ARO Inspection Report

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCS000093 Effective: 03/01/09 Expiration: 02/28/14 owner: BRP US, Inc.
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: BRP US, Inc.
County: Mitchell 1211 Greenwood Rd
Region: Asheville
Spruce Pine NC 28777
Contact Person: Bernice Wilson Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 08/28/2018
Primary Inspector: Isaiah L Reed
Secondary Inspector(s):
EntryTime: 10:OOAM
Reason for Inspection: Routine
Permit Inspection Type: Stormwater Discharge, Individual
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
0 Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Certification:
Phone:
Exit Time: 11:30AM
Phone: [phone]
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Page: 1

Permit: NCS000093 Owner - Facility: BRP US, Inc.
Inspection Date: 08/28/2018 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
On August 28, 2018 this facility was inspected for compliance. I met with Bernice Wilson and others on site. The facility
was also inspected to confirm applicability of pending individual permit renewal. During the inspection, the following items
were noted:
1) An area was observed outside the facility which was being used to store a large number of steel cages. After inquiry, it
was explained that these cages hold aluminum parts for a washing/drying process. The permitee is directed to confirm that
these cages do not present any opportunity to expose any chemicals to precipitation when stored outside after use. The
permitee is also directed to provide a written summary of the industrial process associated with these cages to the regional
office.
2) A chemical storage area was observed at the facility containing a large number of used chemical drums. Due to the total
storage volume of these containers, this area must be under secondary containment to be in compliance with the permit.
The permitee is directed to immediately begin the process of designing and implementing secondary containment for the
chemical storage area.
Page: 2

Permit: NCS000093 Owner - Facility: BRP US, Inc.
Inspection Date: 08/28/2018 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
❑
❑ ❑
Comment: See summary for more information
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? 0 1:11:11:1
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Page: 3