20110720 Ver 2_Mitigation Monitoring Report_20180917

Action History (UTC -05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
Submit by Anonymous User 9/17/2018 3:48:33 PM (Message Start Event)
Approve by Montalvo, Sheri A 9/18/2018 8:02:36 AM (Initial Review- Sheri Montalvo)
• The task was assigned to Montalvo, Sheri A 9/17/2018 3:48 PM

D# * 20110720
Version* 2
Select Reviewer:* Katie Merritt
Mitigation Project Submittal - 9/17/2018
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r— Stream r Wetlands fJ Buffer rJ Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a a Yes a No
New Site? *
Project Contact Information
.........................................................................................................................
Contact Name:* Daniel Ingram
Email Address:* [e-mail]
Project Information
Existing (DWR) ID#:*
20110720
(nurrbers only... no dash)
Existing Version:*
2
(nurrbers only)
Project Name:*
Cedar Grove
County:*
Orange
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Cedar Grove Bank
14.17MB
Parcel_MY4_Report_9.17.2018. pdf
Rease upload only one RDF of the corrplete file that needs to be subrritted...
Signature
Print Name:* Ryan Medric
Signature:*

CEDAR GROVE MITIGATION SITE
Orange County, NC
Bank Parcel Development Plan Monitoring Year 4 Report
DWR Project # 11-0720v2
Issue Date: September 2018

Submitted By:
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

Prepared By:

Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC

i
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Project Location and Description ..................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................................ 2
2.0 Project Area – Pre-Construction Condition Summary ............................................................................ 2
3.0 Bank Site Conditions .............................................................................................................................. 3
3.1 Restoration Plan ............................................................................................................................... 3
3.2 Vegetation Monitoring Plots ............................................................................................................ 3
3.3 Photo Stations ................................................................................................................................... 4
4.0 Monitoring Conditions ............................................................................................................................ 4
5.0 Neuse Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation ........................................................................... 5 Appendix A: Site Maps Figure 1: Site Location Map Figure 2.1: Conservation Easement Area Figure 2.2: Vegetation Plot and Photo Station Monitoring Locations Figure 2.3: Neuse Buffer & Nutrient Offset Restoration Areas Figure 2.4: BPDP Neuse Buffer & Nutrient Offset Restoration Areas Figure 3: As-Built Exhibit Figure 4: Cedar Grove Stream Mitigation Plan Map Appendix B: Existing Conditions Photographs Appendix C: Vegetation Assessment Data Table 1: Plant Species Summary Table 2: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table Table 3: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos Appendix E: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets Appendix F: Photo Stations

1
1.0 Introduction 1.1 Project Location and Description
Located off of McDade Store Road (NCSR 1354), northwest of its intersection with Rick Road in Orange
County, North Carolina (Figure 1), is the Upper Neuse buffer and nutrient offset mitigation site currently
known as Cedar Grove Mitigation Site (Site). The Site is located approximately 0.8 miles southwest of the
intersection of McDade Store Road and State Route 86 and approximately 0.7 miles northeast of the
intersection McDade Store Road and Efland Cedar Grove Road.

The tract containing the Site is approximately 131.5 acres, which includes area within the right- of-way
along its frontage of McDade Store Road. A 60.14 acre conservation easement protects the Site. Within the
conservation easement, existing riparian areas have been restored and enhanced to generate both Neuse
buffer and nutrient offset (nitrogen and phosphorus) credits in the Falls Lake Watershed. In addition, the
dimension, pattern, and profile of existing perennial and intermittent stream channels located within the
conservation easement have been restored at the Site in accordance with the approved stream mitigation
plan approved by the Interagency Review Team (IRT). The As-Built design of the Cedar Grove Stream
Mitigation Bank site is shown in Figures 2.3 and As-Built Exhibit. The remaining 71.36 acres not placed
within a conservation easement will be developed as a low-density subdivision that will consist of three
single-family lots that are a minimum size of 28-acres, along with driveways, existing walking trails, and
other infrastructure. Please refer to Table 1, below, for additional information regarding buffer restoration,
buffer enhancement, and nutrient offset credits proposed within this Site.

The Site is located within the Upper Falls Lake watershed in the Neuse River Basin (8-digit USGS HUC
03020201, 12-digit USGS HUC 03020201 0301), more specifically within Neuse Sub-basin 03-04-01.
Stormwater runoff from this site drains into the East Fork Eno River (Stream Index #27-2-3), which is
located in the northeastern section of the Site. According to the N.C. Division of Water Quality Basinwide
Information Management System (BIMS), the East Fork Eno River is classified as WS-II (Water Supply
II), HQW (High Quality Waters), and NSW (Nutrient Sensitive Waters). The WS-II classification is for
“waters used as sources of water supply for drinking, culinary, or food processing purposes which are
generally in predominantly undeveloped watersheds”. HQW is a “supplemental classification intended to
protect waters that are rated excellent based on biological and physical/chemical characteristics” while
the NSW designation is for “Nutrient Sensitive Waters”. The purpose of this Site is to improve water quality
within the Neuse River Basin, specifically the Falls Lake watershed, by providing off-site mitigation for
development (both existing and proposed) requiring stream buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 and nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0240. Nutrient offset credits can only be
provided to offset nutrient loads in the Upper and Lower Falls Lake Watersheds of the 03020201 HUC.

This Site is established under the terms and conditions of the EBX Upper Neuse Riparian Buffer and
Nutrient Offset Umbrella Mitigation Bank (Bank), signed on February 10, 2012, made and entered into by
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC (EBX), a subsidiaryy of Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
(RES), acting as the Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources - Division of Water Quality (DWR). Annual monitoring activities and monitoring
reports will be performed by RES.

2
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The goals of this buffer and nutrient offset mitigation project are:

- Improve the overall water quality and aquatic habitat in and around the unnamed tributaries of
the Neuse River by reducing nutrient and sediment loads into the streams caused by
development and agricultural influences.
- Improve the richness and diversity of the plant species within the conservation easement.
- Provide perpetual protection for the unnamed tributaries to the East Fork Eno River and
associated riparian and upland buffers

These goals will be met through the following objectives:

- Establishing a native plant community to match the endemic plant species at the Bank Site.
- Reducing the quantities of exotic invasive species at the Bank Parcel through chemical
methods.
- Establishing a conservation easement to provide long-term protection for the Bank Site.
- Donation of the conservation easement and all of its interests, in perpetuity, to an accredited or
approved land trust or stewardship program.
2.0 Project Area – Pre-Construction Condition Summary
The majority of the existing riparian areas within the Site were considered maintained/disturbed and
cultivated lands that have, historically, been a maintained golf course, which included fairways, greenways,
driving range, and maintained fields. The Neuse riparian buffer area width within the maintained/disturbed
and cultivated land areas were less than 50 feet in some instances prior to mitigation work activities. As
part of buffer mitigation, Neuse buffers would be restored out to a minimum of 50 feet. Other riparian areas
which extended 51 feet to a maximum of 200 feet on both sides of the bankfull elevation of each restored
stream bank weree planted and described as nutrient offset areas and are shown on Figure 2.4. These areas
were ripped and scarified prior to vegetation planting activities. Existing grasses were mowed and treated
with herbicide to reduce competition with planted species. Where necessary, invasive species were also
treated with herbicide to ensure they do not become dominant, or hinder the establishment, growth and
survival of planted vegetation.

In addition to maintained/disturbed and cultivated land areas within the Site, there are existing forested
riparian areas which have been selectively timbered. Significant portions of the secondary understory within
these existing forested riparian areas have been cleared. Riparian buffer enhancement was considered for
these forested areas that are within 50 feet of the stream, but lacking adequate stem counts. Riparian buffer
enhancement is defined as the process of converting a sparsely woody vegetated area (greater than or equal
to 100 trees per acre but less than 200 trees per acre that are greater than or equal to five inches diameter at
breast height (dbh) for trees and greater than two feet in height for shrubs) to a forested riparian buffer area
(15A NCAC 02B .0233 (2)(m)). Nuisance and exotic vegetation are not included in the stem count.

3
3.0 Bank Site Conditions 3.1 Restoration Plan
Stream restoration and enhancement construction activities at the Bank Site were completed in early May
2015 in accordance with the Cedar Grove Stream Mitigation Plan approved by the IRT. Neuse riparian
buffers and other riparian areas were planted on May 13, 2015. Construction activities included Priority I
stream restoration, stream enhancement, bank stabilization, and installation of stream structures. Removal
of golf course cart paths, draining and filling ponds, and planting Neuse riparian buffers (0-50’) and other
riparian areas (51-200’) within the conservation area were also completed. Monitoring devices were
installed post-construction which included 12 photo stations and 12 vegetation plots. On June 15, 2015,
DWR staff conducted an on-site visit to inspect the As-Built conditions of the buffer mitigation and nutrient
offset areas. Based on DWR’s findings at the site visit, approximately 4.22 acres of planted riparian areas
were removed from the creditable acreage for the bank. Originally, Neuse riparian buffers and other riparian
areas were proposed within Conservation Easement Area 3 along Ponds A and B as well as stream UT6
(Figure 2.4). These areas are considered not subject to generate credit and account for the 4.22 acres
removed from the creditable acreage for the bank.

Abandoned golf course fairway areas within the conservation easement were bush-hogged and scarified
prior to vegetation planting activities. The established microtopography on level surfaces has promoted
diffuse flow and surface water storage. In addition, subsurface hardpans were eliminated to promote
vegetation growth and survival and to increase groundwater recharge rates. Where necessary, invasive
species were treated with herbicide to ensure they do not become dominant within the Bank Site, or hinder
the establishment, growth and survival of planted vegetation.

The Cedar Grove Bank Site was planted with bare root seedlings consisting of species previously observed
on the Bank Site and selected species known to inhabit Dry Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest community type as
described in Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina (Schafale and Weakley, 1990).
Table 1 (Appendix C) provides a listing of planted species and a summary of total stems planted at the
Bank Site. A total of 28,200 individual stems, or 787 stems per acre, were planted within the Bank Site,
which is slightly above the desired 680 stems per acre. A total of 3,000 live stakes were also planted along
streams banks to provide bank stability and aquatic cover as required per the stream mitigation plan
approved by the IRT.

The planted species were a mixture of hardwood tree species consistent with those found within a Basic
Dry Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest in the Piedmont. Plant composition consisted of 10 tree species. Temporary
and permanent native herbaceous seed mix was applied simultaneously to the nutrient offset restoration
areas within the Bank Site area. Temporary seed will provide cover until the permanent seed applied
becomes established. Temporary cover consisted of millet (Echinochloa crusgalli), annual rye grain (Secale
cereale), and crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum). Permanent ground cover consisted of switchgrass
(Panicum virgatum), deertongue (Panicum clandestinman), black-eyed susan (Rudbeckia hirta), and
riverbank wildrye (Elymus riparius).

3.2 Vegetation Monitoring Plots
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC permanently installed 12 vegetation plots for future vegetation
monitoring purposes. The locations of each vegetation plot are depicted on Figure 2.2 (Appendix A). The
vegetation plots were randomly setup throughout the Bank Site and each are 100 square meters in size (10
meter by 10 meter square plots). Vegetation monitoring was conducted in general accordance to CVS-EEP
Protocol for Recording Vegetation (CVS-EEP, v4.2). Table 2 (Appendix C) provides a success summary
for each vegetation monitoring plot. As a result of DWR’s site visit on June 15, 2015 and the removal of

4
4.22 acres from the bank, vegetation plot #1 does not require monitoring. However, all 12 vegetation
monitoring plots will continue to be monitored. Vegetation plot #1 monitoring data will be reported;
however, it has been discarded from the site’s overall stems/acre average and will not be counted towards
the success criteria.

Monitoring Year 4 field activities were conducted in August 2017. Based on the Year 4 vegetation
monitoring data, 10 of the required 11 vegetation monitoring plots have met the success criteria for Year 4
monitoring. Vegetation Plot 6 is just below the success criteria primarily due to mortality caused by soil
compaction. The area this plot is in experienced heavy machinery traffic during construction. The Site’s
overall average Year 4 planted stems per acre is 552 excluding Vegetation Plot #1. The Site’s overall
average Year 4 total stems per acre including volunteer species is 956 excluding Vegetation Plot #1 (Table
2, Appendix C). Table 3 (Appendix C) provides a more detailed summary of stem counts and the type of
planted species within each vegetation monitoring plot. The survival of planted stems per acre during
monitoring Year 4 ranges from 283 to 890 stems per acre. The overall average stem height excluding
Vegetation Plot #1 was 5.2 feet.

Photographs of each vegetation monitoring plot are located in Appendix D. Vegetation Monitoring Plot
Data Sheets are provided in Appendix E. Each Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheet provides the
measurements, location, and vigor of each planted tree within the vegetation monitoring plots. 3.3 Photo Stations
Photo documentation is a key essential to monitoring the success criteria of the Bank Site. Photographs
provide a visual representation of the onsite vegetation conditions. RES installed 12 permanent photo
stations for future annual monitoring purposes. The locations of each photo station are depicted on Figures
2.2 (Appendix A). Photographs for the photo stations are located in Appendix F. 4.0 Monitoring Conditions
The Site will be monitored for one more year or until the required success criteria have been met as
determined by DWR. The Site is performing as planned and is on track to meeting its success criteria.
Overall the site’s vegetation is developing into an established stream buffer. An abundant amount of
herbaceous ground cover as well as volunteer trees species were present during Year 4 monitoring activities.
No major problems or areas of concern were noted during Year 4 monitoring activities on the Cedar Grove
Bank Site. The area in and around Vegetation Plot 6 has a low stem density and will be replanted this
winter. Additionally, the low stem density areas in the pond bottoms were replanted in 2018.

The Cedar Grove Bank Site contains 12 vegetative monitoring plots, 11 of which were monitored and
reported for success criteria in general accordance with the CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation
(CVS-EEP, v4.2). Twelve 10 by 10-meter square plots were permanently established following completion
of the planting phase and at least two opposing corners have been permanently installed and surveyed for
future use. The plant species, density, survival rates, and the cause of mortality, if identifiable, have been
recorded within each plot. Twelve vegetation plots were sampled and reported; however, vegetation plot
#1 has been discarded from the site’s overall stems/acre average and is not counted towards the success
criteria. Success criteria will be generated from vegetation monitoring plots 2 – 12. The primary focus of
the vegetative monitoring will be solely on the tree stratum, although shrub and herbaceous species
encountered may also be recorded, but will not be counted towards the success criteria.

Within Neuse buffer and nutrient offset restoration areas, success criteria will be based on the survival of a
minimum density of 320 trees per acre after five years of monitoring. Within Neuse buffer enhancement
areas, success criteria will be based on a minimum of at least two tree species at an average density of 320

5
trees per acre following five years of monitoring. Year 4 vegetation monitoring activities occurred in
August 2018. As of Monitoring Year 4, the Cedar Grove Bank Site yields 552 planted stems per acre and
956 total stems per acre counting volunteer species. The Site is performing as designed and is on track to
meeting Year 5 success criteria of 320 planted stems per acre.
5.0 Neuse Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation
The Cedar Grove Site will provide Neuse buffer and nutrient offset mitigation credits for development
impacts within the Neuse River Basin USGS HUC 03020201, specifically the Falls Lake watershed (Figure
1). Of the 60.14 acres conservation easement (Figure 3), approximately 39.43 acres will be dedicated to
Neuse buffer restoration / enhancement and nutrient offset restoration. A Neuse buffer restoration area of
14.46 acres (629,616 sf) will be used to generate 14.46 acres (629,616 sf) of Neuse buffer credits. A Neuse
buffer enhancement area of 0.75 acres (32,611 sf) will be used to generate 0.25 acres (10,870 sf)
(enhancement area divide by 3) of Neuse buffer credits. Therefore, a total of 14.71 acres (640,486 sf) of
Neuse buffer credit will be generated. The remaining 24.22 acres of riparian restoration area within the Site
(i.e. areas outside of the Neuse buffer) will provide nutrient offset credits for nitrogen and phosphorus. The
Site will provide 55,052.54 pounds of Nitrogen Nutrient Offset credit and 3,545.81 pounds of Phosphorous
Nutrient Offset credit.
Table 1 provides a summary of mitigation credit for the Site. Table 1: Mitigation Credit Summary
NEUSE BUFFER RESTORATION/ENHANCEMENT
Conservation Area Neuse River Buffer (Acres)
Restoration Enhancement
1 1.37 (59,503 sf) 0.00
2 3.02 (131,551 sf) 0.75 (32,611 sf)
3 10.07 (438,562 sf) 0.00
TOTAL ACERAGE 14.46 (629,616 sf) 0.75 (32,611 sf)
RATIO 1:1 3:1
TOTAL CREDITS 14.46 (629,616 sf) 0.25 (10,870 sf)
NUTRIENT OFFSET RESTORATION
Conservation Area Nutrient Offset
Restoration (Acres)
Nitrogen Credit
(2,273.02 lbs/ac)
Phosphorus Credit
(146.4 lbs/ac)
1 2.69 6,114.42 393.82
2 7.14 16,229.36 1,045.30
3 14.39 32,708.76 2,106.70
TOTAL 24.22 55,052.54 3,545.81

6
6.0 References

Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2

North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) 2004. Guidelines for Riparian Buffer
Restoration. Available at internet site: http://www.nceep.net/news/reports/buffers.pdf. Accessed
August 2009.

Schafale MP and AS Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina: Third
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.

APPENDIX A Site Maps

03020201
03010104
NC 8
6

Ef
land
-Cedar
Grove
RdCompton RdAllison RdCaviness Jordan RdLees Chapel Rd
Hawkins RdHurdle Mills RdOakley Rd McDade Store RdCarr Stor
e

R
d Rick RdOli
n

R
dStewart Farm RdMcCullough Rd
Cedar Va
l
ley
RdToms Creek LoopCarr Store Rd
© OpenStreetMap (and) contributors, CC-BY-SA
0 2,0001,000
Feet
FIGURE 1 - SITE LOCATION MAP
CEDAR GROVE MITIGATION SITE
ORANGE COUNTY, NC
Legend
Roads
Cedar Grove Streams
Cedar Grove Mitigation Site
HUC Boundary
©Date: 6/9/2015
Drawn by: BSH
Checked by: xxxxxxxx
Document Path: E:\RES Files\Cedar Grove\CADD\GIS\MXD\BPDP As Built Figures\Figure 1. Site Location Map.mxdCedar Grove Mitigation Site
Rick RdMcDade Store RdCompton RdParticipating NC Counties, NCCGIA, NC OneMap, US EPA, NC OneMap, NC
Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC 911 Board
0 500250
Feet
FIGURE 2.1 - CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA MAP
CEDAR GROVE MITIGATION SITE
ORANGE COUNTY, NC
Legend
Roads
Cedar Grove Streams
Cedar Grove Mitigation Site
County Boundaries
Parcels
©Date: 6/19/2015
Drawn by: BSH
Checked by: xxxxxxxx
Document Path: E:\RES Files\Cedar Grove\CADD\GIS\MXD\BPDP As Built Figures\Figure 2.1 Conservation Easement Area Map.mxdEast Fork
Eno River
UT1
UT3
UT4
UT2
UT2
UT5
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_^_
^_
PS-5
PS-4
PS-3
PS-2
PS-1
PS-6
PS-7
PS-8
PS-9
PS-10PS-11
PS-12 1
2
6
3
4
5
7
89
10
11
12
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community
©
0 400200
Feet
Figure 2.2
Cedar Grove MY4 2018
Vegetation Plot andPhoto Station Location Map
LEGEND
Date: 9/17/2018 Drawn by: RTM
Document Path: S:\@RES Projects\North Carolina\Neu-Con UMBI\0105 - cedar grove\monitoring\Monitoring Data\MY4 - 2018\GIS\MXD\Figure 2.2 - Cedar Grove- VP and Photo Station Map.mxdConservation Easement
Stream Restoration
^_Photo Station
Vegeation Plot Success
>320 stems/acre
<320 stems/acre
Source: 2017 NC OneMap Aerial Imagery
Latitude: 36.195740 Longitude: -79.160346
Vegetation Condition Assessment
AbsentPresentMarginal
Absent
Present
Target Community
Invasive SpeciesNo Fill
Rick RdMcDade Store RdNC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC 911 Board©0300150FeetFIGURE 2.3NEUSE BUFFER & NUTRIENT OFFSET RESTORATION AREAS CEDAR GROVE MITIGATION SITEORANGE COUNTY, NCLEGENDCedar Grove Mitigation SiteRoadsTop of BankBuffer Restoration AreaBuffer Enhancement AreaNutrient Offset AreaDate: 6/19/2015Drawn by: BSHChecked by: xxxxxxxxDocument Path: E:\RES Files\Cedar Grove\CADD\GIS\MXD\BPDP As Built Figures\Figure 2.3 Neuse Buffer Nutrient Restoartion Areas Map.mxdEnhancement1020.75 (32,611 sf)30TOTAL ACERAGE0.75 (32,611 sf)RATIO3:1TOTAL CREDITS0.25 (10,870 sf)Conservation AreaNutrient Offset Restoration (Acres)Nitrogen Credit (2,273.02 lbs/ac)Phosphorus Credit (146.4 lbs/ac)12.69 6,114.42 393.8227.14 16,229.36 1,045.30314.39 32,708.76 2,106.70TOTAL24.22 55,052.54 3,545.8110.07 (438,562 sf)14.46 (629,616 sf)1:114.46 (629,616 sf)NUTRIENT OFFSET RESTORATIONNEUSE BUFFER RESTORATION/ENHANCEMENTConservation AreaNeuse River Buffer (Acres)Restoration1.37 (59,503 sf)3.02 (131,551 sf)Conservation Area #1Conservation Area #2Conservation Area #3Conservation Area #3
xxxxxxxxxxxx'JHVSF

Ml
Q57
SF1E
VICINITY MAP
(NOT tO SYALE)
NOTES
7. No Nc GAW S(DNIMpYTS WERE LMATEO W77AN
2099. OF THIS PROPEIRM
2 ALL DISTANCES ARE HORL70NW GROUND
MEASUREMENTS AN FEET 8 DECAMLS TNEREO,r,
MESS OTHERMMC WtW-
3. NO UDUMS ARE SHOWN DN IFAS SURYiEY.
LEGEND
RfW y RIGHT OF WAY
CfL - CENIERCAME
BEARFNO
475 - EX6-mn AWN STARE
L-98
EB° = EX6 71W BRAN PIPE
41`
EAAM - VAVMMT MAC MA9-
N 1 57'E I
EPK = EXiSnW FK NIL
L-98
ERRS EXFS7WG RAO ROAD SPWE
32.9 '
EAX = E78STBNG AXLE
{ACREACE LATA BY COMPUTER)
Ap$ - ND POW SET
O = NOPLW7T SET
(
CONMOL
CORNER
L4/F' +. NOW OR PDRI ERL y
am/
ADVOPWG PROPERTY LINE
-------- = IXISTWG PARCEL LINES
(NOT SURWEYED)
RE LINE TABLE
FAX A' TO NPS B'
LBM-
BEARFNO
DaSrANCE
L-98
T
41`
0-97
N 1 57'E I
fg45•
L-98
I N 86'38`10' E 1
32.9 '
0,73 AKES PROS! ERRS. ALONG
of MCLADE STORE RO (NC51R
LNFERSECwN OF N.C. NWA. 86
SOURCE OF 'TITLE A"
DB 572J PG 198 E9°Il
M8 110, PG 142 r
r
A ,
r+
r�r r
l� Al
;
Ew 'r fIIG� EBX NEMS£ L LLC De 5323, Pc 798
II I
ARLIA IfSRENT
I" �f
o
t
Ci4WWAC P. MCWE
& S
PB 55z% PG 147 f �i �,i✓
FUM STATEitIENT
WS PROPERTY FS LOWED R4 ZONE ',LL.&'
AE'
AND i5 PARTMLLY LOCATED MFW A SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD AREA. AS DEMWINED BY MRP RATE *KPS
OATM fE8RydKr 1 200.7 : C01M A07Y PANE[
NLpfBET7537Dif2-98+8-,1 At 3 79342-98.59_,1.
�PON
ME�
NfF
90GERET S ANpERSON firm
9D -E-312
DA 227. PC 1584
POND 1 4�_ POND
PARCEL LANE
-- (8'30K 7 rQ FACE f 42)
w
r
t
r
r
Ir
�J
ESX NEUSE L uc
OB 5323, PG 198
WD
4LLWAY
UTC
EAST FORK
ENO RIVER
ESN NEUSEk LLC
Do W224 PC I"
CONSERVA TION EASEMENr 13
1
LIT 2
%
/Al
lj/•f;®,�_`y,/��I / /
~ f f/ /1
�.
"Z
UT 3
ARE+ 2 .r�{,r /j' r/�/,j , Iy .F'EPN w
l/ h Ur 2 v• %f/jd.✓- %%� // r DS 70. PSG M9
✓✓ 6 r Piz 25, PIG 24
ry
rrr a
COASWN EASEMENT 12 '�,�!•� / �j/ - //%f ff. �
fRV z�..J
STATE OF NORTH CAROLM
Ear r4EDsE ,LLC
MARGEMET S.%WER50N NEARS
80 -E -3x2
OB 22,7• PC 1581
r
JOSEPH W. cohoP Ov, •BR:
ANNE E COW"
DB 870, PG 329
PS 25 PG 24
l/l/°rlrl
dSCAR
SSip' Yyl�
L R WATSON, PROFES5W, 9L LAND SURIESYA4 NO. 4712
�``pQ
i 2 • OkCERI8�1'
SEAL -y
Tikr TNS SURVEY 15 OF AWNER CATEGORY. TTS WTI,-
AN EXCEPTM TO THE CEF9MON OF SU8(NIN91L8V.
_a
L-4712
rlZl�:tS �lJ 'n4`v�
11
LEGEND & ACR-EAGE BATA
ORAME COUNTY
{ACREACE LATA BY COMPUTER)
, /. j// - J DB 3,72.3 PG rs9 L JAMES R. WATSON CE6RWY TMT VZ
//' . j%✓ j .r? y DAMW
DB 536332. PC se yI .f / / J� SStAmwYY nWAS t m MY sU DETF' MYk'�ft DFR&fM
R£CLtlilTED " SLAP OEED horq
' f� e' BDUNLARIEs nrLsr suRViliD ARE CLEARLY MICATED As wa9WN
%/' j,/./`• !' rJ ,ir' - - / ;/ I FROM AVFOReN7MV REFERENCED HEREOAh TMT THE 94770
CONSERVAT&7N EASEWENI 1r f/% /f.�'f CONSERVAPON I I- OF PREM0N AS CALMATEO IS 1: MOM THAT P#S PLAT
EASEWNT 1J t ` WAS PREPARED IN ACCORawc WRIF GS 47-30 As
AMENaM MA(E'.S MY ORAVM9L Slf5MnW_ REMST1 TON
NUMBER AND SEAL THS ISTH 04Y OF .NM , A.D.
S 87'50`46" W
CHAMY MG R kkOADE "
09 52118 PC 394 t1
PB 109. PC B
JOHN F. PORE
DS 1669, PC 60
NP
.rUrw r: POPE
DB x664. PG 60
AS-BUILT 'EXHIBIT
FAR
CEDAR GROVE MI TI GA TION SITE
BANK PARCEL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
MR -PROJECT #I 1-072OV2
CEDAR GROVE TOWNSHIP JUNE 15, 2015
STRANGE COUNTY, N.C. SCALE: I" e 200'
200` 100' 0 200' 406'
GRAPMC SCALE
I
= CONSERVATA'NL EASB ENT (CE.) -LAMES NOT SURtlY
CE. 11 R 5.02 ACRf32
C.E. 12 = 1121 ACRES;
Cr4991 ACRES;
701 AREA W CC, W. r4 ACRES±
= NUTRF£NT OFFSLT TdMIN ATx7N AREA
WRHW CE 1T = 2.69 ACRESf
MMM CE 12 .. 7. r4 AARES3
MMW CE13 = 14.39 ACRES±
TOTAL AREA - 24.22 ACRES;
= NEUSE BUFFER RESTOR477W AREA
W IF -M C.E: 16 .. 1.37 ACRES# 5SS503 Sq. FF.;J
W YNIN CZ 12 3.02 ACRES4 rJ1,5gI SFJ Flt)
WaHw C.E. /3 = 10.07 ACRES; (43&S62 SR FT.;)
TOTAL AREA - 14.46 ACRES*
= NEUSE SMER MiANCEMEW AREA
IIM M CE: 1T = 0.00 ACRES
wngv CE 12 - 0.75 ACRES; (32,61 t SC FT.;)
MINACRES
TOTAL ARM . 0.75 ACRE (JZ621 SR FT;)
MATRIX EAST, PLL+C
PROFEM aL LMD SUffvE M
908 N. QUERN ST., SUITE A
Til: 252-522-2500
FIRM LIC. i P-0221
DRAWN BY: JRW
SURVEYED BY. JAS/DGJ
SCALE: 1" R 200'
KINSTON. NC 2$501
FAX: [phone]
EMAIL: surveyor*maWxeosLnet
PROJECT NO.: 20140036
DATE: 6-15-15
DRAWING NAME. BUFFERS

999'JHVSF
4USFBN
.JUJHBUJPO
1MBO
.BQ

APPENDIX B Existing Conditions Photographs

Appendix B. Existing Conditions Photos

Appendix B.
Cedar Grove Existing Conditions Photos

EFER Looking Upstream

EFER Looking Downstream

UT1 Looking Upstream UT1 Looking Downstream
UT2 Looking Upstream

UT2 Looking Downstream

Appendix B. Existing Conditions Photos

Cedar Grove Existing Conditions Photos

UT3 Looking Upstream

UT3 Looking Downstream

UT4 Looking Upstream

UT4 Looking Downstream
UT5 Looking Upstream UT5 Looking Downstream

APPENDIX C Vegetation Assessment Data

  Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data

Table 1. Planted Species Summary
Planted Date: May 13, 2015
Scientific Name Common Name
Species
Type
Total Stems
Planted
Betula nigra River Birch Bare Root 4,000
Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud Bare Root 200
Liriodendron tulipifera Tuliptree Bare Root 4,000
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Bare Root 8,200
Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak Bare Root 3,700
Quercus nigra Water Oak Bare Root 3,000
Quercus phellos Willow Oak Bare Root 2,000
Quercus rubra Northern Red Oak Bare Root 600
Quercus pagoda Cherry Bark Oak Bare Root 2,000
Cephalanthus occidentalis Common Buttonbush Bare Root 500
Total 28,200
Salix nigra Black Willow Live Stake
1,000 
Populus deltoides Cottonwood Live Stake
1,000 
Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood Live Stake
1,000 
    Total 3,000

Table 2. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary

*Vegetation Plot 1 data was disregarded from the sites success criteria totals.

Plot #Planted 
Stems/Acre
Volunteer 
Stems/Acre
Total 
Stems/Acre
Success 
Criteria 
Met?
Average 
Stem 
Height (ft)
1 607 526 1133 Yes 4.2
2 567 162 728 Yes 3.1
3 526 809 1335 Yes 4.5
4 688 769 1457 Yes 7.5
5 364 405 769 Yes 3.7
6 283 486 769 No 3.4
7 728 850 1578 Yes 5.6
8 486 162 647 Yes 5.2
9 3640364Yes7.3
10 647 40 688 Yes 3.6
11 890 526 1416 Yes 6.4
12 526 243 769 Yes 5.0
Project Avg 556 415 971 Yes 5.1
Project Avg 
w/o VP1
552 405 956 Yes 5.2
  Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data  Table 3: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLSP‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all TAcer negundo boxelder Tree2Acer rubrum red maple Tree29Betula nigra river birch Tree 111222 222222111 22222211113131314141414 14 14 18 18 18 21 21 21Carya illinoinensis pecan Tree11Carya ovata shagbark hickory Tree2Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 5 5 5 2 2 2111 888888888999999DONTKNOW: unsure record999Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree1011111111112 4 7Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree 2 1 18 16 10 8 10 4 1 8 78 114 36 45Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 3 3 5222111668668666101010191919Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree222 111333444Pinus taeda loblolly pine Tree 9 34111817Platanus occidentalisAmerican sycamoreTree 7772224449910 222555333 3 3 3 5 5 5 2 2 2424243444446393939454545484848Prunus serotina black cherry Tree 2 114Quercus oak Tree222666757575Quercus alba white oak Tree 2 2 2222111Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree2 2 2 3 3 3 7 7 7 12 12 12 13 13 13 13 13 13 15 15 15 1 1 1Quercus nigra water oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1111 333666666777888222Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree 222111222222 222 222 111111111111666666Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 444222333111111333444222666336555343437292929242426313133343434Quercus rubra northern red oakTree 333222111666 444 111222777111272727323232282828313131181818Rhus copallinum flameleaf sumac shrub2Ulmus alata winged elm Tree156Ulmus americana American elm Tree224 2Unknown Shrub or Tree11115 15 28 14 14 18 13 13 33 17 17 36 9 9 19 7 7 19 18 18 39 12 12 16 9 9 9 16 16 17 22 22 35 13 1319 165 165 288 171 171 350 147 147 189 179 179 239 237 237 237335668779558334446669667444556669668121217131317101012101015111111607 607 1133 567 567 728 526 526 1335 688 688 1457 364 364 769 283 283 769 728 7281578 486 486 647 364 364 364 647 647 688 890 890 1416 526 526 769 556 556 971 577 577 1180 496 496 637 604 604 806 799 799 799120.30Cedar Grove120.30120.30120.3010.0210.02120.3010.0210.0210.0210.0210.0210.0210.0210.0210.02Stem countsize (ares)size (ACRES)Species countStems per ACRE10.02Annual MeansMY4 (2018) MY3 (2017) MY2 (2016) MY1 (2015) MY0 (2015)05202015‐01‐0007 05202015‐01‐0008 05202015‐01‐0009 05202015‐01‐0010 05202015‐01‐0011 05202015‐01‐0012Current Plot Data (MY4 2018)Scientific Name Common Name Species Type05202015‐01‐0001 05202015‐01‐0002 05202015‐01‐0003 05202015‐01‐0004 05202015‐01‐0005 05202015‐01‐0006

APPENDIX D Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Appendix D. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Cedar Grove Monitoring Year 4 Vegetation Plot Photos

Vegetation Plot 1

Vegetation Plot 2
Vegetation Plot 3 Vegetation Plot 4
Vegetation Plot 5

Vegetation Plot 6

Appendix D. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Cedar Grove Monitoring Year 3 Vegetation Plot Photos

Vegetation Plot 7

Vegetation Plot 8
Vegetation Plot 9 Vegetation Plot 10
Vegetation Plot 11

Vegetation Plot 12

APPENDIX E Vegetation Monitoring Data Sheets

THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05202015-01-0001
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Jul 2018 Data
source Notes*Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 5
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05202015-01-0001
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Jul 2018 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:1953374.114
Latitude or UTM-N:890580.3392
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):168
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*Notes*Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Platanus occidentalis1 1.0 0.4 210.0 0.9 a R
Platanus occidentalis2 1.1 2.8 190.0 1.1 b R
Platanus occidentalis4 1.2 7.9 235.0 1.3 c R
Platanus occidentalis7 3.2 7.2 182.0 0.7 f R
Platanus occidentalis8 3.2 4.8 132.0 e R DBH?
Platanus occidentalis9 3.3 2.9 205.0 1.0 d R
Cercis canadensis11 5.6 0.5 42.0 g R
Cercis canadensis13 5.7 5.8 54.0 h R
Cercis canadensis14 5.6 8.4 70.0 i R
Cercis canadensis15 7.6 7.9 57.0 k R
Cercis canadensis17 7.6 3.1 45.0 j R
Platanus occidentalis19 9.9 0.2 135.0 m R DBH?
Liriodendron tulipifera20 9.8 2.4 132.0 n R DBH?
Liriodendron tulipifera22 9.8 7.0 113.0 o R DBH?
Liriodendron tulipifera23 9.7 9.2 119.0 l R DBH?
# stems: 15 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 1
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05202015-01-0001
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Jul 2018 Data
source Notes*1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0001
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:168 °
a
k

b
l

c
m

d
n

e
o

f

g

h

i

j

# stems:15
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 2
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 5
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05202015-01-0002
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Jul 2018 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:1954312.697
Latitude or UTM-N:890558.7357
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):257
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*Notes*Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Quercus pagoda38 0.5 5.1 55.0 a R
Quercus phellos39 0.6 7.8 50.0 b R
Cercis canadensis42 2.9 5.1 105.0 d R DBH?
Cercis canadensis43 2.8 2.9 45.0 c R
Quercus pagoda44 3.2 0.7 71.0 e R
Quercus phellos49 7.5 8.8 115.0 f R DBH?
Quercus nigra50 7.7 6.5 57.0 i R
Quercus phellos51 7.7 3.9 78.0 h R
Platanus occidentalis52 7.7 1.9 170.0 0.6 g R
Quercus rubra53 9.8 0.6 103.0 j R DBH?
Quercus phellos54 9.8 3.0 79.0 k R
Platanus occidentalis55 9.8 5.7 180.0 0.9 l R
Quercus rubra56 9.8 8.1 115.0 m R DBH?
Quercus rubra57 9.8 9.7 84.0 n R
# stems:14 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 3
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05202015-01-0002
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Jul 2018 Data
source Notes*1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0002
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:257 °
a
k

b
l

c
m

d
n

e

f

g

h

i

j

# stems:14
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 4
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 5
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05202015-01-0003
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Jul 2018 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:1954840.257
Latitude or UTM-N:890553.8035
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):246
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*Notes*Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Betula nigra62 9.6 0.4 235.0 1.3 l R
Quercus alba64 5.4 3.3 47.0 g R
Platanus occidentalis66 0.4 5.7 173.0 1.0 c R
Platanus occidentalis68 5.1 6.2 103.0 f R DBH?
Platanus occidentalis69 7.6 6.1 165.0 0.7 j R
Platanus occidentalis70 9.9 5.7 300.0 1.4 m R
Quercus rubra71 9.0 8.9 104.0 k R DBH?
Quercus phellos72 6.3 9.5 148.0 0.4 h R
Quercus phellos73 3.8 9.5 125.0 e R DBH?
Quercus nigra74 0.8 8.6 189.0 1.4 d R
Quercus alba971 0.2 2.0 51.0 a R
Quercus pagoda972 0.2 3.5 82.0 b R
Quercus rubra1186 7.0 4.5 70.0 i P
# stems:13 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*Notes by ID:62-no marker pole
971-no marker pole
972-no marker pole
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 5
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05202015-01-0003
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Jul 2018 Data
source Notes*1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0003
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:246 °
a
k

b
l

cm

d

e

f

g

h

i

j

# stems:13
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 6
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 5
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05202015-01-0004
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Jul 2018 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:1954555.225
Latitude or UTM-N:890062.7158
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):210
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*Notes*Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Platanus occidentalis76 4.2 0.2 325.0 1.8 h R
Betula nigra77 5.9 0.3 260.0 1.4 k R
Betula nigra78 7.8 0.8 106.0 n R DBH?
Platanus occidentalis79 9.5 1.2 300.0 1.7 q R
Platanus occidentalis81 5.6 3.2 325.0 2.0 j R
Quercus phellos82 3.8 2.6 90.0 g R
Platanus occidentalis83 2.1 2.0 370.0 2.4 c R
Platanus occidentalis84 0.1 1.3 310.0 1.7 a R
Platanus occidentalis85 0.5 4.4 500.0 3.8 b R
Quercus phellos86 3.1 5.0 186.0 1.0 f R
Quercus phellos87 5.4 5.7 115.0 i R DBH?
Quercus rubra88 8.2 6.1 95.0 p R
Platanus occidentalis90 8.1 9.1 280.0 1.6 o R
Platanus occidentalis91 7.7 8.5 230.0 0.8 m R
Platanus occidentalis92 2.8 7.8 270.0 2.2 e R
Quercus pagoda973 2.5 0.2 Missingd R
Quercus pagoda974 7.0 3.0 75.0 l R
Quercus pagoda975 9.5 9.0 71.0 r R
# stems: 18 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 7
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05202015-01-0004
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Jul 2018 Data
source Notes*1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0004
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:210 °
a
k

b
l

c
m

d
n

e
o

f
p

g
q

h
r

i

j

# stems:18
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 8
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 5
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05202015-01-0005
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Jul 2018 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:1954029.015
Latitude or UTM-N:889560.9106
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):106
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*Notes*Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Quercus rubra94 0.1 0.3 Missinga R
Quercus rubra95 0.1 3.4 72.0 b R
Quercus rubra96 0.2 6.6 Missingc R
Quercus rubra97 1.0 9.6 210.0 0.7 d R
Quercus rubra101 2.9 1.0 149.0 0.2 e R
Quercus pagoda102 5.7 1.0 27.0 g R
Quercus rubra103 5.7 3.3 73.0 h R
Quercus pagoda106 7.7 9.6 194.0 0.7 i R
Quercus rubra107 9.4 9.0 40.0 j R
Quercus rubra109 9.7 3.6 135.0 k R DBH?
Quercus phellos111 5.2 9.8 114.0 f R DBH?
# stems:11 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 9
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05202015-01-0005
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Jul 2018 Data
source Notes*1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0005
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
NX-axis:106 °
a
k

b

c

d

e

f

g

h

i

j

# stems:11
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 10
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 5
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05202015-01-0006
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Jul 2018 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:1954563.782
Latitude or UTM-N:890785.7802
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):218
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*Notes*Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Quercus phellos113 2.6 0.0 60.0 d R
Platanus occidentalis115 7.4 0.7 20.0 g R
Quercus michauxii117 7.9 3.7 19.0 h R
Platanus occidentalis118 5.3 3.4 Missingf R
Quercus michauxii120 0.2 3.4 43.0 a R
Betula nigra121 0.7 7.1 290.0 1.9 b R
Betula nigra122 3.2 7.2 255.0 1.5 e R
Platanus occidentalis979 1.5 2.0 39.0 c R
# stems:8 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 11
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0006
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:218 °
a

b

c

d

e

f

g

h

# stems:8
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 12
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 5
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05202015-01-0007
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Jul 2018 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:1953725.702
Latitude or UTM-N:889142.07
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):154
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*Notes*Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Quercus rubra129 0.1 0.0 27.0 a R
Quercus rubra130 0.2 2.6 84.0 c R
Quercus pagoda131 0.2 4.8 94.0 d R
Quercus rubra132 0.3 7.4 58.0 e R
Quercus rubra133 0.1 10.0 59.0 b R
Quercus pagoda135 2.3 5.3 117.0 f R DBH?
Betula nigra138 4.1 1.5 255.0 1.1 g R
Platanus occidentalis139 4.2 3.7 315.0 1.8 h R
Platanus occidentalis140 4.4 5.6 245.0 1.2 i R
Platanus occidentalis141 4.6 7.6 305.0 1.4 j R
Liriodendron tulipifera143 6.5 8.1 168.0 0.5 m R
Liriodendron tulipifera144 6.4 5.6 134.0 l R DBH?
Betula nigra146 6.3 0.9 360.0 2.6 k R
Quercus phellos147 8.2 1.7 139.0 0.2 n R
Platanus occidentalis148 8.3 3.9 163.0 0.5 o R
Platanus occidentalis149 8.4 5.5 275.0 1.5 p R
Quercus phellos150 8.5 7.6 109.0 q R DBH?
Quercus phellos151 8.6 9.7 148.0 0.3 r R
# stems: 18 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*Notes by ID:139-broken
148-broken
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 13
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05202015-01-0007
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Jul 2018 Data
source Notes*1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0007
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:154 °
a
k

b
l

c
m

d
n

e
o

f p

g
q

h
r

i

j

# stems:18
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 14
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 5
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05202015-01-0008
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Jul 2018 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:1953408.748
Latitude or UTM-N:888878.6851
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):56
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*Notes*Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Quercus phellos152 0.1 0.1 200.0 0.5 a R
Quercus phellos154 4.7 0.3 194.0 0.7 h R
Quercus phellos155 6.9 0.2 79.0 k R
Platanus occidentalis156 9.1 0.0 350.0 2.6 m R
Liriodendron tulipifera160 1.7 3.1 31.0 d R
Betula nigra161 1.4 6.3 210.0 1.0 c R
Betula nigra166 7.4 9.1 Missingl R
Platanus occidentalis985 1.3 8.0 110.0 b B DBH?
Nyssa sylvatica986 4.8 9.2 147.0 0.3 i B
Quercus phellos987 6.2 9.2 88.0 j B
Nyssa sylvatica990 3.0 3.2 149.0 0.2 e B
Fraxinus pennsylvanica991 3.5 2.0 162.0 0.5 f B
Platanus occidentalis1196 4.0 6.0 168.0 0.6 g P
# stems:13 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 15
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05202015-01-0008
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Jul 2018 Data
source Notes*1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0008
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
NX-axis:56°
a k

b
l

c
m

d

e

f

g

h

i

j

# stems:13
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 16
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 5
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05202015-01-0009
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Jul 2018 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:1951982.528
Latitude or UTM-N:888860.4046
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):50
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*Notes*Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Quercus rubra176 5.3 3.2 78.0 g R
Platanus occidentalis177 2.9 3.6 390.0 3.5 e R
Quercus phellos179 1.1 5.6 285.0 2.2 a R
Platanus occidentalis183 9.4 5.4 Missingi R
Quercus michauxii184 9.9 9.1 250.0 1.7 j R
Quercus michauxii186 5.6 8.7 230.0 1.5 h R
Quercus michauxii187 3.4 9.0 182.0 0.9 f R
Platanus occidentalis188 1.4 9.8 350.0 2.6 c R
Platanus occidentalis993 1.5 7.0 114.0 b B DBH?
Quercus phellos994 2.5 9.8 125.0 d B DBH?
# stems:10 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 17
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05202015-01-0009
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Jul 2018 Data
source Notes*1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0009
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
NX-axis:50°
a

b

c

d

e

f

g

h

i

j

# stems:10
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 18
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 5
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05202015-01-0010
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Jul 2018 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:1952614.215
Latitude or UTM-N:889185.9688
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):174
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*Notes*Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Quercus phellos189 0.1 0.0 127.0 a R DBH?
Quercus phellos191 0.4 4.2 60.0 d R
Quercus phellos192 0.3 6.3 59.0 b R
Quercus phellos193 0.2 8.4 57.0 c R
Quercus nigra194 2.2 9.5 67.0 f R
Quercus rubra195 2.3 6.6 87.0 e R
Quercus rubra196 2.4 3.6 123.0 g R DBH?
Platanus occidentalis198 4.5 2.0 220.0 1.2 h R
Platanus occidentalis199 4.5 4.5 160.0 0.5 i R
Platanus occidentalis200 4.5 7.4 52.0 j R
Platanus occidentalis201 4.5 9.8 Missingk R
Betula nigra202 6.9 7.4 245.0 1.5 m R
Betula nigra204 6.9 1.4 167.0 0.4 l R
Quercus phellos205 9.2 1.3 92.0 n R
Quercus phellos206 9.3 3.1 86.0 o R
Platanus occidentalis208 9.4 7.5 127.0 p R DBH?
Platanus occidentalis209 9.6 9.6 51.0 q R
# stems:17 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 19
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05202015-01-0010
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Jul 2018 Data
source Notes*1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0010
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:174 °
a
k

b
l

c
m

d
n

e
o

f
p

g
q

h

i

j

# stems:17
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 20
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 5
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05202015-01-0011
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Jul 2018 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:1952446.46
Latitude or UTM-N:889598.4073
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):164
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*Notes*Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Quercus michauxii210 0.1 0.0 170.0 0.8 a R
Quercus michauxii211 2.2 0.1 119.0 f R DBH?
Quercus pagoda212 4.3 0.1 169.0 0.5 j R
Cercis canadensis213 6.5 0.1 80.0 n R
Quercus michauxii214 8.8 0.2 200.0 1.0 s R
Quercus rubra215 9.6 2.2 139.0 0.4 v R
Quercus rubra216 7.3 2.2 220.0 1.4 p R
Quercus rubra217 4.9 2.3 137.0 0.3 k R
Quercus pagoda218 2.6 2.4 81.0 g R
Quercus rubra219 0.4 2.3 131.0 b R DBH?
Quercus michauxii220 0.8 4.7 169.0 0.5 c R
Quercus michauxii221 2.9 4.7 89.0 h R
Quercus michauxii223 7.0 4.7 220.0 1.6 o R
Quercus michauxii224 9.0 4.7 300.0 1.7 t R
Quercus rubra225 8.1 6.7 230.0 1.5 q R
Quercus rubra226 5.5 6.7 240.0 1.8 m R
Quercus rubra227 3.2 6.6 150.0 0.9 i R
Betula nigra228 1.0 6.6 250.0 1.8 d R
Betula nigra229 2.1 9.1 450.0 3.6 e R
Quercus phellos230 5.1 9.1 240.0 1.8 l R
Quercus phellos231 8.0 9.1 210.0 0.9 r R
Quercus phellos1203 9.0 6.0 330.0 2.8 u R
# stems:22 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 21
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05202015-01-0011
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Jul 2018 Data
source Notes*1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0011
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:164 °
a
k
u
b
l
v
c
m

d
n

e
o

f
p

g
q

h
r

i
s

j
t

# stems:22
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 22
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 5
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05202015-01-0012
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Jul 2018 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:1952957.56
Latitude or UTM-N:889560.9684
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):108
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*Notes*Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Betula nigra232 0.1 0.2 380.0 2.6 a R
Platanus occidentalis236 8.2 2.9 235.0 1.3 l R
Platanus occidentalis238 3.7 2.7 80.0 f R
Quercus phellos244 9.4 7.0 79.0 n R
Quercus phellos245 7.5 9.1 126.0 k R DBH?
Quercus phellos246 5.7 8.1 83.0 j R
Quercus rubra247 4.6 9.0 210.0 1.0 h R
Quercus nigra998 9.0 0.5 120.0 m B DBH?
Quercus nigra999 4.0 5.0 172.0 0.6 g B
Quercus phellos1000 5.7 7.5 136.0 i B DBH?
Quercus nigra1001 2.0 8.5 167.0 0.4 d B
Nyssa sylvatica1002 3.0 6.0 120.0 e B DBH?
Nyssa sylvatica1003 2.0 3.0 Missingc B
Quercus phellos1208 1.0 7.5 90.0 b R
# stems:14 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*Notes by ID:246-broken
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 23
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05202015-01-0012
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Jul 2018 Data
source Notes*1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0012
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
NX-axis:108 °
a
k

b
l

c
m

d
n

e

f

g

h

i

j

# stems:14
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 24
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.

APPENDIX F Photo Stations

 Appendix F. Photo Stations

Appendix F.
Cedar Grove Photo Stations

Photo Station 1

Photo Station 1 North

Photo Station 1 South
Photo Station 1 East Photo Station 1 West

 Appendix F. Photo Stations

Cedar Grove Photo Stations

Photo Station 2

Photo Station 2 North

Photo Station 2 South
Photo Station 2 East Photo Station 2 West

 Appendix F. Photo Stations

Cedar Grove Photo Stations

Photo Station 3

Photo Station 3 North

Photo Station 3 South
Photo Station 3 East Photo Station 3 West

 Appendix F. Photo Stations

Cedar Grove Photo Stations

Photo Station 4

Photo Station 4 North

Photo Station 4 South
Photo Station 4 East Photo Station 4 West

 Appendix F. Photo Stations

Cedar Grove Photo Stations

Photo Station 5

Photo Station 5 North

Photo Station 5 South
Photo Station 5 East Photo Station 5 West

 Appendix F. Photo Stations

Cedar Grove Photo Stations

Photo Station 6

Photo Station 6 North

Photo Station 6 South
Photo Station 6 East Photo Station 6 West

 Appendix F. Photo Stations

Cedar Grove Photo Stations

Photo Station 7

Photo Station 7 North

Photo Station 7 South
Photo Station 7 East Photo Station 7 West

 Appendix F. Photo Stations

Cedar Grove Photo Stations

Photo Station 8

Photo Station 8 North

Photo Station 8 South
Photo Station 8 East Photo Station 8 West

 Appendix F. Photo Stations

Cedar Grove Photo Stations

Photo Station 9

Photo Station 9 North

Photo Station 9 South
Photo Station 9 East Photo Station 9 West

 Appendix F. Photo Stations

Cedar Grove Photo Stations

Photo Station 10

Photo Station 10 North

Photo Station 10 South
Photo Station 10 East Photo Station 10 West

 Appendix F. Photo Stations

Cedar Grove Photo Stations

Photo Station 11

Photo Station 11 North

Photo Station 11 South
Photo Station 11 East Photo Station 11 West

 Appendix F. Photo Stations

Cedar Grove Photo Stations

Photo Station 12

Photo Station 12 North

Photo Station 12 South
Photo Station 12 East Photo Station 12 West