The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20170887 Ver 1 _Bethel Branch PJD Final Submittal 11.30.2017 _20180912Corps Submittal Cover Sheet Please provide the following info: 1. Project N arne 2. Name ofPrope1iy Owner/Applicant: IIdfddfdsa________________________ _ 3. Name of Consultant/Agent:------------------------ *Agent authorization needs to be attached. 4. Related/Previous Action ID number(s): ______________________ _ 5. Site Address:---------------------------- 6. Subdivision Name: 7. City: 8. County: 9. Lat: Long: _____________ (Decimal Degrees Please ) 10. Quadrangle Name:------------------- 11. Waterway: _______________ _ 12. Watershed: --------------------- 13. Requested Action: Nationwide Permit# General Pennit # _Jurisdictional Determination Request _Pre-Application Request The following infonnation will be completed by Corps office: AID: ______________________ __ ___ Prepare File Folder ___ Assign number in ORM -------Begin Date Authorization: Section 10 Section 404 Project Desc1iption/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose: Site/Waters Name:--------------------------------Keywords: ___________________________________________ __ Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank – Bethel Branch Site Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation and Request for Verification Page 1 November 30, 2017 Ms. Samantha Dailey US Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 Subject: Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation and Request for Verification Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank – Bethel Branch Site Chatham County, North Carolina Dear Ms. Dailey: Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) is requesting written verification from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) regarding the extent of potential waters of the United States within the subject project area. The Bethel Branch Site is located northwest of the intersection of Moon Lindley Road and R. E. Wright Road northwest of the Town of Pittsborro in northwestern Chatham County, NC (Figures 1 and 2). The Bethel Branch Site is in the planning and design phase for the development of a stream and wetland mitigation bank. To date, a draft mitigation plan is being developed and Wildlands is currently in the process of finalizing easement boundaries. Methodology On December 13 and 14, 2016 Wildlands delineated potential waters of the United States within the proposed project easement area. These areas were delineated using the USACE Routine On-Site Determination Method. This method is defined by the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and subsequent Eastern Mountain and Piedmont Regional Supplement. Wetland Determination Data Forms representative of on-site wetland areas as well as upland areas have been enclosed. Stream channels were classified according to USACE and NCDWR guidance. NCDWR Stream Classification Forms representative of on-site stream channels are enclosed. On November 21, 2017 a site visit was conducted with the USACE to assess the delineated features within the subject project area. Based on this sited visit, some changes were made to the initial submittal. Wetlands D, K, and L were removed due to the absence of all three hydrological indicators within these areas. Based on field assessment of on-site streams, all delineated streams were classified as non-wetland waters. Potential Waters of the United States The results of the on-site field investigation indicate that there are three non-wetland waters within the proposed project area which include unnamed tributaries to South Fork Cane Creek, hereafter referred to as UT1, UT2, and UT3. Nine wetland areas and one open water feature were identified within the proposed project area and are located within the floodplains (Figure 3). The project drains to South Fork Cane Creek (NCDWR Index No. 16-28-5) which is classified as Class WS-V, Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) waters. On-site Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank – Bethel Branch Site Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation and Request for Verification Page 2 stream channels are located within NCDWR Subbasin 03-06-04 of the Cape Fear River Basin (HU# 03030002). Approximate linear footage and acreage of on-site waters are summarized in Table 1. Table 1. Summary of On-Site Potential Waters of the United States Feature Classification Length (LF) Acreage Watershed (ac) NCDWR Stream Scores UT1 Non-Wetland Water 2,446 - 275 35 UT2 Non-Wetland Water 3,480 - 199 34.5 UT3 Non-Wetland Water 454 - 49 19.25 Wetland A Wetland - 0.035 - - Wetland B Wetland - 0.141 - - Wetland C Wetland - 0.019 - - Wetland E Wetland - 0.002 - - Wetland F Wetland - 0.079 - - Wetland G Wetland - 0.002 - - Wetland H Wetland - 0.025 - - Wetland I Wetland - 0.011 - - Wetland J Wetland - 0.030 - - Pond A Open Water 1.073 Streams There three non-wetland waters located within the project easement area including UT1, UT2, and UT3 (Figure 3). The scores on the NCDWR Stream Classification Form ranged from 19.25 to 35 out of 61.5 possible points. Throughout the majority of the project area, the stream channels and riparian corridors have been affected by active livestock grazing and hoof shear. As a result, degraded channel beds and banks as well as riparian communities are persistent along these reaches. Wetlands There are nine wetlands located within the project area and one open water feature. The wetlands occur in the side slopes and floodplains that drain to the on-site stream channels. These features exhibited a high water table, pockets of shallow inundation, saturation within the upper 12 inches of the soil profile, and a low chroma matrix. The open water feature is an impoundment at the headwaters of UTUT3The majority of these areas experience significant impacts from livestock grazing. Wetland Determination Data Forms representative of the wetlands and the associated upland points are enclosed. Table 1 shows the acreage of on-site wetland areas. Soils Soil types within the study area include Cid-Lignum complex (CmB) and Nanford-Badin complex (NaC). Cid- Lignum complex soils are moderately well drained to somewhat poorly drained and are prevalent throughout the project area. Nanford-Badin complex soils which are found along the right floodplain slopes along UT1 and are well drained. On-site soils are mapped in Figure 4. Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank – Bethel Branch Site Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation and Request for Verification Page 3 Please do not hesitate to contact me at 843-277-6221 or at wtaylor@wildlandseng.com should you have any questions regarding this request for preliminary jurisdictional verification. Sincerely, Win Taylor, PWS Senior Environmental Scientist Jurisdictional Determination Request Version: May 2017 Page 1 This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by assigned counties can be found on-line at: http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx, by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager. ASHEVILLE& CHARLOTTE REGULATORY FIELDOFFICES US ArmyCorps of Engineers 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, North Carolina28801-5006 GeneralNumber: (828) 271-7980 Fax Number: (828) 281-8120 RALEIGHREGULATORYFIELDOFFICE US ArmyCorps of Engineers 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Carolina27587 GeneralNumber: (919) 554-4884 Fax Number: (919) 562-0421 WASHINGTONREGULATORYFIELDOFFICE US ArmyCorps of Engineers 2407 West Fifth Street Washington, North Carolina27889 GeneralNumber: (910) 251-4610 Fax Number: (252) 975-1399 WILMINGTONREGULATORYFIELDOFFICE US ArmyCorps of Engineers 69 Darlington Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 GeneralNumber:910-251-4633 Fax Number: (910) 251-4025 INSTRUCTIONS: All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G. NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H. NOTE ON PART D – PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s) authorized agent to be considered a complete request. NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols. NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work. Jurisdictional Determination Request Version: May 2017 Page 2 A. PARCEL INFORMATION Street Address: _______________________________________________ City, State: _______________________________________________ County: Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): B. REQUESTORINFORMATION Name: Mailing Address: _________________________________________ Telephone Number: _________________________________________ Electronic Mail Address: ________________________________________ Select one: I am the current property owner. I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant 1 Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase Other, please explain. ________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION 2 Name: Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Electronic Mail Address: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter. 2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record). Off of Moon Lindley Rd. Snow Camp, North Carolina Chatham 0001073/ 0001054 / 0001053 Win Taylor 497 Bramson Court, Suite 104 Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464 843-277-6221 wtaylor@wildlandseng.com Neill Lindley 1140 Moon Lindley Road Snow Camp, North Carolina 27349 919-795-9803 Jurisdictional Determination Request Version: May 2017 Page 4 F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One) I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein. A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may be “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United States”on a property. PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional “waters of the United States”. PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is “preliminary” in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do not expire. I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that jurisdictional “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United States” are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other “affected party” (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years (subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05- 02). I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information to inform my decision. G. ALL REQUESTS Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the review area. Size of Property or Review Area acres. The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site. 20 Jurisdictional Determination Request Version: May 2017 Page 5 H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: ______________________ Longitude: ______________________ A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area. Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been reviewed and approved).6 North Arrow Graphical Scale Boundary of Review Area Date Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary assessment reach. For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations: Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404 wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features. Jurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries, impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary, open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear length of each of these features as appropriate. Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non- jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non-jurisdictional (i.e. “Isolated”, “No Significant Nexus”, or “Upland Feature”). Please include the acreage or linear length of these features as appropriate. For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations: Wetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404, Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and linear length of these features as appropriate. Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region (at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type) ____________________________________________________________________________ 6 Please refer to the guidance document titled “Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations” to ensure that the supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards.http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit- Program/Jurisdiction/ 35.830245 -79.367977 Jurisdictional Determination Request Version: May 2017 Page 6 Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form x PJDs,please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form7 and include the Aquatic Resource Table x AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form 8 Vicinity Map Aerial Photograph USGS Topographic Map Soil Survey Map Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps) Landscape Photos (if taken) NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms Other Assessment Forms _____________________________________________________________________________ 7 www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL_08-02_App_A_Prelim_JD_Form_fillable.pdf 8 Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/ Principal Purpose:The information thatyouprovide will beusedinevaluating your requestto determine whether thereareany aquatic resources within the project areasubjecttofederaljurisdictionunder the regulatory authorities referencedabove. RoutineUses:Thisinformation maybeshared with the Departmentof Justice andotherfederal, state,and local government agencies, and the public,andmaybe made available aspartof a public notice as required byfederal law. Your nameandproperty location wherefederal jurisdiction is to bedetermined will beincluded in the approved jurisdictional determination (AJD),which will bemade available tothe public on the District's website andontheHeadquartersUSAGEwebsite. Disclosure:Submission ofrequested information is voluntary; however, ifinformation is notprovided, the requestforanAJDcannot beevaluatednorcananAJD be issued. 1 ATTACHMENT PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): August 25, 2017 B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD: Win Taylor 497 Bramson Court, Suite 104 Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464 C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Raleigh Regulatory Field Office D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Bethel Branch Site is located northwest of the intersection of Moon Lindley Road and R. E. Wright Road northwest of the Town of Pittsborro in northwestern Chatham County, NC (Figures 1 and 2). The Bethel Branch Site is in the planning and design phase for the development of a stream and wetland mitigation bank. To date, a draft mitigation plan is being developed and Wildlands is currently in the process of finalizing easement boundaries. The project will involve the restoration and enhancement of approximately 4,100 linear feet of stream and 3.6 acres of wetlands. (USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT SITES) State: NC County/parish/borough: Chatham City: Snow Camp Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.830245 Long. -79.367977 Universal Transverse Mercator: Name of nearest waterbody: South Fork Cane Creek Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area: Non-wetland waters: 5,925 linear feet: 2 - 10 width (ft) and/or acres. Cowardin Class: Unconsolidated Bottom - Streambed Stream Flow: Perennial & Intermittent Wetlands: 0.344 acres. Cowardin Class: Palustrine Emergent & Forested Wetlands Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters: Tidal: N/A Non-Tidal: N/A 2 E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): Office (Desk) Determination. Date: Field Determination. Date(s): 1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in this instance and at this time. 2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring “pre-construction notification” (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes the applicant’s acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or 3 to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This preliminary JD finds that there “may be” waters of the United States on the subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information: SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below): Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: Wildlands Engineering. Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant. Wildlands Engineering Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Data sheets prepared by the Corps: . Corps navigable waters’ study: . U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: . USGS NHD data. USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps. U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 7.5 Minute Silk Hope Quadrangle. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Chatham County Soils. National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: . State/Local wetland inventory map(s): . FEMA/FIRM maps: . 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929) Photographs: Aerial (Name & Date): 2013. or Other (Name & Date): . Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: . Other information (please specify): . 4 IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations. _________________________ 11/30/2017 Signature and date of Signature and date of Regulatory Project Manager person requesting preliminary JD (REQUIRED) (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is impracticable) 5 Table 1. Summary of On-Site Jurisdictional Waters Feature Latitude Longitude Cowardin Class Estimated Amount of Aquatic Resource in Review Area Class of Aquatic Resource UT1 35.831175 -79.368964 Riverine-Streambed 2,446 Non-Wetland Waters of the US UT2 35.829370 -79.366722 Riverine-Streambed 3,480 Non-Wetland Waters of the US UT3 35.830919 -79.365050 Riverine-Streambed 454 Non-Wetland Waters of the US Wetland A 35.828997 -79.366760 Palustrine-Emergent 0.035 Non-Section 10 – Wetland Wetland B 35.831108 -79.365281 Palustrine-Emergent 0.141 Non-Section 10 – Wetland Wetland C 35.833125 -79.367671 Palustrine-Emergent 0.019 Non-Section 10 – Wetland Wetland E 35.832326 -79.368402 Palustrine-Emergent 0.002 Non-Section 10 – Wetland Wetland F 35.830932 -79.369243 Palustrine-Emergent 0.079 Non-Section 10 – Wetland Wetland G 35.830476 -79.369266 Palustrine-Emergent 0.002 Non-Section 10 – Wetland Wetland H 35.829942 -79.369683 Palustrine-Emergent 0.025 Non-Section 10 – Wetland Wetland I 35.829770 -79.369683 Palustrine-Emergent 0.011 Non-Section 10 – Wetland Wetland J 35.829648 -79.369865 Palustrine-Emergent 0.030 Non-Section 10 – Wetland Pond A 35.831379 -79.364651 Lacustrine Limnetic 1.073 Non-Section 10 – Wetland Chatham County Property Record Card DATE 2/14/17 CHATHAM CO TAX DEPARTMENT PAGE 1 TIME 14:52:45 PROPERTY CARD PROG# AS2006 USER KAREN FOR YEAR 2017 PIN... 8795 00 07 7766 LINDLEY M DARRYL TRUSTEE PARCEL ID.. 0001073 LOCATION... MOON LINDLEY RD DEED YEAR/BOOK/PAGE.. 2010 1537 0881 ASSESSMENT NONE 1140 MOON LINDLEY RD PLAT BOOK/PAGE.. 30 7 OWNER ID.. 1325910 LEGAL DESC:F1-25 DISTRICT.. 109 HOPE FIRE DISTRICT 000067376 TOWNSHIP... 1 ALBRIGHT SNOW CAMP NC 27349- NBRHOOD... 0184 EAST ALBRIGHT DESCRIPTION RESIDENTIAL MAINTAINED.. 2/11/2016 BY KAREN VALUED.. 2/13/2017 BY KAREN VISITED..... 4/09/2008 BY KDH ROUTING#.. PARCEL STATUS... ACTIVE CATEGORY.. REAL PROPERTY ***** * LAND VALUED BY NEIGHBORHOOD BASE RATE METHOD * -------------------------------------------- SALES HISTORY ---------------------------------------------------- DEED BK/PAGE SALE DATE SALES INSTRUMENT DISQUALIFIED SALE AMOUNT STAMP AMOUNT DEED NAME 1537 0881 11/03/2010 QUIT CLAIM DEED REVENUE STAMPS LINDLEY M DARRYL TRUSTEE 440 0491 12/31/1996 WARRANTY DEED REVENUE STAMPS LINDLEY MARK DARRYL -------------------------------------------- LAND SEGMENTS ---------------------------------------------------- LND STRAT LAND AVERAGE TOT CURRENT # ZONE CODE TYPE/CODE LAND QTY LAND RATE DPT% SHP% LOC% SIZ% OTH% TOP% ADJ FMV 97.00 1 100 AC R 67.376 3,793.25 .00 .00 100.00 .00 97.00 .00 247,907 LUV.. UA 1 61.000 500.00 LU ADJ & VALUE.. .00 30,500 .00 2 100 AC ZV 6.376 .00 .00 .00 100.00 .00 .00 .00 0 LUV.. UW 1 6.376 340.00 LU ADJ & VALUE.. .00 2,167 TOTAL ACRES.. 67.376 TOTAL LAND FMV.. 247,907 TOTAL IN LU.. 67.376 TOTAL LAND LUV.. 32,667 TOTAL PARCEL VALUES---- LAND / OVR IMPROVEMENTS / OVR TOTAL LAND/IMPROVE 2016 VALUE FMV...... 247,907 0 247,907 275,452 APV...... 32,667 0 32,667 32,667 DEFERRED. 215,240 0 215,240 242,785 -------------------------------------------- COMMENTS - ---------------------------------------------------- PB 30/7 1/2010: 1.79A GAS UTIL R/W ADJUSTMENT 55.92A CONSERVATION EMT PER DB 1833-579 & PB 2015/313 Chatham County Property Record Card DATE 2/14/17 CHATHAM CO TAX DEPARTMENT PAGE 1 TIME 14:52:45 PROPERTY CARD PROG# AS2006 USER KAREN FOR YEAR 2017 PIN... 8795 00 15 0886 LINDLEY M DARRYL TRUSTEE PARCEL ID.. 0001054 LOCATION... MOON LINDLEY RD DEED YEAR/BOOK/PAGE.. 2011 1554 0159 ASSESSMENT NONE 1140 MOON LINDLEY RD PLAT BOOK/PAGE.. OWNER ID.. 1325910 LEGAL DESC:F1-10A DISTRICT.. 109 HOPE FIRE DISTRICT 000018250 TOWNSHIP... 1 ALBRIGHT SNOW CAMP NC 27349- NBRHOOD... 0184 EAST ALBRIGHT DESCRIPTION RESIDENTIAL MAINTAINED.. 2/11/2016 BY KAREN VALUED.. 2/13/2017 BY KAREN VISITED..... 4/09/2008 BY KDH ROUTING#.. PARCEL STATUS... ACTIVE CATEGORY.. REAL PROPERTY ***** * LAND VALUED BY NEIGHBORHOOD BASE RATE METHOD * -------------------------------------------- SALES HISTORY ---------------------------------------------------- DEED BK/PAGE SALE DATE SALES INSTRUMENT DISQUALIFIED SALE AMOUNT STAMP AMOUNT DEED NAME 1554 0159 2/11/2011 QUIT CLAIM DEED REVENUE STAMPS LINDLEY M DARRYL TRUSTEE 1537 0873 11/03/2010 QUIT CLAIM DEED REVENUE STAMPS LINDLEY M DARRYL & NANCY M TRU 537 0401 12/31/1996 WARRANTY DEED REVENUE STAMPS LINDLEY MARK DARRYLE -------------------------------------------- LAND SEGMENTS ---------------------------------------------------- LND STRAT LAND AVERAGE TOT CURRENT # ZONE CODE TYPE/CODE LAND QTY LAND RATE DPT% SHP% LOC% SIZ% OTH% TOP% ADJ FMV .00 1 100 AC R 17.750 5,850.03 .00 .00 100.00 .00 .00 .00 103,837 LUV.. UA 3 17.750 500.00 LU ADJ & VALUE.. .00 8,875 TOTAL ACRES.. 17.750 TOTAL LAND FMV.. 103,837 TOTAL IN LU.. 17.750 TOTAL LAND LUV.. 8,875 TOTAL PARCEL VALUES---- LAND / OVR IMPROVEMENTS / OVR TOTAL LAND/IMPROVE 2016 VALUE FMV...... 103,837 0 103,837 115,375 APV...... 8,875 0 8,875 8,875 DEFERRED. 94,962 0 94,962 106,500 -------------------------------------------- COMMENTS - ---------------------------------------------------- 1/2010: 18.25 (17.75 NET) .50A R/W 1537/873;1/2 UNDVD INT EACH AS T/C 15.51A IN CONSERVATION EMT PER DB 1833-579 & PPB 2015/313 Chatham County Property Record Card DATE 2/14/17 CHATHAM CO TAX DEPARTMENT PAGE 1 TIME 14:52:45 PROPERTY CARD PROG# AS2006 USER KAREN FOR YEAR 2017 PIN... 8795 00 16 6985 LINDLEY M DARRYL TRUSTEE PARCEL ID.. 0001053 LOCATION... 277 R E WRIGHT RD DEED YEAR/BOOK/PAGE.. 2011 1554 0159 ASSESSMENT AVF LFT 1140 MOON LINDLEY RD PLAT BOOK/PAGE.. OWNER ID.. 1325910 LEGAL DESC:F1-10 DISTRICT.. 109 HOPE FIRE DISTRICT 000039800 TOWNSHIP... 1 ALBRIGHT SNOW CAMP NC 27349- NBRHOOD... 0184 EAST ALBRIGHT DESCRIPTION RESIDENTIAL MAINTAINED.. 2/11/2016 BY KAREN VALUED.. 2/13/2017 BY KAREN VISITED..... 4/09/2008 BY KDH ROUTING#.. PARCEL STATUS... ACTIVE CATEGORY.. REAL PROPERTY ***** * LAND VALUED BY NEIGHBORHOOD BASE RATE METHOD * -------------------------------------------- SALES HISTORY ---------------------------------------------------- DEED BK/PAGE SALE DATE SALES INSTRUMENT DISQUALIFIED SALE AMOUNT STAMP AMOUNT DEED NAME 1554 0159 2/11/2011 QUIT CLAIM DEED REVENUE STAMPS LINDLEY M DARRYL TRUSTEE 1537 0873 11/03/2010 QUIT CLAIM DEED REVENUE STAMPS LINDLEY M DARRYL & NANCY M TRU 447 0374 12/31/1996 WARRANTY DEED REVENUE STAMPS LINDLEY MARK DARRYL -------------------------------------------- LAND SEGMENTS ---------------------------------------------------- LND STRAT LAND AVERAGE TOT CURRENT # ZONE CODE TYPE/CODE LAND QTY LAND RATE DPT% SHP% LOC% SIZ% OTH% TOP% ADJ FMV .00 1 100 AC B 1.000 22,500.00 .00 .00 100.00 .00 .00 .00 22,500 .00 2 100 AC R 37.980 4,465.27 .00 .00 100.00 .00 .00 .00 169,591 LUV.. UA 1 37.980 500.00 LU ADJ & VALUE.. .00 18,990 TOTAL ACRES.. 38.980 TOTAL LAND FMV.. 192,091 TOTAL IN LU.. 37.980 TOTAL LAND LUV.. 41,490 ---------------------------------- IMPROVEMENT # 4 MAJOR IMPR-M ------------------------------------------------- MAIN FIN AREA.. 1,680.00 ACT/EFF YR/AGE.. 2004 2004 13 VISITED.. 7/16/2015 BY BLB MAINTAINED.. 2/11/2016 STRAT.......... 100 DESCRIPT.... MANUFACTURED BY KAREN LOCATION #..... 277 R E WRIGHT RD COMPONENT TYPE/CODE/DESC PCT UNITS RATE STR# STR% SIZ% HGT% PER% CDS% COST %CMPL ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AC 51 LEAN TO SHED 100 420.00 4.30 100.00 90.00 1,625 MA 30W MANUFACTURED HOME MU 100 1680.00 57.75 1.00 83.00 80,525 EW 08 ALUM/VINYL 100 176.00 .00 0 - FN 05 METAL/VINYL SKIRTING 0 1680.00 1.75- 83.00 2,439- - FP 03 PREFABRICATED 0 1.00 1800.00 1,800 - HC 07 PACKAGED HEAT/COOL 0 1680.00 3.00 83.00 4,183 --------------- RCN... PCT COMPLETE 100 x 85,694 QUAL.. QG D+10 QUALITY GRADE D+10 90.00 x 77,124 DEPR.. AV DEPRECIATION TO 14 Y 5.00 - 3,856 3,856 T --FMV... 73,268 Chatham County Property Record Card (con't) DATE 2/14/17 CHATHAM CO TAX DEPARTMENT PAGE 2 TIME 14:52:45 PROPERTY CARD PROG# AS2006 USER KAREN FOR YEAR 2017 PIN... 8795 00 16 6985 LINDLEY M DARRYL TRUSTEE PARCEL ID.. 0001053 ---------------------------------- IMPROVEMENT # 4 MAJOR IMPR-M ------------------------------------------------- +------------30-----------+ : : : : 1 : 4 1 : 4 : : : : +--------------+B---------60-------------+---------+ : : : : : : : : : : : : 2 2 8 8 : : : : : : : : : : : : A : +------------------------60------------------------+ ------------- AC 51 LEAN TO SHED --------- TRAVERSE ------------------------------ M U 28.00 M R 18.00 D R 30.00 D U 14.00 D L 30.00 D D 14.00 ------------- MA 30W MANUFACTURED HOME MU FLOOR: 1.00 --------- TRAVERSE ------------------------------ D U 28.00 D R 60.00 D D 28.00 D L 60.00 ---------------------------------- IMPROVEMENT # 5 MISC IMPR-Y ------------------------------------------------- MAIN FIN AREA.. ACT/EFF YR/AGE.. 17 VISITED.. 7/16/2015 BY BLB MAINTAINED.. 2/11/2016 STRAT.......... 100 DESCRIPT.... MISCELLANEOUS BY KAREN LOCATION #..... 277 R E WRIGHT RD COMPONENT TYPE/CODE/DESC PCT UNITS RATE STR# STR% SIZ% HGT% PER% CDS% COST %CMPL ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MS 99 MISCELLANEOUS 3.00 PCT COMPLETE 100 --FMV... 300 TOTAL PARCEL VALUES---- LAND / OVR IMPROVEMENTS / OVR TOTAL LAND/IMPROVE 2016 VALUE FMV...... 192,091 73,568 265,659 287,003 APV...... 41,490 73,568 115,058 117,558 DEFERRED. 150,601 0 150,601 169,445 -------------------------------------------- COMMENTS - ---------------------------------------------------- Chatham County Property Record Card (con't) DATE 2/14/17 CHATHAM CO TAX DEPARTMENT PAGE 3 TIME 14:52:45 PROPERTY CARD PROG# AS2006 USER KAREN FOR YEAR 2017 PIN... 8795 00 16 6985 LINDLEY M DARRYL TRUSTEE PARCEL ID.. 0001053 1/2010: 39.80 (38.98 NET) .82A R/W 1537/873;1/2 UNDVD INT EACH AS T/C 33.48A CONSERVATION EMT PER DB 1833-579 & PB 2015/313 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank - Bethel Branch Site Snow Camp/Chatham 12/13/2016 Wildlands Engineering NC Wetland A - DP1 Win Taylor Hill side seep concave <1 MLRA 136 N 35.828997 W -79.366760 Cid-Lignum (CmB)n/a Vegetation significantly disturbed due to livestock grazing. 0.5 0 - 12+ 0 - 12+ US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 30' 0 1 1 100 15' 0 5' Persicaria longiseta Hydrocotyle umbellata 60 2 62 Yes No FAC OBL 30' 0 Wetland A - DP1 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: 0-8 8-12 10YR 3/1 10YR 4/1 98 98 10YR 5/6 10YR 5/6 2 2 C C PL PL Silt Loam Silt Loam Wetland A - DP1 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank - Bethel Branch Site Snow Camp/Chatham 12/13/2016 Wildlands Engineering NC Upland - DP2 Win Taylor Floodplain concave 0 MLRA 136 N 35.829631 W -79.366771 Cid-Lignum (CmB)n/a Vegetation significantly disturbed due to livestock grazing. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 30' Acer rubrum Liquidambar styraciflua 75 5 80 Yes No FAC FAC 2 4 50 0 0 15'0 0 Liquidambar styraciflua Cornus florida Ligustrum japonicum 30 10 2 42 Yes Yes No FAC FACU UPL 110 330 20 80 5 25 135 435 3.2 5' Allium vineale Stellaria media 10 3 13 Yes No FACU UPL 30' 0 Upland - DP2 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: 0-4 4-12 10YR 4/4 2.5Y 5/4 100 80 10YR 5/6 20 C C PL PL Silt Loam Silt Loam Upland - DP2 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank - Bethel Branch Site Snow Camp/Chatham 12/13/2016 Wildlands Engineering NC Wetland B - DP3 Win Taylor Hill side seep concave <1 MLRA 136 N 35.831108 W -79.365281 Cid-Lignum (CmB)n/a Vegetation significantly disturbed due to livestock grazing and mowing. 0 - 12+ 0 - 12+ US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 30' 0 2 2 100 15' 0 5' Festuca sp Juncus effusus Persicaria longiseta 55 30 5 90 Yes Yes No FAC FACW FAC 30' 0 Wetland B - DP3 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: 0-6 6-10 10-12 10YR 5/1 10YR 5/1 2.5Y 6/2 95 90 90 10YR 5/4 10YR 5/4 10YR 5/6 5 10 10 C C C PL PL PL Silt Loam Silt Loam Silt Loam Wetland B - DP3 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank - Bethel Branch Site Snow Camp/Chatham 12/13/2016 Wildlands Engineering NC Wetland C - DP4 Win Taylor Floodplain concave 0 MLRA 136 N 35.833125 W -79.367671 Cid-Lignum (CmB)n/a Vegetation significantly disturbed due to livestock grazing. 1 0 - 12+ 0 - 12+ US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 30' 0 2 2 100 15' 0 5' Festuca sp Hydrocotyle americana 5 5 10 Yes Yes FAC OBL 30' 0 Wetland C - DP4 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: 0-12 10YR 5/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C PL Silt Loam Wetland C - DP4 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank - Bethel Branch Site Snow Camp/Chatham 12/13/2016 Wildlands Engineering NC Upland - DP5 Win Taylor Floodplain concave 0 MLRA 136 N 35.833063 W -79.367676 Cid-Lignum (CmB)n/a Vegetation significantly disturbed due to livestock grazing. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 30' 0 1 1 100 15' 0 5' Festuca sp Stellaria media 80 15 95 Yes No FAC UPL 30' 0 Upland - DP5 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: 0-2 2-12 10YR 5/3 10YR 5/4 100 100 C C PL PL Silt Loam Silt Loam Upland - DP5 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank - Bethel Branch Site Snow Camp/Chatham 12/14/2016 Wildlands Engineering NC Wetland E - DP7 Win Taylor Floodplain concave 0 MLRA 136 N 35.832326 W -79.368402 Cid-Lignum (CmB)n/a Vegetation significantly disturbed due to livestock grazing. 0 - 12+ 0 - 12+ US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 30' 0 1 1 100 15' 0 5' Persicaria longiseta Hydrocotyle americana 40 2 42 Yes No FAC OBL 30' 0 Wetland E - DP7 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: 0-3 3-10 10-12 10YR 4/2 10YR 5/2 10YR 5/2 98 95 85 10YR 4/6 10YR 5/6 10YR 5/6 2 5 15 C C C PL PL PL Silt Loam Silt Loam Silt Loam Wetland E - DP7 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank - Bethel Branch Site Snow Camp/Chatham 12/14/2016 Wildlands Engineering NC Upland - DP8 Win Taylor Floodplain concave 0 MLRA 136 N 35.832302 W -79.368459 Cid-Lignum (CmB)n/a Vegetation significantly disturbed due to livestock grazing. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 30' 0 1 1 100 15' 0 5' Festuca sp Stellaria media 90 2 92 Yes No FAC UPL 30' 0 Upland - DP8 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: 0-2 2-12 10YR 4/4 10YR 5/4 100 100 C C PL PL Silt Loam Silt Loam Upland - DP8 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank - Bethel Branch Site Snow Camp/Chatham 12/14/2016 Wildlands Engineering NC Wetland F - DP9 Win Taylor Floodplain concave 0 MLRA 136 N 35.830932 W -79.369243 Cid-Lignum (CmB)n/a Vegetation significantly disturbed due to livestock grazing. 0.25 0 - 12+ 0 - 12+ US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 30' 0 1 1 100 15' 0 5' Persicaria longiseta Hydrocotyle americana 40 3 43 Yes No FAC OBL 30' 0 Wetland F - DP9 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: 0-8 8-12 10YR 5/1 10YR 5/2 98 90 10YR 4/6 10YR 4/6 2 10 C C PL PL Silt Loam Silt Loam Wetland F - DP9 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank - Bethel Branch Site Snow Camp/Chatham 12/14/2016 Wildlands Engineering NC Upland - DP10 Win Taylor Floodplain none <1 MLRA 136 N 35.831028 W -79.369242 Cid-Lignum (CmB)n/a Vegetation significantly disturbed due to livestock grazing. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 30' 0 1 4 25 0 0 15'0 0 Juniperus virginiana Ligustrum sinense 20 5 25 Yes Yes FACU FACU 10 30 65 260 0 0 75 290 3.9 5' Paspalum notatum Festuca sp 40 10 50 Yes Yes FACU FAC 30' 0 Upland - DP10 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: 0-2 2-12 10YR 4/3 10YR 4/4 100 100 C C PL PL Silt Loam Silt Loam Upland - DP10 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank - Bethel Branch Site Snow Camp/Chatham 12/14/2016 Wildlands Engineering NC Wetland G - DP11 Win Taylor Floodplain concave 0 MLRA 136 N 35.830476 W -79.369266 Cid-Lignum (CmB)n/a Vegetation significantly disturbed due to livestock grazing. 0.5 0 - 12+ 0 - 12+ US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 30' 0 1 1 100 15' 0 5' Microstegium vimineum Hydrocotyle americana 5 1 6 Yes No FAC OBL 30' 0 Wetland G - DP11 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: 0-2 2-12 10YR 6/1 10YR 5/2 98 90 10YR 5/6 10YR 5/6 2 10 C C PL PL Silt Loam Silt Loam Wetland G - DP11 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank - Bethel Branch Site Snow Camp/Chatham 12/14/2016 Wildlands Engineering NC Wetland H - DP12 Win Taylor Floodplain concave 0 MLRA 136 N 35.829942 W -79.369683 Cid-Lignum (CmB)n/a Vegetation significantly disturbed due to livestock grazing. 0.25 0 - 12+ 0 - 12+ US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 30' 0 1 1 100 15' 0 5' Microstegium vimineum Festuca sp 60 2 62 Yes No FAC FAC 30' 0 Wetland H - DP12 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: 0-2 2-8 8-12 10YR 6/2 10YR 5/1 2.5Y 6/2 98 95 85 10YR 4/4 10YR 4/6 10YR 4/6 2 5 15 C C C PL PL PL Silt Loam Silt Loam Silt Loam Wetland H - DP12 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank - Bethel Branch Site Snow Camp/Chatham 12/14/2016 Wildlands Engineering NC Wetland I - DP13 Win Taylor Floodplain concave 0 MLRA 136 N 35.829770 W -79.369683 Cid-Lignum (CmB)n/a Vegetation significantly disturbed due to livestock grazing. 0 - 12+ 0 - 12+ US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 30' Platanus occidentalis 20 20 Yes FACW 2 2 100 15' 0 5' Microstegium vimineum Amaranthus spinosus 60 2 62 Yes No FAC FACU 30' 0 Wetland I - DP13 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: 0-2 2-12 10YR 5/1 10YR 4/1 98 95 10YR 4/4 10YR 4/6 2 5 C C PL PL Silt Loam Silt Loam Wetland I - DP13 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank - Bethel Branch Site Snow Camp/Chatham 12/14/2016 Wildlands Engineering NC Upland - DP14 Win Taylor HIllslope none 1 MLRA 136 N 35.829684 W -79.369621 Cid-Lignum (CmB)n/a Vegetation significantly disturbed due to livestock grazing. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 30' 0 1 1 100 15' 0 5' Festuca sp Stellaria media Amaranthus spinosus 60 10 5 75 Yes No No FAC UPL FACU 30' 0 Upland - DP14 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: 0-2 2-12 10YR 4/3 10YR 5/4 100 100 C C PL PL Silt Loam Silt Loam Upland - DP14 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank - Bethel Branch Site Snow Camp/Chatham 12/14/2016 Wildlands Engineering NC Wetland J - DP15 Win Taylor Floodplain concave 0 MLRA 136 N 35.829648 W -79.369865 Cid-Lignum (CmB)n/a Vegetation significantly disturbed due to livestock grazing. 0 - 12+ 0 - 12+ US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 30' 0 1 1 100 15' 0 5' Microstegium vimineum Amaranthus spinosus 40 2 42 Yes No FAC FACU 30' 0 Wetland J - DP15 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: 0-6 6-12 10YR 5/2 10YR 6/1 98 90 10YR 4/6 10YR 4/6 2 10 C C PL PL Silt Loam Silt Loam Wetland J - DP15 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank - Bethel Branch Site Snow Camp/Chatham 12/14/2016 Wildlands Engineering NC Upland - DP18 Win Taylor Terrace concave <1 MLRA 136 N 35.828787 W -79.371480 Cid-Lignum (CmB)n/a Vegetation significantly disturbed due to livestock grazing. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 30' Liquidambar styraciflua 80 80 Yes FAC 2 3 66 15' Acer rubrum Cornus florida 5 5 10 Yes Yes FAC FACU 5' 0 30' 0 Upland - DP18 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: 0-3 3-12 10YR 4/3 10YR 5/4 100 100 C C PL PL Silt Loam Silt Loam Upland - DP18 Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank Bethel Branch Site Site Photographs Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank – Bethel Branch Site Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation and Request for Verification UT1 UT2 UT3 Wetland A – Data Point 1 Upland – Data Point 2 Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank – Bethel Branch Site Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation and Request for Verification Wetland B – Data Point 3 Wetland C – Data Point 4 Upland – Data Point 5 Wetland E – Data Point 7 Upland – Data Point 8 Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank – Bethel Branch Site Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation and Request for Verification Wetland F – Data Point 9 Upland – Data Point 10 Wetland G – Data Point 11 Wetland H – Data Point 12 Wetland I – Data Point 13 Upland – Data Point 14 Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank – Bethel Branch Site Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation and Request for Verification Wetland J – Data Point 15 Upland – Data Point 18 Pond A 030300030503 030300020504 030300020505 030300020508 030300030502 030300030505 030300020506 030300020701 030300030501 030300030504 030300030506 030300030206 030300020509 030300020307 030300030509030300030207 030300020503 Figure 1 Vicinity MapCane Creek Umbrella Mitigation BankBethel Branch SiteCape Fear River Basin (03030002) Chatham County, NC 0 3 Miles ¹ Bethel Branch Proposed Easement Hydrologic Unit Code (12) Area 3 Figure 2 USGS Topographic MapCane Creek Umbrella Mitigation BankBethel Branch SiteCape Fear River Basin (03030002) Chatham County, NC 0 1,000 Feet ¹ Silk Hope USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle Bethel Branch Proposed Easement Figure 3 Site MapCane Creek Umbrella Mitigation BankBethel Branch SiteCape Fear River Basin (030300 02)November 2017 Chatham County, NC 0 500 Feet ¹ Proposed Easement Boundary Delineated Wetlands Pond Non-Wetland Waters Wetland F (DP9) Upland (DP2)UT1UT3 U T 2 UT2 UT1Wetland G (DP11) Upland (DP10) Wetland H (DP12) Wetland I (DP13) Upland (DP14)Wetland J (DP15) Upland (DP18) Wetland E (DP7) Upland (DP8) Wetland C (DP4) Upland (DP5) Wetland B (DP3) Pond A Wetland A (DP1) CmB NaB NaC GeC2 NaB NaC GeB2 NaB GkD NaC NaB NaC W NaC W GeB2 W W NaC Figure 4 Soils M apCane Creek Umbrella Mitigation BankBethel Branch SiteCape Fear River Basin (030300 02) Chatham County, NC 0 500 Feet ¹ Proposed Easement Boundary Delineated Wetlands Non-Wetland Waters Pond UT1UT1UT3 U T 2 UT2