Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20011542 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20051214Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director Division of Water Quality January 4, 2006 DWQ Project # 01-1542 Ver. 2 Buncombe County Robin Orr 121 Hominy Baptist Church Drive Candler, NC 28715 Subject Property: Big Cove Estates Subdivision, Phase 2 Big Cove Road, Buncombe County Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions Dear Ms. Orr: You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill within or otherwise impact 0.003 acres of wetlands for the purpose of property development at the subject property, as described within your application received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on December 14, 2005. After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3404 (GC3404). The Certification (s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 14 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, Non-discharge, stormwater, and buffer regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit. This approval is for the filling activities described in your application. If you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below. The Additional Conditions of the Certification are: 401 Wetlands Certification Unit 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Phone: 919-733-1786 / FAX 919-733-6893 / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands Ne o Carolina Atura!!y An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper Robin Orr Page 2 0 6 January 4, 2006 1. Impacts Approved The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other spec and general conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are m No other impacts are approved including incidental impacts: Amount Approved Units Plan Location or Reference Wetland 0.003 (feet) Roadway fill 2. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with specifications governing the proper design, installation and operation a maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to protect surfa waters standards: a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must t designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the mo recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Plannir and Design Manual. b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment an erosion control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, th requirements specified in the most recent version of the North Carotin Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained c all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, includin contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project. c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must b designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the mo; recent version of the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual. d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with th reclamation in accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentatio Pollution Control Act. 3. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or ripar areas beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construci Notification. All construction activities, including the design, installation, operati and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management Practic shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statut or rules occur. Robin Orr Page 3 of 6 January 4, 2006 4. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land Resources has released the project. 5. Certificate of Completion Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650. 6. Diffuse Flow All constructed stormwater conveyance outlets shall be directed and maintained as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the protected stream buffers such that it will not re-concentrate before discharging into a stream. If this is not possible, it may be necessary to provide stormwater facilities that are considered to remove nitrogen. This may require additional approval from this Office. 7. Protective Fencing The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within these boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange warning fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to infringe within the buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities. 8. Turbidity Standard The turbidity standard of 50 NTUs (Nephelometric Turbidity Units) shall not be exceeded as described in 15 A NCAC 2B. .0200. Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices must be used to meet this standard. Continuous monitoring by onsite, calibrated, continuous recording, equipment must be performed both upstream and downstream of any instream work. The results of this monitoring must be submitted along with the below required stability monitoring. Additionally, should the results indicate a violation of the turbidity standard, all work shall cease until such a point the measures are implemented to protect surface waters form further violations. Robin( Orr Page 4 of 6 January 4, 006 9. No Sediment and Erosion Control Measures in Wetlands Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion con,rol devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and he natural grade restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land Resources or locally delegated program has released the project. 10. Construction Stormwater Permit NCG010000 Upon the approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan issued by the Division of Land Resources (DLR) or a DLR delegated local erosion amd sedimentation control program, an NPDES General stormwater pXit (NCG010000) administered by DWQ is automatically issued to the project. Tfis General Permit allows stormwater to be discharged during land disturbi g construction activities as stipulated by conditions in the permit. If your project icovered by this permit [applicable to construction projects that disturb one (1) r more acres], full compliance with permit conditions including the sedimentati n control plan, self-monitoring, record keeping and reporting requirements at e required. A copy of this permit and monitoring report forms may be found t http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/Forms Documents.htm. 11. Deed Restrictions Deed restrictions shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands, wate and protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water a buffer impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting a wetlands, waters and/or buffers approved for impact under this Certificati Approval and Authorization Certificate. 12. Temporary Fills All temporary fill and culverts shall be removed and the impacted area returne' to the original grade, including each stream's original cross sectional dimensions planform pattern, and longitudinal bed and bed profile after construction i? complete or within 6 months of the establishment of the crossing, which ever i? sooner, and the various sites shall be stabilized with natural woody vegetation (except for the maintenance areas of permanent utility crossings) and restored tc prevent erosion. If the crossings are not completely removed and restored as described above within the specified time above, additional written approval from this Office must be obtained to modify this condition. Robin Orr Page 5 of 6 January 4, 2006 13. Riparian Zone Replanting Replanting of vegetation within disturbed areas located within 25 feet of the streambank associated with any land disturbing activity, repair, replacement and/or maintenance must be done in a manner consistant with the Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration immediately following construction. (Please see attached.) 14. If concrete is used during construction (e.g., headwalls), a dry work area must be maintained to prevent direct contact between curing concrete and stream water. Water that inadvertently contacts live concrete should not be discharged to surface waters due to the potential for water chemistry change and a fish kill. 15. Rock, sand, or other materials should not be dredged from the stream channels except in the immediate vicinity of the crossings. Instream dredging has severe effects on aquatic life and disturbance of the natural form of the channel can cause downstream erosion problems. The natural dimension, pattern, and profile of the channels adjacent to the crossings should not be modified by widening or changing their depths. 16. Sandbags, flexible pipe, or other diversion structures should be used to avoid excavation in flowing water. Materials used for flow diversions should be removed from the stream bed after completing the construction work. Any diversion channels must be lined with fabric and/or rock. 17. Storm water from roads should be directed to vegetated buffer areas (e.g. level spreaders) or retention basins and not routed directly to streams. Drop inlets on streams are not allowed. 18. Riparian vegetation, especially trees and shrubs, should be preserved as much as possible. Native woody vegetation (e.g., rhododendron, dog hobble, silky dogwood, sycamore, river birch, red maple) should be reestablished upstream and downstream of the stream crossings if it is removed during construction to provide bank stability and shading. We encourage the use of native plants that must be removed from permanently disturbed areas. 19.All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters should be inspected and maintained regularly to prevent contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids or other toxic materials. 20. Discharging hydroseed mixtures and washing out hydroseeders and other equipment in or adjacent to surface waters is prohibited. 21.The remaining lengths of streams and riparian areas on the tract should be protected in either their existing or improved state (i.e. with native vegetation re- established where absent) in perpetuity from fill, vegetation removal, and other forms of disturbance with deed restrictions or similar instrument. A riparian buffer width of 25 feet is minimally consistent with the stream stability guidelines, but wider buffers are recommended to provide more water quality and habitat functions. Robin }Jrr Page 6 of 6 January 4, 2006 22.All jurisdictional waters on the site shall be inspected weekly for stability (includiig both hydrology and plant survivorability) and a monthly report submitted tot e Asheville Regional Office within 15 days of the end of each month. Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted 'in your application a;d as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit. If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. Y u must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearin , send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina Gene al Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleig?, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless y u ask for a hearing. This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly in t. Central Office in Raleigh at 919-733-9721 or Kevin Barnett in the DWQ Ashevi Regional Office at either Kevin. Barnett@ncmail.net or at 828-296-4657. Sincerely, Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director Division of Water Quality AWK1khb p (? Enclosures: GC 3402 D Certificate of Completion JAN 1 a 2006 DEtv& cc: USACE Asheville Regulatory Field Office "'WLsANDSTTQE%RiwQ?1n' DWQ 401 Central Office 8MAN DLR Asheville Regional Office David McHenry, NC Wildlife Resources Commission File Copy Central Files Filename: 01-1542. BigCoveEstates. Phase2.a Triage Check List Date: 12/19/05 Project Name: Big Cove Estates, Phase II DWQ #:01-1542, Ver. 2 County: Buncombe Kevin Barnett, Asheville Regional Office To: 60-day Processing Time: 12/14/05 to 2/12/06 From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone: (919) 733-9721 The file attached is being forwarded to you for your evaluation. Please call if you need assistance. ? Stream length impacted ? Stream determination Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps ? Minimization/avoidance issues ? Buffer Rules (Neuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman) ? Pond fill Mitigation Ratios ? Ditching ? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable? ? Check drawings for accuracy ? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings? ? Cumulative impact concern Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes, please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold, please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know. Thanks! Xex2? 01--1S42 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 1456 Patton Avenue, Suite C Asheville, North Carolina 28806 828-254-0811 / Facsimile 828-254-0812 www.environmentalservicesine.com MEMORANDUM DL-L I 7005 TO: Cyndi Karoly, DWQ .A E)s - rS" KIWAi r ?, ycr FROM: Jan Gay DATE: 13 December 2005 RE: Big Cove Estates, Phase II, NWP 14 Attached are seven (7) copies of the Nationwide Permit #14 for a linear transportation project for the proposed Big Cove Estates, Phase II project located near Candler, Buncombe County, North Carolina. Included is check number 103355 in the amount of $200.00. A copy has been submitted to Ms. Rebekah Newton (COE Asheville). A courtesy copy has been provided to Mr. Kevin Barnett (DWQ Asheville) and one (1) copy is being provided to Dave McHenry (WRC) for review. If you have any questions or comments, or need any additional information, please let me know. Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application FormOffice Use Only: Form Version March 05 USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. Vey 3u 5 4 2 (If any particular item is not applicable to ttus project, pease enter ivot Appucaoic Ur NiA -) 1. Processing 1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: ® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules ? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ ® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification 2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP k ?- 3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification is not required, check here: ? 4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII, and check here: ? 5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page 4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further det r::21 ? a. II. Applicant Information DEC 1 4 2005 1. Owner/Applicant Information -'NAI It 0, 'AL: I Y WE HANDS A, 0 S i JRM9«t1Ek RRnN6i, Name: Robin Orr Mailing Address: 121 Hominy Baptist Church Drive Candler NC 28715 Telephone Number: 828-321-8040 Fax Number: E-mail Address: 2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.) Name: Company Affiliation: Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Fax Number: E-mail Address: n-.... , ,.r 0 III. Project Information Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings, impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion, so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than I1 by 17-inch format; however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided. 1. Name of project: Big Cove Estates Phase II 2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): 3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 8868.04-62-2934 4. Location County: Buncombe Nearest Town: Candler Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): 5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.) Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.5610°N, 82.7476°W 6. Property size (acres): 7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Unnamed Tributary to Webb Branch 8. River Basin: French Broad River (Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/neaps/.) 9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: See Attachment A 10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project will require the use of hand tools and heavy equipment, including front end loaders and backhoes with hydraulic thumbs. All equipment will be maintained to ensure no hydraulic fluid will enter the stream channels. 11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Proposed fill would allow for road access for development of the proposed Big Cove Estates sub-division, Phase II. T...... 11 -10 0 IV. Prior Project History If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits, certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project, list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with construction schedules. Action ID No. 200230076, NWP 14 authorizing impacts of up to 146 linear feet of UT to Webb Branch was issued on 28 December 2001. Under this permit, approximately 60 linear feet of channel was impacted (culvert). The permit expired and was not renewed. V. Future Project Plans Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application. At this time, no additional permits are anticipated. VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts, permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet. 1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The proposed project would includes fill material for a proposed roadway to be placed within approximately 130 square feet of jurisdictional wetland area. 2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and floodine. Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Floodplain Nearest Stream Impact (acres) (indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) es/no linear feet 1 fill herbaceous N 30 0.0027 2 fill herbaceous Y 2 0.0003 Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.003 3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 2.0 acres n...... 1) ..co 4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560. Stream Impact tream Perennial Average Stream Width Impact Area of Number Name Type of Impact or Before Length Impact (indicate on Intermittent Impact (linear feet) (acres) ma N/A Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 0 0 5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc. Open Water Impact Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) (acres) Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0 6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project: Stream Impact (acres): 0 Wetland Impact (acres): 0.003 Open Water Impact (acres): 0 Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.003 Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0 7. Isolated Waters Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE. 8. Pond Creation If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application. Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond, local stormwater requirement, etc.): Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area: VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization) Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The original permit allowed for impacts of up to 146 linear feet of stream channel of which 60 linear feet were impacted. Reconsideration of the proposed road system and stream crossings eliminated the proposed culverts in favor of bridges avoiding approximately 80 linear feet of stream impact. The adjustments will require the unavoidable impact to approximately 130 square feet of jurisdictional wetland area. VIII. Mitigation DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial streams. USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include, but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar functions and values, preferable in the same watershed. If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at http://112o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strnigide.htm1. 1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet) of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view, preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach a separate sheet if more space is needed. No mitigation is proposed for this project n.. _„ c -'r o 2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at (919) 715-0476 to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information: Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ) 1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ? 2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA coordinator at (919) 733-5083 to review current thresholds for environmental documentation. Yes ? No 3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ? X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ) It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the applicant's discretion. 1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233 (Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify V Yes ? No „--- c -I PO 2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer multipliers. Zone* Impact (square feet Multiplier Required Mitigation 1 3 (2 for Catawba) 2 1.5 Total * Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1. 3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ) Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations demonstrating total proposed impervious level. The total amount of impervious surface for this sub-division has not vet been determined However, the total impervious surface is not erected exceed 20% of the total land surface. XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ) Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. Waste water creation is not expected as a direct result of the proposed impacts However, the secondary impact sub-division creation) will create the need for disposal of domestic waste water. Each lot within the sub-division will require a spparate septic system. Each system will be the responsibility of the individual landowner in terms of permitting building and maintaining XIII. Violations (required by DWQ) Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules? Yes ? No Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ) Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No n...,7 -r o If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: All future development within the Big Cove Estates Phase II will be constructed in a manner which will not affect downstream water quality. Appropriate stormwater measures will be utilized to ensure no affect to the resources. XV. Other Circumstances (Optional): It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control). 1?11?( j o S Applicant/Agent's Signature-, Date (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) Page 8 of 8 ?? ? \ .` _ J?(I rte. )- \ ? 1ri -1 ?,\i?;, `v) ., '\? I. ?VJ(•.?/') , o?--?`; ?j?I?rf 41 /? fs ?????''?_.,?f f ?: ? ?: ?••,, ? .? rJ. ?; -+J Ir _-';?/ It,4??_ ??y}`i' ? ) f\r~"^ ?lJ /? ' ? •`•..A'\6 ? I J((?/\II ;I ?/l.J(l ?-"/?-?' ? ?1 `? ,y' `_ ???? ? ? X11 ? ?1? 1 ??(\ , . -111` ? /? `\ / "(t ;1 III/? ".i'•II?'• ?! r .E ? i r.,. ?t 1 l '? Nil J ?1?) \\ - ice" r I I( l '\ '?? ?• ? ' ? •'?^`? '?I I? jib' 1 !1!::'?''._-? ? ?? a3°o ;? "`.? ? .1.?`'i.? ' ,? /? Y -`' 1 (? _ Ui ? I\ ; 1;?\"/ ?\ ? /`,rx?`%)/?lll lr! ?,c.?-? ? ?'?,.. , - =''?' • \'1 I ? r •.`?ze? ? t?I IT- )lY f 11 1,- 41 00 ???\? carry :? '7? ?. •?_ vi?? (?l -??,....-•:? ? N \? `'-- ?_? r?-?- /-\? ``C? ? mil;' (`??1 •t / /?? /?/"?.._J ?/' ? i? l dM \'1 ? / • .4 • ? ? V ` ?---??` rv?I ?O'LFi'@f?? /'-? `•?/ . '?;? l G'. .ice`" -??') m , ? , ,?'??, ?/ ,yj. ENKA, NC 35082-E6-TF-024 1961 PHOTOREVISED 1990 DMA 4455 II SW SERIES V842 LOCATION MAP Mattern & Craig CONSULTING ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS BIG COVE ESTATES PHASE II 12 BROAD STREET ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA UPPER HOMINY TOWNSHIP Amo N SCALE: N/A COMM# 2470 FAX (828) 25254-2201 4-4562 BUNCOMBE CO. NC 27'\. .19± ACRES? ? ?... ??.? (0.70 Ac. req?.) ?. PROPOSEt? FILL LINE W1 117 S.F. ? ES - `? d.) ? 42 13 S. F. ? PROP BRIDGE i LEGEND STREAM CHANNEL -WB- WETLANDS BOUNDARY PROPOSED FILL IN WETLANDS SCALE: 1 "=50' i i j 0 Z f7 86 WETLANDS DELINEATION BIG COVE ESTATES PHASE II UPPER HOMINY TOWNSHIP BUNCOMBE CO. NC COMM# 2470 Mattern & Craig CONSULTING ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS 12 BROAD STREET A*mmo ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA (828) 254-2201 FAX (828) 254-4562 VZ) r , Ali _ M? ;.^. ', s.. .,?? `C'1 •"? ?? li ?n?'in 1' {C I a' 'r 1 ? ? '7?' 4 k? •7: ??? ',xf 1 t t i L , y ? - ?h n Y S gg ?? r i ?^ -'i+i ?c M"y, •? ,Rg L? y4' y F ?.+: ,'yy t ''I` ? ? . a, r ,y .?? .:? yip t L . I }? 1 n • tooo, " g03r ' ti Z ' G ?'•, w 1 K( e f tit 4, r 4 ,r<. . leg ? , a'ir - a 6 r I? , •>? .r ? '? . c?; aA ?`: ' y, 'fit ? "?? tk ;p ?,i'? ,? •\ ?••7Q JAN' \ ??: 'r k??? ?? ? ?4 5..t?. 4'v a k° `.w! ` , •p! hr',.", , < i5r ?` ? b^-.; V U <- ?"T' 0 AA 1' 1 UUNW,KA1 U AJIIL' Y 1 LLC U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WILMINGTON DISTRICT i. 200230076 County Buncombe GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION Property owner. Ms. Robin Orr Address: 121 Hominy Baptist Church Drive Candler, North Carolina 28715 Telephone No.: (828) 321-8040 Size and Location of project (water body, road nametnumber, town. etc.): Unnamed tributaries to Webb Branch flowing through the approximate 83 acre gig Cove Estates Subdivision off of Big Cove Road In Candler, North Carolina. Description of Activity: to install five culverts in the unnamed tributaries to provide road access within the Big Cove Estates Subdivision. 'A total of 146 linear feet of channel will be impacted by the project. Applicable Law: R Section 404 (Clean Water Act. 33 U.S.C.1344). (check all that apply) Section 10 (River and Harbor Act of 1899). Authorization: Regional General Permit Number. 14 Nationwide Permit Number. Your work is authorized by this Regional General (RGP) or Nationwide Permit (NWP) provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached conditions and your submitted plans, and those conditions outlined in the attached December 20, 2001 NC Wildlife Resources Commission letter. If your activity is subject to Section 404 (if Section 404 block above is checked). before beginning work you must also receive a Section 401 water quality certification from the N.C. Division of Water Quality, telephone (919) 733-1786. Please read and carefully comply with the attached conditions of the RGP or NWP. Any violation of the conditions of the RGP or the NWP referenced above may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, and/or appropriate legal action. This Department of the Army RGP or NWP verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal. State, or local approvals/permits. The permittee may need to contact appropriate State and local agencies before beginning work. If there are any questions regarding this authorization or any of the conditions of the General Permit or Nationwide Permit, please contact the Corps Regulatory Official specified below. Date 12/28/01 Corps Regulatory Official David Baker Telephone No. (828) 271-7980 Expiration Date of Verification 12128103 SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS, PROJECT PLANS, ETC., MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE YELLOW (FILE) COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED. OR AVAILABLE. 11/29/2005 TUE 12:44 FAX 8Z8Zb44b6Z t a i i 1 i CESA W Fw M RevkW Jab 19" DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION l l 70 / t.L Project/Site: Big Cove Estates, Phase II Date: 10/27/2005 Applicant/Owner: Robin Orr County: Buncombe investigator: Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI) State: NC Do normal circumstances exist on the site? j?Yes No Community ID: Herbaceous Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? ? Yes No Transect ID: explain)? otential problem area (If needed Is the area a Data Point #: wet , p ?Yes Q No vhl7h1A11U1N DOMINANT PLANT SPECIES STRATUM INDICATOR DOMINANT PLANT SPECIES STRATUM INDICATOR 1. American beautyberry Callicar a americana herb FACU- 7. 2. soft rush Juncus a us herb FACW+ 8. 3. touch-me-not Impatiens ca ensis herb FACW 9. 4. 10. 5. 11. 6. 12. Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (Excluding FAC-): 67% emarks The hydrophytic vegetation criterion has been met. n s Lnvj1%j" I RECORDED DATA (DESCRIBE IN REMARKS): WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS Primary Indicators: ? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge ? Inundated ? Aerial Photographs Q Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ? Other ? Water Marks ? Drift Lines 0 NO RECORDED DATA AVAILABLE ? Sediment Deposits ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands FIELD OBSERVATIONS Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): n Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches Depth of Surface Water: 0 ? Water-Stained Leaves ? Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Free Water in Pit: 6" ? FAC-Neutral Test ? Other (Explain in Remarks) D t h to Saturated Soil: surface arks: The hydrologic criterion has been met. Lff DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION ? 170 , ?..n rr cuaa,ua Project/Site: Big Cove Estates, Phase II Applicant/Owner: Robin Orr Date: 10/27/2005 County: Buncombe Investigator: Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI) State: NC Do normal circumstances exist on the site? F,-/] Y No Community ID: Herbaceous Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? ? Yes 0 No Transect ID: explain)? otential problem area (If needed Is the area a Data Point #: up , p ? Y Q N o es v hlth 1 A 11UN DOMINANT PLANT SPECIES STRATUM INDICATOR DOMINANT PLANT SPECIES STRATUM INDICATOR 1. American beautyberry Callica a americana herb FACU- 7. 2. Blackberry Rubus spp. herb FAC 8. 3. touch-me-not Impatiens ca ensis herb FACW 9. 4. 10. 5. 11. 6. 12. Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (Excluding FAC-): 67% ffu_ks The hydrophytic vegetation criterion has been met. ri I "M"11"V I RECORDED DATA (DESCRIBE IN REMARKS): WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS Primary Indicators: ? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge ? Inundated ? Aerial Photographs ? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ? Other ? Water Marks ? Drift Lines Q NO RECORDED DATA AVAILABLE ? Sediment Deposits ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands FIELD OBSERVATIONS Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches Depth of Surface Water: 0 ? Water-Stained Leaves ? Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Free Water in Pit: >12" ? FAC-Neutral Test ? Other (Explain in Remarks) Depth to Saturated Soil: >12" arks: The hydrologic criterion has not been met. L Attachment A Big Cove Estates, Phase II Nationwide Permit 14 Project Narrative The Big Cove Estates, Phase Il, is proposing to expand. To allow access to the Phase II properties, road improvements and two stream crossings are necessary. The channel impacts were originally authorized under Nationwide Permit 14, issued on 28 December 2001 (USCOE Action ID No. 200230076). Under this permit, 60 linear feet of stream channel was impacted at a single crossing, utilizing a culvert. The permit expired on 28 December 2003, and was not reauthorized. Big Cove Estates development proposes to sell individual lots, allowing each individual landowner to develop the property independently. Two stream crossings have been targeted to access the remaining property. To reduce impacts, these crossings will be composed of bridges, rather than culverts, removing approximately 120 linear feet of stream impact, as well as associated jurisdictional wetland impacts. To quantify the jurisdictional wetland impacts, ESI Biologist Jan Gay conducted a jurisdictional wetland delineation within the proposed impact limits. The jurisdictional delineation effort took place on 27 October 2005. The effort has not been reviewed by the resource agencies. The proposed access road is located along an existing logging road. Improvements to this route will require impact to jurisdictional wetland areas. Wetland impacts are limited to two jurisdictional wetland areas totaling approximately 0.003 acre of areal extent. Both wetland areas are generally herbaceous in nature, with vegetation consisting of American beautyberry (Callicarpa americana) and soft rush (Juncus effusus). Soils within these wetland areas exhibited hydric characteristics (Mansell color 10YR 3/1). Evidence of jurisdictional hydrology was noted, with saturation at the soil surface. The wetland areas are located adjacent to an unnamed tributary to Webb Branch. The unnamed tributary does not have a separate Best Usage Classification, and therefore shares the Best Usage Classification of its receiving water, Webb Branch. Webb Branch, from its source to Hominy Creek, has a Best Usage Classification of C, and is not a designated Trout water. UT Webb Branch is a small second order channel, approximately 6 feet in width. No mitigation is proposed to offset the approximately 0.003 acre of jurisdictional impacts. Twelve species with ranges considered to extend into Buncombe County are federally Threatened or Endangered: Bog turtle (Clemmys muhlenbergii); Carolina northern flying squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus); spotfin chub (Loxia curvirostra); gray bat (Myotis grisescens); eastern cougar (Puma concolor couguar); Appalachian elktoe (Alasmidonta raveneliana); oyster mussel (Epioblasma capsaeformis); spreading avens ;Geum radiatum); bunched arrowhead ,Sagittaria fasciculata); mountain sweet pitcher plant (Sarracenia jonesii); and Virginia spiraea (Spiraea virginiana). The proposed access road does not contain potentially suitable habitat for any of these species. N D.B. 2322 PG. 385 ?j y1 6-V 0 P.B. 76 PG. 152 y o? 8868.04-54-8423 ° ?? _\ \ ? zss N 811' 21„ W I-- A _ 266.30' (Tie3 - 8868.04-E s .\ 9 \ 1.32± C S? (0.66 Ac. r d 1 1 28 ?. 1.10± AC ES \' 1 ry6?o (0.62 Ac. re o 2) E IST. % N \ 27'k ? 2.19± ACks !. (0.70 Ac. req' .) l PROPOSE \ FILL LINE X00 .\. W1 117 S.F. t<?0 26 I ?+ 2.32 ± ACRES (1.58 Ac. reqd.) 2 13 S.F. - PROP BRIDGE- ,I LEGEND STREAM CHANNEL -WB- WETLANDS BOUNDARY PROPOSED FILL IN WETLAND SCALE: 1 "=100* 8868.04-62-2593 J ? S 1CYy i C VERT / O \ 8868.04 62 43 \ \ 0 VERT----// i ?I cA S 2 5 \/ CULVE Q 868.04-E(3-t3? 40 b(n j. ex s / ? WETLANDS DELINEATIO BIG COVE ESTATES PHASE II UPPER HOMINY TOWNSHIP BUNCOMBE CO.. NC COMM# Mattern & Craig CONSULTING ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS 12 BROAD STREET ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA (828) 254-2201 FAX (828) 254-4562 z n L 0 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application FormOfflce Use Only: Form Version March 05 USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. a a' (If any particular item is not applicable to tors project, please enter Not Appncavic Vi N/t1 .) 1. Processing 1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: ® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules ? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ ® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification 2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 17 3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification is not required, check here: ? 4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII, and check here: ? 5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page 4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details) ?. .c-,heck here ? II. Applicant Information r LEC ? ? ?(1Q5 1. Owner/Applicant Information Name: Robin Orr Mailing Address: 121 Hominy Baptist Church Drive Candler NC 28715 Telephone Number: 828-321-8040 Fax Number: E-mail Address: 2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.) Name: Company Affiliation: Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Fax Number: E-mail Address: n...... I ..r o III. Project Information Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings, impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion, so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format; however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided. 1. Name of project: Big Cove Estates, Phase II 2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): 3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 8868.04-62-2934 4. Location County: Buncombe Nearest Town: Candler Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): 5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.) Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.5610°N. 82.7476°W 6. Property size (acres): 64 7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Unnamed Tributary to Webb Branch 8. River Basin: French Broad River (Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The River Basin map is available at http://li2o.enr.state.nc.us/adniin/maps/.) 9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: See Attachment A 10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project will require the use of hand tools and heM equipment, including front end loaders and backhoes with hydraulic thumbs. All equipment will be maintained to ensure no hydraulic fluid will enter the stream channels. 11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Proposed fill would allow for road access for development of the proposed Big Cove Estates sub-division, Phase II. 7)--- IN _IV 0 IV. Prior Project History If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits, certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project, list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with construction schedules. Action ID No. 200230076, NWP 14 authorizing impacts of up to 146 linear feet of UT to Webb Branch was issued on 28 December 2001. Under this permit approximately 60 linear feet of channel was impacted culvert). The permit expired and was not renewed. V. Future Project Plans Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application. At this time, no additional permits are anticipated. VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts, permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet. 1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The proposed project would includes fill material for a proposed roadway to be placed within approximately 130 square feet of jurisdictional wetland area. 2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, se aratel list impacts due to both structure and flood' g. Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact (indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres) es/no linear feet) 1 fill herbaceous N 30 0.0027 2 fill herbaceous Y 2 0.0003 Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.003 3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 2.0 acres n...,,. 9 -V 0 4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560. Stream Impact tream Perennial Average Stream Width Impact Area of Number Name Type of Impact or Before Length Impact (indicate on Intermittent Impact (linear feet) (acres) map) N/A Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 0 0 5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc. Open Water Impact Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of Site Number cable) (if appli Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact indicate on ma ocean, etc.) (acres) Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0 6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project: Stream Impact (acres): 0 Wetland Impact (acres): 0.003 Open Water Impact (acres): 0 Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.003 Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0 7. Isolated Waters Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE. 8. Pond Creation If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application. Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond, local stormwater requirement, etc.): T--- A -rO Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area: VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization) Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The original permit allowed for impacts of up to 146 linear feet of stream channel of which 60 linear feet were impacted. Reconsideration of the proposed road stem and stream crossings eliminated the proposed culverts in favor of bridges avoiding approximately 80 linear feet of stream impact. The adjustments will require the unavoidable impact to approximately 130 square feet of jurisdictional wetland area. VIII. Mitigation DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial streams. USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include, but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar functions and values, preferable in the same watershed. If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at http://l12o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwet]ands/strnigide.htmi. 1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet) of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view, preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach a separate sheet if more space is needed. No mitigation is proposed for this project 2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at (919) 715-0476 to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.litm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information: Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):- Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):_ IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ) Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ? 2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA coordinator at (919) 733-5083 to review current thresholds for environmental documentation. Yes El No 3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ? X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ) It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the applicant's discretion. 1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233 (Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify V Yes ? No n...... L -CO 2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer multipliers. XI. XII. within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0244, or 9 Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please Donation of Property Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment Zone* Impact (square feet) Multiplier Required Mitigation 1 3 (2 for Catawba) 2 1.5 Total * Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., attach all appropriate information as 0260. into the identified Stormwater (required by DWQ) Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations demonstrating total proposed impervious level. The total amount of impervious surface for this sub-division has not vet been determined However, the total impervious surface is not expected exceed 20% of the total land surface. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ) Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. Waste water creation is not expected as a direct result of the proposed impacts. However, the secondary impact (sub-division creation) will create the need for disposal of domestic waste water. Each lot within the sub-division will require a separate septic system. Each system will be the responsibility of the individual landowner in terms of permitting buildinand maintaining - XIII. Violations (required by DWQ) Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules? Yes ? No Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ) Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No n...... ^r ., r o If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at htt2://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: All future development within the Big Cove Estates Phase II will be constructed in a manner which will not affect downstream water quality. Appropriate stormwater measures will be utilized to ensure no affect to the resources. XV. Other Circumstances (Optional): It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control). '?Ij ? /c ?o S Applicant/Agent's Signatures Date (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) Page 8 of 8 L ) WIG \J yi -t \ s 340 •?'J \1. ENKA, NC 35082-E6-TF-024 1961 PHOTOREVISED 1990 DMA 4455 II SW SERIES V842 d LOCATION MAP Mattern & Craig tn CONSULTING ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS BIG COVE ESTATES PHASE II 12 BROAD STREET 44"00 ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 254-2201 UPPER HOMINY TOWNSHIP N BUNCOMBE CO. NC SCALE: N/A COMMI 2470 FAX (8 8) 254-4562 27'?. .19± ACRES (0.70 Ac. reqC ?. PROPOSEi? FILL LINE W1 117 S.F. k FS { 0 Z A t (A d) 2 13 S. F. PROP BRIDGE 86 LEGEND STREAM CHANNEL -WB- WETLANDS BOUNDARY PROPOSED FILL IN WETLANDS SCALE; 1 '=50' WETLANDS DELINEATION BIG COVE ESTATES PHASE II UPPER HOMINY TOWNSHIP BUNCOMBE CO. NC COMM# 2470 Mattern & Craig CONSULTING ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS 12 BROAD STREET A,omwo ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA (828) 2542201 FAX (828) 254-4562 y r WY1 ?,} y.. `_ r??q.???, 9r g 'r? , ? ? ?' V Cl f?,+ •.,`? ? (t _ ? ?`'? ' i '? ?? Y?J? '*A ??Q ?^ ??W^?•4 ?.? llVVll 4t 4 _? ?,?? ,?1?'1' S , Tr, ,f'?? s9?•? k? ?r. .?,? a 'nrr ? w?t,3?y? ?? C -ANl `l? KpA?? ? `?`.ti+ ??Yf ?• y ? yL"? r ?Fn", M Y? 1.' 1. ? t 4'S'SC?'N .? f F? « f a 81? • t ¢ •l.??? r . ?' ?? t` ? r ? ti .i'i'i \? ' ? ?' <?: # x '783U r •~? X8'90 , ?' .'`g? ?? 788!'` v r a' 'R r lie It, I -'?. y C aSr a d3r '?an: '"H. licit I 11/29/2005 TUE 12:44 FAQ 8Z8Lb44bbZ meow do nA1IL'KN6d1KA1U A711LY1LLC C. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WILMINGTON DISTRICT 1. 200230076 County Buncombe GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION Property owner: Ms. Robin Orr Address: 121 Hominy Baptist Church Drive Candler, North Carolina 28715 Telephone No.: (828) 321-8040 Size and Location of project (water body, road name/number, town. etc.): Unnamed tributaries to Webb Branch flowing through the approximate 83 acre Big Cove Estates Subdivision off of Big Cove Road In Candler, North Carolina. Description of Activity: to install five culverts to the unnamed tributaries to provide road access within the Big Cove Estates Subdivision. A total of 146 linear feet of channel will be impacted by the project. Applicable Law: R Section 404 (Clean Water Act. 33 U.S.C.1344). (check all that apply) Section 10 (River and Harbor Act of 1899). Authorization: Regional General Permit Number. 14 Nationwide Permit Number. Your work is authorized by this Regional General (RGP) or Nationwide Permit (NWP) provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached conditions and your submitted plans, and those conditions outlined in the attached December 20, 2001 NC Wildlife Resources Commission letter. If your activity is subject to Section 404 (if Section 404 block above is checked), before beginning work you must also teceive a Section 401 water quality certification from the N.C. Division of Water Quality, telephone (919) 733-1786. Please read and carefully comply with the attached conditions of the RGP or NWP. Any violation of the conditions of the RGP or the NWP referenced above may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, and/or appropriate legal action. This Department of the Army RGP or NWP verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State, or local approvals/permits. The permittee may need to contact appropriate State and local agencies before beginning work. If there are any questions regarding this authorization or any of the conditions of the General Permit or Nationwide Permit, please contact the Corps Regulatory Official specified below. Date 12/28/01 Corps Regulatory Official David Baker Telephone No. (828) 271-7980 Expiration Date of Verification 12/28103 SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS, PROJECT PLANS, ETC.. MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE YELLOW (FILE) COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED. OR AVAILABLE. WI. V V1 a CESAW FwA !fit Rob" Jan 0" DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION 170 / l..D yr GL =IUD - Project/Site: Big Cove Estates, Phase II UL-A- ---l Date: 10/27/2005 Applicant/Owner: Robin Orr County: Buncombe Investigator: Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI) State: NC Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: Herbaceous Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation ion)? El Yes No Transect ID: explain)? otential problem area (If needed Is the area a Data Point #: wet , p F I N ? Y o / es vMir,IAIILAN DOMINANT PLANT SPECIES STRATUM INDICATOR DOMINANT PLANT SPECIES STRATUM INDICATOR 1. American beautybeny Callicar a americana herb FACU- 7. 2. soft rush Juncus a us herb FACW+ 8. 3. touch-me-not Impatiens ca ensis herb FACW 9. 4. 10. 5. 11. 6. 12. Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (Excluding FAC-): 67% emarks The hydrophytic vegetation criterion has been met. rl T 1JSCVLVV T RECORDED DATA (DESCRIBE IN REMARKS): WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS Primary Indicators: ? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge ? Inundated ? Aerial Photographs Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ? Other ? Water Marks ? Drift Lines 0 NO RECORDED DATA AVAILABLE ? Sediment Deposits ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands FIELD OBSERVATIONS Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches Depth of Surface Water: 0 ? Water-Stained Leaves ? Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Free Water in Pit: 6" ? FAC-Neutral Test ? Other (Explain in Remarks) D th to Saturated Soil: surface IF arks: The hydrologic criterion has been met. JV1LJ MAP UNIT NAME (Series and Phase): Mapped as Edneyville/Chestnut Complex DRAINAGE CLASS: moderately well drained TAXONOMY (SUBGROUP): Undetermined b preliminary Buncombe County Mapping FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Confirm Mapped Type? Yes 2]No PROFILE DESCRIPTION Depth (inches) Horizon Matrix Color (Munsell Moist) Mottle Color (Munsell Moist) Mottle Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc. 0-6 10YR 3/1 sand loam 6-14 10 YR 4/2 sand loam HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS: ? Histosol ? Concretions ? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ? Reducing Conditions ? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ? Listing on National Hydric Soils List ? Listed on State or Local Hydric Soils List Q Gleyed or Low Chroma ? Color ? Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: The hydric soil criterion has been met. WETLAND DETERMINATION Vegetation Present? 0 Yes ? No I Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? i Hydrology Present? P1 Yes ? No Soil Present? Q Yes ? No :s: Datapoint is jurisdictional. Q Yes ? No DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION 1170 / %,n rv G11 ul a LG Project/Site: Big Cove Estates, Phase II Applicant/Owner: Robin Orr lua?.aaavaa a Date: 10/27/2005 County: Buncombe Investigator: Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI) State: NC Do normal circumstances exist on the site? / Yes No Community ID: Herbaceous Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)?_ ? Yes No Transect ID: explain)? otential problem area (If needed Is the area a Data Point #: up , p N ? Y o es Q Vr.lir;lA11VN DOMINANT PLANT SPECIES STRATUM INDICATOR DOMINANT PLANT SPECIES STRATUM INDICATOR 1. American beautyberry Callica a americana herb FACU- 7. 2. Blackberry Rubusspp. herb FAC 8. 3. touch-me-not Impatiens ca ensis herb FACW 9. 4. 10. 5. 11. 6. 12. ercent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (Excluding FAC-): 67% emarks The hydrophytic vegetation criterion has been met. n I 1J1kULV V I RECORDED DATA (DESCRIBE IN REMARKS): WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS Primary Indicators: ? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge ? Inundated ? Aerial Photographs ? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ? Other ? Water marks ? Drift Lines ?? NO RECORDED DATA AVAILABLE ? Sediment Deposits ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands FIELD OBSERVATIONS Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches Depth of Surface Water: 0 ? Water-Stained Leaves ? Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Free Water in Pit: >12" ? FAC-Neutral Test ? Other (Explain in Remarks) Depth to Saturated Soil: >12" emarks: The hydrologic criterion has not been met. JV1LJ MAP UNIT NAME (Series and Phase): Mapped as Edneyville/Chestnut Complex DRAINAGE CLASS: moderately well drained TAXONOMY (SUBGROUP): Undetermined b relimin Buncombe County Mapping FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Confirm Mapped Type? ? Yes No PROFILE DESCRIPTION Depth (inches) Horizon Matrix Color (Munsell Moist) Mottle Color (Munsell Moist) Mottle Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc. 0-14 10YR 5/3 sandy loam HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS: ? Histosol ? Concretions ? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ? Reducing Conditions ? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ? Listing on National Hydric Soils List ? Listed on State or Local Hydric Soils List ? Gleyed or Low Chroma ? Color ? Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: The hydric soil criterion has not been met. WETLAND DETERMINATION Vegetation Present? ? Yes ? No I Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? etland Hydrology Present? ? Yes 0 No ?dric Soil Present? ? Yes 2 No ;marks: Data point is not jurisdictional. ? Yes El No Attachment A Big Cove Estates, Phase II Nationwide Permit 14 Project Narrative The Big Cove Estates, Phase II, is proposing to expand. To allow access to the Phase II properties, road improvements and two stream crossings are necessary. The channel impacts were originally authorized under Nationwide Permit 14, issued on 28 December 2001 (USCOE Action ID No. 200230076). Under this permit, 60 linear feet of stream channel was impacted at a single crossing, utilizing a culvert. The permit expired on 28 December 2003, and was not reauthorized. Big Cove Estates development proposes to sell individual lots, allowing each individual landowner to develop the property independently. Two stream crossings have been targeted to access the remaining property. To reduce impacts, these crossings will be composed of bridges, rather than culverts, removing approximately 120 linear feet of stream impact, as well as associated jurisdictional wetland impacts. To quantify the jurisdictional wetland impacts, ESI Biologist Jan Gay conducted a jurisdictional wetland delineation within the proposed impact limits. The jurisdictional delineation effort took place on 27 October 2005. The effort has not been reviewed by the resource agencies. The proposed access road is located along an existing logging road. Improvements to this route will require impact to jurisdictional wetland areas. Wetland impacts are limited to two jurisdictional wetland areas totaling approximately 0.003 acre of areal extent. Both wetland areas are generally herbaceous in nature, with vegetation consisting of American beautybery (Callicarpa americana) and soft rush (Juncus effusus). Soils within these wetland areas exhibited hydric characteristics (Munsell color 10YR 3/1). Evidence of jurisdictional hydrology was noted, with saturation at the soil surface. The wetland areas are located adjacent to an unnamed tributary to Webb Branch. The unnamed tributary does not have a separate Best Usage Classification, and therefore shares the Best Usage Classification of its receiving water, Webb Branch. Webb Branch, from its source to Hominy Creek, has a Best Usage Classification of C, and is not a designated Trout water. UT Webb Branch is a small second order channel, approximately 6 feet in width. No mitigation is proposed to offset the approximately 0.003 acre of jurisdictional impacts. Twelve species with ranges considered to extend into Buncombe County are federally Threatened or Endangered: Bog turtle (Clemmys muhlenbergii); Carolina northern flying squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus); spotfin chub (Loxia curvirostra); gray bat (Myotis grisescens); eastern cougar (Puma concolor couguar); Appalachian elktoe (Alasmidonta raveneliana); oyster mussel (Epioblasma capsaeformis); spreading avens ;Geum radiatum); bunched arrow'_zead ',Sagittaria fasciculata); mountain sweet pitcher plant (Sarracenia jonesii); and Virginia spiraea (Spiraea virginiana). The proposed access road does not contain potentially suitable habitat for any of these species. B GE- t-) D.B. 2322 PG. 385 I P OP o o? w P.B. 76 PG. 152 Z o? 8868.04-54-8423 v y N85?611'21"Vy zo 266.30' (Tier - 8868.04-E C-1 S 9\ 1.32± C S? _ (0.66 Ac. r d' 1 1 28 \ \ ti6 1.10± AC ES 1 ti6y? (0.62 Ac. re ) o)EIST. 1 27' 2.19+_ ACkS (0.70 Ac. req ) 1. PROPOSE I FILL LINE X00, 1 W1 117 S.F. 26 2.32 ± ACRES (1.58 Ac. regd.) 42 13 S.F. - PROP BRIDGE Q LEGEND STREAM CHANNEL -WB- WETLANDS BOUNDARY PROPOSED FILL IN WETLAND SCALE: 1 "=100' WETLANDS DELINEATION BIG COVE ESTATES PHASE II UPPER HOMINY TOWNSHIP BUNCOMBE CO.. NC COMM# 2470 Mattern & Craig CONSULTING ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS 12 BROAD STREET ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA (828) 254-2201 FAX (828) 254-4562 8868.04-62-2593 \ lk S C VERT / O 8868.04 62 43 \ ? Q VERT // "6QQ ? I cA / X?l 2 5 \/ CULVEQ 868.04-6(3-40 0 j.