HomeMy WebLinkAbout20090705 Ver 1_401 Application_20090609THE LOUIS BERGER GROUP, INC.
1001 Wade Ave. Raleigh, North Carolina 27605
Tel (919) 866-4400 Fax (919) 755-3502 www.louisberger.com
June 15, 2009 . 0 9- 0 7 0 5 31 P
NC DWQ, 401/Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650
Enclosed, please find an application for Nationwide Permit #14 and Water Quality
Certification under sections 404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act for proposed impacts to
wetlands and streams as part of the Proposed Improvements to the Perimeter Road at
the Ammunition Supply Point/108th ADA, Fort Bragg, Fayetteville, North Carolina. This
application is accompanied by a check for the application fee of $240.00. Feel free to
contact me with any questions or comments.
Thank you,
d..
Ray Bode"!!,, PPWS
Senior Environmental Scientist
The Louis Berger Group, Inc.
1001 Wade Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27605
Tel: 919-866-4420
rbodeCaD-louisberger.com
JUN 1 ; 2009
OENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STQRMYYATER swCH
enc: Pre-Construction Notification and Application documents;
Application fee, $240, check # 1048
Cc: Gregory Bean, Director of Public Works, Fort Bragg
Richard Spencer, USACE Wilmington District
file
7
1
11
Proposed Improvements to the Perimeter Road at the
Ammunition Supply Point/108t" ADA, Fort Bragg,
Fayetteville, North Carolina
Pre-Construction Notification and
Application for Nationwide Permit #14 under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
and
Application for Water Quality Certification under
Section 401 of the Clean Water Act
Submitted to:
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District ,
Wilmington, North Carolina
and
North Carolina AV M_ WA
Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Water Quality AM a
R
Raleigh, North Carolina -
Applicant:
Fort Bragg Garrison Command u @.F ?
Fayetteville, North Carolina ®''
JUN 1 7 2009
Prepared by:
The Louis Berger Group, Inc.
Raleigh, North Carolina
June 8, 2009
DENR - WAl Ek UUAUTY
WEnMS AND STORMWATER BRANCM
KAM
Proposed Improvements to the Perimeter Road at the 108th ADA, Fort Bragg, Fayetteville, North Carolina
' PARTI
Introduction
' The United States Army proposes to improve the existing perimeter road at the
Ammunition Supply Point (ASP) facility located on the Fort Bragg Military
Reservation (Bragg) in Cumberland County, North Carolina (Figure 1). Bunkers
' at the ASP facility constitutes part of the installation's integrated contingency
operations providing capacity for processing and out-loading munitions for
airdrop and air-land forces. Also, storage of training and basic load ammunition
' is provided at this location.
The proposed improvements to this road will facilitate enhancements in perimeter
' security and emergency vehicle access at the ASP. The proposed work will
require improvements to culverts at two existing crossing points west side of the
ASP resulting in 0.22 acres of wetland and 87 linear feet of stream impacts.
This PCN package contains information supporting the application to impact
Waters of the United States through execution of the proposed project under US
' Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Nationwide Permit #14 the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) 401 Water Quality Certification.
Proposed Improvements to the Perimeter Road at the 108th ADA, Fort Bragg, Fayetteville, North Carolina
PART II
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
1
1
1
1
1
p9-0705
O
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ?X Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ?X Yes ? No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
Z 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
? Yes ?X No For the record only for Corps Permit:
? Yes ?X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in-lieu fee program.
?X Yes ? No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ?X No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes NX No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Proposed Improvements to the Perimeter Road at the 108th ADA, Fort Bragg, NC
2b. County: Cumberland
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Fayetteville
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Fort Bragg, Garrison Command
3b. Deed Book and Page No. N/A
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): Mr. Gregory Bean, Directorate of Public Works
3d. Street address: IMSE-BRG-PW, 2175 Reilly Road Stop A
3e. City, state, zip: Fort Bragg, NC 28310-5000
3f. Telephone no.: 910-396-0321
3g. Fax no.: 910-396-5830
3h. Email address: gregory.bean@us.army.mil
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009
11
Ci
1
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Michael O'Rourke
5b. Business name
(if applicable): The Louis Berger Group, Inc.
5c. Street address: 1001 Wade Avenue, Suite 400
5d. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27650
5e. Telephone no.: 919-866-4421
5f. Fax no.: 919-755-3502
5g. Email address: morourke@louisberger.com
Page 2 of 10
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
' 1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): Project located on the Fort Bragg Military Reservation
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: -79.036437 Longitude: 35.079853
' 1c. Property size: 6.13 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Bones Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C
2c. River basin: Cape Fear
' 3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
See attached supplemental information.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.45
' 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 347
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
See attached supplemental information.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
See attached supplemental information.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the ?X Yes ? No ? Unknown
' Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / Comments:
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ? Preliminary ?X Final
' of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Dial-Cordy and Associates, inc.
Name (if known): Other: Rahlf Ingle, Senior Scientist
' 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
t
ti
f
d
on.
ocumen
a
or
USACE Wilmington Regulatory approval February 3, 2009. See attached supplemental information
' 5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
Chic nrniact (inch irlinn all nrinr nhasPSl in thp mast?
i
i
?Yes N No ? Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
No permits have been applied for prior to this document.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ?X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
?X Wetlands ?X Streams - tributaries ? Buffers ? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T 2b.
Type of impact 2c.
Type of wetland 2d.
Forested 2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other) 2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
W2 Choose one Choose one Yes/No
W3 Choose one Choose one Yes/No
W4 Choose one Choose one Yes/No
W5 Choose one Choose one Yes/No
W6 Choose one Choose one Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts: 0.22
2h. Comments:
See attached supplemental information.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T) 3b.
Type of impact 3c.
Stream name 3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)? 3e.
Type of
jurisdiction 3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet) 3g•
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 Choose one -
S2 Choose one
S3 Choose one
S4 - Choose one
S5 Choose one
S6 Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 87
3i. Comments:
See attached supplemental information.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.4 January 2009
1
1
1
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individuall list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T 4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable) 4c.
Type of impact 4d.
Waterbody
type 4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 Choose one Choose
02 _ Choose one Choose
03 - Choose one Choose
04 - Choose one Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: No impacts to open waters are proposed.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number 5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond 5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d.
Stream Impacts (feet) 5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 Choose one
P2 Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments: No pond or lake construction is proposed.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin? ? Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Catawba ? Randleman ?X Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number -
Permanent (P) or
Temporary 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Stream name 6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required? 6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet 6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 Yes/No
B2 Yes/No
B3 Yes/No
B4 Yes/No
B5 Yes/No
B6 Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments: The project will not impact protected riparian buffers.
Page 5 of 10
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See attached supplemental information.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
See attached supplemental information.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ?X Yes ? No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ Q Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank
? Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Riparian wetland
Type: Stream
Type: Choose one Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Makin a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ?Q Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 88 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: warm
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0.19 acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4h. Comments: See attached supplemental information.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.4 January 2009
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires Yes X? No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required: o
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
No riparian buffer mitigation is required for this river basin.
6h. Comments:
Page 7of10
L
i
u
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ?X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ? No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 11.7%
2b. Does this pro'ct require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ?X No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
See attached supplemental information.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
?Coastal counties
?HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ?ORW
(check all that apply):
?Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009
1
0
11
n
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the X? Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
Q Yes
? NO
letter.) See attached supplemental information.
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ?X Yes ? No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ?X Yes ? No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
See attached supplemental information.
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ?Yes ?X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
See attached supplemental information.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
This road improvement project will not be a source of wastewater.
Page 9of10
PCN Form -Version 1.4 January 2009
F
D
1
D
u
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or Z Yes ? No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ?Yes ?X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat? ,
See attached supplemental information.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ?X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA EFH online mapper. Available at hftp:/Isharpfin.nmfs.noaa.gov/website/EFH_Mapperfmap.aspx.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes Z No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Data provided by the Cultural Resouces Program, Fort Bragg Directorate of Public Works.
8, Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ?X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA online mapper. Available at http:/Jgist.msafema.govNVebsile/newstor /viewer.hl
.?vtilE Zr?o`ra
Gregory G. Bean
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the ap licant is rovided)
Page 10 of 10
Proposed Improvements to the Perimeter Road at the 108th ADA, Fort Bragg, Fayetteville, North Carolina
' PART III
Supplemental Information
' Section B: Project Information and Prior Project History
Section 133: Project Description
Section 133a: Existing Conditions
At the direction of USACE Wilmington District, the project area was established
' as two separate polygons around the two permit areas. The polygons are drawn
along hypothetical road alignments from the point of curvature to the point of
tangency such that if the proposed road were re-routed it would completely avoid
' impacts to jurisdictional waters. The polygons are bounded by the furthest extent
of the proposed down slope impact (Figures 2 and 3).
' The combined project areas encompass approximately 6.1 acres adjacent to the
west side the ASP facility. This falls within the Cape Fear River Basin (USGS
HUC 03030004, DWQ sub-basin 03-06-15) in the NC Sandhills physiographic
' region of the state. The Sandhills encompasses parts of eight counties and is
situated in the south central part of NC. Most of the project area is occupied by
the existing road and shoulder fill. Wetland crossings occur in two locations and,
' outside of the maintained grass fill slopes, these sites were vegetated with
broadleaved deciduous species such as tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), red
maple (Acer rubrum), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), sweetbay (Magnolia
' virginiana), and water oak (Quercus nigra). The shrub stratum was comprised of
sapling growth of the upper canopy species and switch cane (Arundinaria tecta)
in dense patches.
'
Section 133d: Purpose of the Proposed Project
The ASP facility constitutes part of the installation's integrated contingency
' operations providing capacity for processing and out-loading munitions for
airdrop and air-land forces. Also, storage of training and basic load ammunition
is provided at this location. To provide safe and secure storage of munitions and
' to maintain the Army's state of readiness in a safe fashion, the existing perimeter
road at the ASP is no longer sufficient and must be upgraded. The proposed
improvements to the perimeter road will facilitate enhancements in perimeter
' security and emergency vehicle access.
Section 133e: Overall Project
' The existing road around the perimeter of the ASP currently contains
substandard geometrics which effects vehicle movements due to tight turning
radii (Figures 1, 7, and 8). The proposed alignment will reduce or eliminate
' curves providing a straighter pathway for heavy vehicle movement and increased
sight distance with improved lateral sight distance. Proposed improvements
include widening the pavement surface from the current approximately 15 feet to
' approximately 24 feet. Existing culvert pipes will be lengthened as part of this
project. These activities will require installing fill to expand the existing fill slopes.
Also, the current sight distance from the edge of pavement to the vegetation line
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Proposed Improvements to the Perimeter Road at the 108th ADA, Fort Bragg, Fayetteville, North Carolina
is inadequate for the facility's security needs and will be increased by mechanical
clearing.
Section 134: Jurisdictional Determinations
Section 134d: Dates of Jurisdictional Determinations
A jurisdictional waters survey was conducted by Dial-Cordy and Associates Inc.
in October of 2008. The USACE Wilmington District approved the delineated
boundaries and locations in February of 2009. The jurisdictional determination
tear sheet is included in Appendix A.
Section 135: Project History
Section BSb: Permits
No permits have been applied for prior to this document.
Section C: Proposed Impacts Inventory
Section C2: Jurisdictional Wetland Impacts
The project as proposed will result in permanent impacts to 0.22 acres of
jurisdictional wetlands (Figures 5 and 6).
Tnhlc 1 • Prnnncnrl kA atinnrl Imnnr_tc
Survey 2a. Wetland 2b. Type of 2c. Type 2d. 2d. Type of 2f. Area
Name Impact Impact of Wetland Forested Jurisdiction of
Site Number Yes/No (Corps-404, 10, Impact
DWQ-non404, (acres)
Permanent (P) other)
or Temporary
T
ME W1 P Fill Bottomland Yes Corps - 404 0.03
Hardwood
ME W2 P Mechanized Bottomland Yes Corps - 404 0.02
Clearing Hardwood
ME W3 P Fill Bottomland Yes Corps - 404 0.02
Hardwood
ME W4 P Mechanized Bottomland Yes Corps - 404 0.01
Clearing Hardwood
FF W5 P Fill Bottomland Yes Corps - 404 0.02
Hardwood
FF W6 P Mechanized Bottomland Yes Corps - 404 <0.01
Clearing Hardwood
FF W7 P Mechanized Bottomland Yes Corps - 404 <0.01
Clearing Hardwood
JH W8 P Fill Bottomland Yes Corps - 404 0.08
Hardwood
JH W9 P Mechanized Bottomland Yes Corps - 404 0.03
Clearing Hardwood
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.22
4
1
Proposed Improvements to the Perimeter Road at the 108th ADA, Fort Bragg, Fayetteville, North Carolina
' Section C3: Individual Jurisdictional Stream Impacts
The project as proposed will result in permanent impacts to 87 linear feet of
jurisdictional stream channel (Figures 5 and 6).
1
n
0
I aote z: rroposea zt ream Im pacts
Survey
Name 3a. Stream
Impact 3b.
Type 3c.
Stream 3d.
Perennial or 3e. Type of
Jurisdiction 3e.
Average 3f.
Impact
Number of Name Intermittent Stream Length
Impact Width (linear
Permanent Before feet)
(P) or Impact
Temporary (linear
T feet
EE S1 P Culvert UT to Perennial DWQ 4 57
Bones
Creek
GG S2 P Culvert UT to Perennial DWQ 4 30
Bones
Creek
Total Stream Impact (linear feet) 87
Section D: Impact Justification and Mitigation
Section D1: Avoidance and Minimization
Section D1a: Measures Taken in Design
Because this project involves upftts and improvements to an existing road,
opportunities for avoiding and minimizing impacts through design are limited.
However, a retention wall will be utilized to shorten the fill slope where the road
curves at wetland JH (W8 and W9) to limit the amount of fill required (Figure 6).
' Section D1 b: Measures Taken in Construction
Silt fencing, stilling basins, rock check dams, and other erosion control measures
will be utilized as appropriate to minimize sediment input to jurisdictional waters.
' Also, measures will be taken to minimize soil disturbance outside the permitted
impact areas. To the greatest extent possible, the existing road surface will be
utilized to access the work sites rather than bringing machinery and materials
' through upland areas adjacent to the areas of impact.
Section D4: Payment to In-Lieu Fee Program
' Bragg proposes to mitigate for the proposed impacts to jurisdictional waters by
utilizing mitigation credits available in the Jumping Run Mitigation Bank located
on Bragg property through payment to the North Carolina Ecosystem
' Enhancement Program (EEP) in-lieu fee program. The Jumping Run site
contains a restored stream and riparian wetland areas and is located to the east
of the project site on the Overhills parcel. The EEP has indicated that riparian
' wetland and stream credit are available to Bragg as restoration credits from the
Jumping Run Mitigation Bank. The approval letter from the in-lieu fee program is
attached in Appendix B.
D
Proposed Improvements to the Perimeter Road at the 108th ADA, Fort Bragg, Fayetteville, North Carolina
Mitigation efforts will be coordinated between the Directorate of Public Works,
Environmental Management Branch, EEP, and the USACE Wilmington District
office.
Section E: Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan
Section E2: Stormwater Management Plan
Section E2a: Overall Percent Impervious Surface
The permit areas fall within two distinct, non-contiguous drainage basins (Figures
2 and 3). The drainage basin contributing flow to the permit area within Project
Area 1 measures approximately 42.9 acres and currently contains approximately
3.9% impervious surface. A construction project currently underway on an
upland site within the drainage area will increase the impervious surface to 4.8%.
No other foreseeable future development is planned that would increase that
percentage.
The drainage area that contributes flow to the permit area within Project Area 2
currently measures approximately 1.6 acres and contains approximately 7.8%
impervious surfaces, but a construction project currently underway on an upland
site within the drainage area will alter the contours and drainage patterns such
that the drainage area will be reduced to approximately 0.2 acres and 0.0% of
the land cover will be impervious surface.
Section 2b: Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
No.
The drainage areas that contribute stormwater flow to Project Areas 1 and 2
drainage area do not currently, and will not in the foreseeable future, exceed the
24% impervious surface threshold as specified in NC Water Quality Certification
3704 and therefore the project does not require a Stormwater Management Plan.
' Section F: Supplementary Documentation
Section 171: Environmental Documentation
The proposed project is located on federally owned land and will use federal
' funds. Environmental documentation required by the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) has been approved and a Finding of no Significant Impact
(FONSI) has been issued for this project. The FONSI titled final Finding Of No
' Significant Impact Grow The Army Actions At Fort Bragg, North Carolina is
included in Appendix C of this PCN package.
' Section F2: Violations
Section 172a: Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules, Isolated
Wetland Rules, DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, or Riparian
' Buffer Rules?
A Notice of Violation has not been issued, but the site is in violation of DWQ
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
6
I Proposed Improvements to the Perimeter Road at the 108th ADA, Fort Bragg, Fayetteville, North Carolina
' 172b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes, however work has not advanced beyond initial tasks of mechanized land
' clearing and installation of erosion control measures. Currently, no work is under
way at the site and work tasks will not resume until the necessary wetland
permits are secured.
F2c. Provide an explanation of the violation(s):
Mechanized land clearing work and installation of erosion control measures
' commenced at the wetland and stream crossing sites in advance of applying for
ermits under the North Carolina Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500). In the
p
process of executing this work, wetland soils and hydrology were disturbed. All
i work activity was ceased by order of USACE Wilmington and DWQ Fayetteville,
h formal Notice of Violation was not issued
althou
.
g
' Jurisdictional waters affected by this non-permitted work are the impact sites
proposed as permanent project impacts. No other jurisdictional waters were
impacted.
' Section F3: Cumulative Impacts
'This site is completely controlled by Fort Bragg as a secure facility. Improving
this road as proposed is not predicted to cause additional development that
' would affect water quality.
Section F4: Sewage disposal
' This road improvement project will not be a source of wastewater.
Section F5: Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat
Known populations of threatened and endangered species are monitored closely
by Bragg Environmental Division-Endangered Species Branch staff. Bragg has
populations of four federally-listed endangered plants: pondberry (Lindera
' melissifolia), rough-leaved loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulifolia); Michaux's
sumac (Rhus michauxii); and American chaffseed (Schwalbea americana). The
1997 Bragg Endangered Species Management Plan (ESMP) provides monitoring
' and management programs for all four species, with the primary emphasis aimed
at reaching recovery.
' The federally-listed plant species and their associated habitats were assessed
and evaluated within the review area by the Endangered Species Branch. A site
visit was made on March 13, 2009 to determine if suitable habitat was present for
' the listed species within the proposed building footprint. Suitable habitat was
present for Michaux's sumac; however during a systematic survey conducted on
April 21, 2009, no individuals were found. No impacts are anticipated from
' project construction.
PROPOSED
IMPACT SITE
i
SED
SITE o
D
0
FORT BRAGG ADA
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PERIMETER ROAD
AT THE 10th ADA
YETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
LEGEND FORT BRAGG, A
JURISDICTIONAL WATERS JURISDICTIONAL WATERS IMPACTS
PROJECT VICINITY MAP
01 '
20`°°'
O PROPOSED IMPACT SITE 200'
-hz?°uisBerger Group,lnc. FIGURE 1
Avenue,
00'
Re eighaNC 27605 Suite 400 MAY 2009
N 0)
a
LU
N
z
w
¦ _
w Q
IL
z =
W F
Q
W
w¢0
F-aW W
0
oYJ Q
J C
72
F°> ~ >s
Z
z o?
w=w W ;n
w??
>aLL p a m N
N? ¢ U
( w C7 m
Z
IL ^ ?
.1 IL J ? z
M N O N
w
U) F Of
o O fti ..
w
a
/
/
/
/
/
/
y
/
/
M +I /
sl /
sl /
a/
?e
Q
U
K
CL
w
LU
u? >
a
U 0
x ,• W
°o
a?
U? o
- U ? II
a a
0
L /
\ U
ri --
?I /
/
/
\
W18?
_
WETLAND LEGEND
----------------------- WETLAND BOUNDARY PROPOSED BRIDGE
WETLAND PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
------------
DENOTES FILL IN PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
WETLAND 11 .1
DENOTES FILL IN
-? FLOW DIRECTION
SURFACE WATER
DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
® DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE
WATER
* * DENOTES MECHANIZED
+? •' *" « CLEARING
TB TOP OF BANK
WE EDGE OF WATER
PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
----E--- PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
?* PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
--- NG---- NATURAL GROUND
PROPERTY LINE
-TDE- TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-PDE PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
--EAB-- EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
--EPB-- EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
------- -- WATER SURFACE
x x x x x LIVE STAKES
x x x
E2D BOULDER
--- COIR FIBER ROLLS
LEVEL SPREADER (LS)
DITCH /
GRASS SWALE
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PERIMETER ROAD
AT THE 108th ADA
FORT BRAGG, FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
JURISDICTIONAL WATERS IMPACTS
12 -48
(DASHED LINES DENOTE PIPES
EXISTNG STRUCTURES) 54' PIPES
& ABOVE
SINGLE TREE
WOODS LINE
DRAINAGE INLET
m2N
ROOTWAD
RIP RAP
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
5 OR PARCEL NUMBER
IF AVAILABLE
PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE
LEGEND
The Louis6erger Group, Inc' FIGURE 4
1001 Wade Avenue, Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27605 MAY 2009
\ \ I /
w
U
Z
W
LL
J
Q 00
Cn LL ..
Z 3
W
•• '•
• Q
ILL-
11?
0
w o- 0
IL Op
C(- a o. w
I ? / ? I
1 1
o
1
\
Z?-
\ OOZ
U- 1
\
w C)
4
??
v \ z -
W ?-
?LL U) U)
\J ?3 /
_1n O` /
l
w :
(L
L
Q
0
U 3
Q
U
Q
CL
7- U)
tad LL
LL . . . • ..?.....
....................... .
.? .? .• ..... •-..... Z ~W
• ?..... Z
.? 3 U Z
..!_...... \ I _
... 1.... CD Q Z
I = Z J CL
J\ I I W O _
O \ m zw LLQ cou
i- \ I ?-
11 OOZ I U W U LU Lv HQ
?I
LLI
L"HO \ I Q O 0 3 OM:
o U ?Z91 Z Z Wr
W W \ Z WwO \ 3 o o LLJ w Ocn
LL c? \ LL fn to
\
Jow
F) C) LU-A
0
a
0
w
O
LO
° II
U
n
0
F-
U- z
Ow
w2
C?
W d
U)OJ
nizO
oo?
z
0
Wc0
000
0 Fn
U0? 0
?LLW
CD
z
z
J
J
E
LL \
?I \
L?
Q \ O
Q ? 3 Z Z Lli
<E
u J
/ wcr_ Ho
2: Q L.LQ
w
w U W W
\ 0 0
\ w w
I o 0
W
r
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Proposed Improvements to the Perimeter Road at the 108th ADA, Fort Bragg, Fayetteville, North Carolina
Appendix A: Jurisdictional Waters Delineation, Fort Bragg, Cumberland
County, North Carolina
8
Action ID: S.AW-2008-00067
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2008-00067 County: Cumberland U.S.G.S. Quad: Clifdale
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: US Army Garrison. Fort Bragg Agent: Dial Cordv and Associates. Inc.
Address: Attn: Gregorv G. Bean (Col. Ret.) Address: Attn: Rahlff Ingle
US Armv Installation Management Comand First Union Building. Suite 601
2175 Reilly Road. Stop A 201 North Front Street
Fort Bragg. NC 28310 Wilmington. NC 28401
Telephone No.: 910-396-3702 Telephone No.: 910-351-9790
Property description:
' Size (acres) 1602 Nearest Town Fort Bratlo
Nearest Waterway Bones Creek & Stewart's Creek River Basin Cape Fear River
USES HUC 03030004 Coordinates N 35.07724 W -79.03233
Location description Fort Braga ASP
' Indicate Which of the Followine Applv:
A. Preliminary Determination
Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We
strongly suggest you have this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army
(DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps.
This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
' B. Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the
W permit requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water
' Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied
upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date
of this notification.
We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your
property and/or our present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant.
To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
_ The wetland on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps.
We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be
' reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of ail
areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no chance in the law or
our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
X The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately
depicted on the plat signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on 2/3!3009. Unless
Page 1 of 4
1 Action ID: SAW-2008-00067
there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a
' period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which
_
are subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless
there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a
' period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area
t _
Management Act (CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in
Washington, NC, at (252) 946-6481 to determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the
' Army permit may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC y 1311). If you
have any questions regarding this determination and;or the Corps regulatory program, please contact
Richard Spencer at 910-251-4172.
' C. Basis For Determination
t's
d St
ewar
OHWM and 1987 Delineation Manual. Wetlands were directly abutting Bones Creek an
Creek relatively permanent waters that flow into Little Rockfish Creek and then the Cape Fear
' River a traditional navigable waters.
D. Remarks
' dictional
i
d
jur
s
E. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approve
determinations as indicated in B. above)
' This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If
33
i
ons at
you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulat
CFR part 331 , Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for
' appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to
the following address:
' District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn:Richard K. Spencer, Project Manager,
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue
' Wilmington, North Carolina 28403-1343
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets
the criteria for appeal under 33 CFR part 33 1.5, and that it has been received by the District Office within
' 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the
above address by April 6, 2009.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the District Office if you do not object to the determination
' in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official: cC .?? r J
Richard K. Spene?r,'Regulatory Project Manager
Date February 3, 2009 Expiration Date February 3. 2014
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public, To help us
' ensure we continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at
httD://reeulatorv.usacesurvev.com; to complete the survey online.
'
Page 2 of 4
11
Action ID: SAW-2008-00067
71
s . NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONSAND PROCESS AND .
REQUESTFORAPPEAL "..
App - licant: US Arm Garrison, Fort Bragg I File Number: SAW 2005-00067 ( Date: February 3, 2009
Attached is: I See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PER.MiT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) I B
PERMIT DENIAL C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision. Additional
information may be found at httT)://www.usace.a.rmv.miL/inet/functions/cw/cecwo/reQ or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
V
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section 11 of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section iI of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the preliminary JD.
The PreliminaryJD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps
district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
Pave 3 of 4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Action III: SAW-2003-00067
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the record
of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to clarify the
administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may
provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATIO N:
If you have questions regarding this decision andr'or the If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may also
appeal process you may contact: contact:
Mr. Richard K. Spencer, Regulatory Project Manager Mr. Mike Bell, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District CESAD-ET-CO-R
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
69 Darlington Avenue 60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M 16
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403-1343 Atlanta. Georgia 30303-8801
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government consultants,
to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 13 day notice of any site
investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date: Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form
to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn:Richard K. Spencer, Project Manager,
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, :Borth Carolina 28403-1343
For Permit denials and Proffered Permits send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. )dike Bell,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-ET-CO-R, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 91115, Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8801
Page 4 of 4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
VNIIOLIVO HINON UNr100 ONVRI emo woo•pae?owl„ow•Mxm//:d}}y :a}IS }aw.1.1
133HS X3GN1 oooL - L alvos - eooz/LZ/L aiva
ION I SKI NOININ"IIM z£zs-£z£ (OW xvd
`MMNION3 dO'dNOO ),vquv'S'fl z£ (oL 13 Ha
ZO£eZ tlNf102lV0 HINON 1?JON '3TIA3ll3Atld
$ ONI `S31V1OOSSV V AOU00 IVIO 1332LLS 31c[ST to tOL
r?? TA7? ??T
ZZ d0 L 133HS NO-4
MT As NMYNO NOUVAU3S3U AUV11IIN JJV2i911JOd ??
r3L : WAS TUd V3NV dSV 0I0 'VOV 3HL JO NOlL80d V d0
two£9lio : 103r0Nd NOLLV3NII30 ONVIL3M
? N
oWa ??m
a
a??? WF 0
a K F?J
mW°yVjWpJ
°ggmO? 1
?<S?= 4
$pz??Wa
41?<Kyj€Nq ? ZO F `
IIJJ ZZ `Z,'? F 'yJ¢?///J
ZWZ=6?F?<_ ? 6 . ? 3
y m?JJ?°Z J W f
z]?F?3JZm?a W F ° ?
o - 133b1S e
? I
o p ?
? y
13381S.. _j
\ 1 l _ - 133a1s tt ?
--
o ;.
o?
S \ ,IL
SGpIN RMO aN \ ? ?
r 5? S?
r,o m'i
oz
w
? 3
a ?
? m
g
?r <
?Z IJ
?rc7
? O O? S
3
(
.1
ut
• Z
c
H U
r
r
? II ?? yY.r? '?7 $°
5
F
O jy
ms
z
W' (Y SZ l g .4 1 jK?Z3 <'4 N<
L-. o x -Zg
?
==
0??$
T T
k
V N
N6
Z
.. ymCa IJ $O
a
5F
w
acp5
in'8S
$ ? Nn w
^I
ITO
i -S
a 8
. °
Al
m9x?p??
€g?v3 o N
€3 ? ; -Nogg -11
F P -A39. i A
3!!!!??ZG 2i?F? N
Woa SNS?a$.? o
?F"amg H
3
E
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
VNnONVO HLaON 'A1Nnoo ONVl838Wt10 woo•paa?owl?low•x.Mrn//:d}}y :811S }awalul
,OOL - L :31VOS - BOOZ/LZ/tt 31VO
131b1SIO NOINIWIIM
Z£ZS-£Z£ (OLS) xVd
'S2i33NIJN330'&J00,kvquH'S•fl 004£-£Z£ (OL Hd
zo£ez vNnoavo ruaoN '3rnn3u3 xvd
'8 3Ni 'S31VIOOSS`d V kGIJOO Tdla
80d 1338iS 31dS37110 tIOL
ZZ d0 Z 133HS
xr : AS Nnlvao
NOllt/n2i3S32i )lab'lIIIW JJ`d2i9 12i03
? ?A?
' ? ?bI
f31 HAAS TOW V3HV dSV 0'10 'VOV 3H1 d0 NOLLHOd V d0
4000£St" 103foad NOI1V3Nn30 ON iLw
Gays am M
?] yll ?-,.l - - ? W
F C
W
H W II
Ld
\ Y ? ? J7
m
U
Z ?
s .?g \ 51*
\ S ??
Ll o ? a \ a \ dip
Y $
U
m d 6
°a~
,
AM
1
1 3<
g 9- 1
3 i 9 NE W M .-
c+
of
Z
W0 y?
3 O
a
F
G
D
C z
E
,`,IIIIIIIIIf11f?f
?
'
??
Ii
`
J
0
? .• • i
•
Q w
W M
ter. J
,odd J
?
,
'
41111 P
ffffff111i1111L
h
m
I
1
O
W
53
W?
ZFi
L
u
1
i
fl
1
1
VNnOaVO HLaON ', LNnoo ONYla39rinO woo•paajow!?.w-mm.//:d}}y :.lIs iawal-1
,OOL - L :3'IVOS - 800Z/LZ/Ll 3LVa
LSla NO1NIWlIM
1OIU z£zs-£a£ (04 xvd
-
'SIMNION3 d0'dUOO kvyuv S'fl LLaoN LHON 'a£ (OL6) Hid
zo£az vNnoavo H3TIIn3u3xvd
ZZ d0 £ 133HS '8 ONI 'S31VIOOSS` T A(12i00 -IVIQ
NOd
12i0 133a1S 3ldS3-nLO 'VOL
? ?
?
)rr :AG NMVaa
TOM
: A
NOliVA 13SEIU kNvllllW DEMAS
V38V dSV Ol0 'vav 3HL d0 NOLL80d V d0 ?L
A
.
P3L
HMS
4000£SWO : / 1O3f0ad NOLLV3NIl3(3 ONYU3M
R H
r
N W
Y
0
6BOYN 0I8D ?`l
l] Jrl `l
g
m
d
m rv ?'- n'a;
fi ? ? o
?s a- a
1
zy
m
?ma
Z F
W
U
U_
x
8
F
W ?
u
xa
S
=w?
=?e
wa
°
o?
?. °
'
.0#1 N d'
o f d = < -L
`.?. = Q
=U 'w Cl) ?W
r \ ? .. - -? \ ? 114 ? d W°? U)
SI/
its I
oil
Z.
` -
\\ i z ern
ti? m N °Nlm ?' VA
4 m mmmm „
? ? \m m m??m m./? a
n m
m 1.m m m ' n ,! ? fit N
? ? N ? m F?r/ o ? Fo
r m m m _?? ??
m m m? m / o f
N
VNI108YO HLHON 'A1Nnoo WnM38Wno woo•paawowhlow-mmm//:d;}y :a}lS ;awa}ul
'- OOL - L 3ltlOS - 900Z/LZ/LL 3LVa
lONISIO NOlNIWIIM (016) xv-A
Z
£
S2133NON3 -io,&iOO AW2jv yn £Z£
004£
Zo£9Z VNnoavo HLaoN '3111A3(M) Hd
113Avd
ZZ d0 4 133HS V ONI 'S3iVIOOSSV V k(IMOO IVIG
aid
'
`
' 133aLS 31dS31110 40L
?,
)rr ? Ae NMVaa
f3L WAS : AS TOW 2i81b0=l
dllllW JJb
n2i3S3?! Aa
NOilb
V3av dsv alo 'vav 3HL d0 NOILHod V d0
4o00£ m : $ Lo3`Oad NOlLV3Nn3a aNVl13M _
1
L
Z
N W S '? ?v
o
n a
v
M \
N yW?
m \ n 3
M 9? \
tm1 M \
Z
Z3.
E O
W O
GWr. ~
11
U
Goo ?
U
Z. I
W ?
`y
r
1
I
q
M
N
?..: T9
? o
\
^ N
\
N \ - \
\ '
/
\
O M
o ? ?
ai \
rs Z
\
f LL-
t
l?
-..?4
C
m m
m
m m m m ? \
pp m m m r
/ m
$ / / W m m it
.
Pi - Ov. o?J N
tiuS / / ;
?LL
lz
m m . U .. ui Lll co
a,
Q
? m
M
Jyy
O
vi
r
C
u
F
Z !0 5 :.k 133HS
xr : xe NMraa
1'31: RJAS TOad
t000£SWO :# 103rOHd VNnOarO H1aON 'AiNnOO aNVWsrino
,cm - t -afros - aooz/tz/u a1ra
101MISIa NOINIW"IIM
'SN33NIJN3 r10'daOO.lW :jv,s"(1
V ONI 'S31VIOOSSV V ACA100 "IVIQ
- a0d
NOil`dAii3S32J .lb`dllllW 00"s 1,80=1
MY dSr al0 'r0r 3141 d0 NOUaOd r d0
NOLLr3Nn3a aNrl13M woo-paajowlMow•mmm//:djj4 :a;lS ;awa}ul
z£zs-£z£ (Ots) xr-i
001,C-M: (OW) 14d
ZO£9Z rNllOarO HLaON '3TIA3LL3Arj
?7t-TT y^?13381S 31dS3-nlD 40t
j/ ?L ?1
?, ? 'r/`?`? 1 0*4
I_
arms mac or 8
W
a ? m
\ 0
r ry m \ I--1
n il n n
t ? ( o ?y ,,., q
? O Y
O \ <
Y
\
F )
? ? F' TWTA?
m
m
i p V
\ W
N
??IZ
m
m
,
< \
N m
I? LL ti m
?\l ? .. / / 4 ? n Y Fl ? s
a /jb ? o-<l nm mm m m o m
? ?i.• ? m m? m m W
P "" m m. m
•% C n m
• o ? m a
m m
W
' m
m
m ? m a
m
m? ? m
m ?
m
n
m m e \.
m
m m e i.
m a
m ? o m g ?<
m m m ? m
. U W Lli C7 co
,i
s 1111 111,
a
m ro
W
aw W
a n m S?
m m 3m W6
m
W m?
W
O
\ Fz?
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
VNIIONVO HLaON UNf10O aNV1a39Y4f10 woo paa??wl?low rnx.M//:d}}y :9}!S 19w9}ul
,00& - l 31VOS - 900Z/LZ/11 3LV0
1311:I1S1? NO1NIWlIM
' z£z9-£z£ (m) xvd
(3L H.1
ootC-
z£
fl
`Sb33N10N3 J0 'dM03 ,kiNmv ,S
KON '
I
3llIA3ll 3
ZO£9l VNIl0aVi H1a0N .lVj
'R ONI 'S31`d100SS'd'8 MR100 IVIG
aid AMLS 31dSS3--1100 'VOL
?
ZZ d0 9 # 133HS
a NMVaa
xr ? > N0I1`dA2i3S32i )lLl`dll"IIW JJd2i81uO:j ?A?
' ?1+A - ?
,
r3L W.AS TOad V38V dSV a'10 'vaV 3HL d0 NOLL80d V d0
i000£SIYO # 1031`Oad NOLLV3Nn3a ONV'L3M
C ttm ow
o T?
W
l?
U
U
W
a
x
.S
,F a
W 2
11 II
44
U
Z _
Gn
H E
}
N W
Y
H
\\\\\\\Ililtlffff
Lh ?:
_o Lu
/I/UIgt11111%
e
n
rc
?S
?a
VNnOavo HLHON ', LNnoo oNVla38Yino woo-paajowMow-mmm//:dB4 :a}!S }awalul
,OOL - l :31V0s - 8ooz/LZ/lL :3Lva
lORilSla NOINIWIIM z£zs-£z8 (OLO xVd
c (oss) Hd
o
'SU93NION3 d0 ,dNoo) W2iv'S'fl -Y
zo¢ez vNnoavo NL8ON aoN n1n3u3Avd
V ONI 'SAiVIOOSS`d'8 .1a2i0O IVIG
803 133ULS AdSTM iOt
^
Zz d0 L : !R 133HS
ke NMVaa
xr :
NOIlb?A2I3S32i .1N`dllllW JJ`d?181b0? „^1.?/?T?
??r•?.'IQ
JrJJ ?1y?/ ?
I
M : HKAS -road V3NV dsv am 'vaV 3HL JO NOLLaOd v d0 y
tooomwo : B iowoad
r mMOM NOLLV3Nn3a aNvu3M
8
q° ? o
F ? F
F
m ?
? fa
m m
J
m
a
o ?
_,II?: m
r> z
m o
I '' m
•t, a
' x
.? \?
Q., o m m ? v q
m m
m
m
m
x ?
x.? m
m \
\ m
m ?
Z
S
w a ? v
G
a I
n
F-I F21
W
Y
a
tL. o
M.?
Y
d
3
U LLi v)
U) r1
d av
0
K
N
1zSu?
?Z<
?O
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
VNn0aVO HLHON 'ALN1O0 ONVIH38rino woo pea?owhhw•msr//:d?yy :a}tS }aWa}ul
,OOt . ,t 31V05 - BOOz/tZ/tt 3LV0
NN-CZE (M) XVd
J.OIUISIQ NOINIWIIM (ote) Hd
`SU33NION3 J0 'dli00 ),INMV *s,n zocez VNnoaVi w LLaoN 80N '3-
11n3u.3AVd
ONI 'S31VIOOSSV V),( :fOO Idld
aid n3US 3ldS3
-
11lO ilOL
^
?
ZZ d0 B / 133HS
)rr ? AS NMVai NOIldA2i3632! .l2it/11IIW 00`d8812iOd --
rr
TT y
1
' ?
r31 : HAAS T08d' V3aV dSV Q70 'VOV. 3HL AO NOLLaOd V di
*mm to $ Lo3rOad NOLLV3Nn30 ONV113M
S
co ,v am ar
W
a
}
W
o Y
o=
a=
a
00 0
z, z
0 1
,. N
o =
o? a
73
?n
?Cra
?9 = o
m
a
3
a ?
a ?
5
0
>; -
a o
U ° ? II
r
-I
x
'
ei z
? Z 2
C!a y? S
S
a
\ n
nn.N? z - h
Z Z\ I. 2Z ? / N D ? \ n
- ,mp o 1// Q Q
Y Q ?
Y Z ?
?Q N ?'C,
ul
11
11
1
VNI108VO H180N ',UNnOO oNVla39lvno woo•paajowpjow•mmm//:d114 :agS }awalul
,DOL - L 3lvOS - 9002/LZ/LL 31VO
1ORIlSIa NOlNIWIIM z£zs-£z£ (ole) xvd
'SU33NION3 A0'dU00 J.W2iH'S'fl zo£ez aNnoavo HIaoN - HON z£ (0119) Hd
3-IlIn31 I 3xvd
'8 0NI 'S3iVI00SSV R),(IN00 IVI(l 133a1S 31dS3,1?110 'VOL
zz dos : 1Y 133HS and VQ??I,? ?L A
)rr : Ae r>MVaa NOllt/A2i3SM )lab'lIIIW 09tRi9121O:1
M WAS 'road V39V dSV Olo 'VOV 3H1 AO NOLLaOd V d0
i,ODO tO # i33PObd NOLMNn30 0NV'LL3M
saarrt aura W S
U ..
?\ w o0
yy w
:r g N
V. U Ct
o?
;' ? o c I
75
? ? & 3 r
r 7 Y
75
N
m
N FILL
?•-tl. LL ?/ \ m.?. m TS \
ti '. ? Amy 'Ti
U n LL II
m m N I I ?' N
m \I I
5 r LL`? Nn n d
O
4
?, ti ybl l/¢ ?a
a d ?'
o?.. Bey
?o N .
d 1\ g "
?
w
? ? 3
i
m
?I
m
N
°" m _ N
I
m
l?
m a
s
l
? m p\
I m a
m m,.
m •
m m
m
"
J
o °
m I
I y
°
I
d gg
i
N ?
o
'
<
e
.
m
\
?0.?V
O A
1
1
VNnoaVO NL80N 'A1Nnoo aNV'1a amo woopaajowlryow-mmm//:d}#y :a}lS }awalul
.00L - t 31V05 - 9002/LZ/tt 31Va
-
z£zs-£Z£ (Ow) XVd
IIM
1011:1181a NOINIW
'
' Hd
Z£ (O
fl
S
SUA3NIJN3 =10 'd'800 Avyu d U
zo£az vNnoavo ttiNON LaoN ' 3111A31J3AVd
'R ONI 'S3J-VIOOSSV V AONOO IVIG
HOd 1338iS 31dS31119 40t
T\7TT
ZZ .iO OL / 133HS
x1r : A NMVaa NOIl`d/?2i3S32I A2?t/111IW JJH?1812?Od GHMD ^
:4.?:1.?¦1LL
!)r?l JI?/?I IW71¦1W
M HA AS '1`Oad V38V dSV a10 'VOV 3H1- d0 NouaOd V d0 L
i000£9t*0 / lo3fO8d NOLLV3Nn30 awiL*
s a
a
WWo
w ? w II
Y ?
o p" ?
r o
?Z, e,
o? a =
z¢
v
a
\ `3 \
.fly
m itY
d \? PU §
Y Ar ONO .W ?. 3
o
Nam
\
§
\
^
// ?.. `,1"111/11111//I
d C ii i
o O J N?
klN?t1?ilrhi'I
b~ ! ?: ..gib
. LL _ •e.... LL m m .,.? 1 I
4. ? \
m ?
m Y ? `n o ` C
a \ m \ ? lZ
M `
'' n n a
m ? m o?
m ?a
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
VNn0WO HAON 'A1Nnoo aNV-lH36Wno
,OOL - L 31VOS - 6002/LZ/LI 31Va
lOlUiS1(3 NOlNIWIIM
'S1833NION3 dO 'dNOO Avcdv 'S•n
V ONI 'S3iVIOOSSb" ?),(JUOO -IVI4
ZZ lO LL 133HS NOd
xr A6 NMVao NOIIVAU3S321.kUVIIIIW JJVIdEl I iOd
r31 WS TOM V3UV dSV cno 'VaV 3HL 30 NOLLaod V d0
40o0£9L4o : # 1o3r0Nd NOILV3Nn3a ONVU3M
Rwx axmw
woo•paajowlHow-mmm//:d}}y :9115 iawa;ul
Z£ZS-£Z£ (016) XVd
004£-£Z£ (OL6) Hd
Zo£BZ VNnoMVO HLNON '3l1IA3U3AVd
HrnN?'y^113381S 31dSS3TyT19/ kOL
H H
}
W
Y
Y
W
Ci r?+
E G
W
F.L. a .?
g
> j
Mi
o
.I
?a
n ? V•i ?,{?n - m
c? , a
\k ,
°
N s s" ?:•>
F' ?d
f d
`, ?? d? m `IIIIIIIIIII///
/ f^ a \ m =.w 1J c?
/ g m cy :?
-E. E
? m
?' - ' 4 `• m \ ,'''h4111111,Illy`,
m n m
m m
m m \
w b
m j
m m
m m rc
m ro
m °
n <
m W
75
m m m
m m
' ? nom.
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
VNnoHvo HLaON '.U.Nno0 aNVla3avino woo•paa?wlyow•m..s//AIN :GMS }awaaul
,OOL - L 31VOS - SOOZ/LZ/LL 3LVa
lOlUlSla NOlNIWIIM
'
' z£zs-£z£ (04 xve
Hd
004E-£Z£ (
S
fl
'S2133NIJN3 30 'd2i00 ?W2i`d M1
ZO£SZ VNfIOaVO HLaON '3TIA313AVd
V ONI 'S3-LVlOOSSd'8 AGUOO-lVla 133a1S 3ldS3lllo 40L
ZZ d0 ZL : / 133HS
?NMVaa
xr Ae
:
' a0d
NOllb'A2{3S32l.12?J`dlIIIWJJ`dZi812103
V3aV dSV a10 VOV 3HL JO NOLLaOd V d0 FIM
G ?r"?yl 7"1
a?J )/?,Jj11a'lA?/?
?
HkAS
road
P3L
4000£SWO / lOW08d NOILV3NIl3a 0NVU3M
warm amn w 8
H ° W '.
k, II
Mid
C9
F- ?-'
S
V7
2 N
tFn F=-
F ..
2 !
w LL x
Z ? N
< I=mo- - ..._
uZ \ \
e ?
rn
a'
S _
? a
F
z
z °
O
°
c
+
3
fy ' ?
\
\ w?
i
a
U?
hU
5
w w z ? a \ m
7
1 p`
75
=ze
Fp Z i
i
O ? 6
(7 d U
D
6
}
Its
Y
Y ^ O
•
•
?
???p[" J
• , dam:
rn
1`1,`x,,
,??i??N r?IIIII?III}lilfllf
???//1111111111,, 1
a
w
di
j
W
?
isK
1
L
1
1
VNnOHVO NLaON 'ALNnoo ONVla38PUlo woo•paajow! low•mmm//:d}}y :a}!S }awalul
,oot .t 3ltlOS - 8002/tZ/ll 31tl0
iOINISIO NOINIWIIM
'
' z£zs-£z£ (ols) xv.i
Z£ (M) Hd
S
fl
'SIMNIEWd0'dMOO),YVHV zo£sz vNnoavo FLL8ONaoN '31?IA3113Aa3
ZZ d0 £l : # 13314S V ONI 'S31VIOOSSWR AMOO IVK]
80d
iuOd 133ULS 31dS31110 I'M
9 T???
?T? ?T 1 *4
o
J
(Lgff
xr : xe NMYNO
: NOUVAN3S3H AtIVIIIIW DOVI
V3atl dStl M 'VOV 3N1 d0 NOILMOd V d0 Y'V.l.
? ?
H J
HMS TONd
P31
i000£StfO : # loxoHd NOLLV3Nn30 ONVll3M _
?o
a
?wI I w
s'
w
W
Z
i F O
o
?
m d U
H ?
W
114 I!
m
I x ?
? U
0
N W
Y
iyyyy? ?
n °m
m m
?
m m
m K
n
~ m
H
ttgU114111/?I,
t
t -
¢¢
t ? to
?a
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
Z d0 4l M 133HS
xr ? Ae NMVaa
raL Hms Y'Oad
*ooO£SLiO # 1o31`Oad VNnoavo HLaON 'A1NnOO ON'd'Ia3evino
,OOL - L 31VOS - 900Z/LZ/1L 3LVO
.LOIHiSla NOINMIM
`SIA3NION3 JO 'dld00 kvgHv,s,n
2 0NI'S3iVI00SS` V.lab0OIVI4
40d
N0Il`dA2i3S32i.lUt/lIIIW JJbRi81a03
V38V dSV ol0 'VoV 3HL d0 NOLLaOd V d0
NOLLV3Nn3O ONYU3M woo-poajowl>Iow-mmm//:d#'}y :91lS }awa}ul
an-£z£ (o L6) xvd
001
ZOC9Z vNnoavo HLaoN '311VUu3tive
?+^113333ELSS31311ddS3-1110 VOL
CI?I?' ? l W?
CBC/N ama .]Y
W O
U w~
F?
w
=
U
? _
C
O
1
r
W
Y
Q?
Q
v
I
w?
O
?6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
VNnOSVO H1a0N 'l.1NnOO ONVla38nno woo-pa=wlmow---m//:d}}y :-VS }awa}ul
,OOt - t 31VO5 - 9002/z/U mva
'
z£u-£z£ (ots) XVd
d1Sld NOINIWIIM
l01
,
' 004£-£Z£ (Ot6) Hd
fl
S
`SU93NIJN3 dO 'dNOO muv zo£ez vNnoavo FuaoN '3?IA31i3Kvd
V ONI 'SMVIOOSS` R AaMOO IVIO
a03 133a1S 31dS3-n]D 40t
ZZ d0 St # J33HS
xr : xe NMVaa
NOIlVn2i3S32i ALib'lIIIW JJ?d2i912iO3
TAT
ARP?Vjy
?/ Y
j/
WWI
191. : HkAS TOad V3NV dSV 010 'V0V 3H1 d0 NOLLHOd V d0 ,
tMESM : # 103POSd NOILV3Nn30 ONV'113fA
W
a
C/1 F O
W
U w u
H °
xv?
=W?
€zo?
F? w
°a
m m \ m m _ {?? m Y
m
ILI
d v:
? n
m
m mYm
M
J
I
0 A y?1
0 \ >
m N?
m
VNnOaVO HIWN 'A1Nnoo ONVIoavino WO]'PaaJ]WI?]W'MMM//:d?}y :.JIS }awalul
,0% = L :31VOS - 900Z/LZ/LL 31V0
10fldiSIO NO1NIW1IM
' z£ZS-£z£ (04 xvd
004£-£Z£ (DLL) Hd
S fl
'SU33NIJN3 d0'dZI00,1W2j`d zo£ez vNnoavo ruaoN '3l1IA31t3AV!
ZZ d0 9L 133HS ONI 'S31VIOOSSd'8 kQ1:J00 -IVIO
80d
Od
9
` - 133a1S 31dSTRO 4oL
r? r?T T??TT?T
?
,
?
xr : A's NMVHa 12i
dA2i3S32i ?l2fdllllW JJV2?
NOIl
V 3HL AO NOLLHOd V d0
' A
Y V1lL.ly ?L
Qa?C4
raL HAAS TOad
40o0£SL4O : 0 ioxoHd VO
V3HV dSV Ol0
NOLLV3Nn30 ONVl13M
WHO aw
o
So x
? yli ?? W
a
? w
U
U] E. o
w .,
U
v
?
T
V
N
Z
? N
O?
z
a a ?
a
-a
o ?s'csi
q
C
N W
}
Y
a
FHJ,
0 %still
'0
?
per. •o??" , rV ?
Q: N •, S -
Q :iJ W
•
j?
?a
VNn HVO HLaON ',LLNnoo oNV'1a3sr4no woo•paajowl,tow-mmm//:d}}y :a}IS low-1-1
,OOL = .1 :31VOS - 9OOZ/LZ/LL 31Va
iDNISI4 NOINIWIIM z£zs-£z£ (m) xvd
'SU33NIJN3 JO *db00 kvvuv,s,n 004£-£Z£ (OL6) H.1
zo£az vNnoavo H18oN '3nIn3113Av3
ONI 'S31Vl30SSd'S AClU00lVl C1 y???133a1S 31dS3TTI0 VOL
ZZ 10 LL III : 133HS 80.4 xr ?1,?!'?\D- J yo T,?Aj
As NMVaa NOIIt/na3S32i ?l2ib'lillW JJ`d?18 IbOd 1 ? ??a`J ?ya/ V, A*
A'
r3L : WAS 'road V3NV dSV 0-10 VOV 3H1 JO NOLL80d V d0 .
4ooomwo : Lo3road NOLLV3NIl3a oNVlL3M
SaPYN rtlY9 iY I. h
a
F, ? o K i [TW7
r m m n o a 1"s v t???ii Wyy It
.0
QC TVT??I
t0 n W ? ... ? ?< I V g
S ? 6
s s
5
3 ?
? S
s ? s z
c? ? n
~
m U N
3
? °s o
s
a
3
I
F
o
0
0
`,,``IIIIII II?1??'?',,,
p ., j
:?
44
VNn NVO RLHON ', LNf100 aNV18391Nf1O
l worpaa?owl>fow•rMM//:d}}y :a}!S }awa;ul
t 31tl3S - 800z/tz/tt aLva
,OOL
l0RilSIG N01NIV411M
'
' z£zs-£z£ {ots) xv?
004£-£Z£ (OL6) Hd
S
fl
`S2i33NION330'd2:100 kvyuv Z0£8Z VNf108V0 HLMON '311V,3113Atld
'8 ONI `S31VI00SSV'8 A01:100 IVIO
MOd 133US IdSTM VOL
'
ZZ A 9t / A3HS
Xr : Ae NMVMa
N0UVAN3S3a ANVIIlIIN 00"S iNOxI ?r?r???? T??T,?
?T
Iy ?L `A? -
/1,
<
ga Q?q v ?Ll
P3L = HAAS TOMB V3MV dSV TIO 'VOV 3HL d0 NOLLMOd V d0 ..
,.
.
-
f000£SLWO- / i33f0Md
cars anra ar NOLLV3Nn3a aNV•LL3M
_
" ZZ
2 Y '
n6,
e
P, z
o
? ?m m
C? . G
m
m
- Otl08 --
m?
W
a
U] E., o
W ,..,
H o
? ? II
x ? A
Q+'
J?
a yy??
75/ d 3 U
o
of
Wo
H FRI
r
a Y
` ``pi?nu?gry+
CU [ w L r- W
??+++nmtt?<<???
V41-
m
h
O
Y
i
O
a
iE
i
i
VNn HVO HLMON '.11N000 ONVIH3BWf1O woorpaajowl?low•wnr.M//:d;yy :a}iS 32wa;ul
,OOL = ,L 31YOS - 9OOZ/LZ/LL 31tl0
lOIZIlSIG NO1NIW1IM
'
' Z£ZS-£Z£ (M) XVd
0040-£Z£ (O Hd
S
fl
'SU33NIJN3 30 'dNOO Avgw
3 J.tld
ZO£8Z tlNfI021V0 HL2JON 3111-3-j
ZZ j0 6l M 133HS V ONI 'S31VIOOSSd R),MJOO -IVI4
>dOd
3
`
I
`
' 133HIS 3ldS3Tll0 i'M
T/?n?T
xr ? Ae NMtlaa
' d81N0
d
dllllW E)O
83S32l.12i
NOIltJA
3HL d0 NOLLHOd V d0
'
rOad
PM : WAS
4000£SLtO # 103fOad VOV
V3UV- dSV OlO
NOLLV3Nn30 ONYU3M
rwrr are W S
r?
p., O
W O
U
ZZ ? ?
O? 7
F w
ao
N W
Y
n
` \{{{t\11111!//,,
`l
U W LJ ?.,? LLl
O
h
n
S
S
WE
?a
VNIl0?JVO HLNON 'ALNnOO ONYIH391Y110 woo-paajowljow-.mm//:dlly :allS lawalul
31VOS ON :3lV3S - 900ZAZ/LL 31VO
10WISI0 NO-LNIW1IM
,
- un-ar (m) xtl-d
(ate) Hd
DDas-c
S
n
`S2 TME)N3 d0'duoo kvquv -
zossa tlNnoatlo HLaoN '3n1n3u3.ttld
ZZ d0 OZ 133HS 2 ONI 'S31` l00SS`d'B.IObOO IVIQ
?JOd
`
` 133LLLS 3ldS31119 ilOt
TA?T.JAT?
,m : >.e NrnVaa
'
' dH8lbOd
d11lIW JJ
NOlldn?l3S32i .12i
0V 3HL d0 NOLLNOd V d0
'
1
ONd
1'31: WS
#OODE91" : f n3roud tl
V38V dSV O10
NOILV3NIl30 ONVl13M
swrif also av
m nOnn NNm ? N O Y
m
m
Is m rml rmNnm
Y MNN
n m
m m
O r
m m m n
1? mmm mb
m b?m m
m
om m
aD
Z
O
U
§ N
N Yn'fmn
Nr
YO nmuni ?i.
?
m O
Y N
O
m O
u
O
0 Y N
m g d
i
.=N' 4
N m MO n m
n
$n n m ?°?YY1 C 11a ?n a
<
W
3
0
F _
6
Y
^
vYi u)N
_
m
Y
_
- § §§§ §§§§ §
§ § § § § § §
Y N 'S
m
m O N N iq
n
? O < m
?
w
"? m
m u
i ? of
c7 m
m m n i°n
m m n Y
m m
§ c?
Y
r u ^ nm 'm^ n _ m n oN nm Y m
4
o
r
Y j
n Y ?g m ?m ?o
m ro?i o. m
Y
lvil I I
ws o o
n
m m m
m § § § m°m m a °°
§§ § m§ m § § ?
=m `=
=
§ '§ §§ § '§ § '
?()v ?O?PI' 1 N• ??
:W
=0 W n !q
d Woad J ?
111111??,`,`? r
11fill
N
Y
n
I
0
K
w?
?a
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
VNnONVO R.LHON 'ALNnoo ONVIHMvino
3lVOS ON 31VOS - 90OZ/LZ/LL 3LVO
10lUISIa NO1NIW1IM
'S2i33NIJN3 =10 '&J00 ,kiNuv 'S'fl
V 0NI 'S31HI00SStf'R A0000 IVI(I
ZZ d0 LZ / MHS HOd
NOI VAN3S3a .l?Id11IIW JJ`d 1131'803
NT : A's NMVHG
r3L HAAS 'road V311V dSV a-1o 'VOV 3Hl d0 NOLLNOd V d0
Y000£SWO / 1O3rONd NOLLV3NIl30 ONVl13M
9i jf RN9 JY
L t'p-
woo•paajowlXow-mmm//:d;}y :a}lS LawaLul
Z£ZS-£Z£ (m) XVd
004£-£Z£ (M) Hd
ZO£9Z VNno8vo HLNoN '3llIA3L13AVd
CLq HT??' y^1133815 3ldSS3-nl0 1100L `_L
. •••
???•a?JN 0
Q y Q
?o U) CO
? ?a
vNnoHvo HLaON 7,1Nnoo ONVla3GV4nO woo-paajow!Mow-mmm//:djjj :a}lS }awal-l
31VOS ON -31VOS - BOOZ MI, :31V0
iMUS10 NOINIW1IM
'
' zas-czl: (OLO xvd
004£-£z£ (OL Hd
fl
S
'S2133NION3 d0 'd210O ).W21b zo2ez vnlnoavo H1aoN '3llln3u3.ivd
V ONI 'S31VIOOSSb 81.42100 MCI
a03 133US 31dS31110 VOL
ZZ d0 ZZ 11 133HS
xtr : Ae NMVaa
N0Ilt/A213S32j 1.23'd11lIW JJH219 12104 s t?
' ?ia
f3L HAAS 'road V3HV dSV M 'VOV 3H1 d0 NOLL80d V d0 ..
i,OOOML40•: / 103rOHd NOLLV3Nn30 ONVU3M
C11 1. N
¢:W W( ul
U
Y'•`0 J
???,?N 9I3li IN;l l1Nf..olol
a
n
W
Proposed Improvements to the Perimeter Road at the 708th ADA, Fort Bragg, Fayetteville, North Carolina
Appendix B: In-lieu Fee Program Approval Letter
i
F
1
1 y
o??s'
E e .eni
' PROGRAM
May 12, 2009
Mr. Gregory Bean
Directorate; Public Works
IMSE-BRG-PW, 2175 Reilly Road Stop A.
Fort Bragg, NC 28310-5000 Expiration of Acceptance: February 12, 2010
Project: Fort Bragg 108`h ADA County: Cumberland
' The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that the payment will
be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these
agencies to determine if egment to the NCEEP will be; pproved. oti? st?aFs$" m wtth all otl?erstate feBeralol loca
overnittent s-?e ulatao?ls mrauthbitriationsassoeY?te? " -' citPt it?`?u ?.SI; 2008"?1?°L Att ` et td Ptoino(e_
Corn ensafo IvI' atio ,b vilta I trfi att?rr " - d `- ` in sigF irhBtu'' hnd o'?h?r e?'a) a ne es that
This acceptance is valid for nine months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of the
issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's
responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based
on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the In
Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the following
table.
River
Basin CU
Location Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.) Buffer II
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh
Impact Cape Fear 03030004 0 0 185 0.27 0 0 0 0
Credits Cape Fear 03030004 0 0 370 0.54 0 0 0 0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If the regulatory agencies require
mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and the applicant wants NCEEP to be responsible for the additional mitigation, the
applicant will need to submit a mitigation request to NCEEP for approval prior to permit issuance. The mitigation will be performed
in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Valerie Mitchener at (919) 715-1973.
Sincerely,
William D. Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, NCDWQ Wetlands/401 Unit
Ronnie Smith, USACE-Wilmington
Ken Averitte, NCDWQ-Fayetteville
Michael O'Rourke, agent
RP?StOI?(,'?File
... Enka"... PrO&Cu oar . -tale, WC-E FOR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 /www.nceep.net
Proposed Improvements to the Perimeter Road at the 108th ADA, Fort Bragg, Fayetteville, North Carolina
Appendix C: Finding Of No Significant Impact
FINAL
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
GROW THE ARMY ACTIONS AT FORT BRAGG, NORTH CAROLINA
On 12 October, 1999, the Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Staff proposed a new initiative to help ensure that the
Army would remain an effective and relevant operational force in the 21u Century. The national security threats that
the United States currently face are different from those confronted in the Cold War Era, and the Transformation of the
Army initiative was intended to address these unconventional modern-day threats. The Army has completed the first
phases of this 30-year Transformation initiative and will continue to move toward a full-spectrum force that is best
suited to meet the strategic security and defense needs of the changing 21St Century world.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Mobile District, has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) which
identifies, documents, and evaluates the environmental effects of the Army growth and restructuring actions at Fort
Bragg. The EA has been developed in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.) and implementing regulations issued by the President's Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ)' and
Environmental Analysis of Army Actions, 32 CFR Part 651. The purpose of the EA is to inform decision makers and
the public of the likely environmental consequences of the proposed action and alternatives.
1.0 PROPOSED ACTION
Fort Bragg is one of several installations being considered to receive units and facilities as part of GTA. The Combat
Support (CS) and Combat Service Support (CSS) units proposed at Fort Bragg would include conversion of the I st
Theater Sustainment Command to an Active Component unit; two Air Defense Artillery (ADA) Batteries; one
Sustainment Brigade; one Explosive Ordnance Disposal Battalion with four Companies; one Military Intelligence
Battalion; and other CSS units. As part of the Preferred Alternative for this proposed action, Fort Bragg would relocate
its Ammunition Supply Point (ASP) and use the land at its existing ASP to provide space for future construction to
support new growth at the installation, including facilities to accommodate the incoming 108th ADA Brigade.
In order to accommodate these units and their missions, Fort Bragg's Preferred Alternative would decommission and
relocate the existing ASP and construct facilities on the existing ASP site to house the incoming and growing units.
This would accomplish several objectives, since buildable land on the installation is in short supply. Existing bunkers
at the Fort Bragg ASP are in need of modernization and replacement, and encroaching development at the ASP
perimeter, particularly the proposed I-295 spur to the east, makes movement of the ASP highly desirable for reasons of
safety and security.
The proposed action at Fort Bragg would necessitate the construction of new facilities; the projects proposed to
accommodate and support the GTA action are as follows:
Project Number (PN) 67107 Brigade HQ Complex (EAB -108th ADA). Under PN 67107, the existing ASP
would be decommissioned and relocated. The 108th ADA would then be relocated to the ASP site on Fort Bragg.
The proposed project would include the construction of a 227,800 square foot (sf) Company Operations
Building, a 164,500 sf Vehicle Maintenance Shop (VMS), a 15,400 sf Brigade Headquarters Building, a 36,400
sf Battalion Headquarters Building, 25,900 sf of Deployment Equipment Storage and a 13,800 sf Organizational
Classroom. An additional 96,100 sf of supporting facilities at the relocated ASP would be required, including a
surveillance workshop, material handling equipment building, guard building, inspection building, inert storage
building, and an oil storage building. Privately-Owned Vehicle (POV) and additional paving requirements
would equal 147,000 square yards (sy) of paving.
1 Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act, 40 CFR Parts 1500-1508.
PN 68773 Training Support Center. The facilities associated with this project include a 118,700 sf Training
Support Center, including 34,200 sf of Training Aids Center/Admin space and 84,500 sf of General Purpose
Storage, and a 4,000 sf Storage Shed.
PN 68798 Notional Barracks Complex. PN 68798 would require construction a barracks complex for the
108`1' ADA at the current ASP on Fort Bragg. This facility would include a 399,000 sf Barracks Complex for
enlisted unaccompanied personnel. The complex would also include 19,100 sy of Non-Organizational Parking
and road improvements.
PN 68818 Unit Operation and Maintenance Facility. PN 68818 would expand the ASP once it is relocated.
The facility would include a 150,800 sf VMS, 26,500 sf of Deployment Equipment Storage, a 2,500 sf Oil
Storage Building, and 161,200 sy of Organizational Vehicle Parking as well as an ASP.
PN 68921 Unit Operation Facilities. Construction associated with PN 68921 would provide additional
facilities for the 108'1` ADA at Fort Bragg's existing ASP location. The primary buildings for the project would
include 194,000 sf of Company Operations Facilities, a 33,600 sf Battalion Headquarters, and a 55,200 sf
Brigade Headquarters. POV parking and Petroleum, Oil, and Lubricant (POL) Truck Company would be
provided.
PN 69353 Medical Clinic and ADD/ALT Dental Clinic. This project would construct a new building to
provide supplemental administrative space for offices and functions currently located within the hospital, in
order to allow a medical and dental facility to be placed in the hospital proper. Once these functions are
relocated to the new administrative offices, which would occupy approximately 69,700 sf adjacent to the
existing hospital, the vacated space clinic space within the hospital would be filled with a medical clinic and a
dental clinic; 60,000 sf of POV parking would be provided.
2.0 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
CEQ regulations require inclusion of the No Action Alternative. The No Action Alternative serves as a baseline
against which the impacts of the proposed action and alternatives can be evaluated. Under the No Action Alternative,
Fort Bragg would not implement the proposed action. Organizations presently assigned to Fort Bragg would continue
to train at and operate from the post. No units would relocate from overseas locations. No new units would be
established. Fort Bragg would use its current inventory of facilities, though routine replacement or renovations actions
could occur, through normal military maintenance and construction procedures, as circumstances independently
warrant. The No Action Alternative is evaluated in detail in this EA to provide the baseline prescribed by CEQ
regulations.
The U.S. Army considered and analyzed one other alternative, the "Preferred" Alternative. Under the Preferred
Alternative, Fort Bragg would utilize the existing ASP at Pope Air Force Base (AFB) to accommodate components of
the existing Fort Bragg ASP. Real property accountability at Pope AFB will transfer to the Army at Fort Bragg as part
of BRAC. The construction of new ammunition storage bunkers at the Pope AFB ASP is the Army's Preferred
Alternative for the location of the new Fort Bragg ASP. The Preferred Alternative would be implemented through the
decommissioning of the existing ASP at Fort Bragg, which is outdated and being encroached upon by development.
Once the ASP is decommissioned, its supplies and equipment would be moved up to new facilities at Pope AFB, once
they are completed. Once movement of the ASP is complete, new construction would then take place at the Fort
Bragg ASP site to accommodate incoming or expanding units at Fort Bragg under the proposed action.
Other alternatives were considered, but not analyzed in the EA. These included (1) use of existing facilities at Fort
Bragg, (2) acquisition of new property; and (3) leasing existing space off-base. These other alternatives were
considered not feasible to implement the proposed action and were therefore dismissed from further analysis.
3.0 FACTORS CONSIDERED IN DETERMINING THAT AN ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT STATEMENT IS NOT REQUIRED
The EA, which is incorporated by reference into this Final Finding of No Significant Impact (FNSI), identified and
examined potential effects of the alternatives. The EA evaluated 12 resource areas and areas of environmental and
socioeconomic concern: land use, aesthetic and visual resources, air quality, noise, geology and soils, water resources,
biological resources, cultural resources, socioeconomics, transportation, utilities, and hazardous and toxic substances.
The EA determined that implementation of the proposed action would not have any significant adverse effects or
impacts on any of the environmental or related resource areas at Fort Bragg or on areas surrounding the Installation.
Potential effects associated with implementation of the Preferred Alternative are expected to be negligible or minor.
These impacts would be experienced in the following areas: land use, aesthetic and visual resources, air quality, noise,
soils, water resources, biological resources, cultural resources, socioeconomics, transportation, utilities, hazardous
materials, and cumulative effects.
Based on the findings of the EA, none of the predicted effects of the proposed action would result in significant
impacts; therefore, mitigation is not required, and implementation of the proposed action will not require the
preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement. Therefore, preparation of a FNSI is appropriate.
4.0 PUBLIC COMMENT
Interested parties were invited to review and comment on the EA and Draft FNSI from June 24, 2008 through July 23,
2008. An additional two days was requested by the North Carolina State Clearinghouse with a final comment period
ending on July 25, 2008. A Notice of Availability was published on June 24, 2008 in The Fayetteville Observer
newspaper.
The EA and Draft FNS1 were also available for review during the public comment at the following local libraries:
Cumberland County Public Library & Information Center
Local & State History
300 Maiden Lane
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5000
John L. Throckmorton Library & Command Reference Center
ATTN: AFZA-CAS-EL
Bldg. 1-3346, Randolph St.
Fort Bragg, NC 28310-5000
Reviewers were invited to submit comments on the EA and Draft FNSI during the public comment period via mail or
telephone to:
Miss Christie Lowery
Environmental Division at Directorate of Public Works Fort Bragg
Garrison Command; Installation Management Agency
Fort Bragg, NC 28310
Phone: (910) 432-8479
There were no comments received from the general public and only standard comments from North Carolina state
agencies, with the exception of NCDENR/Division of Water Quality (DWQ). The state agency comments and
applicable responses have been attached to this FNSI and included in the Final EA as Appendix J in the form of an
Errata Sheet and a comment/response form. The Errata Sheet was developed to address any comments that Fort
Bragg concurred with and includes the appropriate corrections and wording. All DWQ comments, including those not
accepted by Fort Bragg, are listed with the applicable Fort Bragg responses on the comment/response form. None of
the comments made by DWQ would warrant a mitigated FNSI. Following the public review period, this final FNSI
was prepared, signed by the Garrison Commander of Fort Bragg, and released to the appropriate local, state, and
federal repositories.
5.0 CONCLUSION
Based on the EA, it has been determined that implementation of the proposed action will have no significant direct,
indirect, or cumulative adverse effects on the quality of the natural or human environment. Because no significant
environmental impacts will result from implementation of the proposed action, an Environmental Impact Statement is
not required and will not be prepared.
Date: C2 4C2& V
David G. Fox
COL, SF
Garrison Commander