20180005 Ver 2_401 Application_20180818

Kimley»>Horn
August 13, 2018
Ms. Karen Higgins
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: NCDWR Project #18-0005 — 401/Buffer Modification Request Package
The Station at Raleigh, Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Higgins,
On behalf of our client, LCD Acquisitions, LLC, Kimley-Horn is submitting the attached revised Pre -
Construction Notification (PCN) application package for the above referenced project to modify and
update the previously issued 401 Approval and Buffer Authorization to match the revised project footprint
per US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) requirements.
Following the receipt of the USACE comments relating to avoidance and minimization efforts of the
previously proposed Thornberry Street extension, Kimley-Horn and LCD Acquisitions, LLC revisited the
requirement for the roadway extension to the property line with the City of Raleigh. Based on the USACE
feedback, our client was granted an exception from this requirement by City reviewers and the proposed
Thornberry Street extension has been removed. Due to this change, Kimley-Horn has revised the Site
Plan and associated plan sheets, Figure 6b, and the PCN application to reflect the removal of proposed
culvert associated with the Thornberry Street crossing. This change has removed all stream impacts
previously approved by at the NCDWR-designated impact sites S2 and B2. Impact site B3 has shifted
slightly to account for the site layout modification, and impacts associated with the drainage conveyance
have been further reduced. The realignment of the interior layout has added a small area of grading and
revegetation in Zone 2 only (650 square feet), which has been re -designated as buffer impact site 2 in the
attached revised PCN.
To assist in your review of this NWP application, the following additional and/or revised information has
been included:
• Revised PCN Application Form 0 Revised Site Plan, Grading Plan, & Detail
• Figure 6a and Revised Figure 6b 0 Previously Issued 401 Approval
If you need any additional information to assist in your review of this project, feel free to contact me at
919-678-4155 or [e-mail].
Very truly yours,
Kimlleefy-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Jason Hartshorn, PWS

O�OFW A TF9OG
UJ
O � Y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
The Station at Raleigh
2b.
County:
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh
2d.
Subdivision name:
n/a
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
n/a
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
LCD Acquisitions, LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Mark Jensen
3d.
Street address:
315 Oconee Street
3e.
City, state, zip:
Athens, GA 30601
3f.
Telephone no.:
706-715-6951
3g.
Fax no.:
n/a
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
® Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Jason Hartshorn, PWS
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Kimley-Horn
5c. Street address:
421 Fayetteville St, Suite 600
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC, 27601
5e. Telephone no.:
919-678-4155
5f. Fax no.:
n/a
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
0784565495, 0784569220
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.799976 Longitude: - 78.710875
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
18.99 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Richland Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C;NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Land use within the project parcels consists of a cleared grass and gravel lot used for event parking during stadium and
NC State Fairground events. The northern portion of the project area is forested and crossed by a perennial stream. A
single family house is located in the middle of the project area, but the structure is abandoned. Land use in the vicinity of
the project is generally urbanized, and developed for industrial, commercial, and institutional uses. The developments in
the vicinity are interspersed with pockets of undeveloped forested land.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
515 LF
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The proposed project would construct a multi-family residential development located between Westchase Boulevard and
Trinity Road in Raleigh.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project involves the construction of a multifamily residential development, including the residential
buildings, various ammenities, interior roadways, and walking paths. Typical site development and structural construction
equipment will be utilized including dump trucks, graders, bulldozers, cranes, asphalt pavers, excavators, and concrete
trucks.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: Preliminary JD was submitted to the USACE and
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
confirmed in May 2017, but documentation is pending
(USACE AID SAW-2017-00623). NCDWR issued a Buffer
Determination for the Site on March 28, 2017 (NBRRO
#17-088)
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
® Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Kimley-Horn
Name (if known): Ross Sullivan
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
USACE - May 2017, NCDWR - March 28, 2017
Page 3 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

S. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
n/a
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
The project will be constructed as a single development.
Page 4 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
Page 5 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland
Type of jurisdiction
impact
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
number —
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Permanent
(P) or
Temporary
T
W1 ❑ P ❑
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0
2h. Comments: No wetlands will be impacted as a result of the proposed project.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
impact
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
number -
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear feet)
Permanent
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
(P) or
Temporary
(T)
Site 1 — S1
Road Crossing/Culvert
Stream S1 - UT to Richland
®PER
®Corps
g
118
® P ❑ T
Installation
Creek
F1 INT
❑ DWQ
Site 1 — S1
Stream S1 - UT
® PER
® Corps
® P ❑ T
Outlet Protection
to Richland
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
8
9
Creek
Site 1 — S1
Temporary
Stream S1 - UT
® PER
® Corps
❑ P ® T
Dewatering/Construction
to Richland
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
8
29
Access
Creek
❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
1 299 F (P),
LF (T)
3i. Comments: Unavoidable impacts to stream S1 will result from the proposed project. S1 will be permanently impacted as a
result of a perpendicular road crossing associated with the project. Site 1 is the primary entrance and exit road into the
property carrying traffic from Westchase Boulevard and Trinity Road, and also includes impacts associated with outlet
Page 6 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

protection at the downstream end of the culvert. Riprap will be utilized for outlet protection and will be keyed into the bank
during installation so no permanent loss of waters will result from the outlet protection. Temporary impacts to S1 will also
occur due to temporary dewatering activities needed to facilitate construction access in the stream bed for the culvert
construction/installation. All temporary disturbance areas will be returned to pre -construction contours after completion of the
project.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
number —
Permanent
(P) or
Temporary
T
01 ❑P❑
T
02 ❑ P ❑
T
03 ❑ P ❑
T
04 ❑ P ❑
T
4E Total open water impacts
0 acres
4g. Comments: No open water impacts will result from the proposed project.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then com tete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose of
(acres)
number
pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
R Total
5g. Comments: No ponds or lakes will be constructed as a result of the proposed construction.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ®No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
N/A
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
N/A
5k. Method of construction:
N/A
Page 7 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse El Tar -Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer
impact
Reason for
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
number —
impact
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Permanent
required?
(P) or
Temporary
Site 1
Road
Stream S1 - UT to Richland
❑ Yes
8,460
5,524
® P [_1T
Crossing
Creek
® No
®�P
Grading and
Revegetation
Stream S1Creek o Richland
® Nos
0
650
2❑ T
in Zone 2
Site 3
Drainage
Conveyance
Stream S1 - UT to Richland
❑ Yes
367
131
® P ❑ T
(Treated)
Creek
® No
6h. Total buffer impacts
8,827
6,305
6i. Comments: Unavoidable impacts to the protected riparian buffer associated with stream S1 (UT to Richlands Creek) will
result from the proposed construction of a main north -south connector road between Westchase Boulevard to the north and
Trinity Road to the south. This main north -south connector road will serve as the entrance and exit route into the development.
A small area of Zone 2 will be graded and revegated to assist with Site layout near the northern limit of the development south
of S1. The small area of grading and revegation will not compromise the vegetation in Zone 1 and will not concentrate
stormater flows. A third impact site will result from the construction of a stormwater management pond outfall in the
northeastern corner of the development. All riprap protection at Site 3 will stop at or before top of bank to prevent stream
impacts to S1.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts to the streams and buffers within the project corridor were minimized to the extent practical. Stream impacts were
minimized by aligning the road crossing to be as close to perpendicular crossing over S1 as possible at the necessary
crossing location. Headwalls have also been utilized in the design to allow narrower fill slopes and minimize the culvert length
and impacts to S1. Stream S1 crosses the entire property along the northern boundary, preventing any access to Westchase
Boulevard without a stream impact. The stream crossing was selected to utilize a perpendicular crossing with minimal buffer
impact.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Impacts to streams and buffers within the corridor will be minimized to the extent practical throughout the construction process
by avoiding stream and buffer features whenever possible. Where feasible, staging and construction access routes will be
located in upland areas throughout the corridor. Silt fencing, sediment basins, and other Stormwater Control Measures
(SCMs) will be used throughout the construction process to minimize impacts to downstream receiving waters and minimize
runoff from the construction sites.
Page 8 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: n/a
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
n/a square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
n/a acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
n/a acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
n/a acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
n/a
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
0
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
n/a
Page 9 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6h. Comments: Impact Sites 1 and 3 are considered "allowable" under the NCDWR Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Rules
Table of Uses. Site 1 is a perpendicular road crossing impacting less than 150 LF of riparian buffer and less than 1/3 rd of
an acre of riparian buffer, which is "allowable". Site 3 is a new drainage conveyance through the riparian buffer, but is
carrying a treated stormwater outfall with attenuated flow from a BMP located outside of the riparian buffer, which is also
considered "allowable". Site 2 is limited to grading and revegetation in Zone 2 only and is considered "exempt".
Page 10 of 14
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
® Yes ❑ No
Comments: N/A
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
55%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: N/A
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The stormwater BMPs and infrastructure have been designed to meet the City of Raleigh's stormwater requirements.
Stormwater will be captured and treated by two ponds, which outfall to stream S1.
® Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
City of Raleigh
® Phase II
® NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
® Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
® Yes ❑ No
Page 11 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments: N/A
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): N/A
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Development within this site will serve existing and currently projected growth in this urban, developed area of the City.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sewer connection approval will be obtained from the City of Raleigh prior to site construction.
Page 12 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The NC Natural Heritage Program Element Occurrence Database (updated October 2017) indicates no known
occurrences any federally listed threatened or endangered species within 1.0 mile of the project area. Suitable habitat is
not present within the study area for Michaux's sumac due to the open field being used for parking and regularly
maintained through mowing, and field edges are overgrown with vine shrub species. Habitat is not present for red -
cockaded woodpecker due to the lack of mature pines and historic development within this area resulting in successional
forests. Suitable habitat is also not present for dwarf wedgemussel due to the low -flow, encised, and rocky nature of
stream S1.
Incidental take of Northern long-eared bat (NLEB) is prohibited if it occurs within a hibernaculum, or if it results from tree
removal activities within 0.25 mile of a known hibernaculum or the activity jeopardizes a known maternity roost tree or
trees within a 150 -foot radius of the maternity roost tree. Per the NC Natural Heritage Program Element Occurrence
Database (updated October 2017), there are no known occurrences of NLEB, hibernaculums, or roost trees within 1.0
mile of the project area.
Due to the lack of known occurrences within the study area and the lack of suitable habitat within the study area, the
proposed project is not anticipated to have any effect on any federally listed threatened or endangered species.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper (Accessed December 21, 2017)
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
® Yes ❑ No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service (Accessed June 21, 2017) was reviewed
and no National Register sites or National Register Study List sites are present within the project area. A single structre
within the project area is listed in the database as "Survyed" in 1989, but is not listed on the NR or NR SL. The structure
in the project area is the Medlin House (WA0945), and a family cemetary is located along the eastern property boundary.
Due to the presence of the surveyed structure and the location within the central area of Raleigh resulting in over 40
known properties/sites within a 1.0 -mile radius of the project, Kimley-Horn conducted an Environmental Review with the
NCSHPO in advance of this permit application. Attached is the Kimley-Horn project review request outling the findings of
the historical properties investigation, as well as the concurrence letter from NCSHPO (dated August 22, 2017) confirming
that the proposed development will have No Effect on historic or archaeological sites.
Page 13 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: N/A
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Floodplain Mapper, FRIM Panel 3720078400J
Effective 05/02/2006 (Accessed December 21, 2017).
Jason Hartshorn
4/02/2018
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 14 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

He
tended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document with
Buffer is Existing NCDOT Right -of -Way
Roadway Facility
—X —,vim�.: -M_ I �V A
0
\\
TV11 r
N-1
L y
-141
T',,�,`•-� 'col
L4 CA V
ca y `r PD M!+�+ . ri•r'{t y,e t
\N� •AW Q CIDtai+til tit 1•j 4 ( L`! tA i' a'!�w"y ���.� 1'�.;
'• �t` t 1 ! a�4 i i l l ' a O l i p �u i► ! !'� � r "`�� �. `��. ` -.�... � ��.. `•..
�� Jill
N1
Ir4�4 _d �'♦ �r'i♦ � ti 1 ( A�
11Jf4t+ ftl x'111 1�f1tt �-p \\ t
II I - •1 z�4k 46....,tt hS1• \ �
vrlly�U9 �` tt�i aiIN,
400
SITE 1
a ' 118 LF Permanent Stream Impact
0 0 g o? ' 9 LF Outlet Protection
z ��� �' ` — 29 LF Temporary Stream Impact
rm
v
8,460 sf BZ1 Impact
0 25 50 100
Feet 5,524 sf BZ2 Impact
Q
Legend C
fir+- Streams NRB Buffer Zone 1 Limits of Disturbance I m
*w%*.f Temporary Construction Access Buffer Zone 1 Impacts Project Study Area
Permanent Culvert Installation NRB Buffer Zone 2
Permanent Outlet Protection Buffer Zone 2 Impacts
KimleyoHorn
Figure 6a: Proposed Impacts
Station at Raleigh Site
Raleigh, NC
January 2018

f N t r I ! r!!
V W
Graphical Symbol Only
~ �-.-�``� (no n ra to be laced
wm ` Wti P P P
4L�or �� y,S1 T t / / iv in stream channel at Site 3)
I�
\tom 4- / , !
Stream S1
begins in
study area
�i� y- Q t If I ! at culvert
<
Z 1 f \ \ 1--t—.� ((� outlet
CD
466 \ ti,En
JL
'x,18
{{{J469
�I
4
COO
'v 000
4
.>O f 458 .cam W � 367 s ZE Impact
c
4S SITE 2 / B
4 131 sf BZ2 Impact
4 650 sf BZ2 Impact /av
►v / 454
ACC 0.
30
458
0 25 50 100eet
Legend
�- Streams NRB Buffer Zone 1 Limits of Disturbance
�i Temporary Construction Access NRB Buffer Zone 2 Project Study Area
Permanent Culvert Installation ® Buffer Zone 1 Impacts
Permanent Outlet Protection ® Buffer Zone 2 Impacts
Kimley>>> Horn
Figure 6b: Proposed Impacts
Station at Raleigh Site
Raleigh, NC
April 2018

PROPOSED
RIP RAP DIMENSIONS
FES -1 (WET POND INLET 1) .49
CLASS GRIP RAP ON FILTER FABRIC vne -
NEW
EMIR WIDTH: 9.00 FT
(MIN 22
THICKNESS) NE -W -L
LEND 18.00 FT
EXT WIDTH: 21.00 FT V
(MA�(WPEIOUS A
OUTLET go -
FES -Z (YET POND INLET
CLASS A RIP RAP ON FIA FABRIC
(WIN 22' THICKNESS)
ENTRYWIDTH: 4.50 F`rteT z
LEND - 6.00 FT J
EXIT WIDTH: 7.50 FT
VV .. -
I if 0
YET POND OUTLET Q U.
'H: 9 DO FT
CLASS 1 FOP RAP ON FILTER FAB= I
(MIN 22' THICKNESS)
ENTRY INV N� -09.20 (CB -NL -
2 .00 FT 'A
TWIDTH: 27.00 FT 19V IN: *-af41
LENGTH:
INV GUY 459.24
FES -4 LET) A, -
CIL RIP RAP ON FILTER FABRIC J(DRY POND IN
WET POND
0
(MIN 2 THIKNMS
ENTRYWIDTH:
LENGTH: 15.00 FT
EXIT WIDTH: 18.00 FT /B
I \I
A 1151-
TWOF B 4
Ik4
V
)4
4.67 21 INV CU 7&27 (CB -2 VN 11 L47
5.42
4 'j
:B 21
N/F- III 40\ -kl* 4 . 2 4ft
I I,& OF 'TokTH IN.
T.
1. 41111 .04 111
IL W-6�' OF
P
1*1
wY!f -V% X'i
vj
P
1 5.
TI
7
Iw
/ 76P Aa ow.n/ / ' l � ) 1 (' f / / a / / A ) - -- / - I FO :77-W
IN
IN 473.48 17)
T. N17.,Wi 12)
'r- 465.29 -45)
7, '717
\481 ym
r1x 0. RCP
OF
SOX
2 - --/ - -- I . I I I / �2
'/ I , I I ) ;; ' 1 93� R I - If .1
A taa of MA-XIMPERVI SAREA-4.97'AO "cr-
EW-06T
A",
I /,pt�b' �)�TAIES
1 77
4EI
U PROPOSED I
7,v 1 1 RETAINING
Ilig r.*AG j, R 177.02
OT
44R&
t 12 183
ROTE 7, f L 51 L
CTYPJ I/
)MA S.
IP CD
LI _1 11 E, 032682isI - k(
2 R
3s. 4-7 Q.-'479.98 I r O �j 0
.14: 47&0 '(CB -39)
RIM:' 411.41 0
0 6v in
INY t IV OUT�,475.80 (CB -7)
A\ -
OUT
V or
78 LF
o 8
is' Mp
t 7> i ca
N 35 LF OF INV OUT/47 jj((R-4)
1554% LL]
z
PROPOSED W TE INTO EXISTING
o RCP CULVERT• I. -'-N, DRAIN
122 LF 0 IXNG DOGHOUSE
<
A 3N BOX
t I sk �il' n' 15* RCP M: 47
CEI -34 R 56
INV 11 (c z
INV OUT. 40.92 (CB -35) INV OUT. 469.46 (MH -5)
j- Ti 35 -
RIM: 4511.14 <
ol' k - G 1� I f -j
34) RIM/ 4 0
L Li I
;=437.00O 4 Fj OF TIR.- 456.00 (CB -
PF �ED .,If I. k\ kill t 15' RCP INV OUT'. �.80 (CB -36) INV IN; 472.41 (G!11-2)�j Iml
o 6.56%
R I, I 11:1.111 11 STRUCTURE OB -35 INV OUT. 0.71 (CP -4) r
4 RIM: 454.18
i ALL 425- CONNECT DRY PON 138 LF OF 44 z
OUTFLOW PIPE TO 24' ROP V IN: 447-38 (UG -28) N/F I Sr. CB -4
I DT 3� f." IN 111M, 417,1
O 3.O&x MY IN: 450.OD (CS -35) BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE ENDOMAENT �UNU OF NC
3.15
-55 2 RIP RAP PROPOSED 60' ROP --w 1 0 M5
((MIN.
'1�21� DIAMETER)
CULVERT INV OUT. 447.00 (CB -36) STATE umivaisi r�, I 42.�i (�B, ) 38 IF
N ALLY .272. N/r 38 845C, PG. 1333 T--%jAxNPER`V1OL7§XWAj.65A0 I INV IN: 47
OR 8684 PG. 38� Ni: PIN INV OM� 09 5
STREAM BANK NCSU STUDENT AID ASSOC. INC. BM 2000, FG. 472 IS*
0784-56-,392
NC PIN ff 0784-`6-G3336%4 200C. PG. 1.72 HEADWALL
OFFICE M.XFD USE(OX)
USE: VACANT RIM EL -=S PROPOSED OKF.D OF ICE MIXED UT
LSE' VACANT
4THICK BAFFLE WALL M. ELEv-'- <
TOP EUEY. 451.00
4' THICK BAFFLE WALL
P ELEY. 451.00 0
35 LF OF 48 . RCP Of
----------
IN, Ooox QONQLIRRENT REVIEW APPROVAL
35 LF OF 48' RCP 4' THICK 445.68 Z15TCRC UTUET I/
0 0.00%-\ RAFFLE WALL A. S* CIRCULAR ORIFICE 0 -50X w
INV -445,68 Top a" THROUGH BAFFLE WALL CITY OF RALEIGH - PLANS Aun*xurED FOR GoNGTRUGTION
451,01 imv_�5.68
6" CIRCULAR ORIFICE 4'
THROUGH BAFFLE WALL IF PLANS FOR THE PROPOSED USE HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR
IN 445.68 6' CIRCULAR ORIFICE NCSU STjDEN`N AID ASSIW.. INC'� g .0
THROU014 RAFFLE WALL GENERAL COMPLIANCE WIN APPLICABLE CODES. This LIMITED
157 ROP OUTLET INV -44668 DB 3F84, PC, 392 RENEW, AND AUTHORIZATION FOR CONSTRUCTION is NOT To LL _j
00.50x BE CONMERED TO REPRESENT TOTAL COMPLIANCE WTH ALL
BM I 2000, PG. 14/2 LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DEYEIGPMETfT AND CONSTRUC770M.
0 pl� #0784-46-913-? DIE PROPERTY OWNER, DESIGN CONSULIANM AND a
ZONED OFFICE M ED CONTRACTORS ARE EACH RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLIANCE WTH <
USE: PAR , ING LCT ALL APPLICABLE CITY STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS THIS
D_
SPECIFICAMCRIZAVON BELOW IS NOT A PER&ITT, NOR SHALL
IT BE wKsTRum TO REParr ANY MIQLATION OF CITY, STATE z fur, <
is* RCP OUTLET OR FEDERAL LAW ALL CONSTRUC77ON MUST BE A 0 IL z
00.50% A ANCE WTH ALL LOCAL. STA7& AND FEDERAL RLXES
SECTION 3-B JALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE NTH ALL A REGULATIONS.
SECTION A -A CITY OF RALEIGH AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND TRANSPORTATION FIELD SERVICES 0
SPECIFICATIONS., PUBLIC UTILITIES <
STO WATER
A 40-
SURVEY NOTE: PLANNING/ZDNINC
U)
EXISTING INFORMATION TAKEN FROM. AN ALTA/AGSM LAND
UNDERGROUND PIPE STORAGE GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET TITLE SURVEY PROVIDED BY MCKIM & CREED, 1730 FINE
CROSS SECTION 0 25 50 100 VARSITY DRIVE, SUITE 500, RALEIGH, NC 27606. URBAN FORESTRY SHEET NUMBER
N.T.S. PHONE: 91,9-233-8091 AND DATED JANUARY 23, 2017. SITE ACCESSBUTY_

SITE DATA
TRD (2) CAR GARAGE PARIGNG
P. LADED UNITS F. H. R
S. AND T UNITS
�MEff®16D{RL
EXISI7IC 20NN0: qt -12-p1
EXISTING USE:
UNDENLOPED NGIE FAMILY
'
1. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ME HO■Z
N U.3. SURIEY FEET. (UNLESS 0
2 ALL BEARINGS ARE BASED ON TH
PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD
TOTAL SITE AREA 1670 (611.672 Sr)
PROPERTY SETBACK& PRIMARY S■EET - 5'
9®6- - 0-a'
REAR - 0-6'
PPacrr oATA
PROPOSED USE MR.TI-FAMLY
PN/ 076h56-7409
0761-56-9220
PROPOSED 6 OF BUILDINGS 21
BMDNO IDT COVERAGE: 50.56% (412.076 / 611672 SF)
BKE PARKM REOUIRED: 9
PROPOED: 12
AMENITY AREA SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS
PROPOSED BUODPq HDWT- 36-W
SITE IM ERNOUS MEA• EWSDNG (PRE-DEY.):
-31.799 SF(19011)
PROPOSED (POSTr.
-449.1D4 3(�,31Q
� o.Riw EAs�
OB 13070. PG
I OB 0054, PG 1828
DEED IEASEMENT
I AND HT -0F -WAY �
RICH
N
I �
/ i I
� / I
j I /
Ls] �
m I/'jll i ,\`C�'I DU CgIPCTOR
EX DRY
I
x 7 (
POND
EX. RETAININGJ
— WALL
LLJ
I
I
I
I
i��ii� iii` ♦ �6y' � � � � �� � �� !'• •� 1
0
% ii90el
,iiOiO,iOi�4y0
,
■ ��i■9T■I� !fK
Mal
I MEN
ADA
•flu _ _ _ ��
Thi si � � � �ilTf■ a � ) " �,. �
• E •ry.•• .1r. 1f � L�4
6 iii �.i�1�_i�•-r��ybbby : S ■ a� � '■�e+ � '—�—�'�''r ,.'>r [� . • �• : , �ia -
� � 6 � O 1 � I■ �! >v }y�rr�h p � !� ��wh�� s■
' s!
`
DL RA ACCESSIBI-E a CUTTER
RAMP •
SIDEWALK
TEMPOIWY
EASEMENTS
_IIIIOONSTRUCTION
Ii.ITMz_
I N/'
NCSJ S--LD--NT AIC ASFCC. INC.
D6 P.654, PG. 359
BV 2000, PG. 14.2
vC PIN 9 0784-55-0833
ZONED CFFICE MIXED USE(OX)
USE: VACANT
N/F
BOARD CF TRUSTEES OF THE ENDOKMENT FUND OF NC
STATE UNIVERSITY
UB 8466, PG. 1333
BM 2000, PG. 1472
NC PIN ,# 0784-56-3392
ZONED OFFICE MIXED USE(UX)
USE: VACANT
I I
_ z I
9 I
I I
B I
LOQ
I
L---
24' CRESSACCESS
I
EASEMENTS --
-- -- - - I ---L
TEMPORARY —
CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENTS
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL
Z CITY OF RALEIGH AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND
SPECIFICATIONS
SURVEY NOTE:
AC UNITS TO BE EXISTING INFORMATION TAKEN FROM AN ALTA/ACSM LAND
SCREENED WITH GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET TITLE SURVEY PROVIDED BY MCKIM & CREED, 1730
LANDSCAPING O 25 50 100 VARSITY DRIVE, SUITE 500, RALEIGH, NC 27606.
PHONE: [phone] AND DATED JANUARY 23. 2017.
0
N 0 O U
p O N
O wN y m y
o.O Q o m c
Z
Q
a
w
Ir
Q
Z
Lu
a
2 J Z
J O
0:
U
W L
ILLI D:
z
O
O
Q IL
Z w
0aa
Q
Lu
!- a
Of
SHEET NUMBER
C2.0
LEGEND
PAINTED TRAFFIC ARROW
—��
C, . • - • I
CONCRETE SIDEWALK
HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE
(8- G 4000PSI)
®
PROPOSED PARKING COUNT
HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT
LIGHT DUTY ASPHALT
DETECTABLE WARNING
SURFACE
I I
_ z I
9 I
I I
B I
LOQ
I
L---
24' CRESSACCESS
I
EASEMENTS --
-- -- - - I ---L
TEMPORARY —
CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENTS
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL
Z CITY OF RALEIGH AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND
SPECIFICATIONS
SURVEY NOTE:
AC UNITS TO BE EXISTING INFORMATION TAKEN FROM AN ALTA/ACSM LAND
SCREENED WITH GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET TITLE SURVEY PROVIDED BY MCKIM & CREED, 1730
LANDSCAPING O 25 50 100 VARSITY DRIVE, SUITE 500, RALEIGH, NC 27606.
PHONE: [phone] AND DATED JANUARY 23. 2017.
0
N 0 O U
p O N
O wN y m y
o.O Q o m c
Z
Q
a
w
Ir
Q
Z
Lu
a
2 J Z
J O
0:
U
W L
ILLI D:
z
O
O
Q IL
Z w
0aa
Q
Lu
!- a
Of
SHEET NUMBER
C2.0

s
s
E
_o
426;,,_ -�--
- = Z . 427— —
m
CULVERT
I
a
Dr
�4
4 42 ?g
2
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 10 20 40
J
Q
V
CULVERT TO BE �—
EMBEDDED 1' INTO
3 SIREAMBED
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 30 60 120
HORIZONTAL
14..
KHA PROJECT
011770002
SHEET NUMBER
Kimley)))Horn
01/2 4/2018
THE STATION AT RALEIGH
CULVERT 1
®2018HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SCALE AS SHOWN
PREPARED FOR
STREAM CROSSING EXHIBIT
EX
4TE
21 FAYETVILLE ILLE STREET. SUITE 600, RALEIGH, NC 27601
DESIGNED BY me
THE STATION AT RALEIGH, LLC
-1
PHONE: [phone]
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
DRAWN BY TRC
No. REVISIONS DATE I BY
CHECKED BY COB
RALEIGH
NORTH CAROLINA

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
February 1, 2018'•
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Interim Director
DWR #18-0005
Wake County ,
LCD Acquisitions, LLC
Attn: Mark Jensen
315 Oconee Street
Athens, GA $0601
Subject: APPROVAL OF 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION WITH ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE PER THE NEUSE RIVER BASIN RIPARIAN BUFFER
PROTECTION RULES (15A NCAC 02B .0233) WITH ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
The Station at Raleigh
.6 r:Mr. Jensen:
You have our approval for the impacts listed below for the, purpose described in your
application dated -December 21, 201 -7 -and received -by the'Division of Water' Resources
.(Division) on December 28, 2017 with additional information received on January 30, 2018.
These impacts are covered by the attached Water Quality General Certification' Number 4139
and the conditions listed below. This -certification is,associated with the use of Nationwide
Permit Number 29 once it is issued to you by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Please -note
that you should get any other federal, state or local permits before proceeding with .your
project, Including those required by (but not limited to) Sediment and. Erosion Control, Non -
Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations. I
This approval requires'you to follow the conditions listed in the enclosed certification and the
following additional conditions:
1. The following impacts are hereby approved provided that all of the other specific and
general conditions of the - Certification and Buffer Rules are met. No other impacts are.
approved, including incidental impacts. [15A NCAC 0213.0506(b)(6)•and 15A.NCAC 02B,
.0233(8)]'
Division of Water Resources, Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Operations Section
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Location: 3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh, NC 27609
httpJ/poTtal.ncdenr.org(weblwq/aps.
Phone: [phone] " I
Fax: [phone]
,alll�• ql

The Station at Raleigh-,'
DWR #18-0005
401 AND BUFFER APPROVAL
Page 2 of 4
Type of Impact,
Amount Approved
(units)
Permanent
Amount Approved
(units)
Temporary
Stream
S1 -Road Crossing/Culvert
118 (linear feet)
0 (linear feet)
S1 -Outlet Protection
9 (linear feet)
0,(linear feet)
S1-Dewatering/Construction Access
0 (linear feet).
29 (linear feet)
S2 -Road Crossing/Cblvert
146 (linear feet)
0 (linear feet)
S2-0utlet Protection
8 (linear feet)
0 (linear feet)
S2-Dewatering/Construction Access
0 (linear feet)
38 (linear feet)
Buffers — Zone 1
Bi -Road Crossing
'8,460 (square feet)
0 (square feet)
132 -Road Crossing
7,037 (square feet)
0 (square feet) "
133 -Drainage- Conveyance -treated
859(square feet)
0 (square feet)
Buffers — Zone 2 '
'
131 -Road Crossing
5,'•524 (sq"ware feet)
'0 (square feet)
132 -Road Crossing
3;378, (square feet)
0 (square feet)
133 -Drainage Conveyance -treated
7678 (square feet)
0 (square feet) .
2.. Stormwater Management Plan '(SMP) Approvallfrom 'Local Community Required
The stormwater management plan (SMP) must be! approved by the City of Raleigh and meet
the requirements -cif this. Certification. The SM,P;maynot be modified without prior written
authorization from the City of Raleigh. [15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(3)]
3. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No -waste, spoil, solids, or .fill .of any kind shall occur.in wetlands,waters, or riparian areas
beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre -Construction Notification. All
construction activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of
sediment and erosion control Best,Managemen't Practices, shall be'performed so that no
violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur. [15A NCAC 02H .6501
and .0502]
4. Protective Fencing.
.The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along,the construction corridor within
these boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange
warning fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have -been approved to
infringe within the buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure
compliance -with 15 NCAC 02H .0500. '[15A NCAC 02H..0506 (b)(2) and (c)(2) and 15A NCAC
.02H.0507 (c)]

The Station at Raleigh
DWR #18-0005
401 AND BUFFER APPROVAL
Page 3 of 4
This app`roval•is for the purpose and design described in your application. The plans and
specifications for this project are incorporated by reference as part of the Certification and
,Buffer Authorization. If you change your project, you must notify the Division and you may
be required to suis mit-a new application package with the.app'ro,p.riatefee. If the property is
sold; the new -owner must be given a copy of this approval letter and General Certification
and is responsible ;for complying with all conditions. [15A NCAC'.02B ..0507(d)(2)]
6. This approval'.and its conditions are final andbinding unless-contested..[G.S. 143-215.5]
This'Certification and Buffer Authorization can be 'contested as'provided in. Articles 3 and 4 of
Generai'Statute 1506 by filing a written petition for an administrative hearinig to'the Office of
Administrative Hearings (hereby -known as OAH). A petition form -,,may be obtained -from the
OAH -at tittp://www.;ncoah.com/ or, -by calling the OAH Clerk's Office: at (919), 431-3000 for.
information.
Within sixty`(60) calendar days of .*eipt of this notice, a petition must be filed with the..
OAH. A petition is considered filed,'when the original and one (1) copy along with.•any
applicable OAH filing fee is received in`the OAH during normal office hours (Monday through
Friday between 8:00am and 5:00prri; excluding official state holidays).
The petition may be faxed to the OAH-at [phone], provided the original and one copy of
the petition along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received by the OAH within five (5) .
business days following the faxed transmission.
Mailing address for the OAH: ��
If sending by First Class Mail; If sending via delivery service
via the US Postal Service: (e.g. UPS, FedEx):
Office of Administrative Hearings Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center 1711 New Hope Church Road
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714 Raleigh, NC 27609-6285
One (1) copy of the petition must ail'so be served to Department of Environmental Quality:
William F. Lane, Gei
Department of Envi
1601 Mail Service C
Raleigh, NC 27699
Please send one (1) copy of the p
If sending by First Class A
via the .US:Postal Service:
ill Counsel
mental;Quality
e r
)n to ,DWR:
If sending via delivery service
(e.g. UPS, FedEx).:

Karen Higgins
NC DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
The Station at Raleigh
DWR 418-0005
401 AND BUFFER APPROVAL
Page 4 of 4
Karen Higgins
NC DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
This letter completes the review of the Division under section 401 of the Clean Water Act and
the Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules as described in 15A NCAC 02B .0233. Please contact Stephanie
Goss at 919-791-4256 or [e-mail] if you have any questions or concerns.
Sincerely
��
Danny Smith
Supervisor, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Enclosure: GC 4139
cc: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Raleigh Regulatory Field Office; 3331 Heritage Trade Dr.,
Ste. 105; Wake Forest, NC 27597
DWR RRO 401/Riparian Buffer file
DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit via Laserfiche
Jason Hartshorn via e-mail at [e-mail]