20090760 Ver 1_CC Application_20090709

Transmittal
To: N.C. DWQ, 401/Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Attention:
We Transmit:
? as per your request
? under separate cover
® by mail
? by messenger
? by pick up
? by overnight carrier
? regular UPS
the following:
? prints
? copies
® reports
? studies
? reproducibles
? product literature
? computations
? specifications
? shop drawings

for:
? your approval
? your review and comment
® your file/use
? revision and submission
? distribution
09-0760
? as requested by
? as approved by
? as submitted for approval by
t;pl?R7ESY ?C?C?'@o?I(sD
r
.,0( )PY JUL 9 2009
DW • WATER QUALITY
WETL&M AID STORMTER BRANCH
Copies Date Number Description
1 7/6/09 The Virginia / Carolina Regional Water Authority Water Distribution System
Waterline Installation Nationwide Permit 12 Request Report
Comments: This Nationwide Permit 12 Request report is being forwarded to your department for your files.
Please review enclosed Permit Request Report and contact me at [e-mail] or
434-797-4497 with questions or comments.
If enclosures are not as noted, please notify us at once
Dewberry`
551 Piney Forest Road
P.O. Box 1509 (24543)
Danville, VA 24540
Date: 7/6/09 Project No: 50013093
Project: Virginia/Carolina Regional Water Auth.
Reference: NCSR 1403&1402 Waterline
cc:
Signed: A??
Brl a L. Bro , Environmental Scientist
This transmission may contain confidential or privileged information. if you receive this message in error, notify the sender without
reading, copying or disclosing contents. The unauthorized use or dissemination of any confidential or privileged information contained in
this transmission is prohibited.
¦
' The Virginia / Carolina Regional Water Authority
Water Distribution System
' NCSR 1403 and NCSR 1402 Waterline Installation
' Nationwide Permit 12 Request
July 6, 2009
1
Submitted For:
The Virginia / Carolina Regional Water Authority
Sparta, North Carolina

' Submitted To:
Amanda Jones
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
' Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
Submitted By:
t Dewberry & Davis, Inc.
551 Piney Forest Road
' Danville, Virginia 24540
434-797-4497
1
f0e Dewberry

Dewberry
' July 6, 2009
' Ms. Amanda Jones

551 Piney Forest Road 434 797 4497
Danville, Virginia 24540-3353 434 797 4341 fax
P.O. Box 1509 • Danville, Virginia 245434509 www.dewberry.com
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue
Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
RE: The Virginia/ Carolina Regional Water Authority Water Distribution System
NCSR 1403 and NCSR 1402 Waterline Installation
Request for Nationwide Permit 12
Dear Ms. Jones:
Enclosed is the Pre-Construction Notification Form (PCN) required for the request of a United
States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Nationwide Permit 12 for the proposed Virginia /
Carolina Regional Water Authority Water Distribution System. The proposed waterline will run
' parallel to the North Carolina State Roads (NCSR) 1403 and 1402 within the right-of-way for
approximately 17,524 linear feet from the intersection of NCSR 1403 and Interstate 21 to the end
of NCSR 1402. This proposed segment of the waterline is illustrated in Figure 1.
' The USGS topography map (Figure 1) illustrates that there are two (2) stream crossings
associated with the waterline installation. The first stream crossing will result in a temporary
' impact along an unnamed tributary to the New River located at 36.569167 latitude and
81.378333 longitude. Photographs of the stream subject to temporary impact are provided in
Figure 2. Stream crossing construction details are provided in Figure 3. The second stream
crossing will occur within the Department of Transportation (DOT) right-of-way. The stream
crossing is located at 36.566667 latitude and 81.116667 longitude. The waterline will be
installed 18" above the existing culvert and will not impact the stream channel. Stream crossing
construction details are provided in Figure 4.
The National Wetland Inventory (NWI) map was generated from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service Wetland Mapper (Figure 5) and used to identify mapped wetlands. The digital NWI
maps indicate that there are no wetlands present along the proposed waterline route. The Natural
Resources Conservation Service, Web Soil Survey for Alleghany County was used to identify
and classify soil types present at the site (Figure 6). None of the soils listed within the project
area are listed on the National Hydric Soils List for Alleghany County, North Carolina.
The PCN Form is provided in Appendix A. As required in PCN Section F.l.c., supplementary
information is provided in Appendix B.
Dewberry & Davis, Inc.
Ms. Amanda Jones
Page 2
' July 6, 2009
On behalf of the Virginia / Carolina Regional Water Authority, Dewberry & Davis, Inc.
' (Dewberry) requests a Nationwide Permit 12 for the proposed waterline described above with
construction details and site information provided in the enclosed PCN.
If you should have any questions or comments, please contact me at 434-797-4497 or at
[e-mail].
Sincerely,
Dewberry & Davis Inc.
Bri a L. Broo
Environmental Scientist
Troy A. Shelton
Environmental Department Manager
BLB\tas\chn
Enclosures
cc: NC DWQ, 401/Wetlands Unit
Bryce Simmons, Dewberry
P:\50013093Wdmin\Reports\2009.7.6 PCN Cover Letter.docx
It Dewberry®

1

' FIGURE 1
USGS Topography Map
1 Illustrating the Proposed Waterline Route

i
1
1 ? -
C {TYSON { i) rTI Al S0I
t1Lf.E?.HANY I ? AI.f,$C'F? ('Cyry
36.569167 f i
' - ' 81.37833
TEMP. STREAM CROSSING S1
?f ,L N
?,, CSR 1401
NILE
t ROAD r- =
' r 36.566667 ;. ';.
81.116667
- NON-IMPACT STREAM CROSSING 2
P ROJ E-CT LOvai-MO N
NEW WATERLINE "B"
r J
}ia }? I lieu' Hi"r Ch t ., c
l`
Q'I
'DoUghtpn
cam-., Mtn
.0' 200' 400'
..
FIGURE 1 ?ils-k Dewberry
FIGURE 2
Stream Crossing S I Photographs

7 ?r

4
"
R

f

S
r

v
hn

?
•
A IV
AI
y Y
ay, ? s '^w. -sue
Ste' 1 x
?

ca

r

w
1
r r?
I
.N
N
O
L
U
c?
L
?ox
r-i
!1A
C
.N
N
O
L
U
E
N
L
7

1
' FIGURE 3
Stream Crossing S 1 Construction Details

1

STA. 1+00, CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD
VERIFY VERT. AND HORIZ. LOCATION
OF EXISTING 12'X12' TEE AND 12'
VALVE AND TIE-IN TO EXISTING 12"
WATERLINE W/ NEW 12' WATERLINE .
^ 2+00 3+00
N v h
(J / / ,. ..238 \
f
STA. 3+41, INSTALL
12' - 45' BEND W/
RESTRAINED FITTINGS
54 (LF) - 12' D.I.P. TO EXTEND
BEYOND EACH END OF CASING 5'-0'
APPROX. STA. 1+00 TO 1+54
44 (LF) - 24' DIA. X 0.312' WALL
THICKNESS STEEL CASING PIPE, DRY
BORE AND JACKED EXTEND TO 5'-0'
MIN. EACH SIDE OF PAVEMENT
APPROX. STA. 1+05 TO 1+49
I 2400
I
239C
238(
2371
I
2360
'CALE: VERT. 1"=10'
HORIZ. 7=100'
i , i DATE TITLE SHEET NO.
Dewberr 7-1-09 STREAM CROSSING
EXHIBIT
rl) lwr yo
.0
o Dewberry & Davis, Inc. PROJ. NO. PROJECT 1
o D561 A PuLLF- VA EST r+oAO
?N? VA/NC REGIONAL WATER AUTHOR"
VA
PHONE: [phone]W 50013093 CONTRACT III-NILE RD/MOXLEY RIDGE
/
a_ FAX [phone] RD WATERLINE
STA. 3+26, INSTALL
12' - 45' BEND W/
RESTRAINED FITTINGS
PROVIDE NORTH AMERICAN GREEN
BIONET C125BN (OR APPROVED
EQUAL) ON STREAM BANKS
STA. 3+98, INSTALL
12' - 45' BEND W/
RESTRAINED FIRINGS
qq(TYP.) NEW 12' WATERLINE-/ Z o
?W
STA. 3+90, INSTALL 0
BLOWOFF I I Pr
STA. 3+80, INSTALL 12'
- 45' BEND WITH W/
RESTRAINED FITTINGS o
30LF - 6' THICK CONCRETE ENCASMENT
AROUND 12' WATERLINE BELOW STREAM PER
DETAIL (APPROX. STA. 3+48 TO 3+78)
40LF - CLASS 350 D.I.P. REQ'D AT
CREEK CROSSING FROM
(APPROX. STA. 3+43 TO 3+83)
PROM
kl-
E NORTH RICAN GRE
BION C12 58N (0 APPROVED i
EQUAL ON STR BANKS
\ EX GRADE

2390

N 12' WATE LINE
30 - 6' THI K CONCRETE ENCASMENT
AR UND 12' WA TERLINE BE W STREAM
P DETAIL AP ROX. STA. +48 TO
p N N Z
F " 7 3+
AT 8) 40LF -
CREEK CRO CLASS 350
SING FROM .I.P. REQ'D
o i < ( PROX. STA +43 TO 3+ )
N J
3
238C
O jr
N
?2NF;'
pN WZ
U F\
0 < Z \
3
; Z z Z < ; z
W i 4 _ < zW
- 2371
jnW W Z
WW
f 0 TnW
I
.-K m 1 K m NC

3NI1831VM dH 3001H A3lXOW
1W / OH 31IN 8L'8 VL lOV81NOO IA o
ON 'ALNnoo ANVHJ3llV G n
b
3 oaLL /VINIOUTA'AlNnOO NOSAVHO ;i d=
.w5 x z` u
NOISN31X3 3NIl»31VM Zl
Q 'k N ..... .•??.• a w 4 w 0
AUIHOH1f1V H31VM IVNOI038 00 > _
VNIIOUVO / VINIOUTA yW
N Y y
X1----
-33N&

v I
I

I
o°
+
M
I
O 7
0 "-
+
I N
I
I I

O

+ ?
N
Z
H
Z
m?
T
+
I m
W ?
?
I I
I VI w ¢
'
I
I
0 I LL
+ W
O

I
I
LL ??
?W I
0
0
m _J
W
O
Z o
°- ° M
cc C) Inn
m ?
F- z m? Q Q p V
?Z G z
US 3 ¢ w w ru
a k 5 - w
o o t -C\j
a_
I T
< O M O N O O O O
O
I
II
a a a a a a a a v ¢ a
N N N N N N N N N N N o
O

L °
0
a

o
0
M

O
O
1 8GAH 3613
11V1SM 9+11 'V1S

0
O

` O
O
O
\
IO[I
<
N <
a
N O
a
N M
c
N OM
a
N N
a
N ON
a
N
v
N
<
\ N O
a
N O
0
N

'Q
N \ o

N In
° o

N o
M
N o
M
N In
o
N o
m
N In
M
N o
M
N In
M
N
\
\ o
+
m
1 3A1nO X3
'll0 ONV 3Ni16 VM
„ZL M N 30 d01 3*A8
NOI1VdV 3S 'NIW „8l NIV NIVW

W -_ \ O

W
J
LL \
O Z
J
W

1 \ F
3
En 1
?

c _ _ O
O
W
I 3 n
Z \ z

W
H
a ?

0
z ? ° co
? w O
p W
\ ~ ?
w V1
w 3 a n
z

z N Z N M O
z
V d z \
¢ ¢ Z
OV J x VQI p n
p
d
W m Y H J z
U N+ O
¢ w = 3 a¢
z d SONIlll3 03NIV61S36 ;+
z m \ N .
..
W p N - /M ON38 .Sb - Z L
m m m ;o J
Q o y 1lV1SNl 86+£ 'V1S
zn'z \ °
2 wawo
0 330M018
__ w 0° w° m v a 11V1SN1 O6+£ "V1S
p Z j °M ¢ a "? a SONIlll3 .31IV61136
O
amw I /M H11M N38 .Sb -
ZI l V1SN1 08+£ 'V1S
O
_
/
o
SONILLI-1 3NIVd1S3d o
F a : a o
N
~ 163 1nO 'X3 30 'll 8 ONV /M ON .9 b - „ o

w -
W
+ a
°
M
3NI1631V
„Zl MIN
0 O1 N33
8
11V1SNl '
lb+[ 'V1S
o z w
f
o c? N011 8 Vd3S 'NIW 8/( NIVINIV
x X ¢ SONIlll3 MNIV61S36
o, ? w a f M ON38 .Sb - Z L
__..
? N
° + ° J W
W Y W
V H U O
NN ?

/
I N
H
to
I I ? ° _ )
W Z U
<
x LL
z O
I
0
v
n L
¢ a m
1
\i -- 3NI1831VM „ ZL MIN / 3NI1d31VM
„ZL ONIl$1 3 01 NI-311 ONV 3AWA
.,ZL ONV 3 1 „ZLX„ZL N11SIX3 30
N011VO01 I 80H ONV 6 3A A3163A
1 313 11VHS OlOV61N00 ' 00+L 'V1S o
In o 0 0° rn rn '? o o In
M m n m
N N ry N N N M M M M M
N N N N N ±
bl3 3N/\
i
9
I
1 1
+ I
I ?
O
I
I
10'3 W063 30NV1S10
NIW „0-,9 NIVINIVW
o w U V M ¢
w ?
W U I I W pJ m +
CD? J30 I I ?m+d
zm a z N ZZz M_?o
U.- Z29 ^3rn o?d°?M
¢¢ w ? O ? ?? o a
K m -m p Q ¢ 2z +
MOB mN? O N F-f-- U ¢X MzM
¢..,w +<z ,( l as z z3 Fi?ov`?iNd
Z ° V I ti
Z M K v O
mm- i m oWw o?agcr
V ZN NNE I I I' O +lWi m+mz ° VX
UO O MO M. Zw y it
3:0 ° w O ¢ p w o w o a
?Oz pZ? fnm VI 1 K M¢O<U.¢..
o z G ? oz A
zwZ amw J
az O
+ M + _
< vw `rl
0 O J? O
o
M w a
'o z
'zc w I w (A+ d W+
O V O z >
<o zOz a ~ ,.0V w xln Pao
0 nz¢ N Z ? 60 In
N w X 3 ? m W O Z °+ o° 0 0
N w W c - W o+ W +
low O N ° c - w Y W
¢? N + aZ NUS N(A X 2 ?
0X2 I O M I? I wN INO=N
z< z 0 ¢r N OK.?w Z¢Ux
??\ N In Nd' ?}ZK ?y no
O w I Y laid Y?a
+> W z 0
?az I ?n m¢ =0
c?m?¢
w W w
w O > 3
\W
Z
^J
I..L
M1
W
I.AJ
Z
J
W
a
3
I m
W
V '
f>Mo'a,< Ja- 1 - Irl Ma);: a6Pl?l i,??xoW
1
1
' FIGURE 4
Stream Crossing 2 Construction Details

n
n

a/sTgNTq/N
?rys?F FRo 0'.
40CgTO e0ito'
p
N?
NEW 12
WATERLINE

I
i
2430
2420
2410
2400
2430
2420
2410
SCALE: VERT. 1"=10'
2400 HORIZ. 1"=100'
Q
DATE TITLE SHEET NO.
Dewberry STREAM CROSSING
o 7-1-09
;EXHIBIT
rl) o Dewberry & Davis, Inc. PROJ. NO. PROJECT 2
? ? DANVILLE, Av D VA/NC REGIONAL WATER AUTHORITY 24540 PHONE: [phone] 50013093 CONTRACT 111-NILE RD/MOXLEY RIDGE
n FAX: [phone] RD WATERLINE
2434

/ 0' 50' 100'
i SCALE: 1" = 50'

o 3NII831VM 48 300114 A3lXOW
w 3 / as 3IIN - 8L'8 VL lOV81NOO
4 ON `A1Nf10O ANVHJ3IIV

3 n / VINIE)HIA `A1NnOO NOSAVaJ
o NOISN31X3 3NI1831VM.lzI

Q AiIHOHinv H31VM IVNOIJ38
VNIIOHVO / VINVDHIA

W O <
J ?yy
X100 Q4
m J
U- of
ZO a
O
N
>: CL J o
0
Lc)
m?
wo U
2Q Q o
?Smy 3 i w 12 ?j J 'O w
o a U D H N J a ai
I..L
O N O N O N O N O N O
.O N N O O M M N N
e a a < N N < a < N o
N N N N N N N N N N N O
t` +
3NI12131V „Zl M3N 0 d01 ONV
12l3A-ino x3 30 'll N33M138
I
0
0
0
1 "
I
I
3Nn2131 M „Zl M3N 0 ll08 0
3A 4
NOI1VdV 3S NIN „8l NIVINIVN
3
r`
/ 3Nn 31VM ,Zl 3N 30 ll0 0
ONV 1 3nlno 'X3 3 d01 N33 8 0
/ N011 2itld3S NIN „BL NItl1Nltl ?

z
w
a
3
N / O
O
3
w / +
?
tO
z /

-- 0
O
r 0

W >
W
p
J /<
a O
a N O
a N
a O
a
a O
a N O
Z
Q
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N a
N a
N o
O
O
O N
Ot O
OI N
00 0
u0 N
t? O
r` N
O O
O N
N O N
b
? ? ?n
N a
N a
N t
N a
N a
N e
N <
N ? a
N a
N a
N
1 /
1 /
MM

Z Z /
J o
o

H W
Q /

o
0
n

/
/
0
O

/
/
SONIlll3
03NIV21 38 IM AO
/ l llV1SNI O+19 V1S
/
Al8N3S V 1NV2IOAH o
3 13 7V1SNl O+19 'V1S

N N N N N N N N N
d'
?
N
?
N M
N
N N
N O
N N_
N O
N O
N O
N
/ m
Y rn
<
N N N N N N
/ N N
O
O
+
O

/
/
/ O
-- +
O

/
1

111
0
0
+
to
/
/
/
O
0
M M N O ?_ O N O ill O r
N N N N N ? N N N Y a ?
N N N N N N N N N N N
Wd 6V:8Z:2 600Z/9A 'bmp'4xy-gloM_? - 50 g0'600Z\A9AJnS ?MCCpd abp!d @IXOA - 6- l -6002 .Nr CI ?0 ,?60? 1005
;o:p „? CL II In
:Q :? Wp Z?:. w? ??1
fr fV
'ssd?''. d'd?.i a Lu 2
a .R?+ N>x
a
y o
?? v1S 3NIl HOIVVV

' FIGURE 5
Site NWI Map
1

o
N
C
Of R
d m
; c c }i
C
N
O L d d L
N a
d C o 3? N
d m d
v A
5 w `m O1 w a
f f d m e m
'A Y ? ,?
w o °
v
1, a m
( d 0 m t o
m °c c W a°
"" `d `m d Q
ao _
E° o d m
H o E E
•-.? O .d+ O1 L
z
p N y cm
.? d L CY
U)
V r y d
l0
; C C A A N d
A A L L L C
r r N W N d d d O
d
; O+
a j9 A
C O d Q Q
N C M « t
? 7 0
L° m y
2 O< rn 7 0
o m o
M U 7 J n a d m m L >_
W W LL ii LL _3 O K o
J d W o
2 0 z o x o o 14 0 0
Z U N 0 2

36-35-0 N 36-34-30 N 36-34-0 N 36-33-30 N 36
0
0
M
n
O
aO
O
M
aD
W
O
C?
z
0
m
00
LI 7
n
0
0
(7
n
O
aD
O
M
OP
W
O
m
aD
3
O
CD
W
S£-9£ N 0£-b£-9£ N 0-tiE-9E N OE-££-9£ N (
FIGURE 6
Site Soil Survey Map
M
7 iM
Ih fh
..84.9 .LB
.,94 .9 . L8
0 w
..6Z,6 .L9
?Oo
m
m
0
0
0
v
0
0
x
?O
N O
? O
Q N
C
O O
N
C
C
Q
8 O
N
_ N
d
O O
Z-<
„6Z,6.LR
OO
N ?
m
N
IL
T
N
Z
N
y'o
Z?
U.Y
_ 2
U)
a
N O
?U
N
C
O
Z
?o
d :p
?L
? c
M8
Z CJ
0
e
M
co
_C
O)

C
7
O
C c
O .?
> N
mp
C7 Y
c
c
co
ai C
c m
0 m
C
m=
U 2
0
0
Z
.T. L
C
0
UQ
C y
C M L
C ~
N
L
m
2
0
U
(N E
N
a(Di m
L
N ma `°
CL
Z m O
0 x E m
LO 3 N
N Q E
? u
? oo m
Q o Too a)
'a a)
Z ?N o
m a)
d a E o
Q C) C O
C 0 M CO d
L N .L.. Lj y
m U)
_ 0 c 42
O C
m o > a)
(0 N r N E
Oc) m?
N .- N N
M O C a) a)
2 P E a E
00
co
YO
U O rn 'O
2.1 v
a) v o
U
c
O U
m co cU
a) 0 Z
O
(n 2.
C . Q
p
)
CD m m
=0 3 c
0
N E N
L ? w L
H
m "a
J f0 y
Z? E c w
0) a)
a) N M2
CL >,
m j U N ca
fn a) j C
N O C O ?n
`U 2 cL 0
O O N
O 0 :E O
U 3: U H
m
C
O
m
U
L W
0O
00
Z N
c c
o m
0--)
L)
T O)
cco 0
N CD
Q ?
m CO
? CO
Q m
T y
za
7 T
U a)
0 :3
U U
0 m
-0 (COD N .3 C 0
(a > m m N
N
Q) CD N a) a) .O N
c: T)
7 V 0 tC O r N 7 C_
N C? 0-.N 00 C 2,E
O d 'O 0,5U)
O - Y a)
Ctr- m '0 y O N.0 O
o: O N D N CD O N
m O N h
m N N 'L-' 7
c° ?NE (D -5
.n Q) BEN
?N - p O
N O N C y ( 00 L 3 N m C
> 04 CL u EE?.+> m 0(D
C O N C N 'E Z Ol a tt=
0 a) a) ? 7 o O '0 N a>)
U(ri »o m c- E 4) t Ea m?
m
? ^L
>>,Ln ?c6 a 0 0
(v j 0 E -5 c° 3 ? o_ L E
E c N 0 N L C •N
f? N (D 'O 0) O N O
m ? 7 m L m O O) N C
a)
m
Q m z
T O T c _C m O 'O 'a.0
O L O N c Q m _)
c~ O 0,0
Q 7
co
`?? o
cAa>i 2))a`)m6 EL - 0)
N? 7 0 d m
O O ??°
-Z '0 :5 -0 O °' E m E
L o
U(n >- H m 0.-C O FL- °u O
V1 N
y
O. C lC
U t
(n
C N
? a
N v
m rn
N

p m
?
N
N
O O
°
m )
v)
C N
o .
. O
Q p
d
Z, L T c L y m E
m N r 0
w `p
> O C c9 fn O U E O (n 3 w C

D J
R
U.
d
z
W
C
_ •
;; CL
c
$
W
J

a O u a

U) p
0
a co

u U
Y a 0 _ E
m
N Z
m °
4) o ?
a
C
O$

Q 7

CML -4 " 0

a a '"

a >

_ 3

0 0

C7

m

P
°

O a

m a

m ul

>

6 m

T
U)
LL ° O Q) N w

C L

> O y

N C
2

° m
=
C T

C
5 L O U
- Q T
-
N
Q O C o
(n •-p co O m 0
m U U
0 0
J m
J M C 4
)
a
of CO
fn C
N 4
)
(n C
!n
u) 00
fn O p
(n fn
d a
c
w
0 ?

0

® X +

X

®

<' -4

OK

OO

O

>

+

I?I

O

,r„

I11 d
H
h , ,
a in
ma
o
0 0
0
N N
f.- O)
co
a
a)
Z
U
N O
E U
m
m
u) O
a
.0 0
U
f9
C
O
m
z
d
v
N
V N
7 y
C C
y O
? m
d
y
00
Z U
?Ir
Soil Map-Alleghany County, North Carolina, and Grayson County, Virginia
The Allegheny Waterline and Tank Design
Map Unit Legend
1

11
11

Allegheny County, North Carolina (NC005)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
Ad Alluvial land, wet (Nikwasi) 27.3 3.2%
CaE Chandler silt loam, 10 to 25 percent slopes 0.9 0.1%
CaF Chandler silt loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes 43.6 5.1%
CdG Chandler stony silt loam, 45 to 65 percent
slopes 14.0 1.6%
CeC Chester loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes 1.2 0.1%
CmE Clifton loam, 10 to 25 percent slopes 11.4 1.3%
CsF Clifton stony loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes 9.1 1.1%
Cx Codorus complex (Arkaqua) 26.8 3.2%
Cy Comus fine sandy loam (Rosman) 4.0 0.5%
FnC2 Fannin silt loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes,
eroded 96.4 11.4%
FnE2 Fannin silt loam, 10 to 25 percent slopes,
eroded 115.1 13.6%
FnF Fannin silt loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes 12.6 1.5%
FoF2 Fannin silty clay loam, 15 to 45 percent
slopes, eroded 32.8 3.9%
Gu Gullied land 38.1 4.5%
TaC Tate loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes 12.5 1.5%
TaD Tate loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes 9.7 1.1%
TIC Tusquitee loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes 5.6 0.7%
TID Tusquitee loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes 9.6 1.1%
TIE Tusquitee loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 3.1 0.4%
W Water 0.5 0.1%
WaC Watauga loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes 4.9 0.6%
WaE Watauga loam, 10 to 25 percent slopes 116.4 13.7%
WaF Watauga loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes 109.6 12.9%
WsF Watauga stony loam, 15 to 45 percent
slopes 40.1 4.7%
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 745.4 87.9%
Totals for Area of Interest 848.2 100.0%
Grayson County, Virginia (VA077)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres In AOI Percent of AOI
28C Glenelg loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes 37.4 4.4%
28D Glenelg loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 25.0 3.0%
28E Glenelg loam, 25 to 35 percent slopes 35.4 4.2%
42E Peaks very gravelly loam, 35 to 55 percent
slopes 1.1 0.1%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/1/2009
aim Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4
Soil Map-Alleghany County, North Carolina, and Grayson County, Virginia

1

The Allegheny Waterline and Tank Design
Grayson County, Virginia (VA077)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres In AOI Percent of AOI
50F Rock outcrop-Peaks complex, 25 to 80
percent slopes 2.6 0.3%
W Water 1.4 0.2%
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 102.9 12.1%
Totals for Area of Interest 848.2 100.0%
uauA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/1/2009
? Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4

0

u

1

' Appendix A
PCN Form
09-0760
o?oF wArF?QG
0 C 'C'
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: COPY
? Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ? No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Virginia/Carolina Regional Water Authority Water Distribution System
2b. County: Allehany County
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Sparta
2d. Subdivision name: N/A U 'V/ Lrm- 4F
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state

project no: L.Of
N/A

JUL 9 2009
3. Owner Information
R AUTY
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: WETI,ANOSANDSTORMWA
3b. Deed Book and Page No. Municipal Project
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): Bryan Edwards, Chairman (VA/Carolina Regional Water Authority)
3d. Street address: PO Box 99
3e. City, state, zip: Sparta, NC 28675
3f. Telephone no.: 336-372-4257
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page I of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name: Virginia / Carolina Regional Water Authority
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address: PO Box 99
4e. City, state, zip: Independence, VA 24348
4f. Telephone no.: 276-773-3703
4g. Fax no.: 276-773-2634
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Dewberry& Davis, Inc.
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Dewberry
5c. Street address: 551 Piney Forest Road
5d. City, state, zip: Danville, VA 24543-1509
5e. Telephone no.: 434-797-4497
5f. Fax no.. 434-797-4341
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 36.569167 Longitude: - 81.37833
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to New River
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C; ORW
2c. River basin: NEW
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Limited or Non Limited Roads & Highways surrounded by rural development temporarily impacted for utility line
installation
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
40'
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Installation of utility water line
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Installation of approximatley 17,524 linear feet of 12" waterline using a standard 3 cubic foot bucket
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
? Yes ® No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 1.0, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
if there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W 1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W2 ? PEI T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ? P ® T excavation to UT1 from New ® PER ® Corps
11'
40'
install utility line River ? INT ? DWQ
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
? PER ? Corps
S5 ? P ? T ? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 40
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10 '
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No if yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWO)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse
? Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary T impact required?
B1 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B2 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Reduced construction difficulty and space requirements by avoiding existing utility' lines on opposite side of road
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The stream excavation will utilize coffer-dam and pump method, rip rap will be removed after installation and bank returned to
original condition
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank

El Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10 ,
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

I

r
11'
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWO
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes Z No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWO)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.

Comments: El Yes F-1 No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 0%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ? No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Approved plan NCDENR Land Quality Section
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ® DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Alleghany County
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
? HOW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply):
? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ® No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 8 of 10 ,
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

1
1
n

11

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWO Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ® Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
® Yes ? No
letter.)
Comments: FONZI
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWO Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The waterline shall provide a reliable water source to the towns of Sparta, NC and Independence, VA. Currently the two
(2) towns are served by groundwater wells and have at times exceeded the permitted capacity.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
1
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
El Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
US Fish & Wildlife website
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
hftp://ocean.floridamarine.org/eth-coral/ims/viewer.htm
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
North Carolina Office of State Archaeology website
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Floodplain Map Website

Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version ,
1

0
1
1
n
1
' Appendix B
PCN Supplementary Information
SECTION 1
PURPOSE AND NEED OF PROJECT
1
1
The Virginia Carolina Water Authority was recently created to serve the needs of
Grayson County, Virginia and Alleghany County, North Carolina, including the Towns
of Independence and Sparta. The project area includes these two Towns and the
interconnecting corridor along U.S. Route 21. The project area is shown in Figure 1
(Exhibit A).
The water systems serving the two Towns rely exclusively on groundwater sources. The
Town of Independence has four groundwater wells, four water storage tanks, and
approximately 84,000 L.F. of water line serving approximately 540 customers: The
Town of Sparta has 17 groundwater wells, six water storage tanks and approximately
160,000 L.F. of water lines serving approximately 1,270 customers. The Town of
independence has experienced a significant reduction in water capacity and has exceeded
on occasion 80 percent of the permitted capacity. The Town of Sparta has approximately
25 percent of their permitted water source capacity remaining but has experienced
moderate growth in the last few years.
t 1.1 Project Description
The proposed project replaces the existing 23 groundwater wells of both
Towns with a new water treatment plant utilizing the New River as the water
source. The project includes a 1.0 MGD membrane filtration water treatment
plant, two water storage tanks, 51,000 L.F. of 12-inch and 8-inch water lines,
and four pumping stations. The interconnection between the Towns creates a
' new distribution system in Alleghany and Grayson Counties serving
approximately 33 new connections in Alleghany and 21 new connections in
Grayson. The proposed locations of these facilities are shown in Figure 2
' (Exhibit A).
' The new water treatment plant and distribution line, including storage tanks
and pumping stations, will be owned and operated directly by the Authority.
Improvements within the Towns will be needed to adequately convey water
from the new treatment facility throughout each Town. The opinion of
probable cost for total project construction is $8,027,000.
1.2 Purpose and Need of Project
The Towns have maintained the existing well sources in good working
condition, however, there have been reductions in capacity, along with some
contamination, that have reduced the water production capabilities for both
Towns. The Independence water system has experienced a water capacity
Virginia - Carolina Water System
Environmental Report
Page I
reduction from drought conditions and well abandonment due to
contamination. The Sparta water system has also experienced some loss in
well capacity but has also experienced an increase in water consumption.
The Virginia Department of Health Waterworks Regulations requires plans to
be developed for new source development whenever the source water
production exceeds 80 percent of the rated capacity for a three-month period.
A recent report indicated the well source capacity of Independence has been
reduced from the permitted capacity and the water system is operating at
about 84 percent of rated capacity level. The Regulations also require that
systems utilizing wells as the sole source of supply shall provide source
capacity of a minimum of 0.5 gallons per minute per equivalent residential
connection. This requirement is also not being met. Several test wells were
drilled in the early 2000s in the Independence area with unsatisfactory results.
The Town of Sparta has approximately 25 percent of their permitted water
source capacity remaining but has experienced moderate growth in the last
few years therefore reducing the available capacity. Also, in the recent past,
the Town has removed four wells from service due to contamination and
water production issues.
Failure to pursue this project would continue to leave the Towns with
inadequate water supplies. This project would also enable both Towns to
meet and exceed the drinking water requirements of each state and to provide
a safe and adequate water supply.
Virginia - Carolina Water System Page 2
Environmental Report
SECTION 2
ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION
Alternatives were evaluated to determine the most feasible approach to provide drinking
water to the planning area. These alternatives are discussed in detail in the Virginia
Carolina Water System Preliminary Engineering eport, prepared by Lane Engineering,
Inc. The following summarizes the alternatives:
Alternative I - Groundwater Wells
In the past, groundwater has been sufficient to meet the drinking water needs of the
planning area. However, several instances of contamination have been realized recently.
This alternative explores the continued use of groundwater by developing a new well
field in areas where contamination can be controlled through wellhead protection
programs. The plan essentially institutes land use controls within the protection zone
where activities that could potentially contaminate the groundwater source are prohibited
and the plan is based on community involvement. Based on the past and present
performance of existing wells and the lack of success in developing new wells, this
alternative is questionable in meeting the needs of the Authority. As this is not a viable
option, no cost estimate has been prepared.
Alternative 2 - Conventional Surface Water Treatment Plant
A conventional 1.0 MGD surface water treatment site located near the U.S. Rt. 21 bridge
over the New River is proposed for Alternative 2. The safe yield capacity of the New
River is more than adequate based on preliminary information from VDEQ and the safe
yield analysis performed as part of the PER. The existing water source capacity available
from the New River is also more than adequate to meet the Authority's water
needs for the next 30 years. The capital cost of the construction of a conventional water
treatment plant is $4,242,500. The associated costs of the water storage tanks, pump
stations and water lines of approximately $4,729,000 bring the total project cost to
$8,971,500.
Alternative 3 - Membrane Treatment Plant with Riverbank Filtration Intake
This alternative is also based on using the New River as the water source. The
groundwater adjacent to the river presents a reliable drinking water source. The natural
sediments and soils of the riverbank are used to pre; filter alluvial aquifer groundwater
adjacent to the river prior to membrane filtration treatment. This system is described as
riverbank filtration where an extraction groundwater well is developed within the zone of
influence from the New River. This alternative consists of a combination of innovative
technologies to reduce operation costs and also reduce impacts to the environment. The
capital cost of the construction of a membrane filtration treatment plant is $3,298,000.
The associated costs of the water storage tanks, pump stations and water lines of
approximately $4,729,000 bring the total project cost to $8,027,000.
Virginia - Carolina Water System Page 3
Environmental Report
Alternative 4 - "No Action"
This alternative evaluates the consequences of "No Action." The Town of Independence
is required by waterworks regulations to develop an additional water source since the
water production has reached and exceeded 80 percent of the existing source capacity.
Both Towns risk water shortages and service interruptions to their customers if additional
water sources are not developed. During service outages, customers would use whatever
alternative source was available, posing a real threat to public health.
Well development is not considered as a practical or long term solution to meet the
Towns' needs. A water treatment plant will allow both Towns to meet and exceed
regulatory standards for safe drinking water and will provide for the immediate and
future needs of the planning area. Compared to conventional treatment, the riverbank
filtration intake and membrane filter aspects of Alternative 3 offer the Authority reduced
impacts to the environment and substantial savings in capital and operation costs. Also,
any future expansion of water withdrawals would be much less difficult with this
alternative. Therefore, Alternative 3 was chosen as the recommended alternative and is
therefore the proposed project as discussed throughout this report.
Virginia - Carolina Water System Page 4
Environmental Report
SECTION 3
AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT / ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES
Alleghany and Grayson Counties border each other in the Blue Ridge Mountains. They
are both predominantly rural, agricultural areas with most commercial and industrial
' developments in close proximity to the Towns and major transportation corridors.
The 233 square miles of Alleghany County is located in the northwest corner of North
' Carolina, with a population of 10,000 people. Most of the County is at an average
elevation of 2500 to 3000 feet MSL, with its highest peak at 4000 feet MSL.
' Grayson County, located in southwest Virginia, has a population of approximately 17,000
within its 450 square miles. The County is the state's largest in size. Grayson County is
also home to the two highest mountains in Virginia, Mount Rogers at 5729 feet MSL and
Whitetop Mountain at 5520 feet MSL. Elevations within the County range from 2180 to
5729 feet MSL.
The Area of Potential Effect would be immediately adjacent to the water treatment plant
' site, waterline route and the tank and pump station sites. Water line installation will
primarily occur along the shoulders of existing Virginia Department of Transportation
(VDOT) and North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) rights-of-way
' along U.S. 21/221.
Letters requesting information regarding the presence of any environmental resources
within the project area were sent to various regulatory agencies. A list of agencies
contacted is contained in Section 5 of this Report and copies of all responses received to
date are contained in Exhibit B. Information contained in this Report is based on
' responses from these agencies and the Virginia - Carolina Water System Preliminary
Engineering Report.
' 3.1 Land Use / Important Farmland / Formally Classified Lands
3.1.1 Affected Environment
Area land uses within the project area are primarily residential with forests
and various types of farms. The Natural Resources Conservation Service
(MRCS) for both states and the Virginia Department of Conservation and
Recreation (DCR) were contacted by letter for their comment on land uses
¦ within the project area. Copies of these agencies' responses are contained
in Exhibit B.
The project would involve purchasing land, totally less than two acres, on
which to construct the pumping station and water storage tank. Waterline
construction would generally follow existing Virginia Department of
Virginia - Carolina Water System Page 5
Environmental Report
Transportation (VDOT), North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT), or other public rights-of-way.
3.1.2 Environmental Consequences
The sites for the treatment plant, pump station, water storage tank, and
water line corridor were evaluated by NRCS. An on-site visit was also
made to the Virginia site by NRCS staff. Subsequently, NRCS has
determined that these sites in Grayson County do not contain prime,
unique, statewide or local important farmland. NRCS has determined that
approximately 14.8 acres of prime farmland in Alleghany County will be
impacted by the proposed project. However, only 1.0 acre will be
converted by the two pump stations and the water storage tank sites. The
temporary construction easement for line work will convert 13.8 acres,
which will be restored to its original contour.
According to DCR, no State Natural Preserves are within the project
vicinity.
3.1.3 Mitigation
In order to minimize adverse impacts to the land uses of the project area,
activities will follow all applicable local, state, and federal regulations.
An erosion and sediment control plan, as described in the Virginia Erosion
and Sediment Control Handbook, 1992, Virginia Department of
Conservation and Recreation, will be developed, approved, and
implemented prior to any construction activity. All disturbed areas will be
stabilized and vegetated with native plant species, as soon as practicable to
reduce the amount of time barren soils are exposed.
3.2
Floodplains
3.2.1 Affected Environment
The project area was compared to Federal Emergency Management
Agency Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Copies of these maps, (Grayson
County, Virginia, Panel 510243 0145 B) and Alleghany County, North
Carolina, Panel 370004 0002 A) are contained in Exhibit A.
3.2.2 Environmental Consequences
The proposed water line alignments, water storage tank sites and pump
station sites are in areas designated as Zone X - Areas determined to be
outside the 500-year floodplain.
Virginia - Carolina Water System Page 6
Environmental Report
The water treatment plant will not be constructed within the floodplain.
However, components of the river bank filtration system, including
belowground screens and a well pumping system will possibly be located
within the 100-year floodplain. Also, a wellhead pitless adapter that will
be sealed at ground surface will possibly be located within the floodplain.
All electrical controls associated with the pumping system will be located
above the 100-year floodplain.
The proposed locations of the water treatment plant, water storage tanks
and pump stations are shown on the floodplain maps.
3.2.3 Mitigation
The extent of floodplains to be crossed or impacted and the clearing of
riparian vegetation will be minimized. When floodplains are encountered,
the land will be restored to its original contour and vegetated with native
plant species.
No permanent structures will be constructed within a floodplain.
3.3
Wetlands
3.3.1 Affected Environment
There are no known wetlands within the project area. No wetland areas
have been identified by roadside surveys. The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers was contacted for review and comment on wetlands within the
project area. A copy of this agency's responses is contained in Exhibit B.
3.3.2 Environmental Consequences
Detailed project plans along with site specific information is needed to
determine if the proposed activity is within the Corps' jurisdiction. The
Corps recommends that efforts be made to avoid and minimize crossings
of streams and wetlands to the maximum extent practicable. If it is
necessary to cross waters/wetlands, design should comply with the Corps'
Nationwide Permits Number 12 for utility line activities.
3.3.3 Mitigation
Efforts will be made by the design engineer to relocate utility lines away
from wetlands and watercourses. Detailed project plans will be submitted
to the Corps to determine if a proposed activity is within their jurisdiction.
In the event that a wetland is encountered, heavy equipment will be placed
on mats to prevent soil compaction. Machinery must be kept out of
Virginia - Carolina Water System Page 7
Environmental Report
streams and wetlands when not being actively used. Directional drilling
will be used, when possible, from upland locations for placing water lines
where stream and/or wetland crossings are unavoidable. In areas where
directional drilling is not feasible, the trench backfill must consist of the
original material removed. No stockpiled material will be stored on a
wetland site and the affected site will be restored to its original contour.
All required permits must be obtained prior to construction activity.
3.4
Cultural Resources
3.4.1 Affected Environment
The Virginia Department of Historic Resources (DHR) and the North
Carolina Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation
Office (HPO) were contacted to initiate the consultation process under
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA).
According to an archives search, two archaeological sites and two
architectural resources have been previously recorded adjacent to the Area
of Potential Effect (APE).
3.4.2 Environmental Consequences
Two known or map-projected archaeological resources are in the vicinity
of the project. Due to the concern of the impact of this project on these
and unrecorded resources, DHR recommended a Phase I identification
survey be conducted. A Phase I identification survey for archaeological
resources was conducted in May 2007 (report enclosed in Exhibit Q. The
survey was conducted within the water treatment plant site, riverbank
horizontal screen easement, water storage tank site, two pump station sites
and approximately 760 L.F. of proposed water line easement (4.15±
acres). "No prehistoric or significant historic period cultural materials
were recovered". The two previously recorded archaeological sites lie
outside of the project's APE. Neither of the previously recorded
architectural resources is currently in existence. Both were replaced
during improvements to Highway 21/22 1. According to this report,
construction of the facilities and water line, as presently designed, will
have no effect on historic properties and no further work is recommended.
DHR concurred with this recommendation and issued a determination of
"no historic properties affected".
DHR also noted that the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians wish to be
consulted on proposed projects in Grayson County. Rural Development
has initiated consultation and submitted detailed project information to
this tribe. To date, no response has been received from the tribe.
Virginia - Carolina Water System Page 8
Environmental Report
According to the North Carolina HPO, after review of the proposed
undertakings, they are not aware of any historic resources that would be
affected. Therefore, this office has no comment on the undertaking as
proposed.
3.4.3 Mitigation
The development of a plan for the treatment of unanticipated
archaeological discoveries in accordance with §800.13 will be
incorporated into the construction documents for treating unexpected
historical or archaeological discoveries during construction. The plan will
include names, telephone and fax numbers of the appropriate County and
agency contacts and will also include the following stipulations:
a. In the event that a previously unidentified archaeological resource is
discovered during ground disturbing activities, all construction work
involving subsurface disturbance will be halted in the area of the
resource and in the surrounding area where further subsurface remains
can be reasonably expected to occur. The SHPO, or an archaeologist
approved by their office, will immediately inspect the work site and
determine the area and the nature of the affected archaeological
property. Construction work may then continue in the project area
outside of the site area. Within 10 working days of the original
notification of discovery, SHPO will determine the National Register
eligibility of the resource.
b. If the resource is determined to meet the National Register Criteria (36
CFR Part 60.6), compliance with Section 800.11 of the Council's
regulations will be ensured. Work in the affected area shall not
proceed until either (a) the development and implementation of
appropriate data recovery or other recommended mitigation
procedures, or (b) the determination is made that the located remains
are not eligible for inclusion on the National Register.
3.5
Biological Resources
3.5.1 Affected Environment
The Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR), the
Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries (VDGIF), the North
Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission, the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
(Virginia Field Office and Asheville Field Office) responded to request for
comments. Copies of responses received to date are contained in Exhibit
B.
Virginia - Carolina Water System Page 9
Environmental Report
3.5.2 Environmental Consequences
According to VDGIF and the Corps, there are currently no documented
occurrences of threatened or endangered species in this project area.
According to the USFWS County Species List for North Carolina, there
are no federally protected species documented within Alleghany County.
There are two state threatened species: Logperch (Percina caprodes) and
Seep mudalia (Leptoxis dilatata). There are several other state species of
concern.
According to the USFWS, Virginia Field Office, appropriate habitat may
exist for the Smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata), the Virginia
spiraea (Spiraea virginiana), the Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis), the Virginia
northern flying squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus), and the Bog
turtle (Clemmys muhlenbergii). USFWS recommends surveys within
appropriate habitat for these species. A survey of suitable habitat for the
Smooth coneflower and the Virginia spiraea was conducted (See report in
Exhibit Q. It was determined that suitable habitats for these species are
not present.
After evaluating the species' habitat requirements, it has also been
determined that suitable habitat for the Bog turtle, defined as wetlands and
bogs, is not present. The suitable habitats for the Indiana bat and the
Virginia northern flying squirrel, as defined by USFWS, are also not
present at the project site. Furthermore, the proposed project does not
involve tree clearing. Therefore, no impacts to any of the listed species
are anticipated.
According to DCR, the New River-Brush Creek Conservation Unit is
within the project area. This Stream Conservation Unit has been given a
biodiversity ranking of B5, which represents a site of moderate
significance. The natural heritage resources associated with this site are
Moustached clubtail (Gomphus adelphus), Green floater (Lasmigona
subviridis) and Kanawha minnow (Phenacobius teretulus). The Green
floater was recently listed as state threatened by the VDGIF. DCR
recommended coordination with DGIF (letter dated 8/21/07). According
to DGIF (letter dated 9/26/07), there are currently no documented
occurrences of T/E species in this project area.
3.5.3 Mitigation
In order to preserve existing habitat conditions, the N.C. Wildlife
Resource Commission recommends the following: Clean Water Act
Section 404 Permits and Section 401 Certifications must be followed for
any impacts to jurisdictional waters, including wetlands; sediment and
erosion control measures will adhere to the design standards for sensitive
Virginia - Carolina Water System Page 10
Environmental Report
' watersheds; instream activities should not occur during the fish spawning
season of May 1 through July 15 to prevent impacts to fish eggs and fry
downstream of the site. Additionally, best management practices (BMPs)
will be implemented to prevent sediment from entering the stream and any
streams crossings of the unnamed tributary to the New River that parallels
NCDOT Route 21/221 will be accomplished by directional bore.
NCWRC also recommended against the removal of large trees at the edge
of construction corridors and to seed disturbed areas with native plant
species that are beneficial to wildlife. Efforts are being made to
aesthetically incorporate the water treatment plant in with its surrounding
environment. The presence of trees will be important in maintaining the
natural surroundings. As noted previously, all disturbed areas will be
revegetated as soon as practicable with native plant species.
To protect the critical habitats of all threatened and endangered species
and the surrounding environment, an erosion and sediment control plan, as
described in the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, 1992,
Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, will be developed,
approved, and implemented prior to any construction activity.
The above mitigation measures will be implemented to protect all
biological resources.
3.6 Water Quality Issues
3.6.1 Affected Environment
The proposed project will involve the crossing of the following waters:
New River, Brush Creek and other unnamed tributaries. The Virginia
Department of Environmental Quality and the North Carolina Wildlife
Resources Commission commented on water quality issues. Copies of
their responses are contained in Exhibit B.
3.6.2 Environmental Consequences
The water treatment plant withdrawal and discharge permitting
requirements have been discussed with DEQ. The proposed riverbank
filtration system intake will not require a formal permit from DEQ,
USACE or Virginia Marine Resource Commission as long as no work
occurs within the streambed or banks. The proposed membrane treatment
plant does produce filter backwash water that will require a discharge
permit from these agencies. The initial conventional treatment process
will consist of a screened raw water intake on the riverbank. The intake
will include static screens to filter 1 mm particle size with maximum
Virginia - Carolina Water System Page 11
Environmental Report
velocity of 0.5 fps as required by proposed VDEQ regulations for water
withdrawals. The small filter size will prevent damage to aquatic wildlife.
DEQ does not anticipate long-term adverse impacts to the water quality of
the project area. However, potential short-term adverse impacts resulting
from surface runoff due to construction must be minimized.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission recommends the
following: adherence to Clean Water Act Section 404 Permits and Section
401 Certifications for any impacts to jurisdictional waters, including
wetlands; in the event of withdrawal from the New River, contact with NC
Division of Water Resources to discuss any registration or permitting
requirements; measures must be taken to protect an unnamed tributary to
the New River that parallels NCDOT Route 21/221; sediment and erosion
control measures should adhere to the design standards for sensitive
watersheds; water conveyance across the New River should be
accomplished by pipe suspension under the existing bridge.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Asheville Field Office recommends
the following: maintenance or establishment of minimum 100-foot native
forested buffer along each side of perennial streams and 50-foot native
buffers along each side of intermittent streams and wetlands; leaving 30
percent of the development area as green space and ensuring that green
space is connected to natural resources; all stream crossings be
accomplished by using directional boring or a clear-spanning structure;
limiting impervious surfaces within residential development.
3.6.3 Mitigation
In general, development must incorporate features which prevent
significant adverse impacts to the environment. Strict erosion and
sediment control measures, as outlined in the Virginia Erosion and
Sediment Control Handbook, are critical to water protection. Strict
adherence to best management and construction practices must be
maintained in order to protect all streams in the project area from
impairments due to sediment. A Virginia Marine Resources Commission
will be obtained prior to construction. Also, work within jurisdictional
waters will adhere to the Clean Water Act Section 404 Permits and
Section 401 Certifications.
Utilizing riverbank filtration, there will be no withdrawal from the New
River. The water line crossing of the New River is proposed to be
accomplished by attaching the utility line to the existing bridge.
Directional boring of streambeds will be utilized where feasible.
Recommendations by the USFWS, Asheville Field Office for
establishment of native forest buffers along streams to protect water
Virginia - Carolina Water System Page 12
Environmental Report
' quality were reviewed with the Virginia Carolina Water Authority Board.
The Authority does not have the legal authority to establish these land use
restrictions. However, local authorities have been encouraged to adopt
stream buffers and storm management practices to mitigate future
development impacts to the water quality. The Alleghany County Board of
Commissioners has adopted subdivision ordinances with minimum lot
sizes of 3/4 acre. In high water quality areas and watershed areas, the
' minimum lot size increases to 1 acre. These existing ordinances help to
protect water quality from degradation associated with future high density
land development.
For unavoidable impacts, the following practices will be implemented to
minimize impacts to wetlands and waterways: the operation of machinery
and construction vehicles outside of streambeds and wetlands, the use of
directional drilling from upland locations for the installation of utilities,
and the use of synthetic mats when in-stream work is unavoidable;
stockpiling of material excavated from the trench for replacement if
directional drilling is not feasible; and preservation of the top 12 inches of
trench material removed from wetlands for use as wetland seed and root
stock in the excavated area.
Additionally, all streams crossings of the unnamed tributary to the New
' River that parallels NCDOT Route 21/221 will be accomplished by
directional bore.
The use of herbicides and pesticides during construction or for landscape
maintenance will be in accordance with the principles of integrated pest
management. The least toxic pesticides that are effective in controlling
' the target species will be used. The use of these chemicals near waterways
will be avoided and the use of petroleum products, other chemicals or
other hazardous materials will be carefully monitored.
3.7 Coastal Resources
There are no coastal resources located within Grayson County, Virginia or
Alleghany County, North Carolina.
3.8 Socio-Economic / Environmental Justice Issues
' 3.8.1 Affected Environment
The proposed project will serve a wide variety of people. The customers
of the water systems will benefit greatly from the provision of an adequate
supply of safe, potable water.
Virginia - Carolina Water System Page 13
Environmental Report
3.8.2 Environmental Consequence
The project will be highly beneficial to the residents of the project area.
The provision of potable drinking water will eliminate any potential health
risks associated with contaminated groundwater. The project is not
anticipated to adversely affect the human health or environmental
conditions of the area being served. It is also not anticipated to have a
disproportionate effect on LMI communities.
3.8.3 Mitigation
Efforts will be made to encourage public participation in the project.
Public notices and public meetings will be advertised, in order to promote
community involvement.
3.9 Miscellaneous Issues - Air Quality
3.9.1 Affected Environment
Project construction will require the use of fossil-fuel burning equipment
(i.e., backhoes). The Department of Environmental Quality was contacted
for comment on the proposed project. A copy of DEQ's response is
enclosed in Exhibit B.
3.9.2 Environmental Consequences
According to DEQ, the project is not likely to affect air quality. The use
of fossil-fuel burning equipment will produce normal engine exhaust, a
by-product of gasoline and diesel fuel combustion. Such emissions are
state- and federally-regulated. Normal engine emissions occur everyday
and are dissipated into the atmosphere at acceptable quality levels. The
emissions produced as part of construction activities are not unusual
events, and will not have any adverse impact upon air quality. Completed
project activities will not generate any air emissions.
3.9.3 Mitigation
During construction, measures must be taken to ensure compliance with
federal and state regulations regarding fugitive dust control and open
burning. Fugitive dust must be kept at a minimum. Measures, such as
application of water to suppress dust and the washing down of
construction vehicles and paved roadways immediately adjacent to the
construction site, should be implemented. All land clearing debris should
be disposed of in an approved manner. Any open burning must comply
with 15 A NCAC 2D.1900 and VA Admin. Code (VAC) 9 VAC 5-50-60
Virginia - Carolina Water System Page 14
Environmental Report
et. seq., and 9 VAC 5-40-5600 et. seq. The following permits must be
obtained and compliance is necessary: NC Permit to construct & operate
Air Pollution Abatement facilities and/or Emission Sources and NC
Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973. Should any asbestos
' materials be encountered in NC, they will be handled in accordance with
15A NCAC 2D.1110 (a) (1) 7.
' 3.10 Miscellaneous Issues - Noise
' 3.10.1 Affected Environment
During project construction, some nuisance levels may be produced by the
engines of construction equipment representing short-term negative
impacts.
3.10.2 Environmental Consequences
The noise levels produced will not be at any health-endangering
thresholds. Completed project operations will not produce any noise
levels.
3.10.3 Mitigation
Contractors will be encouraged to use noise control devices and all
' activities will be limited to normal daylight hours only.
3.11 Miscellaneous Issues - Transportation
3.11.1 Affected Environment
' Construction of the water treatment plant, water storage tanks and pump
station will occur on private property. Water line construction will take
' place along existing VDOT, NCDOT U.S. 21/221.
3.11.2 Environmental Consequences
According to NCDOT, the thoroughfare plan for this area proposed future
widening of this facility to 12-foot lanes. NCDOT requests coordination
with the Alleghany County District Engineer's office.
Only moderate and temporary disruptions might occur during
construction. Project construction activities will add limited tractor-trailer
and delivery vehicle traffic to these roads. Completed project activities
Virginia - Carolina Water System Page 15
Environmental Report
should not produce any increase in the volume of traffic or have any other
adverse impacts to transportation within the area.
3.11.3 Mitigation
All work with the potential to effect roadways or other transportation
facilities will be coordinated with the District office and the local
residency office. Specifically, the project will be coordinated with the
Alleghany County District Engineer to incorporate future plans.
Construction along roadways will require some flagging of traffic,
however, road closures will be limited and will be coordinated with
VDOT and NCDOT. All permits will be obtained prior to construction.
Table 1 summarizes the anticipated long-term impacts to environmental resources within
the project area.
Table 1. Summary of Anticipated Significant Impacts to Environmental Resources
Resource Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3
Land Use / Imp. Farmland / Formally
Classified Lands No No No
Floodplains No No No
Wetlands No No No
Cultural Resources No No No
Biological Resources No No No
Water Quality Issues No No No
Coastal Resources N/A N/A N/A
Socio-Economic / Env. Justice Issues No No No
Air Quality No No No
Noise No No No
Transportation No No No
Virginia - Carolina Water System Page 16
Environmental Report
SECTION 4
SUMMARY OF MITIGATION
Construction activities will follow all applicable local, state, and federal regulations to
minimize / mitigate potential adverse impacts to the environment. This will include, but
is not limited to the following:
State Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines - to minimize erosion and sediment/
siltation transport occurrences.
Dust Control - roadways and open areas within the project area will be watered as
needed to minimize the generation and migration of dust.
Working within stream environments - for waterline stream crossings, accepted state
guidelines as outlined in stream crossing permits, will be followed to minimize
adverse impacts to the aquatic environment.
General construction practices - construction activities will follow state and federal
safety standards (i.e., OSHA), best management practices and accepted industry
guidelines to protect not only the environment, but construction personnel as well.
The following permits will be required for the completion of project construction. Also
listed is the department from which these permits can be obtained.
• Land Use Permit - Virginia Department of Transportation, North Carolina
Department of Transportation
• Erosion and Sediment Control Permit - Grayson County Building Inspector,
Alleghany County Building Inspector
• Permit for Road Crossings - Virginia Department of Transportation and North
Carolina Department of Transportation
• Water System Construction and Operations Permit - Virginia Department of
Health
• Virginia Marine Resources Commission Permit
The Virginia Carolina Water System is not anticipated to significantly impact any
environmental resources within the project area. However, in order to minimize potential
impacts of the project, the following mitigation measures will be followed:
1. All permits must be obtained prior to any land disturbing activity and compliance
with all permits is required. Specifically, compliance with the Virginia Marine
Resources Commission permit the Clean Water Act 404 Permit and the 401
Certification is necessary.
2. In order to minimize adverse impacts to the land uses of the project area and to
ensure the protection of water quality and all biological resources, activities will
Virginia - Carolina Water System Page 17
Environmental Report
follow all applicable local, state, and federal regulations. Construction activities
will comply with Best Management Practices. A Stormwater Management and
Sediment Control Plan, as described in the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control
Handbook, 1992, Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, will be
developed, approved, and implemented prior to any construction activity. All
disturbed areas will be restored to their pre-construction state. Disturbed areas
will be stabilized and vegetated with native plant species, as soon as practicable to
reduce the amount of time barren soils are exposed.
3. The extent of floodplains to be crossed or impacted and the clearing of riparian
vegetation will be minimized. When floodplains are encountered, the land will be
restored to its original contour and condition and vegetated with native plant
species. No permanent structures will be constructed within a floodplain.
4. Detailed project plans and specifications will be submitted to the USACE for their
concurrence prior to the start of construction activities.
Should a wetland be encountered, to prevent soil compaction, heavy equipment
must be placed on mats and no stockpiled material can be stored on the wetland
site. Machinery must be kept out of streams and wetlands when not being
actively used. Directional drilling from upland locations will be used for placing
water lines where stream and/or wetland crossings are unavoidable. In areas
where directional drilling is not feasible, the trench backfill must consist of the
original material removed. The top twelve inches of trench material removed
from wetlands must be stockpiled on mats or filter cloth for final placement as
wetland seed and rootstock in the excavated area. The affected site must be
restored to its original contour. All required permits must be obtained prior to
construction activity.
6. A plan will be incorporated into the construction documents for the treatment of
unanticipated archaeological discoveries. The plan will include the names,
telephone and fax numbers of the appropriate County and agency contacts. The
plan is discussed in detail in Section 3.4.3. In the event that previously
unidentified archaeological resources are discovered, all construction work
involving subsurface disturbance will be halted and the steps outlined in the plan
will be immediately followed.
Instream activities will be avoided during the fish spawning season of May 1
through July 15 to prevent impacts to fish eggs and fry downstream of the site.
The removal of large trees will be limited to those necessary for construction.
9. The use of herbicides and pesticides during construction or for landscape
maintenance will be in accordance with the principles of integrated pest
management. The use of these chemicals near waterways will be avoided and the
Virginia - Carolina Water System Page 18
Environmental Report

use of petroleum products, other chemicals or other hazardous materials will be
carefully monitored
.
10. Efforts will be made to encourage public participation in the project. Public
' notices and public meetings will be advertised, in order to promote community
involvement.
11. During construction, measures must be taken to ensure compliance with federal
and state regulations regarding fugitive dust control and open burning. Fugitive
dust must be kept at a minimum. Measures, such as the application of water to
suppress dust and the washing down of construction vehicles and paved
roadways, must be implemented to prevent adverse impacts to the air quality of
the project area. Any open burning must comply with 15 A NCAC 2D.1900 and
VA Admin Code (VAC) 9 VAC 5-50-60 et. seq., and 9 VAC 5-40-5600 et. seq.
12. Obtain and comply with the NC Permit to construct & operate Air Pollution
Abatement facilities and/or Emission Sources
13. Obtain and comply with the NC Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973
14. Should any asbestos materials be encountered in NC, they will be handled in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2D.I I10 (a) (1) 7.
15. In order to minimize noise pollution, contractors will be encouraged to use noise
control devices and will have limited noise duration times, occurring only during
' normal daylight hours.
16. The project will be coordinated with the Alleghany County District Engineer to
incorporate future widening plans. Flagging of traffic will be required, however,
to reduce traffic congestion, road closures will be limited and will be coordinated
with VDOT and NCDOT.
17. All solid wastes generated at the site will be reduced at the source, re-used or
recycled. All hazardous wastes will be minimized. Otherwise, all solid waste,
hazardous waste, and hazardous material will be managed in accordance with all
applicable federal, state, and local environmental regulations.
18. The applicant will recommend to local governments the implementation of land
use controls for forested buffers, stream resources, infrastructure locations,
floodplains, impervious surfaces, storm water treatment, and erosion and sediment
control. The applicant will encourage the localities adopt stream buffer
regulations as offered by NC USFWS but cannot enforce these measures.
Virginia - Carolina Water System Page 19
Environmental Report
SECTION 5
CORRESPONDENCE
Letters concerning environmental resources were sent to various regulatory agencies
requesting their comment on the proposed project. The following agencies have
commented on the proposed project and copies of all responses are enclosed in Exhibit B:
? Natural Resources Conservation Service (Alleghany and Grayson Counties)
? North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
? North Carolina Department of Transportation
? North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
? United States Army Corps of Engineers
? United States Fish and Wildlife Service (Asheville and Virginia Field Offices)
? Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation
? Virginia Department of Environmental Quality
? Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries
? Virginia Department of Historic Resources
Virginia - Carolina Water System Page 20
Environmental Report
SECTION 6
EXHIBITS / MAPS
The following maps are included in Exhibit A:
Figure 1. Service Area Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Distribution System Improvements
' Floodplain Maps - taken from Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance
Rate Maps (Grayson County, Virginia - Panel 510243 0145 B and Alleghany County,
North Carolina Panel 370004 0002 A).
Exhibit B contains copies of all correspondences with regulatory agencies concerning
environmental resources within the project area.
Exhibit C contains the "Phase I Identification Survey for Cultural Resources" and
"Vegetation Analysis" - Survey for Virginia spiraea and Smooth coneflower.
Virginia - Carolina Water System Page 21
Environmental Report
Virginia Carolina Water System Environmental Report - Addendum #1
The Virginia Carolina Water System Environmental Report (dated June 2007, revised February
2008) was accepted as an Environmental Assessment by USDA Rural Development on
February 28, 2009. Since that time, design changes have been made.
The proposed site for the water treatment plant has been moved. This change was necessary
in order to utilize the proposed treatment method of riverbank filtration. Another factor for
the move was the inability to reach an agreement with the property owner. The new site is
approximately two miles downstream and is still located in Virginia. An agreement has been
reached with the property owner and the site has been approved by the Virginia Department
of Health.
Letters and maps detailing the proposed change were sent to the following for review:
Natural Resources Commission Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Virginia Department of
Conservation and Recreation, Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, and Virginia
Department of Historic Resources. Copies of these agencies' responses follow.
The Department of Historic Resources (DHR) requested a Phase I Identification Survey for
Cultural Resources at the new site. This survey was performed and the report was submitted
to DHR. A determination of "no historic properties affected' was made by DHR. A copy of the
Phase I Survey report follows this addendum. No new comments were made by the other
review agencies.
Based upon the comments received, the new location of the water treatment plant will not
significantly impact the environment of the project area.

1
1
03/11/2009 10:04 FAX [phone] APRIL LANE
121002
U.S. Department of AgrleultUre
FARMLAND CONVERSION IMPACT RATING
PART 1(To be compNho by Fed" Agency) . Dille Of lade Evaaraton Reprsal 12W9
Nrrr q Prgeu VlrplnI"roMnalWaler System Fed" Agar y k%Wftd Fill IN
( )
prpp0aad Lam0 L" Wstor Treatment Planl Location - Ind Location 0-ft AM $lele Grayson, VA
PART U (To be complsted by NRCS) Data ReWnel Received By MRCS
Don the site contain prime. u"e. statewide or loaf Important farmland? - -° Yes No !Acres krlpeted I Avermip Fen Stv --
(it no, she FPPA does nor apply » do not complete sddklonal pans of this form). 7! L, 160
MOW Cropp) Poll FerrtuEls Lade M OW. h/40ktion Amount 01 FamitaM As DMMmed l WSW
-IIII Acres* 150.609 -- % Acres: 30 %
tams OI I." EvahNCOn System usid I Nome Or Wram Site Messi System Ode Wio Evaluation RsYmmed By NRCS
22109
PART M (To be completed by Federal Agency) .Q--
..... A. Total Acres Toil.
Converted Directly .. _..--.-. _.:? _ ... _- .
S. Total Acres To Be Converted Indirectly
C. Total Acres In Site 23.2 0.0 i0.0 0.0
PART fV (To be completed by NRCS) Land Evalwtion information
A Total Acres Prime And UnWs Farmland 14.4
B. Toed Acres Statewide Arid Loal Important Farmland ----- 0.9 C. Pa c V__ a Of FsrtNand In Coun Or Local Govt. Unit To Be Convened 0.1 -
--..-_ .,-.'- ------?-- --'- -..
0. Percentap Of Farm tiM in Gov. JWWIclm vft Sams Or Ralsom Value 25.0
PART V (To be campleed by NRCS) Land Evalustion Criterion 71
IO 0
Relative Value Of Farmland I a Be Convened (Sala of 0 to 100 P tomb)
l
PART h (To be completed by FedeM1t Agency) Melsmenm
Site Aseseemeit CntMa (Thew crbele ea eaplOW N 7 CFR 616.1(b) Posits
1. Area In Nonurbon Use
_. .W . . .. _ ....... ., i
2. PirimelnNOnurba.rmUas __ rG• l ___ _
3. Percent Of Site BOV FFarmed O
4. Prolacllon Provided By State t" Local Government J^% '^

a. Crasllon Of Nonfarmsbla Farmland
_
9. Availabill 01 Farm SOW SWv6s v
10. Oft-FwmkNnlments c• _ _
_ 11. Elleds Of Conversion On Form Support Services C.,
12. CompatidMy, With Esietirq AWtnr"Ufa
TOTAL SITE ASSESSMENT POINTS i 160 0 l0
S 7 D 0
PART VN (To M completed by Federal Agency)
Relative Value Of FenMand (From Pert h '------- 1 too - _71 0
?0
-
-Toed -iii -Aniei?rnt (Aram sn DT`eso.; -?& wcif - 1 100 -
0 5
I p ?..
?
0
i 0
a" asawemerV) 7 .
TOTAL POINTS (Total of above P fates) 260 3' 0 0 i 0
mac A l asis nssesanme m uaaar
Site Selected: Pate Or Selection Yes ? No 0
This is the second determination for', Wster Treatment Plant _ This is the second, new location. • J.C. Freyman, SRS 21022009
isw s1eeYCaOIY sn reverse able) Form AD 1006 (1663)
TWr le- - WWsrsliy pMtM by Wsmvv Pnd~6r *SW
I Page 1 of I
You replied on 2/13/2009 3:36 PM.
April Lane
From: [e-mail] [Kimberly_Smtth*fws.gov1 Sent: Fri 2/13/2009 9:45 AM
To: April Lane
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Virginia Carolina Water System
Attachments:
April,
This is in response to you email dated January 5, 2009 requesting
information on federally listed species. Surveys for the Virginia spiraea
and smooth coneflower were conducted in 2008. If the new proposed
locations were not previously included in the surveys for these species, we
recommend that you conduct surveys within appropriate habitat for each
plant.
Ki m
--------------------
Kimberly Smith
Fish and Wildlife Biologist
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
6669 Short Lane
Gloucester, VA 23061
[e-mail]
[phone] ext. 126; [phone] FAX
https://bigstone.dyndns.org/exchange/alane/Inbox/Virginia%20Carolina°%20Water%20Sys... 2/24/2009
i
L. Preston Bryant, Jr. .i
Eeaetary of Natvai Resources M4 v Dve?da H. Maroon
Q)
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEP.ARTNIENT OF CONSERVATION AND RECREATION
217 Govemor Street
Richmond, V.V= 23219-2010
(804) 7867951 FAX [phone]
February 3, 2009
April Lane
The Lane Group
P.O. Box 1340
Chilhowie, VA 24319
Re: Virginia Carolina Water System
Dear Ms. Lane:
The Department of Conservation and Recreation's Division of Natural Heritage (DCR) has searched its
Biotics Data System for occurrences of natural heritage resources from the area outlined on the submitted
map. Natural heritage resources are defined as the habitat of rare, threatened, or endangered plait and
animal species, unique or exemplary natural communities, and sigrrificant geologic formations.
According to the information currently in our files, the New River-Brush Creek Conservation Unit is
within the project area. Stream Conservation Units (SCUs) identify stream reaches that contain aquatic
natural heritage resources, including 2 miles upstream and 1 mile downstream of documented
occurrences, and all tributaries within this reach. SCUs are also given a biodiversity significance ranking
based on the rarity, quality, and number of element occurrences they contain. The New River-Brush
Creek SCU has been given a biodiversity ranking of B5, which represents a site of general significance.
The natural heritage resource associated with this site is:
Gomphus adelphus Moustached Clubtail G4/SI/NL/NL
Adult Odonata (dragonflies and damselflies}, commonly seen flitting and hovering along the shores of
most freshwater habitats, are accomplished predators. Adults typically forage in clearings with scattered
trees and shrubs near the parent river. They feed on mosquitoes and other smaller flying insects, and are
thus considered highly beneficial. Odonates lay their eggs on emergent vegetation or debris at the water's
edge. Unlike the adults, the larvae have an aquatic larval stage where they typically inhabit the sand and
gravel of riffle areas. Wingless and possessing gills, they crawl about the submerged leaf litter and debris
stalking their insect prey. The larvae seize unsuspecting prey with a long, hinged ••gtaspet' that folds
neatly under their chin When larval development is complete, the aquatic larvae crawl from the water to
the batik, climb up the stalk of the shoreline vegetation, and the winged adult emerges (Hoffman. 1991;
Thorpe and Covich 1991). Because of their aquatic lifestyle and limited mobility, the larvae are
particularly vulnerable to shoreline disturbances that cause the loss of shoreline vegetation and siltation
They are also sensitive to alterations that result in poor water quality, aquatic substrate changes, and
thermal fluctuations.
Skase Parks • Soil and Wiser Conservation • Narural Herbage • Onsdoor Recreation Plannb?g
Clusapeake Bay LocalAssislaance • Dann Sgfely and Floodplidn MamVernenr • Land Conservation
In addition, the Green floater (Lanwgona subW?I&s, G3/S2/NL/L1) has been historically documented in
the New River downstream of the project site.
To minimize adverse impacts to the aquatic ecosystem as a result of the proposed activities, DCR
recommends the implementation of and strict adherence to applicable state and local erosion and sediment
control/storm water management laws and regulations.
our files do not indicate the presence of any State Natural Area Preserves under DCR's jurisdiction in the
project vicinity.
Under a Memorandum of Agreement established between the Virginia Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services (VDACS) and the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR), DCR
represents VDACS in comments regarding potential impacts on state-listed threatened and endangered
plant and insect species. The current activity will not affect any documented state-listed plants or insects.
A fee of $90.00 has been assessed for the service of providing this information. Please find enclosed an
invoice for that amount. Please return one copy of the invoice along with your remittance made payable
to the Treasurer of Virginia, Department of Conservation and Recreation, 217 Governor Street,
Richmond, VA 23219. Payment is due within thirty days of the invoice date. Please note late payment
may result in the suspension of project review service for future projects.
New and updated information is continually added to Biotics. Please contact DCR for an update on this
natural heritage information if a significant amount of time passes before it is utilized.
The Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries maintains a database of wildlife locations,
including threatened and endangered species, trout streams, and anadromous fish waters, that may contain
information not documented in this letter. Then database may be accessed from
www.deif.vir finia.eov/wildlife/'info man/index.httnl. or contact Shirl Dressler at [phone].
Should you have any questions or concerns, feel free to contact meat 804-371-2708. Thank you for the
opportunity to comment on this project.
Sincerely,
n
S. Rene' Hypes
Project Review Coordinator
CC: Ernie Aschenbach, VDGIF
Literature Cited
Hoffman, R. 1991. Arthropods. Pp. 173 in: K. Terwilliger (ed.), Virginia's Endangered Species:
proceedings of a symposium. The McDonald and Woodward Publishing Company, Blacksburg,
VA.
Thorpe, J.H., and A.P. Covich. 1991. Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater
Invertebrates. Academic Press, Inc., San, Diego, California.
1
1
1

1

COMMONWEALTH of VIRCjINIA
L. Preston HrN ant' h.
tie,,ewr1 or '%atw,i RYSplll'.--
April O. Lane
Environmental Specialist
The Lane Group, Inc.
124 Depot Avenue
P.O. Box 1340
Chilhowie, Virginia 24319
Robert ?l . Duncan
Department of Ganre and Inland /'isherie't F.; ..„ , i"4rr(mr
January 7, 2009
RE: Re-re-review of ESSLOG #23294, Virginia/Carolina Water Authority Water System Project,
Independence/Sparta Interconnection, Grayson County, VA.
Dear Ms. Lane:
This letter is in response to your request for updated information related to the presence of
threatened or endangered species in the vicinity of the above referenced project.
There are currently no documented occurrences of threatened or endangered species in
this project area.

Information about fish and wildlife species was generated from our agency's computerized Fish and
Wildlife Information System, which describes animals that are known or may occur in a particular
geographic area. Field surveys may be necessary to determine the presence or absence of some of
these species on or near the proposed area. Also, additional sensitive animal species may be
present, but their presence has not been documented in our information system.
Endangered plants and insects are under the jurisdiction of the Virginia Department of Agriculture
and Consumer Services, Bureau of Plant Protection. Questions concerning sensitive plant and
insect species occurring at the project site should be directed to Keith Tignor at [phone].
The Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, maintains a
database of natural heritage resources, including the habitat of rare, threatened, or endangered plant
and animal species, unique exemplary natural communities, and significant geologic formations,
that may contain information not documented in this letter. Their database may be accessed from
http://www.dcr.statc.va.us/dnh/nhi.info.litm, or by contacting S. Rene Hypes at [phone].
This letter summarizes the likelihood of the occurrence of endangered or threatened animal species
at the project site. If you have more questions in this regard, please contact me at [phone].
Please note that this response does not constitute consultation or management recommendations
regarding endangered or threatened wildlife, or any other environmental concerns. These issues are
4010 %% VS ( BROAD STREET. P.O. 1300, 11104. RI('H\I(rAD, AV 232311-1t04
f8tN1 3 6 7-1111111 1A /'fDD) Egnal Oppureuniry' Linplo ment. Progran % and !'aeiiitiec EAX (804) 367-04115
April O. Lane
ESSLog #23294 (re-re-review)
1/7/2009
Page 2
analyzed by our Environmental Services Section, in conjunction with interagency review of
applications for state and federal permits. If you have any questions in this regard, please contact
the Environmental Services Section at [phone].
There is a processing charge of $25.00 for our response. Please remit a check, made payable to
TREASURER OF VIRGINIA, within 30 days. To insure proper credit to your account, please
address your payment envelope directly to Shirl Dressler at the address listed in the letterhead.
Please mote that the data used to develop this response are continually updated. Therefore, if
significant changes are ntade to your project or if the project has not begun within 6 nhomhs of
receiving this letter, then the applicant should request a new review of our data.
For your reference, if you do not receive a response from our office within 30 days, this does not
constitute a finding of "no adverse impact" to wildlife or wildlife resources. If you need an
expedited response to your request, please call Shirl Dressler at [phone].
The Fish and Wildlife Information Service, the system of databases used to provide the information
in this letter, can now be accessed via the Internet! The Service currently provides access to current
and comprehensive information about all of Virginia's fish and wildlife resources, including those
listed as threatened, endangered, or special concern; colonial birds; waterfowl; trout streams; and all
wildlife. Users can choose a geographic location and generate a report of species known or likely to
occur around that point. From our main web page, at www.dgif.virginia.gov. choose the hyperlink
titled "Virginia Fish and Wildlife Information Service". For more information about the service,
please contact Shirl Dressler at [phone].
Thank you for your interest in the wildlife resources of Virginia.
Sincerely,
r
r
t-.---S'usan H. Watsotf
Information Specialist
cc: R.T. Fernald. VDGIF
M 1g.-.. .-_ 4
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
t N swnn- t )r Department of Historic Resources
vup of Sat . Feexour:e.
?R(fl Kensington -Venue. Richmond. Srirguua 3+'_:1-0?1
March 4, 2009
Ms. April Lane
Lane Engineering. Inc.
P.O. Box 1340
Chilhowie. Virginia 2431()
k tl .?5 M 1?. c.-
D

RE: A Phase l identification S'urvel tor ('ultural Resow'ce sridrin a Neu It suer 7reatr12e11 Plena .Sin'. If'ater
(make and A.ssocinle41 Rater Line Easement for the Pir};inia-('arnlirut ftinnal Water frnprovenanrts
Project in Grq sson Counts; PiTinia
DI R File No. 2006-1580
Dear Ms. Lane:
We have received for res.iess a copy of the report referenced abcoe prepared by Calvert W. Mcllhan\ We are
pleased to inform you that the fieldwork and repot meets the Secretary of the Interior's Archeolofrf and Historic
Preservation: Secretart o% the Interior :+ S'iandards emd Guidehne.s (48 FR 44716-42_) and our Ihpartment's .Surcct'
Guidelines (revised 2003). Our comments are being. sought by Lane Engineering. Inc. as pan of the emironmental
review required by USDA - Rural Development.
Although the study area includes some landtorms considered moderate to high potential to contain cultural
resources, the survey did not identify any intact archaeolouical sites or potential for deeph buried deposits within
the Area of Potential Effects. The consultant recommends that no further cultural resources investigations be
conducted. We concur with this recommendation. Accordingh. a detemsination of no historic properties a(Jczted
is appropriate for this project.
Thank you for informing our office of the change to this project and your continued consideration of historic
properties during the planning of this project. If you have any questions, please contact me at (804) 367•2_323, c 15,
or email roger kirchcn n dins ir_q),a.go
Sntcerch.
Rog/c,AK Kirchen..Archaeoloost
Office of Revie, and Compliance
Cc: Mr. "Mavis Jackson. USDA - Rural Development
Mc Calvert Mcliham
\t1 non>troti•-r \cr? c., c :1 h I. ,i,. 1 1 H. 1
P t rsht,r . t`t = ? -.
Notice of a Finding of No Significant Impact
The USDA Rural Utilities Service has received an application for financial assistance
from the Virginia/Carolina Water Authority. The proposed project consists of the
construction of a 1.0 MGD membrane filtration water treatment pant, two water storage
tanks, 51,000 L.F. of 12-inch and 8-inch water lines, and four pumping stations. The
proposed construction will occur in Grayson County, Virginia and Alleghany County,
North Carolina.
As required by the National Environmental Policy Act, the Rural Utilities Service has
assessed the potential environmental effects of the proposed project and has determined
that the proposal will not have a significant effect on the human environment and for
which an Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. The basis of this
determination is: (1) impacts will be temporary in nature due to construction; and (2) the
requirement of mitigation measures. In order to avoid or minimize any adverse
environmental impacts, the Rural Utilities Service will require the applicant to
incorporate the following mitigation measures into the proposed project's design: The
extent of floodplains to be crossed or impacted and the clearing of riparian vegetation
will be minimized. When floodplains are encountered, the land will be restored to its
original contour and condition and vegetated with native plant species. No permanent
structures will be constructed within a floodplain. A plan will be incorporated into the
construction documents for the treatment of unanticipated archaeological discoveries.
The plan will include names, telephone number and fax numbers of the appropriate
County and agency contacts. In the event that previously unidentified archaeological
resources are discovered, all construction work involving subsurface disturbance will be
halted and the steps outlined in the plan will be immediately followed. Instream
activities will be avoided during the fish spawning season of May 1 through July 15 to
prevent impacts to fish eggs and fry downstream of the site.
Copies of the Environmental Assessment can be reviewed or obtained at USDA Rural
Development, 140 Highland Drive, Suite 5, Lebanon, VA 24266. For further
information, please contact Robert B. Hilt at [phone], Ext. 122. Any person
interested in commenting on this proposed project should submit comments to the
address above by May 1, 2008.
A general location map of the proposal can be obtained by contacting Rural Development
at the above telephone number.
USDA ?i?
Rural I
Development
United States Department of Agriculture
Rural Development
Tappahannock Local Office
February 28, 2008
TO: Travis Jackson, Area Director
USDA Rural Development
Lebanon, VA
FROM: Judith T. Allen
State Environmental Coordinator
SUBJECT: Virginia Carolina Water System Immprovements
Multi-Community Water Project
Environmental Documentation from Other Sources Review
I have reviewed the Environmental Documentation for the Virginia Carolina Water System
Improvements Project and have made the following determinations:
CONCURRENCE WITH CLASSIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
Categorical Exclusion with an Environmental Report (7 CFR 1794.22 (b) and (c))
X Environmental Assessment (7 CFR 1794.23 (a) and (b))
ACCEPTANCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT/ENVIRONMENTAL
DOCUMENTATION
X Acceptable
Unacceptable. In order to bring the report into compliance with regulatory and
Agency Requirements, please address the items listed in Exhibit B.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at 804-443-3437, or by
email to [e-mail]
cc: Carrie Schmidt, Program Director, RU/CF Division
Attachments
772 Richmond Beach Road • P. O. Box 700 • Tappahannock, VA 22560
Phone [phone] • TDD [phone] (for hearing impaired) FAX [phone]
www.rurdev.usda.gov/va
Committed to the future of rural communities.
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building,
14 '" and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call [phone] (voice) or (202) 720=6382 JTDD).