The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutOnslow U-5787 Revised PJD Request_signedPRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Mason Herndon, NCDOT Division 3, 5501 Barbados Blvd., Castle Hayne NC 28429 C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: (USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES) State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Onslow City: Jacksonville Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 34.781282° Long.: -77.392429° Universal Transverse Mercator: 18S 2810413851374 Name of nearest waterbody: Sandy Run Branch E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): ❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date: ❑ Field Determination. Date(s): TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY JURISDICTION. Site Latitude (decimal Longitude Estimated amount of Type of aquatic Geographic authority to Number degrees) (decimal degrees) aquatic resources in resources (i.e., which the aquatic resource review area (acreage wetland vs. non- "may be" subject (i.e., and linear feet, if wetland waters) Section 404 or Section applicable 10/404) TA 34.779616° N -77.396186° W 0.13 ac Non-wetland Section 404 water SA 34.778941° N -77396681° W 81f Non-wetland Section 404 water SWTC 34.783270° N -77393547° W 0.03 ac Non-wetland Section 404 water SWTB 34.782929° N -77.392468° W 0.08 ac Non-wetland Section 404 water SWP A 34.778574°N -77.392468° W 0.17 ac Non-wetland Section 404 water SWP B 34.778921°N -77.396180° W 0.05 ac Non-wetland Secrion 404 water SWP C 34.781489°N -77391981° W 1.31 ac Non-wetland Section 404 water SWP D 34.781889°N -77392221° W 0.87 ac Non-wetland Section 404 water SWP E 34.781901°N -77391155° W 0.07 ac Non-wetland Section 404 water SWP F 34.782577° N -77.388787° W 0.06 ac Non-wetland Secrion 404 water SWP G 34.782981°N -77392840° W 0.55 ac Non-wetland Section 404 water SWP H 34.783005° N -77394154° W 0.10 ac Non-wetland Section 404 water 1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate. 2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the oprion to request an AJD before accepring the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatary mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information: SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply) Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where indicated for all checked items: � Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by ar on behalf of the PJD requestor: Map: Attachment B Fi�ures 1 through 4 � Data sheets preparedlsubmitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor. ❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation repart. ❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale: ❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: ❑ Corps navigable waters' study: ❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: � USGS NHD data. ❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps. � U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24,000 Jacksonville North (2016) � Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS Soil Survev of Onslow Count. (� 1992� ❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: _ ❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s): _ ❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: _ ❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929) � Photographs: �Aerial (Name & Date): NC OneMap Orthoimagerv (2016) or �Other (Name & Date):Representative Photo�raphs (Attachment F� ❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: ❑ Other information (please specify): IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations. Signature and date of Regulatory staff inember completing PJD Digitally signed by Mason Herndon DN: rn=Mason Herndon, o=NCDOT, � / � �/1� ou=Division 3, l� �aa �� email=tmherndon@ncdot.qov, c=US Date: 2018.09.19 14:0636 -04'00' Signature and date of person requesring PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is impracticable) i � Districts may establish timeframes for requester to retum signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action. NCDOT Division 3 STIP U-5787 August 2018 SR 2715 Exfension from NC 53 to McDaniel Drive in Onslow County, NC — Request for JD Attachment B Figures � �. � 9� ��_�� r ,� .S Si y� � �t'�ti, e_:- ,� � � � • ,e � ,,R:- f� �� ,;� y�_. ti. 6� d l•� � _ r� � �� r' _ � � � �� : r r�Y�� +� ��• �' � �r�'k � �•f � � • � F� '"�.� � � � � : :� '�s � � � � � � `,�.f _� �� Legend � Project Study Area (- 61.4 acres) 17 N W r E s �T��_ �, �� 0 � c rr r.� :� Client: ��w�4 rroarrr c,y p�v . � �q ��9� P \ r��roTOF TR0.�� Project: Trade Street (SR 2715) Extension from NC 53 (Western Boulevard) to McDaniel Drive Onslow County, NC Title: I IL�]Z�Zli:7� �:I [�lU /� � Ref. USGS 7.5 Minute Topography Quadrangle Map [Jacksonville North, NC (2016)] nslow C un , N C Jacksonville North Drawn By: Checked By: JLK WSB �`� Potential Non-Wetland Waters of the US (Intermittent Stream) Approved By: Date: Potential Non-Wetland Waters of the US (Tributary) MAI 9/17/2018 Stormwater Pond/Tributary STV Inc. Project No. 0 400 800 1,600 Feet 4017737 FIGURE 2 ; �} �� . � � _ � ;� �_. .�. . . y� fr : �{-.�. $rL.�. :� x. tiLr.,� �,.. :ti • . � _ : •. .. . . , . r�Y4Y' 'cy ' :� .�. .tik r . '+�+c.• �h+v'.' `,: 4 �;rU45 fry.r-1r 1 f? �f . % � `�. � ��y,��:�::df ,,�n,•,�¢.:�.,, r. �. _y,•_1. ' ¢ } ,�. '�,�}: .-�`�v�k.$� �`j��'•�'r�f:; r •�a,v,�-�� r •�� ' �. �' Mapped Soil Units Within the PSA ��,� } i" ti' {�r}��1 ' L: �r,� K'�r ��.��x.� ��;:� ��r_.' ' 'r �. ;�r .� �,.{. �- , r,�,��r•��r•: �� } �tr• GpB Goldsboro-Urban land complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes `� �."�� r ��. r. � . . � . � �� ;. � � .�.�':. . T� loo '�; . �tir . i t �+� ii �, l . ' � r�,}` �' � 1 1 ��'_-. . krr � ��?�, rV� •.��v..��.. �•'�r r,y� �,;� r,r.'x� ,, .�"#, :�,:. �r;, �� '. �� l�,r j�1 r �• t� Ly Lynchburg fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Atlantic Coast Flatwoods . ,,a�*•.•' '• } .}}�:s�. r �}� 'r � � �7•' �' � �r' 1r`` �::' � , �'-^�- r h . � �. ° �.�}.�. •' �+�.�"�.��., �v �' l = - r x�d.�r Pn Pante o muck loam f '. � 7::� #' � •: r;� _ . �' r .1 • �f- y'K 39s ��; � -�•. .�: �'� �r 't'ri, � '�.k''' '�4:k:�.•r �:�,c•• , +:.� 9 Y -='�' %'//l-:1 � __ r 1 � � -s : W:, 7'; y : �+� r � '� - •7�!r, r . x ;. �;r�c ��-�;.' � aty� ' � � f. {r� _ � ��. � Y y� � � `~r �• .,•�.�,�•; ti ,� 0,��1 ; , r _ r.��' �� Ra Rains fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Atlantic Coast Flatwoods +��' � �.y 7;rK � Y �; �# � rx�-".�r"�� •.+�4� �'?� � � k;". },'�ff t: -: �-} �..� ,"`i��[,,ti' �:{� � ,ti�7 �y.jG•�, ` � • .. . � , . rG1r� x, }: r ' � ti • r r'a _ '^a .,� , ,i� ti�;'ro-�� 4 f y+'1 � �.�� 1'��7 ' � ' •. 1r: ti� $�' �ti ;,�. • . .� ti ��'•'�'� �' + � f v.- ti +`��.��j ��4, '� �c ,�.�- W��• _+A��:..�ti 3u /+.�,{F.. f' J • '} :}' �N � �� £ • ' ��h�'r' ::' . ; .. � �� .�•' ��r iti�� _ ��'�' _ I.ti��c �f 1K#,�' �� p.�r'�(�+' f{��.'; ��1�1�+ i �i'5,.. }�:.1r..��. � �i.,V1 ti ti�;'.• i'-f , . �}. .r. ' ;1 � ,. '�'� - .h��'�7v � �� .{� ..�,;;� t ��:,� �� -�. .,� .� �'., e � �� '�` ` �� ~ ��' . � 5- . • � . y� ,C`�,�'•• '' �r�.-, ' '�¢r}�,. .7 fi;�?'r �j- ;� r . �} r , �•'r#� .x; � a.. ,, y• • ti: ,� - 1 . L� tir.•• � 1..¢•. p.�#`� • �,�' .'¢�; 'k�'�L''�?Y'�� r .r�r'�p �,�l.rti¢r. � s'' �� :,.` .',.} _� r y�i,ci. �: $ i�f�.'��'a��[''!� �_ ' � r�;�-} � l • � • ' � r ' r _ . ' , .. ; . i �y .� Client: oRT a �1 � .r'� ¢ �. '� r� _�..{ "�f'�'� ii „.rr,� �;` :� "'f� �•a�r,r: �. �:.: '��"�.�J:. i�? ^ �-�:;�1 �4 �� a. :f. �'`. � 6� ~ . . ,aa+ Qe �'� 4\} T,� • {� fi. S .^ �� }y' tir ��' ?1� � � t fy •r � �V' F .'+7�� '�1C � .� r�,�, .'+�'��"• w`� � �{ ! r� t ��i �Y� � ` -$$v , . , . { hQW �� + .k�tir. {`r�`. ¢ {a+'�} � . � �� 7 � �'� } '�� ` '' ` � � � � {�• �1 . . � ,..� ='�`• �. r�'' , �:'• '�`�''' �� '�r�'7��j �s. �;. ••• ' • � v � � �' �l_ f��• � r •�' �'.�'1"�p 1`'}�'� �� • ' { ir � y 1�l f' j 1r r.�,=•f{-•7 � � x�Lh.�.�ti.1:+rn 7••'T. } ! ,,.� ��• '!L i� v'Y� ` r . •� �. ti � p�l _{r;�r� �r• ��j� S��`�".''• `# ' �'� .�• f,��{Vr� '�+i �.S.r• r �� • .. • r. „ f : � ^ � • r '� ¢ �C• � � . 4•'• ` �G � T �.. �1. F'_..� �.i`�: •. o- . r fi +�' - �` � � f'k 7.' � `'p�l%..r•�{'' �r•. f r '�'•.:,fi's,�-v:r` eG ��. f,�� G � ,f` 4�'o-�tiv , .�r . c �f ti'�;F'l `F•?� , hv_ ��~�•"��' I� +� {- +� �• r 6% s;�r: � . , r .� J r� � ' 0 r �+i. f� "'' Y. 4 2 r � .� ti.�1 '�' : �" �� 5 ' y�. i� /) �•ra. ti ��r�' : �y�,..ti Q} r "�t �� '' Q� r:i.rr y-r _ N ��+ �*� ti r v r• � 7 �+' o �` ='i �'� . � '• �fi _ ' y +�c:*J 5 � . r . �=•r r~ �. �_ .1� `v r�..-h / �o _ ' �v-. �` `� r ,�, � � . I. � `�' �'{` +':' .. �� .�' rti. =�,:. i�`�tf�{`� �. r� k �k �. r O ',�:�y•1�-•{�.�r; �. f.-:� {��. 5�'' .. .ti�v.��'if �,SYrr �{±,�.r,v��. .�,E-�� ..�.F' ��f.. ,�k'•f'�-'f . f ' � �i � i• Y h'�cy ' r �` + - Jf t �v'4iF �bt �. , �. � �p9r tic �x r� :. t }rt$., r'¢' �i}c .� v� - r �'�- �y;y;: "'�'� ~ 1•-..i.��`:r. •�'•}:s'ti$ar.•.�i`��{r• �iyk��-y1�ti'� /��.e� ��r.=� �Gr{ ��.k., � . � ti � ��r . • - . f?� {' � �.?rFh� N�QpP {�4 ' � . . �}� SS.��'{� s'_'•�j� �}. ' � 1 yr.� .'}�iti. ti�.. ry f: "f�ti• (� 5 �Y ��. ' ' �Jr� �'�. J� OF7R� .7Cr ti {�N'' � ti��i�' � �� .j� ' } ¢. �'��•}•,'q�� 1'�'�'. ..ti,+ }��,`-.�: C ,c�. � f J�� e }� ti.'titi A�4 �1�y� . •ti. L • S {- ��', r v �•':�1 •r}Yir7�{ 7-• 1 L}v��.1� ��+�,� ta:' _ � k� �� A� •. �" �+'- ' . { : ^�,_ • . ,Y '/14 �• _ � 4'�.•_ }+� =� J�. s.�a_ � ��' �•' � ,1 � • 4 +l� r � • 1 ,�_;..:'h`� �r� � v } � � �.. .. 1:_ �:. �} ..-..��.w` . .��.��•:: Y � a��n. r �� • �. � r �• {�. ,� . � . � �4��, rt`�ti .I.�{�� 1'�J�'�v,�i. i� ` , �. Fi �,�, ��l_ i �''�`�C �� f`�i ,n�' ��}: :ti, . " � f5 +'u � . }` .� ' � ~ Pro ect: � �' � '��rv }� k '�.a, +7;�� ¢��• � •' . � y� r �, 5�... : � ��5.• ��' � . f ;� . , •�: J �'.a •!;�. •{tip . .� .rr � �j� ►•'- r. . :.t� -wy{'y •y{_ - •,ti..r . '\�,�,�'`-Y�' F � t..� =a. �},� • �'� • �';t• �;""ti•'.., � • - '� . ..�� j,�. � � �!/ � k• 't • c�k,��+ ., sec . . y}'•'�k'.� �• � .}V" � � ''i i�,• 1" � ' �_ �'� �4'� : ��h ��lr ,� �,�*� v`'�.�'+c�.}- ��Y f$'1 •X�"•' r�y1� Y - .�� r � �i � � ti r•�r� r u !'�' .: � �.ti.' ��Sf•• r.� ti � . ti. � 4 �S � '¢r ..ni 9t� _ � ,, � �`�o {� :'_�:' ��4x•� �-��,�:. � s � ' - :�_� � ..�a ' -�r� . t o �� {' � { � : :,�;�, : � `1• _� +' �.�r •�'�'� : �.r. � fl:"�� Trade Street (SR 2715) • �:� • �'' .� ]�• ,� � {�'•-' '�•- _ �(. -'' •�. 'rit �+ ; ,w . a. � • - ,., • � : �: �� • �'•� �' � {' :. -ti � � � {��r � , A �••� . a� r��r•�� . . � � � . .�:.� �'. .�� f � � Extension from NC 53 .� �' ��w:• � .��.� �:. � � �.7{ �. r... f• " �• � ''• �G�.�`�rkk`�^��!`.�:�� , �' ' . } - •;r�,' ':,��' � • - .��••+�� ;�� • ��-. • �: xr �� ., . �..r. . �' �1 �L � � ,- �: .•r� ti.'v.'�, `t,.t;�.�� j .'.�'�,,,'+t.�� • � � ��- .f .' . �'ti } . f : ,7r • � J �, �' � 9' -k � i �� r:. �. . ti • �� 1 �� 'r �:r �f � •: {. '�} ��.: •r�� } . • .��1 �' (Western Boulevard) ..vy��l�yrtf;•� I' •A • ' '�� li �:�:.. : i�v f•~Vf��•.ti 1 � . . , . . :.:4. l � v�� .,,. � f,�� ,�•. •• _ � • � ; f� � - � ��,�� .. f�� , • x, � � r �rJ . to McDaniel Drive •1 �- f'� �� . _ ... �. • �� _ { ��•-� -,�. �{:•:�.., r�:��_ . �� a�_ � � �4� ��;�r �� x� } !i � :� y� �+r: ; .� • c�• a•' :k•�o- ti "��' .' yr , '} � �� '�:�,�` {s:.�� ~�ti t ��n +• "rf ` � •�`' � ��` �r- :�' ��x 'Yr�;':-�s�, _ "R„�� 't-,r� . '' �� r 1 ..r; c r; r+•`i Onslow County� NC � �' _ . ti; �� - . :��,�: _ �.�- 'y�`�: . � k.�r �":.�'•,� ti_,/�• '}�• f.'. '_t1 - , �'� F . . _ � � ��rrrc: r a + k' � � � � s� r . t •�� ti �.J.r.� �-. � ; .r a '� +� �� {� _ ".'f t t . '.�. $.../�. �f. !,sc• r� � : :ti', :�� ++'•f �' �rr' ' r ��. � r . f �' y . �..�� { .J�Y'_� �•'$,.�t" d�� , �� _ . • tr�� f _/C',,,�. �'ti' � y. Y: r �.+—: �. _ ' 'ti� � •,.�.�� G�j,�� y� i''.c��;�. �`� �•�,Q.,.*�r �;�� ; - �,`' � ,.�'{':�'��' �'�, �� •'� ��j��{+ r�r. , .��}� :��y�. :�t�' ,f, - r' �' '�`�. �''� • Title: Or ti . '. Lr.' • _ rr }.� �4 � r+Y .�ia �J 1'�% {�a •fv • • '('l �i' � ~ '� '� ti � � F �,`F� ti QQ/ �` • ' �'?��- ��'�' � .� ti . vao- .'� `-f G` ::� `�.. f•�;:�.� � � _ . ,� ��.�. r. i�: �_ `� �� ' _ ��i'�•' .;.� • �-.� � . ..� � f� Y � ' . . k � j . ��1y } �.ti„ ~ y r • ��y.yjF ~ _ + .?�iOj. _ �., r �� y � ,� i ¢ •`�,, r . . . ��- NRCS SOILS � .I.. r . j _ - i•.,�Y • . r.• � .� � �l � �,x} ��n' _ i , {� •,��+ ,��A .�• ¢ . f'�-`,� � . � 'i+{�1 ' . . �: ��., lvltii �kOF' , : • r � , �r� . � $ • r�-,} - � .� � '� • � , Yir_ ��;�"� �, r�x {.; ;:: •:;. , �.r' ' � :rx¢� 1992 Soil Survey (Sheet - 24) • � - ._ .�i '� _ n} i� �. �� ',E �` .t.. . r��: � f , ti :•}. � r.:�}� +r ±f a �:r'' '' ''�� ~~ � fi �j' r ,r �:. � . :�� ur.r,� .� •� . f � � -^�, rt r ,�� •��, � _ -'� • . �• r �c, .s� .�} f .��, r.V . + ,� .�tia�f, . � �'�•.. . . • - f�, � .� � :.f' � •1 y�� l f l�, y _r � Lf�� 'S��^'� • •f�tj�'rlF-J� � �'R '� . .�{�• �r� • �. " •_ Sources: NRCS Soil Survey of Onslow County, NC (1992) k fi . �' � . s � � r `�yN f J �•`� k� r, � �}�� ` _ a. ; t •.;ti!/� � �,t�� :r - - � � ti y.�ai�. . ��r �r;;;• �"� '�`:it' � �.kp :x • �u 1.4 ; �'� /�,� ,� `:r .' ' ' Onslow County, NC �� _ 9� � r� , $� J � �-�' �'_ •+� '` . � � } � s . . - �'. ' � +� ��, ~ .�''�' .�� ';Ja�` ��A:� �O .,'�r:'~ �' �.� i 4 �� ,~ � ,� •.� _ �� .• t"• 'f �: � . ti � � r L • . . •�%� .�,�� . �� ,� _t V _}. i ��. I� . � , . � ;�� .�,,,Y _ .,� . ��,�. . . •`,�e v �. �.. s �, '� �b �ti l � ,f w. ~ _ w 4 ' V .$ J �ti`. ,� L'i•: :��} N�A` �'�. •: �� ' .�+�., ' :. � ,..{+A zse ,� '--� ,:+1� ••�r � ?��. .1: �� hr�� .�� , �.5{ ��J�\`" +�r' �' ' _�, i.'F. � Q 1 ¢' '�'r • � �,� • . �• 1 _. � �„f� , � �p.�` �.: �� , • �t �r •ti /� f#~• �f.° f { 4 ,�,��;'rir 1�?r .;i�r .�iy' t -Rt _ . _ �, '� , ..� �a:r •.�� _, � � • �' � � `�r � " ' �. A `.+.Y� �� .. C,�' � � .� �.� � �. �.• �. � 1 '' �, , ' ,.5�. . c �� . '�; ` ` 0�� ,(� Qi� � • ' { # �' f ,� "r a5.ti"` , 7.� c i'� ~� �'��r, r�` ��l � �+ n �h 1��. �' �� ,��` y r: .•�.'�r }.rr� . .�:�0_r'��'�O�' '.,rj' . ��' yi �'.�, r� P' r 4 ,� 5 1 1 _ _ �: �� _ �'` � ,��r ,+ , r�,' \, �� _��. �� - i1�r• � . 4� r �,� �, �� ,�� . �' ..+ ��? � • . �s� }� ` . ,�� r ;r� � ��".' , f. �N �Q, • 4 : ?k i +� r� ti,}�'. '�h ,ff' r '� 'r y'� -.� .ti r�� . �'� ��r . e5�'� - , �,;' k �� {' '� � `' k �x" V �'��t � � : � '�: , •� �� ' • . { ��''�' Drawn By: Checked By: � � -0�. r4~� l. • r��'{�� ` ,� � �� }F� `,� •.�� • T4 �;�r_ ��7� '� '4!r . ��c ' . � .�� .��F�� JLK WSB ' � �� _ � - ,�r � ��,. �{� _ t :. � r _ : �. ••t 1$'� f i. �i 1� . . . . � "� _ .t� f �• . • � � N . Approved By: Date: � � '��:�� l�µ . . Legend ��'� � ��r� �f � . � ��`� � MAI 8/6/2018 _ - � ��'• ,.� - ' �" � . . ' . �# W � E . } � . r'r �'- ' .� . _ . �,� �` �' z � '' - �� :�� k'�' i - ~J �� '�r� -- r�.`~ . � Project Study Area (- 61.4 acres) S STV Inc. Project No. � ti _• . �-. g� f,� . �� . ¢' ,� . �. .'.. .�� F�.' .�` � '��` l�'� s��'r . ' 0 40o soo 1 600 4017737 �� . ;f�. � k.:. �:�.. `•�,� ,. .� �.,� - , fj;' : .�. • •� �• � .ti ��,� r ,� . � •e/L; � �� Feet ;�� •�-. ��,.� , - '�': � ��': � �� r'� k. `� �Q'��ti . - FIGURE 3 J{ �i' �.' . . . T� y� ti a _ .. 3. �". y� .J.� _ f4, Y�. .�� , � . r r �•.� �` �s . J -• �` i . � .- �� 1 11 . " ' ' . � �+ �� ,/_� 1 � �A �, t�• • rs� � , T ,.. ; • ' r�f 1 � � " �a, =" { � , �'�.� /+sr / ''� :S ir � � ! • �pi"�`'' • �� 1 . r� r �y ��,` .�� . -Z, � ��.� `� � . . ,� {t. . �4 . • • ,� • . �\ '�,. ''� ' •,• ,, �. �� Q-�� ,!'4. ',�, �p�G �•:. . �,,j� ' � Potential Non-Wetland � r ! � '� ` ,;�� • ' � •. . �`a� �QI��.�a'` . � ? � * • � Waters of the US ,.. t �� e � i � ' � � `� � � ,� � r , O�� ,� *"��,,r ��a� •r �G� � �� Stormwater Tributary - B (- 881 If) �• �O O ` �TV-=� �l, � � � Potential Non-Wetland �� • � � � 5e � - i'//l-:i � : , ;. „� Waters of the US � " � ; ` . �G'�a � � ' % (34.782929° N, -77.392468° W ) ', , �' �, r '- � `� � �� , � � � ` � � Stormwater Tributary - C (- 302 If) � � � � �� e � � � � � � , `� '' ' �% `` • �A, - /� •. . �. x" ` �� (34783270° N, -77.393547° W) �' { .�t`L ,• "' ee•� , r � ^".,� � %a ��i , , �. "� s - �j a • � •� �� •'' � �•' '�%j . �, �� .'� �� . i� i �� i ♦ . ✓ � � ,i ` } +�� - �� • � ! � �, /S,s � �,�. • � - �/ t�• ! � • ♦ �r .�., �'% o i y � ♦ /a - �i' .,� , � ♦ �,� ��,*� i 1 � �� `�� .� • �� , � . � G � X'.._ .. :. Client: � �� Z � . ��, f s,.� . „� �� _�,.#�• �+.� n„ � �• �' �r r,. l� /� e J� k •, .. Qf t30HT ca � , "� � , � �. ' �� ' � • �� Stormwater Pond � ,'�y.. �� _��.t �t ^. r}��a ., - S� . � � �/ • 4! `'}� . `��.i'�' hQ4' ��2 -� : <• i` " , SWP - H - 0.10 acre � >�q1 ��`I � e ' �^ \e' �� i' 5,,.� y_ '� ♦ � r ;1=��o '��;� r '-,'. ��' = � �` (34.783005° N, -77.394154° W) 'f �� !� � � � �i� o+r° �� ti'� �' � `,. ii - I. °f - -� o z� ��;/� " � r � � �'� � `'� " a�` �Il'' � �' „ � � ' + � _ �• � . �,� p ° ,� " ti . � � . � � � Stormwater Pond � ,' 9 p � ; . s, �R + `. � �� • '� � ..� , � .iR';� _ p 6 � / ; p 0 �� . ., �.. . �. ��" •, - SWP - F (- 0.06 acre) . ��,�� oQti � �- �r: . , �i ,�' � � ,-� � � , rop NSQ� �}�� _ �+, : � i � � . Jlr �1, �,,• � 1 ,�!� � _� � '►• (=4,782577° N, -77.388787° W) . oFrn� . � . �-- � y s� , ♦ � �\.� * _ • Stormwater Pond � + : ,i �, ;,J� . /! � - -� .� � . • -�l.� «�♦ 01� � `�',' �'�� ` ,� ` � � �,0�' �Z� ` , ,i SWP - G (- 0.55 aCre) 1s�� , ° ° � ' �T , ' , . � e� •.� , ,� •� -, � � '7 �!� • Project: !� �,•r � � � � �" � �� (34.782981 ° N, -77.392840° W ) �.; • �r . � � \ �. � � '� - a�. • , � ' .� �y� � ,� • , �'' ♦ ♦ � ,�r t y ♦ � . ��`� + � • ` .1 * � �'� d .. � n` � - � � �' h' . . � i � c r '� � '• ^ �' . � �j r . t • � � r � .. `' `'4 . � - V � i c a ti. � � `Z.� \ ��` ♦ ti . �ii ' ♦ , 1 � ` � t .,� � , ,� ''�. � , � .� � .<-�, � ":. .+� Trade Street (SR 2715) �� '' ' q �� ` �,�.ti '' . � -, � e J ti � ` � , � �a� ,. . - , � , �r�'� ,�v� , � Extension from NC 53 ,t � �� r \�i a '�' r `' ,� �'3. ,a_ . + �. �, � • ./ �' , �_ � ��t° �'�: -'� �. �' _ : , • � � : , ��o' � � 'd '1 � (Western Boulevard) • t ' � .<�" .�. ��'�� . .�'v,_' � ,. . :' ` '�: �. � s, ,. � , to McDaniel Drive • �� ^ � o.� .� Stormwater Pond f� _�� , �+'' ' ` . " ! �� 1►'' � � •' � � • , , � , , - o;, , ' ,� '� :�� . Onslow County, NC a y - � •� �,�i;, ' .� SWP - D (- 0.87 aCre) - o' i„� - � V � �" :� !- � ♦ r � • , ,, F:-�*.� (34781889° N, -77.392221° W) � �,.� �� ` ��' r �, r, � ` ` ,, .. � �_' :� 1 � ' �.�•� +'� � - Ir .•1 �I `_,, , �;. . ,� Ai�s�q.• . .a,�. � ,�+� 4 w '�.A , � � ,�. . . ��., � � t�i�� . �� . . . �' .'� i jr� `� • .�� r . r - � . . � I � �:�� '��.\ F � . ^f ' � a�� ^.i�� • ^a _ /��' � .!: � 1 Ii+. . ' . y� � ., � '� ^' ` 1'- . �l - r ��_ _ �- �," ►� �� . _ ` ,o ,� • ,# y � ;, Stormwater Pond Title: � � �` � Stormwater Pond - ' ,�'' ! '`T 7.� - .� . , :• �� " �, SWP - E (- 0.07 acre) ^` � : . ' � SWP - C (- 1.31 acre) , �,�i� o + ;;;y ' • . � , �� • �� • � (34.781901 ° N, -77.391155° W ) � 4 (34.781489° N, -77.391981 � W ) ,t � . � � ' /� � T% �� / ,� � - . . .�� ` � � � . � � � = � . � �, r ^ . +^,' APPROXIMATE �..' " � Y� ' ,Y� : ' ' , , ` 'Y • r . ' �` WATERS OF THE U.S. � � � ;�� ' � � • ?'�' t` i � � 4' � � ' �. - .. • �t��,�, . � t�, ,' AND WETLANDS � o' '` • . ''f� `- ''� �� ; y � � - , , . , . � 9 - �, �. BOUNDARY MAP od' , � `' ,/�A� � f � � ,r 3�� ., �� ,�r � � '-�'^ � � ` ,. ' ' � � � * �0�� i. j � �w� 1 ' . �'�� '�. J �,� �� , �� y o ' � ♦ �3,� !w( �; * �.. f 'yf � ~^ �jrs . . . y . c� , • � �. .� 4' q � ! � _i � - �'..:d' . . S � � h` . `. . � � , , � r > �1 , w�s• .. * •' ' - �? � i � `-y , �'� � . ',�r -� - ' ,� � �� _ � � y �,p � . Source: NC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic .�+ �_� ,, Potential Non-Wetland % t_ ' ,;�r � . -.�� ,4t � . +.y � � � �� - • , Information and Analysis, NC 911 Board i ' Waters of the US + - . '�*y, ' '•�. . •+ � .�. � �� a , � ,, �,_ �, � �,,, � � Tributary - A (- 0.13 acre; 428 If) � �- � r �,.�i a•� ,, � � • .�� a �Y `• ��.\ • f � �,. � . Notes: y�, (34.779616° N, -77.396186° W) , 1 � ,' f �r / " • , �� Tl��', �%f ' � ' + � � ,�' -' �� + � 1. The boundaries of potential jurisdictional � #•;,�"� � :� 'p \ `� � �, •+ � • �` - -, ,�..�+Lti,��,� �' +• � �' +. �� a�� L+*}� , • � �!�y,. � Y� ♦ v�� waters of the U.S. were approximated by STV � + � �y� � �, • ' � '^}4 F�t ''!.� � � � � � � �t � .t � • � .� Engineers, Inc. during a field review conducted "�#�.' ' �� 4 �d ` �+ y¢� �� 1 � . ' �� 'r; ��; ��r. '>�" �� ' � �'=� . on June 13th, 2018. Potentialjurisdictional � � " , . ,� �. � • � ,. �;S �S : IlC � ♦ " � A�,r, � � �.; • �,� �,1 • • � � � S4h ��, •�, � �, A � . fi ` �� sf boundaries have been marked in the field with �f _�_. �._ , a� ` ��" • , •�, 4�' y�� M►. � � i , � � \ � , � , i .�_ h �, �, �, �,�+, �r'ti �. , �' � S; .. ` � pink survey tape and mapped using a Trimble � � :�` �' `�i� e' �, • � , ��a '� '' a►� �; r ? � �*; �,';- � . � � � �3, ' � Y � � Geo7X hand-held GPS unit ca able of subfoot Potential Non-W etland � rse��-,� ` �'�+ � '. �. � , -• �� ' �t, '�++�:�,�, s,;k.` ` ` ! � a � accuracy. This map is intend d for planning Waters of the US � �,'� � � Tributa A 0.13 acre; 428 If �' "' 1 " '`�`'� '�" � � ta''- '� �* ' '� ry- (- ) � Tnset � ," � purposes only. � _ ' Stormwater Pond • � N (34.779616° N, -77.396186° W) � � _ ,. � �f � � 'trf� � SWP-B(-0.05acre) �"� 13. Legend ; 2. The boundaries of jurisdictional waters of �- � p o : • ,� _ �� (34.778921 °�, 7y396180° W)� ` w r E the U.S. are subject to change following } � �_�� a t '� ��, ��, verification by the U.S. Army Corps of ' �� • � � 4-' � Project Study Area (� 61.4 acres) S Engineers. � � � ,;'+�' t+'� -� Stormwater Pond " y «'' � � Y .� -�� SWP -A (- 0.17 acre) i,; � �"`� Potential Non-Wetland Waters of the US (Intermittent Stream) , * � S � �� ` � ��'�\ . (34778574° N, -77.395899° W) �. ,� y� Drawn By: Checked By: . , o� �. ' ,,�'��.� ~` r � � '� r -� ';�'� i,,,;,; � Potential Non-Wetland Waters of the US (Tributary) JLK WSB r , "��: � � . �.� � " . � 1�. _ _ � ., � �, .� .� �!k �� , , ` �:: `�� " �` ' t� '�'{ ' ' ' � Stormwater Pond/Tributar Potential Non-Wetland F = �r' � ' ``Y _ �''� r ` `• ' � y - -� • d: . r� f� . . � �i Waters of the US �.�.�+ �r� �, �`. ` „� �' � ' � �� Approved By: Date: Stream - A (- 8 If) , ':i r 7� : . �. . �. � • w , � .t • , r • � Pipe/Culvert (34.778941° N, -77.396681° W) �� _I ,t'� '� , . " �: �4- , � , ' .:�''�-� MAI 9/17/2018 � ' :, Lo�x°-s ,�'� , 1�- ` ��, '�. , ' �=a �+ Photograph Location ��-• _'-_ 'l' " rI.- ' � �� •: , . � . � , . �Sr, STV Inc. Project No. - �+ .-�-;, �°�-�• , �- '�` �� ,:.�' �� ;r7 � Wetland Determination Data Point - �� 4� Ins;e� � _�:, • �,� � - :o � ,zj , .' '� I�� / �� 4017737 v Y- - R , r�,; 1 , • � 7 �� `� * .� 0 300 600 1,200 - `R� ;%' . � + � � f '�� ' � � . � � a • FIGURE 4 . ;;�� . � �, Feet �;-- • = � � - �i t 'o . _ a , ' . NCDOT Division 3 STIP U-5787 August 2018 SR 2715 Extension from NC 53 to McDaniel Drive in Onslow County, NC — Request for JD Attachment C NCDWR Stream Identification and NCSAM Forms NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: 06/13/2018 Project/Site: STIP U-5787 Trade St Latitude: 34.779015° N Evaluator: Steven Busbee County: Onslow Longitude: -77.396684° W Total Points: Stream Determination (circle one) Other Tributary A Stream is at least intermittent 26.�J Ephemera ntermitten Perennial e.g. Quad Name: if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30' A. Geomor holo (Subtotal = 9.5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1a Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 1 2 3 ripple-pool sequence 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 9. Grade control DO 0.5 1 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 a _1��_�_� �:.-'--- --- --• __•_-' --- -"-----`---' B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7.5 ) 12. Presence of Baseflow 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 14. Leaf litter 15. Sediment on plants or debris 16. Organic debris lines or piles 17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? C 1 0 3 1 2 3 1 0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 No=O es= C. Biology (Subtotal = 9.5 ) 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 0 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 22. Fish 0 0. 1 1.5 23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0 `perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: Sketch: NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1 USACE AID #: NCDWR #: INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant. NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area). PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION: 1. Project name (if any): STIP U-5787 Trade Street 3. Applicant/owner name: NCDOT Division 3 5. County: Onslow 7. River basin: White Oak Date of evaluation: 6/13/18 Assessor name/organization: Nearest named water body on USGS 7.5-minute quad: S.Busbee Sandy Run Branch 8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 34.779015 N; -77.396684 W STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations) 9. Site number (show on attached map): Tributary A 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 50 11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 2 ❑Unable to assess channel depth. 12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 3 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes �No 14. Feature type: ❑Perennial flow �Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION: 15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ❑ Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (I) � Outer Coastal Plain (0) 16. Estimated geomorphic �A �� valley shape (skip for Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) ❑B (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope) 17. Watershed size: (skip ❑Size 1(< 0.1 mi2) �Size 2(0.1 to < 0.5 mi2) ❑Size 3(0.5 to < 5 mi2) ❑Size 4(>_ 5 mi2) for Tidal Marsh Stream) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: 18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? �Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area. ❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑II ❑III ❑IV ❑V) ❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters ❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect �Nutrient Sensitive Waters ❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) ❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area. List species: ❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species) 19. Are additional stream information/supplementarv measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? I-lYes 6allo 1. Channel Water — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams) �A Water throughout assessment reach. ❑B No flow, water in pools only. ❑C No water in assessment reach. 2. Evidence of Flow Restriction — assessment reach metric ❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams, beaver dams). �B Not A 3. Feature Pattern — assessment reach metric �A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert). ❑B Not A 4. Feature Longitudinal Profile — assessment reach metric �A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down-cutting, existing damming, over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these disturbances). ❑B Not A 5. Signs of Active Instability — assessment reach metric Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include active bank failure, active channel down-cutting (head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip-rap). �A < 10% of channel unstable ❑B 10 to 25% of channel unstable ❑C > 25% of channel unstable 6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). LB RB �A �A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction ❑B ❑B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area, leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching]) ❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an interstream divide Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric Check all that apply. ❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam) ❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone) ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem ❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors) ❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch" section. ❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone ❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone ❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc) ❑I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section) �J Little to no stressors 8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought. ❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours ❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours �C No drought conditions 9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric ❑Yes �No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition). 10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric 10a. ❑Yes �No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging) (evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12) 10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams) ❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses ��, ❑F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) �� ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation ❑B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o w ❑H Low-tide refugia (pools) vegetation Y � ❑I Sand bottom ❑C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) L@ ❑J 5% vertical bank along the marsh �D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots �� ❑K Little or no habitat in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter ❑E Little or no habitat *********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS**************************** 11. Bedform and Substrate — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams) 11a. ❑Yes ❑No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams) 11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es). ❑A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c) ❑B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d) �C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life) 11 c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged. Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare (R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _> 10-40%, Abundant (A) _> 40-70%, Predominant (P) _> 70%. Cumulative percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach. NP R C A P ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Sand (.062 — 2 mm) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ SilUclay (< 0.062 mm) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip-rap, concrete, etc.) 11d. ❑Yes ❑No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams) 12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) 12a. �Yes ❑No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual? If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other: 12b. �Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that apply. If No, skip to Metric 13. 1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams. � ❑Adult frogs ❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles ❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) ❑ ❑Beetles ❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T) ❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula) � ❑Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp) ❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae ❑ ❑Dipterans ❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E) ❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae) ❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae � ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea) ❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula) ❑ ❑Other fish ❑ ❑Salamanders/tadpoles ❑ ❑Snails ❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P) ❑ ❑Tipulid larvae ❑ ❑Worms/leeches 13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types) Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff. LB RB ❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area �B �B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area ❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes) 14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types) Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area. LB RB ❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water > 6 inches deep ❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep �C �C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep 15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal wetted perimeter of assessment reach. LB RB �Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area? ❑N �N 16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams) Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach. ❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges) �B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins) ❑C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam, weir) ❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage) �E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present) ❑F None of the above 17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Check all that apply. ❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation) ❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit) �C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed) �D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach ❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge ❑F None of the above 18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Consider aspect. Consider "leaf-on" condition. �A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes) ❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees) ❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent 19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out to the first break. Vegetated Wooded LB RB LB RB ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide ❑C �C ❑C �C From 30 to < 50 feet wide �D ❑D �D ❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide ❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees 20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width). LB RB �A �A Mature forest ❑B ❑B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure ❑C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide ❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs ❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation 21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet). If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22: � Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet LB RB LB RB LB RB ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use) 22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width). LB RB �A �A Medium to high stem density ❑B ❑B Low stem density ❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground 23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide. LB RB �A �A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent. ❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent. ❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent. 24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to assessment reach habitat. LB RB ❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species, with non-native invasive species absent or sparse. �B �B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees. ❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation. 25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams) 25a. ❑Yes ❑No Was conductivity measurement recorded? If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ❑Other: 25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter). ❑A < 46 ❑ B 46 to < 67 ❑ C 67 to < 79 ❑ D 79 to < 230 ❑ E >_ 230 Notes/Sketch: Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1 Stream Site Name STIP U-5787 Trade Street Date of Assessment 6/13/18 Stream Category Oa2 Assessor Name/Organization S. Busbee Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent Function Class Rating Summary (1) Hydrology (2) Baseflow (2) Flood Flow (3) Streamside Area Attenuation (4) Floodplain Access (4) Wooded Riparian Buffer (4) Microtopography (3) Stream Stability (4) Channel Stability (4) Sediment Transport (4) Stream Geomorphology (2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction (2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow (2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability (3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability Tidal Marsh Stream Geo (1) Water Quality (2) Baseflow (2) Streamside Area Vegetation (3) Upland Pollutant Filtration (3) Thermoregulation (2) Indicators of Stressors (2) Aquatic Life Tolerance (2) Intertidal Zone Filtration (1) Habitat (2) In-stream Habitat (3) Baseflow (3) Substrate (3) Stream Stability (3) In-stream Habitat (2) Stream-side Habitat (3) Stream-side Habitat (3) Thermoregulation (2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat (3) Flow Restriction (3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability (4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability (4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology (3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat (2) Intertidal Zone Overall U SAC E/ All Streams HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH MEDIUM LOW MEDIUM HIGH NA LOW NA NA NA NA NA MEDIUM HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH NO LOW NA LOW LOW HIGH LOW MEDIUM LOW HIGH MEDIUM HIGH NA NA NA NA NA NA NA MEDIUM NCDWR Intermittent HIGH MEDIUM HIGH HIGH HIGH MEDIUM LOW MEDIUM HIGH NA LOW NA NA NA NA NA MEDIUM MEDIUM HIGH HIGH HIGH NO NA NA HIGH MEDIUM MEDIUM LOW MEDIUM HIGH HIGH MEDIUM HIGH NA NA NA NA NA NA NA HIGH NCDOT Division 3 STIP U-5787 August 2018 SR 2715 Exfension from NC 53 to McDaniel Drive in Onslow County, NC — Request for JD Attachment D USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region ProjecUSite: STIP U-5787; SR 2715 Ext from NC 53 to McDaniel Drive City/County: �acksonville/Onslow ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT Division 3 State: NC Investigator(s): Steven Busbee, PWS Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-T Lat: 34.779673 Long: -��•396222 Sampling Date: 06-13-18 Sampling Point: DP2 Slope (%): 0-1 % Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name: Rains fine sandy loam, 0-2% slopes, Atlantic coast flatwoods (Ra) NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X X within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: DP2 was taken in a narrow corridor of mixed hardwood-pine forest adjacent to Wetland A approximately 320 feet west of the intersection of Trade Street and Western Boulevard; see Att B- Figure 4 for a map depicting the location of DP2. DP2 is representative of a non-jurisdictional upland area. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two required) Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that applv) II Surface Soil Cracks (B6) ❑ Surface Water (A1) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) Q Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) Q1--f Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (616) ❑ Water Marks (B1) I--I Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (62) Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) 0 Crayfish Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift Deposits (B3) Q Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) a Algal Mat or Crust (64) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) II Geomorphic Position (D2) a Iron Deposits (B5) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) II Shallow Aquitard (D3) a Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) II FAC-Neutral Test (D5) a Water-Stained Leaves (69) II Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): N/A Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): NiA Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): '12 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X includes ca illa frin e Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: No wetland hydrology indicators are present. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. sampiing Po�r,t: °P2 Absolute Dominant Indicator pominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30�"�0� ) % Cover S�ecies? Status Number of Dominant Species � Pinus taeda 5o yes FAc That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: $ 2 Acer rubrum zo yes Fnc Liquidambar styraciflua zo yes FAc Total Number of Dominant 3• Species Across All Strata: 9 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5• That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 89 6. � Prevalencelndex worksheet: $ Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv: 90 = Total Cover OBL species x 1= 50% of total cover: 45 20% of total cover: �$ FACW species x 2= Saplinp/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30�"�0� ) FAC species x 3= � Liquidambar styraciflua zo yes Fnc FACU species x 4= 2 Acer rubrum zo yes Fnc UPL species x 5= 3 Morella cerifera zo yes Fnc Column Totals: (A) 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 50% of total cover: 30 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30� X �o� � 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 50% of total cover: zo Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30� X �o� � � Lonicera japonica 2 Toxicodendron radicans 3 Vitis rotundifolia 4. 5. 60 = Total Cover 20% of total cover: 1z 40 = Total Cover 20% of total cover: $ 10 yes FACU 10 yes FAC 10 yes FAC 30 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6 Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). A dominance of hydrophytic vegetation is present Prevalence Index = B/A = (A) �B) (A/B) _ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation X 2- Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) �B) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb — All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DP2 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) °/o Tvpe' Locz Texture Remarks 0-2 10YR 3/1 100 sandy loam 2-12+ 10YR 4/3 100 C=Concentration. D=Deoletion. RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains. loamy sand ZLocation: PL=Pore Linina. M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': � Histosol (A1) � Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) � Histic Epipedon (A2) � Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) �T�I 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) � Black Histic (A3) � Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) �u--I Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) � Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) � Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Tu�I Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) � Stratified Layers (A5) � Depleted Matrix (F3) u Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) � Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) � Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 1536) � 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) � Depleted Dark Surface (F7) �❑I Red Parent Material (TF2) � Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) � Redox Depressions (F8) u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) � 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) � Marl (F10) (LRR U) � Other (Explain in Remarks) � Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) � Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) � Thick Dark Surface (Al2) � Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and � Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) � Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, � Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) � Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. � Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) � Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) � Sandy Redox (S5) � Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) � Stripped Matrix (S6) � Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) � Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: No hydric soil indicators are present. Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region ProjecUSite: STIP U-5787; SR 2715 Ext from NC 53 to McDaniel Drive City/County: �acksonville/Onslow ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT Division 3 State: NC Investigator(s): Steven Busbee, PWS Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-T Lat: 34.778866 Long: -��•396522 Sampling Date: 06-13-18 Sampling Point: DP4 Slope (%): 0-1 % Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name: Rains fine sandy loam, 0-2% slopes, Atlantic coast flatwoods (Ra) NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X X within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: DP4 was taken in a fragmented area of mixed hardwood forest adjacent to Wetland B approximately 150 feet west of the intersection of Trade Street and Western Boulevard; see Att B- Figure 4 for a map depicting the location of DP4. DP4 is representative of a non-jurisdictional upland area. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two required) Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that applv) II Surface Soil Cracks (B6) ❑ Surface Water (A1) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) Q Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) Q1--f Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (616) ❑ Water Marks (B1) I--I Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (62) Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) 0 Crayfish Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift Deposits (B3) Q Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) a Algal Mat or Crust (64) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) II Geomorphic Position (D2) a Iron Deposits (B5) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) II Shallow Aquitard (D3) a Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) II FAC-Neutral Test (D5) a Water-Stained Leaves (69) II Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): N/A Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): NiA Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): '12 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X includes ca illa frin e Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: No wetland hydrology indicators are present. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. sampiing Po�r,t: °P4 Absolute Dominant Indicator pominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30�"�0� ) % Cover S�ecies? Status Number of Dominant Species � Quercus nigra 5o yes FAc That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: $ 2 Liquidambar styraciflua ao yes Fnc llex opaca zo no FAc Total Number of Dominant 9 3• Species Across All Strata: 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5• That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 89 6. � Prevalencelndex worksheet: $ Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv: ��o = Total Cover OBL species x 1= 50% of total cover: 55 20% of total cover: 2z FACW species x 2= Saplinp/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30�"�0� ) FAC species x 3= � Liquidambar styraciflua z5 yes Fnc FACU species x 4= 2. Persea borbonia zo yes FACW UPL species x 5= 3 Morella cerifera zo yes Fnc Column Totals: (A) 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 50% of total cover: 3z.5 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30� X �o� � � Persea borbonia 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 50% of total cover: � 5 Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30� X �o� � � Lonicera japonica 2 Toxicodendron radicans 3 Smilax glauca 4. 5. 65 = Total Cover 20% of total cover: 13 15 yes Prevalence Index = B/A = (A) �B) (A/B) _ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation X 2- Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) �B) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must FACW be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb — All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. 15 = Total Cover 20% of total cover: 3 15 yes FACU 10 yes FAC 10 yes FAC 35 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: �� 5 20% of total cover: � Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). A dominance of hydrophytic vegetation is present Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 S�IL Sampling Point: DP4 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) °/o Tvpe' Locz Texture Remarks 0-4 10YR 2/1 100 sandy loam 4-8 10YR 4/3 10YR 2/1 8-12 2.5Y 5/4 2.5Y 4/3 70 30 60 40 sandyloam sandyloam loamy sand loamy sand 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: � Histosol (A1) � Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) � Histic Epipedon (A2) � Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) �T�I 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) � Black Histic (A3) � Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) �u--I Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) � Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) � Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Tu�I Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) � Stratified Layers (A5) � Depleted Matrix (F3) u Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) � Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) � Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 1536) � 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) � Depleted Dark Surface (F7) �❑I Red Parent Material (TF2) � Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) � Redox Depressions (F8) u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) � 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) � Marl (F10) (LRR U) � Other (Explain in Remarks) � Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) � Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) � Thick Dark Surface (Al2) � Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and � Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) � Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, � Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) � Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. � Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) � Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) � Sandy Redox (S5) � Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) � Stripped Matrix (S6) � Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) � Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: No hydric soil indicators are present. Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 NCDOT Division 3 STIP U-5787 August 2018 SR 2715 Exfension from NC 53 to McDaniel Drive in Onslow County, NC — Request for JD ��+�� t � �• � . � '+ �j�4 � ' �. 4 � .iC '4.� T . ��} rt .. �" � . �"�' � r � '�- 1 _� �, !� 3 n, �.:.. w.,..,�.�g; w y',a.' � , �� .. u � r -:' �1, ��♦J �� i �9 a� 'ti i dT�Q . '1'.. � .--r1�i �a�' � 3>�f. � :� 'L �� ,� r "'� -. �.rL. . Photograph 1— View of Tributary A looking upst�ream at originalion. V.S�' � �i,'r !u� r �; � , ,! . y , K N ..+ f � Y' .�� .�/ F� '� `_ � �t��; � � �' � ' �'•.3 � ;k , � �ti`��i.'`�j��.. '�. ,._ � _ " :�?: �� "'+'�" �� '" � " �' ��` `k k"'C+�w r �T�jf 'u' �.;`.�+� =��, d �- �°T � ,�..a� - �� " � ��,.. _ . . r . �� . �� , * �, ,� � �,�$. �.� � �,, 'v � ��'�� ,�j�� '` � `��'�`�� . �'� -:�' + "" ` `.: ,. ��:{ '", �- `� '�'t •, � ..,. k ,k-y 'A Re' 'r'�,5� � � �'S'':^ +�f _�' " = Ya� T �� . .` s'S �,• �y-�F�r.r.�. 'a1 l . �� s{�� )3� �(��.•�� ;"" '�� .x�� *�' � � .� �I."�� . . . y.. . � r� 2��".. ,2 - . .� � . '� :'7 .+/ :.� �[-t=.l�'' t , � f 1 _ �.. '� � . �'✓�,�,� � A �� ` � �dX �'.��y�� ia' 4 . � =-r :, a .� . 3�" . � } ` . ,�, F ''-' ��y •3w � � ". � 2. r��` '_ F Y7 � �'t ~ '��r `� 4i �s•M�e. J� -dt. �► +�_�: $ ` � . �• .,fr 'e 3 �� '4. .- C� r, � `�, �' �•, ~' .�-.��-'�� 1' � � ri. '°t n a .�p � ., � f L � .\�r�" �r.�y�,y .a�'L. ;r< �� _�!_s�"`� c • t� �„4y �� . � � '� �^ F .�i'T"� �(Yi��.�S�P- .•�'� �`'�.z..�. � ��."E �:� .. tl3Y'r'�4:" ,�` a - w ?'•'� _ �w—.•�' �1`�.�`, is� : .�� ' Photograph 2— View of Tributary A�looking downstream fi-om oi-igination. . � , R�_ �:1 NCDOT Division 3 STIP U-5787 August 2018 SR 2715 Exfension from NC 53 to McDaniel Drive in Onslow County, NC — Request for JD - :� '�'�� _ �,� 3�'% �, � /� � , Pl�otograpl� 3— View of Wetland A(northeaste�-�I portion). � , � � �*�,.� , g, ,� ,. `, 1V �A'� � �-�,� -, � � k�-+ r f-� �4�`"'� ;�'+f '�'' - 'iqll ' . i ��,. �-� b� .� - t�r T P `�'�� ' , �`� _`��'�� +•re, , �£ �;� �jrN � :.;ai{'•-' �,r`-`- ._il :�.,,_ ...... , � . � �. Photograph 4— View of Wetland A(west cent��al portion). NCDOT Division 3 STIP U-5787 SR 2715 Exfension from NC 53 to McDaniel Drive in Onslow County, NC — Request for JD ru : : r . :; � .! ��• 4+ 9 w � ._ r � =_'� � - . _' J .. .. „ n _ . r'�IA � �.��,{�� .': � � n i. , "�.,.�4. t ..- . '�D �':1�( II � �',"�. 't _ . � h . '�. .�� . �� , i a �#�, � � ;,+ r�E}� c�� r��t° y �. �` �.� �. y August 2018 � c. �,y,s�.,;,..� (y . '�T�-fk 3�t � , /: i� V �4 �� ^\�a�ti - . ��r,t:: �. �.� c�' It �...�u ni ��_. � y:' d�`� �� m� r� �a i'"s . " ri�z:.� . t ��, ro`�"'*'F -37 �� 1 t 1 � �` r . �,s §F �§'� '� ... r �e �yy i �!iun �k� .� �n � r ^ y t� i �y , J , � Q �1'+ar .� w� " r ,t pt ��fll�`e��tl�� 9 ��i` N� �h�7j i�;� t� 4* 'F'} ` �•`o� �� .`S'r'� � 4u � x j � ,�. r �Os'� � �G �'� a n- r.� . > 3 ��+e �� i�S)°j i � „ y `�e^,.�'-' �'! ��.. ey�� ; � � xf '� k,�'v`��,� _ " �� p ( ]��'+�"ay l�.%x i i '�i`�� , '� .. �.i^' � �' r y✓'?' � ,tr 4n � �'a � � �� r � ��('' 1� � - �, �ra�' . _ �� Ai, y , s � ._—�w� • � ro '� ! r s %�° � ? £. «- ,� • - i�-� w s .�, �'-'a-"" _ Qe 1�•' �, • `�'S � . ,�a . �y4 .. '"*-� F _ �.. `�� .,.�� i: e k �� k ��1+� �.��yl, �� $ � 5*� ' � ;�,:c�; -... '� � � :.� e �� a#�` �� j «s ,g;j`4a�� °i 's. 'Irys ��E`�ti '�+t� . .:u + g �� i'a..�.. � ��, 1� ��,` �� !''� ''t.� n., .�,: �t�..'�`.aid�.'�.��'.7R. * I��4 , il�� Photograpll 5— View o�P Wetland A at the Moosehavea� Road pipe inlet. A � � w � �-'� •" - ,� � ''',° ,� �, „� �. �� s �, k r S 4 . 'i i � ' ,i . ,'f(�t:: :� .� � .=� � , r, <, � r: _ � . . �i; . ,3,j"a _ y � �' . &i� 59. �� r �' �.� y a,�r-�n�' � ..,�"� � �j�yj :.__ �s �� v S. .✓+ ; �.e.a �i� nS*.!. n.s �{ �,{; er �t'�b}i6c - �' � $,« � � ... . .. � �:� �.-, _ _ .. - . . ��-':.ri . �+, .t.� ..�. mY <n.�..��: �,-- �� :p �E��' , ��,� � - " , � �� ,. ,�. :�b �;�`,.,�- !ir; _L� A. �. _ ';', `a � . , �� _ � '- � ' ,, r �..�� ,�� -� �,Y+-.i �.h 7R, ry /. �,y. � (,S t -' - '�ry'�7^,rr� . � - . 1f' �`.�.y�{' ` `�F/��t R . •��" 'yR ' }`�� ''.h�`�•� I �� . . �`' £' '". Tt �. Z�1�� F /�� e :: R� � �� ' , _, , .� . '� . t ��_-�� _� t� �� Photograph 6— View of Wetland A at the Moosehaven Road pipe outlet. NCDOT Division 3 STIP U-5787 August 2018 SR 2715 Exfension from NC 53 to McDaniel Drive in Onslow County, NC — Request for JD Pholograph 7— View oi�' Wetland B. Photograph �— View of Ditcl� Tributary B(ilortl�west/upstream end) loolcing downstreaiil. NCDOT Division 3 STIP U-5787 August 2018 SR 2715 Exfension from NC 53 to McDaniel Drive in Onslow County, NC — Request for JD F �i - �� "�Fr ra�y? � I i ��'i j� r„' 6 v, i , i r9C� �_,� � i �`�� c1 � � ��i:.1��,�. J� � . � �� .- _ �� , .. Yi :wn�l�y•. Photograph 9— View of Ditch Tributary B looking downstream from Foxhorn Road pipe outfall � �,a� �� ,�F '� � - �,� � -'"' ;��,. E ��f `-��'z6� i.-�, i�� $ .� �fi� ��. F��.. � .. .. � � � �� `_ � y � �¢ � � � � T�"� t �� i :�""�F. _ � .:,' �� y �t y .. +� � �.,- � F . �� -.,�� . .��_ Ly _i. . — � ` 1 a� r � _ _ '�Kft��ti�.r '=7%�� .. �i�,� ;� ^'la _�~" E a'� ��:' �".� ^y . � � ,K � _- ti � � B �`r � �"�� R; ....- �� y � r � , � �j �: ��1`��ai `u.. � s � � uL i-.r '1� �r �5" i�:':. � � t,,12�eF-,��.� � _'_ �� 0`,'.' ��. ,��-��•, �' .�• �w i� ��l,�.f — � ��'�� •�� y • . .. �'y_ T i � � �� ' I►c�,� "��aAm �� . '_'��j,��l;�� •,��+ ' C� Photo�aph 10 — View of Ditch Tributary C loolcing downstream from stormwater pond pipe outfall. NCDOT Division 3 STIP U-5787 August 2018 SR 2715 Exfension from NC 53 to McDaniel Drive in Onslow County, NC — Request for JD �e�- �` '�' ,� �� .,�...-��.�, „� �� Photobraph 1 1— View oC Stoi7nwater Pond A(SWP A). _"!E�.;� w o:n .-:��.��..� � � .�� ¢ _. , � '. � ._ � _ � _s= y' �. ,✓c : i3 ('4�5.... .. .. -' . . . . Photograph 12 — View of Storniwater Pond C(SWP C). NCDOT Division 3 STIP U-5787 August 2018 SR 2715 Exfension from NC 53 to McDaniel Drive in Onslow County, NC - Request for JD i . - -.., �t1t�� w,°� � e � e�. .~t� �, �, ��}-=`o`�T''ae$'�'.`�'ti. ; Ai'�F�s` z4y�;@ t�•e�aoa�+,°1. `'a+v°a,a��':.�bp�'�cR.�'a n k u.,�� -_ � fi � =� ,- �; ___ ,.,. ; -, • ,��:� r �� ^�� °'9'�m��aw�,,aa�.►'�.7�q �'!x'+8. � .�� ►�o i M ' '�p4 @ 8 %�,Q . .A'3!�N+II �a.,�aky*s�Pa4p?� ��, �-aC� � 7RG �W A�0.4$�-i '�°�b� � �T"'� � R.:=� � 4l�bA* �,t'i;�;<'-� - .- : -: �: . � - y� }�� ^ r, . �i . 4 ti� t'1'6 �� . r 4 1 �' r�� k 4�a� i�f � 9 ,. .�5� r �.. nt`#.*k� � g. S, �".- Ean7 '- : '�"stai �'"�'',i�'��t .� .". �8 �. � d�f -.1 :� � n,�#��'��cn��'V �' a�t'� � ' � ,v ��r �� j�v:yk�r �k.�� k : W '_ ('� �v� S'��h ��" j a .y _, 't ' Vi �.�,y� q " q§„ S � �� q� �� 0. {.k � � �'G �� M � . � � � '� � [ 6 � Y �-"_a,.,.`� � �W� k �V an �,� � . h`�'p xr ♦'�,. e � R . � , , I Y h ! l . f t�N�� i1 � 4 �.� �.�1T� .4 -- - _-.' .: .N `l� r . F�M1 �..t S + w�� '� U. qnr �:,� .. �'i�, , b �R s � ' � t , ,s� � ,�'� 'a. _ —��,.`"'".�-� �`�F ; � �y . _ 7 . � � _ , � �".4t ` _ ' �� ,::" �Y.�� `� �"�..r. .� � "`:'z - � �.. `� c � � i � ��. _. � Photograph 13 — View of Stormwater Pond D(SWP D). �t. �r� G s.. :��`'� �,.� 9 �_ r —.; � „ , � rr, ��If� � � q� � � o r ii�l�'�'r a'� � e ' �`^ "� ��,�a��> � _� i IIIII Inll ni� �Iry ��I II li .'lll�., . !'�- ' ,'„ r �y �� . � � I.�.'�'�+isi�.' E � � ��:i .•- ■ e'��e�ji '� ,+%a � �j s��rY�� 1 � � +� .. . . S6 � .j�� - - 1�� _� � �.. �� . �l�;j��i�F'',��.' �y�,�ti��," � -- _ . - J. _� V ( y �" �T_��«�. � - _ Y � - � KK� 7,�',T"�'�►'e�; '�� - =-- � :-�� v� �� "�<�.� �,,,��,��.z ; _- � -_ - _ _ * -- -- - - -- _ ; � _- � . � f r`�L ..- ,-x` �_� y_- � � �� '�� ` � - � � 4�- . _�"� _- �.. . c -- � _, .^!.i;`� . fi _ "' - � - a . ` �'�"` . - � � .. _ � _ a� � s , ., ` -: ayl�„ti _ �- 3 s � ��_ £ � ..� �i1 � � � -y�'� `�,� ''E S�� -� �, i.� � � _ � : ,Ks -- { "��, � .�fy _�'��yy -�t-�� __j�s`�t-��s 4�� ' ':` , . � .i .M1 f 6�. �%", -v.�a- -c '„A�+"".'��-- -.: ' � ..-1�. -�,= �s__: � i��,�+�C =�a� _ . -�" k��t.F aA� •{� -��+, �: -� � { � �. - " .a� _ _r _ .:"_rT�2K.�-« ��+�k�-"'�'a�: ��ca"` .� a�c;� �� a,-'�— _o . _�e '�`�; Photograph 14 — View of Storinwater Pond E(SWP E). NCDOT Division 3 STIP U-5787 SR 2715 Exfension from NC 53 to McDaniel Drive in Onslow County, NC — Request for JD .`. August 2018 ,� � Photobraph 15 — View of Stor��water Pond G(SWP G). �� •T— `,�„'°:t' ��'� , s , �.. � �� h ' ��'�aj� �a r � � � L �t � � A�'�' � � '��, i � —_.. _ ��.�q Oi a �� ' ��,� 1�� I � t�p'�'�+ ,l/ . 1 =� � �. . � ° '.er��' : R�1'�-:'ei ,i ��'�'"- � ��_Y ��j-'��.= � Photograph 16 — View of Stormwater Pond H(SWP H). _ � r�.�_ _ � �� ' � /� � _; �,�� ` i"r � .� �