20081602_Email_20090528

W'.'
Wainwright, David
From: Turchy, Michael A [[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 3:49 PM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Rivenbark, Chris
Subject: FW: R-2414 A Camden County US 158 culvert to bridge
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Ili David.
I'm about to work on the written request for the condi!ion modification request for R-2414A regarding the construction of
the bridge and working in the dry during the moratorium for this project, per your April 28th request (below). I have
included below the response from CAMA, the Corps and WRC indicating via email that their permits are hereby
modified. Before I started on this document. I wanted to verify that you still wanted a written request tor this
modification.
Thanks,
Michael
From: David Wainwright ImaiIto: David.Waimvrighta)ncmail.net]
Sent: Tuesday. April 28, 2009 7:22 AM
To: Rivenbark Chris
Subject: Re: FW: R-2414 A Camden County US 158 culvert to bridge
Chris.
I think that this is a fairly significant modification in the tact that we are essentially waiving the moratorium. I think under
the circumstances, I would prefer a formal request. I think by doing so it would help alleviate any concerns that may arise
in the future. I will try and turn it around as quickly as possible. Thank You.
David Wainwright
-----Original Message-----
From: Headley, Jim
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 11:09 AM
To: Rivenbark; Chris
Cc: Brittingham, Cathy
Subject: RE: R-2414 A Camden County US 158 Culvert to bridge
You know what I thought I had replied but apparently I did not. I apologize.
So based on the Email sent by NCDOT and Travis in regards to the methodology and timing around the sheet pile
installation at the bridge location, DCM feels that as those conditions pertaining to this item are currently worded now.
that they still would apply and that no modification or refinement is required for DO']- to move forward as described.
Chris if you are okay with this let me know. Once again I Apologize. Also have you heard anything as to the potential of
changing the number of poles as I thought I overheard at the preconsnuction or additional hand clearing that was not
originally thought to be required as the utilities thrwght that more area would need to be cleared. They have already
started and perhaps finished clearing I just want to make sure we are good on this.
James W I-loadley_ NCDO f Field Representative NC Division of Coastal Management
1367 US Highway 17 South
Elizabeth City, NC 27909

Phone: [phone] x 237 FAX 252 - 264 - 3723
[,mail: Jim.{ [e-mail]
r
-----Original Message,---
From: Biddlecomc, Nyilliam.l SAW [maiIto: William.J.13iddlccorreausace.army.rn i I I
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 12:28 1'M
To: Rivenbark, Chris; Wainwright David; Cathy Brittingham
Cc: Wilson, Travis W.. "furchy, Michael A
Subject: RE: R-2414 A Camden County US 158 culvert to bridge - Corp Action ID # 1994-02124
This e-mail will act as authorization for the modification to this permit for permit site 11 only. The permit is hereby
changed so that special conditions It and i (In-Water Moratorium) do not apply to permit site # 1 I for this project. It is
understood that the impervious dikes used to dewater the work site will remain in place during the moratorium period. At
this time, these conditions still apply to the B section of this project. All other special conditions are still applicable for
this project. If ?ou have questions concerning this action please contact me at [phone].
-----Original Message-----
From: Rivenbark. Chris
Sent: Monday, April 27. 2009 3:32 I'M
To: 'Biddlecome, William J SAW: Wainwright, David; 'Cathy Brittingham'
Cc: Travis Wilson': Turchy, Michael A
Subject: FW: 12-2414 A Camden County US 158 culvert to bridge
Please see Travis' email below pertaining to Permit Site I I for R-2414A. NCDOT is requesting that permit conditions be
modified to reflect this change. Can each of you let me know if this email is sufficient or do you prefer that we submit a
formal request for the modification?
Thank you.
Sent: Friday, April 247 2009 10:34 AM
To: Turchy, Michael A
Subject: R8: R-2414 A Camden County US 158 culvert to bridge
per our conversations and after reviewing the proposal. There does not appear to I,le an alternative method of construction
that would not have increased impacts to the resource. This circumstance is unique and should not be viewed as a
standard for future projects. WRC does not object to the DOT proposed construction within the moratorium for R-2414A
for replacing the existing culvert on the UT to Pasquotank river on US 158.
Travis W. Wilson
Eastern Region Highway Project Coordinator Habitat Conservation Program NC Wddlite Resources Commission
1142 1-85 Service Rd.
Gcedmoor. NC: 27522
Phone: [phone] ext. 226
Fax: [phone]
'I'ravis.Wilson rr,)ncwildlife.oig<mailto:Travis.Wilson Dt ncwildlife.org>
From: Turchy, Michael A
Sent: Thursday. April 16, 2009 2:20 PM
To: Wilson, Travis W.
Subject. IZ-2414 A Camden County US 158 culvert to bridge
"Davis.
Thanks for meeting with us regarding R-2414 A alter a long day of concurrence meetings.

From our conversations. the department is having some constructability and timing conflicts with the anadianIOLIS Fish
moratorium for the removal of the existing culvert and replacement with a bridge on the UT to the Pasquotank Rivcr.
Duc to the extent of the construction, the department does not believe it is possible to remove the culvert, phase the
construction of the bridge, stabilize the stream banks, and then reestablish the channel/ flow within the June 16 to
February 14 time fames allowed by the moratorium.
I'm attaching theaerial and the permit drawings of the site.
We appreciate you looking into thissystem and this request. Please let me know if you need any additional information.
'T'hanks,
Michael
1"n-mil correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties.