Kinston Bypass (2)

Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
k-A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
June 29. 2009
MEMORANDUM
Natural Resources
Dee Freeman
Secretary
To: Melba McGee, Environmental Coordinator, Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs
From: David Wainwright, NC Division of Water Quality 9J
Subject: Scoping comments on the proposed US 70 Kinston Bypass freeway on new location in Lenoir
County, TIP R-2553.
SCH# 09-0349
Reference your correspondence dated May 28, 2009 in which you requested comments for the referenced
project. Preliminary analysis of the project reveals the potential for multiple impacts to perennial streams
and jurisdictional wetlands in the project area. More specifically, impacts to:
Stream Name River
Basin Stream
Classification(s) Stream Index Number
Neuse River Neuse C;NSW 27-(75.7), 27-(56)
Neuse River Neuse WS-IV;NSW,CA 27-(75.3)
Neuse River Neuse WS-fV,NSW 27-(70.5)
Bear Creek Neuse C;Sw,NS W 27-72-(0.1)
Heath Mill Run Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-101-15-4
Taylor's Branch Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-80-1-1
Wheat Swam Creek Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-86-24
White Mash Run Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-77-2.5
Beaverdam Branch Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-83
Brie Run Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-81-1
Buck Branch Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-77-2-0.5
Core Creek Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-90
Falling Creek Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-77
Flat Swam Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-101-15-2-1
Folle Branch Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-84-2
Groundnut Creek Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-77-2-2
Gum Swam Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-84-1-1
Gum Swam Creek Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-77-3
Hallam Branch Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-86-24-1
Ha s Branch Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-84-3
Heath Branch Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-80-9
Heath Mill Run Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-101-15-4
Jericho Run Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-81-2
Jumping Run Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-77-1
Little Snake Hole Branch Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-84-4-1
Transportation Permitting Unit
1650 Mail service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Location: 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Internet: http.llh2o.enr.state.nc. uslncvietlandsl
NorthCarolina
Natura!!r"
An Equal Opponunily 1 Affirmative Action Employer
Mill Branch Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-80-6
Mosel Creek Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-77-2, 27-84
MottSwam Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-80-6
Peter Creek Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-78
Southwest Creek (Kelly's Pond) Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-80
Spring Branch Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-80-5
Stonyton Creek Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-81
Strawberry Branch Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-80-7
Trace Swam Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-84-1
Walters Mill Run Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-77-2-1
Whitle s Creek (Whiteface Creek) Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-76
Yadkin Branch (Adkin Branch) Neuse C;Sw,NSW 27-79
Further investigations at a higher resolution should be undertaken to verify the presence of other streams
and/or jurisdictional wetlands in the area. In the event that any jurisdictional areas are identified, the
Division of Water Quality requests that NCDOT consider the following environmental issues for the
proposed project:
Project Specific Comments:
All waterbodies are NSW waters of the State. The NCDWQ is very concerned with sediment and
erosion impacts that could result from this project. The NCDWQ recommends that highly protective
sediment and erosion control BMPs be implemented to reduce the risk of nutrient runoff to waters of
the state within the project area. The NCDWQ requests that road design plans provide treatment of
the storm water runoff through best management practices as detailed in the most recent version of
the NCDWQ's Stormwater Best Management Practices.
Review of the project reveals the presence of surface waters classified as Water*Supply Critical Area
in the project study area. Given the potential for impacts to these resources during the project
implementation, the NCDWQ requests that the NCDOT strictly adhere to North Carolina regulations
entitled "Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds" (15A NCAC 04B .0124) throughout design and
construction of the project. This would apply for any area that drains to streams having WS
CA(Water Supply Critical Area) classifications.
Should bridges be located within the Critical Area of a Water Supply, NCDOT may be required to
design, construct, and maintain hazardous spill catch basins in the project area. The number of catch
basins installed should be determined by the design of the bridge, so that runoff would enter said
basin(s) rather than flowing directly into the stream, and in consultation with the NCDWQ.
3. This project is within the Neuse River Basin. Riparian buffer impacts should be avoided and
minimized to the greatest extent possible pursuant to 15A NCAC 2B.
General Project Comments:
4. The environmental document should provide a detailed and itemized presentation of the proposed
impacts to wetlands and streams with corresponding mapping. If mitigation is necessary as required
by 15A NCAC 2H.0506(h), it is preferable to present a conceptual (if not finalized) mitigation plan
with the environmental documentation. Appropriate mitigation plans will be required prior to
issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification.
5. Environmental assessment alternatives should consider design criteria that reduce the impacts to
streams and wetlands from storm water runoff. These alternatives should include road designs that
allow for treatment of the storm water runoff through best management practices as detailed in the
most recent version of the NCDWQ's Stormwater Best Management Practices, such as grassed
swales, buffer areas, preformed scour holes, retention basins, etc.
After the selection of the preferred alternative and prior to an issuance of the 401 Water Quality
Certification, the NCDOT is respectfully reminded that they will need to demonstrate the avoidance
and minimization of impacts to wetlands (and streams) to the maximum extent practical. In
accordance with the Environmental Management Commission's Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0506[h]),
mitigation will be required for impacts of greater than I acre to wetlands. In the event that mitigation
is required, the mitigation plan should be designed to replace appropriate lost functions and values.
The NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program may be available for use as wetland mitigation.
7. In accordance with the Environmental Management Commission's Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0506[h]),
mitigation will be required for impacts of greater than 150 linear feet to any single perennial stream.
In the event that mitigation is required, the mitigation plan should be designed to replace appropriate
lost functions and values. The NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program may be available for use as
stream mitigation.
8. The NCDWQ is very concerned with sediment and erosion impacts that could result from this project.
The NCDOT should address these concerns by describing the potential impacts that may occur to the
aquatic environments and any mitigating factors that would reduce the impacts.
9. Whenever possible, the NCDWQ prefers spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not
require work within the stream or grubbing of the streambanks and do not require stream channel
realignment. The horizontal and vertical clearances provided by bridges should allow for human and
wildlife passage beneath the structure. Fish passage and navigation by canoeists and boaters should
not be blocked. Bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream when possible.
10. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream. Stormwater should be directed
across the bridge and pre-treated through site-appropriate means (grassed swales, pre-formed scour
holes, vegetated buffers, etc.) before entering the stream. Please refer to the most current version of
the NCDWQ's Stormwater Best Management Practices.
11. If concrete is used during construction, a dry work area should be maintained to prevent direct contact
between curing concrete and stream water. Water that inadvertently contacts uncured concrete should
not be discharged to surface waters due to the potential for elevated pH and possible aquatic life and
fish kills.
12. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, the site should be graded to its preconstruction
contours and elevations. Disturbed areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and
appropriate native woody species should be planted. When using temporary structures the area
should be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area with chain saws, mowers, bush-hogs, or other
mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and root mat intact allows the area to re-vegetate
naturally and minimizes soil disturbance.
13. Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands should be below the
elevation of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches, and 20
percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches, to allow low flow
passage of water and aquatic life. Design and placement of culverts and other structures including
temporary erosion control measures should not be conducted in a manner that may result in dis-
equilibrium of wetlands or streambeds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream of the
above structures. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the equilibrium is being
maintained if requested in writing by the NCDWQ. If this condition is unable to be met due to
bedrock or other limiting features encountered during construction, please contact NCDWQ for
guidance on how to proceed and to determine whether or not a permit modification will be required.
14. If multiple pipes or barrels are required, they should be designed to mimic natural stream cross
section as closely as possible including pipes or barrels at flood plain elevation, floodplain benches,
and/or sills may be required where appropriate. Widening the stream channel should be avoided.
Stream channel widening at the inlet or outlet end of structures typically decreases water velocity
causing sediment deposition that requires increased maintenance and disrupts aquatic life passage.
15. If foundation test borings are necessary; it should be noted in the document. Geotechnical work is
approved under General 401 Certification Number 3624/Nationwide Permit No. 6 for Survey
Activities.
16. Sediment and erosion control measures sufficient to protect water resources must be implemented and
maintained in accordance with the most recent version of North Carolina Sediment and Erosion
Control Planning and Design Manual and the most recent version of NCS000250.
17. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area unless otherwise
approved by the NCDWQ. Approved BMP measures from the most current version of the NCDOT
Construction and Maintenance Activities manual such as sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams and other
diversion structures should be used to prevent excavation in flowing water.
18. Sediment and erosion control measures should not be placed in wetlands and streams.
19. Borrow/waste areas should avoid wetlands to the maximum extent practical. Impacts to wetlands in
borrow/waste areas could precipitate compensatory mitigation.
20. While the use of National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps, NC Coastal Region Evaluation of Wetland
Significance (NC-CREWS) maps, and soil survey maps are useful tools, their inherent inaccuracies
require that qualified personnel perform onsite wetland delineations prior to permit approval.
21. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in order to
minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other pollutants into streams. This
equipment should be inspected daily and maintained to prevent contamination of surface waters from
leaking fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
22. Riprap should not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed in a manner that
precludes aquatic life passage. Bioengineering boulders or structures should be properly designed,
sized and installed.
Thank you for requesting our input at this time. The NCDOT is reminded that issuance of a 401 Water
Quality Certification requires that appropriate measures be instituted to ensure that water quality
standards are met and designated uses are not degraded or lost. If you have any questions or require
additional information, please contact David Wainwright at [phone].
cc: William Wescott, US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington Field Office
Chris Militscher, Environmental Protection Agency (electronic copy only)
Travis Wilson, NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Garcy Ward, NCDWQ Washington Regional Office
File Copy
L

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GOVERNOR
May 28, 2009
MEMORANDUM TO:
FROM:
Mr. John
Division
Gregory J.
Project De
SUBJECT: Start of Study for USr70
freeway on new location,
STIP No. R-2553
0
HEr, G o ??
4rR r?r c'1109
EUGENE A. CONTI, Jx:y
SECRIrARY
Analysis Branch
Kinston Bypass, four-lane divided
Lenoir County, WBS 34460,
The Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch is starting the project
development, environmental and engineering studies for the proposed US 70 Kinston Bypass. The
project is included in the 2009-2015 North Carolina Transportation Improvement Program and is
scheduled for right of way in fiscal year 2015 and construction is currently unfunded.
Attached for your review and comments are the scoping information sheets for the proposed project.
We would appreciate any information you might have that would be helpful in evaluating potential
environmental impacts of the project. If applicable, please identify any permits or approvals that may be
required by your agency. A scoping meeting will be scheduled with NCDOT staff to discuss the proposed
project in more detail. In order to include your comments in our materials for this meeting, we would
appreciate your response by July 31, 2009. If you would like to attend the scoping meeting, please notify the
project engineer.
It is anticipated that a state funded Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared for this
project. This document will be prepared in accordance with the State Environmental Policy Act.
If you have any questions concerning the project, please contact Mark Pierce, Project Planning
Engineer, of this Branch at [phone], Ext. 214 or email [e-mail]. Please include the
TIP Project Number in all correspondence and comments.
GJT/plr
Attachment
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE.' WWW.NCDOT.ORG
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Project Review Form
Project Number: 09-0349 County: Lenoir Date Received: 06/06/2009
Due Date: 7/1/2009
Project Description: Scoping - US 70 Kinston bypass, four-lane divided freeway on new location,
WBS 34460, STIP No. R-2553

s rolec is emg reviewe as m ica e e ow:
Regional Office Regional Office Area In-House Review
Asheville ? Air _ Soil & Water ? Marine Fisheries
Fayetteville ? Water ? Coastal Management - Water Resources
i
_
Mooresville ? Aquifer Protection
Wildlife ?
-
ronmental Health
Env
_
? Wildlife - DOT
Solid Waste Mgmt
Raleigh Land Quality Engineer
? -
_ ? Forest Resources - Radiation Protection

Washington
?
- Land Resources Other
Wilmington -
- ? Parks & Recreation
Winston-Salem
- -
Water Quality
/ t titer Quality= DO`S

Air Quality

Manager Sign-Off/Region: Date: In-House Reviewer/Agency:
Response (check all applicable)
_ No objection to project as proposed. _ N Comment
Insufficient information to complete review Other (specify or attach comments)
_
If you have any questions, please contact
Melba McGee, Environmental Coordinator at [e-mail] D. ?
SUN
'9
ot,Nk 9,200
?"%1'?h1Tkk
???1944?? 7I?,
y
7
START OF STUDY/SCOPING
MEETING INFORMATION
Kinston Bypass Project
Lenoir, North Carolina
TIP Project No. R-2553
Prepared For:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Prepared By:
URS CORPORATION - NORTH CAROLINA
J??'?eTM4,4'
kf
0
4 ?
;for nNS'O6
May 20, 2009 n
09 D
JuN
4oos
Q4l STXi???S MVH
STIP R-2553 Kinston Bypass, Lenoir County, North Carolina
Cost Estimate:
TIP Estimate:
Current Estimate:
Construction: Right of Way: Total Cost:
$118,000,000 $9,800,000 $127,800,000
$169,800,000 $9,800,000 $180,678,000
(updated March (includes
2009) $1,078,000 from
Prior Years)
PAGE 3 OF 10
STIP R-2553 Kinston Bypass, Lenoir County, North Carolina
Natural / Human Environmental Information (include
comments from agencies):
A public outreach program will be an integral part of the EIS process. The Section
404/NEPA Interagency Merger Process will be applicable. Sections 404 and 401
permits will be be required, with noise analysis, air quality screening, threatened and
endangered species surveys, and contamination screening evaluation to be conducted
in order to determine the full extent of the environmental and engineering constraints. A
preliminary list of known constraints include the following:
General Information
- North Carolina Railroad Company/Norfolk Southern Railroad is located
north of US 70 and US 70 Bypass, which runs east-west through Lenoir, Jones and
Craven Counties.
- The North Carolina Global Transpark is a 2,400 acre industrial/airport site located
approximately three miles north of Kinston, north of C.F. Harvey Parkway.
Cultural Resources
- Preliminary Documentation of Archaelogical and Historic Resources is currently
underway, with more information to be presented at the scoping meeting.
According to the FONSI for STIP project R-2719A, several historic resources exist
in the project vicinity, west of Kinston. The Wyse Fork Battlefield
includes 4,069 acres of land where the second largest land battle in North Carolina
took place and is located within the project vicinity, east of Kinston. The Wyse Fork
Battlefield proposed boundary will be presented for inclusion on the National
Register of Historic Places later this year. The approximate location is within and
surrounding the area created by the intersection of US 70, British Road and
Caswell Station Road. The location of a Naval Engagement at Camp Pool is also
identified on the National Register of Historic Places, which occurred in 1862, and
is located within the project vicinity, east of Kinston. Additionally, the site of the
First Battle of Kinston, which occurred in 1862, is located within the project vicinity,
south of Kinston, and is also on the National Register of Historic Places.
Natural Systems
- Natural Resources data will be gathered as the project progresses, however,
according to the FONSI for STIP R-2719A, jurisdictional resources exist in the
project vicinity, west of Kinston. Investigation of USGS Quad. maps for the
remainder of of the project vicinity resulted with several major stream systems
beinq identified including the following:
PAGE 6 OF 10
STIP R-2553 Kinston Bypass, Lenoir County, North Carolina
-The Nuese River, which runs west to east through Lenoir County and crosses
US 70 Bypass south of downtown Kinston.
-Bear Creek, a tributary of the Neuse River, runs north to south and crosses
US 70 west of La Grange.
-Falling Creek, a tributary of the Neuse River, runs west to east and crosses
US 70 west of Kinston.
-Southwest Creek, a tributary of the Neuse River, runs south to north and crosses
US 70 east of Kinston.
-Stonyton Creek, a tributary of the Neuse River, runs west to east and crosses
NC 11 east of Kinston.
-Tracey Swamp, a tributary of the Neuse River, runs south to north and crosses
US 70 near the Lenoir-Craven county line.
Endangered and Threatened Species
Endangered and Threatened Species list on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
website for Lenoir County, includes the Red-cockaded woodpecker (endangered)
and the Sensitive joint-vetch (threatened). Jones County includes the American
Alligator (threatened due to similarity of appearance) and the Red-cockaded
woodpecker (endangered). Craven County includes the American Alligator
(threatened due to similarity of appearance), the Leatherback sea turtle
(endangered), Red-cockaded woodpecker (endangered), the West Indian manatee
(endangered), the Rough-leaved loosestrife (endangered) and the Sensitivejoint-
vetch (threatened).
Traffic Data
- Locations of preliminary proposed intrsections/interchanges have been identified in
the Traffic Forecast Request dated August 2008.
Adjacent Projects
- Major State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) projects within the project
vicinity include the following:
-R-2719 Crescent Road (C.F. Harvey Parkway), which will be a four-lane
divided highway, will bypass the northwest side of Kinston from US 70 to NC 58.
The A section, from US 70 to US 258 has not been constructed, however Right
of Way acquisition is currently underway with funding for construction included in
the current STIP.
The following projects are also included in the STIP; however, given neither the
right-of-way or construction are funded, they are not considered to be in place in the
foreseable future. Additionally, given the project vicinity lies within an RPO, with no
fiscally constrained projects identified, these projects will not be considered in the
future year traffic forecast nor the Indirect and Cummulative Effects analysis.
PAGE 7 OF 10
STIP R-2553 Kinston Bypass, Lenoir County, North Carolina
-R-3308 US 258 from Crescent Road to US 64 in Tarboro.
-R-3102 NC 58 from Kinston to Wilson.
-R-4423 US 258-NC 191 from Dobbs Farm Road in Kinston to US 264 Alt. with
bypass of Snow Hill.
-U-3618 Carey Road Extension from Rouse Road to US 258 (deferred).
-U-4018 Plaza Boulevard Extension from NC 58 to NC 11.
-U-3341 Global Transpark Spine Road.
-FS-0802A New route proposed US 70 Bypass to NC 11-58.
North Carolina Department of Transportation Strategic Highway Corridor
- US 70 from Raleigh to Morehead City, North Carolina is identified as a
Strategic Highway Corridor.
North Carolina Intrastate System
- US 70 from 1-40 in Wake County to NC 24 in Carteret County is included in the
North Carolina Intrastate System, which states the facility shall "provide high
speed, safe travel service throughout the State." General Statute §136-178 also
states the North Carolina Intrastate System shall also:
• Connect major population centers both inside and outside the State and provide
safe, convenient, through travel for motorists.
• Be designed to support statewide growth and development objectives and to
connect to major highways of adjoining states.
• Have at least four travel lanes except those for which projected traffic volumes
and environmental considerations dictate fewer lanes.
• When warranted, have vertical separation or interchanges at crossings, have
more than four travel lanes, or having bypasses..
The above topics listed are not all inclusive and will be expanded upon as additional
data is collected. These topics will be among those discussed in further detail at the
Scoping Meeting.
PAGE 8 OF 10
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Preliminary Estimate
TIP No.
Route
From
Typical Section
R-2553
US 70 Kinston Bypass
New Loc. 4-Lns, 46'Med., 4'& 10' PS
Prepared By: Doug Lane
Requested By: Mark Pierce
[Page]
County: LENOIR
CONSTR.COST
$169,800,000
3/16/09 Updated Unit Prices
3/16/09
Line
Item
Des
Sec No.
Description
Quantity
Unit
Price
Amount
Clearing & Grubbing 239.0 Acres $ 12,000.00 $ 2,868,000.00

Earthwork 2,632,000 CY $ 4.00 $ 10,528,000.00
Undercut Excavation 130,700 CY $ 10.00 $ 1,307,000.00
Soil Stabilization Fabric 130,700 SY $ 3.00 $ 392,100.00
Borrow to Replace Undercut 170,000 CY $ 8.00 $ 1,360,000.00
Reinforced Bridge Approach Fills 12 Each $ 22,000.00 $ 264,000.00
Drainage 12.4 Miles $ 350,000.00 $ 4,340,000.00

Fine Grading 708,600 SY $ . 2.00 $ 1,417,200.00
Subgrade Stabilization 578,400 SY $ 5.50 $ 3,181,200.00
Pavement
8" ABC 260,100 Tons $ 20.00 $ 5,202,000.00
Asphalt Binder PG 64-22 14,881 Tons $ 430.00 $ 6,398,830.00
4.0" B 25.0 B 120,900 Tons $ 32.00 $ 3,868,800.00
3.5" 1 19.0 B 107,700 Tons $ 32.00 $ 3,446,400.00
2.5" S 9.5 B 77,000 Tons $ 33.00 $ 2,541,000.00

Erosion Control 257 Acres $ 12,000.00 $ 3,084,000.00
Fencing (Woven Wire) 12.4 Miles $ 35,000.00 $ 434,000.00

Signing (Interchanges) 5 Each $ 125,000.00 $ 625,000.00
Traffic Control 1 LS $ 270,000.00 $ 270,000.00
Thermo and Markers 12.4 Miles $ 20,000.00 $ 248,000.00

Frontage Roads 2.0 Miles $ 2,000,000.00 $ 4,000,000.00
Interchan e & Grade Se Roadwa
Flyover Interchange US 70 West 1 LS $ 7,049,900.00

Grade Separation at SR-1324 1 LS $ 1,492,500.00

Diamond Interchange at NC 11-55 1 LS $ 6,850,400.00

Diamond Interchange at US 258 1 LS $ 6,850,400.00

Diamond Interchange at NC 58 1 LS $ 6,850,400.00

Grade Separation at SR-1904 1 LS $ 1,492,500.00

Flyover Interchange US 70 East I LS $ 7,049,900.00
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Preliminary Estimate
Prepared By: Doug Lane 3/16/09 Updated Unit Prices
Requested By: Mark Pierce 3/16/09
[Page]
Line
Item
Des
Sec No.
Description
Quantity
Unit
Price
Amount

Interch Gr.Se .&Stream X-in Strs
,Flyover US 70 West 38'x 240' 9,120 SF $ 115.00 $ 1,048,800.00
Bridge A roach Slabs 2@38'x25' 1,900 SF $ 27.00 $ 51,300.00

Gr. Sep. SR-1324 30'x 180' 5,400 SF $ 105.00 $ 567,000.00
Bridge Approach Slabs 2@30'x 25' 1,500 SF $ 27.00 $ 40,500.00

Duals over Neuse River 2@40'x 400' 32,000 SF $ .100.00 $ 3,200,000.00
Bridge Approach Slabs 4@40'x 25' 4,000 SF $ 27.00 $ 108,000.00

Diamond at NC 11-55 2@38'x 150' 11,400 SF $ 105.00 $ 1,197,000.00
Bridge Approach Slabs 4@38'x 25' 3,800 SF $ 27.00 $ 102,600.00

Diamond at US 258 2@38'x 150' 11,400 SF $ .105.00 $ 1,197,000.00
Bridge Approach Slabs 4@38'x 25' 3,800 SF $ 27.00 $ 102,600.00

Diamond at NC 58 2@38'x 150' 11,400 SF $ 105.00 $ 1,197,000.00
Bridge Approach Slabs 4@38'x 25' 3,800 SF $ 27.00 $ 102,600.00

Gr. Sep. SR-1904 30'x 180' 5,400 SF $ 105.00 $ 567,000.00
Bridge Approach Slabs 2@30'x 25' 1,500 SF $ 27.00 $ 40,500.00

Flyover at US 70 East 38'x 240' 9,120 SF $ 115.00 $ 1,048,800.00
Bridge Approach Slabs 2@38'x 25' 1,900 SF $ 27.00 $ 51,300.00

I E
Misc. & Mob (15% Structures) 1 LS $ 1,593,470.00
Misc. & Mob (45% Roadway) 1 LS $ 42,035,000.00
Lgth = 12AMi. Contract Cost .......................... .................... $ 147,662,000.00
E. & C. (15%) .......................... .................... $ 22,138,000.00
Construction Cost .......................... .................... $ 169,800,000.00
Pavement Design
2.5" S 9.5 B
3.5" I 19.0 B
4.0" B 25.0 BHB
8.0" ABC
Subgrade Stabilization
Note: Utility Construction (Water and Sewer) not included.
n}
O
-C'?,
C r?--
J
r Y I
r
m
z
O
;u-
0
c
ZT
i?
------------

? f
Z?1
C

-Y, (

f I I
t _- o
i I . w ? r
i
`? >) c m
z Ri
I
Zn= -
- N
r 1
Y
i?
r..

00,
/J O ;u
z ,<
`- z
OE
Z
=o?
?.1
o
d
a
?u
a
r
r .,
f,

t
0
1c

. , Yz
I
IJ
<

On

O
I< W
T
-? O

7 O
+1 c„ 2. z
cn
0 z
o
0
r_
O
N
C7
0 D
O
r_
C!)
z
D
Q

D
rn (-tea.--? z
Q)
- - - - - - - - - - - -

CD
,7 / ,?.` \ r? ATM. t,?-? I `' Y/ \? l ?- ,• '1 B7
t _..
Q
"J N
1 m N ?( _ R. 1 f i 1 r
.
• O J?
- -------------
;1
.r•? ? Art .? t ??? ?? ? _ _. ? ^?. t_1 ? ''?.
co Ch
p ,ti ?y
< -
J Y
Y-F
71
fil
L \ t ?- I Q C
f f , r
!\ -- - ` -?
CD
m cnx<c
5' cn
-- - - / 3 -4
sl
- d s o co?0
J' \ _ r
CD -
n
i
U
O
-
o Z
CD z
cn (D C)
CD D
cf)
D
I ?