20090675 Ver 1_Application_20090609

??

`.J
3
C?
li
n
v
lJ
L
_>T?o
2q?°r E /" >
'9 wf//
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ?
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE EUGENE A. CONTI, JR.
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
June 5, 2009
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
ATTN: Mr. Steve Lund
NCDOT Coordinator
Subject: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permit 33 for the proposed
replacement of Bridge No. 314 over South Fork Jones Creek on SR 1127
(Old US 52) in Anson County, Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1127(6);
Division 10; WBS Element 33035.1.1; TIP No. B-3404.
0 9 06 75
Dear Sir:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge No.
314 over South Fork Jones Creek on SR 1127. There will be 0.02 acre (43 linear feet) of
temporary stream impacts.
Please see enclosed copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), Approved
Jurisdictional Determination Form, permit drawings, stormwater management plan and
design plans for the above-referenced project. The Programmatic Categorical Exclusion
(PCE) was completed in August 2008 and was distributed shortly thereafter. Additional
copies are available upon request.
This project calls for a letting date of March 16, 2010 and a review date of January 26, 2010.
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: WWW..N000TORG
LOCATION:
4701 ATLANTIC AVENUE
SUITE 116
RALEIGH NC 27604
A copy of this permit application will be posted on the NCDOT Website at:
http://www.nedot.org/doh/preconstruct/pc/. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please e-mail Erin Cheely at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
2? Grego . Thorpe, Ph.D.
6 Enviro ental Management Director, PDEA
cc:
W/attachment
Mr. Brian Wrenn, NCDWQ (2 Copies)
Ms. Marella Buncick, USFWS
Ms. Marla Chambers, NCWRC
W/o attachment (see website for attachments)
Dr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Victor Barbour, P.E., Project Services Unit
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. Barry Moose, PE, Division Engineer
Mr. Larry Thompson, DEO
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Majed Alghandour, P. E., Programming and TIP
Mr. At McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. Scott McLendon, USACE, Wilmington
Ms. Natalie Lockhart, PDEA Project Planning Engineer
o ? /? ?/O' F/?? W ? ? A?¦/T E' g\y \ 1OG
? L?w?v? -i
0liii? Y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:

Section 404 Permit E] Section 10 Permit
I
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 33 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
® Yes ? No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation

of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
Yes
El
® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
th. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Replacment of Bridge No. 314 over South Fork Jones Creek on SR 1127 (Old US 52)
2b. County: Anson
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Morven
2d. Subdivision name: not applicable
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: B-3404
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
not applicable
3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center
3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
3f. Telephone no.: [phone]
3g. Fax no.: [phone]
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name: not applicable
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: not applicable
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 34.88687 Longitude: - 80.02278
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: 2.2 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, et(;.) to South Fork Jones Creek (HUC 03040201)
proposed project:
21b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C
2c. River basin: Yadkin-Pee Dee
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The land in the project vicinity is approximately 90-95% Forest Land (including loblolly pine plantations and mixed
hardwood forest) and 5-10% Disturbed Land (impervious surfaces and maintained roadsides and electrical easements).
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
100 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To replace a structurally deficient bridge. Bridge No. 314 has a sufficiency rating of 21.8 out of 100.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project involves replacing a 162-foot bridge with a 170-foot, 2-span bridge on the existing alignment with an off-site
detour. Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
? Yes ®No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: Only one stream on project (SF Jones Creek)
41b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ®No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
Site 1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
Site 2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
Site 3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
Site 4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
Site 5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
Site 6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWO
2g. Total wetland impacts 0 Permanent
0 Temporary
2h. Comments: No wetlands within project area.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average Impact length
number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream (linear feet)
Permanent (P) or intermittent (Corps - 404, 10 width
Temporary (T) (INT)? DWQ - non-404, (feet)
other)
Site 1 ? P ® T Temporary South Fork Jones ® PER ® Corps 30 43
causeways Creek ?INT ? DWQ
Site 2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
Site 3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWO
Site 4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
Site 5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
Site 6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 0 Perm
43 Temp
3i. Comments: The maximum permanent impact in the stream from the construction of the proposed interior bent is an area of
19 square feet due to two 3'-6" diameter drilled shafts adjacent to the stream.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer
impacts below. If an impacts require miti gation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse
? Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet
)
(square feet)
Temporary T required?
B1 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
E32 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: Project is not in a protected buffer area.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individual) list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of
impact number - waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or (if applicable)
Temporary T
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
0. Total open water impacts 0 Permanent
0 Temporary
4g. Comments: No open water within project area.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID
b Proposed use or (acres)
num
er purpose of pond Excavat
Flooded Filled ed Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The bridge will be replaced in place with an off-site detour. Temporary causeways will be used to remove the existing
interior bent and to install the new bent. There will be no discharge of deck drainage directly into the creek from the
bridge and a pre-formed scour hole will be used at the pipe outlet in the southeast quadrant.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The temporary causeways will not be in use simultaneously and will be removed when they are done being used.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ®No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank
? Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4., Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a perrnittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a . Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ®No
6b . If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zo ne 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
61h. Comments:
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a . Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b . If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
El Yes No
?
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a . What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A
2b . Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ? No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d . If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
See attached permit drawings.
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? not applicable
? Phase If
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented Stormwater management programs ? NSW
El USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? HOW
(check all that apply): ? ORW
? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ? No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ® Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ® Yes ? No
9
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ®Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental,document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ® Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ® Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? ®No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The new bridge will be constructed in the same location as the old bridge.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
not applicable
10
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or Yes No
® ?
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ® Yes ? No
impacts?

5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ?
Raleigh
® Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
An NCDOT field survey for Schweinitz's sunflower was last conducted on September 20, 2007. An NCDOT field survey
for red-cockaded woodpecker habitat was last conducted on March 5, 2008. Neither Schweinitz's sunflowers nor suitable
foraging or nesting habitat for the red-cockaded woodpecker exist within the project area ("No Effect"). A survey for
Carolina heelsplitter was last conducted by NCDOT biologists on August 21, 2007 with a biological conclusion of "No
Effect". Fritz Rohde of the Division of Marine Fisheries confirmed a "No Effect" conclusion for shortnose sturgeon for this
project as it is highly unlikely that the sturgeon would be found in the main stem of the PeeDee River or its tributatries in
North Carolina.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? T[3 Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NMFS County Index
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NEPA Documentation
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics coordination with FEMA
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps
Dr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph D Mac
A
li
t/A
t'
i
d N
P
pp
can
gen
r
s
nte
ame Appli nUAgent's Signature Dte
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is rovided.
I1
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the 1D Form Instructional Guidebook
SECTION 1: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: B-3404 -Replacement of Bridge No. 314 over South Fork Jones Creek on
SR 1127 (Old US 52)
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Anson City: Morven
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 34.886870 N, Long. -80.02278° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: South Fork Jones Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TN W) into which the aquatic resource flows: Pee Dec: River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03040201
® Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
? Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK .ALLTHAT APPLY):
? Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
? Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION IL SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RNA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "narigable waters ofthe U.S." within River: and Harbors Act (RHA)jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
? Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
? Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Afe "waters ofthe U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA)jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply):
? TN Ws, including territorial seas
? Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters' (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments ofjurisdictional waters
Q Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. -Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: 100 linear feet: 30 width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: 0 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: Established by ORWM.
Elevation of established OH WM (if known):
2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):'
? Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below
` For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TN W and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.
SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TN Ws. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section 11I.A.1 and Section III.D.I. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections II I.A.I and 2
and Section III.D.I.; otherwise, see Section HLB below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanoshave been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section II I.B.1 for
the tributary, Section 11 1.6.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section 111.63 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section IILC below.
1. Characteristics of non-TN Ws that flow directly or indirectly into TN W
(t) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Plcklifit
Drainage arm: Pick bili
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(it) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
? Tributary flows directly into TNW.
? Tributary flows through PI& List tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pick iblat river miles from TNW.
Project waters are N&fist river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Plck?Idit aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Picit ist aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TN W5:
Tributary stream order, if known:
Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and emsional features generally and in the and
west.
Flow mute can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ? Natural
? Artificial (manmade). Explain:
? Manipulated (roan-altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
? Silts ? Sands ? Concrete
? Cobbles ? Gravel ? Muck
? Bedrock ? Vegemnon. Type)%cover:
? Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Pick List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: PickLisi
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
? Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
? Bed and banks
? OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
? clear, natural line impressed on the bank ?
? changes in the character of soil ?
? shelving ?
? vegetation matted down, bent, or absent ?
? leaf litter disturbed or washed away ?
? sediment deposition ?
? water staining ?
? other (list):
? Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
If factors other than the OH W M were used to determ
High Tide Line indicated by: ?
? oil or scum line along shore objects
? fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
? physical markings/characteristics
? tidal gauges
? other (list):
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
ine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
? survey to available datum;
? physical markings;
? vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
'A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OH WM does not necessarily severjurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OH W M has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.
IN) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
? Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average widt)):
? Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
? Habitat for:
? Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
? Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings-:
? Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
? Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
properties:
Wetland size: acres
Weiland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick"List. Explain findings:
? Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
? Directly abutting
? Not directly abutting
? Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
? Ecological connection. Explain:
? Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
project wetlands are Pick'List river miles from TNW.
project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List flocidplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics: -
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
? Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width): .
? Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
? Habitat for:
? Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
? Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
? Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
? Aquatidwildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any) ___
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: PickList
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.
For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size in acres Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain Is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TN Ws, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW? ,
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section II I.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TN Ws and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
Q TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TN Ws.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round arejurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: The NCDWQ stream ID form for South Fork Jones Creek is >30. In addition, it is a named stream on
quad maps and 30 feet wide.
0 Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section 111.6. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
® Tributary waters: 100 linear feet 30 width (h).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non-RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Waterbody that is not a TN W or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TN W is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Q Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TN Ws.
Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates forjurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TN Ws.
? Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TN W arejurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates forjurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW arejurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates forjurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general role, the impoundment of ajurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Q Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Q Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
Q Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRASTATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):"'
? which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
from which fish or shellfish are or could he taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
Other factors. Explain:
"See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
? Tributary waters: linear feet width (It).
? Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
? Wetlands: acres.
NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
? If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
? Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce-
ED Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC;' the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule' (MBR).
? Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
? Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
? Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (II).
? Lakes/ponds: acres.
? Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
? Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required forjurisdiction (check all that apply):
? Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
? Lakes/ponds: acres.
? Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type: of aquatic resource:
? Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply -checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
? Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
? Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
? Office concurs with data sheets/delincation report.
? Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
? Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters' study:
? U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
? USGS NHD data.
? USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
? National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
? State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
? FEMA/FIRM maps:
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
? Photographs: ? Aerial (Name & Date):
or ? Other (Name & Date):
? Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
? Applicable/supporting case law:
? Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
? Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:
J-13
i(y °' S F t )l i 11 i 1 ` ?'?: ?. t .jam
?
s"S*v 1F?:?'!?`Mf 'buy g
,F ?l *4 / ( ? y ,P?r??y"Ajt?r f,
1 1 d, ? ? 4 yi LII lw ??t ? i ?.i•+?e
.f ?P- ? > Xi r
LLam?. ,s.- I -NU t
?^ y
?y
i
f4
'V
i°
'
' R
4
'
6 `
t
/
?
`•
I
t k t z 1
_ !
ma
/
?
t

..
.
O
,r/
a
\
±'
3..
0 J
f?,
\ ?
l
5
a":?.
N
'Al
%+.
.
.r lt
4
? .5sp
J
?"
?'?
,
`
y'
r
;,t 1
7 liw?'n`,s?.
aft <^
t'?
?
u
,
,?
,
}
,.er.
Y
.n
(
(y
•-, £3 t?{l`'t t 3 >? }S Y4"'n? ,Y.? w ?` S? A T?y?y
x, F y+ „ I .? t iD `'3? 1.,.... •• F?v1?, lL1i F V J?
1 J ?ai
t 'Y-Y i
d F1^ !fy a+SS ...
?y •'
?t syl
'
? ,
t+
`? l,.
,:.P :? ?+.?/?
.
?, /r lti y
> 4 die
L y kt x
5
.
.
vr
y,
i
...w
5 ry'n `3''P
4 t
,, • ? +e ~?.?. ¢ _ ? a' i ,1.t / ?- 3}? L ? ,/.
??J`?" r
(} F `C"'j T?rv4 y Y?S'? d ,?}t, fl yL ,}?
5,ft F .r 5, y
}
R It
t • 4F k l 1}i
•? t tY ! X5'4 v
}y!{g #11+?\??,w.
f 4" q? yy^^e'.k 4
1 .
;
i
e1
/ Q
! y
P §N" .r' ?fYj 4Q ?r+G• ?"'`. t ?.,i. °F" f+.. `+ii- ??$*?'?{R ?l x,?? 4 ?a.N?
? ?+y v },1 t '? .i? '`Cp ? ??'"i Rid n t< 4 i?py. ..^''N?,f,X "`""'Y ??° ? •' "
yy ^Gf4d4 "?°- llr l- 1 y? "1 a +. ,? Y"il t .i.1'W?'? ^} eF
Nil
r r+?^e
?
?
x
y
!
r
x

>
rf
y .itj ? ? y
,d ?' ft .+??`? L? ti.Y'
?y y'°r". ..'ns v R q
?`
'
j}
?.. S °p ..M1J .TI
'5.5
?t
f/
Xt ? `V 6'
l
?
/
K` Y!
IN tR 4
1yi .-.F
f
t ? 't ? ?` *« / "SF
I
d
? tM1.
y. {
r l
?
'
'
.V
}}
Ti f
11 +!
1 ?xritiKi?`'b
r / 1? q ?y
. 1-16 J ?« ? f -'
T ?tk y+ ?

elr fV
'AN
S ?
°?t° ..
• .fit 1r^_.???-! A
?ix k,"-s--r"" 4?.",+".-. y.`;'?r l" ? I 't
sr ? 1?bv ?.
?
-•\?i` } •? ? ? ? .?..?.?" r'.'?+/e et : ^.F'`t ?i k?.. .Y"r 4 ? ?-`t ?
^
.. ? t? ¢?5 ??t x'"? ? it
,
.._...
a-M

"
1
3 AQ? }
'-'. t e
t Y'k
?
7](1) s
? ? r
?!
?
?
?
? / _111
t
J 3. `M Yi
? `
? ?y t
T
f3
f 1 ? ? ..?„?
- ` ?
? ? "?
{(
?? ?'' ? \
f
?
y
i
.
.`(
( , •

k?< ( 5 t o

VIA" 5 , ;! - (toy F _
f
_
f
0
c_
.
MIN
8`W
Name: WADESBORO Location: 034' 53' 12.51" N 080'01122.87"W
Date: 418/2009 Caption: B-3404
Scale: 1 inch equals 1000 feet Permit Drawing
j Sheet I of
Property Owners
Parcel Number Names Addresses
15 Piedmont Center, Suite 1250
1 Brunswick Timber LLC Atlanta, GA 30305
Billy Lynn Wall &
2 Myrtle Eddins Wall P.O. Box 419 Lilesville, NC 28091
3 Willis C. Suddreth, II 191 Butternut Road Troutman, NC 28166
Permit Drawing
Sheet a of
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ANSON COUNTY
WBS - 33035.1.1 (B-3404)

Z
O 0
<
N
a
ty N
0 n
Z
R'
E S O
w k U
0
0
Fzz
M 0
o
m m

D m
3

x
CL 2

m

m
a

c E
m m
E?
N
N L
80
n c
m V
t m
O N
C
y
O

?
U m
H
2
T C m
? <Q 'c
m m a
m ? `m
c
E E
E E m
m E
m E m
J ?
c
m L
a ? o
c
c Ti ?
_
y v
_
3 E ?
cc m
c
c m
J
y m c
J E„ N
m N
Z am
`
m
x m
EE
E m
_
m m m
z

Sheet 3 cl

E m H
C
Z

y
o.
c c Fi
N
6 m?
f
U m
'Rr E? a ?
Q W U -
a

d' ? c
?
Q ? c m m
'm m n € ? °o
c
E
W W V
a
U
Q
LL
??m' v
o
0
7 E
m
N
0
rn E
H o
1
K
C _
= y
m
y

?
€
a
E
o
v
tll
F m
a
U
d y
? ?

c'?=mu o
o

F U

W
9
tl c =
m m
m
2 y u ?j 3 o
Q

W
d o

3
? ?
? m
°

o y
?
?
m m o

O
Z
g
W 3

W y
? a ? c
E
-
m o

LL 3
F
O
C y
m V
C C C

p
m - m mm
LL O
0
3
a

U
2 N
m
N N

p
o C N

3
Q m
y
LL
r'
H
J

J
g
o r
mz o
Permit Drawing
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Project: 33035.1.1
TIP #: B-3404
County: Anson
04/17/2009
Hydraulics Project Manager: Roger Weadon, P.E. (MA Engineering),
Marshal Clawson, P.E. (NCDOT Hydraulics Unit)
ROADWAY DESCRIPTION
The project B-3404 consists of constructing a new bridge 170 feet long to replace the
existing bridge #314 in Anson County on SR-1127 (Old US-52) over South Fork Jones
Creek. The total project length is 0.136 miles. The project creates impacts to South Fork
Jones Creek, which is located in the Yadkin River Basin. The project drainage systems
consist of grated inlets with associated pipe systems, and preformed scour holes at the
pipe outlets along with roadside ditches and bridge deck drainage.
Jurisdiction Stream: South Fork Jones Creek
ENVIRONMENTAL DESCRIPTION
The project is located within the Yadkin River Basin in Anson County Impacts have been
minimized by and using preformed scour holes at the pipe outlet and designing the deck
drainage so there is no discharge over the stream.
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND MAJOR STRUCTURES
The primary goal of Best Management Practices (BMPs) is to prevent degradation of the
states surface waters by the location, construction and operation of the highway system.
The BMPs are activities, practices and procedures taken to prevent or reduce stormwater
pollution. The BMP measures used on this project to reduce stormwater impacts are:
Rip rap preformed scour hole at pipe outlet.
Design of deck drainage so there is no discharge over the stream.

1\
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
TIP Project No. B-3404
W.B.S. No. 33035.1.1
Federal Project No. BR2r1127(6)
A. Project Description:
The purpose of this project is to replace Anson County Bridge No. 314 on
SR 1127 over South Fork Jones Creek. Bridge No. 314 is 162 feet long. The
replacement structure will be a bridge approximately 180 feet long providing a
minimum 26 feet clear deck width. The bridge will include two 11-foot lanes and
2-foot bridge rail offsets. The bridge length is based on preliminary design
information and is set by hydraulic requirements. The roadway grade of the new
structure will be approximately the same as the existing structure.
The approach roadway will extend approximately 300 feet from the west end of
the new bridge and 250 feet from the east end of the new bridge. The approaches
will be widened to include a 22-foot pavement width providing two 11-foot lanes.
Four-foot grass shoulders will be provided on each side (7-foot shoulders where
guardrail is included). The roadway will be designed as a Rural Local Route
using the Sub-Regional Tier guidelines with a 60 mile per hour design speed.
Traffic will be detoured off-site during construction (see Figure 1).
B. Purpose and Need:
NCDOT Bridge Management Unit records indicate Bridge No. 314 has a
sufficiency rating of 21.8 out of a possible 100 for a new structure.
The bridge is considered structurally deficient due to structural appraisal of 2 out
of 9 according to Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) standards and
therefore eligible for FHWA's Highway Bridge Program.
The superstructure and substructure of Bridge No. 314 have timber elements that
are eighty years old. Timber components have a typical life expectancy between
40 to 50 years due to the natural deterioration rate of wood. Rehabilitation of a
timber structure is generally practical only when a few elements are damaged or
prematurely deteriorated. However, past a certain degree of deterioration, most
timber elements become impractical to maintain and upon eligibility are
programmed for replacement. Timber components of Bridge No. 314 are
experiencing an increasing degree of deterioration that can no longer be addressed
by reasonable maintenance activities therefore the bridge is approaching the end
of its useful life.
As of 2006 Bridge No. 26 carries 220 vehicles per day with 500 vehicles per day
projected for the year 2025.
P
Components of both the superstructure and substructure have experienced an
increasing degree of deterioration that can no longer be addressed by maintenance
activities. The posted weight limit on the bridge is 22 tons for single vehicles
and 27 tons for truck-tractor semi-trailers. The bridge is approaching the end of
its useful life. Replacement of the bridge will result in safer traffic operations.
C. Proposed Improvements:
Circle one or more of the following Type II improvements which apply to the
project:
Modernization of a highway by resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation,
reconstruction, adding shoulders, or adding auxiliary lanes (e.g., parking,
weaving, turning, climbing).
a. Restoring, Resurfacing, Rehabilitating, and Reconstructing
pavement (3R and 4R improvements)
b. Widening roadway and shoulders without adding through lanes
c. Modernizing gore treatments
d. Constructing lane improvements (merge, auxiliary, and turn lanes)
e. Adding shoulder drains
f. Replacing and rehabilitating culverts, inlets, and drainage pipes,
including safety treatments
g. Providing driveway pipes
h. Performing minor bridge widening (less than one through lane)
L Slide Stabilization
j. Structural BMP's for water quality improvement
2. Highway safety or traffic operations improvement projects including the
installation of ramp metering control devices and lighting.
a. Installing ramp metering devices
b. Installing lights
c. Adding or upgrading guardrail
d. Installing safety barriers including Jersey type barriers and pier
protection
e. Installing or replacing impact attenuators
f. Upgrading medians including adding or upgrading median barriers
g. Improving intersections including relocation and/or realignment
h. Making minor roadway realignment
i. Channelizing traffic
j. Performing clear zone safety improvements including removing
hazards and flattening slopes
k. Implementing traffic aid systems, signals, and motorist aid
1. Installing bridge safety hardware including bridge rail retrofit
3. Bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement or the construction of
grade separation to replace existing at-grade railroad crossings.
a. Rehabilitating, reconstructing, or replacing bridge approach slabs
b. Rehabilitating or replacing bridge decks

C. Rehabilitating bridges including painting (no red lead paint), scour
repair, fender systems, and minor structural improvements
O Replacing a bridge (structure and/or fill)
4. Transportation corridor fringe parking facilities.
5. Construction of new truck weigh stations or rest areas.
6. Approvals for disposal of excess right-of-way or for joint or limited use of
right-of-way, where the proposed use does not have significant adverse
impacts.
7. Approvals for changes in access control.
8. Construction of new bus storage and maintenance facilities in areas used
predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such
construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and located on or near
a street with adequate capacity to handle anticipated bus and support
vehicle traffic.
9. Rehabilitation or reconstruction of existing rail and bus buildings and
ancillary facilities where only minor amounts of additional land are
required and there is not a substantial increase in the number of users.
10. Construction of bus transfer facilities (an open area consisting of
passenger shelters, boarding areas, kiosks and related street
improvements) when located in a commercial area or other high activity
center in which there is adequate street capacity for projected bus traffic.
11. Construction of rail storage and maintenance facilities in areas used
predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such
construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and where there is no
significant noise impact on the surrounding community.
12. Acquisition of land for hardship or protective purposes, advance land
acquisition loans under section 3(b) of the UMT Act. Hardship and
protective buying will be permitted only for a particular parcel or a limited
number of parcels. These types of land acquisition qualify for a CE only
where the acquisition will not limit the evaluation of alternatives,
including shifts in alignment for planned construction projects, which may
be required in the NEPA process. No project development on such land
may proceed until the NEPA process has been completed.
13. Acquisition and construction of wetland, stream and endangered species
mitigation sites.
14. Remedial activities involving the removal, treatment or monitoring of soil
or groundwater contamination pursuant to state or federal remediation
guidelines.

D. Special Project Information:
The estimated costs, based on 2008 prices, are as follows:
Structure $ 457,000
Roadway Approaches $ 168,000
Structure Removal $ 42,000
Misc. & Mob. $ 150,000
Eng. & Contingencies $ 133,000
Total Construction Cost $ 950,000
Right-of-way Costs $ 30,000
Right-of-way Utility Costs $ 10,100
Total Project Cost $ 990,100
Estimated Traffic:
Current - 220 vpd
Year 2025 - 500 vpd
TTST - 1%
Dual - 2%
Accidents: Traffic Engineering has evaluated a recent three year period and
found no accidents occurring in the vicinity of the project.
Design Exceptions: There are no anticipated design exceptions for this project.
Bicycle Designation: This portion of SR 1127 is not a part of a designated
bicycle route nor is it listed in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) as
a bicycle project.
Bridge Demolition: Bridge No. 314 is constructed entirely of timber and concrete
and should be possible to remove with no resulting debris in the water based on
standard demolition practices.
Alternatives Discussion:
No Build - The no build alternative was studied but eliminated because of
Division 10 coordination with the Town of Morven and local officials
agreeing that there was a need for Bridge No. 314 to be replaced due its
condition.
Rehabilitation - The bridge was constructed in 1928 and the timber
materials within the bridge are reaching the end of their useful life.
Rehabilitation would require replacing the timber components which
would constitute effectively replacing the bridge.
Offsite Detour - Bridge No. 314 will be replaced on the existing
alignment. Traffic will be detoured offsite (see Figure 1) during the
construction period. NCDOT Guidelines for Evaluation of Offsite Detours
r
for Bridge Replacement Projects considers multiple project variables
beginning with the additional time traveled by the average road user
resulting from the offsite detour. The offsite detour for this project would
include SR 1121 to US 52, and then back to SR 1127. The majority of
traffic on the road is through traffic. The detour for the average road user
would result in 4 minutes additional travel time (2.1 miles additional
travel). Up to 12-month duration of construction is expected on this
project.
Based on the Guidelines, the criteria above indicate that on the basis of
delay alone the detour is acceptable. Anson County Emergency Services
along with Anson County Schools Transportation have also indicated that
the detour is acceptable. NCDOT Division 10 has indicated the condition
of all roads, bridges and intersections on the offsite detour are acceptable
without improvement and concurs with the use of the detour.
Onsite Detour - An onsite detour was not evaluated due to the presence
of an acceptable offsite detour.
Staged Construction - Staged construction was not considered because
of the availability of an acceptable offsite detour.
New Alignment - Given that the alignment for SR 1127 is acceptable, a
new alignment was not considered as an alternative.
Other Agency Comments:
The N.C. Wildlife Resource Commission and U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service in
standardized letters provided a request that they prefer any replacement structure
to be a spanning structure.
Response: Hydraulic unit recommends a bridge.
The N.C. Division of Water Quality states that South Fork Jones Creek is Class
C Waters of the state and is not currently included on the State 303d List.
Response: This is noted in the document and acceptable.
Public Involvement:
A newsletter has been sent to all those living along SR 1127, between SR 1121
(Gatewood Station Rd) and US 52. No comments have been received to date.
Based on the lack of responses to the newsletter, a Citizen's Informational
Workshop was determined unnecessary.
f?

E. Threshold Criteria
The following evaluation of threshold criteria must be completed for Type II
actions
ECOLOGICAL YES
(1) Will the project have a substantial impact on any

unique or important natural resource? ?
(2) Does the project involve habitat where federally
listed endangered or threatened species.may occur? F
(3) Will the project affect anadromous fish? ?
(4) If the project involves wetlands, is the amount of
permanent and/or temporary wetland taking less than
one-tenth (1/10) of an acre and have all practicable measures
to avoid and minimize wetland takings been evaluated? X
(5) Will the project require the use of U. S. Forest Service lands? ?
(6) Will the quality of adjacent water resources be adversely

impacted by proposed construction activities? ?
(7) Does the project involve waters classified as Outstanding Water ?
Resources (OWR) and/or High Quality Waters (HQW)?
(8) Will the project require fill in waters of the United States

in any of the designated mountain trout counties? ?
(9) Does the project involve any known underground storage ?
tanks (UST's) or hazardous materials sites?
PERMITS AND COORDINATION YES
(10) If the project is located within a CAMA county, will the
project significantly affect the coastal zone and/or any ?
"Area of Environmental Concern" (AEC)?
(11) Does the project involve Coastal Barrier Resources Act ?
resources?
(12) Will a U. S. Coast Guard permit be required? ?
(13) Could the project result in the modification of any existing
regulatory floodway? x
NO
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
NO
X
X
X
6
n
(14) Will the project require any stream relocations or channel
changes? x
SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND CULTURAL RESOURCES YES NO
(15) Will the project induce substantial impacts to planned ?
growth or land use for the area? x
(16) Will the project require the relocation of any family or
business? ? x
(17) Will the project have a disproportionately high and adverse
human health and environmental effect on any minority or
low-income population? X
(18) If the project involves the acquisition of right of way, is the
amount of right of way acquisition considered minor? X
(19) Will the project involve any changes in access control? ?
x
(20) Will the project substantially alter the usefulness

and/or land use of adjacent property? ?
x
(21) Will the project have an adverse effect on permanent
local traffic patterns or community cohesiveness? ? x
(22) Is the project included in an approved thoroughfare plan
and/or Transportation Improvement Program (and is,

therefore, in conformance with the Clean Air Act of 1990)? ?
X
(23) Is the project anticipated to cause an increase in traffic
volumes? ? x
(24) Will traffic be maintained during construction using existing
roads, staged construction, or on-site detours? X
(25) If the project is a bridge replacement project, will the bridge
be replaced at its existing location (along the existing facility)
and will all construction proposed in association with the
bridge replacement project be contained on the existing facility? x
(26) Is there substantial controversy on social, economic, or
F
environmental grounds concerning the project? x
(27) Is the project consistent with all Federal, State, and local laws

relating to the environmental aspects of the project? ?
X.
(28) Will the project have an "effect" on structures/properties
eligible for or listed on the National Register of Historic Places? x
(29) Will the project affect any archaeological remains which are ?
important to history or pre-history? x
(30) Will the project require the use of Section 4(f) resources
(public parks, recreation lands, wildlife and waterfowl refuges,
historic sites, or historic bridges, as defined in Section 4(f)
of the U. S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966)? x
(31) Will the project result in any conversion of assisted public
recreation sites or facilities to non-recreation uses, as defined
by Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Act
of 1965, as amended? x
(32) Will the project involve construction in, across, or adjacent
to a river designated as a component of or proposed for
inclusion in the National System of Wild and Scenic Rivers? x
F. Additional Documentation Required for Unfavorable Responses in Part E
Response to Question 2: Habitat for the Red-Cockaded Woodpecker, Shortnose
Sturgeon, Carolina Heelsplitter, Bald Eagle, and Schweinitz's
Sunflower are present in Anson County. No species were found
during recent survey's therefore, a biological conclusion of
"No Effect" was determined for the listed species. In the July
9, 2007 Federal Register ( 72:37346-37372), the bald eagle was
declared recovered, and removed (de-listed) from the Federal
List of Threatened and Endangered wildlife. This delisting took
effect August 8, 2007. After delisting, the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act) (16 U.S.C. 668-668d)
becomes the primary law protecting bald eagles. The Eagle Act
prohibits take of bald and golden eagles and provides a
statutory definition of "take" that includes "disturb". The
USFWS has developed National Bald Eagle Management
Guidelines to provide guidance to land managers, landowners,
and others as.to how to avoid disturbing bald eagles.
Response to Question 13: Anson County is a participant in the National Flood Insurance
Regular Program. South Fork Jones Creek is included in a
detailed flood study, having a regulated 100-year floodway.
The Hydraulic Unit will coordinate with the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to determine if a
Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) and a
subsequent final Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) are required
for the project. If required, the Division will submit sealed as-
built construction plans to the Hydraulics Unit upon project
completion certifying the project was built as shown on
construction plans.
G. CE Approval
TIP Project No. B-3404
W.B.S. No. 33035.1.1
Federal Project No. BRZ-1127(6)
Project Description:
The purpose of this project is to replace Anson County Bridge No. 314 on
SR 1127 over South Fork Jones Creek. Bridge No. 314 is 162 feet long. The
replacement structure will be a bridge approximately 180 feet long providing a
minimum 26 feet clear deck width. The bridge will include two 11-foot lanes
and 2-foot bridge rail offsets. The bridge length is based on preliminary design
information and is set by hydraulic requirements. The roadway grade of the new
structure will be approximately the same as the existing structure.
The approach roadway will extend approximately 300 feet from the west end of
the new bridge and 250 feet from the east end of the new bridge. The
approaches will be widened to include a 22-foot pavement width providing two
11-foot lanes. Four-foot grass shoulders will be provided on each side (7-foot
shoulders where guardrail is included). The roadway will be designed as a
Rural Local Route using the Sub-Regional Tier guidelines with a 60 mule per
hour design speed.
Traffic will be detoured off-site during construction (see Figure 1).
Cateizorical Exclusion Action Classification:
TYPE II(A)
x TYPE II(B)
Approved:
Q
Date

/ P 'ect De elop ent & Environmental Analysis Branch
Date sect gineer
c/ P 'ect Developmen & Environmental Analysis Branch
Date O8 Proie Plannine Eneineer '
ect Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
For Type II(B) projects o
Date John F. Sullivan,
Federal Highway

PROJECT COMMITMENTS:
Anson County
Bridge No. 314 on Old US 52
Over South Fork Jones Creek
Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1127(6)
W.B.S. No. 33035.1.1
T.I.P. No. B-3404
Division Ten Construction, Resident Engineer's Office - Offsite Detour
In order to have time to adequately reroute school busses, Anson County Schools should
be contacted at [phone] at least one month prior to road closure.
Anson County Emergency Services needs to be contacted at [phone] at least one
month prior to road closure to make the necessary temporary reassignments to primary
response units.
Hydraulic Unit / Resident Engineer's Office
The Hydraulics Unit will coordinate with the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) to determine if a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) and a
subsequent final Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) are required for the. project. If
required, the Division will submit sealed as-built construction plans to the Hydraulics
Unit upon project completion certifying the project was built as shown on construction
plans.
Programmatic Categorical Exclusion
Green Sheet
>.uaust 2008
Page 1 of 1

' 1811 4
I-5 1813
18x2
112
--Eotewood 2.3 1121 0-
Ch. 1121 7
.4 1-4 1812 ?
rl?
g X1129 \ 112
\ \ 8211
m I
\ 19 1126 B-3404
1 \
MORVEN
1 1128 - ue 1 POP. 573
1824 82
1124 5 ? 9
I --- -- - s 1812
\ 1-5 1124 1- 1 W 1 .?
V 1 ,
` 1125 5 s 1 ?'
1103 m 1- - '- - -'
s" b 1$29
1
Studied Detour Alk
mob ?OP111?\ NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
. TRANSPORTATION
`
•? DIVI$IONOF HIGHWAYS
;ga
! PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
y ENVQtONMENTALANALYSIs BRANCH
ANSON COUNTY
REPLACE BRIDGE No. 314 ON SR 1127
OVER SOUTH FORK JONES CREEK
B-3404
Figure I
,' ya STATro?
y?° r s•
P y
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Pets B. Sandbel. Adm ru ttz=
Michael F. Easley, Governor Office of Archives and Hisro
Iisbrrh C. Evans, Scu
erary Division of Histotiral Resources
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy S-tLry David Smolt. Ditector
June 6, 2007
MEMORANDUM
TO: Natalie Lockhart
NCDOT - Bridge Project Development Unit
FROM: Peter Sandbec*a- 1?
??MM dd
SUBJECT: Replacement of Bridge 314 on SR 1127 over South Fork Jones Creek, B-3404, Anson County,
ER 01-8178
Thank you for your letter of May 17, 2007, concerning the above project
We have conducted a review of the proposed undertaking and are aware of no historic resources that would be
affected by the project Therefore, we have no comment on the undertaking as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763, ext. 246. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced tracking number.
ADMINISTRATION 507 N. Blount Suer Raleigh NC 4617 Mail S. (-.atvr. Rilrig,h NC 176994617
RESTORATION 515 M Blount.S.m Raleigh NC 4617 btil Swig C.=. Raluglk NC 176994617
°URVEY & PLANNING F15 N. Iiluun1 S11.11. [Ulknh. NC 1617 \lad Service fin.er. IFalcieh NC 276994617

I
14-APR-200y9 1p0:42 1
$$$USERNAMtES gb3904_rdy_tsh.dgn
CONTRACT:
O O O z R
O a w H O C

6i M -1

r
OOn
z o € n m
1 8 w H Q X Z O

i _
O
O Z
rji

fib Z O
O z m

O I pa

•

gb yy
2 ~~o N
b CA0z
o paC
n n o n n n 0°wm
O

y2 o°?

oa

O?p?.
A 3: 0
? Z
F
aR
s
ag o
bR
a A^JSN
i
o ,D p
_
N ? •

i I O

?pm

O
'
z O=m
z 2u
Z ' z
Z
v O
r m
z
O m
p
g
O c D
m

m
i
m ?O
A
O m
O
' m
O A
H
[mi m m

P A A

n n n
0 o O
a N Ig

r
? r
H y
I ?

N ?
0 K b
?y
b ? 4

4y?

m e
Gx Q
.

g I 1

?
n

? 4F
gR

TIP PROJECT.- B-3404

O

M
O c ?=

r m
1
D ?
z

V
+
A p r
N m NO
} N
CA 0
Zm
y

A
O N N O
O ;a

i 0m
m
South /Cl
?On°s
Creek
m
Z (A
PO
v

?
- r

I J

4 N
14

1
?z
zu
v
D 4 p
Dm
0 A m 8

-1 0.
V m
O
N Z

A N -
1; .
W
M
x
? o
b ?O
V
O
W
O
0x
? y
a
z
n
0
z
o'
i
J
f
O
1d
i t
f Ie?l
0 ?] M
pn '
F
D
i
4
??o 8 S?aa31$?o a ?tb TT3297788'8 o
S. 8 .O 3 'b m 3 O s 3 0 0 m l l m Ey\yy?++ m 4 o v C
i Q o 'e o g m (? o 3 ?` c e f 3$ f a c o C. ? e•
N f rn 4 ,, 4? o s? c p v, ? s
a ? ?] 3 ?j m m n a??? C s?? 3 0
c i e? ?. o, o S' 'o Z 3
_ n 3 3 n Z" a a ?
I ? R R I? .o .? ? I I x
oo s ¢ e e I (l) Go o
III ? II
J I I U I
I Li ! I l i
5 O?= f/1 S 99 a 9 T T 9 9 Q@• ? ? 9 9?? T 9 'e T 9 ? 1Y N A
? ?. m O m W C a ? a ? a a } ? a a ? a ? a a ? ? ? ? 7Y Yi5 iN° ?
s °
o e oo? 3 0 0 o e 3 ? o >> o $ m o
a a. s y 3 N n'° a s n m e_ ?. G em n q •° Z° ° ° n
0 2 ? ?1yy? ??°° '? f1 °P O ? S m N c o_ ?l ' o' o o' e° e e g o ° °30 ? c c 3 3 ? ? ? ° ? d?
P' y 3 g c o o °- S a o a• g an 3 3 3 3° 3° 3 3 ?l ° c
x m c? a 8 8 8 s ae 8 8 8 cis ?? s s s a e S v,
a__ as a°se3 3@ .?
a a =1 3• yyZ ? o ?}oe o o
_ V o f1
3 '
'» 3 3
•
o o p ® iT i I l a i? I I D s? ?o
o i. Ilii I I I li ??
s s o e ?r
?$???$y O O O O °O~ m
S ~
g? ° 9 ? 9 Q O ° ° v
'{ O 9 O Q O °
O o v o v o°
Q O n 0 r 6
sLr *3 Cwao
P° C S O O
H N C
C C A
-F •-P I
I I I
I I I
I
oo of a S j jj [q 1- 3
v ? ° ? ? S S o'e
O G y 0 O
?_ C O O
? d O
C O
O O
°
I
I
I
i
I
I
i
6 ,
fy/1 N v T y = 1 1 1 1
O a O O O
o ° Fo • . 2CO
r.
C O m = 6 ? C
n d m
C
J
C O ?
°
O1 6 ('
v
i
v
I
> > g3 g g
aSp=g gT E
3 R° i 3 m c n r 6 Z n t1 o d 3 e
O m `G P d g a e O
?' S C o' o c O n w C
c S q ? o
7 ? C£ N ^ G N _
C a ? C L- P C H
'? Y m P O m C
EP •. m y !?
•.mS m
I ? T
I I I ' I I
I I I I I
I I a I
9® O O• d d a n 0® 6 ®O a j®®© R S 0® 0
_? i r I I I I
I
n
0
Z
rn
0
Z
D
r
Z
m
N
0
r
N

r
II
h
s
a 0
f
T?
l °
?v
zz
E?
A
`J3 R
?v
I
i
i
I
omr ooh
a
J m
a> O
r+ N
~ O
• O
00
?I
4
} - Q
' L'
f
a I
III

9
\ ?\a

I
1
o o

lN-
°°
OT

O m

moo

.
l
Om m r
c") OC1 I
? Z ?
m
rZO
:D Cl
MO
ZTl .
D?
xmD -D
MZ
N mZ
?ON
or
M7 co
r-w
m m -+m
amn 0
OZOZ ZZ
W m Om
O O
m
4K /rr
DN DN

ND ND
N N
O N
o
O+ cn
co
O 0
UI
mm
00
70 ?u
0 -0
--I ZQ
m0
C m
nF
-Im
C
mr
m
-o N
D M
Zm
0?
0=
mm
mm
V)m
x
m
m
0
0
41
A
+11
0 ?? Z u
N I {,J v
S? S
a
L-a`i

?I
BRU ~

?? p a
N
§ o ^';4
yr
? 8
A 2

., I 00 02
Il
C
01 02
g 6 10,
n 1I
II
II
I al I I H
/5400 } T
_ R 40
; a
: a I/ = r? g r
u
e
O + . bb
a u ? 11 ? g
V II
a W j1 ?
I1 v
pp S 11
M I l m
o ?
II
I I II o ? I „_ m o
I I g +? ? ?
I I ?? ? ? s wIE
T T II ? ? si
II
I I ?. ? 11
I { $ ? 11 z
3 ? II
So
}Ii = 1 1 m ^tC
II
/ ?p II O9c S g
I? BB i; }
?? I It ,, ,; i 8s
I I e
9
T LV•W
$88
a
N ? ???tirOD?
OYM • ! y-?1 ?M I
j1 V 11 !8ro
N ?. e
ry ??
JSj 3
v ss•.. a?e sas? __ ?
I T ??
I }o ?yb? ?.
S2
tl o-
NNf?
25?j

+
O Q IQ V

+
O
10
0
I N
0
S
N
O
I N
N
+
O
I N
t
O
IN
A
O
O
I N
P
O
O
I N
P
+
O
N
V
+
O
O
w
m
m
w
S
N
O
+ A
0
a
N
O
+
O
_
0
I
I
-di
I
I

i
rz?
a

a""^ ti??mmmcZ 2i cZ
T? ° $$$ ,?Qzxx ?
?2Rim 2 y
---
ro S ro ?' a a ro }a?i O -

,# -{.:.}. :1.}tk. l}1 }'J:k- i I 1. j.+!++: f,.l-f +t.A -.1 4-,{ 1+-k- + +. L}k `+•+f fl+!i-k• F}-r` :+I_ jt to {-.1 ..}{:{. { .{ i- . 4 T r t I.'
t!a k!: k l
+
+
+
+r
a
+
i
{
k#
i ?1. # tT,(?; t aid+} {F,
F, t!E f+
+
r
'
.

-
:
.

'
i + .
+
-
4.
.
,._>_. +
:+ ,t•,l-r-+ _..,•r?
: +.+, +,..+{.. , ._
.
_ .
_
_..
,.....:..
_
.._
.
..__
.
:-
. ...
4
; 7
t
}{
i
:
. T.F.
..., II..
q.
4
y ,+F!
.„
i...;-
l,fl•F.,-.Ir+.FU'
.:-..
-.
I.
fHI fi it{ L j-?L ,j.}7' + ?{? ?"?Er f } +F? 4?? r+,..,+ +f. # ; L-"a rl } I I' I 11 -? $ + {+.--?' 'f -

+ r++ i r.:: ++
kr { TI,TS t!Y}[, }T,
11;
•
"
am
{

+k ?f +

- +

!_ r + w r - + + i-

t r .t .13 }j t ?- + +, +-.
+
tf'Atl +i

+

+
_ }
HT +:
{ 17[=i
FI. "k
,{l
, !r
.f...
...":T, f }
i•?a-.
T
t
+ +
*+
'?' +; r-
+
i• +
+
•
t Rfil 1.1-.,r il1-? (rr -1- 11
: t i!
k {-1 1!
.
-
* +t S ?-ii: {I-++'1+ 1-+,.r 1++T
l
;t
E
fif
$*
T }j? ++-- +?+;-++
:} +++l-•+ ++++++ +t
$ R
i-
r+ } +li i'. ,+ + Y + _

'!- R
• }
I +I
F
+
!-
+ +.
} Tit+}tJ.:
I + r•r
4.
t+.r+l
4
:{r+ll +i=?1}Ir
!Erz I+
3
1 } +:i( r,!( I, i,F
1``Illtr Ilf{r,f=F, ,! ,!a !
..
+
-4
t r7 I
?t+ tf+: Y++ I,i'-G +1}i -+hi aT+k
?
? 1±I F$i tf++•- +{? + i-?? +++k• f'
+?'+ ' *+
:
:
'1'
':
- - -
• r, ?,-, r. .I.I .. . .• AI
. -+.- F -+, 4.y H. ,1+. .1i. . ,.. H y.. ....y .
r. .... :..
I.

f + I :t i + -f?h # ?i I '1+': ? I * F} - +'. { i r+ } ? S 11, ':'I

i.;E 14 11

T
T 414 +
I II { F+lA! 1 {I ..t f ti4
1, t
fl
t
i !k "__ {k ! L
I { { ! II:I II I
E . :
{.
.
y
el
, { .{ I•-1.. ...1 • ::.
t
1++{'4 Y 1 ?-r;i++ -
r + I*? f;ti .. C{'+ + ; r I+ +
f +I+} + ri i--Y
+Ti
+
:i { ++} ++f
+ ± ,+
:
+
+ +
+
C
!
_
:
.
71 .:-
+ .?
+.r _
r + r _!i
T
+ . { +
di i
h
I1 ., :f f' ,-F} +t!- +1Y i +
+Y1 t F +
I-

j
,{ r+4 $'' 411
?? ,..1+.+ a { . I +
+r +

14
{h r-t, 4 t
z
t

1'
1 + i -4r tt. - 4 ---I { { yy-

+
r
r =14

ii. F +i
4? ?f{I i4„ $ h
l ,
+f
', t,
? t 1#
+t ,+- f ,t'? ?-
?
!'? ,'+ ?}+.
T
f! !
?
4
-
+
: ?; ----- - ---- --
,
,
,l
`
•
r , . . •.,
.
.
I I J { I I
.
. . - - - -

- + +

.. .. . .
....
.... , ... I.. _ _._.. ..-

,.
a A:9
I
is

:.' _77 7,

j :j

7 -

::-. .I r.l.. I. ._. j 4 .. r . ,. ... ...+. .. !. . ...n t. ... I _. .:., ?:. .III .r. :1. ': . I I• I, 1. I
. I

+ + I.. . 4 , + +, r + p?+ + -

I I
TH
,

RE
.4.
4. y
f {t 1111 1111 il' 'j; (f i t.t . ! !i'i iFl '. 1 ? 'i {: ?

i It
{?1
+1 1. 1:'11
(T a t_
}}+ +?+1
(
+
' ; yfy:T
+ I+ +1 F.

,.-
-
;,
..
it -: 1
+
'
'f

ttl

Wt t44
, :lid afl ? I
i-1.1 Ij' V 11

:t 7

4 4

_ L: L

` 1

,tea- 1111-.:, ,4
T 4,-:. ,' tt?}._4-. i,! ,I-.I
i:. +
J., f. V,. ..1 l..r
+•+l. =1.
1
?t??

N
FU
m
0
V_
00
N
O
O
W
O
O
A
w
V
T
C
X
N
M \
O m 6
An
VI ZM3OOO
C v Z A??1A
= m O Z-Z?
la Q Z Z O
?T T1O0o
CA;
A O
oO A ZZG
D ?
Z O H N
EA Z H
mo
M 70 ?
M J x
J
N
V
'I I
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
CONTRACT.
Z
O C
T LA!
p O O 0 1 A;
n v ? 0 0 ? m
O n m1b_o
y ?4 0
j o 0 o N o H r Gl
>?> Zoo
C y ONZm
N 70
O
8 ?Miv
m CA
>g
b ZCA Z
< -L O S W° C03 mm m 0
< o o { C
II II II II II II m y m
O ho b C'<= P
D 2 0" o o u a a z m;m O Z
r o I ,O y nyr N
n ? ae ae ae a ?xv
N S • > G
^
co
O m m z T
y z Z v O
m m
m 2 S
m m m
Z rn
O a
C D
O c D
b
v 1 ? b
0
m O m ?O]
A A A
if if If
o to
3 X13
m m r
N N N
1b
G1 N,? at"1
P O a °0 1?,
N ? N ? 9 m `oJ
o fl
g N?a
n
m m a y
Q ?
6 e
N 0
?
?i y

IS ?
Cf
z 01
f

?4?
H
ao
as
$x
yy
y i

zb a? :m
K
e .
2
y
H y

TIP PROJECT: B-3404

Z =

?
I
O
C F? ?

r m
N
D 0
Z
O

J
+ J
l
A ?
O
Ln ` r co
1 yz
aZ
A

A
CD
N
O 70
+v
a m

South Ford
/o12os
Creek

z A
v l
r ?_
N
r m
D IV ?v
D
p
O
A iI L77
O
m + -1 N
+
tr
V 0 ? m
O.

A V Z
A ?
N
b
y
s.
P
b
h
O
xo
ii
ti 0
N
V
ti
0
0
0
pn
l
8
m
® ,%PSy M
O s? ^
C` A
a

? a
a
; A
N
P ?
a O
Y
pp
a

? r _ a!

tl
?
ff
4 ?

\ I
f O
G I
?p vµy
AAA
M1

? ^
g

n
O
m
7m
0 0

N-0
> ?? 6a
170
C m .R a
O r ?

m
? fC
yg
a
C ? q
°o
1
mr
>
as
i
T
r
S
r m $
s
z m a
C/) N
in =
m m !1 v
mM rr
0Ln
3
m V
I
N

C, I I -0
N
F
I
I*
I
I
/
I ?
I
y I
1
I
11?
ii
3 O
/5#00
$

20+00
"S'$t

$?g
r
c?
`ate
F
Fr
O r
Ir
r1A
ax dm
k '-
N y

z
?i
ao
mA
s

,I

N
t
O
O
P
t
O
O
r
V
t
O
O
O
t
O
O
?O
t
O
O
N
O
t
O
O
N_
t
O
O
N
N
t
O
O
N
O
t
O
O
N
A
t
O
O
N
co
t 8
O