Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20130918 Ver 1_Culvert Construction_20180821Carpenter,Kristi From: Wilson, Travis W. Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2018 8:16 AM To: David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil; Gary Jordan (gary�jordan@fws.gov) Cc: Parker, Jerry A; Norton, Apri) R Subject: RE: [External] FW: Culvert Construction We have not gotten away from using sills at the inlet and outlet of culverts. If my memory is correct what you are seeing on this one are intermediate sills (or baffles) the engineer proposed in the 4b meeting to help retain bedload throughout to culvert due to it's length. It should not be shown to be backfilled unless in is a dry floodplain culvert and likewise if it was a dry floodplain culvert it should not have baffles just an inlet and outlet sill then backfilled. -----Original Message----- From: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2018 7:53 AM To: Wilson, Travis W. <travis.wilson@ncwildlife.org>; Gary Jordan (garyJordan@fws.gov) <garyJordan@fws.gov> Cc: Parker, Jerry A<jparker@ncdot.gov>; Norton, April R<april.norton@ncdenr.gov> Subject: [External] FW: Culvert Construction CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Report Spam.<mailto:report.spam@nc.gov> Good morning Travis and Gary. I hope you have both had a good weekend. A question came up from Div. 7 regarding a culvert about to be installed for U-2525C, part of the Greensboro Urban Loop project. The attached details show the culvert with baffles extending the full width of the culvert, and then backfilled in between with native material. Keep in mind that this project was permitted several years ago. In more recent years, our experience has been that baffles are more typically designed as alternating structures that extend �1/2 way across the width of the culvert, with no backfilling proposed. Before I respond with the Corps' opinion, I wanted to get your thoughts about the design attached, or if you would prefer/accept a design more like the paragraph above. Thanks! -Dave Bailey David E. Bailey, PWS Regulatory Project Manager US Army Corps of Engineers CE-SAW-RG-R 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 Phone: (919) 554-4884, Ext. 30. Fax: (919) 562-0421 Email: David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is located at: http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0 Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey. -----Original Message----- From: Parker, Jerry A [mailto:jparker@ncdot.gov] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2018 3:56 PM To: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil>; Norton, April R<april.norton@ncdenr.gov> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Culvert Construction Dave and April, I have attached a culvert construction detail that is being used for U-2525C. Is this how we want the culverts constructed? With baffles that extend the entire width of the culvert and then backfilled with native material? I thought we had gone away from this type construction? Jerry Parker Environmental Supervisor Division 7 North Carolina Department of Transportation 336 256 2063 office jparker@ncdot.gov <mailto:jparker@ncdot.gov> 1584 Yanceyville St. P.O. Box 14996 Greensboro, NC. 27415-4996 Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties