NCG030317_Compliance Inspection Evaluation_20150713

Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 07/13/2015
Primary Inspector: Darlene J Kucken
Secondary Inspector(s):
Certification: Phone:
Entry Time: 01:OOPM Exit Time: 02:30PM
Phone:
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Metal Fabrication Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
0 Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1
Compliance
Inspection Report
Permit: NCG030317
Effective: 11/01/12
Expiration: 10/31/17 Owner: -Geie
e
SOC:
Effective:
Expiration: Facility:
Coleman Cable - Hayesville
County: Clay
788 Tusquittee Rd
Region: Asheville
Hayesville NC 28904
•��
� 0LVP_
ll
C04 3 A \
Contact Person: - r7 h i -w rsv
Title:
Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 07/13/2015
Primary Inspector: Darlene J Kucken
Secondary Inspector(s):
Certification: Phone:
Entry Time: 01:OOPM Exit Time: 02:30PM
Phone:
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Metal Fabrication Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
0 Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG030317 Owner - Facility: Coleman Cable
Inspection Date: 07/13/2015 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
1 This inspection was conducted to assess the results of the Tier I sampling and request for no exposure (NE). The
facility was previously inspected in January 2014 in response to a NE request and was found to be non compliant and the
NE request was not granted based on site coonditions
2. A recycling program has been instituted at the facility, as well as some housekeeping practices. These changes have
resulted in lower Zn levels (2014 = .080 mg/L and 2015 = 045 mg/L) and lower Cu levels (2014 =.048 mg/L and 2015 =
.020 mg/L). Current benchmarks for these metals are: Zn = .067 mg/L and Cu = .007 mg/L. Upon permit renewal, these
benchmarks will increase to Zn = 126 mg/L and Cu = 010 mg/L.
3 The facility appears to not exceed the Zn benchmark, but is above the benchmark for Cu. Given that the facility has
copper on site for processing, there appears to be a need for further investigation as to the source of the copper.
4 There are still two large uncovered dumpsters that now contain primarily waste that can not be recycled. These
uncovered dumpsters constitute an exposure. Covering or placing the dumpsters under cover would remove this exposure.
5. The new pallets stored on site are not considered to be an exposure; however, the used pallets on site are an exposure.
Storing used pallets under cover would eliminate this exposure.
6. The previously noted floor drains were inspected and determined to be in the location of a removed restroom. These
drains discharge to a municipal wastewater system.
7. The facility will need to cover and/or remove the two dumpsters and the used pallets to be considered for a no exposure
permit Additional effort may be needed to investigate the source of Cu to assure smaple values are at or below benchmark
levels. Semi-annual analytical monitoring should be continued
Page: 2

Permit: NCG030317 Owner - Facility: Coleman Cable
Inspection Date: 07/13/2015 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
N
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
E
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
E
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑
❑ N ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
E
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
E
❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
E
❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
E
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? E ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? N 1:111 ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Comment:
Page: 3