20181208 Ver 1_401 Application_20180818

OF W A TF9
o� pG 1 2 Q a Office Use Only:
2 ' a Corps action ID no.
o DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
A.
Pre -Construction Notifica i .PCN) Form
i0% Itrl
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
/
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 13 or General Permit (GP) number: n/a
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Elevated Park Stream Improvement
2b.
County:
Haywood
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Maggie Valley
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Elevated Mountain Management Group, LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
Deed Book 923 / Page 2030
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
David Angel, Manager
3d.
Street address:
698 Brown Ave
3e.
City, state, zip:
Waynesville, NC 28786
3f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 20
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner) ?' r
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Town"of Maggie Valley - Public Services
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Town of Maggie Valley
4d. Street address:
3987 Soco Road
4e.
City, state, zip:
Maggie Valley, NC 28751
4f.
Telephone no.:
828-926- 0866
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Eric Romaniszyn
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Haywood Waterways Association
5c.
Street address:
P.O. Box 389
5d.
City, state, zip:
Waynesville, NC 28786
5e.
Telephone no.:
828-476-4667
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 20

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
7686-38-1515
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): - if you can't get
these, just include a very good vicinity map
Latitude: 35.519 Longitude: -83.091
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c.
Property size:
0.22 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
Jonathan's Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C & TR (Trout)
2c.
River basin: map is available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/
Pigeon (06010106)
Page 3 of 20
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site usage is a community park. It is legally owned by Elevated Mountain Management Group, LLC. The town of
Maggie Valley has a greenway/park easement on this property. They have the rights to maintain and improve the
land.
The stream is a drinking water source for the town, has some of the highest water quality in the county,.has excellent
trout habitat, and supports the town's Mountain Heritage Trout Waters designation. The general land use in the
vicinity of the property is developed urban residential.
This project would address eroding stream banks. The stream bank is vertical along most of the park due to erosion.
The protective vegetation is in poor condition; it is mostly grass, which has small root systems that do a poor job of
preventing the stream bank from being undercut, or stopping erosion if it starts. At the downstream end of the park,
the stream bank is held together with an old bus buried in the bank. It is severely corroded and not expected to last
too many more years. The park is also on a bend in the stream channel so it receives high erosion pressure,
particularly when flow levels are high. Other issues this project addresses are public access to Jonathan Creek
because much of the property in Maggie Valley along the stream is private, and improving fish habitat for fishing,
particularly for the disabled.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
160
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
This is Phase I of a two-phase project. It includes stabilizing 160 linear feet of eroding stream bank, replacing a
culvert that connects Phase I with Phase II, and educational signage. It would be part of a larger effort by the
town to protect water quality and improve their park system.
Page 4 of 20

3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Phase II also involves removing ten asphalt parking spaces and installing a stormwater collection and treatment
device that is adjacent to the storm drain. The new culvert will function to transport overflow from the
stormwater device to the stream.
Phase 1 the following steps will be taken in order to fix the stream bank issues. Please see the attached
preliminary engineering plan for complete details.
1. Construct instream structures, including rock and log vanes and toe revetments). These are standard stream
restoration best management practices to push water away from the stream banks and protect the bank from
being undercut. Construction would be subcontracted to Jennings Environmental. For the log vane and toe
revetments, we would use a tree from on site that needs to be removed to access the bus buried in the stream
bank. The engineer has also proposed a riffle enhancement in case substrate conditions are disrupted during
construction. Their installation will be determined at time of construction.
2. Stabilize the stream bank through slope modifications and vegetation. The current slope is vertical and would
be replaced with a 2:1 or 3:1 slope for greater stability under high flow conditions. During construction, standard
controls (i.e., silt fence, native grass seeding, coir matting) would be used to prevent erosion and sedimentation.
A mix of native trees and shrubs would be planted along the entire reach using volunteers.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
El Yes ®No El Unknown
ro ect (including all prior phases) in the past?
P 1 C 9 P� P )
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known):
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
® Yes ❑ No
6b.
If yes, explain.
This application is for Phase I of a two phase project. Phase I includes stabilizing 160 linear feet of eroding
stream bank and replacing a culvert that connects Phase 1 with Phase II. Phase 11 is addressing stormwater
originating from Elevated Mountain Distilling. It involves removing ten asphalt parking spaces and installing a
stormwater collection and treatment device that is adjacent to the storm drain.
Page 5 of 20

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -PER
-(PER)
or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent P
( ) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ® P ❑ T
Stream
Restoration
Jonathan Creek
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
40
160
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
160
3i. Comments: The current stream substrates and riparian buffers are highly impacted by sediment and human disturbance.
Relocating the stream will improve those conditions, particularly for the buffers and reducing streambank erosion.
Page 6 of 20

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required
B1 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 7 of 20

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Conceptual design plans were created by Jennings Environmental in collaboration with Town of Maggie Valley
staff. Greg Jennings is an engineer that previously taught courses for 23 years at North Carolina University's
Biological and Agricultural Engineering department. He has collaborated on more than 120 stream and
watershed restoration projects throughout North Carolina. In -stream impacts and impacts to riparian buffers will
be minimized to the extent feasible. Considerations will be made for stream slope, erosion prevention and
sediment control.
b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction would temporarily increase turbidity and sedimentation downstream of the site. These impacts
would be reduced by working in the dry as much as possible. Work is expected to be completed within two
weeks.
Fine excavation and grading would be conducted by hand digging.
Standard erosion and sedimentation controls (i.e., silt fence, minimizing disturbance, maintenance inspections
and corrections) would be used to prevent erosion during construction. Impacted riparian buffer area would be
seeded in native grasses and covered in coir matting at project completion. Additional protection would be made
through planting of riparian shrubs and trees in select locations.
A skilled engineer would be on-site during construction to make sure the designs and proper construction
techniques are followed. A skilled heavy equipment operator would also be used to minimize disturbance.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
Page 8 of 20
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? If yes, you will have to fill out this entire form — please
contact the State for more information.
❑ Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 20

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Yes ❑
❑ No
Comments:
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0.0%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: No impervious surfaces that could
elevate stream discharge.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Maggie Valley
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 20
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑Yes
❑ No
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213 .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 11 of 20
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

S. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impaCts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat? Latest USFWS updated database.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Latest Corps updated Heritage database.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: No change in stormwater discharge is anticipated from this
project. This project will not increase the floodplain height.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? The DRIFM map was provided by the engineer Greg
Jennings.
Nathan Clark
August 23,
2018
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
A plicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 12 of 27

Pre -Construction Notification
Elevated Park, Maggie Valley, NC
Stream improvement project on Jonathan Creek
Vicinity Map
U

Pre -Construction Notification
Elevated Park, Maggie Valley, NC
Stream improvement project on Jonathan Creek
Photos of existing conditions
Facing upstream
14
Facing downstream

Pre -Construction Notification
Elevated Park, Maggie Valley, NC
Stream improvement project on Jonathan Creek
20 Foot Topo Map
15

Pre -Construction Notification
Elevated Park, Maggie Valley, NC
Stream improvement project on Jonathan Creek
Easement Record
lnstrument# 2017001720 Book 923 Page 2031
Town of Maggie Valley, Nortlt Carotirta
Planning Department
3987 Saco Road
Maggie Valley, NC 28751
atv_�n a�t6v.rzolmr ieMail� COtY}
[phone] x104
Greenway/ Public Park Easement Agreement
Property Owner, David lee Angel, Elevated Mountain Distilling Co.
Property Pin: 7686-38-1515
Address: 3732 Som Road
THIS GRANT OF A PARK/TRAIL RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT is made as of thisr day of 2017 by
Elevated Mountain Mme
anagent Group, LLC ("Grantor"), and the Town of Maggio Valley and/or it essors or assign's
(collectively hereinafter referred to as "Grantee"), and Is consented to by Elevated Mountain Distilling Company, LLC as
tenant.
WWITNESS THAT:
WHEREAS, the Grantor is the sale owner in fee simple of certain real property within the Town of Maggie Valley, North
C.arofina, more particularly described on EXHIBIT A (the "Property"), and
WHEREAS, the Grantor is willing to convey, and the Grantee Is willing to accept a recreational easement on a portion of
said property consisting of a strip of land with the total square footage of 9,580 sq. ft, consisting of all creek adjacent
greenspace shown on the survey attached as Exhibit A, and labeled as "Existing picnic Shelter" and "Dedicated
Greenspace" on Exhibit B (the "Park/Trag Easement Area") as well as the "Dedicated Parking Area" labeled on Exhibit B
(the "Parking Area"), together with ingress and regress over the Property as more particularly designated as "Access
Easement Area" on Exhibit 8 and extending to the public road (the "Access Easement Area") (collectively, the "Park/Trail
Easement") .
WHEREAS, the park/trail area Is intended to enhance local recreational opportunities for the general public, and to
protea the environmentally significant areas within the Town of Maggie Valley:
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the granting of the Trail Easement, the parties agree as follows:
I. THE GRANT:
The Grantor does hereby grant and convey unto Grantee a recreational easement over the Park/Trail Easement
Area and Parking Area, together with ingress and regress over the Access Easement Area which the Grantee may
allow the general public to use.
II. PURPOSE OF THE EASEMENT:
The Park/Trail Easement may be used for recreational purposes such as but not limited to recreational
picnicking, fishing, and trail purposes. Should any question arise regarding the propriety of any use of the
Park/Trail Easement, this Easement shall be construed liberally in favor of such use; provided, however, that the
Grantee or its designee, in its sole discretion, shall have the right to regulate or restrict uses (including but not
limited to those specific uses listed above) which the Grantee determines to be unsafe or otherwise detrimental
to the continued use and vitality of the Park/Trail Easement.
16

Pre -Construction Notification
Elevated Park, Maggie Valley, NC
Stream improvement project on Jonathan Creek
Soil Map
17
N�
,r'
d
k
1
r
00.
17

Pre -Construction Notification
Elevated Park, Maggie Valley, NC
Stream improvement project on Jonathan Creek
Soil Map
Index to Map Units
BkB2—Braddock clay loam, 2 to 8 percent
EdF—Edneyville-Chestnut complex, 50 to 95
slopes, eroded ....... ....... I ...... I — , ....
13
percent slopes, stony........................ 36
Bkc2—Braddock clay loam, B to 15 percent
EvD—Evard-Cowes complex, 15 to 30 percent
slopes, eroded ..............................
14
slopes...................................... 38
BoD2—Bradd(ock clay loam, 15 to 30 percent
EvE—Evart-Cowes complex, 30 to 50 percent
slopes, eroded, stony ........................
15
slopes...................................... 39
BrC—Braddock-Urban land complex, 2 to 15
EwF—Evard-Cowes complex, 50 to 95 percent
percent slopes ..............................
16
slopes, stony ............................... 40
BSC—Brasstown-Junaluska complex, 8 to 15
ExD—Evard-Cowee-Urban land complex, 15 to
percent slopes ..............................
17
30 percent slopes ........................... 42
BsD—Brasstown-Junaluska complex, 15 to 30
_ 61
FnE2—Fannin loam, 30 to 50 percent slopes,
percent slopes ..............................
18
eroded ..................................... 43
SsE—Brasstown-Junaluska complex, 30 to 50
63
HaB2—Hayesville clay loam, 2 to 8 percent
percent slopes ..............................
20
slopes. eroded.............................. 44
BuD—Burton-Craggey-Rock outcrop complex,
I 1 66
HaC2—Hayesvile clay loam, 8 to 15 percent
windswept. 8 t0 30 percent slopes, stony ......
22
slopes, eroded .............................. 45
ChE—Cheoah channery loam, 30 to 50 percent
67
HaD2—Hayesville clay loam, 15 to 30 percent
slopes ......................................
23
slopes. eroded.............................. 46
ChF—Checah channery loam, 50 to 95 percent
69
HeC—Hayesville•Urban land complex, 2 to 15
slopes ......................................
24
percent slopes.............................. 47
CO—Cullasala very cobbly loam, 15 to 30
69
HeD—Hayesville-Urban lard complex, 15 to 30
percent slopes, extremely bouldery ...........
25
percent slopes
CtE—Cullasaja very cobbly loam, 30 to 50
71
HmA—Hemphill loam. 0 to 3 percent slopes,
percent slopes, extremely bouldery ...........
26
rarely flooded ............................... 48
CxA—Cullowhee-Nikwasi complex, 0 to 2
72
HwB—Humaquepts, loamy, 2 to a percent slopes,
percent slopes, frequently flooded ............
27
storry....................................... 49
DeA—Dellwood cobbly sandy loam, 0 to 3
73
OcE--Oconaluftee channery loam, 30 to 50
percent slopes, occasionally flooded ..........
27
percent slopes .............................. 49
DhA—Dellwood-Urban land complex, 0 to 3
75
OcF—Oconaluhee channery loam, 50 to 95
percent slopes, occasionally flooded ..........
28
percent slopes .............................. So
DsB—DiNsboro loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes.........
29
Owl)-0conaluftee channery loam, windswept,
DsC—Dillsboro loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes .......
31
15 to 30 percent slopes ...................... 51
DUC—Dlflaboro-Urban land complex, 2 to 15
77
OwE—Oconaluffee channery loam, windswept,
percent slopes ..............................
32
30 to 50 percent slopes...................... 52
EdC—Edneyville-Chestnut complex, 8 to 15
78
Pg—Pits........................................ 53
percent slopes, stony ........................
32
PwC—Plotz fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent
EdD—Edneyville-Chestnut complex, 15 to 30
79
slopes, stony ............................... 53
percent slopes, stony.. .. _ . . ...............
34
PwD –Plott fine sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent
EdE—Edneyville-Chestnut complex, 30 to 50
80
slopes, stony .................... 1.......... 54
percent slopes, stony ........................
35
PwE—Plott fine sandy loam, 30 to 50 percent
slopes. stony ............................... 56
PwF—Plott tine sandy loam, 50 to 95 percent
TrE—Trimont gravelly loam, 30 to 50 percent
slopes, stony ...............................
57
slopes, stony ............................... 61
RIF—Rock outcrop -Asha -Cleveland complex,
TrF—Tnmont gravelly loam. 50 to 95 percent
30 to 95 percent slopes ......................
58
slopes, stony ............................... 82
RgF—Rock outcrop-Cataska complex, 50 to 95
TuD—Tuckasegee-Cullasaja complex, 15 to 30
percent slopes ..............................
58
percent slopes. very stony ................... 83
RmF—Rock outcrop-Craggey complex,
TvE—Tuckasagee-Cullasaja complex, 30 to 50
windswept, 30 to 95 percent slopes ...........
59
percent slopes, extremely stony .............. 84
RoA—Rosman fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent
Ud—Udorthents, loamy ........................... 85
slopes, occasionally flooded ..................
60
UfA—Udorthents-Urban land complex, 0 to 3
ScB—Saurnwk loam. 2 to 8 percent slopes.......
_ 61
percent slopes, rarely flooded .......... _ .... 86
SdC—Saunook loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes,
Ur—Urban land .................................. 86
stony .......................................
63
WaD—Wayah sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent
SdD—Saunock loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes,
slopes, stony ............................... 87
stony.. . . .......................... ­ ­
I 1 66
WaE—Wayah sandy loam, 30 to 50 percent
SeE--Saunook loam, 30 to 50 percent slopes,
slopes, stony ............................... 87
very stony... .. . ............................
67
WaF—Wayah sandy loam, 50 to 95 percent
SfC—Saunook-Urban land complex, 2 to IS
slopes, stony ............................... 88
percent slopes ..............................
69
WeC—Wayah sandy loam, windswept. 8 to 15
SmF—Soco-Cataska-Rock outcrop complex,
percent slopes, stony ........................ 89
50 to 95 percent slopes ......................
69
WeD—Wayah sandy loam, windswept, 1S to 30
SoE--Soco-Stecoah complex, 30 to 50 percent
percent slopes. stony ........................ 90
slopes.. . ................... ......... .....
71
WeE—Wayah sandy loam, windswept, 30 to 50
SoF—Soco-Stecoah complex, 50 to 95 percent
percent slopes, stony ........................ 91
slopes. ......... .................... ......
72
WhB2—Wayah loam, windswept, 2 to 8 percent
SaE—Spivey-Whiteoak complex, 30 to 50
slopes, eroded, stony ........................ 92
percent slopes, extremely bouldery ...........
73
WhC2—Wayah loam, windswept, 8 to 15 percent
SuA—Statler loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rarely
slopes, eroded, stony ........................ 92
flooded .....................................
75
WhD2—Wayah loam, windswept, 15 to 30
TaC—Tanasee-Balsam complex, 8 to 15 percent
percent slopes. eroded, stony ................ 93
slopes, stony ...............................
75
WhE2—Wayah loam, windswept, 30 to 50
TcD—Tanasee-Balsam complex, 15 to 30
percent slopes, eroded, stony ................ 94
percent slopes, very stony ...................
77
WhF2—Wayah loam, windswept. 50 to 95
TcE—Tanasee-Balsam complex, 30 to 50
percent slopes, eroded, stony ................ 94
percent slopes, very stony ...................
78
WoC--Whiteoak cobbly loam, 8 to 15 percent
TeC2—Tanasee-Balsam complex, 8 to 15
slopes. stony ............................... 95
percent slopes, eroded, stony ................
79
WoD—Whteoak cobbly loam, 15 to 30 percent
TeD2—Tanasee-Balsam complex, 15 to 30
slopes, stony ............................... 97
percent slopes, eroded, stony ................
80
Um

Pre -Construction Notification
Elevated Park, Maggie Valley, NC
Stream improvement project on Jonathan Creek
DFRIM
Nom. = 670.500. Easmfg = 781.440 Northing: = 670,500. Easwq = 784.901)
pmouo. Irttotmstlpn roouf katnnal Ftbp9 mcunnor Prppnm Tooa4 mtps onso�s SM F_N FspoO Yap Eton at wwr.n,so.Mna.psrr Dara Man ma0a auosaopavt to M Orb Delhi Wa Dbsl. Forint bbst
19
IMth out Base =!oad EI c,alhon (8FE)
With BFE or Depth
�' �'°^ ` Regulators Floodwal
r¢ e,' tl
0,2% Annual Cb a nee Flood Hazard
Future Conditions 1b Annual C ha rice
Flood Hazard
Arco5 Determined to be OuMind the
0 2% Annual Chance Flood Harard
ludsdiCt Ill BUandan,
FBM Panel Boundary
North Carolina State Plane Projection Feet (Zone 3200)
Datum: NAD 1983 (Horizontal), NAW 1988(Vartical)
ibca-se01N[ t:80a6
0 tzs 250 soo
1-0 M 50 IPO
ssaun
E
TO
i
NATIONAL ROOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
bD
2
Panet(s):7687.7686
0_
CONTAINS:
(D
COMMUNITY CID
V
C
HAYWOOD COUNTY 37DI20
TOWN OF MAGGIE 370389
VALLEY
h
C
Notice to User: The Map Numbers) shown
below should be used when piecing map
orders; the Community Numbers) shown
0above
should be used on insurance
0
applications far the subject community.
LL
SELECTED PANELS:
C
MAP NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE
0
37007687DDJ 4/312012
37DO76SODDJ 41312012
M
�Z
4
��1
rWrT
f=+�4

Pre -Construction Notification
Elevated Park, Maggie Valley, NC
Stream improvement project on Jonathan Creek
DFRIM
hdp:J/fema.00v
20
FEMA: National Flood Insurance Program
Page 2 of 2
Panelis):7687,7686
NOTES TO USERS
LEGEND
Base map Information and gecspat:al daa used io develop tris FIRMeae were obtained
LEGEND
CONTAINS:
COMMUNITY CID
from various organizations. including the participating local community(ies), state and
MAP REVISIONS
HAYWOOD COUNT! 370120
federal agencies. audlor other sources. The primary base for this FIRM is aerial imagery
There are no map revisions for the
TOWN OF MAGGIE VALLEY 370389
acquired by the State in 2D10. Information and geospatial data supplied by the 1x31
community(res) that met FEMA base map specifications were considered the preferred
selected area.
Notice to User. The Map Numberls) shown below should be
used when placing map orders; the Community Numberls]
source, fordevelopmem of the base map.
shown above should be used on insurance applications for
the subject community.
See geospatial metadam for the associated digital FIRMette for additional information
about base mappreparation. Base map features shown on this FIRMette. such as
SELECTED PANELS:
corporate limits, are based on the most up-to-date data available at the time of publication.
MAP NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE
Changes in the corporate limits may have occurred since this ma was
y P Pu63ished. Map
37DD788700J 4132012
users should consult the appropriate community official or website to verify current
37D076860DJ 4/3/2012
conditions ofjunsdictional boundaries and base map features. This map may contain
roads that were not considered in the hydraulic analysis of streams where no new
hydraukc madei was created during the production of this statewide format FIRM.
NOTES TO USERS
This is an official FIRMette of a portion of the effective panels
Flood elevators on this map are referenced to either or both the North American Vertical
listed in the Title Block shown on Page I. The information
Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88) or National Geodetic Datum of 1929 (NGVD 29). and are
represented on this FIRMene was extracted from the effective
labeled accordingly. These flood elevations must be compared to structure and ground
digital flood hazard data available at hap:JAns.nc.govHris.
elevations referenced m the same vemcal datum. To obtain current elevation. description,
Base flood elevation data. floedway, rwnencreachment widths,
andlor location information for bench marks shown on this map, or for information
information on certain areas no in the Special Flood Hazard
regarding conversion between NGVD 29 and NAVD 88, please contact the Information
Areas protected by flood control structures, and other pertinent
Services Branch of the National Geodetic Survey at [phone], or, visit its website at
data arc available in the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) available at
htrpl'w" r gs.noaagov'.
htblJMns.nc.gov/fris, Users should be aware that flood elevations
MORE INFORMATION
shown on this FIRMette represent elevations rounded m one
term of a foot (0.1') and should be utilized in corrjunetion with
Leners of Map Amendment {LOMA) 1-277-33&2627
data available in the FIS.
hbC :rimsc.fema. ovr
Letters of Map Revision (LOMR) 919-715-5711
www.ncfloaJma s corm
Flood Insurance Availability
North Carolina Division of Emergency 919-715-5711
Management(NCDEM) h J/www.naimmecon"I. 1rF
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)1-877-6380620
he :/Avww.f ma. lbustn.essrnfi
Questions about this FIRMette 11-877-336-2627
hdp:J/fema.00v
20

JONATHANS CREEK RIVER RESTORATION
3732 SOCO ROAD, MAGGIE VALLEY, NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT DIRECTORY
PROJECT OWNER
HAYWOOD WATERWAYS ASSOCIATION
1.0
ERIC ROMANISZYN
2.0
Executive Director
3.0
828-476-4667
4.0
[e-mail]
ENGINEER
JENNINGS ENVIRONMENTAL
~
GREG JENNINGS, PHD, PE
President
ZJ
919.600.4790
~
[e-mail]
SHEET INDEX
COVER SHEET
1.0
PROPOSED RESTORATION PLAN
2.0
PROPOSED DETAILS
3.0
PROPOSED RE -VEGETATION PLAN
4.0
PRELIMINARY PLAN
SUBMITTED ON JULY 93 2018
eo
d
U)
w0Zz
a0 >- a
w C-) <
12�O>z
Uu)W2
(nNU) J
M
Q
z
O
O
U
o❑
N
w
m
~
}
ZJ
~
QUjN
Uj
LU
Lij
J
Q
U
w
❑
(n
LL]
U
Z
Q
2
a
¢
a
z
z
CL
J
o
�
cD
O
z
Z
Z
O
U
U
N
w p
w
w
'
❑ a
❑
❑
( w
a -�

U)
>0��
W 0 Q
�O>z
UcoW5�
(n N CD J
co
H
Q
Z
O
cj
h v
GRADE RIGHT BANK AT 3:1 SLOPE
na �rt
TO EXISTING ELEVATIONS AND GRADES
x
I
m RIVER COBBLE TOE PROTECTION PER DETAIL
REMOVE OLD SCHOOL BUS BURIED IN RIGHT BANK
,TM
"Lim ��xu , an
REMOVE EXISTING 12" CMP
s
N
» c
i
m
h v
GRADE RIGHT BANK AT 3:1 SLOPE
na �rt
TO EXISTING ELEVATIONS AND GRADES
x
I
m RIVER COBBLE TOE PROTECTION PER DETAIL
REMOVE OLD SCHOOL BUS BURIED IN RIGHT BANK
,TM
"Lim ��xu , an
REMOVE EXISTING 12" CMP
s
N
N
�
J�
U)
w
w
J
Q
U
w
Q
N
w
U
z
Q
IL
z
z
o
O 2t
a
0
o
z
L)
~
3
LD
S2
' o
w
>
p m
w
w
w

Do
w
ENHANCED NATIVE RIFFLE
DETAILED PLAN
P.T. ELEVATION
PER PROFILE
GLIDE
BANKFULL WSE
�_-EFLO� RIFFLE SLOPE VARIES PER PROFILE
j j% j j j�
SELECT RIFFLE SUBSTRATE
MATERIAL PER NOTES
SELECT RIFFLE SUBSTRATE
MATERIAL DEPTH AND GRADATION
PER NOTES
ENHANCED NATIVE RIFFLE
DETAILED CROSS-SECTION A - A'
NOT TO SCALE
P.C. ELEVATION
PER PROFILE
`STREAMBED
RUN
ENHANCED NATIVE RIFFLE
NOTES
NOT TO SCALE
1. THE ENHANCED NATIVE RIFFLE IS A STREAM AND RIVER RESTORATION DESIGN FEATURE THAT
INCORPORATES COARSE MATERIAL IN THE CHANNEL BED. REPLACING (OR SUPPLEMENTING) THE NATIVE
CHANNEL BED MATERIAL WITH LARGER DIAMETER SUBSTRATE ENHANCES FLOW DIVERSITY AND
TURBULENCE UNDER BASE FLOW CONDITIONS, WHICH PROMOTES AQUATIC HABITAT, NUTRIENT
PROCESSING AND RE -AERATION OF STREAM FLOW BENEFITING WATER QUALITY.
2. ALL SELECT RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL BE NATIVE MATERIAL AVAILABLE ONSITE. THE ENGINEER MUST
APPROVE THE USE OF ALL ONSITE NATIVE MATERIAL.
3. THE GRAVEL AND COBBLE SUBSTRATE USED FOR THIS DESIGN FEATURE SHOULD BE PREFERENTIALLY
HARVESTED FROM THE EXISTING CHANNEL AND OTHER DESIGNATED MINING AREAS ONSITE.
4. SORTING AND SIEVING OF THE HARVESTED RIFFLE SUBSTRATE IS INCIDENTAL TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF
THIS STRUCTURE.
5. CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 3.0 FT U/S OF THE P.T. INTO THE GLIDE AND
D/S TO THE P.C.
6. SELECT RIFFLE MATERIAL DEPTH SHALL BE AT LEAST 2.5 TIMES THE DioD (MM) SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER.
7. SELECT RIFFLE MATERIAL WILL BE PLACED AT A UNIFORM THICKNESS.
8. THE SELECT RIFFLE MATERIAL WILL BE PLACED SUCH THAT, IN CROSS-SECTION, ITS LOWEST ELEVATION
OCCURS IN THE CENTER OF THE CHANNEL AS PER THE DETAIL.
9. SELECT RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL BE COMPACTED USING TRACK EQUIPMENT OR AN EXCAVATOR BUCKET
SUCH THAT FUTURE SETTLEMENT OF THE MATERIAL IS KEPT TO A MINIMUM.
10. THE SURFACE OF THIS STRUCTURE SHALL BE FINISHED TO A SMOOTH AND COMPACT SURFACE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE LINES, GRADES, AND CROSS-SECTIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE
DRAWINGS. THE DEGREE OF FINISH FOR INVERT ELEVATIONS SHALL BE WITHIN 0.1 FT OF THE GRADES AND
ELEVATIONS INDICATED.
11. RE -DRESSING OF CHANNEL AND BANKFULL BENCH/FLOODPLAIN WILL LIKELY BE REQUIRED FOLLOWING
INSTALLATION OF IN -STREAM STRUCTURES AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO CONSTRUCTION.
BANKFULL
KEY MATTING INTO EROSION CONTROL MATTING \
COARSE MATERIAL COIR 700 GRAM
INNER BERM
RIFFLE MATERIAL
MINIMUM DEPTH = 2.0' OR
2.5-Dj.
NOT TO SCALE ENHANCED NATIVE RIFFLE
/
DETAILED CROSS-SECTION B - B'
SELECT NATIVE SUBSTRATE
NOT TO SCALE
U)
>0��
W
<Q
O�O>Z
Ucnw2
wc\I 0 J
ch
H
Q
Z
O
m M
LU
LL
LL
0
z
aQ
x
z
LU
0
N
a
a
Lu
LU
J
Q
❑
U
In
W
Lu
U
Z
Q
a
2
a
_z
z
a
o
L
�
0
O
z
O
~
2
Lo
Lu a
<
w
w
'
O a
w
❑
❑
a
CL n

SELECT
BEHIND ST
NON -WC
GEOTEX
HIGH DENSITY—
LIVE STAKING
SILL STRUCTU
INTO STREAM BAI
MIN. 15.0
C
O
BANhrUL_L_—
BOULDER J -HOOK
WBKF
a BKF _ — 3 BKF 3 BKF
CI (')IA/
DETAILED PLAN
BOULDER J -HOOK
CROSS-SECTION
KEY BOULDERS INTO
STREAM BANK MINIMUM 15.0 FT.
KEY BOULDERS INTO
STREAM BANK @ 1/3 BKF STAGE
PROPOSED BANKFULL WSE
/ /
ARM SLOPE _ 3%
NOT TO SCALE
�/ �/7 PLACE BOULDERS INTO
THE BOMB F
DER DIAMETER
NOT TO SCALE
PROPOSED BANKFULL WSE
HEADER
BOULDER FLOW
SCOUR POOL
SELECT BACKFILL '� BELOW STEP
BEHIND STRUCTURE �
NON -WOVEN
GEOTEXTILE
FOOTER
BOULDER
BOULDER J -HOOK
SECTION A - A'
NOT TO SCALE
w
Z
a>
Oa=
BOULDER J -HOOK
NOTES
0
THE BOULDER J -HOOK IS A DESIGN FEATURE USED TO CONTROL GRADE IN HIGH IN GRADIENT REACHES OR AT
BOULDER SILL INTO
CRITICAL JUNCTURES OF THE PROPOSED CHANNEL.THIS STRUCTURE WILL ALSO ENCOURAGE POOL
SANK MIN 15.0 FT
MAINTENANCE AND CREATE A DIVERSITY OF AQUATIC HABITAT THROUGH SCOUR OF THE RIVER BED. THE
BOULDER J -HOOK IS COMPOSED OF A BOULDER SILL, WHICH IS A ROW OF BOULDERS SET AT AN ELEVATION
O
PROVIDED IN THE PROPOSED PROFILE THAT SPANS PERPENDICULAR TO AND SLIGHTLY ARCED ACROSS THE
O
CHANNEL. THE BOULDER SILL EXTENDS FROM A BOULDER VANE ARM INTO THE OPPOSITE STREAMBANK. THE
O
BOULDER VANE ARM EXTENDS UP AND TOWARDS THE OUTSIDE STREAM BANK, EVENTUALLY KEYING INTO THE
BANK AT AN ELEVATION HIGHER THAN THE SILL BOULDERS.
O
1. ALL BOULDERS USED FOR THE OFFSET BOULDER STEP SHALL BE STRUCTURAL STONE, CUBICAL OR
O O
RECTANGULAR IN SHAPE. THE ENGINEER MUST APPROVE THE USE OF BOULDERS THAT MAY BE AVAILABLE
O
ONSITE.
02.
DIMENSIONS AND SLOPES OF STRUCTURES DESCRIBED IN THE DETAIL MAY BE ADJUSTED BY THE ENGINEER
O
TO FIT CONDITIONS ONSITE.
O
3. CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO FIT BOULDERS TOGETHER TIGHTLY.
4. GAPS BETWEEN BOULDERS SHALL BE MINIMIZED BY FITTING BOULDERS TOGETHER AND PLUGGING WITH NC
DOT CLASS A AND SELECT MATERIAL OR CHINKING STONE APPROVED BY DESIGN ENGINEER, AND LINING WITH
Luw
FILTER FABRIC.
5. THERE SHALL BE NO DROP GREATER THAN 0.5 FT OVER A SINGLE STEP. BOULDERS SHALL BE 3 FT X 4 FT X 2
Q
FT +/- 0.5 FT.
6. NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE SHALL BE PLACED ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE TO PREVENT
O
WASHOUT OF SEDIMENT THROUGH BOULDER GAPS. FILTER FABRIC SHALL EXTEND FROM THE BOTTOM OF
—HIGH DENSITY
THE FOOTER BOULDER TO THE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION AND SHALL BE PLACED THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF
LIVE STAKING
THE STRUCTURE. COARSE SELECT BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE
NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC.
NOT TO SCALE
�/ �/7 PLACE BOULDERS INTO
THE BOMB F
DER DIAMETER
NOT TO SCALE
PROPOSED BANKFULL WSE
HEADER
BOULDER FLOW
SCOUR POOL
SELECT BACKFILL '� BELOW STEP
BEHIND STRUCTURE �
NON -WOVEN
GEOTEXTILE
FOOTER
BOULDER
BOULDER J -HOOK
SECTION A - A'
NOT TO SCALE
w
Z
a>
Oa=
0
N
�
O
�
_
X
x
Lu
Luw
Q
U
w
O
()
w
U
cn
z
Q
S
IL
z
z
o
o
a
(9
O
z
Z
Z
2
U
U_`
Ln
Lu O
w
w
'
o a
❑
❑
w
a �

BANKFULLSTAGE
X
Y_ x
7C ?�
BANKFULL BENCH WITH
EROSION CONTOL MATTING
WIDTH
MIN. =12.0FT� Y.
� X
X 7t
y
Y at
X �
� 0 0
RIVER COBBLE
TOE PROTECTION
RIVER COBBLE TOE PROTECTION
DETAILED PLAN
�IIIIII Ilplll �II Tib MATAMAVAM
�IIII IIIIIIII �T� &MAVAMOAT
T�f 0AVAM MVA
T11i•TT•MATATe,I
SELECT SOIL •GRAVEL BACKFILL
�•TiT�pT1T��
TAT/T�T�T�T�TI
TT♦T�T�T�T�T/
T�TLT�T�T�
LTO�TO�TI
UNDISTURBED GROUND
T�T�T�TL�
OR PR • T�T�pTTi\
EXCAVATI
Q�pT�
•
LIMITS
:T..�
�T�TL
AWA
FN
NOT TO SCALE
BANKFULLSTAGE
/ PLANTING SPACING = 5.0 FT O.C.
GRADE RIVER BANK AT 3:1 SLOPE UP TO
BANKFULLSTAGE
700 GRAM COIR FIBER EROSION CONTROL
F MATTING. SEE DETAIL
SELECT GRAVEL BACKFILL TO SECURE
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
SELECT RIVER COBBLE TOE
BASE FLOW WSE
RIVER COBBLE TOE PROTECTION
DETAILED PROFILE - SECTION A - A'
NOT TO SCALE
RIVER COBBLE TOE PROTECTION
NOTES
1. A 1.5 - 2.5 FT THICK BEDDING COURSE CONSISTING OF WELL GRADED COBBLE AND GRAVEL
AVAILABLE ONSITE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE BASE OF THE RIVER BANK FOR TOE
PROTECTION. THE ENGINEER MUST APPROVE ALL ONSITE MATERIAL.
2. GRAVEL LEVELING BASE SHALL BE INSTALLED ABOVE THE HIGHEST ELEVATION OF THE
COBBLE TOE PROTECTION BEFORE REBUILDING THE RIVER BANK.
4. PLACE A LAYER OF 6.5 FEET WIDE GEOCOIR DEKOWE 700 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, OR
EQUIVALENT, ON TOP OF THE GRAVEL LEVELING COURSE SUCH THAT 3.0 FEET OF THE
BLANKET WILL BE BURIED BELOW THE SOIL BACKFILL.
5. SOIL BACKFILL SHALL BE GRADED TO A 3:1 SLOPE AND COMPACTED SUCH THAT FUTURE
SETTLING WILL BE KEPT TO A MINIMUM.
6. THE EROSION CONTROL FABRIC SHALL BE PULLED OVER THE NEWLY GRADED RIVER BANK
AS TIGHT AS POSSIBLE WITHOUT TEARING OR EXCESSIVELY DISTORTING THE FABRIC.
7. SECURE THE EROSION CONTROL AND NON -WOVEN MATTING IN PLACE BY STAKING THE END
OF THE EROSION CONTROL FABRIC WITH WOODEN STAKES ON 1.5 -FOOT CENTERS.
8. SEE DETAIL 5.3 FOR EROSION CONTROL MATTING INSTALLATION.
9. THE SURFACE OF THIS STRUCTURE SHALL BE FINISHED TO A SMOOTH AND COMPACT
SURFACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LINES, GRADES, AND CROSS-SECTIONS OR
ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. THE DEGREE OF FINISH FOR ELEVATIONS SHALL
BE WITHIN 0.1 FT OF THE GRADES AND ELEVATIONS INDICATED OR APPROVED BY THE
ENGINEER.
10. RE -DRESSING OF CHANNEL AND BANKFULL BENCH/FLOODPLAIN WILL LIKELY BE REQUIRED
FOLLOWING INSTALLATION OF IN -STREAM STRUCTURES AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED
INCIDENTAL TO CONSTRUCTION.
H
U)
of
> O
Lu
W OU Q Q
wO>Z_
U cn W
(n CN (D J
Z 10 (D L1J
2�<a
Q
Z
O
I� M
H
U
w
O
w
O
6w
m
m
O
U
0
of
o
�
�
K
ui
W
w
�
0
to
LLJ
0
Z
Q
J
=
a
¢
a
z
z
a
CD
0
'
Ir
0
0
z
zzo
3:
LD
Wo
a
0
0
a n

EROSION CONTROL MATTING
DETAILED PLAN
6" MIN. HORIZONTAL -
OVERLAP
6" MIN. VERTICAL
OVERLAP
2'
/TVD\
6" MIN. HORIZONTAL—
OVERLAP
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
DETAILED STAKING PLAN
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
NOTES
1. EROSION CONTROL MATTING IS USED TO PROTECT RECENTLY CONSTRUCTED STREAM BANKS
A, FROM EROSION. THE MATTING WILL REMAIN INTACT WHILE THE BANK AND RIPARIAN VEGETATION
MATURES, PROVIDING CRITICAL BANK PROTECTION.
2. BEFORE INSTALLING COIR FIBER BLANKET, RAKE SOIL LEVEL AND ADD SEED, FERTILIZER, LIME
AND MULCH.
3. 700 GRAM COIR FIBER EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL BE PLACED ALONG THE LENGTH OF
THE NEW CHANNEL FROM THE TOE OF SLOPE OUT TO A MINIMUM OF 3 FT BEYOND THE BANKFULL
ELEVATION.
4. SECURE COIR MATTING IN PLACE BY STAKING AND OVERLAPPING AT THE SEEMS WITH A
SHINGLE -TYPE METHOD SUCH THAT THE OVERLAPPING PIECE IS IN THE SAME DIRECTION AND AS
THE STREAM FLOW. ADDITIONAL STAKING SHALL BE APPLIED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO
ADDITIONAL COST IF THE MATTING SEPARATES FROM THE SOIL MORE THAN ONE INCH UNDER A
REASONABLE PULL.
NOT TO SCALE
SUPPLEMENT WOODEN STAKES
WITH 12" ECO -STAKES
X700 GRAM COIR FIBER MATTING
�2'LONG 2" x 2" WOOD STAKES
w/ 3" GALVANIZED ROOFING NAIL
AT THE TOP TO SECURE MATTING
700 GRAM COIR—\
MATTING
3'
NOT TO SCALE EROSION CONTROL MATTING
EARTH
L L V I V l L A L V V V V" J I PN I\ L J
w/ 3" GALVANIZED ROOFING NAIL
AT THE TOP TO SECURE MATTING
DETAILED CROSS-SECTION A - A'
NOT TO SCALE
H
U)
Ilf
>o}�
W OU Q Q
o_O>Z_
Ucow2
(n CV J
Z � UI W
2 0_
a
Z
O
2
0
N
2.5' (TYP)
—■
■
■
_
O N �- O
■
O O
6" MIN. HORIZONTAL—
OVERLAP
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
DETAILED STAKING PLAN
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
NOTES
1. EROSION CONTROL MATTING IS USED TO PROTECT RECENTLY CONSTRUCTED STREAM BANKS
A, FROM EROSION. THE MATTING WILL REMAIN INTACT WHILE THE BANK AND RIPARIAN VEGETATION
MATURES, PROVIDING CRITICAL BANK PROTECTION.
2. BEFORE INSTALLING COIR FIBER BLANKET, RAKE SOIL LEVEL AND ADD SEED, FERTILIZER, LIME
AND MULCH.
3. 700 GRAM COIR FIBER EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL BE PLACED ALONG THE LENGTH OF
THE NEW CHANNEL FROM THE TOE OF SLOPE OUT TO A MINIMUM OF 3 FT BEYOND THE BANKFULL
ELEVATION.
4. SECURE COIR MATTING IN PLACE BY STAKING AND OVERLAPPING AT THE SEEMS WITH A
SHINGLE -TYPE METHOD SUCH THAT THE OVERLAPPING PIECE IS IN THE SAME DIRECTION AND AS
THE STREAM FLOW. ADDITIONAL STAKING SHALL BE APPLIED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO
ADDITIONAL COST IF THE MATTING SEPARATES FROM THE SOIL MORE THAN ONE INCH UNDER A
REASONABLE PULL.
NOT TO SCALE
SUPPLEMENT WOODEN STAKES
WITH 12" ECO -STAKES
X700 GRAM COIR FIBER MATTING
�2'LONG 2" x 2" WOOD STAKES
w/ 3" GALVANIZED ROOFING NAIL
AT THE TOP TO SECURE MATTING
700 GRAM COIR—\
MATTING
3'
NOT TO SCALE EROSION CONTROL MATTING
EARTH
L L V I V l L A L V V V V" J I PN I\ L J
w/ 3" GALVANIZED ROOFING NAIL
AT THE TOP TO SECURE MATTING
DETAILED CROSS-SECTION A - A'
NOT TO SCALE
H
U)
Ilf
>o}�
W OU Q Q
o_O>Z_
Ucow2
(n CV J
Z � UI W
2 0_
a
Z
O
2
0
N
J
H
_
U)
LuLu
w
0
w
w
01
0
Z
a
a
z
z
o
�
o
0
0
z
Z
Z
�
U
LD
0
ul o
w
w
O d
'
af
0
0
z w
IL

PLAN LEGEND
- PARCEL BOUNDARY
RIVER BANKFULL
RIVER CENTERLINE
0 ENHANCED NATIVE RIFFLE
® BANK GRADING AT 3:1
BOULDER CROSS VANE
Feet
SCALE:: 1" = 20'
I I ,
1+50 1+60
4
0 STREAMBANK AND BUFFER PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS
LIVE STAKES, BARE ROOTS AND / OR CONTAINERIZED PLANTINGS - 3,900 FT
SCIENTIFIC NAME
COMMON NAME
SIZE (CAL)
SPACING
QTY
Liriodendron tulipifera
TULIP POPLAR
0.25" - 1.0"
5 FT O.C.
25
Salix sericea
SILKY WILLOW
0.50" - 1.0"
5 FT O.C.
50
Platanus occidentalis
SYCAMORE
0.25" - 1.0"
5 FT O.C.
25
Betula nigra
RIVER BIRCH
0.25" - 1.0"
5 FT O.C.
25
Comus amomum
SILKY DOGWOOD
0.25" - 1.0"
5 FT O.C.
50
PERMANENT SEEDING - 3,900 FT
SCIENTIFIC NAME
COMMON NAME
TYPE
APP. RATE
QTY
------
RIPARIAN SEED MIX
SEED
4 LBS / 1000 SF
16 LBS
Elymus virginicus
VIRGINIA WILD RYE
SEED
20%.
------
Agrostis perennans
AUTUMN BENT GRASS
SEED
15%
------
Pancicum virgatum
SWITCHGRASS
SEED
15%
------
Redbeckia hirta
BLACK-EYED SUSAN
SEED
10%
------
Coreopsis lanceolata
LANCELEAF COREOPSIS
SEED
10%
------
Andropogon gerardii
BIG BLUESTEM
SEED
10%
------
Juncus effusus
SOFT RUSH
SEED
10%
------
Schizachyrium scoparium
LITTLE BLUESTEM
SEED
5%
------
Sorghastrum nutans
INDIAN GRASS
SEED
5%
------
TEMPORARY SEEDING, MULCHING AND SOIL PREP - 3,900 FT
SCIENTIFIC NAME
COMMON NAME
TYPE
APP. RATE
QUANTITY
Secale Cereale
MILLET
SEED
5 LBS / 1000 SF
20 LBS
------
GROUND AG. LIMESTONE
PELLET
45 LBS / 1000 SF
180 LBS
------
10-10-10 FERTILIZER
PELLET
17 LBS / 1000 SF
65 LBS
------
WHEAT STRAW MULCH
STRAW
90 LBS / 1000 SF
360 LBS
GENERAL RE -VEGETATION PLAN NOTES
A. TREES IN 1 GALLON CONTAINERS SHALL BE PLACED IN
TWO OFFSET LINES INSIDE THE ZONE 1 RIPARIAN
BUFFER FOR RE-ESTABLISHMENT.
B. SOIL PREPARATION ELEMENTS, TEMPORARY AND
PERMANENT SEED AND GROUND COVER SHALL BE
SPREAD OVER ALL AREAS WITHIN THE LOD THAT ARE
DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION.
C. CONTAINERIZED PLANTS AND BARE ROOT STOCK
SHALL BE LOCATED WHERE SHOWN ON PLAN.
D. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE VEGETATION PLAN SHALL BE
MADE ONLY IF APPROVED BY THE PROJECT OWNER
OR PROJECT ENGINEER.
BARE ROOTS, LIVE STAKES AND CUTTINGS
E. CUTTINGS SHOULD BE INSTALLED THE SAME DAY THEY
ARE CUT. THE STAKE SHOULD BE ORIENTED WITH THE
BUDS POINTED UP, AND THE BOTTOM SHOULD BE CUT
AT AN ANGLE FOR EASY INSERTION INTO THE GROUND.
F. ABOUT a OF THE LENGTH OF THE STAKE SHOULD BE
BELOW GROUND AND ANGLED DOWNSTREAM. AN IRON
BAR CAN BE USED TO MAKE A PILOT HOLE TO
PREVENT BARK FROM BEING DAMAGED DURING
INSTALLATION.
CONTAINER STOCK
G. STOCK SHALL HAVE BEEN GROWN IN A CONTAINER
LONG ENOUGH FOR THE ROOT SYSTEM TO HAVE
DEVELOPED SUFFICIENTLY TO HOLD ITS SOIL
TOGETHER ONCE REMOVED FROM THE CONTAINER.
H. CONTAINER PLANTS WILL NEED TO BE WATERED
REGULARLY AND PLACED IN SHADY CONDITIONS UNTIL
PLANTING OCCURS.CREATE PLANTING AREA FOR EACH
PLANT AND EXCAVATE PIT.
I. THE DIAMETER OF THE PLANTING HOLES (PITS) FOR
EACH PLANT SHOULD BE AT LEAST THREE TIMES THE
DIAMETER OF THE ROOT MASS. SCARIFY THE
PLANTING PIT PRIOR TO EACH PLANT INSTALLATION.
J. SET PLANTS UPRIGHT IN THE CENTER OF THE PIT. THE
BOTTOM OF THE ROOT MASS SHOULD BE RESTING ON
UNDISTURBED SOIL.
K. PLACE BACKFILL AROUND BASE AND SIDES OF ROOT
MASS, AND WORK EACH LAYER TO SETTLE BACKFILL
AND TO ELIMINATE VOIDS AND AIR POCKETS. WHEN PIT
IS APPROXIMATELY 3 FULL, WATER THOROUGHLY
BEFORE PLACING REMAINDER OF THE BACKFILL.
WATER AGAIN AFTER PLACING FINAL LAYER OF
BACKFILL.
d
U)
rY
Lu0Z
�0��
Lu 0
wC)<<
ofO>Z_
U(nw�
U) 0
Z (D w
Q
Z
0
IN
z
O
Q
w
w
a >
Lu
cc
s
N
c'
N �
J
Z) c Q.
Lli
W J
Q U ui
❑ cn w
U
a
a ¢ a
z z
d o
CL
o
z
Z Z O U
3 D ' o
fr w w O a
❑ ❑ a w