20090474 Ver 1_Email_20090623

G
Sonia
GAG
From: Ward, Garcy
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 9:26 AM
To: Gregory, Sonia
Subject: FW: B-4594, Bridge No. 44 in Pamlico County, NC304 Bridges PCN revisions
Attachments: REV_PCN_B4594_page5.pdf
Importance: High
E-mail correspondence to and form this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
From: Cindy Carr [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 3:36 PM
To: Ward, Garcy
Cc: Johnson, Jay B
Subject: B-4594, Bridge No. 44 in Pamlico County, NC304 Bridges PCN revisions
Importance: High
Garcy,
Attached is the revised PCN page for Bridge No. 44 as requested:
B-4594 (Bridge No. 44): Page 5, revised. Section 2 to represent previously revised wetland impacts
submitted to Stephen Lane, NCDCM
Page 5, revised Section 3 to represent stream impacts shown on revised plan
sheets previously submitted.
There are no buffer impacts at Bridge No. 44. Please call me if you have any questions or concerns.
Cindy Carr
Senior Scientist
Mulkey Engineers & Consultants
P.O. Box 33127
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3127
919-858-1871 (direct)
91.9-851-1918 (fax)
Mulkey... helping you transform everyday challenges into everyday achievements.
m
http://www.mulkeyinc.co
From: Ward, Garcy [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 4:05 PM
To: Cindy Carr
Cc: Johnson, Jay B; Sutton, Michael W
Subject: RE: B-5129E, Bridge No. 42 in Pamlico County, NC304 Bridges CAMA Permit Drawing revisions
Hey Cindy,
Thanks for sending the revised plans. In addition, I also need the revised impact tables in the PCN (pp 5-7). I've
issued the 401 and BA for 5129 C and D, so I only need this information for the other 3 bridges. Also, for bridge
42 - B5129E -the canal on the SE side of the road has been determined to be subject to the buffer rules and
should have the 50' buffer and any impacts shown on the plan sheets. In this situation, the buffers on the canal
and those on Gale Cr have an area where they overlap and the impacts in this area don't need to be counted
twice. There did however, appear to be some fill in the canal buffer outside of the buffers off the creek. These
impacts would need to be counted in the buffer totals. If you have any questions, feel free to give me a call.
Thanks - Garcy
E-mail correspondence to and form this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and
may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Cindy Carr [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 11:44 AM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Caldwell, Betty A; Johnson, Jay B; Wendee Smith
Subject: B-5129E, Bridge No. 42 in Pamlico County, NC304 Bridges CAMA Permit Drawing revisions
Importance: High
Garcy,
Attached are the revised pages for the CAMA/404/401 permit package on Bridge No. 42, B-5129E.
These revisions reflect the comments from Stephen Lane, DCM as noted in the email forwarded to
me on May 6 and my telephone conversation with him on May 14. The revisions include the
following items:
• Revised MP-5, page 3 of 4 which contains Section 3 items (e), (f), and (g) - 8.5 x 11 sized
• Revised Stream and Wetland Impacts plan view, which contains reduced 404/CAMA wetland
impacts revised by design modifications and WLB correction - 8.5 x 11 sized
• Revised Profile plan view, which contains shading at excavation areas - 8.5 x 11 sized
Per Stephen's request, I am providing only the sheets with revisions and have initialed and dated the
bottom corner to indicate the sheet contains changes from the original submittal.
I will be sending you revised pages for the other bridge sites by separate email. If you have any
questions or concerns, please call me.
Cindy Carr
Senior Scientist
Mulkey Engineers & Consultants
P.O. Box 33127
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3127
919-858-1871 (direct)
919-851-1918 (fax)
Mulkey... helping you transform everyday challenges into everyday achievements.
m
http://www.millkeyinc.co
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.