20090743 Ver 1_401 Application_20090709

900 South Post Road
Shelby, NC 28150
Phone-866-295-0230
www.villagesofhacres.com
[e-mail]
Thursday, July 02, 2009
c?Po
Cyndi Karoly
State of North Carolina,DWQ 401 Permits
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
WETLANDS AND STORMWATfR BRANCH
Re: NWP 29 Application, The Villages at Hallelujah Acres, Cleveland County,
North Carolina
Dear Ms. Karoly:
The Villages at Hallelujah Acres is submitting the Pre-construction
Notification requesting issuance of an after the fact Nationwide Permit 29,
authorizing impacts to 65 linear feet of perennial stream channel associated
with a road crossing, 110 linear feet of intermittent stream channel
associated with two road crossings, and 320 linear feet of intermittent stream
channel associated with the construction of a pond. Included in this
attachment are the PCN, the Rapanos forms for the Intermittent channels (RPW
with Seasonal Flow), the Rapanos forms for the Perennial Channel (RPW with
Perennial Flow), a Topo Location Figure, and a Proposed Impact Figure. In
Addition, when we incorrectly submitted this permit to Mr. Alan Johnson on
June 15, 2009, Mr. Johnson provided us said additional direction of
additional information that we should provide as part of our submittal to you
which we have included on a number of exhibits that are identified such as
Proposed Long Term Development Land Use Master Plan, Street Maps, Roadway
section Maps, our most recently approved stormwater drainage plan which has
been revised per request by State of North Carolina and a vegetation plan for
the 50 foot vegetated buffer around the intermittent channel and created pond.
Our certified landscape planner, Mr. Fred Blackley, ASLA informs us that the
best time to plan trees is when the trees are dormant so it is our plan to
make these plantings after the trees are dormant for winter for best survival.
A future crossing (Proposed Crossing 4) is shown on the Intermittent and
Perennial Stream Designation Map. At this time, we do not know if this
crossing will be enacted as shown, if at all, and are not requesting
authorization at this time.
The intermittent channel impacts have been previously determined by you and
Steve Chapin (COE) to not require mitigation. However, to ensure that water
quality is protected within this area, we will enact and maintain a 50-foot
vegetated buffer around the intermittent channel and created pond. A walking
path will be in this buffer area. We have changed our master plan to assure
that no lots will be within the intermittent stream area located west of Lake
George Road. All areas east of Lake George Road are within common areas that
environmentally sensitive to the intermittent stream. An organic gardens is to
be located within the common areas and between the two intermittent streams
before crossing 2 and crossing 3.
I appreciate your attention to this matter.
comments, or need any additional information,
Stuart Gilbert at (704-481-1700), ext 738 or
Services, Inc., (828-280-3273).
Since y,
P ulXt, Managing Director
Villages of Hallelujah Acres, LLC
08-0743
R&MMA 00
JUL u 2009
If you have any questions or
please feel free to contact
Jan Gay with Environmental
.. t , ..
900 South Post Road
Shelby, 28150
Phone-866-295-0230
www.villagesofhacres.com
COPY -Monday, June 15, 2009
[e-mail]
Mr. Alan Johnson
North Carolina DWQ
610 East Center Avenue
Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Re: NWP 29 Application, The Villages at Hallelujah Acres,
Cleveland County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Johnson:
The Villages at Hallelujah Acres is submitting the
Pre-construction Notification requesting issuance of an after the
fact Nationwide Permit 29, authorizing impacts to 65 linear feet
of perennial stream channel associated with a road crossing, 110
linear feet of intermittent stream channel associated with two
road crossings, and 320 linear feet of intermittent stream
channel associated with the construction of a pond. Included in
this attachment are the PCN, the Rapanos forms for the
Intermittent channels (RPW with Seasonal Flow), the Rapanos forms
for the Perennial Channel (RPW with Perennial Flow), a Location
Figure, and a Proposed Impact Figure.
A future crossing (Proposed Crossing 4) is shown on the attached
Figure 2. At this time, we do not know if this crossing will be
enacted as shown, if at all, and are not requesting authorization
at this time.
The intermittent channel impacts have been previously determined
by you and Steve Chapin (COE) to not require mitigation.
However, to ensure that water quality is protected within this
area, we will enact and maintain a 50-foot vegetated buffer
around the intermittent channel and created pond. A walking path
will be in this buffer area.
I appreciate your attention to this matter. If you have any
questions or comments, or need any additional information, please
feel free to contact me at (704-481-1700) or Jan Gay with
Environmental Services, Inc., (828-280-3273).
SrulMalkmus, ly,
P Managing Director
Villages of Hallelujah Acres, LLC
PCN application form 401 State permit
08-0743
O?OF W pT ?9QG
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the

Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: The Villages of Hallelujah Acres
2b. County: Cleveland
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Shelby
2d. Subdivision name: The Villages of Hallelujah Acres
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
b 2?t19

3. Owner Information 1M. WA
?SgppS 1FRQ?,?RY
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Paul H. Malkmus, George H. Malkmus ?`?
3b. Deed Book and Page No. BK 32 PAGE 139
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): Paul Malkmus
3d. Street address: 900 South Post Road
3e. City, state, zip: Shelby, NC 28150
3f. Telephone no.: 704-481-1700
3g. Fax no.: 704-481-0345
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 59304
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.2583 Longitude: - 81.4986
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 160 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to UT to Roberts Branch
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C
2c. River basin: Broad River
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project site is currently being targeted for a mixed used development. Land use in the project vicinity is a mixture of
commercial, residential and agricultural use.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
>1 acre
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
approximately 2,100
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project is designed to construct a mixed use development. The proposed impacts include one crossing of a
perennail strema channel, three crossings of an intermittent stream channel, and creation of a pond feature within an
intermittent stream channel.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project includes 1 perennial stream channel crossing, 2 intermettent stream channel crossing, and construction of 1
pond feature within an intermittent stream channel. This is an after-the-fact permit request, so the crossings have been
completed.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
? Yes ? No Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
®Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ® Yes ? No
6b. If yes, explain.
Future phases of this project are planned at this time. Impacts may be associated with the future phase. However, these
plans are subject to change at this time.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ® Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ® P ? T Road Crossing 1 UT Roberts Creek ? PER
® INT ® Corps
® DWQ 3 65
S2 ®P ? T Road Crossing 2 UT Roberts Creek ? PER
® INT ® Corps
® DWQ 3 45
S3 ® P ? T Road Crossing 3 UT Roberts Creek ® PER
? INT ® Corps
® DWQ g 65
S4 ® P ? T pond construction UT Roberts Creek ? PER
® INT ® Corps
® DWQ 3 320
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 495
3i. Comments: Of the proposed 495 feet of linear impact, 65 If are within a perennial stream channel. The remaining 4301f of
proposed impact are within an intermittent stream channel
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4L Total open water impacts 0
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
The pond to be created for
aesthetic reasons and to
P1 provide final protection of 0 0 0 0 320 0
4
water quality by enacting a .
vegetated buffer around the
pond
P2
K Total 0 0 0 0 320 0.4
5g. Comments: The pond construction is within an intermittent channel. To ensure water quality is protected and enhanced, a
vegetated buffer will be in place around the created pond as well as the intermittent stream channel. A walking path is
planned within this buffer area, to allow pedestrian access from the poposed residential areas to the proposed commercial
area. The proposed path footprint will be kept to a minimum
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ® No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 0.4
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 50
5k. Method of construction: use heavy equipment to construct a dam across the intermettent channel,
combined with excavation of the adjacent upland areas to create the pond.
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - EReason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary T required?
61 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B2 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Approximately 320 If of impact to the intermittent stream channel have been reduced by realigning the proposed parking lot
within the commercial area to avoid this feature.The Road Crossings in Phase 1 are all perpendicular crossings, which
minimizes the necessary footprint.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ? Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps
? Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
? Payment to in-lieu fee program
® Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
3c. Comments: Although mitigation is not required for stream channel impacts, the client is proposing to create and maintain a
vegetated buffer around the created pond as well as the remaining intermittent stream channel above and below the proposed
pond site. This buffer will be maintained to ensure that water quality is protected. A paved footpath is proposed within the
buffer area to act as a pedestrian conduit between the residential areas and th ecommercial aras. The path footprint would be
kept to a minimum.
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Although the impacts to pemnial streams is below the thresholds requiring mitigation, the permittee is proposing to
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 40%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ? No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The stormwater plan meets all State standards. Basins, vegetated buffers and other BMPS will be utilized to ensure the
protection of all waters in and adjacent to the property.
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ® DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
? HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
® Other: General Stormwater
Permit
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ® No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ? Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ® Yes ? No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26.0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ® Yes ? No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): The development
placed three culverts within features they believed to be non jurisdictional features, based on lack of water flow. Additionally,
a pond was created within on of these features, which was also being used as a temporary stormwater retention device. The
imapcts include 65 linear feet associated with one perennial stream crossing, 110 linear feet of impact associated with two
intermittent stream crossings, and 320 linear feet of impact associated with a pond constructed within an intermittent stream
channel.
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
All sewage from the Villages at Hallelujah Acres will be treated through the local sewer authority.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ? No
impacts?

Raleigh
?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
O review of records held by the NC Natural Heritage Program were reviewed, which indicated no known occurrences of
any species offered federal protection within 2.0 miles of the study area.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
State records
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
ESI Database
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA floodmaps available on-line

Paul H. Malkmus, Applicant 4/21/09
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Rapanos Files Villages of Hallelujah Acres
Intermittent Channel
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Cleveland City: Shelby
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.2583° N, Long. 81.4986° >S?4'.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Unnamed Tributaries to Roberts Branch
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Raoberts Branch
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03050105
Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There ,navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There .. lM-" "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): t
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: 1700 linear feet: width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: 0 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on "8T p 6th 4"
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
1 Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
s For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section HIT.
SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.l.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.C below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: 50M.-
Drainage area: 50 Average annual rainfall: 50 inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
? Tributary flows directly into TNW.
® Tributary flows through 0 tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are '2-5 river miles from TNW.
Project waters are urns) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are
Vor4gss) aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5: Channel flows to RPW (UT to Roberts Branch) to Roberts Banch (TNW).
Tributary stream order, if known: first.
a Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ® Natural
? Artificial (man-made). Explain:
? Manipulated (man-altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 3 feet
Average depth: 0.5 feet
Average side slopes: . -
banks..
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
® Silts ? Sands ? Concrete
? Cobbles ? Gravel ? Muck
? Bedrock ? Vegetation. Type/% cover:
? Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: the channel is deeply incised, with eroding
Presence of run/riffle/ 1 complexes. Explain: riffle/pool sequences are present within this reach.
Tributary eom
etry: '
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): 5 %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: P 'flow
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year:
Describe flow regime: intermittent flow, generally slow.
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Characteristics: A discrete channel is presnet, containing flow.
Subsurface flow: gnm. Explain findings:
? Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
® clear, natural line impressed on the bank
® changes in the character of soil
® shelving
? vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
? leaf litter disturbed or washed away
? sediment deposition
? water staining
? other (list):
? the presence of litter and debris
? destruction of terrestrial vegetation
® the presence of wrack line
? sediment sorting
? scour
? multiple observed or predicted flow events
? abrupt change in plant community
? Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
IM High Tide Line indicated by: U1 Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
? oil or scum line along shore objects ? survey to available datum;
? fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ? physical markings;
? physical markings/characteristics ? vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
? tidal gauges
? other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: water color was generally clear during the site reviews. Sediment had entered the channel during previous
events.
Identify specific pollutants, if known: Sediment from the adjacent development.
6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
Ibid.
(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): grassy and wooded, approximately 10 feet.
? Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
? Habitat for:
? Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
? Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
? Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
? Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: . Explain:
Surface flow is: p gist
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: JJj!W
Explain findings:
? Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
? Directly abutting
? Not directly abutting
? Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
? Ecological connection. Explain:
? Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are river miles from TNW.
Project waters are aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from:
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
? Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
? Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
? Habitat for:
? Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
? Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
? Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
? Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: UWJ
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.
For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section IILD:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: RPW's are fed by springs, and have an abundant macro-bethic population indicative of perennial flow.
Ig Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
13 Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
[ Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Non-RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Iffi Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: Wetlands are connected directly to the on-site RPWs through both overland flow and
shallow subsurface flow.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
El Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):"
which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
Other factors. Explain:
8See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section 111. D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands: acres.
NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
? Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
? Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
? Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
? USGS NHD data.
? USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ? Aerial (Name & Date):
or ? Other (Name & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
Applicable/supporting case law:
Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
Other information (please specify):ON-site meeting with Steve Chapin, COE.
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:
Rapanos Files Villages of Hallelujah Acres
Perennial Channel
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Cleveland City: Shelby
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.2583° N, Long. 81.4986° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Unnamed Tributaries to Roberts Branch
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Raoberts Branch
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03050105
Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There ? "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There ' . "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): t
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waterS2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
E' Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Q Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
El Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: 400 linear feet: 8-15 width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: 0 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on 19 T_ Del ?tj+*.V
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
1 Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III. F.
SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.C below.
Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size:
Drainage area: Est
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationshiv with TNW:
? Tributary flows directly into TNW.
® Tributary flows through tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are t river miles from TNW.
Project waters are river miles from RPW.
Project waters are aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5: C.
Tributary stream order, if known:
o Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into 7NW.
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ? Natural
? Artificial (man-made). Explain:
? Manipulated (man-altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 3 feet
Average depth: 0.5 feet
Average side slopes: Nck.List.
banks..
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
? Silts ? Sands ? Concrete
? Cobbles ? Gravel ? Muck
? Bedrock ? Vegetation. Type/% cover:
? Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: the channel is deeply incised, with eroding
Presence of run/rifflelpool complexes. Explain: rifflelpool sequences are present within this reach.
Tributary geometry: MAIM`
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: "T
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: Pi*
Describe flow regime: intermittent flow, generally slow.
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: . Characteristics: A discrete channel is presnet, containing flow.
Subsurface flow: st. Explain findings:
? Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
? Bed and banks
? OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
? clear, natural line impressed on the bank ?
? changes in the character of soil ?
? shelving ?
? vegetation matted down, bent, or absent ?
? leaf litter disturbed or washed away ?
? sediment deposition ?
? water staining ?
? other (list):
? Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
High Tide Line indicated by:
? oil or scum line along shore objects
? fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
? physical markings/characteristics
? tidal gauges
? other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
ine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
? survey to available datum;
? physical markings;
? vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: water color was generally clear during the site reviews. .
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'ibid.
(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
? Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): grassy and wooded, approximately 10 feet.
? Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
? Habitat for:
? Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
? Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
? Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
? Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: t. Explain:
Surface flow is: st
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Explain findings:
? Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
? Directly abutting
? Not directly abutting
? Discrete wetland hydrologic connection: Explain:
? Ecological connection. Explain:
? Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are river miles from TNW.
Project waters are aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: -
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
? Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
? Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
? Habitat for:
? Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
? Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
? Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
? Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis:
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.
For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (YIN) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Ep Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: RPW's are fed by springs, and have an abundant macro-bethic population indicative of perennial flow.
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
0 Tributary waters: 400 linear feet 8-15 width (ft).
Q Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Non-RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
13 Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: Wetlands are connected directly to the on-site RPWs through both overland flow and
shallow subsurface flow.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section 111.13 and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):"
which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
Other factors. Explain:
8See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the hlstructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands: acres.
F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
? Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Up, Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
? Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
? Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
? USGS NHD data.
? USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ? Aerial (Name & Date):
or ? Other (Name & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
Applicable/supporting case law:
Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
Other information (please specify):ON-site meeting with Steve Chapin, COE.
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:
".•?
? z ? ...
?? /??
s " s
-?,.?
S ?>,
'? a
s,
?,? <a. h? ?? ?a_ . e '_
*x ae4
?`?'_
.? ???

Revised Stream Delineation Map of intermittent
and perennial streams
N 0
fit
i
9 ? c m 3 •2 ???
m
$ x. /
i
aoz \
i
3a
zm a N 1
z 1
;0 1
10On
oa o j
pQ A a v 1
? i
a i
Ch o'
? A j ap
m
a n
N / p
N If
w { W
' o
? ?1 1
i
a /
u
.? o?
t ®? < /
CZ)
/ n
N O O Q /
C,
n ?l j /,, o a W -
N CD
N
J O (n
'. o n ? a ro
a a N
a W w p
Q0
a 2 ? o
° i?N a orv v
ti o ti
S10'1433"W /
860 'i' /
ENVIItO1VMENfAL Project: EE09007.00
SERV[CFS,INC. Stream Crossings and Designations
Date: Jul 2009
The Villages of Hallelujah Acres Drwn/Chkd: AJS/JG
e+ei s++ro?rwx Cleveland County, North Carolina
figure: 2
r,c.oo.w?awms.?aoeuo,ucnwas_nam_wz.w.v. rrzaooe,xu:,arM
Cleveland Co., NC -- Printable Map
Cleveland Co., NC
T
N
Page 1 of 1
DISCLAIMER: The information contained on this site is furnished by government and private industry sources and is
believed to be accurate but accuracy is not guaranteed. Mapping information is a representation of various data sources
and is not a subsitute for information that would result from an accurate land survey. The information contained hereon
does not replace information that may be obtained by consulting the information's official source. In no event shall
Cleveland County, NC or the consultants of Cleveland County, NC be liable for any damages, direct or consequential,
from the use of the information contained on this site.
http://www.webgis.net Anderson & Associates, Inc. http://www.andassoc.com
http://arcims2.webgis.net/nc/cleveland/printable. asp?process=undefined&x2=undefined&y2... 7/2/2009
Cleveland Co., NC -- Printable Map
Cleveland Co., NC
T
N
Page 1 of 1

4 a '
4
?
2 3 2 23902 13922--'
38
`4 4.
26365 $342336 3 2
7 23906 J 2
I 0 '. 7.
8 i` 23907
? 3 2` 4
620
)
S5

26380
4 56
t
0 -
, 5tl 13 4
"-' rr^ 28748
1 4
.
46902
23 79

49

3 '`

60930

5 23906

4
46
F
+
;
4 i? g 5450 46903 ?'.?"
//
3 3967
676 46,5
.
-
2, ! ?t 5451 ?
+ 8 83 4
44; r;•. I \ 4
}_ - 46904
X44 46909
GO 0973
4 4 3
6
F r.
j? 480
807 5sJ
49 g47s 6905 .1 45, 3 93 23909
690 0931
09 6906 y,-
2 09 ?
60932 4841 5 7
3087 4 4 3054 t.i r?
60100
8 3 9 73 5 7
99 9 4821 844 9
4 0 0

3085 3082
183 I
6 5 2
5
6 6 32
3 6 2 5 4905
1 08 074 6 .0 77 0 81,
3083 _ 7
1
2
13 3106
2 7 4832
73001
3085 7 3 2
3 12 ! 2 103 4811 4882
665
0 - 12 9667 59666 4813 4812
9623
DISCLAIMER: The information contained on this site is furnished by government and private industry sources and is
believed to be accurate but accuracy is not guaranteed. Mapping information is a representation of various data sources
and is not a subsitute for information that would result from an accurate land survey. The information contained hereon
does not replace information that may be obtained by consulting the information's official source. In no event shall
Cleveland County, NC or the consultants of Cleveland County, NC be liable for any damages, direct or consequential,
from the use of the information contained on this site.
http://www.webgis.net Anderson $ Associates, Inc. http://www.andassoc.com
http://arcims2.webgis.netlnclcevelandlprintable. asp?process=undefined&x2=undefined&y2... 7/2/2009
Street Map
Vegetation Plan
TGS engineering road, storm water
duiq asn puuZ juamdojanaQ pasodo.id

4
I

0 _0
L) -0 3
O
W
W
J0 tDo I

O
W
a0 +
O Q? L

u N N ' N
O p ?- O N > v
0 ? .? >
am) < 13 (D 0)
0
?,
u
Q N
Q
Vl
L
d U
d
? = a N L N o L C
Q 2 >
0 M 2 Ou
O O
m u
Q
O = = ao
? V
Q
T
o
-C . -C
u
U m
i
)
o o = o rd
z 3 o ?: ? z
c
CID
O
C C N -2 0
a 0
1 -0
V, ° X
u N
t c 0
c E > O
0 7a
0 -C
t? L
0 0 ° E o
u, N ? U L 00
lu o O .c O U-
c
V u u
0
QQ=
ry

? y
yr t

3 4-
C - ? °
M
°
}; c

3 L O Cd
a?
C
Q ??
C
ry- Lo o
O cd ?
U L cd
= ?
v N
L
Q
C -C -C

u o d cn

C
O
r
d
,
cd v
A i ?
c C ? cn

a.,
?
L
O
N
N
N 0
v 0 M v N
Q - > Q _

a) E - -d
Ln 0_
v, u -
a? 'd o
Q 0.0 N_
E
N c -C
? N
O `c3 E E
"I
E O °
a
> X
N O
? O
O O
N vi 0 V
DL = c
`? ago
4- C U0
o ° n Q a
+cd ?. cd rd 0 :3 sd
O O O L
O c
u u E 0 V) a7-3
O N - cn
0
-C n
LO °J
o
E o N W Ln
o cn
° > U
° - U o v; o U
ao ? p ? -p ?d dS i ? ?.
w `n o O
Q. N vu ?- D U O
y cn E-) N ° 0. Ln U E
-c a W p ?_ E
Q? o\ (It u?U?U

Q)
-C cd
?
V(d
Ln J)
J O
V
ti Cl- (1)
C
- O
p n
a
4? ) E Q

. . . . . . . . . . n

o° -<` o oa C(D w o 0 o a
m
y
O
C
D
E3
7 as r+
W
_a
D
Q
(
`.
p C r+ ? C O n w W C ?-
(
D
w - (/) a
n - n
:3 3 _
0
_ D n o R? -,m o + rn c- 0 3 (D a
o 3 ? I( ? n
3 v, ??

0 N
0
„ D
(n
CD
Lo
CD
o
R
H N S
CD ? D { cn (D
in
n c)
O Z
n0 rn- 0 w
C CD (D C
D 9Q D
C N N n
C) iA
a?
n .
n
c
Q -p
Q In
T
3

?
Q
.
?
w
Q n
r+
r
Q
N
Ln
a a o (D
r+ CD
CD
O (D
ttt
O CD 0'Q n CD :E
a u- 2 o P h =
C(D 77- CD (D w o
QQ 0 < -- C <
a rn O =CDR.
N O r a n c?
77- O o n A
c n ?_ X O
W
3 77- (D
N 3 - (./) to
O O + 7
phi O)Q 0:3Q d C<D C
O
(D -0
V) CD a
(D h
-0 °a T
C d
r+-
O
D
n
O
3
3
r+
n
0
r+
CD
a
I*k

&Y
d
t+t ?
1`tt ?
Y
N

f
1
t _
W
T
L-
O
_f..J
E
E
Q
V

? y
°(? Y I'I Y I'1 Y f"f ? /j
?R 11 ?NR I?t e`3R I?I ?>R If i a?
L-.-J P l--J X L ---.1 .!
I'1
1P1
J L..J
i
4 ..

coo
J
rJ1
t X

_. -.__- -1a["

J
a

k TlV

" •D ? a i s? `l?w+
w i o f
d'L l

"
_
R
f K f
r ? X ?
a R X F
6
0 ? !+. " V

Ali

" ? ? k ? X
i W C•'' {"ereQ
4
-_ 9"i
aiyya
'

I
nd
a y?y
It-

v 3
`
.
f"
U _.13 ?Y

.1
IT
,

iti .

ti
v
L
tN'
C?
O
O?
? b
vO
O
O
: w -? z
3
w
rn
as ( ?
+ CD r±
¢ (D O
CD
7IN
v? S
n O
o n
N
P O
? r+ Ul
CD ° 3
W
o
3 (D
(D CD
+ 3 Z
CD ?' O
O V)
CD n w
< n O
oAa 3 w
cD 3
to
(D F) C
(D
CD
W
r+ -
O
O
O
(D
< v)
w
N ?+,

=

N ?0N
< z

?
CD

N CD
(D -
D

w

cn ?

OL)
O-Q
o O 6
CLD 0-
O
a
rn 5 O in 0
0
o ° -0 CD O

o O CD
O
0 CD
C
D
CD
c 6
cn A
N
S
(D r+ w sv o

(D
w (D
cW
A'
a
CD
°
0

N
(D
2-
w
0- O ?
p oa
O n

J
CD s? :3
a
< (D
< CD
CD - BCD - :
7 (D CAD

0

O w

LT
O
N w

3 0-
CD
?- w (D W
N
C
cn
:7
CAD

(D N CD
CAD O O'Q 0 7

0O (D
a
O c):
o
¢+

+ 0
o (D
(D

Q ° ? n ?
CD

n C)
O
5
a ?^ ¢ a O
w o 0 m
a N D ::7
n w O
o (D (D
< 0
CD O

O w

Q 0

C
W W ? ?

0
3 3 0 0 c o ?`' < (D ° o U) o n w rn S ?T -1i V) . 3 (D o 1-j 3 CAD
CD < (D
cn (D
Ln (D CO
w CD Ln CD
o- 77 :3 O n w CD D (D ?, cn D
0 11 D r+ O CD n O D n
? ? 3 (D (D (D +
(D
n " O-a w S?o O-Q r+ fl-
n n W n < C-'D rn?
C('D W O r+ CD r+ CAD r+: - U
-o 3
0- 0 --+, Oak
-7 v) n
W CD (D C) D C:
0 r+ (D
O ¢' = (D 3 n -0 3 (D d CD N S2° T CD •
3 OCAD o TCD w et
W, n
(D 3 C CD
n - CD Ommi
LIL ::y- (D W
n (D P) U) OQ
o N 3 D `n (D
Q -?<, D 0 ° °= 0 CAD o
D n
o r-7+ r
o

(D 7
O o

N v, n O-
. C
D Q o
13

o (D o O rn

CD (
6 D
w

CD
D O
W p ^ .
CND CD
n
C
?zl

o 3 p ?.
°
0 0 ? rn
N o
W
D
U o
-
CD
)
a?a n 0 w w

D C O
3
n 3
n O<
C
D
P?
r+
A
(D
d -
a>,
e
r e
1.O
r
ova"
e
rr
OWN"
C y Mai s
f
.r ..v
1 v p? s
elk,
?A
oft
W ? ew,
1"? Vv
mr
rr . #
r
NUNN
i