20170920 Ver 1_401 Application Paper_20180823

ROY COOPER
Governor
Environmental
Quality
August 22, 2018
Karen Higgins, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit Supervisor
Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 - 1617
Re: Permit Application- Heron Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site, Alamance County (DMS
Full Delivery Project)
Dear Ms. Higgins:
Attached for your review is 404/401 permit application package for the subject project. Another
copy has been sent to the Winston-Salem Regional Office for review. A memo for the permit
application fee is also included in the package. All electronic files have been uploaded to NC
DWR's file system. Please feel free to contact me with any questions regarding this plan (919-
707-8319).
Thank you very much for your assistance.
Sincerely
Lin Xu
Attachment: 404/401 Permit Application Package
Final Mitigation Plan
Permit Application Fee Memo
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality
217 West Jones Street 1 1601 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 1601
919 707 8600

Environmental
Quality
August 22, 2018
Sherri Knight, Regional Supervisor, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
NC DEQ Winston-Salem Regional Office
450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300
Winston Salem, NC 27105
ROY COOPER
Governor
Re: Permit Application- Heron Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site, Alamance County (DMS
Full Delivery Project)
Dear Ms. Knight:
Attached for your review is 404/401 permit application package for the subject project. Please
feel free to contact me with any questions regarding this plan (919-707-8319).
Thank you very much for your assistance.
Sincerely
Lin Xu
Attachment: 404/401 Permit Application Package
Final Mitigation Plan
Cc: Karen Higgins
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality
217 West Jones Street 1 1601 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
919 707 8600

Environmental
Quality
MEMORANDUM:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Summer Lowe
Lin Xu L_x
Payment of Permit Fee
401 Permit Application
August 22, 2018
ROY COOPER
Governor
The Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is implementing a mitigation project for
Heron Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site in Alamance County (DMS IMS # 100014).
The activities associated with this restoration project involve stream and wetland
restoration related temporary stream and wetland impact. To conduct these activities,
the DMS must submit a Pre -construction Notification (PCN) Form to the Division of
Water Resources (DWR) for review and approval. The DWR assesses a fee of $570.00
for this review.
Please transfer $570.00 from DMS Fund # 2981, Account # 535120 to DWR as
payment for this review. If you have any questions concerning this matter I can be
reached at 919-707-8319. Thanks for your assistance.
cc: Karen Higgins, DWR
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality
217 West Jones Street 1 1601 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
919 707 8600

NA 7'EA p�
1 Il.J1�J`J<
CD
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Ns���i
Page 1 of 10 CFS
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
X❑ Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 27 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
X❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes X❑ No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Heron Stream & Wetland Mitigation Site
2b.
County:
Alamance
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Snow Camp
2d.
Subdivision name:
--
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
DMS Project ID No. 100014
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Russel B. Hadley Revocable Trust
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
1195, 0905
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
8922 Bethel South Fork Rd
3e.
City, state. zip:
Snow Camp, NC 27349
3f.
Telephone no.:
--
3g.
Fax no.:
--
3h.
Email address:
-- 1
Ns���i
Page 1 of 10 CFS
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: NCDMS
4b. Name:
Lin Xu
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
NCDEQ, Division of Mitigation Services
4d. Street address:
217 West Jones St.
4e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27603
4f. Telephone no.:
919-707-8319
4g. Fax no.:
919-5714718
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Worth Creech
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Restoration Systems, LLC
5c. Street address:
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27604
5e. Telephone no.:
919-755-9490
5f. Fax no.:
919-755-9492
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
104014
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
ILatitude: 35.853955 Longitude: -79.363458
1 c. Property size:
17.5 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Pine Hill Branch & South Fork Cane Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -V, NSW
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The Site drainage area is primarily composed of pasture, forest, agricultural land, sparse residential property, and < 2% impervious surfaces. Site land
use consists of disturbed forest and agricultural land used for livestock grazing and hay production. Livestock have unrestricted access to Site
streams and stream banks are eroded vertically and laterally, and receive extensive sediment and nutrient inputs. Riparian zones are sparse.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.61
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 5,285
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The proposed project will result in 4183 If of Priority I stream restoration, 1234 If of stream enhancment (Level 1), 1131 If of stream enhancement (Level
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
A detailed description of proposed activities is provided in the attached Mitigation Plan. The project will be completed with standard earth -moving equip
D
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
X❑ Preliminary E] Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): W. Grant Lewis
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other: Axiom Environmental, Inc.
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Site visit on October 13, 2017; the signed Notification of Jurisdictional Determination dated December 21, 2017 is attached..
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes 0 No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams —tributaries ❑X Buffers ❑X Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
LB
SEE ATTACHED TABLE
PA
SH
SG
SD
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
Permanent impacts to eight (8) small wetland areas are anticipated by construction of proposed stream channels for a total of 0.09 acre. Temporary
impacts to all remaining on-site wetlands are limited to enhancement activities including invasive species removal and planting with native forest
species. Jurisdictional wetland areas will be avoided to the maximum extent practicable; however, some encroachment will be necessary during
project construction. Construction -related impacts will be temporary and all areas will be restored to pre -project elevations and planted appropriately.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial (PER) or
Type of
Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)?
jurisdiction
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1
Choose one
SEE ATTACHED TABL
S2
Choose one
S3
S4
S5
S6
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Project activities include restoration of 4183 If, enhancement (Level 1) of 1234 If, and enhancement (Level 11) of 1131 If of stream channels. No impacts
are anticipated in conjunction with Enhancement (level 11) activities. Please see the attached Mitigation Plan.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivii ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 P
UT South Fork Cane Creek
Drainage
Pond
0.1
O2 P
UT South Fork Cane Creek
Drainage
Pond
0.35
03
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
0.45
4g. Comments: he Tarm ponds are proposed to be removed restoring streams and wetiands.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
(acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments: NA
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no.
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑X Other: Jordan Lake
6b.
Buffer Impact
number-
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
NONE
Yes/No
B2
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
0
0
6i. Comments: Site tributaries are not depicted on Silk Hope (1974) 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangle or USDA Web Soil Survey mapping
updated 8/21/17.
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
This is a stream and wetland mitigation project. As a result, avoidance and minimization were not part of the original design planning. The proposed
project is anticipated to increase the function and length/area of jurisdictional stream and wetlands.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The only activities that will take place within the stream are filling and stabilization of banks, placement of channel bed material, and the installation of
cross vanes and drop structures. No machinery will be driven within existing stream channels or jurisdictional wetland areas. If water is present,
channels will be temporarily dewatered and all work will be performed in the dry. Impacts to jurisdictional areas are designed to benefit hydrology and
vegetative communities.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
o
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
NA.
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
NA; however, numerous marsh treatment areas are included in the Site design.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes 0 No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
No impervious surfaces will be generated by the proposed project. On-site stormwater will be treated by a marsh treatment areas or flow through
vegetated riparian buffers prior to flowing into surface waters.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
NA
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
State
0 Phase 11
El NSWEl
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes X❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑X Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑X Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑X Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
X❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.) Please see the Approved Categorical Exclusion Form (Appendix E of the attached
Comments: Mitigation Plan)
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
El Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
El Yes X❑ No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
NA
- No sewage will be generated by the proposed project.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes X❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS county -wide list of Threatened and Endangered species in North Carolina indicates that there are no federally protected species or critical
habitat present within Alamance County.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Fisheries Essential Fish Habitat Mapper v2.0 (online)
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ YesX❑ No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC Department of Cultural Resources, State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB online mapping tool.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
NC Floodplain Mapping Program (DFIRM panel 8796) and coordination with the the National Flood Insurance Program.
�/_>Z114
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

Proposed Impacts Inventory - Heron Stream & Wetland Mitigation Site
WETLAND IMPACTS
Wetland impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404, 10) or
DWQ (401, other)
Area of
impact
(acres)
GB (P)
Fill
Headwater Wetland
No
Corps
0.012
GB (T)
Fill
Headwater Wetland
No
Corps
0.049
PB (P)
Fill
Headwater Wetland
No
Corps
0.011
PB (T)
Fill
Headwater Wetland
No
Corps
0.065
PD (P)
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.026
PD (T)
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.090
PC (P)
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.002
PC (T)
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.028
GF (P)
Fill
Headwater Wetland
No
Corps
0.006
GF (T)
Fill
Headwater Wetland
No
Corps
0.010
BC (P)
Fill
Headwater Wetland
No
Corps
0.008
BC (T)
Fill
Headwater Wetland
No
Corps
0.036
BA (P)
Fill
Headwater Wetland
No
Corps
0.001
BA (T)
Fill
Headwater Wetland
No
Corps
0.007
BB (P)
Fill
Headwater Wetland
No
Corps
0.004
BB (T)
Fill
Headwater Wetland
No
Corps
0.013
GE (P)
Fill
Headwater Wetland
No
Corps
0.017
GE (T)
Fill
Headwater Wetland
No
Corps
0.075
Total Wetland Impactsl
0.46
STREAM IMPACTS
Stream Impact Number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
Type of Impact`
Stream Name
PER or INT
Type of Jurisdiction
Average
Stream
Width
(feet)
Stream
Impact
Length
(feet)
S1 (T)
Stabilization
UT 1
PER
Corps
8.5
470
S2 (P)
Relocation
UT 1
PER
Corps
8.5
753
S3 (P)
Relocation
UT 2
INT
Corps
3.9
19
S4 (P)
Relocation
UT3
INT/PER
Corps
4.5
269
S5 (P)
Relocation
UT4
PER
Corps
3.8
485
S6 (P)
Relocation
UT5
INT/PER
Corps
3.7
422
S7 (P)
Relocation
UT 6
INT/PER
Corps
1 6.4
683
S8 (T)
Stabilization
UT7
INT
Corps
5.3
764
S9 (P)
Relocation
UT 8
PER
Corps
5.1
549
Total Stream & Tributary Impacts
4414
* No impacts are anticipated in conjunction with Enhancement (level II) activities.
OPEN WATER IMPACTS
Open Water Impact
Name of
Waterbody
Number Permanent (P) or
Permanent (P) or
Type of Impact
Stream Name
Area of Impact (acres)
Zone 1 Impact (ft sq)
Waterbod y
Temporary (T)
yP
Type
Temporary (T)
sq)
NONE*
UT South Fork
Total Buffer Impacts
Ol
Drainage
Pond
0.1
Cane Creek
UT South Fork
02
Drainage
Pond
0.35
Cane Creek
Total Open Water Impacts
0.45
BUFFER IMPACTS: Jordan Lake
Buffer Impact Number
Reason for
Buffer
Zone 2
Permanent (P) or
Stream Name
Mitigation
Zone 1 Impact (ft sq)
Impact(ft
Temporary (T)
Impact
Required
sq)
NONE*
Total Buffer Impacts
0
*Site tributaries are not depicted on Silk Hope (1974) 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangle or USDA Web Soil Survey mapping
updated 8/21/17.

r � '
r
ar
` Lr. 9 nst`
Au F.nvromwwar, mc.
i�7 Prepared for
x.550
o
io
c Project
:m
.Sw p _ r59,
ta
r HERON STREAM
-5°_ A ,ti AND WETLAND
\�z`•
I, �� o MITIGATION SITE
r r 1 i/ Alamance County, NC
Title
Snow Camp \ r JJ '+ h t PROJECT
LOCATION
N\ v� �r �' � I � � J ! /, \✓ 5�y O AL'A"HA C�.4'E CQ
_
JtiAM CO - Drawn by
c
° -..1 _-. _' i \\ e C•�Date.
th Fork Ch j DEC 2017
Scale
1:20000
— /
Project Na
" \_ w� , „ Directions to the Site from Raleigh:
�.
Take US West out of Raleigh and frave125 miles, 17-008
Take exit 381 and turn right onto NC -87 N,
After 5 miles, take a left onto Castle Rock Farm Road,
After 5.8 miles, turn left onto Greenhill Road, FIGURE
After 1.2 miles, turn left onto Lindley Mill Road,
1V Qt/ After 0.5 mile, turn right onto Bethel South Fork Road,
/ tai x t7 Site can be accessed from both sides of Bethel South Fork Road.
Site Latitude, Longitude 35.853955, -79.363458 (NAD831WGS84)
F/ r• J
I If
USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map (Silk Hope and Crutchfield Crossroads, NC Quad)

N I1
IL
e'.
Prepared for:
tr'j��Z..
-
L 71r
-
�. Qj Protect
S :r ?, t} y 'Y• Figure 2B
HERON STREAM
1 1.
J'"r"
vl - -ty AND WETLAND
x+5& ;, �jii�!/""` ►�,w " MITIGATION SITE
e
Alamance County, NC
�•,�•. .,. �i :� Lq' €fit ; . -
• �5
Title.
^t.'.� JURISICATIONAL
AREA IMPACT
r, FIGURE INDEX
k
Legend 4 --r""-
Drawn by
Conservation Easement - 17.5 acres CLF
Figure Index ` Date.
rK Power Line iJrs'b - JULY 2018
-- Gas Pipeline" _,t. "' "' " Scale.
Open Water Impacts 1:4200
-- Stream Design Channel i •� .v - Project No..
� 17-008
Channel Backfill
Wetland Impacts
Permanent Impacts U FIGURE
Temporary Impacts ;.✓•
- No Impact
0 500 1,000 `
Feet ,

A— Em+a,nrMN. snc.
Prepared for:
Project
HERON STREAM
AND WETLAND
MITIGATION SITE
Alamance County, NC
Title
JURISICATIONAL
AREAIMPACT
SHEETS
x
Legend 4t
Drawn by.
.. ` CLF
OConservation Easement - 17.5 acres
« Power Line
-
-=
t
A
- Gas Pipeline
-
i
_I Open Water Impacts
Stream Design Channel
Channel Backfill`''
Wetland Impacts
Permanent Impacts
�^
Temporary Impacts
— No Impact
0 270
540
Feet
iN� 1 1 Date.
JULY 2018
Scale
r„ 1:1200
Protect No..
7 r.
17-008
' � � 9 i•.. ; � k
FIGURE
�` 2A

Mian EmrornwuM. tz.
i
Prepared for
e -
Protect
HERON STREAM
AND WETLAND
MITIGATION SITE
4
J:
Alamance County, NC
Title.
t . JURISICATIONAL
AREAIMPACT
SHEETS
7 r`
� r
�r
Legend��,'+ Drawn by CLF
OConservation Easement - 17.5 acres t,v`;s
� Power Line �. �' _ � „;. � _ �,` s c# Date. JULY 2018
`--= Gas Pipeline .., �'`- Ir ;�' �. '", .: Scale:
Open Water Impacts "�._az` 1:1200
Stream Design Channel ,. ^-. ! _ _ - Project No. 17-008
yy i
Channel Backfill
Wetland Impacts
Permanent Impacts FIGURE
Temporary Impacts
No Impact i • y � �
2C
L 2
0 270
Feet

Legend
OConservation Easement - 17.5 acres
Power Line
= Gas Pipeline
Open Water Impacts
- Stream Design Channel
Channel Backfill
VIetland Impacts
5. ..
i
Permanent Impacts
Temporary Impacts
No Impact
0 270 540
Feet
, E ..on w" I..
Prepared for:
Project.
HERON STREAM
AND WETLAND
MITIGATION SITE
Alamance County, NC
Title
JURISICATIONAL
AREA IMPACT
SHEETS
Drawn by
CLF
Date.
JULY 2018
Scale
1:1200
Project No..
17-008
FIGURE
2D

SAW -2017-01471
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW -2017-01471 County: Alamance U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -Silk Hope
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: NCDEQ DMS
Attn: Tim Baumeartner
Address: 1619 Mail Service Center
Raleieh, NC 27699-1619
Size (acres) —20 Nearest Town Snow Camp
:Nearest Waterway South Fork Cane Creek River Basin Cape Fear
USGS HUC 03030002 Coordinates 36.853955 N, -79.363458 W
Location description: The project area is located on the east side of Bethel South Fork Road, east of its intersection with Clark
Road, on both side of South Fork Cane Creek, near Snow Camp, Alamance County, North Carolina. The Project Area is
shown as the "Easement" on the attached Fieure 3, titled "Jurisdictional Areas."
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appear to be waters including wetlands, on the above described project area, that may be subject to Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RNA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters including wetlands, have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently
accurate and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated
October 2017. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process,
including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation
requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat
all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an
appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters including wetlands, on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However,
since the waters including wetlands, have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be
used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an
effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters including wetlands, at the project area, which is not
sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters including
wetlands, on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a
timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the pennit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waters including wetlands, on the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters including wetlands, on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
❑ The waters including wetlands, on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the
Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated MAP DATE. If you wish to
have the delineation surveyed, the Corps can review and verify the survey upon completion. Once verified, this survey will

SAW -2017-01471
provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA and/or RHA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no
change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters including wetlands, have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps
Regulatory Official identified below on SURVEY SIGNED DATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact David Bailey at [phone] X 30 or
David. E.Bailev2(a).usace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: See the Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination form dated 12/21/2017.
D. Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room IOM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Digitally signed by BAILEGovernment,
o .=Doo, 83736
ou=PKI
DN: c=US, o=US. Government, ou=8373 ou=PK1,
3u—USA, cn=BAILEy.DAVID.E.1379283736
Coles Regulatory Official: Date: 2017.12.21145159-05'00'
Date of JD: 12/21/2017 Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at http: /corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/t'?p=136:4:0.
Copy furnished:
Sue Homewood, NCDEQ-DWR, 450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300, Winston-Salem, NC 27105

SAW -2017-01471
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: N(.DEQ DMS Attn: Tim Baum artner File Number: SAW -2017-01471 Date: 12/21/2017
Attached is: See Section below
F-11 INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Pen -nit or Letter ofpermission) A
F-11 PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of ennission B
❑ PERMIT DENIAL C
DI APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
ZI PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION 1 - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or htt,2:/\N,WW.usace.armv.mil Mission, CivilWorks P, ulator\ Pro_ramandPermits.aspx
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the pennit document and return it to the district engineer for Final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the pen -nit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the pen -nit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terns and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terns and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section ii of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.

SAW -2017-01471
SECTION tI - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
attn: David E. Bailey
CESAD-PDO
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the onvortuni to participate in all site investi ations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant oragent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, David Bailey, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North Carolina
28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal
Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD): 12/21/2017
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
NCDMS (Attn: Tim Baumgartner)
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
SAW -2017-01471 (NCDMS ILP - Heron Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Alamance
City: Snow Camp
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 35.852517 .N; Long. -79.361977 OW,
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: south Fork
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non -wetland waters:
--5937 linear feet: 2-15 width (ft) and/or
Cowardln Class: WB1/2, R4U81/2, R3UB2/3, and R4U8213
Stream Flow: perennial and Intermittent
Wetlands: 0.61 acres.
Cowardin Class: PF01, Pss1
acres.
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal:
Non -Tidal:
I

E
REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
0 Field Determination. Date(s):
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
❑✓ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/Consultant: Aerial, topo, and soils maps (Axiom)
❑✓ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
app ant/consultant.
X Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S_ Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
❑✓ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Silk Hope 7.5 -minute
0 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation: Soil Survey of Alamance County, NC (1960)
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
© Photographs: © Aerial (Name & Date): 2014 NC OneMap or
❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑X Other information (please specify): LiDAR
9

Estimated amount of
Site Number/
Cowardin
aquatic resource in
Class of aquatic
Feature Name
Latitude
Longitude
Class
review area
resources
Non -section 10 -
UT1
35.855734
-79.365621
R3UB1/2
1155 linear feet
Non -wetland
Non -section 10 -
UT2
35.854815
-79.365570
R4U61/2
363 linear feet
Non -wetland
Non -section 10 -
UT3
35.856247
-79.366189
R3UB2/3
269 linear feet
Non -wetland
Non -section 10 -
UT4
35.852036
-79.362248
R3UB1/2
485 linear feet
Non -wetland
Non -section 10 -
UT5
35.852544
-79.361933
R3UB2/3
907 linear feet
Non -wetland
Non -section 10 -
UT6
35.853614
-79.360226
R3UB2/3
683 linear feet
Non -wetland
Non -section 10 -
UT7
35.854101
-79.358908
R4UB2/3
202 linear feet
Non -wetland
Non -section 10 -
UT8
35.847951
-79.360242
R3UB1/1
1221 linear feet
Non -wetland
Non -section 10 -
GB Wetland
35.856582
-79.365246
PFO1
0.24 acres
Wetland
Non -section 10 -
PB Wetland
35.855694
-79.365906
PSS1
0.06 acres
Wetland
Non -section 10 -
PC Wetland
35.854978
-79.366584
PFO1
0.06 acres
Wetland
Non -section 10 -
PD Wetland
35.855109
-79.366182
PFO1
0.14 acres
Wetland
Non -section 10 -
GE Wetland
35.852517
-79.361977
PSS1
0.09 acres
Wetland
Non -section 10 -
GF Wetland
35.854459
-79.359486
PSS1
0.02 acres
Wetland
Non -section 10 -
BA Wetland
35.853218
-79.363100
PSS1
0.01 acres
Wetland
Non -section 10 -
BB Wetland
35.853134
-79.362693
PSS1
0.02 acres
Wetland
Non -section 10 -
BC Wetland
35.853337
-79.359848
PSS1
0.04 acres
Wetland
Non -section 10 -
OW -1
35.853411
-79.363295
R3UB2/3
0.10 acres
Non -wetland
Non -section 10 -
OW -2 1
35.854870 1
-79.359953 1
R3UB2/3
0.35 acres
Non -wetland

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre -construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.

This preliminary JD finds that there "maybe" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
Digitally signed by
BAI LE y. DAVI D.E.I 379283736
ON: r-U5'o-U.S. Government,
ou-Da D. -""-USA,
—BAILEY DAVID.E.1379283736
Date: 2017,12 21 14:51:40 -0500'
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
'. UIG�41 s4m1b/W. (inrM _s>.k
W. Grant Lewis"
.w.aoaF++u.erwswknat+c cx.a
oaa anrmmt4�n�eam
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

r ,' Ii :~ •ash :_:y
♦�p4 F."'eb ,� �I t ..._....r .-�..^�'AYe,., ./d%..t*-r ww.w>.►Fx#4t+�INNnF 4. },s~ u�.,�'� ��yf� \� N
NA
\ � eyra.oMrat.r. rte.
(F'S Prepared for
��► !�_�,, PD {j
n-ctl—u
„s
iT-1
I ,
P,oject
i UT6
;I i
OW 1 HERON STREAM
A11111milBC Wetland AND WETLAND
BA Wetland BB Wetland MITIGATION SITE
Nis
0
+� ;.� GE Wetland Alamance County, NC
b/{ 0
UT -4 UT -5 Title
o JURISDICTIONAL
AREAS
r
Notes
r �!1 1 Back Ima Source
t �'�� - ground fiery
aoi4aaral pretb"pny
pmvd—y.. NC One Map
ra
!•��.^}., t •� r 1j[y pmgm o n
l ine. p,ovded by
ka�ryy ' p9 y{t the NCGeog,aph
SBO ittre " •�—_ f li �Q C—dnaten Counc it rmat pn
? y• t� ""a As
Drawn by
KRJ
Legend 9 �t Date NOV 2017
Easement `'/ 1.t� y (�
— Potential Streams -approximately 5,285 feet \� 91w �1kt,� ♦i Scale 1:5000
Potential Wetlands (Headwater Forest) -approximately 0.68 acres �V�tj +'l fff Project No.
<. 17-008
- Potential Jurisdictional Open Water - approximately 0.45 acres
>� NCDOT Roads �� � y
4 -toot elevation wnlours(LiDAR 2007) FIGURE
1'7 NC SAM Forms :y'�� `� ��r-.� - �•y w,r�i i /
* NC WAM Forms
3
Feet
0 500 1,000 2,000
s6o

N g
gb-100
gbos b ] boe GB Welland - - -
6101 g604
g603
yb103 gbO2 Ct
g601=gb 04
Atom Envnu,anarga�. ax;.
Prepared for
PB Wetland vb'
Pb
b-0B
pb-05
-03
ral B-9 ` ��r OieCl
i Ptl55 Ptl' , .:..
PD Wetland HERON STREAM
ptl-0, S AND WETLAND
Pc o,
MITIGATION SITE
psi-04
C, Alamance Alamance County. NC
t Title
PC wetland F ` WETLAND
DETAIL
= e
GF Wetland Notes
gr
_ eackyrraunc Imagery Source
hi
o'vNnE by pthe NO 0,,Map
by
he NCGeograph c Inm
ki
. _hei �._. _
M.
Legend BC-03 BC Drawn by KRJ
OEasement BB Welland Bc-0
BA � Be c-0] Date NOV 2017017
Potential Streams - approximately 5,285 feet -0s Be-0 _
- Potential Wetlands (Headwater Forest) - approximately 068 acres Welland Be
Be B BC Wetland Scale 1:2000
- Potential Jurisdictional Open Water- approximately 0.45 acres = r�• - Project No. 17.008
• Wetland GPS Points �;.
GE atland
Wetland Data Forms s+`
ey. ] FIGURE
NCDOT RoadseO
'a
4-foot elevation contours (LiDAR 2007) ,o_ , G
GESS GEro'_ ,Lo �{�
Feet y'J
0 250 500 1,000 "`"

FINAL MITIGATION PLAN
HERON STREAM AND WETLAND MITIGATION SITE
Alamance County, North Carolina
DMS Pr
o�ect ID No. 100014
Full Delivery Contract No. 7192 411 j�
USACE Action ID No. SAW -2017-0147 16 Z lFb
RFP No. 16-006990'V;/�/064�fa
V/ 818
OF
Cape Fear River Basin ERV/
Cataloging Unit 03030002 CFS'
Prepared for:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
1652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1652
July 2018

FINAL MITIGATION PLAN
HERON STREAM AND WETLAND MITIGATION SITE
Alamance County, North Carolina
DMS Project ID No. 100014
Full Delivery Contract No. 7192
USACE Action ID No. SAW -2017-01471
RFP No. 16-006990
Cape Fear River Basin
Cataloging Unit 03030002
Prepared for:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
1652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1652
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Contact: Worth Creech
919-755-9490 (phone)
919-755-9492 (fax)
Prepared by:
And
July 2018
Axiom Environmental. Inc.
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Contact: Grant Lewis
919-215-1693 (phone)
"This mitigation plan has been written in conformance with the requirements of the following:
• Federal rule for compensatory mitigation project sites as described in the Federal Register Title 33
Navigation and Navigable Waters Volume 3 Chapter 2 Section § 332.8 paragraphs (c)(2) through(c)(14).
• NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services In -Lieu Fee Instrument signed and dated July 28, 2010
These documents govern NCDMS operations and procedures for the delivery of compensatory mitigation."
This document was assembled using the June 2017 DMS Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plan Template and Guidance
and the October 24, 2016 NC Interagency Review Team Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory
Mitigation Update.

Regulatory Division
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
69 DARLINGTON AVENUE
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403-1343
August 13, 2018
Re: NCIRT Review and USACE Approval of the Heron Site Draft Mitigation Plan; SAW -2017-
01471; DMS Project #100014
Mr. Tim Baumgartner
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Dear Mr. Baumgartner:
The purpose of this letter is to provide the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
(NCDMS) with all comments generated by the North Carolina Interagency Review Team (NCIRT)
during the 30 -day review for the Heron Site Draft Mitigation Plan, which closed on June 1, 2018,
2018. Please note the comment period was extended to allow the provider to respond to project
concerns. These comments are attached for your review.
Based on our review of these comments and the provider's response to comments, we have
determined that no major concerns have been identified with the Draft Mitigation Plan, which is
considered approved with this correspondence. However, the provider's proposed changes to the
draft mitigation plan in response to issues identified in the memo must be addressed in the Final
Mitigation Plan.
The Final Mitigation Plan is to be submitted with the Preconstruction Notification (PCN)
Application for Nationwide permit approval of the project along with a copy of this letter. All
changes made to the Final Mitigation Plan should be summarized in an errata sheet included at the
beginning of the document. If it is determined that the project does not require a Department of
the Army permit, you must still provide a copy of the Final Mitigation Plan, along with a copy of
this letter, to the appropriate USACE field office at least 30 days in advance of beginning
construction of the project. Please note that this approval does not preclude the inclusion of permit
conditions in the permit authorization for the project, particularly if issues referenced above are
not satisfactorily addressed. Additionally, this letter provides initial approval for the Mitigation
Plan, but this does not guarantee that the project will generate the requested amount of mitigation
credit. As you are aware, unforeseen issues may arise during construction or monitoring of the
project that may require maintenance or reconstruction that may lead to reduced credit.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter, and if you have any questions regarding
this letter, the mitigation plan review process, or the requirements of the Mitigation Rule, please
contact Andrea Hughes at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Henry M. Wicker
Deputy Chief, Wilmington District
Enclosures
Electronic Copies Furnished:
NCIRT Distribution List
Jeff Schaffer, NCDMS

Heron Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site IRT Comment Responses 7/10/2018
Mac Haupt, NCDWR, May 18, 2018:
1. Please note that in the future, the soils series mapped as Local Alluvial Land
will be treated as a Fluvaquent and therefore will require a minimum hydro
period saturation of 12% in the approved growing season.
2. DWR notes that the wetland growing season proposed is March 1 st-October
22nd. This is acceptable, however, DWR would like to know the frequency
of soil temperature measurement that will occur from February through
April. Since an extend growing season is proposed, DWR requests that the
soil temperature measurements are taken from February two weeks prior to
the growing season start date and maintained until the end of April.
3. DWR accepts the 10% wetland saturation performance criteria. Please note
that if any of the wetland restoration areas contained the Local Alluvial Land
series the performance criteria would be as stated in # 1.
4. DWR requests that a stream gauge be placed at sta 2+75 on UT6.
5. DWR requests that a stream gauge be placed at sta 2+50 on UT2.
1101 Haynes St., Suite 211 • Raleigh. NC 27604 • www.restorationsystems.com • Ph 919.755.9490 • Fx 919.755.9492

6. DWR requires that a vegetation plot be placed at the top of UT7 (in the relic
pond area), the current proposed plot at the beginning of the Enhancement
1 reach can be moved to the pond area.
7. The same requirement goes for the vegetation plot near the top of UT5,
please locate the vegetation plot in the relic pond bed.
8. DWR has an issue with the current design sheet plans. The proposed thalweg
shows no bedform changes, especially when numerous grade control
structures are proposed, for example plan sheets 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, and 12.
Please redo the design sheets to graphically show the proposed bedform
changes per structure and in the reach.
9. The designer is well aware what DWR thinks of the Terracell drop
structures. While currently, DWR is letting these structures be utilized, there
are two locations in the proposed 4 applications where DWR questions their
need. As per the design sheet 13, it appears that the end of UT6 is being
raised, and therefore removes the need for a drop structure. Also, at the
confluence of UT4 and UT5, the slope is the same that is being utilized
upstream to manage grade with cross vanes.
10. DWR would like to emphasize that in the future, highly fragmented and
disconnected sites may receive a credit reduction. On the other hand, larger
contiguous sites may garner more credit. Of course, the prior statement is
pending IRT review and approval, nevertheless, DWR will continue to
emphasize these points.
Andrea Hughes, USACE, June 14, 2018:
1. The plan provides extensive discussion of the reference areas, and functional
uplift and project goals/objectives. However, the mitigation plan does not
provide adequate description of the existing resources and the proposed
treatments. The plan should include a brief paragraph for each resource
describing the existing conditions (including a description of the existing
buffer) and impairments. The mitigation plan should also include a
paragraph for each resource describing the proposed treatments that will be
implemented to address the impairments. The plan indicates that the site
includes stream restoration, enhancement I and enhancement II and wetland
restoration and enhancement. The general descriptions provided are
adequate for a prospectus document but lack sufficient detail for a draft
1101 Haynes St., Suite 211 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • www.restorationsystems.com • Ph 919.755.9490 • Fx 919.755.9492

mitigation plan.
2. Tables should include a column for each tributary proposed for restoration.
Table 8 combines UT3, UT4, UT5, and UT6, Table B 1 combines UT 4 and
UT 5. Neither table includes information on UT 2.
3. Table 15 indicates that gauges or trail camera will be utilized to document
bankfull on UT3, UT5, and UT 7. Bankfull must be documented for all
stream restoration reaches.
4. Stream gauges to document minimum flow should be placed in the upper
third of all intermittent reaches proposed for restoration.
5. Under performance standards, ET for C/E channels should be > 2.2.
6. Under vegetation success, a minimum of 260 stems per acre must be present
at Year 5.
7. Section 8.2.2 provides a contingency for wetland enhancement areas but
does not provide discussion for wetland re-establishment areas.
8. The plan indicates six shallow wetland marsh treatment areas will be
excavated in the floodplain but will not receive mitigation credits. If these
areas are not proposed to generate credits, then please remove the credit
release schedule for Coastal Marsh Wetlands (page 30). However, since the
marsh treatment areas are located within the stream buffers, the mitigation
plan should include a performance standard for the marsh wetlands tied to
vegetation success.
1101 Haynes St., Suite 211 • Raleigh. NC 27604 • www.restorationsystems.com • Ph 919.755.9490 • Fx 919.755.9492

9. According to field notes, a utility line on UT6 was proposed for relocation.
The plan does not provide information regarding relocation.
10. According to field notes, some EII areas along UT 8 should be 5:1 ratio.
11. According to field notes, the provider indicated they would provide
additional information regarding whether the spray field is included in the
easement areas. The mitigation plan does not provide information.
12. According to field notes, UT 2 was approved as EII. The plan indicates
restoration for UT 2B.
1 101 Haynes St., Suite 211 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • www.restorationsystems.com • Ph 919.755.9490 • Fx 919.755.9492

Thank you,
Worth Creech
1 101 Haynes St., Suite 211 • Raleigh. NC 27604 • www.restorationsystems.com • Ph 919.755.9490 • Fx 919.755.9492

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 PROJECT INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................. 1
1.1 DIRECTIONS TO SITE.............................................................................................................. 1
1.2 USGS HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE AND NCDWR RIVER BASIN DESIGNATION ....................... 1
1.3 PHYSIOGRAPHY AND LAND USE............................................................................................ 1
1.4 PROJECT COMPONENTS AND STRUCTURE.............................................................................. 2
2.0 WATERSHED APPROACH AND SITE SELECTION .................................................... 7
3.0 REFERENCE STREAMS..................................................................................................... 9
3.1 CHANNEL CLASSIFICATION................................................................................................... 9
3.2 DISCHARGE......................................................................................................................... 10
3.3 CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY.................................................................................................... 10
4.0 BASELINE AND EXISTING CONDITIONS
4.1 SOILS AND LAND FORM .....................................
4.2 SEDIMENT MODEL .............................................
4.3 NUTRIENT MODEL .............................................
4.4 PROJECT SITE STREAMS ....................................
4.4.1 Existing Conditions Survey ....................
4.4.2 Channel Classification and Morphology
4.4.3 Channel Evolution ..................................
4.4.4 Valley Classification ..............................
4.4.5 Discharge ................................................
4.5 CHANNEL STABILITY ASSESSMENT ...................
4 6 BANKFULL VERIFICATION
.......................................................... 10
.......................................................... 10
.......................................................... 12
.......................................................... 12
.......................................................... 13
.......................................................... 13
.......................................................... 16
.......................................................... 16
.......................................................... 16
.......................................................... 16
.......................................................... 16
................................................................................................... 18
5.0 PROJECT SITE WETLANDS (EXISTING CONDITIONS).........................................19
5.1 EXISTING JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS............................................................................... 19
5.2 HYDROLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION................................................................................. 19
5.3 SOIL CHARACTERIZATION................................................................................................... 19
5.3.1 Taxonomic Classification......................................................................................... 19
5.3.2 Profile Description................................................................................................... 20
5.4 PLANT COMMUNITY CHARACTERIZATION........................................................................... 20
5.5 REFERENCE FOREST ECOSYSTEM........................................................................................ 20
6.0 FUNCTIONAL UPLIFT AND PROJECT GOALS/OBJECTIVES .............................. 21
7.0 DESIGN APPROACH AND MITIGATION WORK PLAN .......................................... 26
7.1 STREAM DESIGN.................................................................................................................. 26
7.1.1 Stream Restoration................................................................................................... 26
7.1.2 Stream Enhancement (Level I)................................................................................. 27
7.1.3 Stream Enhancement (Level II)............................................................................... 27
7.2 INDIVIDUAL REACH DESCRIPTIONS..................................................................................... 28
7.2.1 UT 1......................................................................................................................... 28
7.2.2 UT 2......................................................................................................................... 28
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) Table of Contents page i
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

7.2.3 UT 3......................................................................................................................... 29
7.2.4 UT 4............................................................................
7.2.5 UT 5............................................................................
7.2.6 UT 6............................................................................
7.2.7 UT 7............................................................................
7.2.8 UT 8............................................................................
7.3 HYDROLOGICAL MODIFICATIONS (WETLAND RESTORATION)
7.4 WETLAND ENHANCEMENT.....................................................
7.5 SOIL RESTORATION................................................................
7.6 NATURAL PLANT COMMUNITY RESTORATION .......................
7.6.1 Planting Plan...............................................................
7.6.2 Nuisance Species Management ...................................
........................................... 29
........................................... 30
........................................... 31
........................................... 31
........................................... 32
........................................... 33
........................................... 33
........................................... 33
........................................... 34
........................................... 34
........................................... 36
8.0 MONITORING AND SUCCESS CRITERIA.................................................................. 36
8.1 SUCCESS CRITERIA ..............................
8.2 CONTINGENCY .....................................
8.2.1 Stream Contingency .................
8.2.2 Wetland Contingency ...............
8.2.3 Vegetation Contingency...........
8.3 COMPATIBILITY WITH PROJECT GOALS
38
38
38
39
39
39
9.0 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN................................................................................ 41
10.0 LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN......................................................................... 41
11.0 REFERENCES...................................................................................................................42
TABLES
Table 1.
Project Components and Mitigation Credits.................................................................... 3
Table 2.
Project Activity and Reporting History ........................................................................... 4
Table 3.
Project Contacts Table..................................................................................................... 5
Table4.
Project Attribute Table..................................................................................................... 5
Table 5.
Watershed Stressors and Usage Ratings.......................................................................... 9
Table 6.
Web Soil Survey Soils Mapped within the Site.............................................................
11
Table 7.
BEHI and NBS Modeling Summary.............................................................................
12
Table 8.
Essential Morphology Parameters.................................................................................
14
Table 9.
Stream Power (Q) and Shear Stress (z) Values.............................................................
17
Table 10.
Reference Reach Bankfull Discharge Analysis...........................................................
19
Table 11.
Reference Forest Ecosystem........................................................................................
20
Table 12A. Heron Site NC SAM Summary .................................................................................
22
Table 1213. Heron Site NC WAM Summary ...............................................................................
24
Table 12C. Stream/Wetland Targeted Functions, Goals, and Objectives ....................................
25
Table13.
Planting Plan................................................................................................................
35
Table 14.
Monitoring Schedule....................................................................................................
36
Table 15.
Monitoring Summary ...................................................................................................
37
Table16.
Success Criteria............................................................................................................
38
Table 17.
Compatibility of Performance Criteria to Project Goals and Objectives .....................
40
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) Table of Contents page ii
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

APPENDICES
Appendix A. Figures
Figure 1. Project Location
Figure 2. Hydrologic Unit Map
Figure 3. Topography and Drainage Area
Figure 4. Existing Conditions
Figure 5A. Cedarock Reference Drainage Area
Figure 5B. Cedarock Reference Existing Conditions
Figure 5C. Cedarock Reference Reach Dimension, Pattern, and Profile
Figures 6 & 6A -D. Restoration Plan
Figure 7. Proposed Dimension, Pattern, and Profile
Figures 8A -B. Typical Structure Details
Figure 9A -9C. Planting Plan
Figure IOA-1 OD. Monitoring Plan
Appendix B. Existing Stream Data
Table B 1. Heron Morphological Stream Characteristics
Figure B1. Cross-section Locations
Existing Stream Cross-section Data
Sediment Data
NC SAM Forms
NC WAM Forms
NCDWQ Stream Forms
Appendix C. Flood Frequency Analysis Data
Appendix D. Jurisdictional Determination Information
Appendix E. Categorical Exclusion Document
Appendix F. Financial Assurance
Appendix G. Site Protection Instrument
Appendix H. Credit Release Schedule
Appendix 1. Maintenance Plan
Appendix J. Randolph Electric Membership Corporation, Utility Work Agreement
Appendix K. City of Burlington, Map Modification for Land Application
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) Table of Contents page iii
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

1.0 PROJECT INTRODUCTION
The Heron Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site (hereafter referred to as the "Site") encompasses
17.5 acres of agricultural land along warm water, unnamed tributaries to Pine Hill Branch and
unnamed tributaries to South Fork Cane Creek. The Site is located approximately 4 miles
southeast of Snow Camp and 4.5 miles north of Silk Hope in southern Alamance County near the
Chatham County line (Figures 1 and 2, Appendix A).
1.1 Directions to Site
Directions to the Site from Raleigh, North Carolina.
➢ Take US -64 West out of Raleigh and travel 25 miles,
➢ Take exit 381 and turn right onto NC -87 N,
➢ After 5 miles, take a left onto Castle Rock Farm Road,
➢ After 5.8 miles, turn left onto Greenhill Road,
➢ After 1.2 miles, turn left onto Lindley Mill Road,
➢ After 0.5 mile, turn right onto Bethel South Fork Road,
➢ Site can be accessed from Bethel South Fork Road.
o Site Latitude, Longitude
35.853955°N, -79.363458°W (WGS84)
1.2 USGS Hydrologic Unit Code and NCDWR River Basin Designation
The Site is located within the Cape Fear River Basin in 14 -digit United States Geological Survey
(USGS) Cataloging Unit and Targeted Local Watershed 03030002050050 of the South
Atlantic/Gulf Region (North Carolina Division of Water Resources [NCDWR], formerly the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality, subbasin number 03-06-04) [Figures 1 and 2, Appendix A]).
Topographic features of the Site drain to Pine Hill Branch and the South Fork Cane Creek which
has been assigned Stream Index Numbers 16-28-5-1 and 16-28-5, respectively, and a Best Usage
Classification of WS -V, NSW (NCDWR 2016a). Site tributaries and their immediate receiving
waters are not listed on the draft 2016 or final 2014 NC 303(d) lists (NCDWR 2014, NCDWR
2016b).
1.3 Physiography and Land Use
The Site is located in the Carolina Slate Belt Ecoregion of the Piedmont Physiographic Province
within Alamance County, North Carolina. Regional physiography is characterized by dissected
irregular plains, some hills, linear ridges, isolated monadnocks, and low to moderate gradient
streams with mostly boulder and cobble substrates (Griffith et al. 2002). Onsite elevations range
from a high of 550 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) to a low of approximately 490
feet NGVD (USGS Silk Hope, North Carolina 7.5 -minute topographic quadrangle) (Figures 1 and
3, Appendix A).
The primary hydrologic features of the Site consist of unnamed tributaries (UTs) to Pine Hill
Branch and UTs to South Fork Cane Creek. Site UT drainage areas range in size from 14.1-96.4
acres (0.02-0.15 square mile) (Figure 3, Appendix A). The Site drainage area is primarily
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 1
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

composed of pasture, forest, agriculture land, and sparse residential property. Impervious surfaces
account for less than two -percent of the upstream land surface.
Site land use consists of disturbed forest and agricultural land used for livestock grazing and hay
production. Livestock have unrestricted access to Site streams and stream banks are eroded
vertically and laterally, and receive extensive sediment and nutrient inputs. Riparian zones are
primarily composed of herbaceous vegetation that is sparse and disturbed due to livestock grazing,
bush hogging, and regular land -management activities.
A query of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program database indicates there are no records
for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas
within the proposed project boundary, or within a one -mile radius of the project boundary.
However, a North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS) conservation easement
boundary occurs approximately 0.6 mile east of the Site boundaries.
1.4 Project Components and Structure
The Site encompasses 17.5 acres of agricultural land along warm water, UTs to Pine Hill Branch
and South Fork Cane Creek. In its current state, the Site includes 5285 linear feet of degraded
stream channel (based on the approved PJD), 0.61 acre of degraded wetland, and 0.35 acre of
drained hydric soil (Figure 4, Appendix A).
Proposed Site restoration activities include the construction of meandering, E/C-type stream
channel resulting in 4183 linear feet of Priority I stream restoration, 1234 linear feet of stream
enhancement (Level 1), 1131 linear feet of stream enhancement (Level I1), 0.35 acre of riparian
wetland restoration, and 0.61 acre of riparian wetland enhancement (Table 1) (Figures 6A -6D,
Appendix A).
Completed project activities, reporting history, completion dates, project contacts, and background
information are summarized in Tables 1-4.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 2
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Heron Restoration Site
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 3
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018
Stream
Existing
Restoration
Restoration or
Reach ID
Stationing/
Footage/
Footage/
Restoration Level
Restoration
Mitigation
Mitigation
Comment
Wetland Type
Acreage
Acreage
Equivalent
Ratio
Credits
UT IA
00+00 to 04+70
470
470
Enhancement (Level I)
470
1.5:1
313
64 if of UT 1 is located outside
UT IB
04+70 to 13+06
753
836
Restoration
9,6-0-1
1:1
772
of the conservation easement
772
and therefore is not generating
credit
UT 2A
00+00 to 03+43
343
343
Enhancement (Level 11)
343
2.5:1
137
UT 2B
03+43 to 03+89
19
46
Restoration
46
1:1
46
UT 3
00+00 to 02+79
269
279
Restoration
279
1:1
279
UT 4
00+00 to 04+50
485
450
Restoration
450
1:1
450
53 If of UT5 is located outside
UT SA
00+00 to 09+52
422
952
Restoration
�1�2 > ;
1:1
899
of the conservation easement
899
and therefore is not generating
credit
UT 5B
09+52 to 14+90
538
538
Enhancement (Level 11)
538
2.5:1
215
UT 6
00+00 to 07+81
683
781
Restoration
781
1:1
781
42 if of the UT7 restoration
reach is located outside of the
UT 7A
00+00 to 02+32
0
232
Restoration
)32-4)
- 190
1:1
190
conservation easement and
therefore is not generating
credit
52 if of the UT7 enhancement
reach is located outside of the
UT 7B
02+32 to 09+96
764
764
Enhancement (Level 1)
"712
1.5:1
475
conservation easement and
therefore is not generating
credit
UT8A
00+00 to 06+07
549
607
Restoration
607
1:1
607
UT 8B
06+07 to 08+57
250
250
Enhancement (Level II)
250
2.5:1
100
Wetland R
Riparian
0.35
Restoration
0.35
1:1
0.35
Wetland Restoration
Riverine
Wetlands E
Riparian
0.61
0.61
Enhancement
0.61
2:1
0.31
Wetland Enhancement
Riverine
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 3
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits (continued)
Heron Restoration Site
Length & Area Summations by Mitigation Category
Restoration Level
Stream (linear footage) Riparian Wetland (acreage)
Restoration
4024* 0.35
Enhancement (Level I)
1182** --
Enhancement (Level II)
1131 --
Enhancement
-- 0.61
*An additional 159 linear feet of stream restoration is proposed to occur outside of the conservation easement and is therefore not included in this total or in mitigation credit
calculations.
**An additional 52 linear feet of stream enhancement (level 1) is proposed to occur outside of the conservation easement and is therefore not included in this total or in mitigation
credit calculations.
Overall Assets Summar
Asset Category Overall Credits
Stream 5264
Riparian Riverine Wetland 0.66
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Heron Restoration Site
Data Collection
Activity or Deliverable Com fete
Completion
or Deliver
Technical Proposal (RFP No. 16-006990) January 11, 2017
January 11, 2017
Institution Date (NCDMS Contract No. 1000 14) --
May 22, 2017
Mitigation Plan --
July 2018
Construction Plans --
--
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 4
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Heron Restoration Site
Full Delivery Provider
Restoration Systems
Project Name
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Project County
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Project Area (acres)
Worth Creech
Project Coordinates (latitude & latitude)
919-755-9490
Designer
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Project Watershed Summary Information
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Project River Basin
Grant Lewis
Cape Fear
919-215-1693
Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Heron Restoration Site
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) _ page 5
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018
Project Information
Project Name
Heron Restoration Site
Project County
Alamance County, North Carolina
Project Area (acres)
17.5
Project Coordinates (latitude & latitude)
35.853955°N, -79.363458°W
Planted Area (acres)
12.05
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Piedmont
Project River Basin
Cape Fear
USGS HUC for Project (14 -digit)
03030002050050
NCDWR Sub -basin for Project
03-06-04
Project Drainage Area (acres)
14 to 96
Percentage of Project Drainage Area
Impervious
that is
<2%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Managed Herbaceous Cover & Mixed Upland Hardwoods
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) _ page 5
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

Section 4. Project Attribute Table
Heron Restoration Site continued
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 6
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
UTI
UT2
UT 3 UT4
UT 5
UT6
UT 7
UT 8
Length of reach (linear feet)
1155
363
269 485
907
683
202
1221
Valley Classification & Confinement
Alluvial, confined
Drainage Area (acres)
96.4
7.1 11.7 17.2 38.1 14.1
20.9
30.8
NCDWR Stream ID Score
30.5
22.5 28.5 33.5 27.5 23.5
24.5
27.5
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral
Perennial
Perennial/ Perennial/ Perennial/
Intermittent Intermittent Perennial Intermittent Intermittent
Intermittent
Perennial
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
WS -V, NSW
Existing Morphological Description
(Rosgen 1996)
Cgs
GO
Cgs
Eg5
Eg5
Cgs
Cgs
Eg5
Proposed Stream Classification (Rosgen
1996)
C/E 4
Gf 5
C/E 4
C/E 4
C/E 4
C/E 4
EM
C/E 4
Existing Evolutionary Stage (Simon and
Hupp 1986)
III/IV
I/III/IV
III/IV
11/I11
11/111
III/IV
111/IV
II/111
Underlying Mapped Soils
Alamance silt loam, Georgeville silt loam, Goldston slaty silt loam, Herndon silt loam, Orange silt loam, Worsham sandy
loam, Local Alluvial Land,
Drainage Class
Well -drained, well -drained, well -drained, well -drained, well drained, poorly -drained, poorly -drained
Hydric Soil Status
Nonh dric, nonh dric, nonh dric, nonh dric, nonh dric, hydric, hydric, respectively
Valley Slope
0.0074
1 0.0270 0.0222
0.0244 0.0358 0.0300 0.0255
0.0218
FEMA Classification
NA
Native Vegetation Community
Piedmont Alluvial Forest/Dry-Mesic Oak -Hickory Forest
Watershed Land Use/Land Cover (Site)
43% forest,55% agricultural land, <2% low density residential/impervious surface
Watershed Land Use/Land Cover
(Cedarock Reference Channel)
65% forest, 30% agricultural land, <5% low density residential/impervious surface
Percent Composition of Exotic Invasive
Vegetation
<5%
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 6
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Heron Restoration Site (continued)
2.0 WATERSHED APPROACH AND SITE SELECTION
The Cape Fear River basin is one of four rivers in North Carolina completely contained within the
state's boundaries. Comprised of five major drainages—Haw River, Deep River, Northeast Cape
Fear River, Black River, and the Cape Fear River—the basin drains portions of 26 counties and
115 municipalities with a total of 6386 stream miles. The most populated portions of the basin are
located in the Triad, the Triangle, Fayetteville, and Wilmington (NCDWQ 2005).
Primary considerations for Site selection included the potential for improvement of water quality
within a region of North Carolina under heavy development and livestock/agricultural pressure.
More specifically, considerations included: desired aquatic resource functions; hydrologic
conditions; soil characteristics; aquatic habitat diversity; habitat connectivity; compatibility with
adjacent land uses; reasonably foreseeable effects the mitigation project will have on ecologically
important aquatic and terrestrial resources; and potential development trends and land use changes.
Site specific characteristics are summarized below, in addition to development trends and land use
changes within the watershed.
Currently, the proposed Site is characterized by disturbed forest and agricultural land used for
livestock grazing and hay production. A summary of existing Site characteristics in favor of
proposed stream and wetland activities include the following.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014)
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Alamance County, North Carolina
page 7
Restoration Systems, LLC
July 2018
Wetland Summary
Information
Parameters
Wetlands
Wetland acreage
0.35 acre drained & 0.61 acre degraded
Wetland Type
Riparian riverine
Mapped Soil Series
Worsham and Local Alluvial Land
Drainage Class
Poorly drained
Hydric Soil Status
Hydric
Source of Hydrology
Groundwater, stream overbank
Hydrologic Im airment
Incised streams, compacted soils, livestock
Native Vegetation Community
Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest
% Composition of Exotic Invasive Vegetation
<5%
Restoration Method
Hydrologic, ve etative, livestock
Enhancement Method
Vegetative, livestock
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved? Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States -Section 401
Yes
Yes JD Package (App D)
Waters of the United States -Section 404
Yes
Yes JD Package A D)
Endangered Species Act
No
-- CE Document A E)
Historic Preservation Act
No
-- CE Document (App E)
Coastal Zone Management Act
No
-- NA
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
No
-- CE Document (App E)
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
-- NA
2.0 WATERSHED APPROACH AND SITE SELECTION
The Cape Fear River basin is one of four rivers in North Carolina completely contained within the
state's boundaries. Comprised of five major drainages—Haw River, Deep River, Northeast Cape
Fear River, Black River, and the Cape Fear River—the basin drains portions of 26 counties and
115 municipalities with a total of 6386 stream miles. The most populated portions of the basin are
located in the Triad, the Triangle, Fayetteville, and Wilmington (NCDWQ 2005).
Primary considerations for Site selection included the potential for improvement of water quality
within a region of North Carolina under heavy development and livestock/agricultural pressure.
More specifically, considerations included: desired aquatic resource functions; hydrologic
conditions; soil characteristics; aquatic habitat diversity; habitat connectivity; compatibility with
adjacent land uses; reasonably foreseeable effects the mitigation project will have on ecologically
important aquatic and terrestrial resources; and potential development trends and land use changes.
Site specific characteristics are summarized below, in addition to development trends and land use
changes within the watershed.
Currently, the proposed Site is characterized by disturbed forest and agricultural land used for
livestock grazing and hay production. A summary of existing Site characteristics in favor of
proposed stream and wetland activities include the following.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014)
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Alamance County, North Carolina
page 7
Restoration Systems, LLC
July 2018

• Streams and wetlands are accessible to livestock
• Stream banks are trampled by livestock
• Streams and wetlands have been cleared of forest vegetation
• Streams have been impounded
• Site receives nonpoint source inputs including agricultural chemicals and livestock waste
• Wetland soils have been compacted by livestock and agricultural equipment
• Wetland hydrology has been removed by stream channel entrenchment
• Streams are classified as nutrient sensitive waters
In addition to the opportunity for ecological improvements at the Site, the use of the particular
mitigation activities and methods proposed in the Design Approach & Mitigation Work Plan
(Section 7.0) are expected to produce naturalized stream and wetland resources that will be
ecologically self-sustaining, requiring minimal long-term management (Long-term Management
Plan [Section 10.0]).
Development Trends and Land Use Changes in Cape Fear 03030002 (Cape Fear 02)
Between the 2000 and 2010 censuses, the Cape Fear 02 population increased approximately 17
percent. The general trend of population growth appears to be continuing according to recent
population estimates, which indicate Guilford, Orange, Chatham, and Durham counties are all
growing at faster annual rates than North Carolina's 1.02 percent (USCB 2013). These data
suggest land development activities will increase in frequency, as will aquatic ecosystem impacts
related to such development. Therefore, there is an immediate and prolonged need for
compensatory stream mitigation in the watershed. Of further benefit, aquatic ecosystem
restoration projects are capable of reducing nutrient loading in sensitive downstream receiving
waters such as Jordan Lake.
According to the Cape Fear River Basinwide Water Quality Plan (NCDWQ 2005), all land uses
and discharges of wastewater and stormwater in the Cape Fear 02 subbasin 03-06-04 potentially
contribute nutrients to B. Everett Jordan Lake. B. Everett Jordan Lake provides low -flow
augmentation, flood control, recreation, fish and wildlife habitat, and water supply. The lake is
impaired for aquatic life due to excessive levels of chlorophyll a in violation of current standards
in all segments of the reservoir. In addition, the Site has a supplemental water quality classification
of Nutrient Sensitive Waters, which designates areas with water quality problems associated with
excessive plant growth resulting from nutrient enrichment. The proposed mitigation activities will
reduce sediment and nutrient levels, and improve water quality within the Site and downstream
watersheds.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 8
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

able 5. Watershed Stressors and Usage Ratings
Site Subbasin Index # Receiving Water NCDWR Rating 303(d) status*
Pine Hill Branch 03-06-04 16-28-5-1 Cane Creek WS -V, NSW NL
South Fork 03-06-04 16-28-5 Cane Creek WS -V, NSW NL
*Draft 2016 and Final 2014 303(d) status (NCDWR 2014, NCDWR 2016b); NL = Not Listed
Project goals are based on the Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) report
(NCEEP 2009) and on-site data collection of channel morphology and function observed during
field investigations. The Site is located within Targeted Local Watershed (TLW)
03030002050050 (Figure 2, Appendix A). The RBRP report documents benthic ratings vary
between "Fair" and "Good -Fair" possibly due to cattle, dairy, and poultry operations. The project
is not located in a Regional or Local Watershed Planning Area; however, RBRP goals are
addressed by project activities as follows with Site specific information following the RBRP goals
in parenthesis.
1. Reduce and control sediment inputs (sediment model — reduction of 67.3 tons/year after
mitigation is complete);
2. Reduce and manage nutrient inputs (nutrient model - livestock removal from streams,
elimination of fertilizer application, and marsh treatment areas will result in a direct
reduction of 893.2 pounds of nitrogen, 47.0 pounds of phosphorus per year, and 9.4x1011
colonies of fecal coliform);
3. Protect and augment designated natural heritage areas.
Site specific mitigation goals and objectives have been developed through the use of North
Carolina Stream Assessment Method (NC SAM) and North Carolina Wetland Assessment Method
(NC WAM) and are discussed further in Section 6.0 (Functional Uplift and Project
Goals/Objectives).
3.0 REFERENCE STREAMS
Two reference reaches were identified for the Site. The first reference stream (Cedarock) is located
approximately 10 miles northeast of the Site in Cedarock Park on an unnamed tributary to Rock
Creek (Figure 5A, Appendix A). The second reference stream (Causey Farm) is located less than
11 miles northeast of the Site, immediately north of Causey Airport on unnamed tributaries to
Stinking Quarter Creek. The Causey Farm reference was measured in 2004 as a reference reach
for the Causey Farm stream mitigation project, which was a successful project through five years
of monitoring with no issues. The streams were measured and classified by stream type (Rosgen
1996). Stream data is available for the Causey Farm reference; however, no figures were available
for inclusion with this document.
3.1 Channel Classification
The reference reaches are both characterized as E -type streams; Cedarock is a moderately sinuous
(1.2) channel dominated by gravel substrate and Causey Farm had slightly higher sinuousity
channel, due to a lower valley slope, with a sand -dominated substrate.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 9
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

3.2 Discharge
Field indicators of bankfull approximate an average discharge of 31.3 and 59.8 cfs, respectively
for the Cedar Fork and Causey Farm reference reaches, which is 108 and 94 percent of that
predicted by the regional curves.
3.3 Channel Morphology
Dimension: Data collected at Cedarock and Causey Farm indicate bankfull cross-sectional areas
of 8.0 and 14.7 square feet, respectively. Cedarock was slightly larger than predicted by regional
curves (7.5 square feet) and Causey Farm was slightly smaller than predicted by regional curves
(15.7 square feet). Cedarock and Causey exhibit a bankfull width of 8.1 and 1 1.0, a bankfull depth
of 0.8 and 1.4 feet, and width -to -depth ratios of 10.1 and 9.0, respectively (see Table 131,
Morphological Stream Characteristics). Figure 5C (Appendix A) provides plan view and cross-
sectional data for the Cedarock reference reach. The reference reaches exhibit a bank -height ratio
of 1.0 and 1.4, respectively. The Causey Farm reference reach was slightly incised; however,
defined bankfull indicators were present, which assisted with determining the appropriate cross-
sectional area.
Pattern and Profile: In -field measurements of the reference reaches have yielded an average
sinuosity of 1.2 at Cedarock and 1.45 at Causey Farm (thalweg distance/straight-line distance).
Onsite valley slopes of Site restoration reaches range from 0.0185-0.0241. Valley slopes exhibited
by reference channels range from slightly higher (0.0310 at Cedarock) than the Site to slightly
lower (0.0077 at Causey Farm), providing a good range of slopes to compare existing and proposed
Site conditions. Although slightly incised, the Causey Farm reference reach had a suitable pattern
with no shoot cutoffs, eroding outer bends, or excessively tight radius of curvatures, in addition to
appropriate pool -to -pool spacing and meander wavelengths.
Substrate: Reference channels are characterized by substrate dominated by gravel and sand sized
particles, respectively.
4.0 BASELINE AND EXISTING CONDITIONS
4.1 Soils and Land Form
Soils that occur within the Site, according to the Web Soil Survey (USDA 2016) are described in
Table 6.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 10
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

Table 6. Web Soil Survey Soils Mapped within the Site
Soil Series
Hydric
Status
Description
This series consist of moderately well -drained soils found on interfluves. These
Alamance
soils derived from residuum weathered from metavolcanics and/or argillite. Depth
silt loam
Nonhydric
to restrictive features is 20-40 inches to paralithic bedrock and 40-80 inches to
(AaB)
lithic bedrock. Depth to the water table is about 18-36 inches. Slopes are typically
2-6 percent.
Congaree
This series consist of frequently flooded, moderately well -drained soils found on
fine sandy
Nonhydric
floodplains. These soils are loamy alluvium derived from igneous and
loam (Cg)
metamorphic rock. Depth to restrictive features is more than 80 inches. Depth to
the water table is about 30-48 inches. Slopes are typically 0-2 percent.
This series consist of eroded, well -drained soils found on interfluves. These soils
Efland silt
derived from residuum weathered from metavolcanics and/or argillite. Depth to
loam (Ea132)
Nonhydric
restrictive features is 20-40 inches to paralithic bedrock and 40-80 inches to lithic
bedrock. Depth to the water table is more than 80 inches. Slopes are typically 2-6
percent.
Georgeville
This series consists of eroded, well -drained soils found on hillslopes on ridges.
silt loam
Nonhydric
These soils derived from residuum weathered from metavolcanics and/or argillite.
(GaC,
Depth to restrictive features depth to the water table is more than 80 inches. Slopes
GaC2, GaE)
are typically 6-25 percent.
Goldston
This series consists of well -drained soils found on hillslopes on ridges. These soils
channery silt
derived from residuum weathered from metavolcanics and/or argillite. Depth to
loam (GcD,
Nonhydric
restrictive features is 10-20 inches to paralithic bedrock and 20-40 inches to lithic
GcE)
bedrock. Depth to the water table is more than 80 inches. Slopes are typically 10-
25 percent.
Herndon silt
This series consists of eroded, well -drained soils that soils formed from residuum
loam (HdC,
Nonhydric
Weathered from metavolcanics and/or argillite. They are on hillslopes on ridges.
HdC2)
Depth to restrictive features and the water table is more than 80 inches. Slopes are
6-10 percent.
Local
This series consists of poorly drained soils found on floodplains and formed of
alluvial
Hydric
loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock. Depth to restrictive
land, poorly
features is more than 80 inches and the water table is about 0-12 inches. Slopes
drained (Lc)
range from 0-2 percent.
This series consists of moderately well -drained soils found on hillslopes on ridges.
Orange silt
These soils derived from residuum weathered from metavolcanics and/or argillite.
loam (ObC,
Nonhydric
Depth to restrictive features is 20-40 inches to paralithic bedrock and 40-80 inches
ObB, ObB2)
to lithic bedrock. Depth to the water table is about 12-36 inches. Slopes are 2-10
percent.
Worsham
This series consists of poorly drained soils found in depressions and formed of
sandy loam
Hydric
alluvium and/or colluvium over saprolite derived from granite and gneiss. Depth to
(Wd)
restrictive features is more than 80 inches and the water table is about 0-12 inches.
Slopes range from 2-6 percent.
Hydric soils and jurisdictional wetlands were delineated and mapped by a licensed soil scientist in
November 2016. Based on soil delineations approximately 0.61 acre of disturbed jurisdictional
wetland occur within the Site boundaries. Wetlands have been disturbed by livestock grazing and
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 1I
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

clearing of vegetation within pastureland. In addition, 0.35 acre of drained hydric soil occurs
within the Site boundaries. These hydric soils have been effectively drained by stream channel
incision and/or relocation of stream channels to the margins of the floodplain.
4.2 Sediment Model
Sediment load modeling was performed using methodologies outlined in A Practical Method of
Computing Streambank Erosion Rate (Rosgen 2009) along with Estimating Sediment Loads using
the Bank Assessment of Non point Sources Consequences of Sediment (Rosgen 2011). These
models provide a quantitative prediction of streambank erosions by calculating Bank Erosion
Hazard Index (BEHI) and Near -Bank Stress (NBS) along each Site reach. The resulting BEHI
and NBS values are then compared to streambank erodibility graphs prepared for North Carolina
by the NC Stream Restoration Institute and NC Sea Grant.
Streambank characteristics involve measurements of bank height, angles, materials, presence of
layers, rooting depth, rooting density, and percent of the bank protected by rocks, logs, roots, or
vegetation. Site reaches have been measured for each BEHI and NBS characteristic and predicted
lateral erosion rate, height, and length to calculate a cubic volume of sediment contributed by the
reach each year. Data forms for the analysis are available upon request and the data output is
presented in Appendix B. Results of the model are presented in the following table.
Table 7. BEHI and NBS Modeling Summary
Stream Reach
Proposed Mitigation Treatment
Predicted Sediment
Contribution
tons/ ear)
UT I
Restoration/Enhancement (Level I)
23.2
UT 2
Restoration/Enhancement (Level II)
1.7
UT 3
Restoration
13.6
UT 4
Restoration
3.8
UT 5
Restoration/Enhancement (Level II)
0.9
UT 6
Restoration
13.2
UT 7
Restoration/Enhancement (Level I)
1.5
UT 8
Restoration/Enhancement (Level II)
9.5
Total Sediment Contribution tons/ ear
67.3
Based on this analysis, mitigation of Site streams will reduce streambank erosion and subsequent
pollution of receiving waters.
4.3 Nutrient Model
Nutrient modeling was conducted using a method developed by NCDMS (NCDMS 2016) to
determine nutrient and fecal coliform reductions from exclusion of livestock from the buffer.
The equation for nutrient reduction for this model includes the following:
TN reduction (lbs/yr) = 51.04 (lbs/ac/yr) x Area (ac)
TP reduction (lbs/yr) = 4.23 (lbs/ac/yr) x Area (ac)
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 12
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

Where:
TN — total nitrogen;
TP — total phosphorus; and
Area — total area of restored riparian buffers inside of livestock exclusion fences.
Equations for fecal coliform reduction for this model include the following.
Fecal coliform reduction (col) = 2.2 x 101 1 (col/AU/day) x AU x 0.085
Where:
Col - quantities of Fecal Coliform bacteria
AU - animal unit (1000 lbs of livestock)
Results of the NCDMS analysis indicate approximately 893.2 lbs/yr of nitrogen, 47.0 lbs/yr of
phosphorus, and 9.4 x 10' � col of fecal coliform/day may be reduced due to exclusion of livestock
from the easement area.
4.4 Project Site Streams
Streams targeted for restoration include unnamed tributaries to Pine Hill Branch and South Fork
Cane Creek, which have been cleared, dredged of cobble substrate, straightened, trampled by
livestock, eroded vertically and laterally, and receive extensive sediment and nutrient inputs from
livestock. Approximately 62 percent of the existing stream channel has been degraded
contributing to sediment export from the Site resulting from mechanical processes from livestock
hoof shear. In addition, streamside wetlands have been cleared and drained by channel
downcutting and land uses. Current Site conditions have resulted in degraded water quality, a loss
of aquatic habitat, reduced nutrient and sediment retention, and unstable channel characteristics
(loss of horizontal flow vectors that maintain pools and an increase in erosive forces to channel
bed and banks). Site restoration activities will restore riffle -pool morphology, aid in energy
dissipation, increase aquatic habitat, stabilize channel banks, and greatly reduce sediment loss from
channel banks.
4.4.1 Existing Conditions Survey
Site stream dimension, pattern, and profile were measured to characterize existing channel
conditions. Locations of existing stream reaches are depicted in Figure 4 (Appendix A) and cross-
section locations are depicted in Figure B1 (Appendix B). Stream geometry measurements under
existing conditions are summarized in Table 8 (Essential Morphology Paramaters) and presented
in detail in Table BI (Appendix B).
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 13
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

Table 8. Essential Morphology Parameters
Parameter
Existing
Reference
UTI
UT2
UT3
UT4
UTS
UT6
UT7
UT8
Cedarock
Park
Causey
Farm
Valley Width (ft)
50-100
20-50
50-100
50-100
50-100
50-100
20-50
50-100
50-100
150-200
Contributing Drainage Area (sq.
mi.)
0.13
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.05
0.21
0.63
Channel/Reach Classification
Cg5
Gf 4/5
Cg5
Eg5
Eg5
Cg5
Cg5
Eg5
EM
E5
Design Discharge Width (ft)
4.7-11.1
3.9
3.2-5.9
3.1-4.9
2.5-6.0
4.6-9.6
4.1-6.7
4.2-6.1
8.1
11.0
Design Discharge Depth (ft)
0.5-1.1
0.3-0.7
0.2-0.4
0.4-0.6
0.3-0.7
0.2-0.3
0.3-0.5
0.4-0.6
0.8
1.4
Design Discharge Area (ft2)
5.1
1.0
1.4
2.0
1.6
1.5
2.0
2.5
8.0
14.7
Design Discharge Velocity (ft/s)
3.8
1.9
3.6
3.7
3.4
3.5
3.5
3.6
3.6
4.1
Design Discharge Discharge (cfs)
19.3
19.3
5.0
7.3
5.5
5.2
7.0
9.1
28.8
60.6
Water Surface Slope
0.0057
0.017
0.0207
0.0283
0.0372
0.0280
0.0248
0.0210
0.0258
0.0053
Sinuosity
1.30
1.14
1.07
1.04
1.04
1.07
1.03
1.04
1.20
1.46
Width/Depth Ratio
4.3-22.0
10-24
8-29.5
5.2-12.3
3.6-20.0
15.3-48.0
8.2-22.3
7.0-15.3
10.1
9.0
Bank Height Ratio
1.4-2.5
3-3.7
1.7-2.4
1.3-4.0
1.3-2.7
3.7-7.5
1.8-4.1
1.4-3.7
1.0
1.4
Entrenchment Ratio
1.6-4.3
1.4-2.0
1.4-3.8
1.3-6.1
1.4-7.3
1.1-4.8
1.7-5.2
1.1-4.9
2.1
12
Substrate
Sand
I Sand
I Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Gravel
Sand
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 14
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

Table 8 (continued). Essential Morphology Parameters
Parameter
UTI
UT2
UT3
UT4
Proposed
UT5
UT6
UT7
UT8
Valley Width (ft)
50-100
20-50
50-100
50-100
50-100
50-100
20-50
50-100
Contributing Drainage Area (sq. mi.)
0.13
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.05
Channel/Reach Classification
E/C4
Gf 4/5
E/C4
E/C4
E/C4
E/C4
EM
E/C4
Design Discharge Width (ft)
8.4
3.9
4.4
5.0
5.0
4.6
5.3
5.9
Design Discharge Depth (ft)
0.6
0.3-0.7
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.4
Design Discharge Area (ft2)
5.1
1.0
1.4
2.0
1.6
1.5
2.0
2.5
Design Discharge Velocity (ft/s)
3.8
1.9
3.6
3.7
3.4
3.5
3.5
3.6
Design Discharge Discharge (cfs)
19.3
19.3
5.0
7.3
5.5
5.2
7.0
9.1
Water Surface Slope
0.0057
0.017
0.0193
0.0311
0.0311
0.0261
0.0222
0.0190
Sinuosity
1.30
1.14
1.15
1.15
1.15
1.15
1.15
1.15
Width/Depth Ratio
14.0
10-24
14.0
14.0
14.0
14.0
14.0
14.0
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
3-3.7
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Entrenchment Ratio
8.9
1.4-2.0
9.0
10.0
10.0
10.9
9.4
8.5
Substrate
Gravel
Sand
Gravel
Gravel
Gravel
Gravel
Gravel
Gravel
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 15
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

4.4.2 Channel Classification and Morphology
Stream geometry and substrate data have been evaluated to classify existing stream conditions
based on a classification utilizing fluvial geomorphic principles (Rosgen 1996). Existing Site
reaches are classified as unstable Cg- and Eg-type streams with variable sinuosity. Existing Site
reaches are characterized by sand substrate as the result of channel impacts including livestock
trampling, channel straightening, and riparian vegetation removal.
4.4.3 Channel Evolution
Site streams targeted for restoration have been channelized and are continually trampled by
livestock resulting primarily in channels classified as channelized (Class II), degraded (Class I11),
and degraded and widened (Class IV) channels throughout the Site (Simon and Hupp 1986).
4.4.4 Valley Classification
The Site is characterized by small stream, headwater, confined, alluvial valleys with approximately
20- to 100 -foot floodplain valley widths. Valley slopes of restoration reaches are typical for the
Piedmont region and range from 0.0074-0.0358. Typical streams in this region include C- and E -
type streams with slightly entrenched, meandering channels with a riffle -pool sequence. However,
steeper slopes may trend towards B -type, bedrock confined, step -pool streams.
4.4.5 Discharge
This hydrophysiographic region is characterized by moderate rainfall with precipitation averaging
approximately 40-50 inches per year (USDA 1960). Drainage basin sizes range from 0.02- to
0.15 -square mile.
The Site's discharge is dominated by a combination of upstream basin catchment, groundwater
flow, and precipitation. Based on regional curves (Harman et al. 1999), the bankfull discharge for
the Site (0.02- to 0.15 -square mile watershed) ranges from 5.0 to 21.0 cubic feet per second. Based
on indicators of bankfull at reference reaches and on -Site, the designed channel will equal
approximately 93 percent of the channel size indicated by Piedmont regional curves; this is
discussed in Section 4.6 (Bankfull Verification).
4.5 Channel Stability Assessment
Channel degradation or aggradation occurs when hydraulic forces exceed or do not approach the
resisting forces in the channel. The amount of degradation or aggradation is a function of relative
magnitude of these forces over time. The interaction of flow within the boundary of open channels
is only imperfectly understood. Adequate analytical expressions describing this interaction have
yet to be developed for conditions in natural channels. Thus, means of characterizing these
processes rely heavily upon empirical formulas.
Traditional approaches for characterizing stability can be placed in one of two categories: 1)
maximum permissible velocity and 2) tractive force, or stream power and shear stress. The former
is advantageous in that velocity can be measured directly. Shear stress and stream power cannot
be measured directly and must be computed from various flow parameters. However, stream
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 16
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

power and shear stress are generally better measures of fluid force on the channel boundary than
velocity.
Stream power and shear stress were estimated for 1) existing dredged and straightened reaches, 2)
the reference reaches, and 3) proposed Site conditions. Important input values and output results
(including stream power, shear stress, and per unit shear power and shear stress) are presented in
Table 9. Average stream velocity and bankfull discharge values were calculated for the existing
Site stream reaches, the reference reach, and proposed conditions.
In order to maintain sediment transport functions of a stable stream system, the proposed channel
should exhibit stream power and shear stress values so the channel is neither aggrading nor
degrading. Results of the analysis indicate the proposed channel reaches are expected to maintain
stream power as a function of width values of approximately 0.82-2.83 and shear stress values of
approximately 0.19-0.60 (Table 9).
Table 9. Stream Power M) and Shear Stress (T) Values
Cedarock reference reach values for stream power and shear stress are higher due to steeper valley
and water surface slopes resulting in higher stream power and shear stress values. Causey Farm
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 17
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018
Bankfull
Discharge
(ft3/s)
Water
surface
Slope
(ft/ft)
Total
Stream
Power
A
OJW
Hydraulic
Radius
Shear
Stress
(T)
Velocity
(v)
T v
Tmax
Existing Conditions
UTI 19.3 0.0057 6.86 0.81 1.72 0.61 1.13 0.69 0.92
UT3 5.0 0.0207 6.46 1.44 1.10 1.42 0.89 1.27 2.13
UT4 5.5 0.0344 11.81 3.19 1.30 2.79 0.90 2.51 4.18
UT5 7.3 0.0344 15.67 4.24 1.30 2.79 1.20 3.33 4.18
UT6 5.2 0.0280 9.09 1.42 8.11 14.18 0.09 1.30 21.27
UT7 7.0 0.0248 10.83 2.04 1.52 2.36 0.75 1.78 3.54
UT8 9.1 0.0210 11.92 2.34 1.41 1.85 1 1.06 1.95 2.77
Reference Conditions
Cedarock
28.8
0.0258
46.37
5.72
0.82
1.33
3.60
4.78
6.67
Causey Farm
60.6
0.0053
20.04
1.82
1.07
0.35
4.12
1.45
2.10
Proposed Conditions
UTI 19.3 0.0057 6.86 0.82 0.53 0.19 3.78 0.72 0.28
UT3 5.0 0.0193 6.02 1.37 0.28 0.34 3.57 1.20 0.51
UT4 5.5 0.0311 10.67 2.13 0.31 0.60 3.06 1.84 0.90
UT5 7.3 0.0311 14.17 2.83 0.31 0.60 4.06 2.44 0.90
UT6 5.2 0.0261 8.47 1.84 0.29 0.47 3.47 1.63 0.70
UT7 7.0 0.0222 9.70 1.83 0.33 0.45 3.50 1.59 0.68
UT8 9.1 0.0190 10.79 1.83 0.37 0.44 3.64 1.61 0.66
Cedarock reference reach values for stream power and shear stress are higher due to steeper valley
and water surface slopes resulting in higher stream power and shear stress values. Causey Farm
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 17
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

reference reach values for stream power and shear stress are slightly lower due to flatter valley and
water surface slopes resulting in slightly lower stream power and shear stress values.
Existing, Site streams are characterized by a wide range of water surface slopes and varying
degrees of degradation. In general, stream power values of existing streams are slightly elevated
as compared to proposed values, and shear stress values of existing streams are significantly
elevated as compared to proposed and reference reach values. Proposed stream power and shear
stress values appear adequate to mobilize and transport sediment through the Site, without
aggradation or erosion on proposed stream banks.
4.6 Bankfull Verification
Discharge estimates for the Site utilize an assumed definition of "bankfull" and the return interval
associated with that bankfull discharge. For this study, the bankfull channel is defined as the
channel dimensions designed to support the "channel forming" or "dominant" discharge (Gordon
et al. 1992).
Based on available Piedmont regional curves, the predicted bankfull discharge for the reference
reaches averages approximately 28.8 and 63.8 cubic feet per second (cfs) for Cedarock and Causey
Farm, respectively (Harmen et al. 1999). The USGS regional regression equation for the Piedmont
region indicates that bankfull discharge for the reference reaches at a 1.3-1.5 year return interval
average approximately 27-32 and 53-65 cfs, respectively (USGS 2006).
Field indicators of bankfull, primarily topographic breaks identified on the banks, and riffle cross-
sections were utilized to obtain an average bankfull cross-sectional area for the reference reaches.
The Piedmont regional curves were then utilized to plot the watershed area and discharge for the
reference reach cross-sectional area. Field indicators of bankfull approximate an average
discharge of 31.3 and 59.8 cfs, respectively for the reference reaches, which is 108 and 94 percent
of that predicted by the regional curves; which is verified by the range approximated by the USGS
regional regression equation.
Based on the above analysis of methods to determine bankfull discharge, proposed conditions at
the Site will be based on reference reaches, onsite indicators of bankfull (UT 4 several cross-
sections Appendix B), and indicators of bankfull on a cross-section located in an undisturbed reach
located at the Abbey Lamm Mitigation Site (located less than 2 miles northwest of the Site and
currently in its third year of successful monitoring). Indicators of bankfull were used at the Abbey
Lamm Mitigation Site to compare the bankfull cross-sectional area to that predicted by the curves;
however, a detailed reference reach analysis was not appropriate. Based on field indicators of
bankfull on -Site (93 percent of the curves), and the Causey Farm Reference Reach (94 percent of
the curves) and Abbey Lamm Mitigation Site (90 percent of the curves), the designed onsite
channel restoration area will equal approximately 93 percent of the channel size indicated by
Piedmont regional curves. Table 10 summarizes all methods analyzed for estimating bankfull
discharge.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 18
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

Table 10. Reference Reach Bankfull Discharge Analysis
Method
Watershed Area
(square miles)
Return Interval
(years)
Discharge
(cfs)
Cedarock Reference Reach
Piedmont Regional Curves
(Harman et al. 1999)
0.2
1.3-1.5
28.8
Piedmont Regional Regression Model
(USGS 2004)
0.2
1.3-1.5
27-32
Field Indicators of Bankfull
0.2
1.3-1.5
31.3
Causey Farm Reference Reach
Piedmont Regional Curves
(Harman et al. 1999)
0.6
1.3-1.5
63.8
Piedmont Regional Regression Model
(USGS 2004)
0.6
1.3-1.5
53-65
Field Indicators of Bankfull
0.6
1.3-1.5
59.8
5.0 PROJECT SITE WETLANDS (EXISTING CONDITIONS)
5.1 Existing Jurisdictional Wetlands
Jurisdictional wetlands/hydric soils within the Site were delineated in the field following
guidelines set forth in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and subsequent
regional supplements, and located using GPS technology with reported submeter accuracy
(Environmental Laboratory 1987). A jurisdictional wetland delineation was completed and
verbally approved by United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) representative David
Bailey during a field meeting on October 13, 2017; the signed Notification of Jurisdictional
Determination dated December 21, 2017 can be found in Appendix D. Existing jurisdictional
wetlands are depicted in green and drained hydric soils are depicted in pink on Figure 4 (Appendix
A).
5.2 Hydrological Characterization
Construction activities are expected to restore approximately 0.35 acre of drained riparian hydric
soils, and enhance 0.61 acre of cleared riparian wetlands. Areas of the Site targeted for riparian
wetlands will receive hydrological inputs from periodic overbank flooding of restored tributaries,
groundwater migration into wetlands, upland/stormwater runoff, and, to a lesser extent, direct
precipitation. Hydrological impairment in drained soils has resulted from lateral draw -down of
the water table adjacent to existing, incised stream channels.
5.3 Soil Characterization
5.3.1 Taxonomic Classification
Detailed soil mapping conducted by a North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist (NCLSS) in
November 2016 indicate that the Site is currently underlain by hydric soils of the Worsham Series
(Figure 4, Appendix A). Wetlands have been disturbed by livestock grazing and cleared of
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014)
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Alamance County, North Carolina
page 19
Restoration Systems, LLC
July 2018

vegetation within pastureland. These hydric soils have been effectively drained by stream channel
incision or relocation of stream channels to the floodplain margins.
Onsite hydric soils are grey to gley in color and are compacted and pockmarked by livestock
trampling. Livestock trampling, grazing, and clearing has resulted in an herbaceous vegetative
community. Groundwater springs and surface runoff contribute hydrology to these areas, although
the dominant hydrological influence is the lateral draw -down of the water table adjacent to incised
stream channels or streams relocated to the floodplain margins. A detailed soil profile conducted
by a NCLSS is as follows; the location is depicted on Figure 4 (Appendix A).
5.3.2 Profile Description
Depth (inches)
Color
Texture
0 - 3
10 YR 4/4
Fine sandy loam
3 - 18
10 YR 7/2
Sandy loam
green ash Fraxinus enns lvanica)
10 YR 7/1 mottles 20%
eastern red cedar (Juni erus vir iniana)
the bark oak(Quercus pagoda)
IOYR 6/1 mottles 10%
willow oak ( uercus hellos)
18+
10 YR 7/2
Sandy loam
10 YR 7/1 mottles 20%
10 YR 5/6 mottles 20%
5.4 Plant Community Characterization
Areas proposed for wetland restoration and enhancement are primarily vegetated by fescue and
opportunistic herbaceous species with very little vegetative diversity.
5.5 Reference Forest Ecosystem
A Reference Forest Ecosystem (RFE) is a forested area on which to model restoration efforts at
the Site in relation to soils and vegetation. RFEs should be ecologically stable climax communities
and should be a representative model of the Site as it likely existed prior to human disturbances.
Data describing plant community composition and structure should be collected at the RFEs and
subsequently applied as reference data in an attempt to emulate a natural climax community.
The RFE for this project is located 2.5 miles northwest of the Site at the Abbey Lamm Stream and
Wetland Mitigation Site. The RFE supports plant community and landform characteristics that
restoration efforts will attempt to emulate. Tree and shrub species identified within the reference
forest and outlined in Table 11 will be used, in addition to other relevant species in appropriate
Schafale and Weakley (1990) community descriptions.
Table 11. Reference Forest Ecosystem
Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest
red maple (Acer rubrum)
black gum (N ssa s lvatica))
tag alder (Alnus serrulata)
black cherry (Prunus serotina)
ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana)
white oak (Quercus alba)
pignut hickory (Carya labra)
swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxii)
green ash Fraxinus enns lvanica)
water oak (Quercus nigra)
eastern red cedar (Juni erus vir iniana)
the bark oak(Quercus pagoda)
tulip poplar (Liriodendron tuli i era)
willow oak ( uercus hellos)
sweet um (Li uidambar s raci ua)
slippery elm (Ulmus rubra)
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 20
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

6.0 FUNCTIONAL UPLIFT AND PROJECT GOALS/OBJECTIVES
Project goals are based on the Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) report
(NCEEP 2009) and on-site data collection of channel morphology and function observed during
field investigations. The RBRP report documents benthic ratings vary between "Fair" and "Good -
Fair" possibly due to cattle, dairy, and poultry operations. The project is not located in a Regional
or Local Watershed Planning Area; however, RBRP goals are addressed by project activities as
follows with Site specific information following the RBRP goals in parenthesis.
1. Reduce and control sediment inputs (sediment model [Section 4.2] — reduction of 67.3
tons/year after mitigation is complete);
2. Reduce and manage nutrient inputs (nutrient model [Section 4.3]- livestock removal from
streams, elimination of fertilizer application, and marsh treatment areas will result in a
direct reduction of 893.2 pounds of nitrogen and 47.0 pounds of phosphorus per year);
Site specific mitigation goals and objectives have been developed through the use of North
Carolina Stream Assessment Method (NC SAM) and North Carolina Wetland Assessment Method
(NC WAM) analyses of existing and reference stream systems at the Site (NC SFAT 2015 and NC
WFAT 2010). These methodologies rate functional metrics for streams and wetlands as high,
medium, or low based on field data collected on forms and transferred into a rating calculator.
Using Boolean logic, the rating calculator assigns a high, medium, or low value for each metric
and overall function. Site functional assessment data forms are available upon request and model
output is included in Appendix B.
Tables 12A and 12B summarize NC SAM and NC WAM metrics targeted for functional uplift and
the corresponding mitigation activities proposed to provide functional uplift. Metrics targeted to
meet the Site's goals and objectives are depicted in bold.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 21
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

Table 12A. Heron Site NC SAM Summary
NC SAM Function Class Rating
Summa
UT 1
U
UTI
(Down)*
UT4
UT5
Reference
(1) HYDROLOGY
LOW
LOW
HIGH
LOW
HIGH
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
LOW
HIGH
LOW
HIGH
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
LOW
HIGH
LOW
HIGH
(4) Floodplain Access
LOW
LOW
HIGH
MEDIUM
HIGH
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
(4) Microtopography
LOW
LOW
HIGH
LOW
HIGH
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
LOW
HIGH
LOW
HIGH
(4) Channel Stability
LOW
LOW
HIGH
LOW
HIGH
(4) Sediment Transport
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
(4) Stream Geomorophology
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
(1) WATER QUALITY
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
HIGH
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Stream -side Area Vegetation
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
(1) HABITAT
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
(3) Baseflow
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Substrate
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
HIGH
LOW
HIGH
(3) In -Stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
(2) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
OVERALL
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
HIGH
*Functional assessments completed on UTI (Down) were used to determine potential functional uplift for UT3 due to similarities
of the channels. UT2 is primarily proposed for enhancement (Level II) with the exception of a short reach that is proposed for
restoration prior to tying into UT
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 22
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

Table 12A continued. Heron Site NC SAM Summary
NC SAM Function Class Rating
Summar
UT6
UT7
UT8
Reference
(1) HYDROLOGY
LOW
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
HIGH
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
HIGH
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
(4) Floodplain Access
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
HIGH
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
LOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
(4) Microtopography
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
HIGH
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Channel Stability
LOW
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
(4) Stream Geomorophology
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
(1) WATER QUALITY
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
HIGH
MEDIUM
HIGH
(2) Stream -side Area Vegetation
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
LOW
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
YES
YES
NO
(1) HABITAT
LOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
(3) Baseflow
HIGH
HIGH
MEDIUM
HIGH
(3) Substrate
LOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
HIGH
MEDIUM
HIGH
(3) In -Stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
(2) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
LOW
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
LOW
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
LOW
HIGH
HIGH
OVERALL
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
Based on NC SAM output, all three primary stream functional metrics (Hydrology, Water Quality,
and Habitat), as well as 19 sub metrics are under -performing as exhibited by a LOW metric rating.
These same metrics measured in a relatively undisturbed reference reach exhibit HIGH metric
ratings (see Figure 4, Appendix A for NC SAM data reaches). LOW performing metrics are to be
targeted for functional uplift through mitigation activities, goals and objectives, as well as,
monitoring and success criteria.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 23
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

Table 12B. Heron Site NC WAM Summary
NC WAM Sub -function Rating Summary
KI*
K2
K3
Wetland Type
HF
HF
HF
(1) HYDROLOGY
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Surface Storage & Retention
HIGH
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Sub -surface Storage and Retention
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
(1) WATER QUALITY
HIGH
LOW
HIGH
(2) Pathogen change
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Particulate Change
HIGH
LOW
LOW
(2) Soluble change
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Physical Change
HIGH
LOW
HIGH
(1) HABITAT
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
(2) Physical Structure
HIGH
LOW
LOW
(2) Landscape Patch Structure
LOW
LOW
LOW
(2) Vegetative Composition
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
OVERALL
HIGH
LOW
HIGH
Wetland Type - HF (Hardwood Forest)
* Reference Wetland — Slated for Enhancement
NC WAM forms are filled out for wetland enhancement areas. Wetland restoration areas are not
able to be rated by the NC SAM methodology.
Table 12C outlines stream and wetland functions targeted for functional uplift, goals that are tied
to the specific functions, and objectives to be completed to achieve the proposed goals.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 24
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

Table 12C. Stream/Wetland Targeted Functions. Goals. and Obiectives
Targeted Functions Goals Objectives
-(l)HYDROLOGY
(2) Flood Flow (Floodplain Access)
• Attenuate flood flow across the Site.
. Minimize downstream flooding to the
maximum extent possible.
• Connect streams to functioning wetland
systems.
Construct new channel at historic floodplain elevation to restore overbank flows
and restore jurisdictional wetlands
•
Plant woody riparian buffer
• Remove livestock
• Deep rip floodplain soils to reduce compaction and increase soil surface roughness
Protect riparian buffers with a perpetual conservation easement
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
• Increase stream stability within the Site
(4) Channel Stability so that channels are neither aggrading nor
degrading.
(4) Stream Geomorphology !
a Construct channels with proper pattern, dimension, and longitudinal profile
• Remove livestock
• Construct stable channels with cobble/gravel substrate
• Plant woody riparian buffer
1 WATER QUALITV
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
• Remove direct nutrient and pollutant
inputs from the Site and reduce
contributions to downstream waters.
Remove livestock and reduce agricultural land/inputs
• Install marsh treatment areas
• Plant woody riparian buffer
• Restore/enhance jurisdictional wetlands adjacent to Site streams
• Provide surface roughness through deep ripping/plowing
Restore overbank flooding by establishing proper channel dynamics
Cessation of municipal land application
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
Wetland Particulate Change
Wetland Physical Change
1 HABITAT
(2) In -stream Habitat
• Improve instream and stream -side
habitat.
Construct stable channels with cobble/gravel substrate
• Plant woody riparian buffer to provide organic matter and shade
• Construct new channel at historic floodplain elevation to restore overbank flows
and plant woody riparian buffer
• Protect riparian buffers with a perpetual conservation easement
• Restore/enhance jurisdictional wetlands adjacent to Site streams
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In -Stream Habitat
2 Stream -side Habitat
O
(3) Stream -side Habitat
3 Thermoregulation
Wetland Physical Structure
Wetland Landscape Patch Structure
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 25
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

7.0 DESIGN APPROACH AND MITIGATION WORK PLAN
7.1 Stream Design
Onsite streams targeted for restoration have endured significant disturbance from land use
activities such as land clearing, livestock grazing, straightening and rerouting of channels, and
other anthropogenic maintenance. Site streams will be restored to emulate historic conditions at
the Site utilizing parameters from nearby, relatively undisturbed reference streams (see Section
3.0 Reference Streams).
Primary activities designed to restore Site streams include l) stream restoration, 2) stream
enhancement (Level I), 3) stream enhancement (Level II), 4) wetland restoration, 5) wetland
enhancement, 6) construction of marsh treatment areas, and 5) vegetation planting (Figures 6A-
613, Appendix A).
7.1.1 Stream Restoration
Stream restoration efforts are designed to restore a stable stream that approximates hydrodynamics,
stream geometry, and local microtopography relative to reference conditions. Restoration at the
Site will be Priority I restoration; therefore, bankfull elevations will be raised to meet the adjacent
valley floodplain elevation.
Stream restoration is expected to entail 1) channel excavation, 2) removal of an agriculture pond,
3) spoil stockpiling, 4) channel stabilization, 5) channel diversion, and 6) channel backfill.
In -stream Structures
The use of in -stream structures for grade control and habitat is essential for successful stream
restoration (Figure 8A, Appendix A). In -stream structures may be placed in the channel to elevate
local water surface profiles in the channel, potentially flattening the water energy slope or gradient
and directing stream energy into the center of the channel and away from banks. The structures
will consist of log cross -vanes or log j -hook vanes; however, at the discretion of the Engineer, rock
cross -vanes or rock j -hook vanes may be substituted if dictated by field conditions. In addition,
the structures will placed in relatively straight reaches to provide secondary (perpendicular) flow
cells during bankfull events.
Piped Channel Crossings
Landowner constraints will necessitate the installation of three piped channel crossings within
breaks in the easement to allow access to portions of the property isolated by stream restoration
activities. The crossings may be constructed of properly sized pipes and hydraulically stable rip -
rap or suitable rock. Crossings will be large enough to handle the weight of anticipated vehicular
traffic. Approach grades to the crossing will be at an approximate 10:1 slope and constructed of
hard, scour -resistant crushed rock or other permeable material, which is free of fines.
Outfall Structures
Four drop structure are proposed at the outfall of the UT5, UT6, and UT8 restoration reaches, and
the outfall of the UT7 enhancement (level 1) reach. The drop structures may be constructed out of
Terracell, or large cobble depending upon anticipated scour from the restored stream channels
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 26
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

(Figure 813, Appendix A). The structures should be constructed to resist erosive forces associated
with hydraulic drops proposed at the Site.
Marsh Treatment Areas
Six shallow wetland marsh treatment areas will be excavated in the floodplain to intercept surface
waters draining through agricultural areas prior to discharging into the Site. Marsh treatment areas
are intended to improve the mitigation project and are not generating mitigation credit. The
proposed marsh treatment area location is depicted on Figures 6A -6D (Appendix A) and will
consist of shallow depressions that will provide treatment and attenuation of initial stormwater
pulses (Figure 813, Appendix A). The outfall will be constructed of hydraulically stable rip -rap or
other suitable material that will protect against headcut migration into the constructed depression.
It is expected that the treatment area will fill with sediment and organic matter over time.
Powerline relocation
An existing powerline services an agriculture complex including a livestock barn. The powerline
parallels the UT 7 stream bank and crosses both UT 7 and UT 6 in its current location.
Coordination with Randolph Electric Membership Corporation has been initiated to move the
powerline upstream, and outside of the UT 6 and UT 7 easement. A copy of the Utility Work
Agreement with the Randolph Electric Membership Corporation is included in Appendix J. Work
to be conducted under the Utility Work Agreement will be initiated upon approval of this Detailed
Restoration Plan.
City of Burlington Map Modification for Land Application
Agriculture fields adjacent to, and west of, UT 8 have been utilized by the City of Burlington for
the application of municipal waste. Communication with the City of Burlington Residuals
Management Coordinator has been ongoing throughout the design process to update maps (map
NC -AM — 16 [Michael Hadley]) such that land application of municipal waste will cease within,
and immediately adjacent to, UT 8. Communications of the successful modification to City of
Burlington maps are included in appendix K.
7.1.2 Stream Enhancement (Level I)
Stream enhancement (Level I) is proposed on the upper reach of UTI and along the majority of
UT7. The channels will be enhanced by raising the channel bed to the historic floodplain,
constructing a channel to the appropriate dimension, installing habitat/grade control structures,
cessation of current land use practices, and planting with native hardwood vegetation.
7.1.3 Stream Enhancement (Level II)
Stream enhancement (level II) will occur on the majority of UT2, the lower reach of UT 5, and the
lower reach of UT8. Stream enhancement will entail the cessation of current land management
practices, excluding livestock, invasive species control (predominantly Chinese privet), and
planting riparian buffers with native forest vegetation. Riparian buffers will extend a minimum of
50 feet from the top of stream banks to facilitate stream recovery and prevent further degradation
of the stream.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 27
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

7.2 Individual Reach Descriptions
Mitigation strategies proposed for each UT are presented below (Figures 6A to 6D).
7.2.1 UT 1
UT 1 enters the Site through a culvert and extends for 1155 linear feet in its current location. The
upper half ofthe reach is characterized by a disturbed forest buffer, which is accessible by livestock
resulting in poor understory growth and little herbaceous vegetation. The UT crosses a gas line
midway through the Site and enters pasture land vegetated largely by herbaceous grasses and
natural recruits. The entire reach is actively grazed by livestock.
In its current state, UT 1 is classified as a Cg -type channel with an entrenchment ratio ranging
from 1.6 to 4.3 (averaging 2.5). Although entrenchment ratios exhibit some connection to the
floodplain, the majority of the channel is incised, as evidenced by bank -height -ratios ranging from
1.4 to 2.5. Incision varies across the reach, with sections of deep incision in the far upper reaches
(below the culvert and halfway through the woods) and pastureland in the mid-, to lower reaches.
Reaches in the lower half of the woods are frequently characterized by debris jams, shallow and
wide channels from extensive hoof shear to channel banks, and sediment choked channels resulting
in lower incision values.
UT 1 is proposed for two mitigation treatments; 1) stream enhancement (level I) and 2) stream
restoration.
Stream enhancement (level I) is proposed in the upper wooded reaches of UTI, where channel
pattern appears to exhibit suitable sinuosity and pool -to -pool spacing; however, the channel is
relatively incised, impacted by livestock, and is characterized by low radius of curvature values in
several bends. Mitigation in these areas will focus on elevating the stream bed, providing the
proper channel dimension, and reducing shear on tight meander bends. Structures will be
strategically placed to reduce pressure on channel banks and focus scour into the center of the
channel. This reach will ultimately reconnect the channel to the floodplain and adjacent wetlands,
and bring the channel to a suitable elevation to initiate Priority 1 stream restoration in the
downstream reach.
Stream restoration is proposed to initiate in the lower wooded reaches where the channel has been
heavily impacted by livestock and debris jams, resulting a series of nearly braided channels,
followed by an incised/scoured reach. The lower wooded reach appears to be significantly less
sinuous than the upper wooded reaches and relict channel sections appear to be evident adjacent
to the current channel. The reach is proposed for Priority l restoration on new location,
reconnecting the channel to degraded/drained wetlands or hydric soils. Once the channel exits the
lower wooded areas the channel will be excavated in a relatively wide, flat floodplain. The channel
discharges through a culvert beneath the neighboring driveway.
7.2.2 UT 2
UT 2 initiates within the Site boundaries as a headwater stream system. A small agriculture pond,
located upstream and outside of the project boundaries, discharges water which coalesces and
forms the upstream channel initiation point. The channel drains for 363 linear feet before
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 28
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

converging with UT 1. The channel initiates in disturbed woods that are actively utilized by
livestock for browse and shade. As UT 2 descends the valley, pasture abuts the right bank of the
channel for the duration of its path.
Currently, UT 2 is classified as a Gf-type channel with entrenchment ratios ranging from 1.4 to
2.0 and bank -height -ratios ranging from 3.0 to 3.7. The channel does not appear to be actively
eroding, possibly due to storm water attenuation from the upstream pond. The lack of bank erosion
and intermittent flow regime for the channel resulted in the IRT designating the reach for stream
enhancement (level II).
A small section of UT 2, at the downstream extent, is proposed for stream restoration. This reach
extends from the terminus of the existing channel to the proposed channel tie-in with UT 1. This
reach of channel will require the excavation of channel on new location. The reach proposed for
restoration extends slightly upstream within the UT 2 channel, which is necessary to maintain
proper slope of the channel (the bed of UT 2 at the extreme lower reach is below the design channel
bed of UT 1 at its confluence).
7.2.3 UT 3
UT 3 is contained within an agriculture field ditch that drains roadside ditches and headwater
wetlands in the upper slopes of livestock pasture. Both margins of UT 3 are characterized by
pasture land which are vegetated by herbaceous species and actively grazed. The stream is
designated as intermittent for the upper half and perennial for the lower half.
Currently, UT 3 is classified as a Cg -type channel with entrenchment ratios ranging from 1.4 to
3.8. The channel is deeply incised, as evidenced by bank -height -ratios of 1.7 to 2.4. The incised
channel appears to be draining hydric soils along its margins. Excavation of UT 3 into an
agriculture ditch is evidenced by a complete lack of sinuosity, riffle -pool structure, or other aquatic
habitat zones.
UT 3 is proposed for stream restoration through a combination of raising the channel bed, lowering
the adjacent floodplain, installation of log cross vane structures, planting vegetation, and removing
livestock. A narrow, relatively steep valley slope necessitate a relatively low sinuosity stream
channel which will ultimately be constructed as an E/C-type channel, but will function similar to
a Cb -type channel.
7.2.4 UT 4
UT 4 enters the Site below a cattle crossing located at the juncture of a wooded stream and a
heavily eroded ditch draining a chicken house complex. UT 4 drains through the Site for 485 feet
prior to discharging into UT 5. The stream is bound on each side by disturbed forest, which is
actively used by livestock for browse and shade. Pasture characterizes the outer margins of the
easement, with agriculture runoff entering the stream.
UT 4 is classified as an Eg-type channel with entrenchment ratios of 1.3 to 6.1. The channel has
drastically different depths due to high sediment loads from the eroding upstream ditch, which has
aggraded the channel. Once streamflow passes the sediment plugged reaches, channel scour
results from stormwater pulses, a lack of vegetation, and cattle hoof shear. The scoured channel
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014)
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Alamance County, North Carolina
page 29
Restoration Systems, LLC
July 2018

reaches have bank -height -ratios ranging from 1.3 to 4.0. The downstream end of UT 4 has a dirt
ford crossing combined with a small sediment, or agriculture watering pond that further exacerbate
sediment transport problems.
UT 4 is proposed for stream restoration through new channel excavation, installation of instream
structures, removal of sediment sources, and removal of the agriculture watering pond. In addition,
an upgraded piped crossing will be installed above the reach.
An important component of the stream restoration effort will be to control sediment originating
from an eroding ditch immediately above the Site. As proposed, a sediment pond will be installed
at the outlet of drainage discharging from the chicken house complex. In addition, the ditch
draining from the chicken house complex will be stabilized with coir matting and plantings. The
ditch will then drain to an additional marsh treatment area that will attenuate flows and allow for
some additional sediment treatment until the ditch stabilizes. These features will discharge above
the piped culvert prior to entering the Site.
7.2.5 UT 5
UT 5 originates within the Site boundaries in an agriculture pond and drains for 907 feet in its
current location. The upper reaches of UT5 (above the dirt road) is completely contained within
agriculture pasture. The middle reaches of UT 5 are split between agriculture pasture and fallow
fields that appears to have been a lagoon, or some other wet flat with spoil piled in the lower
sections before the tributary enters the woods. The lower reaches are characterized by disturbed
forest.
Overall, UT 5 is classified as an Eg-type stream channel with entrenchment ratios ranging from
1.4 to 7.3. However, the upper reaches are characterized by more of an aggrading channel (pond
attenuating stormwater pulses, pipes under roads fixing grade, and heavy livestock trampling of
the channel below the pond) and subsequent higher entrenchment ratios. As the channel crosses
under the road and progresses down valley, channel incision becomes more significant (bank -
height -ratios up to 2.7). UT 5 enters a wooded section for the lower reaches by passing through
extensive spoil piles (or possibly a relict dam) and has a significant hydraulic drop before
stabilizing within the woods.
UT 5 is proposed for stream restoration in its upper reaches and enhancement (level II) in its lower
reaches. Stream restoration is expected to entail the complete remove of the agriculture pond dam,
excavation of the new channel within and adjacent to the existing channel, upgrading a road
crossing that is paired with a piped cattle crossing of the stream, installation of instream structures
(log cross vanes), installation of a TerraCell drop structure, planting, and removal of livestock
from the easement.
Removal of the pond dam is expected to include 1) notching the dam to dewater sediments; 2)
removal of the dam to the elevation of the adjacent floodplain; 3) excavating sediment that is
unsuitable for channel bank construction; 4) backfilling areas of sediment removed with soil
suitable for channel construction (if necessary); 5) excavation of the design channel, 6)
stabilization of the channel with coir matting, seed, and mulch; and 7) installation of structures.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 30
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

7.2.6 UT 6
UT 6 originates immediately downstream from a gas line crossing. The stream is intermittent for
a brief period and converts to a perennial stream shortly thereafter and flows for 683 feet in its
current location. The channel is bound by a combination of pasture and sparsely vegetated forest
and is almost entirely accessible by livestock. A power line crosses over the middle section of the
stream that provides power to a barn located outside the easement. In the lower sections of the
stream, a small pond has been excavated for watering livestock. The pond dam was breached some
years prior and a wetland complex has developed in the pond bottom.
Overall, UT 6 is classified as a Cg -type channel with entrenchment ratios ranging from 1.1 to 4.8.
The upper reaches of the channel are relatively steep, particularly in the intermittent sections, prior
to reaching a significant nick point where the channel slope flattens slightly. Channel flattening,
combined with some backwater effect from the pond dam and heavy livestock traffic make
classification of the channel atypical (width -depth ratios range between 15 and 48). The upper
reaches are characteristic of a G -type channel (width -depth ratio <12) and the lower reaches are
characteristic of an F -type channel (width -depth ratio <12). Both channels are characterized by
significant incision, with bank -height -ratios ranging from 3.7 to 7.5.
UT 6 is proposed for stream restoration which is expected to entail stabilization of hydraulic drops
in the channel, raising the channel bed, installation of structures (log cross vanes and log vanes),
removing the agriculture pond and dam, moving the powerline crossing over the stream, installing
TerraCell drop structures, planting with native hardwood forest, and fencing livestock from the
stream.
Moving the powerline is to be conducted in conjunction with the Randolph County Electric
Membership Corporation (a "Utility Work Agreement" is provided in Appendix J). The current
work plan includes moving the utility easement upstream of the conservation easement for UT 6
and UT 7, thereby eliminating the easement break and maintenance associated with the utility.
7.2.7 UT 7
UT 7 originates in an agriculture pond and descends a relatively steep valley through pastureland.
The entire reach of UT 7 is characterized by herbaceous grasses that are grazed by livestock. A
powerline crosses the upper section of the stream and a gas line crosses the lower section of the
stream. Attenuation of stormwater and the loss of channel forming flows has resulted in the loss
of stream channel characteristics below the pond.
UT 7 is classified as a Cg -type channel, with entrenchment ratios of 1.7 to 5.2. The narrow steep
valley exhibits characteristics of a B -type channel, which have been targeted during proposed
channel design. The entire channel reach is incised (with the exception of a short reach near the
gas line), with bank -height -ratios ranging from 1.8 to 4.1. Channel incision is likely to result from
removal of vegetation, disturbance to the channel during development of pasture, and active
livestock grazing. The channel has low sinuosity; however, this would be expected in a relatively
steep, narrow valley.
UT 7 is proposed for two mitigation treatments; 1) stream restoration and 2) stream enhancement
(level I).
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 31
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

Stream restoration is proposed within the pond bed and under the pond dam. Similar to the upper
reaches of UT 5, removal of the pond dam is expected to include 1) notching the dam to dewater
sediments; 2) removal of the dam to the elevation of the adjacent floodplain; 3) excavating
sediment that is unsuitable for channel bank construction; 4) backfilling areas of sediment removed
with soil suitable for channel construction (if necessary); 5) excavation of the design channel, 6)
stabilization of the channel with coir matting, seed, and mulch; and 7) installation of structures.
Stream enhancement (level I) is proposed below the pond dam and is expected to include
stabilization of hydraulic drops in the channel, a combination of raising the channel bed and
lowering the adjacent floodplain, installation of structures (log cross vanes and log vanes), moving
the powerline crossing over the stream, installing TerraCell drop structures, planting with native
hardwood forest, and fencing livestock from the stream.
The narrow, relatively steep valley necessitate a relatively low sinuosity stream channel which will
ultimately be constructed as an Eb-type channel, with shorter pool -to -pool spacing and more
frequent structures, particularly in the upper reaches of the stream.
7.2.8 UT 8
UT 8 enters the Site from an adjacent property and flows for 1221 linear feet in its current location.
The stream has been excavated as a ditch, apparently to move the channel to the property line and
off pasture land. The upper half of the tributary flows through disturbed forest, accessible to
livestock. The lower half of the tributary is fenced on the left bank, removing livestock from the
channel.
In its current state, restoration reaches of UT 8 are classified as Eg-type channels with
entrenchment ratios ranging from 1.1 to 4.9. Similar to other reaches on the Site, the channel has
sections of incision and aggradation, likely resulting from extensive hoof shear to the channel
banks and debris jams in the channel. The channel appears to be incised, as evidenced by bank -
height -ratios ranging from 1.4 to 3.7. The upper reaches of channel have been ditched, and
straightened and have relatively wide flat floodplains adjacent to the existing channel.
As originally proposed, UT 8 was to include preservation in the upper reaches. However,
discrepancies with the county maintained GIS property lines (confirmed by a licensed surveyor)
have removed that reach from the project. Currently, UT 8 is proposed for stream restoration in
the upper reach and stream enhancement (level II) in the lower reach.
Stream restoration is proposed to initiate in the upper wooded reaches where the channel has been
ditched and heavily impacted by livestock. This reach is proposed for Priority 1 restoration with
the channel to be relocated to the adjacent floodplain. The channel will ultimately discharges into
the existing channel that is fenced from livestock. The existing channel without livestock access
is situated approximately 3 feet below the design channel bed and will be connected through the
use of a TerraCell drop structure.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 32
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

Stream enhancement (level II) is proposed for the lower half of the stream reach and is expected
to include planting with native hardwood forest, and fencing livestock on the left bank of the
easement.
7.3 Hydrological Modifications (Wetland Restoration)
Wetland restoration activities are designed to restore a fully functioning wetland system, which
will provide surface water storage, nutrient cycling, removal of imported elements and compounds,
and will create a variety and abundance of wildlife habitat. Portions of the Site underlain by hydric
soils have been impacted by channel incision, ground surface compaction, vegetative clearing, and
earth movement associated with agricultural practices. Wetland restoration options will focus on
the removal of fill materials, restoration of vegetative communities, the reestablishment of soil
structure and microtopographic variations, and redirecting normal surface hydrology back to Site
floodplains. These activities will result in the restoration of 0.35 acre of riparian wetland.
Reestablishment of Historic Groundwater Elevations
Hydric soils adjacent to the incised channels appear to have been drained due to lowering of the
groundwater table and a lateral drainage effect from existing stream reaches. Reestablishment of
channel inverts is expected to rehydrate soils adjacent to Site streams, resulting in the restoration
of jurisdictional hydrology to riparian wetlands.
Reestablishment of Soil Structure
Soil structure throughout the Site, particularly within wetland areas, will be reestablished to allow
for penetration of rain water to the groundwater table. This will be accomplished by removing
livestock from the Site, ripping compacted soils, and revegetating the Site.
Hydroph3lic Vegetation
Site wetland areas targeted for restoration have endured significant disturbance from land use
activities such as land clearing, livestock grazing, and other anthropogenic maintenance. Wetland
areas will be revegetated with native vegetation typical of wetland communities in the region.
Emphasis will focus on developing a diverse plant assemblage. Section 7.5 (Natural Plant
Community Restoration) provides detailed information concerning community species
associations.
7.4 Wetland Enhancement
Wetland enhancement will focus on the removal of livestock and restoration of vegetative
communities resulting in the enhancement of 0.61 acre of riparian wetland.
7.5 Soil Restoration
Soil grading will occur during stream restoration activities. Topsoils will be stockpiled during
construction activities and will be spread on the soil surface once critical subgrade has been
established. The replaced topsoil will serve as a viable growing medium for community restoration
to provide nutrients and aid in the survival of planted species.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 33
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

7.6 Natural Plant Community Restoration
Restoration of floodplain forest and stream -side habitat allows for development and expansion of
characteristic species across the landscape. Ecotonal changes between community types
contribute to diversity and provide secondary benefits, such as enhanced feeding and nesting
opportunities for mammals, birds, amphibians, and other wildlife. Reference Forest Ecosystem
(RFE) data, onsite observations, and community descriptions from Classification of the Natural
Communities of North Carolina (Schafale and Weakley 1990) were used to develop the primary
plant community associations that will be promoted during community restoration activities.
7.6.1 Planting Plan
Stream -side trees and shrubs include species with high value for sediment stabilization, rapid
growth rate, and the ability to withstand hydraulic forces associated with bankfull flow and
overbank flood events. Stream -side trees and shrubs will be planted within 15 feet of the channel
top of bank throughout the meander belt -width. Shrub elements will be planted along the
reconstructed stream banks, concentrated along outer bends. Piedmont Alluvial Forest is the target
community for Site floodplains and Dry-Mesic Oak -Hickory Forest is the target community for
upland side -slopes.
Bare -root seedlings within the Piedmont Alluvial and Dry-Mesic Oak -Hickory Forests will be
planted at a density of approximately 680 stems per acre on 8 -foot centers. Shrub species in the
stream -side assemblage and Marsh Wetland Treatment Areas will be planted at a density of 2720
stems per acre on 4 -foot centers.
Table 13 depicts the total number of stems and species distribution within each vegetation
association (Figures 9A and 913, Appendix A). Planting will be performed between December 1
and March 15 to allow plants to stabilize during the dormant period and set root during the spring
season.
In addition to planting seedlings, a seed mix will be spread within Marsh Treatment Wetland Areas
as follows.
1. Virginia wildrye (Elymus virginicus)
2. Switch grass (Panicum virgatum)
3. Big blue stem (Andropogon gerardii)
4. Indian grass (Sorghastrum nutans)
5. Deer tongue (Dichanthelium clandestinum)
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 34
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

Table 13. Planting Plan
Vegetation Association
Piedmont/Low
Mountain Alluvial
Forest*
Dry-Mesic Oak-
Hickory Forest*
Marsh Treatment
Wetland**
Stream -side
Assemblage"
TOTAL
Area (acres)
3.0
5.2
0.05
3.8
12.05
Speciesplanted*
#
% of
totalplanted*
#
% of
total
#
lanted**
% of
totalplanted"
#
% of
total
# planted
Tag alder (Alnus serrulata)
--
--
--
--
14
10
517
5
530
River birch (Betula nigra)
204
10
--
--
--
--
204
10
721
Ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana)
--
--
707
20
__
__
__
__
707
Buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis)
--
--
--
--
27
20
__
__
27
Red bud (Cercis canadensis)
--
--
530
15
--
--
--
--
530
Sweet pepperbush (Clethra alnifolia)
--
--
--
--
20
15
--
--
20
Silky dogwood (Cornus amomum)
204
10
--
--
20
15
2067
20
2292
Persimmon (Diospyros virginiana)
--
--
354
10
--
--
--
--
354
White ash (Fraxinus americana)
--
--
177
5
__
__
__
__
177
Green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
408
20
--
--
--
--
2067
20
2475
Blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum)
--
--
--
--
14
10
--
--
14
Tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera)
204
10
--
--
--
--
--
--
204
Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis)
408
20
--
--
--
--
2067
20
2475
Black gum (Nyssa sylvatica)
--
--1
530
15
--
--
--
--
530
Water oak (Quercus nigra)
306
15
707
20
--
--
1034
10
2047
Willow oak (Quercus phellos)
306
15
530
15
--
--
1034
10
1870
Black willow (Salix nigra)
--
--
--
--
--
--
1034
10
1034
Elderberry (Sambucus canadensis)
--
--
--
--
27
20
__
__
27
Possumhaw (Viburnum nudum)
--
--
--
--
14
10
--
--
14
TOTAL
2040
100
3536
100
136
100
10336
100
16048
riamea at a aensny of oau stems/acre.
** Planted at a density of 2720 stems/acre.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 35
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

7.6.2 Nuisance Species Management
Invasive plant species will be observed and controlled mechanically and/or chemically, as part of
this project. No other nuisance species controls are not proposed at this time. Inspections for
beaver and other potential nuisance species will occur throughout the course of the monitoring
period. Appropriate actions may be taken to ameliorate any negative impacts regarding vegetation
development and/or water management on an as -needed basis. The presences of nuisance species
will be monitored over the course of the monitoring period. Appropriate actions will be taken to
ameliorate any negative impacts regarding vegetation development and/or water management on
an as -needed basis.
8.0 MONITORING AND SUCCESS CRITERIA
Monitoring will be conducted by Axiom Environmental, Inc based on the schedule in Table 14. A
summary of monitoring is outlined in Table 15 (Figures 10A — IOD, Appendix A). Annual
monitoring reports will be submitted to the NCDMS by Restoration Systems no later than
December 31 of each monitoring year data is collected.
Table 14. Monitoring Schedule
Resource Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 1 Year 7
Streams
Wetlands
Vegetation
Macroinvertebrates
Visual Assessment
Report Submittal
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 1000 14) page 36
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

Table 15. Monitoring Summary
Stream Parameters
Parameter
Method
Schedule/Frequency
Number/Extent
Data Collected/Reported
Stream Profile
Full longitudinal survey
As -built (unless otherwise
required)
All restored stream channels
Graphic and tabular data.
Stream Dimension
Cross-sections
Years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7
Total of 34 cross-sections on restored
Graphic and tabular data.
channels
Areas of concern to be depicted on a
Visual Assessments
Yearly
All restored stream channels
plan view figure with a written
Channel Stability
assessment and photograph of the area
included in the report.
Additional Cross-sections
Yearly
Only if instability is documented
Graphic and tabular data.
during monitoring
Stream Hydrology
Continuous monitoring surface water
Continuous recording through
Total of 10 surface water gauges
Surface water data for each monitoring
gauges and/or trail camera
monitoringperiod
period as depicted in Figures IOA- 1 OD.
Total of 10 surface water gauges:
Continuous monitoring surface water
Continuous recording through
One gauge on UT 1, 2, 3, 6 and 8.
Surface water data for each monitoring
Bankfull Events
gauges and/or trail camera
monitoring period
Two gauges on UT 5.
period
Three gauges on UT 7
Visual/Physical Evidence
Continuous through
All restored stream channels
Visual evidence, photo documentation,
monitoringperiod
and/or rain data.
"Qual 4" method described in Standard
Pre -construction, Years 3, 5,
2 stations (one at the lower end of
Results* will be presented on a site-by-
Benthic
Operating Procedures for Collection
and 7 during the "index
UTI and one at the lower end of
site basis and to include a list of taxa
Macroinvertebrates
and Analysis of Benthic
period" referenced in Small
UT5); however, the exact locations
collected, an enumeration of
Macroinvertebrates, Version 5.0
Streams Biocriteria
will be determined at the time pre-
Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and
(NCDWR 2016)
Development (NCDWQ 2009)
construction benthics are collected
1 Trico etera taxa as well as Biotic Index.
Wetland Parameters
Parameter Method
SchedulelFrequency Schedule/Frequency
Number/Extent
Data Collected/Reported
As -built, Years 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, Soil temperature at the beginning of
Wetland Groundwater gauges and 7 throughout the year with 6 gauges spread throughout restored each monitoring period to verify the
Restoration the growing season defined as wetlands start of the growing season, groundwater
March 1 -October 22 and rain data for each monitoring period
Vegetation Parameters
Parameter
Method
Schedule/Frequency
Number/Extent
Data Collected/Re orted
Permanent vegetation plots 0.0247 acre
Vegetation
(100 square meters) in size; CVS-EEP
As -built, Years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7
14 plots spread across the Site
Species, height, planted vs. volunteer,
establishment and
Protocol for Recording Vegetation,
stems/acre
Version 4.2 Lee et al. 2008)
vigor
Annual random vegetation plots, 0.0247
acre (100 square meters) in size
As -built, Years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7
4 plots randomly selected each year
Species and height
*Benthic Macroinvertebrate sampling data will not be tied to success criteria; however, the data may be used as a tool to observe positive gains to in -stream habitat.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page j7
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

8.1 Success Criteria
Monitoring and success criteria for stream restoration should relate to project goals and objectives
identified from on-site NC SAM data collection. From a mitigation perspective, several of the
goals and objectives are assumed to be functionally elevated by restoration activities without direct
measurement. Other goals and objectives will be considered successful upon achieving success
criteria. The following summarizes Site success criteria.
Table 16. Success Criteria
8.2 Contingency
In the event that stream success criteria are not fulfilled, a mechanism for contingency will be
implemented.
8.2.1 Stream Contingency
Stream contingency may include, but may not be limited to 1) structure repair and/or installation;
2) repair of dimension, pattern, and/or profile variables; and 3) bank stabilization. The method of
contingency is expected to be dependent upon stream variables that are not in compliance with
success criteria. Primary concerns, which may jeopardize stream success, include 1) structure
failure, 2) headcut migration through the Site, and/or 3) bank erosion.
Structure Failure
In the event that structures are compromised the affected structure will be repaired, maintained, or
replaced. Once the structure is repaired or replaced, it must function to stabilize adjacent stream
banks and/or maintain grade control within the channel. Structures which remain intact, but
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 38
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018
Streams
•
All streams must maintain an Ordinary High -Water Mark (OHWM), per RGL 05-05.
•
Continuous surface flow must be documented each year for at least 30 consecutive days. Surface water
monitoring gauges will be installed in the upper third of all intermittent channels, unless otherwise requested
by the IRT.
•
Bank height ratio (BHR) cannot exceed 1.2 at any measured cross-section.
•
Entrenchment ratio (ER) must be no less than 2.2 for E- and C-type channels at any measured riffle cross-
section. Note: B -type channels may have an ER less than 1.4.
•
BHR and ER at any measure riffle cross-section should not change by more than 10% from baseline condition
during any given monitoring period.
•
The stream project shall remain stable and all other performance standards shall be met through four separate
bankfull events, occurring in separate years, during the monitoring years 1-7.
Wetland Hydrology
•
Saturation or inundation within the upper 12 inches of the soil surface for, at a minimum, 10 percent of the
growing season, during average climatic conditions. Note: Soil temperature for growing season establishment
will be measured daily utilizing a continuous monitoring soil probe. Soil temperature will be measured from
mid-February through the end of April at a minimum).
Vegetation
•
Within planted portions of the site, a minimum of 320 stems per acre must be present at year 3; a minimum of
260 stems per acre must be present at year 5; and a minimum of 210 stems per acre must be present at year 7.
•
Trees must average 7 feet in height at year 5, and 10 feet in height at year 7 in each plot.
•
Planted and volunteer stems are counted, provided they are included in the approved planting list for the site;
natural recruits not on the planting list may be considered by the IRT on a case-by-case basis.
8.2 Contingency
In the event that stream success criteria are not fulfilled, a mechanism for contingency will be
implemented.
8.2.1 Stream Contingency
Stream contingency may include, but may not be limited to 1) structure repair and/or installation;
2) repair of dimension, pattern, and/or profile variables; and 3) bank stabilization. The method of
contingency is expected to be dependent upon stream variables that are not in compliance with
success criteria. Primary concerns, which may jeopardize stream success, include 1) structure
failure, 2) headcut migration through the Site, and/or 3) bank erosion.
Structure Failure
In the event that structures are compromised the affected structure will be repaired, maintained, or
replaced. Once the structure is repaired or replaced, it must function to stabilize adjacent stream
banks and/or maintain grade control within the channel. Structures which remain intact, but
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 38
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

exhibit flow around, beneath, or through the header/footer will be repaired by excavating a trench
on the upstream side of the structure and reinstalling filter fabric in front of the pilings. Structures
which have been compromised, resulting in shifting or collapse of a header/footer, will be removed
and replaced with a structure suitable for Site flows.
Headcut Migration Through the Site
In the event that a headcut occurs within the Site (identified visually or through measurements [i.e.
bank -height ratios exceeding 1.4]), provisions for impeding headcut migration and repairing
damage caused by the headcut will be implemented. Headcut migration may be impeded through
the installation of in -stream grade control structures (rip -rap sill and/or log cross -vane weir) and/or
restoring stream geometry variables until channel stability is achieved. Channel repairs to stream
geometry may include channel backfill with coarse material and stabilizing the material with
erosion control matting, vegetative transplants, and/or willow stakes.
Bank Erosion
In the event that severe bank erosion occurs within the Site, resulting in incision, lateral instability,
and/or elevated width -to -depth ratios locally or systemically, contingency measures to reduce bank
erosion and width -to -depth ratio will be implemented. Bank erosion contingency measures may
include the installation of log -vane weirs and/or other bank stabilization measures. If the resultant
bank erosion induces shoot cutoffs or channel abandonment, a channel may be excavated to reduce
shear stress to stable values.
8.2.2 Wetland Contingency
Hydrological contingency will require consultation with hydrologists and regulatory agencies if
wetland hydrology enhancement/restoration is not achieved. Floodplain surface modifications,
including construction of ephemeral pools, represent a likely mechanism to increase the floodplain
area in support of jurisdictional wetlands. Recommendations for contingency to establish wetland
hydrology will be implemented and monitored until Hydrology Success Criteria are achieved.
8.2.3 Vegetation Contingency
If vegetation success criteria are not achieved, supplemental planting may be performed with tree
species approved by regulatory agencies. Supplemental planting will be performed as needed until
achievement of vegetation success criteria.
8.3 Compatibility with Project Goals
The following table outlines the compatibility of Site performance criteria described above to Site
goals and objectives that will be utilized to evaluate if Site goals and objectives are achieved.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 39
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

Table V. Compatibility of Performance Criteria to Project Goals and
Goals 10bjectives
(1) HYDROLOGY
ectives
Success Criteria
• Attenuate flood flow across the • Construct new channel at historic floodplain elevation to
Site. restore overbank flows and restore jurisdictional wetlands
• Minimize downstream flooding • Plant woody riparian buffer
to the maximum extent • Remove livestock
possible. a Deep rip floodplain soils to reduce compaction and increase
• Connect streams to functioning soil surface roughness
wetland systems. a Protect Site with a perpetual conservation easement
• Increase stream stability within
the Site so that channels are
neither aggrading nor
degrading.
• Construct channels with proper pattern, dimension, and
longitudinal profile
• Remove livestock from the Site
• Construct stable channels with cobble/gravel substrate
• Plant woody riparian buffer
• BHR not to exceed 1.2
• Document four overbank events in separate monitoring
years
• Livestock excluded from the easement
• Attain Wetland Hydrology Success Criteria
• Attain Vegetation Success Criteria
• Conservation Easement recorded
• Cross-section measurements indicate a stable channel with
cobble/gravel substrate
• Visual documentation of stable channels and structures
• BHR not to exceed 1.2
• ER of 2.2 or greater for C/E-type channels
• < 10% change in BHR and ER in any given year
• Livestock excluded from the easement
• Attain Veeetation Success Criteria
(1) WATER QUALITY
• Remove direct nutrient and
• Remove livestock and reduce agricultural land/inputs
. Livestock excluded from the easement
pollutant inputs from the Site
• Install marsh treatment areas
• Attain Wetland Hydrology Success Criteria
and reduce contributions to
• Plant woody riparian buffer
. Attain Vegetation Success Criteria
downstream waters.
a Restore/enhance wetlands adjacent to Site streams
1 HABITAT
• Cross-section measurement indicate a stable channel with
• Construct stable channels with cobble/gravel substrate
cobble/gravel substrate
• Plant riparian buffer to provide organic matter and shade
• Visual documentation of stable channels and in -stream
• Improve instream and stream-
• Construct new channel at historic floodplain elevation to
side habitat.
restore overbank flows and plant woody riparian buffer
structures.
• Attain Wetland Hydrology Success Criteria
• Protect Site with a perpetual conservation easement
Attain Vegetation Success Criteria
• Restore/enhance wetlands adjacent to Site streams
Conservation Easement recorded
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 40
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

9.0 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN
In the event the mitigation Site or a specific component of the mitigation Site fails to achieve the
necessary performance standards as specified in the mitigation plan, the sponsor shall notify the
members of the IRT and work with the IRT to develop contingency plans and remedial actions.
10.0 LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
The Site will be transferred to the NCDEQ Stewardship Program. This party shall serve as
conservation easement holder and long-term steward for the property and will conduct periodic
inspection of the Site to ensure that restrictions required in the conservation easement are upheld.
Funding will be supplied by the responsible party on a yearly basis until such time an endowment
is established. The NCDEQ Stewardship Program is developing an endowment system within the
non -reverting, interest-bearing Conservation Lands Conservation Fund Account. The use of funds
from the Endowment Account will be governed by North Carolina General Statute GS 113A -
232(d)(3). Interest gained by the endowment fund may be used for the purpose of stewardship,
monitoring, stewardship administration, and land transaction costs, if applicable.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 41
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

11.0 REFERENCES
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical
Report Y-87-1. United States Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg,
Mississippi.
Gordon, N.D., T.A. McMahon, and B.L. Finlayson. 1992. Stream Hydrology: an Introduction
for Ecologists. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. West Sussex, England.
Griffith, G.E., J.M. Omernik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H. McNab, D.R. Lenat, T.F.
MacPherson, J.B. Glover, and V.B. Shelbourne. 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina and
South Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.
Harman, W.A., G.D. Jennings, J.M. Patterson, D.R. Clinton, L.A. O'Hara, A. Jessup, R. Everhart.
1999. Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for North Carolina Streams. N.C. State
University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation. Version 4.2. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). 2014. Stream and Wetland Mitigation
Monitoring Guidelines. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Raleigh,
North Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). 2016. Quantifying Benefits to Water
Quality from Livestock Exclusion and Riparian Buffer Establishment for Stream
Restoration. June 15, 2016. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality,
Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2005. Cape Fear River Basinwide Water
Quality Plan. Available: https:// https:Hdeq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-
resources/planning/basin-planning/water-resource-plans/cape-fear-2005 [December 8,
20161. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North
Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). 2014. Final 2014 Category 5 Water
Quality Assessments -303(d) List. Available: https:Hncdenr.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-
public/Water%20Quality/Planning/TMDL/303d/2014/2014_303 dlist.pdf [November 16,
2017]. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). 2016a. River Basin Classification
Schedule (online). Available: https://deq.nc.gov/river-basin-classification-schedule
[November 16, 2017]. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Raleigh.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 42
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). 2016b. Draft 2016 Category 5
Assessments EPA Submittal -303(d) List. Available:
https://ncdenr. s3.amazonaws.com/s3 fs-
publ is/Water%20Quality/Planning/TM DL/303 d/2016/NC_2016_Category_5_20160606.
pdf [November 16, 2017]. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Raleigh,
North Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). 2016. Standard Operating Procedures
for Collection and Analysis of Benthic Macroinvertebrates (Version 5.0). (online).
Available:
https:Hfiles.nc.gov/ncdeg/Water%20Qualiiy/Environmental%2OSciences/BAU/NCDW R
Macroinvertebrate-SOP-February%202016_final.pdf
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2009. Small Streams Biocriteria
Development. Available:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/get file?uuid=2d54ad23-0345-4d6e-82fd-
04005 f48eaa7&groupId=3 8364
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). 2009. Cape Fear River Basin
Restoration Priorities 2009 (online). Available
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/get file?uuid=864e82e8-725c-415e-8ed9-
c72dfcb55012& roupId=60329
North Carolina Stream Functional Assessment Team. (NC SFAT 2015). N.C. Stream Assessment
Method (NC SAM) User Manual. Version 2.1.
North Carolina Wetland Functional Assessment Team. (NC WFAT 2010). N.C. Wetland
Assessment Method (NC WAM) User Manual. Version 4.1.
Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology (Publisher). Pagosa Springs,
Colorado
Rosgen, D. 2009. A Practical Method of Computing Streambank Erosion Rate (online). Available:
http://www.u-s-c.orv,/html/documents/Erosionrates.pdf.
Rosgen, D. 2011. Estimating Sediment Loads using the Bank Assessment of Non -point source
Consequences of Sediment (BANCS). Watershed Assessment of River Stability and
Sediment Supply (WARSSS). Hagerstown, Maryland.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina: Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of
Parks and Recreation, North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural
Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 43
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

Simon A, Hupp CR. 1986. Geomorphic and Vegetative Recovery Processes Along Modified
Tennessee Streams: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Disturbed Fluvial Systems. Forest
Hydrology and Watershed Management. IAHS-AISH Publ.167.
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2010. Interim Regional Supplement to the
Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Region.
United States Census Bureau (USCB). 2013. Population estimates V.2013.
http ://qu i c k facts.cen su s. gov/g fd/states/3 7000. htm 1
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2016. Web Soil Survey (online). Available:
http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.jzov/app/WebSoi lSurvey.gWx.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1960. Soil Survey of Alamance County, North
Carolina. Soil Conservation Service.
United States Geological Survey (USGS). 2006. Estimating the Magnitude and Frequency of
Floods in Rural Basins of North Carolina — Recompiled. USGS Water -Resources
Investigations Report 01-4207. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) page 44
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

APPENDIX A
FIGURES
Figure 1. Project Location
Figure 2. Hydrologic Unit Map
Figures 3-3A. Topography and Drainage Area
Figure 4. Existing Conditions
Figure 5A. Cedarock Reference Drainage Area
Figure 5B. Cedarock Reference Existing Conditions
Figure 5C. Cedarock Reference Reach Dimension, Pattern, and Profile
Figures 6 & 6A -D. Restoration Plan
Figure 7. Proposed Dimension, Pattern, and Profile
Figures 8A -B. Typical Structure Details
Figures 9A -9C. Planting Plan
Figures IOA-IOD. Monitoring Plan
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) Appendices
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

( tj
Prepared for
s \ � • �—f -"� f �?LYS "�-r ( v
J -N.
-21
V
raT/ ��n i.l mss'°=°osR, N7Q
f / � (.. .0
� � � �f' � Project
� . 59s
/ c i ✓ i u HERON STREAM
AND WETLAND
;J t MITIGATION SITE
�.
x lm
:5� <�•. ( - t/ ,P. -+Nn. - Alaance County NC
r✓
fl
1' E G irs bo ` ,� "'.�' �.�. r' S ( ! Title
Do CIaPo�H IIR ad-l`�..
1 PROJECT
Snow Camp G. �, e
LOCATION
_`Ch •, r, .•v' 4'n �T�•—
35 016 _T—S �v,�oa
Gia•
_ ALAMANCE CO
�;\ !,' .1� 7 _ I _ 1 • !CHATHAM ('.0 Drawn by.
c_-
1 KRJ
Date
,` -:. f / ,� /�.,• i lhPark'c1 � DEC 2017
r
• r C / I , I _,,�� � .. - - :3iS ST] r Scale
1.20000
f..
.i ,). , / ^.bl - _ ,:i / Protect No.
/ 't , • , _ _ _ ( Directions to the Site from Raleigh:
J) /`
Take US -64 West out of Raleigh and travel 25 miles, 17-008
c..•wr '. ("-_ �'� 1 / -%'�� v� c: " ( Take exit 387 and turn right onto NC -87 N,
After 5 miles, take a left onto Castle Rock Farm Road,
-
�..; After 5.8 miles, turn left onto Greenhill Road, FIGURE
After 1.2 miles, turn left onto Lindley Mill Road,
31i /I J `Q Q�'/ - After 0.5 mile, turn right onto Bethel South Fork Road,
'a Site can be accessed from both sides of Bethel South Fork Road.
Site Latitude, Longitude 35.853955, -79.363458 (NAD831WGS84) 1
r l Z _
�,I„ USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map (Silk Hope and Crutchfield Crossroads, NC Quad)

N�
,
V rnpna
Ltin'1!fe (ckr .� nur ua.
Prepared for
IN
`a w
uu
,
f N
Protect
HERON STREAM
AND WETLAND
MITIGATIONSI T
E
r
1
a
Alamance County, NC
/ s - Title
HYDROLOGIC
UNIT MAP
s
I \
p � —
r- r �
�` ..
Drawn by
V
Location of Heron Stream and KRJ
i � ! Wetland Mitigation Site wdhin r am - Date
USGS Hydrologic Uniand ''� _ DEC 2017
Targeted Local Watershed
{.
3 s.acre +i' 03030002050050 j n ryi Min y �+ Scale 1:375000
.a•�`r�. Protect No.
Legend I W
17-008
OEasement �+
QUSGS Hydrologic Unit 03030002 FIGURE
14 Digit Hydrologic Unit Boundaries
Targeted Local Watersheds
0 5 10 20 30
Milesi' ' `V
- ^`.aux �� 1 Gouy gf l 2014 .Luiire

95
ti A
2351 A
_ _. • r .777.
South FM
t
- / L, pyixtrd National Geographlo Society'i_cuty. d
R.Aw, %U
PF,l
S
n�
Legend
OEasement - 17.5 acres
Drainage Area UT 1 - 0.15 sq mi (96.4 ac)
Drainage Area UT 2 -0.01 sq mi (7.1 ac)
Drainage Area UT 3 - 0.02 sq mi (11.7 ac)
Drainage Area UT 4 - 0.03 sq mi (17.2 ac)
- Drainage Area UT 5 - 0.06 sq mi (38.1 ac)
Drainage Area UT 6 - 0.02 sq mi (14.1 ac)
Drainage Area UT 7 - 0.03 sq mi (20.9 ac)
Drainage Area UT 8 - 0.05 sq mi (30.8 ac)
R ESTORNTION
SYSTEMS ILLC
HERON STREAM
AND WETLAND
MITIGATION SITE
Alamance County, NC
Title
TOPOGRAPHY I
AND DRAINAGE
AREA
Drawn by
KRJ/CLF
Date.
APR 2018
Scale
1:10,000
Protect No.
17-006
FIGURE
3

1y�
N �' �!
�/ i W s
- bbO nit �LR�' ;j•
^�hldC All! 11 Map u
Hydric
I r HdB2
d` Symbol
Map Unit Name
status Taxonom
Aa8
Alamance Silt Loam
NA Typic Ha ludults
,.. Y _
r,.- GaC2
Geor evdle Silt Loam
NA Typic Kanha ludults
{ GaC2� UT3 it ��
, GcE
Goldston Sla Silt Loam
NA Typic D strude is
_
` •�
I y } • r 4. ♦.. _ .M
I..IS
- H B7 "� HdC&HdC2
• ` „ Lc
Herndon Silt Loam
Local Alluvial Land, PoorlyDrained
NA Typic Kanha ludults
H dric NA
r Ga 82
i AaH
+ Mc
1
Mixed Alluvial Land, Poorly Drained
H dric NA
�E'lm•
'
Wu
r, ObB
Orange Silt Loam
NA Alba uic Ha ludalfs
Wd
Worsham Sand Loam
H dric T is Endoa uults
Ob C2 +�< ,; •r l t ObH 'i h{bH �,s !i/ S+" r -. ....
.._.
HdC2
ylle
Prepared for
i
oh9
•`.err
Prosect
A!
L 4
.R rTaoga4 1tAt�
`'
s y c t �,
HERON STREAM
AND WETLAND
r
/'' I/
WW2
Hdc
MITIGATION SITE
{�
Sf
ee
aB2
' Hac
� Gfs'
Alamance County, NC
U74
Title.
'+i .��•. .��
sM E
b9-
^—
Ezisting condition cross-section locations
EXISTING
r1—
are depicted on Figure 81 (Appendix B). ��–
CONDITIONS
Legend
OConservation Easement - 17.5 acres
LO
d
Drawn by
Perennial Stream = 3.947 it
GaE
KRJ/CLF
– Intermittent Stream = 1,338 If
bB
G
- -
Date
Jurisdictional Wetlands = 0.61 ac
APR 2018
Drained Hydric Soil = 0.35 acd¢ ,t
ji
•,
Scale
SAM Forms ,
a
j CCcbc�
1:5000
• WAM Forms .t
Ga
�`, ,.
1
Project No..
17-008
♦ Soil Profile
•�
e2
E.'
r r4 .d
r� Power ne l'jy,��-y� �A
Line
Gas Pipeline
�caE
FIGURE
NRCS Soil Boundary�.:,
2 It LIDAR Contour
GaD
' Gac
�j.
0 500 1,000 2,000
a
_ Feet
. Gacz
GbC3

Legend - Drainage Area Topography
• Cedarock Reference Site
Cedarock Reference Drainage Area = 0.21 sq mi
0 320 640 1.280 1,920
Feet
1:8600
-A b
t
'Antioch ,� IN
1
1 Ccopynght:© 013 Natiofal Geographic Society, i -cube
Dwn by FIGURE
Axiom Environmental CEDAROCK REFERENCE DRAINAGE AREA wGt_
- 218 Snow Avenue HERON STREAM AND WETLAND Nte
Raleigh, NC 27603 5 A
�[phone] MITIGATION SITE Mar 2014 H
Alamance County, North Carolina ProjecC
4xrom Envnonmxnlal. me 17-009

D— °y
EXISTING CONDITIONS CEDAROCK
FIGURE
Environmental
-
REFERENCE REACHRale
wc�
218 Snow Avenue
218 S
(919) 15-1 27603
[phone]
HERON STREAM AND WETLAND
5B
Da1e
Mar 2014
AV -
MITIGATION SITE
P,OfeC, -
I
Alamance County, North Carolina
17-009

100
50
0t
0
Cross Section 2
50 100
Referane= Pattern
Lp-p = 37 (25 - 68) ft
Lm = 68 (44 - 116) ft
Wbelt = 23 (20 - 38) ft
Rc = 16 (11 - 27) ft
Lp-p/Wbkf = 4.6 (3.1 - 8.4)
Lm/Wbkf = 8.4 (5.5 - 14.3)
WbelttWbkf = 2.8 (2.4 - 4.7)
RcfWbkf = 2.0 (1.4 - 3.3)
SIN = 1.20
150 200 250 300 350 400
Pattern Legend
Top of Bank
Thalweg
Cross Section
450
Cmsc R- inn 1 - Riffle
Abkf = 6.6 ft
Dave = O.B ft
_15 F r n Wbkf =8.1 ft
Dmax = 1.1 ft
a
Bank Height = 2.0 ft
Bank Height Ratio = 1.8
W/o = 10.0
FPA = 18
ENT = 2.2
Stream Type = E
Illi�fli���ta•�� �
e 10
Cedarock Reference Reach
Cracc R ct� ion�g
zeo Abkf = 9.6 It
Dave = 0.6 it
ns Wbkf = 12.1 ft
Dmax =1.4ft
zea Bank Height = 1.4 ft
Bank Height Ratio = 1.0
277 W/D = 15.2
FPA = 25
zea ENT = 2.1
o io
2. 3o Stream Type = Eb
rm.%% Section S - Riffle
Abkf =8.Ott
Dave = 1.0 ft
Wbkf = 8.0 it
Dmax = 1.4 ft
Bank Height = 1.4 It
Bank Height Ratio = 1.0
W/o = 8.0
FPA = 15
ENT = 1.9
Stream Type = Eb
Profile (Reference Reachl
Save = 0.0258 rise/run
Svalley = 0.0310 rise/run
Sriffle = 0.0316 (0 - 0.0576) rise/run
Spool = 0.0007 (0 - 0.018) rise/run
Srun = 0.0353 (0 - 0.3565) rise/run
Sglide = 0.0029 (0 - 0.0431) rise/run
Water Surface
Channel Bed
RESTORATION
SYSTEMS : U.0
Heron
Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Site
Alamance County
North Carolina
Title:
Cedarock Reference Reach
Dimension, Pattern,
and Profile
cele: NA FIGURE NO.
Date: r F /'�
August 2017 1
Pm)ect No.
«�...!!J V
17-009

'UT
'J-
3
1
Start Restoration
- +
End Restoration
$to 00+00
6A
X
UT
!
End Restoration
-
Sla 02-79
JT 2
Rastoralion
�
ta
Sra 03+89
\UT
2
End Enhance
II
' ..h Start Restoration
t SI,. 03*43
# E
/End ration
Start Enhance I:'
.r! VSta 02+32 '
t
j. UT 7
��' Slac fle5toration
St. &D "o
r.uI \\ 6V
t
SI , 7 -!l f \
urs
UT 2 _ Start Restoration
start Enhance II' -"a00+00
sta 00+00 6
E
Sta
Elvr-
3t
0lk
. kt L
�JT
lr " \.
star,
-
1
6D QTS
d. - tail i e II
Y
7e
LEGEND
44 !.,
— Easement = 17.5 ac i
Stream Restoration = 4024 ft1 f,
Stream Enhancement I = 1182 ft
Stream Enhancement 11= 1131 t',
Wetland Enhancement = 0.61 ac - —
Wetland Restoration: 0.35 ac
Scale: Title: Project: NOTES/REVISIONS
As Shown
Dale:
Nov 2017 Heron
Project No.: Mitigation Site
17-008 RESTORATION
FIGURE NO. PLAN Alamance County
North Carolina •
6 Axiom Environmental, Inc.

- End Restoration y :r
r;C UT J - Sla 02+75
Start Restoration Elev 534.31ft
Std 00,00 1
rib EIev,5d926
eta
EIS
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
i
b4 fl of ch nnel is outside
of ,asemen and removed
lip -
LEGEND
Easement = 17.5 ac
n Stream Channel yy, '+ En 2
Design r 7�P�.a End RestoraUo
Cross Vane ,: } Sta J3+85
UT 1 1a� 1�� v 58'35
Vane Arm ehd Enhance I
Stari Retoration 7P4 i
® Drop Structure
.S 04<70
[:] Marsh Treatment Area Elev 540.76
Piped Crossing
Stream Restoration = 4024 ft • %+ur i
Stream Enhancement 1 = 1182 ft I it i
Stream Enhancement II = 1131 ft
6
Wetland Enhancement= 0.E1 ac
v". Wetland Restoration = 0.35 ac I-
}
kA
UT
51 nl F�tc�nce It
staio�lr,
Project:
Heron
Mitigation Site
Alamance County
North Carolina
Title:
RESTORATION
PLAN
M FDate:
:
AS SHOWN FIGURE NO.
/-� /�
0 '" Nov 2017 (�•-f�H
_ Project No.'
SCA - - 17-008

Y
ur7
ill Start Restoratlun
• Sta 00+00
1 •. ,'.M� 5C Elev 526.36
a
42 feet of channel is
,`, outside of easement and
\ t d l �' removed from credit.
Al�' it
.UT
End Restoration
0,00 Start Enhance
Sta 02+32
' < . Elev 518.06
Saari
,
n
E;
rt Refnove power line _
, .1 fmn, easement
52 feet of charnel is
outside of easement
removed from credit.
UT 7
Lnd Enhance)
Sla 09196
Elev 495.38
R-1 S
RESTORATION
SYSTEMS I.LC
Project:
lap I ll
rlev 50.5 Heron
Mitigation Site
4 - Alamance County
North Carolina
title:
RESTORATION
PLAN
Scale:
FIGURE NO.
ASSHOWN
Date:
Nov 2017
^ ^
(v.� Iv'
Project Na.:
17-008
/ Remove Dam
LEGEND
- Easement = 17.5 ac
Design Stream Channel
kk:'
Cross Vane
Vane Arm
'•`•
..-a E ' s
f•'
® Drop Structure
��
0• -
❑it
Marsh Treatment Area
Piped Crossing
"a
Stream Restoration = 4024 ft
^''c
,r
`
Stream Enhancement 1 = 1182 ft
tTepe,rr
Stream Enhancement 11 = 1131 ft
1
E
Wetland Enhancement = 0.61 ac
'�
... Wetland Restoration = 0.35 ac
52 feet of charnel is
outside of easement
removed from credit.
UT 7
Lnd Enhance)
Sla 09196
Elev 495.38
R-1 S
RESTORATION
SYSTEMS I.LC
Project:
lap I ll
rlev 50.5 Heron
Mitigation Site
4 - Alamance County
North Carolina
title:
RESTORATION
PLAN
Scale:
FIGURE NO.
ASSHOWN
Date:
Nov 2017
^ ^
(v.� Iv'
Project Na.:
17-008

TYPICAL CHANNEL PROFILE
NOTES'
1. POOL -TO -POOL SPACING IS MEASURED FROM
CENTER OF POOL BEND TO CENTER OF POOL BEND.
TYPICAL CHANNEL PLAN VIEW
CHANNEL PLAN VIEW NOTES'.
1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LAYOUT THE CHANNEL ALIGNMENT BY LOCATING
THE RADII AND SCRIBING THE CENTER LINE FOR EACH POOL BEND. THE
CONNECTING TANGENT SECTIONS SHALL COMPLETE THE LAYOUT OF THE CHANNEL.
2. FIELD ADJUSTMENTS OF THE ALIGNMENT MAY BE REQUIRED TO SAVF TREES
OR AVOID OBSTACLES. THE STAKE -OUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTION
MANAGER BEFORE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CHANNEL.
NE WIDOW
FiOOOP Axbm Environmental, Inc.
TYPICAL RIFFLE CROSS-SECTION
1:15LOPE
TYPICAL POOL CROSS-SECTION
CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. MATERIAL EXCAVATED FROM CHANNEL AND FLOODPLAIN SHALL. BE
USED TO BACKFILL EXISTING CHANNEL.
2. BANK PROTECTION SHALL CONSIST OF NATURAL COIR FIBER MATTING.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY BED MATERIAL FOR THE ENTIRE RED
LENGTH OF EACH RIFFLE SECTION. THE BE.0 MATERIAL SHALL CONSIST OF
A MIX OF CLASS A AND SMALLER STONE.
II NOTES/REVISIONS II
Project:
Heron
Mitigation Site
Alamance County
North Carolina
Title:
PROPOSED DIMENSION,
PATTERN, AND PROFILE
tale:
FIGURE NO.
CROSS-SECTION DIMENSIONS
Date:7
Nov 2017
REACH
Wbkf ft.
Wbot k. Drill R.) Well (tt.)
D ool ft.
W ool(fl.)
Wtbal ft.
UT 1
8.4
5.2 0.7 0.1
1.1
9.3
2.5
UT3
4.4
2.8 0.3 0.1
0.6
4.9
1.0
UT 4, 5, and 6
4.B
3.2 GA 0.1
0.6
5.2
1.5
UT 7
5.3
3.7 0.3 0.1
0.7
5.8
1.0
UT8
5.9
4.3 0.3 0.1
0.8
6.5
1.5
II NOTES/REVISIONS II
Project:
Heron
Mitigation Site
Alamance County
North Carolina
Title:
PROPOSED DIMENSION,
PATTERN, AND PROFILE
tale:
FIGURE NO.
NA
Date:7
Nov 2017
Project No.:
17-008

LOG CROSS VANE
ENISHNG IOP OF BANK E-11N.
ND
c ourvo FAOFR�oO IBArvKruw
1�J
oIR LOc
lACK-LED AND COMPACTED ' 907
0LAI Sa A RIONEANO
L IP RAI�r NATIVE _ —__
SECTION M
MATERIAL
STONE
PGO
ON T"'s"4 p%SECTION A -A
REACH ARM LENGTH (FT, CHANNEL DEPTH(FT.I
UT 1, 4, 5, 6, 7.-6 DO -05
UTI lo o.e
NOTE.
HEAD RAND FOOTER STONES ARE LARGE, ANGULAR BOULDERS
MEASURING A MINIMUM OF 24" ALONG THE SHORI ESl DIMENSION.
CHANNEL �£ CHANNEL
BANK I I HANK
FILTER
mR r FABRID
L HEADER STONE
I c
'DOTER_ /
m STONE
� � I
PLAN VIEW
TYPICAL CROSS -VANE
DANK
TOP
IT
OLn OE C«ArvrvFi ------
TYPICAL LOG VANE
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
7
RESTORATION
SYSTEMS I LLC
II
Project:
Heron
Mitigation Site
Alamance County
North Carolina
Title.
TYPICAL
STRUCTURE
DETAILS
Scale:
FIGURE NO.
NO SCALE
^ /�
Date:
Nov 2017
(yv(l H
Project NO.
17-008

WATER SURFACE
ELEVATION
TR TERRACELL
__________ _` 181N TERRACEL
SV NTNETIC GEOGRID
` tlR iER RACtLI
18 IN TERRACELL
SYNTHETIC GEOGRID
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
FILTER CLOTH
`-`
PROFILE
3 ------
ydl 1
FILTER Ci OTH
W. J.5 to 8.011
0.1P
CROSS-SECTION
RAP
ISEt NOIFsi
NOTES/REVISIONS
TERRACEIL STRUCtURF NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR WILL INSTALL 18 -INCH TERRACELL SYNTHETIC GEOGRID AS PER THE MANUFACTURER'S
SPECIFICATIONS.
ItRRACELL STRUCTURE NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR WILL INSTALL 18 -INCH TERRACELL SYNTHETIC GEOGRID AS PER THE MANUFACTURER'S
SPECIFICATIONS.
2. AT BOTTOM RIFFLE DOWNSTREAM FROM TERRACELL STRUCTURE THE POOL WILL BE ARMORED WITH
FR OSION CON I'ROL FABRIC AND CLASS 1 RIP RAP OR OTHER SUITABL.F MATERIAL.
2. ONCE THE SYNTHETIC GEOGRID HAS BEEN INSTALLED, GEOCEL LS WILL BE BACKFILLED WITH GRAVEL
AND TOPSOIL AND PLANTED WITH EROSION CONTROL GRASSES AND WILLOW STAKES IS9LLYN/ ,"
DP'I OaNL[T
PL
Project:
PROFILE =.,,°
_T-MA
O
Heron
Mitigation Site
!
1
O
O
Alamance County
North Carolina
_
OO
OO
Tine:
TYPICAL
STRUCTURE
DETAILS
ensliP
Scale:
FIGURE NO.
NO SCALE
/1 ^
Dace:
Nov 2017
] ,U•(
MARSH TREATMENT AREA
V•(
Project W.
17-008

r
db-
1EGE "'l`3
Easement - 17.5 m
Design Stream Channel
Smnarnslide Assemblage - 3.8 ac
iiiiiil Piedmont Mountain Alluvial Forest = 3.0 ac,
Mesic, Oak -Hickory Fc—t = 5.2 ac
9A
9B
9C
A
"am Environmental, Inc.
FSRESTORATIONYSTEMS � I I.c]I
Project:
Heron
Mitigation Site
Alamance County
North Carolina
Title:
PLANTING
PLAN
Scale: FIGURE NO.
As Shown
Date:
NOV 2017 9B
Project No.,
17-008

- Rio s
RrS*I ORA] ION
SYSTEMS, LLC

u
w�.
J z.
=6 maim
1 �FLY�ET•
E id Resl iU)n
UrC�UT 3 Sta 02-7_-
Start Restoration Elev 534.31f Axiom Environmental, Inc_
Sta 00+00 r- .
n.
Elev 539:211
"Aide" -
a� E
C
--�-."
LEGEND
" --
Easement = 17.5 ac
Design Stream Channel
Cross Vane
Vane Arm
®
Drop Structure
[]
Marsh Treatment Area
Piped Crossing
Stream Restoration = 4024 ft
Stream Enhance 1 = 1182 ft
Stream Enhance 11 = 1131 ft
Wetland Enhancement = 0.61 ac
Wetland Restoration = 035 ac
p
Approximate Vegetation Plot Location
Monumented Cross Section
O
Groundwater Gauge'
+�
Surfacewater Gauge
UT 1.
grid Enhances°°
Stasi Retoresian
. sta 04+1n
Elev 540.76
4 It of oha,
of.,aser'un
UT 2
StartEnI. .... till
s h"ML
l
Project:
Heron
Mitigation Site
Alamance County
North Carolina
Title:
MONITORING
PLAN
Scale: FIGURE NO.
AS SHOWN
e" Date: w OA /�
100" Nov 2017 H
Project No.: -I
5CAI E IN 6 17-008

ioB
�." riW-V
Stan Restoration �
�Axiom Environmental, Inc.
�
53 -ft of channel is Outside
of easement aid remora -1
r
Remove from credit.
�
� m NOTES/REVISIONS
"
UT 5
Top of TerraCell `x
- Sta 09+12
z , Elev514.53
t
S 4
UT --.
j
End Re� Project:
\ Start Enhance 11
LEGEND
Easement = 17,5 acJ Heron
Design Stream Channel
n Site
Mitigatio
Cross Vane
®
Drop Structure
AS SHOWN
C::]
Marsh Treatment Area
-..
Nov 2017
Piped Crossing
Project
Stream Restoration = 4024 ft
Stream Enhance 1 = 1182 ft
,1
Stream Enhance 11= 1131 ftWijh.cloth,
r vegeta
Wetland Enhancement = 0.61 ac
and/or stone.,-
tone.-Wetland
WellandRestoration = 0.35 ac'
❑
Approximate Vegetation Plot Location
C r «t r
Monumented Cross Section
r
_ -
O
Groundwater Gauge
., z
r..t
Surfacewater Gauge,
Title:
MONITORING
PLAN
Scale:
FIGURE NO.
AS SHOWN
Date:
n
Nov 2017
0 6 �
Project
17-008

J ti-
rtemove uam
4 4 -ar R ixati-i
EIe, �8.5 a
LEGEND �'-
Easement = 17.5 ac .' `s .,
Design Stream Channel
Cross Vane
Vane Arm
®
Drop Structure
©
Marsh Treatment Area
`
Piped Crossing
rtemove uam
4 4 -ar R ixati-i
EIe, �8.5 a
LEGEND �'-
Easement = 17.5 ac .' `s .,
M
Uf 7
Staff I u:t:u
�
Sla URI n
Eley 2f, ,i,
Design Stream Channel
Cross Vane
Vane Arm
®
Drop Structure
©
Marsh Treatment Area
`
Piped Crossing
Stream Restoration = 4024 ft
Stream Enhance 1 = 1182 If
Stream Enhance II = 1131 It
Wetland Enhancement = 0.61 ac
Wetland Restoration = 0.35 ac
❑
Approximate Vegetation Plot Location
r_
Monumented Cross Section
O
Groundwater Gauge
Surfacewater Gauge
M
Uf 7
Staff I u:t:u
�
Sla URI n
Eley 2f, ,i,
Remove power line .
from easernenL
441
co
J
Remove Dam
1
4
Axbm Envlrunmental, Inc.
52 feel of channel is _--
outside of easement and
removed from credit.
UT 7
End Enhance 11
Sta 09+96
Elev 495.38
Top Terracell
Sia 09+15
Elev 502.15
z Project:
t
t sl+ �' • �
Heron
+ Mitigation Site
Alamance County
North Carolina
Title:- - - -
MONITORING
PLAN
Scab: FIGURE NO.
ASSHOWN
Date:
017 1 O ^
(v'
2
Project No.:
17-008
42 `eet of channel is
outside of easement and
removed from credit.
UT 7
'-
End Restoration
`
Start Enhance I
Eta 02+32
Elev 518.06
S
Remove power line .
from easernenL
441
co
J
Remove Dam
1
4
Axbm Envlrunmental, Inc.
52 feel of channel is _--
outside of easement and
removed from credit.
UT 7
End Enhance 11
Sta 09+96
Elev 495.38
Top Terracell
Sia 09+15
Elev 502.15
z Project:
t
t sl+ �' • �
Heron
+ Mitigation Site
Alamance County
North Carolina
Title:- - - -
MONITORING
PLAN
Scab: FIGURE NO.
ASSHOWN
Date:
017 1 O ^
(v'
2
Project No.:
17-008

Appendix B
Existing Stream Data
Table Bl. Heron Morphological Stream Characteristics
Figure Bl. Cross-section Locations
Existing Stream Cross-section Data
Sediment Data
NC SAM Forms
NC WAM Forms
NCDWQ Stream Forms
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) Appendices
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

`u£
iffi
8
8
MI
a
�
110
1afa
HINDI
iLL
5
'
Wild
ao
za
8
d
ftaa01
11111111
1111111!
as
sa=
adv
ani
gar
baa
ffig=
�gd
3
i
All
£
Da
_-
f_
#ALM
-_ -
x
s�
A
o
�
a�
P
:�
�
a
nJ
x
•
a
l
Aso
n
11
s
Ll
Ll ---.1 f a F a
x
aR
g
�4
fid_
�
f
a 3
a u
_
tg
qfl€
R
K9P
S
8
y3€
e
kg
ia�a�a
fa
FaiaFafa
`u£
iffi
8
8
MI
a
�
110
1afa
HINDI
iLL
Wild
8
d
ftaa01
11111111
1111111!
as
sa=
adv
ani
gar
baa
ffig=
�gd
3
#ALM
A
o
�
a�
P
:�
�
a
nJ
x
•
a
l
Aso
n
11
La
Ll
Ll ---.1 f a F a
x
aR
g
�4
f
a 3
a u
L
x
iffi
8
8
MI
a
�
110
1afa
HINDI
Wild
8
d
ftaa01
11111111
1111111!
as
sa=
adv
ani
gar
baa
ffig=
�gd
3
#ALM
nJ
11
La
Ll
Ll ---.1 f a F a
aR
g
�4
qfl€
R
K9P
S
8
y3€
kg
L
x
iffi
8
8
MI
a
�
110
1afa
HINDI
8
d
#ALM

Velatles REFERENCE- REFERENCE-CAUS-
CEDAROCk PARI( FARM
EE a
Oralna9v Mea (m� 0.21
BanMJ Oixharge pls) 60.6
mmenam v.natle.
SI,-Croaa- 1anal aaa (A,) e.0 117
Ernlag CrwacSeparul Mea a, TOB( 60 ta.7
BanNll Wtldn hVu) Mean n
Ramp 6.0-12.1 Raa 10.)-11.]
-ul Mean Deph(Da) an n
F. -0.6-t.0 Range
BanNJMar�mm Dvph (D„e) Meann
Rrg ?0-ZO
ad Wrtlm M'� Rape a^ t05
.imam Pool Deph(D„a) Mean 6 Men 2.7
Rang1S-1t Raryp
holF pr rWa,) Mean a ]1
Rang +11-1a0
Oimmem Reim
EMremhneM Rlw (WyN/,..1 Mean Mean f1
Range Rang
n1 Wh Rauo(Wr.N-) Mean t0.t2 Mean
Rang. 6.D 15.1 Range.
v. Drl Dar Ram n Mvarr
Range Rang -I.5
BaM Mez. pa. Rano 0.araiB^e an t
Maaavm Pod Oeplh rB,nMW nn 1
an Deph(D.o.) Range Raine
P-1 Wath/BaMdJ n 1
wdm hV.,aWs.I RRrgv Rang
Pad Mea/B.1 n an 1!
�ralaea D•+c Rang
VeMtlea
REFERENCE-
CEDAROCNPARK
REFERENCE�CAU.E-
FARM
R ern
VarMtlu
C.5 EIC4
Me0 la.
Pool b Pool6pacng (Led d ]
Rang ?69 Range 11-81
MeaMar Leyln (L,.1 Md11Me
Barge . Ra
Rel -h(W_,}166 -
W.
Rang 10- 6 36
Radivad Curvamre(R,1 Med' t6.5 Meece
]0.6
21
Barge
5inmalry (sing 1 16
Pattern Rlim
Ib Pod Sparicy Med Ned
BanMri wash (L.Mrr) Rarg Barg )
5
MeaMar LerglM1/ .a Med 5.�
B
BanMW WNIM1 (L„NVw) Radn9e 55-1a.3 Range 0.9-6.J
Nl- WMh R-
DrdeaNJrr) RadR.1S - JS
a
Radia of Curvalurei 10 Med 1.8
BanNW wdn (RuW�,I Barge R--
dile V,rl,tlea
Average Waler St.-Sbce (5,.) 00156 0.0053
vabv sbce (s,wl 00]10 opp7T
k sbce(5.,�Mean 0.031fi Mean 0.0096
R. a. 1.
ael Sbm ts„a) Meane Om7.m)6 Meese 00006
0-O.00a
ce (s,,.l Meen 00]535 n
Barge
Sbce <SyJ Range. Raryp
Pretrle ft-
R.- -1.1Surface n Mean
Sbce(S,�y -) 0fil./
P m16bIwANater Sachin
Range%
ffR
RanOe
Cauzey harm Hehrence In4u0ec meawrmente ham A Relerenm Srte -.-s �, 20D4
E.-9 UT
Eaeing UT6 P,-..
Eaeing UT P-11ED
Eg5
E95 E.Ca
C.5 EIC4
0.03
0.01 001-00
001 0.02
1.3
5.5 5.5-7.33
53 52
D'In,enam
v,rhtlea
6
MM
R. -]0t 602
7 550J.1
Med2. ,
Rrg. 15.1 1.
19 R.- 1.5 60 Ra
Range
n Range Range 0 J 0) Range.
T4R.-
Rarree.Rang. D.l 0a
Range Range 0!
OS nnRaryp
Rang.Range
Na daarcl recehllve IRnarn or dannp racebme inner
rdba aM poor tlw,a rd2a aN pink hie tan R.o 5.0
alagMenirre aclrveiaz g rg Innwa ^
Rape 0.5
5.5 5 0
No deuM re FIN inners of IR.w
>0 r6ha ara gook due 1a 4 4t 14
MegMenxg apnitwa ^ 0,6
00 Re
n. t5 Mean an
Rrg Barge. IS
50 an. t n.
75 Range Rang
DimN,Na,
R,nm
-JF n t n
10 6.1 Range )3 Ralg. Sa
Mean ! n 109
Rang 1.6 Rtt.;
n. Mean Mean
Range. 52 ] Rang J6 10.0 Rang +1.0
It.S
1 Mean }B) n M0
1fi.0 R.-15.3 0 Raye110
n 15 n n
Rrg I 1 B Rang 1.] 2.0 Rang
1, n TI n
I.5 Rang 1.3 a.0 R-; 11
^ 2.J n an
Rayv. Barge },} IO
a 50 ^ ,IO
1.3 Range )] 75 Range
Range
repeeuve inners d M
erdllee aM pmt ha to
re m mzra alagMemm sopsMagMenug
an
Minn
re2a ab ce14 lhve proem o+ M
- adPoole due to can t.t
apnem Rang 10
1.6 Rargv t!
--g UT
EReing UT
Pposed
Eaeing UT G
PROPOSE.
em V,aatlez
�Alka ara moka Bono
g rg 1rvn«a
1 repdnrve Il -d
dellesaM gook eue to
aagMmag aaa
Med Ot
l02
rid repeelne m6arn of
orllksaM gook dce l0
sMgperng an'x,aa
1
R.-1]7 ] M)
MM
R. -]0t 602
M
17.5 550
Med2. ,
Rrg. 15.1 1.
1e.]
Med'+S.t
_
n 9.15 1a
Rage45.6
O9
o e�fbsaM gook due moa
zlagMenirg apnnas
diAlks arN pink due to^a
dagMenirq acwdiee
Ned
30 6.0
I,-lirct
Na recel�we mnem al
rdlbseM ceok due to
g mg xnwsl0
Mae'
Range
aNt, 60 120
M 65
Rama o
l.0 fi0
R a
Med30
Barge
Rrge 1.0 100
retlle Var,ahka
002BJ
0,072
00]tl 00260
o-
nn lbc anJcepmk hre mon
g e rq aarvnas
q aeniy aclrvh es
01,
n2500031 0.
Meece
Range 1a Na di -r 111Pecenern al
Mean 0012a0 IksaM pock eue to
,slegMerur,9 adxnns
Rag
n -
R. 0249
Mean Date
00]110.0016 Oa]0
MezSa
R 00000 1 0.0163
Mean OOtOa
Ra g
029
n 0.099D W
hellle Rtim
dlbsaMpmkeuemr^a
g 9 trvnas
saM gook draneoeal
g edrq.clrvaaa
Mean 1 60
Range l
repnime panem of
dhsara pock due to
Megpemgacl«nap
Mean t. o
Barge
Range
RMean -
arg
Mean
0.0
Meae
Ra g !
an DI1+
Range 00 1. 1
an n
00

Vuktlea REFERENCE- REFERENCE-CAU-
CEWROCKPARR FARM
Sream Type E54 EI
Oranuge Nea (m') 0.21 O.fi3
BaeMJ Diuru'9e (ps) 38.8 60.6
OlrrRnalpn Varlatlea
BaNdJ CraoSecm.1 A,. (A,) 00113
ErRhy Cress-SepbnalNea al TOB( 8.0 141
aa.MJwNIn hV.,) n n
Rag 8.0-12.t Rag I a Itt]
BenNJMean pepn lOrl Men aan
Range -1.0 Raye
Ba'#JMarimrm OepR10..1 an Nage
Rag.
Pdd WN1n lW.d Men n 105 z a
Range Raye
Manrrum Pod Depn (D,,.1 Mean a-92 Mean 2.
Range. 1.5-2.1 Range
We1M1 of Fbmpore Nu NVrI a e M nn 131
Range 1535 Range
Ol�naian RM,-
EarezrvreaRauo(WyW�,I Mean an
Rag 1
1
h r Deph R.I. IW_AO.al n n 9
Range -t5.t Range
Mar. Se/q„Ram n n
RZ; II Range.
-Ranh Rales rrum pod an t0 n
Amrit�
Rey .Depnr BanNJ Mean 'I
.oan z
M- 0aph(D„aNi,) Range 21
PooIWJF'BanMJ Mea'gi t
M1h M1V-,AV,) Range
Pod Area r -A an Mean 1 �
cm'JNea Rage
Vanatles
REFERENCE- I REFERENCE -CAU..
CEDAROCK PARK FARM
PaKern
W
12 u
rod b Pad spaa�re a..� Raaga a -6a Raye
M. -Le 114,3 Med - Med 39
Range Reye 60 9+
Bel Wakh lwr)
Ramp
aea. acarvalae m,l M.Oce 538
Ray Rey
SmwsM (fim)
htlern AM...
Pool to Pod fipaciyr a.6 Mad
nNJ WidIh (L,dW,n1 Raye. 3.t -8.a Rag 0-]a
Lerglhr Mad'. 5 2
BanNul WhMh (L„ANar) R ­5.51x] Ran 0.9-80
Mn`W�W�In Rana Range. a.] Ranga 1.53.5
ua d curvalwa/
nNJ WJh1RchVaa) Ray, I 'I3ARaye
anile Varratlea
ate'sudace Sbce (5„I 00258 0005]
ce(Sr) 0 B31 0Fl.T2
5bce 1S,rU Mean. O.OJ1fi Mean 0.0098
F.- 00528 Rayn
n.12
a sbce(s..J F_ a . CO6a
un I.. (I-) an. o-3 '..
dee sbce (si,J Rage an
-1.
Rdlb Sbpa W e'Sw au Mean Mean
86ce 1fi-NS..JRaye 0.19-2.2] Range 61.i
Paa 5b Naater 6unace n an
Bbce (s„N5� Rag 0'0.8
01.Js 10
Run sbpeAMaler fiurlace Mean Mean
1-13.2 Range.
Glee sbpeANater Surface Mea
Raye. ' 1 62 1 Range
Caueey Farm RBfere... includes measurtnents horn A Reference Sile measured in 2004.
E.R..g UT J
Prapoud
Ev 11, UT I
PROP08ED
uiatles
MeA1.
Rag
M.J a5.0 ]
aAlleslaM puck -d 1. emo Barge 6J.5
s N eniy aamnas t
31.7
15.9
Rag
Na dslagl iaPoaeu pallmn of
:AlbsaN pock du to
sMgmeniy acmnma11
7
Rag 111]
Med
Rag J5S1. 21.0
23 1
Rag 55
12
Rag12
m Ratips
Me0 a
Ra ge
M.dBS
Na ARmd mpnuusx Pallern of Rag 6.0 120
. y y lrvnin:
Rag. 3.01. o
Rag 20 10.0
Nod..-mpel-pallem al
re re meKe
a.
Ray
85
R 60 12
Raye 30 E0
Range 20
0.02aa 00223
0.0210
O.Ot 90
n 0 0355
Ray1.
n 6 0,0022 0.
N. ] o 1 F_
'Albs aM pwk o 11bn
g y Dunne a"
Rag
ep I' 1 -pattern of
atoms a'N -
d
pooue 1a
1eghlenmg a1
n
3280.0019 .0]
R
n
0.ag
Mean.21
Rag
aik Ra
aA16a1aM pookl vuen orno
g 9 1
Ray 11 11
ddM aN puk wce orn al
g y A
60
Rag
an 0'10
an
an o1a0
Meg1.
,
Rag
n 0111
Raye B.o Be
an O.t1
aange ae

XS 34
XS 9
XS 10
XS 12 --_
LIT3/
XS 11
XS 26
UT 1
XS 37 /
UT 1 XS 5
Z7
XS 14
XS 15
XS 21
UT ?
XS 4
UT 7 XS 26
UT 6
XS 9
XS
` UT 8
AXIorn EnAro—ental, Inc.
XS 24
XS 20
XS 17
/XS12XS9
/--- XS7 • •
S3
XS 2
UT 7
NOTES/REVISIONS
Project:
Heron
Mitigation Site
Alamance County
North Carolina
�Itle
CROSS SECTION
LOCATIONS
Scale: FIGURE NO.
AS SHOWN
Date:
Nov 2017 B1
Project No.t
17-008

Heron UT 1 Downstream - XS 5 Riffle -
100 5
100
99.5
99
z 985
w 91
965 -
96
95 5
150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
description. ' � � •
height of instrument
(ft):
x -section area
1 1
6.5
Id mean
wet p
omit I distance
FS
0.8
FS FS W fpa
channel
Manning's
4.2
4 3
notes t. ft
ft
elevation
bankfull to of banl fl
sloe
99.37665
t
99.89527
9696 1 98.25
9887346
98.83089
dimensions
98.70804
5.1 x -section area
0 -
d mean
1 :
98.82145
11.1 width
11 a
,el P
t
98.60536
1.1 d max
h d ratli
• 1 .
98.63956
2.3 bank ht
L38
w/d ratio
98.24781
18.0 W flood rone area
ant ratio
•
97.11073
96.52962
Ca
• 1 : • :
96.7391
0.0 velocityft/sec
• 1
t -
96.06496
0.0 discharge rate cfs
•
!
95.92786
0.00 shear stress Ibs/ft s
1 1
96.59294
0.00 shear velocityft/sec
97.35106
0.000 unit stream ower (lbs/ft/sec)
97.96389
0.00 Frcude number
1
''
98.89156
0.0 friction factor u/u'
1 •'
1
100.1967
09 threshold rain size mm
check from channel material
_
0 measured D84 mm
0 0 relative rou hness
0 0
frit. factor
0 000 Mannin 's n from channel
material
nates
100
99
98
97
Heron UT 1 Downstream - XS 14 Riffle --
80 85 90 95 100 105 110
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
elevation I I bankfull
0
dimensions
5 1
4
x -section area
1 1
6.5
Id mean
wet p
2 0
0.8
h d rade
3 2
20 0
L;��
4.2
4 3
w/d ratio
ent ratio
hydraulics
0.0
velocity Msec
0 0
discharge rate Q cfs
0.00
shear stress Ibs/fts
0.00
shear velocity ft/sec
0.000
unit stream ower(lbs/ft/sec)
0.00
Froude number
0.0
friction factor u/u'
0
threshold grain size mm
check from channel material
0 measured D84 mm
0 0 relative rou ,h.s) Eric. factor
0 000 Mannin 's n from channel material

Heron UT 1 Downstream - XS 15 Riffle -
104
1035
103
_102.5 - --- -
c
102
101 5 -
W 101
1005 -
100
995
80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
Width from River Lea to Right ift)
Riffle
bankfull to of bank It sloe % "n"
100 96 1 102.19
dimensions
0
measured D84 mm
0 0
0 000
5.1
x -section area 0.8
d mean
9.7
6.3
width
6.9
wet P
0.5
1.3
d max
0.7
w/d ratio
30.0
2.5
bank ht
79
Mrat,�.
130
W flood rone area
21
hydraulics
0.0
velocit ft/sec
0.0
discharge rate D cfs
0.00
shear stress Ibslfls
0.00
shear veloci fUsec
0.000
unit stream power Ibs/fUsec
0.00
Froude number
0.0
friction factor u/u'
0�
threshold rain size mm
chec from channel materia
0
measured D84 mm
0 0
0 000
relative mu hness 0.0 fn:: factor
Manning's n from channel material
1055
105
104 5
104
1035
103
1025
notes
0
Heron UT 1 Upstream - XS 21 Riffle -
5 10 Width frA River Left to l?lght (a) 25 30 ._
of instrument fl
mce I FS FS F:
0 (a) I elevation bankfull too of
"n"
dimensions
5.1
x -section area
0.5
d mean
9.5
width
9.7
wet P
_
d max
h d rad,
0.9
0.5
1.3
bank ht
17.6
w/d ratio
30.0
W flood prone area
3.2
ent ratio
hydraulics
0.0
veloci ft/sec
0.0
discha a rate cfs
0.00shear
stress lbs/a s
0.00
shear veloci fl/sec
0.000
unit stream power Ibs/ftfsec
0.00
Froude number
0.0
Motion factor u/u•
"
Mreshold rain size mm
check from channel mat 'net
0
measured D64 (mm) ��
II0 0
ralative roughness 0 0 fnc factor
I 0.000
Manning's n from channel material

Heron UT 1 Upstream - XS 26 Riffle
1055
105 -- — —
X1045
v 104 —
1035
103
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
dimensions
5 1[x
-section area
0.6
Id mean
92
width
9.4
wet P
0 9
d max
0.5
h d rad,
16
bank ht
16.6
w/d ratio
17 0
W flood phone area
1.9
ant ratio
h draulice
0 0
velocity fVsec
0.0
discharge rate Q cfs
0.00
shear stress Ibslft s
0.00
shear velocity ft/sec
0.000
and stream povmr lbs/ft/sec
0.00
Fhoude number
0.0
friction factor Wu*
08
threshold grain size mm
check from channel material
0 measured D64 mm
0 0 relative rou hness 0.0 Inc. factor
0 000 Mannin 's n from channel material
108
107 5
107
1065
i 106
w
105.5
105
1045
Heron UT 1 Upstream - XS 34 Riffle --
0 5 10 15 20 JS 30
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
dimensions
5.1
x -section area
0 5
d mean
9.6
width
99
wet P
1.0
d max
0 5
h d radi
2.0
bank ht
17 9
w/d ratio
25.0
W flood phone area
2 6
ent ratio
hydraulics
0.0
veloci B/sec
0.0
dischar a rate Q cfs
0.00
shear stress Ibs/ft s
0.00
shear velocity ft/sec
0.000
unit stream ower lbs/ft/sec
0.00
Froude number
0.0
friction factor u/u'
if B-0 Ithreshoid
grain size mm
check from channel material
0
measured D84 mm
00
relative hou hness I 0.0
Eric. factor
0.000 1
Mannin 's n from channel material

10d 5
108
`✓107 5
y 107
1065
106
0 5
of instrument
notes
Heron UT 1 Upstream - XS 37 Riffle --
10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Width from River Lett to Right (ft)
dimensions
5.1
8.8
0.8
2.0
19.0
x -section area
wndth
0.6
9.1
0.6
15.1
2.2
d mean
we
ad,
d max
bank ht
W flood prone area
tio
tio
hydraulics
0.0
velocity It/sec
0.0
charge rate Q cfs
0.00
shear stress lbs/ft s
0.00
shear velocity ft/sec
0.000
unit stream power Ibs/ft/sec
0.00
Froude number
0.0
friction factor u/u'
ll0
threshold grain size mm
check from channel material
0 measurD84 mm
atived
0 0 rele mu,
u hness 0 0 f- factor
11 000Mannin 's n from channel material
For additional cross sections make a copy of the "Dimension" worksheet
To create a copy "right click" on the dimension tab below.

82
81 8
81 6
81 4
t 81 2
81
'w
808
w
806
804
80 2
80
Heron UT 3 - XS 9 Riffle --
70 75 so 85 90 95 100
Width from River Left to Right (a)
nsions
1.4
3.3
0.6
0.8
15.0
x -section area
width
0.4
3.6
0.4
8.0
4.5
Id mean
wet P
h d radi
d max
bank ht
W flood prone area
/d ratio
ent ratio
ERP
hydraulics
00
velocity ft/sec
channel
0.0
_
discharge rate cfs
elevation
0.00
shear stress Ibs/8 s
sloe %
0.00
shear velocity (ft/sec)
78.77534
0.000
unit stream povver (lbs/ft/sec)
0.00
Froude number
78.08974
00
friction factor u/u'
B-0
threshold grain size mm
76.96229
check from channel material
0
measured D84 mm
00
relative roughness 1 0.0 1 frit. factor
0.000
Ma inin 's n from channel rnetenal
mon
dr
• %eron UT3-XS10
omit distance FS
FS
FSfpa
W1)
channel
Manning',
notes pt H) (ft)
elevation
bankfull
to of bank
sloe %
"n"
78.77534
78.08974
74.68
75.36
76.96229
1
76.24316
dhTwitsions
75.7055
1 4
x -section area
0.3
d mean
1:
75.36145
44
width
46
wet P
74.18626
0.5
d max
0.3
74.33435
1 2
bank ht
134
Wr.fi.
75.74873
60
W flood hone area
1.4
r
76.87945
78.91293
_
hydraulics
t
80.14183
0 0
vel2cd fUsec
81.6435
0 0
dischar a rate, cfs
r :: r • :
83.11902
0.00
shear stress Ibs/R s
84.31545
0 00
shear velocity (ft/sec)
0 000
unit stream povver(lbs/ft/sec)
000
Froude number
_
00
friction factor u/u'
0-0
threshold grain size mm
f,
check from channel material
0
measured D84 mm
0 0
relative rou hness
2rrmiatedal
hie. factor
0 000
Manning's n from channe

Heron UT 3 -XS 11 Riffle -
75
74 5 - --
74 - -
v
735
w
73
725
40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
distance
elevation
bankfull to of bank ft
sloe %
"n"
d mean
wet P
17.69753
-.n., .•.
0.4
7.2
h d rade
w/d ratio
12.0
W flood rone area
77.11762
173.55
74.24
friction factor u/u'
0-0
threshold grain size mm
76.18556
75.09717
Idimensions
74.2403
14
x -section area
02
d mean
73.2506
5 9
width
6.2
wet P
73.72209
0.5
d max
0.2
h d radi
73.06011
1 2
bank M
24.3
vWd ratio
73.15215
9 0
W food rone area
1.5
ent ratio
74.37504
75.80792
hydraulics
77.41747
0.0
velocity (ft/sec)
78.75593
0.0
dischar a rate Q cfs
0.00
shear 2Uess Ibslft s
shear veloci fUsec
0.000
unit stream power lbs/ft/sec
0.00
Froude number
0.0
friction factor u/u'
0-0
threshold grain size mm
check from channel materia
0measre
measured D84 mm
0 0
relehve rou hness 1
0 0
1 fnc. factor
0 000
1 Manning's n from channel material
Heron UT 3 - XS 12 Riffle -
3
725 - - -
72
o 71 5
w 71 -
u
40 45 50 Ath from R,v.PP.ft to Right (nf 70 m_
dimensions
14
3.2
x -section area
vndth
04
3.6
d mean
wet P
0.7
1.2
d max
bank htEEE
0.4
7.2
h d rade
w/d ratio
12.0
W flood rone area
3.8
ent ratio
hydraulics ®�
0.0
_
velocity ft/sec
0.0
discharge rate d cfs
0.00
shear stress Ibs/ft s
0.00
shear velocity fVsec
0.000
unit stream power (lbs/f/sec)
0.00
Froude number
0.0
friction factor u/u'
0-0
threshold grain size mm
check rom cNannel material
0 measured D84 mm
0 0 relative rou hness1 0 0 I Eric. factor
0 000 1 Mannln 's n from channel material

995
99
985
98
97 5
97
0
notes
Heron UT 4 - XS 4 Riffle —
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 a0
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
Riffle
bankfull
dimensions
2.0
3.4
0.8
1.0
x -section area
width
0.6
4.0
0.5
5.6
2.0
4.9
0.7
0.9
300
x -section area
width
0.4
53
04
12.2
6.1
9.0
d max
Emean
,
o
o
bank ht
Wflood rone area
hydraulics
0.0
velocity (ft/sec)
0.000
unit stream r Ibs/fVsec
0.0
discharae rater cfs
Froude number
0.00
shear stress Ibslft s
B-0
0.00
Shear velocity fVsec
0.000
0.00
unit stream povver(lbs/ft/sec)
0measured
Froude number
0 0
friction factor a/u'
0.000
6O
threshold grain size mm
check from channel material
0ea
msured D84 mssm
00 relative rou hne0.0 1 fnc tactor
0 000 1Mannin 's n from channel material
W 5
97
96 5
r 96
95 5
w 95
945
94
0 5
Riffle
Heron UT 4 - XS 7 Riffle --
10 15
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
20 ?5
dimensions
2.0
3.4
0.8
1.0
x -section area
width
0.6
4.0
0.5
5.6
d mean
wet P
d max
bank ht
h d rad:
w/d ratio
9.0
W flood rone area
2 7
ent ratio
hydraulics
0 0
velocity ft/sec'
0 0
_
discharge rate. cfs
0.00
shear stress Ibs/ft s
0.00
shear velocity ft/sec
0.000
unit stream r Ibs/fVsec
0.00
Froude number
0.0
friction factor u/u'
B-0
threshold grain size mm
check from channel material
0measured
D84 mm
0.0
relative rou It 0.0 Inc factor
0.000
1 Mannin 's n from channel material

Heron UT 4 - XS 8 Riffle —
97
96.5
96
_ 95.5
95
j
945 —
w 94
935 —
93
925
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
elevation I I bankfull
Bions
2.0
3.1
0.9
1.5
16.0
Ix -section area
width
06
3.9
0 5
4.8
5.1
d mean
wet P
d max
bank ht
h d radi
w/d ratio
Mood rone area
ent ratio
hydraulics �
0.0
velocity ft/sec
2 0
3.8
0.8
1.7
60
0.0
discharge rate 17 cfs
0.00
shear stress lbs/fls
0.00
shear velocity It/sec
VBIOcI ft/$ec
0.000
unit stream power IbsrfUsec
0.0
0.00
Fmude number
0.0
friction factor u/.-
"
threshold grain size mm
shear veloci Poses
0.000
chec from channel matsnal
0 measured D84 mm
Froude number
0 0 relative rou hness 0 0 fric. factor
0 000 Mannm 's n from channel material _J
fnction factor u/u'
93
92 5
92
91 5
w 91
905
90
Heron UT 4 - XS 11 Rife --
0 10 20 Width fr99t River Left to Qht (ft) 50 60 70
bankfull
dimensions
2 0
3.8
0.8
1.7
60
x -section area
width
0 5
42
0 5
7 3
1 6
®radi
d max
bank ht
W flood rone area
hydraulics
0.0
VBIOcI ft/$ec
0.0
discha rate D cfs
0.00
shear stress Ibs/ft s
0.00
shear veloci Poses
0.000
unit stream ower Ibs/tVsec
0.00
Froude number
0.0
fnction factor u/u'
(LO
threshold grain size mm
check from channel materia
0measured D84 mm
0 0 relative rou hness 0 0 fn, factor
0.000 Mannin 's n from channel material

96
955
95
945
Y 94
935
93
w 92 5
92
91 5
91
Heron UT 5 - XS 13 Riffle --
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Width from River Lek to Right (k)
notes of (k) _ k elevation
94.57997
94.25547
93.54829
92.83907
91.56463
r • 91.503
91.46218
#; t • 91.93583
93.80632
94.0616
_ 95.37626
95.55676
AMLJIL-
I bankfull Itopofban (k) 1 slo a (% "n"
52 34 1 93 55
dimensions
1.6
2.5
0.9
2.1
3.5
x -section area
width
d max
bank hl
Mood prone area
0.7
3.4
0.5
3.8
1.4
Id mean
wet P
h d rad,
w/d rat,o
ent rat,o
hydraulics
00
velocity (ft/sec)
0.0
discharge rate D cfs
0.00
shear stress Ibs/k s
0.00
shear velocity (ft/sec)
0.000
unit stream war(lbs/ft/sec)
0.00
Froude number
0.0
friction factor u/u'
O.g
threshold rain size mm
check from channel materia
0
measured D84 mm
0.0
relative rou hness 0.0 frit. factor
0.000
Mannin 's n from channel material
98
97 5
97
96 5
,6
95 5
Heron UT 5 - XS 15 Riffle --
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Width from River Lek to Right (k)
qns
d mean
1.6
x -section area
0.4
4.1
width
46
wet P
0.8
d max
0 3
h d radi
1.0
bank ht
10.4
w/d ratio
30.0
W flood prone area
7.3
ant ratio
hydraulics
0.0
velocity (f/sec
0.0
discharge rate cfs
0.00
shear stress Ibs/k s
0.00
shear velocity (ft/sec)
0.000
unit stream power lbs/ft/sec)
0.00
Froude number
0 0
friction factor u/u'
99
threshold irain size mm
check kom channel material
0
1 measured D84 mm
0.0
relative roughness T0.0
frit. factor
0.000 I Mannings n from channel material

Heron UT 5 - XS 21 Rife -
1045
104
103.5 -
103 _ - ---
1025 -
w 102 - -- 1015 - --
101
100.5
0 5 10 15 WidAirom RiveRelt to RigR9ft) 35 40 45 50
height of instrument ft):
omit distance FS FS FS W fpa channel Mannings
notes pt. (fl) (fl) elevation bankfull too of ban (ft) slope (%) "n"
nswns
Heron UT 5 - XS 17 Rife ---
1.6
x -section area
100 5
d mean
34
width
4.1
wet P
0.7
d max
0.4
h d radi
1.9
bank ht
7.5
w/d ratio
100
W flood phone area
2.3
ant ratio
hydraulics
0.0
velaci fl/sec
0.0
dlschar a rate O cfs
995
0.00
shear stress lbs/ft s
0.00
shear velocity (ft/sec)
0.000
unit stream power lbs/ft/sec
99
0.00
Froude number
0.0
friction factor ulu'
4.9
threshold rain size mm
i 98 5
check rom channel material
..
measured D84 mm
0 0
relatwe rou hness
0 0
fric factor
0 000
Mannin 's n from channel
material
w
98
97 5
-
-
97
0
5
10
15 20
25
30
Width
from River Lett to Right (ft)
aBGlpfl:
.
Riffle
description:
height of instrument R
OMKI
distance FS
FS FS W fpa I
channel
I Mannings
notes I
pt.
ft ft
elevation
I bankfull Itopofbank (ft)
sloe
99.17475
r '
99.53117
98.23 1 98.75
98.7507
'
97.46669
dimensions
r r
97.31761
1.6Ix-sectio n area
0.7
• r - • 1
98.9411
2.5 width
3.6
rr
99.81361
0.9 d max
0 5
Eratio
r
100.0116
1.4 bank ht
3.7
7.0 W flood rone area 2.8
hydraulics
0.0 vel ocit ft/sec
0.0 dlschar a rate p cfs
0.00 shear stress lbs/ft s
0.00 shear velocity (ft/sec)
0.000 unit stream power lbs/ft/sec
0.00 Froude number
D.0 friction factor u/u'
OD threshold 2ram size mm
check from channel matenaI
0 measured D84 mm
0 0 relative rou hness
00
fric factor
0.000 Mannin 's n from channel
material
Heron UT 5 - XS 21 Rife -
1045
104
103.5 -
103 _ - ---
1025 -
w 102 - -- 1015 - --
101
100.5
0 5 10 15 WidAirom RiveRelt to RigR9ft) 35 40 45 50
height of instrument ft):
omit distance FS FS FS W fpa channel Mannings
notes pt. (fl) (fl) elevation bankfull too of ban (ft) slope (%) "n"
nswns
1.6
x -section area
0.5
d mean
34
width
4.1
wet P
0.7
d max
0.4
h d radi
1.9
bank ht
7.5
w/d ratio
8.0
W flood phone area
2.3
ant ratio
hydraulics
0.0
velaci fl/sec
0.0
dlschar a rate O cfs
0.00
shear stress lbs/ft s
0.00
shear velocity (ft/sec)
0.000
unit stream power lbs/ft/sec
0.00
Froude number
0.0
friction factor ulu'
4.9
threshold rain size mm
check rom channel material
..
measured D84 mm
0 0
relatwe rou hness
0 0
fric factor
0 000
Mannin 's n from channel
material

Heron UT 5 - XS 25 Riffle
1095
109 — — — —
106 5
106
>1075
w 107
106 5 — —
106
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
instrument
notes I of I (ft) I (ft) I elevation I I bankfull
dimensions
1 fi
6.0
x-secfion area
width
0.3d
6.1
mean
wet P
0.5
d max
0.3
h d radi
1.0
10 0
bank ht
W Flood rune area
22.4
1 7
w/d ratio
ent ratio
hydraulics
0.0
veloG Nsec
0.0
discha a rate Q cfs
0.00
shear stress lbs/fts
0.00
shear velocity ft/sec
0.000
and stream povver (lbs/ft/sec)
0.00
Froude number
0.0
friction factor u/u'
I) -B
threshold 2ram size mm
check from channel materia
0
O0
0.000
measured D84 mm
relative rou hness 0 0 fnc. factor
Mannin 's n from channel matenal

f f IYl uoil�al3 m m m
—
m _ —2.2
N � W
E
K
E xv `�3 iv m �LL�E= E di
�
m
v
tla m E� mop c000000� � o
i
�
E
oo
a
3
-
o ro m"No �' atDon
V
O O �
7-7-7
V
C
m
o
MMMEN
o n �
u e
14)
u011ena13
c

104
103
102
� 101
m 100
w 99
98
97
Heron UT 6 - XS 5 Riffle --
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width hom River Left to Right (ft)
dimensions
r 1
1.5
5.5
0.4
3.0
90
x -section area
width
0.3
5,) 6
0.3
19.8
1.6
d mean
wet P
d max
bank ht
W flood prone area
h d radi
w/d ratio
ent ratio
hydraulics
0 0
velocity Poser
notes t. ft
0.0
discharge rate, 0 (cfs
Itopofbank ft
0.00
shear stress Ibs/fts
0.00
shear velocity Poser
0.000
unit stream power lbs/ft/sec
0.00
Froude number
102.75
00
friction factor u/u'
e g
threshold grain size mm
check from channel material
0 measured D84 mm
0 0 relative rou hness 0.0 Eric. factor
0 000 Mannln 's n from channel material
1055
105
104 5
104
x
1035
103
w
1025
w 102
101 5
101
100.5
Heron UT 6 - XS 6 Riffle --
0 10 20 Width f4h River Lett to rnght (it) 50 60
height of instrument
r 1
omit distance FS
FS I
FSW fpa
channel
Manning's
notes t. ft
I bankfull
Itopofbank ft
slope (%)
105.1078
103.9953
101.22 1
102.75
103.2977
•
102.9452
clintensions
r
101.0194
1.5
x -section area
0.2
d mean
1
100.8634
66
Width
6.7
wet P
r
101.2039
04
d max
0.2
h d red,
r
102.1192
_
bank ht
29.1
w/d ratio
102.746
W Flood ronearea
1.1
ent ratio
103.2253
.1
103.302
hydraulics
11
103.0198
0.0
velocity (ft/sec)
. r •
103.3581 1
0.0
discharge rate Q cfs
-
0.00
shear stress Ibs/ft s
000
shear velocity ft/sec
'
0 000
and stream power (lbs/ft/sec)
0.00
Froude number
00
friction factor u/u'
6d
threshold grain size mm
check from channel material
_
0
measured D84 mm
0.0
relative rou hness
0.0
fric. factor
0.000
Mannin 's n from channel material

111
110
109
108
107
106
v 105
w 104
103
102
101
Heron UT 6 - XS 7 Riffle —
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
of instrument
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
notes I ot. I (ft) I (ftl I elevation I I bankfull It000f
dimensions
1.5
z -section area
0 3
d mean
5.6
width
5.7
wet P
0.4
d max
0.3
h d radi
2.2
bank ht
20 4
w/d ratio
7.0
W flood rove area
1.3
ent ratio
h draulics
0.0
velocity (ft/sec
0.0
discharge rate cfs
0.00
shear stress Ibs/ft s
0.00
shear velocity ft/sec
0.000
unit stream ower lbs/ft/sec
0.00
Froude number
0.0
friction factor u/u'
"
thrash b amin size irrtm
the m c anne melena
0
measured '84 mm
0 0
relative mu hness 0 0 fnc. factor
0 000
Mannin 'S n from channel maleriai

Heron UT 7 - XS 7 Riffle --
101 5
101
1005
100
995
99
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
of instrument
notes
bankfull
dimensions
2.0
5.6
0.8
0.9
29.0
-section area
0.4
5.9
0.3
15.6
5.1
d mean
wet P
width
d max
h d radi
bank ht
w/d ratio
aril ratio
W flood rone area
hydraulics
0
OC)
0000
00
velocity (fVsec
Mannin 'snfromchannel materia
0
0000
dischar rate 0 ds
Id mean
0.00
shear stress Ibs/R s
width
OM
shear velocity R/sec
0.000
unit stream r Ibs/R/sec
0.3
0.00
Froude number
0.7
0.0
friction factor u/u'
atio
�ent
O0
threshold grain size mm
W flood prone area
check from channel materia
0
OC)
0000
measured 084 mm
relative rou hness 0.05�j
Mannin 'snfromchannel materia
Heron UT 7 - XS 9 Riffle —
1026
1024
1022
102 — ----
c 1018 ------
1016 —
w 1014 —
012
101
100 8
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 air
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
notes
despip8on: -__
of instrument (R7:
dimensions
2.0
x -section area
0.3
Id mean
6.7
width
6.8
0.4
d max
0.3
ad,
0.7
bank ht
22 1
atio
�ent
15 0
W flood prone area
2.2
tio
hydraulics
00
velocity ft/sec
0.0
discharge rate Q cfs
0.00
shear stress lbs/R s
000
shear velocity ft/sec
0 000
unit stream power Ibs/ft/sec
0.00
Froude number
00
friction factor u/u'
Ola
threshold grain size mm
check from channel material
0
measured D84 mm
0.0
relative rou hness 1 00
fric. factor
0.000
1 Mannin 's n from channel material

Heron UT 7 -XS 12 Riffle ---
104 5
104 -- - -
X1035
v 103
1025
102
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Width from River Lett to Right (8)
descript
trument
I FS
bankfull
dimensions
2.0
6.2
z- section area
width
03
64
Id mean
wet F
0.5
0.9
d max
bank ht
0.3
19.2
h d rad,
wld ratio
11.0
W flood prone area
1.8
ent ratio
hydraulics
Heron UT 7 - XS
0.0
velocity (ft/sec
0.0
discharge rate Q cfs
0.00
shear stress(Obs/ft s
0.00
shear velocity (fUsec
0.000
unit stream povver (lbs/ft/sec)
0.00
Froude number
0.0
friction factor ulu•
.._..... ■ ..._�,.._..�.: a{.-67.��YSS'
0.0
threshold grain size mm
35 -7.06 8.0
r
...
," ■ 5.149854 -7.839129 �r
checkrom channel material
%:,.-& j;,, 4465 -7.291559
0
measured 084mm
0 0
relative roughness 0 0 frit. factor
_-M062 -7.056377---_
0 000
Mannin 's n from channel matenat
Heron UT 7 - AS 17 Riffle --
108 -
107 5 -
107
w
1065
106
1 05 5
0 5 10 Width frNh River Left to Ajht (R) 25 30 35
hydraulics
0.0 velocity (ft/sec)
0.0 discharge rate Q cts
0.00 shear stress lbs/ft s
0.00shearveloci fll c
0.000 unit stream ower Ibs/fl/sec
0.00 Froude number
0.0 friction factor Wu•
0-0 threshold grain size mm
check from channel material
0 measured D84 mm
0 0 relative rou hness 0 0 Inc. factor
0 000 [Mannings n from channel material
Heron UT 7 - XS
17
height of instrumentAML
100.00
.._..... ■ ..._�,.._..�.: a{.-67.��YSS'
r : r .F!,
35 -7.06 8.0
r
...
," ■ 5.149854 -7.839129 �r
%:,.-& j;,, 4465 -7.291559
_-M062 -7.056377---_
,
�FM-'W.9781 5.641773
�r
0 22.93059 -5.677179
r
Q30.79654
■ 25.73133 -7.134241
-7.775702[�
.®.■
r
hydraulics
0.0 velocity (ft/sec)
0.0 discharge rate Q cts
0.00 shear stress lbs/ft s
0.00shearveloci fll c
0.000 unit stream ower Ibs/fl/sec
0.00 Froude number
0.0 friction factor Wu•
0-0 threshold grain size mm
check from channel material
0 measured D84 mm
0 0 relative rou hness 0 0 Inc. factor
0 000 [Mannings n from channel material

111
110 5
110
x1095
> 109
w 1085
108
1075
Heron UT 7 - XS 20 Riffle — I Heron UT 7 - XS 24 Riffle —
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
of instrument
dimensions
2 0
5 1
06
1 2
9 0
1 x -section area
width
0.4
5.3
0.4
13 3
1.8
d mean
wet P
h d radi
d max
bank ht
W Flood rone area
w/d ratio
ent ratio
hydraulics
2 0
0.0
velocity(ft/sec
d mean
0.0
discharge rate cfs
49
0.00
shear stress Ibs/fl s
h d radi
0.00
shear velocity (ft/sec)
1 4
0.000
unit stream ovrer Ibs/Nsec
w/d ratio
0.00
Froutle number
2.1
0 0
friction factor u/u'
G 0
threshold Qrain size mnn
check from channel material
check from channel material
0
measured D84 mm
0.0
0 0
relative rou hness D G fnc. factor
Mannin 's n from channel matenal
0 000
Mannin 's n from channel matenal
1135
113
_1125 -- --
112 —
i111 5
111 ---- --
1105
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
dimensions
2 0
x -section area
04
d mean
4 7
width
49
wet P
d max
h d radi
0 7
04
1 4
bank ht
11.2
w/d ratio
10 0
W flood prone area
2.1
ent ratio
h drauh s
0 0
velocit Nsec
0 0
dischar a rate, cfs
0.00
shear stress Ibs/ft s
0 00
shear velocity (ft/sec)
0 000
unit stream ower Ibs/Nsec
0.00
Froude number
00
friction factor u/u'
00
threshold Rrain size mm
check from channel material
0
measured D84 mm
0.0
relative rou hness 0 0 frit factor
0.000
Mannin 's n from channel matenal

Heron UT 7 - XS 26 Riffle --
1155
115
114 5 —
c 114
°1135
w 113
112 5
112
111 5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Width from Rrver Left to Right (fl)
of
notes
section
dimensions
2.0
x- section area
0.5
Id mean
4 1
width
4 5
wet P
0 7
d max
04
h d radi
2.5
bank ht
8.4
Wd ratio
7 0
W flood proms area
1 7
ant ratio
hydraulics
0 0
velocity ft/sec
0.0
discharge rale D cis
0.00
shear stress Ibs/fls
0.00
shear velocity ft/sec
0.000
unit stream ower lbs/ft/sec
0.00
froude number
0.0
friction factor u/u'
"
threshold grain size mm
check from channel material
0measured
D84 mm
00
relative rou hness
0 0
frit factor
0 000
Mannin 's n from channel matenal

1025
102
101 5
101
Y
1005
100
995
w 99
98 5
98
975
Heron UT 8 - XS 1 Riffle --
40 45 50 55 60 65 70
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
descnp6on
of instrument (it)
bankfullto
of bank (ft) slop
x -section area
width
0.4
6.3
988
1 100 35
d max
bank ht
dimensions
yd radi
w/d ratio
W flood prone area
ent ratio
2.5
x- section area
0.000
unit stream power(lbs/ft/sec)
4.5
width
Froude number
Men,
0.0
0.6
dmax
0-0
2.2
bank ht
check from channel material
0
50
W flood rone area
0.0
0 000
Mannin 's n from channel material
hydraulics
0.0
velocity ft/sec
0.0
discharge rate Q efs
0.00
shear stress Ibs/ft s
0.00
shear velocity (ft/sec)
0.000
unit stream povver Ibs/fUsec
0.00
Froude number
0.0
friction factor u/u^
i3-0
threshold grain size mm
material
"fromnel
nin 's n from channel material
Heron UT 8 - XS 3 Riffle —
100
99 5 — — —
99
v
985
5
30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
of instrument
of
dimensions
2.5
6.1
x -section area
width
0.4
6.3
d mean
wet P
03
1.0
30.0
d max
bank ht
04h
15.0
4 9
yd radi
w/d ratio
W flood prone area
ent ratio
hydraulics
0.0
velocity ft/sec
0.0
discharge rate D cfs
0.00
shear stress Ibs/ft s
0.00
shear velocity ft/sec
0.000
unit stream power(lbs/ft/sec)
0.00
Froude number
0.0
friction factor u/u'
0-0
threshold grain size mm
check from channel material
0
1mm)
measured D84ne
0.0
fri
relative roti hss 0 0 t factor
0 000
Mannin 's n from channel material

Heron UT 6 - XS 7 Riffle - -
975
97
96.5
c 96
i 95.5
w
95
94 5 -- ---- —
94
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
of instrument
notes
dimensions
2 5
x -section area
0 4
d mean
_ ..
vndth
59
wel P
O S
d max
0 4
h d radi
Froude number
bank ht
12 6
Id ratio
b J
W flood rone area
J 7
ent ratio
hydraulics
0.0
veloci / fUsec
0.0
d,schar a rate D cfs
0.00
shear stress Ibs/ft s
0.00
shear velocity (ft/sec)
0.000
unit stream ower lbs/fUsec
0.00
Froude number
0.0
friction factor ulu'
0-0
threshold rain size mm
check from channel materia
0
measured D84 mm
0 0
relative rou hness 0.0
fnc. factor
0.000
Mannin 's n from channel matenal
95
945
94
r
935
- 93
w 926
92
91 5
91
Heron UT a - XS 9 Riffle —
0 10 20 Width from RivePEeft to Right (ft) 40
description:
height of instrument1 r i
omit distance FS
notes 0 (ft) (ft) � elevation
50 60
fflen5i0ns I
2.5
4.2
x -section area 06
width 4.7
d mean
wet P
1.0
2.5
7.0
d max 0.5
bank ht 6.8
W flood rone area 1.7
h d rad,
w/d ratio
ant ratio
hydraulics
0.0
_
velocity ft/sec
0.0
discharge rate Q(ds)
0.00
shear stress lbs/ft s
0.00
shear velocity ft/sec
0.000
unit stream ower (lbs/ft/sec)
0.00
Froude number
00
friction factor u/u'
0-0
threshold qram, size mm
check from channel material
0measured D84 mm
00 relative rou hness 0 0 I fnc factor
0.000 1 Mannin 's n from channel material ji

Site
Heron Steam and Wetland Mitigation Site
Stream
UT 1
Bank Length
2738
Observers
Grant and Kenan
Date
5 -Dec -16
Station
Bank
BEHI
NBS
Erosion Rate
Length
Bank Height
Eronsion
1 85
left
low
low
0
85
2
0.0
2 195
left
high
low
0.1
110
1.75
19.3
3 225
left
low
low
0
30
1.5
0.0
4 520
left
high
low
0.1
295
3.9
115.1
5 605
left
low
low
0
85
1.5
0.0
6 1 655
left
high
low
0.1
50
2.5
12.5
7 1015
left
low
low
0
360
1.5
0.0
8 1369
left
high
low
0.1
354
2.5
88.5
9
0.0
10 85
right
low
low
0
85
2
0.0
11 1 210
right
high
low
0.1
125
1.75
21.9
12 510
right
high
low
0.1
300
3.9
117.0
13 580
right
low
low
0
70
1.5
0.0
14 655
right
high
low
0.1
75
2.5
18.8
15 1015
right
low
low
0
360
1.5
0.0
16 1 1369
right
high
low
0.1
354
2.5
88.5
17
0.0
18
0.0
19
0.0
20
0.0
21 1
1
0.0
22
23
24
Sum eronsion sub -totals for each BEHI/NBS
Total Erosion (ft3/yr)
481.4
Divide total erosion (ft3) by 27
ITotal Erosion (yd/yr)
17.8
Multiply Total erosion (yard3) by 1.3
ITotal Erosion (tons/yr)
23.2
Erosion per unit length
ITotal Eronsion (Tons/yr/ft)
0.01

Site
Heron Steam and Wetland Mitigation Site
Stream
UT 2
Bank Length 755
Observers
Grant and Kenan
Date 5 -Dec -16
Station
Bank BEHI
NBS
Erosion Rate
Length Bank Height
Eronsion
1 45
1 left high
low
0.1
45 1.5
6.8
2 95
left low
low
0
50 1
0.0
3 115
left high
low
0.1
20 1.5
3.0
4 145
left low
low
0
30 1
0.0
5 190
left high
low
0.1
45 1.5
6.8
6 380
left low
low
0
190 1
0.0
7
0.0
8
0.0
9
0.0
10 60
right high
low
0.1
60 1.5
9.0
11 90
right low
low
0
30 1.5
0.0
12 120
right high
low
0.1
30 1.5
4.5
13 155
right low
low
0
35 1.5
0.0
14 185
right high
low
0.1
30 1.5
4.5
15 375
right low
low
0
190 1.5
0.0
16
0.0
17
0.0
18
0.0
19
0.0
20
0.0
21
0.0
22
23
24
Sum eronsion sub -totals for each BEHI/NBS
Total Erosion (ft3/yr)
34.5
Divide total erosion (ft3) by 27
Total Erosion (yd/yr)
1.3
Multiply Total erosion (yard3) by 1.3
Total Erosion (tons/yr)
1.7
Erosion per unit length
Total Eronsion (Tons/yr/ft)
0.00

Site Heron Steam and Wetland Mitigation Site
Stream UT 3
Bank Length 902
Observers Grant and Kenan
Date 5 -Dec -16
Station Bank BEHI NBS
Erosion Rate
Length Bank Height
Eronsion
1 263 1 left very high low
0.15
263 2.9
114.4
2 451 left high low
0.1
188 1.4
26.3
3
0.0
4
0.0
5
0.0
6
0.0
7
0.0
8
0.0
9
0.0
10 263 right very high low
0.15
263 2.9
114.4
11 1 451 1 right high low
0.1
188 1.4
26.3
12
0.0
13
0.0
14
0.0
15
0.0
16 1 1
0.0
17
0.0
18
0.0
19
0.0
20
0.0
21
0.0
22
23
24
Sum eronsion sub -totals for each BEHI/NBS
Total Erosion (ft3/yr)
281.5
Divide total erosion (ft3) by 27
ITotal Erosion (yd/yr)
10.4
Multiply Total erosion (yard3) by 1.3
ITotal Erosion (tons/yr)
13.6
Erosion per unit length
ITotal Eronsion (Tons/yr/ft)
0.02

Site Heron Steam and Wetland Mitigation Site
Stream UT 4
Bank Length 832
Observers Grant and Kenan
Date 5 -Dec -16
Station Bank BEHI
NBS
Erosion Rate
Length Bank Height
Eronsion
1 75 left low
low
0
75 0.7
0.0
2 150 left high
low
0.1
75 1 1.3
9.8
3 195 left low
low
0
45 0.7
0.0
4 305 left high
low
0.1
110 2.7
29.7
5 416 left low
low
0
111 1.2
0.0
6 1
0.0
7
0.0
8
0.0
9
0.0
10 75 right low
low
0
75 0.7
0.0
11 150 right high
low
0.1
75 1.3
9.8
12 195 right low
low
0
45 1 0.7
0.0
13 305 right high
low
0.1
110 2.7
29.7
14 416 right low
low
0
111 1.2
0.0
15
0.0
16
0.0
17
0.0
18
0.0
19
0.0
20
0.0
21
0.0
22
23
24
Sum eronsion sub -totals for each BEHI/NBS
Total Erosion (ft3/yr)
78.9
Divide total erosion (ft3) by 27
Total Erosion (yd/yr)
2.9
Multiply Total erosion (yard3) by 1.3
Total Erosion (tons/yr)
3.8
Erosion per unit length
Total Eronsion (Tons/yr/ft)
0.00

Site Heron Steam and Wetland Mitigation Site
Stream UT 5
Bank Length 1292
Observers Grant and Kenan
Date 5 -Dec -16
Station Bank BEHI NBS,
Erosion Rate
Length Bank Height
Eronsion
1 323 left moderate low
0.02
323 1.5
9.7
2 646 left low low
0
323 1
0.0
3
0.0
4
0.0
5
0.0
6 1
0.0
7
0.0
8
0.0
9
0.0
10 323 right moderate low
0.02
323 1.5
9.7
11 1 646 right low low
0
323 1
0.0
12
0.0
13
0.0
14
0.0
15
0.0
16
0.0
17
0.0
18
0.0
19
0.0
20
0.0
21
0.0
22
23
24
Sum eronsion sub -totals for each BEHI/NBS
Total Erosion (ft3/yr)
19.4
Divide total erosion (ft3) by 27
Total Erosion (yd/yr)
0.7
Multiply Total erosion (yard3) by 1.3
Total Erosion (tons/yr)
0.9
Erosion per unit length
Total Eronsion (Tons/yr/ft)
0.00

Site
Heron Steam and Wetland Mitigation Site
Stream
UT 6
Bank Length
1450
Observers
Grant and Kenan
Date
5 -Dec -16
Station
Bank
BEHI
NBS
Erosion Rate
Length
Bank Height
Eronsion
1 35
1 left
high
low
0.1
35
1.2
4.2
2 50
left
low
low
0
15 1
0.9
0.0
3 60
left
high
low
0.1
10
1.3
1.3
4 140
left
low
low
0
80
1.2
0.0
5 185
left
high
low
0.1
45
2.9
13.1
6 270
1 left
high
low
0.1
85
1.6
13.6
7 340
left
high
low
0.1
70
3
21.0
8 495
left
low
low
0
155
0.5
0.0
9 545
left
high
low
0.1
50
2.5
12.5
10 570
left
low
low
0
25
1
0.0
11 730
1 left
high
low
0.1
160
4
64.0
12
0.0
13 12
right
low
low
0
12
1.2
0.0
14 70
right
high
low
0.1
58
1.2
7.0
15 145
right
low
low
0
75
1
0.0
16 195
1 right
high
low
0.1
50
2.9
14.5
17 280
right
high
low
0.1
85 1
1.6
13.6
18 415
right
high
low
0.1
135
2.7
36.5
19 485
right
low
low
0
70
0.5
0.0
20 510
right
high
low
0.1
25
3.5
8.8
21 560
1 right
low
low
0
50
1
0.0
22 720
right
high
low
0.1
160
4
64.0
23
24
Sum eronsion sub -totals for each BEHI/NBS
Total Erosion (ft3/yr)
273.9
Divide total erosion (ft3) by 27
Total Erosion (yd/yr)
10.1
Multiply Total erosion (yard3) by 1.3
Total Erosion (tons/yr)
13.2
Erosion per unit length
Total Eronsion (Tons/yr/ft)
0.01

Site Heron Steam and Wetland Mitigation Site
Stream UT 7
Bank Length 1557
Observers Grant and Kenan
Date 5 -Dec -16
Station Bank BEHI
NBS
Erosion Rate
Length Bank Height
Eronsion
1 120 left low
low
0
120 0.4
0.0
2 427 left moderate
low
0.02
307 1.3
8.0
3 488 left low
low
0
61 1.3
0.0
4 776 left moderate
low
0.02
288 1.3
7.5
5
0.0
6 1
0.0
7
0.0
8
0.0
9
0.0
10
0.0
11 1
0.0
12
0.0
13 125 right low
low
0
125 0.4
0.0
14 432 right moderate
low
0.02
307 1.3
8.0
15 493 right low
low
0
61 1.3
0.0
16 1 781 right moderate
low
0.02
288 1.3
7.5
17
0.0
18
0.0
19
0.0
20
0.0
21 1 1
0.0
22
0.0
23
24
Sum eronsion sub -totals for each BEHI/NBS
Total Erosion (ft3/yr)
30.9
Divide total erosion (ft3) by 27
Total Erosion (yd/yr)
1.1
Multiply Total erosion (yard3) by 1.3
Total Erosion (tons/yr)
1.5
Erosion per unit length
Total Eronsion (Tons/yr/ft)
0.00

Site Heron Steam and Wetland Mitigation Site
Stream UT 8
Bank Length 1493
Observers Grant and Kenan
Date 5 -Dec -16
Station Bank BEHI
NBS
Erosion Rate
Length Bank Height
Eronsion
1 60 1 left high
low
0.1
60 1.8
10.8
2 220 left low
low
0
160 0.5
0.0
3 420 left very high
low
0.15
200 2.8
84.0
4 744 left moderate
low
0.02
324 3
19.4
5
0.0
6
0.0
7
0.0
8
0.0
9
0.0
10
0.0
11
0.0
12
0.0
13 70 right moderate
low
0.02
70 1.8
2.5
14 210 right low
low
0
140 0.8
0.0
15 425 right high
low
0.1
215 2.8
60.2
16 749 right moderate
low
0.02
324 3
19.4
17
0.0
18
0.0
19
0.0
20
0.0
21
0.0
22
0.0
23
24
Sum eronsion sub -totals for each BEHI/NBS
Total Erosion (ft3/yr)
196.4
Divide total erosion (ft3) by 27
Total Erosion (yd/yr)
7.3
Multiply Total erosion (yard3) by 1.3
Total Erosion (tons/yr)
9.5
Erosion per unit length
Total Eronsion (Tons/yr/ft)
0.01

L
m
E
E
7
N
m
Z
2
LU
m
45 L
N
n'0
W
01
f'V
t.f)
X11
M
O vii
N
.
-1
M
Om
-I
01
O r0.
Lu
L
V
f6
e--I
N
m
-:r
Ln
lD
r�
W
jp
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
C
m
F
O
L
N

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Heron Site (UT 1 lower) Date of Assessment 12/5/16
Stream Category Pa2 Assessor Name/Organization Axiom Environmental
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
(1) Water Quality
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
LOW
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
LOW
(4) Microtopography
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
LOW
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
LOW
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
LOW
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(3) Baseflow
HIGH
(3) Substrate
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Heron Site (UT 1 upper)
Stream Category Pal
Date of Assessment 12/5/16
Assessor Name/Organization Axiom Environmental
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
LOW
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
MEDIUM
(4) Microtopography
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
(4) Channel Stability
LOW
(4) Sediment Transport
MEDIUM
(4) Stream Geomorphology
HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(3) Baseflow
HIGH
(3) Substrate
MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Heron Site (UT 4) Date of Assessment 12/5/16
Stream Category Pal Assessor Name/Organization Axiom Environmental
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
HIGH
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Flood Flow
HIGH
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
HIGH
(4) Floodplain Access
HIGH
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
LOW
(4) Microtopography
HIGH
(3) Stream Stability
HIGH
(4) Channel Stability
HIGH
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(3) Baseflow
HIGH
(3) Substrate
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
HIGH
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall

Stream Site Name Heron Site (UT 5)
Stream Category Pal
Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Date of Assessment 12/5/16
Assessor Name/Organization Axiom Environmental
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
USACE/
NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
LOW
LOW
(4) Microtopography
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
LOW
LOW
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
LOW
LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
LOW
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
LOW
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Baseflow
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Substrate
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
LOW
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
NA
Overall

Stream Site Name Heron Site (UT 6)
Stream Category Pal
Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Date of Assessment 12/5/16
Assessor Name/Organization Axiom Environmental
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
MEDIUM
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
LOW
(4) Microtopography
MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
LOW
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(3) Baseflow
HIGH
(3) Substrate
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Heron Site (UT 7) Date of Assessment 12/5/16
Stream Category Pal Assessor Name/Organization Axiom Environmental
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
(1) Habitat
USACE/
NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Flood Flow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
LOW
LOW
(4) Microtopography
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Channel Stability
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
LOW
LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
LOW
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
LOW
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Baseflow
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Substrate
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
HIGH
HIGH
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
LOW
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
NA
Overall

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Heron Site (UT 8) Date of Assessment 12/5/16
Stream Category Pal Assessor Name/Organization Axiom Environmental
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Perennial
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
MEDIUM
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
HIGH
(4) Floodplain Access
HIGH
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
HIGH
(4) Microtopography
MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
MEDIUM
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
MEDIUM
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
HIGH
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall

Wetland Site Name
Wetland Type
NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
K1
Headwater Forest
Date 12/5/2016
Assessor Name/Organization Jernigan/Axiom
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
YES
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
HIGH
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Function Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
HIGH
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
HIGH
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Habitat Physical Structure
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Particulate Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Physical Change Condition
HIGH
Function Rating Summary
Function
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Hydrology
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
HIGH
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
LOW
Vegetation Composition
Condition
MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function
Metrics/Notes
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
HIGH
Water Quality
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Habitat
Condition
MEDIUM
Overall Wetland Rating HIGH

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name K2
Wetland Type Headwater Forest
Date 12/5/2016
Assessor Name/Organization Jernigan/Axiom
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
YES
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Function
Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
MEDIUM
LOW
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
HIGH
Water Quality
Pathogen Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Particulate Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Physical Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Habitat
Physical Structure
Condition
LOW
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
LOW
Vegetation Composition
Condition
MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function
Metrics/Notes
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
HIGH
Water Quality
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Habitat
Condition
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

Wetland Site Name
Wetland Type
NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
K3
Headwater Forest
Date 12/5/2016
Assessor Name/Organization Jernigan/Axiom
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
YES
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Function
Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
MEDIUM
HIGH
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
HIGH
Water Quality
Pathogen Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Particulate Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Physical Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Habitat
Physical Structure
Condition
LOW
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
LOW
Vegetation Composition
Condition
MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function
Metrics/Notes
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
HIGH
Water Quality
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Habitat
Condition
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating HIGH

NC Division of Water Quality —Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Oriqins v. 4.11
r� uwq stream Identification Form Version 3.11
Date: - Project/Site Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points: - - . -- - - - --
Stream Determination (circles Other
Stream is at reasr intermittent
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30' Ephemeral Intermittent ¢erenni e g Quad Name:
A Geomorphology iSubtotai = I
Absent
We
Moderate `
Strong
I" Continuity of channel bed and bank
_
p
?
2
-
-— -{
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg3
_---
3 In -channel structure ex riffle -pool step -pool
P
— i
-
z
-
- apple -pool secLuence
0
4 Particle size of stream substrate
-
C
i t, !
2
3
-
fct floplain
5 Act)vejrelicod
3
—
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
+_ -
-
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
C
1
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
1
i 2 1
3_
9 Grade control
0
1 05
-1
1 5
10 Natural valley 0 '05
t
11 Second or greater order channel i No =
a artificial ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
B Hydrology (Subtotal
12 Presence of Baseflow - 0 2 i
13 Iror oxidizing bacteria
14 Leaf later 1 5 1 05
15 Sediment on plants or debris 0 0 1
16 Organic debris Imes or piles _ 0 0 5 1
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0
C. Biology (Subtotal
15
Yes = 3
-tee--
3
3
0
15 _
t5
Yes =3i
18 Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed3 2 r 1 0
20 Macrobenthos inose diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21 Aquatic MOIIusKs 0 1 2 3
22 Fish 05 1 1 5
0
23 Crayfish 0 a,5 1 1 5
24 Amphibians 0 t 15
25 Algae 0' 0 5 1 15
26 Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0 75 OBL = 1 5 Other = 0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods Seep 35 of manual
Notes
Sketch
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC VWQ stream Identification form Nersilon 4.11 - —
Date: r` ?; Project/Site _ ,. Latitude:
Evaluator: f. { County: ,�, Longitude:
Total Points: Stream Determination (circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent _ - Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial e 9 Quad Name:
if z 19 or perennial it t 30-
A. Geomoroholoav (Subtotal = Absent Weak T Moderate T Strong
10 Continuity of channel bed and bank
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
0
1 _
t
2 _
2 fi
3
3 In -channel structure ex nffle-pool step -pool
ripple -pool sequence_
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
0
1
y
_ 7J
2 1
3
3
5 ActivetreUd floodplain
0
1
1
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
0
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
i-
2
3
9 Grade control
0-
`
1
1 5
10 Natural valley
0
05 d
1
OBL = 1 5 Other = 0
11 Second or greater order channel
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods Seep 35 of manual
Notes
No =
Yes = 3
- artificial ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
R Hvrirninov tSuhtntal = 4, • `^ )
12 Presence of Baseflow
1 2 3
i 13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
1 2 3
14 Leaf litter
1 05 0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
05 1 1 5
16 Organic debris Imes or piles
05 1 1 5
17 Sod -based evidence of high water table')
No = 0 Y s =
C Rinlnnv tSuhtntal = I 1
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
2
0
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed 3
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22 Fish
0
05
1
1 5
23 Crayfish
05
1
1 5
24 Amphibians
-0'
05
1
1 5
25 Algae
`
05
1
1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75
OBL = 1 5 Other = 0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods Seep 35 of manual
Notes
Sketch
I
41

,J� 3
NC Division of Water Quality —Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
1l VVtV Stream Identification Form Version 1.11
Date: " Project/Site Latitude:
Evaluator: CountyLongitude.
Total Points:
Stream is ar teasr ntermrttent Stream Determination (circle one) Other
d>_ 19 or perennial if a 30Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial e g Quad Name:
A Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
?
{ 2
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
i t
+—
2 �
3 _
3 In -channel structure ex riffle -pool step -pool
apple -pool sequence
0
1
2�
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
C
1
2
�� '
3
5 Activerrel,ct floodplain
—-- -
+
1 --!
1
-
3
6 Depositional oars or benches
0
---� -�
t.'
2
---
3
Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
+
8 Headcuts
0`
1
2
3
9 Grade control
_ 0
05
i
t
1 5
10 Natural valley
0
0 5
1- i
1 5
11 Second or greater order channel
No = (I)
= 3
a amfciat ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
B _Hydrology (Subtotal
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1,
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0'
1
2
3
14 Leaf fitter
1 5
i
-1
05
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
C
0 5
1
1 5
~16 Organic deons lines or piles
0
0 5
1
1 5
17 Sod -based evidence of high water table'1
No = C
Yes = 3,
C Biology (Subtotal
-�
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19 Rootea upland plants in streambed
3/
_ 2
1
0
X20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundances
0
j 1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
Q
1
2
3
22 Fish
4
+..._ 05
1
1 5
23 Crayfish
-- --�--mac—
0�
05
1 1
----•-----_.,
1 5
24 Amphib ars
61
05
1
+ 5
25 Algae
QN
0 5
1
1 5
26 Wetland plants .n streamoed
FACW = 0 75
CBL = 1 5 Other = 0
'perenrnai streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of -anuat
Notes
Sketch
41

NC Division of Water Quality —Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
�t Uw Q Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: �_ Pro'ecVSite
i - � 1 Latitude:
Evaluator: County: �'. Longitude:
Total Points: Stream Determination (c; Other
Stream s at reasr intermittent Ephemeral IntermitteA Perenni e g Quad Name:
if r 19 or perennial d >_ 30'
A Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate j
Stroll
?' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
2
4
3
- --
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
C
- _
1
20r
3
3 In -channel structure ex riffle -pool step -pool
0
t
2)
_
apple -pool sequence
3
4 Particle size of stream subst-rate
0
t
+ 2 1
5 Acbfloodplain
0
-
�
� -- - --
2
3ve�rehct
3
_
5 Depositional bars or benches
-
0
- - _
3
_ Recent alluvial deposits
C
1
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
2
3
9 Grade control
-
0
0 5
t
t 5
r
10 Natural valley
C
+
05
1 5
? t Second or greater order channel
-
No =S1,;
Yes_ = 3
artificial ditches are not rated see dmCuSwon5 in manual
B Hydrology y gy (Subtotal = )
12 Presence of Basedow
0
1
2
31
-13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
: 0
?
3
__-
14 Leaf litter
1 5
-
—2
F 05
0 —
5 Sediment on plants o, debris
--- 0
0 5�
t
5
16 Organic debris Imes or piles
0
0
Sol -based evidence of high water table'1
No = C
Yes = 3)
C Biology (Subtotal = i
.8 Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
+
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3 '
2
t
p
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
+ ?
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
?
_
22 Fsh
23 Crayfish
C
0
05
05
1
t?
1 5
t 5
24 Amphibians
0
05
t
5_
25 Algae
0'
05
?
b
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75
OBI = 1 5 Other =
-;
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods Seep 35 of maruai
- _ -
-
Notes
Sketch
41

NC Division of Water Quality —Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Oriqins v. 4.11
'M DVVV stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: l ; ProjecVSite - - Latitude:
Evaluator: ' _„ , County: Longitude:
Total Points: I Stream Dete circle one) I Other
Stream is at +east 23rt� Ephemera ntermitte Perennial
d>_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30'- P �' l e g Quad Name:
A Geomorphology (Subtotal = i
Absent
Weak
Moderate ! Strong
'° Continuity of channel bed and bank
0 +
_
1
--
2 3, -4
2 Sinuosity of Channel along thalweg
0
B Hydrology (Subtotal 4)
2 3
3 In -channel structure ex riffle -pool step -pool
—
, plepoa sequence
0
1 )
2 3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1-
5 Acbvelrelict Floodplain
0
14 Leaf litter
2 3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
---
-- 2 3
1
Recent alluvialo
C
C
_-_
1 ;
�-
2 3eposlts
8 Headcuts
-
0
1
t 2 3
9 Grade control
0—
05
No
10 Natural valley
0
0 5
�1 5
11 Second or greater order channel
_
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated see discussions m manual
B Hydrology (Subtotal 4)
12 Presence of Baseftow
C
1 2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
2
3
14 Leaf litter
1
1 0
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
S '
0 5 1
1 5
_
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
05 1j
1 5
1Sol-based evicence of high water table'?
No
Yes= 3
C Biology (Subtotal
18 F,brous roots in streambed+
3'
2 1
0
-
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3,
— _—r- --
2 1
-
0
20 Macrobenthos ,note diversity and abundance)
D
1 2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0+
1 2
3
22 Fish
0__
0 5 1
1 5
23 Crayfish
0;
0 5 1
1 5
24 Amphibians _
0
+
F
---.--- _
05 1
_ -_ -i
1 5
~25
Algae - I 0 05 t t 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0 75 OBL = 1 5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using otner methods See p 35 of man,,ai
Notes
Sketch
41

,.J,`:' i
NC Division of Water Quality —Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DNN'Q Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: ProjecVSite - Latitude:
Evaluator. County: f. Longitude.
Total Points: Stream Dete circle one) i Other
Stream is at least ife 30tent -' Ephemeral Intermitte Perennial a Quad Name:
d? t 9 or perennial J >_ 30' 9
A Geomorphology (Subtotal = % I
Absent
Weak
Mod rate
Strong
a
1 Continuity of channel bed and bank
—
0
+ -
2)
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
p
�
-�f 1 --
3
3 In -channel structure ex riffle -pool step -pool
25 Algae
O)
0-5 1
-�
uenc
,pple-pool seqe
0
;
1
2,
J
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
C
_ _--
i
2
3
5 Activeireltct floodplain
�-
2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
—�-
--'—�
2
3 - 1
Recent alluvial deposits
F _ - -- --
8 Headcuts
>
- 2
3
9 Grade control
0
I 05
1
i 5
r10 Natural valley
0
1 05
1T
? 5
I 1 1 Second or greater order channel
No = 4 .'
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
B Hydrology (Subtotal = )
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
--
t
3
3 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3—
14 Leaf litter
1 5
1
05 --
0
5 Sediment on plants or debris
0
- 050-
1
1 5
16 Organic debris lines or piles_
0
O S
1
1 5
1' Soil -based evidence of high water tables
No C
Yes = 3 .3
C Biology (Subtotal
18 F brous roots in streambed
--._._-
+ 3
F 2
iJ
-- -
19 Rooted upland olants in streambed
3
.._
2
- -_
1
-
0
20 Macrobenthos mole diversity and abundance'_
C
1
2 �—
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
-- --
4
-
2 -
3
22 F sh0
�—
5 1
1 5
23 Crayfish
0
05 t
1 5
24 Amprnbians
0
0 5 1
5
_- _
-1 -_ ._ .._-
,
25 Algae
O)
0-5 1
1 5
26 Wetland plants in streamoed
FACW = 0 75 OBL = 1 5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of rnanual
Notes --
Sketch
...... .... .....
41

1"
NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Oriqins v. 4.11
Irk UwV Ntream Identification Form Version 4.11 •f•
Date: - Project/Site ' - Latitude:
Evaluator: County: I Longitude.
Total Points: � ination (circle one) 1 Other
Stream is at least intermittent 'Ephemeral 1 ermittent Perennial e g Quad Name:
A>_ 19 or rental d >_ 30'
A Geomorphology (Subtotal=
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
I Fla Continuity of channel bed and bank
J
1
2
3
_
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
—
!; --' 2T
-_
3
1 3 In -channel structure ex nffte-pool step pool
0
1
2
B Hydrology (Subtotal = )
ripple -pool Sequence
3
a Particle size of stream substrate
C
2
2,
3
5 Actrveirelict floodplain
0 --
?
2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
Q
?
2
3
Recent alluvial deposits
_
1
2
3 —
-
8 Headcuts
0
+
2 i
3
9 Grade control
0_ _ 05
r 10 Natural valley
0
115
1�
j 5 I
? 1 Second or greater order channel
j No
= 0
Yes = 3 _
a artificial ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
B Hydrology (Subtotal = )
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
T f i
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
?
2
3
14 Leaf fitter
1 5
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0 5
1
1 5
16 Organic aeons Innes or piles
C2 I
05
1
1 5
Soil -based evidence of high water table')
No = 0
----yam --- -_ - __--
C Biology--
(Subtotal = i
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3`,
2
?
0
20 Macrobenthos mote diversity and abundance!
C
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
C
?
2
3
22 Fish_
C_
05
1
1 5
23 Crayfish
0 0 5
1
1 5
24 Amphibians
0
05
?
5
25 Algae
0--
05
1 5 1
~26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75
OBL = 1 5 Other = 0 '—
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods Seep 35 of manuai
Notes
-_ - -
-
Sketch
41
�Ir

NC Division of Water Quality —Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
:NIL uw stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: - II ProjecVSite Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude.
Total Points: Stream Determination (circle one) Other
Streamr at least l if? 30' j Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial e g Quad Name:
d > 19 or tennis! d > 30'
A Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
t
2}
~ 2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
+
t-
3 In -channel structure ex riffle -pool step -pool
ripple -pool sequence
0
'
i
2
3
-- - - -_
4 Particle size of stream substrate
C
-
rt
2
3
5 Active/relict Floodplain
t
2
3
- - ---
6 Depositional bars or benches
1
f
—
1
2
3
�7 Recent alluvial deposits
_ 0
i
+
2
3
8 Headcuts
Q—
t
2
3
Grade control
0
05
1.' i
1 5
10 Natural valley
0
05
1
1 5
11 Second or greater order channel
No = 0-,
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
B Hydrology (Subtotal = )
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
t
2
3
3 Iror oxidizing bacteria ---
u
3 y
14 Leaf litter
-_
t 5
-
1
+_
0
�5 Sediment on tants or debris -
1 P
v
'`
-
�--
i
--
0 5
�
1
-- -
1 5
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
"05%
1
t 5
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table'?
No = 0
C Biology Subtotal =
—
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance;
C
�
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
-�—
2
3
22 Fish
t Q
_
05
1
1 5
23 Crayfish
0
0 5
t
t 5
24 Amphibians _ li
25 Algae
26 Wetland plants in streambed
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See 0 3{ of man,al
�Notes � r •''
Sketch
41
05 t T 15
05 t t5 _
FACW = 0 75 OBL = t 5 Other = 0

Appendix C
Flood Frequency Analysis Data
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) Appendices
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

Reference Reaches
Flood Frequency Analaysis-Regional Regression Equation (USGS 2004)
Cedarock Reference Reach
Return
Interval
(years)
Discharge
(cfs)
1.3
27
1.5
32
2
43.6
5
81.4
10
115
25
169
50
217
100
272
200
337
500
438
Note: Bold values are interpolated.
500
450
400
> 350
300
v 250
200
150
a 100
cc
50
0
Cedarock Reference Reach
0 100 200 300 400 500
Discharge (cfs)
Causer Farm Reference Reach Causey Farm Reference Reach
Return
Interval
(years)
Discharge
(cfs)
1.3
53
1.5
65
2
94.3
5
171
10
238
25
342
50
435
100
541
200
663
500
852
900
800
`m 700
a
600
> 500
c 400
c 300
200
100
0
0 100 200 300 400 500
Discharge (cfs)

Appendix D
Jurisdictional Determination Info
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) Appendices
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

SAW -2017-01471
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW -2017-01471 County: Alamance U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -Silk Hope
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: NCDEO DMS
Attn: Tim Baumgartner
Address: 1619 !Mail Service Center
Raleieh, NC 27699-1619
Size (acres) —20 Nearest Town Snow Camp
Nearest Waterway South Fork Cane Creek River Basin Cape Fear
USGS HUC 03030002 Coordinates 36.853955 N, -79.363458 W
Location description: The project area is located on the east side of Bethel South Fork Road, east of its intersection with Clark
Road, on both side of South Fork Cane Creek, near Snow Camp, Alamance County, North Carolina. The Proiect Area is
shown as the "Easement" on the attached Figure 3, titled "Jurisdictional Areas."
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appear to be waters including wetlands, on the above described project area, that may be subject to Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters including wetlands, have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently
accurate and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated
October 2017. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process,
including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation
requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat
all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an
appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters including wetlands,. on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However,
since the waters including wetlands, have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be
used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an
effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters including wetlands, at the project area, which is not
sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters including
wetlands, on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a
timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waters including wetlands, on the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters including wetlands, on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
❑ The waters including wetlands, on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the
Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated MAP DATE. If you wish to
have the delineation surveyed, the Corps can review and verify the survey upon completion. Once verified, this survey will

SAW -2017-01471
provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA and/or RHA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no
change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters including wetlands, have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps
Regulatory Official identified below on SURVEY SIGNED DATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact David Bailey at [phone] X 30 or
David. E.BaileyZa�usace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: See the Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination form dated 12/21/2017.
D. Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room IOM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
DN: c=US,ally o=U.S.ned GoverBAiLEnment,
.=DoD,ou=PKl
�� DN: c=US, n-BAI Government, ou=8373PKI.
/90V ou=USA, cn=BAILEY.DAVID.E.1379283736
Corps Regulatory Official: Date: 2017.12.2114:51:59-05'00'
Date of JD: 12/21/2017 Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at littp:/',,coi-psmapLI.Lisace.ai-my.mil/cin apex/t?p= 136:4:0.
Copy furnished:
Sue Homewood, NCDEQ-DWR, 450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300, Winston-Salem, NC 27105

SAW -2017-01471
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: NCDEQ DVIS Attn: Tim Baum artner File Number: SAW -2017-01471 Date: 12/21/2017
Attached is: See Section below
F-11 INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission) A
❑ PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Pen -nit or Letter of ennission B
❑ PERMIT DENIAL C
❑ APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
® PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or Imp:Lisace.arniv.mil Missions;CivilWorkslRegulatoaPrt)sjrramandPermits.aspx
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Pennission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the pen -nit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terns and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
pen -nit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section Ii of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.

SAW -2017-01471
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
attn: David E. Bailey
CESAD-PDO
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportuni to participate in all site investi ations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant oragent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, David Bailey, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North Carolina
28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal
Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD): 12/21/2017
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
NCDMS (Attn: Tim Baumgartner)
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
SAW -2017-01471 (NCDMS ILF - Heron Stream and Welland Mitigation Site
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC
County/parish/borough: Alamance
City: Snow Camp
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 35.852517 0N; Long. -79.361977 °W,
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: south Fork
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non -wetland waters:
-5937 linear feet: 2-15 width (ft) and/or acres.
Cowardln Class: R3UB1/2, R41.181/2, R3UB2/3, and R4UI32/3
Stream Flow: Perennial and Intermittent
Wetlands: 0.61 acres.
Cowardin Class: PF01, PSS1
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal:
Non -Tidal:
1

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s): i ?,/?, i /-)D i 7
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
❑� Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant: Aerial, topo, and soils maps (Axiom)
❑✓ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
appli nt/consultant.
X Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
❑✓ U.S- Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Silk Hope 7.5 -minute
❑✓ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation: Soil Survey of Alamance County, NC (1960)
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
© Photographs: © Aerial (Name & Date): 2014 NC OneMap or
❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑X Other information (please specify): LiDAR
2

Estimated amount of
Site Number/
Cowardin
aquatic resource in
Class of aquatic
Feature Name
Latitude
Longitude
Class
review area
resources
Non -section 10 -
UT1
35.855734
-79.365621
R3UB1/2
1155 linear feet
Non -wetland
Non -section 10 -
UT2
35.854815
-79.365570
R4UB1/2
363 linear feet
Non -wetland
Non -section 10 -
UT3
35.856247
-79.366189
R3UB2/3
269 linear feet
Non -wetland
Non -section 10 -
UT4
35.852036
-79.362248
R3UB1/2
485 linear feet
Non -wetland
Non -section 10 -
UT5
35.852544
-79.361933
R3UB2/3
907 linear feet
Non -wetland
Non -section 10 -
UT6
35.853614
-79.360226
R3UB2/3
683 linear feet
Non -wetland
Non -section 10 -
UT7
35.854101
-79.358908
R4UB2/3
202 linear feet
Non -wetland
Non -section 10 -
UT8
35.847951
-79.360242
R3UB1/1
1221 linear feet
Non -wetland
Non -section 10 -
GB Wetland
35.856582
-79.365246
PFO1
0.24 acres
Wetland
Non -section 10 -
PB Wetland
35.855694
-79.365906
PSS1
0.06 acres
Wetland
Non -section 10 -
PC Wetland
35.854978
-79.366584
PFO1
0.06 acres
Wetland
Non -section 10 -
PD Wetland
35.855109
-79.366182
PFO1
0.14 acres
Wetland
Non -section 10 -
GE Wetland
35.852517
-79.361977
PSS1
0.09 acres
Wetland
Non -section 10 -
GF Wetland
35.854459
-79.359486
PS51
0.02 acres
Wetland
Non -section 10 -
BA Wetland
35.853218
-79.363100
PSS1
0.01 acres
Wetland
Non -section 10 -
BB Wetland
35.853134
-79.362693
PSS1
0.02 acres
Wetland
Non -section 10 -
BC Wetland
35.853337
-79.359848
PSS1
0.04 acres
Wetland
Non -section 10 -
OW -1
35.853411
-79.363295
R3UB2/3
0.10 acres
Non -wetland
Non -section 10 -
OW -2
1 35.854870
1 -79.359953
1 R3UB2/3
1 0.35 acres
Non -wetland

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre -construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.

This preliminary JD finds that there "maybe" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
Digitally signed by
BAI LE Y.DAV I D.E.1 379283 736
DN: C-US,o-LLS. Government,
ou=DoD, ou-PKI, ou-USA,
n -BAILEY. DAVI D. E.1379283736
Date: 2017 12.2' ' 4:51'.40 05 00
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
Dg1E'�/sgns0 trl l't G2M:e'ns,
W. Grant Lewis
Em:m•�. y 1. eo. °u
.kn=ow �,rvomw..vnMuta� c,u5
m,�rbu:,o�am
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

f tisk #It�
.,-.k / �' I t . « ; �,,�ii y` '�.�',► r cU1 f`x {(�j 1.
�� .. � :`�t• .�I� i �..__–.,..ss...i �Iwr« 'A'h :4�.s.....r..E.w1►t.�,'�k!M� t� 3� �`•,t f�!1�� moo)
�-
E
•
t r- ids '"'� •' t!�%"` tc1i; rppej�g
t� piy �,• t N 3 i t
woo—
*..
+� :tea
�g jo �.—' t
1 41
LegendWilli
JJJ�I�tay¢
Easement
— Potential Streams -approximately 5,285 feetl(111�Lgq��
- Potential Wetlands (Headwater Forest) - approximately 0.68 acres
—PotenlialJwisdidionalOpen Water - approximately 0.45 acres >1' •,, v �`. '� �'
� NCDOT Roatls
4toot elevation contours (LiDAR 2007)
1'7 NC SAM Forms
NC WAM Forms
a
Feet
0 500 1,000 2,000
A
N
I
Axom Ermaurrrgal, Inc.
Prepared for
Project
HERON STREAM
AND WETLAND
MITIGATION SITE
Alamance County, NC
Title
JURISDICTIONAL
AREAS
Notes
Ba cRB�ound Imagery Source
2m41er11phobg,aphy
pmvded by the NC One Map
pmgmm (onl ne. prov ded by
e NCG,byr h c Intb— -
C—b nalpn C—.i)
Drawn by. KRJ
Date. NOV 2017
Scale 1:5000
Project No. 17-008
FIGURE
3

N 9g-98 gb ] gb fi r i
96.100
s
b1 1 9604 �'
gb0
-'' g 01=gb 04 AaxxT E.ny+arnwwal, Inc.
Prepared for
Pd r
- - - rd -01 P P 3 pb-04pb 0, IC �• it � .i � h � - y
Pb z yP
y'i/1y
Project
ss t�� Ilk
P 51 HERON STREAM
PD Wetland +, AND WETLAND
MITIGATION SITE
Alamance County, NC
Title
WETLAND
DETAIL
t';. q e sv _ • 1 `
GF-vtietla nd gro3 sr.: Aores
' y Background Imagery source
2014 aor a1 Pnotagrapny
p ' 1 �`•ioi
Progninn (nlne p—ded by
y6 `1 E 1 E � � ,e - me NCGeP9reP6 c Informal on
Legend Be 3- Drawn by
a< Be KRJ
OEasement 3 - Be C 8 BC -0g Date
Ba oa . c-0] NOV 2017
Potential Streams - approximately 5,285 feet 1 -
Potential Wetlands (Headwater Forest) - approximately 0.68 acres BA Wetland yP ,1.'t Scale. 12000
.0 Wetland
.1 Project No.
Potential Jurisdictional Open Water - approximately 0.45 acres =.�'° 17-008
d Wetland GPS Points
Wetland Data Forms ve
FIGURE
NCDOT Roads
eo
4 -foot elevation contours (LIDAR 2007) gs o_ G w1
yl
Feet GE 3 y -�
0 250 500 1,000 E

Appendix E
Categorical Exclusion Document
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) Appendices
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

Appendix A
Categorical Exclusion Form for Ecosystem Enhancement
Program Projects
Version 1.4
Note: Only Appendix A should to be submitted (along with any supporting documentation) as the
environmental document.
ProjectPart 1: General • •
Project Name: Heron Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Count Name: Alamance County
DMS Number: 100014
Project Sponsor: Restoration Systems, LLC
Pro'ect Contact Name: Raymond Holz
Project Contact Address: 1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211 Raleigh, NC 27604
Project Contact E-mail: [e-mail]
DMS Project Manager: Lindsay Crocker
ProjectDescription
The Heron encompasses approximately 20 acres of agricultural land used for livestock grazing
and hay production. Existing Site streams have been cleared, dredged of cobble substrate, trampled
by livestock, eroded vertically and laterally. The project will restore streams and wetlands within the Site
for a total of 5928 Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs) and 0.63 Riparian Wetland Mitigation Units (WMUs).
For Official Use Only
Reviewed By:
Date DMSProject Manager
Conditional Approved By:
Date For Division Administrator
FHWA
❑ Check this box if there are outstanding issues
Final Approval By:
9- - G ems._ ____
Date For Division Administrator
FHWA
6 Version 1.4, 8/18/05

Appendix F
Financial Assurances
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) Appendices
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

Per the NC EEP RFP #: 16-006990, Restoration Systems will provide financial assurance in one
of the following forms:
1) Performance Bonding — The Offeror must provide security in the form of acceptable
performance bonds as described in the following paragraph to guarantee delivery of the
maximum number of originally contracted Mitigation Units. The performance bonds must
be obtained from a company licensed in North Carolina as shown in the Federal Treasury
Listing of Approved Sureties (Circular 570). The maximum allowable amount provided by
a surety may not exceed the "underwriting limitation" for the surety as identified in the
Federal Treasury Listing. Although this RFP is a request for mitigation and not
construction, the performance bonds shall follow the prescribed wording provided in
N.C.G.S. § 44A-33. The Offeror must provide two performance bonds. The first bond must
be for 100% of the total value of the contract and must be in effect and submitted with the
Task 3 deliverable (see Section 8. SCOPE OF WORK — Task 3) before EEP will authorize
payment for that deliverable. The bond must remain in effect until the Offeror has received
written notification from the EEP that the requirements of Task 6 (submittal of baseline
monitoring report) have been met. After the successful completion of Task 6, the bond can
be retired and a second bond must be substituted for the first. The second bond must be for
40% of the value of the contract, which covers the monitoring period. The Monitoring
Phase Performance Bond can be reduced yearly concurrent with the payment schedule once
the yearly deliverable is approved by EEP and credits are released by the IRT.
2) Letters of Credit- LOCs must be drawn from a reputable Bank identified by the FDIC as
"Well Capitalized" or "Adequately Capitalized" and follow the submittal timing, contract
amounts and schedules for reduction as those described above for the performance bonds.
Evergreen or irrevocable Letters of Credit shall be required to provide a 120 day notice of
cancellation, termination or non -renewal.
3) Casualty Insurance on underlying performance of Credits or Units of Restoration — Must
follow the same submittal timing, contract amounts and reduction schedules as those
described above in performance bonds. The insurance must contain the following
information.
a) The "NC DENR" must be named as the "Regulatory Body". NC DENR shall have
the sole right to place a claim against the policy. NC DENR shall have the sole right
and obligation as the responsible "regulatory body" to approve any claim settlement.
b) Initial insurance must be for a 10 year period.
The process of evaluating these options is underway. Once obtained, RS will provide digital and
hard copies of the assurance of distribution to IRT members.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) Appendices
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

Appendix G
Site Protection Instrument
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) Appendices
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
AND RIGHT OF ACCESS PROVIDED
PURSUANT TO
FULL DELIVERY
MITIGATION CONTRACT
COUNTY
SPO File Number:
DMS Project Number:
Prepared by: Office of the Attorney General
Property Control Section
Return to: NC Department of Administration
State Property Office
1321 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1321
THIS DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF ACCESS, made
this day of , 20_, by Landowner name noes here
, ("Grantor"), whose mailing address is Landowner address goes here , to the State of
North Carolina, ("Grantee"), whose mailing address is State of North Carolina, Department of
Administration, State Property Office, 1321 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1321. The
designations of Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs,
successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as
required by context.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-214.8 et seq., the State
of North Carolina has established the Division of Mitigation Services (formerly known as the
Ecosystem Enhancement Program and Wetlands Restoration Program) within the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources for the purposes of acquiring, maintaining, restoring,
enhancing, creating and preserving wetland and riparian resources that contribute to the
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 1 of 11

protection and improvement of water quality, flood prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife
habitat, and recreational opportunities; and
WHEREAS, this Conservation Easement from Grantor to Grantee has been negotiated,
arranged and provided for as a condition of a full delivery contract between ( insert name and
address of full delivery contract provider 1 and the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality, to provide stream, wetland and/or buffer mitigation pursuant to the North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality Purchase and Services Contract Number
WHEREAS, The State of North Carolina is qualified to be the Grantee of a Conservation
Easement pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-35; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the United
States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District entered into a Memorandum of
Understanding, (MOU) duly executed by all parties on November 4, 1998. This MOU
recognized that the Wetlands Restoration Program was to provide effective compensatory
mitigation for authorized impacts to wetlands, streams and other aquatic resources by restoring,
enhancing and preserving the wetland and riparian areas of the State; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the North Carolina
Department of Transportation and the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
District entered into a Memorandum of Agreement, (MOA) duly executed by all parties in
Greensboro, NC on July 22, 2003, which recognizes that the Division of Mitigation Services
(formerly Ecosystem Enhancement Program) is to provide for compensatory mitigation by
effective protection of the land, water and natural resources of the State by restoring, enhancing
and preserving ecosystem functions; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality, the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management, and the National Marine
Fisheries Service entered into an agreement to continue the In -Lieu Fee operations of the North
Carolina Department of Natural Resources' Division of Mitigation Services (formerly Ecosystem
Enhancement Program) with an effective date of 28 July, 2010, which supersedes and replaces
the previously effective MOA and MOU referenced above; and
WHEREAS, the acceptance of this instrument for and on behalf of the State of North
Carolina was granted to the Department of Administration by resolution as approved by the
Governor and Council of State adopted at a meeting held in the City of Raleigh, North Carolina,
on the 81h day of February 2000; and
WHEREAS, the Division of Mitigation Services in the Department of Environmental
Quality, which has been delegated the authority authorized by the Governor and Council of State
to the Department of Administration, has approved acceptance of this instrument; and
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 2 of 11

WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying, and being
in Township, County, North Carolina (the "Property"), and being
more particularly described as that certain parcel of land containing approximately
acres and being conveyed to the Grantor by deed as recorded in Deed Book at Page
of the County Registry, North Carolina; and
WHEREAS, Grantor is willing to grant a Conservation Easement and Right of Access
over the herein described areas of the Property, thereby restricting and limiting the use of the
areas of the Property subject to the Conservation Easement to the terms and conditions and
purposes hereinafter set forth, and Grantee is willing to accept said Easement and Access Rights.
The Conservation Easement shall be for the protection and benefit of the waters of if known
insert name of stream, branch, river or waterway here.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms, conditions, and
restrictions hereinafter set forth, Grantor unconditionally and irrevocably hereby grants and
conveys unto Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever and in perpetuity, a Conservation
Easement along with a general Right of Access.
The Conservation Easement Area consists of the following:
Tracts Number containing a total of acres as shown on the plats
of survey entitled "Final Plat, Conservation Easement for North Carolina Division of Mitigation
Services, Project Name: , SPO File No. , EEP Site No. ,
Property of ," dated 20_ by name of surveyor,
PLS Number and recorded in the County, North Carolina Register
of Deeds at Plat Book Pages
See attached "Exhibit A", Legal Description of area of the Property hereinafter referred to as the
"Conservation Easement Area"
The purposes of this Conservation Easement are to maintain, restore, enhance, construct,
create and preserve wetland and/or riparian resources in the Conservation Easement Area that
contribute to the protection and improvement of water quality, flood prevention, fisheries,
aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities; to maintain permanently the
Conservation Easement Area in its natural condition, consistent with these purposes; and to
prevent any use of the Easement Area that will significantly impair or interfere with these
purposes. To achieve these purposes, the following conditions and restrictions are set forth:
I. DURATION OF EASEMENT
Pursuant to law, including the above referenced statutes, this Conservation Easement and
Right of Access shall be perpetual and it shall run with, and be a continuing restriction upon the
use of, the Property, and it shall be enforceable by the Grantee against the Grantor and against
Grantor's heirs, successors and assigns, personal representatives, agents, lessees, and licensees.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 3 of I 1

II. GRANTOR RESERVED USES AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES
The Conservation Easement Area shall be restricted from any development or usage that
would impair or interfere with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Unless expressly
reserved as a compatible use herein, any activity in, or use of, the Conservation Easement Area
by the Grantor is prohibited as inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement.
Any rights not expressly reserved hereunder by the Grantor have been acquired by the Grantee.
Any rights not expressly reserved hereunder by the Grantor, including the rights to all mitigation
credits, including, but not limited to, stream, wetland, and riparian buffer mitigation units,
derived from each site within the area of the Conservation Easement, are conveyed to and belong
to the Grantee. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following specific uses are
prohibited, restricted, or reserved as indicated:
A. Recreational Uses. Grantor expressly reserves the right to undeveloped recreational
uses, including hiking, bird watching, hunting and fishing, and access to the Conservation
Easement Area for the purposes thereof.
B. Motorized Vehicle Use. Motorized vehicle use in the Conservation Easement Area is
prohibited except within a Crossing Area(s) or Road or Trail as shown on the recorded survey
plat.
C. Educational Uses. The Grantor reserves the right to engage in and permit others to
engage in educational uses in the Conservation Easement Area not inconsistent with this
Conservation Easement, and the right of access to the Conservation Easement Area for such
purposes including organized educational activities such as site visits and observations.
Educational uses of the property shall not alter vegetation, hydrology or topography of the site.
D. Damage to Vegetation. Except within Crossing Area(s) as shown on the recorded
survey plat and as related to the removal of non-native plants, diseased or damaged trees, or
vegetation that destabilizes or renders unsafe the Conservation Easement Area to persons or
natural habitat, all cutting, removal, mowing, harming, or destruction of any trees and vegetation
in the Conservation Easement Area is prohibited.
E. Industrial, Residential and Commercial Uses. All industrial, residential and
commercial uses are prohibited in the Conservation Easement Area.
F. Agricultural Use. All agricultural uses are prohibited within the Conservation Easement
Area including any use for cropland, waste lagoons, or pastureland.
G. New Construction. There shall be no building, facility, mobile home, antenna, utility
pole, tower, or other structure constructed or placed in the Conservation Easement Area.
H. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction or maintenance of new roads, trails,
walkways, or paving in the Conservation Easement.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 4 of 11

All existing roads, trails and crossings within the Conservation Easement Area shall be shown on
the recorded survey plat.
I. Signs. No signs shall be permitted in the Conservation Easement Area except
interpretive signs describing restoration activities and the conservation values of the
Conservation Easement Area, signs identifying the owner of the Property and the holder of the
Conservation Easement, signs giving directions, or signs prescribing rules and regulations for the
use of the Conservation Easement Area.
J. Dumping or Storing. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste,
abandoned vehicles, appliances, machinery, or any other material in the Conservation Easement
Area is prohibited.
K. Grading, Mineral Use, Excavation, Dredging. There shall be no grading, filling,
excavation, dredging, mining, drilling, hydraulic fracturing; removal of topsoil, sand, gravel,
rock, peat, minerals, or other materials.
L. Water Quality and Drainage Patterns. There shall be no diking, draining, dredging,
channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or diverting, causing, allowing or permitting
the diversion of surface or underground water in the Conservation Easement Area. No altering
or tampering with water control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the restored,
enhanced, or created drainage patterns is allowed. All removal of wetlands, polluting or
discharging into waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides in the
Conservation Easement Area is prohibited. In the event of an emergency interruption or
shortage of all other water sources, water from within the Conservation Easement Area may
temporarily be withdrawn for good cause shown as needed for the survival of livestock on the
Property.
M. Subdivision and Conveyance. Grantor voluntarily agrees that no further subdivision,
partitioning, or dividing of the Conservation Easement Area portion of the Property owned by the
Grantor in fee simple (`fee") that is subject to this Conservation Easement is allowed. Any future
transfer of the Property shall be subject to this Conservation Easement and Right of Access and to the
Grantee's right of unlimited and repeated ingress and egress over and across the Property to the
Conservation Easement Area for the purposes set forth herein.
N. Development Rights. All development rights are permanently removed from the
Conservation Easement Area and are non-transferrable.
O. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change, disturbance, alteration or impairment of
the natural features of the Conservation Easement Area or any intentional introduction of non-
native plants, trees and/or animal species by Grantor is prohibited.
The Grantor may request permission to vary from the above restrictions for good cause
shown, provided that any such request is not inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation
Easement, and the Grantor obtains advance written approval from the Division of Mitigation
Services, 1652 Mail Services Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 5of11

III. GRANTEE RESERVED USES
A. Right of Access, Construction, and Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents,
successors and assigns, receive a perpetual Right of Access to the Conservation Easement Area
over the Property at reasonable times to undertake any activities on the property to restore,
construct, manage, maintain, enhance, protect, and monitor the stream, wetland and any other
riparian resources in the Conservation Easement Area, in accordance with restoration activities
or a long-term management plan. Unless otherwise specifically set forth in this Conservation
Easement, the rights granted herein do not include or establish for the public any access rights.
B. Restoration Activities. These activities include planting of trees, shrubs and herbaceous
vegetation, installation of monitoring wells, utilization of heavy equipment to grade, fill, and
prepare the soil, modification of the hydrology of the site, and installation of natural and
manmade materials as needed to direct in -stream, above ground, and subterraneous water flow.
C. Signs. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors or assigns, shall be permitted
to place signs and witness posts on the Property to include any or all of the following: describe
the project, prohibited activities within the Conservation Easement, or identify the project
boundaries and the holder of the Conservation Easement.
D. Fences. Conservation Easements are purchased to protect the investments by the State
(Grantee) in natural resources. Livestock within conservations easements damages the
investment and can result in reductions in natural resource value and mitigation credits which
would cause financial harm to the State. Therefore, Landowners (Grantor) with livestock are
required to restrict livestock access to the Conservation Easement area. Repeated failure to do so
may result in the State (Grantee) repairing or installing livestock exclusion devices (fences)
within the conservation area for the purpose of restricting livestock access. In such cases, the
landowner (Grantor) must provide access to the State (Grantee) to make repairs.
E. Crossing Area(s). The Grantee is not responsible for maintenance of crossing area(s),
however, the Grantee, its employees and agents, successors or assigns, reserve the right to repair
crossing area(s), at its sole discretion and to recover the cost of such repairs from the Grantor if
such repairs are needed as a result of activities of the Grantor, his successors or assigns.
IV. ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
A. Enforcement. To accomplish the purposes of this Conservation Easement, Grantee is
allowed to prevent any activity within the Conservation Easement Area that is inconsistent with
the purposes of this Conservation Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or
features in the Conservation Easement Area that may have been damaged by such unauthorized
activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation Easement by Grantor, the
Grantee shall, except as provided below, notify the Grantor in writing of such breach and the
Grantor shall have ninety (90) days after receipt of such notice to correct the damage caused by
such breach. If the breach and damage remains uncured after ninety (90) days, the Grantee may
enforce this Conservation Easement by bringing appropriate legal proceedings including an
action to recover damages, as well as injunctive and other relief. The Grantee shall also have the
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 6 of 1 I

power and authority, consistent with its statutory authority: (a) to prevent any impairment of the
Conservation Easement Area by acts which may be unlawful or in violation of this Conservation
Easement; (b) to otherwise preserve or protect its interest in the Property; or (c) to seek damages
from any appropriate person or entity. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the
immediate right, without notice, to obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other
appropriate relief, if the breach is or would irreversibly or otherwise materially impair the
benefits to be derived from this Conservation Easement, and the Grantor and Grantee
acknowledge that the damage would be irreparable and remedies at law inadequate. The rights
and remedies of the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, all
other rights and remedies available to Grantee in connection with this Conservation Easement.
B. Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors and assigns, have the
right, with reasonable notice, to enter the Conservation Easement Area over the Property at
reasonable times for the purpose of inspection to determine whether the Grantor is complying
with the terms, conditions and restrictions of this Conservation Easement.
C. Acts Beyond Grantor's Control. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement
shall be construed to entitle Grantee to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or change
in the Conservation Easement Area caused by third parties, resulting from causes beyond the
Grantor's control, including, without limitation, fire, flood, storm, and earth movement, or from
any prudent action taken in good faith by the Grantor under emergency conditions to prevent,
abate, or mitigate significant injury to life or damage to the Property resulting from such causes.
D. Costs of Enforcement. Beyond regular and typical monitoring expenses, any costs
incurred by Grantee in enforcing the terms of this Conservation Easement against Grantor,
including, without limitation, any costs of restoration necessitated by Grantor's acts or omissions
in violation of the terms of this Conservation Easement, shall be borne by Grantor.
E. No Waiver. Enforcement of this Easement shall be at the discretion of the Grantee and
any forbearance, delay or omission by Grantee to exercise its rights hereunder in the event of any
breach of any term set forth herein shall not be construed to be a waiver by Grantee.
V. MISCELLANEOUS
A. This instrument sets forth the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the
Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or
agreements relating to the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be invalid, the
remainder of the provisions of the Conservation Easement, and the application of such provision
to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is found to be invalid, shall not be
affected thereby.
B. Grantor is responsible for any real estate taxes, assessments, fees, or charges levied upon
the Property. Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs or liability of any kind related to the
ownership, operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of the Property, except as expressly
provided herein. Upkeep of any constructed bridges, fences, or other amenities on the Property
are the sole responsibility of the Grantor. Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor of the
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 7ofII

obligation to comply with federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits that may apply to
the exercise of the Reserved Rights.
C. Any notices shall be sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested to the
parties at their addresses shown herein or to other addresses as either party establishes in writing
upon notification to the other.
D. Grantor shall notify Grantee in writing of the name and address and any party to whom
the Property or any part thereof is to be transferred at or prior to the time said transfer is made.
Grantor further agrees that any subsequent lease, deed, or other legal instrument by which any
interest in the Property is conveyed is subject to the Conservation Easement herein created.
E. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement shall survive
any merger of the fee and easement interests in the Property or any portion thereof.
F. This Conservation Easement and Right of Access may be amended, but only in writing
signed by all parties hereto, or their successors or assigns, if such amendment does not affect the
qualification of this Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee under any applicable
laws, and is consistent with the purposes of the Conservation Easement. The owner of the
Property shall notify the State Property Office and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in writing
sixty (60) days prior to the initiation of any transfer of all or any part of the Property or of any
request to void or modify this Conservation Easement. Such notifications and modification
requests shall be addressed to:
Division of Mitigation Services Program Manager
NC State Property Office
1321 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1321
and
General Counsel
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
G. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this Conservation Easement are in
gross and assignable provided, however, that the Grantee hereby covenants and agrees, that in
the event it transfers or assigns this Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the
interest will be a qualified holder under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34 et seq. and § 170(h) of the
Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee further covenants and agrees that the terms of the
transfer or assignment will be such that the transferee or assignee will be required to continue in
perpetuity the conservation purposes described in this document.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 8of11

VI. QUIET ENJOYMENT
Grantor reserves all remaining rights accruing from ownership of the Property, including
the right to engage in or permit or invite others to engage in only those uses of the Conservation
Easement Area that are expressly reserved herein, not prohibited or restricted herein, and are not
inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Without limiting the generality of
the foregoing, the Grantor expressly reserves to the Grantor, and the Grantor's invitees and
licensees, the right of access to the Conservation Easement Area, and the right of quiet
enjoyment of the Conservation Easement Area,
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said rights and easements perpetually unto the State of
North Carolina for the aforesaid purposes,
AND Grantor covenants that Grantor is seized of said premises in fee and has the right to
convey the permanent Conservation Easement herein granted; that the same is free from
encumbrances and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the same against the claims of all
persons whomsoever.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 9 of I 1

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day
and year first above written.
(SEAL)
NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, , a Notary Public in and for the County and State
aforesaid, do hereby certify that , Grantor, personally appeared
before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Notary Seal this the
day of , 20.
Notary Public
My commission expires:
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 10 of 11

Exhibit A
[INSERT LEGAL DESCRIPTION]
NCDMS Full Del ivery.Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 11 of 11

Appendix H
Credit Release Schedule
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) Appendices
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

Table 3 — Schedule of Monitoring Events
Monitoring
Monitoring Activities Required
Event
Streams
Wetlands
Pre -Construction
• Water Quality (Section VII(A))
Per Mitigation Plan
• Macroinvertebrate & Fish (Section VII(B-C))*
Year 0
0 As -built Survey (includes longitudinal profile and
• As -built Survey
(As -Built)
sampling point locations)
• Vegetation (Section V)
• Vegetation (Section V)
• Stream Channel Stability/Hydrology (Section VI)
• Wetland Hydrology (Section IX)
Year 1
• Water Quality (Section VII(A))*
• Visual, two times (Section X)
• Visual, two times (Section X)
• Vegetation (Section V)
• Vegetation (Section V)
Stream Channel Stability/Hydrology (Section VI)
• Wetland Hydrology (Section IX)
Year 2
• Water Quality (Section VII(A))*
• Visual, two times (Section X)
• Visual, two times (Section X)
• Vegetation (Section V)
• Vegetation (Section V)
• Stream Channel Stability/Hydrology (Section VI)
0 Wetland Hydrology (Section IX)
Year 3
• Water Quality (Section VII(A))*
• Visual, two times (Section X)
• Macroinvertebrate & Fish (Section VII(B-C))*
• Visual, two times (Section X)
Year 4
• Water Quality (Section VII(A)) *
• Visual (Section X)
• Visual, two times (Section X)
• Wetland Hydrology (Section IX)
• Vegetation (Section V)
• Vegetation (Section V)
• Stream Channel Stability/Hydrology (Section VI)
• Wetland Hydrology (Section IX)
Year 5
• Water Quality (Section VII(A)) *
• Visual, two times (Section X)
• Macroinvertebrate & Fish (Section VII(B-C))
• Visual, two times (Section X)
Year 6
• Water Quality (Section VII(A)) *
• Wetland Hydrology (Section IX)
Visual, two times (Section X)
• Visual, two times (Section X)
• Vegetation (Section V)
• Vegetation (Section V)
• Stream Channel Stability/Hydrology (Section VI)
• Wetland Hydrology (Section IX)
Year 7
• Water Quality (Section VII(A)) *
• Visual, two times (Section X)
• Macroinvertebrate & Fish (Section VII(B-C))
• Visual, two times (Section X)
*Indicates optional monitoring activities
XIV. Credit Release Schedules
The standard release schedule for mitigation bank and ILF credits generated through stream and wetland
mitigation projects has been modified to meet the new standards for the monitoring timeframes provided
in this guidance document. For mitigation banks, the first credit release (15% of the bank's total stream
restoration and/or enhancement credits) will occur upon establishment of the mitigation bank, and upon
completion following criteria:
1) Execution of the MBI or UMBI by the Sponsor and the USACE
2) Approval of the final Mitigation Plan
1.

3) The mitigation bank site must be secured
4) Delivery of the financial assurances described in the Mitigation Plan
5) Recordation of the long-term protection mechanism and title opinion acceptable to the USACE
6) Issuance of the 404 permit verification for construction of the site, if required.
For mitigation sites that include preservation -only credits, 100% of the preservation credits will be
released with the completion of the six criteria stated above.
For ILF sites (including all NCDMS projects), no initial release of credits (Milestone 1) is provided because
ILF programs utilized advance credits, so no initial release is necessary to help fund site construction. To
account for this, the 15% credit release associated with the first milestone (bank establishment) is held
until the second milestone, so that the total credits release at the second milestone is 30%. In order for
NCDMS to receive the 30% release (shown in the schedules as Milestone 2), they must comply with the
credit release requirements stated in Section IV(I)(3) of the approved NCDMS Instrument.
The following conditions apply to the credit release schedules:
A. A reserve of 10% of a site's total stream credits will be released after four bankfull events
have occurred, in separate years, provided the channel is stable and all other performance
standards are met. In the event that less than four bankfull events occur during the
monitoring period, release of these reserve credits is at the discretion of the NCIRT.
B. For mitigation banks, implementation of the approved Mitigation Plan must be initiated no
later than the first full growing season after the date of the first credit transaction (credit sale).
C. After the second milestone, the credit releases are scheduled to occur on an annual basis,
assuming that the annual monitoring report has been provided to the USACE in accordance
with Section IV (General Monitoring Requirements) of this document, and that the monitoring
report demonstrates that interim performance standards are being met and that no other
concerns have been identified on-site during the visual monitoring. All credit releases require
written approval from the USACE.
D. The credits associated with the final credit release milestone will be released only upon a
determination by the USACE, in consultation with the NCIRT, of functional success as defined
in the Mitigation Plan.
29

The schedules below list the updated credit release schedules for stream and wetland mitigation projects
developed by bank and ILF sites in North Carolina:
Credit Release Schedule and Milestones for Wetlands
Credit
Credit
Banks
ILF/NCDMS
Release
Release Activity
Interim
Total
Interim
Total
Milestone
Milestone
Release
Released
Release
Released
Released
Site Establishment (includes all required criteria
Site Establishment (includes all required criteria
1
1
15%
15%
0%
0%
0%
stated above)
stated above)
Completion of all initial physical and biological
Completion of all initial physical and biological
2
improvements made pursuant to the Mitigation
15%
30%
30%
30%
30%
Plan
Plan
Year 1 monitoring report demonstrates that
Year 1 monitoring report demonstrates that
3
3
10%
40%
10%
40%
40%
interim performance standards have been met
interim performance standards have been met
Year 2 monitoring report demonstrates that
Year 2 monitoring report demonstrates that
4
4
10%
50%
10%
50%
55%
interim performance standards have been met
interim performance standards have been met
Year 3 monitoring report demonstrates that
Year 3 monitoring report demonstrates that
5
5
15%
65%
15%
65%
75%
interim performance standards have been met
interim performance standards have been met
Year 4 monitoring report demonstrates that
Year 4 monitoring report demonstrates that
6
6
o
5 /°
°
70 /0
0
5 /0
0
70 /o
0
85 /o
interim performance standards have been met
interim performance standards have been met
Year 5 monitoring report demonstrates that
Year 5 monitoring report demonstrates that
7
7
15%
85%
15%
85%
100%
interim performance standards have been met
performance standards have been met
Year 6 monitoring report demonstrates that
8
°
5 /0
°
90 /0
0
5 /0
0
90 /o
interim performance standards have been met
Year 7 monitoring report demonstrates that
9
10%
100%
10%
100%
performance standards have been met
*Please note that vegetation plot data may not be required with monitoring reports submitted during
these monitoring years unless otherwise required by the Mitigation Plan or directed by the NCIRT.
Credit Release Schedule and Milestones
for Coastal Marsh Wetlands
Credit
Banks
ILF/NCDMS
Release
Release Activity
Interim
Total
Interim
Total
Milestone
Release
Released
Release
Released
Site Establishment (includes all required criteria
1
15%
15%
0%
0%
stated above)
Completion of all initial physical and biological
2
improvements made pursuant to the Mitigation
15%
30%
30%
30%
Plan
Year 1 monitoring report demonstrates that
3
10%
40%
10%
40%
interim performance standards have been met
Year 2 monitoring report demonstrates that
4
15%
55%
15%
55%
interim performance standards have been met
Year 3 monitoring report demonstrates that
5
20%
75%
20%
75%
interim performance standards have been met
Year 4 monitoring report demonstrates that
6
o
10 /0
0
85 /0
0
10 /0
0
85 /o
interim performance standards have been met
Year 5 monitoring report demonstrates that
7
15%
100%
15%
100%
performance standards have been met
30

Credit Release Schedule and Milestones for Streams
Credit
Banks
ILF/NCDMS
Release
Release Activity
Interim
Total
Interim
Total
Milestone
Release
Released
Release
Released
Site Establishment (includes all required criteria
1
15/0
15/0
0%
0%
stated above)
Completion of all initial physical and biological
2
improvements made pursuant to the Mitigation
15/0
30%
30%
30%
Plan
Year 1 monitoring report demonstrates that
3
channels are stable and interim performance
10%
40%
10%
40%
standards have been met
Year 2 monitoring report demonstrates that
4
channels are stable and interim performance
10%
50%
10%
50%
standards have been met
Year 3 monitoring report demonstrates that
5
channels are stable and interim performance
10%
60%
10%
60%
standards have been met
Year 4 monitoring report demonstrates that
6`
channels are stable and interim performance
5%
5%
(75%-)
(5%--)
standards have been met
Year 5 monitoring report demonstrates that
7
channels are stable and interim performance
10%
--)
10%
(85
(85%-)
standards have been met
Year 6 monitoring report demonstrates that
8'
channels are stable and interim performance
5%
o
5%
0
(90%-)
(90%-)
standards have been met
Year 7 monitoring report demonstrates that
9
channels are stable, performance standards
10%
10%
(100%")
(100%")
have been met
*Please note that vegetation data may not be required with monitoring reports submitted during these monitoring
years unless otherwise required by the Mitigation Plan or directed by the NORT.
**10% reserve of credits to be held back until the bankfull event performance standard has been met.
31

Appendix I
Maintenance Plan
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) Appendices
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

Maintenance Plan
The Site shall be monitored on a regular basis and a physical inspection of the site shall be conducted a
minimum of once per year throughout the post -construction monitoring period until performance
standards are met. These site inspections may identify site components and features that require routine
maintenance. Routine maintenance should be expected most often in the first two years following site
construction and may include the following:
Component/Feature
Maintenance through project close-out
Routine channel maintenance and repair activities may include securing of loose
coir matting and supplemental installations of live stakes and other target
Stream
vegetation along the channel. Areas where stormwater and floodplain flows
intercept the channel may also require maintenance to prevent bank failures and
head -cutting.
Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor of the targeted
plant community. Routine vegetation maintenance and repair activities may
include supplemental planting, pruning, mulching, and fertilizing. Exotic invasive
Vegetation
plant species shall be controlled by mechanical and/or chemical methods. Any
vegetation control requiring herbicide application will be performed in
accordance with NC Department of Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations.
Beaver and associated dams are to be removed as they colonize and until the
Beaver
project is closed.
Site boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between
the mitigation site and adjacent properties. Boundaries may be identified by
Site Boundary
fence, marker, bollard, post, tree- blazing, or other means as allowed by site
conditions and/or conservation easement. Boundary markers disturbed,
damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced on an as needed basis.
Road crossings within the site may be maintained only as allowed by
Road Crossing
Conservation Easement or existing easement, deed restrictions, rights of way, or
corridor agreements.
Terracell Drop
Routine maintenance and repair activities may include removal of debris and
supplemental installation of live stakes and other target vegetation along the
Structure
channel. Undermining of the structure may require repair or replacement.

Appendix J
Randolph Electric Membership Corporation
Utility Work Agreement
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100014) Appendices
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

Utilit% NN ork .-agreement
1 -his agreement. made this '?th ala% of .lanuar% . 2016 b% and bet"een Russell B Hadlc%
thereinafter refcrrcd to a, the 'Member) and Randolph Electric Membership Corporation.
thereinatter referred to a RENIC).
WITNESSETH-
VAk. I HFREFt)RF. in order to facilitate the orderlc and expedih,_+u, completion of requested
(irks the Member and RENIC ha4e a, -,reed to the follo'Aing
I That the x:ope. description and location of the %%ork to be undertaken hti RFMC is as tolloi v
Relocate: c',enccad priman 01.M Cr liiic and in -Stall sccondar` ser icc to a meter base *that ser%cN a
,Aell Located at 8922 Bethel South Fork Rd ^`
_'. That RELIC \% ill prepare an estimate, detailing_ the cost of labor i:on,;truction, materials, supplies.
handhn_ transportation. equipment, right, nt ),kay. prehminarl engineering and construction
engineering, inclu�iim�.t an itemization of appropriate credits for safv ate. betterments and a, cruel
depreciation, all in sutlicient detail to provide the Member a reasonable hast, for analysis
-
I hat to the eo ent it is determined there are chin -es in the :cope ot' the work, the duration of the
a ork. extra work. or major from the statement ork co% erect h,, this agreement,
reimbursement :hall he limited to the same rate as helo%% I rucks and other equipment needed in the
aho�e mentioned "ork t4ill he billed as lollo+c, A A
4 The member will he billed at a cost of*S_N :A per hour. �k ith an estimated A hours needed
to complete the cork. The aho%e mentioned equipment Will he assn *ned to this job for A A
hours For all jobs c tth an expected duration time of ? hours or Ie,s. the RUNIC crews and all
needed equipment % ill remain at the Joh ;tie The total estimated cost of the %%ork proposed herein is
estimated to be S 10.:60 . Afie "ill hill actual cost.
IN \t "I i \F SS %\ HLREt?F. the parties hercb% hx� o: atl�eted their name, h% their duly authorized
of -beer, that d,n and year first ahove critten
Member
B,.
Randolph Electric Membership Corporation
B% Dai id Rich
T-ttie _Stakin Spsmalist

Appendix K
City of Burlington
Map Modification for Land Application
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 1000 14) Appendices
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina July 2018

Grant Lewis
From:
Worth Creech <[e-mail]>
Sent:
Monday, July 02, 2018 1:55 PM
To:
Grant Lewis
Subject:
FW: Easement
fyi
Worth Creech I Restoration Systems LLC
1101 Haynes St. Suite 2111 Raleigh, NC 27604
office: 919-334 9114 1 mobile [phone]
web: www.restorationsystems.com
From: Shane Fletcher <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2018 1:54 PM
To: Worth Creech <[e-mail]>
Subject: Easement
The City of Burlington will modify our maps for NC -AM -16 ( Michael Hadley ) and not land apply in any
stream restoration easements.
Shane Fletcher
Residuals Management Coordinator
City of Burlington NC
Cell - 336-675-5927
Office - 336-570-6138
stletcher t ci.buw-lin,,ton.nc.us
1

,ocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
pll
r
SITE
AIAMANCE COUNTY 1
— FIATHAAI couNTr—
/ 100 -
VICINITY MAP
Not to Scale
END -UTI-
STA I3+06
GRAPHIC SCALES
50 25 0 50 100
PLANS
50 25 0 50 100
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
10 5 0 1010 5
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
z
O
CONSTRUCTION PLAINS
HERON SITE
LOCATION: ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
TYPE OF WORK: STREAM RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT (CLEARING,
GRUBBING, GRADING, EROSION CONTROL AND PLANTING)
END -UT7-
STA 9+96
UT7 -
QST/
START -U7-7-
STA 0+00
START -UT6-
STA 0+00
START
S7
END -UT2-
S8
UT1 ---\T A 3+9
a�
ND -UT6-
TA 7+81
QST
,1 UT6
Q5� oq
Q51`
UT5
r
rr
— UT2
PSH 06
/VU -U/ J- v
STA 2+79
UT3 'In A`P
ART -UT3-
STA 0+00
UT1
/4 —/
ART -UT2-
A 0+00
-U/ 3-
4+90
END -UT8-
STA 8+57
PSH 16
PSH 17
START -UT8- �: ' �:
a= K Gr eek STA U 8 +00 o t o
FO W
S0 Z
IQ
END -UT4-
STA 4+50
I
START -UT4- j
STA 0+00
u d
<K �
r FO
So�ti
6e�'re\ 2351
Sj
START -UTI-
STA 0+00
PROPOSED LENGTH
OF UT1 =
1306 LF
PROPOSED LENGTH
OF UT5=
1490 LF
PROPOSED LENGTH
OF UT2=
398 LF
PROPOSED LENGTH
OF U76=
781 LF
PROPOSED LENGTH
OF UT3=
279 LF
PROPOSED LENGTH
OF UT7=
996 LF
PROPOSED LENGTH
OF UT4=
450 LF
PROPOSED LENGTH
OF UT8=
857 LF
TOTAL STREAM
LENGTH= 6557 LF
RESTORATION LEVEL
STREAM
(linear footage)
RIPARIAN WETLAND (acreage) NONRIPARIAN WETLAND (acreage)
RESTORATION
4183
0.35
-
ENHANCEMENT
1234
-
-
TOTALS
1131
0.61
-
MITIGATION UNITS
5264 SMUs
0.66 RIPARIAN WMUs
- NONRIPARIAN WMUs
SHEET NUMBER
01
024 THRU 020
03
03A
04 THRU 17
E-02 THRU E -02B
E-03 THRU E -03E
E -03F
E-04 THRU E-17
P-02
P-03 THRU P -03A
P-04 THRU P-17
9TAT6 8T T8 Pik- ReP6R8NCC No.
BNEOT
TOTwL
SHE6T8
N .0 . HERO-,- SITE
INDEX OF SHEETS
SHEET
Title Sheet
Typicals
Control Points and Location Map
Easement Map
Ran and Profile Sheets
Erosion Control Notes
Erosion Control Details
Haul Road Locations
Erosion Control Ran Sheets
Ranting Notes
Planting Typicals
Planting Ran Sheets
I
I
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION:
7.8 ACRES
I
C�
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
DQ>iL cl Imo:
Des! nedPrepared in the Office of: F
Axiom Environmental SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. 108�
:3 �C14994C3-
218 Snow Ave _ S
Raleigh, NC 27603 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD _ CL r
Q RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606TELz _ O Q
859-2243 GRANT LEWIS i ENGIFIRM LIC NSE NO. C-890 —
Axiom EmUo mental, Inc. PROJECT DESIGNER
1 ED-Restoration Systems
1021Haynes St.
Raleigh, 211 27604 JOSHUA G. DALTON, P.E.
PROJECT ENGINEER
WORTH CREECH 7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM E
SITE CONSTRUC77ON MANAGER DATE:

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
M
K
m
s
°a
POOL
RIFFLE RUN GLIDE. RIFFLE
c WATER SURFACE
ELEVATION _ _ _ _
IF -II- �
I�I I- -1
-11-11 = /
BOTTOM OF
CHANNEL -
(VARIES - SEE NOTE 1)
TYPICAL CHANNEL PROFILE
NOTES:
1. POOL -TO -POOL SPACING IS MEASURED FROM
CENTER OF POOL BEND TO CENTER OF POOL BEND.
POOLLENGTH
VALLEY
SIDE SLOPE
PROPO
FLOODI
15' MIN.
JVE WILLOW
STAKES
PROPOSED
FLOODPLAIN
COIR FIBER
Wbkf ft.
\
EROSION
MAX. 1:1 SLOPE
Dpool (ft.)
CONTROL MATTING
Wthal (ft.)
UT 1
SEE NOTE 2
5.2
1
Class A and
\ "
-III-_-
Cobble Stone
TYPICAL POOL CROSS-SECTION
2:1
0
0.3
BANK SLOPE 1
0.6
4.9
RIFFLE
/'
4.8
EXTENDSTONE
Wtha
o
BED MATERIAL UP
5.2
1.5
CHANNEL BANK
5.3
3.7
TO 1/3 Drlff
W bot
0.7
TYPICAL RIFFLE CROSS-SECTION
JVE WILLOW
STAKES
PROPOSED
FLOODPLAIN
CHANNEL PLAN VIEW NOTES:
1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LAYOUT THE CHANNEL ALIGNMENT BY LOCATING
THE RADII AND SCRIBING THE CENTER LINE FOR EACH POOL BEND. THE
CONNECTING TANGENT SECTIONS SHALL COMPLETE THE LAYOUT OF THE CHANNEL.
2. FIELD ADJUSTMENTS OF THE ALIGNMENT MAY BE REQUIRED TO SAVE TREES
OR AVOID OBSTACLES. THE STAKE -OUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTION
MANAGER BEFORE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CHANNEL.
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
TYPICALS 2A
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE I DATE: 20/8
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
906 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
1 EIG' NORTH 27606
TEL (91>•�� ��� ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C490
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
��\\IIIIIIII///
DocuaSi�ln�"y: CA RO
jo
SEAL
26971 = _
U %ii1,C' I N`��\��
''/IIIIIIII\\`�
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
CROSS-SECTION DIMENSIONS
/
Wbkf ft.
\
Driff (ft.)
MAX. 1:1 SLOPE
Dpool (ft.)
\
Wthal (ft.)
UT 1
F
5.2
0.7
0.1
\ "
/
RIFFLLE
TYPICAL POOL CROSS-SECTION
TAIL OF
0.3
/� - HR1
0.6
4.9
RIFFLE
/'
4.8
3.2
TAIL OF x R2
0.1
DESIGNRIFFLE
5.2
1.5
UT 7
5.3
3.7
CHANNEL
0.1
0.7
5.8
1.0
UT 8
5.9
4.3
0.3
R/FFF /
C
Fi
CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1.5
O Q�
/
\
FLOWo
1. MATERIAL EXCAVATED FROM CHANNEL AND FLOODPLAIN SHALL BE
USED TO BACKFILL EXISTING CHANNEL.
R1
2. BANK PROTECTION SHALL CONSIST OF NATURAL COIR FIBER MATTING AND
POOL LENGTH
PLACED TO THE TOP OF BANK. (SEE DETAIL COIR FIBER MATTING, SHEET E -3D)
TYPICAL
CHANNEL PLAN VIEW
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY BED MATERIAL FOR THE ENTIRE BED
LENGTH OF EACH RIFFLE SECTION. THE BED MATERIAL SHALL CONSIST OF
A MIX OF CLASS A AND SMALLER STONE.
CHANNEL PLAN VIEW NOTES:
1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LAYOUT THE CHANNEL ALIGNMENT BY LOCATING
THE RADII AND SCRIBING THE CENTER LINE FOR EACH POOL BEND. THE
CONNECTING TANGENT SECTIONS SHALL COMPLETE THE LAYOUT OF THE CHANNEL.
2. FIELD ADJUSTMENTS OF THE ALIGNMENT MAY BE REQUIRED TO SAVE TREES
OR AVOID OBSTACLES. THE STAKE -OUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTION
MANAGER BEFORE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CHANNEL.
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
TYPICALS 2A
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE I DATE: 20/8
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
906 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
1 EIG' NORTH 27606
TEL (91>•�� ��� ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C490
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
��\\IIIIIIII///
DocuaSi�ln�"y: CA RO
jo
SEAL
26971 = _
U %ii1,C' I N`��\��
''/IIIIIIII\\`�
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
CROSS-SECTION DIMENSIONS
REACH
Wbkf ft.
Wbot (ft.)
Driff (ft.)
Dthal (ft.)
Dpool (ft.)
Wpool (ft.)
Wthal (ft.)
UT 1
8.4
5.2
0.7
0.1
1.1
9.3
2.5
UT 3
4.4
2.8
0.3
0.1
0.6
4.9
1.0
UT 4, 5, and 6
4.8
3.2
0.4
0.1
0.6
5.2
1.5
UT 7
5.3
3.7
0.3
0.1
0.7
5.8
1.0
UT 8
5.9
4.3
0.3
0.1
0.8
6.5
1.5

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
LOG CROSS VANE
SCALEATS
HEADER LOG
A ,C COIR LOG TOP OF BANK
CLASS .X RIP RAP / FLOW �(BANKFULL)
NATIVE CHANNEL
MATERIAL
EXISTING TOP OF BANK #57 STONE / NATIVE D SCOUR
GROUND -I-HEADER LOG (BANKFULL) 1 GROUND CHANNEL MATERIAL POOL
�'"$:.� pCOIR LOG p /
BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED o. �o FILTER J ETRLEVATION
EAMBED
WITH #57 STONE AND YjPopOL FABRIC
E
CLASS'A' RIP RAP / NATIVE D '"�`��`j" FOOTER LOG
CHANNEL MATERIAL J
STREAMBED FILTER FABRIC SECTION A -A
ELEVATION FOOTER LOG
SECTION B -B
REACH
PLAN VIEW
CHANNEL DEPTH (FT.)
UT 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8
7
LL FLOW
UT 1
10
0.6
Y
#57 STONE AND
a
CLASS'A' RIP RAP/
m
A
FILTER FABRIC
NOTES:
NATIVE CHANNEL
MATERIAL
�
LOG SILL
1. HEADER AND FOOTER LOGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 1B -
DIAMETER AND SHALL BE A HARDWOOD SPECIES.
y
(FOOTER LOG MAY BE SUBSTITUTED WITH PINE)
��
2. A DOUBLE FOOTER LOG MAY BE REQUIRED IN SAND BED
STREAMS.
3. ALL STONES ARE TO BE STRUCTURE STONES.
\�
FILTER FABRIC
4. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE
HEADER LOG
OF THE STRUCTURE TO PREVENT WASHOUT OF SEDIMENT
THROUGH LOG GAPS. FILTER FABRIC SHALL EXTEND
FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE FOOTER TO THE FINISHED GRADE
�J
ELEVATION AND SHALL BE PLACED THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE
FOOTER
STRUCTURE.
B d LOG .
_
B
5. PERPENDICULAR ROOTWAD LOGS ARE REQUIRED IF THE LOG
VANE ARM DOES NOT HAVE A ROOTBALL TO TIE INTO THE BANK
HEADER LOG
A ,C COIR LOG TOP OF BANK
CLASS .X RIP RAP / FLOW �(BANKFULL)
NATIVE CHANNEL
MATERIAL
EXISTING TOP OF BANK #57 STONE / NATIVE D SCOUR
GROUND -I-HEADER LOG (BANKFULL) 1 GROUND CHANNEL MATERIAL POOL
�'"$:.� pCOIR LOG p /
BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED o. �o FILTER J ETRLEVATION
EAMBED
WITH #57 STONE AND YjPopOL FABRIC
E
CLASS'A' RIP RAP / NATIVE D '"�`��`j" FOOTER LOG
CHANNEL MATERIAL J
STREAMBED FILTER FABRIC SECTION A -A
ELEVATION FOOTER LOG
SECTION B -B
REACH
ARM LENGTH (FT.)
CHANNEL DEPTH (FT.)
UT 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8
7
0.4-0.5
UT 1
10
0.6
NOTE:
HEADER AND FOOTER STONES ARE LARGE, ANGULAR BOULDERS
MEASURING A MINIMUM OF 24' ALONG THE SHORTEST DIMENSION.
CHANNEL �0 CHANNEL
BANK �� BANK
I 0 � FILTER
oa
FABRIC
I A
I A
I
� I
L- HEADER STONE
I
I s'
FOOTER
STONE -
5 EXIST. 5
\ \
CHANNEL-------_____
\ HEADER/
\ STONE
T
FOOTER
ELEVATION A -A STONE
ARM LENGTH
0.5' HEADER STONE BACK FILL
�( TO GRADE
© FOOTERSTONE CK NEL
® DE H , FLOW
© EXIST.
GROUND
12 �2
ROCK FILL
(#57 STONE)
PLAN VIEW WHERE NEEDED
TYPICAL CROSS -VANE
PROFILE B -B
FILTER FABRIC
TYPICAL LOG VANE
A ® '\
\
CHANNEL
BANK )
�I
LARGE -�
STONE
i
(
SCOUR
HOLE
/ I
\
\ CHANNEL
BANK
\
NOTE:
FILTER FABRIC TOED IN AND DRAPED
ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF LOG VANE
PRIOR TO BACKFILL.
TOP OF BANK
PLAN VIEW
SCALE: N.T.S.
LOG VANE
FILTER
FABRIC
LARGE
STONE
SHEET NAME I SHEET NUMBER
TYPICALS I 2B
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALANANCE DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
✓� 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27606
.(f TEL[phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Envimnmenlal, Inc.
CROSS-SECTION A -A
SCALE: N.T.S.
LARGE
TOP OF BANK STONE
BANKFULL
_---- _ --- -_� 10-15•
FLOW
BOTTOM OF CHANNEL 1
- ------------
LOG
-----------LOG VANE
FILTER
FABRIC
NOTE:
FILTER FABRIC TOED IN AND DRAPED
PROFILE B -B ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF LOG VANE
SCALE: N.T.S. PRIOR TO BACKFILL.
OF
\'\1111111/)/j
�a� by A Rod
2666971
NGI NE- .
/ 1 1 1 1 1
G.
P�
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE.-
DOCUMENT
ATE:DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
WATER SURFACE
ELEVATION
TR TERRACELL
LOG SILL /
8 IN TERRACELL
SYNTHETIC GEOGRID
BR TERRACELL
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
PROFILE
DROP STRUCTURE - TERRACELL
ARMORED POOL
(SEE NOTES)
TERRACELL STRUCTURE NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR WILL INSTALL 8 -INCH TERRACELL SYNTHETIC GEOGRID AS PER THE MANUFACTURER'S
SPECIFICATIONS.
2. THE POOL AT THE BOTTOM OF THE DROP STRUCTURE WILL BE ARMORED WITH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
AND SUITABLE NATURAL BED MATERIAL.
3. NATURAL BED MATERIAL IS DEFINED AS MATERIAL OBTAINED FROM STOCKPILES AT THE SITE RANGING
IN SIZE FROM 5" - 17" AVERAGE DIAMETER WITH THE MAJORITY OF MATERIAL HAVING 10" AVERAGE
DIAMETER, OR EQUIVALENT MATERIAL.
PROFILE
SECTION A -A
M
Side Slope at 8 to
Sta—te,
weaane
\ Gmd a ease of
wenana at 15 In t
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
SHEET NAME
SHEET NUMBER
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
• • RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA 27606
L_� . t ' TEL (919)8%22 FIRM U32243
_��+�% r ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. CA90
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
\\\\1111111111j1
Dolzu'S. 64by:CARo
8 IN TERRACELL = t08�� L /
SYNTHETIC GEOGRID =
26971 = -
1 3 - NGI NE��
Wbkf=16ft
' A G. DP \
0/1111111\0
Wbot 6.0 ft 7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE:
DOCUMET
CROSS-SECTION NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALNL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
TERRACELL STRUCTURE NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR WILL INSTALL 8 -INCH TERRACELL SYNTHETIC GEOGRID AS PER THE MANUFACTURER'S
SPECIFICATIONS.
2. ONCE THE SYNTHETIC GEOGRID HAS BEEN INSTALLED, GEOCELLS WILL BE BACKFILLED WITH GRAVEL
AND TOPSOIL AND PLANTED WITH EROSION CONTROL GRASSES AND WILLOW STAKES (SAL/.YN/GR4.
MARSH TREATMENT AREA
P
DITCH OR
PIPE INLET
------------------
_ 7
Qc�_ \
1 y \
d
i
c
RIP RAP OUTLET'
DEEP POOL
`RIP RAP

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341 C-4A9C-I33F2-464DACD81029
t
C
-o
ENGINEERED RIFFLE
SCALE: N.T.S.
CL A RIP RAP
Natures/ Natural
Graund Ground
BANK SLOPE BANK SLOPE
CHANNEL
NOTES:
1) PLACE CLASS A RIP RAP IN CHANNEL AND ON BANK SLOPES.
2) RIP RAP SIZE MAY BE ADJUSTED BASED ON FIELD CONDITIONS
AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER OR DESIGNER.
PERMANMENT CROSSING
SCALE: N.T.S.
CL 'A' RIP RAP
0.5' DEPTH MIN
1' MIN
SHEET NAME
SHEET NUMBER
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION S?E
COUNTY: ALAMANCE DATE: 2018
- SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
905 JONES FRANI<UN ROAD
y RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27505
TEL 2243
ENO FIRM LICENSE E NO. CA90
Apom Environmental, Inc.
,�Y is A i I/// //
Ej81
oauSi
=Q7 SEAL
_ = 26971 = _
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE.
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
NOTES:
1) INSTALL PERMANENT CROSSING WHILE CONSTRUCTION
LOCATION WITHIN STREAM HAS BEEN DEWATERED.
2) IF UNABLE TO INSTALL WHILE LOCATION IS DRY, PLACE
MATTING ON EXPOSED SOILS.
3) INSTALL 18" CMP FLOODPLAIN PIPES IN FLOODPLAIN IF
INDICATED ON PLANS.
COMPACTED
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC CMP PIPE BURY PIPE 20% SELECT MATERIAL
18" CMP �(SIZEPER PLAN)
FLOODPLAIN PIPES
BURY 20% SECTION A -A'
CL 'A' RIP RAP COMPACTED
0.5' DEPTH MIN SELECT MATERIAL
CL 'I' RIP RAP
18" THICK MIN
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC CMP PIPE
(SIZE AS PER PLAN)
SECTION B -B'

n e
n S')E to In% 200700au'Ze!r_AeorARAnAi`nG'In9Q
ocu gnve p
., ...... ,.. �. ....+-.+v.-w�...�.+.+.+...�.. SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
CONTROL POINTS 3
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCf I DATE: 2018
300' 150' 0 300' boo- SUNGAATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
SCALE: 1"=600' .. +� 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 77505
tt ++ TEL [phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Envimnmental, Inc.
0X I
G�0 I
J„Lr
5° I
I
UT7 ISS CA
J201
v I
I
ISS CAPD UT O
1200 ISS CAP Z I Z
ISS CAPD 5800
5801 UT8 0 0
ISS CAP
500 OLU
UT5 � UT4 � °rk Z I a
with KI=
I
UTl
UT2
I
ISS CAP 3
stir F I
1ss CAP I erre\ 5°
UT3
ISS CAP�2
I
UTI
oa
Nit
tiS¢7
Heron Control Points
Pt ## Northing Easting Elevation Type
ISS -1 766878.017 1891524.189 547.12 ISS CAP
ISS -2 766422.000 1891276.231 552.39 ISS CAP
ISS -3 766317.450 1891759.946 547.12 ISS CAP
ISS -500 765640.240 1892765.077 533.73 155 CAP
ISS -1200 766091.429 1893253.248 528.88 ISS CAP
ISS -1201 765822.117 1893561.790 518.40 ISS CAP
ISS -5800 763119.383 1893197.061 553.67 ISS CAP
ISS -1203 763900.423
= � E
1893043.101
536.50
ISS CAP

DocuSign Envelope ID:
0
C-4A9C-B3F2-464DAC D81029
300' 150 0 300' .11
1111111111\I
SCALE: 1"=600'
SHEEP NAME SHEET NUMBER
EASEMENT JA
PROJECr NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNW: ALWANCE I DATE: 2018
SLINGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
S JONES FRANKLIN .
RALEIGH, NI 11
1171
TEL( 19)85&2243
ENG SIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Environmmtal, Inc.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
I
1
A
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
DENOTES WETLAND STRUCTURES 4
ENHANCEMENT IROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
ALL EXISTING WIRE FENCE �couNTr: .aL,waNCE DATE: 20/8
WITHIN EASEMENT TO BE REMOVED DENOTES
RESTORATION
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
.� 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA27606
\irf� r 2243 GIFIRMBLICEN E NO. C-890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
HADLEY, MICHAEL TODD
DB 3492 PG 0554
UT /
livD ENHANCEMENT /
l CT AIOT QCCT(10AT1/1A1
UT 1
—DocuSigneby�`
\\,4 -N C A Ro '
—10AD4.Q3,C
wvSEAL
2697
�
1
N���� �
OS �illlll�O
'1111N,4 C 13 P�
///Ililllln�`�
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
9� DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
U
F�X s
S O
�G
i
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR
550
_535 LIT.
+50
I.
Lnut
W
w 54.0 .
Q =
�u�
w
LIT
Lu
z _ 535_
S
U
F --
Q 'cin
+50
-UT 1- STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
STATION
OFFSET
NORTHING
EASTING
CROSS VANE
0+22.85
0
766,108.03
1,891,183.25
CROSS VANE
1+03.86
0
766,144.65
1,891,245.34
CROSS VANE
2+11.09
0
766,204.67
1,891,313.78
LOG VANE
2+39.88
0
766,232.23
1,891,305.89
CROSS VANE
1 2+84.05
0
766,263.45 1
1,891,331.23
CROSS VANE
3+58.02
0 1
766,266.53
1,891,393.09
CROSS VANE
4+43.93
0
766,338.06
1,891,42824
LOGVANE
4+70.15
0 1
766,360.45
1,891,441.29
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
DENOTES WETLAND STRUCTURES 4
ENHANCEMENT IROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
ALL EXISTING WIRE FENCE �couNTr: .aL,waNCE DATE: 20/8
WITHIN EASEMENT TO BE REMOVED DENOTES
RESTORATION
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
.� 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA27606
\irf� r 2243 GIFIRMBLICEN E NO. C-890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
HADLEY, MICHAEL TODD
DB 3492 PG 0554
UT /
livD ENHANCEMENT /
l CT AIOT QCCT(10AT1/1A1
UT 1
—DocuSigneby�`
\\,4 -N C A Ro '
—10AD4.Q3,C
wvSEAL
2697
�
1
N���� �
OS �illlll�O
'1111N,4 C 13 P�
///Ililllln�`�
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
9� DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
U
F�X s
S O
�G
i
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR
550
_535 LIT.
+50
I.
Lnut
W
w 54.0 .
Q =
�u�
w
LIT
Lu
z _ 535_
S
U
F --
Q 'cin
+50

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
It
4
DENOTES WETLAND I ALL EXISTING WIRE FENCE
ENHANCEMENT II WITHIN EASEMENT TO BE REMOVED
DENOTES WETLAND
RESTORATION
DENOTES MARSH
. ` TREATMENT AREA
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
STRUCTURES 5
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALWANCE I DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
. 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27506
TEL
(ML -2243
GFIRLICENSE NO. C4190
Axiom Envimnmenfal, Inc.
oaoLIslyh�CAR o
O ;9
1 'GATE jossA,Da saca
�--.
ui
SEAQ _
E 1 = = 2697
XE �`SLIRV, Y�DARY
J
Y,LOG�
CROSS -VANE p E 1 Osh�q G
LOG CROSS VANE
l p P 2 NEE N_
-42 x� S�S�E S L SS VANE 7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
E R DATE:
LLJR R R O rn I DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
?� \ UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
=Ow 1+0 R R R R R 6
_
+ UT J p
F- (_0V) R R R EF e E F
Q ,l, ,
a L LOG CROSS VANE E�
F-
�
PROP BANKFULL RETA
LOG CROSS CTE E -
,
VANE
z (/T 2 LOG CROSS VANE
STq�ql>, OODPLAIN PIPE W END RESTORATION E \
00 ��'1/ BURY 20%CH SIDE z STA 3+98.4 UT 2
F STA, 7+38.7 UT l" H DLEY, _HAEL TODD
FFT�T UT 2 a GATE ELEV =538. 3 UT 3 3
PG 0554
6 D PERMANENT CROSSING END 'RESTORATION, U
ART R ORATIGN 2@36" CMP STA 2+78.7 UT 3 END RESTORATIO
STA 3+04 BURY 20% 7MARSH TREATMENT STA 1/+9/:b UT l STA 13 05.9
EL��9. DARY �� W-� WIDTH (TYP) AREA , - ELEV=534.19 ELEV=532: A,
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR
UT 2 UT 2 UT 3 UT 3 _
END ENHANCEMENT 11 �' END RESTORATION
START RESTORATION r- STA 2+78.7 UT 3
I.
540,Z) _ _ STA 3+43 LIT 2 _ __ 53 _� k- _ EL.EV . 534.19 _
I =ow �`� ELEV 539.13 _ =Ow
535 wr _ _. _ UT 2_. 530 �..
Q N END RESTORATION +50 03
+50 04 STA 3+98.4 'UT 2 ___
ELEV 538.82'
UT
END RESTORATION
540 z _ UT 1 UT 3 STA 13+05.9
w — — _ END RESTORATION
J Q f — — — — — — —' — _ SUT 3 ELEV 532.76
z w TA 2+78.7 _ -- [I+91:6
N PERMANENT CROSSING STA UT I
535 Q _. w UT 2 / _ 2@. 36"_CMP _ f % ELEV 534.19 _ 535_ _
s :2 Q w ENO RESTORATION �— FLOODPLAIN PIPE
mar V) STA 3+98.4 UT 2 18" CMP_( EACH SIDE]—
�LEtn
STA 7+38.7 UT I BURY ALL 20% _ --
EXST GROUND
=m ELEV 538.82 AT PROP THALWEG
+50 07 +50 08 +50 09 +50 10 +50 11 +50 12 +50 13
-UTI-STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
STATION
OFFSET
NORTHING
EASTING
LOG CROSS VANE
6+75.34
0
766,452.31
1,891,593.76
LOG CROSS VANE
7+20.26
0
766,467.95
1,891,632.92
LOG CROSS VANE
8+58.08
0
766,576.02
1,891,597.62
LOG CROSS VANE
9+24.55
0
766,635.80
1,891,609.53
LOG CROSS VANE
10+34.12
0
766,705.60
1,891,687.27
LOG CROSS VANE
10+77.36
0
766,745.33
1,891,695.63
LOG CROSS VANE
11+07.99
0
766,772.09
1,891,709.50
LOG CROSS VANE
11+58.60
0
766,809.35
1,891,685.06
LOG CROSS VANE
12+20.05
0
766,867.09
1,891,678.42
LOG CROSS VANE
12+74.10
0
766,914.68
1,891,697.04
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
STRUCTURES 5
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALWANCE I DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
. 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27506
TEL
(ML -2243
GFIRLICENSE NO. C4190
Axiom Envimnmenfal, Inc.
oaoLIslyh�CAR o
O ;9
1 'GATE jossA,Da saca
�--.
ui
SEAQ _
E 1 = = 2697
XE �`SLIRV, Y�DARY
J
Y,LOG�
CROSS -VANE p E 1 Osh�q G
LOG CROSS VANE
l p P 2 NEE N_
-42 x� S�S�E S L SS VANE 7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
E R DATE:
LLJR R R O rn I DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
?� \ UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
=Ow 1+0 R R R R R 6
_
+ UT J p
F- (_0V) R R R EF e E F
Q ,l, ,
a L LOG CROSS VANE E�
F-
�
PROP BANKFULL RETA
LOG CROSS CTE E -
,
VANE
z (/T 2 LOG CROSS VANE
STq�ql>, OODPLAIN PIPE W END RESTORATION E \
00 ��'1/ BURY 20%CH SIDE z STA 3+98.4 UT 2
F STA, 7+38.7 UT l" H DLEY, _HAEL TODD
FFT�T UT 2 a GATE ELEV =538. 3 UT 3 3
PG 0554
6 D PERMANENT CROSSING END 'RESTORATION, U
ART R ORATIGN 2@36" CMP STA 2+78.7 UT 3 END RESTORATIO
STA 3+04 BURY 20% 7MARSH TREATMENT STA 1/+9/:b UT l STA 13 05.9
EL��9. DARY �� W-� WIDTH (TYP) AREA , - ELEV=534.19 ELEV=532: A,
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR
UT 2 UT 2 UT 3 UT 3 _
END ENHANCEMENT 11 �' END RESTORATION
START RESTORATION r- STA 2+78.7 UT 3
I.
540,Z) _ _ STA 3+43 LIT 2 _ __ 53 _� k- _ EL.EV . 534.19 _
I =ow �`� ELEV 539.13 _ =Ow
535 wr _ _. _ UT 2_. 530 �..
Q N END RESTORATION +50 03
+50 04 STA 3+98.4 'UT 2 ___
ELEV 538.82'
UT
END RESTORATION
540 z _ UT 1 UT 3 STA 13+05.9
w — — _ END RESTORATION
J Q f — — — — — — —' — _ SUT 3 ELEV 532.76
z w TA 2+78.7 _ -- [I+91:6
N PERMANENT CROSSING STA UT I
535 Q _. w UT 2 / _ 2@. 36"_CMP _ f % ELEV 534.19 _ 535_ _
s :2 Q w ENO RESTORATION �— FLOODPLAIN PIPE
mar V) STA 3+98.4 UT 2 18" CMP_( EACH SIDE]—
�LEtn
STA 7+38.7 UT I BURY ALL 20% _ --
EXST GROUND
=m ELEV 538.82 AT PROP THALWEG
+50 07 +50 08 +50 09 +50 10 +50 11 +50 12 +50 13

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
N
C)
�O
----F.SURVEY BOUNDARY _I \
STA 0+00
ELEV=544.89
ALL EXISTING WIRE FENCE
WITHIN EASEMENT TO BE REMOVED
STRUCTURES r 6
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAYANCE I DATE: 2016
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
T F* 905 JONES 11.11.11.
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609
r TEL ISM
8.`$2243
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C4190
Axiom En i,onnwnfal, Inc.
�IIIIIIIIIII
DocuSiRgy: CAR
�i/,
3a89ADIC�� C
SEAL
26971 = _
�0� GI NE�,����
////III W\0
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Q TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR
UT 2
- -
5.55
_ _ ... --- _
cu __.
_ _ 555___
f—
550
_ -- __ ... -- _-- __. _ ___ .... ... .
__ ___.
__ - _- — 550__ _
a
_
w
545.
a�
545 _
I
�
— — —
wLij
w
a
540
% _
_ � �-'-_- —��.L
�V)-
UT 2
EXST
_
BE61N ENFI4NEEMENT It _ _ _ THALWEG
m
535
STA 0+00
a
535
__
Car
\ =(P
IPSO]
0 +50 01 +50 02 +50 03

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
9
I
HADLEY, MICHAEL TODD
OB __3492 PG 0554
O �
ISS CAP Pay
MARSH TREATMENT E E —
_ AREA
LOG CROSS.
Q -
VANE
s W
mI
UT3
START RESTORATION
STA 0+00
ELEV =539.43 W
I
1 _
PROP
BAN KFU LL
3
rn
Ln
F—
z :LLJ
F—
�OW
= (D =
u+ V)
Q CV
W
Q LIJ
uq
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
STRUCTURES 7
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE I DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
.. 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
TEL[phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. CA90
Axiom Envimnmemtal, Inc.
DENOTES WETLAND
RESTORATION
DENOTES MARSH
TREATMENT AREA
DocuSig�day:
Josh
10 A�64C3...
SEAL
26971 = _
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
ALL EXISTING WIRE FENCE
WITHIN EASEMENT TO BE REMOVED
k2_
-UT 3- STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
STATION
OFFSET
NORTHING
EASTING
LOG CROSS VANE
0+66.23
0
766,769.98
1,891,501.82
LOG CROSS VANE
0+84.75
0
766,768.07
1,891,520.22
I
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
LOG CROSS VANE
0+97.55
0
766,769.44
1,891,532.93
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
LOG CROSS VANE
1+29.99
0
766,772.93
1,891,564.68
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR
LOG CROSS VANE
1 1+77.71 1
0 1
766,781.03 1
1,891,610.62
UT 3
545 _
UT 3
r°
_ 545__._.
BEGIN RESTORATION
_ _
_- STA 0+00
EXST GROUND �-
__ AT PROP THALWEG
54Q . _..
ELEV 539.43
m _
_
540
_
o Ln
_
PROPOSED
W
535. _ .
_ _ _
THALWEG
a
535_.__
Ln
r
530
w
r
0 +50
01 +50 02
k2_

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
S
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
STRUCTURES 8
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORAT/ON S?E
COUNTY: ALAMANCE DATE: 2018
PERMANENT CROSSING
2@24" CMP SU�N{GATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
i
BURY 20% �/ 11111111? 905 JONES RLWKLM ROAD
29' TOP WIDTH (7 yP Pay ♦ / ! TE ;9 99) NORTH NA2TSas
`, , NO ' \�� tf/ i ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-990
H A D L E Y , RUSSELL B. �, e�' Awom Envimrnental, Inc.
REVOC TRUST o
DB 1195 PG 0905 j �_ DOCUSIgnir
CA,
SURVEY` - J J E �
_ �X 2@12 = ... O�; -
14
9
OGATESo 717 O EAS
2697
1 - -
BOUNDARY. ,
MARSH �.�' ' LOG CROSS VANE '
TREAT�EN�T E sy��,�o? \
E �j + '�, �q
" LOG CROSS PANE
Al- S s 9 7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE:
x
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
DENOTES WETLANE
�c '9 S ENHANCEMENT
DENOTES MARSH
j /�"` LONG CROSS VANE K " TREATMENT AREA
LOG CROSS VANE / 2@12' 3
GATES,
---_>-_ TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
LOG CROSS VANE - SUROF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
LOG VANE VEY BOUNOgRy \ NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR
�G rRvr _/ 1�
5 BANKFULL -
�'
STAP RESFOR
SFA Q �
ELEV=5
38Z9fT'�
ALL EXISTING WIRE FENCE
WITHIN EASEMENT TO BE REMOVED
-UT 5- STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
ST TYPE
STATION
OFFSET
F—
NORTHING
FASTING
LOG CROSS VANE
0+64.94
0
765,725.17
1,892,353.98
LOG CROSS VANE
0+81.32
0 1
765,711.81
1,892,362.94
LOG CROSS VANE
0+96.55
0
765,702.32
1,892,374.64
LOG CROSS VANE
1+19.55
0
765,680.78
1,892,379.02
LOG CROSS VANE
1+36.84
0
765,668.74
1,892,389.96
LOG VANE
1+57.94
0
765,649.84
1,892,397.87
LOG CROSS VANE
1+79.85
0
765,642.12 1
1,892,416.23
-UT 5 -STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
STATION
OFFSET
NORTHING
EASTING
LOG CROSS VANE
1+99.26
0
765,650.83
1,892,433.31
LOG CROSS VANE
2+19.79
0
765,646.69
1,892,452.32
LOG CROSS VANE
2+36.70
0
765,646.21
1,892,469.06
LOG CROSS VANE
2+57.12
0
765,633.55
1,892,483.75
LOG CROSS VANE
2+83.75
0
765,633.04 1
1,892,508.61
LOG CROSS VANE
3+40.37
0
765,617.53
1,892,558.98
LOG CROSS VANE
4+92.80
0
765,502.04
1,892,654.76
LIT 5
540
\ _
_ _. - _
L7
540
535..
�_`
_ _ _ _ _.. _
_
o-
,535 _
�-
530l_
EXST GROUND
Q w
530
_.
AT ' PROP THALWEGLij
_.
_
1
LLr
525
_ _
\
Lij
_
525_ _
UT._5
__
� '—�—__
_
_ BEG.IN RESTORATION
_ - r --
v
STA 0+00
_--
`
_.
s m
520
ELEV 538.00_
PERMANENT CROSSING
Q
_
2@2d" -CMP . _ _ _.
-
____.520__
_
�a
BURY 20%
' C
'0 E
0 +50 01 +50 02 +50
03 +50 04 +50 05 +50 06
+50

DocuSign Envelope ID:
0
t
1
I
C-4A9C-133 F2-464 DAC D81029
ISS CAP 500
�� fG
�Z-
-UT4-STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE STATION OFFSET NORTHING EASTING
LOG CROSS VANE 1 4+18.34 0 765,207.36 1,892,798.42
LOGCROSSVANE 1 4+18.34 0 765,214.50 1,892,822.95
HADLEY, RUSSELL B.
REVOC TRUST
UT 5
530-
525
30..
-UT 5- STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
o-
STR. TYPE
STATION
OFFSET
NORTHING
EASTING
LOG CROSS VANE
5+71.94
0
765,470.48
1,892,720.05
LOG CROSS VANE
5+95.77
0
765,447.97
1,892,720.55
LOG CROSS VANE
6+18.73
0
765,429.38
1,892,732.22
LOG CROSS VANE
6+32.66
0
765,429.38
1,892,732.22
LOG VANE
6+56.79
0 1
765,412.59
1,892,759.12
LOG CROSS VANE
7+24.35
0
765,356.55
1,892,787.18
LOG VANE
7+39.14
0
765,342.13
1,892,788.84
LOG VANE
7+97.48
0
765,299.68
1,892,823.99
LOG CROSS VANE
8+64.24
0
765,240.24
1,892,820.73
LOG CROSS VANE
1 8+96.66
0
765,216.88 11,892,841.67
-UT4-STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE STATION OFFSET NORTHING EASTING
LOG CROSS VANE 1 4+18.34 0 765,207.36 1,892,798.42
LOGCROSSVANE 1 4+18.34 0 765,214.50 1,892,822.95
HADLEY, RUSSELL B.
REVOC TRUST
UT 5
530-
525
30..
61
SHEET NAME
SHEET NUMBER
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE I DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
1. '.0 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTN CAROLINA 27805
TEL[phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
DocuSigne�\hy:��I1IIII///
\` C A
Eil
o3i ,� N L�.I.0 ,// /(i�9A13�gl441$41635 S/ O� _
=Q7 SEAL
26971 = _
CI N
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM ED
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
DENOTES WETLAND
ENHANCEMENT
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR
UT 4 LIT4
EN
�L I END RESTORATION
STA 4+49.6
iALWEG
10 +50
11
525
o-
000
_
w
\ — -
GROUND
520
`� LJ
AT PROP THALWEG
_
_ --_—�_ _
cn
I
_
W w
, PROPOSED —
E
_515
N
THALWEG - — _ _. _ _ �.'
_ -`
UT 4
_
m
510
`�
END
RESTORATION
�
r
_
_ . _ STA
4+49:6 UT 4
�a
STA
9+10.5 UT 5
loNE
°
_ _ _ .
EL€V 5t3.88
IXST i
05
+50 06 +50 07 +50 08
+50
09 +50
61
SHEET NAME
SHEET NUMBER
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE I DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
1. '.0 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTN CAROLINA 27805
TEL[phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
DocuSigne�\hy:��I1IIII///
\` C A
Eil
o3i ,� N L�.I.0 ,// /(i�9A13�gl441$41635 S/ O� _
=Q7 SEAL
26971 = _
CI N
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM ED
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
DENOTES WETLAND
ENHANCEMENT
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR
UT 4 LIT4
EN
�L I END RESTORATION
STA 4+49.6
iALWEG
10 +50
11

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
ALL EXISTING WIRE FENCE /
WITHIN EASEMENT TO BE REMOVED
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
STRUCTURES 1 /0
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE I DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
TEL IM CEN43
GFIRL E NO. C4390
Axiom Envimnmental, Inc.
X11111111///
DocuSireii �y C A 1 /i,
` r Ro �/
Ej'�-089AD13C1�14C3
SEAL
26971 =
�NGI N����
C3 I IP
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR
UT 5 _
515
+. _
_ _ `_ -515-
155]0
510
10_.0
510-
0
±
_505
W
_
` ` — --- EXST THALWEG
_ --. _ -UT .5-- _. _ 505
END ENHANCEMENT II
l .
_
u')
_LLJ---_. . _STA 14+90-.4 -
500
LiJ
z
_
__ '� _ _ 500
_
U__
m
_495
a _
_ _ _ 495
=m
11
+50 12 +50 13 +50 14 +50 15

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
SHEET NAME SHEEP NUMBER
STRUCTURES 11
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE I DATE: 2018
SUNGAATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
+� 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
// RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27505
TEL [phone]
r. r ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. Cd90
Axiom Emimnmental, Inc.
DocuS)ye �a �y`Iliiillll I
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE ! \` C A R0�
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON .io34i��.�� `, G
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR TD�sadac���5acs OZ ,9
SEAL- � _ -
26971 = _
y�q 6i
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
ALL EXISTING WIRE FENCE
WITHIN EASEMENT TO BE REMOVED
-UT 4- STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
`
DENOTES MARSH
OFFSET
NORTHING
'
*" ►
TREATMENT AREA
0
765,227.40
UT 4 �y
LOGVANE
1+61.16
0
765,232.78
START RESTORATION
LOG CROSS VANE
2+03.78
0
_
STA 0+00
KA
LOG CROSS VANE
2+24.21
0
765,232.22
52
LOG CROSS VANE
2+43.20
0
765,221.14
,
HADLEY, RdSSELL B.
LOG CROSS VANE
2+64.53
_
765,216.10
REVTRUST
LOG CROSS VANE
2+84.31
0
765,223.04
DB/A5 PG 0905
LOG CROSS VANE
2+99.49
0
o�
1,892,712.61
LOG CROSS VANE
3+30.63
0
765,218.66
1,892,742.54
LOG CROSS VANE
3+47.73 1
0 1
765,219.10
1,892,759.48
_ 520 _.
PERMANENT CROSSING
LOG VANE
PROP BANKFULL
X X WIR FXENCE X XX
X X
X X
_
-
515
BURY 2Q%
AT PROP THALWEG
LLj _ w
PERMANENT CROSS
SHEET NAME SHEEP NUMBER
STRUCTURES 11
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE I DATE: 2018
SUNGAATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
+� 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
// RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27505
TEL [phone]
r. r ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. Cd90
Axiom Emimnmental, Inc.
DocuS)ye �a �y`Iliiillll I
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE ! \` C A R0�
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON .io34i��.�� `, G
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR TD�sadac���5acs OZ ,9
SEAL- � _ -
26971 = _
y�q 6i
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
ALL EXISTING WIRE FENCE
WITHIN EASEMENT TO BE REMOVED
-UT 4- STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STIR TYPE
STATION
OFFSET
NORTHING
EASTING
LOGVANE
0+62.88
0
765,227.40
1,892,503.65
LOGVANE
1+61.16
0
765,232.78
1,892,586.08
LOG CROSS VANE
2+03.78
0
765,231.74
1,892,625.59
LOG CROSS VANE
2+24.21
0
765,232.22
1,892,645.73
LOG CROSS VANE
2+43.20
0
765,221.14
1,892,659.61
LOG CROSS VANE
2+64.53
0
765,216.10
1,892,679.41
LOG CROSS VANE
2+84.31
0
765,223.04
1,892,697.79
LOG CROSS VANE
2+99.49
0
765,221.66
1,892,712.61
LOG CROSS VANE
3+30.63
0
765,218.66
1,892,742.54
LOG CROSS VANE
3+47.73 1
0 1
765,219.10
1,892,759.48
UT 4
530
_ —_ _----
_ _ _ _. _ _ __ _.-
530.__
_525.
p(n
Ln
PROPOSED, _
+
THALWEG
re) W
_ 520_
_
_
LLJ _
_ 520 _.
PERMANENT CROSSING
Ln
_ 2@24" CMP
EXST GROUND
d)
_
-
515
BURY 2Q%
AT PROP THALWEG
LLj _ w
515
BEGIN RESTORATION __
_
.
STA 0+00
•
510
ELEV=522..76
_. _
_ 510
L
O tl
0
+50 01 +50 02 +50 03 +50

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
HADLEY, RUSSELL B.
REVOC TRUST
/ DB 1195 PG 0905
UT 6 ooX�� Q �k--- -- �--_ -- -- --- ---�
START RESTORATION oN�P� EM
STA 0+00 00� DROP�\P� N LOG VANLL' LOG VANE E
ELEV 5 8.50 STRUCTl1 o�0 `pd �R
4� �000 ti�N�
SHEEP NAME SHEET NUMBER
STRUCTURES l2
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION S?E
COUNTY: ALAMANCE I DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
• 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
( RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27806
TEL [phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C -M
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
DocuSignFd�ill:i
CARD
Ej
aJ1A�ae�,l
SEAL �=
26971
I N
PROP BANKFUIL LOG CROSS VANfFO
LOG VANE
i
90wOgRY`_i__—� RtEy B D y
i
i
i
ALL EXISTING WIRE FENCE
WITHIN EASEMENT TO BE REMOVED
-UT 6- STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
STATION
7/17/2018 9.21.42 AM EDT
NORTHING
EASTING
DROP STRUCTURE
0+00
0
DATE:
1,893,090.66
DROP STRUCTURE
--
�, E
765,961.56
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
DROP STRUCTURE
0+74.13
-- x= z
�-- '
765,921.54
1,893,138.14
DROP STRUCTURE
0+91.15
DENOTES WETLAND
765,910.28
1,893,150.89
LOG CROSS VANE
1+28.33 1
0
ENHANCEMENT
LOG VANE
/
F 4/4
x �;
<6 6�
1,893,216.59
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
1+83.60
0
0 700
00
Y
20NF
i
LOG CROSS VANE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA qL2 LIDAR
0
LOG CROSS VANE
R._�
�P ��
2+13.55
0
PROP BANKFUIL LOG CROSS VANfFO
LOG VANE
i
90wOgRY`_i__—� RtEy B D y
i
i
i
ALL EXISTING WIRE FENCE
WITHIN EASEMENT TO BE REMOVED
-UT 6- STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
STATION
OFFSET
NORTHING
EASTING
DROP STRUCTURE
0+00
0
765,970.74
1,893,090.66
DROP STRUCTURE
0+9.35
0
765,961.56
1,893,092.44
DROP STRUCTURE
0+74.13
0
765,921.54
1,893,138.14
DROP STRUCTURE
0+91.15
0
765,910.28
1,893,150.89
LOG CROSS VANE
1+28.33 1
0
765,908.72
1,893,186.84
LOG VANE
1+60.17
0
765,900.12
1,893,216.59
LOG CROSS VANE
1+83.60
0
765,879.15
1,893,221.59
LOG CROSS VANE
1+94.44
0
765,868.51
1,893,219.52
LOG CROSS VANE
2+13.55
0
765,855.16
1,893,230.78
LOG CROSS VANE
2+44.45
0
765,826.36
1,893,237.45
LOG CROSS VANE
2+85.45
0
765,801.85
1,893,265.67
LOG CROSS VANE
3+02.49
0
765,794.35
1,893,280.45
LOG VANE
3+57.68
0
765,765.93
1,893,322.62
LOG VANE
4+12.57
0
765,716.91
1,893,333.92
UT 6
520
_
520
I-
515
_
` ` PROPOSED THALWEG
p rrT
515
EXST GROUND
AT PROP- THALWEG __
�.� _
510
-UT 6- s
Ln LLi
_
BEGIN RESTORATION
— -
d =
_ _ _ 510
STA_ 0+0Q_
�- J
~ C/)ELEV=518.50
505_--�--�
_ /_�
w
ww
_ _
z cn
_. 505 _
J
• N
500
_
~
o ,r
�E
=m
0 +50 01 +50 02 +50
03 +50 04 +50 05

DocuSign Envelope ID
C-4A9C-63 F2-464 DAC D 81029
ALL EXISTING WIRE FENCE
WITHIN EASEMENT TO BE REMOVED
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
STRUCTURES /3
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: AIAMANCE DATE: 2018
w
HADLEY, RUSSELL B. °� SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
OO \9�
REVOC TRUSTJONES
DB 1195 PC 0905 _ Q '
RALEIGH,NORTH FRANGROUNBA 27808
i' ,.., / . ' TEL [phone]A3
- �l'�/ _ ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C -M
J .O A J m Emiwn*nW, Inc.
SUR=80UNDARY d / Z
DocuSignby:
z
Ei
°
v
9
SEAL
_ = 26971
X XI \
I NE���
Lu I � � � ''IIII��``
�6
x
Oo FFA 7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
� DROP STRUCTURE J\\ r� DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
-� UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
w
� UT 6
o
END RESTORATION,`
+ 3 _ STA 7+80.9
ELEV=500.88
_-- ---
SURVEY BOUNDARY -��'
3
� 7 ;
O
0Q
I
I D
` D
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR
UT 6
520 _ L�___ _ _ 520
-UT 6-
ENE) :RESTORATION
STA 7+80.9
515 _ p cv __ _ _ELEV=500.88 _ 515
0
+
Ln w
510 _ w PROPOSED THALWEG _ 510
Lij
(n _ — �-
505 zLiJ _ 505
t-� r
U EXST GROUND
500 _ ~ AT PROP THALWEG
<_ _
L
E
N
tiS
05 +50 06 +50 07 +50 08
-UT 6- STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
STATION
OFFSET
NORTHING
EASTING
ROP STRUCTURE
6+98.76
0
765,517.13
1,893,473.41
ROP STRUCTURE
7+80.86
0
765,472.94
1,893,542.07

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
E
UT 7_ �.
START ENHANCEIV NT IT
STA +00 \
ELEV=S 5.74
SS\BUN A
2@24 CMP
1.2'. GATE \ BURY 20% ROSS VANE
\ �6�OP WIDTH (TYP) E
E
9
LOG CROSS VANE
3
SHEET NAME SHEEP NUMBER
STRUCTURES 14
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCf DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
10 + 906 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27608
_ \\If TEL [phone]
r ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Emimnmenlal, Inc.
DENOTES WETLAND
\
togAQ8���84
ENHANCEMENT
3...
NORTHING
DENOTES WETLAND
LOG CROSS VANE
_ - 26971
RESTORATION
766,309.23
1,893,323.09
DENOTES MARSH
0+35.91
0
TREATMENT AREA
1,893,327.79
O�
r
0
+o
HADLEY, RUSSELL B.
/s
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
REVOC TRUST
766,261.60
1,893,346.33
DB 1195 PG 0905
0+90.17
0
766,249.02
1,893,360.07
MARSH
X
0
TREATMENT
J ��
Q) r�
o
AREA
j7
766,215.89
_ --- -SURD=ARr
N I,
PERMANENT CROSSING o
7
-
-t0Cr-CROSS VANE It
S;
E
UT 7_ �.
START ENHANCEIV NT IT
STA +00 \
ELEV=S 5.74
SS\BUN A
2@24 CMP
1.2'. GATE \ BURY 20% ROSS VANE
\ �6�OP WIDTH (TYP) E
E
9
LOG CROSS VANE
3
SHEET NAME SHEEP NUMBER
STRUCTURES 14
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCf DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
10 + 906 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27608
_ \\If TEL [phone]
r ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Emimnmenlal, Inc.
SOP
of
,y 0
�..� BANKFU3
Docui�) I ICi � �0,
\
togAQ8���84
STATION
3...
NORTHING
=� SEAL
LOG CROSS VANE
_ - 26971
0
766,309.23
1,893,323.09
LOG CROSS VANE
0+35.91
0
766,291.10
1,893,327.79
y� <2
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
0
DATE:
1,893,338.69
/s
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
0
SOP
of
,y 0
�..� BANKFU3
ALL EXISTING WIRE FENCE
WITHIN EASEMENT TO BE REMOVED
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR
(A 515 _
t—
I
o v 510
-UT 7- STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
\
STR TYPE
STATION
OFFSET
NORTHING
EASTING
LOG CROSS VANE
0+16.88
0
766,309.23
1,893,323.09
LOG CROSS VANE
0+35.91
0
766,291.10
1,893,327.79
LOG CROSS VANE
0+53.93
0
766,277.19
1,893,338.69
LOG CROSS VANE
0+71.37
0
766,261.60
1,893,346.33
LOG CROSS VANE
0+90.17
0
766,249.02
1,893,360.07
LOG CROSS VANE
1+09.38
0
766,231.68
1,893,367.73
LOG CROSS VANE
1+30.95
0
766,215.89
1,893,382.18
LOG CROSS VANE
1+86.15
0
766,166.25
1,893,404.24
LOG CROSS VANE
2+04.95
0
766,151.31
1,893,415.40
LOG CROSS VANE
2+21.20
0
766,136.13
1,893,420.86
LOG CROSS VANE
2+61.86 1
0
766,106.11
1,893,445.66
LOG CROSS VANE
2+83.231
0
766,094.65
1,893,463.02
LOG CROSS VANE
2+99.18
0
766,083.16
1,893,473.92
LOG CROSS VANE
4+38.46
0
765,998.78
1,893,580.59
ALL EXISTING WIRE FENCE
WITHIN EASEMENT TO BE REMOVED
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR
(A 515 _
t—
I
o v 510
\
0 —
Ln LJ_I
505 _
_
EXST GROUND
LLJ_ 505
1
\ —
_
AT PROP THALWEG
< =
a
ul
cn
W
500
PROPOSED THALWEG
PERMANENT CROSSING ` -�
_ _
Z c _ 500
ii
-UT 7-
2@24" CMP
_
BEGIN ENHANCEMENT I
BURY 20%
s
_
STA 0+00
• _
495 _ ELEV=525.74
_ _ __
._
Q _ _ _ 495
r
o,
0
+50 01 +50 02 +50 03
+50 04 +50 05

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
STRUCTURES /5
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
. l COUNTY: ALANANCE DATE: 2018
HADLEY, RUSSELL B.
OARY SUsNG/♦ATE DESIGN GROUP,
P.A. .
905 JONES FRANKUN ROAD
REVOC TRUST RRALE9HOR CAROLINA2788
LI 8%-2243
DB 1195 v (oLS ENGFIRM LICENSE NO. C4190
IAxiom EnNmnmentel, Inc.
--- O I DocuSig(gail� y I I I I l I I
rnZDEje
7C�AR�
SURVEY BOUNDARY (p ~ I ib89ADj#C3...
SEAL = -
2' GATE +
/ - 26971
E
E E
DROP STRUCTURE
z I 7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
o = PSNC L TI Z I DATE.
F— + L7 _ I C� ER _ DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
Q �7 I UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
UD LLJ _
Q LLI - -
I I�
c� X
I LOG CROSS VANE
z �
3 W I 3 3 11
\'---- ILQ
3 PROP BANKFULL O�NoaRv
SURVEY BOUNDAR---
_ T 7 0
a w o END ENHANCEMENT l ;
--- STA 9+96.2
12' GATE z I a <�<� ELEV =495.38
of coo
I �
' I I
-UT7- STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
'� ;�
ALL EXISTING WIRE FENCE
WITHIN EASEMENT TO BE REMOVED
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR
STR. TYPE STATION OFFSET NORTHING FASTING
LOG CROSS VANE 6+25.76 0 765,944.94 1,893,755.97
LOG CROSS VANE 6+55.02 0 765,943.46 1,893,784.98
DROP STRUCTURE 8+98.72 0 765,929.93 1,894,017.21
DROP STRUCTURE 9+96.21 0 765,918.69 1,894,114.01
UT 7
515 ____
_
515
PROPOSED THALWEG
510
0
_ _
EXST GROUND
_ 510
_
AT PROP THALWEG
U-) W
505
Q =
_ — ` _
-UT 7- _
_ 505
i-- uo
` —"
— _ END ENHANCEMENT I
cnLLJ
STA 9+96.2
500
w
Z
ELEV=495.38
cn
500
v
_
495
Q
_
_ _ _ _ . _ _
495
t
g
�E
ti=
05 +50 06 +50 07 +50 09
+50 09 +50 10

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
HADLEY, RUSSELL B.
REVOC TRU _..-
H J: EEK
R VOC TRUST
00DB 1195 PG 0905
��� CO of
O Ca
+ ti
SHEET NAME I SHEET NUMBER
STRUCTURES__j 16
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAIIANCE I DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
. ' 905 JONES FRANKILIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTN CAROLINA 27908
\4 �� ♦ TEL[phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
�Il���ill
DocuS1gnTd\6-. G A R01,111,
5
Eil O89AA0
-UT 8 -STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
N
STR. TYPE
STATION
OFFSET
NORTHING
EASTING
LOG VANE
0+39.75
0
763,666.35
1,893,294.34
LOG CROSS VANE
1+89.36
0
763,792.64
1,893,268.23
LOG CROSS VANE
2+13.58
0
763,816.32
1,893,267.65
LOG VANE
2+33.63
0
763,835.34
1,893,273.30
LOG VANE
2+86.18
0 1
763,882.97
1,893,254.82
LOG CROSS VANE
3+12.03
0
763,904.20
1,893,266.00
LOG CROSS VANE
3+57.38
0
763,944.69
1,893,276.85
LOG CROSS VANE
4+07.72
0
763,990.25
1,893,271.93
LOG VANE
4+54.83
0
764,034.46
1,893,266.47
SHEET NAME I SHEET NUMBER
STRUCTURES__j 16
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAIIANCE I DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
. ' 905 JONES FRANKILIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTN CAROLINA 27908
\4 �� ♦ TEL[phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
�Il���ill
DocuS1gnTd\6-. G A R01,111,
5
Eil O89AA0
UT 8 -SUS -ND Y�
N
== S E A L77
-5 AR__-
RESTORATION '"- -
PROP BANKFULL
- _ r -
-
STA 0+00 --
E
- 2697 I _
ELEV =522.06
- --
E
CROSS VANE LOG
VANE
x(� cb
_G
\
SURVEY BOUNDAR —
__--
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
s�
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
--�_
sti o ti
CA
ALL EXISTING WIRE FENCE
--�— SUR W
—
O El
WITHIN
EASEMENT TO BE REMOVED
—
BO NDARY 3
--_
/LOG
LOG .CROSS VANE
3.
ALLEN, DANNY T. VANE _-__
/
LOG VANE
DB
512 PG 676
/ LINDLEY, DARRYL m.
\
LOG /VANE
-
BOUNDARY
REVOC TRUST -
D13 30"04 PG 0810
/
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR
UT 8
530
_ «i
530
525525
EXST GROUND
At PROP THALWEG
~
+_�
-
520
_
_
Ln Lij
w
520
PROPOSED THALWEG
_ _
_ - —
- `
cn w
515_
---
zvwa
515
-UT 8-
BEGIN RESTORATION
510
_ _ STA 0+00
__ _ _
_
__
_
F—
�_
N
ELEV=522.06
_ _510
L E
Sm
0 +50 01
+50 02 +50 03
+50 04
+50
05

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979
888-341 C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
STRUCTURES /7
p PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITEMY
\ \ \ \ UT U COU: ALAMANCE DATE: 208
\ \ \ END RESTORATION 11 SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
\ STA 6+09.0 _
\ \ . ' 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
\ z � �i� . RALEIGH,F NORTH LIN ROAD
27808
\C\ F ca 859.
ELEV=5/1.4.;J ���% G,FIRMLICENSENO. C -M
Axiom Environmental, "Inc.
CD DoeuSignFQUI� I I I l l
N BARO
C:) \ \ c/NeFq o c 11 HADLEY, RUSSELL B. ljl(MgAl
os( ,��ID:I�,A,, <i
`O \ FMFN REVOC TRUST bG\ 4 3a
HADLEY," PEGGY J. CHEEK =
-oNq \ REVOC TRUST = = SEAL = _
DB 1195 PG 0905 _ 26974 CID
_
E MFtiT c o ; uo I N E,
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE:
"\ DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
\ - UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
RELIM l YR
P
�6
CP DROP STRUCTURE - s�R�er FLOOD ZO
e0(
-UT 8- STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE STATION OFFSET NORTHING EASTING
\ DROP STRUCTURE 5+66.15 0 764,121.60 1,893,219.14
--_�- SURVEY 3 DROP STRUCTURE 6+09.00 0 764,161.11 1,893,202.56
-
BOUNDAR-_
UT 8
ALL EXISTING WIRE FENCE
-__
END ENHANCEMENT 11
WITHIN EASEMENT TO BE REMOVED
STA 8+56.9 -
ELEV=506.64
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR
UT 8
525
_oo_
_ _
525
f
EXST GROUND
i
AT PROP THALWEG
520 _
o
_
_' _ _
_ _ 520_
0
Ln w
_ 515 _
LJj
a=
--�� _ _ _ _
__.515_
F— Cn
EXST THALWEG
cn
w
_ -
-UT 8-
510
LLJ
z (.n
— — _ _
_
END ENHANCEMENT II_ _ 510
=
PROPOSED THALWEG — — -� 1
—
STA 8+56.9
-UT 8-
505 _
a
_
_ �END R€STORATION _EGIN
505 _
ENHANCEMENT II
STA -6+09.0
ELEV=511.43
05
+50 06 +50 07 +50
08 +50
09

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
Construction Notes:
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
Staging areas, stockpile areas, construction entrances and access roads will be identified and located
according to the Erosion Control Plans and landowner agreements. Variances will be allowed assuming both
the Contractor and Designer verbally agree.
2. A construction entrance (as shown on the Erosion Control Plans) from Secondary Road 2351 (Bethel South
Fork Road) will be installed for access to the UTI, UT2, UT3, UT4, UT5, UT6, and UT7 as shown on the
Erosion Control Plans. An additional construction entrance from Secondary Road 2351 (Bethel South Fork
Road) will be installed for access to UT8.
3. The Contractor will install silt fencing, as noted on the Erosion Control Plans, at applicable staging and
stockpile areas.
4. The proposed stream alignment and structure locations will be staked for each reach (UT1, UT2, UT3, UT4,
UT5, UT6, UT7, and UT8). Staking will be restricted to riffle elevations only in order to establish and
maintain grade for the entire system. Pools will be excavated once structures are installed.
5. The Contractor will begin stockpiling materials in a designated staging area. General details associated with
all sections include:
a. Sediment bags will be used to filter the groundwater and placed within areas of newly excavated
channel that are offline from the existing flow. These bags will be utilized as the contractor or
designer deem necessary.
b. Temporary and permanent seed mixes, including applicable mulching, will be applied to the
streambanks and disturbed areas at the end of each working day as definable sections are
completed. Erosion control matting will be installed on top of the seed and straw in accordance
with the Erosion Control Construction Sequence.
c. Excavated material that is stockpiled will follow erosion and sediment control guidelines as they
relate to material storage and stockpiling.
d. All remaining disturbed areas are to be seeded and covered according to the Erosion Control
Construction Sequence.
e. Riprap aprons will be constructed to impede any erosion of the channel and streambanks by the
water diverted from the pump -around procedure.
Boulders and materials used for stream structures will be delivered through the primary construction
entrance and stockpiled in the appropriate area.
This project will require pumping water around the channels during construction. Work will generally
proceed from upstream to downstream.
9. Adjust haul roads and associated silt fence as necessary when permanent stream crossings are installed.
Construction Sequence
1) S_ ICI A R,,,,,
3'089t8L,1�99�C3...
=� SEAL
2697 1
^
tiUQI I � � I�IP`�v
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE.
SHEET NAME
SHEET NUMBER
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE I DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
.. 805 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALE
_\\�.l/� . ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. O. C M eoe
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
The Contractor will excavate the proposed channel and modify portions of the existing channel based on
riffle elevations in sections no greater than 300' in length at a time (except where longer sections are
necessary to maintain constructability) in an upstream to downstream fashion. Impervious dikes will be
installed upstream and downstream of the current work section before work on the section is initiated
unless noted otherwise (see Table 1 on sheet E -2A for suggested work section stations and progression).
Water will be diverted around the current work section through the use of a pump and temporary
flexible hose. The current work section will be dewatered using an additional pump and a sediment bag.
Work sections that involve the construction of a confluence of two reaches may require the use of two
pump -around operations. Structures will be installed according to the details presented in the
Construction Plans. Excavate only a portion of the channel that can be completed and stabilized within
the same day. All excavated material will be placed in an appropriate stockpile area. Pools will be
established once structures and channel alignments have been completed locally. Permanent stream
crossings will be installed while the working section containing the crossing has been dewatered.
Grading of some portions of the proposed floodplain may need to be delayed until after work in
subsequent sections has been completed, especially near confluences. Haul roads and temporary silt
fence may also need to be removed before the proposed floodplain can be completed and/or unused
existing channel can be filled.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE (CONTINUED
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
Table 1. - Working
Sections
Order of
Progress
Pump
Station #
Reach
Begin
Station
End
Station
Construction Notes
1
P-1
UT1
0+00
2+29
2
P-2
UT1
2+29
4+36
3
P-3
UTI
4+36
7+04
Fill exst. channel between impervious dikes.
4
P-4
UT1
7+04
7+73
Operate pump stations P-4 and P-5 simultaneously to
build confluence of UTI and UT2, permanent crossing. Fill
exst. channel between impervious dikes.
P-5
UT2
3+04
(UT2)
7+73
(UT1)
5
P-6
UT1
7+73
10+11
Fill exst. channel between impervious dikes.
6
P-7
UT1
10+11
11+69
Fill exst. channel between impervious dikes.
7
P-8
UT3
0+00
2+59
8
P-9
UT1
11+69
13+06
Operate pump stations P-9 and P-10 simultaneously to
build confluence of UTI and UT3. Fill exst. channel
between impervious dikes.
P-10
UT3
2+59
(UT3)
11+06
(UTI)
9
P-11
UTS
0+00
2+31
Dewater pond before installing downstream impervious
dike. Do not rely solely on DTM/TIN model for
constructing proposed channel through existing pond.
Field adjustments will be necessary and shall be approved
by engineer or designer.
10
P-12
UTS
2+31
4+89
Install permanent crossing.
11
P-13
UTS
4+89
7+39
Fill exst. channel between impervious dikes.
12
P-14
UT4
U/S of
crossing
2+59
Install permanent crossing.
13
P-15
UT4
2+59
3+67
14
P-16
P-17
UT4
UTS
3+67
7+39
9+53
9+53
Operate pump stations P-16 and P-17 simultaneously to
build confluence of UT4 and UT5. Fill exst. channel
15
P-18
UT6
0+00
3+14
16
P-19
UT6
3+14
5+68
17
P-20
UT6
5+68
7+81
18
P-21
I UT7
0+00
1+98
19
P-22
UT7
1+98
4+74
20
P-23
UT7
4+74
7+28
21
P-24
UT7
7+28
9+96
22
P-25
I UT8
0+00
2+29
23
P-26
I UT8
2+29
6+09
Fill exst. channel between impervious dikes.
—Docuftnr d N` l H I I//I
9 C \ R
—10-89AD8�9
SEAL
26971 = _
N
i� NvQ
//VIII GaQN��A
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE.
SHEET NAME
SHEET NUMBER
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
' 906 JONES FRANIQIN ROAD
RAL�\{.�� . TEL EENGFlRM8L� NORTH
oOUN 27808
Axiom Environmental, Inc. 1
2. Ponds shall be dewatered prior to dam removal using the following methods:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
-For ponds with an outlet structure, open the outlet structure to dewater the pond at a rate that
does not cause excessive erosion downstream of the dam.
-For ponds without an outlet structure or that require supplemental drawdown, use a pump and
temporary flexible hose to dewater the pond into the downstream channel. A rip rap dissipation
pad shall be used at the outlet of the temporary flexible hose. Dewater at a rate that does not
cause excessive erosion downstream of the discharge point.
3. At the end of each working day, the Contractor will be responsible for the application of seed and straw, as
applicable, to newly established streambanks and disturbed areas. Erosion control matting will be installed
on top of the seed and straw in accordance with the Erosion Control Construction Sequence.
Post -Construction
After all channel work has been completed:
1. All remaining disturbed areas are to be seeded and mulched in accordance with the Erosion Control
Construction Sequence.
2. Live staking can begin on all completed sections of channel (UTI, UT2, UT3, UT4, UT5, UT6, UT7, and
UT8) in accordance with the Planting Plans.
3. Once channel construction and seeding has been complete, bare -rooted seedlings will be installed.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
EROSION CONTROL CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
1) Obtain grading permit.
2) Install temporary construction entrances, silt fencing, access roads, and other measures shown on the
approved erosion and sedimentation control plan.
3) Install rain gage on site. Contractor shall provide a log book at the project site and shall read and record
rain amounts at the same time each day.
4) Contact local Soil Erosion Authority or State for on-site inspection by Environmental Inspector and
obtain certificate of compliance.
5) Begin clearing - maintain devices as necessary.
6) Begin channel construction - stockpile waste material in designated spoil areas and surround with silt
fencing.
7) Temporary or permanent ground cover stabilization shall occur within 7 calendar days from the last
land -disturbing activity, with the following exceptions in which temporary or permanent ground cover
shall be provided within 14 calendar days from the last land -disturbing activity:
• Slopes between 2:1 and 3:1, with a slope length of 10 feet or less
• Slopes 3:1 or flatter, with a slope length of 50 feet or less
• Slopes 4:1 or flatter
8) All graded stream banks must be seeded, mulched, and matted at the end of each day. For this reason,
daily disturbance is limited to the length of stream that can be completed within daily work hours.
9) Once a newly constructed channel section is stabilized, impervious dikes and pump around stations may
be removed, and water may be reintroduced to the channel.
10) When construction is complete and all areas are stabilized completely, call for inspection by
Environmental Inspector.
11) If site is approved, remove silt fencing, access roads, etc. and seed out any resulting bare areas.
12) When vegetation has been established, call for final site inspection by Environmental Inspector.
O4l \bya tII
DocuSk
AR
1089AR8�44 994C3._
SEAL
26971 =
CI N�F�
04
''Iilli��Il���v
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE.
SEEDING SCHEDULE
TEMPORARY HERBACEOUS SEED
SHEET NAME
SHEET NUMBER
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION 5?E
COUNTY: ALAMANCE I DATE; 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
(' 905 JONES FRANKUN ROAD
TEL( )8511RTN OouN �n9oe
ENG FLICENS. C-8Axiom Environmental, Inc.
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Common Name
Scientific Name
Application Rate
Application Dates
Grain Rye A
Secale cereale
130 lbs. per acre
Year-round
(3 lbs. per 1,000 ft'-)
Orchard Grass B
Dacrvlis glomerate
15 lbs per acre
September - March
(0.35 lbs. per 1,000 fr)
Brown Top Millet B
Panicum ramosam
40 lbs. per acreMay
—September
(1 .0 lbs. per 1,000 ft)
German Millet B
Setaria Italica
25 lbs. per acreMay
—September
(0.5 lbs. per 1,000 ft')
A Primarily utilized on disturbed or stockpiled areas.
e Primarily utilized near stream channels and streambanks.
SOIL AMENDMENTS
In lieu of a soil test:
Fertilizer 10-10-10
1000 lbJacre
Mulch
Small grain mulch must be applied at a rate of 2 tons/acre to all seeded areas.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
RIP RAP
DISSIPATION PAD
I
I
I
PD1 SEDIMENT BAG
(SEE DETAIL)
I
DEWATERING
PUMP
I
IMPERVIOUS DIKE \\
(SEE DETAIL) \
\
\
\
\
\
\
I
I
I
\
\
\
TEMPORARY P \\
FLEXIBLE HOSE \
EXISTING CHANNEL
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE FOR TYPICAL PUMP -AROUND:
I.INSTALL UPSTREAM PUMP AND TEMPORARY FLEXIBLE HOSE.
2. PLACE UPSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE, DOWNSTREAM RIP RAP DISSIPATION PAD, AND
BEGIN PUMPING OPERATIONS FOR STREAM DIVERSION.
3. PLACE DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE.
4. INSTALL SEDIMENT BAG AND ASSOCIATED PUMP. DEWATER THE ENTRAPPED
AREA.
5. PERFORM STREAM RESTORATION WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS.
6. EXCAVATE ANY ACCUMULATED SILT AND DEWATER BEFORE REMOVAL OF
IMPERVIOUS DIKES. REMOVE IMPERVIOUS DIKES, PUMPS, TEMPORARY FLEXIBLE HOSE,
AND DISSIPATION PAD (BEGIN WITH DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE FIRST).
I
7. ALL GRADING AND STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN THE PUMP
AROUND AREAS BETWEEN THE IMPERVIOUS DIKES. THE IMPERVIOUS LOCATIONS AS
SHOWN ON THIS SHEET ONLY REPRESENT THE UPPER AND LOWER EXTENT OF
I WORK FOR EACH STREAM SEGMENT. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
DETERMINING THE LOCATION OF THE IMPERVIOUS DIKES.
8. REMOVE SEDIMENT BAG(S) AND BACKFILL. STABILIZE DISTURBED AREA WITH SEED
I
A� AND MULCH.
\ i0 iG
\ 2F
PUMP -AROUND PUMP
P-1
NOTES:
I. ALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ONLY DRY OR ISOLATED
SECTIONS OF CHANNEL
2. IMPERVIOUS DIKES ARE TO BE USED TO ISOLATE WORK FROM
STREAM FLOW WHEN NECESSARY
3. ALL GRADED STREAM BANKS SHALL BE SEEDED, MULCHED, AND
MATTED AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY. ALL OTHER GRADED
AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS.
A. MAINTENANCE OF STREAM FLOW OPERATIONS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL
TO THE WORK, THIS INCLUDES POLYETHYLENE SHEETING,
DIVERSION PIPES, PUMPS, AND HOSES.
5. PUMPS AND HOSES SHALL BE OF A SUFFICIENT SIZE AND NUMBER
TO DEWATER THE WORK AREA.
6. RIP RAP DISSIPATION PAD TO BE INSTALLED DOWNSTREAM OF LOWER
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
TYPICAL PUMP -AROUND OPERATION
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
(SEE DETAIL)
—DocuSiF\ ReO 6�.
`6ARO
—W89A86�994c3...
SEAL-
26971 = _
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE.
RIPRAP DISSIPATION PAD
4.0 FT---�
3Ll_ I IUIN A—A
NOTES:
T= 12"
TER
OLANKET
I. La IS THE LENGTH OF THE RIPRAP APRON.
2. T = THICKNESS
3. IN A WELL-DEFINED CHANNEL EXTEND THE APRON
UP THE CHANNEL BANKS TO THE TOP OF THE BANK.
4. A FILTER BLANKET OR FILTER FABRIC SHOULD BE
INSTALLED BETWEEN THE RIPRAP AND SOIL FOUNDATION.
SHEET NAME
SHEET NUMBER
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALANANCE I DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
' 905 JONES FRANQIN ROAD
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27808
TEL[phone]
in_� ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C4190
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
PLAN VIEW
RIP RAP DISIPATION PAD SPECIFICATIONS
ASSUMED
PERMANENT
LENGTH
WIDTH
STONE SIZE
STONE CLASS
THICKNESS
HOSE SIZE
(IN)
(Y/N)
La (FT)
Wo (FT)
d50 (IN)
(IN)
4"
N
4.0
1.0
3
A
12

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
It
A
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
SEDIMENT
CONTROL STONE
1'-6" MIN.
1' 2
—C -i �--
1� Op (� 3'MAX.
00 2. n 901_,.
IMPERVIOUS
GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC STRUCTURAL
STONE
CROSS SECTION VIEW
NOTES:
I. USE CLASS B STONE FOR
STRUCTURAL STONE.
2. USE NO.5 OR NO. 57
STONE FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL.
3. CONSTRUCT DAM A MAXIMUM
OF I FT. ABOVE NORMAL FLOW
DEPTH.
4. TOE IN IMPERVIOUS
MATERIAL
5. LINE BANKS WITH CLASS B
STONE 5' UPSTREA"" Amn in,
DOWNSTREAM OF
BANKv I I
I�BASE OF STREAM
TOP VIEW
TnM (1C MAAIV
STREAM BED �®
2' MIN.
FRONT VIEW
EXISTING GROUND
/-- PUMP HOSE
CLASS B STONE
( 12" THICK) —
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
—Docusiq#.��. CA \ R
1089A ;� C3...
SEAL
_ = 26971 = _
I NES \\\
0 .// 1 1 1 1.\\
�'� yUq G. D P�. ��•
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE:
SEDIMENT BAG
15' MINIMUM
$HEFT NAME
SHEET NUMBER
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCf DATE: 2018
- SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27808
(919)05 --
ENG` _�••� -/ r FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
SEDIMENT BAG
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
INSTALLATION:
I. INSTALL SEDIMENT BAG ON A SLOPE SO
INCOMING WATER FLOWS DOWNHILL THROUGH BAG
WITHOUT CREATING MORE EROSION. TO INCREASE THE
EFFICIENCY OF FILTRATION, PLACE THE BAG ON A
GRAVEL BED IN ORDER TO MAXIMIZE WATER FLOW
THROUGH THE SURFACE AREA OF THE BAG.
2. BAG IS FULL WHEN IT NO LONGER CAN EFFICIENTLY
FILTER SEDIMENT OR ALLOW WATER TO PASS AT A
REASONABLE RATE. FLOW RATES WILL VARY
DEPENDING ON THE SIZE OF SEDIMENT BAG, THE TYPE
AND AMOUNT OF SEDIMENT DISCHARGED INTO THE
BAG, THE TYPE OF GROUND, ROCK OR OTHER
SUBSTANCE UNDER THE BAG AND THE DEGREE OF THE
SLOPE ON WHICH THE BAG LIES. UNDER MOST
CIRCUMSTANCES THE SEDIMENT BAG WILL
ACCOMMODATE FLOW RATES OF 1100 GALLONS PER
MINUTE. USE OF EXCESSIVE FLOW RATES OR
OVERFILLING WITH SEDIMENT WILL CAUSE THE BAG
TO RUPTURE OR FAILURE OF THE HOSE ATTACHMENT
STRAPS.
3. DISPOSE OF SEDIMENT BAG AS DIRECTED BY THE SITE
DESIGNER. IF ALLOWED, BAG MAY BE CUT OPEN AND
THE CONTENTS SEEDED AFTER REMOVING VISIBLE
FABRIC.
4. REFER TO DETAIL REGARDING GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
ATTRIBUTES.
STREAM

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
r
i
0
C
G
NOTES:
I. USE CLASS 'A' STONE ON PAD. PAD TO BE MINIMUM 100' LONG x 12' WIDE x 6" DEEP
2. TURNING RADIUS SHOULD BE SUFFICIENT TO ACCOMODATE LARGE TRUCKS.
3. ENTRANCE(S) SHOULD BE LOCATED AS TO PROVIDE MAXIMUM UTILITY BY ALL
CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES.
4. ENTRANCE(S) MUST BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT
TRACKING OR DIRECT FLOW OF MUD ONTO ADJACENT ROADWAYS. PERIODIC
TOP DRESSING WITH STONE MAY BE NECESSARY.
5. ANY MATERIAL WHICH FINDS ITS WAY ONTO THE ADJACENT ROADWAY MUST
BE CLEANED UP IMMEDIATELY.
VLV I L/� i ILL I HUI\IV
�IIIIIIIIII
—DocuSigo 6y: CARO
SEAL
= 26971 = _
(/ U I N� \\�
'//lllllllll�`\\
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE:
4' MAX. 4' MAX.
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
EROSION CONTROL TYPICAL I E -3B
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
' . 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
TEL
ENG LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL _7
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
NOTFS,
I. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE A MINIMUM
OF 36" IN WIDTH AND SHALL BE
FASTENED SECURELY TO THE POSTS.
2. STEEL POST SHALL BE 5'-0" IN HEIGHT
AND BE OF THE SELF -FASTENER ANGLE
STEEL TYPE.
-fi 3. WHEN JOINTS ARE NECESSARY, SECURELY
FASTEN THE FABRIC AT A SUPPORT POST
>" MIN WITH OVERLAP TO THE NEXT POST.
ABOVE EX 4, FILTER FABRIC TO BE NYLON, POLYESTER,
RADE PROPYLENE, OR ETHYLENE YARN WITH EXTRA
STRENGTH (50 LB/LIN. INCH MINIMUM) AND
WITH A MINIMUM FLOW RATE OF 0.3 GAL/FT/MIN.
FABRIC SHOULD CONTAIN ULTRAVIOLET RAY
INHIBITORS AND STABILIZERS.
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT
FILTER FABRIC -
COMPACTED FILL
SILT FENCE
I
I I
4 i STE
I �
EXTENSION OF FABRIC
INTO TRENCH

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
J.
r
CIT
TOP
12'x12' +/-
ROUGH CUT TIMBER
LENGTH VARIES
LOG MAT BRIDGE
PLAN VIEW
NOTE:
DETAIL PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL
PURPOSES. USE OF LOG MAT BRIDGE
IS AT CONTRACTORS DISCRETION.
BOLTED
APPROPRIATE
ROUGH CUT TIMBER
LENGTH VARIES
O• OF BANK I
0�/i, %��
�ON/01110=000111
/ / /����i,� POW/
5' MIN 51 MIN
12' MAX I2*xI2"
ROUGH CUT TMBEik
LENGTH VARIEIS
CROSS SECTION VIEW
SECTION THROUGH
LOG MAT BRIDGE
Docu&?"dby. I1III//////
CAR
oagsOftas 0
SEAL
26971 =
Off\;;
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE:
SHEET NAME
SHEET NUMBER
' PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAU AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
' COUNTY: ALAMANCE DATE: 2018
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
. ' 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, CAROLINA
TEL
NOC-90
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
1.
TYPICAL MATTING LOCATION
COIR FIBER MATTING
FROM TOE OF CHANNEL 3
TO MINIMUM I FT. o
BEYOND BANKFULL
PROPOSED BANKFULL
ELEVATION
PROPOSED
WATER SURFACE
ELEVATION
NOTES:
-MEDIUM WEIGHT WOVEN COIR FIBER MATTING SHALL BE
PLACED ALONG THE OUTSIDE BANK OF ALL BENDS
AND ALONG BOTH SIDES OFTHE CHANNEL IN TANGENT AREAS.
-FIELD ADJUSTMENTS TO MATTING LOCATION MAY
BE MADE AT THE DESIGNERS OR CONTRACTORS DISCRETION
AS NECESSARY.
'(111111111
DocuSiRgta'by: C A R ��i�,
lI
SEHL
26971 = _
4 61 P
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE:
SHEET NAME I SHEET NUMBER
EROSION CONTROL TYPICAL I E -3D
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE I DATE: 2018
SUNGAATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
. ` 903 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27309
TEL [phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. CA90
Axiom Envi=menfal, Inc.
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
COIR MATTING CROSS SECTION
FT, MIN. 6' MIN
COIR FIBER MATTING BANKFULL BACKFILL
ELEVATION
NORMAL WATER
STRAW MULCH I
BED MATERIAL6' MIN . SECURE TOE OF MATTING WITH 24" WOODEN STAKES
OVERLAP WITH GALVANIZED NAIL BENT TO PROHIBIT MATTING
FROM WORKING OFF OF STAKE.
2. USE 12" WOODEN STAKES ON 5' CENTERS OR AS
DIRECTED BY MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.
3. MINIMUM I' WIDE, G" DEEP TRENCH OVER TOP OF BANK
WITH MATTING LAID FLAT AND STAKED. TRENCH TO BE
BACKFILLED WITH EXCAVATED MATERIAL.
STRAW WATTLE
STRAW WATTLE
EXISTING
GROUND
STRAW WATTLE CHANNEL/
EXISTING I' MIN
GROUND mu
Z
NOTES:
I. STRAW WATTLE TO BE INSTALLED AT THE DISCRETION
OF THE CONTRACTOR OR DESIGNER IN AREAS THAT
MAY NEED ADDITIONAL RUNOFF PROTECTION.
\ 2. INSTALL STRAW WATTLE ALONG TOP
OF BANKFULL CHANNEL.
\ 3. SECURE STRAW WATTLE WITH I'x2'XI8' WOODEN
\ STAKES, SPACE AT 5' MAXIMUM.
4. STRAW SHALL BE CERTIFIED WEED FREE.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
DocuSigpe4byd :
i
E�08�D'49'i4Csm
3_
=� SEAL
26971 = _
�oSFNCI NE_c0 "�\,
''Illll�ll�l���
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM E
DATE:
SPECIAL SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCE BREAK
VARIABLE i
DIMENSION
2 ft
NOTE:
-INSTALL 9 FT SECTION OF SEDIMENT CONTROL
FENCE AS A BREAK IN TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
TO RELIEVE ACCUMULATION OF RUNOFF AS
DIRECTED ON PLANS AND AS DEEMED NECESSARY
BY CONTRACTOR OR DESIGNER.
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. USE NO. 5 OR NO. 57 STONE
FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL STONE.
2. USE HARDWARE CLOTH 24 GAUGE WIRE
MESH WITH 1/4 INCH MESH OPENINGS.
3. INSTALL 5 FT. SELF FASTENER ANGLE
STEEL POST 2 FT. DEEP MINIMUM.
4. SPACE POST A MAXIMUM OF 3 FT.
SEDIMENT CONTROL STONE
1 ft min
1/4 WIRE MESH
SEDIMENT CONTROL STONE
F-- 1 ft min
WATER FLOW —► 2
—III III--JILJI
I
1/ WIRE MESH
2 ft
STEEL POST -
2 ft DEPTH
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
EROSION CONTROL TYPICAL E -3E
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNW: ALAMANCE DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27606
TEL (919) FIRM 59-2243
LIICENS
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. CA80
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
�A,
Z
0
V
Q
V
SHEET NAME I SHEET NUMBER
HAUL ROADS I E -3F
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE I DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
. ' 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27808
TEL [phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Envimmentel, Inc.
—D ... signB0Bj..
Josh' ,e N,, 4,B,
'.. S
—11289A&8,,1---4 3... O� ,
=wvSEAL
26971 =
INE��'�
0i
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
■ ■ ■ ■ ■
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
HAUL ROAD
SPECIAL SEDIMENT
CONTROL FENCE
BREAK
SHEET NAME
SHEET NUMBER
PROJECT NAME: HEMS STREAM AND WETLAND RESTDR ioN SrTE
COUNTY: ALAMANOE DATE: 206
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
10 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROU 77808
\1'f • TEL (919)& -,S -
__,a
919)559 -
1\/1 ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C490
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Docuftg 06 Y
\ GSA R
O/i
Ei
ost�lrp����.�bw,��if,
n,89A 3...
=CL SEAL F--
2697 1 26971 = -
.� _ s`
UT
-¢
-ND -N t-
`-\HADLEY,
-
`START RESTORATION
--'
J-
MICHAEL /'TODD
-' _-
--___-54TA-4+70
r -r ;
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
- ✓��
l i 1
% J 1�
gal -' DB 3492 PG ,0554
S� j - - -
-- ELEV=54ID7 _ _
_
- -'
DATE.
_1 ``
_-
ART ENH ENT I 548- --
- - - __-_--_
- —�
_ - ' _ --
' / /k
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
-
/
ELEY =5` 4 9 ------ ------
�.
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
\
I C
/i((>
/
k
son—�
r__�����__,�
- -'LIMITS/OF
� DISTURBANCE,,
I rc, ,v', �% r / rr f : � " � � ,� 1 — — � � a � _ • _��r ��/ •,r,,.`'� �' F v c : � — ' \� ,�— _ 3,y.�+l,� • _� --'
I' l / t s ,�/ , —, ♦ � ,vim -� �� �.� , < � � �-� �'�� �
� � �� / � --irl�-�'�vs'�T,�,!■■■■■♦ /546- ♦ �P _-_ — I r � �� ' ���-___ �-- y
b�v Irl lrll/,'� •�♦■■ ♦41#-' ♦ �� - ---'' t�
LC),
IMPERVIOUS
_ _ \ IMPERVIOUS s F
DIKE � P-2 O I I =_ � _ -r �� �- � x �,'� - <1\ 6'
/ ♦ ♦=" IMP. �• -\ �.
DIKE' .at ••. J G
s
"IV 4P 00
is �� �•me
��•♦ ---- S� -/ ---
_
\ _
- = \-T _RBANC
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR

DocuSign Envelope ID:
1 C-4AK-63F2464DACD81029
.....
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
HAUL ROAD
SPECIAL SEDIMENT
CONTROL FENCE
BREAK
sx"
F6'
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
EROSION CONTROL E5
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTOROM WE
COUNTY: ALWAMCE I DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
. 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27808
�I, J TEL (9 9)
859.2243
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Envlmnmantal, Inc.
00,
� I
r�
;I TURBANCE
E Ln
ILC
u
R. \
\ t \
2
2� \
;tO5. 9 -' CIMITS OP
DISTURBANCE'
��1111111111�
DocuSig(*Vb C ARo
Ejr
889ADSC' 94C / 0
�SEAET-
_ = 26971 = -
RSA G
�'''IIIIIIIIW`vv
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
1100..
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
HAUL ROAD
SPECIAL SEDIMENT
CONTROL FENCE
BREAK
!Di
I
N C'
' I � StiFtil�ti
/ / T
u�`� \ /
4 E
I 11 i '��-�� �� // �' ��47 �I �/ /�� i/ �� ♦ ��F ��j.
� / �I ���A �// LII�ITS�OF ��� � �, x C'
- PISTURBANC tiF O y
r• -
I
� r
LD
/ I �
I rl
_' — —— bbd— _ — ——
T 2�'------HADLEY, MI E
LD
D8,
�TARTLfNHANCE 3492 RGA ?F
TA 0+00
4LEV=
— R _ II„
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
EROSION CONTROL I E6
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALMANC£ DATE: 206
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
. ' 805 JONES FRANIO_IN ROAD
TEL
511- CAROLINA 27805
\\f !r TEL (FIR LICENSE
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. CA90
Axbm EnvimnmenTal, Inc.
—DocuSignejvbi:
CAR
J036`..I..��Q�•"� v
—1089At4O�Q4�3s S
=� SEAL
26971 = -
�111G N
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR

UOCU51gn tnvelOpe IU: 2UUtUt$?5t3-3410 4AVU-bJt-Z-4b4UAC:US1029
-----552 \=--�
— - — \
-- _-- --- -----„_---
\
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
HAUL ROAD
�-
8 ^
-551
BREAK
-E-Zi
J
--,HADLEY, MICHAEL TODD
I
�55m 549
-543
5407
- -_
—
_// ---- --_ --------
-�-=_- -�
---- ---_
/
/- -- -----------------------------546--
--
Io MARSH TREATtMft-T4--- - - - - ---t11N1T5�F 44
AREA
DISTURBANCEOWN
��'--
( __ � . �
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■,F�Q3” _ _542-
RIB
� � , � ■ .
00-
-15
Ci
3
IMPERVIOUSUT
vV, START RESTORATION
v
•■
v
su 0+00
v .. , ,
\
.
ELEV=X39.43
//
LIMITS OF S
\
_ s�S
\
DISTURBANCE `
�\
M Lo
w
I— w
Z ,-
O LLI
LLI
V _
I— N V1
a w
maw
�N
V)
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
EROSION CONTROL E7
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATIM SITE
COUNTY: AAMAWE I DATE: 2W
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
. w 905 JONES FRANIO_IN ROAD
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27808
V1 TEL [phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C -B90
Axiom EnvfrOnmental, Inc.
Do1cuySgv"b i CARO
tQ89A�86lvyns3... / O� 9 /,
=wvSEAL
2697
I N EFQ
0
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE.
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
■ ■ ■ ■ ■
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
HAUL ROAD
SPECIAL SEDIMENT
CONTROL FENCE
BREAK
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR

DocuSign Envelope ID
7
\o
1 C-4A913-B31F2-464DACD81029
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
EROSION CONTROL E8
PROJECr NAME: HEROIN STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION WE
COUNTY: ALANAMCE I DATE: 2138
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
. 905 JONES FRANI(UN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 77808
TEL[phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
\�1!I I II III
DocuSig�gdV�N: ///�
/ ) (� / / 1 l ( �l ( / - _ / -� (( \\Q � C 4 Ro�
� �JJ JJJ /
3 r / n ��� �� c > (v h' v Eilg�sada�l\4�3...
< P@RMAt4 NT CkbSSING \\ = n
i / ��� ,C _� SERE - -
2, f " CMP
26971 -
��3 r i / WRY � 0
/ i > 4D L v 29','TOP V/1 DTH (TiYP)`
r /HADLEY,�US�ELL / -- ; �o 'rNCI Nv -
1/REVD T USI / / A i /� /� i �� V / �� .74-'' �(� �`
/ / (3 Q
/D DB IIs55 Pj1.7 090 CID
�IIIIi
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
(Z)'� 0 �/' /� �� /� �� // �� " DATE:
��� , r5 �� >�__, > - ' i /, /` / \ / i / ✓ / / / / / / i 2� ., DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
i'�'�.. / /' , / v i UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
�MARSFi
T ATMENT
NN,�Mfi■■■�i�■■■r■ 7�Iv�■ $ / / / •w• / ' .ice
. ■ _ MITOF / • / -Q - / P-13 F S
iiYFr ERVICIUS \Fid \ ♦ / ��' / i' ice^ </ ' �' / 'y --- `__ t��O
/v 3F DIKE v I i v�` ♦�i �'�� � / P�12�.,=' � 1VFRERVIOUSv �Fj Gv�fn
�n i, ♦�■ �' •� DIKE ,-
U - a _ •,
rr __ 1 �/ >'_ h `-��■■■? I its
If
MP. �� 5 : y
DrICE LIMITS OF \\ �S
541//
/ll_DISTURB4NC.E \\ s 8 vv�v 4r# ' �lV Av v ` Cj�� �� v v vv�
j \
S�
b t7
*•qrA V v v A Z '77
j v��—v , ,
■ ■ . ■ .
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
HAUL ROAD
SPECIAL SEDIMENT
CONTROL FENCE
BREAK
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR

DocuSign Envelope ID:
a
C-4A9C-B 3 F2-464 DAC D81029
s -
sFF s9��,
stiF yti
6 F
11:101111
r
VN
s ' '
HAD, LI EY, RUSSELL B.
t REVOC T�UST
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
EROSION CONTROL E9
PROJECT NAME: NERDN STREAM AND WETLAND RESTDRATAiN SITE
COUNTY: A NARCE I DATE: cW
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
905 JONES FRANRLN ROAD
` RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27505
TEL (919)859.
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Z�W
J
Q 0
moi
.....
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
HAUL ROAD
SPECIAL SEDIMENT
CONTROL FENCE
BREAK
—DocuSigneq*.\ ) I I I � I) I I/
�\N CARo
—I OPADit4
SEAL
26971
;/ U
CIN -
0
�o
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
co L,
1'f fj
T 5 i E�1'
ND ENH Ad Il
STA
�G /r ' j l i
I l 1
Cj
\ \\ u) r / /r i/ x / "/ vT I
/r/i�
Cb
510 @m
� � v A 1 V c — � � �/ 4 � �—�— �• � X16'
626
>
N
6 � vvvwv
8 HA)DLEY - SS -EA �O
v ` `A `� v �> v i v �� v �Iv _;/ 5 r� �! RUST 8
t v � _ "DL�� GY CHEEK vv�`
RE 0C TR T I
e
P%0-1795 PG 0905
V
'AllCn
®& a`' e LD
9e
S 5�f�
sa
D°
SHEET NAME
SHEET NUMBER
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE I DATE: 204
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
. ' 905 JONES FfUM UN ROAD
. ' RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27808
TEL[phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Adom Envinxlm5nfal, Inc.
DowSignFd�ti7f
` �S
reaskoac��@sbc.. O� ; 9 ,
SEAL
26971 = _
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM E[
DATE.-
DOCUMENT
ATE:DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR

DocuSign Envelope ID
•
1 C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
/
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
UT 4 _,— —�—, �� �,
5,1
SPECIAL SEDIMENT
STA f RESTOR -19V
CONTROL FENCE
BREAK
i LEv=l5V212T6
E�iADLEY, RUSSELL B.
34--' ,_- -
' REVCC j-AUST'_
f��
/t, DB A51PG 09.05_
,526 �4
X525•
*� _ 1MITS OF i
�/ - -----�
_ URBANNE-�
DIST
E 4
5th
--523
8��zPA�iN�-N RO$ I �
�� � ��•� �rti�
�'� _.. �� - ,,, - �t's�'i _ � � �'
S: A ' 2 @� CMS•
Of L6V 20#-
� ��0
• - -i► . 1
�� 1 ti I PERVIO N'' v
01)
Pf5 DIKE Lu Lu
---_ -` Z�
� ---- _ - w
A� I�\♦•—NOME -\ -- rxb !UO=
S� \ !ice �• %� -I>�.
v v v v v vI v� �E HE �� •� _, _ vlow
gLu
I l 1 I 1 I III SIA 1 A ✓ i'_ Ji h ifAITS OF
rII iI At111111�11�`\ _-- )ISTURBANC-E-------- g
/
- -� �, S��
MAR§ TREATM€NT------------- - - - - -- -\ 4A-aLE`7; F��SSELC
AREA-- _ ------ \
—REV@� 7RUS1`\ \
24A'/\ 93�--_j - -- Aja 'PE.GGY- J. H�EK`\ \\ \\\\ \
vter /�� _
\'..— moi' /l—'�, � — /,' ��;\I``� �\�`s�'�J�'���_ \_ RE���.' T R
�ll�lll (III i / ' �— —i�� ����� ��� /'� _ ���v �� �DQ 1195,P0 09 l v
\
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
EROSION CONTROL Ell
PROJECT NAME: HEAIW STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATIDIY SITE
COUNTY: ALAMAWE I DATE: 2DB
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
1 ' 995 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27595
( TEL [phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axi m Environmental, Inc.
r(IIIIIIII11
EDocuSigpZbNy: C A O �i
R < i
89 C994 3...'
X33..' 0/G
SEAL
26971 =
'FtiGi NE�,
'��IIIIIIII����
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
.....
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
HAUL ROAD
SPECIAL SEDIMENT
CONTROL FENCE
BREAK
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
i
r
•
\ h1
( '
HADLEY, RUSSELL B.
REVQC-'TRUST /
--DB-1195 PG P905-
o
/ X516' -5ti5�
- UT
RESTORATI
-STAA+00 ,. 15. E
'l ��� ti -
Fzt€�1=51&3U` •��`� LIMITS OF - -
----- /----
' , i c , ' _ •' , - -8 , ' S12DTSTURBANCFr
,- -.525-/ ' ,- �' �-'� _ --- ♦-- ,-
�/� "� /' '� / // /'' v//�♦ '/'�'''�/// �-=� ��---•� / -' ...••IMP.--�
■'f...■ ---{)1K ��i0aa00 -
m"n,tr_0-�
''�'� ''�� / /•••J. / /''/��/ / �� �Jl �___ -' P= - i -.---tom• '
Ir
I � /� // '' __518 �� --bis-jam♦ \ \ / \` h -
�-
/,K\` ��_ 1. 1�--_ • \\*
•• O
\ \e --975, ` •1 \ - ---- `
-DI KE \\ 'ice �.�a_•�L• _-- - -- - - -• - - - - -- - f � lt�5a'i4±--
-- >S - 6 -- —
S -�I
- - �' ' -LuZrs _ - - - -
'eCs` ,\\ A\ 9 s, -- _ -- ,_16fSTUNANCE- ---- � ------ \,��\ �rS- `--
\ ✓ � � � � � - � yr _—�=_.� - \-- - - - - -
\ , L - -
Cb
�, \ _
SHEEP NAME
SHEET NUMBER
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTaWAOS STE
COUNTY: ALMAWE I DATE: 20AR
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
. 905 JONES FRANRLN ROAD
( RALEIGH, NORTN CAROLINA 27808
TEL [phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-880
Axiom EnvRonmentel, Inc.
��IIIIIII�,��
—DocusigRpoibN C 4 ROS''
—1CWAD;B§ 9�4C3... �� 9
=� SEAL-
_ = 26971 =
I NE����
';,`SOS �'�IIIIII�`��0�\•�
tiUA 6 P
'��IIIIII�I�`
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
■ . ■ ■ ■
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
HAUL ROAD
SPECIAL SEDIMENT
CONTROL FENCE
BREAK
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
N NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR
w

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
/ l /
HADLEY RUSSELL / B. �� r z
��tEV Ci TRUST
OB 1195 -PG 09051 o rt _
...tvoc? 4
j
T 1r'.'I r •'' 90
■■■*��=_
�O♦- it ' I
IMP.-- / e�
LfMITO �. / :I
DIKE — ' -- 5�6 — — _DISTURBANCE
q
�A\!��9.R20.05
\\\ ___ •5 �—_�����••/Ji )'ice ��� =��� 11
- ■ �J 5 � _ � / v 1
•moi\ -- - - i �1 1
\ \
■ ■ , ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ � �,\ , \ B P' ■ f, ' / 7 / \s EWD IgGJ ATi0A(
STA 7+80:9
�� �v v v v •• v v •• vi , .1611 mi I —
,. . \ • ■ ■ ■' \ 1, \ ` \�ELEV =500.88
OF `O,
- LIMITS
Gja k' STtXRBANCE iA /Ill
1 L "0
LD
SHEET NAME I SHEET NUMBER
EROSION CONTROL I Eli
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION STT
COUNTY: ALAVAACE DATE: 2q�B
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
. , 905OM
JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
. ' RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27808
1 ! TEL IS 9) 859-2213
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axbm Environmental, Inc.
DOCGSIgngdbj� 1 � I I 111
\ CA 10
timil. (�9O,96C3 .S
SEAL
26971
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
. ■ ...
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
HAUL ROAD
SPECIAL SEDIMENT
CONTROL FENCE
BREAK
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
SHEET NAME I SHEET NUMBER
EROSION CONTROL I E14
PROJECT NAME: HERQM STREAM AND WETLAND RESTQRATAdM S/TE
COUNTY: ALWANCE I DATE: 200
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
• '
RALEIGH NORTH CAROL 21808
TEL (919)'859-2243
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C M
Axiom Environmental. Inc.
LD
LD
I I �
1 I I
H A R�� 0 AUT REms/ B. LD
------ ,— � DB 1195 PG,0905�`
MARSH' 1> % A i
r r , TREATMEN-T, _ LIMITS O
/ ARCM- — ' // /i l ♦ Q tom. \ \ O \ I
DIS )UURBANCE �'. ' �v vv v /' '
J
tWAN ENT CROSSING
I 2� 4 CNP
€
4"9--: ■ ■ .. ■ .... ■ . -TOP IDT_H- P) _ �' _ ' �/ / / �9
a1NITS C)F y O
[3IT�TIPJRBfjP4CE .40IMP / �Fj `<�F
21 1111111. DIKE �A
W/w/1R KE
-22
DIKE - - --- •
_ l
P-21
€Nt�ftNCfl T t ��,, ....� W ML saw...■ --- --- -- ----
off
STA Ems 0 T771111111111 INS
41,
=52574-
3
OZ�� -' -' — `�
i ! 27 \ %'
..... LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
HAUL ROAD
SPECIAL SEDIMENT
WENME CONTROL FENCE
BREAK
Doe uSiqpeli�6yl IC 4
R�
4b89AC1,D 1 494C3._
CL SEAL-
_ = 26971 = -
I NE�
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE.
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
w
L
5
0 o
Yl
,RUSaF-tC-B: 44QC-'TRUST
/ S )
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
EROSION CONTROL E15
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION S/TE
COUNTY: MANAWE IDATE: POB
SUNGAATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27908
( TEL[phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C -M
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
.....
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
HAUL ROAD
SPECIAL SEDIMENT
CONTROL FENCE
BREAK
5..........
DOCUSiRgbd by: G A //
Eji)89Abe�91�13
.�VA/
... / O�
=� SEAL
26971 = _
i U FOCI IN \
Uq P \
C. D
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
' —53 7r — —
/ , ,W
536 Z cf� —
' l g \ 53,5_
• �i� --
ur =>
AR�3f
ESTORATtON 3z, `
HADLEY, RUSS sB
f --sus
RE) TR% - _
HAg a �1`FYJ�EEK ..�
_ w
\, `A,95 PG 09`05 _
We
� _ / `-
- �----- __`\ ",/-532 ,
'530'� r�29'-- \ \ 53� —_ \ ' �ILDISTURB _E_
?AOTS_OF__-53lb
®20_— — --- —.
mo►aIi�
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
.������i�
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
®
`
SPECIAL SEDIMENT
�I.
BREAK
U
'
� h
Q�A
soo
-_-- __ _
■ :. ■
725 S �� ■\ ,I��-\ �� `—..-- — ` ��
—�---___ \ � �!♦ �\ ■ ~•• —rte— �� ����--'"=`--
IM \■ ■\IR ■ ■ ■Dlk� ■ • _ `• ■ ■ . ■ ■
,!■~VLIMITS OF TMPERVIOI)S ■■■•■■,■■■',■•■— — —
�'�,—� `. DISTURBANCE `��,DIKE
\ �_ ••< —__ _ ��— — .—____ --
LP
\w� v- 3v V v v A ■ ■ / \■■ ■••• ��
NY
B y t c�
DB 512 f�i 676
TS7 v
— DBp�0A4, , fl8d0 '� \ / \ ��.. �_ _ter-_ - -,A
@ ,
' � , — v I /b / •. � i a� it �
IIS,/
. ■ .. ■
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
®
HAUL ROAD
SPECIAL SEDIMENT
CONTROL FENCE
BREAK
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
EROSION CONTROL El6
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMARCE I DATE: 204
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
' 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27505
TEL [phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axi m Envimnmenfal, Inc.
DocuSip�*&� y� lG A i 1 j 1111
`<
5089�8�,1�99�C3...
=� SEAL
26971
NA
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL I
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
-1535,
� I 1
\. f
33
w X32 + 52
7
oti
o GAF
6'cp
V '
A,
I 1 ,
1 \\ CO mac° /
� I �
! D Co U
V 1 V A C31 /
v HvADEEt AUSSEEE B.
v REVOC TRUST ,S
HA(`EEY,'PEGGY J. CHEEK Un
v REybC TkdST �-
vI i D8 )W�5 PG 0905 �° /' (� �•
v 1 1 1 v v � _y e /•
\ I
.....
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
HAU L ROAD
SPECIAL SEDIMENT
CONTROL FENCE
BREAK
SHEET NAME I SHEET NUMBER
EROSION CONTROL I Ell
PROJECT NAME: HEADN STREAM AND WETLAND RESTDRATIDM SITE
COUNTY: ALAVANC'E I DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
to 905 JONES FR NKUN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27808
TEL(9t9)859-2243
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO- C-890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
�\I1111111)!�
EDowsiqI�JeVby: CARO/// /
i'-7:t9Aci4`� CZI
SEAL
26971 = _
v Vol N� \
1000
7/17/2018 9:21:42 AM EDT
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
Sa
0
BARE ROOT SEEDLLNGS
Plant Selection
■ Species listed for the project should be grown from stock that corresponds to the same physiographic
province in which they will be used.
■ The designer reserves the right to reject any plant stock due to inferior qualities.
Planting & Handling
■ Bare root seedlings will be planted according to vegetation details or as directed by the designer.
• All vegetation will be planted during the dormant season (December to March). Temperatures ranging
from 36 to 60 degrees Fahrenheit are ideal for planting. Planting will not take place during periods
exceeding this range of temperature. Planting will not take place during excessively windy conditions or
other extreme conditions which may reduce vigor of the planting material.
■ The designer reserves the right to reject any bare root seedling due to inferior quality. The designer also
reserves the right to have any plant replanted due to improper planting techniques.
■ All vegetation designated for a particular planting zone will be culled for inferior quality before being
loaded into planting bags. Furthermore, these species will be thoroughly mixed prior to loading the
planting bag, such that each planting zone will be planted in a random manner.
■ All vegetation will be reviewed by the designer to ensure the highest quality of planting material
throughout the entire process.
Storage
■ Plant stock will be stored at temperatures between 36 to 40 degrees Fahrenheit in appropriate bags
supplied by the plant producer when long-term storage is necessary.
■ Only the necessary quantities of plant stock will be transported to the site on a daily basis. Large
quantities of planting material will not be stored on-site during the planting process unless proper
refrigeration is provided by the planting contractor.
WITHIN BANKFULL CHANNEL
A seed mix containing an equal mix of at least three (3) grasses and two (2) herbs will be used on the side
slopes below the bankfull stage except on the inside of meanders on pool cross sections at a rate of 25 Ib/acre.
Common Name Scientific Name I Application Rate Application Dates
Grass
Deertongue
Panicum clandestinum
25 lbs. per acre
(0.5 lbs per 1000 ftz)
Aril -June
P
Bottle -brush Grass
Hystrix patula
25 lbs. per acre
(0.5 lbs per 1000 ftz)
Aril - June
P
Switch GrassPanicum
virgatum
25 lbs. per acre
(0.5 lbs per 1000 ftz )
April -June
River Oats
Chasmanthium latifoltum
25 lbs. per acre
(0.5 Itis per 1000 ftz)
April -June
P
Herb
Joe-Pye Weed
Eupatonum fistulosum
lbs 25 lbs. per acre
0.5
(0. ftz)
April -June
Cardinal Flower
Lobelia cardinalts
(0. lbs 25 lbs. per acre
0.5 per 000 ftz)
April -June
Tall CoreopsisCoreopsis
tripteris
acre
(0.
0.5
lbs 25 lbs.per1000 ft2)
April - June
Bee Balm
Monarda didyma
25 lbs. per acre
(0.5 lbs per 1000 ftz )
April -June
Iron Weed
Vemonia sp.
25 lbs- per acrez
(0.5 lbs per 1000 ft2)
April - June
Touch Me NotImpatiens
capensis
25 lbs. per acre
(0.5 lbs per 1000 ftz )
April -June
TRANSPLANT VEGETATION
Selection & Handling
■ Transplant vegetation will be selected and flagged by the designer for use on the project site. The
desiener reserves the right to select any vegetation for transplant during any point of the project.
• Transplant vegetation will be planted within 1 day of being moved from its original location. If planting
in desired location is not feasible, the transplant will be replanted or stored in a manner as to ensure its
long-term survival. The designer will provide guidance throughout the process.
LIVE STAKING
Plant Selection
■ All plant species used for live staking should conform to the specifications set forth in the vegetation
details.
• Plant species listed for use as live stakes will be selected from plants found on the project site or as
directed by the designer.
■ Plant species used as live stakes will be collected during the dormant season (December to March) and
during normal average daily temperatures for this period.
Preparation & Handling
■ Plant species will be collected to conform to sizes specified in the vegetation details.
■ Live stakes will be prepared by making a straight cut at the narrow end of the plant material forming a
blunt end. The thicker end (toward the trunk) of the plant will be formed into a point.
■ Live stake preparation will be done according to vegetation details unless otherwise specified by the
designer.
Planting
■ Live stakes should be prepared and planted immediately following collection. Proper storage techniques
should be followed to ensure the hiehest rate of survival.
■ Live stakes will be planted with the point of the live stake going into the soil and the blunt end facing
up.
• Live stakes will be placed as deep as possible and as close to the water table as possible.
■ Live staking will be done according to the vegetation details unless otherwise specified by the designer.
The designer reserves the right to reject any live stake due to inferior quality. Likewise, any improperly
planted live stake will be corrected by the planting contractor.
Storage
■ Live stakes will be bundled and stored completely submerged in the stream channel in the event
immediate staking is not permissible. Temporary storage will not exceed a three week period.
BANKFLZL TO END OF BUFFER
A seed mix containing an equal mix of at least three (3) forbes and two (2) grasses will be used from the edge of
the bankfull channel to the limits of the riparian buffer at minimum rate of 30lb/acre. Also use this mixture at
the same rate to plant the staging and stockpile areas, all other areas within the riparian buffer that will be
planted with trees, and any other areas as directed by the designer.
Common Name Scientific Name A lication Rate A lication Dates
Forbe
Balck-eyed Susan
Rudbeckia hirta
30 lbs. per acre(0.7 lbs per 1000 ft2)
April -June
Lance -leaved
Coreopsis lanceolata
30 lbs- per acre
April - June
Coreopsis
(0.7 lbs per 1000 ftz)
Purple Cone Flower
Echinacea purpurea
30 lbs. per acre z
(0.7 lbs per 1000 ft2)
April -June
Bur -marigold
Bidens aristosa
30 lbs. per acre
(0.7 lbs per 1000 ftz)
April - June
Narrow -leaved
Helianthus angustifolius
30 lbs. per acre
April - June
Sunflower
z
(0.7 lbs per 1000 ft2)
Threadleaf Coreopsis
Coreopsis verticillata
30 lbs. per acre
(0.7 lbs per 1000 ftz )
April -June
Grass
Big Bluestem
Andropogon gerardii
30 lbs. per acrez
(0.7 lbs per 1000 ft )
April - June
Indiangrass
Sorghastrum nutans
30 lbs. per acre
(0.7 lbs per 1000 ftz )
April - June
Little Bluestem
Schlzachynum
scoparium
30 lbs. per acre
(0.7 lbs per 1000 ft2 )
April -June
Switchgrass
Panicum virgatum
30 lbs. per acre
(0.7 lbs per 1000 ftz )
April - June
SHEET NAME
SHEET NUMBER
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAILANCE DATE: 298
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
low 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
MIGN. NORTH CAROLINA Z7
EF RM919 SLI
2243
ENGLICENSE NO. CA90 808
Axiom Environmental, Inc.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
BAREROOTED SEEDLINGS
HEELING IN
I. LOCATE A HEELING -IN SITE IN A SHADY, WELL
PROTECTED AREA.
2. EXCAVATE A FLAT BOTTOM TRENCH
12 INCHES DEEP AND PROVIDE DRAINAGE.
3. BACKFILL THE TRENCH WITH 2 INCHES WELL
ROTTED SAWDUST. PLACE A 2 INCH LAYER OF
WELL ROTTED SAWDUST AT A SLOPING ANGLE
AT ONE END OF THE TRENCH.
4. PLACE A SINGLE LAYER OF PLANTS
AGAINST THE SLOPING END SO THAT
THE ROOT COLLAR IS AT HIGHER
GROUND LEVEL.
5. PLACE A 2 INCH LAYER OF WELL ROTTED
SAWDUST OVER THE ROOTS MAINTAINING
A SLOPING ANGLE. ,
6.REPEAT LAYERS OF PLANTS AND SAWDUST
AS NECESSARY AND WATER THOROUGHLY.
DIBBLE PLANTING METHOD
(USING THE KBC PLANTING BAR)
I I
�II
II �2 IN
I I
I I I I I I
I
I. INSERT PLANTING 2. REMOVE PLANTING 3. INSERT PLANTING
BAR AS SHOWN BAR AND PLACE BAR 2 INCHES
AND PULL HANDLE SEEDLING AT TOWARD PLANTER
TOWARDS PLANTER. CORRECT DEPTH. FROM SEEDLING.
I
I I I I I
I I I
I
4. PULL HANDLE OF 5. PUSH HANDLE 6. LEAVE COMPACTION
BAR TOWARDS FORWARD FIRMING HOLE OPEN. WATER
PLANTER, FIRMING SOIL AT TOP. THOROUGHLY.
SOIL AT BOTTOM.
NOTES:
PLANTING BAG
I. DURING PLANTING, SEEDLINGS SHALL BE KEPT tAA,
IN A MOIST CANVAS BAG OR SIMILAR CONTAINER
TO PREVENT THE ROOT SYSTEMS FROM DRYING.
KBC PLANTING BAR
2. PLANTING BAR SHALL HAVE A BLADE WITH A
TRIANGULAR CROSS SECTION, AND SHALL BE
12 INCHES LONG, 4 INCHES WIDE AND I INCH
THICK AT CENTER.
ROOT PRUNING
3. ALL SEEDLINGS SHALL BE ROOT PRUNED, IF r
NECESSARY,SO THAT NO ROOTS EXTEND MORE
THAN 10 INCHES BELOW THE ROOT COLLAR.
SHEET NAME I SHEET NUMBER
PLANTING TYPICALS I P-3
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION S?E
COUNW: ALAIIANCE I DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
.. �' 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
` RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27808
�i !f TEL [phone]
�''. t• f f / _ ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C4190
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
REFORESTATION
Vegetation Association
Piedmont/LOwNlountain
AlluNial Forest*
Dry Niesic Oak-
Hickory Forest*
harsh Treatment
R`edand**
Stream-side
Assemblage—
TOTAL
Area (acres)
9.7
3.3
0.1
3.8
169
Species
# planted*
% of total
# planted* % of total At planted** % of total
# planted**
% of total # planted
Tag alder (Alms sermlata)
–
–
__ __
27 10
517
5
544
River birch (Benda nigra)
660
10
-- –
-- –
517
5
1176
Ironwood (Carpinus carol iniona)
–
_
449 20
__ _
_
–
449
Buttonbush(Cephalanthusoccidentalis)
–
–
-- –
54 20
–
_
54
Red bud (Cercis canudensis)
–
–
337 15
-- –
–
–
337
Sweet pepperbush (Clethra alnifolia)
–
–
-- –
41 15
–
–
41
Silky dogwood (Cornus amomum)
660
10
–
41 15
2067
20
2768
Persimmon (Diospyros virginiona)
–
–
224 10
– –
_
_
224
White ash (Fraxinus americana)
–
–
112
-- –
–
–
112
Green ash (Frasinus pennsyha»ica)
1319
20
-- –
-- –
2067
20
3386
Blueberry (6accinittmcorymbosmn)
–
–
_
27 10
_
_
27
Tudippoplar (Liriodendrontulipifera)
660
10
-- –
-- _
_
_
660
Sycamore (Platanusoccidentalis)
1319
20
– –
-- –
2067
20
3386
Black gum (.Nrssa sy'Jrarica)
–
–
337 15
-- –
_
_
337
Water oak- (Quercus nigra)
989
l5
449 20
–
1034
10
2472
Willow oak(Ouercusphellos)
989
15
337 15
-- –
1034
10
2360
Black willow (Sala' nigra)
_
_
_
_
1034
10
1034
Elderberry (Sambucus canadensis)
–
–
-- –
54 20
–
–
54
Pos surnhaw (Viburtlum nudum)
–
–
-- –
27 10
–
–
27
TOMU
6596
100
2244 100
272 100
10336
100
1 19448
" Planted at a density of 680 sten siacre.
** Planted at a density of 2720 stems. -acre.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
NOTES:
I. STREAMBANK REFORESTATION USING LIVE STAKES AND TUBLINGS SHALL BE
PLANTED 2 FT. TO 4 FT. ON CENTER, RANDOM SPACING, AVERAGING 3 FT. ON
CENTER, APPROXIMATELY 4840 PLANTS PER ACRE.
2. STREAMBANK REFORESTATION USING BARE ROOTED SEEDLINGS SHALL BE
PLANTED 6 FT. TO 10 FT. ON CENTER, RANDOM SPACING, AVERAGING 8 FT. ON
CENTER, APPROXIMATELY 680 PLANTS PER ACRE.
SEE PLAN SHEETS FOR AREAS TO BE PLANTED
SQUARE CUT
BUDS (FACING UPW
LIVE CUTTING
( 1/2"-2" DIAMETER
0
ANGLE CUT 30
LIVE STAKE SCHEMATIC
OL
5
r.
- 3 Feet
LIVE STAKES
t -
t
.Floodplain
COIR FIBER MAT
BANKFULL
LIVE STAKES—��
NORMAL
WATER SURFACE
4 EXISTING/PROPOSED
STREAMBED
CROSS SECTIONAL VIEW
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
PLANTING TYPICALS P -3A
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE DATE: 20/8
SUN®®GATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
y� 905 JONES FRANKLM ROAD
. RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
L� TEL ( 19) FIRM LI9-2243
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. G890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Erosion
Control Mat
Bankfull flow
~ 4 foot stake length
Baseflow � ~ 2 inch stake diameter
=j T
Z7
~ 3 foot stake spacing -`
BANK STABILIZATION WITH LIVE STAKES
EXISTING/PROPOSED NOTES:
GROUND I. LIVE STAKES SHALL BE SPACED APPROXIMATELY
4 FEET ON CENTER
2. LIVE STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN UNTIL
APPROXIMATELY 3/4 OF LIVE STAKE IS WITHIN
GROUND

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
STREAMSIDE ASSEMBLAGE
DRY—MESIC OAK HICKORY FOREST
PIEDMONT/LOW MOUNTAIN
ALLUVIAL FOREST
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
PLANT/NG P-4�
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
• • 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
1 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
TEL[phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. CA90
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
m

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-63F2-464DACD81029
�
STREAMSIDE ASSEMBLAGE
DRY—MESIC OAK HICKORY FOREST
PIEDMONT/LOW MOUNTAIN
ALLUVIAL FOREST
SHEET NAME
SHEET NUMBER
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
/ RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27606
TEL (919) 8%2243
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. CA90
Axiom Envimnmen[al, Inc.
L0
m

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
STREAMSIDE ASSEMBLAGE
DRY—MESIC OAK HICKORY FOREST
PIEDMONT/LOW MOUNTAIN
ALLUVIAL FOREST
4
SHEET NAME
SHEET NUMBER
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE DA -R: 20/8
/ SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
�' 0 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27808
TEL [phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Envimnmental, Inc.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
EOP EOP
HADLEY, MICHAEL TODD
DB 3492 PC 0554
-o
�Ln
W
z � ,-
�ow
= o w
U +
C=
~ V
Q W
� Q W
F— N
N
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
PLANTING P-7
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE I DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAR OUNA 27608
TEL [phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO C-890
Axiom Environmental. Inc.
STREAMSIDE ASSEMBLAGE
DRY-MESIC OAK HICKORY FOREST
PIEDMONT/LOW MOUNTAIN
ALLUVIAL FOREST
�Ln
W
z � ,-
�ow
= o w
U +
C=
~ V
Q W
� Q W
F— N
N
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
PLANTING P-7
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE I DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAR OUNA 27608
TEL [phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO C-890
Axiom Environmental. Inc.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
M
SHEET NAME
SHEET NUMBER
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
. ' 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
.
\ RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
TEL[phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
m
°a
I
STREAMSIDE ASSEMBLAGE
DRY—MESIC OAK HICKORY FOREST
\
PIEDMONT/LOW MOUNTAIN
ALLUVIAL FOREST
M
SHEET NAME
SHEET NUMBER
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
. ' 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
.
\ RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
TEL[phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
m
°a
I

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341 C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
STREAMSIDE ASSEMBLAGE
DRY-MESIC OAK HICKORY FOREST
✓✓✓PIEDMONT/LOW MOUNTAIN
ALLUVIAL FOREST
ISS CAP 500
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
PLANTING P-9
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE I DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
1 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
I RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27MB
TEL [phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
AAom Environmental, Inc.
IR
0
i

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
It
moo
HADLEY, RUSSELL B.
REVOC TRUST
HADLEY, PEGGY J. CHEEK
REVOC TRUST
DB 1195 PG 0905
STREAMSIDE ASSEMBLAGE
DRY-MESIC OAK HICKORY FOREST
PROJECT NAME:
PIEDMONT/LOW MOUNTAIN
ALLUVIAL FORFST
moo
HADLEY, RUSSELL B.
REVOC TRUST
HADLEY, PEGGY J. CHEEK
REVOC TRUST
DB 1195 PG 0905
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
PLANTING I P—/0
PROJECT NAME:
HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAA/ANCE DATE: 2018
a
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
TEL [phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
A
� a
r
a
STREAMSIDE ASSEMBLAGE
DRY—MESIC OAK HICKORY FOREST
PROJECT NAME:
PIEDMONT/LOW MOUNTAIN
XXXN
ALLUVIAL FOREST
A
� a
r
a
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
PLANTING P-//
PROJECT NAME:
HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE I DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
'+ 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
TEL[phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
a
M
N
a
STREAMSIDE ASSEMBLAGE
�j DRY—MESIC OAK HICKORY FOREST
PIEDMONT/LOW MOUNTAIN
ALLUVIAL FOREST
HADLEY, RUSSELL Be
REVOC TRUST
DB 1195 PG 0905
r. t „
-• uggr�� / � �rnr
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
PLANTING 1 P-12
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: Z ANCE DATE: 20/8
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
/ . . 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAO
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 2760fi
1 TEL (919) 85&2243
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C -M
Axiom Environmental, Inc.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
I
i
--1 OVUINUAKY
HADLEY, RUSSELL Bo
REVOC TRUST
DB 1195 PG 0905
STREAMSIDE ASSEMBLAGE
DRY—MESIC OAK HICKORY FOREST
PIEDMONT/LOW MOUNTAIN
ALLUVIAL FOREST
7 .o
9�
F
(n
F�
W
Eci�^
6� 6 L
U V I,
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
PLANTING P—l3
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: AMANCE DATE: 20/8
AL
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
TEL19) NORTH CAROLINA 27606
(9
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-090
Axiom Environmental, Inc.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
0
°a
STREAMSIDE ASSEMBLAGE
�j DRY—MESIC OAK HICKORY FOREST
PIEDMONT/LOW MOUNTAIN
ALLUVIAL FOREST
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
PLANTING P -14
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
% . ' 906JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
TEL (919
ENGFIRM
LICENSE NO. G890
Axion Environmental, Inc.

DOCUSI9 n Envelope ID' 2Q979RRR-3410-4Agr.-R3F9-4R4nAr.nAingq
0
_.._._. SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
PLANTING P-15
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE DATE: 2018
1
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
/ \\
ow 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
401, U RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27808
TEL (19) FIRM 59-2243
LICENSE
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. CA90
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
l
HADLEY, RUSSELL B. y� EV eo"NoaRY
REVOC TRUST
DB 1195 PG 0905
--- O
Ir
O / \
O I
SURVEY BOUNDARY - - �O \ ___ A\ 03j -
11
I
E x i
z�° X
Z NC TI
Ln
ISER
w
Q --
X
Lo
� •I I ,
X /I1
I
z I
w � 3
\` SURVEY ---
80UNOAR------ c ,�- SUF�N�
a.
I�
_ ---
o
J J �
o I o
STREAMSIDE ASSEMBLAGE
DRY—MESIC OAK HICKORY FOREST
PIEDMONT/LOW MOUNTAIN
ALLUVIAL FOREST
a
r
m�
oa
N �L
SLE
m
'MCC

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
w
0
°a
HADLEY, RUSSELL B.
REVOC TRUSI
HPbE J-. EEK
's� R VOC TRUST
ocb ot-� 00
DB 1195 PG 09005
o�
SURV-NO_1� N
-� E gj
_--_SIJRVEy BOUNOAf
- SURV l W
ALLEN, DANNY T.
DB 512 PG 676
/
/ LINDLEY, DARRYL M.
/ REVOC TRUST
/ DB 3004 PG 0810
/
STREAMSIDE ASSEMBLAGE
3
DRY-MESIC OAK HICKORY FOREST
PIEDMONT/LOW MOUNTAIN
ALLUVIAL FOREST
F eNiq<
4S�MFNT
BOUNDARY
SHEET NAME
SHEET NUMBER
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
\ . 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH'NORTH CAROLINA 27806 l TEL (3
FIR LICENSE
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-090
Axiom Environmental, Inc.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 20979888-341C-4A9C-B3F2-464DACD81029
r
� a
oL
C�
\
\ T
\ \
\ F �O
\ 4 O
\ o \ \ 0N/q� p/pF Z�c
\ \ \ Fq HADLEY, RUSSELL B.
REVOC TRUST
HADLEY, PEGGY J. CHEEK
F oN/q� \ \ \ REVOC TRUST
DB 1195 PG 0905
F4 \ F O
E SFMFNT \ C \ O+ I—
SURVE�
07
\ O
6' cp RvFy PRELIM I
60ZO YR
�NOgRY
90
QR-
UNp \
_
STREAMSIDE ASSEMBLAGE
�j DRY—MESIC OAK HICKORY FOREST
NPIEDMONT/LOW MOUNTAIN
ALLUVIAL FOREST
-
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
PLANTING P—17
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION 5?E
COUNTY: ALAMANCE DATE: 2018
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
. ' 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
TEL(919)65&7263
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-090
Axiom Environmental, Inc.