20180919 Ver 1_401 Application_20180919

D# * 20180919
Version* 1
Select Reviewer:* Mac Haupt
Mitigation Project Submittal - 9/19/2018
Type of Mitigation Project:*
V Stream r Wetlands r Buffer r Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a f Yes r No
New Site? *
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:* Lin Xu
Email Address:* [e-mail]
Project Information
Existing (DWR) ID#:* 20180919
(nun-bers only... no dash)
Existing Version:* 1
(nurrbers only)
Project Name:* Meadow Brook Stream Restoration Project
County:* Yadkin
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plan
File Upload: MeadowBrook_100024_MP_2018_reduced.pdf
38.13MB
401 PermitFee- Mead owBrook.pdf
39.49KB
MB PJD_SIGNED.pdf
3.95MB
MB_CatEx_Packet_F INAL. pdf
29MB
MeadowBrook401 COffice.pdf
39.26KB
MeadowBrook401 Winston. pdf
34.12KB
MeadowBrookPCN.pdf
1.44MB
Rease upload only one RDF of the complete file that needs to be
submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Lin Xu

Signature:*

of WAL'S:
Q�a Office Use Only:
t t > Corps action ID no.
t Y DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 27
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
X❑ Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
or General Permit (GP) number:
❑ Yes Q No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record u, iy iu, D V'W— For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? 401 Certification:
❑ Yes X❑ No ❑ Yes No
1 f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank ❑ Yes No
or in -lieu fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes ❑X No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ❑X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Meadow Brook Stream Restoration
2b. County:
Yadkin
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Hamptonville
2d. Subdivision name:
N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
See attached agent authorization letters and map
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent Q Other, specify: Permittee
4b. Name:
Lin Xu
NC Division of Mitigation Services
217 W Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27603
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
919-707-8319
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
S. AgentlConsultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Kevin Tweedy, PE
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Ecosystem Planning and Restoration
5c. Street address:
599 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, NC 27606
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
919-388-0787
5f. Fax no.:
.....
919-388-0789
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

IB. Project Information and Prior Project History i
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
4867254364, 486700258016, 4867254139
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.141378 Longitude: -80.819068
1c. Property size:
11.2 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
South Deep Creek (12-84-2-(1))
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -III
2c. River basin:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The Meadow Brook project is located in pastureland that was previously drained by the installation of ditches and the channelization of the streams.
The project consists of two streams, Meadow Brook and an Unnamed Tributary (UT) to Meadow Brook. Wetlands also exist on the property, although
they are of degraded quality.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 6
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 2,800
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
See attached
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
See attached
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the ❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall riot phases)in the past? Comments: pJD submitted 114/16, approved 4/17/18
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ❑X Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: EPR
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Site visit 1/24/18: William Elliott (USACE), Sue Homewood (NCDWR), Cidney Jones (EPR), Thomas Barrett (EPR)
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
Q Wetlands Q Streams —tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction Area of
number Corps (404,10) or impact
Permanent (P) or DWQ (401, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No I
-
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
See attached
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 1 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average Impact
number intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction stream length
Permanent (P) or width (linear
Temporary (T) (feet) feet)
S1 T
Relocation
Meadow Brook R1
PER
Corps
12.5
1,304
S2 T
Relocation
Meadow Brook R2
PER
Corps
14.5
327
S3 T
Relocation
Meadow Brook R3
PER
Corps
21
289
S4 T
Relocation
UT1 to Meadow Brook
PER
Corps
8
361
S5 T
Stabilization
Meadow Brook R4
PER
Corps
21
283
S6 P
Culvert
UT1 to Meadow Brook
PER
Corps
8
35
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 2,599
3i. Comments:
The proposed project is being performed for stream restoration credits and the proposed channels will provide more aquatic function than the existing
channels. Meadow Brook and UT to Meadow Brook will be lengthened as a part of this project. All impacts except the culvert on the UT will be
temporary. The culvert is proposed in order to keep the cattle, farm equipment, and associated pollutants out of the stream.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all oven water impacts below.
4a. 4b.
4c.
4d.
......... ..... -.............
4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number (if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
type
Yes/No
Temporary T
Choose one
Yes/No
01 -
Choose
Yes/No
- — .....
02 - Choose one Choose
03 - Choose one Choose
Yes/No
04 - Choose one Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: open waver exists on sisre
S. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. . 5c. 5d. 5e.
Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
purpose of pond (acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2 Choose one
—
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer Impact Reason for impact Stream name Buffer Zone 1 Zone 2
number- mitigation impact impact
Permanent (P) or required? (square (square
131 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See attached
I _
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
See attached
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes Q No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Type: Choose one Quantity:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Quantity:
Type: Choose one Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
linear feet
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
Zone Reason for impact
Zone 2
6d. 6e.
Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
3 (2 for Catawba)
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
The project is not located in a protected buffer area.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
❑ Yes ❑ No
0%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? _-- ❑ Yes No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
The percent imperviousness of the project will not be altered as no impervious surfaces will be added to the area. Forested wetland
areas adjacent to the stream will promote increased plant uptake and retention of surface runoff before it reaches the stream channels, minimizing
overland flow velocities.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply) ❑ USMP
' ❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No
t4D
ttached?
WQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
❑ORW
[]Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the Yes El No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State F es X
P q ❑Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? i
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application? El Yes ❑X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in []Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater will be generated from the project.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

S. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 1
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWSwas contacted 6/21117 but no response was received.
https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/mammals/nieb/pdf/N LEBFactSheetOl April2015. pdf.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes Q No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
USFWS County List, NC Natural Heritage Data, NC Wildlife Resources Commission
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes 0 No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
I -
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
State Historic Preservation Office contacted June 21, 2017. Response received July 19, 2017
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain? Q Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
CLOMR application has been submitted to FEMA. A LOMR package will be produced post -construction.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA DFIRM panel 3710486600J, effective May 18, 2009.
Lin Xu
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the avplicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10
Date

B3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The proposed project will create a permanent conservation easement and restore two headwater stream -
wetland complexes in a WS -III watershed that have been heavily impacted by farming practices, past
stream channelization, and direct cattle access. Riparian buffers will be restored at least 50 feet in width
along most stream reaches. Wetlands are present on the property, though they are of degraded quality.
Agricultural BMPs will be implemented to remove the cattle from the streams, buffers, and wetlands to
ensure these resources provide long-term stability and water quality improvements.
B3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall goal of the project is the restoration of a self-sustaining headwater stream -wetland complex.
Functional uplift will come from restoring the project streams to a stable condition, revegetating the
conservation easement area, decreasing the drainage of riparian wetlands, and installing agricultural
BMPs to exclude livestock from the conservation easement area.
Stream Restoration and Agricultural BMP's
The restoration of the UT, Meadow Brook Reaches 1 and 2 will consist of re -meandering the existing
channels through the existing floodplains, thereby reconnecting the incised channels to the existing
wetlands and providing increased bedform diversity. The abandoned channels and existing ditches
currently draining the wetlands will be filled or bowled out through grading to reduce wetland drainage.
Meadow Brook Reach 2 will require roughly 210 feet of cut to meet the natural constraints imposed at
the beginning of Reach 3, where bedrock is present in the floodplain and a tributary enters Meadow Brook
from the adjacent parcel. The depth of cut for this section is less than 0.5 foot up to station 31+13.00 in
order to minimize impacts to the existing wetlands and less than 1 foot up to the ford crossing. Meadow
Brook Reaches 3 and 4 occur within a narrower valley than the rest of the project area and work will
primarily consist of laying back the existing banks to create a floodplain bench with the narrow valley.
Reach 3 will consist of some channel re -alignment to reduce energy and improve lateral stability. The
wetlands/ riparian buffer within the conservation easement will be enhanced through planting native
vegetation.
Agricultural BMPs include three strands of high tensile electric fencing along the edge of the conservation
easement and around two water wells/ spring heads. One of the well/spring heads is existing on the site
and the other will be installed as a part of the project to provide water supply to the proposed watering
stations. Up to five watering stations and lines to support each watering station will be installed for the
livestock outside of the easement area.
Stream Crossings
The top of the UT to Meadow Brook will be constructed as a culverted stream crossing to allow livestock
and farm equipment to access fields and pastures on either side of the project streams. The culvert will
be sized appropriately for the watershed. Ford crossings will be utilized downstream of the confluence of
the UT and Meadow Brook (between Reach 2 and Reach 3) as well as at the downstream end of Meadow
Brook Reach 4. The ford crossings will provide for long-term stability, maintain fish passage, and will likely
reduce potential maintenance costs, as compared to a culverted crossing. The crossings will be fenced to
provide permanent exclusion of livestock.
Meadow Brook Stream Restoration Project Page 1 of 3

Construction Equipment
Stream restoration activities will employ heavy construction equipment. Large flat-bed tractor trailers
will initially bring equipment and materials to the site. Access will be coordinated through NCDOT to
manage traffic on Marler Road. Once at the site, front-end loaders may be used to transport materials
from the tractor trailer to the site's staging area and vice versa or from the staging area to the
installation area within the project. Due to the size of the site and access constraints, small to medium
sized dump trucks will haul materials on and off site. Tracked excavators will be used to shape stream
banks, excavate the floodplain, install stream structures, and perform general grading. Bulldozers may
be required to reach final grades. And finally, the vegetation installation will be supported by small
utility vehicles such as medium size flat-bed trucks, single -ton trucks, and bob -cats for material delivery.
C2. Wetland Impacts
[22a., Wetland 2b. Type of 2c. Type of 2d. 2e. Type of 2f. Area of
Imact Impact Wetland Forested jurisdiction Corps Impact (acres)
Number (404,10) or DWQ
Permanent (P) (401, other)
or Temporary
(T) - -
W1 (WA) -T Excavation Riverine No Corps 2.60
Swamp Forest
W2 (WB) -T
Excavation
Riverine
Swamp Forest
W3 (WC) -T Excavation
Riverine
Swamp Forest
W4(WD)-T
Excavation
Riverine
Stream
Swamp Forest
W5 (WA) - P
1 Riverine
Relocation
Swamp Forest
W6 (WB) - P
Stream
Riverine
Relocation
Swamp Forest
W7 (WC) - P
Stream
Riverine
Relocation
Swamp Forest
W8 (WD) - P
Stream
Riverine
Relocation
Swamp Forest
C2h. Comments:
No Corps
1.97
No j Corps 1 0.72
No { Corps 1 0.09
No { Corps { 0.30
No Corps { 0.23
No I Corps 1 0.08
No I Corps { 0.01
2g. Total Wetland Impacts
6.0
Permanent wetland impacts are due to stream channel realignment through the existing wetlands.
Temporary impacts are due to excavation/grading that will occur within the wetlands and impacts
incidental to constructing the stream restoration. The wetlands onsite are of degraded quality and the
proposed project and associated grading is intended to increase the size and functional quality of the
wetlands. There will be no net loss of wetland function on the site. Temporary and permanent wetland
impacts are shown in Figure 5.
Meadow Brook Stream Restoration Project Page 2 of 3

D1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the
project.
The proposed project is being performed for stream restoration credits and the proposed channels will
provide more aquatic function than the existing channels. Meadow Brook and LIT to Meadow Brook will
be lengthened as a part of this project. All stream impacts except the culvert on the LIT will be temporary.
The culvert is proposed in order to keep the cattle, farm equipment, and associated pollutants out of the
stream. Natural channel design principles were used to develop the stream restoration plans. Only natural
material will be used to construct stream features. Only native grass and woody vegetation will be planted
on the stream banks.
In order to restore aquatic functions to the resources onsite, the project will establish two headwater
stream -wetland complex. The wetlands onsite are of degraded quality and the proposed project and
associated grading is intended to increase the size and functional quality of the wetlands. There will be no
net loss of wetland function on the site.
D1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through
construction techniques.
In order to create a functioning headwater stream -wetland complex, construction must occur in the
wetlands onsite. The wetlands onsite are of degraded quality and the proposed project and associated
grading is intended to increase the size and functional quality of the wetlands. There will be no net loss of
wetland function on the site. A North Carolina Land Quality sediment and erosion control approval will be
obtained.
Meadow Brook Stream Restoration Project Page 3 of 3

YADKIN COUNTY S
U5421
i 4!wi:
�1------------ -S
Site Coordinates
36.141378 °N
80.819068 °W
sparM> Rst
n
a
_ 6C'
C
+:a Rtdge Pu55 G
'fadk,, ftkps Hwy oOily
ya dktj f�wy
ly
Legend
* Site Location
qp
G�
Brown11?v
a
co
Marlef fid
I�
&2
y6
4
m
'O
0/d US
�y1Yy w
u
0 0.25 0.5 MEADOW BROOK STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
Miles VICINITY MAP
FIGURE 1 YADKIN COUNTY, NC
Olaf US Qp f t'Wy �
R9ekY 8ranrh Rd - - --
PREPARED BY:
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
DATE:
JULY 2018
"W", ",
e
J

rro�
!
�fr
14/1111
i
G
LEGEND
Meadow Brook R1
Meadow Brook R2
Meadow Brook R3
Meadow Brook R4
UT to Meadow Brook ti
Conservation Easement
Existing Wetlands
------• Existing Ditch r
V
n
aow _
t.-
p
0 200 MEADOW BROOK STREAM RESTORATION PROJEC
' Feet USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
FIGURE 2 1YADKIN COUNTY, NC
L`
PREPARED B'y':
A
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
DATE:
JULY 2018

x�
i ti4 GRADY M. SHORE.
ET UX ET AL
t PIN 4867254364
r }.�
���`` �F ' --
�'i• _ F w D COLON A. SHORE
!,pGRADY M. SHORE IN 48670025$0 16
i4 ANDREW S. SHORE
ih PIN 48672541 39
w44
R4 r E'
LEGEND
I 4y
Conservation Easement y
Parcels I �, 'V
PIN 486700258016 (7.06 ac.)►
PIN 4867254139 (0.30 ac.)
PIN 4867254364 (3.86 ac.
0 200 1 MEADOW BROOK STREAM RESTORATION PROJE
Feet LAND OWNER MAP
FIGURE 4 YADKIN COUNTY, NC
PREPARED BY:
IriECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
DATE:
JULY 2018

- _ -
I ' y 47 ' t
Y.ff'
LEGEND
CONSERVATION EASEMENT TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACTS PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTS,
MEADOW BROOK R 1 W 1 W5
MEADOW BROOK R2 W2 W6~' sY*
MEADOW BROOK R3 W3 W7 r. Oro %.,r'' r i�
MEADOW BROOK R4 W4 W8
UT
MEADOW BROOK STREAM RESTORATION PROJECTPREPARED BY:
O 200 ECOSYSTEM
Feet WETLAND IMPACTS PLANNING &
Iri RESTORATION
FIGURE 5 YADKIN COUNTY, NC DATE:
JULY 2018