20051250 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20050707

W AT
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
June 23, 2006
DWQ # 05-1250
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Jerry Nowell
900 East Chatham Street
Cary, NC 27511
And
Mr. Joseph Levinson
Post Office Box 117
Benson, NC 27504
Subject Property: Trinity Ridge Subdivision, Cary, NC
UT to Richlands Creek [030402, 27-33-11, C NSW]
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL
Dear Mr. Nowell and Levinson:
On July 7, 2005, you requested a 401 Water Quality Certification from the Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
for your project. We wrote to you on July 19, 2005 discussing concerns that we have regarding the design of
the project and stating that it would be placed on hold for three weeks giving you time to address DWQ's
concerns. As of today, DWQ has not received a response to this request. Therefore, your file is hereby
considered withdrawn and will not be reviewed until DWQ's earlier concerns are addressed. Once you have
collected sufficient information to have a complete application (please see our July 19, 2005 letter for the
missing information), you will need to reapply for DWQ approval. This includes submitting a complete
application package with the appropriate fee.
Please be aware that you have no authorization under Section 401 of the Clear Water Act for this activity and
any work done within waters of the state would be a violation of North Carolina General Statuses and
Administrative Code. Please call Mr. Ian McMillan at 919-715-4631 if you have any questions or concerns.
S' cerely,
.
/
Cyn 1 Karoly, Supervisor
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
cc: Eric Kulz, Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
Aaron Cooper, S&EC, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
Filename: 5:\2006 Correspondence\05-1250 Trinity Ridge (Wake) NOW.doc
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.tis/ncwctlands
None Caro na
taral??y
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
?OFWAT?RP
O G
O ?
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
July 19, 2005
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Jerry Nowell
900 E. Chatham St. &
Cary, NC 27511
Subject Property
Mr. Joseph Levinson
P.O. Box 117
Benson, NC 27504
Trinity Ridge
Brandywine Drive
Cary, NC
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Nowell and Mr. Levinson:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ Project # 05-1250
Wake County
On July 7, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated July 7, 2005 to
impact 0.0075 acres of wetlands and 196 feet of streams to construct the proposed residential subdivision.
The DWQ has determined that your application was incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information
as discussed below. The DWQ will require additional information in order to process your application to
impact protected wetlands and/or streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive the
additional information requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as
required by 15A NCAC 2H.0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this
additional information. Please provide the following information so that we may continue to review your
project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Plan Detail Incomplete
• Please show all stream impacts including all fill slopes and dissipaters on the site plan.
• Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan.
• Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan.
• Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overlays on the site plan.
• Please locate all isolated or non-isolated wetlands, streams and other waters of the State as
overlays on the site plan.
• Please provide the location of any proposed stormwater management practices as required
by GC3402
• Please indicate all stormwater outfalls on the site plan.
• Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan.
Noce hCarolina
Naturally
401 Oversight/Express Review Permits Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http7//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Nowell and Levinson:
Page 2 of 2
July 19, 2005:
2. Additional information
Please provide 5 copies of the site plans and other supporting information.
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in writing
and Eric Kulz of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office. If we do not hear from you within three weeks, we
will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project as withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters
or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not
authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly or Mr. John Dorney at 919-733-1786
if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
sor
Rev- w Permits Unit
CBK/ijm
Enclosures: GC3402
cc: Aaron Cooper, Soil & Environmental Consultants, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC, 27614
Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 051250TrinityRidge(Wake)OnHold
Trinity Ridge S/D DWQ 2005-1250
Subject: Trinity Ridge S/D DWQ 2005-1250 AX>G ?
From: Laurie Dennison <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:10:03 -0400
To: [e-mail]
Please see attached the Division of Water Quality's request for more information
related to your recent application. Please note that this message is being forwarded
to you electronically so that you may expedite preparation of your response. Please
do not send your response as a reply to this e-mail or via fax. A hard copy letter is
being sent via US Mail. All response correspondence is to be mailed via hard copy to
the 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC, 27604
unless otherwise noted.
051250TrinityRidge(Wake)OnHold.doc Content-Type: application/msword
Content-Encoding: base64
1 of 1 7/27/2005 6:35 AM

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
To: Col d l ko"l-V
Transmittal
2005 1 250
Project Date: -2 7 Q?
Project Name: r y ?4t? 1U `to
s,?t 2,m
File:
We Transmit to you Herewith:
? Drawings ? For your information and files
? Specifications ? For comment or approval
? Brochures or photos ? Returned for correction, resubmit
? Correspondence ? Approved as noted
? As per your request
Under Separate Cover:
? By mail
R[ By courier
? By express
No. Copies Document No. Date Description

i C &t e car ?s'r Ov

Remarks: r / eo c, e
,all ?Q?'lacTr 7i
n/ICc t 40141
IC-e "k'

If enclosures are not as listed as above, kindly notify us at once.
03 DO
By: ?G t e -'V 0 7 2005

wc DENR - WATER QUALITY
?wl3s
-
-

Charlotte Office: ,?as
Aft
1 L
. V% OM
JJLn
Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive '
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]

n n ? ? 5
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone],
www.SandEC.com July 7, 2005
S&EC Project # 9236.W1
To: US Army Corps of Engineers NC Division Of Water Quality
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Andrea Wade Attn: Cyndi Karoly
6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250 `
Suite 120 Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Raleigh, N.C. 27615
From: Aaron Cooper - a ;-I
,4r
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A. p`?z"ty@
11010 Raven Ridge Road J
Raleigh, NC 27614 `I'CU JUL 0 7 2005
Re: Trinity Ridge Subdivision
, N.C. DENR WAr1 F,QUALnY
Cary
WETLANDS AND STORMIVA(L'-R BRAP1GH
On behalf of the owners, Jerry Nowell and Joseph Levinson, please find attached a complete
application and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NC-DWQ) that
the activities proposed below may precede utilizing Nationwide Permit 39. Please contact me at
[phone] if you have any questions or require additional information.
PPr) IF=r T CI IRAIIAAPV
Project Name Trinity Ridge Subdivision
Project Type Residential Subdivision
Owner / Applicant Jerry Nowell, Joseph Levinson
Count Wake
Nearest Town Ca
Waterbod Name UT to Richlands Creek
Basin / Sub-basin 03-04-02
Index Number 27-33-11
Class C, NSW
IMPAr`T CI IMKAAPV
Stream Impact (acres): 0.0196
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.0075
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.0271
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 196
Attachments:
Pre-construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Agent Authorizations
Cary USGS Map
Wake County Soil Survey Map
Impact Maps
Crossing Profiles
Letter from Deputy Fire Marshall
Letter with Impervious Surface Calculations
Wetland Data Forms
$475 Water Certification Fee
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Office Use Only: 5 c v?arsbn March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. J U
(it any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details leek here: ?
D
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information JUL 0 % 200.5
Name: Jerry Nowell / Joseph LeviNR - W r,,
Mailing Address: 900 E. Chatham St. / PO Box 117?T?R?
Cary N.C. 27511 / Benson N.C. 27504
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Aaron Cooper
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh N.C.27614
Telephone Number: 919-846-5900 Fax Number: 919-846-9467
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Trinity Ridge
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): n/a
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0774572360, 0774881893, 0774651911
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town:_ Cary
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):_ Trinity Ridge Subdivision
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): The site is located at the
eastern end of Brandywine Drive approximately 1000 feet east of its intersection with Trinity
Road (SR 1655), and is immediately west of I-40 in Cary N.C.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.8049661 ON 78.7421198 °W
6. Property size (acres): +/- 50 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Richlands Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is currently wooded and undeveloped The general
land use surrounding the property is residential I-40 is immediately west of the property.
Page 2 of 9
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
proposed project consists of the construction of a residential subdivision utilizing typical
utilities (i.e. sewer, water). Typical construction and grading equipment would be utilized for
this project.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed project is to
develop a residential subdivision to meet the demand for such projects in this area
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. S&EC performed a detailed wetland and Neuse River buffer
evaluation on the site. No other permits have been issued or requested for this project in the past
Data forms accompany this application for verification of the wetlands on site
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
The installation of a sanitary sewer line is anticipated for the future of this project This
installation is expected to include a temporgy perpendicular stream crossing The exact
alignment has not been determined at this time Once the proposed placement of the alignment is
finalized a NWP 12 will be requested for the proposed impact
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:Three permanent impacts are
proposed that will result from the installation of a road connecting all portions of the
Page 3 of 9
proposed subdivision. Impact 1 equals 95 linear feet (662 sq ft) of a perennial channel
Impact 2 (same location as impact 1) equals 327 sq ft (0.008 acre) of wetland Impact 3
equals 101 linear (202 sq. ft.) feet of an intermittent channel Buffer impacts resulting from
Impact 1 equal 5257 sq. ft. of zone 1 and 3177 sq ft of zone 2 Buffer impacts resulting from
Impact 3 equal 5740 sq. ft of zone I and 3531 sq ft of zone 2 Total cumulative impacts equal
196 linear feet of channel, 327 sq. ft. (0.0075 acres) of wetland 10,997 sq ft (0 25 acres) of
zone 1 buffers and 6708 sq_ft. (0.15) of zone 2 buffers
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and floodinu.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh
, 100-year Nearest Impact

(indicate on map)
herbaceous, bog, etc.) oodplain
Fl Stream (acres)
es/no linear feet
2 Permanent/ fill linear no +1_5 0.0075
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.0075
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: +/-0.25
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multinly length X width- then divide by 41 560
Stream Impact Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact Perennial or Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Intermittent? Before Impact linear feet acres
I UT to Richlands Permanent

Creek
Culvert/ Fill Perennial
+/- ?' 95 0.015
3 UT to Richlands Permanent

Creek
Culvert/ Fill Intermittent
+/-21
101
0.0046
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 196 0.0196
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredginj4, flooding, drainage. bulkheads- etc.
Open Water Impact Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
indicate on ma ocean, etc. acres
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Total Open Water Impact (acres) n/a
Page 4 of 9
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the proiect:
Stream Im act (acres): 0.0196
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.0075
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.0271
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 196
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): n/a
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): n/a
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: n/a
Size of watershed draining to pond: n/a Expected pond surface area: n/a
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The placement of the road was chosen due to an existing fixed road stub at the northern
property boundary. Impact 3 is unavoidable not only for interconnectivity to the entire site but
also to maintain a reasonable easement to the adjacent property owners This section of the
channel was also chosen to maintain a perpendicular crossing The road crossing placement is
also recommended by the Deputy Fire Marshall to improve access for emergency response (see
attached letter).
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
Page 5 of 9
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmy,ide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No mitigation is requested as the impacts are below the thresholds for stream and wetland
impacts for DWQ and the road is necessary to access all portions of the site and dictated by
the Fire Marshall. If mitigation is required payment to the NC-EEP at a 1.1 ratio is proposed
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wlp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):0 (95 if required)
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0 (0.0075 if required)
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Page 6 of 9
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ?
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact 1
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 5,257 3 (2 for Catawba) n/a
2 3,177 1.5 n/a
Total 8,434 n/a
Zone* Impact 2
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 5,740 3 (2 for Catawba) n/a
2 3,531 1.5 n/a
Total 91271 n/a
T tone i extends out JU teet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 7 of 9
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. Mitigation should not be required because
each crossing is below the thresholds for buffer mitigation and is considered "Allowable" by
current regulations.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level._ As this subdivision is still in the preliminary
planning phase due to rezoning a conservative impervious percentage has been calculated at
28.7% considering the maximum allowable number of lots (see attached letter).
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
A sanitary sewer system will be utilized for the proposed subdivision
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No ?
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/newetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: We
have reviewed the "DRAFT Internal Policy Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality
Certification and Isolated Wetland Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water
Quality on October 3, 2002, version 1.6 The draft states that most residential subdivisions are
unlikely to cause cumulative impacts. Trinity Ridge does not meet any of the three criteria of
private projects that can clearly result in cumulative impact The project is not relatively large for
a residential development in eastern Wake County, the project will involve no commercial
development, and the project would be surrounded by either existing residential development or
Page 8 of 9
Interstate 40. Some of the current regulations protecting water quality associated with this project
include the 401, 404, and C NSW. We anticipate that you will advise us if a qualitative or
quantitative impact analysis is required.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
Soil. & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 RGVM tgd6e ttod • Rilcigk Nadi au Nick 27614 • Pkmc; (919) W-5900 - Frc: (9119) 846.9467
' www.Sa?dE.C,caa
AGENT AU'HOlUZATION FORM
Phone:
Project Naane/Description: ?Ih f? ??1 ??rG
Date:'
The Department of the Ae my
U.S. Army Corps of Engirwers, Wilumgtor+ I)iMrtct
P.O. Box 1890
N?ftdngton, NC 28402
Attn: A
Field Mice:
Re: Wetlands Related Corisalting and Permitting
To Whom, It May Concern:
1, floe current Dry owner, beteby? designate and authorize SOU & Environmental Consulftnts, PA to
act in My behalf as my agent m tte Processing of permit applications, to fltrnish upon request da of
supPtCnental information in supl'ort of epplitationS, etc. From this day (vrwurd. The ?- y
This notification supersedes any previous corresponderlc+e conceming the agent for this project,
NOTICE ]Phis 1.eetka0zation, for lialMty and professional courtesy teasone, is valid Woy for
govelcement off dab to eAW the pr"witywhen accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call C
to Arrange a site meeting prior to vwtietb the site- n .11 print property o%7*r's dame

tc; Ms. Cyndi Karoly rc`7' Mr. Aaron Cooper
NCDENR - DWQ Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
7321 Crabtree Boulevard
R.Je.g1-. NC ?_7604
S3t?Mrn olllec:
A11l1.QQi6l:: 3$173L L.Wn4bin rMwd
236 L'F%111P Cart, suite C Co"mbmo. MC 21455
Concord. KC Ism.5 Phone: [phone]
pbon`: [phone] IP,..- n-41-1 Uh-014
.z,.,, nnd%-nmot'4A
Ad4ress: 900 E C
Cc;'r C. 2- -7S / /
_., _ ... _ .. .... u??.?? '919 +462 6545 Poi
06!1012003 10:01 FAX
Gilleeae 6 Assoc
-Z-
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA?,
11099 U.rO RkI a Red R.hiA KOtO C*Ghm 29614 - Pho -, (91? W49M • rm., (fl9) N6 9167
00 WAeWCAwP
(S 1,91 X460-7637
I&OR/102

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
ALM y Be FIW Wy_TheUrrent1mWowm
Naorne? Q•re O ? e c/rV1,So.?
A44mw f1?? CJ X I1 ???
U 2 ?So 1 , 2 -750L(
_
Maw
Project IYa?,e/Dtsttript(on: ? ,n I t? ? ? ?? ,
Date: ?? ? ? ? CJ? ,
Mw Depo of IM A"
U.S. Army Cape 0f 9rfV V% Wftvogtant Dfta
P.O. box %"D
Wilmington, NC 29402
Aft: n rep
]tir?ld OEOce: `- - - --
Rg wedends Rclatcd eoesulov MW Peruidmns
Ito Whm It Maly Conoem:
L ft current L 0WM, herby dwWVt0 Old authoNM Sell dr SnvironVwtd Cons Mfr PA to
act in MY W" Of ftY agent in 9* pl•COes w$ of pem%d epplicrtione, to furnish open ritgneat
suppleawntO^ l0FO)Sdon nI eup)vrt of epplkxtlom etc. ftm INS day farwArd. The 1?2_ day of
7M rlovk A w" snPffsedes MY pteVww con"Pond0m cancetnft the "gear for this project.
r4OTIC?o Tj* oudwdn"aw, for "Al ft atod preftnkmd cow "Y aewvar9, is wad V* for
groYe.rrw?et a9tttkfirrfa to eetrr else parapetly Mf1? tlasleepauled by 6&EC xIs& Too *Os1M eels S&EC
bu saato?ye • suer >seRlWla poor t9F of eitis? the sffr. .. ' ?
" dL
print Property Owneees Mw* Property Owrws $Wmh. ?
?.
cc: Ma. cynOl Karaly cc; Mr. Aaron Cavpcr
NCDENR - DWO Se0 4 DAVI C m ,"t+l Ca PA
2321 Crbbtree boo w+ttd
RmIoLb, NC 2760#
236 LoNlfepoe.n, suh c 3817.4 L"V "V"
C"w. Ne 2ralrr.+ 0"n bam NC "OS
ttM .. (9oe) 7WM 9how (196f 5"34
4\
apt •? J, ?? I
? o _.
\ L ??-_ -'? J
VWIRV

\\ ?jl `
? _ i J 1 C 1 l+\ t T

t 1011
(17
?
•
=

=,
, Lam
\ u •,
.
• .
? r
?/
Will
V
-

J 1

a \ ?• ,
65 ! -
to 'um

• e
lit,
i
I
'
?

QX'

rX7

Project No. Figure 1 - USGS Map

S
il & E
i
l C
l
o
nv
ronmenta
onsu
tants, PA
Project Mgr.: Tdnty Rd. Site 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
TP Wake County
NC [phone] - [phone]
, Web Page: www.SandEC.com
Scale:
1" = 2,000'
12/16/04 Raleigh W. & Cary Quadrangle
Dated 1993
a .� t -1 �' )�) < y it -r ti..w `i e `tr - s R P �r p t 'r' 1 % 1, - �* ^c: • 7T. .. ' . 5 r
t t uli� �' _�' ; r i,�)R .sar �.'�� V - . L l.`` - /_-�9Fi ['•� �tSY ?i�C 4 f,,. - /�'
rR fC ._. �,r[ r,}.y♦ Lf b S,.; .4 �a t �� �4�1 ti y y " ti� [{'�. 3`r
"MITT, t' ` tV; i•x�*mal �""R
'+ � � 1°�� `�. f_�s)� �� r i.! { E. 1'a�� �� ��.i• f -`\ �.1 - a rE r��♦ v .
•��� f z j D✓\ .y /fl.�'s.r <n. e�'pr♦ r.• L-:` [ .
♦ r; tc.. � W` �, � a <t� ' r I, •y! 1' �. )� .i a..-�. -T SL 't +�L/ .".ir
'� y/ a f .. C � a' , eG . y o t � - .-� � � Q • g '�,, ",' r _' ,4 ... .y � 'Y t � [ i ��"�f ? +•n r\ t - -.
Won, t / _
a \ t�sl .r-♦ LIF. r �. b3 Y
r
a cr r it ,�
S t r 6 ♦ ' r- -.. elr. � �'`s 4r �. _ �� s3�' .J �S i'L 9 -i•'t r; ." s���` EE P � `4`-+,1
1r -1 b / ' � ! st i � • ° ,� / 4'S • r @ $- _ � \may . C- : s -ire A �!-'�`t G � � t ��`f
t..P ✓ s. _ey�l r.�it� > �_�,4t. g..¢ F c� �r.y'�ris�``E �,.� rl'1 ..��. ��aA�`�'sa r'T>>z� ti.-:.GjY�
is
. •c P W u Q ✓ '� 6 6- -. '€`'COOK R i
L - .4f arr' �•E �� }�- ♦p L , ;� C � � :� <.".: f?` i`�A{-m4'- c� r'rf T1s. Ste' - t` . ; � F: -.;,
' i/�E -E. r�� \x m , c \ •,'" _,,, r,r-"`t v._� 1, -. ;e r S; 7 ���p � � f �j �¢
` �� ! ; } r. r` .;e a • : s _a � ... r�. a �. � it yt e. ter; � E-�r .FC r�-• � lr..� �4�;;
�` �� elr.S ria4` _. s - +.. ; � r �.- ,♦-% �d yr � �� Y °'iYcE / .8 4" /•y i 4 '1:
� -� �' <.. sd / f,-. / * i 1iy "�`w ,,. - ( �� f� •gyp, ; i'A! „"> ^a.r � �t! � �, : �y� sa � _` f� i. -c.,. .a,,' • r� ` -
r^iIC r Y.4 � l �F�/... � a� �_. e: ♦ �� G '`' X18 f''t t 4... C 'i Y.
•a t ..S 'xlr r r ySCj. . . a3� '� a � d a , �'r rf , f e � '° 1�'a � �� \ kR
r\ ti .,,,� f. � _ _ t � -.. 4 i Gam'} �� � ) � � f >. t S r � S � i > P o.♦ - �' � 't x'°rrf'�[. _ X�'
� twr 1 �' s �)a\FE �CLkr4 � FC - - ii c.S, 4p �,. /' p y # � �r, �1.R ..'G �t tG•t _. d r �. tb ��j��rj+-..l r �1� \, o, c _-_-,_ ��
rr i i •1 �, ii € ! It 4 t . 1 ! 11 air'} [ Yeot
X
Fe ttrow + S \` t. a imp: i
t= 4hv`s° ` 6. _ VIA
'' :` _ y \ '-yi ;,rk� tti -. f, � A yr e t! t •�: L� sFe -".
Ar TA
y
• _ \ 4 �.. 2.� r .f Ate. a _<,s t
e;
t + dY! •3 i'J r_t< )� c'
An has
K
.x�w',! �` tl •c,' t ,e;• ., ° + PC' ?� ♦ i -t oda } ! k
OW
114 a I - E. I• ;� ro � � /tt-,
A i_
♦ +j ` Y / f \L 5. r r Sfc °G dx ;* rr wr�c sEEsa
too
s -'J t• '€ .s',' 3''t,'E;g�� i a i 4 F. ,..�� ..,, z .E -'. irti¢r�\ 3 b. \~ :.-.t
fir'. + � z s A =7 A- 4
r cy \v �-�.`, i t
a ,.!� i SFit A... a ?. f77:•3 S1-�'! d�E � �~\ - �_� zr. r�' e' �� >. ) •';, '7�}'� �;s ��F s, n� � �e,� `.
I . tr_._- t'�._ �- ���_ ra.}�_. 4� .., x •.S F` �a1 S._�5 d 63 tl. � .. � .. _..<, a_ -�_ � .. .- �-_ � � ',i:',* s fk .� P y ..� �L.,,"p,.\, Yr'�.:
..-. �.. ,_ .xf.�:.£ .s+ .. ::-:1,. 6�.:-, .'a �f�. a�,ss s., 's•C=tri. .*.ci . ?4k��a,eV�+'

ARRON A. HATHCOCK
HALEY FAMILY, L.L.C.

m T
v J.
?C
a rn
5 ILL
C

f-0ZT7
F- (3-) Z
C? I n m
?T
I
n p
CX)?n
r_..
n
(D v
I 0
(p .?
? . N (n
fv v1 f- rn
O rn
S _

rn
w 4N _ i
I
4?- ;-
iJ
z
n rn

0
0 ?J
7
tD
v
A
m ?
n
o ? o-u x

?v g a
w O
x

v ?
O r.p.
V /CI
1?I ?
w
V
fll

1?'
Q
x
m A
N ?
<

L f D
o r A
?

N
f
? A
o
C ?
D 7

n
n
r

m

rn

m

" 4m
rn
? O
0 _0
~

o
u
n rn z
D

f? M

DIANE STONE BALLARD
HELEN S. JONES HEIRS
BY WILL
DOUGLAS WAYNE JONES
BY WILL
?q O
m
?m
? D
r
r
lz
T, / T
fP? /
Jff /
0 / a
05, / / / • a
TRACT 1
13.292 ACRES
CHARLES DAVID RAPER,
JR 1
T
THOMAS L. HOOPER /
ROGER LEE CHENOWETH
TRACT 2
_ 10.594 ACRES
AROND LAVANI \
'
HARVEY A. STONE
?RANO

V ?I ,?
RIPARUN BUFFER CONTINUES
Ysp
NF zl I

a
PATR/CIA F. CASION
\
HARRY E. DR

BR/AN DILLEY

THOMAS ?. MCEVOY -?

FRANK/f YARBOROUCH COUG£
0
? \ 7
?. MARK HOLLOWELL TRACT 3
LISA C. DYER 22.652 ACRES O

WILLIAM GLEN EDWARDS
PAUL LAMBERT
JAMES EUGENE RICE, ?R.
JAMES EUGENE RICE, JR.
MS HOLDING COMPANY, LLC
Zc>
- i 7
.?7rk> V f??,
1
O ?1

? T
V
? C
aQ
lT
/rCr• ?/
V1
1
V! ,
W
rn
^O
1 / ?j?fV1
P)
?0
Z
ON
0 ^+
?
?A
o (?
710
x0
?0
O rp
i A
V `(IYl
O
W
V
:0
rn
a
m
A
A
r
T U,
6
a a
s U)

v
-?I

Z

Z Z
< > --
? L) D

C A A ? ?
A m
z
r
A wc
N
N ? N Obi
v ? ? N 5
z
4??T?yr
?o
r_n
Z
u N
oO O
Lnlz
O
v3 8 0
oo??y
rD
Of
v
?es
V
v,

G /
1 `
r Hob
°*
Z QN\
N f
C7 +R U - to
V
/
? I
I ?
? I
- - oo+ez 60+'
' oo±sz
- - - I- T-1 , 00*
,n
?^
LEVINSON CROSSING (NORTH)
PROFILE
410.00
406.00
ANNEL
402.00
I
0
v
.2 398.00
394.00
IN V INS 398.00
!N V OUT= 398.50
390.00 '-
0.00
20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00
Distance --- ft
S'T'REAM CFA PROS
FM
"t1~iII UY F03M
JDB 1996.25 SHEE1:
88 L,F OF q.2" RCP w/ FES EA. END
1.70
Huoh J. aLnci ,A®BOCimtee gwgw Ur. W4 VAIL; a
070 WAIMA HWoot Ou" 000 C* Y NC Phorrem OM)469-M dim (' W)4aG-7)M7 DWH By, - DAIS
VRT_9OWL, i •?'_ SC_A
NOWELL CROSSING (SOUTH)
PROFILE
440.00
436.00
V4-
c
0
0
w 428.00
CHANNEL
6 L-F OF 30
» Rcp
j,.. CA. ENIJ
I NV . - 428.00 2.919°x`
IN4
424.00
420.00
0.00
20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00
Distance - ft
SIAEAM CROSSM PRQFLr=
FM
TFOM FUDGE
.w J; 1988.25 D*z
Huoh J. Gi?le ?c? sricA Aso©c--M3t?S ? aY: °^'p °'
670 VValmd GW*4 t tlo 000 cry, No PPot w (m)400-cwt Fom (Qw)4eQ-7?J7 UP B'p DAIE?
VRT SCALE 1',,4' HRZ 9CA
Jun 14 05 11:40a Gilleece & Assoc
[phone] p.2
FIRE DEPARTMENT
June 14, 2005
Jeff Zweber
Hugh J. Gilleece, III & Associates, P.A.
875 Walnut St. Suite 360
Cary, N.C. 27511
Dear Jeff,
In an effort to achieve connectivity and improve access for
emergency response, I hereby recommend providing access to the
Trinity Ridge subdivision from the south via the Trinity Woods
subdivision and from the north via Trinity Road.
Sincerely,
Keen n Hawley, , Dep ty Fire Marshal
TOWN Of CARY
T 100 Notth Academy St - Cary, NC 27511 • PO Box 8005 • Cary, NC 27512-8005 ?.?tel[phone] • fax [phone]- www.townofcary.org
. v.
Gilleece & Assoc [phone] p•2
Hugh A Gilleece, III & Associates, P.A. 875 Walnut Street, Suite 360
Consulting Engineers Cary, North Carolina 27511
[phone]
Fax [phone]
[e-mail]
June 13, 2005
Soil & Environmental Consultants
Attn: David Gainey
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Trinity Ridge Riparian Buffer Crossings
Dear Mr. Gainey:
Proposed zoning for this development will allow a maximum of 98 dwelling units. Assuming
that the parcels are developed at the maximum density of 98 dwelling units, we have calculated a
conservative preliminary percent impervious for the site of 28.7%.
Maximum Impervious Area per lot:
(house) + (deck) + (drive) + (walk) + (house walks) = (impervious area per lot)
2900 SF + 190 SF + 700 SF + 300 SF = 4090 SF/lot
Assume roadway is 27' back-to-back with 5' sidewalks each side.
37 feet of impervious area per linear foot of road.
Attribute 100 lineal feet of one half of road to each dwelling unit.
(1/2) X (37 feet) X (100 lineal feet) = 1850 SF road impervious per dwelling unit.
Total impervious area is estimated at:
98 DU X (4090 SF + 1850 SF) = 582120 SF or 13.36 AC
Undcveloped Parcel Area:
13.29 AC + 10.59 AC + 22.65 AC = 46.53 AC
Percent Impervious:
(13.36 AC) / (46.53 AC) = 28.7%
Sincerely,
Q?4. q?_
Jeffrey Zweber
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Trinity Ridge / S&EC# 9236.W1 (Wet) Date: December 23, 2004
Applicant/Owner: J. Gileece County: Wake
Investigator: DG State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Emergent
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: 2'W of flag 03A
If needed, explain on reverse.) 1 11
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Ligustrum sinense Shrub FAC 9.
2. Nyssa sylvatica Sapling FAC 10.
3. Liquidambar styraciflua Sapling FAC+ 11.
4. Smilax rotundifolia Vine FAC 12.
5. Arundinaria gigantea Grass FACW 13.
6. Microstegium vimineum Grass FAC+ 14.
7. Athyrium felix-femina Herb FAC 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 100%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
X Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) X Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 12+ (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 12+ (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Project/Site: Trinity Ridge / S&EC# 9236.W1 (Wet) Plot ID: 2'W of flag 03A
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Poorly drained
(Series and Phase): Worsham sandy loam Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic Typic Ochraquults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) ( Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-6 10yr 3/2 Sand clay
6-12+ 10yr 4/1 Sand clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
IL--
11
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No X Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No
Remarks:
L- I I
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Trinity Ridge / S&EC# 9236.W1 (up) Date: December 23, 2004
Applicant/Owner: J. Gileece County: Wake
Investigator: DG State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Pine/ Hardwood
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: 40'N of flap 01
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Vitis rotundifolia Vine FAC 9.
2. Ligustrum sinense Shrub FAC 10.
3. Nyssa sylvatica Tree FAC 11.
4. Carpinus caroliniana Tree FAC 12.
5. Quercus alba Tree FACU 13.
6. Pinus taeda Tree FAC 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 83%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: - (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: - (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: - (in.)
Remarks:
11 JI
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Project/Site: Trinity Ridge / S&EC# 9236.W1 (up) Plot ID: 40' N of flag 01
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Poorly drained
(Series and Phase): Worsham sandy loam Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic Typic Ochraquults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) ( Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-12+ 10 yr 3/4 Clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
L--
J1
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
IL- I
$0
20051250
•
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com July 7, 2005
S&EC Project # 9236.W 1
To:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Andrea Wade
6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd
Suite 120
Raleigh, N.C. 27615
From: Aaron Cooper
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P;A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Trinity Ridge Subdivision
Ca N C
JUL 0 7 2005
ry' DENR - WA7FFt QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BR Nf'H
On behalf of the owners, Jerry Nowell and Joseph Levinson, please find attached a complete
application and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NC-DWQ) that
the activities proposed below may precede utilizing Nationwide Permit 39. Please contact me at
[phone] if you have any questions or require additional information.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name Trinity Ridge Subdivision
Project Type Residential Subdivision
Owner / Applicant Jerry Nowell, Joseph Levinson
Count Wake
Nearest Town Ca
Waterbod Name UT to Richlands Creek
Basin / Sub-basin 03-04-02
Index Number 27-33-11
Class C, NSW
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0.0196
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.0075
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.0271
Total Stream impact (linear feet): 196
Attachments:
Pre-construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Agent Authorizations
Cary USGS Map
Wake County Soil Survey Map
Impact Maps
Crossing Profiles
Letter from Deputy Fire Marshall
Letter with Impervious Surface Calculations
Wetland Data Forms
$475 Water Certification Fee
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
NC Division Of Water Quality
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 " ` '
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
2 0 0 5 1 2 5
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 0
(it any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name:_ Jerry Nowell / Joseph Levinson
Mailing Address: 900 E. Chatham St. / PO Box 117
Cary, N.C. 27511 / Benson N.C. 27504
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Aaron Cooper
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27614
Telephone Number: 919-846-5900 Fax Number: 919-846-9467
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page I of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Trinity Ridge
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): n/a
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0774572360.0774881893. 0774651911
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Cary
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Trinity Ridge Subdivision
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): The site is located at the
eastern end of Brandywine Drive approximately 1000 feet east of its intersection with Trinity
Road (SR 1655), and is immediately west of I-40 in Cat y, 5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.8049661 ON 78.7421198 °W
6. Property size (acres): +/- 50 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Richlands Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application:_ The site is currently wooded and undeveloped The general
land use surrounding the property is residential I-40 is immediately west of the property.
Page 2 of 9
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
proposed project consists of the construction of a residential subdivision utilizing typical
utilities (i.e. sewer, water). Typical construction and grading equipment would be utilized for
this project.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:- The purpose of the proposed project is to
develop a residential subdivision to meet the demand for such projects in this area
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. S&EC performed a detailed wetland and Neuse River buffer
evaluation on the site. No other permits have been issued or requested for this project in the past
Data forms accompany this application for verification of the wetlands on site
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
The installation of a sanitary sewer line is anticipated for the future of this project This
installation is expected to include a temporary perpendicular stream crossing The exact
alignment has not been determined at this time Once the proposed placement of the alignment is
finalized a NWP 12 will be requested for the proposed impact
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Three permanent impacts are
proposed that will result from the installation of a road connecting all portions of the
Page 3 of 9
proposed subdivision. Impact 1 equals 95 linear feet (662 sq ft) of a perennial channel
Impact 2 (same location as impact 1) equals 327 sq ft (0.008 acre) of wetland Impact 3
equals 101 linear (202 sq. ft.) feet of an intermittent channel Buffer impacts resulting from
Impact 1 equal 5257 sq. ft. of zone 1 and 3177 sq ft of zone 2 Buffer impacts resulting from
Impact 3 equal 5740 sq. ft of zone 1 and 3531 sq ft of zone 2 Total cumulative impacts equal
196 linear feet of channel 327 s q. ft. 0.0075 acres of wetland 10,997 s q. ft. 0.25 acres of
zone 1 buffers and 6708 sq. ft. (0.15) of zone 2 buffers
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding-
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of

Site Number
Type of Impact
(e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year r
I00ye Nearest Impact

(indicate on map)
herbaceous, bog, etc.) F
a Stream (acres)
es/no linear feet
2 Permanent/ fill linear no +1-5 0.0075
Total Wetland Impact (acres) --d -0.0075
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: +/-0.25
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multi 1 len h X width then divide b 43 560
Stream Impact
Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Before Impact linear feet acres
I UT to Richlands Permanent
Creek Culvert/ Fill Perennial 7' 95 0.015
3 UT to Richlands Permanent

Creek
Culvert/ Fill Intermittent 2' 101 0.0046
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 196 0.0196
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads etc.
Open Water Impact Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
indicate on ma ocean, etc. acres
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Total Open Water Impact (acres) n/a
Page 4 of 9
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project.
Stream Impact (acres): 0.0196
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.0075
Open Water Impact (acres : 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.0271
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 196
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): n/a
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): n/a
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: n/a
Size of watershed draining to pond: n/a Expected pond surface area: n/a
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The placement of the road was chosen due to an existing fixed road stub at the northern
property boundary. Impact 3 is unavoidable not only for interconnectivity to the entire site but
also to maintain a reasonable easement to the adjacent property owners This section of the
channel was also chosen to maintain a perpendicular crossing The road crossing placement is
also recommended by the Deputy Fire Marshall to improve access for emergency response (see
attached letter).
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
Page 5 of 9
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strrnp,ide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No mitigation is requested as the impacts are below the thresholds for stream and wetland
impacts for DWQ and the road is necessary to access all portions of the site and dictated bX
the Fire Marshall. If mitigation is required payment to the NC-EEP at a 1.1 ratio is proposed
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wM/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0 (95 if required)
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0 (0.0075 if required)
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Page 6 of 9
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ?
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact 1
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 5,257 3 (2 for Catawba) n/a
2 3,177 1.5 n/a
Total 8,434 n/a
Zone* Impact 2
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 5,740 3 (2 for Catawba) n/a
2 3,531 1.5 n/a
Total 9,271 n/a
tone t extends out 3U feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 7 of 9
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. Mitigation should not be required because
each crossing is below the thresholds for buffer mitigation and is considered "Allowable" by
current regulations.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. As this subdivision is still in the preliminM
planning phase due to rezoning a conservative impervious percentage has been calculated at
28.7% considering the maximum allowable number of lots (see attached letter).
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
A sanitary sewer system will be utilized for the proposed subdivision
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No ?
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: We
have reviewed the "DRAFT Internal Policy Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality
Certification and Isolated Wetland Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water
Quality on October 3 2002, version 1.6. The draft states that most residential subdivisions are
unlikely to cause cumulative impacts. Trinity Ridge does not meet any of the three criteria of
private projects that can clearly result in cumulative impact The project is not relatively large for
a residential development in eastern Wake County, the project will involve no commercial
development, and the project would be surrounded by either existing residential development or
Page 8 of 9
Interstate 40. Some of the current regulations protecting water quality associated with this project
include the 401, 404, and C NSW We anticipate that you will advise us if a qualitative or
quantitative impact analysis is required
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
..7., D!?*
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
Consultants,
Phone: - r
Project Naole/ Descrfp tion: trn1 l ? '??1 d -
Date: V`C-
The VVartanerie of the Army
U.5. Army Corps of EnOeers, Wiltrwngton District
P.Q. box 1890
W flatiinln, or+ NC 28402
Attn: And -
Neld office: ?. ----
Re: Wetlands Related Coftsultfng and Permitting
To Whom It May CmXem:
1, %be current er?t owner, hereby designate and authorize SOU & Environmental Consultaanta, PA to
act in nzy beha f as my agent in tbe processing of permit applications, to fttRrti5lt upon request da of
supptSxnental information in suprort of applications, etc. from this day fflrward. The -- y
This nodficaNon supersedes any previous correspondertc+e conceming the agent for this project
NOTICE This autlhtoidgation, for b0fl ity and pr+obs6onAd courtesy reasons, is Vaud Cody for
government oft&Ws to eater the p=erty?when accoatpaaW by SWEC staff. You abould ca11 7c,
to akrrange a site sleeting prior to vubfiting the site. A 4
Print properly o wrw's Maim
cc: Ms, Cyndi Karoly
NCDENR ^ DWQ
2329 Crabtree Boulevard
Mr. Aaron Cooper
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
RsielsK NC 7_7604
???etlQt??? 3RA9?t? LuwnAnlq f1lfve
236 L&r6Nlp Court, suiAe C Gtembwa. NC 17455
concord. NC 28M., phase: [phone]
r'lMnc: (7041) 720.9463 r.,.. 117011 'tAh.014
.h., rtndi77n oenR

Gilleeae 6 Assoc
W10/2008 10:09 FAX
P.01
P•2
S1,91 462 6Ti, qz
(9191460-7837
;0OOt/001
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
I laic Roam Rif" RAd R?biA N*4 ClWW x914 - Rom (91P W 4W - Fine; (919) OWM7
*WWAGWIBCAM
AGENT AUTHOZZAMN FORM
?! To Ee Fi1kd In ev_Tht?Cutrertt IattdOwrler
None. ? c L el/rV4S?-?
Addmw PO COX l L
0 e/ulon 2 ISO
ri>aat?:
PrAject /17dtript(on• I Y,n I tom' ? ???? '
Rate: ? ? ? l ? ?
The Depart+eM of the Army
U.S. Army Co" of F,nOne M Wilxn VM D(SMO
P10, 60% 1"0
Wi adngim NC 28102
Attn: n c c o-
pidd Office:
Rc Wedends Retakd Consulting arnd Permifdng
To Whom It May Concern:
tltt' euvent KRZIM owM, heltby de dtNle and andwirk Bolt & Envlronmentld Consnltaaft PA to
acct in MY b" as t+ay agent in d+r Poeessing of pie &PPticatial+s, to Atmish upon Wgttaa!
9uppkttMat4 inforrrly 00A In "Oft of nppticattoru, etc, Ervin this day [arwAud The Lc? day of
- -. r ?1•-`?-_-
7tds 1?ottciCation sgpersades AnT Previous cw"PwdeneR concerning the agevat 10x this Pw)wt.
No ltd I)* odmftmom for NaMlMta? aid ram--dottd c0urtnnrl? Novo, b wow owy for
govemsee t afxid ds to eater the pltopalp rrha„ ttresatPaaled by S&RC OfdL X00 t&onld Cell S&EC
to awgR?r • dk a4oft Oft t(tvIRll xx dw die : N
Print Propexty OwnWs Non*
cc: Ms. Cyndl Kiraly
NCDWR - DWO
2321 Crbbtree boalwad
Rmlelgh, NC 27604
cc; Mr. Aaran Cooper 4
$ail & Bnvironmantal x tso PA
*6 L*Md*p Cm. Me C M 7-tt t,m+MAeN DMw
04600 ?. 4c atna.+ Ortewbove, W "491
Fjww f101) 7XJW Plwe, (1961$40. 014
ci6w
/
1 J 1 tJ ? t
-
.(

• ?.
50??r • %?;,' ? .?`i '; ?-:ter;
?? `
r

A- F
Lam` - ?
h

? • n

* \ d

•
¦
{ ( • ( • ! 655'
•

-1 ?
X I-C
• M •
-
l i
!

?- ?- (A 161
A
ect No. Figure 1 - USGS Map
9236
.Wl
S
il & E
i
l C
o
nv
ronmenta
onsultants, PA
Project Mgr.: Tdnty Rd. Site 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
TP Wake County
NC [phone] - [phone]
, Web Page: www.SandEC.com
Scale:
1" = 2,000'
12/16/04 Raleigh W. & Cary Quadrangle
Dated 1993
4„F ;J2q r� t � � � F � . ! wt 1i; � p'„\S. 't n+ `, F �.. -r �s` i T.9 _ a.. y �..t ` 4 4 1^ t � a ,� � ►. :7-. -. -:--
�5.- !� � �. (,,. `.. dy,i ! l �. se H` .'. � .'sy `(ate( i y���`?+'�r F"r >f �,r � .. � - js"rf'' �._' 4' ♦ _,,',,^F t� ) � ~� �l t tErr: r-�` `�j .7'•."r��SCJRhR�a�y,:-+ } y .�-' � $ s.A,Y�� -.E � � �,..if .:_ � k;F y1� \ �'e.�� a�kx(•. .::
�_`, 7 ` a: �. �� +F cue• i ��{tJ 3.ee sJ i 1p i * �:t �S Js y `+�F''� ®�
4 .� L�ti � � _ } < `C ti Atl � � �.�lt` �, \ -? .� / -v :.I r s_i' �. t ��"� = .r � ( ",.`S -+}"...Y hw' ,+'T/,--. �-y ��" •�,\ 4 .a �s�
=_ J :. _ � Ly } � 5 �'' ..i` '. / _- � 1; a'Ye � E as a ir'i i - ^ -. r tr Eat'• fl.. �4 . d s+2 o a i�...
~ (�{ tr {' o `.; ( tr•,s �r �J ySil1. ''' :! n kta yi:.S shy-a�J �. 'tet h.F 4- st fa��� f �-`
O
e �r ¢ JP.• ;.`.q. t z i \ fz""kG¢ 4•s'
\\r' < .,.% .. va " spf%-a �Yr:: , : t 'z+Y�i—�'Ax s
f FFF,,, , c -c /R ♦ / ,c.a p Yp t 1 � � \ i a.r .r '� 7. ►J Y{
� a_ ¢ <. 6J '!�
f . I `'r. n� -N
R ♦ � f 1. �% .J, - s`Ji, r : N z �r ,�+r 6.l -` t � ! . 4 .� � \ ;,.:
YOU:o<\! aa�r t �s .% i S� y<S 9 p a. ,6•'<la� -C r 3 -
,�.¢ F v a`iy f f! �`t�J� f�• k t .�re i- -i �t Y"�-:C'�s YT A��, t< - ,i �: \ {{4,,
<F \ y\�1�.�1R� � ,� '',4,�t <...b F ( f.:.�at L\'f �'_'i �L�a, :. �`\� _ ,♦,e„ -"'z:/ °rF-a<.t � 4�•.-.�rir2 �i
—tons Wk k `r f :>.F ¢ t
vvl
' i t-.=,(?,r,•3�1r�. � '+.� ♦} <.- - 4iC •; SJ � .�".: b� = Fd r'4` [�.'.�� l..r.. ti -f ,, t �'s 1. '� -�t
• t3s w'
k - J j �.. g� t i k
h '
...`r Tt !:. t —•,
' i S Cl � � � �,-h 3� �1 �_;�' a to �' ''_ F '}- •"^ Sre ' A1'. Ya -t n � ._ :.. ° y �4 >
Leh \a f �r ��/ �."r t� "� i f( �•�f� ••��p.. _ �` /1 ""! �-a �,<ff1 err �y�> f _ !� �.-c��,� .,,.'� r%
`'a �f '•Jlr s f y}t .. .r,>F ''.,� . �'" t'P tt" x '` .t ;! ,, -1 a E
1
a „t� c Pr 6 ! .€,rf� �tr,a "
r s �
ff
. --� r `� ♦-`� s Y.'G6 a sr �'�� a f ♦ },� t° `.�
f4:.q�eFr- �t.ie i•\\`?�iAY
rye 1 t `± � � � 'r• ` aE F' � �f �'i.
F � � ti � 'ti .: � �'' _t• f d f - 4 S`. � is ♦ �, \' - _.
coo
—'4x
Al
Wool
ASON
\ y
F f
5< `F �` F F
I1 F s+ 1 C f Ju�.F
� �' .F'�` (i °' � $ � - -. - J �_ p . t, "� � J .. i •x R c-tf r F c
14 ax( J 16 §.i
r `rt
dee } _ _s
'.k . S _.
r� 3
WAV
OMQ
ti�<
\
,/
'; . � ri�� t r. �• n.:v �
JAI. 1
Ir s= a0 Al R C
�= e
♦ C ? r _Y _ ! \`C a �- coo C'
tta
l i _•v f s ff! F i x,'37 r,-� _ "a. �J't - ! .:n
.�all
r @y r.6 l \ a
�._ _. � F._ f..#': } �.t':n � .� r �.� i .aa �...R\r�^.. �... x '. -. , r(�'. t`.s. 4'�Ii` �3�f4 - r '_ ,t �.ir -.f•� r .`<6Y, �. .

ARRON A. HATHCOCK
o?
HALEY FAMILY, L.L.C. /
Z -\\ c??`' T Y

DIANE STONE BALLAf ?
RS fi?

f
/
JONES HE/RS
HELEN S 0?
.
BY WILL
p
-?a
-- P\QP
/
b
/?O
Q
DOUGLAS WAYNE JONES
?' 11 BY WILL
TRACT I
13.292 ACRES
CHARLES DAVID RAPER, JR.
JI
?c
w rn
7 tlL
C

(D > 4, -9 CL
f'OZ?u
?0-)
zi<
1 nrm
OT -??
c?DF.<
j O
W . fv rT1 cn
O ' r)
w
1
1,
Z
00
0
7
n
v
o

o >
x ro
?a x

N
ll
o
w
x

lp
0)
O ?.
v ?
/A 6

m z
o

ti
Q ?

i
//
THOMAS L. HOOPER
ROGER LEE CHENOWETH
TRACT 2

` 10.594 ACRES

ARVIND LAVANI c \ -
4
HARVEY A. STONE \
BRq
Nyk,?
p
01 ?.I R/PAR[4N BUFFER CONTINUES
RAF p\ O
I i
?
g? l
> Ll
PATRICIA F. GASTON
?q O
m
r1 HARRY E. ORUCK
D

r BRIAN OILLEY
r ?
THOMAS J. MCEVOY
r
Z \

FRANK/E YARBOROUGH GOUGE
J. MARK HOLLOWELL
LISA C. DYER
WILLIAM GLEN EDWARDS
PAUL LAMBERT
60' RZWL
JAMES EUGENE RICE, JR.
JAMES EUGENE RICE, JR.
BLANCH TMr
(60' R/W)
MS HOLDING COMPANY, LLC
TRACT 3
22.652 ACRES
i
N G
D v
N o

Z
m
n a?

?_ o
rrj

y ?
D m ?

&

\
0
0 0
\
0 0
- zi
c
0 ?
0 Y/
m z
v, c >

?: CD
5 -
I
a7
0-
O
D
MO
r A A ? Z
Dot ?
> n m a
D y ti
O ? ? r
0 2
Z
N -;
<N
G
w r?
? l11
V! J
m1m
`V
N ,
1Y
to N
^Z^ 1
V
0
m?m
1Y
rn
?A
7
w0
x
?0_
g
C)
O
I A
m
W
V
m
Q
uwtnrn
v N ? S
V tf N
T N ? N
io
N A
v Z
I (wJi v O Z
u a cn
0 0
wrn - -?
?1 T ? V1 !-
^ b
O1
v
0
6 9
S N
7v e y
R7
E
GIII
y z
`z ?
n m
T
!!1 A m
o
N ?
0
A
nZ z Z
o
P D
t, \ 0 V

(" G
IP G
N
CO
S

"_
r •S
'op
b \ r
I _ i n 1Nt
I ICI` _
t
/ U ? mI D
i
r I
j
- - - o g 6o+' - -r
tool-- I l
ri 0 I
m!
? J i ll?i.I
/ C CD 'non'
/ m> C=)
? L-n
Way
00 e
Z
n
LEVINSON CROSSING (NORTH)
PROFILE
410.00
ANNEL
406.00
N ,88 LF bF 42 RCP w/ FES EA. END
S ? 1.709 f ? -
IN V IN- 398.00
IN V OUT= 396.50
402.00
f
0
v
w 398.00
394.00
390.00,
0.00
20.00 40.00 60.00
Distance -- ft
80.00 100.00
STREAM CR XMM PROFILE
m"
TF*M RIDGE
roe t 1M.ss SHELM
Hugh J. C?ill®ebce.: aricl A®aocit?te?
076 WAIMA efrsst ou" 000 Cory, NC Ptu*ww. OM)40*-VM F&o @W3400--"W
¦ "w 6C .- UAIC I
NOWELL CROSSING (SOUTH)
PROFILE
440.00
436.00

c
428.00
424.00
420 00
EX. CHANNEL
8s OF 30" ,
- ' RCP
???'EA. ENa,
IN V 428.00 S ' 2.91
IN V . 425.50
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00
Distgnce - ft
Hugh J_ C?Ilc??scc and Aas©ciaLtes
070 Walnut GWoot "o 000 Cary. NC mo/w (Q=)40 - flM Faw OM)4? "37
80.00 100.00
STREAM CRO Q PROFILE
FOR
TFI N[TY FIDGE
1988.2$ BN E .

Jun 14 05 11:40a Gilleece & Assoc
[phone] p.2
FIRE DEPARTMENT
June 14, 2005
Jeff Zweber
Hugh J. Gilleece, III & Associates, P.A.
875 Walnut St. Suite 360
Cary, N.C. 27511
Dear Jeff,
In an effort to achieve connectivity and improve access for
emergency response, I hereby recommend providing access to the
Trinity Ridge subdivision from the south via the Trinity Woods
subdivision and from the north via Trinity Road.
Sincerely,
F'?(1
Ken Hawley, Dep ty Fire Marshal
TOWN Ot CARY
100 North Academy St - Cary, NC 27511 • PO Box 8005 • Cary, NC 27512-8005 ??tel [phone] • fax [phone]• www.townofcary.org ?: ??
Gilleece & Assoc [phone] p.2
Hugh I. Gilleece, III & Associates, P.A. 875 Walnut Street, Suite 360
Consulting Engineers Cary, North Carolina 27511
[phone]
Fax [phone]
[e-mail]
June 13, 2005
Soil & Environmental Consultants
Attn: David Gainey
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Trinity Ridge Riparian Buffer Crossings
Dear Mr. Gainey:
Proposed zoning for this development will allow a maximum of 98 dwelling units. Assuming
that the parcels are developed at the maximum density of 98 dwelling units, we have calculated a
conservative preliminary percent impervious for the site of 28.7%.
Maximum Impervious Area per lot:
(house) + (deck) + (drive) + (walk) + (house walks) = (impervious area per lot)
2900 SF + 190 SF + 700 SF + 300 SF = 4090 SF/lot
Assume roadway is 27' back-to-back with 5' sidewalks each side.
37 feet of impervious area per linear foot of road.
Attribute 100 lineal feet of one half of road to each dwelling unit.
(1/2) X (37 feet) X (100 lineal feet) =1850 SF road impervious per dwelling unit.
Total impervious area is estimated at:
98 DU X (4090 SF + 1850 SF) = 582120 SF or 13.36 AC
Undeveloped Parcel Area:
13.29 AC + 10.59 AC + 22.65 AC = 46.53 AC
Percent Impervious:
(13.36 AC) / (46.53 AC) = 28.7%
Sincerely,
?
q
Jeffrey Zweber
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Trinity Ridge / S&EC# 9236.W1 (Wet) Date: December 23, 2004
Applicant/Owner: J. Gileece County: Wake
Investigator: DG State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Emergent
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: 2'W of flag 03A
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Ligustrum sinense Shrub FAC 9.
2. Nyssa sylvatica Sapling FAC 10.
3. Liquidambar styraciflua Sapling FAC+ 11.
4. Smilax rotundifolia Vine FAC 12.
5. Arundinaria gigantea Grass FACW 13.
6. Microstegium vimineum Grass FAC+ 14.
7. Athyrium felix-femina Herb FAC 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 100%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
X Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) X Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 12+ (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 12+ (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Project/Site: Trinity Ridge / S&EC# 9236.W1 (Wet) Plot ID: 2'W of flag 03A J
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Poorl drained
(Series and Phase): Worsham sandy loam Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic Typic Ochraquults Confirm Mapped Type? _ Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) ( Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-6 10yr 3/2 Sand clay
6-12+ 10yr 4/1 Sand clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No X Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Trinity Ridge / S&EC# 9236.W1 (up) Date: December 23, 2004
Applicant/Owner: J. Gileece County: Wake
Investigator: DG State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Pine/ Hardwood
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: 40' N of flag 01
If needed, explain on reverse.
VF(:FTATInN
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Vitis rotundifolia Vine FAC 9.
2. Ligustrum sinense Shrub FAC 10.
3. Nyssa sylvatica Tree FAC 11.
4. Carpinus caroliniana Tree FAC 12.
5. Quercus alba Tree FACU 13.
6. Pinus taeda Tree FAC 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 83%
Remarks:
HYnRnLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: - (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: - (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: - (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Project/Site: Trinity Ridge / S&EC# 9236.W1 (up) Plot ID: 40' N of flag 01
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Poorly drained
(Series and Phase): Worsham sandy loam Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic Typic Ochraquults Confirm Mapped Type? _ Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) ( Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-12+ 10 yr 3/4 Clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
IL--
11
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
L- I
2 0 0 5 1 2 5 0
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com July 7, 2005
S&EC Project # 9236W1
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Andrea Wade
6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd
Suite 120
Raleigh, N.C. 27615
From: Aaron Cooper
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
NC Division Of Water Quality
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
AIL 0 7 2005
Re: Trinity Ridge Subdivision DENR - WAfFft QUAt ITY
Cary, N.C. WETI.ANDSAND STORMVVATER BRANCP
On behalf of the owners, Jerry Nowell and Joseph Levinson, please find attached a complete
application and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NC-DWQ) that
the activities proposed below may precede utilizing Nationwide Permit 39. Please contact me at
[phone] if you have any questions or require additional information.
PPC) IFr`T Cl 1KA1IAADV
Project Name Trinity Ridge Subdivision
Project Type Residential Subdivision
Owner / Applicant Jerry Nowell, Joseph Levinson
Count Wake
Nearest Town Ca
Waterbod Name UT to Richlands Creek
Basin / Sub-basin 03-04-02
Index Number 27-33-11
Class C, NSW
IMPAr`T CI IRAAAADV
Stream Impact (acres): 0.0196
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.0075
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.0271
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 196
Attachments:
Pre-construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Agent Authorizations
Cary USGS Map
Wake County Soil Survey Map
Impact Maps
Crossing Profiles
Letter from Deputy Fire Marshall
Letter with Impervious Surface Calculations
Wetland Data Forms
$475 Water Certification Fee
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Office Use Only: Fonn Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 20051280
(it any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information E [ 0W P
1. Owner/Applicant Information
JUL 0 7 2005
Name: Je Nowell / Joseph Levinson DENR - WAtER QUALITY
Mailing Address: 900 E. Chatham St. / PO Box 117 nAN snra cH
Cary, N.C. 27511 / Benson N.C. 27504
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:_ Aaron Cooper
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants
Mailing Address:_ 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh N.C. 27614
Telephone Number: 919-846-5900 Fax Number: 919-846-9467
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page I of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Trinity Ridge
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): n/a
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0774572360.0774881893.0774651911
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Cary
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Trinity Ridge Subdivision
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): The site is located at the
eastern end of Brandywine Drive approximately 1000 feet east of its intersection with Trinity
Road (SR 1655), and is immediately west of I-40 in Carv N.C.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.8049661 ON 78.7421198 °W
6. Property size (acres): +/- 50 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Richlands Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is currently wooded and undeveloped The general
land use surrounding the property is residential I-40 is immediately west of the property-
Page 2 of 9
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
proposed project consists of the construction of a residential subdivision utilizing typical
utilities (i.e. sewer, water). Typical construction and grading equipment would be utilized for
this project.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed project is to
develop a residential subdivision to meet the demand for such projects in this area
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. S&EC performed a detailed wetland and Neuse River buffer
evaluation on the site. No other permits have been issued or requested for this project in the past
Data forms accompany this application for verification of the wetlands on site
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
The installation of a sanitary sewer line is anticipated for the future of this project This
installation is expected to include a temporary perpendicular stream crossing The exact
alignment has not been determined at this time Once the proposed placement of the alignment is
finalized a NWP 12 will be requested for the proposed impact
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Three permanent impacts are
proposed that will result from the installation of a road connecting all portions of the
Page 3 of 9
proposed subdivision Impact 1 equals 95 linear feet (662 sq ft) of a perennial channel
Impact 2 (same location as impact 1) equals 327 sq ft (0.008 acre) of wetland Impact 3
equals 101 linear (202 sq. ft.) feet of an intermittent channel Buffer impacts resulting from
Impact 1 equal 5257 sq. ft. of zone 1 and 3177 sq ft of zone 2 Buffer impacts resulting from
Impact 3 equal 5740 sq. ft of zone 1 and 3531 sq ft of zone 2 Total cumulative impacts equal
196 linear feet of channel 327 sq ft (0.0075 acres) of wetland 10,997 sc ft (0 25 acres) of
zone 1 buffers and 6708 sq. ft. (0.15) of zone 2 buffers
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding-
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
indicate on ma
( p)
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
es/no linear feet
2 Permanent/ fill linear no +/-5 0.0075
1 Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.0075
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: +/-0.25
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multi 1 length X width then divide b 43 560
Stream Impact Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact Perennial or Stream Width Length Impact

indicate on ma Intermittent?
Before Impact
linear feet
acres
I UT to Richlands Permanent

Creek
Culvert/ Fill Perennial 7' 95 0.015
3 UT to Richlands Permanent

Creek
Culvert/ Fill Intermittent 2' 101 0.0046
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 196 0.0196
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding. drainave_ hulkheadc etc
Open Water Impact Name
Wat Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number e)
(if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond,
estuary, sound, bay,
Impact
indicate on ma ocean, etc. acres
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Total Open Water Impact (acres) n/a
Page 4 of 9
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the US- resultinu frnm the nrnient-
Stream Im act (acres): 0.0196
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.0075
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.0271
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 196
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): n/a
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): n/a
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: n/a
Size of watershed draining to pond: n/a Expected pond surface area: n/a
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The placement of the road was chosen due to an existing fixed road stub at the northern
property boundary. Impact 3 is unavoidable not only for interconnectivity to the entire site but
also to maintain a reasonable easement to the adjacent property owners This section of the
channel was also chosen to maintain a perpendicular crossing The road crossing placement is
also recommended by the Deputy Fire Marshall to improve access for emergency response (see
attached letter).
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
Page 5 of 9
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwctlands/strrngide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No mitigation is requested as the impacts are below the thresholds for stream and wetland
impacts for DWQ and the road is necessary to access all portions of the site and dictated by
the Fire Marshall. If mitigation is required payment to the NC-EEP at a 1.1 ratio is proposed
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wKp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0 (95 if required)
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0(0.0075 if required)
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Page 6 of 9
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ?
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact 1
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 5,257 3 (2 for Catawba) n/a
2 3,177 1.5 n/a
Total 8,434 n/a
Zone* Impact 2
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 5,740 3 (2 for Catawba) n/a
2 3,531 1.5 n/a
Total 9,271 n/a
cone t extenas out sv teet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 7 of 9
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. Mitigation should not be required because
each crossing is below the thresholds for buffer mitigation and is considered "Allowable" by
current regulations.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. As this subdivision is still in the preliminary
planning phase due to rezoning a conservative impervious percentage has been calculated at
28.7% considering the maximum allowable number of lots (see attached letter).
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
A sanitary sewer system will be utilized for the proposed subdivision
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No ?
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: We
have reviewed the "DRAFT Internal Policy Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality
Certification and Isolated Wetland Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water
Quality on October 3, 2002, version 1.6. The draft states that most residential subdivisions are
unlikely to cause cumulative impacts. Trinity Ridge does not meet any of the three criteria of
private projects that can clearly result in cumulative impact The project is not relatively large for
a residential development in eastern Wake County, the project will involve no commercial
development, and the project would be surrounded by either existing residential development or
Page 8 of 9
Interstate 40. Some of the current regulations protecting, water quality associated with this project
include the 401, 404, and C NSW We anticipate that you will advise us if a qualitative or
quantitative impact analysis is required.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
-7_ e ,5*
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
-nvirontne
Address:
(v?r L 2--7
Phone:
Project Nacre/ Descx1p don:?1
Date:,
The Departrrwen, of the AMY
U.5. Army Corps of Engineers, V"Irr" ngton District
P.Q. Box 1890
W ilmingtort NC 28402
Attn: A_
Pteld Office: ' .Y
Re: Wettands Related Consulting and Pexmithng
To WhoMIt May COMM
1, lbe torrent 2999RAdY owner, hereby designate and autha%ize Sall & EnvironRnental Consult&nts, PA to
act in my behalf as my agent M ow processing of permit applic+ttaons, to furnish upon request da of
supplCmemtal information in support of applications, etc, front, this day forward. The -92- y o
This nodHcation supersedes any prt4ioas torrespondeme coAcerning the agent for this project,
NOTICE This 4tetatnRizatioA, for liabMy and pWassional re mxtesy reasons, is valid oWy for
government ofciab to eater the prvpextywhen accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call lvC
to arrange a site meeting prior tQ vW'dAg the site. A i1
Print Property owner's Name Y fignature
cc: Ms, Cyndi Karoly cC: Mr. Aaron Cooper
NCDENR - DWQ Soil & Environme"tal Consultants, PA
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raieisb, NC 27604
QIftWQMM 30187'.r? Lut"It k T Mve
236 tsP MkP Conn. Suilg C GteeMbwo. NC 17455
cewcord. NC 16023 Phwit (336) 540-92114
(70d) 720.0463
?„ r rnd1 7,)n,oAAR

W10/2003 10:00 FAX
Gilleeae 6 Rssoo
c-
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11019 R"im W* Rad R.t id. N" CW6m M4 - Phony (011h WSW • Fiuec (PIA) 016.M7
rww,smmc"m
[phone]
0002/002
p.2
AGENT AUTROZ ZATION FORM
AUli a o ?e F?kd In DIE Thecurrent 1ADdowner
Nastrtr: Qse L e
Add,te?s_ PCJ 13 c/x 11
e.tso n/C, 2 7S0 ? j
rl>o?: _
Praject N?/Ddtrippton: ? ,n I t'om' 2 ? ?G
ad,e: ?l La
The Depwbnmt of tho Army
U.S. Army Cmym of Erl&*M, WftWSto" MAIM
P.O, b" %am
Wdudogion, NC 211
Attn: n lea- G
Plwld Office: ? '
tC Wed Mdy hlak4 Consulting and Perwirdh$
To Whom It May Comm
L ft etwent C owt wr, herby dwoute and authorial Soil do Envimnmwtal Consulbm, PA to
at in bar ba6v of my ag6tlt in Ow processtnp of perw applications, is hirn4 rh upan Oquest
supplemmul Info anon In aunut of appllcattorm etc. han+ this day forward. The LO- day of
5
71vs AoeficaW mp umWes arty pre dam correspotldenee eoAmnft the agent for this project.
140TIC7? rAp Doty fo"NOM W 40d rufmkmw cmwggr mm", lA valid s* fa
go+tCMU' ut affidAa to eater dW pltopsafy wfbft aresmspnded by BMC staff. TOO 8bOVld CAH MEC
tow gls?e a sly 0 0049 pdor to vls10mg dw site. ?
Vic i(c??K ? ?. ? -r?.,., ?:, ,?r? C? ?,????? ?' ???:? ?•?: NO Property OwnWj Nam Property Ownees svwtu-m
CO Ma. Cyndl Ksroly cc; Mr. Aaron Capper ?-
NCDENR - D1h1Q $ala Enviroemento, Cn tartb, PA
2321 CTabtree bouWard
Raimph, NC Z76M
t?riote?C . ? _ _ fl1?ptAiocaQ?Ama,
?3i LeM1Gp Dora. wits C 38114 lAwlsftto Drive
C6". tic MOM Ortem6aM NC 270
flow.. (VQ 730-"W t'heee; OM 546-V34
y.., MM 7".q.K ft,.- mkA t,y?.RfRi
eke k

a l} .

17

• ? - r 111 ? !
ir t ' J?f _? 1 ?
r

J
14

° c
° _7

?V .1
e

• r t? K
I ! 655.
?

'e-
'f?? ? ?,??\?_/
\ /
rN '(?
•131 .:

ect No. Figure 1 - USGS Map
9236 S
il & E
i
l C
l
o
nv
ronmenta
onsu
tants, PA
Project Mgr.: Trinty Rd. Site 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
TP Wake County
NC [phone] - [phone]
, Web Page: www.SandEC.com
Scale:
1" = 2,000'
12/16/04 Raleigh W. & Cary Quadrangle
Dated 1993
i
ARRON A. HATHCOCK
HALEY FAMILY, L.L.C.
MI
? T
?e
w rn
7 llL
C

rt -7, 70 -1 7? W
0Z T7
s rn F-
(c) :T
J_
-<

0
W .- r) m
O

t,
Z
00
0 x
7
N
n
Cl
?

A
cop '
Y
J
? N
v Q ? x
n
-
N 9
in
W 0
x r
?
?0
_
01
O F +
? m
(? $
W
V
?
I"fl z
o
an
CD
a
?q 0
?m
?D
r
lz
DIANE STONE BALLARD
HELEN S. JONES HEIRS
BY WILL
DOUGLAS WAYNE JONES
BY WILL
R
Jff?P /
9 ? a
?oa
a
TRACT 1
13.292 ACRES
CHARLES DAVID RAPER, JR.

i
//
THOMAS L. HOOPER /
ROGER LEE CH£NOWETH
TRACT 2
10.594 ACRES
ARVIND LAVANI

HARVEY A. STONE \
4944' oI I \\ R/PAR 4N BUFFER CO
D
/ NT/NUES
Ysov?
Nf ? ?I I
g. I

PATRICIA F. GASTON
\
HARRY E. DR

BR/AN DILLEY

0
THOMAS J. MCEVOY

FRANK/E YARBOROUGH GOUGf

?. MARK HOLLOWELL
LISA C. DYER TRACT 3
22.652 ACRES O
WILLIAM GLEN EDWARDS
PAUL LAMBERT
JAMES EUGENE RICE, JR.
JAMES EUGENE RICE JR.
BLANCH -=
(60' R/W)
MS HOLDING COMPANY, LLC
W
CD
v
L
m Uul!
< ?

v
Z N

G
E
y
A
f'1 v
vj ?'
?•. ...a

1 L J

Z
^ ?
? i?
/` : 1
;c D
frr r
m ? 6
n m m cr ? ? ? ? ? .•. '? t1l 1 h .. /
r \ \ n ^ T
S
°
° m D
z

Z

-JJ
m 5
C A -
yy
> >A A z >
X` z
Dy ti
Z 2 ?
w m
z ?
? A A
gg
N N N

v1O+
r
?

N V O
W O N
z
n

L
z
Z
y
?
N
C

?
T
V
nnl?
o
?C
C op ID J y
r
-' T
Ill ?
Y?'1 _
1 v

1Y
7m'

1
?0
Z
00
T
V
O
S
m?m
,V

s
W
A

? ?
>
?
V SZ xi
? O

?v
E ty
''

xp C-

Q0

I
V
V
rn

G I
t N
N
C7 m (7
2
fn ? W

J
A . Z D z

o

m
ff T
.
D

?

r
?
o >
D
= r
CO
I
;

,? R
f l
Cl I

I '
5d 'o ?

N N
a

/ m
l /
/ / I I
i
Ye,
i I
00+9L 60+ L 4 -?•?{
/y, I
I ,
a ?
_ /?byaoq?i? 0?
lij! .? oy ?il II I? /I / ? % I I ?r /I rl ? j I 1 I I
p L ?IIJLJ
cn? Q
rp
£? N
!ll
all-"
,0 0
I
I
' 11 ? I. ? l
l% w

bMe I.?
?al r
?y$ I I ? l l l
Y
0S'
I-
' v I

I
/*
,

r

al 9 uuu
M.
T.
LEVINSON CROSSING (NORTH)
PROMS
410.00
406.00
ANNEL
"- 402.00
f
0
v
w 398.00
394.00
INV IN-- 398.00
INV OUT 396.50
390-00,
0.00
20.00 40.00 60.00
Distance --- ft
80.00 100.00
STREAM MOSSING PROFILE
F"
Jog 1M.25 SHEEP
Hugh J_ G111emeb4-,eR? and A®aociateB
o7o waimo ob om eune deo oo#v, Nc Phonem tvMMOW- urn Fam tMY4e3--"W
¦ Uv 6R - UAIC i
8
?14 11 8 LF 6F'42" ?RCP'w/FS?EA///E?/
1. 7
NOWELL CROSSING (SOUTH)
PROFILE
440.00
436.00
w
c
0
a
428.00
CHANNEL
8 ,
6 ,
OF' 30" RCP -?
FES EA•N4
NV 428.00 2.91??`
ENV ' 2 0
424.00
420.00 '-
0.00
20.00 40.00 60.00
Distonce - ft
80.00 100.00
STS CROSSM PROFILE
Fm
T Q1 T p0m
.!? . 1988.28 ZMEM
Huigh J_ C0I14!!?escemt. sncJ ^aaC>C:jgktgs
era walnut swoot BLafs om cary, NC Pnanw (OW 400-mm Faw Om WO-"37 DYM 81" - DA7E
1 UDT MAI r- I"-& NR7 qrA
Jun 14 05 11:40a Gilleece & Assoc
[phone] p.2
FIRE DEPARTMENT
June 14, 2005
Jeff Zweber
Hugh J. Gilleece, III & Associates, P.A.
875 Walnut St. Suite 360
Cary, N.C. 27511
Dear Jeff,
In an effort to achieve connectivity and improve access for
emergency response, I hereby recommend providing access to the
Trinity Ridge subdivision from the south via the Trinity Woods
subdivision and from the north via Trinity Road.
Sincerely,
T1?1Y1Ou,
Ken Hawley, Dep ty Fire Marshal
TOWN Of CARY
100 North Academy St - Cary, NC 21511 • PO Box 8005 • Cary, NC 27512-8005
tel [phone] • fax [phone]• www.townofcary.org
0
Gilleece & nssoc [phone] p.2
Hugh I. Gilleece, III & Associates, P.A. 875 Walnut Street, Suite 360
Consulting Engineers Cary, North Carolina 27511
[phone]
Fax [phone]
[e-mail]
June 13, 2005
Soil & Environmental Consultants
Attn: David Gainey
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Trinity Ridge Riparian Buffer Crossings
Dear Mr. Gainey:
Proposed zoning for this development will allow a maximum of 98 dwelling units. Assuming
that the parcels are developed at the maximum density of 98 dwelling units, we have calculated a
conservative preliminary percent impervious for the site of 28.7%.
Maximum Impervious Area per lot:
(house) + (deck) + (drive) + (walk) + (house walks) = (impervious area per lot)
2900 SF + 190 SF + 700 SF + 300 SF = 4090 SF/lot
Assume roadway is 27' back-to-back with 5' sidewalks each side.
37 feet of impervious area per linear foot of road.
Attribute 100 lineal feet of one half of road to each dwelling unit.
(1/2) X (37 feet) X (100 lineal feet) =1850 SF road impervious per dwelling unit.
Total impervious area is estimated at:
98 DU X (4090 SF + 1850 SF) = 582120 SF or 13.36 AC
Undcveloped Parcel Area:
13.29 AC + 10.59 AC + 22.65 AC = 46.53 AC
Percent Impervious:
(13.36 AC) / (46.53 AC) = 28.7%
Sincerely,
Jeffrey Zweber
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Trinity Ridge / S&EC# 9236.W1 (Wet) Date: December 23, 2004
Applicant/Owner: J. Gileece County: Wake
Investigator: DG State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Emergent
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: 2'W of flag 03A
If needed, explain on reverse.
VFrFTAT10N
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Ligustrum sinense Shrub FAC 9.
2. Nyssa sylvatica Sapling FAC 10.
3. Liquidambar styraciflua Sapling FAC+ 11.
4. Smilax rotundifolia Vine FAC 12.
5. Arundinaria gigantea Grass FACW 13.
6. Microstegium vimineum Grass FAC+ 14.
7. Athyrium felix-femina Herb FAC 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 100%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
X Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) X Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 12+ (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 12+ (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Project/Site: Trinity Ridge / S&EC# 9236.W1 (Wet) Plot ID: 2'W of flag 03A
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Poorl y drained
(Series and Phase): Worsham sandy loam Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic Typic Ochraquults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) ( Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-6 10yr 3/2 Sand clay
6-12+ 10yr 4/1 Sand clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
I
J1
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No X Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Trinity Ridge / S&EC# 9236.W1 (up) Date: December 23, 2004
Applicant/Owner: J. Gileece County: Wake
Investigator: DG State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Pine/ Hardwood
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: 40'N of flag 01
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Vitis rotundifolia Vine FAC 9.
2. Ligustrum sinense Shrub FAC 10.
3. Nyssa sylvatica Tree FAC 11.
4. Carpinus caroliniana Tree FAC 12.
5. Quercus alba Tree FACU 13.
6. Pinus taeda Tree FAC 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 83%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
_ Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: - (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: - (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: - (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Project/Site: Trinity Ridge / S&EC# 923601 (up) ( Plot ID: 40'
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Poorl y drained
(Series and Phase): Worsham sandy loam
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic Typic Ochraquults Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type?
Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (
Mottle Color Mottle
Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0-12+ 10 yr 3/4 Clay loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
IL--
11
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
IL- I
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone],
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Andrea Wade
6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd
Suite 120
Raleigh, N.C. 27615
July 7, 2005
S& EC Project # 9236.W 1
NC Division Of Water Quality
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
From: Aaron Cooper
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Trinity Ridge Subdivision 20061260
Cary, N.C.

2rr.--' F.M- 0af2 p
JUL 0 7 2005
WEB nD?ENR - WAVER QUAL11-Y
On behalf of the owners, Jerry Nowell and Joseph Levinson, please find attached aSb'n7Erz BRANCH
application and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NC-DWQ) that
the activities proposed below may precede utilizing Nationwide Permit 39. Please contact me at
[phone] if you have any questions or require additional information.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name Trinity Ridge Subdivision
Project Type Residential Subdivision
Owner / Applicant Jerry Nowell, Joseph Levinson
Count Wake
Nearest Town Ca
Waterbod Name UT to Richlands Creek
Basin / Sub-basin 03-04-02
Index Number 27-33-11
Class C, NSW
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0.0196
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.0075
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.0271
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 196
Attachments:
Pre-construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Agent Authorizations
Cary USGS Map
Wake County Soil Survey Map
Impact Maps
Crossing Profiles
Letter from Deputy Fire Marshall
Letter with Impervious Surface Calculations
Wetland Data Forms
$475 Water Certification Fee
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 20051250
(if any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), chec
dM?
II. Applicant Information
9 iul0 7 1. Owner/Applicant Information KE DENR w 2??5
Name: Jerry Nowell / Josenh Levinson TLA/V?sANn ADD oi,- -
"Tift 7_17-
Mailing Address: 900 E. Chatham St. / PO Box 117
ArFRSRaA,,
Cary, N.C. 27511 / Benson N.C. 27504
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Aaron Cooper
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh N.C. 27614
Telephone Number: 919-846-5900 Fax Number: 919-846-9467
E-mail Address: acooper ,sandec.com
Pagel of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Trinity Ridge
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): n/a
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0774572360. 0774881893.0774651911
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Cary
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):_ Trinity Ridge Subdivision
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): The site is located at the
eastern end of Brandywine Drive approximately 1000 feet east of its intersection with Trinity
Road (SR 1655), and is immediately west of I-40 in Cary N.C.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.8049661 ON 78.7421198 °W
6. Property size (acres): +/- 50 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Richlands Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is currently wooded and undeveloped The general
land use surrounding the property is residential I-40 is immediately west of the property.
Page 2 of 9
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
proposed project consists of the construction of a residential subdivision utilizing typical
utilities (i.e. sewer, water). Typical construction and grading equipment would be utilized for
this project.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed project is to
develop a residential subdivision to meet the demand for such projects in this area
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. _ _ S&EC performed a detailed wetland and Neuse River buffer
evaluation on the site No other permits have been issued or requested for this project in the past
Data forms accompany this application for verification of the wetlands on site
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
The installation of a sanitary sewer line is anticipated for the future of this project This
installation is expected to include a temporary perpendicular stream crossing The exact
alignment has not been determined at this time Once the proposed placement of the alignment is
finalized a NWP 12 will be requested for the proposed impact
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:Three permanent impacts are
proposed that will result from the installation of a road connecting all portions of the
M,
Page 3 of 9
proposed subdivision. Impact 1 equals 95 linear feet (662 sq ft) of a perennial channel
Impact 2 (same location as impact 1) equals 327 sq ft (0.008 acre) of wetland Impact 3
equals 101 linear (202 sq. ft.) feet of an intermittent channel Buffer impacts resulting from
Impact 1 equal 5257 sq. ft. of zone 1 and 3177 sq ft of zone 2 Buffer impacts resulting from
Impact 3 equal 5740 sq. ft of zone 1 and 3531 sq ft of zone 2 Total cumulative impacts equal
196 linear feet of channel, 327 sq. ft. (0.0075 acres) of wetland 10,997 sq. ft.(0 25 acres) of
zone 1 buffers and 6708 sq. ft. (0.15) of zone 2 buffers
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
s aratel list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
es/no linear feet
2 Permanent/ fill linear no +1-5 0.0075
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.0075
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: +/-0.25
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiDly length X width- then divide by 43 560
Stream Impact Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact Perennial or Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Intermittent? Before Impact linear feet acres
I UT to Richlands Permanent

Creek
Culvert/ Fill Perennial 7> 95 0.015
3 UT to Richlands Permanent

Creek
Culvert/ Fill Intermittent 2' 101 0.0046
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 196 0.0196
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage. bulkheads. etc-
Open Water Impact Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
indicate on ma ocean, etc. (acres)
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Total Open Water Impact (acres) n/a
Page 4 of 9
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the I1.S_ resultinu from the nrnieet-
Stream Im act (acres): 0.0196
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.0075
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.0271
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 196
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): n/a
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): n/a
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: n/a
Size of watershed draining to pond: n/a Expected pond surface area: n/a
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The placement of the road was chosen due to an existing fixed road stub at the northern
property boundary. Impact 3 is unavoidable not only for interconnectivity to the entire site but
also to maintain a reasonable easement to the adjacent property owners This section of the
channel was also chosen to maintain a perpendicular crossing The road crossing placement is
also recommended by the Deputy Fire Marshall to improve access for emergency response see
attached letter).
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
Page 5 of 9
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stn-ngide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No mitigation is requested as the impacts are below the thresholds for stream and wetland
impacts for DWQ and the road is necessary to access all portions of the site and dictated by
the Fire Marshall. If mitigation is required payment to the NC-EEP at a 1.1 ratio is proposed
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0 (95 if required)
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0 (0.0075 if required)
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Page 6 of 9
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213.0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 0213.0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ?
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact 1
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 5,257 3 (2 for Catawba) n/a
2 3,177 1.5 n/a
Total 8,434 n/a
Zone* Impact 2
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 5,740 3 (2 for Catawba) n/a
2 3,531 1.5 n/a
Total 9,271 n/a
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 7 of 9
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. Mitigation should not be required because
each crossing is below the thresholds for buffer mitigation and is considered "Allowable" by
current regulations.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. As this subdivision is still in the preliminary
planning phase due to rezoning a conservative impervious percentage has been calculated at
28.7% considering the maximum allowable number of lots (see attached letter)
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
A sanitary sewer system will be utilized for the proposed subdivision
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No ?
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: We
have reviewed the "DRAFT Internal Policy Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality
Certification and Isolated Wetland Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water
Quality on October 3, 2002, version 1.6 The draft states that most residential subdivisions are
unlikely to cause cumulative impacts. Trinity Ridge does not meet any of the three criteria of
private projects that can clearly result in cumulative impact The project is not relatively large for
a residential development in eastern Wake County, the project will involve no commercial
development, and the project would be surrounded by either existing residential development or
Page 8 of 9
Interstate 40. Some of the current regulations protecting water quality associated with this projqct
include the 401. 404, and C NSW We anticipate that you will advise us if a qualitative or
quantitative impact analysis is required
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
-7-Off.
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Kum Rkige Roid • RiIcigk NYo"h Cwwim 27614 • Fkmc: (919) R40-5900 - Frc: (9154 84&9467
' www.SandE,C,tw?a
VGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
phone:
Project Name/ Deschp ban: Date:`
The Department of the ,A Any
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
W ua>ingtort NC 28402
Attn: An,d??. c?_ ??
Meld Office:
Re: Wetlands Related Consaltiing and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
1, the current 21 ,er_. xt owner, hereby designate and authorize Sou & FnvitOnmental Co"sulb nts, PA to
act in n-ty behalf as my agent in The processing of permit applications, to fulRtish upon request
da f
supplemental informatioln in $Upport of applications, etc. from this day forward. The -42- y o
This notification supersedes any f mrdous correspondence mwerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE This p.uthoOzation, for Wability and profess(ions) rcmrtegy reasons, is vapid Cody for
govemment of 6dab to eaW the prpperty when ac Mpatlied by S&EC staff. You should call C
to amauge a site meeting prior to vWtimb the site. A 4
. 11 F,R ., WHE ___f le
print property opmm er's blame
cr. Mc, Cyndi Keroly cc Mr. Aaron Cooper
NCDENR -- DWQ Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
2321 Crabtree 801xlevard
RalcteiK NC 77604
S?L?filatiRA1 t)Mea:
q 1Qt Q?? 3Rl'1•>+Lu-un&IR DOW
136 trcPhyllp Couft, Suda C Gt2?t?sbvro.KC 2M5
Cencotd. Ne !sm.'s Phone (336) Sao BZa4
p.. rtoR? sgh.A??4
1'hbn<; god.) 120-0405
ay.. rmei'77n 600
Addres;s: `AGO C ?: ?. Sfi
__._... ..? ....` g 9 40z zq3 R 0i
Gilleeae 6 Assoc (919146a-7637 P•2
06/10/2003 10:00 PAX a002/601
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA,
11010 RAm RMV RAd RaWA flood! L k"m 29614 - MOM (91P W4#W • RW (919) 0169167
*W 6- >dCPM
AGENT AUTHORMATION FORM
-- AU a'O Be EAW In t The Current Mndoww
Nam. Q.?c 0 C e,(/r
Addms. PC 13 c/ x 11
0 eAs0111 L 2 7SO
Prajece New/Dturi}+tEan: ? ?n__? ?c?g? '
Pate: ?. ??ICJS
The Deputmerre of t* A"
U.S. Army Cups Of En6tneett, Wil MMBtnn Drsedce
A,O, bast 1990
Wilndngton, NC 29M
Attu: n c c e-
FwdOffke: +'
RC Wedm6 Related Canning and Pemuttins
To Who= It May Comm
!, the cttrrertt PtAMM owner, herby dagwte ind authortte Soli do Envlromwtol Conmifwa% PA to
stet in MY bd+alf as mr Writ in the ptocmml of pffW appheadom to htrrdah upon trgnest
`upplement4l WO r AUM to "+ott of appllcatioms, e'tC. Gam this day forward- Tice jday of
7U nodticmdon Mpeesedea my previous correspondence colu+rr kC the agent for d* project
A onm T#* OWMAU0014 for IIA" tp 4" Reoleselond c~1WW ? renva, M rand 0* fa
fgorenrMWM no AL to gofer tht, v P=Mty VO Zaceeetpatded by S&EC OWL Xoo **IW can S&EC
tf
Print Propexty Owne s Nwt*
cc: M& Cyndl Karoly
NCDV* - DWO
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
itMWO. NC 27604
236 Lip Cbm, Sum c
c4bew. tic at0l.S
MOW (M) 7]O-"w
.%_, r %M 7".pM[
Properly Owtaera S?at„re - . ,?
m W. Aarert Copper ?+-
96A do Environa14t w Co ts' PA
Orembon?, NC 2741f
M,n?+aha+Ro

l\ \

.?45 a J ?? : ? ?
L ? 1
p

? ?/?r?
\
f
? \'' a %' '• 1'? - - -
'
?
/?

X '77
r
Mot
PIT

"
N d

• ?\ t" r
I
! 655 t

?
i ..?M \ • A . , •

;r

Project No. Figure 1 - USGS Map

S
il & E
i
l C
l
PA
- o
nv
ronmenta
onsu
tants,
Project Mgr.: Trinty Rd. Site 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
TP Wake County
NC [phone] - [phone]
, Web Page: www.SandEC.com
Scale:
1" = 2,000'
12/16/04 Raleigh W. & Cary Quadrangle
Dated 1993
�-rat . . !i �>.. A y - r�
F. 4 a " n _Key
- �' `' 4 �L `y {�j i-:� ,'� ! n'- !° / ! �. _ i >+c jl t •t �. 3 r ° � .y J, Y .�+r�5 F F t � a
__,s �°� �:yu �, �C }4.f `4 ktls'� ;t � ��.. y. _i i �-•. � � S:�_�i�. i �� ��� _f � vq..i� A�a`e . >���Pi,�..
r. fit) . r 4 a S,► F� ► • 9� �'i 4 _ - ! ^ = 4 ! ' [` . P ' ,
f d4'. f ��« F►l+y O'tL 4�r
�
z. -c .:t t / 4 _.t, 4�:a� 4?♦. ^x �`� �'- F Fls yy �?.k�a v �w'
t� �.'. d {Is},:l t �� r C i e � jL` .j ��r.r _.fes �.. LI t r Wxrk .. '.' ," �j $ f1 !4 6• F € `:�lk \;.
y( F �. � Q a •� �..: � ( F L;' _ $i tf/^� '_ -4.•� � y�\i- r.+ �..-Yr a.3 {`�� ��-�, yL _.� e F '"a �•�e�. ..� 1 :P �� � 3� {�,
$ CIA, ( /4 •� `v:� �0 �y`ie. wt`s %.-�„ti i*- �.;;,r �rf 'z.` �. i KA
` .!� ice- -.'.�. - K C E .. ! p -> ,'F' il � _ (R' � 1r. . ► { � _ '� LF -'- 'f
Y,`�a
4 �'J�'`�i : •�� f f _rot.,,, �.�or h, € tom'^ f � � �, ii �f ��` '`� p�P > � r� t.�i� - yc:
_ �� �° '`!E nlr.f . ri:c>:' - - a' j '� p e ,s�e'Y`t / eoa. �q� � y a -_-p � � •� �s � �'
�..` s ! / 8 slle ��� - !e• �.� �' - �" /-
� e )
4.
+i `d t�►.' �'�• <• / .'-40
�.^ l.✓ f T ►+► al i l ` S4Y �' r t �' �`_° is e Ga -- ��
t � �..y�.�`'f a� !.. .:� F 4 •. F E /� }ii S� .�_ .y.R � r ,C `,� �` 1 f. F � ,� l a gr u
.� •- P ( ._ --� .�.. ! t
• r ! Y s 2 i� �R 6 .. �� �. C
VON -Tat
It
Allis
TWA

ARRON A. HATHCOCK
o ?
HALEY FAMILY, L.L.C. / ? I

Z DIANE STONE BALLARD
f /
f
HELEN S. JONES HEIRS
BY WILL e?
•?a
o / /
/
g
p?QP a

DOUGLAS WAYNE JONES
T
y/ BY WILL
? T
V 1
(n
?e
a

1 M
0Z 1
rr
r?
1 F-11
D T f -
(n n

<
09

D n>r
( ? O
J
N, JmF11
0
I r7 7Z -
w

Z
00

00 ^,
?J &

v

0 '^ n 4 x
?
VJ
' ?
N
x V a
w O
x ?,
ID
,
nn11
In P
0 F+
V
rn
d
P, 0
71
i ?
?D
'r
r
r
D
Z
I?
TRACT 1
13.292 ACRES
CHARLES DAVID RAPER, JR.
4//
THOMAS L. HOOPER /
ROGER LEE CHENOWETH
TRACT 2
10.594 ACRES
ARV/ND LAVANI \

HARVEY A. STONE
B/QgNO
/ ? I ( \. R/PAIL4, BUFFER CONT/NUES
Yso
NF
?J ;o I
? I
\ g. ?
D
PATRICIA F. GASTON
\
HARRY E. OR

BRIAN D/LLEY
\
THOMAS J. MCt
FRANKIE YAR80ROUGH GOUGE
J. MARK HOLLOWELL
LISA C. DYER
D'W
?so, Lq
L
WILLIAM GLEN EDWARDS
PAUL LAMBERT
JAMES EUGENE RICE, JR.
JAMES EUGENE RICE, ?R.
BLANCHE'
(60' "/
MS HOLDING COMPANY, LLC
y L
P { x
r^ A
H cu 2 C

n
N

? CIO

s ?
N >c ?
n
> U ,? T? j © )))

g
o
y
o
> ? m
D
?
>?? ?

y CZ)

o

I, 0

is
z
js
oil
TRACT 3
22.652 ACRES

Q=
m
C A A(7;
f+l ? ? SS? D
Co CO
n A al
O 2
2
N m
tb
?C
OD
V/ J
,
V! ,
\Y
mC ,?
W
C)
w
?0
z
00
00
rn ?
rn
o?
-n co
w0
X
?0_
O
I
J
W
v CO
rn
2L
d
z
m
W W U O1
io
U
A
? N
v
2
I l?n v O Z
W O U
0
z
00 ? ? D
vmo?>
b
52

/

/"

/
U) 0
z

Z
-71

?
n
Y
R
A

?" c n
?
C
h7

?m
J W I
Z z
Fl' .1 mom ?
m -<
ti n
?I
o r d
G
Cf)
^ym°
V) Z
i
-AD R;
m%
=Ar-
Y_
r
L
C
r
j
?-n

I
/
I y I
7'
x,
I ? . of
N
N
6
/ I I
9
- ? ?9.sor r i /
00+22:
60+'
00+q+ - \
"Oll
I
, I
n
/? I I I / I I ' I
/ I
0p x
x4
LEVINSON CROSSING (NORTH)
PROFILE
410.00
406.00
CHANNEL
"- 402.00
f
0
C
w 398.00
394.00
Z88 LF OF 42""
RCP w/ FES EA. END
S = 1.707? -
INV 1N^ 398.00
IN V OUT= 396.50
390.00,
0.00
20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00
Distance - ft
8°1AEAM CROMM PROF LE
FM
'IF*frY REME
dos R im-25 SMIr
Hugh J_ Clll®ebC?r and A®aoclat?o QAM a
676 Walmd Btre 8u" MO 0*rV NC Phw- dM)4GW-VM Fam QA)4aG-'AW 1 QVRWN BY - DAIS
T SCALE: 1"+?4' -HRZ SCA
NOWELL CROSSING (SOUTH)
PROFILE
440.00
436.00
4-
I
c
0
a
428.00
EX. CHANNEL
8
0-j I
6 LF "OF' 3
" RCP
ENV 9E.A. END
428.00 190
INV ' 2X50
424.00
420.00 L-
0.00
20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00
Distance - ft
S1F?EAM CROSSING PROFILE
FOR
TFANM R0M
" 1988.25 slaEC
Hugh J. C`ti?1?e?c? aric1 As??caci?tgs - Dr. -JK4 ul%=
670 wmhvA DW04A "o 000 CwY, No moor (*=)4eQ-rAn Faw (ofoN4 7037 DWN BN, ? DAIF- -
????VRT SCALE: 1"-,V H _ Z 5CA
Jun 14 05 11:40a Gilleece & Assoc
[phone] p.2
FIRE DEPARTMENT
June 14, 2005
Jeff Zweber
Hugh J. Gilleece, III & Associates, P.A.
875 Walnut St. Suite 360
Cary, N.C. 27511
Dear Jeff,
In an effort to achieve connectivity and improve access for
emergency response, I hereby recommend providing access to the
Trinity Ridge subdivision from the south via the Trinity Woods
subdivision and from the north via Trinity Road.
Sincerely,
Keen n Hawley, Dep ty Fire Marshal
TOWN Of CARY _
100 North Academy St - Cary, NC 21511 • PO Box 8005 • Cary, NC 27512-8005 tel [phone] • fax [phone]• www.townofcary.org
r. u.
Gilleece & nssoc [phone] p.2
Hugh I Gilleece, III & Associates, P.A. 875 Walnut Street, Suite 360
Consulting Engineers Cary, North Carolina 27511
[phone]
Fax [phone]
[e-mail]
June 13, 2005
Soil & Environmental Consultants
Attn: David Gainey
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Trinity Ridge Riparian Buffer Crossings
Dear Mr. Gainey:
Proposed zoning for this development will allow a maximum of 98 dwelling units. Assuming
that the parcels are developed at the maximum density of 98 dwelling units, we have calculated a
conservative preliminary percent impervious for the site of 28.7%.
Maximum Impervious Area per lot:
(house) + (deck) + (drive) + (walk) + (house walks) = (impervious area per lot)
2900 SF + 190 SF + 700 SF + 300 SF = 4090 SF/lot
Assume roadway is 27' back-to-back with 5' sidewalks each side.
37 feet of impervious area per linear foot of road.
Attribute 100 lineal feet of one half of road to each dwelling unit.
(1 /2) X (37 feet) X (100 lineal feet) = 1850 SF road impervious per dwelling unit.
Total impervious area is estimated at:
98 DU X (4090 SF + 1850 SF) = 582120 SF or 13.36 AC
Undeveloped Parcel Area:
13.29 AC + 10.59 AC + 22.65 AC = 46.53 AC
Percent Impervious:
(13.36 AC) / (46.53 AC) = 28.7%
Sincerely,
Jeffrey Zweber
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Trinity Ridge / S&EC# 9236.W1 (Wet) Date: December 23, 2004
Applicant/Owner: J. Gileece County: Wake
Investigator: DG State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Emergent
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: 2'W of flag 03A
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Ligustrum sinense Shrub FAC 9.
2. Nyssa sylvatica Sapling FAC 10.
3. Liquidambar styraciflua Sapling FAC+ 11.
4. Smilax rotundifolia Vine FAC 12.
5. Arundinaria gigantea Grass FACW 13.
6. Microstegium vimineum Grass FAC+ 14.
7. Athyrium felix-femina Herb FAC 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 100%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
_ Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
X Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) X Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 12+ (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 12+ (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Project/Site: Trinity Ridge / S&EC# 9236.W1 (Wet) Plot ID: 2'W of flag 03A
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Poorly drained
(Series and Phase): Worsham sandy loam Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic Typic Ochraquults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) ( Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-6 10yr 3/2 Sand clay
6-12+ 10yr 4/1 Sand clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
L-
11
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No X Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No
Remarks:
L- I
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Trinity Ridge / S&EC# 9236.W1 (up) Date: December 23, 2004
Applicant/Owner: J. Gileece County: Wake
Investigator: DG State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Pine/ Hardwood
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: 40' N of flag 01
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Vitis rotundifolia Vine FAC 9.
2. Ligustrum sinense Shrub FAC 10.
3. Nyssa sylvatica Tree FAC 11.
4. Carpinus caroliniana Tree FAC 12.
5. Quercus albs Tree FACU 13.
6. Pinus taeda Tree FAC 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 83%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: - (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: - (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: - (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Project/Site: Trinity Ridge / S&EC# 9236.W l (up) Plot ID: 40' N of flag 01
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Poorly drained
(Series and Phase): Worsham sandy loam Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic Typic Ochraquults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) ( Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-12+ 10 yr 3/4 Clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
L-
11
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
IL- .1
Plan Detail Incomplete
? Please provide a location map for the project.
?
0 Please show all stream impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, on the site plan.
??`' Please show all wetland impacts including fill slopes.on the site plan.
Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan.
Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan.
Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overlays on the site plan.
Please locate all isolated or non-isolated wetlands, streams and other waters of the State as overlays on the site plan.
? Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage.
? Please locate any planned sewer lines on the site plan.
! _
Please provide the location of any proposed stormwater.management practices as required by GC Z Z
Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required by GC
?
? Please specify the percent of project imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out conditions.
Please indicate all stormwater outfalls on the site plan.
Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan.
? Please indicate whether or not the proposed impacts already been conducted.
Avoidance and/or Minimization Not Provided
? The labeled as on the plans does not appear to be necessary. Please eliminate the or provide adatiotral
information as to why it is necessary for this project.
This Office believes labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the
'eves that the
Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts.

? ed to minimize the impacts to the

that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigur
This Office believes
Please revise the plans to minimize the impacts.

? Thd stormwater discharges at the location on the plans labeled will not provide diffuse flow through the buffer because
rovide calculations to show that diffuse flow will be achieved through the entire buffer. If it
lans and
th
i
p
e p
se
Please rev
ve diffuse flow through the entire buffer then it may be necessary to provide stormwater management
'ble t o achieve possible
is not ossr
practices that remove nutrients before the stormwater can be discharged through the buffer.
Other
? The application fee was insufficient because over 150 feet of stream and/or over 1 acre of wetland impacts were requested. Please
j
provide $ . This additional fee must be received before your application can be reviewed.
? Please complete Section(s) on the application.
? Please provide a signed copy of the application.
vide copies of the application, copies of the site plans and other supporting information.
Pl
ease pro
I

tion
Mitt
g
? of compensatory mitigation is required for this project. Please provide a compensatory mitigation plan. The
0500 and must be appropriate to the type of impacts proposed.
15 A NCAC 211
i
.
n
plan must conform to the requirements
Please indicate which 404 Permit the USACE would use to authorize this project.
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
NC Division of Water Quality
Tran # Invoice Type Date Reference
7344 0627051 Invoice 06/27/05 9236.W1
017656
Check Number: 17656
Date: 06/27/05 Check Ant: $475.00
Balance Discount Pay Amount
$475.00 $0.00 $475.00