The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNC0005185_Inspection_20180827United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved. EPA Washington, D.C. 20460 OMB No. 2040-0057 Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires 8-31-98 Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS) Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type 1 IN 2 15 1 3 I NC0005185 111 12 I 18/08/20 I17 18 I S i 19 LG] i 201 I 211111 1 1 1 1 1 1 II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I 1166 Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating 131 QA ----------------------Reserved------------------- 67 2.0 70 71 I.. I 72 I �, I 73 �74 751 I I I I I I 180 u u Section B: Facility Data Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date POTW name and NPDES oermit Number) 09:OOAM 18/08/20 15/10/01 Charlotte II Terminal 7924 Old Mount Holly Rd Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date Paw Creek NC 28130 10:15AM 18/08/20 20/06/30 Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data Mark A Bowen/ORC/704-399-6331/ Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number Contacted Melanie Little,One Williams Ctr Md 27 Tulsa OK 741721VP Operations/918-574-7000/ No Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated) Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters Laboratory Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) (See attachment summary) Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date Water Quality Program Meckenburg County MRO WQ//704-336-5449/ Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date W. Corey Basinger MRO WQ//704-235-2194/ EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete. DocuSigned by: 8/27/2018 AtaccsatAFvazs... Page# NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type NC0005185 111 121 18/08/20 1 17 18 JCJ Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) Page# Permit: NC0005185 Owner -Facility: Charlotte II Terminal Inspection Date: 08/20/2018 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation ❑ ❑ ❑ • Permit Yes No NA NE (If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ application? ❑ ❑ ❑ • Is the facility as described in the permit? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Are there any special conditions for the permit? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: The facilitv's current Dermit became effective on 10/1/2015 and exDires on 6/30/2020. The last inspection of this facility was conducted by the Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program on 8/29/2016. The facility is as described in the permit, with treatment units that include diked areas for aboveground storage tanks, an oil/water separator for flow generated at the loading -rack, a manually operated discharge valve at Outfall #006, a secondary containment area equipped with an automated valve for ethanol offloading, and a groundwater remediation system. The oil -water separator listed as being associated with the groundwater remediation system is no longer active. Discharge at Outfall #006 includes stormwater collected in the dike containment area and separated water from the oil -water separator. Outfall #007 is not currently active, and flow generated from groundwater remediation activities is hauled offsite for treatment and disposal. Record Keeping Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? Is all required information readily available, complete and current? Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)? Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? Is the chain -of -custody complete? Dates, times and location of sampling Name of individual performing the sampling Results of analysis and calibration Dates of analysis Name of person performing analyses Transported CDCs Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters? Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? (If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift? Is the ORC visitation log available and current? Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? 1[-T M►[•7►/_V►19 • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ Page# 3 Permit: NC0005185 Owner -Facility: Charlotte II Terminal Inspection Date: 08/20/2018 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Record Keeping Yes No NA NE Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Comment: During the inspection, DMRs were reviewed from 7/2017 through 6/2018. No effluent limit violations were observed during the review period. Collection dates and analysis results documented on DMRs matched collection times and analysis results in the chain -of -custody The facility's primary ORC, Mark Bowen, and backup CIRC, Mike Harris, were both observed to have valid certifications in the Division's Basinwide Information Management System (BIMS) database. Laboratory Yes No NA NE Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is the facility using a contract lab? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Celsius)? Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Comment: The facility contracted with Pace Analytics (NC Certification #12) to conduct analysis of permit parameters except acute toxicity, which is analyzed by ETT Environmental (NC Certification #022). Effluent Sampling Is composite sampling flow proportional? Is sample collected below all treatment units? Is proper volume collected? Is the tubing clean? # Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)? Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)? Yes No NA NE ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: The permit requires -grab samples for all required parameters. The facility is conducting analytical monitoring for all parameters at the frequency stated in the permit. Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Page# 4 Permit: NC0005185 Inspection Date: 08/20/2018 Owner -Facility: Charlotte II Terminal Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable ❑ ❑ ❑ Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable? Comment: Facility personnel conduct weekly visual inspections of the oil -water separator. Separated water from the oil -water separator discharges into a small holding pond before flowing into the containment dike. Accumulated petroleum waste is removed from the oil -water separator by Heritage -Crystal Clean on a semi-annual basis. Flow Measurement - Effluent Yes No NA NE # Is flow meter used for reporting? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is flow meter calibrated annually? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the flow meter operational? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ (If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Comment: An 8" Neptune inline flow meter. located at outfall #006. is used to measure discharae from the facility. The meter was last calibrated on 1/30/2018 by SLC Meter. Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Comment: The facility was not discharging at the time of inspection. No visual signs of pollution were observed below the outfall. Page# 5