20111022 Ver 1 _Year 4 Monitoring Report -Final _20180315

ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT (YEAR 4)
MARCH 2018
PREPARED FOR:
AFFP, LLC
PREPARED BY:
HEADWATERS RESTORATION, PLLC
A
N
D
E
R
S
O
N
F
A
R
M
S T
R
E
A
M
M
I
T I
G
A
T
I
O
N
B
A
N
K
ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT (YEAR 4)
MARCH 2018
PREPARED FOR:
AFFP, LLC
PREPARED BY:
HEADWATERS RESTORATION, PLLC

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................2
II. RESTORATION SUMMARY............................................................................................................2
A. On-site Construction............................................................................................................... 2
B. Planting...................................................................................................................................3
III. MONITORING PLAN......................................................................................................................3
A. Hydrologic Monitoring Wells....................................................................................................3
B. Vegetation Monitoring............................................................................................................. 3
C. Stream Channel Monitoring.................................................................................................... 5
D. Success Criteria...................................................................................................................... 5
IV. MONITORING RESULTS (YEAR 4)...............................................................................................6
A. Vegetation Monitoring............................................................................................................. 6
B. Hydrologic Monitoring............................................................................................................. 6
C. Stream Channel Monitoring.................................................................................................... 8
V. ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT............................................................................................................ 8
VI. CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................9
Tables
Table 1. Planted Species at Anderson Farm Site.................................................................................. 4
Table 2. Summary of Monitoring Plot Data............................................................................................ 6
Appendices
APPENDIX A
— SITE MAP
APPENDIX B
— SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
APPENDIX C
— MONITORING PLOT DATA
APPENDIX D
— HYDROLOGIC GRAPHS/WETS DATA
APPENDIX E
— STREAM CHANNEL SURVEYS
BANK SPONSOR INFORMATION:
AFFP, LLC
372 Merrimon Avenue
Asheville, NC 28801
Fax: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank 1
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 4)
March 2018

I. INTRODUCTION
The Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank site (approximately 25 acres) consisted primarily of
channelized first -order stream systems that had been historically altered as a result of silvicultural and
livestock management practices prior to the initiation of restoration activities. The site is part of a 103 -acre
parcel located just west of Mag Sluder Road, approximately ten miles north of Asheville, North Carolina, in
Buncombe County. The site consists of moderately to steeply sloped terrain and is bisected by two main
stream systems which flow southward into Newfound Creek, a third -order stream located in the French
Broad River Basin (8 -digit Hydrologic Unit 06010105) (Subbasin 06010105090020). Based upon the as -
built survey, a total of 2,800 linear feet (If) of stream restoration was completed in addition to 555 If of
stream enhancement (Appendix A). Approximately 16 acres (ac.) of riparian habitat were also restored
through the planting of native hardwood species. As a result, the restoration effort is providing for
increased in -stream habitat, floodwater storage, nutrient retention/sediment reduction, and riparian habitat
expansion for resident and migratory fauna.
II. RESTORATION SUMMARY
A. On-site Construction
On-site construction was conducted between August 5, 2013, and October 1, 2013. Early activities
focused on the removal of invasive vegetation and large trees within the proposed construction zone.
Trees were stockpiled and later utilized as grade control structures per the engineer's specifications.
Following the clearing stage, excavation of the stream bank and contouring of the riparian area were
conducted. This level of disturbance was conducted in 500 -foot (ft) sections throughout the property to
minimize the risk of large-scale erosion and bank failure. Topsoil was stockpiled and redistributed following
the establishment of stable bank slopes. Excavated material was wasted in one of two designated areas
within the Anderson Farm property.
Restoration within the stream channel was conducted in concert with the grading activities. A majority of
the in -stream work focused on the installation of log and/or stone sills across the existing channel. These
structures serve as grade control features and support the development of different habitat niches
throughout the reach. Numerous pools and constructed riffles were also established and/or stabilized to
restore the natural features of the streambed. In addition, three ephemeral drainage channels, located on
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank 2
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 4)
March 2018

the western side of UT -1 and UT -3, were also stabilized using reinforced coir fiber matting. Rock -lined
pools were also engineered along these features to dissipate runoff velocities prior to their intersection with
the restored channel.
B. Planting
Planting of the site was conducted between December 30, 2013, and January 1, 2014. During this period a
mixture of livestakes and bare root seedlings were planted throughout the site. Livestakes were installed
every two feet along the restored streambank. Bare root seedlings were planted on 8 -foot spacings
(approximately 680 stems per acre) throughout the 16 -acre riparian buffer area. Table 1 contains a
complete list of the planted species. Supplemental planting near the confluence was also conducted
following the Year 1 monitoring event.
III. MONITORING PLAN
A. Hydrologic Monitoring Wells
Documentation of stream flow within the project is being conducted using three pressure transducers (one
in each restored reach). One additional gauge has also been installed within the area targeted for
enhancement. All four wells were re -installed on June 26, 2014. These gauges are measuring the
elevation of water in the channel throughout the duration of the project and will be used to determine if the
project is meeting the applicable "success criteria" related to the total number of bankfull events.
B. Vegetation Monitoring
Given the size of the project, 2% of the planted riparian areas are monitored via the establishment of
permanent 0.10 -ac. plots. These areas are located within approximately 16 acres in two different habitat
types. Per the approved mitigation plan, a total of five plots were established. GPS coordinates for the
centers of each sampling plot were recorded and are included with the as -built survey (Appendix A).
During monitoring, surviving planted individuals and volunteers will be identified, measured, and
enumerated within each plot.
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank 3
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 4)
March 2018

Table 1. Planted Species at Anderson Farm Site
Zone 1 - Streambank
2,800 linear feet
Common Name
Scientific Name
# Planted
Composition
Elderberry
Sambucus canadensis
34%
1,200
Ninebark
Physocarpus opulifolius
34%
1,200
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amomum
31%
1,100
TOTAL
3,500
Zone 2 - Floodplain
2 acres
Common Name
Scientific Name
# Planted
Composition
River Birch
Betula nigra
25%
300
Green Ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
25%
300
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Quercus michauxii
25%
300
Ironwood
Carpfnus caroliniana
25%
300
TOTAL
1,200
Zone 3 - Mountain Slope
—16 acres
Common Name
Scientific Name
# Planted
Composition
Tulip Poplar
Liriodendron tulipifera
25%
2,600
American Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
25%
2,600
Persimmon
Diospyros virginiana
4%
450
Paw Paw
Asimina triloba
8%
850
Sugar Maple
Acer floridanum
24%
2,550
Serviceberry
Amelanchier laevis
4%
450
American Holly
flex opaca
10%
1,100
TOTAL
10,600
GRAND
15,300
TOTAL
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 4)
March 2018

C. Stream Channel Monitoring
Given the size, uniform design, and moderate slope (2%) of the proposed project area, cross-sections were
established every 500 feet of stream length (totaling 6 permanent stations). Placement of these stations
was designed to assess the performance of potential problem areas (e.g. severe erosion, structural failure,
etc.) within the restoration areas. These stations were evenly distributed between riffles and pools
throughout the project (Appendix A).
D. Success Criteria
The stream and riparian buffer restoration effort will be evaluated based upon performance criteria related
to vegetative density and stream stability. A total of five (5) monitoring events will occur following
completion of the proposed work. Additional monitoring may be required if subsequent plantings are
deemed necessary to meet the success criteria listed below. Note that non -planted individuals of
characteristic species may volunteer into the restored areas. Suitable volunteers are an important
component of the riparian area, as they serve as indicators for appropriate hydrologic regimes and provide
increased diversity. The presence of suitable volunteers also demonstrates trending of the site toward
vegetative success.
The primary success criteria for the restored stream systems will be:
(1) Documentation of 2 bankfull events using techniques discussed below within a normal rainfall year during
the initial 5 years of monitoring. These events must occur in separate years. Additional monitoring maybe
necessary in the event of abnormal climatic conditions.
(2) Demonstrated density of planted species to meet or exceed 260 trees per acre at the end of 5 years (post -
planting).
Level I Monitoring will be required for the Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank as detailed in the Stream
Mitigation Guidelines. Monitoring will occur five times in the years following completion of construction.
Monitoring reports will be prepared each monitoring year and will include completed Channel Mitigation
Monitoring Sheets with current data, a discussion of any deviations, and whether they are indicative of a
stabilizing or destabilizing situation.
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank 5
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 4)
March 2018

IV. MONITORING RESULTS (YEAR 4)
A. Vegetation Monitoring
Vegetation monitoring was conducted at the site on September 16, 2017. A total of 295 stems were
counted throughout the five plots, which correlates to an average of 590 stems per acre within the project
area (an increase in 58 stems per acre over the previous year). Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) was
the most abundant woody specie, with a total of 68 individuals. Other planted species such Tulip Poplar
(Liriodendron tulipifera), American Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), and Sugar Maple (Acer floridanum)
were also prevalent within the monitoring plots. All five of the plots contained sufficient densities of planted
and volunteer species. Plot #3, located near the confluence, registered the highest density with 94
individuals (up from 76 the previous year). This was likely due to the supplemental planting that occurred in
early 2016. Supplemental planting was necessary to counteract poor survivorship due to drought and soil
compaction from previous land use. See Appendix B for photographs of the monitoring plots during the
September event. Individual plot data is presented in Appendix C.
Table 2. Summary of Monitoring Plot Data
Plot Number
Number of Planted Species
Density per Acre
1
45
450
2
58
580
3
94
940
4
57
570
5
41
410
TOTAL
295
--
AVERAGE
590
B. Hydrologic Monitoring
Hydrologic monitoring wells were reinstalled at the site on June 26, 2014. Each well records the water level
in the stream every 15 minutes, which is sufficient to capture the impact of most rainfall events. Each well
captures data ranging from -42 inches (") (bottom of thalweg) to 0" (top of unit). Rainfall levels were
abnormally low in March and December 2017. Data from the spring and fall were above average.
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank 6
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 4)
March 2018

Corresponding rainfall data reflects the official readings from the climate database at the Asheville Airport
(AVL). See Appendix D for WETS table information and individual well graphs.
UT -1 b
This well is located at Cross -Section #2 near station 17+50 of UT -1b. Based on the design plans, the
average bankfull depth for this section is 0.53 ft. Data from 2017 depict the target hydrologic regime for this
first order stream with a small drainage area. Recorded events were typically brief, lasting 15 to 30
minutes. Several small rain events from June 18th through June 21St 2017, resulted in a bankfull event of
-33.4" at this site. An additional 0.39" rainfall event on July 2nd, 2017, resulted in a -34.2" reading.
UT -2
This well is located at Cross -Section #4 near station 19+00 of UT -2. Based on the design plans, the
average bankfull depth for this section is 0.59 ft. A majority of the data collected at this site in 2017 was
judged to be erroneous. Recorded levels corresponded with rainfall events, but were greatly exaggerated.
For example, recorded depths on July 25th showed water levels of -27.8" while the downstream UT -3 well
registered -35.4". Physical evidence of overbank flooding (rack line creation and vegetation silting) were
observed when the well was replaced in December.
UT -2 (Enhancement)
This well is located near station 12+00 of UT -2. This section was targeted for enhancement via the
removal of invasive vegetation and livestock watering infrastructure. Both of these tasks were completed in
conjunction with the construction activities on the remaining portions of the reach. Removal of the livestock
infrastructure has allowed the characteristic flow regime to return to this section. Well data provided depict
a normal increase in water levels which correlates to measurable rain events during the summer and fall of
2017. Highest water levels also correspond to bankfull events registered at the other monitoring locations.
UT -3
This well is located at Cross -Section #5 near station 10+25 of UT -3. Based on the design plans, the
average bankfull depth for this section is 0.63 ft. Recorded data from 2017 depict the targeted hydrologic
regime for a small second order stream. A 0.42" rain event on June 22nd 2017, registered a bankfull event
of -32.3". Rain events from July 1st— July 2nd registered a level of -28.0.
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank 7
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 4)
March 2018

C. Stream Channel Monitoring
Survey work was conducted at each of the six permanent stations in November 2017. Cross-section #1
has experienced a decrease in pool depth of 0.64" compared to the as -built survey. The riffle present at
Cross-section #2 has also experienced a small amount of accretion. Cross-section #3 showed a decrease
in pool depth and has returned to dimensions resembling the as -built survey. Cross-sections #4 showed a
small decrease in bankfull depth, while bankfull area remained nearly identical to the as -built. Pool depth at
Cross-section #5 was identical to the as -built survey. Mean and maximum depths at Cross-section #6 also
showed little to no change in channel geometry. No bank failures or major structural issues were observed
during the site survey. Overall, the site has performed well through a number of large rain events and will
likely benefit from increased vegetative cover over the course of the remaining monitoring schedule. See
Appendix E for specific information on the individual cross-sections and the requested comprehensive data
table.
V. ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT
This year's annual monitoring event enumerated a relatively stable population of bare root and livestake
seedlings throughout the project area. A stand of encroaching pine saplings remains a concern near the
confluence of UT -1 and UT -2 (see Appendix B). The Sponsor is actively managing this area by
manually trimming and removing seedlings.
Encroachment from kudzu vines, particularly on the western side of UT -1 are also being actively managed
by the Sponsor. Landscape crews have been contracted to provide physical removal and chemical
treatment to limit growth during the spring of 2018.
Future efforts will focus on mitigating the presence of these invasive and non -target species within the
project area.
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank 8
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 4)
March 2018

VI. CONCLUSION
The Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank has performed as designed during the fourth year following
construction. Stream features remain intact and stable after several large rain events, and a variety of
native hardwood species, grasses, and shrubs occupy the floodplain ecosystem. Both UT -1 and UT -3
registered definitive bankfull events. Natural hydrologic conditions were also enhanced in the upstream
section of UT -2.
Physical evidence of consistent flow and bankfull events were noted at UT -2, but hydrologic data were
deemed to be inaccurate for a majority of 2017. Installation of a new monitoring device should provide the
necessary remedy and valuable data for 2018. Note that this location recorded multiple bankfull events in
both 2015 and 2016, meeting the necessary success criteria for the project.
Vegetation densities increased as compared to Year 4 monitoring results due in part to the supplemental
planting and adequate precipitation levels during the growing season. Given the current population level, it
is anticipated that the site will maintain sufficient densities to meet the aforementioned success criteria in
the remaining years. Overall, the site is progressing well towards the goal of reestablishing the low
mountain alluvial and bottomland forest ecosystems.
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank 9
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 4)
March 2018

APPENDIX A - SITE MAP
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 4)
March 2018

APPENDIX B - SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 4)
March 2018

1) View of Plot #1.
2) View of Plot #1 and UT-1a/b valley.
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank B-1
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 4)
March 2018

3) View of Plot #3 near stream confluence.
4) View of Plot #4 and UT -3 corridor.
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank B-2
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 4)
March 2018

5) View of Plot #4 facing North.
6) View of UT -2 Enhancement area.
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank B-3
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 4)
March 2018

APPENDIX C - MONITORING PLOT DATA
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 4)
March 2018

Summary of Anderson Farm Year 4 Monitoring Plot Data - 2017
Plot Number
Number of Planted Species
Density per Acre
1
45
450
2
58
580
3
94
940
4
57
570
5
41
410
TOTAL
295
--
AVERAGE
590
Most Abundant Species
Name Total
Green Ash 68
Tulip Poplar 56
Sycamore 56
Sugar Maple 31

Site: Anderson Farm Plot: #1
Date/Time: 9/16/2017, 3:OOpm Weather: Sunny, 80°F
Data Collector(s): Brent Manning, Lisa Manning
Specie
Height (feet)
Quantity
Green Ash
1
1
Green Ash
2
1
Persimmon
3
2
Persimmon
4
1
Red Oak
2
2
Red Oak
3
2
Red Oak
4
6
Red Oak
5
1
Sugar Maple
2
2
Sugar Maple
3
3
Sugar Maple
4
5
Sugar Maple
5
1
Swamp Chestnut Oak
1
1
Swamp Chestnut Oak
2
1
Sycamore
2
2
Sycamore
3
1
Sycamore
4
3
Sycamore
5
2
Sycamore
8
1
Sycamore
12
1
Tulip Poplar
2
1
Tulip Poplar
3
1
Tulip Poplar
4
2
White Oak
1
1
White Oak
3
1
Total
45
Note: Used 37' radius for plant counts.

Site: Anderson Farm Plot: #2
Date/Time: 9/16/2017, 2:OOpm Weather: Sunny, 80°F
Data Collector(s): Brent Manning, Lisa Manning
Specie
Height (feet)
Quantity
River Birch
7
1
River Birch
8
1
Sugar Maple
3
2
Sugar Maple
4
1
Sugar Maple
6
1
Sugar Maple
7
1
Swamp Chestnut Oak
6
1
Sycamore
3
1
Sycamore
4
2
Sycamore
5
1
Sycamore
7
1
Sycamore
8
2
Sycamore
10
1
Sycamore
12
3
Tulip Poplar
< 1
2
Tulip Poplar
1
7
Tulip Poplar
2
5
Tulip Poplar
3
7
Tulip Poplar
4
1
Tulip Poplar
4
2
Tulip Poplar
5
4
Tulip Poplar
7
1
Tulip Poplar
8
2
Tulip Poplar
10
1
Tulip Poplar
12
2
Willow
6
1
Willow
10
1
Willow
12
2
Willow
16
1
Total
58

Site: Anderson Farm Plot: #3
Date/Time: 9/16/2017, 12:45pm Weather: Sunny, 80°F
Data Collector(s): Brent Manning, Lisa Manning
Specie
Height (feet)
Quantity
Elderberry
2
1
Elderberry
3
11
Green Ash
2
14
Green Ash
3
33
Green Ash
4
7
Persimmon
3
1
Red Oak
2
1
Red Oak
3
1
Red Oak
4
2
Sugar Maple
3
3
Sugar Maple
4
1
Swamp Chestnut Oak
4
1
Swamp Chestnut Oak
5
1
Sycamore
2
4
Sycamore
3
1
Sycamore
4
3
Sycamore
5
2
Sycamore
6
2
Sycamore
7
1
Tulip Poplar
3
2
Tulip Poplar
4
2
Total
94

Site: Anderson Farm Plot: #4
Date/Time: 9/16/2017, 11:45am Weather: Sunny, 80°F
Data Collector(s): Brent Manning, Lisa Manning
Specie
Height (feet)
Quantity
Green Ash
2
8
Green Ash
3
3
Green Ash
4
1
Persimmon
6
1
Red Oak
4
1
River Birch
3
2
River Birch
4
2
River Birch
5
1
River Birch
6
1
River Birch
7
1
River Birch
8
2
Sugar Maple
2
2
Swamp Chestnut Oak
1
1
Swamp Chestnut Oak
2
1
Swamp Chestnut Oak
4
1
Sycamore
1
1
Sycamore
2
6
Sycamore
3
2
Sycamore
4
1
Sycamore
5
1
Sycamore
6
1
Tag Alder
6
1
Tulip Poplar
1
1
Tulip Poplar
2
1
Tulip Poplar
3
1
Tulip Poplar
4
1
Tulip Poplar
8
1
White Oak
2
2
White Oak
3
2
Willow
5
1
Willow
6
2
Willow
8
4
Total
57
Note: A lot of short Green Ash were originally planted.

Site: Anderson Farm Plot: #5
Date/Time: 9/16/2017, 11:OOam Weather: Sunny, 73°F
Data Collector(s): Brent Manning, Lisa Manning
Specie
Height (feet)
Quantity
Elderberry
2
1
Elderberry
6
1
Persimmon
2
1
Persimmon
3
1
Persimmon
5
1
Persimmon
6
1
Red Oak
2
3
Red Oak
4
1
River Birch
4
1
Sugar Maple
2
4
Sugar Maple
3
3
Sugar Maple
4
1
Sugar Maple
5
1
Sugar Maple
6
1
Sycamore
2
1
Sycamore
3
1
Sycamore
4
2
Sycamore
5
1
Sycamore
6
3
Sycamore
8
1
Sycamore
10
1
Tulip Poplar
2
4
Tulip Poplar
3
3
Tulip Poplar
5
2
White Oak
3
1
Total
41
Note: 20-30 short leaf pines at 2-3 feet tall.

APPENDIX D - HYDROLOGIC GRAPHSMETS DATA
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 4)
March 2018

10
9
8
7
6
�o
c
0 5
a�
z
u
C
4
3
2
1
0
2017 - 30-70 Rainfall Analysis
>a°���
Month
X30 -Day Running Total
30%
70%

W41
-28
-30
-32
v
a�
J
4J
-34
3:11
-38
-40
3/29/2017
4/29/2017
5/29/2017
UT -1 Stream Gauge - Year 4 Monitoring - 2017
Daily Precipitation Water Level
6/29/2017
7/29/2017
Date
8/29/2017
9/29/2017
10/29/2017
4
3.5
3
1.5 p
1
0.5
' 0
11/29/2017

-18
-20
-22
-24
-Z:� -26
t
U
C
Owe
-32
N:L=
-36
-38
3/30/2017
4/30/2017
UT -2 Stream Gauge - Year 4 Monitoring - 2017
Daily Precipitation Water Level
5/31/2017
6/30/2017
7/31/2017
Date
8/31/2017
9/30/2017
10/31/2017
4
3.5
3
1.5 p
0.5
' 0
11/30/2017

UT -2E Stream Gauge - Year 4 Monitoring - 2017
Daily Precipitation Water Level
rZO
-28
-30
�: -34
-36
SCI:
4
3.5
3
1.5 p
0.5
-40 0
1/1/2017 2/1/2017 3/1/2017 4/1/2017 5/1/2017 6/1/2017 7/1/2017 8/1/2017 9/1/2017 10/1/2017 11/1/2017 12/1/2017
Date

UT -3 Stream Gauge - Year 4 Monitoring - 2017
-18
-20
-22
-24
-26
> -28
v
J
N
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38 LI LI 1 1
2/14/2017 3/14/2017 4/14/2017 5/14/2017
Daily Precipitation Water Level
6/14/2017
Date
7/14/2017
8/14/2017
9/14/2017
2.5
2
Kelm
1.1 1 1 0
10/14/2017

APPENDIX E - STREAM CHANNEL SURVEYS AND CROSS-SECTION DATA
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 4)
March 2018

Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank
Cross -Section Data Through Year 4
Cross -Section
Number
Riffle or Pool
Monitoring
Year
Survey Date
Bankfull Area
Z
(ft)
Bankfull Width
(ft)
Maximum
Bankfull Depth
(ft)
Mean Bankfull
Depth (ft)
Width to Depth
Ratio (Bankfull
Width/Mean
Bankfull Depth)
Maximum Pool
Depth (ft)
As -Built
Oct. 2013
6.51
8.61
1.60
1
Oct. 2014
8.25
9.80
1.71
2
Feb.2016
4.01
7.00
1.06
1
Pool
3
Dec.2016
5.11
7.81
1.05
4
Nov. 2017
4.18
8.31
0.96
5
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
As -Built
Oct. 2013
3.25
6.98
0.88
0.47
14.99
1
Oct. 2014
5.07
9.67
1.09
0.52
18.44
2
Feb.2016
2.90
8.18
0.85
0.35
23.07
2
Riffle
3
Dec.2016
2.97
9.2
0.74
0.32
28.50
4 Nov. 2017 1.59 5.89 0.57 0.27 21.82
5
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
As -Built
Oct. 2013
5.39
7.3
1.44
1
Oct. 2014
11.95
8.87
2.76
3
Pool
2
Feb.2016
11.43
8.02
2.71
3 Dec.2016 10.41 6.58
2.60
4
Nov. 2017
5.80
7.00
1.30
5
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
As -Built
Oct. 2013
4.02
6.66
1.06
0.60
11.03
1
Oct. 2014
3.13
7.58
0.80
0.41
18.36
2
Feb.2016
4.02
7.88
0.86
0.51
15.45
4
Riffle
3
Dec.2016
3.59
6.99
0.77
0.51
13.61
4
Nov. 2017
4.14
8.05
0.85
0.51
15.65
5
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
As -Built
Oct. 2013
3.87
6.23
1.11
1
Oct. 2014
3.39
6.62
1.13
2
Feb.2016
3.41
7.59
1.08
5
Pool
3
Dec.2016
3.18
6.20
1.09
4
Nov. 2017
4.59
9.17
1.11
5
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
As -Built
Oct. 2013
3.12
7.78
0.70
0.40
19.40
1
Oct. 2014
2.76
6.78
0.62
0.41
16.66
2
Feb.2016
2.63
6.90
0.69
0.38
18.10
6
Riffle
3
Dec.2016
1.85
5.47
0.54
0.34
16.17
4
Nov. 2017
2.21
5.26
0.73
0.42
12.52
5
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD = To Be Determined

-p-
■■■■■■■■■■
xooa
''_
E�'t I
�1mommemomms
s
2aoa
S
z
I ON
lowhow
oNow-
"a
�i/�
"a
-XIMME
2003
MEMO
lmmlkW,-lmml
2003
$
�
d
2002
2002
" � �v o xo 0
A54ZILT &055-5ECvI N I - POOL
rIOW ZONTAL: I" = 4'
VERTICAL: I = 2'
A5-8UILT CR055-SECTI0N 2- RIFFLE
MORIZONTAL: I " - A'
VERTICAL: I " - 2'
■■■■■■■■■■
E�'t I
�1mommemomms
mom
Is
I ON
lowhow
oNow-
�i/�
-XIMME
MEMO
A5-8UILT CR055-SECTI0N 2- RIFFLE
MORIZONTAL: I " - A'
VERTICAL: I " - 2'
MONITORING CRO55-5ECTION I - FOOL
MORIZONTAL: I" = 4'
VERTICAL: I" = 2'
■■■■■■■■■■
E�'t I
�1mommemomms
Is
I ON
n`~`MEEMW
oNow-
�i/�
lmmlkW,-lmml
MONITORING CRO55-5ECTION I - FOOL
MORIZONTAL: I" = 4'
VERTICAL: I" = 2'
0 3 b 3 b 3 S b o
MONITORING CR055-5ECTION 2- RIFFLE
LEGEND
AS -BUILT BED
1 YEAR BED (OCT. 2014)
2 YEAR BED (FEB. 2016)
3 YEAR BED (DEC. 2016)
4 YEAR BED (NOV. 2017)
❑ BREAK SYMBOL
MOR ZONTAL: I " - 4'
VERTICAL: I . - 2'
�GAR� off.
.s c
-47
su
i! I141
■■■■■■■■■■
E�'t I
�1mommemomms
0 3 b 3 b 3 S b o
MONITORING CR055-5ECTION 2- RIFFLE
LEGEND
AS -BUILT BED
1 YEAR BED (OCT. 2014)
2 YEAR BED (FEB. 2016)
3 YEAR BED (DEC. 2016)
4 YEAR BED (NOV. 2017)
❑ BREAK SYMBOL
MOR ZONTAL: I " - 4'
VERTICAL: I . - 2'
�GAR� off.
.s c
-47
su
i! I141

pp�� ♦♦ ♦♦ ♦ y• y yN� ♦m♦
e e O o v v S O P v v 9
A5 -BUILT CRO55-5ECTION 3- POOL
HORI70NTAL: 1' - A'
VERTICAL: I' - 2'
■■■■t
w0r
_
mile0110
5971
1971
MOB'-
�
7
mmimmoommiml
w
pp�� ♦♦ ♦♦ ♦ y• y yN� ♦m♦
e e O o v v S O P v v 9
A5 -BUILT CRO55-5ECTION 3- POOL
HORI70NTAL: 1' - A'
VERTICAL: I' - 2'
A3 -BUILT CRO55-5ECTION 4- RiFPLE
HONZO AL: 1 = 4'
VERTICAL: I" - 2'
■■■■t
w0r
_
mile0110
5971
1971
�
7
w
�
�
1970
3
1970
�
I
1988
I
1989
A3 -BUILT CRO55-5ECTION 4- RiFPLE
HONZO AL: 1 = 4'
VERTICAL: I" - 2'
N I♦♦� W♦ ry v [5 �V+ v�♦♦ m
p e o v S 4 P e p p e
MONITORING CK055-5ECTION 3- POOL
HO RI70 NTAL: I" = 4'
ti1ERT1CAL: I" � 2'
MEMO�
■■■■t
w0r
_
mile0110
MEENS
Emmommommomm
N I♦♦� W♦ ry v [5 �V+ v�♦♦ m
p e o v S 4 P e p p e
MONITORING CK055-5ECTION 3- POOL
HO RI70 NTAL: I" = 4'
ti1ERT1CAL: I" � 2'
MEMO�
■■■■t
w0r
_
LEGEND
AS -BUILT BED
1 YEAR BED (OCT. 2014)
2 YEAR BED (FEB. 2016)
3 YEAR BED (DEC. 2416]
4 YEAR BED (NOV. 2417)
❑ BREAK SYMBOL
MONITORING CRO55-5ECTION 4- RIFFLE
HORIZONTAL: I' - A'
VERTICAL: I' = 2'
CAq
-�oFESSIn
a SEAL r -
L; 4647

0 0 9a a a
A5 -BUILT CRO55-5ECTION 5- POOL
HORI2ONTAL: J" = A'
VERTICAL: I' - 2'
■M■M■EM
a
�
�
■■■
_= _ _
1049
..
■■■�
.. ,Fm■■■
�:
..
■■■EMMEMM■ME
1049
■■■■■■■■■■■■
lftmmmp�lffl
MEN
lipoommon
MEN
MENEM
,,,a
IMMEMMIMMEMMEM
0 0 9a a a
A5 -BUILT CRO55-5ECTION 5- POOL
HORI2ONTAL: J" = A'
VERTICAL: I' - 2'
� a
A5 -BUILT CRO55-SECTION G- RIFFLE
HQRJZONTAL: V = 4'
VERTICAL: 1" = 2'
■M■M■EM
a
�
�
■■■
_= _ _
1049
..
■■■�
.. ,Fm■■■
�:
..
■■■EMMEMM■ME
1049
� a
A5 -BUILT CRO55-SECTION G- RIFFLE
HQRJZONTAL: V = 4'
VERTICAL: 1" = 2'
0 0 o a A 4 0 0
MONITORING GRO55-5ECTION 5- POOL
HORIZONTAL: I' = 4'
VERTICAL: I' - 2'
■M■M■EM
I
■■■
_= _ _
..
■■■�
.. ,Fm■■■
�:
..
■■■EMMEMM■ME
■■■■■■■■■■■■
lftmmmp�lffl
0 0 o a A 4 0 0
MONITORING GRO55-5ECTION 5- POOL
HORIZONTAL: I' = 4'
VERTICAL: I' - 2'
LEGEND
AS -BUILT BED
- 1 YEAR BED [OCT. 2414]
2 YEAR BED (FEB. 2016)
3 YEAR BED (DEC. 2016)
4 YEAR BED (NOV. 2417)
❑ BRFAK SYMBOL
B � �
MONITORING CR055-5ECTION G- RIFFLE
HORIZONTAL: V - A'
VERTICAL,
= 2'
\�W�ARO�''�,
-
SS
a FE� ti
a SEAL r ,
_ -4B4
��ffilR�'LLtP
rill LIL11
■M■M■EM
I
■■■
_= _ _
..
■■■�
.. ,Fm■■■
�:
..
■■■EMMEMM■ME
■■■■■■■■■■■■
LEGEND
AS -BUILT BED
- 1 YEAR BED [OCT. 2414]
2 YEAR BED (FEB. 2016)
3 YEAR BED (DEC. 2016)
4 YEAR BED (NOV. 2417)
❑ BRFAK SYMBOL
B � �
MONITORING CR055-5ECTION G- RIFFLE
HORIZONTAL: V - A'
VERTICAL,
= 2'
\�W�ARO�''�,
-
SS
a FE� ti
a SEAL r ,
_ -4B4
��ffilR�'LLtP
rill LIL11

t
e
88 Central Avenue. Asheville.
[phone] License #: C-3039
Report of Sure
Survey for: Headwaters Restoration LLC
Job: 1711246 -Anderson Farms Monitoring YEAR 4
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE) SUBJECT
PROPERTY
�rl
I certify that this project was completed under my direct and responsible charge from an actual survey
made under my supervision; that this ground topographic survey for the purpose of stream monitoring
was performed at the 95% confidence level to meet the Federal Geographic Data Committee Standards
and is in compliance with the North Carolina Standards of Practice for Land Surveying (21-56.1690); that
the survey location data was performed to meet the requirements for a topographic ground survey to the
accuracy of Class A Horizontal and Class C Vertical(21 NCAC-56 section .1606), and the original survey
data was obtained the date of 11113117; that the survey was completed on 11/30/17 and the final
documents were digital files supplied on this date(see items below); all distances are horizontal ground
distances and coordinates are based on the projects ground control network from the As -Built survey and
was established in compliance with the Standards of Practice for Land Surveying (21-56.1600)
Digital Files Certified:
• pdf. files of cross-sections
■ CAD file
This 301h Day of November, 2017
�CARO"����
•a SEAL
L-4647
SUR`l'4..'
� 1Ipy S 110
P/a, el - 7. 4,
Phillip B. kee, PLS NC -4647