The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20090454 Ver 1_More Info Received_20090602Gregory, Sonia Dom! L? SC'/ From: Ward, Garcy Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 9:26 AM To: Gregory, Sonia Subject: FW: B-5129E, Bridge No. 42 in Pamlico County, NC304 Bridges Revised PCN Pages Attachments: REV_B5129E_PCN_pages_page7_PlanSheet9_buffers.pdf Importance: High E-mail correspondence to and form this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. From: Cindy Carr [mailto:ccarr@mulkeyinc.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 3:39 PM To: Ward, Garcy Cc: Johnson, Jay B Subject: B-5129E, Bridge No. 42 in Pamlico County, NC304 Bridges Revised PCN Pages Importance: High Garcy Attached are the revised PCN pages for Bridge No. 42 as requested: B-5129E (Bridge No. 4J2: Page 5, revised Section 2 to represent previously revised wetland impacts submitted to Stephen Lane, NCDCM Page 5, revised Section 3 to remove S3 stream impacts as reflected on revised plan sheets previously submitted Plan Sheet 9 of 10, buffer impacts, with hand-drawn revisions at adjacent canal I did not make any buffer impact changes because the area you refer to in your email message below is a CAMA wetland. Please call me if you have any questions or concerns. Cindy Carr Senior Scientist Mulkey Engineers & Consultants P.O. Box 33127 Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3127 919-858-1871 (direct) 919-851-1.918 (fax) Mulkey... helping you transform everyday challenges into everyday achievements. http://www.mulkeyinc.com From: Ward, Garcy [mailto:garcy.ward@ncdenr.gov] Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 4:05 PM To: Cindy Carr Cc: Johnson, Jay B; Sutton, Michael W Subject: RE: B-5129E, Bridge No. 42 in Pamlico County, NC304 Bridges CAMA Permit Drawing revisions Hey Cindy, Thanks for sending the revised plans. In addition, I also need the revised impact tables in the PCN (pp 5- 7). I've issued the 401 and BA for 5129 C and D, so I only need this information for the other 3 bridges. Also, for bridge 42 - B5129E -the canal on the SE side of the road has been determined to be subject to the buffer rules and should have the 50' buffer and any impacts shown on the plan sheets. In this situation, the buffers on the canal and those on Gale Cr have an area where they overlap and the impacts in this area don't need to be counted twice. There did however, appear to be some fill in the canal buffer outside of the buffers off the creek. These impacts would need to be counted in the buffer totals. If you have any questions, feel free to give me a call. Thanks - Garcy E-mail correspondence to and form this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. From: Cindy Carr [mailto:ccarr@mulkeyinc.com] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 11:44 AM To: Garcy.Ward@ncmail.net Cc: Caldwell. Betty A; Johnson, Jay B; Wendee Smith Subject: B-5129E, Bridge No. 42 in Pamlico County, NC304 Bridges CAMA Permit Drawing revisions Importance: High Garcy, Attached are the revised pages for the CAMA/404/401 permit package on Bridge No. 42, B- 5129E. These revisions reflect the comments from Stephen Lane, DCM as noted in the email forwarded to me on May 6 and my telephone conversation with him on May 14. The revisions include the following items: • Revised MP-5, page 3 of 4 which contains Section 3 items (e), (f), and (g) - 8.5 x 11 sized • Revised Stream and Wetland Impacts plan view, which contains reduced 404/CAMA wetland impacts revised by design modifications and WLB correction - 8.5 x 11 sized • Revised Profile plan view, which contains shading at excavation areas - 8.5 x 11 sized Per Stephen's request, I am providing only the sheets with revisions and have initialed and dated the bottom corner to indicate the sheet contains changes from the original submittal. I will be sending you revised pages for the other bridge sites by separate email. If you have any questions or concerns, please call me. Cindy Carr Senior Scientist Mulkey Engineers & Consultants P.O. Box 33127 Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3127 919-858-1871 (direct) 919-851-1918 (fax) Mulkey... helping you transform everyday challenges into everyday achievements. http://www.mulkeyinc.com Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers ® Open Waters ? Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number- Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres) Temporary T W1 ®P ? T Roadway fill, riprap Tidal Freshwater Marsh ? Yes ®No ® Corps ? DWQ 0.002 (83 square feet) W2 ®P ? T Roadway fill, riprap Tidal Freshwater Marsh ? Yes ® No ® Corps ? DWQ 0.003 (127 sq. ft.) W3 ®P ? T Roadway fill, riprap Tidal Freshwater Marsh ? Yes ® No ® Corps ? DWQ 0.001 (8 sq. ft.) W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps ? No ? DWQ W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps ? No ? DWQ W6 ? PEI T ? Yes ? Corps ? No ? DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 1 0.005 (218 sq.ft.) 2h. Comments: B-5129E, Bridge No. 42: All impacts are to CAMA wetlands for fill placement at new bridge end bent locations and are necessary for guard rail installation. 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non404, width (linear Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet) S1 ®P ? T Fill (bridge end bent) Gale Creek ® PER ? INT ® Corps ® DWQ 85 11 S2 ® P ? T Fill (bridge end Gale Creek ® PER ® Corps 85 3 bent) ? INT ® DWQ S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps ? INT ? DWQ ? PER ? Corps S4 ? P ? T ? INT ? DWQ S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps - ? INT ? DWQ S6 ? P ? T 7 ? PER ? Corps ? INT ? DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 14 3i. Comments: Stream impacts include placement of riprap along the stream bank for stabilization at the new end bent locations and are as follows: St: 118 sq.ft. S2: 93 sq.ft. - Page 5 of 11 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version '5-5q9 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ® Neuse ?Tor-Pamlico ? Other: Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number- Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) orTemporary T impact required? B1 ?P?T ?Yes ? No B2 ?P?T ?Yes ? No B3 ®P ? T Fillr?prap Gale Creek ® Nos 501 428 6h. Total buffer impacts 501 428 6i. Comments: D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization I a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. Avoidance Measures: Existing roadway and bridge alignment will be maintained during staged construction and an on-site detour will avoid need for a temporary detour bridge by using a portion of the existing bridge to maintain traffic flow. The new structure will be constructed using precast concrete components which avoids potential impacts from live concrete. During demolition, components of the existing bridge will not be dropped in the water. Sediment curtains will be used around relic wood piles to prevent sediment from entering the water column. Minimization Measures: Wetland impacts have been minimized to the extent feasible, with impacts occurring only where new location of bridge bents and piers are required to support the structure and installation of safety guard rails. Existing roadway and bridge alignment have been maintained to minimize impacts. 1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Use of the existing roadway to maintain traffic on-site during construction of the new bridge. Use of existing roadway to operate construction equipment; no equipment will enter wetlands or waters. Use of precast concrete bridge components avoid use of live concrete. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ?-Yes ® No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWO ? Corps ? Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ? Payment to in-lieu fee program ? Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity A- 61a 9 E Page 7 of 11 PCN F%m/- Version 1.3 December 10, 08 Version ?? DENOBUFFTESEIR MP 20tACTJES1TO OT L IM DENOTES III ZUNI, TD BUFFER ZONE 2 xJ3i77 FILL REMOVAL MIETTHOD 11 CLEARING NOTE: GALE CREEK IS A BLUE LING STREAM AS SHOWN ON THE VANDEMERE USGS QUAD MAP BI "'194" 7?01' FILL REMO\0L \ n ?FIiI RLMOI 1? W Z_ J _L U 1- Q _- J EXISTING BRIDGE: P 6' l' ' ' '- ' p_S CU ' S ANS: 1916 : 191 -i : 1916 -6 8 : ' ' ' ' ' ' B? '? 1916 -911917 ; 1917 -6 -2 L -. LENGTH: ICI'-6' ' pp WIDTH: 28 CLEAR ROADWAY .., ryl TIMBER CAPS, PILES. AND JOISTS 1'•= - ?j? zyV CROWN TO BED: 7' ° WATER DEPTH: 3' P13OP05ED BRIDGE: 21'CONCRETE CORED SLAB WIDTH: 33' CLEAR ROADWAY LENGTH: 1930'; Ip50': I00' NO DECK DRAINS ALLOWED B4 _ ";E . 8ZI IYPACI r 0 bf 7B PILL REMOVAI. = 0 Gf 8Z2 IM?ACF r 0 s. FILL REMOVAL _O?If PLAN VIEW IFOR PERMITTING ONLY SCALE: 1" :50' LNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ZONE IBUFFFR IMPACTS ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACTS BI j 0_SOUARE FEET AREA I 0 SQUARE FEET 82 -.0 SQUARE FEc AREA 2--0 S_OUARE FEET B3 501 SO DARE FEET AREA 3 42H SQUARE FEET 84 0 SQUARE FEET AR=4-6 QUARE FEET TOTAL 501 SQUARE FEET TOTAL____ 1 SGUARE FEETI 0.012 ACRES O.OD ACRES 2, ? to 6J4 N, 1 ?O W a ? Z ^Yl _J A4nc s?vLt 7 cfto x r? h -0lE f • ?o1j, 0 °U+go NCDO ll DIVISION OF HIGHTVAYS PAMLICO COUNTY PROJECT: B-5129E REPLACE BRIDGE R42 ON INC 304 OVER GALE, CREEK SHEET 7 OF /0 3-3-09 'p4W 51ai/g9 1&-j1tSED