhcgov.com>, <bkopp@nhegov.com>, <npritchett@nhcgov.com>, <Jennifer.S.Frye@us.army. mil>, <Rick.Shiver@ncmail.net>, <cyndi.karoly@ncmai].net>, <apope@dot.state.nc.us>, <lanny73763@aol.com>, <dannym@ncleg.net> LADIES AND GENTLEMEN .......PLEASE, PLEASE.....WE NEED YOUR HELP. WAL-MART IS NOT WANTED OR NEEDED IN UPPER NEW HANOVER COUNTY. SOME OF YOU LET IT HAPPEN ON MILITARY CUTOFF AND LOOK WHAT HAPPENED. LEARN FROM OUR PAST MISTAKES...... DON'T LET IT HAPPEN ON MARKET STREET. YOU TAKE YOUR LIFE IN YOUR HANDS EVERY TIME YOU DRIVE THERE NOW. PLEASE READ AND ACT POSITIVELY ON MY LETTER TO CAROLYN JUSTICE. GOD BLESS YOU ALL AND THANK YOU FROM THE RESIDENTS OF OGDEN. WE NEED YOU NOW. DON'T LET US DOWN ----- Original Message ----- From: James Barnes To: Carolyn Justice Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 4:20 PM Subject: WAL-MART LTR TO CAROLYN JUSTICE News of the proposed Wal-Mart in Ogden has evetyone in the area thoroughly upset, as we feel that the proposed facility will ruin the quality of life,which we all presently enjoy, not to mention the negative affect the facility will have on the infrastructure of the northern end of New Hanover County. As you are aware, the traffic in the area of the proposed complex is one of the most congested accident pro the county. There is not a day that goes by that the residents either witness an accident, sits in traffic becat accident, or are traveling victims of the continuous traffic congestion. We need your help!!! The residents that border the proposed site and all the adjacent subdivisions maintain cared for properties, family and friends and have a fine quality of life, which they worked so hard to achieve. Whether it is a yc family or retirees, we all love our homes, the quality of life and the community in which we live. It is so disheartening to listen to people, who have struggled for years to buy a home in a quiet neighbor, only to h, their dreams, their homes and their dollar investments shattered by an infrastructure such as Wal-Mart. Fo it will mean that their property value will go down, not increase like the rest of the area. Bordering such a complex to residential neighborhoods is bad for all homeowners. There is so much land north, which is not yet developed, that would not have a negative effect on the lives of folks, who work so maintain their properties in a positive manner. There is no place for a Wal-Mart in the Ogden area. What in God's name were the "powers" thinking whc approved such an undertaking in our little community. Is it too difficult for shoppers to travel a little furth- Market Street to the already existing Wal-Mart? I recently heard a comment that Wilmington will someda. called Walmartington if the trend continues. We fear for the threat to our water quality„the very real potential of increased storm water runoff due to thi over of grasslands, and with the proposed site dumping storm water into Pages Creek and Smith Creek. Tl runoff will negatively affect all the residents and in particular those that are on well water. I fear that their 1 of 2 10/24/2005 9:33 AM Fw: WAL-MART OGDEN of drinking water will have ill effects on both them and our community. Even today, with the newly laid p the Middlesound area, the water pressure diminishes to a slow supply during hours when families are prep; for their upcoming day. This will only get worse with the proposed Wal-Mart. Sewer capacities; too, are maxed out. Why are we adding to the dilemma? Crime is our area of the county is probably one of the lowest in the area. With the proposed Wal-Mart in our little community, this will regrettably change, and not just for those shopping, but in the a neighborhoods as well. Representative Carolyn Justice, we, as residents sincerely request that you represent us to the best of your STOP IVAL-MART from ruining our quality of life. Time is getting short and action must be taken now. elected you because you are a fair and decent person, not afraid to step up to the plate for what is right. Plc please help its STOP IVAL-MART. The Barnes Families and the residents of the Ogden area appreciate the efforts you will extend on our beha Sincerely James and Bernice Barnes Providence Subdivision 2 of 2 10/24/2005 9:33 AM OCT,20-2005 09:49A FROH: TO:B1919T3?bo93 P: 1/9 Date: October 20, 2005 To: Cyndi Karoly, DWO Fax: 919-733-6893 @ a ?/ D D From: Jeffery M. Hill OCT 2 0 2005 hillj@uncw.edu DENR - WATER QUALITY 910-686-9718 WERANDS MD STOR MATER BRANCH Number of pages, including this cover sheet: 10 Comments: Cyndi, if there are problems with this transmission or entering this into public record as a fax, please let me know. Thanks ...Jeff Hill OCT-19-2005 WED 21:4T TEL:919T336393 NRVIE:DHQ-WETLAhdDS P. 1 QCT-20-2005 09:49A FFOM: 70:819197339893 P:2 9 Petition to Halt the Construction of a Wal-Mart in Ogden, NC We, the undersigned, are concerned citizens who are opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart store in Ogden, North Carolina. Given that there is an existing Wal-Mart SuperCenter less than 5 miles away on Market St., this project is clearly not in the public interest and will significantly diminish the quality of life for Ogden residents. Our specific concerns are: "Traffic- (lie impact of increased traffic and potentially additional traffic lights on existing congestion, increased truck traffic, decreased air quality, and diminished public safety from fire and rescue services of the Ogden Fire Department Water duality- the threat to water quality and aquifers, increased of stomlwater runoff due to additional impervious surfaces, increased runoff into Pages Creek and Smith Creek, and diminished well water quality in Bayshore Estates and other local residential areas serviced by wells Urban sprawl- the loss of even more open space and natural areas, contribution to the deterioration of historic commercial centers in Wilmington, the loss of commerce for local businesses and resultant loss of jobs, and opening the door for further large-scale commercial development in Ogden which is inconsistent with the current land-use in the area Therefore, we, the undersigned, as concerned citizens, are opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart store in Ogden, North Carolina. We do not think a Wal-Mart in Ogden will promote the thoughtful growth that will enhance and benefit the local community as a whole. Therefore, I do not support the construction of a Wal-Mart in the Ogden arcs and I support any actions necessary to prevent this from occurring. Printed name Signature, Address Comments Date CiOMQS 673L C/;? RNC1, R o !an i ) 0 -is? Huc?? ram pc G rt. P???c c KI /)J/o S LL J •t- AA , a l A - (?2, 141P BtSCA'f Corr ti rr EEa `fr+ ? i2 ?FG? w rg/? I (-? SS6?A. J(Ju BrL?St'OQG? 02 Wf?Jf t'?JB?n,t / s y WNso J c - ' ?.. 7110 "'Of (u Ro "POR r0Q Ft ocA t"' 1Xc, ¢ r?o ??SL o " , o - - v e ?? (.v, I ?zt.tn . ?°. ' $ I 311 %1 Od,?ls Dr F (rn caalL, C?tv$e ?is?? IOll??o ' a" C w?r ??- To tit !? a i A?l ' 11" 'e 3 6 461 ?? ,r 13 '.1a, 4 vN e ?tv i s 1 - 6( -T-5V 0 is 74at COQ, cam- J t cr; 1J ?g Za 0 C K . zr I 12 l 1, Q{) att'es't that the above are accurate and valid to the best of my ability. 1-?W 7 All OCT-19 C-0057 DIED 21:47 TEL:9197336893 t1H-ME:DWQ-WETLAHDS P. 2 ,OCT-C,0-2005 09:50A FF.OM: L TO.81919:3J5333 P:3/9 Petition to Halt the Construction of a Wal-Mart in Ogden, NC We, the undersigned, arc concerned citizens who arc opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart store in Ogden, North Carolina. Given that there is an existing Wal-Mart SuperCenter less than 5 miles away on Market St., this project is clearly not in the public interest and will significantly diminish the quality of life for Ogden residents. Our specific concerns arc: Traffic- the impact of increased traffic and potentially additional traffic lights on existing congestion, increased truck traffic, decreased air quality, and diminished public safety from fire and rescue services of the Ogden Fire Department Water quality- the threat to water quality and aquifers, increased of stormwater runoff due to additional impervious surfaces, increased runoff into pages Creek and Smith Creek, and diminished well water quality in Bayshorc Estates and other local residential areas servic.,d by wells Urban sprawl- the loss of even more open space and natural areas, contribution to the deterioration of historic commercial centers in Wilmington, the loss of commerce for local businesses and resultant loss of jobs, and opening the door for further large-scale con-unercial development ul Ogden which is inconsistent with the current land-usc in the area Therefore, we, the undersigned, as concemcd citizens, are opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart store in Ogden, North Carolina. We do not think a Wal-Mart ui Ogden will promote the thoughtful growth that will enhance and benefit the local community as a whole. Therefore, I do not support the construction of a Wal-Mart in the Ogden area and 1 support any actions necessary to prevent this from cccurring. Printed name Signature Address Comments -T 1 1114 ate J -U lv 03 I' (C) c 5r>rF? f fro z ?- ?i? uG??IiS l?r. 1 Gl? 1, attest that the above are accurate and valid to the best of my ability. OCT-19-2005 DIED 21:48 TEL:9197336S93 NAME:DLlQ-WETLANDS P. 3 IXT-20-2005 09:51A FFOH: T0:81919=1S893 P: 4/9 Petition to Halt the Construction of a Wal-Mart in Ogden, NC We, the undersigned, are concerned citizens who are opposed to the construction of a Wal-51art store in Ogden, North Carolina. Given that there is an existing Wal-Mart SupcrCenter less than miles away on Market St., this project is clearly not in the public interest and will significantly diminish the quality of life for Ogden residents. Our specific concerns are: Traffic- the impact of increased traffic and potentially additional traffic lights on existing congestion, increased truck traffic, decreased air quality, and diminished public safety from fire and rescue services of the Ogden Fire Department Water quality- the threat to water quality and aquifers, increased of storinwater runoff due to additional impervious surfaces, increased runoff into Pages Creek and Smith Creek, and diminished well water quality in Bayshore Estates and other local residential areas serviced by wells Urban sprawl- the loss of even more open space and natural areas, contribution to the deterioration of ltistorie conunercial centers in Wilmington, the loss of conuinerce for local businesses and resultant loss of jobs, and opening the door for further large-scale commercial development in Ogden which is inconsistent with the current land-use in the area Therefore, we, the undersigned, as concerted citizens, are opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart store in Ogden, North Carolina. We do not think a Wal-Mart in Ogden will promote the thoughtful growth that will enhance and benefit the local community as a whole. "therefore, I do not support the construction of a Wal-Mart in the Ogden area and I support any actions necessary to prevent this from occurring. Printed name Signature Address Comments Date e4zg 11 lkt! N i7urt the above are accurate and valid to the best of m}? ability. OCT-19-2005 WED 21:49 TEL:9197336893 IIA°tE:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 4 5S OCT-20-2005 09:51A FF.OM: TO:81919733S8D3 P:5%9 Petition to Halt the Construction of a Wal-Mart in Ogden, NC We. the undersigned, are concerned citizens who are opposed to the construction of a Wall-Alart store in Ogden, North Carolina. Given that there is an existing Wal-Mart SuperCentcr less than 5 iniles away on Market St., tlvs project is clearly not in the public interest and will significantly diminish the quality of life for Ogden residents. Our specific concerns arc: Traffic- the impact of increased traffic and potentially additional traffic lights on existing congestion, increased truck traffic, decreased air quality, and diminished public safety from fire and rescue services of the Ogden Fire Department Water quality- the threat to water quality and aquifers, increased of stonnwater runoff due to additional impervious surfaces, increased runoff into pages Creek and Smith Creek, and diminished well water quality in Bayshore Estates and other local residential areas serviced by wells Urban sprawl the loss of even more open space and natural areas, contribution to the deterioration of historic commercial centers in Wilmington, the loss of commerce for local businesses and resultant loss of jobs, and opening the door for further large-scale commercial development in Ogden which is inconsistent with the current land-use in the area Therefore, we, the undersigned, as concerned citizens, are opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart store in Ogden, North Carolina. We do not thiiilc a Wal-Mart in Ogden will promote the thoughtful growth that will enhance and benefit the local conununity as a whole. Therefore, 1 do not support the construction of u Wal-Mart in the Ogden area and I support any actions necessary to prevent this froin occurring. Printed name Signature Address Comments Date 30 4t,% ch'nr- 115 1t?-! ?.c u ou-?, /u/ ' . b t? -7 v'(Z a'? / cl?' "Oil /k OZ-C A-+DA?1 G?r W .? rn. kt? t 1 L ? E??1? hr h.e`e.ue? Cr hn4.rugj. //?`? L uv.?e.,u. '?uc? eJe. 7 Sa11 °!ly' Dr f/ t ,v t o r C ?T 6r11 ?0? '?' -1u 33 gPJL-,hT t.c.JJprZ1o W LA,< 1,3 U Zts 1 t hr-r- n4-C:- ?A'n/ra?, ry ti t? t nP Jr ?c? BJdj ?F l} St *l '?l L ( AL u? w e n ?YhC?' co www ' wf t ?S uSA A ??c(vrczn?.I" Its Nt.?. crx z Y//)T Oil I I / ?Nficst that the above are accurate and valid to the best of niy ability. OCT-19-2005 DIED 21:49 TEL:919733Ge93 HAME:DWQ-WETLAHDS P. 5 ,OCT-20-2005 09:52A FFOH: T0:8191973-_3Se33 P:5/9 Petition to Halt the Construction of a Wal-Mart in Ogden, NC We, the undersigned, are concerned citizens who are opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart store in Olden, North Carolina. Given that there is an existing Wal-Mart Supe?Center less than 5 miles away on Market St., this project is clearly not ui the public interest and will significantly diminish the quality of life for Ogden residents. Our specific concerns are: Traffic- the impact of increased traffic and potentially additional traffic lights on existing congestion, increased trick traffic, decreased air quality, and diminished public safety from fire and rescue services of the Ogden Fire Department Water duality- the threat to water quality and aquifers, increased of stomtwater runoff due to additional impervious surfaces, increased runoff into Pagcs Creek and Smith Creek, and diminished well water quality in Bayshore Estates and other local residential areas serviced by wells Urban sprawl- the loss of even more open space and natural areas, contribution to the deterioration of historic comunercial centers in Wilmington, the loss of commerce for local businesses and resultant loss of jobs, and opening the door for further large-scale commercial development in Ogden wluch is inconsistent with the current land-use in the area Therefore, we, the undersigned, as concerned citizens, are opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart store in Ogden, North Carolina. We do not think a Wal-Mart in Ogden will promote the thoughtful growth that will enhance and benefit the local conununity as a whole. Therefore, 1 do not support the construction of a Wal-Mart in the Ogden area and I support any actions necessary to prevent this from occurring. Printed name Signature Address Comments Date ?rac P oN ? ?. s"5?L J3d ?f'lre.t t? ?/' v,?a'14?ti Cr e?--f 1418 S is 5 rt- rv r' A 6 c,?_ (,l iz- M 6 7 q 0 2? 'rna.ie,? ?. 'm ` ? Cb 1 Not, t? - ???1a c c to, ? & tv 7, H G?c t" `0 ?yc a p lJ? 1?/a l/.t,??-? 42- -7731 Nit 1 ?c , r? r?(o f ?('i fv2v - -f? l?C.r ??N?S lPJ a,?Wt that the above are accurate and valid to the best of my ability. OCT-19-2005 14ED 21:50 TEL:919733GG93 NANE:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 6 5- ,OCT220-2005 09:52A FF011: TO:81919733S893 P:7%9 Petition to Halt the Construction of a Wal-Mart in Ogden, NC We, the undersigned, are concerned citizens who are opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart store in Ogden, North Carolina. Given that there is an existing Wal-Mart SupetCentcr less than 5 miles away on Market St., this project is clearly not in the public interest and will significantly diminish the duality of life for Ogden residents. Our specific concerns are; Traffic- the impact of increased tragic and potentially additional traffic lights on existing congestion, increased truck traffic, decreased air quality, and diminished public safety from fire and rescue services of the Ogden Fire Department Water quality- the threat to water quality and aquifers, increased of storrnwater runoff due to additional impervious surfaces, increased runoff into Pages Creek and Smith Creek, and diminished well water quality in Bayshtore Estates and other local residential areas serviced by wells Urban sprawl- the loss of even more open space and natural areas, contribution to the deterioration of historic commercial centers in Wilmington, the loss of cotnrnerce for local businesses and resultant loss of jobs, and opening the door for further large-scale commercial development in Ogden which is inconsistent with the current land-use in the area Therefore, we, the undersigned, as concerned citizens, arc opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart store in Ogden, North Carolina. We do riot think a Wal-Mart in Ogden will promote the thoughtful growth that will enhanee and benefit the local community as a whole. 77icrcfore, I do not support the construction of a Wal-Mart in the Ogden area and I support any actions necessary to prevent this from occurring. Printed name Signature Address Comments Date ' JfJfn Co u.rr??u,.. ) D?LQ ) 'JRL- O)O'lr M u-csjnrnyr c. t ?4TI 4 i N? 71?1 -12 11 ! b I f3 w ? t l.; ?hvl? r l ? s G ? < 6 ZIOo 74 Gt? co C///!t f ?d ' c D 4 5 sra Is01") Krsv '., ?• to-?es? aA-ks 2-Z& rQ/,a i, is??s c hest that the above arc accurate and valid to the best o?nry ability. t OCT-19-2005 WED 21:50 TEL:919733E893 NAME: DWQ-WETLANDS P. 7 ?s ?s 7S 1S ,OCT-20-2005 09:53A FROM: 70:919197335993 P:e/9 Petition to Halt the Construction of a Wal-Mart in Ogden, NC We, the undersigned, are concerned citizens who are opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart store in Ogden, North Carolina. Given that there is an existing Wal-Mart SuperCenter less than 5 miles away on Market St., this project is clearly not in the public interest and will signifleantly diminish the quality of life for Ogden residents. Our specific concerns are: Traffic- the impact of increased tmffic and potentially additional traffic lights on existing congestion, increased truck traffic, decreased air duality, and dinninishcd public safety from fire and rescue services of the Ogden Fire Department Water quality- the threat to water quality and aquifers, increased of storrnwater runoff due to additional impervious surfaces, increased runoff into Pages Creek and Smith Creek, and diminished well water quality in Bayshore Estates and other local residential areas serviced by wells Urban sprawl- the loss of even more open space and natural areas, contribution to the deterioration of historic commercial centers in Wilmington, the loss of commerce for local businesses and resultant loss of jobs, and opening the door for further large-scale commercial development in Ogden which is inconsistent with the current land-use in the area Therefore, we, the undersigned, as concerned citizens, are opposed to the construction of a 'Val-Mart store in Ogden, North Carolina. We do not dunk a Wal-Mart in Ogden will promote the thoughtful growth that will entrance and benefit the local Conunlnnlty as a whole. Therefore, I do not support the construction of a Wal-Mart in the Ogden area and I support any actions necessary to prevent this from occurring. OCT-19-2005 WED 21:51 TEL:9197336993 fJAME:DWO-HETLRIDS P. 9 ,0CT-20-2005 09:53A FFOH: T0:81919733S893 P:9/9 Petition to Halt the Construction of a Wal-Mart in Ogden, NC We, the undersigned, are concerned citizens who are opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart store in Ogden, North Carolina. Given that there is an existing Wal-Mart SuperCenter less than 5 miles away on Market St., this project is clearly not in the public interest and will significantly diminish the quality of life for Ogden residents. Our specific concerns arc: Traffic- the impact of increased traffic and potentially additional traffic lights on existing congestion, increased truck traffic, decreased air quality, and diminished public safety from fire and rescue services of the Ogden Fire Department Water quality- the threat to water quality and aquifers, increased of stonnwater runoff due to additional impervious surfaces, increased runoff into Pages Creek and Smith Creek, and diminished well water quality in Bayshore Estates and other local residential areas serviced by wells Urban sprawl- the loss of even more open space and natural areas, contribution to the deterioration of historic commercial centers in Wilmington, the loss of commerce for local businesses and resultant loss of jobs, and opening the door for further large-scale commercial development in Ogden which is inconsistent with the current land-use in the area Therefore, we, the undersigned, as concerned citizens, are opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart store in Ogden, North Carolina. We do not think a Wal-Mart in Ogden will promote the thoughtful growth that will enhance and benefit the local community as a whole. Therefore, I do not support the construction of a Val-Bart in the Ogden area and f support any actions necessary to prevent this from occurring. Printed name Signature Address Comments Date 6 a F II`` ?pt1nQ t10 ? 1 y't8 ? ??c?t t?DV?. t C V ECt 4..5- - i r t,??? ftcti uk ,o a 1 'attest that the above are accurate and valid to the best of my ability. OCT-19-2005 VIED 21:51 TEL:919733E893 HAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 9 [Fwd: [Fwd: Conunents on proposed Wal-Mart site in Ogden]J Subject: [Fwd: [Fwd: Comments on proposed Wal-Mart site in Ogden]] From: Toni Reeder <tom.reeder@ncmai1.net> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 07:22:14 -0500 To: Rick Shiver <Rick.Shiver@ncmail.net>, Cyndi Karoly <cyndi.karoly@ncmail.net>, John Dorney <John.Dorney@ncmai1.net> Thanks, Rick. Actually we are aware of the controversy regarding this project and Cyndi, John, Coleen, and I actually visited the site when we were in Wilmington for a mtg with the ACOE yesterday. I do not think we are inclined to entertain the requests for a hearing at this time, but, as you know, everything is subject to change. Thanks again for the info. Subject: [Fwd: Comments on proposed Wal-Mart site in Ogden] From: Rick Shiver <Rick.Shiver@ncmail.net> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 09:47:44 -0500 To: Tom Reeder <Tom.Reeder@ncmai 1. net> Hi, Tom, I have received about six emails with respect to the proposed Wal Mart in Ogden, New Hanover County. I have forwarded all of them to Ed Beck so that he can make a more detailed reply. The property is already zoned appropriately for it, so the opponents will hit the permits hard, especially the environmental ones. I have forwarded Dr. Larry Cahoon's email to you FYI, since it articulates concerns that we will have to address (as opposed to more traffic, noise, and the like). I think we need to be prepared for the opponents to ask for a hearing on whatever permits we issue, so this message is a heads up. Thanks, Rick Subject: Comments on proposed Wal-Mart site in Ogden From: "Cahoon, Larry" <calioon@uncw.edu> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:47:05 -0400 To: <Jennifer.S.Frye@us.army.mil>, "Rick Shiver" <Rick.Shiver@ncmail.net> CC: "Curtis J. Wright" <curtisjw@bellsouth.net> Hello, I have been asked to comment on water quality issues pertaining to the proposed construction of a Wal-Mart store and accompanying parking lots, gas station, etc. in the 7200 block of Market Street in New Hanover County in the Ogden area. I have looked at preliminary site plans, which I understand are subject to modification. It appears that a very large portion of the -31 acre site will become impervious surface, that the site straddles the Smith Creek and Pages Creek drainage basins, and that a storm water detention pond will be built on the western side of the tract, presumably draining into the Smith Creek basin. I would assume that the storm water pond will be sized to accommodate the "design storm" for which ever stream basin is intended to receive its discharge, meaning either a 1" or 1.5" storm in 24 hours. Given that storms in this area frequently exceed those rates, it is proper to consider effects of those larger storms in evaluating impacts. I note that Pages Creek is currently rated as Impaired for its designated use (shellfishing) from source to the ICW W and that Smith Creek is considered Impaired for aquatic life (consistent with its SC rating) in the 2005 Draft of the "Cape Fear River Basinwide Water Quality Plan". As both drainages now lack major point source discharges, impairment must largely be caused by storm water runoff, despite current storm water management 1 of 2 11/8/2005 12:23 PM [Fwd: [Fwd: Comments on proposed Wal-Mart site in Ogden)) regulations. The Clean Water Act has a "non-degradation" clause that prohibits any action that will degrade water quality, regardless of impairment status. High flows resulting from storm events exceeding the "design storm" values can cause sedimentation downstream, partly from poor treatment, but also from increased scour of existing channels. This effect has been documented in Clear Run Branch (Bradley Creek drainage), which displays heavy sedimentation in its lower reaches despite storm water detention ponds serving all the mandated developed areas in the drainage. This sedimentation is "impairment". I would encourage permitting agencies to require use of permeable pavements in parking areas, as well as other design features presented in the Center for Watershed Protection's manual, "Better Site Design: A handbook for changing developm3ent rules in your community", as well as the Final Report of the City of Wilmington's Watershed Protection Roundtable, which adapted recommendations from the "Better Site Design" manual for our local situation. There are many design features that would help mitigate the effects of storm water runoff on water quality in these impaired watersheds. Thank you for consideration of these comments. Lawrence B. Cahoon Professor Content-Type: message/r&822 [Fwd: Comments on proposed Wal-Mart site in Ogden] Content-Encoding: 7bit Comments on proposed Wal-Mart site in Ogden Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Encoding: 7bit 2 of 2 11/8/2005 12:23 PM 14 ? ' LI?J l US Army Corps Of Engineers Wilmington District PUBLIC NOTICE o5-1915 Issue Date: September 29, 2005 Comment Deadline: October 29, 2005 Corps Action ID #: 200500058 All interested parties are hereby advised that the Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers (Corps) has received an application for work within jurisdictional waters of the United States. Specific plans and location information are described below and shown on the attached plans. This Public Notice and all attached plans are also available on the Wilmington District Web Site at www.saw.usace.army.mi]/wetlands Applicant: Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust 702 SW Eighth Street Bentonville, Arkansas 72716 AGENT (if applicable): Land Management Group, Inc. U 12 61 [P. a W Attn: Ms. Kim Williams n n Post Office Box 2522 W ?J Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 OCT 1 3 2005 DENR - WATER QUALITY IYETLANDS AND STORIAWATER BRANCH Authority The Corps will evaluate this application and decide whether to issue, conditionally issue, or deny the proposed work pursuant to applicable procedures of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Location The 31.13-acre tract is located at 7241 Market Street (also known as U.S. Highway 17), which is immediately southwest of the Ogden Volunteer Fire Station, northeast of the City of Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina. The site contains approximately 4.2 acres of jurisdictional wetlands adjacent to an unnamed tributary to Pages Creek, a tributary to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, a navigable water of the United States. The site also contains a linear Water of the United States along the northwest property boundary that is hydrologically connected to an unnamed tributary to Smith Creek, a tributary to the Cape Fear River, a navigable Water of the United States. Site coordinates are 34.2785N, -77.8159W. r Existing Site Conditions The proposed project area is currently undeveloped. The majority of the uplands on the tract have been cleared of woody vegetation and support herbaceous species such as dog fennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), lespedeza (Lespedeza sp.), and goldenrod (Solidago spp.). A small fringe of vegetated uplands exists along the edge of the wetland area and supports water oak (Quercus nigra), sweetgum (Liquidanibar styraciua), privet (Ligustrum sinense), and honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica). Wetlands within the tract contain bald cypress (Taxodium distichun2), black gum (Nyssa sylvatica), red maple (Ater rubrum), titi (Cyrilla racemiflora), privet, wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera) and royal fern (Osmunda regalis). According to the United States Department of Agriculture Soil Survey of New Hanover County (April 1977), the site is underlain by Murville fine sand, Seagate fine sand, Leon fine sand, and Dorovan soils. Land use to the west of the tract consists of the Jacob's Ridge residential subdivision; to the north are the Odgen Volunteer Fire Department and the KOA Campground. Commercial development exists to the east and south. Applicant's Stated Purpose The purpose of the project is to provide access to the proposed Wal-Mart Center (Store #3798- 00). Project Description The applicant has proposed to construct a Wal-Mart Supercenter, a gas station, associated parking, stormwater pond, and an entranceway at the subject location. The majority of the development would be located in the upland area. Proposed wetland impacts consist of an entranceway to the Supercenter from NC Highway 17/Market Street and access drive to the rear of the Supercenter building. No impacts are proposed to the Waters of the United States located along the northwest property boundary. According to the application submitted, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) and New Hanover County dictated the proposed location of the entranceway. These entities determined that the entrance would require a traffic light at US 17/Market Street and would have to line up with an existing intersection on the opposite side of US 17/Market Street. The number of ingress and egress lanes of the entrance was determined by a NCDOT traffic study. The applicant has also submitted an Alternatives Analysis that includes both on-site and off-site alternatives. This information has been included with this Public Notice. The applicant has also submitted a mitigation proposal with their application that includes on-site' creation of 1.1 acres of wetlands by excavating upland areas adjacent to the existing wetlands and planting with native wetland species.,., Also, the applicant has proposed to preserve the 2 remaining wetlands (4.26 acres) in perpetuity with a legal covenant.; Finally, the applicant has proposed to install culverts under the entranceway for aquatic life passage. Other Required Authorizations This notice and all applicable application materials are being forwarded to the appropriate State agencies for review. The Corps will generally not make a final permit decision until the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) issues, denies, or waives State certification required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (PL 92-500). The receipt of the application and this public notice in the NCDWQ Central Office in Raleigh serves as application to the NCDWQ for certification. A waiver will be deemed to occur if the NCDWQ fails to act on this request for certification within sixty days of the date of the receipt of this notice in the NCDWQ Central Office. Additional information regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be reviewed at the NCDWQ Central Office, 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit, 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-2260. All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application for certification under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act should do so in writing delivered to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ), 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 Attention: Ms Cyndi Karoly by October 21, 2005. The applicant has certified that the proposed work complies with and will be conducted in a manner that is consistent with the approved North Carolina Coastal Zone Management Program. Pursuant to 33 CFR 325.2 (b)(2) the Corps is, by this notice, forwarding this certification to the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM) and requesting its concurrence or objection. Generally, the Corps will not issue a Department of the Army (DA) permit until the NCDCM notifies the Corps that it concurs with the applicant's consistency certification. Essential Fish Habitat This notice initiates the Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) consultation requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. The Corps' initial determination is that the proposed project will not adversely impact EFH or associated fisheries managed by the South Atlantic or Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Councils or the National Marine Fisheries Service. Cultural Resources The Corps has consulted the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places and is not aware that any registered properties, or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion therein are located within the project area or will be affected by the proposed work. Presently, unknown archeological, scientific, prehistoric, or historical data may be located within the project area and/or could be affected by the proposed work. Endangered Species The Corps has reviewed the project area, examined all information provided by the applicant and consulted the latest North Carolina Natural Heritage Database. Based on available information, the Corps has determined pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, that the proposed project will have no effect on federally listed endangered or threatened species or their formally designated critical habitat. Evaluation The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefit that reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be considered including the cumulative effects thereof; among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, flood plain values (in accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving the discharge of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, the evaluation of the impact of the activity on the public interest will include application of the Environmental Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) guidelines. Commenting Information The Corps is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) and/or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity. Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a public hearing be held to consider the application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. Requests for a public hearing shall be granted, unless the District Engineer determines that the issues raised are insubstantial or there is otherwise no valid interest to be served by a hearing. Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will be received by the Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, until 5pm, October 28, 2005. Comments should be submitted to Jennifer S. Frye, Post Office Box 1890, Wilmington, North Carolina, 28402- 1890, at (910) 251-4923. 4 ALTS, RNATIVIJS ANALYSIS The alternatives that were evaluated are no-action alternative, off-site alternatives, on-site alternative site layouts, and the preferred project. No-Action Alternative The no-action alternative would keep the site in its current undeveloped condition and is not considered feasible for several reasons. This site is located in a part of Wilmington that is predominantly developed. It is one of the few developable pieces of land that can support a retail center of this magnitude. The tract is located off of a major road (US Highway 17) that receives a great deal of traffic and is in an expanding location (northerni part of New Hanover County). This site is economically valuable because of its location. The inability to develop this tract of land would be a significant loss of return for the applicant. A Wal-Mart shopping center in the northern part of the County would also contribute secondary benefits to the community. This Supercenter would provide approximately 420 jobs and significant tax revenue to the County. Furthermore, Wal-Mart stores typically have budgets to give donations away locally throughout year. The no-action alternative would prevent these benefits to the community. Alternate Sites An evaluation of alternative sites similar in size and vicinity was conducted. It should be noted that early on in the development process, Wal-Mart representatives spoke with officials of New Hanover County and the NC Department of Transportation regarding zoning requirements and access into a potential shopping center. It was immediately determined that this site would require a traffic signal at its entrance to function properly and that the entrance drive must line up with an existing intersection. These factors dictated where the driveway could be located within a potential property. Accessibility is critical and in order for adequate access to occur, an entrance would be needed along US Hwy 17. Other factors considered when searching for a tract included size and zoning. The applicant needed at least 25 acres on which to build and a zoning'classification that was consistent with the proposed development. Potential tracts that were evaluated include: 1. 7910 Market Street This 39.74-acre tract is owned by Bayshore Estates LLC (Figure 6). It is zoned residential and is surrounded by the Marsh Oaks Subdivision. It would likely be very difficult 3 to obtain a zoning change from the County in order to build a Wal-Mart, especially with an existing subdivision directly adjacent to it. Therefore, this site was not considered further. 2. 8101 Market Street This 28.77-acre site is. owned by New Hanover Regional Medical Center, and is currently being developed for an expansion of their medical facilities (Figure 7). According to maps of the site, there are wetlands located on the eastern part of the property. Because of potential wetland impacts and the existing building plans, this site was not pursued. 3. 9000 Market Street This 153.31-acre site is owned by SENCA Properties (Figure 8). This site is already under development by its current owners and was not available for purchase. On-site Alternatives The preferred site was ultimately selected because of its availability, location (7241 Market Street; northern part of the County, direct access off of Highway 17), size (31 acres), and zoning classification (O & I). Once the site was determined, Freeland and Kauffman Inc, the engineers working on this project, evaluated several different site plan layouts. 1. Alternate Driveway Location Wal-Mart initially attempted to design the driveway to line up with Wendover Lane, which would have allowed the main road to completely avoid wetlands. The only impact would be to approximately 0.2 acre of wetlands to provide access to the back of the building (Figure 9). However, Wal-Mart would have needed to purchase an additional tract. After many discussions with the current landowner of this tract, Wal-Mart was unable to acquire the property needed for this access. 2. Development of the Entire Tract Wal-Mart evaluated the potential to develop all of the property, including that which is adjacent to Market Street, since it has good visibility off of a high traffic street. This would include a Wal-Mart Supercenter, a gas station, and up to seven additional buildings (Figure 10). Although lucrative to the applicant, this development scenario would require impacting the entire wetland pocket within the 4 tract, approximately 4.2 acres. Because of the large amount of wetland disturbance, this scenario was not considered to be feasible. 3. Development of a Gas Station and an Out-Parcel The applicant also evaluated a slightly smaller development scenario, including a Wal-Mart Supercenter, a gas station, and one out-parcel (Figure 11).'This would disturb 1.76 acres of wetlands for the construction of the gas station and the - entr anceway (the-out-parcel would be located in uplands). Although this additional out-parcel would have been profitable for the applicant (proposed sale = $800,000), it was ultimately deleted from the site plan because of the significant amount of wetland disturbance. Preferred Project The preferred project is to construct a Wal-Mart Supercenter that is 4.67 acres in size, associated parking, a gas station, stormwater pond, and an entranceway within the selected tract (Figure 12). Most of the proposed Supercenter and parking will be located outside of the wetlands, except for a small area needed to access the back of the building. It should be noted that the designers of the site plan have left a 50' setback along the western property boundary in order to give the adjacent residents of Jacob's Ridge subdivision a buffer from the development. The majority of the wetland impacts can be attributed to the entranceway, which cuts through the wetland pocket (Figure 13). The location of the entranceway was dictated by NC Department of Transportation and New Hanover County officials. These agencies determined that the entrance to Wal-Mart would require a traffic light, especially on the already heavily traveled Market Street: In addition, this entrance would need to line up with an existing intersection on the opposite side, which ultimately determined its location. The number of ingress and egress lanes of the entrance was determined by a NCDOT traffic study. List of Figures Figure 1. Vicinity map Figure 2. Topographic map Figure 3. SCS Soil Classification map Figure 4. Aerial photograph of site Figure 5. 404 Wetland survey Figure 6. Off-Site Alternative #1.7910 Market Street Figure 7. Off-Site Alternative #2. 8101 Market Street Figure S. Off-Site Alternative #3.9000 Market Street Figure 9. On-Site Alternative #1: Alternate Driveway Location Figure 10. On-Site Alternative #2: Development of the Entire Tract Figure 11. On-Site Alternative #3: Development of a Gas-Station and an Out-Parcel Figure 12. Preferred Site Plan Figure 13. Cross-Section of Entranceway Figure 14. Culvert End View 8 .t E 4 ! {- x t c ?Cti uCTLAVsLU{ ? ?,"""µr. 's ?r ;e'.ry "--'- r r-.ry x t` `1i'S T f - -- I ; !. ?', iSC+t+r ?'+ ,,r' '• a 1 i'.f i P?-?''r. ?^" 5'i C?I•?ti ?,j?f ?.f-'r4? _?+- i?' ? }1 ~ ? 1? l d ???kC ?`_?!- ??«?? 1 r' T ti's/ ,mss J l 1r ^_?fy f ? 1?"P_ ? t I V'1'h \? .10 + TJ ?j 4?. ,?l?? ?I...« ?? .-?I ,? r-i?? r{ e t.r r'",., ?"'?lP ??rr?+ :Y-? ua •.Aj. -fi° r1 ?nyt?,{ ??' (j ! ? `+'??.?'??dt a `c? M•, ? ?1 ?'n hu ? ? ? y I t I ?TV Z F '? Z g ?•Jf yl'-? f CG1'. TI i,ekf?,/??i#' "'-. ,,W .n'*v .may + / I ?'. ` •;.3*A;. t ro ,..+-v„-s? -a. 4,r /1?. ,}1t 1, I, : K I1 - rAr ??.?' .,?It Ir f'•.: alt _ F• ((?#'iY N r+n. ..-.-! w ! -, c I? rv ?at•`tt Y + +' =y;+.,jl.'?"y l'...,-} 14 11 V!'? r ? s w ,+(, LL . r .` /' +t ps v , " ' r: t f } r ?' 9 6?.. _ .* 7 f ?' ,+ .."l "Yrp } ) f r P +t.S ?/fY.r`'• ??'„4 ?is "IN 411 v r F...? ! *S,++a ? ?r' f .r.-it?i, i l..f, i f?:. i? '?j 1 + i "? ti i,-.. ',•-!-'+i ?'?' I I 1?: :4 ?? -:. 5'?- + ^V ?,' ?{r? ? ?„ Y Mµ.^.w9 "W.:'it rf 'a?"YY?•1?? ?.w Y ?%?' 41 ?":? +, A It ,{ r? r; k iF ? ,J f ?.(.1j"^ '?iti.`r' ',,.i' ?.1R•', bE Y J' i„--- 7._?_ , lry d' •? {' •'?f ?_ _i C` ! ?? Y -M'7'` -_f,?t 1 a ( I [Fr { i ' ?.? '?? {f 1 t 'ra r( . d •-,.e rat.?? jd'??J' "' 1 rylt,?? reA ?." +' ! •I s-?I 1?? ? YY [ ?? 41 ?? ?,??? , _ 4G l ?0 i ? ??' ? .?Y? i r r ?a ?i "'` r ' l' `t'+?,r ? y'j- ' 4 r t .% I I f 4 ?1u ELM i?,'?,ie?-a'ir' .? Y ? ??- ,?r`r,`, t ?, f d[ - 1 ti t r ,is" t ? ?f i , ? ? ? tw -ns, pl, 1 ! II ..•"> 5, ,l-?? 1 v s. K nftar ,I rf { 1?'''r 1*k M_ ,+r: 1 -,,.7 1. 1 r? '14` r?l t 1..~' F ^!1 c p -?a I ,?r w '? •1 1 t _-"L. 41: flylfr '+a'.. ry'--'•s- 7 "+,a jr "^'vi l++'y ??4? 7 ?~ d f I ,. t6 f ,:`?5r /?+ ?` "`7 4 :? . f +., a.-- _? ,+. 1C ?` ? ? (•: + ; r la r'i?l h .? J F r , a 7l 1 rl. : 4 .. P ?W r_: •,,? ,-,• L z-`'i ?. r'ti, ?fi`°?,? 7 ?l'r ,•. -- 17 ?1 i ry°? r S ..-n Ij "??? f ?f.l"??S,,f? ??yy r ?.*.,i tr .. /`r '`- f?r. f' ! k \•, ?4a f Y, ti -,^f?'"y'.- / fi. 7 j'.' r ` ?4r ,° ,1 t ,-.,?h f ? .• 1 ?.dl??? 4 ?aylf?rln t 1 ?F 4. r 4 .,' 4 ? + ?` +? + ? r ? I i ? P, ? ! +. ? /+?>h : f r•{ r ? f `? 3:?? ,.. y"l.,Jl.?•?r Jrl'j1',, -~[t,.; `'t,? fJ? {?I, r .i .; , _?f,?..:.. A'.«6.._, -... ..+?-...t.-:r?r .,. ,?i•,.m,, .r. ,airrF?__.r ,....+. e.:?. _...'_'-:..!•''"-i}3'.?1'.-..,.Y:?;?G.?l?'].-.LSZ111y M`l??{"-S:L7r.+?.q'???. ,W.......+., 4 ms's SCALE 1" = 2 miles If SITE I Map Source: DeLorme: North Carolina Atlas and Gazetteer., 2003 p. 84. WALMART STORE #3798-00 Land Management Group, Inc. Ogden, NC Environmental Consultants Figure 1. Site Location Map Wilmington, N.C. Individual Permit Application ,,3_.,,, August 2005 SCALE 1" = 2000' Man Source: Scotts Hill. N.C.. 1997. USGS 30' Toooaraohic auadranale. WALMART STORE #3798-00 Land Management Group, Inc. Ogden, NC Environmental Consultants Figure 2. Topographic map Individual PermitA.pplication Wilmington, N.C. 03Z4MG August 2005 r ' >t ri -ot J" tS Map Source: Soil Survey of New Hanover County, Sheet 12 SCALE 1" - 1000' WALMART STORE #3798-00 Ogden, NC Individual Permit Application 03-04-EL6 Land Management Group, Inc. Environmental Consultants Wilmington, N.C. Figure 3. SCS Soil Survey August 2005 ,. ? 1?.?. - ? ?, t r nF ''3 d 7?.? "°F.T'- ?-c----?' +,., r-•t4"--??y ? ---_-z^_.-.°---?, f -4` 4V ?U ti?'?51°? 1 :fir r? t ?C ?.d+ ?•R t ? +. ???+e?."!?r'?#? ??+?y?i? F Sra .;? ` ! ?? et t w 2i4 a ? r l 'j4 rar IL• 2 i f `+ dttrrf^ hy. 'x 7y ?JYF' ;.tt¢• ,:?- L.p x,?t+-:F; -„ ?t.t! ?? .yam( Y?cr F: r? ?? C? t ° r?? v..` r? 14- y ,i lr ?.t bbd 9r?? f -?.. ? ?P?? #?.?• ??! ?s ?' ? ? ??. ? ?-3 'r 4' VIEW I: Yti A?'y?°„r+,t 3 ,Y?w 'q?r• i:. ?4tr i T°Cf? (tr p T ?' y ° Itr M' r i-?F , f ?A ?. :,ti +,?r xY ?? k' ?.. 7},., Jf'?Yr..: v 7 x bry. r kfb +1 E x r+ii ,?q ??' X irr • J 5 4'iv ' yC' ?`!'?.?,? +?? a.Y l•,?g rt??7'?{ ???-. ? 7" _ f + ,r.-- ? + - F `! f d?'ix'JI. Ij? ? '} J'G . r? -yY1'? t r 7 J 47 ? }t `3 a qqC :a,;??p_q p± it 1 i p" , q ?' e Y F 4 x+ ?R ° d 7 -P c?7#Y } + ?? x 3 rq fV + f i ? ? dr t? k y?^ „li"''r5 {a">- > `' T tt' '! ?'d, rr 'r r ?T?. 4 F!? 1 a tr! tr -9. :. r, f mn r Ar tt`` tfi 1y , a '? X11 tr Lr? v7 tw C'?? .,.rr . 1. 1 .? t '$.•'r? ky?+tn,? ?? ?'`? ? ?? •k ? ? tr+ r ,' 1 +1 ' F', 4' '?, t .?,;?`;?° ? r? alv,4 a'`r.'? r ?' ti "t ? '"?l;h '?ra•-'" ? ? r,?!'?1 ?,,"? ??_,r.? f h??'tr.? `. J? ?.?, y T,"y 1cfp irk t? '.:r ? ? .?;5--?? ?,'a?,+-•? it??? ? ??'??? ?'???FYr.rjy '"+Y r? ?,... tr r ?+ r??b r+ -t '?ir=,?+ ? ?I1 Jr i,.?-''?,r. iJ+r rr??_ •. a?` ?fl ? i ?'.'yX + ?.. ` f' '?,I:t? ,. +"f1r i t + r11?? ,, ?1 11 l,fVY; +yrti rJ:}•`7r1 ,'?'_ µ 0 `?`: •1? L M ® SCALE 1" = 1000' WALMART STORE #3798-00 Land Management Group, Inc. Ogden, NC Environmental Consultants Figure 4. Aerial photograph Individual Permit Applicatio n Wilmington, N.C. of site 06-04-556 August 2005 FIGURE 5.404 WETLAND SURVEY lie it i tf E ,I? NMI I 7PZ {i ?'' r? [ t t ? 3? 777 CAI \ a "? 1 pp \ ' ' tl i?6 ??? `\?ki v i t q 0 ? `'?. .pI O y v.pg911?E4 9E3d giip?i??e? ? 'b ? ??l S'f:I3? ¢1te ? ? ?u???p(0$75219 i7 i?~ S ?J? lyj l! ? itlC i?l?, 3 ,p {Afir p 3NV? $ gab C z? - _ U?i;?: yea w vS??si oa?? e ?•f ?L??\ ,, g3J ic'13 a'. 3 F i .. 4So?oH • 1 ' r 1?{ t? tq . ? ?iii?iill4il<<i??ii?li IlII? .a ••.•a.•.Il..u itu•.• !{ S t ?? ap{ff7 { !. Q e?'7te7rdl??QpeYY @ i5 `.t! ! ' { ?? F€,7 0 y ptS?j Q P { 1 I ? ? [ ,o ?i.etzl? °?C? e PI '? [ {e•-. Y 9` s z tE . q S?•? R i-? v !?i??? { Q ?' t i ii ?3 ppi{ql?i$Y5p•'?ih SP!e$iEi ' 1? 'e CS?+ i ?" ?z' p , • q?'$ ??' ? Q p :? ? 3? i{1g= { 7 @ P k€Fq- .q rp t? li{°?Y ?pPba 9 cP°,I?t II ' hMISS?° 9 t F7 E ' Q No uyll". ? el, }} ? • - pf' . Q , I E [?Qi s 9$ q;, $ e i ! qit its. it}?t•?t. pip'akq°Pq?* . ?op-.g•k:P7aYe ?!e S Q?iq'? I Q + l4' i 7 7E?7 ! L 1 . ??: 7 7c?? qB { 9 7 ? ° ? 1 ?'4j"a'? '? I ;?' ? °q=- `'Y. Ir? , ?-P?. •aq I S ,l ALE,'. 3ti a >5•$'?°1 p•' i'z'D17. i zq-P, 3?f1 ¢? 3 F? ? r? ' ? ° ?p? $ ? ? d ? Y 7p i 1?7;? ? A1 ?1 ? i- •r ? ?4g ? iB pp 1 1 E??: t 7g ? g K ?l.rl9z.4a6Y 1•Q7g1? ?aaitiaa• ? 1. ; 'ry; : :?? t ?' s? Ha:i. • N ` 7? i w , ?,. ?? ?,' ?i' ,?? - .a SCALE 1" = 600' WALMART STORE #3798-00 Ogden, NC Individual Permit Application Land Management Group, Inc. Environmental Consultants Wilmington, N.C. August 2005 Figure 6. Off-Site Alternative #1: 7910 Market Street 0304-556 SCALE 1" = 600' WALMART STORE #3798-00 Land Management Group, Inc. Ogden, NC Environmental Consultants Figure 7. Individual Permit Application Wilmington, N.C. Off-Site Alternative #2: o August 2005 8101 Market Street e.Y it A i? tj 8 ° .7 1.• a f w f ji? +...aa y. ,71.- .fk?'? ?? ?8. b*7..1 '? S t r 1 _ f i .i•F µ C ?r ?}'f?? "! f? ..•y? 9a?1 Y?." Y,.t ? ?? ?1y__ .C ? y . t? i ? 1,7, ? d y,c,i. ti 3" ? 1 ? A ? ? ? !%T ?? S? 1 yb ? t ` I i is T 1 A RAY ? 1 ? T _}y ? ?{, ? T ry z _ ? _ .Y .7 L 3 y, rt J, 17 Y f i .>1 r .S v I SCALE 1" = 1000' WALMART STORE #3798-00 Land Management Group, Inc. O den, NC Figure 8. __ __ 9 Environmental Consultants Individual Permit Application Wilmington, N.C. Off-Site Alternative #3: 0304.556 August 2005 9000 Market Street '%% FIGURE 9. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS WITH ENTRANCE ACROSS FROM WENDOVER LANE WAL-MART STOKE *798-00 FZEELAND and KAUFFMAN,_ INC._--- OGDEN, \NORTN OAPOLINA 6i 209 YvwttstrnoAviceua WA:,-MAW STOFS. tC. G©onvlo. 5cv:h Cuohro 29601 702 50 Q--7F4 - W,864233-5447 fnx1264-233-8915 r--?TQf< LLE. AWANSAS :Tit, MONe- 474.273-4CCO S :ALA P-25C' 02AWN: AE3J DATE; d/25/05 Cot ' ??:. ? tom. \•. ? `?=?c„ / .:i .. ' _ ? ` ? ?_ ?-?_?'? ^. Cam' ??'.? ? ???•,/"1?'?7 -1.•? `•y V it •// ' :: "r Al a T {tl ?;'?yyam •' ~ ? ? t /;' ;', / ' n l 7y •? X of cl) WETLANDS AS D?AEA BY LAND MAtJAGEMEM GROUP '??• ? `??, ?1w `, I t 4.06 AC. OF / \y \ \ / WETLANDS M IENWE ROAD • h > • OG RGHT-OF-iAY doll, ^\?. j ? tENpR[ RDAD OX MGNT-CF-WAY FIGURE 10. 0 \ .'. y 100' WGIT-Ii-r AY a \V ?? ? $ AS DELGJEATED 13Y LAND MANAGEM04T j G201.P • .1L s ? O w*r VUM F"WAT 17 i tUAMT STRCC» 100' RIGM-OT-MAY O? PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS Z)'== ` W/GAS LOT AND MULTIPLE OUTLOTS 3A WAL-MART STORE X3798-00 FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC. Engineers - LCaM CCJPO -VClVlQ0t3 OGDEN, NO2TN CAROLINA 209 West Stone Avonua WAL-MART STORES. INC. Greonville, South Corolim 29609 702 SW EIGTH ST ph-864-233-5497 tox-864-233-8915 BENTONVLLE. AWANSAS 72716 PHONE, 479-273-4000 SCALE 1'-250' DRAWN- ABJ DATE, 7/13/05 o,-1 I FIGURE 11. wALM?f t1RaCDf+GR 1 1 .1 ,J / ? I i .ice ?• - f ?v `1a ETLANDS AS DEL.WE.4T" BT LAND MANAGEMENT GQOLP U.S. 11K7/uY 17 (MARKET STREET) 100' RIGHT-OF-WAY =L76 AC. OF WEfLAWS TO DE DISTLJR= •ya M. OF?/ VLLS HOMY 17 (-RKET STREET) . 70dRrp1T-Of-WAY J 01 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS JHCCI IVV. VV/GAS LOT AND ONE OUTLOT WAL-MART STORE U3798-00 OGDEN, NORTH CAROLINA WAL-MA12T STCRES. NC. 702 SW EIGTP ST BENTONVILLE. ARKANSAS 72716 PHONE- 479-273-4000 LEKpRE ROAR v? 60' RK:xT-Oi-WAY ~'t . ? moo. 'III, UDJDQE ROW 60' a,pTr.-os-uY FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC. Fsgineers • Londscopo Architects 209 West Stony Avertuo Greenville. South Corolino 29609 ph-864-233-5497 toz,864-233-8915 SCALE- r-250' DRAWN- ABJ DATE- 8/26105 O I us wcN??r v puaRcr sr?rr) oo' aura-ar-rrr AC. CF CREATED ON-SrrE WETLANDS WETLANDS AS DEUNEATED BY LAND MANAGEMENT C20La' 52 AG OF CREATED -SITE WG7LANDS FIGURE 12. PREFERRED PROJ oC /T/? PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS SHEET NO. T VV/GAS LOT AND NO OUTLOTS WAL-MAQT STORE =3798-00 FREE -LAND and KAUFFMAN, INC. OGDEN, NOQT-I CAROLINA ?r'9 09s Wet stoonoeA enue °'$ WAL-MART STORES, INC. Greenville, South Coruino 29609 702 SW EIGTH ST ph,864-233-5497 toz-864-233-8915 BENTONVLLE,' ARKANSAS 72716 PHONe, 479-273-4000 SCALE, 1'-250' DRAWN, ABJ DATE 8/26/05 -FINISHED GROUND PROPOSE EXI TING WET AND PR P E GR UND FILL ARE CULVERT FIGURE 14. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS SHEET NO. CULVERT END VIEW WAL-MART STORE =3798-00 F12EELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC. OGDEN, NORTH CAROLINA Engineers - Lonoscope Architects 209 Wost Stone Avenue WAL-MART STORES. NC. aeonvlllo, South Carolina 29609 702 SW EIG11-1 ST ph,864-233-5497 tax-864-233-8915 BENTONVILLE. ARKANSAS 72716 P140NEl ,479-273-4000 SCALE, N.T.S. DRAWN ABJ DATE, 8/26/05 j) $ _. ( r1 I S United States Department of the Interior O..fT F C p„c.?i ve? ) FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Raleigh Field Office Post Office Box 33726 Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726 October 25, 2005 r?l?v t - 2005 Ms. Jennifer S. Frye DErJR-YVAJPN unt.ilY U. S. Army Corps of Engineers V4lV,,v a fl;tyato:'?`.'!A1ti ltc? ?, 11 Wilmington Regulatory Field Office P.O. Box 1890 Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890 Subject: Action ID No. 200500058, Wal-Mart Supercenter, Ogden, New Hanover County, North Carolina Dear Ms. Frye: This letter provides the comments of the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) on the subject Public Notice (PN), dated September 29, 2005. The applicant, Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, has applied for a Department of the Anny (DA) permit to discharge fill material into jurisdictional wetlands to provide access to a new Wal-Mart Supercenter. These comments are submitted in accordance with the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA) (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d). Comments related to the FWCA are to be used in your determination of compliance with 404(b)(1) guidelines (40 CFR 230) and in your public interest review (33 CFR 320.4) in relation to the protection of fish and wildlife resources. Additional comments are provided regarding the District Engineer's determination of project impacts pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543). Project Area, Proposed Activities and Environmental Impacts The project site is a 31.13-acre, undeveloped tract consisting primarily of uplands which have been cleared of woody vegetation. The tract contains a 4.2-acre wetland adjacent to an unnamed tributary to Pages Creek which flows into the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW). The site also has a linear waterway which connects to Smith Creek which flows to the Cape Fear River. Figure 12 of the PN states that 1.04 acres of wetlands would be "disturbed" by fill to create an entranceway and an access route to the rear of the store. The entrance fill would divide the r existing wetland area. The applicant proposes to install culverts within the entranceway fill for the passage of aquatic life. As compensatory mitigation, the applicant proposes to create 1.1 acres of wetlands by excavating uplands in two areas along the margin of the existing wetland. The excavated area would be planted with native vegetation, but no details are provided on the target wetland community, monitoring of the planted species, or potential remedial actions which might be required. The created wetlands along the remaining 3.16 acres (4.20 - 1.04) of existing wetlands would preserved in perpetuity with a legal covenant, for a total preservation component of 4.26 acres. Federally Protected Species The Service reviewed available information on federally-threatened or endangered species known to occur in New Hanover County. We have also reviewed information from the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database which contains excellent data on the special status species, both federal and state. This database can be accessed by topographic quadrangle (quad) of the U. S. Geological Survey (USGS). Data from USGS quads provide the most project-specific information on species which should be considered in permitting this project. The project area is located in the Scotts Hill quad. The occurrence data of special status' species within this quad can be obtained on the internet at the "Database Search" heading of < httn://wNNv.ncnlip.or.i?/Pages/heritagedata.litnil >. Our review indicates that there are no current occurrence records for any federally protected species within, or in the immediate vicinity, of the project area. Therefore, the Service would concur with a determination by the District Engineer that the action is not likely to adversely affect species designated as threatened, endangered, or their designated critical habitat. The Corps' requirements under section 7(a)(2) of the ESA would be fulfilled. However, section 7 consultation must be reconsidered if. (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action. Service Concerns and Recommendations The Service is concerned about impacts to the existing wetland community on the site. While isolated pockets of wetlands may have limited value as habitat for larger, terrestrial wildlife, such area may provide an important refuge for birds, reptiles, and amphibians. While there are only historic records for Mabee's salamander (Anibystonia mabeei), state designated as significantly rare (SR), in the Scotts Hill quad, salamanders with similar requirements could exist on the site. Wetlands in developed area may also provide important water quality and flood control benefits. Wetland, even in highly developed areas, can reduce the input of sediment and pollutants into waterway. Watersheds begin to degrade when about 10 percent of its area is covered in roads, roofs or other structures, and begin experiencing severe environmental problems at around 20 percent. Such problems arise because hardened surfaces produce more runoff and there is less area for moisture to soak into the ground. Mallin.et al. (2000) report that the percentage of impervious surface area has been shown to be important in determining stream water quality. While the Service understands that the uplands at the project site will ultimately be developed, every effort should be made to preserve the existing wetlands on the tract. Since the current preferred alternative would impact waters of the United States, there should be a clear presentation of the public need to be addressed. In this regard, the applicant should discuss the public need which is not currently being met by the existing Supercenter on the same road approximately four miles southwest of the project site. There should be clear evidence that impacts to jurisdictional wetlands are necessary to benefit the public interest. The applicant's discussion of off-site alternatives is very limited in geographic scope. While the new Supercenter (in the 7200 block of Market Street) is intended to serve northern New Hanover County, the three alternative sites are all on Market Street and range from the 7900 Block to the 9000 Block. Two of the sites are currently being developed and the third is zoned for residential use. Tracts which clearly cannot fulfill the intended purpose of a project do not provide viable options to the current site. The off-site alternatives analysis should include sites on which the Supercenter could actually be constructed and look beyond a single road to serve the northern part of the county. As your letter of October 12, 2005, to the applicant states, fulfillment of the 404(b)(1) guidelines requires the selection of the least damaging, practical alternative along with appropriate and practical steps to reduce impacts on waters of the United States. In regard to avoidance and minimization, the issues of access to the Supercenter from Market Street should be clarified since most wetland impacts are directly related to creating such access. The applicant's alternatives analysis states (p. 5) that the location of the entranceway was dictated by the NCDOT and New Hanover County officials. It is our understanding that these agencies determined that a traffic signal would be required and that the "entrance would need to line up with an existing intersection on the opposite side." Figure 12, the preferred project, does not indicate a traffic signal at the proposed entranceway. Furthermore, the entranceway of the preferred alternative does not appear to be aligned with a public road, but may be aligned with another private access point on Market Street. The PN and alternatives analysis do not discuss a possible right-in/right out entrance off southbound Market Street. A complete consideration of wetland avoidance requires knowledge of the flexibility in locating the Supercenter entranceway off Market Street. There should be a determination of whether a new traffic signal would be allowed and whether the entrance route must be aligned with a public road or private drive intersecting Market Street from the east. If the applicant would not be allowed to have a connection to northbound Market Street, either for entering or exiting the Supercenter, the use of a right-in/right-out entrance for southbound traffic would maximize flexibility for locating the entrance along the approximately 750 feet of frontage on southbound Market Street. As shown in Figure 9 of the PN, shifting the entrance south could reduce wetland impact from 1.04 acres to approximately 0.2 of an acre. The applicant's alternatives analysis states that the layout in Figure 9 would require the purchase of additional property. However, a redesign or relocation of the gas station could allow an entrance slightly north of that shown in Figure 9 and south of the location shown in Figure 12, currently the applicant's preferred alternative. The relocation or redesign of the proposed gas station would allow the entranceway to be constructed entirely on uplands without requiring an additional land purchase. A right- in/right-out entrance for use by only southbound traffic would also appear to reduce the need for a traffic signal and an alignment with a road or other access point of the cast side of the road. 4 Impacts to the existing wetlands could be reduced by bridging the entranceway. Such a low bridge would greatly reduce wetland fill and allow more natural hydrologic connectivity and natural wildlife movement. If culverts are used, these structures should maintain natural water flows and hydraulic regimes without scouring, or impeding fish and wildlife passage. Culverts or pipes should be of sufficient size to allow normal surface water exchange between the wetlands on both sides of the fill. The culvert or pipe invert should be buried at least one foot below the natural streambed to promote the passage of aquatic organisms. The proposed plan of compensatory mitigation is not adequate. The Wilmington Regulatory web site, < http://www.usace.army.miI/wetlands/Miti at?pennitting.11tm >, discusses mitigation ratios. Restoration, creation, and enhancement require ratios of 2:1, 3:1, and 4:1, respectively, as stand alone forms of compensation. The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidance of 2001 requires a 6:1 ratio for wetland creation. Preservation may be used in combination with the other three methods at a ratio of 10:1. When preservation is provided at the 10:1 ratio, the Service usually will accept, as the second component, one of the other forms at one half of the ratios given above, or 1.5:1 for wetland creation. This ratio is necessary to account for the time delay in fully replacing the habitat values of larger trees and other components of an established wetland ecosystem. For the current proposal, the Service recommends that compensation for the permanent loss of 1.04 acres of wetlands should require at least 10.4 acres of preservation (a 10:1 ratio) along with at least 1.56 acres (1.04 x 1.5) acres of created wetlands which have demonstrated both hydrological and vegetative success. Any plan for created wetlands should include a detailed site grading plan, a designated wetland target community, a detailed plan of the species to be planted, a monitoring plan for both plants and hydrology, definite success criteria for both wetland vegetation and hydrology, and specific remedial actions which would be taken if success criteria are not achieved. Regardless of the final location of the entranceway, all wetlands not impacted during construction or provided as mitigation should be permanently protected. Information on the degree of protection to be provided by the legal covenant should be provided. The Corps should ensure that the applicant understands'that both the created wetland and all preservation wetlands cannot be maintained as neat, park-like areas. The conservation easement should be designed to maintain as much natural habitat as possible. The proposed conservation easement should contain all the prohibited and restrictive activities given in Article Il of the Corps' model conservation easement. The model easement can be seen along with the "District Preservation Process with Models" at (< http://www.saw.usace.arniy.mil/WETLANDS/Mitiuation/ >), revised in August 2003. There should be no destruction, mowing, or other alteration of vegetation within the compensatory wetlands. The conservation easement should apply to both the created wetland and naturally occurring wetlands which would not be impacted. Overall, the Service recommends that a DA permit not be issued at this time. The applicant should consider a wider geographic area for an off-site alternative and consider sites of the necessary size which are actually available for commercial development. There should be clarification of the degree of flexibility allowable by the NCDOT and county officials on the location of an entranceway. The amount of flexibility would allow a thorough consideration of locating the entranceway entirely on uplands. A bridging option should also be considered for the entranceway. Once all practical means of avoidance and minimization have been implemented, a detailed plan of compensatory mitigation plan can be developed. The plan should comply with the guidelines employed by the Wilmington District. The Service appreciates the opportunity to comment on this PN. Please advise us of any action taken by the Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers. If you have questions regarding these comments, please contact Howard Hall at 919-856-4520, ext. 27 or by e-mail at < howard_hall@fws.gov >. Si 1 Pete enB jamin Ecological Services Supervisor Literature cited Mallin, M. A., K. E. Williams, E. C. Esham, and R. P. Lowe. 2000. Effect of human development on bacteriological water quality in coastal watersheds. Ecological Applications. 10(4): 1047-1056. cc: Ronald Mikulak, USEPA, Atlanta, GA John Dorney, NC Division of Water Quality, Raleigh, NC Steve Everhart, NC Wildlife Resources Commission, Wilmington, NC Jim Gregson, NC Division of Coastal Management, Wilmington, NC (kT (-- O S -) `1 1 S Regulatory Division Action ID No. 200500058 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS PO BOX 1890 WILMINGTON NC 28402-1890 I October 12, 2005 Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust 702 SW Eighth Street Bentonville, Arkansas 72716 Dear Applicant: D 0 DW OCT r R D 20 05 4nrvAiERBP?. .. Please reference your request for the Department of the Army (DA) authorization permit to discharge fill material into 1.04 acres of Section 404 wetlands adjacent to an Unnamed Tributary to Pages Creek, a tributary to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, associated with the construction of Wal-Mart Center (Store #3798-00), located at 7241 Market Street, immediately southwest of the Ogden Volunteer Fire Station, northeast of the Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina. On February 6, 1990, the Department of the Army (DA) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) signed a memorandum of agreement (MOA) establishing procedures to determine the type and level of mitigation necessary to comply with Clean Water Act Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines. This MOA provides for first, avoiding impacts to waters and wetlands through the selection of the least damaging, practical alternative; second, taking appropriate and practical steps to reduce impacts on waters and wetlands; and finally, compensation for remaining unavoidable impacts to the extent appropriate and practical. To enable us to process your application, in compliance with the MOA, we request that you provide the following additional information: a. Permits for work within wetlands or other special aquatic sites are available only if the proposed work is the least environmentally damaging, practicable alternative. Please furnish information regarding any other alternatives, including upland alternatives, to the work for which you have applied and provide justification that your selected plan is the least damaging to water or wetland areas. b. It is necessary for you to have taken all appropriate and practicable steps to minimize wetland losses. Please indicate all that you have done, especially regarding development and modification of plans and proposed construction techniques, to minimize adverse impacts. A -2- c. The MOA requires that appropriate and practicable mitigation will be required for all unavoidable adverse impacts remaining after the applicant has employed all appropriate and practicable minimization. Please indicate your plan to mitigate for the projected, unavoidable loss of waters or wetlands or provide information as to the absence of any such appropriate and practicable measures. The aforementioned, requested information is essential to the expeditious processing of your application; please forwarded this information to us within two (2) weeks of your receipt of this letter. In addition, you should be aware that State and Federal commenting agencies might recommend design modifications. Finally, please be aware that the Corps cannot issue a final permit for your proposed activity until your project has been determined consistent with the approved state Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Program. Please reference the enclosed document titled "North Carolina Federal Consistency Certification Submission Guidance (Subpart "D" 15 CFR 930)", for information on the steps involved in obtaining this determination. Once you have made this determination, you should submit to the Corps a statement indicating that your proposed activity complies with, and would be conducted in a manner that is consistent with, the approved state CZM Program. The Corps will then forward your determination to the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management with a request for concurrence or non-concurrence. If you have questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at (910) 251-4923. Sincerely, Jennifer S. Frye Regulatory Specialist Wilmington Regulatory Field Office Enclosure Copies Furnished (with enclosure): Ms. Kim Williams Land Management Group, Inc. Post Office Box 2522 Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 -3- Copies Furnished (without enclosure): Ms. Becky Fox Wetlands Regulatory Section - Region IV U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1349 Firefly Road Whittier, North Carolina 28789 Mr. Doug Huggett Division of Coastal Management N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1638 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 Mr. Stephen Rynas Federal Consistency Coordinator N.C. Division of Coastal Management Hestron Plaza II, 151 B, Highway 24 Morehead City, North Carolina 28557-2518 Ms. Cyndi Karoly D''vision of Water Quality C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621 Mr. Pete Benjamin U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Fish and Wildlife Enhancement Post Office Box 33726 Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726 o5-1ri 1 $ North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission P Richard B. Hamilton, Executive Director MEMORANDUM To: Stephen Rynas p@wWq NC DENR/DCM OCT 1 1 2005 From: Steven H. Everhart, PhD Southeastern Permit Coordinator WETLANDENR DS NDS -WATER QUALITY AND STORMWATER BRANCH Date: October 4, 2005 RE: Wal-Mart Supercenter #3798-00 - DCM Application 20050082, New Hanover Co. Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the subject application for impacts to wildlife and fishery resources. A site visit was made on October 4, 2005. Our comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661 et. seq.), and Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act (as amended). The project site is located off US 17 near its intersection Wendover Lane, just north of Wilmington. The 32 +/- acre site is currently undeveloped and supports various herbaceous species and a forested/scrub-shrub wetland. Surrounding land use is residential and commercial.. The applicant proposes to construct a Wal-Mart Supercenter that is 4.67 acres in size, associated parking, a gasoline station, stormwater retention pond, and entranceway. The majority of the wetland impacts are the result of the location of the entranceway dictated by the NCDOT and New Hanover County officials. The project would impact 1.04 acres of total approximately 4.2 acres of wetlands on the property by filling/culverts. The applicant proposes to mitigate for these impacts by the creation of 1.1 acre of wetlands on-site by grading adjacent to existing wetland and planting species consistent with those of the impacted wetlands. It is unlikely that the project will impact threatened or endangered species. There are no significant habitat types as identified by the NC Natural Heritage Program on or in the immediate vicinity of the project site. Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries - 1721 Mail Service Center - Raleigh, NC 27699-1721 Telephone: (919) 707-0220 - Fax: (919) 707-0028 Wal-Mart 3798-00 We recommend that: October 4, 2005 1) Culverts are embedded sufficiently to allow for passage and settlement of aquatic organisms. 2) Utility crossings are either directionally bored or supported above any wetlands. 3) The wetland creation sites are graded well below grade of adjacent wetlands and that the root mat and organic layer of the impacted wetlands be transferred to the creation site prior to any planting efforts in order provide maximum likelihood of success. 4) A post-project monitoring program is established with appropriate benchmarks to evaluate the mitigation success and, if necessary, an approved alternative mitigation plan initiated. The Wildlife Resources Commission does not object to this project if our recommendations are included as permit conditions. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this application. If you have any questions or require additional information, please call me at (910) 796-7436. CC: Noelle Lutheran, NC DENR/DWQ Jennifer Frye, USACE Cyndi Karoly, NC DENR/DWQ