20181227 Ver 1_Bridge 240_Division 7 packet_20180905

n�
`�,�~, .Ilmme '��'�1
\ � l. N-,itur Park �
" 5�`
� ,
���
�e
N- - �'1 - - ��`e� -
t^`
�
�1� Qt
��@` g�iP`e
QµDr�
r
0
`r' o
f,
4
cl�' o°Q R d �O
Janc? L��
zF¢t.ti�" �
G v� O
�
�i .
u '� 'F
8 ��or � 6 _
SWCe(0� �
�a �__ _ . � ' __
Qa -
m -
Vo Etlgm.vood �r � .�
O .°i
c� Barbour pr = � � --
4
Rd m
S�a�pe � ,
V
N
��. �de Or
O
o Chippentl5le Trl � Farin;. r �
F a
F!� Caalleton Rd
a �
S� . �� �j ��r,. .. �
i q
�
� � McGlnlY Or _? Clovelty Dr
0
_ �
.a. N d' F(BB ..' "
q S� G
V � w
LL
C�
_ � � '
_ o' - -
�
•�J it�
ZisOl�' Vr�=..�.. ..,
lJ�l/�_; �
� <J�
il _
= 4 �,
' � r ' _
�
� � . . ��F %^ f �''' ,
� - - � � �ause� � . -
eae _ :d % .
4��
�oc
" Cy�l h
R 9
. �4cql�W,y Alamance Cbur�p R ?
K��riny I.n 'D OQ . _ ..
9 B�Onk�'c F oti s f li tl
-�._;L.:i:�''�� � �
u �,a
F �;� �, � a Mosstlale R,
�� .ir[ it�3 .�
oi..i._ .ii
. . 'U ca.win e,�.
a
C
'1'.�.�r Fi.l —
` � _'
F;
�`� o °c iFdl/n Rri
�'�i�..y i.�::�i=. �:,� o '
3
Nd �
�• �_ '
`�U�,.i
Legend e2°
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap;` inc`rement P Corp., NRCAN,
� StUdy Af2a ��-; �� Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), Mapmylndia, O
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
0 1,000 2,000 4,000 17BP.7.R.113
FEET BRIDGE 240 OVER LIT°TLE � �
,,��,
ALAMANCE CREEK ON SR 3285 �� ��`
FIGURE 1 PREPARED BY: DATE:
STUDYAREA GUILFORD COUNTY, NC -,� ���� �- au�us-r
C� � � ,,;.�,P;:;�&,: 201 �

; - � �
I � � .
I
, r j ;
� � - � �
t
,
� �i' 1 • � � ._ + {'
� � � ' ' _
� � • y � ' � '�� ....
r �' '�� � �.
1
_+ � � ,� �
� r � r� � ' '�` f
, � � a
� � � ,�
.. .�" � �
� � � � � ,} � � �
� � ,..
�
�� � .
.4 . � � � �� �.
� � "
� � - - p�
�� « , i
.�
- � � ` � �� �
� ' - � � f
R
i� ,�
i � ,�
+ � �
� � {
f '• «� • � i
�
M -
}. J
� � + � s �.
' ��+ �, 7
i
� � ,
�_ ' �
y�J -
� " � �� .
,
.
� '
i � �f • r,
� �
� �� �
' �� � �
�
Legend � � � �� ����
� Study Area � � '
�
0 75 150 300 450 600 17 B P.7. R.113 �- �'��T �,;
Feet BRIDGE 240 OVER LITTLE .s��
ALAMANCE CREEK ON SR 3285
FIGURE 2 PREPARED BY: DATE:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC GUILFORD COUNTY, NC ��� ' A 2Ou7T

� f;, � �� ,— T- F c�,� - 4.
�'1 . ��' / �' . �{1+, "_�II
. �' � '� ��• `" �1 ' -
.r � �y, � '+� 1. �y�. ?'.�ti t � �,
..� i ' .. 1 t ` d
ti = t 4R" '► • 1 `
� � �` • � � � � _ _ `'�.�1 � � �'�;�r�� � , � ,���; � i �
�- -� � �� - ,- �. � �. ���F ;T'� ��� �':-
} , � �--� MnB2 �., �� _ . r �
� :� � ��� .� � .
: .�-_ �"� 1�r� � �$ � �# ; -, }�,�� � � `� �I
' '�/►;` • �,?, -' `���=�y,��_- ,v!'':
r �
i�` � - ,, �;
� � . . .�'� I �.�r' '�� `I+�� +V
� ��� r �' ' �� f 4 �
MhB2 �: ;' ' �r • �'�; ���r� ''� `
,, ,.� . . -.t , . j( ��L��'•.
.{ !� -f ,�J � - + �..j � 1'�y .ti.
�' M1
� yr �' ��� 1�' �� s� _ ''�1� .
� � EnC � r . � . � `-�' i�� <<n' '-,;.w� �.,
. �' � � � ' -- -r,��� ���� ..� � .4t�� "� ��� .� . � �I � � � � �
. � �'+� }.�.� �� �
. . li . � � -�'a'a . ( . . ' �.
y +� �1�. . �+ � � !� . ���,
� � � � � i �� i� �i'. J�'�1 � . � 4?�
��?
�. ��1'1 � t 5 � � ^' �. �.,h h• � �� �. ' 'hy.Y
� � � ��..
�� � �� i .
-� �,; -,;�+ ,c• ''� �` f�
� _ ' 1 J .� 1 � 4� . i .. � 1 , � /�.
r � � �. '�. _.� .� �� ,
� -
' , . . _; ,. � x `� _ �,��1�► �`i � �,
�' ' ' 1' ' � a'� �, � �
�-' - _ w �+ f- ' � ` ' •
' - . �.:i�I W Y � T VS �
. _ ' !. . •;, � L
.. � _ � . � � • �I •'r i � , t -4 �� r'�:
r ,' . � i�:.' � �sa �' � , • - '� � M. - '�
' 1'c'... � ! , .' � -�. F�� -���, _ r� �. . �F� . �
' ; _ �. � `; , -�`� � • ' � , � .
, �.� i '�" � �
� . ., �� , , 4 ;�; _} � �
���'�` , _ �.
, } � � `''��,
_ �,.
,� . ,�
.�: �� � ,
�I ` ' �• J � Mi1c2 �
: ��'�` �„ , � •i r � +
��kk � ; -`! •_i� � �� _ � .
� �
��N" ,v ��1F,,�C \ . � . Y ''� � �' � .
. 1� - . � '';` -,_2 � � ,�
�,�• � � 4. -�.. ^ .. t�� � f �jYi' T ;,; ' t�' ,L �
' " �, ' �,1`rV i{ H .., „ �'• ��`. � Ai
� � "r`+�- +�,�y �l �tit� _�� � "�ChA`,
� � _ ��s �`�y � ` ' • ��; �.' � i ,
�, ,�. ;� ���, , �
� ��� �F. � � 4�. _ 5' �} � � �; � v�
f�,� �1��' �;.` i+ {� TS`i�� �. � 'r. f. � :'.i �. .
' •�;.• '` t►,.• =• +t;, .,,;�i.� � -.
-�� � � � ��� .�f .r� �C ,
}►(; _ f= �?; ,� , �� ' �i��►i 4 �, ;[ . � _ _ . , y ; ' ,'{ . �'J���'. � �}�:�,1 �
� �� ��'����. �'�{� _ '��i .,l ,. _.: — � 4�. �7�� 'y'� . ,jw �' � ��
� '%� Y ��"'' �� ,� � �'` E n D _ � . � t�. '� . �� b � .� `
�j , '
„� "S�� � ,.1 � �5..�•�' " EnC � ���¢� � � ti� ; ��,•�'�
-, �. r , �;; x � �1 , t
;
�� , � +�y''. f�''�
Legend � �� ; , '��, a� 4 ...
,; • , � . "'' � t:' s ., - ' a R � ;iR
s
s� � �!�,� 1 ♦ �
� Study Area R � : �' , ; ` �, ,� ,, �,.
� ,- , 'x �, � �� � � ��h �:►.
ChA Chewacla �� ` �� ' ','� ,t '.':�� _. ';, �:r-' �'s �T�'
� �,� �� � , �2� � ' . �'' L . ;1 � '
EnC Enon fine sandy loam �� ,,��,. � ��, . , � s�` - ,��'
� �;-. � :� �',. . � :���,�, �
h i _ i! . .. r, ,A, ,
MhC2 Mecklenburg sandy loam �� a ,��•` !� .�,. � ; ��. ,� � ,,,,?t:�3 ti .L%`
.%
- �' �• �':�' � ' .�
0 75 150 300 17BP.7.R.113 "'
Feet BRIDGE 240 OVER LITTLE
a�
ALAMANCE CREEK ON SR 3285 ��
PREPARED BY: DATE:
FIGURE 3 GUILFORD COUNTY, NC
SOILS ��"�"�~-F'°' AUGUST
�_>���, -, ; � 2017
�r r,r.=To��aTioN

� t � _ , - - ; , - �,,- _ ti
,�
`f l ' � ��t
. � � ' T L `+�� � � , � L�'�
��, �' . F� S - - �" 1 • ' �' � � �� L
r � -'�; ti • � � �1• ■ �r �_�•I
� . y i � � _
� � . , � _ � � . ~ '�'�� ' ` �
�
. � � � {
_ � -, �� � 4.��' � ��
, ' _ '.� " - , ' �����„ �
� ' �,
. - . ti�}�, ,�
, �� . -
_ �� � � �-�J �y � �
� , _ ; �', r
-. � ��'� S i S `� I•� ' L ITII
.
�� � .'
4
7 • �L
� � �
�' _ � .�' -J �' � '�I
i� ,
l RJ �
- � � r
� - ' -
� , � 1 - ~ • �*'� � ��G ' �
r
� ' `� -.
# 5 � � M .5 �
� `��R •� � � �
: �_ •. � .4 � � r` ��. , r y '� '
x �� � � . �
�
_ • _ * _�.
i � � -. - �
�� � � �.
. .� ! - ���.
�� • � + ' + � r4
� � 4
l� 'r� � � -i �
' r _ F �► -
. `�'' �
i � - �
-� ' � � J � . •r � � , � _ .T .�. .
�� ti � ' J
� � 1 � � ` -
- � � � ,l� 5 � .� 1 '�. � 1
�
I � � - • � � •r • � �' �� � ' � . �
�
. i
. '� - •�r . L ~ � �
. • I { } L '',� '
� �� _ 1 L �1' .I� ' _ � 1
- � iI � � .
� �; - � ���" � . '��
� �� � �
�, -
. ' ' �.' i�'.
�.
. 'y. - � �` Y, �L L ��
��
� S � . .� . �.'U
� I - � ti `
� —' ■ti �'' � ��
F ,
- � ■� � y s'
��.
�
� ' � . ��
� . '�'� �:4 _
. �' ' �'l
• • . . � i � �i� �
_ y �w r, '•�
_ � � �,+ .
�

NC D�VQ Stream Identificalion Form Version a.l l
3,.�a
Date: � j , � ProjectlSite� . , ,
/ !J �) :� / _ _ _..�.:.f �^' L
Evaluator. ." 'l _ County: /,_ �_�;
�
Total Points: ! Stream Determination
Stream is at /eas� mtermrttent z� Ephemeral Intermittei
il e 79 oi oerennial il>_ 30' �. .�
"i `?
�,�*' '
' t- /G..-�-.< _.
� `'�� Latitude:
..,.�_ � c� � . s
Longitude: , � 5 ��$
�
:ircl��a)..� Other i+ /e ��,,,..:., ✓. /,��
_perennial_. � e.g Quad Name:
anmciai aicnes are noi rareo: see arscussions m rnanuai
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = %. � )
12 Presence of BaseFlow
13. Iron ozidizing bacteria
14. Leaf litter
15 Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic de6ris lines or piles
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table?
C. Biolo y (Subrotal = '-. -%
o i z �
4�- 1 2 3
:ri ` 1 0 5 0
0 0.5 , i � 1.5
0 0.5 1
- ,._n � va�_z
18 Fibrous roots in streambed 3'� 2 7
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed .:-3- 2 1
20. Macrobenthos (note diversiry antl abundance) .,;;"' -/, 0 <�l _ 2
21 Aquatic Mollusks � 2
22 Fish = ' 0 .y03��, 7
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 7
24 Amphibians ��'Q�� 0 5 1
25. Algae CO.�' 0.5 1
26 Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 075; OBL = 1.5
'perennial slreams may also 6e itlenlified using othe� methotls. See p. 35 of manual
NOIES: .��.� �Y.�. :� i � .. �e�� ��• :XG .�a�..< a-c...' •a /C�.•.�
i i
rr+.-i � ' - t �c;.�
^l� ..
Sketch:
0
0
3
3
15
1.5
1.5
15

USACE AID# DWQ #
;./p" _ /C, .� :��.
Site #_ (indicate on attached map)
„- STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach uoder assessment:
1. ApplicanPs name: /�%G^.'. c�" � 2. Evaluator's name: �-.c -� _
i
3. Date of evaluation: �/s' y;! � 4. Time of evaluation: .� �v ��
�
5. Name of stream: �. v .�<_ :��� ,
� r
7. Approximate drainage area: " ' '
9. Leng[h of reach evaluated: '��'�'� �
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312y. ' � �
6. River basin: - ��:��_: �
8. Sheam order: � ~
10. Counry: .�..s-v � ""r.J�'
12. Subdivision name (if any): i'���/%
Longitude(ex.-77.556611): ' - � ..�� "
Method location determined (circle): .-C�PS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Phoro/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
. 4 ,� .4 . - � -
_ _ ^
14. Proposed channe] work (if any): d.," . '�
15. Recent weather conditions: � . -' C� �_ �-�: � • �
16. Site conditions at time of visit: . ' ��.�.. . � , G o� , - �_�-o: -�,. . �a T
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section l0 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters � Nutrient Sensitive Waters '✓ Water Supply Watershed �(IdV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point?._�F�NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: ^"�-^< �' -
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YE� NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey� I'CS NO
21. Fstimated watershed land use: �_`>% Residential ^ F' % Commercial '�''% Industnal � �% Agricultural
` r % Forested '=% Cfeazed / Logged � °% Other ( - )
22. Bankfull width: �o- '-� 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: r Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Modernte (4 to ]0%) _S[eep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: _Straight _Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
fustructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by detemvning the most appropriate ecoregion based on
locatioq terrain, vegetatioq sheam classificarion, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregioa Assign points
to each characteris[ic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluatioa If a
characteris[ic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and pruvide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pastwe
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a sepazate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with e score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
fii —
Total Score (from reverse):T Comments: `v.. �er_ .£-,:r.� �:-,� ;.".z, � �.-_
� _._ ,. ..<,.._.�. i, ....i . .. � ,... ��.... +,o ...� _ r, _._i ._.,_�... !�r„
� �
Evaluator's Signature � �.fl�. ' - Date �"� � ��
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowoers and environmental professionals in
gatheriog the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this Corm is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular roitigation ratio or requiremeot Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

.,.N .�, .r !-'-.....
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
#� CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mouotain
1 Presence of tlow / persistent pools io stream 0- 5 0- 4 0- 5 r
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = mas points)
z Evidence of past human alteratiou 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alterahon = mae points) �
3 Riparianzone 0-6 0-4 0-5 `��
(no buffer = 0; conti uous, wide buffer = ma�c oints y
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 �
(extensive discharges = 0; no dischazges = max points)
�5 Groundwaterdischarge 0-3 0-4 0-4 �
U (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, we8ands, etc. = max poin[s
ir Presence of adjacent floodplain .
rn 6 0-4 0-4 0-2
�y (no floodplain = 0; exteosive floodplain = max points)
�� � Entrenchment / iloodplain access 0- 5 0- 4 0- 2
Q" (deepty entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = marz poin[s)
8 Presenceofadjacentwetlands 0-6 0-4 0-2 'I
(no wetlands = 0; lazge adjacent wetlands = max poiuts)
9 Channel sinuosity 0- 5 0-4 0-3 �
(extensive channelizarion = 0; naturat meander = ma�c points
�� Sedimentinput 0-5 0-4 0-4
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = ma�c points) -`�
�� Size & diversity of chanoel bed substrate NA' 0- 4 0- 5
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
� 2 E��dence of c6annel incision or widening 0- 5 0- 4 0- 5
�'' dee 1 incised = 0; stable bed & banks = ma�c oints)
� � 3 Presence of major baok failures 0- 5 0- 5 0- 5 �
� (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points) ^
d] � 4 Roat depth and density on banks p_ 3 0- 4 0- 5 �
�,Qy (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = ma�c points) �
� � 5 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber productioo 0- 5 0- 4 0- 5 /
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points) �I
� 6 Presence of rifHe-pool/ripple-pool complexes Q_ 3 0- 5 0- 6 �
F no riffles/ri les or ools = 0; well-develo ed = ma�c oints -
� �� Habitatcomplexity 0-6 0-6 0-6 �:?
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = mau points �
� � 8 Canopy coverage over streambed 0- 5 0- 5 0- 5 �
� (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canop = max points) �
t9 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0- 4 0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose strucNre = max) -
ZQ Preseoce o[ stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0- 4 0- 5 0- 5 ��
� no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = mau oints �^
� Z � Presence of amphibians 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max oints) C
� 22 Preseoceoffish 0-4 0-4 0-4 �
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max points) 1
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 �
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 ]00 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
' 7hese characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
ProjecUSite: Bridge 240 City/County: Guilford Sampling Date: 2� �ul, 2017
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WA-01 wet
Investigator(s): R. Lepsic; A. James Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 36.0314 Long: -79•7292 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No
Remarks:
Small depression in the floodplain of Little Alamance Creek. Separated from the stream by a levee. No channelized connection to Little Alamance
Creek.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that applv) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ✓ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3) ✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (61) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
✓ Sediment Deposits (62) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
✓ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613) _ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
includes capillary fringe
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Recent sediment deposits in area. Mainly on stream levee.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. sampiing Point: WA_o� wet
Absoiute Dominant Indicator pominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10' x 10' � % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: � (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3• Species Across AII Strata: � (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5� That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �% (A/B)
6.
� Prevalence Index worksheet:
8 Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv:
0% = Total Cover OBL species � x 1= �
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 10' x 10' � FACW species � x 2= �
� Acer negundo 15 Y FAC FAC species � x 3= �
2 Asimina triloba 15 Y FAC FACU species � x 4= �
g Lindera benzoin 10 Y FAC UPL species � x 5= �
q Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5 N FACW Column Totals: � (A) � (B)
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
10' x 10' �
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
10' x 10' �
Prevalence Index = B/A = �
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
45°/o _ 4- Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
= Total Cover data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
�% = Total Cover
0% = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Small sample area used due to small wetland area. No canopy species within wetland.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetiand hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WA-01 wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) °/o Tvpe' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-9 10YR 4/4 100 clay loam
9-13+ 10YR 4/2 80 5YR 4/6 20 C PL clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
zLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
ProjecUSite: Bridge 240 City/County: Guilford Sampling Date: 2� �ul, 2017
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WA-01 up
Investigator(s): R. Lepsic; A. James Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 36.0314 Long: -79•7292 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No _
Remarks:
Narrow levee between wet�and WA and Little Alamance Creek
HYDROLOGY
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No ✓
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that applv) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (61) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
✓ Sediment Deposits (62) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
✓ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613) _ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
includes capillary fringe
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Recent sediment deposits in area.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. sampiing Point: WA-o� up
Absoiute Dominant Indicator pominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10' x 10' � % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
� Platanus occidentalis 2p Y FACW That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: $ (A)
2 Liquidambar styraciflua 10 Y FAC
3 Carpinus caroliniana 10 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant $
Species Across AII Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5� That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% �q�g�
6.
� Prevalence Index worksheet:
8 Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv:
40% - Total Cover OBL species � x 1= �
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 10' x 10' � FACW species � x 2= �
� Acer negundo 20 Y FAC FAC species � x 3= �
2 Asimina triloba 60 Y FAC FACU species � x 4= �
g Lindera benzoin 20 Y FAC UPL species � x 5= �
4. Column Totals: � (A) � (B)
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10' x 10'
�. Boehmeria cylindrica
2 Microstigeum vimineum
3 Persicaria virginiana
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
0
10' x 10'
)
100% = Total Cover
40 Y FACW
20 Y FAC
10 N FAC
70% = Total Cover
0% = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Small sample area used due to narrow width of levee.
Prevalence Index = B/A = �
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetiand hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WA-01 up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) °/o Tvpe' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-10 10YR 3/3 100 loam
10-14+ 10YR 4/6 100
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
clay loam
zLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
ProjecUSite: Bridge 240 City/County: Guilford Sampling Date: 2� �ul, 2017
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WB-03 wet
Investigator(s): R. Lepsic; A. James Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 36.0316 Long: -79•7294 Datum: NSD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No
Remarks:
Small depression in the floodplain of Little Alamance Creek. Appears to be old borrow area. Connected to WC by narrow non-jurisdictional swale.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that applv) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ✓ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ✓ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3) ✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
✓ Water Marks (61) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (62) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5) ✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613) _ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
includes capillary fringe
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Evidence of recent ponded water.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. sampiing Point: WB-os wet
Absoiute Dominant Indicator pominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10' x 10' � % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
� Fraxinus pennsylvanica 30 Y FACW That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3• Species Across AII Strata: � (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5� That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 71.43°/o (A/B)
6.
� Prevalence Index worksheet:
8 Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv:
30% - Total Cover OBL species � x 1= �
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 10' x 10' � FACW species � x 2= �
� Ligustrum sinense 5 Y FACU FAC species � x 3= �
2 Rosa multiflora 5 Y FACU FACU species � x 4= �
g Lindera benzoin 15 Y FAC UPL species � x 5= �
4. Column Totals: � (A) � (B)
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10' x 10'
�. Verbensia alternifolia
2 Microstigeum vimenium
3 Persicaria virginiana
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size
� Smilax rotundifoila
2 Vitis rotundifolia
3 Toxicodendron radicans
4.
5.
6.
0
10' x 10' �
25°�o = Total Cover
5 N FAC
5 N FAC
20 Y FAC
30% = Total Cover
10 N FAC
30 Y FAC
15 Y FACU
Prevalence Index = B/A = �
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetiand hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ✓ No
55% = Total Cover I
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Small plot due to small size of wetland. Most vegetation on edge of wetland due to past ponding water. Few herbs in shallower areas.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WB"03 wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) °/o Tvpe' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-1 10YR 2/1 100 silty clay many fine roots
1-4 7.5YR 3/2 90 5YR 4/6 10 C PL silty ciay
4-14+ 7.5YR 3/1 90 5YR 4/6 10 C PL silty clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
zLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
✓ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
ProjecUSite: Bridge 240 City/County: Guilford Sampling Date: 2� �ul, 2017
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WC-03 wet
Investigator(s): R. Lepsic; A. James Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 36.0318 Long: -79•7297 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No
Remarks:
Large depression in the floodplain of Little Alamance Creek. Connected to Little Alamance Creek by narrow jurisdictional swale.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that applv) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ✓ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ✓ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3) ✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
✓ Water Marks (61) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (62) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5) ✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613) _ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
includes capillary fringe
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Evidence of recent ponded water.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. sampiing Point: Wc_os wet
Absoiute Dominant Indicator pominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 20' x 20' � % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
� Juglans nigra 30 Y FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: $ (A)
2 Celtis Iaevigata 30 Y FACW
3 Acer negundo 10 N FAC Total Number of Dominant 9
Species Across AII Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5� That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 88�89% (A/B)
6.
� Prevalence Index worksheet:
8 Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv:
��% = Total Cover OBL species � x 1= �
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20' x 20' � FACW species � x 2= �
� Acer negundo 25 Y FAC FAC species � x 3= �
2 Lonicera morrowii 5 N FACU FACU species � x 4= �
g Lindera benzoin 10 Y FAC UPL species � x 5= �
4. Column Totals: � (A) � (B)
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 20' x 20'
�. Boehmeria cylindrica
2 Microstigeum vimenium
3 Persicaria virginiana
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size
� Smilax rotundifoila
2 Vitis rotundifolia
3.
4.
5.
6.
0
20' x 20' �
40°/o = Total Cover
5 Y FACW
5 Y FAC
15 Y FAC
25% = Total Cover
10 Y FAC
10 Y FAC
Prevalence Index = B/A = �
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetiand hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ✓ No
20% = Total Cover I
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Most vegetation on edge of wetland due to past ponding water. Few herbs in shallower areas.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WC-03 wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) °/o Tvpe' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-1 7.5YR 3/1 90 5YR 4/6 10 C PL silty clay
1-14+ 7.5YR 3/1 80 5YR 4/6 20 C PL silty ciay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
zLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
✓ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
ProjecUSite: Bridge 240 City/County: Guilford Sampling Date: 2� �ul, 2017
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WB & WC up
Investigator(s): R. Lepsic; A. James Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 36.0316 Long: -79•7294 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No � within a Wetland? Yes No ✓
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No �
Remarks:
Upland area between WB and WC. Data form is for both wetlands.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that applv) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (61) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (62) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613) _ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
includes capillary fringe
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. sampiing Point: WB � Wc up
Absoiute Dominant Indicator pominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' x 30' � % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
� Ulmus americana 10 N FACW That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
2 Liquidambar styraciflua 10 N FAC
3 Carpinus caroliniana 80 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant 6
Species Across AII Strata: (B)
q Juniperus virginiana 5 N FACU
Percent of Dominant Species
5� That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: $3.33°/o �q�g�
6.
� Prevalence Index worksheet:
8 Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv:
105% - Total Cover OBL species � x 1= �
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' x 30' � FACW species � x 2= �
� Acer rubrum 10 Y FAC FAC species � x 3= �
2 Carpinus caroliniana 5 N FAC FACU species � x 4= �
g Lindera benzoin 15 Y FAC UPL species � x 5= �
q Asimina triloba 5 N FAC Column Totals: � (A) � (B)
5 Ligustrum sinense
g Lonicera morrowii
� Liquidambar styraciflua
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' x 30'
� Dichanthelium clandestinum
2 Microstigeum vimineum
3 Verbesina alternifolia
q Rosa multifloria
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size
� Vitis rotundifolia
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
0
30' x 30' �
10 Y FACU
5 N FACU
5 N FAC
55°/o = Total Cover
10 N FAC
50 Y FAC
5 N FAC
5 N FACU
70% = Total Cover
15 Y FAC
15% = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Wide floodplain forest.
Prevalence Index = B/A = �
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetiand hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WB �` WC up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) °/o Tvpe' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 3/3 100 clay loam
6-14+ 10YR 3/6 100
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
clay loam
zLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
ProjecUSite: Bridge 240 City/County: Guilford Sampling Date: 5/23/18
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WD wet
Investigator(s): A. JameS Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 36.031481 �ong: -79.730031 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: ChewaCla NWI classification: PSS/PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Yes � No Is the Sampled Area
Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes � No
Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that applv) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns (B10)
✓ Saturation (A3) ✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (61) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (62) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Ti�led Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65) _ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
✓ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No � Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No `� Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes � No Depth (inches): �� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. sampiing Point: WD wet
Absolute Dominant Indicator pominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' rad � % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
� Salix nigra 30 YES OBL That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
2 Acer negundo 20 YES FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3• - - Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
4. - -
Percent of Dominant Species
5• That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 �q�g�
6. " -
� _ _ Prevalencelndex worksheet:
8 _ _ Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv:
50 = Total Cover OBL species x 1=
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' rad � FACW species x 2=
� Fraxinus pennsylvanica 20 YES FACw FAC species x 3=
2 Acer rubrum 10 YES FAC FACU species x 4=
3. - - UPL species x 5=
4. - - Column Totals: � (A) � (B)
5. - - �
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6. - -
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. - -
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. - -
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9. - - —
3- Prevalence Index is s3.0'
10. - - —
30 _ 4- Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
= Total Cover data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' rad �
� Carex lurida 40 YES oBL — Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2 Carex vulpinoidea 35 YES OBL
3 Solidago gigantea 20 NO FACW 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4 Verbesina alternifolia 15 NO FAC
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5 Toxicodendron radicans 15 NO FAC
6 Microstegium vimineum 10 NO FAC Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7� - - height.
8. - -
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9� than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall.
10. - -
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
11. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12. - -
135 = Total Cover Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' rad � height.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WD Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) °/o Tvpe' Locz Texture Remarks
0-3" 10YR 4/4 100 Clay Loam
3-11" 10 YR 5/2 60 10 YR 5/8 40 C M/PL Loamy clay
11-12+" 10 YR 4/1 80 10 YR 5/8 20 C M/PL Loamy clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: None
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. zLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 748)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes � No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
ProjecUSite: Bridge 240 City/County: Guilford Sampling Date: 5/23/2018
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WD up
Investigator(s): A. JameS Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 0-1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 36.031456 �ong; -79.730203 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: ChewaCla NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
No � Is the Sampled Area
No � within a Wetland? Yes No �
No ✓
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that applv) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (61) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (62) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Ti�led Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65) _ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No � Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No `� Depth (inches): �
Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. sampiing Point: WD up
Absolute Dominant Indicator pominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 � % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
� Juglans nigra 40 YES FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
2 Liriodendron tulipifera 30 YES FACU
Platanus occidentalis 20 YES FACW Total Number of Dominant
3• Species Across All Strata: $ (B)
4 Liquidambar styraciflua 10 NO FAC
Percent of Dominant Species
5• That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 37 5 (A/B)
6. " -
� _ _ Prevalencelndex worksheet:
8 _ _ Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv:
100 = Total Cover OBL species � x 1=�
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 � FACW species z0 X 2= 40
� Ligustrum sinense 25 YES FACU FAC species 35 X 3= 105
2 Carya tomentosa 20 YES NI FACU species 100 X q= 400
g Acer rubrum 10 NO FAC UPL species � x 5=�
4. - - Column Totals: 155 �A� 545 �B�
5. - -
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.5
6. - -
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. - -
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. - -
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9. - - —
3- Prevalence Index is s3.0'
10. - - —
55 _ 4- Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
= Total Cover data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 �
� Verbesina alternifolia 30 YES FAC — Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2 Boehmeria cylindrica 5 NO FACW
3 Persicaria virginiana 5 NO FAC 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4� Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5. - -
6 _ _ Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7� - - height.
8. - -
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9� than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall.
10. - -
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
11. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12. - -
40 = Total Cover Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 � height.
� Lonicera japonica 5 YES FACU
2 Smilax rotundifolia 5 YES FAC
3. ' -
4. - -
5 _ Hydrophytic
Vegetation /
g, - - Present? Yes No ��
10 = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WD Up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) °/o Tvpe' Locz Texture Remarks
0-4 7.5YR 3/4 100 sandy loam
4-12+ 2.5YR 4/6 100 sandy loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. zLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 748)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No �
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0