19880018 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19880101

d ?.. AATf o
ti
J
Qaw
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Coastal Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor David W. Owens
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary Director
October 28, 1988
Colonel Paul W. Woodbury
District Engineer
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
Dear Colonel Woodbury:
m „ L a,
Er
The State of North Carolina has completed its review of
Corps Public Notice SAWC088-N-028-0431 concerning a proposal
by Ms. Betty Brewer represented- by Mr. John Fussell,
Environmental Services Incorporated, 9104 Cypress Green Drive,
Jacksonville, FL 32216. The proposal involves filling
wetlands for the purpose of providing an area suitable for the
installation of two septic tanks on lots 2 and 3, Amelia
Heights Subdivision, near Manteo, Dare County, North Carolina.
We provided a preliminary summary of our review results to Mr.
Charles Hollis of your staff and to Ms. Brewer, the applicant,
by letter dated 10/21/88.
Based upon our review, we disagree with the applicant's
certification that 'the proposed activity is consistent with
the North Carolina Coastal Management Program. Specifically,
the proposed work is inconsistent with Coastal Water Quality
Policies found in 15 NCAC 7M .0801 ( a) , ( b) , and ( c ) in that
the required Water Quality Certification under Section 401 of
the Federal Clean Water Act has been denied by the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management.
A copy of this letter will be mailed to the applicant.
It will serve as our formal notice that we disagree with her
certification. it will also serve as our notice that our
position may be appealed to the Secretary, U.S. Department of
Commerce, Washington, D.C. The appeal must be filed within 30
days of receipt of our letter and must specifically address
one of the following findings: That although the project
currently is inconsistent, it may be federally approved
because (1) the activity is consistent with the objectives or
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611.7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
A
purposes of the Federal Coastal Zone Management Act, or (2) is
necessary in the interest of national security. Mr. Steve
Benton, of the N.C. Division of Coastal Management in Raleigh
is available to discuss the appeal procedures and to provide
assistance if needed in filing an appeal. He can be reached
at [phone].
Sincerely,
Y4q??/
I
avid W. Owens
cc: NC Division of Environmental Management
NC Division of Water Resources
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Ms. Betty Brewer c/o
Mr. John Fussell, Environmental Services Incorporated
9104 Cypress Green Drive
Jacksonville, FL 32216
Mr. Donald E. Critchfield, Acting Director
U.S. Department of Commerce, OCRM
Washington, D.C. 20235
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
October 28, 1988
B
IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Branch
SUBJECT: File No. SAWCO88-N-028-0431
Ms. Betty Brewer
126 Howe Street
Norfolk, Virginia 23503
Dear Ms. Brewer:

Reference your application for Department of the Army
authorization to place fill material in wetlands adjacent Roanoke
Sound, Manteo, Dare County, North Carolina.
By copy of North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
(NCDEM) letter to you of September 30, 1988, we have learned that
your application for Water Quality Certification, pursuant to
Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act, has been denied.
Also, the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM)
has informed us that accomplishment of your work would be
inconsistent with the State's Coastal Zone Management Plan. Under
the administrative rules of our regulatory program, denial of the
Certification or the finding of inconsistency would preclude
favorable consideration of a Federal. permit. Accordingly, your
Department of the Army application is hereby denied, and your file
has been retired.
By letter of September 23, 1988, we provided you comments of
the National Marine Fisheries Service and the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service. While appealing the State authorization is the
next step in pursuing State authorization, you should be aware
that these Federal agencies' comments would be unchanged by the
outcome of that appeal. Because of the Federal agencies'
influence on Department of the Army permit decisions, it is
unlikely a Department of the Army permit would be available unless
your project can be modified to lessen impacts.
Ms. Alison Arnold of my staff is available to answer any
questions. She may be reached at telephone [phone].
BY AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:
Paul W. Woodbury
Colonel, Corps of Engineers
District Engineer
-2-
f
Copies Furnished:
Mr. John Parker Mr. William Mills
Division of Coastal Management Water Quality Section
North Carolina Department of Division of Environmental Management
Natural Resources and North Carolina Department of
Community Development Natural Resources and
Post Office Box 27687 Community Development
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Ms. L. K. (Mike) Gantt
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Randy Cheek
National Marine Fisheries Service
Habitat Conservation Division
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
Mr. David Griffin
Elizabeth City Regional Office
North Carolina Division of
Coastal Management
108 South Water Street
Elizabeth City, North Carolina 27909
Mr. W. Mark Spence
Aycock, Spence and Graham
Post Office Box 117
Nags Head, North Carolina ,27959
Mr. Robert F. McGhee, Chief
Wetlands Section
Region IV
Marine and Estuarine Branch
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
345 Courtland Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
Mr. John Fussell
Environmental Services, Incorporated
9104 Cypress Green Drive
Jacksonville, Florida 32216
d ??. $r q

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Coastal Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor David W. Owens
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary Director
October 21, 1988
Mr. Charles Hollis
Chief, Regulatory Branch
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
Dear Mr. Hollis:
The State of North Carolina is not able to make a finding
at this time on consistency with the North Carolina Coastal
Management Program pursuant to 15 CFR 930 Subpart D for the
proposal by Ms. Betty Brewer, represented by Mr. John Fussell,
Environmental Services Incorporated, 9104 Cypress Green Drive,
Jacksonville, FL 32216. This proposal was circulated for
review under Corps Public Notice SAWC088-N-028-0431 and
involves filling of wetlands for the installation of two
septic tanks on lots nos. 2 and 3, Amelia Heights Subdivision,
near Manteo, Dare County, North Carolina.
All review comments on the above proposal have been
received with the exception of a fina-1 determination on the
outcome of the required 401 Certification by the NC Division
of Environmental Management. It is our understanding that
based on anticipated water quality impacts associated with the
emplacement of septic tanks in fill over wetlands, the 401
Certification has been recommended for denial. Additional
objections to the proposal have been received from the North
Carolina Division of Water Resources and the Wildlife
Resources Commission.
The Division of Water Resources has indicated that the
proposal is unacceptable from a policy standpoint unless it
can be demonstrated that either, 1) the site has been
incorrectly identified as wetlands, or, 2) that if the site is
a wetland it is severely degraded. The North Carolina
Wildlife Resources Commission has determined that the proposal
is inconsistent with its policies concerning non-water
dependant projects which individually or cumulatively result
in the degradation of the productivity of existing fish and
wildlife ecosystems.
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Pursuant to 15 CFR 930.63 (b), we are sending a copy of
this letter to the applicant to inform him of the status of
the matter and basis for our delay:. Thank you for your
consideration of the North Carolina Coastal Management
Program.
Si?rrcerely,
Qte en B. Benton
Consistency Coordinator
cc: Ms. Betty Brewer c/o
Mr. John Fussell, Environmental Services Incorporated
9104 Cypress Green Drive
Jacksonville, FL 32216
NC Division of Environmental Management
NC Division of Water Resources
NC Wildlife Resources Commission

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor September 30, 1988 R. Paul Wilms
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ms. Betty Brewer
126 Howe Street
Norfolk, VA 23503
Subject: Application for Water
Quality Certification
Betty Brewer
Proposed Septic Tank Systems
Croatan Sound Area
Dare County
Dear Ms. Brewer:
This Division received your application for Water
Quality Certification under Section 401 of the Federal Clean
Water Act on July 21, 1988. The application proposes the
placement of fill material in wetlands adjacent to the
waters of Croatan Sound and its tributaries. These areas to
be filled are on two residential lots in the Amelia Heights
Subdivision near Manteo. The purpose of the fill is to
create areas approvable for septic tank systems to serve
residential dwellings proposed for the lots. Issuance of a
Water Quality Certification by this Division must be based
on a reasonable assurance that the proposed activity is not
expected to result in violations of Water Quality Standards
applicable to the surface waters which may be affected.
Septic tank installations in fill areas such as the,
ones proposed for these lots create concerns for potential
violations of water quality standards in adjacent surface
waters. Septic tank effluent would likely move vertically
downward through such fill material until original soils
are reached then begin a lateral movement into surface
waters in the area. Surface waters which are affected by
septic tank effluent have low dissolved oxygen, high
Pollution Prevention Pavs
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]

Ms. Betty Brewer
Page Two
September 30, 1988
fecal coliform bacteria value
levels in addition to creatin
nuisance conditions. Because
of Water Quality Standards, I
application for Water Quality
denied.
s, and excessive nutrient
g potential public health and
of these potential violations
have determined that your
Certification should be
You do have the right to a review by the N. C.
Environmental Management Commission, if this denial is
unacceptable to you. Your request for Commission review
must be in writing, identifying the specific items to be
contended, within 10 days of your receipt of this denial.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please
contact Mr. Bill Mills at 733-7015.
Sicer 1
Jf
R. Paul Wilms
RPW/dkb
cc: Charles Wakild
Dennis Ramsey
Washington Regional
David Owens
Office

, _,.•
ooolm
n?
North Carolina Department of Natural
Resources &Community Development
W- U, 1 77' -777-w- 7
1

also

r ,.Of ti
?I
IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Branch
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402.1890
July 19, 1988
SUBJECT: File No. SAWC088-N-028-0431
Mr. William Mills
Water Quality Section
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of Natural
Resources and Community Development
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Mills:
RECEIVED
J ! L 2 i 41988
WATER
0 r'
Enclosed is the application of Ms. Betty Brewer for Department
of the Army authorization and a State Water Quality Certification
to fill 0.64 acre of wetland to make the property suitable for the
installation of two septic tanks, at Lots Nos. 2 and 3, Amelia
Heights subdivision, near Manteo, Dare County, North Carolina.
Your receipt of this letter verifies your acceptance of a valid
request for certification in accordance with Section 325.2(b)(ii)
of our administrative regulations.
We are considering authorizing the proposed activity pursuant
to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and we have determined that
a water quality certification may be required under the provisions
of Section 401 of the same law. A Department of the Army permit
will not be granted until the certification has been obtained or
waived.
In accordance with our administrative regulations, 60 days
after receipt of a request for certification is a reasonable time
for State action. Therefore, if you have not acted on the request
by September 19, 1988, the District Engineer will deem that waiver
has occurred.
Questions or comments may be addressed to Ms. Alison Arnold,
telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
%th:arW. Hol
egulattyyBranch
Enclosure

-2-
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Natural Resources and
Community Development
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Mr. David R. Griffin
District Manager
Elizabeth City Regional Office
North Carolina Division of
Coastal Management
108 South Water Street
Elizabeth City, North Carolina 27909
+1t-? k
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
SAWC088-N-028-0431 July 21, 1988
PUBLIC NOTICE
MS. BETTY BREWER, represented by MR. JOHN FUSSELL, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,
INCORPORATED, 9104 Cypress Green Drive, Jacksonville, Flordia 32216, has
applied for a Department of the Army permit TO PLACE FILL MATERIAL IN 0.64
ACRE OF WETLANDS TO MAKE THE AREA SUITABLE FOR THE INSTALLATION OF TWO SEPTIC
TANKS, LOTS NOS. 2 AND 3, AMELIA HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION, NEAR MANTEO, ROANOKE
ISLAND, Dare County, North Carolina.
The following description of the work is taken from data provided by the
applicant and from observations made during an onsite visit by a
representative of the Corps of Engineers. Plans submitted with the
application show the proposed placement of approximately 2,000 cubic yards of
fill material in 0.64 acre of wetland to raise the elevation of the properties
approximately 19 inches. The purpose of the work is to make the two lots
suitable for the installation of septic tanks and construction of single-
family homes. Sections of these lots are considered by the Dare County Health
Department to be "conditionally suitable" for installation of septic tanks.
They would be considered suitable for septic tanks after the fill material is
in place. Plans showing the work and a narrative site description are
included with this public notice.
The applicant has determined that the proposed work is consistent with the
North Carolina Coastal Zone Management Plan and has submitted this
determination to the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management for their
review and concurrence. This proposal shall be reviewed for the applicability
of other actions by North Carolina agencies such as:
a. The issuance of a Water Quality Certification under Section 401 of the
Clean Water Act by the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management.
b. The issuance of a permit to dredge and/or fill under North Carolina
General Statute 113-229 by the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management.
c. The issuance of a permit under the North Carolina Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA) by the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management or
their delegates.
d. The issuance of an easement to fill or otherwise occupy State-owned
submerged land under North Carolina General Statute 143-341(4), 146-6, 146-11,
and 1.46-12 by the North Carolina Department of Administration and the North
Carolina Council of State.

-2-
e. The approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan by the Land
Quality Section, North Carolina Division of Land Resources, pursuant to the
State Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 (NC G.S. 113 A-50-66).
The application for Department of the Army authorization will be denied if
any required State or local authorization and/or certification is denied. No
Department of the Army permit will be issued until a State coordinated
viewpoint is received and reviewed by this agency. Recipients of this notice
are encouraged to furnish comments on factors of concern represented by the
above agencies directly to the respective agency, with a copy furnished to the
Corps of Engineers.
This application is being considered pursuant to Section 404(b) of the
Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Any person may request, in writing within
the comment period specified in the notice, that a public hearing be held to
consider this application. Requests for public hearing shall state, with
particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing.
The District Engineer has consulted the latest published version of the
National Register of Historic Places for the presence or absence of registered
properties, or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion therein, and
this worksite is not registered property or property listed as being eligible
for inclusion in the Register. Consultation of the National Register
constitutes the extent of cultural resource investigations by the District
Engineer, and he is otherwise unaware of the presence of such resources.
Presently, unknown archeological, scientific, prehistorical, or historical
data may be lost or destroyed by work under the requested permit.
The District Engineer has determined, based on a review of data furnished
by the applicant and onsite observations, that the activity will not affect
species, or their critical habitat, designated as endangered or threatened
pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973.
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of
the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity
and its intended use on the public interest. Evaluation of the probable
impacts which the proposed activity may have on the public interest requires a
careful weighing of all those factors which become relevant in each particular
case. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the
proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The
decision whether to authorize a proposal, and if so the conditions under which
it will be allowed to occur, are therefore determined by the outcome of the
general balancing process. That decision should reflect the national concern
for both protection and utilization of important resources. All factors which
may be relevant to the proposal must be considered including the cumulative
effects thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general
environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values,
r
,,- '*
k
-3-
flood hazards and flood plain values (in accordance with Executive Order
11988), land use, navigation, shore erosion and accretion, recreation, water
supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber
production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in
general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving the
placement of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, a
permit will be denied if the discharge that would be authorized by such permit
would not comply with the Environmental Protection Agencies' 404(b)(1)
guidelines. Subject to the preceding sentence and any other applicable
guidelines or criteria, a permit will be granted unless the District Engineer
determines that it would be contrary to the public interest.
Generally, the decision whether to issue this Department of the Army
permit will not be made until the North Carolina Division of Environmental
Management (DEM) issues, denies, or waives State certification required by
Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The DEM considers whether or not the
proposed activity will comply with Sections 301, 302, 306, and 307 of the
Clean Water Act. The application and this public notice for the Department of
the Army permit serves as application to the DEM for certification.
Additional information regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be
reviewed at the offices of the Environmental Operations Section, North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management, Salisbury Street, Archdale
Building, Raleigh, North Carolina. Copies of such materials will be furnished
to any person requesting copies upon payment of reproduction costs.
The North Carolina Division of Environmental Management plans to take
final action in the issuance of the Clean Water Act certification on or after
August 15, 1988.
All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application for Clean
Water Act certification should do so in writing delivered to the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management, Post Office Box 27687, Raleigh,
North Carolina 27611-7687, on or before August 9, 1988, Attention:
Mr. William Mills.
Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will
be received in this office, Attention: Ms. Alison Arnold, until 4:15 p.m.,
August 22, 1988, or telephone [phone].
ti
F'oo t Weigh
Cp '16. 34
yi / /" v \ Kl or ' ?'
O ' ` 6
x?t? po e' •. r \ ?QO?? • 25 2
?9, 1116 '' •' '? " ?? y ,
// x--15 •? ?? ' ?' ?`? ? w P /?• \,'w\
` 'gM /• i , .. '`,
Sunny Side JO
64 •.j?.. ?? a ,g' •• ? i ?--•/ ? ?.
,\
4 64
' • 10 • ??•. • %. i?? ° \ of rsYinayard? \\
COUN EGIONAL Al PORT \ \ \ -
10
Romp y ? - lo' • ? ?, ;n • : ?MANTEQ"'
fBM 5r
• .:'
2 n-91
6em
14.
\ 2 ;??. //' y j• :' .,?''? ' ?1, .:_ Sand
Light
/ , ; v? y •• , r ' ??. <? a -qi
Maven' f,?k2k %i •i .
Burnside Headquarters • '` 1123 ( ''?? y?' `
tHistprical sites Califbittia'. .• ;, . ' ?. 2
?. t -fit
Manteo
2 well Field 1128 ^\.. Site
\ 'rum
Saw.
R O A : b?.K E
_ X
88-43?
S ffEET 1 OF
DESIGNED BY: I PROJECT s:
Roanoke Island/Brewer Site °`""B' °'T`
CMECKM BY-
I SHEET OF

MOW O• WOAMtt<LY
i0 O?N.lLO LlbT"IL
•i1M

,'
I' NO•

/ II
II
?
V
? .II

• ,I
I
I
?± ? I I
r II
II
I

s I
I
S I!
o ii as
? II
II
I !
1
I

- t4 400
O!?' E
C o
- P
2 ,
x
C.AT`I ?--- r C. At V
3
x
LIMA
?M•TO. W
4 ? tL.t ?A1'
1.
O.O ?i UC?.O• I t0.0'
tf •
L,viRT
I?ME1.?P??pj 1?Y •? tap' IL :
. ,r...j>t', i;?r"', ^.S..?S' ?/?7'';f.+ •w lo=T',i/
FLOOlb MOSS: ALD
S+?fi •?oo0 9.O' 'C" ??,• K. 11?V T)^%& e0. WALU.

i
14V- 8$-431
.:? sit-E-r Z
Or
_m
as
pr
m
O
4
O
E
t
V
I
u

t
iy I W
i?
9
O

W
V J
L
Q?
L
m
C
_co
Cl)
m
seo
O
C
cis
O
rr
siT_E PF5MPTtuN

Soil on the tract is Mascotte soil. Over most of the
tract, this is covered by a layer of fill material
(deposited many years ago), which varies in depth from
about 1" deep to about 12" deep.
The tract is covered by a dense growth of small trees
(about 20' high), shrubs, and herbaceous species.
Near Amelia Drive, willows (Salix caroliniana) are the
dominant tree species. Farther back, pines
(Pinus taeda) are dominant.
There is a heterogeneous mixture of shrubs and herbs
with no dominant species. The following species were
identified:
Trees (most are shrub-sized)
Acer rubrum
Ilex opaca
Juniperus virginiana
Liquidambar styraciflua
Persea borbonia
Pinus taeda
Salix caroliniana
Shrubs
Cornus stricta
Ligustrum sinense
Myrica cerifera
Rhus copallina
Herbs
Vines
Andropogon virginicus
Erigeron sp.
Eupatorium capillifolium
Hypericum hypericoides
Lactuca sp.
Osmunda regalis
Phragmites communis
Scirpus americanus
Solidago sp.
Gelsemium sempervirens
Lonicera japonica
Mikania scandens
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
Rhus radicans
Smilax bona-nox
88- 43/
G? S
SHEET 5

Please type pr print. Carefully describe all an-
ticipated development activities, including construc-
tion, excavation, filling, paving, land clearing, and
stormwater control. If the requested information is
not relevant to your project, write N/A (not ap-
plicable). Items 14 and 8-9 must be completed for
all projects.
1 APPLICANT I
a. Name
Address
City State
Zip Day phone
Landowner or Authorized agent
b. Project name (if any
c. If the applicant is not the landowner, also give
the owner's name and address.
2 LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. Street address or secondary road number
b. City, town, community, or landmark
c. County
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction?
e. Name of body of water nearest project
3 DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED
USE. OF PROPOSED PROJECT
L?°7
?f}wco-3 T-N-WS- Oy31
d. _ Describe the planned use of the project.
4 LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire _ tract
b. Size of individual lot(s)
c. Elevation of tract above mean sea level or Na-
tional Geodetic Vertical Datum
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
e. Vegetation on tract
f. Man-made features now on tract
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan Classifica-
tion of the site? (Consult the local land use
plan.)
Conservation Transitional
Developed Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
i. How are adjacent waters classified?
j. Has a professional archaeological survey been
carried out for the tract?
If so, by whom?
5 UPLAND DEVELOPMENT
Complete this section if the project includes any
upland development.
a. Type and number of buildings, facilities, or
structures proposed
b. Number of lots or parcels
a. Describe all development activities you propose c. Density (Give the number of residential units
(for example, building a home, motel, marina, and the units per acre.)
bulkhead, or pier).
d. Size of area to be graded or disturbed
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than
one acre of land, the Division of Land
If you plan to build a marina, also complete Resources must receive an erosion and sedimen-
and attach Form DCM-MP-2. tation control plan at least 30 days before land
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an ex- disturbing activity begins. If applicable, has a
isting project, new work, or both? sedimentation and erosion control plan been
submitted to the Division of Land Resources?
c. Will the project be for community, private, or
commercial use? f. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet
of mean high water to be covered by im-
permeable surfaces, such as pavement,
buildings, or rooftops.
.. w.1, rd
g. List the'materials, such as marl, paver stone, b. Amount of material to be excavated from
asphalt, or concrete, to be used for paved below water level in cubic yards
surfaces. c. Type of material
d. Does the area to be excavated include marsh-
h. If applicable, has a stormwater management land, swamps, or other wetlands?
plan been submitted to the Division of En- e. High ground excavation, in cubic yards
vironmental Management? f. Dimensions of spoil disposal area
i. Describe proposed sewage disposal and/or waste g. Location of spoil disposal area
water treatment facilities.
h.
Do you claim title to the disposal area?
j. Have these facilities received state or local If not, attach a letter granting permission from
approval? the owner.
k. Describe existing treatment facilities. i. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance??
If so, where?
j. Does the disposal area include any marshland,
1. Describe location and type of discharges to swam0land,'or water areas?
waters of the state (for examplersurface runoff, k. Will the fill material be placed below mean
sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial high water?
effluent, or "wash down"). 1. Amount of fill in cubic yards
m. Type of fill material
n. Source of fill material
m. Water supply source o. Will fill material be placed on marsh or other
n. If the project is oceanfront development, wetlands?
describe the steps that will be taken to main- p. Dimensions of the wetland to be filled
tain established public beach accessways or pro- q. How will excavated or fill material be kept on
vide new access. site and erosion controlled?
o. If the project is on the oceanfront, what will
be the elevation above mean sea level of the
first habitable floor?
6 EXCAVATION AND FILL
INFORMATION
a. Describe below the purpose of proposed excava-
tion or fill activities (excluding bulkheads,
which are covered in Section 7).
Access channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
r. What type of construction equipment will be
used (for example, dragline, backhoe, or
hydraulic dredge)?
s. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equip-
ment to the project site? If yes, explain
the steps that will be taken to lessen en-
vironmental impacts.
7 SHORELINE STABILIZATION
Boat basin
Other (break-
water, pier,
boat ramp,
rock jetty)
Fill placed in
wetland or below
MHW
Unland fill
a. Length of bulkhead or riprap
b. Average distance waterward of mean high water
or normal water level
c. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months,
in feet
d. Type of bulkhead material
e. Amount of fill, in cubic yards, to be placed
below mean high water
f. Type of fill material
Length Width Depth
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims
title to the affected property. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then for-
ward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permis-
sion from the owner to carry out the project.
An accurate work plat (including plan view and
cross sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on 8 I/z x 11 white paper. (Refer to Coastal
Resources Commission Rule 7).0203 for a detailed
description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if 16
high quality copies are provided by the applicant.
(Contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regard-
ing that agency's use of larger drawings.) A site or
location map is a part of plat requirements and it
must be sufficiently detailed to guide agency per-
sonnel unfamiliar with the area to the site. Include
county road (SR) numbers, landmarks, and the like.
A stormwater management plan, if applicable, that
may have been developed in consultation with the
Division of Environmental Management.
A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners. These
individuals have 30 days in which to submit com-
ments on the proposed project to the Division of
Coastal Management. The applicant must advise
the adjacent landowners of this opportunity by sen-
ding a copy of the permit application to them by
registered or certified mail. This notification is re-
quired by G.S. 113-229(d).
Name_
Address
-A-list of previous state or federal permits issued
for work on the project tract. Include permit
numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
A check for $100 made payable to the Depart-
ment of Natural Resources and Community
Development to cover the costs of processing the
application.
A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in ocean-
front and inlet areas.
A statement on the use of public funds. If the
project involves the expenditure of public funds, at-
tach a statement documenting compliance with the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act
(N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to 10).
9 CERTIFICATION AND PERMIS
SION TO ENTER ON LAND
Any permit issued in response to this application
will allow only the development described in the
application. The project will be subject to condi-
tions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the pro-
posed activity complies with the State of North
Carolina's approved Coastal Management Program
and will be conducted in a manner consistent with
such program.
I further certify that I am authorized to grant, and
do in fact, grant permission to representatives of
state and federal review agencies to enter on the
aforementioned lands in connection with
evaluating information related to this permit ap-
plication and follow-up monitoring of project.
This is the ;9// day of ta_
19s.
X_ (24
Lan owner or Authorized agent
Name Send the completed application materials to the
Address Division. of Coastal Management Office nearest you
and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. See the
Name map on the inside front cover for the appropriate
Address DCM office and addresses and phone number.
3
! - #
Form DCM-MP-2
MARINA
DEVELOPMENT
Attach this form to the Application for Permits to
Develop in North Carolina's Coastal Area. Be sure
to complete all other sections of that application
which relate to this proposed project, including
upland areas, even if duplicative. All shore-based
facilities must be included in application and work
plats.
1 MARINA CHARACTERISTICS
a. Check below the type of marina proposed.
Commercial Public
Residential
b. Will the marina be open to the general public?
c. If there is residential development associated
with the marina, how many units or lots are
manned?
d
C -
Check all of the types of service to be
provided.
Full service, including travel
lift and/or rail
Dockage, fuel, and marine supplies
Dockage ("wet slips") only
Number of slips
Dry storage
Number of boats
Boat ramp(s)
Other (describe)
e. Check below the proposed type of siting.
Land cut and access channel
Open water with dredging for basin
and/or channel
Open water, no dredging required
Other (describe)
f. Describe the typical boats to be served (for ex-
ample, open runabout, charter boats, sail boats,
or mixed types).
g. Typical boat length
h. Maximum boat length
i. Are any floating buildings planned?
If so, describe.
1.µ:2 MARINA OPERATIONS s:
a
Check each of the following sanitary facilities
which will be included in the proposed project.
Office toilets
Toilets for patrons
Number
Location
Showers
Boat holding tank pumpout
Type and location
b. Describe treatment type and location for all
sanitary wastewater.
c. Describe solid waste, fish offal, and trash
disposal.
d. How will overboard discharge of sewage from
boats be controlled?
e. Give the location and number of "No Sewage
Discharge" signs proposed.
f. Describe the special design, if applicable, for
containing industrial type pollutants, such as
paint, sandblasting waste, and petroleum pro-
ducts.
g. Where will residue be disposed of?
h. Give the number of channel markers and "No
Wake" signs proposed.
Note: Regulatory signs such as these require ad-
ditional approval by the N.C. Wildlife
Resources Commission.
4
0
i. Give the location of fuel handling facilities and
describe the safety measures planned to protect
area water quality.
j. Describe design measures that promote boat
basin flushing or circulation and reduce water
quality impacts.
k. What will be the marina policy on overnight
and live-board dockage?
1. Is the proposed marina located near any
shellfish leases? If so, give the name and
address of the leaseholder.
m. If this project is an expansion of an existing
marina, what types of services are currently
provided?
n. How many slips are now available?

1
%
Date: 29 June 1988
1. APPLICANT
a. Environmental Services, Inc.
9104 Cypress Green Drive
Jacksonville, Florida
32216 904-636-8552
b. None
c. Betty Brewer
126 Howe Street
Norfolk, Virginia
23503
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED PROJECT
JUL 5 1988
REGULATORY BRANCH
a. Amelia Drive, lots 2 and 3.
b. Ca. .5 mile west of Manteo.
C. Dare County.
d. Proposed project site is not within city limits; it
is within planning jurisdiction.
e. Croatan Sound; it is .7 mile from proposed project
site.
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. The purpose of the project is to make the two lots
suitable for single homesites, specifically so that
they will be suitable for the installation of septic
tanks.
b. New work.
C. Private use.
d. The purpose of the project is to make the two lots
suitable for single homesites, specifically so that
they will be suitable for the installation of septic
tanks.
R
4. LAND AND WATER CHARACTERISTICS
a. .7 acre, 180'x168.37'.
b. .35 acre, 90'x168.37'.
C. Ca. 3.4'-3.6', excluding ditch areas.
d. Soil on the tract is Mascotte soil. Over most of the
tract, this is covered by a layer of fill material
(deposited many years ago), which varies in depth from
about 1" deep to about 12" deep.
e. The tract is covered by a dense growth of small trees
(about 20' high), shrubs, and herbaceous species.
Near Amelia Drive, willows (Salix caroliniana) are the
dominant tree species. Farther back, pines
(Pinus taeda) are dominant.
There is a heterogeneous mixture of shrubs and herbs
with no dominant species. The following species were
identified:
Trees (most are shrub-sized)
Acer rubrum
Ilex opaca
Juniperus virginiana
Liquidambar styraciflua
Persea borbonia
Pinus taeda
Salix caroliniana
Shrubs
Cornus stricta
Ligustrum sinense
Myrica cerifera
Rhus copallina
Herbs
Andropogon virginicus
Erigeron sp.
Eupatorium capillifolium
Hypericum hypericoides
Lactuca sp.
Osmunda regalis
Phragmites communis
Scirpus americanus
Solidago sp.

Vines
f . None.
Gelsemium sempervirens
Lonicera japonica
Mikania scandens
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
Rhus radicans
Smilax bona-nox
g. Transitional.
h. RS8.
i_. If the nearby swamp forest were classified, it would
be classified SC. The portion of the Croatan Sound
into which this swamp forest is connected (by ditches)
is closed to shellfishing.
j. Not to our knowledge.
5. UPLAND DEVELOPMENT
a. Two single-family residences proposed.
b. Two.
C. Two, 2.87/acre.
d. Initially, the addit ion of fill material on the lots
will disturb approx. 95% of the .7 acre area of the two
lots. No fill is to be placed o n a narrow fringe of
swamp forest at the back of the lots.
e. N/A.
f. N/A.
g. No specific plans at this time.
h. N/A.
i. Sewage disposal will be by means of septic tanks.
j. These lots, or more specifically, sections of these
lots, are considered by the Health Department to be
"conditionally suitable" for installation of septic
tanks. This means that they will be considered
suitable for septic tanks if a certain amount of fill
material is placed on them. In this case, the needed
depth of fill material is 19".

k. None.
1. N/A.
m. Well.
n. N/A.
o. N/A.
6. EXCAVATION AND FILL INFORMATION
a. Fill placed in wetland:
Length-170' Width-150-165'
b. None.
C. N/A.
d. N/A.
e. N/A.
f. N/A.
g. N/A.
h. N/A.
i. N/A.
j N/A.
k. No.
1. 2000 cubic yards.
M. Sand.
n. Unknown.
o. Yes, fill material will be placed in 404 wetlands.
A description of the 404 wetlands was given under
Land and Water Characteristics.
P. 170'x150'-1651.
q. By use of siltation screens.
r. Fill will be trucked in.
S. No.

7. 'SHORELINE STABILIZATION
N/A.
8. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
There are no adjacent riparian landowners. However, names
and addresses of adjacent landowners are:
Katie W. Williams
P.O. Box 755
Manteo, NC 27954
Ricky A. & Karen C. Beacham
P.O. Box 1276
Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
Linda Putnam & Lynwood Putnam:
Linda Putnam
Wingina Avenue
Manteo, NC 27954
Lynwood Putnam
9 Michie Road
New Castle, Delaware 19720
No previous permits have been issued for work on this tract.
.. - -
Fo?t R. ft, igih a-
50
•(i 1 ; mss, :'. -X7 „'
' i ? i l? •• ?0,
liz?, 01
Sunny Side
BR o
tor'
COUN EGIONAL Al PORT'.
V? ?i2 `
;0 fk1 ower, )I
Remo' ,y • _ ( .
2
2
i
I
Burnside Headq
(Historical S
?t
I
9
h
TE / Maven'

\?\\ 4 I
Light it
6
....., ??,? i
WiA,
Mart e O\
`Well Fields \ LL'1
Site
-Turn
Best
I - l\ Syr
- R O ,? [ O K E
j
S/P43l
S l; EET 1 O r S
DESIGNED fry PROJEC' N

0nnnnlin 1c?1n?-?rl/RrntA/nY ('itCI 'DaWNf'l .DAT=_
r
NOW Or. FOgMIRLY
l0 OAA11L. {.6,ThT¦
Ak enR '-N 40. 05.'L` ILI*
R
..1 P
- - - - - I CIO. o' 40.0'
- r P UT v ?----- r C nZ v
v
I I
II ND•
II
II
I
r?
{?
91

W ? II
it
? l
I
I
II
1 I
s II
?LCV.1-VKIL

I
I
I ?
s•.n.TO? ??

5400 Ob'W-m tI? _• ..._ 7
t1 t*
K .1
U6 V1L WT
F t-oo o zor?E.. Arc P.M?I..\A ?E.\C?? ?,?
e•r..t.c r?ooo . t3.0' *C,N ^ sue. t1t, Or.Ri es. wna..
y
TED MMM:
rat
•?? ?r?s PR
s • " „T
SEAL
L 1465
him M,?,

U)
cv ?.____...
N
0
Q 1
m^
CD
n
(n 1
--s
\V
T 1
C/) v
CD A 1
i
?P
0
1
Co
N y
w
O
0
m
m

D
r
m
a
3
co
w
0
7
r_
W
v:
m
a ?
0
m
T
g
w
m
I
cr
Q
m
a
0
0
a
v
M
m
x
r«
a
0
m
m
0
a
a
W
a
to O
1
N W A Ln
I + ! I I I I ?

O
w
Z3
O
P7
CD
(n
Q.
CD
CD
In
CCU
,_+
CD

O p
O - + N W A N
z ` ! 1 1 1 1 1

W

o ?! o
-
0
D,
?o
w
0
v
w
N
? O
CL
D
3
N
w
v
D
D
0
_x
w
(D
n
0
i
cf)
(D
n
0
w
U)
cD
0
D
(fl
Q7
0
r
0
.+
-D
,46
slrE DESG?_IPT_IVN
Soil on the tract is Mascotte soil. Over most of the
tract, this is covered by a layer of fill material
(deposited many years ago), which varies in depth from
about 1" deep to about 12" deep.
The tract is covered by a dense growth of small trees
(about 20' high), shrubs, and herbaceous species.
Near Amelia Drive, willows (Salix caroliniana) are the
dominant tree species. Farther back, pines
(Pinus taeda) are dominant.
There is a heterogeneous mixture of shrubs and herbs
with no dominant species. The following species were
identified:
Trees (most are shrub-sized)
Acer rubrum
Ilex opaca
Juniperus virginiana
Liquidambar styraciflua
Persea borbonia
Pinus taeda
Salix caroliniana
Shrubs
Herbs
Vines
Cornus stricta
Ligustrum sinense
Myrica cerifera
Rhus copallina
Andropogon virginicus
Erigeron sp.
Eupatorium capill.ifolium
Hypericum hypericoides
Lactuca sp.
Osmunda regalis
Phragmites communis
Scirpus americanus
Solidago sp.
Gelsemium sempervirens
Lonicera japonica.
Mikani.a scandens
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
Rhus radicans
Smilax bona-nox

SNE?T ?? 0F_ 5