20070183 Ver 1_Application_20070102

EcoScience
1101 Haynes Street Suite 101 RalcirSh. NC 27604 Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
February 1, 2007
John Hennessy ~ ~,
Transportation Permitting Unit
N.C. Division of Water Quality
Mail Service Center 1650
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
RE: Application for Section 401 Permit, Cox to Hoskins Siding Improvements
Dear Mr. Hennessy,
Please find enclosed aPre-Construction Notification and supporting materials to apply for a
Section 401 permit for the Cox to Hoskins Sidings Improvements project, under the N.C.
Department of Transportation Rail Division. The project involves improvements to a 8.9-mile
section of rail bed between High Point and Greensboro in Guilford County.
The project proposes impacts to 347 feet of jurisdictional streams (including 281 feet in HU
03030003 and 66 feet in HU 03030002), and to 0.08 acre of vegetated wetlands. During
negotiations with Mr. Todd Tugwell of the USACE, it was agreed that impacts in the two HUs
would be considered separately, thereby allowing the project to be processed under Nationwide
Permit 14 and the accompanying Water Quality Certification #3404. Although impacts to the
Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed, totaling 20,350 square feet, are proposed, railroad
crossing projects are exempt from the riparian area protection requirements under 15A NCAC
02B.0250 (2)(e)(i). Mitigation for jurisdictional area impacts to streams is proposed under the
NC EEP's In-Lieu Fee Program.
We appreciate your attention and assistance in this matter. Please let us know if any additional
information is needed to expedite the permitting process.
Sincerely,

cc: Monte Matthews, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Marc Hamel, NCDOT Rail Division
Attachments
A ~~~~ ~~,~~~
~~z
. h

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USAGE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
^ 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 14
If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Mr. David Foster. PE
Mailing Address: N.C. Department of Transportation
Rail Division
1556 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1556
Telephone Number: 919-733-4713 Fax Number: 919-715-6580
E-mail Address: dbfoster(a,dot.state.nc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
. ~=-" ~ ~
Updated 11/1/2005 ~~~~ ~~
Page S of 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ?C1Rl?
i(`~+~4ltfl4J~s` 1}.jCl a{'P xf~wt !^t~~l{ ~SRNdl;pl

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps maybe included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Cox to Hoskins Siding Improvements
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A. NCDOT Rail
Division Proiect
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A. Railway right-of--way.
4. Location
County: Guilford Nearest Town: Greensboro & High Point
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A. Not in a subdivision.
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Corridor follows Norfolk
Southern rail line between High Point and Greensboro. Be ig ns approximately 700 feet
northeast of North College Drive (SR 1278) in High Point and extends for approximately 8.9
miles to a point approximately 1600 feet southwest of Interstate 40 in Greensboro. See
Ficure 1 attached.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): (see attached sheetZ°N (see attached sheets°W
6. Property size (acres): N/A. Property is a 8.9-mile length of railroad siding with a 200-foot-
wide (typical) right-of--way.
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Deep River 17-3.3 (WS-IV); Richland Creek
17-7-(0.5) (WS-IV); Bull Run 17-5-(1) (WS-IV); South Buffalo Creek 16-11-14-2 (C NSW
8. River Basin: Cape Fear (CPF8 [03030003] and CPF2 [03030002])
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http:L%h2o.enr.state.nc,us/ad~nin/maps/.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 9

9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Site conditions are env disturbed, as is typical for a
railroad bed. Forested buffers often persist along the railroad grade outside of the maintained
zone and along stream marlins. Surrounding land use consists of industrial, commercial, and
residential development. The majority of the alignment lies within High Point, Jamestown,
or Greensboro municipal limits.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: A new
track will be installed approximately 15 feet to the south of the existing track for the length
of the project ali~mnent. Minor realignments will be installed at intervals on the existing
track and turnouts. Existing stone/concrete culverts will be extended where possible or will
otherwise be replaced with steel pipes.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Siding improvements for rail traffic between
Greensboro and High Point.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. The original~urisdictional determination for the project (attached was
approved on January 22, 2003 (Action ID 2003 20342) and is scheduled to expire on January 22,
2007. The project corridor was recently surveyed for any chan eg s in jurisdicttonal areas, and an
implication for extension of the jurisdictional determination was submitted on December 8, 2006.
NCDOT project U2524 AB & AC (Greensboro Bypass) required temporary reali~mment of
the railroad bed at Station 6550 of the proposed project. Stream impacts were permitted under
USACE Action ID 2003 21137; DWQ# 030909. This stream reach will not be affected by the
proposed project.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A. No future project plans.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 9

accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs maybe included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Fill will be placed to the south of
the existing railroad bed to accommodate the new track. Earth fill will be placed in wetlands
and stream culverts will be extended or the culverts will be replaced using the jack and bore
method.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact

Site Number
(indicate on map)

Type of Impact Type of Wetland

(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream (linear
feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
C9 fill, culvert extension scrub-shrub no 0 0.005
C18 fill forested no 30 0.005
C20 fill, culvert extension forested no 92 0.055
C22 fill scrub-shrub no 0 0.015

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.080
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.4 acre
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage. multiply length X width_ then divide by 43 5(~
Stream Impact
Number

(indicate on map)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average Stream
Width Before

Impact Impact
Len th
g
(linear feet) Area of
Im act
p
(acres)
C2 UT to S Buffalo Creek culvert replacement perennial 4 feet 66 0.0061
C7 UT to Bull Run culvert extension intermittent 4 feet 42 0.0039
C9 UT to Bull Run culvert extension intermittent 3.5 feet 55 0.0044
C12 UT to Bull Run culvert extension intermittent 3 feet 13 0.0009
C13 UT to Bull Run culvert extension perennial 7 feet 28 0.0045
C16 UT to Deep River culvert replacement intermittent 3 feet 34 0.0023
C18 UT to Deep River culvert re lacement intermittent 5 feet 47 0.0054
C19 UT to Deep River culvert extension perennial 10 feet 33 0.0076
C20 UT to Deep River culvert replacement intermittent 3 feet 6 0.0004
C22 UT to Richland Creek culvert replacement perennial 7 feet 23 0.0037
Total Stream Impact (by len th and acreage) 347 0.0392
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 9

5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dred~in~, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact

Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)

Type of Impact Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc. Area of

Impact
(acres)
None None None None None

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.0392
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.080
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.1192
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 347
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A. No pond construction is proposed.
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e. g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It maybe useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 9

techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Please see attached sheet for
descriptions of avoidance and minimization strategies for individual crossings.
The on final jurisdictional delineations on the railway right-of--way described 29 intermittent
and perennial stream crossings totaling 2888 feet. Sixteen vegetated wetlands were delineated
totalling 0.781 acre. Of these jurisdictional areas, only 10 stream crossings are proposed to be
impacted by the proiect, with a total of 347 feet of stream impacts. Four wetland impacts are
proposed, with 0.080 acre of impacts. During the design phase for the proposed rail sidings, fill
slopes were minimized and track alignments were adjusted to avoid and minimize im acp is to
jurisdictional areas wherever possible. Placement of the new sidings as close as possible to the
existing track further minimizes impacts.
Widening of the rail bed will result in unavoidable stream and wetland impacts. Crossin swill
be constructed using culvert extensions, where possible. Many existing culverts are undersized
or perched and cannot be extended. In these cases, new culverts will be installed using the jack
and bore method to minimize impacts to jurisdictional areas.
Construction of the new sidings and main track to either side of the existing rail bed would not
result in lesser impacts to wetlands or streams.
The developer feels that the most efficient and practicable design solution is proposed, as well
as the least damaging.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http:i h2o.em•.state.nc.us;'ncwetlands~`strm~ide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
Updated l l/1/2005
Page 10 of 9

and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A. Mitigation is proposed through NC EEP.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http:/Ih2o.enr.state.nc.us/wtp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 472 linear feet
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): None
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): None
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): None
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): None
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 11 of 9

Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ^
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multi lier Required
i..,,,,..,.o ~ o~~ p r,r:4;,.,.4;,.~
1 I 15,315 13 (2 for Catawba) I 0
2 5035 1.5 0
Total I 20,350 I ~ 0
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Considering railroad ballast as impervious, the
existine surface is 36.37 acres and the proposed area is 44.93 acres. The railway right-of--way is
213.96 (200 feet x 46,600 feet). Therefore, the impervious are will increase from 17.0% to
21.0%.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A. No wastewater will be generated.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 12 of 9

Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: N/A
No future development is anticipated as a result of this project.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
-2~-/ -o
Applicant/Agent~Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 13 of 9

a
__ o00
a LL Z ..T, Z N
/a9`" ~ "°``+. ~ z p g z z c c h- Z w ~ .Q
b~., J H 7 = _ ~ a
'c?Q `b~,. ~ 2 F y ~ Z Ur ~ O Q ~ y y p LL
iF ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Y Z LlJ C..1 ~ ' ~ z ~
~:i o1 VFa C xQN 0~ 'OV Q ~ ~ w ~ C7
~~b ~~ z ~ W (~ ~ (/~ ~ .O O w N V m W .~ LL
QQ = LL
$ w
L
''L^^ cc
V
0
N
N
N
f0
a
~ J
~~
O
LL
J
m
V ~
m O
•~
d O N
1
O
C
7
~ t C
a ~ ~O
o is
w
.~
~ aao.~in~ N
H1,1S210~ NOSalntla

- u ._
i ~
f'"'r ~ ~
Jurisdictional Areas ,
-, , _,
.~ .. :.
~ r ,
N Stream '~_. ~.., ~ f ~ ,~, - F ~ ~'+'1 ray
i
N Wetland ,,~~" ~ -'? ~$c,C~-'~~'''` %' ~ . r" .
,4 N Project Corridor ~, ~ " ~,~,~,.,,. f/~', ~ , ~ -:,~-
1000 0 1000 Feet ~~~`'=.,~. ~ ` ~ _ ~ ,`
', r
,.
Image Source: Guilford and Greensboro, NC USGS quads ~~ ` ~,~r' C1 ~ r _, ~'~
~'" ~,
a
t ~w -•,,
• it .-~
( ~ • _
..
3• '
r ~ ~
~h
~`~ ~~~
t #.
.~-,_ -
r~ •
r"
1r
~' +
x,
,e ,
i
~lJ.
:'` ~ '
P5r
~ ~'
~~~~
f ~~~ ~~ ~`

I.. ~4 I, ~ y'_
.~ ~
~$'+ ~' ~ ~
\~ ii (
1"!, f It 4S {~ j
..~ r~ .Q ` 't'
~,~~
C3 ~
~:
,~ ,~
~, ~ ,~~
i .- ; -~
~~ A
~r#" M~
f '_"'^ '1
,, ~,
~~ ~~
~,~, ,, ;.
';~ ~ . ~~~
! ~ ,~ r
t~,~ , -, ,.._
~, f f r „ ~T,

` ~ ~f
~~ -~ c

Y
R 1 -~ ~
..~,~ t
1 J
t
e ~ ~,'
~ -.~~! ~
' 1~..~'~ .
,~. ~ _ ~.,J' ti _ .....
' '` .
~ ~,
;~'w _ 1 ~`
. ...-''~ ~ C6~ `~
i ,
/ '._..

~'~`.~-r Monry pq~o\
iq y'~. NCDOT
~+~ '~ RAIL
~,~ ,~? DIVISION
~1
•_
\~ ~ OF TR0. 4.
~~
~/
~*

~ ~~* r
..
,
~
~~ ~
;
~ ~"
~
i ~
'

~ ~
~~~
~
~
~

7 ~+.wx.,~ ",~ a`

~.
f~

`~ ,.=if * ~ ~ . ~ ,~~
j

~ ,
et ~K o
f
~' ~ ~
~ ~
,-
'-
~-
~ .
"` ~ ~ ~y
'
`" ""
~.

;`• '~ ~
,$jJ yeti.
~~ ,~, _.
~;
~~ ~
~~
~. ~ ~ ~~ ~
~r:~i~ ~~ j ~~
1
F ~,-
1~, ,t,
`t '~
~ • F '~ r
~ s..
'~ M
.,_~r, . ~
~ • ~ • ~ ...
• I ~
JURISDICTIONAL AREAS
Cox to Hoskins Siding improvements
Guilford County, North Carolina
Drawn ey: FIGURE
ES
~.~:
1" = 1000'
JUN 2006
ESC Project:
~~ 2a
03-172.04

rr `,~ ~-
'~
Jurisdictional Areas 7~~ ~ ~~~ ~. ~~' ~ ~ ``~ r~ + •~ ~~~ Q) j ~y ~ '~{
NStream ~. _ -.., --.
Wetland _~... _ ,~ _~' ~ t'`: ~ - 1~.~ `~ ~1
NProject Corridor ~~~± - ~~ `~ r-~ ~.,,, ,'~'~„" , ~,! ~ ~ `...,
1000 0 1000 Feet ~ ; "^~ '"~ ~ `~.,~~ ' ~ ~``~ ~,
~ ~,~- -~
Image Source: Guilford, NC USGS quad j ~ k +-"°~~~''"'~~~~~ J ~~ 'f ~ `*,' ~ L ~,~~~,~,/~ ' ~Y! ~~`~'t. ~
{, [ _ .
..
' ~ ,
-• ~, a ~ r
;: '
` -P
~ ~ 1 -°'
_,
,.
Y:
'`~ ~ `~ `ice ^ ,.~}~ ~ I V ~ . ~ ` -' ~ /!{ r~ ~ ''
~,, \~ r. ; f ~~
/'' ! /~ ~
# wIL~+~~.~~,,+~ ~ / ,r •s~+ ~~ ~ ~,• e
4
_ J~ t
~~
..- ..
~'''' ' ~_
~~ l
`,~`~ 'A
~. ,, • ~ ~ ~
~~
.~~
r~ . _ ___-
~.
*#r/ ~ ~ •
.~~
~, • t
a
~y,~
"r'd~ ti5 . ~ { ~ ,~,, ~ ~ i
,~ iJ . -1 ~ f \ -
"R. ~ mow.-" I •
"i.a~' 1 ,
4
`\ i a
~~ • ' •
4~..~, ~~ff [ • •.
t - ,~~~
t ~
jf ~~ t
r 4 ~ ~f+y.
~ ~ ~`
~ ~ {.

/~'~ }iOtlTy C490~
%~ `~~~ NCDOT
~+'
'~ '~ RAIL
+
,f
~_

~ OF TpA ,~~ DIVISION
P .
~`,%
V-
~~
JURISDICTIONAL AREAS
Cox to Hoskins Siding Improvements
Guilford County, North Carolina
Drawn ey: FIGURE
ES
~~:
1" = 1000'

JUN 2006 2 b
ESC Prgatl:
03-172.04

Z

~~
`
' '
a
~ ~ y
!b 0.
,~
tee. oFP-~ Z~F
c /
i ~'4 1 J
~` t
~,, ,
r ~ .y
`?~.~~.
Q
W
Q

0 0 0
Z =
U] ~
a
s w o
z
~o
3 ~ W ~ o
U
N
y _ ~, _ .r~
~ ~ r
~ 1 )tY _ ... .. ~„ ~
.' y.-
f - - - x
i ! ~ ~,i ..A~. ~ .~ to
~. ~
~' ~-
~~ / ~ is 1~..a~~r'' ~. r+n3 '~ k •
~~#~~ 1 1
f ,~. ` ` C
/~ ~ ~'-•
,cad'
,_ --~,
.. ~~~ i
~~"~~-.
•t
`~ *~ ~ ~

• -~4T`a '
• ~
• ~ A ~ ~ ~,
• .. ~ j. '+~ ~''.r

T ~ '. - '~ -.. ~ O O V •
J` _ ,, ~~ ~ _ ~ A Z
qtr s ~ X ` l ~. ~~~-.~ ~ c`. ,v ~~ ~• ' ; • G1 ~ ~ a
~ ,,'*' *~ • ~ ~ ,., ~p to ~ d o ~
/ i \ .,
.N m
- O o0
_._
~` - "v' ~ ' t; ' '`r' E
r 3 a 1~
~r. .~
~~'~
{• •
yr ~ '``~. '~; .
*'.
. ,~-.~ • j.,,. .
'.~"'~ -
• ~~ •• •~... f s ~ -
~ ~ •
• ~fa ~ ~~f
• ~+ M ~ •
• ~4rLr+~ i
1 ~i . ~ l l1 ~ _.e• ~'J
y ~ :f~
J~~ ~r
.^ c
~Y .
~-„ ,,,
_ _
'~ ~ _~:
~ / _ +
Z . ~ ,..<~ - ~. _
;:
t
1 .~
,,
,,~ ~ ~• I ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ -.
~~ }
.. ~~ \`+
V
~.
_r' r -
,.~, ~.
y 1 I r ~ ~ ,•
+ f~ ~ ,
• *_ ~ .-
r
~- ,
f /#_' • i H"a~1t~' Tom' ,Y ~ ~,~ -4 ~^ +yr ~ ~ `°+,.~ {~}~_.
i ~ TJ w
sw ~ ~
7 1 lJ ~.
'•
_'' ~ ~ t .,. ~- r. • .. ~ \ 1. • y ~'_ ~ 1 i
y 4.
s_ ~
_~ .
.-. _x

Z T
c
~

O ,
7 -
~ Y
X Z w
~ U m
~ U
~
~O ~
Cn~ o~
w = ~ •~ o
a ~ ~ Z

__ aoo
Q <L Z ~ +~'+ N Q Z Z N
/d9`~ ~ xou+r~ z 0 ~ z Z c .c Z w ~ x
~:i o; V~d ~ O~ ~~ ~L Gd' ~ $ LL
``6 F~Z ~ w U~ N~ ~~ NQ w o
~ 8
o ~
., • ~
r +~`~.
.- ~~,~ •
• ~ f
_ _„ __
v « .:~' _ •
`- ___~ ` ~~ I ~ ' t ~ ' _ ~~~ -
ti ~ '' _ ~,
`_ - _ -~.
s p •7 ' '
:k~ • • ~ J
t~ _.~' ~ ? _ ~~' ~+ .. • yr, r-it „w • 4~~ ~ • f.° ~,;• .'4 - ~,,+., ~~ # +
S ~ t"
__.
_ •_
+.
~.
,.~_ _ _ . .
1
g -~
.~ _,
~..
.~ ~ .. -,~{ .' ~r ~, ~ r
,...«., ~ - if r p1 ~ ~ i '~ P a • ! • •- ~ ~ r t
~1J /
,- ~
• I r
<.
_ . a
• ~~. ~ r
_ ~~
-~ '",~
. .
y,~"""www... ,
I ..
~.. ~
_ MJ ,Op c i ,- * ~ ~. ~~,, ~ ~ ~ +~ ' ~-' ~ ~ • - ! ~ " . ~4 it ~ ~.
J`
.~ 1
`-~ t o..~
~r ,. 3
` -
r'
c ~ ~ .' ~ , - a .~,.~..
~ 4 ,/ ,~
,/ ,
~ .r ~„_.
_ ~ ~ ~~
y • t
- ` ... a f=~ i ~;; ~` ' ''A _ ~___ N _ t , rte
- ~ ~-. jr ~ F ~~ ~~ ti ,~ '. ~,,~_. "~ fir. ~ ~ ~ c
~j M1 F ~ ' ~ ~
F O ~ i„ ~ ~k` ~~9 _`l x , +, p M ~
O ~ 1~ ~'" ~ r f~ ~' f ~/ U
. ,.
. ,
`'
... ,
~w ~~~ •- ' ---- --~,

Section 111.5.
CROSSING LONGITUDE LATITUDE
C2 -79.87715736 36 .04322639
C7 -79.89547865 36 .01968251
C8 -79.90288658 36 .01320146
C9 -79.90559066 36. 01052397
C11 -79.90976636 36.0062883
C12 -79.91117708 36. 00539389
C13 -79.91444199 36. 00321345
C16 -79.93766695 35. 99225179
C17 -79.94802222 35. 98363632
C18 -79.95110703 35. 98028715
C19 -79.95387388 35. 97782524
C20 -79.96007453 35. 97245564
C22 -79.97256764 35. 96664753
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Rail Division Cox to Hoskins Siding Improvements

,~•
[ ,-e~ ~ ,
'~~ x~ -,r
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
Action ID: 200320342 County: Guilford
Notification of Jurisdictional Determination
Property
Owner NC DOT /Rail Division
Authorized.
Agent EcoScience
Marc Hamel
Address 1553 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1553
Telephone Number
C/o Adam V. McIntyre
Address 1101 Ha es Street Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27604
Telephone Number 919 828-3518
Size and Location of Property (waterbody, Highway name/number, town, etc.) NC DOT /Rail
Division's Cox to Hoskins Siding Extension Project located south of I 40 to the intersection of
College Drive, adjacent to the Deep River, northeast of High Point, in Guilford County, North
Carolina.
Indicate Which of the Following apply:
0 There are wetlands on the above described property which we strongly suggest should be delineated and surveyed.
The surveyed wetland lines must be verified by our staff before the Corps will make a final jurisdictional
detemunation on your property.
0 Because of the size of your property and our present workload, our identification and delineation of your wetlands
cannot be accomplished in a timely manner. You may wish to obtain a consultant to obtain a more timely
delineation of the wetlands. Once the consultant has flagged a wetland line on the property, Corps staff will
review it, and, if it is accurate, we strongly recommend that you have the line surveyed for final approval be the
Corps. The Corps will not make a final jurisdictional determination on your property without an approved survey.
The wetlands on your property have been delineated (limits were fla~,~ed in the field), and the
limits of the Corps ~urasdictcon have been explained to you It is recommended that you
provide a land survey of these flaQ~ed limits Verification of such a survey, unless there is a
change in the law or our published re~ulattons, could result in a signed determination that
maybe relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date ofthe verification_
0 here are ro wetlands present. on the above described property which are subject to the permit requirements of
section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not tq exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
0 The project is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties. You should contact the nearest State Office of Coastal
Management to determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material in wetlands on this property without a Department of the
Army permit is in most cases a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1311). A
permit is not required -for work on the property restricted entirely to existing high ground. If you
have any questions regarding the Corps of Engineers re ulatory program, please contact
John Thomas at 19 - 876 - 8441 extension 25
Project Manager Signature
Date January 22, 2003 Expiration ate January 22 2007
SURVEY PLAT OR FIELD SKETCH OF DESCRIBED PROPERTY AND THE WETLAND
DELINEATION FORM MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE YELLOW (FILE) COPY OF THIS FORM.

NOTII;IC~-~TION 0I' ':~b1~1INISTR~1'1VI~, t~PPE:-~L OPTIONS ~Nll PRC?CESS~S,r~IVD
- - REQUEST,FOR,PPEAL: '` ~ '~ `'~
e.

Applicant: Mr. Marc Hamel, NC DOT /Rail Division File Number: Action ID. Date: January 22,
1553 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1553 1200320342 12003
Attached is: See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
PERMIT DENIAL C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
XX PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION 1 -The, 1-~ollon~in~r identifiesyourY-ights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the at~ove
~~~~~-;s;on. ~1dc~i~i~~na? i»torm~rtionmau be found at hltn '!usace.tinny.mil'i~ietllunctions/cw/cecwo/red or
Corl>> rc~~~nlatic~l~s at ~3 CEO Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Pernut or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights
to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that
the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer.
Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this Notice, or you will forfeit your right
to appeal the pernut in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a)
modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify
the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the
district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights
to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this
form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the
date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process
by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date
of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received
by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an
approved JD (which maybe appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may
provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION 11 - IZE(~,lIES7' FUR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT _
--
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe-your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an
initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons
or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record. However,
you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POT?~TT (lr~ (~n~~fr ~-(,rr r~~[? r-ii; =.c'I'l~)jv'.C CIFZ -~~Ft-~r?n;T_~~ t[lTr.
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the appeal If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
process you may contact: Raleigh Regulatory Field Oftice also contact:
C/o John Thomas Mr. Arthur Middleton, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
6508 Falls of Neuse Rd., Suite 120 CESAD-ET-CO-R
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615 U.S. Army Cont~s of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
Telephone: [phone] ext. 25 60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date: ~ Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or went.
DIVISION ENGINEER:
Commander
U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303.-3490

USACE A1D#
DWQ#
....
Site # C~- (indicate on attached map)
1
,~
j ~ ~ ~ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
~ ~'.
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: '~~©'~ (~. t ~~ Ui~ ash 2. Evaluator's name: ~~'I`~'~"~~ t~j ~,t7 ~L'~ ~`;~? ~'~-'
3. Date of evaluation: ~ t ~~ " (9 l~ 4. Time of evaluation: ~ ~ ~ U ~
5. Name of stream: ~T ~ ,5 ~ ti !Q ~ f`~~..-
7. Approximate drainage area: 2~I' ~ a.~ ~ d -~f '~`' ~
9. Length of reach evaluated: 7
l 1. Site coordinates (ifknown)~ ~ ~~-~ 1~-
t`~c '-
6. River basin:~~~ 1`'~~
8. Stream order: "
10. County: ~' ~ ~rO'L
12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
ago' S 6~ .~-`fD
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: ~-~/`~
16. Site conditions at time of vis

l7. Identify any special waterway classifications known: ~ection 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel. appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential
30 % Forested
Commercial G 0 % Industrial _% Agricultural
22. Bankfull width: 3
tf
~ % Cleared /Logged _% Other
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): ~~ ~ ~
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight -Occasional bends Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the -nost appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): ~ ~ Comments:
Evaluator's Signature y . ~"~I'` ~"~'
Date ~-1`~ ~~~
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 2ti.
~. ct~ ~ So to ~ ~e

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
--
_- - --
-~ --~- - F.~nuFrrn~~~pn~>y7~r RANfiF~
~~ ,~ I CFIAIlACTERISTLCS
Coastal ~- ~_ ~ .~~~ull~'
Piedmont Mountain

I Presence of flow /persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4 0-5

~
~ (no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max _ Dints)
-__ _ -
~~
2 ..Evidence of past human alteration 0 = 6- 0 - 5 ~ ~ 0 - 5 ~ (~,
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max Dints) - fff -
i ,; Riparian zone 0- 6 0- 4 0- 5

i nobuffer= 0' aonti uous wide buffer= max o~nts)
~
Evidenceof nutrienf or chemical discharges _ 0~- 5 0- 4 0 - 4
4 (extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max Dints)
's harRe
~•~ter dr_c
Groundw~
b

-

0~

_

0 4

-

0~
5 (qo dischar e =-0; s rims, see s, wetlands, etc. = max Dints)
~' Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
'0 ?
~J
i t 6 (no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max Dints)
~+ Entrenchment / floodplain access 0- 5 0- 4 0 2
4 ~ 'dee 1 entrenched = O;fre went flooding = max Dints).
i 8 ~ Pr•esenceofadjacentwetlands
j 0-6 0`-4 0~ 2

~ acent wetlands = max pints)
(no wetlands = 0; lar e ad
~ ~ Channel sinuosity
0-5`
0-4
0. 3 ~,
~ (extensive channelization = 0; natural meander =_max points)
Sediment input 0- 5 0- 4 0~
10 extensivede osition= 0; littleor no sediment= max Dints)
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate N ~ k d4 0 _ ~
11 (fine,homo~enous = 0; lame, diverse sizes = max Dints)
_ >;vidence of channel incision or widening 0 - 5 0- 4 0- 5
~. I2 (dee I"incised= O; stable bed& banks = max Dints)
F'
]3 Presence of major bank failures
0 - 5
0 - 5
0- 5 ~
~ (severe erosion = O;no erosion, stable banks = max Dints)
_
"^ RooYdepth and density on banks 0 _ ; 0 - d 0 - 5
`~ ld no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max Dints)
~
'/
-' Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 5
t 5 ~ (substantial im act =0; no evidence ° max Dints) `
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0 - ~ 0 - 5 0 - 6'
I6 (no rifflesh-i les or Dols = 0; well-develo ed = max Dints)
F1"
Q. ~ Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
L~.~
~ I ~ (little or no habitat = 0; fre uent varied habitats = max points)
Canopy coverage over streambed 0 - 5 0 - 5 0 - 5 E~
., I ~ (noshadin~ vegetation = 0; continuous canes = max Dints)
~
.Substrate embeddedness NA* 0 - 4 0 - d
19 (dee 1 °embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
Presence ofsh-eam invertebrates (see page 4) 0 _,~ 0 - > 0 - 5
!.
~0
~' (no evidence = 0; common, numerous tv es = max ~oirlts
~ ~ Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 ~o
Q: ~~ (no evidence = 0; common, numerous tv es = max points)
'~ Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-~t /'~
~
2
(no evidence 0; common, numerous types = mas points)
_
___ ~J
~ Evidence of ~r~ildlife use 0- 6 0 S 0
~ (no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)

Total-Points Possible. 100 t00 100
-- - - _.
TnT~L SC'O~E (also ether ot1 first page)
-5
*These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

r-
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: ~ . t 3 _ ~ 6 Project: (~ Latitude:
Evaluator: ~~~~ /S~j~.,~ Site: ~'
a Longitude: ~Q . ~ ~ ~. ~~ / w
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent ~ ~
if>_ 19 or erennial if? 30
County: ~-!~ ~,f
t /o't Other
~ ,`
e.g. Quad Name: i ~~/
A. Geomorpholo (Subtotal = l )
1a. Continuous bed and bank Absent
0 Weak Moderate Strong
1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain p 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1, 2 3
7. Braided channel p 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9 a Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 ` 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
a
No ~~ -~
Yes = 3
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = ~' ~ 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- dr or rowin season 0 ~
l...J 2
3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5- p
17. Sediment on plants or deb ~is 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes 1.5
~"
C. Biology (Subtotal = (~ , `~ )
20°. Fibrous roots in channel
b 3 2 0
21
. Rooted plants in channel 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish X2'3 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0. 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 t 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton ~a `1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus.
29 b. Wetland plants in streambed 0.5 1 1.5
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other ~ 0 1
Hems cu ana n Locus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:

North Carolina Division cif Water Quality -- Stream identification Form; Version 3..1
Date: ~~tz~~~ PraJect: (;>~~-d~,S1~i,15 Latitude: ',3t'. ~~~0~ ~'E,t~~tp
Evaluator: j z Site:
rr+;~t ~~r.~~:,~'r~.w. ~
Longitude: ~.~b'~1 ~~-`~'~'$~
Ttstal Points:

Stream is at least Intermittent t ~ County: `l~"
t j Other

e
Qu
d N
t~~
~
~
if> 19 or erennial rfi? 30 .g.
a
ame:
~
4r
..,..
A. Geomar hoto -
a (Subtotal - ~ } A ~':s~ttit
' . elk ' 'tlrlod~~~i;~,e .. ~#ralh'9
1. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2

2. Sinuosity 0 3
1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 1 2
3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1
2 3 .
6. Depositional bars or benches ~ 2 3
7. Braided channel 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits ~ 1 2
9 a Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 j 1 5
i2. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1
5
13. Secand or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented No ~ 0) .
,.
Yes - 3
evidence. l./
aMan-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual

B. H droto - (sufatotal . }
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or rowin season ~ 1 2 3
1 B. l.eaflitter 1.5 1 0.5
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0.6 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack fines) 0 0.5 1 1 5
19: Hydric soils {redoximorphic features} present? No 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Biolo (Subtota- = is ) '~ _
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1
21 .Rooted plants in channel 3 2' 1
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1
23. Bivalves ~ 1 2
24. Fish
25. Amphibians 0 0,5
0 1
1"
26. fvlacrobenthos (note diversity and abundance} ' Q ° .5 1
27. Filamentous algae; periphytgn ~ 0 0 5 1
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0.5 1
29 .Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW .0.75; OBL. = 1.5 , SAV = 2.0;
Items 20 and 21 focns on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
0
0
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5

USACE AID#
~ ~
i~®~i
_ DWQ #.
Site # C7 (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCDOT Rail Division
3. Date of evaluation: Mav 26, 2006
5. Name of stream: UT to Bull Run
7. Approximate drainage area: 18.1 acres
f
•~
2. Evaluator's name: Scherrer / EcoScience
4. Time of evaluation: 10:00 am
6. River basin: Cape Fear
8. Stream order: 0
9. Length of reach evaluated: 50' 10. County: Guilford
11. Site coordinates (if known): 36.019640325N, 79.895494185W 12. Subdivision name (if any): __
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
on railroad track 1650 feet northeast_of intersection with MacKav Road (SR 1549)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Siding improvements
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Clear
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters -Nutrient Sensitive Waters WS-IV Water Supply Watershed _(I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on U5GS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 40 % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
35 % Forested 65 % Cleared /Logged _% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 4 feet 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 6 inches - 1 foot
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight -Occasional bends X Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 46 Comments:
Culvert partly clogged with sediment.
Evaluator's Signature Date 5-2ti-06
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POIN T RANGE
# C
CHARACTERISTICS S
ORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain

1 Presence of flow /persistent pools in stream
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 5
0
no flow or saturation = 0; stron flow = max oints
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 2
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max oints
3 Riparian zone 0- 6 0- 4 0- 5 3
no buffer = 0; Conti ous, wide buffer = max oints
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 3
extensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es = max oints
5 Groundwater discharge 0- 3 0- 4 0- 4 0
no dischar e = 0; s rin s, see s, wetlands, etc. = max oints
U
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0 - 4
0 - 4
0 - 2
1
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max oints
a ~ Entrenchment /floodplain access 0- 5 0- 4 0- 2 1
dee 1 entrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max oints
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0- 6 0- 4 0- 2 3
acent wetlands = max oints
no wetlands = O; lar a ad
9 Channel sinuosity 0- 5 0- 4 0- 3 3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max oints
10 Sediment input 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 2
extensive de osition= 0; little or no sediment = max oints
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0 - 4 0 - 5 2
fine, homo enous = O; lar e, diverse sizes = max oints
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 5 3
,~•i dee 1 incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max oints
~
13 Presence of major bank failures
0 - 5
0 - 5
0 - 5
4
~ severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max oints

14 Root depth and density on banks 0 - 3 0 - 4 0 - 5 3
F no visible roots = 0; dense roots throu hout = max oints
~
15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 5
4
substantial im act =0; no evidence = max oints
16 Presence of riffle-pooUripple-pool complexes 0- 3 0- 5 0- 6 1
I~ no riffles/ri les or ools = 0; well-develo ed = max oints
~ 1 ~ Habitat complexity 0- 6 0- 6 0- 6 3
little or no habitat = 0; fre uent, varied habitats = max oints
18 Canopy coverage over streambed 0- 5 0- 5 0- 5 3
~ no shadin ve etation = 0; continuous cano = max oints
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0- 4 0- 4 2
dee 1 embedded = O; loose structure = max
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0 - 4 0 - 5 0 - 5 0
~„i
- no evidence = 0• common numerous es = max oints
Presence of am
hibians
( 21 p 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 2
O no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max oints
'"a
O
22 Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
~ no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max oints
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 1
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max oints
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 46
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

North Carolina Divisior~ r~# Wafer Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
~
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal = ) Ahs~'tt 'tNe
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1
2. Sinuosity 0 1
3. in-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0
5. Active/relic flcodplain 0
• 6. Qepositional bars or benches '~
7. Braided channel 1
8. Recent alluvial deposits '
9 a Natural levees 0 1
10. Headcuts 1
11. Grade controls 0
1?... Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5.
13. Second or greater order channel on existin ,~,
USGS or NRCS map or other documented No ,
evidence.
i Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
@. H drolo ~ (subtotal =
14. Groundwater flow/discharge ~ 1
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or ~ 1
Water in channel -- d ar roLVin season
. Leaflitter 1.5
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 .5`
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
i
1
Yes = 3
2
2
0.5
1
1
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? ~ No = 0 Yes
C. B3olo ' ' (Subtotal =
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
21 . Rooted plants in channel
3
3

2
j
22. Crayfish .5 1
23. Bivalves 1 2
24. Fish 0.5 1
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance} ° 0 0.5 1
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0.5 1
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0.5 1
29 .Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 , SAV = 2.0;
Items ZO and 21 focus on the presence G upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.

Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this forrn for additional notes.)
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
0
0
0
1.5
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
i.5
1,5

3
USAGE AID# DWQ #_
Site # C8 (indicate on attached map)
~ ~ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
~~~~~
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
~`_
., ,
1. Applicant's name: NCDOT Rail Division 2. Evaluator's name: Scherrer / EcoScience
3. Date of evaluation: May 26, 2006 4. Time of evaluation: 10:30 am
5. Name of stream: UT to Bull Run 6. River basin: Cape Fear
7. Approximate drainage area: 27.8 acres 8. Stream order: 0
9. Length of reach evaluated: 50' 10. County: Guilford
11. Site coordinates (if known): 36.013185416N. 79.902951586W 12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
on railroad track 1550 feet southwest of intersection with MacKav Road (SR 15491
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Siding improvements
15. Recent weather conditions: Clear
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Clear
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters -Nutrient Sensitive Waters WS-IV Water Supply Watershed _(I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YE5 NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential
35 % Forested
22. Bankfull width: 6 feet
20 % Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
65 % Cleared /Logged 80% Other (municipal cemetery )
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 6 inches - 1 foot
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight -Occasional bends X Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 56 Comments:
Culvert partly cloacaed with sediment.
Evaluator's Signature Date 5-26-06
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USAGE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 06103. To Comment, please ca11919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POIN T RANGE

# CHARACTERISTICS SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain

1 Presence of flow /persistent pools in stream
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 5
0
no flow or saturation = 0; strop flow = max oints
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 3
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max oints
3 Riparian zone 0- 6 0- 4 0- 5 3
no buffer = 0; Conti ous, wide buffer = max oints
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 3
extensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es = max oints
5 Groundwater discharge 0- 3 0- 4 0- 4 0
no dischar e = 0; s rip s, see s, wetlands, etc. = max oints
~ 6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0- 4 0- 4 0- 2 2
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max oints
~ Entrenchment /floodplain access 0- 5 0- 4 0- 2 2
~'~"' dee 1 entrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max oints
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0- 6 0- 4 0- 2 0
acent wetlands = max oints
no wetlands = 0; lar a ad
9 Channel sinuosity 0- 5 0- 4 0- 3 3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max oints
10 Sediment input 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 3
extensive de osition= O; little or no sediment = max oints
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0 - 4 0 - 5 3
fine, homo enous = O; lar e, diverse sizes = max oints
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 5 3
,'~ dee 1 incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max oints
~
13 Presence of major bank failures
0 - 5
0 - 5
0 - 5
4
~ severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max oints
~ 14 Root depth and density on banks 0 - 3 0 - 4 0 - 5 3
E,,,, no visible roots = 0; dense roots throu out = max oints

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 5
4
substantial im act =0; no evidence = max oints
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool completes 0- 3 0- 5 0- 6 3
no riffles/ri les or ools = 0; well-develo ed = max oints
E
~ 17 Habitat complexity 0- 6 0- 6 0- 6 4
little or no habitat = 0; fre uent, varied habitats = max oints

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0 - 5
0 - 5
0 - 5
4
~ no shadin ve etation = 0; continuous cano = max oints
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0 - 4 0 - 4 3
dee 1 embedded = O; loose structure = max

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 - 4
0 - 5
0 - 5
0
no evidence = 0; common numerous t es = max oints
Presence of amphibians
21 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 3
O no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max oints
22 Presence offish 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 0
~ no evidence = 0; common, numerous t es = max oints
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 3
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max oints
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 56
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

North Carolina Divisir~n rif Water Quality -Stream tdentitication Form; Uersir~rt ~..i
Date: ~I~~ Project: x ~ ~~s Latitude: '~ . ~t3 I $(
Evaluator: ,~~, J~`~ ~~., Slte: Longitude: - ~, ~-~~ ;,~~,~-f
~;~
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent '~,,. i , County: Other
i e.g. Quad Name: ~~-~:s a~j fqr
if>_ 19 or erennial if? 30 t t '~`
t ~} S'~
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal = ` t t ~ )
~ `suit
Weak '
oder~'
1 a. Continuous bed and bank
2. Sinuosity 0
0 1
1 2
2
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting ~ 0 1
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1` 2
7. Braided channel 2
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1' 2
9 a Natural levees 1 2
10. Headcuts
~ 1 2
11. Grade controls 0 .5 1
12. Natural valley or-drainageway 0 05 1
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. No~~
,.~'' Yes = 3
r wlan-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H drot~ subtotal = 5 t~
14. Groundwater f(qw/discharge 0 1 2
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or rowin season 0 1 2
16. Leaflitter 1.5 0.5
17. Sediment an plants or debris 0 1
18. Organic debris lines or piles ('Vrack lines) 0 0. 1
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? ~ No = 0 Yes ~ 1.5

~. 81010_ (Subtotal = 4`~ ) .a,
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 ~ '
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1
22. Crayfish 0 0. ~ 1
23. Bivalves 1 2
24. Fish 0.5 1
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1
26: Macrobenthos {note diversity and abundance] 0.5 -
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 0.5 ° 1
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/tungus. 0 0.5 1
29 .Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW ~ 0.75; OBL ; 1.5 , SAV = 2.0; Qtl
Tterns 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29
Notes: {use back side of this form for additional notes.) focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
3
3
0
1.5
t.5
1.5
3
1.5

USACE AID#
DWQ#.
_.___ . _. _ .. __.~ .__ e_ .__ _ _ __ __._,__ _ .,
{
Site # C9 (indicate on attached map)
~ ~ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCDOT Rail Division 2. Evaluator's name: Scherrer / EcoScience
3. Date of evaluation: May 26, 2006 4. Time of evaluation: 10:45 am
5. Name of stream: UT to Bull Run 6. River basin: Cape Fear
7. Approximate drainage area: 20.9 acres S. Stream order: 0
9. Length of reach evaluated: 50' 10. County: Guilford
11. Site coordinates (if known): 36.010528426N. 79.905576522W 12. Subdivision name (if any): Guilford Memorial Park
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
on railroad track 2870 feet_southwest of intersection with MacKav Road (SR 1549)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Siding improvements
15. Recent weather conditions: Clear
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Clear
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters -Nutrient Sensitive Waters WS-IV Water Supply Watershed _(I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 0.8 acre
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential
0 % Forested
22. Bankfull width: 3 feet
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
_% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
100 % Cleared /Logged 100% Other (municipal cemetery
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1 foot
X Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
-Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 39
Evaluator's Signature Date 5-26-06
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
Comments:

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POIN T RANGE
C
A
AC
IS
CS
H
R
TER
TI SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain

1 Presence of flow /persistent pools in stream
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 5
0
no flow or saturation = 0; stron flow = max oints
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 1
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max oints
3 Riparian zone 0- 6 0- 4 0- 5 2
no buffer = 0; Conti ous, wide buffer = max oints
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 2
extensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es = max oints
5 Groundwater discharge 0- 3 0- 4 0- 4 0
no dischar e = 0; s rin s, see s, wetlands, etc. = max oints
U
r-~
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0 - 4
0 - 4
0 - 2
2
~ no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max oints
','~ ~ Entrenchment /floodplain access 0- 5 0- 4 0- 2 1
p" dee 1 entrenched = 0; fre went floodin = max oints
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0- 6 0- 4 0- 2 0
no wetlands = O; lar a ad
acent wetlands = max oints
9 Channel sinuosity 0- 5 0- 4 0- 3 1
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max oints
10 Sediment input 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 2
extensive de osition= O; little or no sediment = max oints
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0 - 4 0 - 5 1
fine, homo enous = 0; lar e, diverse sizes = max oints
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 5 2
,'~ dee 1 incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max oints
iH„ i
13 Presence of major bank failures
0 - 5
0 - 5
0 - 5
4
~ severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max oints
14 Root depth and density on banks 0 - 3 0 - 4 0 - 5 3
~ (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throu out = max oints
~
15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 5
4
substantial im act =0; no evidence = max oints
16 Presence of riffle-pooUripple-pool complexes 0- 3 0- 5 0- 6 1
F no riffles/ri les or ools = 0; well-develo ed = max oints
~
17 Habitat complexity
0 - 6
0 - 6
0 - 6
3
~ little or no habitat = 0; fre uent, varied habitats = max oints

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0 - 5
0 - 5
0 - 5
4
~ no shadin ve etation = 0; continuous cano = max oints
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0 - 4 0 - 4 2
dee 1 embedded = O; loose structure = max

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 - 4
0 - 5
0 - 5
0
no evidence = 0; common, numerous t es = max oints
hibians
Presence of am
21 p 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 2
O no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max oints)
a
22 Presence offish
0 - 4
0 - 4
0 - 4
0
no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max oints

23 Evidence of wildlife use 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 2
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max oints
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 39
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

North Carolina Division of Wa#er Quality -- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: ~..~,~_~ .Project: Latitude: ~-
Evaluator: ~~, ~' ~ , Site: ~ Longitude: ~ „~
,~ <.rr tie ~.~, -.,~~ ' . ; (7 ~ ~. ~` ~~ ~
Tate! Points: Other
Stream is at least intermittent ~ County: /' t ~~
if? 79 or erennial if? 30 ~ ~ l'~'~ ~ e.g. Quad Name: ~t~,; (,~~~
A. Geomor hoio (Subtotal ~ ~ ~' }
1a. Continuous bed and bank Abs~~t
0 U1~~~~ ' . •. MQdea?at~; : ~tro~tg
1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 2 3
~
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 ~: 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 1 2
3
7. Braided channel i 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
9 ~ Natural levees 1 2 3
1 2
3
10. Headcuts t 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. ,
Nod 0~ Yes = 3
~-~'
an-made d'etches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H drola Subtotal = ~ K~
14. Groundwater flow/discharge
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or rowin season 0 1 2 3

0 t 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris p 1 t .5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0, ;5 1 1 5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? N = 0 Yes . 1.5
~.- Biolo (Subtotal = ) _ .
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1
0
21 .Rooted plants in channel 3 i 0
22. Crayfish 0.5 1
~ .5
23. Bivalves ~ 2 3
24. Fish 0.5 1 i .5
25. Amphibians 0.5 1'
1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 ~ 0,5 t 1 ~
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0,5 t
1.5
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 1 5
29 . 1Nettand plants in streambed FA °= 0.5; FACW = 0.75;. OBL = 1.5 , SAV ~ 2.0; Qther A
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants. "'~"
Notes: (use beak side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION C,
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation~Manualj
Project/Site: ~c9 ~c - ({o j ~; k~ ,f?a % (mod a.~ Date: ~ - ~~ _Q 2
Applicant/Owner: _ lf/CQ~ j _ /1~ ~.J'L County: _ G'~; /~,.o/
Investigator c V' lL(~ 1 a ~ ~,. State• y~
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~ No Community ID: 4/'~}(~.c./
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation? Yes ~ Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes ~gl Ptot ID: ~ ~ txK
(If needed, explain on reverse
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species tratum

1
~c6~ ~"4b~.~ ~ ndicato

~'
~ Dominant Plant Soeciea
Tatum ndicator
. ~¢~. s.
2.' 10.
3. [~ ~L.J'f /a •a 3 % art ~ ~ ~~ F~C. 11.
4. 12.
5. ~ti ~G (:c Vii4:vt c~ ~ FfK ^t- 13.
6. _ 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBI, FACW or
FAC (excluding FAC-) ~ ~``
V
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
-Recorded Data fDescribe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs k'tnundated-- S:S ti~
-Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
~C No Recorded Data Available -Water Marks
-Drift Lines
-Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: iC'Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or mare required):
Depth of Surface Water• ~- ~'
(~~') -Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
_Water-Stained leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: ~ (in,) -local Soil Survey Data

Depth to Saturated 5oi1: ,S ;,~ _
(in.) _FAC-Neutral Test
-Other (Explain in Remarks) ,
Remarks:

SOILS
Map Unit Name. j' ~
(Series and Phase): G~ld~l 7` %d
i d' SG"tt0~ ~yG~i Drainage Class: / ,~
tom/

Taxonomy (Subgroup): ~ ~~ %c.. Field Observations
/~4/~k ct 4 ~f j Confum Mapped Type: Yes ~11a,
profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Motile Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
i ches oriza lMunsell Moist) IMunsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast $tntcture. etc.
6 : 3 (0 Y2 ~S13 r-- ~Qc ~,
3 + r'd roe `f/r ~O YR 5l3 . 3~~a.y (ya.,
Hydric Sol Indicators:
_ Histosai _ Concretians-
J Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface layer in Sandy Soiis
,_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Sa'Is
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Usted on Local Hydric Soiis List
~Redueing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Sogs List
Gieyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND, DETERMtNAT10N
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? f~ No (Circle) (Circle)
Weiland Hydrology Present? 4.63 No
Hydric Soiis Present? ~ No Is this Sampling Point Within a WettandT Ye No
Remarks:
Approved by HQUSACE 2/92
HJL
8193 ''

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
11987 COE Wetlands Oelineation.Manual) C~
Project/Site• ~c»c -- ~, ,t;;~s ,~~; /,~~,( Date: 2- /~t-O 2
Applicant/Owner: fjj~C/~O ~ ~ /zD ~s ~ County: _ cs4 ; / ~j,.~
investigator: _~~ n (/' /Lt ~ in .~.~ State• /fj-L
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? 1(~No Community ID: _ ~'-fd(c,,,,,/
Is the site signifiicantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes f~ Transect ID:
is the area a potential Problem Area? Yeses Plot ID: ~~,~~
_ (tf needed, explain on reverse
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum di
In color
Dominant Plant Species ~ dicato
Stra
1. ~_cl'Ofe~~ f~7/CC:7~~~.e. _L ~f 9.

3. _"'_"
11.

5. _"'__
i3.
/-
s. (~+~1>C6~a i cAd.t ~ CC
----~~a ~ ~ FAL- ta. .

s. ~ s.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or
FAC (excluding FAC-) ~ ~~^
v
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
-Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks); Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-Stream. Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
-Aerial Photographs -Inundated
-Other ySaturated in Upper 12 Inches
~„No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
-Drift Lines
-Sediment Deposits
Fisid Observations: _Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 ar more required):
Depth of Surface Water•
• ~ (in) -Oxidized Roat Channels in Upper 12 Inches
- Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (ln.) -Local Soil Survay Data

Depth to Saturated Sail:
(in.) _FAC-Neutral Test
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

. t _.

gnu
Map Unit Name_ ~/1 '
(Series and Phasel: ~~(~I J`i .~ cs `
sG K ~j (dC~ Drainage Class: G./
//''
Taxonomy (Subgroup): ~ !'~i ~ (7'4 Feid Observations
~~k Gtu ~~J Confirm Mapped Type: Yes
Profile Description:
Depth ~ Matrix Color Mottle Caters Mottle Texture, Concretions,
ches rizo fMunsell Moistl ( Munsell Moistl Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
(o Y2 - S/ -- ~-- ~a c h
Hydric Soil indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface layer in Sandy Soiis
_ Sulfidie Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soiis
_ Aqufc Moisture Regime _ Usted on Local Hydrie Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Usted on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chrome Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINAT(UN
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soiis Present?
Remarks:
Yes ~ (Circle) (Circle)
Yes ~
Yes ~ Is this Sampling Paint Within a Wetland? Yes ~ '
Approved by HQUSACE 2/92
HJL '
8/93 , .. ..

_ __... _.
a USAGE AID#
~ ~
i~®~i
DWQ#
...
Site # Cll (indicate on attached map) {
___. ...___...._ ._-_.__ ._ __..._ I
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCDOT Rail Division
3. Date of evaluation: Mav 26, 2006
5. Name of stream: UT to Bull Run
7. Approximate drainage area: 33.4 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 50'

2. Evaluator's name: Scherrer / EcoScience
4. Time of evaluation: 11:15 am
6. River basin: Cape Fear
8. Stream order: 1
10. County: Guilford
11. Site coordinates (if known): 36.006349977N, 79.909771732W 12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
on railroad track 4750 feet southwest of intersection with Macl<ay Road (SR 1549)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Siding improvements
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Clear
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters -Nutrient Sensitive Waters WS-IV Water Supply Watershed _(I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential
30 % Forested
22. Bankfull width: 6 feet
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
_% Commercial 80 % Industrial _% Agricultural
70 % Cleared /Logged _% Other
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1 - 2 feet
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous .Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 36 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 5-26-06
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USAGE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POIN T RANGE
# CH
ACTE
IS
ICS
AR
R
T SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain

1 Presence of flow /persistent pools in stream
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 5
1
no flow or saturation = 0; stron flow = max oints
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 1
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max oints
3 Riparian zone 0- 6 0- 4 0- 5 1
no buffer = 0; Conti ous, wide buffer = max oints
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 2
extensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es = max oints

5 Groundwater discharge
0 - 3
0 - 4
0 - 4
0
no dischar e = 0; s rin s, see s, wetlands, etc. = max oints
-Vi
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0 - 4
0 - 4
0 - 2
2
~ no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max oints
~ Entrenchment /floodplain access 0- 5 0- 4 0- 2 1
a" dee 1 entrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max oints
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0- 6 0- 4 0- 2 0
no wetlands = O; lar a ad
acent wetlands = max oints
9 Channel sinuosity 0- 5 0- 4 0- 3 1
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max oints
10 Sediment input 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 2
extensive de osition= 0; little or no sediment = max oints

11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate *
NA
0 - 4
0 - 5
2
fine, homo enous = 0; lar e, diverse sizes = max oints
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 5 2
,'~ dee 1 incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max oints
,,H„~
13 Presence of major bank failures
0 - 5
0 - 5
0 - 5
3
~ severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max oints
14 Root depth and density on banks 0 - 3 0 - 4 0 - 5 3
F no visible roots = 0; dense roots throu bout = max oints
~
15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 5
4
substantial im act =0; no evidence = max oints
16 Presence of riffle-pooUripple-pool complexes 0- 3 0- 5 0- 6 1
~ no riffles/ri les or ools = 0; well-develo ed = max oints
~ 1 ~ Habitat complexity 0- 6 0- 6 0- 6 2
~ little or no habitat = 0; fre uent, varied habitats = max oints

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0 - 5
0 - 5
0 - 5
2
~ no shadin ve etation = 0; continuous cano = max oints
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0 - 4 0 - 4 1
dee 1 embedded = O; loose structure = max
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0 - 4 0 - 5 0 - 5 1
~ no evidence = 0; common numerous es = max oints
~- Presence of amphibians
21 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 2
O no evidence = 0; common, numerous t es = max oints
''~
22 Presence of fish
0 - 4
0 - 4
0 - 4
0
no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max oints
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 2
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max oints
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 36
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

North Carolina Division of Water Gfuality -- Stream tderttification Form; Version 3..i

Date: ~_~, ,.~,~ Project: ~~ ,~ 5 ~;..tS Latitude: ,
~~~i`~`
~
1 99~
Evaluator: ,~~~,.~, f,~-~~~~. Site: G„~ Longitude: ~~t~, c~~~~~' ~3
Total Points:
Stream !s at least intermittent ~'~w County:
~~,~- ~d Other
g
Quad Name: ~
, /
~
~ ` `~~' e
if? 79 or erennial if Z 30 .
.
,,~
.
,,

A. Geomor hot© (Subtotal =~.`) Abs~"t~'t °'::~~rt- ~~_ ct~r~~;t~:: ~ ~:tra~:g
1 a. Continuous bed and- bank 0 1 2
2. Sinuosity 0 2
3
3. fn-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 2 3
4. Soli texture or stream substrate sorting 0 i
3
5. Active/relic floodplain p 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 1 3
7. Braided channel 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits ~ 0 2 3
9 e Natural levees 1 2
3
10. Headcuts 2 3
i i. Grade controls .5 1 1 5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 ,5 1
13. Second or greater order chahnei on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented No ~ Yes . 3
evidence.
i an-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H drola Subtotal
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, ar
Water in channel -- d or rowin season 0 1 2 3
16. Leafiitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 1 1 ~
it3. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 1
1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? ~ N _ 0` Yes ~ t.5
_
-C. Ciiolo (Subtotal ~
2f7 .-Fibrous roots in channel 2 1 ~ 0
21 .Rooted plants in channel 2 i
0
22. Crayfish 0.5 1
"
1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 •= 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 `t~-
1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 ~ 0.5 _n; '1 " 1.5
27. Fliamentous algae; periphyton ~` 0.5 1 ~ i 6
28. Iran oxid21ng bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 .
15
29 . Vlletland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 , SAV = 2.0; Qther 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form far additional notes.) Sketch:

~,......
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # CIS (indicate on attached map)
C ~ ~' S
~ ~ ~ i ~ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET ~ ~-
r* `I .
S4
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: ~~~ ~~ ~ c~~/i ,~~ ~ -°} 2. Evaluator's name: ~~~`~~ / ~~.oSc.; ~°irt L~
3. Date of evaluation: ~ ' ~ 3 ` ~ ~~ 4. Time of evaluation: ~ f %Q ~ bt F'~"'
5. Name of stream: ~~ ~ ~Jv~ l I ~ d'^ 6. River basin: ~~ ~ ~
7. Approximate drainage area: ~-~ t~L~ D ~Jt I v-~f Z 8. Stream order: ^^ ~~~
9. Length of reach evaluated: ~ ~ l 0. County: V'"~" ~
3 . ua
11. Site coordinates (if known): ~~ • q 6 t ~ Sy In1 12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
l5. Recent weather conditions:
cy~ - .rPi+~~

16. Site conditions at time of visit: C~-~ vW
l7. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fishe-r~ie~s Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters {Water Supply Watershed J-1~-(I_IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO f yes, estimate the water surface area•
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YE NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential
~ ?`' % Forested
22. Bankfull width: ~ V
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight -Occasional bends -Frequent meander
SJ.V~vr~~
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): ~/ Comments:
Evaluator's Signature °/ ~
This channel evaluation form
-Very sinuous -Braided channel
Date ~ ` t "~ °" ~
-Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (> 10%)
is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
~~ % Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
~~% Cleared /Logged _% Other ( ~
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank)
~u~
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION'PO~I~' T 1tA~GE
___
_
rt
~ CHA1tACTEKTSTICS
Coastal
Piedmont ~
SCORE
~ Mount;un
I
~ Presence of t7ow /persistent pools in stream 0 - 5 0- 4 0 -
1
~ (no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max Dints) ~
~ ~ ~ Evidence of past human alteration 0- 6 0 5 D 5
2 (extensive alteration=0; no alteration = max Dints)
Riparian zone 0- 6 0- 4 0 S
3
no buffer= 0; conti:uous, wide buffer = max Dints)
Evidence of nutrienf or chemical discharges 0 - S 0 - 4 0 - 4 L..~

~, 4 -
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges -max ~omts)
~' ~ ~ Groundwater discharge 0.3 0=4 0-4
~` (no discharge ° 0; s rims, see s, wetlands; etc. = max Dints}
u
~' Presenceof adjacent floodplain
~
0-4
0-4
0 2 `~
r
~,,, 6 (no flood .lain = 0; extensive flood fain = max Dints)
x' 7 Entrenchment / floodplain access 0- 5 0- 4 0 2
dee l entrenched = 0; fi-e uent flooding = max onts)
~, 8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0 - 6 -0 - 4 0 2
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
~ Channel sinuosity 0- 5 0- 4 0 3
(extensive channelization = 0; naturalmeander = max Dints)

10 Sedinrent input.
0-5
0-4
0-4 ~ :_
(extensive de osition= 0; little or no sediment = max Dints)
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0 - 4 0- 5
~ '
~ 11 (fine, homo enous = 0; lame, diverse sizes = max Dints)
_

2
nnel incision or widenin
ce of cha
Eviden g
_

0-~

_

0 4

_

0 5
~`'

_.
~ ~.
i
;;, 1
- (dee 1 incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
;,,,~ Presence of major bankfailures 0 - 5 0 5 0 - 5 ~
~ ~ 13 (severe erosion =0; no erosion stable banks =max Dints) F
~~ Root depth and density on banks 0 _; 0 - ~ 0 5
:'
~~ 14 (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max Dints)
/' lm act b a riculture livestock or timber roduction
P' Y'g P
0-5
0-4
0.-5 '
15 (substantialim act=0; no evidence= max Dints) ~~
~ Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0 - ~ 0 - 5 0'- 6
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ^o ritfles/ri les or Dols = 0; well-deveto ~cd = max oiuts) ~
~ Habitat complexity 0- 6 0- 6 0- 6
~ f ~ (little or no habitat = 0; fret cent, varied habitats = max Dints) ~-`
Al Canopy coverage over streanibed ~'
f ~ (I~o shading; vegetation = 0; continuous cano ~ = max Dints)
d
Substrate embeddedness NA* 0- 4 0- 4 ~
1 ~ (dee,l ~ embedded = 0; loose structure = max) ~
~~ Presence of sh•eam invertebrates (see paged) 0~ 0S 05 '~'-l
no evidence = 0; common; numerous tv es = max ~ointsl t:'<

Presence of amphibians 0- 4 0- d 0- 4 ~ „,~
Q ~ 1 (no evidence = 0; common, numerous tv es = max oiip its) ~,•%
~~

22 Presence offish
0-4
0-4
0-4 ~

r
(no evidence = 0' common, numerous types = niax points)
Evidence of wildlife use 0 - 6 0 - ~ 0 - ~ ~~"="'
23 (no evidence 0; abundant evidence max Dints) $
TotalPoints Possible ~ 100 100 10~~
--
TOTAL SCORE (also enter onfirst pabe) ~
~~
_ ---- -
*These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

~ ~~--- .
f~
A. Geomorpholo (Subtotal = I ~ )
1a. Continuous bed and bank
2. Sinuosity
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
5. Active/relic floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Braided channel
8. Recent alluvial deposits
9 a Natural levees
10. Headcuts
11. Grade controls
12. Natural valley or drainageway
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
a Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtatal = ~ 1
Absent Weak Moderate Strc
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3
0 1 3
0 1 2 3
0 'rT 2 3
0 1 2 3
0 2 3
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3
1 2 3
0 0.5_ 1 1.5
0 0.5 1 1.5
No ~ Yes=3
14. Groundwater flow/discharae_ 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- dr or rowin season 0 1 ~ 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0. 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes ~ 1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = -P' ~'S )
20°. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21°. Rooted plants in channel 3 t~ 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0. 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 1 1.5
29 °. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other - 0
items cu ana ri Locus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1

USACE AID#
DWQ#
Site # ~'t ~ (indicate on attached map)
f C ,~
~ ~ i1 t ~ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET '~
':
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: /"'~'''~~~ ~~ ~ ~i~ ~ j~1r1 2. Evaluator's name: ~~'~~~ ~C c4 S ~;~ (,`
3. Date of evaluation: ~ " i 3 " ~ 6 4 Time of 1 t' ~` ~ ~s ~~
5. Name of stream: (/("r ~ rJ~ t t ~ ~ s.,
-Z
7. Approximate drainage area: ~~• o«~ ~ -i ~ ~^"
9. Length of reach evaluated: ~D
3~o-vo 3c(p2 N
11. Site coordinates (if known): Vie. a ~ WU R ~ w
eva ua//io~~n.
6. River basin: t..~-~ ~~~`°~
8. Stream order: ~
10. County: ~~(7~'
12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach u-lder evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): 'e-7~ (~V ~y~Pi/~
15. Recent weather conditions: G~.ri j'W
16. Site conditions at time of visit: ~~~. 1'ttM
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known
Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters
-Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheri~es -H-abitat
-Nutrient Sensitive Waters ~ater Supply Watershed .L (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE NO f yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel. appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential % Commercial a0 % Industrial
~ ~`~ % Forested
22. Bankful] width: a ~ ~
3v % Cleared /Logged _% Other
Agricultural
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): ~_~,
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) / Moderate (4 to l 0%) -Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight ~ Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): GI ~ Comments:
Evaluator's Signature (J • S t/~~/~"I~/~'~ Date ~ '1 ~~ Q
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Fonn subject to change -version 06703. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
`- i`~- - ECORE~ION POIN 1' IZ.aivi(:C ~
O
C
CHARACTERISTICS Coastal Piedmont ' ~ itilountain C
R

nee of flow / ersistent ools in stream,
Prese
P P
~

5
-

4
0
_

0 5
l
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flo~~~ = max oints)
`~
~ ~
~ Evidence of past human alteration 0'- 6 0 - 5 0 5-

i " eration =0~ no alteration = max oints) -
(extensive alt
3 Riparian zone 0- 6 0- 4 0 5 ~
~ (no buffer= 0; conti~uons, wide buffer= max oints) .~
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0~-4 ~ ~ 0-4
~
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max oints)
~ Groundwater discharge 0 _; ~ ~0 -4- ~ 0 - 4 '~
!
~~ 'r; 5 (nodischar~e ° 0; s rims, see s, wetlands, etc.° max outs)
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0 _ 4 0 = =1 0` 2
1
'f' (~io flood lain = 0; zxtensive flood lain = rnax oints) .
Entrenchment / floodplain access 0_ j 0- 4 0 2
7 (dee I entrenched =0; fre cent flooding max oints) ~-~
g Presence of adjacent wetlands 0- 6 0 d 0 2
~
(no wetlands = 0; lar~ e adjacent wet{ands -max oints) ~-
Channel sinuosity 0_- 5 0- 4 0- 3 "_'
i 9 nsive channelization = 0; natural meander _ max aints)
t ~"~
e
:(ex
in ut
Sediment
p
-
0-~

0-4
_
0 4

~._:~~ .
l~ extensive de osition= 0; little or no sediment =max oints)
Size & diversity of channel bedsubstrate NA* 0 4 0 - S
1
I 1 (fine, homo enous ° 0; lar e;diverse sizes =max oints _
Evidenceof channel incision or widening ~
0-5 _
0 4
0-5
-~
;.r ' I Z (dee 1 incised= 0; stable bed~~ banks = max oints)
Presence of major bank failures p - 5 0 - 5 0 - 5 ' `_ ,
~ 13 (severe erosion = 0; noerosion; stable banks= max oints ,
C~1 Root depth. and density on banks ~ _ ~ 0 _ ~ 0 - 5 -
r- l4
(no-visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max oints)
~,
/~ Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 5
.,
1 ~ (substantial im act =0; no evidence = max oints)
~ Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool conrplexes p_ ~ 0- 5 0- 6
I (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed max points)
~ Habitat complexity _
0 6 _
0 6
0~- 6
~ i ~ (little or no habitat =-0; fie cent, varied habitats = max oints)
S Canopy coverage over streambed 0 - 5 0 ~ 0- 5 °`
~ 1 (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous cano = max oints) `'~
x'
Substrate embeddedness NA* 0_ 4 0- 4 t
19 (dee I embedded = 0; loose structure = max) i
Presence ofstream invertebrates (see page ~) 0 _ 4 0 5 0 - S ~ ~
i
' ~~ (no evidence = 0; common numerous types = max points)
.t
~ ~
~r Presence of amphibians 0 _ ~} p - ~} 0 4
Q 21 (no evidence = 0; common, numerous tv es = max points)
~
0
~z Presence of fish
o-a
o-a
n-a
q (no evidence= 0; common, nume~_ous tv yes = max points) _
Evidence of wildlife use 0 _ ( 0 - 5 0 - ~
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)

Total Points Possible LOS 100 100
'.TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) ~ ~
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

~~
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal = t'' _) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 ~ 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 2 g
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0' 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 2 3
9 a Natural levees 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 ~1. 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 _ .5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No ~0
Yes = 3
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = ~
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- dr or rowin season ~ 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 r1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No Yes = 1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = ~'~ )
20b. Fibrous roots in channel ~ 3 ', 2 1 0
21b. Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish _ 0 0. 1 1.5
23. Bivalves ~ 1 2 3
24. Fish l 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians , 0.5~ 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton :>`0" 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. ~~ 0.5 1 1.5
29 °. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other ~0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1

USACE AID#
DWQ #_
Site # C16 (indicate on attached map)
~ ~ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
i~.~i ','
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCDOT Rail Division 2. Evaluator's name: Scherrer / ECOScience
3. Date of evaluation: May 26, 2006 4. Time of evaluation: 11:50 am
5. Name of stream: UT to Deep River 6. River basin: Cape Fear
7. Approximate drainage area: 20.8 acres 8. Stream order: 1
9. Length of reach evaluated: 50' 10. County: Guilford
11. Site coordinates (if known): 35.992435421 N. 79.937812807W 12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
on railroad track 2100 feet northeast of the Deep River crossing
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Siding improvements
15. Recent weather conditions: Clear
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Clear
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters -Nutrient Sensitive Waters WS-IV Water Supply Watershed _(I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential
5 % Forested
22. Bankfull width: 2-3 feet
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
_% Commercial 80 % Industrial % Agricultural
95 % Cleared /Logged _% Other
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1-3 feet
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g:, the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 29 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 5-26-Oti
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please ca11919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POIN T RANGE
# CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain

1 Presence of flow /persistent pools in stream
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 5
2
no flow or saturation = 0; stron flow = max oints
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 0
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max oints
3 Riparian zone 0- 6 0- 4 0- 5 1
no buffer = 0; Conti ous, wide buffer = max oints
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 1
extensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es = max oints

5 Groundwater discharge
0 - 3
0 - 4
0 - 4
0
no dischar e = 0; s rin s, see s, wetlands, etc. = max oints

6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0 - 4
0 - 4
0 - 2
2
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max oints
a ~ Entrenchment /floodplain access 0- 5 0- 4 0- 2 1
dee 1 entrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max oints
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0- 6 0- 4 0- 2 0
no wetlands = 0; lar a ad
acent wetlands = max oints
9 Channel sinuosity 0- 5 0- 4 0- 3 1
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max oints
10 Sediment input 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 1
extensive de osition= 0; little or no sediment = max oints
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0 - 4 0 - 5 1
fine, homo enous = O; lar e, diverse sizes = max oints
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 5 2
y+ dee 1 incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max oints

13 Presence of major bank failures
0 - 5
0 - 5
0 - 5
3
~ severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max oints
~ 14 Root depth and density on banks 0 - 3 0 - 4 0 - 5 2
H no visible roots = 0; dense roots throu out = max oints

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 5
4
substantial im act =0; no evidence = max oints
16 Presence of riffle-pooUripple-pool completes 0- 3 0- 5 0- 6 1
~ no riffles/ri les or ools = 0; well-develo ed = max oints
e.~
1 ~ Habitat complexity
0 - 6
0 - 6
0 - 6
2
little or no habitat = 0; fre uent, varied habitats = max oints

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0 - 5
0 - 5
0 - 5
1
~ no shadin ve etation = 0; continuous cano = max oints
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0 - 4 0 - 4 2
dee 1 embedded = O; loose structure = max

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 - 4
0 - 5
0 - 5
0
no evidence = 0; common numerous t es = max oints
Presence of am
hibians
21 p 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 1
O no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max oints
'"~
22 Presence of fish
0 - 4
0 - 4
0 - 4
0
no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max oints
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 1
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max oints
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 29
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

North C:aralina Division of Wa#er Quality -- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: °~ - ;p ~- ~ Fra ject: ~~
Evaluator: ~5~~ ~~"~ ~~a~~ Site: G~~
Total Points:
Stream is at least /ntermfttent ~ ~~ County: j ~ ('~
if> 18 orperennlal if>_ 3r7 i'~
A. Geomor holog subtotal =~) ~r~:s~
1$. Continuous bed and bank 0
2. Sinuosity 0
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
5. Active/relic floodplain
6. pepositional bars or benches
7. Braided channel 0
0
p

0
$. Recent alluvial deposits
9 a Natural levees 0
10. Headcuts
11. Grade controls
0
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0
i3. 5ecand or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
r Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H drub ~ Subtotal=
14. Groundwater flowldischarge

p
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or rowin season ~
16. Leaflitter 1.5
17. Sediment on plants or debris
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
19. Nydric soils (redoximorphic features) present?
- C Bio1O Subtotal = ~~s )
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
2i .Rooted plants in channel
22. Crayfish
23. Bivalves
24. Fish 0
25: Amphibians p
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
~,~~~~5 Latitude: ~'~; r~~ 35y a1
longitude: ~~~~)~~(~,~
Other
e.g. Quad Name: ~t ~h ~,~~
1 2 - 3
1 2 S
2 3
1 2 3
1' 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
2 g
1 2 3
1 2
0.5 i .5
0.5 1 .5
Nct/- 0) Yes = 3
~ 2 3
1 ~ 3
1` _ 0.5 0
0.5 1 1.5
0.5 1 1.5
Yes . 1.5
2 1
2 1
0.5 1
1 2
0.5 1
0.5 ft
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0.5 1
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1
29 .Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 , SAV . 2.0;
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Itam 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
0
0
1.5
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1:5

USACE AID#
~/ _ ._~.. W.~
_.,DW . #,, _ ._
....., _.
Q Site # N ~" (indicate on attached map)
~ ~ i ~ ~ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
G -~-
~~

y4
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: ~t ''` (r(~~ ( ~"~ ~ t'Q `"'- 2. Evaluator's name: S~/'~/ /EG~~c.i ~ ~ !~-
3. Date of evaluation: ~ ' / 3 "~ ~O 4. Time of evaluation: ~ ~ 3i7 ~/~-.
5. Name of stream: (,l.T ~"1J ~ ~° ~Z ~ ~ ~
7. Approximate drainage area: 3 ~ ~ ~ v- ~~ O~ oC~ c~h: ~
~~
9. Length of reach evaluated:
3~. a ~ 3t,
11. Site coordinates (if known): ~-q . 4 ~ ~'d SS ~
6. River basin ('~~Q ~~
8. Stream order: ~
10. County: ~, (~/~
12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(~~ ' S ~ d ~ Pu~P tS},-»~, dam, ~o~
14. Proposed channel work (if any): ~r,,t,,l,Irl ~'~- +~.(~ (A tPYr~~
15. Recent weather conditions: ~~`°~r ~~ ~"
16. Site conditions at time of visit: C Grp, ~(!!
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal W'at/ers -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient^Se~nsi~tive Waters V Water Supply Watershed ~_(I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point'?~~~(~ NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: Q ~ ~" a G
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? 'E NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: ~ % Residential % Commercial GD % Industrial °/moo Agricultural
~ ._% Forested ~ % Cleared /Logged _% Other
22. Bankfull width: ~ "~ ~ 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): ~~2 ' 3
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) /Gentle (2 to 4%} -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (> I 0%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional .bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate farm used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 represejnting a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 5 ~ Comments: ~~Kl~ Q~~- ~ P~~~ , l'~ S ~Q,~~~ r>•iQ ~ '
/~ r~ tn~ ~
Evaluator's Signature ~~- ~~~'~~ ~' Date ~ ` t ~ - ~ ~
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and- does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAl~~ QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

~
~ - -
~-- -~ -
>ECOREGION POII~I
T RANGE

'~
C1lAR~1C~TE_RISTICS

Coastal

Piedmont

-
19ountain SCORE

I
1 Presence of~flow /persistent pools in stream 0 - 5 0- 4 0 - 5
(no flow or saturation = 0; strop flow=max Dints)
~ Evidence,ofpast human alteration '0 - 6 0 - 5 0 -5
~~ (extensive alteration =~0; no alteration= max Dints)
I ~
~ Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
3_
(no buffer = O; contiguous, wide buffer = max Dints)
~ Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 -4
3
(extensive discharges = 0; no dischar es = max Dints) ~
~ i~ ~ Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0'-4
~~ (no discharge= 0; s rims, see s, wetlands, etc..= ma~~ Dints)
6 Presence of ad~acent flood lain
n
0 - 4
0 - 4
0 2
~" max Dints
_ ~ ive flood lai
(no flood lain 0; extei s )
~ ~ Entrenchment / floodplain access 0 -5 0 -4 0 -2
(dee l entrenched = 0; fi e uent flooding = max Dints)

~ 8
~ Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0 -6 0 -4 0-2
~ acent wetlands = max Dints)
no~ wetlands = 0; lame ad
~ Channel sinuosity 0- 5 0- 4 0-
~
extensive channelization ° 0; nah~ral meander = max Dints) ~
lb Sediment input 0_ j 0- 4 0- 4
extensive de osition= 0; little or no sediment = max Dints
_
11 ~ Size&`diversity ofchannelbed substrate N.~* 0-4 0 - 5
(fine, homo<=enous = 0; lar e, diverse sizes = max Dints)
l~ Evidence of channel incision or widening 0 - 5 0 4 0 - ~ 7

;;.,
~ (dee l incised =0; stable bed& banks = max Dints
_ __ _ ,
13 Presence of major bank failures 0 - 5 0 - 5 0 - 5
-~ (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable bank = max Dints)
~ 14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-~
E-+
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max Dints
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0~
0-4
0-5 t /,
-
15
(substantial im act =0; no evidence = max ointsj T
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0 - ~ 0 - 5 0 6 ~
no riffles/ri les or Dols = 0; well-develo red = max oiuts)
~
~ 17 Habitat complexity. 0- 6 0- 6 0- 6
~ (little or no habitat= 0; fre uent; varied habitats = max Dints)
~ ~ 8 Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0- 5
0-5
1 (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous cano = max points)
~
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0 -4 0-4 ~~
(dee l ~ embedded = 0; loose structtue = max)
~ Presence ofstream invertebrates. (see page 4) 0 - 4 0 - 5 0 5
~
' 0 (no evidence = 0; common; numerous t es = max Dints _ i °
'
r+
~
21
Presence of amphibians
0 - 4
0 - ~
0 - 4
3
Q ~ common; numerous tv es = max points)
(noevidence = 0;

0 ~
2~ .
Presence of fish 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4
~ (no evidence = 0; common, numerous tv es = max Dints)

~ Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-~
0-5
~ (no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max Dints)
Total Points Possible 106 100 100
_ __-
TOT ~L SCORE (also enter ~n first pale) ~ ~j~
~-
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

C(~
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal = l`i~. ~ ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 ~ 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 2 g
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9 a Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0.5 1 1.
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No ~
Yes = 3
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = ~~ ~
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- dr or rowin season 0 1 ~ 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 .5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = ~ ~ ~ )
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21°. Rooted plants in channel 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5~ 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversit~~ and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton ~ 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0. 1 1.5
29 b. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other 0
items ZU and z1 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # C18 (indicate on attached map)
~ ~ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
~~~~~ ,,
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCDOT Rail Division 2. Evaluator's name: Scherrer / EcoScience
3. Date of evaluation:- May 26, 2006 4. Time of evaluation: 1:00 pm
5. Name of stream: UT to Deep River 6. River basin: Cape Fear
7. Approximate drainage area: 7.1 acres 8. Stream order: 0
9. Length of reach evaluated: 50' 10. County: Guilford
11. Site coordinates (if known): 35.980283081 N, 79.950944119W 12. Subdivision name (if any): --
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
on railroad track 5000 feet southwest of Deep River crossing
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Siding improvements
15. Recent weather conditions: Clear
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Clear
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters -Nutrient Sensitive Waters WS-IV Water Supply Watershed _(I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 40 % Residential _% Commercial 10 % Industrial _% Agricultural
40 % Forested 60 % Cleared /Logged _% Other
22. Bankfull width: 5 feet 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1 foot
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 48 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 5-26-06
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POIN T RANGE
# ARACTE
ISTICS
C
H
R SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain

1 Presence of flow /persistent pools in stream
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 5
1
no flow or saturation = 0; stron flow = max oints
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 1
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max oints
3 Riparian zone 0- 6 0- 4 0- 5 3
no buffer = 0; Conti ous, wide buffer = max oints
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 3
extensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es = max oints

5 Groundwater discharge
0 - 3
0 - 4
0 - 4
1
no dischar e = 0; s rin s, see s, wetlands, etc. = max oints

6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0 - 4
0 - 4
0 - 2
2
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max oints
,~
~ Entrenchment / floodplain access
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 2
2
a dee 1 entrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max oints
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0- 6 0- 4 0- 2 2
acent wetlands = max oints
no wetlands = 0; lar a ad
9 Channel sinuosity 0- 5 0- 4 0- 3 2
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max oints
10 Sediment input 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 1
extensive de osition= O; little or no sediment = max oints
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0 - 4 0 - 5 1
fine, homo enous = O; lar e, diverse sizes = max oints
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 5 2
,y, dee 1 incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max oints

13 Presence of ma or bank failures
0 - 5
0 - 5
0 - 5
4
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max oints

14 Root depth and density on banks 0 - 3 0 - 4 0 - 5 3
E„~ no visible roots = 0; dense roots throu out = max oints
~
15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 5
4
substantial im act =0; no evidence = max oints
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0- 3 0- 5 0- 6 1
no riffles/ri les or ools = 0; well-develo ed = max oints
~
~ 17 Habitat complexity 0- 6 0- 6 0- 6 2
little or no habitat = 0; fre went, varied habitats = max oints

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0 - 5
0 - 5
0 - 5
4
no shadin ve etation = 0; continuous cano = max oints
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0- 4 0- 4 2
dee 1 embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0 - 4 0 - 5 0 - 5 1
~,,, no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max oints
21 Presence of amphibians 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 3
O no evidence = 0; common, numerous t es = max oints
O 22 Presence of fish 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 0
~ no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max oints
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 3
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max oints
Total Points Possible ~ 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 48
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

North Carolina Division of Wa#er Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3..1
Date: 5- ~„tn_.,O (p Protect: ~~ ,~; ~--,~ ~ Latitude: ~~ ~g~v~ S3r~~'~
Ev~ aluator: ,~'r-,~~+ ~-t~~ci-~- Site: J~' Longitude: t .,5.;~ ~
~ ~ ~/t
Total Points: Other
S>ream is at least intermittent ~ ~ County: t ~ ~! e.g. Quad Name
if_ 19 orperennial ifir 30 t ~t ~ f~1~ h ~p;~- ;v"~
A. Geomor bolo ~ 5
(Subtotal = ~
~ se7rt
e~;I~ ` _
odet~~;1<~;
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2
2. Sinuosity
3. In-channel structure: riffle-peol sequence 0
0 1
2
4. Soii texture or stream substrate sorting ~ 0 2
5. Active/relic fioodplain 0 1' 2
6. Depositional bars or benches 1 2
7. Braided channel i 2
8. Recent alluvial deposits ~ 0 1 2
9 a Natural levees 1 2
10. Headcuts 0 1 2
11. Grade controls 0•, 1
' 2. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1
13. Second or greater order channel on existin
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
Nt~.~`
Yas = 3
r Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
v-
B. H drolo ~ Subtotal = J )
14 Grcundwater flow/dischar e

0
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
i ,5
g 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or /;+,
0
Water in channel -- d or rowin season l,~/ 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1 5 1 _ 0,5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 1 f 5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines} ~ 0 0, 1 1 5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? ~ No = 0 Yes 5'
G. 8010 (Subtotal = t
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 1
21 .Rooted plants in channel 2
22. Crayfish ~ 0.5 1
23. Bivalves 1 2
2d. Fish 0.5 1
25. Amphibians b 0.5 1
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 " p, 1
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton I#.5 1
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungu"s. 0 0.5 1
29 . INettand plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 , SAV . 2.0;
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Nates: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
0
_0
1.b
3
1.5
1.5
1:5
1.5
1.5 _.._

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(198.7 COE Wetlands Delineatian~Manual~
cog .
Project/Site: ~c3ac -- /~ ~~ ,~;~~ ~G - /,,.Jg ~ Date:
Applicant/Owner: ~~d % ~ f Z"-'2o ^U Z
Investigator. ~`(vr, (/` ~'~, ~ C County: G'4 , (~ ~"/
~ 1 K ~X~a State• ~YC_
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? C o Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation? `~
Is the area a potential Problem Area?~ Transact ID: _ ~~s^~
(If needed, explain on reverse Ye•L:y Plot lD' - ~~,
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species -a
2.'
4.
S.JN:~4X CIaGcC~
6.
7.
8.
ndica a dominant Plant Species
~~~ a rn i tar
9.
70.
~~-~' 11.
12.
~~ C 13.
14.
15.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or
FAC (excluding FAC-)
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
-Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:
_Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
-Aerial Photographs
-Other
~Ya Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth to Free Water in Pit:
Depth to Saturated Soil:
r-.-~ --~
(in.l
~~lin.
Remarks:
16.
~Sp~
Wetland Hydrology indicators:
Primary Indicators:
-Inundated
,Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
-Water Marks
-Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
~CDrainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
-Local Sal Survey Data
_FAC-Neutral Test
-Other (Facplain in Remarks)

.. t.
i

SOILS
Map Unit Name. /~,/ e~ ~ ~C~h ~k~,
" S.~Nd c~4 /da.ti ~// 17
(Series and Phase): /
` S y ) Drainage Class:
fj -
Taxonomy iSubgroupl: ~ ~'f ~ ~ ~r Field Observations
10 ~ ~ ~ ~*~ ~J Confirm Mapped Type: Yes
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Motile Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions.
nche Horizon (Munsell Moist) IMunsell Moistl Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc.

q fi ~ Z-s Y s/Z Z-Sy s/,~ l,-s~.~ ~ e~
--~~
Hydric Sol Indicators:
_ Histosoi _ Concretions'
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface layer in Sandy Soils
_ Suffidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Sols
_ Aouic Moisture Regime _ Usted on Local Hydric Soils list
~! Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
~ Gleyed or Low-Chrama Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarksi
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Sails Present?
Remarks:
No (Circle) (Circle)
No
P~e No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Ye No
Approved by HQUSACE 2/92
HJL
8/93

.,

" ~ ~`-;
DATA FORM n /G .
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (,,~ O
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation~Manual)
Project/Site: ~ox - /ioJ~.:aJ' /~4: lroa c~ Date• -2 - Z ~ -p Z
Applicant/Owner: _ ij/ ~V T - ~ d ~ ~, j~~, County ~ ~„~ ~ / ~e ~.,~
Investigator. a,•t 1/' ~! ~ ~ n ~ ~ r State: ,ij/ C
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~ No Community ID: _ ~„~/chop "
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation!? Yes I~ Transact ID: '
Is the 1~rea a potential Problem Area? .Yes Ns~ Plot ID: _(~~c
(If needed, explain on reverse
VEGETATION
Domin PIaM Soecies
Stn+tum .ndi or Dominant Plant Soec:e~ ~_ Stratum In i at r
1. ttr u,~` T I-~~ 9,
2. [.isw 0~.6« 1 l ~ _~
3. ~/~r oloctA 1 ~S FAc _ 11.
5. ~ 13.
s. Polys t i• ctn.. cic•ro~1:.t,:,~ ~_ F~ C
1a. .
7. 15. "
8. "_'_
T~.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or ~ S~
FAC (excluding FAC-)
Remarks: ", g ." t
HYDROLOGY
,-Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
-Other
ZCNo Recorded Data Availably
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth to Free Water in Pit:
Depth to Saturated Soil:
~~
.~.
._._,_.._(irr.1
Remarks:
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators: ~~;
-Inundated
.,,-Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
-Water Marks
-Drift Lines
-Sediment Deposits
-Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
-Oxidized Raot Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
~tocal Soii Survey pata
_FAC-Neutral Test _
-Other (Explain in Remarks)

SAILS
Map Unit Name. ~
(Series and Phasel: ~~ ~ ~~h ~ /'C ~ .may
jG it d y G ~~) ~°°''' Drainage Ctass: ~y
1
Taxonomy (Subgroupl: ~,T%G ~~~ ~U~Q Feld Observations
~ fS Confirm Mapped Type: Yes No .
. Profile Deseriotion:
Depth ~ Matrix Color Motile Colors MotUs Texture, Concretions.
i ch s Horizon IMunseN Moist? IMunseB Moistl Abundance/Contrast _ S picture. efc.
©_(o ~ 2-r y .3~Z .___ ~ --- /ate

Hydrie Soil Indicators: r .
_ Histosol _ Concretions'
_ Hlstic Epipedon ,High Organic Cor>tert in Surface layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime ~ _ Listed on Local Hydric Sols List
•_ Reducing Conditions _ Usted on National Hydric Soiis List
_ Gleyed or Law-Chrome Colors 'r _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Q(p1. (Circiei _ (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydrie Soils Present? Yes ~ is this Sampling Point Within a Wetlarid7 Yes ~ '
Remarks: - -
-• Approved by HQUSACE 2/92
HJL
8/93 _ •,

DATA FORM C ~o
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Cd>c - H o j,E; ,~ 1 ~ i l.-o ~ a( Date: 2 - Z ~^ C9 2
Applicant/Owner: ~~ Qp j' ~_ Q ~ ~JC. County Gu: / v~rt
Investigator: ,~(da~+ (/' ~(~ ~~, i-~, ~ s State• /!~`L
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~ No Community ID: /,t/~•}/,.~.,1
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes ISta Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes t~ Plot tD: ~-F ® 3
(If needed. explain on reverse
VEG>:TATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum ~d^'ica Dominant Plant Seer+e~ tratu i ator

2. 10.
3. ~clt7llG~ J~ G ~~ Ai C G R ~~ 11.
4.S,~sr~ S1~4c~ ~_ FPFc. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that
FAC (excludin
FAC-) are OBL, FACW or
~ s
'
g (
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
-Recorded Data (Describe in Remarksl:
-Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
-Aerial Photographs
-Other
,~UVo Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: ~ (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: '- ~ - (in,)
Depth to Saturated Sail: .- - (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
?clnundated
Saturated in Upper 121nches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
-Sediment Deposits
_~rainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators 12 or more requiredl:
_Oxidi2ed Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained leaves
-Local Sod Survey Data
_FAC•Neutral Test
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
.:

CAII C
Map Unit Name. ,~,/ /
(Series and Phasel: /yl ~k ~~N D~fc ~ ~~^ ~~
SG'tO'~~ G Z_ Drainage Class:

Taxonomy (Subgroup): ~ ~• is ~~p Reld Observations
~ K ~ G ~ ~S Confirm Mapped Type: Yes ~ .
Profile Descriation:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colon Mollie Texture. Concretions.
" ches ono IMunsell Moistl iMunsell Moistl Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc.
d t to ye ~/, l o YR ~/~ s ~~oK ( _ 5~~`r, id~~ -
Hydric Soil tndicaton:
_ Histosol _ Concretions'
_ Histic Epipedon ~ High Organic Content in Surface layer in Sandy Soils
_ Suifidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Usted on Local Hydric Soils Ust
Reducing Conddions _ Usted on National Hydric Soils Ust
~C Gteyed or Low-Chrome Colon _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Sorts Present?
No (Circle)
No
C:~' No
- (Circtel
is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ~e No
Remarks:
Approved by HCtUSACE 2/92
HJL
8/93 -: ___.. - •,
-- - ._ - ~~ ;.:i

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation~Manuall
cog
Project/Site• ~,~ - /~/d,j,~;.~s ,Qc.; IrJcto4 Date: __ 2 Z1>-O
Applicant/Owner: /mil/ Qd j ~,~~ ~cf ~
County: rm4: /~~ ~J
Investigator: ~.? (/ /Lf c
~- -t H i` 6 State: _ ,Rr ~
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~ No Community ID: ~-( / ,,E
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situationl? Yes ~ Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes ~ Plot ID: V'~cd ~
hf needed, explain on reverse
VEGETATION
Aominant Plant Sepci s Stratum dice or Dominant Plarrc S~pcies
Stratum di a or

'
s T / ~/°L
-
3. ~:d,.. if f~. '`'
4. ~ ~~ ~..~ 4 (~c~ ~ /I~. 1 Z.
5. 13.
s. f M: fGk c ~4 cc c c. _ rr FR L 1a.
7. 16
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or
FAC (excludin
FAC-) G ~~
g ~
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
-Recorded Data (Describe in Remarksl: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs -Inundated
-Other +Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
,~No Recorded Data Available -Water Marks
-Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits

Field Observations: -
-Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or mom requiredl:
Depth of Surface Water- '
• -"
(in.l Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
_Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: ~` pn,l -Local Soil Survey Data
_FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: ~_ (in•~ -Other (Explain in Remarks) ,
Remarks:

:.

SODS
Map Unit Name- /,~ /
(Series and Phase): /'"r ~ IE ~~id~``t jG'^'~~ ~'~~'~`-~ Drainage Class: L/Q
/~ ~¢(~ Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): ~ ~•~ : L t~fQ~ '~ Confirm Mapped Type: Yes
profile Descriotion•
Depth Matrix Color Matde Colors Motde Texture, Concretions,
)inches) ri o IMunseli Moistt (Munseil Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc.
ID•-' _.__ ~O YQ 'FEZ (O y~ MI6 J ~~~> ~ 0 a ~,
Hydric Soil Indcators:
_ Histosol
_ Histic Epipedon
_ Sulfidic Odor
_ Aquic Moisture Regime
~CReducing Condttions
Zc Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
_ Concretions
_ High Organic Content in Surhace layer in Sandy Soils
_ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Listed on Local Hydric Solis List
Listed on National Hydrie Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks)
II Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation PresentT Y®~ (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils PresentT Pe No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wettand7 Yes (~ -
II Remarks:
approves ny rtuuSAC:e zia:
HJL
8/93 , -

.,

'+ USACE AID#
,__.-.__ T~__._.__._ ___._-----_.---
DWQ #
Site # C19 (indicate on attached map)
~ ~ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
i~.~i
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCDOT Rail Division
3. Date of evaluation: May 26, 2006
5. Name of stream: UT to Deep River
7. Approximate drainage area: 716 acres (1.1 Sq mi)
9. Length of reach evaluated: 50'

2. Evaluator's name: Scherrer / EcoScience
4. Time of evaluation: 1:45 pm
6. River basin: Cape Fear
8. Stream order: 3
10. County: Guilford
11. Site coordinates (if known): 35.977885071 N. 79.953934554W 12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
on railroad track 315 feet southwest of intersection with Scientific Street (SR 1332)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Siding improvements
15. Recent weather conditions: Clear
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Clear
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters -Nutrient Sensitive Waters WS-IV Water Supply Watershed _(I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 7.3 acres
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 90 % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
15 % Forested 85 % Cleared /Logged _% Other
22. Bankfull width: 6-12 feet 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1-4 feet
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight -Occasional bends X Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 63 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 5-26-06
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION FOIN T RANGE
# T
CHARAC
ERISTICS SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain

1 Presence of flow /persistent pools in stream
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 5
3
no flow or saturation = 0; stron flow = max oints
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 1
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max oints
3 Riparian zone 0- 6 0- 4 0- 5 1
no buffer = 0; Conti ous, wide buffer = max oints
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 2
extensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es = max oints
5 Groundwater discharge 0- 3 0- 4 0- 4 3
no dischar e = 0; s rin s, see s, wetlands, etc. = max oints
U
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0 - 4
0 - 4
0 - 2
3
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max oints
,~
~ Entrenchment !floodplain access
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 2
3
p"' dee 1 entrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max oints
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0- 6 0- 4 0- 2 0
no wetlands = O; lar a ad
acent wetlands = max oints
9 Channel sinuosity 0- 5 0- 4 0- 3 3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max oints
10 Sediment input 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 2
extensive d osition= 0; little or no sediment = max oints
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0 - 4 0 - 5 3
fine, homo enous = 0; lar e, diverse sizes = max oints
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 5 2
dee 1 incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max oints

'"''
13 Presence of ma or bank failures
~
0-5
0-5
0-5
4
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max oints

14 Root depth and density on banks 0 - 3 0 - 4 0 - 5 2
E no visible roots = 0; dense roots throu out = max oints
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0
5
0
4
0
5
4
15 substantial im act =0; no evidence = max oints - - -
16 Presence of riffle-pooUripple-pool complexes 0- 3 0- 5 0- 6 4
no riffles/ri les or ools = 0; well-develo ed = max oints
Habitat complexity
1 ~ 0 - 6 0 - 6 0 - 6 4
little or no habitat = 0; fre uent, varied habitats = max oints

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0 - 5
0 - 5
0 - 5
2
~ no shadin ve etation = 0; continuous cano = max oints
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0 - 4 0 - 4 3
dee 1 embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0 - 4 0 - 5 0 - 5 4
~ no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max oints
(
~ Presence of amphibians
, 21 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 3
O no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max oints
22 Presence of fish 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 4
no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max oints
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 3
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max oints
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 63
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

North Carotins L7ivision of Wa#er Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: ~j'-~ ~ ~ ;~ Project: ~~ ,~ ~~~~- Latitude:
Evaluator:~~,; ~~`~ ~~,}.~~,~,~, Site: ~~ Longitude: ~~.~`:~'~'3`k~5sy
Total Points:
Stream is at /east~ntermittent ,~~
ifz 19 or erennial if_> 30
County: ~ j
' ' ~"
Other
e.g. Quad Name: j.~, (~ t~Oin j,, S
A. Geomor bolo (Subtotal = 2-~' ~) ,~~:s~t`rt '~ ~~`k~.. t~~d~~~ti;~.: Stnart;g
18. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. !n-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 3
4. Sol texture or stream substrate sorting ~ 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 .
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2
7. Braided channel 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits ~ 0 1 3
9 a Natural levees ~ t 2 3
i 0. Headcuts 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natura( valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1
13. Second or greater order channel on existin -
USGS or NRCS map or other documented No_ 0 Yes
evidence
~ Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H drolo ~ Subtotal = ~ )
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 f
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or rowin season 0 1 2
16. Leaflitter 1 0.5
1 ~. Sediment on plants or debris 0 1
18. Organic debris lines or piles {Wrack lines) 0 1
19. Hydric sails {redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes 1
C. $(Olo Subtotal = - ) ,
20 .:Fibrous roots in channel 2 1
21 : flootet~ plants in channel 2 1
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1
23. Bivalves 0 1 2
24. Fish 0 0.5 1
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0.5 1 ,
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0.5 1
~8. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1
29 .Wetland plants in streambed ~ FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 , SAV = 2:0; t
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, kem 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: {use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
~3
~.:~'
0
1.5
1.5
0
.5
1'.5
1:5

USACE A1D#
O~
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: N~~~~ t~i ~ ~1 ~~~~~ 2. Evaluator's name Sc,~G/i"~°'~'~~Go Sci ~ t~
3. Date of evaluation: ~ ' t ~ - ~' ~'
5. Name of stream: (/~~ ~ ~ !,E'~ (~ ~ ~,Y
7. Approximate drainage area: (3 ~~ `~
9. Length of reach evaluated: ~ ~ l ~ . Z ytn~ ~
l 1. Site coordinates (if known): ~ a (~ o~ Y 3 W
4. Time of evaluation:- ~ ~ 9 ~ ~~
6. River basin:- ~ ~-~ ~6~~
8. Stream order:
10. County: ~ t` ~ ~ ~'-
12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
3 ~ ~l4 ' ~ G-- A¢ ~ Su Pm~'i ~', ~ ~~ CS (Z- (33'v~
14. Proposed channel work (if any
15. Recent weather conditions:
~i ~r~ r~ p~, c.~.-.~~- ~
~CL1e~--'~~ (,gyp ~
16. Site conditions at time of visit: G(Qv`~, ~' `~/ ~
l7. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters ~ Water Supply Watershed~(I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use
22. Bankfull width:
~- s
S~ % Residential
5~ % Forested
Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
`~O % Cleared /Logged _% Other (_
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): ~ /2 ~ °~'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: /-Flat (0 to 2%) 'Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to ] 0%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight v Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every cha--acteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown fo-- the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): ~~
Comments: j~ (R-S t"` ~o®I S cA~' S ~?~ C~ I !~-r
Evaluator's Signature (J ~ ~~'~~~~~~~ Date ~~ ~ T- D(~
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
I - LCOItCGTON'POINT RaN

~~
~ r
~ CIIARA~CTERISTICS ~ SC'OIZC
~ r
Coastal Piedmont = ~ ,'~lountaiu
-- --
- --
~ I Presence of flow /persistent pools in stream 0 - 5 0 -4 0 ~ '?,
~ (no flow or saturation = 0; strop flow = max oints)
Evidence of past human alteration 0_ 6 Q_ 5 0 5
2 (extensive alteration= 0; no alteration = max oints) - __
~ Riparianzone
0-6

0 4
-

0-5
~
~ ,_
.-
(no bufter= 0; contiguous, wrde buttes ~-max ourts)
F
Evidence of nutrient or cheutical discharges
0- 5
~0 - 4 _
0 - 4
a
~ (extensive discharges = 0; no dischar es = max oints)
Groundwater discharge 0- 3 0-- 4 0- 4
~ ! ~ 5 (nodischar~e ° 0; s rinUs, see s, wetlands;.. etc. = max points)
~ ~ , Presence of adjacent floodplain 0 - 4 0 - d 0 2
`~'
i- 6 (no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain =max oints)
Z' Entrenchment /floodplain access 0 - 5 0 - 4 0~ 2
~~ =-~ ~ 'dee I entrenched=O;fre uentfloodin~=max oints)
Presence of adjacent wetlands. 0- 6 0- 4 0- 2 3
j 8 (no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max oints)
r
~
Channel sinuosity

0-5

0-4

0`'-3

~o
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander =max oints)
l 0 Sediment input 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4
extensive`de osition= 0; little or no sediment = max oints)
1 t Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0 4 0~- 5
~~
fine,homo enous= O;lar e;diversesizes =max omts
Z Evidence of channel incision or widening 0 5 0- 4 0- 5
~~~
~ ~~
dee 1 incised = 0; stable bed & banks max oints)
~ ~" Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-,
0_5
°~
1 ~ 13 (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max oints)
Ca _
I Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-~
0-5
~ ~ (novisible roots = 0; dense loots throu4hout= max oints)
o
io
15 ~ duct
n..
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber pr
0-~
0-4
0-5
(substantial im act =0; no evidence = max oints)
~ ~ ~ Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes ~ _ ~ 0 - 5 0 - 6
I ~ (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max oints)
~
~ Habitat. complexity 0- 6 0- 6 0`= 6
~
~ I little or no habitat = 0; fret cent, varied habitats = max oints) °
.Canopy coverage over str•eambed 0 - 5 0 5 0 = 5 ~ ..
18 (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous cano = max oints)
~
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0 - 4 0'- 4
(dee ~I ~ embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0 _ ~ 0 -- 5 0 5 ` 3
~~ - ax points
(no evidence. - 0; common, ^umerous t ~ es - m
~

U' Presence of amphibians
0-4
0 -4
0-d
v7
d ~t (n~ evidence ° 0; common, numerous t' es = max points)
~
~'
~~ Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-~
~.
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous tv yes' = max points)
p Evidence of ~i~ildlife use
0-6
0-~
0-5
23 (no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max omts)
Total Paints Possible 10O ~ L00 I~0
--
TOT~L SCORE (also ente~~ oti firstpabe)
~
_ _~_
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

~a~
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal = I i ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 ` 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 ~ 2 3
9 a Natural levees (0~ 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 6 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existin4
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. /'~
No ~ 0 J
~/
Yes = 3
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = ~ )
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- dr or rowin season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 !_O~J 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 c"'r 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = ~ )
20°. Fibrous roots in channel 3 1 0
21°. Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1.5
23. Bivalves ~ 1~ 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 ~0. 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation~Manuall
Project/Site: `o?c - /-(~ ~,;.~~ /Zu ; ly'd4 ~(
Applicant/Owner: _,yC Qp j` _ ~ ~ ~1 ~
Investigator f~o10,4 U •u 4 ,,~~ ~ ,,.r,
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~ No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situationl? Yes Alb
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes ~
(If needed, explain on reverse
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Sa cies Stratum
Z. ~~Q }~tH4) ~ccid64~~, 1
3.
4. ~rH4 f S ~/'/'a /a~q .S
5.~6~+'lt~ GMO hun, .l
6.
7. (.Of1jC~/1q J4 ~ e .t H ~T
S. -~~.L~
c2°
Date: 2 --L ~ -p2
County: 6 u: /,~',, ~ a/
State: ~/'C_
Community ID: 4/6¢(,~,,~
Transect ID:
Plot ID: 0
Indicator Dominant P!a_nt S ecies Stratum di r
F,~ c f 9,
!"flCt/t 10.
11.
1~Rc w,, 12.
~/{CWfi 13.
14.
{-'1fC - 16.
16.
Percent of Dominant Speeies that are OBL, FACW or
FAC (excluding FAC-)
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
-Recorded Osta (Describe in Remarks):
-Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
-Other
~11o Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth to Free Water in Pit:
Depth to Saturated Soil:
Z~_lin.)
_ - (in. )
~ '" (in. )
Remarks:
> S C'1 Sb
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
1Clnundated
iSaturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
-Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
-Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey data
_FAC-Neutral Test
-Other (Explain in Remarks)

i
s - - ---._._____._.____ _ - -- - --
-- - ± ~~

SAILS
Map Unit Name.
(Series and Phase): ~ ~ ~ ~4 ~ ~c` /~
.~4Kd~ oG,•, Drainage Class: !'
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): _F~k~~'k6.r^c Q~.~~o c ~~6~0~`. Confirm Mapped Typa: Yes V~
Profile Description: '
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon tMunseii Maisti tMunsell Moist) AbundancelCantrast Structure. etc.
!n y~,r; 3/Z !0 YK y/s hocta•xi~' 1'a Kd ~ o -

Hydric So~7 Indicators:
_ Histosai _ Concretons•
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface layer in Sandy Soiis
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed an Local Hydric Soils List
I~Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soiis List
,~ Gteyed or Low-Chrome Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soiis Present?
Remarks:
No (Circle! (.Circle)
~ No
~ ~ No Is this Sampling Paint Within a Wetland? ~~ Na
Approved by HQUSACE 2/92
HJL
8/93 :.- :: _.... _ ..:
__. _. ,,
___
s r- ~ , .
.,~

~. C~.~
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
{198.7 COE Wetlands Oetineation~Manual)
Project/Site• ~o x - f~o~ ~rf ~c,: /,•yao~l Date: _ Z Z~ -v 2
Appiicant/Owner: ~~~ ~ -,ems ZcJ ~ Coun
Investigator: /~o(o,~.c ~/' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~. State: .ri-c
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~ No Community ID: ~/,,,/ ,,(
is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation? Yes PQ Transact ID: ~
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes ~ Ptot ID: _(j ~ ®3
(If needed, explain on reverse
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
.. Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soer+~s tratum Indicator
~ iF
2.1,`tt, :G(e.c 6ei• I ~~ r°c' ~/• • _L t~tT~f 10.
3. A~ ~ ~^r ~ : n a 7~ __1___ ~~L 11.
4. 12.
5. ~.~.i~G~ 5~~4CC.
----~ ~ ~/7L
13.
6. Qal.,~+;cL... GC1ro1~%~iVJ. ~ F~ C 14.
7. 15.

8. __
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that
FAC (excluding FAC-) are OBL, FACW or d~
~ ~(~

Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
-Recorded Data (Descnbe in Remarks):
-Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
_Other
~11o Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: 1 (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: - ~'~ (ln.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: ~- -- (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
-Inundated
-,,-Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
-Sediment Deposits
-Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
-Oxidized Root Channels in Uppe- 12 Inches
_Water-Stained Leaves
-,,,-Local Soil Survey Data
_FAC•Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks) ,

gnu s
Map Unit Name.
(Series and Phase): ~~ 6c/'cc ~4
1~~~ ~dah Drainage Class: QD
!

Taxonomy tSubgroupl: F~4vC,44 Q1fiL ~~ Reid Observations
'JyJ~'o t~ ~~~~, Confirm Mapped Type: Yes ~.
Profile Descriotiom.
Depth ~ Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture. Concretions.
inc es Horiio (Munseil Moistl IMunsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc.
~~ ~d Yk ~Z12 ~oG ~--
.~
Hydric Sol Indicators:
Histosol _ Concretions'
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface layer in Sandy Soiis
_ Suifidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soiis List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chrome Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ~ (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soiis Present? Yes Q1j~ Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes ~R
Remarks:
Approved by HQUSACE 2/92
HJL '
8/93 _. s :,,, -, .,

USACE AID#
DWQ #.
Site # C22 (indicate on attached map)
~ ~ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCDOT Rail Division 2. Evaluator's name: Scherrer / EcoScience
3. Date of evaluation:-- May 26, 2006
5. Name of stream: UT to Richland Creek
7. Approximate drainage area: 48.7 acres
4. Time of evaluation: 2:30 pm
6. River basin: Cape Fear
8. Stream order: 1
9. Length of reach evaluated: 50' 10. County: Guilford
11. Site coordinates (if known): 35.966687949N. 79.972796088W 12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
on railroad track 5600 feet east of intersection with College Drive (SR 1278)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Siding improvements
15. Recent weather conditions: Clear
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Clear
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters -Nutrient Sensitive Waters WS-IV Water Supply Watershed _(I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 4.7 acres
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential
25 % Forested
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
Commercial 65 % Industrial _% Agricultural
75 % Cleared /Logged _% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 7 feet 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2-4 feet
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 51 Comments:
Outfall of water treatment plant
Evaluator's Signature Date 5-26-06
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POIN T RANGE
# T
ERISTICS
CHARAC SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain
1 Presence of flow /persistent pools in stream 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 5 4
no flow or saturation = 0; stron flow = max oints
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 1
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max oints
3 Riparian zone 0- 6 0- 4 0- 5 1
no buffer = 0; Conti ous, wide buffer = max oints

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 4
1
extensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es = max oints
5 Groundwater discharge 0- 3 0- 4 0- 4 4
no dischar e = 0; s rin s, see s, wetlands, etc. = max oints
U 6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0- 4 0- 4 0- 2 2
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max oints
~ Entrenchment /floodplain access 0- 5 0- 4 0- 2 1
pr dee 1 entrenched = 0; fre went floodin = max oints
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0- 6 0- 4 0- 2 0
acent wetlands = max oints
no wetlands = 0; lar a ad
9 Channel sinuosity 0- 5 0- 4 0- 3 1
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max oints
10 Sediment input 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 2
extensive de osition= 0; little or no sediment = max oints
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0 - 4 0 - 5 3
fine, homo enous = 0; lar e, diverse sizes = max oints
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 5 2
,-'~ dee 1 incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max oints
,~'"_,
13 Presence of major bank failures
0 - 5
0 - 5
0 - 5
3
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max oints
14 Root depth and density on banks 0 - 3 0 - 4 0 - 5 2
E„+ no visible roots = 0; dense roots throw out = max oints

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 5
4
substantial im act =0; no evidence = max oints
16 Presence of riffle-pooUripple-pool complexes 0- 3 0- 5 0- 6 4
~ no riffles/ri les or ools = 0; well-develo ed = max oints
~ 1 ~ Habitat complexity 0- 6 0- 6 0- 6 4
M little or no habitat = 0; fre went, varied habitats = max oints

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0 - 5
0 - 5
0 - 5
2
~ no shadin ve etation = 0; continuous cano = max oints
`
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0 - 4 0 - 4 3
de 1 embedded = O; loose structure = max

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 - 4
0 - 5
0 - 5
3
no evidence = 0; common numerous t es = max oints

21 Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
2
O no evidence = 0; common, numerous t es = max oints
O 22 Presence of fish 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 0
no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max oints
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 2
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max oints
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 51
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

North Carolina Division rif Water t~uality -Stream Identification Form; Version S..i
Date: ~ _ ~,, ,p Project: ~ „~
Evaluator: f Site: Z.
~c.n ~ ti~t~. G'~ , J ~Q~~r S Latitude: "~~~~ ~
~-~,~~~ ,~~~
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is atleasf intermittent ~- County: pp
if? 19 or erenniai if? 30 ~"~ ~ f'~~ other

e.g. Quad Name: ~~- ~ ~~~ ~,,: ~~ S
~d r
A. Geomor hob. {Subtotal = )
a
I~bs~t~~t ~iF%~~1;t ` '~ii~ider~t~ : 3tt~©tg
-
1
. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting ~ 0 1 " 2 S
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 3
8. Depositional bars or benches 0. 2 3
7. Braided channel 1 2
8. Recent alluvial deposits ~ 0 1 2 3
S a Natural levees 1, 2 3
10. Headcuts 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0,5 1 1 5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0.5 1 1
13. Second or greater order channel on exfstfng
USGS or NRCS map or other documented.
evidence.
No = 0
Yes
~ Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H drota (Subtotal = ~"'~
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or rowin season 0 f
2
16. Leaflitter ,5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants ar debris 0.5 1 5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features} present? No = 0 Yes . 1.5
C. $ioiogy (Subtotal = _.._....
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 2 1 ~ 0
` 21 .Rooted plants in channel 2 1 0
22. Grayfish 0.5
1.5
23. Bivalves ~

24. Fish
25. Amphibians ~ 1

'J_~ 0.5
0 0.5 2
3
1 1.5
1' 1.5
2S. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0,5 1 1 5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton ~ 0.5 1 1.5
28. iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 1.5
2'9 .Wetland plants in streambed FAC -- .5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 , SAV _ 2.0; Qther°`=" 0
Items 20 and 2l .focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants. '°`
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:

DATA FORM C ~~.. .
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: I~iDX - l~n~~iN1 ~~•i/.~dadl Date: 2 Z / --d Z
Applicant/Owner: _~~~p•~ -~Q~ ~l~„ Coun
Investigator• /Q otc.k (/' /G(~ ,~~ f,,,.6 State: yL
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~No Community 1D: L,laf(cr6f'
is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situationl? Yes ~ Transact ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes ~ plot ID: _ ~T 04
(If needed, explain on reverse
VEGETATION
uommant Punt Soecies
1, ~'47~+N4J QCC?chi%i Stratum

T I ca o
FAG (~,~ Dominant Plant Soecies
S ra ^n dicat
9.

3. 11.
4.lrvlkl ,f~y~Y`4 (4'fe. S AGG/ t 1Z.
5. 13.
6. ~?~u~fi C~rso~afa ~ ~~~- 14.

8. I~ 64~ Ste- ~_ '~ 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that
FAC (excluding FAC-1 are 08L, FACW or ~ ~~

Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarksl: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs nundated
-Other ~
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
~11a Recorded Data Available Water Marks
,~cDrih Lines
-Sediment Deposits

Field Observations: ~Dreinage Patterns in Wetlands

D
~- ~ Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized R
t Ch
epth of Surface Water:
(~n'I -
ao
annels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: ~` (in.) -Local Soil Survey Data
_FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: ~' (in.l -Other (Facplain in Remarks) ,
Remarks:

F~di>I,`
Map Unit Name. ,`
(Series and Phasel• ~,'Vt ~C~~6^~~'"S - uraun f'a.rsl Csh~h- Drainage Ctass: 1 ~D
W
Reid Observations
Taxonomy tSubgroup): ~.~ ~~ >~ ~G /JI u r~~ ~ 7~l ~ Confirm Mapped Type: Yes
Profile Descriotion:
Depth Matrix Cotor Mottle Colors Motda Texture, Concrtttons,
' hes orizon (Munsell Moist) IMunsell Moistl Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
~ ~ l s ~2 ~/2 2s y~ K,~ ~ ~.~~~ ~~

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosai _ Concretions'
_, Histie Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor ,LcOrganic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed an Local Hydric Sogs List
,~ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
~Gteyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
Remarks:
No ICircle) (Circle)
No
No is this Sampling Paint Within a Wetland? ~CB~ No
Approved by HQUSACE 2/92
HJL '
8/93 , .. :ww -.._ .: ~~

DATA FORM C' ~~ •
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation ManuaO
Project/Site: Co ~ -- ~~~, k ; ti f ~a; /,-a u ./ Date• 2 Z /- d 2
Applicant/Owner• ~ /~,~ ~ _ D~ ,~~C County: (~, ; ~ .,~~.~,/
s
Investigator: _~~(Q,4 ~ /ll ~ 1 ~ ~ fe State• /!iL
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~s No Community ID: ~(~./
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation? Yes ~ Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Probiern Area? Yes ~ Plot ID• __~~
(If needed, explain on reverse •
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species atu di o
~nk~ 1'a6c~q
1. _
'
~ ~~~ Dominant- Plant Se ~•~e t a m i ator
9
.
_ .
a

4. /~'C6~ ~~6~N ~ 'i FAQ
12.
5. 13.

7. 15.
8. --
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that a-e OBL• FACW or
FAC (excluding FAC-)
~ S
~
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
-Recorded Data (Describe in Remarksl: Wetland Hydrology indicators:
-Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
-Aerial Photographs -Inundated
-Other ~t5aturated in Upper 12 Inches
~C1Vo Recorded Data Available ater Marks
-Drift Lines
-Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: -Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water• '-
• (m') -Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
_Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: - (ln•) -Local Soil Survey Data

Depth to Saturated Soil: S~_(in•) FAC-Neutral Test
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Rnem~_arks: ,~1 7~
i

SOILS
Map Unit Name.
(Series and Phase): /y` ~ ~ ~C~Nb~~''t '
^u~U~ n ~`'~ ~d_"SArc+Drainage Class:
L/Y

Taxonomy (Subgroup): ~ ~7~ %L Feld Observations
f~a /l ~ 4 o~a ~ 1'Ci Confirm Mapped Type: Yes ~I07
~
Profile Oescriotion:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Moue Texture, Concretions,
lMunseil Moistf
hes ri o (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc.
h

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions-
- Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface layer in Sandy Soils
_ Suifidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soiis List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List .
_ Greyed or Low-Chrome Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present)
Wetland Hydrology Present)
Hydric Soils Present)
Remarks:
Yes i~ (Circle! _ (Circle)
® No
Yes ~ Is this Sampling Point Within a WetlandT Yes to '
Approved by HQUSACE 2192
HJL

Section VII. Avoidance and Minimization
Crossing C2
Culvert replacement was used to bring culvert invert nearer to existing stream invert.
Relocated stream channel follows foot of embankment (toe of slope) in order to tie back
in to the existing stream channel at the earliest possible point.
Crossing C7
Culvert replacement was used to bring culvert invert nearer to existing stream invert.
Use of plunge pool to dissipate energy to existing incised stream channel. Relocated
stream channel follows toe of slope to allow efficient tie-in to existing stream channel.
Crossing C8
Impacts to this crossing were avoided. -
Crossing C9
Culvert replacement was used to bring culvert invert nearer to existing stream invert.
Use of plunge pool to dissipate energy to existing incised stream channel. Relocated
stream channel follows toe of slope to allow efficient tie-in to existing stream channel.
New pipe was placed to minimize cut/fill impacts to wetland.
Crossing C10
Impacts to this crossing were avoided.
Crossing C11
Impacts to this crossing were avoided.
Crossing C12
Culvert was extended instead of being replaced, allowing work on only one side of the
rail bed. No stream relocation was necessary. Excavation is proposed only for footprint
of new track.
Crossing C13
Culvert was extended instead of being replaced, allowing work on only one side of the
rail bed. Stream relocation is necessary, but will follow toe of slope to minimize length of
stream relocation. Excavation or fill is proposed only for footprint of new track.
Crossing C16
Culvert replacement was used to bring culvert invert nearer to existing stream invert.
Relocated stream a~annel follows foot of embankment (toe of slope) in order to tie back
in to the existing stream channel at the closest possible point.
Crossing C17
Impacts to this crossing were avoided.
Crossing C18
Culvert replacement was used to bring culvert invert nearer to existing stream invert.
Use of plunge pool to dissipate energy to existing incised stream channel. Relocated
stream channel follows toe of slope to allow efficient tie-in to existing stream channel.
New pipe was placed to minimize cut/fill impacts to wetland.
Crossing C19
North Carolina Department of Transportation Cox to Hoskins Siding Improvements
Rail Division

Section VII. Avoidance and Minimization
Existing above-grade pipes to be filled. Culvert was extended instead of being replaced,
allowing work on only one side of the rail bed. No stream relocation was necessary.
Crossing C20
Culvert replacement was used to bring culvert invert nearer to existing stream invert.
Use of plunge pool to dissipate energy to existing incised stream channel. Relocated
stream channel follows toe of slope to allow efficient tie-in to existing stream channel.
New pipe was placed to minimize cut/fill impacts to wetland.
Crossing C22
Culvert replacement was used to bring culvert invert nearer to existing stream invert.
Use of plunge pool to dissipate energy to existing incised stream channel. Relocated
stream channel follows toe of slope to allow efficient tie-in to existing stream channel.
New pipe was placed to minimize cut/fill impacts to wetland.
North Carolina Department of Transportation Cox to Hoskins Siding Improvements
Rail Division

December 18, 2006
Mr. Todd Tugwell
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Dear Mr. Tugwell:
Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
NCDOT Rail Division Improvements -Cox to Hoskins Siding;
Cape Fear River Basin (Cataloging Units 03030002 and
03030003); Central Piedmont (CP) Eco-Region
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (EEP) will provide the compensatory stream mitigation for the unavoidable
impact associated with the above referenced project. As indicated in the NCDOT's
mitigation request dated December 13, 2006, compensatory stream mitigation from EEP
is required for approximately 472 feet of stream impacts located in the following
cataloging units:
Cape Fear 03030002 132 feet
Cape Fear 03030003 340 feet
Mitigation for this project will be provided in accordance with Section X of the
Memorandum of Agreement between the N. C. Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, the N. C. Department of Transportation, and the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers signed on July 22, 2003. EEP commits to implement sufficient compensatory
stream mitigation up to 264 stream credits in Cape Fear 03030002 and 480 stream credits
in Cape Fear 03030003 to offset the impacts associated with this project by the end of the
MOA year in which this project is permitted. If the impacts change from the above listed
amount, then this mitigation strategy letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation
strategy letter will be required from EEP.
-,
_,. _
~1~E1~1
North Carofina Ecosystem Enhancement ~ro~ram, E6€? Floii Ser~~ice Center, RafeRgh, PAC ~~~r9~-~GSZ / 4C4-7f5-E~~1~ / ~v~~w.neeep.net

If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth
Harmon at 919-715-1929.
Sincerely,
~° `~~ ~`
r '
t
3
William D. Gilmore, P.E.
EEP Director
cc: Mr. John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality, Wetland/401 Unit
Mr. Marc Hamel, NCDOT Rail Division
Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., NCDOT-PDEA
Ms. Linda Fitzpatrick, NCDOT-PDEA
~.:~Is. Elizabeth Scherrer, EcoScience
File: NCDOT Rail Division -Cox to Hoskins Siding Improvements

b0•ZLL-EO euilo~e~ y~oN `~(~uno~ p~o~~in0 NOISIAIO llt/21
:'oN ~~afad ~S3 lOa~N
a~e~s oN .alms S1N3W3n021dW1 JNIdIS oy~/~v~~oy~~o
soot Ivnr S110S S~21N SNIyiSOH Ol XO~ ~~ ~
:area I'
Y
.S~ S~ 0066 aya
32if1Jl~ :~8 P~I~ :~8 uMa :811 :l~afwd ~ H1tlON
~1 ..
.y ~ t
~Ntyt ~"+jM :Satr ,
.~ :)MM pNM ~,
h u.
/' aaM ! ~,
~/ Zpo3 ~~ fltl ,~( i"f34H
/ fluff -..~•' ~ \
£3u3 / Cry
4~~ ,•.~,,... ~ a `~
a~3 ~' i "1`a~y°, ~aM
ZSUW 8~~
~~"~ ~ ~ c*~.~~ J~H Qua ~ 3MM
,~y,~u3 a3 ~ L84W~
.- 1~"_'" ~c~ ~~ ~ J BtIN
~(an~nS I!oS S~2iN ~(;uno~ P~o~l!nJ LL6l :a~~nog , ~tr3 , zk~uw zritti ~ ~~"
r.;
Z84d ~ ~ ' ' •'~4w ~ ~
~' 7~yV1l. ~ ~. ~''~
fJtIH Qll~ •
. Lltt3 j bail ~ ~i
fl~l CBgW e
}~u3 ~ yr
,.,x _ Lk1a~. a ~ I _~.
ikl4ly Elr~i t ~.. ~ 1~ Cr .. ,~u~ ~LF~~ ~ d.. ~ ~ ~ ~ E~~NM-
<':F{!W' _ g - - - .~i3 ~ ~ Ukl~ txf Z84{~M4 .,,z >3a1; ~ -- - _tl~-_~ ' --
k r.tltlW - ~u U CJr
` 3 r ~. ~ ~ ~t.~ ~ ~ )u3 r ~~'~ ^ ~1~
u~ `; ~_ •~ ' .5 , . ru z ~) r ' 1dgW• r\~ ~ ~~~CCC ~~J' ~ ' 't ~}t U~ ~ ,
C~tM s tCJ l8,°,) ,! ~ flc~ .~,~~ y~ ,„~liy F~ '1';4W C1~~~
r '
9ua ~ / ~.~,~e, t _ , '<~ira 7t,j fl~3 '~ ; ;' t ( r ~.•~ Jtl•{, ,,~u~ ,)~t:~~
r. J ' ! ~9hh' 1.84Y~ ,, tea` r . ~u:3 ': U flu ~ ~ ,..i~• ~~N ~
i ~ fl~~~ T.i ~ ~ s,
O,u3 34A, ~Fxr.l~'~Vbc~t i~ r~4~.~ ~~ ~r~. 1~ f ~G'~ a
y t - ~~ ~ ~Qa~~. - E1d~ll^; '~ - a ~ ~U~
H ?• ~ f' i 8 u ~ a'• r u~ _ ~_ ~~' {
~~t r ~ ~ ~ ~r~ ) : , ~ fluff ..... Au~3 .k3U,3
- k3~i3 S ^.~ t~~;: I ~ { 9 1 ,pE{IttrJ ~,7;uVi '- x x j~~ ~`` .~k ~ ~ `r~-~r .ejJ` ~~ t ~ ~.
,~ f / ~~~
~~ ~. , t ./''t L~o3. ~ r ~ ~
~ fluff ~ i E t f r flu ~
.~~r .. ~ ~_. ,a' ~ ~ ~ t I7~IW '; ~~} ~~(~ti rte. "' 8•~ ~:`J r Y. d`
h ~
- Y .-i1t' USIA „+- Eiu3 - ~ ~, ~t;~z y id~~.. :~f ~ ;.i
~..y ~ ~. t).,)u r k-]u 7~ ¢~7t#a6(ra~'r::-+. ~+ ~°.a `x r;s r Qua ...., f~'";,
,".t°' .3 .. ~ .F1~-r Q~~ '-~ ,~1. ~, ~ ~ it r ~A ~ . -t ~' 3Kfi7 r'
f. ~`
~i,~ ; ~~s ~ O ,~ '~i~ ~ r ~ t~~~ t ', ti ~ 6 - ~: `QUA ^~i w ~.
~-~ t7tr~ ~ ,/ t f a
,a. ~ ~ `' r ~ "~ ~ ~ 3
~ ~~ ~ }~ ~ , }~y~l~ ' ~i ~ gu3 9
u s~ 3 ~1 c~ i~ c,>; ,xS~
fl -~ Y ` fl ~ '8 ~,-) d ~ ~,:,' + 6p~. 1~ ~ fir,
~ ,
V ,_ ..., ,~ ~ r e
•p:} ~ 81r E3ll ~t ~.i f~~~ ' .',~ ~ ~:, ~ ~. 4' r? 69 Psj ~ ~~$ ~i v t i• ,~ U,47
' r ~ .~ cf14W ~.,, ~ ~
L ..~ r ~.+3 r .w`~ Yo- •~• k
~ ' ~~ j ~- ~ ~fluj ~ t ~ ' F3i~
' +~ eta _' ;• ~dyy~-~~ ~~ <~d ~u3~
I . ~ . .. ~'.~ ~ ,, ,'~' ,
~ - .-'I 1 E1 ' t n +. ~ !~4 '~~ -rte +~~ya~i ~ .~~. Y y1'zlA~j , ~"~ ~
~~ ~ S5~ ~" _ •'l t r5 • j• R Q ` t ^vW'Tl'tf~} A
~~ ~.- 1, l ~(' ~ 'j
.~' b ~ ~~' ~~ F J ~ j Y iG ~ ~'1`'. 5 G~ t
~j _ 7. ~. J ~ =•r \.:~ 7 .rte F r ,'~ ~ L t{r> J z
k}~ )) ~ ~, V ~ ~~ ~ flu j ~ i ~ ~ y u t > r .A~t1r3' ~. t
flJ~ </ ~y '~ L Yip y ~ 4't'
.~1~ w ti ~.
':d j i3u7 r'~`' ~~ 9 ~''( ~t ~ r. ~ ~ flu r."\i}~ `~.'~.. -
~,' +k ~, u ~ a
~~ , ZH4W Y
~' ~ gal' ~`jr ~ r '
~ ~,Ot1~ ~ ~~ k ~v ~~ ~~ ~~
r
Ju3 t~ ~.~ rJUtN,; ~ ~ gJt ~ '_
4 3. , .. ~ ~f ~ ~~7 ~ ° ~
~1'
~u I 3 u t pci sir Z~4 ~ ,e ci;, 'k
a. F
e ,
a ~AU~v m ` ~~ ,~u~, a Exa~ ~r
r t i T ~ t t
~~`. ~` ~ ~' u S ~P3 Nr•j k.
e
r - zd .L._ -,-~ ~ ~~', ~ Eta '~~ `y~,,~"~ ~~ , r ~ ~ "~~_~ _ , "
;. J~ _ Ju3 C ~,\ flV3 ..u g,~ 4 '' k flea -fiU3 ` ~ju3 ~ 184YJ t
i
Jz 1 N yflu3 .'.~y ~kr3 ' 9~~ ;~u3 "ilu3 _' ~1
.~ ~ 2
~s 1 5, ~ 3 gry ~u3 '~
- ..
~ ~ ~. _
1 ~-
x ~.~~• u~ ~ a ~ ~ t <.-1 r ~'
~. y r u.3 aura Z~o3 QU i-
~ 3 % r _ +~ 1
•'~.Z F~~.~ f Qu, U ~
Auk`".` ~ `-. _ ~ t,,.
B=F~ > Rul' ~ ~
'i:- e* X
u~` E2NlS, 8R3 ~~ a „ ~,x„yyt
fit' ~i '~ j'~ ~' ' i~~ ~ t 5. ~S~'~xr x ~ ~• ~ 'J4W "^4.
~~ ~ i a!
4t7: ` a l ~ Qua 9~. ` apt Y '`i ' ~ ~ '~
gt13. ~ ; 9'? ~ . r ~ ~' t '
~' sue---. J,w~ /~ . (////~Q~ ~ xe ' r. ,~

~ ~
Z ~ w U o
Z ~ ~
O ~ W ~ .~ (~ '' Z
~? =ZW Uca V J ~ `~ ~~
U ~ U ~ o ~
z~ o ~ > _o= GC p W °~ ~ M
~ ~ ~ ~ O Z ~ N.o LL.
X d. C~ Z m ~ a
.o O ~
a V ~ o o ~w
r _,
••. ~~ ~ ,
' ~ .. tv r s' '`~y . ~ 0 J~~fZi z
~' v ~ s ,~ ~ ~~ fn
~:
T ~ .,
` ,,~ _ v -9 m x 3
.. `" s g ~ - `may
~, , ~~
~ w` W q ~,~ U r (n
!( .
a x V ~
..
}' x ._. ~ u
S ~.. ~/~
~- ~ ~ ,ir~ c tb`i -
1--.V' ~w t~`~g2 ~..~~, 'J' 1 ~' . fir(/ ;~ ~ ` ~
~., v m sp' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
r.
~ ~ ~ m ~ ~~~ ,tt ~ ~x U
K ~
,.
,,
.-, .._. - ~ - a s _ c ti
.. m 3.
~- ~ m • J .. ~ ~. ~cj e ;~ r
s
` .~_ a z. !... c ~
W s.i o
Y ~, ~ ~
., ..
- ~ F W .. / ,
4 '1
~" _
ti-
41 '
a ~ ,,, ` [ ~ . , } ~ '~ x'.
,,, C. s = L a t ~. 4
, ..
>.
IIi m u p 3 ,~3 +`+ 3 3 3 o m,~ '~
_ .
... Y a
L L C
m ..
~ ~~ >~
„~ .
•'~ a
ac .. G
1~ • _ V
~. - J yJ '.JJ 3 W , W W u ; ~ '' .. tJ i'~. G t ~' ~ c+..
~ m ~ ~ m w ~ '~ 3 L.
..
s ,
.. L `' w
5. , _ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2gyW ~ ., .. m
.~a~ e. ~~ ~ ~ w C _ 11 ~ ~ -
~'L"r O ~ W ~. .
,. ~ ~ ...
4f L
~ W ~ Y N
Z Q Lam.,. ~~
°z ~ w U
c `~ t. ..... N ''y :.., ..
> / `'
J \\ t
„ ~ U "\ L` n N w '
r ,.
. - - i I _ L ST7 U N U rn
J m r W
~: ~ 4. ~ ~ 1
p .. n~~EZ m ~ ~ W ~ -
uu ~ c; ~ w ~ ~ f y
_ C
m ~ ~' y ` w . - ~`~YoV -
.- >1> - W
'~ _._..• 3 N m ~. m ~
~ ~ U.
, , _ '~, 1
''~ ~~ 3`~ N is _..~ _-_...__ _. _ -._ (~`~' ~~4 ~~ 1 MhG~ ~` .•
;Y ~. { . Y i .~'
~ r
\ ~ ,~ ,~,
_ ~} :. : sue, ~ ~,
5 ~
/`~~ 1G, - 1.+~y~ ~,la- ~~ji--s 1. _~": . ~ ~y ^~'„ ~ 4 • Pd k~ ti ' ~ -.
~ ~ .4~ y ~ i. +a~lr.~ > Y _ _ ~~"~ _ k'c1rt ,.'! ':. ° ~ ai~ + %A ~~~ , ~~ ~ t ~~
.. ~, ~j
~, ~.i ~ ., ~' t' .w ~ arc r~ _rt`~ ~'~ .~. ~~~ R ,,'tY "~r _ ~ ~~r qy ~ ~<a .~ ',;s ~.-,ie: PJ..
_ e+ ti ~~ tt tio- t^t~w~, sw !.~ ~.Z r0. ` r. t ~ ,
~ .c - ,~ k _
e'~~' ~ • 'a{+O ~ .u S. i~. _ '1L+,r - af'+ Ya1~Ff /~ t ~ y .Km "'+ ~ °'4~~`;
,:
.F„~
FR'
..
~, : b
_ _ a r ~~
.y
-~ . -~ II, ~ „~, - F
4 ry ~]' ~ , ~
ti. , ~ r S ., < <+~ (]~ ~
*. ~5'-.ra.. ~S ~` ~ w f~ .1~: gat ~ ~ 7 .~ti r,
.~ _ g
4 5 ~\~ ~. t .v` .ct `~+'r~ ~ ff~'~. ~. • Jo n W .,rt k .. :i~ ~ „M i
°°~ t
. c t w.. ` ~.. ` y*f. 1J .. t' Z a' s.

r
1~
N
'""
0
W
J
V
W
F-
Z ~-
~~
C~m
< Q
~~
J ~
N N
I
W
v I
J I
J W Q
W OO i
Z
QZ OW ~
O = n' Z
Wv ~
i
~ J
< ~ i
LL. QS
.-.~ W
~O ~
N N ~
i
i
w I
~ ~
H
LL W N~ W W
~ ~ II ~ ~ V
~' ~ ~ Z
II ~^~...M~ I
II ~
p p II w II II ~
vu-iQUN~I=- V '
~~a~~za
~f-oc~~
II N-NH
IN-~tn~N~~ '
p ~
Q~~UaoWC~
<d N N~ d N N
<LL ~J
0~_ap~.
p O~Z~°C,
~ = O O a
~ u0
f-~~' p0~
WZD~p~~
3~3aa~~
LL~.
d'

I 1~ ~
1 ~ '
---'
i Z
i
r,
:: Q
F--
1 V
~ ~
w~
~ N ~ J~
Z ~ V
O Q

~ I ~ L~

~ ENO
~ W ~

I
~
J
J_
LL F_

I
I
I
~
I

i 3
I
I
I
1
I

~

I
I ~

_~~= i

ICI
i I I I~
,J~'?
W
~~
3
i ~
i
~ I
/
I
i
i
V
~ H
i
3 ~
N
O
O
Z ~
I
1
i
1
i
GC ~
LL LL
mN mN
0~ ~M
_~ _~
II ~ II
3~ 3v
V Q
Z~ Z~
tL~ ~ LLI N
°z Z zz° z
~O ~O
~j ~~~
~~ I~\\~y
~ W
M ~
~ d.
_ J
W
~~
N
N =
~O
~ N
~E
~ ~
~J
~Z V
~Z ~Q
V= Q~
Ov ~~
~~ ~m
Jw ~O
O~ N w ~
C
QS
J W
~~
M N
NN 1 1V~~ I~
t~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~o ~ ~

t ~
nl (\I (U N
\ m
^u7 N Ci) 'i \
O 1 LL
R
~~ ~~
~ '\' _
->
"~
LL
`
>~
II ~

>
rz rr a ~
~ I

o
s
~
ml w ~ ; ~ \
I~ ~
z i / m
n ~-u ~ I ~ i Q mj
~
~ ~ ~

O ~' o
/ I
~ 3 Q
a
U j
~ j 3 N
/

I i
I
I
I
I I ~

I
j ~

I ~ ~
isfing Tr k~ I J <I
I
l I ~ ~ ~
~ I I ~
~ I
~-.
~OPOSED TF~~ j ~~~, I I ~ ~
~II ~~~ ~
ii' I ~ I~
I ~
.~ Q
v ~I
i O I
t ~ ~
IO'v ~
~ i I

^~
~~
I C.0
r>
M ~ I
~ i I
~~ I O
~
' ~ `
i ~
~
N' (\I N

~^ I ~ ~ a~
..
~~(;
r~ ~ I ~ IC7 <Y
fn In
N ~ ~ ("~

~,"
I(;~~ I
\ lr~i>
w z
''
I I
I vv f71
n

co f u~co
- I ("% '
~~ i
`" i
i t
I
I
I

~

I I
I
I

~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ Cn In ~

N~ 'i I V~~ 1~
~ Z o
Y u'
a O
Q~ O
N N
SW = r F
Q °' W
O~ ~ N
J
~~ v XQ
~0> o ~~
7 `I
Z
O
O L W i~ O
U ~
OW ~ ~~ ° >
U ~ ~.. W Z 3
Z W ~ 3 0~
OZm o ? a ~ ~
v~OJ o ~Z w ~
~!- ~ ~ a ~ o
~u3 0 o Y
W~ i Z~ JoN
~,CC~ o DLL, o o w
~ ~ ~ ~ U N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~ zZ>
OOf"1 ~ p Z u
W ,~
~ ~ ~ Z O ~ ~ Y
o ~
"' w O LL
Lc; m W ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~
~ W a
N W ~ < ~1
~ ~ F
J y
Q~w a
tL Q ~' ~
cry ~ 0 ~ H ~ ~~
cn 0 aZ o M~~ ~ ~~
~ F
(\I W W N ~ ~ W
I- ~ Z < i_~ ~ ~F
~; yW~ w ~~
m H o ~ 3$~
p -~ ,~ -~ ~...~ x
(4 Z 3 J ` W 4~
W ~ W ~~
~ ~ ~F
F (~ a~
z° w ;~~
(\i
:~
i
ti
~;
N>
z~ z
~o
~ "ao
a< 0.~
~' 3 >, 5
F~ a~
W
a~ ~o
z~
~~ ~
a
zs s
0.

CC

U

ti
s
ti

I~1.
~'
~ r--
i
i
i
J
O,
I
W
~~
~ ~~ ~
(V a a
=--=_
r~
V'
W ~
~ ~Z Q~
N UZ ~Q
~_ ~<
~ < ~
W V Z W W J
LL m i J a
~~ ~O~ V
JN O Z
~ JS VQ
Q~ Z=
.~ W i ~
~~ NO
N w (~
J
~ J_
~ W ~"'
3
w
W
~ LL.
W
V~wy,`wLL'-1~-win
OO~u'N II LL W O
~ ~
~~ ~~
II II II ~~N~o II
QUypN II w II II N
~ Z U~ N J=~ V
oga~~ Una.
< Q
'~j <Np~w W ~_<
113NpNNJ~p
N Z ~ 0 Z
U Q
g
Q=~F"dU0.~OC W
<~<~~~a~~~~3
`LLtL-~J
oOLL-a0~~
°z~x=ooQ~~
g~~~ ~~oo
3©~3aa°°~~~

~'

I ~
i ,
i ,
i
I
I
i
~ ~,
~ ~ a.
I a
I
I
<' Z
<_ N
i ~ J U
V Z w
I ~, p W o
I
I ~ ' ~ N Q Li
~ NN UZ
~ N ~ -' O Z
j o z ~3 ,ia
j ~ ' ~ OQ WU
~ n- W W Q
I N =
1 ~ O= J~
I ~
II a j O~ N
I >
I
I , J
I

0 i
Z
g
W

i

ZV
~ FQ- d
i OC
0
W
< m
p
I-
O
W W
J ~
~ N
I
i
i
i
~ GC
LWL. LWL
mN mN
O
_^ =N
N N
~ ~ ~ I I
3~ ~u
V Q
4Z~ Z~
J ~ J N
ZO ZO
~N ~N
NN! 1b'~J' I-',
~ N ~% N N N
N N N N N N
!~ ~ ~'~ ~ ('7 N
°1 (~) :`i (') Cam) (`";
~E
(~ P I

~ (X; (S) ~
d ('"; (~i (S)
~
I
~ r; r~ I m
C'"7 (") ('"% (")
I I a
n ~ > o f ~
w > o a I w
T
~
a ~ fr (n ~
m '
~
`
~~~ w ~ ~ ~
~ o
>~> ~ 3
i
cr, i cn ~
c~ =
~
71 ~
Q U >
~ f ~ ~ ~ m
O i ~ 3 Q m a
~ ~ j ~~
~~
~ ~ ~ I
I ~ a
~
i ~ ~
I~
~
/

q I
/
i
J i '

I ~- I
~ j
j
x x I ~

I I
~ j ~
U I
~ ~ I
j ~ I
,~ :vN Q I
Z N~ S~IJ i I~~i ~~ ~ i ; Z
~~~
°d i ~
N
v ~ ~ I W
I

czxv
i ~ ~l
~ I
~~~~~ ~
~'' ~ `~~
~
~ i ~
c~ ~ I i ,~ w
I I I ~ ~ C0
~~ I I c
; r c~
~ ~ ;~
~N > ~
~ :~ w ~.
>
v~~ ~Jr~

U~
~.' N

i
LC7 ~ ~~
~
Q
I ~
(~;CO
I ~ ~"%
vw
~~~ ~ I
~ I
I
I
I
I
I ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
N N N N N N
~~

Y c9 ~,-~
~
c~;
~
, 1Yj ~Y~ ~Y~ ~Vl ~Yl
N1 I ~~~~
~:
C
N
~)
t~
\'
N
r;
N
ni
N
t~
N
n!
r;
v
N
S
x~
J
~ Z o
I- Y '~
m
Z ~' °~ °
OZ o ~ M
N
G W
Z to o ~ ~ N
O~ W oa
N~ ~ ~~
d I
~ZQ ~ uZ o
OW ~ ~g
~ V O ~ ~ w ~ 3
~ 3 ~ ~
0
~Z Z a w ~
OOW ~z Z ~ ~
w
a ~,_, ~ ~ 0 Q ~ o
~Uw
W=m Z O~ Y ~
~/ OJ ~ O w
~.. ~"" J " w ~ a ~
mz3 s "'" ~zj"`
0 Z u
WOE Z ~ °~ Y ~
O 0. p
Y ~'
UWd ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~
<ad~ a a c~ m u ;
< ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ 8
-per ~ ~~E3
o~~ o
Zop F
QWa [~-
JJWOW
~J ~~ ~~~
~ W Q F M~~ rn
Qm0 F ~ W ~
~ Q x ~~ ~ ~~
a y ~A,
~ w eY
3 ~, A ~ ~~~
3~
~ t/1 Z z ~ al~~
v~iccO `' ~ x
i W W~
~NQ m ~ aA
z ~
Z ~ W z° W ;~~
~~
~> z
zN ~o
ao aF
Fw„ = a
~o
ad zy
~ ;: ~ s
zg 0.S

z ~ O
I 1- 'n o
I\~~ ~' W W ~Z Y Q O
rn
ILL LL.
I ~~ 11i ~ ~ O O N
I. ~ mN °° ~> oN ~
' =-== ~ o o• o ~
II \ wo` w~ °CWp G O~
1 ~
=~ _~ W W O V~
I i F_- N N mQ> a i
~~ '~ ~ ~ w II w II JZ~ W YZ o
~`~ i- 3N~ o d~ ~-'a
~; ~ z 3 ~ 3 ~ N~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ w o 3 ~~
\~ ~I Z d Z °- c~ ~; cv cv c~ U 0 m °a Z p d
r- W N o '~
I- ~ ~ a Z
I N Ow pw UnQQ- ? O~ o o
11 Z Z ~ Z ~ ~ .7 N ~ ~ ~ ~
f.T O ~ O ~ Z N Z' S
I ~ N N WQ~ ~ p Z V
f~ ~ w O ~
I
I ~ 11 ~ I ~ ° NV~ ? o ~~
~ ~~ ~) NO W~ ~~~~
~ 1\ z Q ~~~ ~ ~ ~
'~ H ~ ~V~ c
_ V ~
I I I-Q WwJ
Z~„ H~.~ F
Q a
II GC~ N H~Q S E...~ v ~~
I W W a
~ ~ I Om ~=z H C!~
I~ i ~ ~ Z E- d o ~ ~ ~~
~ (\I F
N i ~- O F ~....~ w~
O~ I I a ~
O 5 ~ - ~ ~ ~~
I I ~ (~ a
N a ~ w Y
N ~ ~ N ~ Exl ~ p o~ x p
O ~ e W W~
I ~ U ~ ~A
-~.
J ~ ~ , oi~ ~ P~oP~S w °z w ~~~
I ~ (')
I C\~ ~ :~
~ 'I <I ~°
N t=
_ I
U i o, ~ w ~
~\\ I X ~ z ~ ~ o
0 v a; a~
~ ~ o
LJJ ~ i ~ a
~ ~ I ~ ~= a
~~
N i I Q ~ .wa e z
N i V ,.
~ ~ zs 0.s
I ~ co
I I
I I
I N ~
I ~
I Q '
~ I W tD
I I ~ ~
~ w
I ~
i °~
I
j ' ~
w ~
w
w
~ w N N t~ N Q
w I- p. ~~~
w w w w w \~ N N N N ~
M N it ~ ~ 1 i (~ J C`7 nl r-,
C'") C`7 (`') (`7 (`')
II ch~O~o I
II ~ I~
p N II W II II it CV'n T I Un~~~
~ ~ N J = N ~
U HV /
~ N ~ ~ Z a 1
N h ~ J ~ ~ I
I
U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~Uaoe~ ~ I
~ ~ d J N N
p~+-~QO~- ~ I I $
OIiZw~ I
= ooQ~ ~
W ~OCt~~j W
J~QQOC I"' I I. F

~~ ~~
i
I
I
3
~,
I ~ ~ _
~
~
r
cv
~'
' 3

~
~ N
' ~
~
~ ~

ting Trac ---~ m

I
U

~~

~ z
°
~I ~
~ I
III ~~~
n TRnc w

~
v
~

°
:~

~ ~i
cm

z
I ~ X

N

o
~
;
~; ~ ~ i
~~ z
w
~
~,~ ~
X
.;
; w
<<» ~ ~
~
~ ~.~
~,
~~;~
~~~~
~ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'
'~ I
I
I

I I
I
I
~
I
~ it i
I

~~
1-
0 (' W
~ Z J
V
Z~ N=
~~ WO
~m ~~
f1
~_ ~Z
~~ ~~
~C =N
,~ ~_
J~ 3M
~tH Jc
O M N -~ O
W M
O~
N
O
W
<J
V
OZ ~
N ~Z ~
Q Q J
O= JWN
WV ~NJ
~ 0=3
~~ ~~
~~ nW~w
NN ON
O : (~
°3
F-
w
W
H Ll.
W
~ H N f.
WLL Ww
Mu'N II Sri
M N ~
II ~~~~
II ~
` p II Z II II '
N
H ~ N J = H
Q ~ F' U
~N~~Za
~~~~
NpNN
wp
W
U~p
~aUa~cc
N~~~~N
LL ~ J
OLL-Qp~
w
~~~~v0
ZpWpO
~3QQ~t~
I
II
~~
I
I
I
I
I
,-
.I
I
1
I 1
i
~ 1
I
i
i
1
i ~
I
i
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
~ I
~ I
~:
1
1
1
I
I
I
1
1
I
1
I
I
i I
I
I
I
I
I
~ I
~ i
I
I
I
~ I
i ~
i
I
I
I
~ I
i 1
i
i
i
i
~ ~
w w
~ ~
~N ~N
m m
W M W
=N =~
II ~ II
3~ 3v
V Q
Z~ g~
LLI~ WN
ZZ ZZ
~O ~O
J
W
°z
QZ
Va
o=
,~ V
W
J ~ ~
~ N J
_0
F-
V
H
N
0
U
V
W
O
N~) i I V~-I~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
w o' ~x) ~ 'o i~)
^~ n. c\i ;v c\i n.

- ~ ~
-- ,
_~._~
- ~
I
I
~~~«;
~~~ I
«, (\1
N C`')
~^ o
~ ~~~
cs;;n _ (~
:X)
.v CO ~
~ i i ~~~~ N
i - ~~~ n
N ~ ~~, z

c~
` I w
' V
~~

~ ~~ ~
~, I ~ ~;
~

j (S)p~ ~ I ~ U
'
I ~°; ~ i _
~i ~ ~ I
~ I
I
/ I ~"
/
`X'o- I i~ ~n
OPOSED~TRA6 dr> j i~,
cx~~
N I ~ 3
~ N N-

cz ^
~~ I
~
L s
~i cv
I

1 I
i
I
I
r-,
fl N

~ U
~ ~ cn
it I
u
~ ~ I

I ~
I Q~
~ ,

I~
;r, a;
I ~
i
I
~)
~
~ r)
~cx~ I~
I
~ ;
co,
r
o I
w cn
I ~\ I
~
~ o
'i I ~ i
c)r~ ~ ~ I
~v ~ I ~ ~
iY)

(1 I ~ i
~
~
r~ 1
~
i
~ I ~; = u)
~~ ~~
~ > CO (\I

~~
~
~ W
~~
r
,,
, rr
)>
N ~11J7
~ ,ti ~d : 1) (Yl ,
cv ~~
~ ~

. ~~
«~
~~ f
~~
N
/

.. i /_ ~

~
I C
I
I C
I
~ I
'~

~

r

~I

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
N 0' (.) !~ CO I ( )
~ ~ ~ ~ N N
~~O i l d~ -~ I -~~
Z ? o
O Q (~ O` r-
~W O N O
~ ~ ~o
N
W
O ~ _
~~ G OXa ~ ~
Z W
~ Ow U~
^ `j m w YZ o
~j o ~g ° g
~ > a F- w o 3 ~~
Q Q p
H ~ ~Z
o
c' Od ~ pQ ~ o
O Y
Z O ~ Y ~ ~
J O O w
~;O} ov
CJ N~ ~ Ny o ~ ~ S
~ ~
~Q ~ p Z Z >
W 0 `~ yWy
~ W O ? 0 o Y d
m~ o d
o
tti m
Q ~ I~aaa
N
IO ~
~~° ~~
a=
~ ~N ~
~° ~`~
Q z
J E~., ~~ w
W x ~ ~.,
ni ~' a ~ ~F
a' Q a ~t~
~ W3~
N ~
O ~ W
W ~ u ~ ~~
~ ~~ a N
O " a~
°z W ~~~
~ ~-- Z
~~ Z ~ o
~; ~
,. z
z~ ~;
`) 40 0.F
Wa a
wY ~;
~_ ~~
~ zs 0.s
~;
0

d

i
~ ~ ~' °
I ~ ~ ~ z ,~
W W ~
I -~ ~J.. LL N ~
I ~LL ~ W O a w
Z ~ m to m N ~ _
~ vI O ~ ~ o o~
`- i V ~~ 0~ G xQ
~ =N = o Out
I
Z
a.' ~ ~ II ~ I o
I !- Y, w II W z O Z
i I N U, I-- 1- '" Y Z o 0
o ~ ~ o 0
~ O F- ~ V ~ V NOS Iw/~ I I i ~ ~ w o o ~~
U Q Q Q - 3 ~a
Z f~ Z< N N Cti N N N Q Z_ Q ~
~ I W < a
~ I N ~ ~~ ~N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Z
a °
~~~ ~~~ r~ N N cu ~ S ,~
O ~ ~ a Z~ o~
O W W Z O j o
~ Z~ Z~ ~ ~ u~ ° ~ _ .~
NH ~~~~
~N dN = Z Z e
I o ~
~ ~ u
i I , ~ z N ~
~ I , u; - O o
I s
W i ~ O
~ a ~ ~ m U
I ~; a
d. I I L() w ~ ~ 8 ~ ~
W ~ N i
J ~ J I N ~
NQ i ~ F Z
I _I o
AHD i I Oi~W (Y z ~ ~~
O w~OW I O QZ F ~
~ O ~ I ~ W U = N ° ~'~ cq ~
~ °'"'= I Oct ~~ `~ z ~ ~
w
N ~.M3 0 ' ~~ ~ ~ 0. ~ ~$
I N ~ ~~ ...~~, r
~ ~ I ~ N N z ~ ~~~
O ~ I ~ Ex N o ~ W
i ~
W
~ ~ ~ W~
W ~ ~
_J ~ ' z ~ >~
o
i __ _ , ~ ~'IZ01'0~ z W ~~~
, ...--- ~
~ 0 ~~ m
a
` -~
r- Z ~
~ ~ w ~ g ~I Z
< ~Z w t ~~ z
< U Z 3 t ~ z~ ~'
~ E,,, ~ cti
VJ <v ~ ~ ~ Wa ~"$
N W W ~ ~ i^ ad ~~
m ~ Z F- I ~~
S
ON ~p i ~ zs0.
I
~ ~O ~ HQ
~~ ~_ a~
~ Q ~ ~ ~" I I`-- V '
NV ~ N3 I ~ ~~
O N
Zo ~W ,I ~~
Q ~ Z ~
I m
~~ ~ cn~ N i O N
O r\ w U po ~ ~,,, 0
w <N JX ~ I J~ N
tJJ ~ J O i C
LL ('V ^
W O LL ~ LJ.. m i ~ (~ ~ N ~9 N N N N
w N~ w O I 1 ~ ~ N 61 N N N N
~ II ~- w I F- ~i N cr m ~
V II N~~o N I
II ~ ~
~n w p II ~ II it i ~ ~ Nn T I ~n~~~
oQ(W~j~~~V I
u7$aO I
II ~n-~wW~ I
I
~ N~ N N J ' I
I
u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I
a~ w U d~~ ~
~`nF-a~NN I W
~nO~~QO~ i 1 ~
o O,~Z~ ~ I
Z~=pOUO I ~
O
I-uZ~~pww j ~
3~3aa~~ I ~
I

II
r`
C IO

N
Q•
I~,r> >
rrl~l ~
~~ ~
(f;

I
I
I I c \i
~~
~
I
~

~,
I I C~
~ I ~
I I N
Nng T-ra k-~ I I ~~~
~

\1 I
I
I

I
u rizAC ~
li °~ i i w
l
II ,~ ')
(
I I _
7
I
v ~ I
~
~~ ~ ~ i i

i
~
\ cn
\
~ ~
~ e
~ I
~ ~
N \ I
U
~
I
m

I I j
I u
0° ~
fl S N I a
Q~

O / 7 >
Q i
(x)

'
I a
m ¢
~ ,~ o
v
1 lid
r rv
I
N
„
(Il I
¢~~ (,~
~ / ~ I

>
'~
,
~~ ~;
~ ~.
U
(ll ' ~
L '~ '".
(7 r ~
'
~~ c~ o- l ~~
o,
l
• V ~ ~ (, LL

a~ o~ ~~ a> j N ' \
\ LL
I
I, 1

I
I I
I
I i z a
Y a 1>_
~ H ~ O
a
TT N
I i ~ `
I W !..
, i i O H
I
N
I W ~ d ~
1 ~ U~
I d ~
UQZ g
I > o~ g ~ a
a
~ NOi IV~~ ' a ~-W o 3 u
I N N N N N N N ~ Z~ o~
I a a w
I j I N N N N N N N a~ Z Z
I ~`~ ~`~ ~`~ (`% CvI !vI (\I ~ Q ~ O
O ~
l ~
m I z O
N ~ U ~ o ~
I 1 I ~ °Q~ w~ o~Ne
I ~ , U H H ~ i~ 3
O I Z U
m ~ ~ ° o ~W
W °
Z c ~- O
n
I t^ , ~ J N ~
O~ 1 W 1 I ~ ~ ~ U' m U
N= i ic; W~ ~~>6~
~~ ~ Q ~~ >~~~~
N ~ I IW- N z
~ I I , ~ o
X = j ~-' Q <
~ 00~ I Zd `~
N g
~r3 I ag
~,-; ~,
X `~, ~ W a ~~ v ~~
MFN- ~ j I Om ~ ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ 1 I N o F~1
N iy 1 ~ n; F cp
N Jj jl WO ~Ex! ~ ~ W ~
N I ; I O~ a y ~F
O I 1 , LL w t~
1 J W ~ IJ 3$~
W it M~ ~oPOSE N _ 1 x ~~`
J i M N ~ 1--~ ~ W~
C
C I ~ I ~ ~ ~ W~
(1~ \ ----- -_ N
V I ~ m
I i _~
~ --
N ~ ~ N z= ~o
l I
L(") ~ J v 0. 0 0.~
N ~ W a ~" o
ct °
M
~D i M N w~ ~o
~ (~,) N z s 0. s
I co
/ V o
' I I ~ P" N
' ~ I ~
I ~ ~
/ ~ W ~
I W ~ tz~
I I I N
I I
I ~ w
~ O ~
~/ ~/ 0
I ~ W LL
I ( I L,L LL N
~ ' \\ I ~ LL ~ LL N
w ~ mN GON `-
LL 1
WW M I ~~' ~M
wwll ~ f.. I WM W~ .-.
r~o<o II i~ ~ ~ ~, oCN ~ II N N ~ N N N N
n ~ii~oo I w II W ~ ~ N N ~ ~
II ~ I --~ F- I- c~ ni ~ ~ N o, ~~ I~
~ II Z II ii I Q~ Q~ r~ ~~~ c~~ r~ w w ~~,~
QuyJ=~ ~ Z 3V ~V
I O I a
~a~~Za i H- ~ Zd Z~ N;il ~V~~~~
_~N ~ I
~ ~ J
N- N I
~~W°~~ I a ) ~, I pw pw ~
N H d d N N I ~ I Z I Z Z Z Z
W
wO~~Z~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ $
~=pOQ~ I
Q ~- u O ,
~ O Q 0 ~~ I I , ~
w3QQoC~-

~I

N

I ~
I C
\
~~ ~' I
I
j
j ~ ~ ~
/
f ng Troc
-~ ~ ~
U N
~;, o

`°'i
"~ ~~
~ ~
°
~ N
1 ~~

, r~ncK I (~~
III ~ ~~ N
~ i ~
~'
~
~ ~~I I ~ ~
i ~
I
i
~
~

IC

` i Q
6 n
`
~ (V~ \ ~ I
c~~ ~ \ ~

~ ~ I
\
\~
I\
~,
~
,
~
;,
~
N
~
i
I i \
~ ~
' I
I ~ N
I ~
I ~ ~
~--~ o-'
~ cD

~ ~ N
~ ~

~,
~ u I
I
~ ~
~
~ I X J ~. I
W I

z ~ cx~ ~ (iJ
X ~7
~ i
Z~ i ti
w ~ I
~ ' XV I >
/
i m
i I tl
~~
B
I W
s
o
j
i

i
~ ~
i ~
~ ~~

N
H
O
W
J
<_
N
N
V

W
~ ~
~

V 3
N
~~
~
w
Z
~ ~
W ~ Z
N
LL W N W H O m
^~
~~0
w II <O
~ II
II II
Q p
II ~
Q
W
H
~ O .~~~
N
W N -
oQV~ ~V
~
~Z~
JW
~
~~~
W
~f-oe~~
II t/1-NN
N
'"'N
~~~~0~

W
~
~
Q~-~UoW.o
C~
a~~~a~N ~

N I
o O
Z~~
u.
O
~ 0
~ ~ ~
~
W W 0~ Q W W I
3~3aa~~
J W
W ~_
Z ~
~ W
V ~~~
O N
r- _
ooh
N ~~
0 ~N=
~ dM~
U
W
w
O
w
J

h
Q v
I~~~' O>
Z ~'ii~l ~
~~i~l~
w i
I '

I
I
N j
I ~

I
I
I I
I --~ ~
I '
0
I
I ~'
V
I ~
t- ~,
I ; Y
U
N
O
r
V ~ ~

O
<<.
< ~
~ W
XV ~
M N
,,^^~~LL
~
0~~...

~
~ ~-- ~, a W
UN~p
1 Z X ~.'
U

I ~W
F-
Q
I ~~Mw
,
I '
I N W
J Q
1 _
I I
I Z ~OX~
ii ' g ~HN~
I'i i
I' I H
% ~
i I
I
1
I ~
1 ~
I ~
r~ t7 ~
~ ~
J I
i1 ; '
~~
I UQ
V
?~ '
N ~
X~
' W=
j -~ H
LL
I
I
I ~
1 ~
i
i
i
~ ~
~ ~
~~ ~~
mN mN
~N =~
~ II ~ ~~
I"~
~ 3N 3v
~Q Z~ Za
d
a~ ~~ ~N
O°° OZ OZ
~ Z Z
~o ~~ ~~
u- Vr/„
~~ r
LL- W
J ~
r, F-
r- N
N~I~dnJ~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ t~ t~ Q ~ ~ ~
N UM MCA~ ~ M~M ~ ~ \~i
l' 1 l l r l l J

Z(~~I

N ? \I
°~ ~
~
~
~
~ ~ (\I

<i ~ A
IS)
-z >
~
r
~
~' '
~~ a ~~
c v
J ~~
~I~
I ~-'
- 7
~, ~ -~
~I X ~I~~

Fxlsting T
ack -~ ~ i ~
~ ~ ~'~
I v ~ cr
I~

.~

~

Q ~
~
~~~ ~ I. ``' o
7 I I ~~y ~
I VI II ~~ I co w
~ I ~ ~
i
(Z cn
~ I

~~
~ j ~~
~
~ ~
, i ~
`
~ ~

I~~ ~ N
~~~
\
l X
Ni \ ~
~ ~ I > n
m r 1 I l i ~
i ~~ ~ ~ ~
~~~~~ I I I ~ ,~
~~ I I I

I_i I ~
r~
I
I
I~
~
L r 1 1 NCO
(~ ~ ZI cow
U (IJ ~ ~ ~
i
III
n
I ~ :J ~
~
~
U~ ~ I ~
I ~ N
rr ~ ~
i
-
-
~
~
~ L ~ C
31 I f 1
; ?
~ n ~~

w e

~~7 IL
i n
~ cr; c~
cv
X
lil lil N
..-,
c~
~
i ~
l
~ ~.
i
Z

N :~ lD ~ tQ N tD

N~ 1 ldn i~
t~
N
LO
N
~c~
~~
~')
N
N
N
N
v
N
N
i~
N
CCU
N
V

V

W N
Z
Y
~

~
X Q
O ~

a
°~
N
N
~,
r
~
~
~
o
~
O

0
r
W
W
N
O
d V ~
~
YZ
U
o

~ Q
s
°

~ a~
F- w
z >
3
~ 3 0 ~
Q
o Z
o
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~
J Q =
v1 0

Z Z

J ,

~

~
~ O
W ~ O
O O
~ w
~ c

~ Z ~ r
G
N ~ Z j
~ W O ~
W
Z O V
0 Z y
i d
o
n
~ G_ p
~ ~ m u
z
F
F
a
0.
F ~+ J ~ tR&
z
m
d ~ ~q
° ~ 3~~
Y
z C7 ~~~
o~ ~¢
~ ~ ~~
U
w~
F
a ~ ;~
°z W ~~~
.~ ~
z~ ~o
a° aF
Wa a$
w~ ~4
ad zy
~' ~ s
za as