Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20080868 Ver 2_Corps gives PCS qualified permit victory_20090507Dorney, John From: Massengale, Susan [susan.massengale@ncdenr.gov] Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 9:52 AM To: denr.dwq.clips@lists.ncmail.net Subject: Corps gives PCS qualified permit victory Attachments: ATT00001.c From the Washington Daily News Corps gives PCS qualified permit victory Decision primarily backs local draft for mine growth By TED STRONG Staff Writer A Wednesday decision by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' was a victory for PCS Phosphate, but not absolute. A review by the Corps' Washington, D.C., office largely backed a decision by its Wilmington office to permit PCS Phosphate to expand its mine at Aurora by thousands of acres. "They gave us a few minor to-dos," said Tom Walker, chief of the Corps' Wilmington field office. He described the changes as "nothing that really changes the flavor but just some things that strengthen the decision." Corps officials must also hold a meeting with officials from the Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Marine Fisheries Service and PCS. Walker said that meeting could result in changes to the proposed outline of the expansion, but isn't likely to significantly alter it. The EPA had requested the review by the Corps of Engineers' Washington, D.C., office after deciding the Corps' Wilmington office hadn't paid enough attention to the EPA's concerns. The EPA has been relatively vocal about those concerns lately and took part in a meeting earlier this year with officials from the Corps, regulatory agencies and PCS in which it pitched a more limited expansion for the mine. The EPA raised similar issues when it asked for the extra review. PCS has criticized the EPA for raising the concerns so late in a process that has proceeded for more than eight years. The EPA's concerns echo worries from environmentalists. They argue that the mine was planning to dig up wetlands it could afford to avoid as it expanded. Those worries were among concerns environmentalists cited earlier this year when they appealed a key state certification PCS had received for the expansion. That appeal has yet to be decided, but is unlikely to delay mine expansion in the short-term. Company officials have maintained that existing assessments of the economics of mining or avoiding wetland areas are solid. The permitting delays worried county officials, who went to Washington, D.C. this week to lobby federal officials and spent $50,000 in county money to hire a lobbyist. The PCS mine-and-plant complex in Aurora employs more than 1,000 people, and the company is a major part of the county's tax base. County Manager Paul Spruill praised the Corps' move. "The county government is thankful that at least the Corps has met its obligation of issuing a permit at the end of this long, eight-year process," he said. "We continue to hope that the EPA will make the correct decision to allow the permit to move forward and act as a responsible regulator." A permit for the mine is expected within a couple of weeks. After that, the EPA will have 10 days to decide if it will veto the decision. Susan Massengale Public Information Officer DENR- Division of Water Quality 1617 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 (919) 807-6359; fax (919) 807-6492 Please note: my e-mail address has changed to susan.massengale(@ncdenr.gov E-iuail corresponclence to and ji-om this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Larv Ural into) be disclosed to third parties.