20181141 Ver 1_401 Application_20180818

Environmental Consultants,
8=412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
sandec.com
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Ross Sullivan
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
From: Kevin C. Martin
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Re: Woodland Park
Franklinton, Franklin County, NC
NOTE: A $240.00 DWR application fee is attached.
August 14th, 2018
S&EC Project # 13336
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Karen Higgins
Archdale Building — 91h Floor P�'�
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
20181141
On behalf of the applicant, R. Wayne Bailey, please find attached a complete application and
supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) that the
activities proposed below may proceed under Nationwide Permit 29, a courtesy 401 notification and
Buffer Authorization request to the N.C. Division of Water Resources (NCDWR . Note that replacement of
21' of existing pipe and the addition of 51' of pipe is proposed along with associated rip rap. Please
contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or require additional information.
PP0_1F(:T SI IMNAARY
Project Name
Woodland Park
Project Type
Residential Development
Owner / Applicant
R. Wayne Bailey
County
Franklin
Nearest Town
Franklinton
Waterbody Name
UT Middle Creek
Basin
Tar
Class
C ; NSW
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres):
0.013
Wetland Impact (acres):
0.0264
Open Water Impact (acres):
0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
0.0394
Total Stream Impact (linear feet):
114
AUG 1 4 201E

Attachments:
Pre -construction Notification (PCN) Application Form Corps Only: PJD Form
Agent Authorization Owner Certification Form
USGS Topographic Map & NRCS Soil Survey Map
Wetland Delineation Sketch Map
Franklin County GIS Owner Info
DWR Buffer Determination Letter
Stormwater Plan Approval Letter
Overall Development plan & Impact Exhibit (3 pages)

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑X Yes ❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
0 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑X Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Woodland Park
2b.
County:
Franklin
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Franklinton
2d.
Subdivision name:
Woodland Park
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
WRIGHT JULIANNA O., BAILEY R WAYNE
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
2083/272
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
10931 Strickland Rd.
3e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27615
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Kevin C. Martin
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
S&EC, PA
5c. Street address:
8412 Falls of Neuse Rd., Ste. 104
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27615
5e. Telephone no.:
919-270-7941
5f. Fax no.:
919-846-9467
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
PIN 1845-29-6497, PID 006925
1b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
I Latitude: 36.111216 Longitude: -78.517166
1c.
Property size:
84 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
UT of Middle Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; NSW
2c.
River basin:
TAR
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Existing site is mostly cutover timberland except mature hardwoods adjacent to streams, some young successional growth pine areas.
Adjacent land is either residential or forest land. Only 84 acres of the 116 acres is being developed. soils on the western side unsuitable for septic.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.422
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 5,231
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Allow development of a residential subdivision
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Equipment typical for the construction of roads will be used, lots will be served by on site septic systems.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: site meeting with And Williams, USACE:12/1/2017
g y
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Kevin C Martin
Agency/Consultant Company: S&EC, PA
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
PJD requested along with this application. DWR buffer determination NBRR0#17-277 dated 9-25-17 by Ray Milosh.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑X Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary
W1 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.0264
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.0264
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial (PER) or
Type of
Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)?
jurisdiction
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
UT Middle Creek
PER
Corps
5
53
S2 P
Stabilization
UT Middle Creek
PER
Corps
5
61
S3 -
Choose one
-
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
114
3i. Comments:
Note that a 21' long pipe exists at the proposed road location and that amount is not included in the new proposed impacts requested. The pipe will
be replaced with a new pipe. The existing pipe is installed such that there is no aquatic life passage because it is "perched". To avoid inadvertently
draining the wetland upstream of the crossing, the agencies have agreed that they prefer that the new pipe be installed in a fashion that will not allow
aquatic life passage rather than using the "normal" design criteria for culvert installations at a road crossing.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑X Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 P
Road Crossing
UT Middle Creek
No
7,041
4,204
B2
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
7,041
4,204
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The engineer has designed the road utilizing an existing crossing location. There is only one impact for a road crossing to access high ground on the
entire project. Because a second pipe has been utilized, the road can be installed at a lower elevation which allows for less fill for the road bed
and there fore less stream and wetland impact.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The engineer has designed the road so that the wetland upstream will not be drained and the channel downstream will not be destabilized.
The rip rap aprons are sized for the 25 -yr storm as opposed to the 10 -yr storm which is typically used. So, they're upsized somewhat based on the
increased flow. The sizing calculations provide assurance that the stones will not dislodged. The sizes shown on the plans include additional width so
that rip rap extends up the slopes. The calculated flow depths should be below this elevation.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) —required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes OX No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑X Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Franklin
county will review the stormwater plan
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
15%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
0 Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
see
attached approval letter from Appian Engineers on behalf of Franklin County.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Franklin county (Appian Engineers)
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Franklin County
❑ Phase II
0 NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
X❑Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑X Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
0 Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
0 Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
El Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
E] Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
❑Yes ❑X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
El Yes ❑x No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We have reviewed the "Draft Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and Isolated Wetlands Programs' document
prepared by the NC Division of Water Quality on April 10, 2004, version 2.1. The draft states that many private developments are unlikely to cause
cumulative impacts, including projects such as urban in-fill, most residential subdivisions and small commercial developments as well as agricultural
and silvicultural operations. Woodland Park is a residential subdivision.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
theproposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
be
Individual onsite septic systems will utilized
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑R No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
'Threatened/Endangered Species are present on Grissom topographic Quadrangle (i.e Dwarf Wedge mussel) but not in or near this project according
to NC -Natural Heritage Programs Data Search. Corps will consult USFWS re: longeared bat, most of site is clear cut.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The NOAA Habitat Conservation/Habitat Protection: National Marine Fish Service; Essential Fish Habitat Mapper website was referenced. No
Essential Fish Habitat was identified near the project.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Records checks at the State Historic Preservation Office or the Office of State Archeology were not performed. No structures were observed during
the wetland evaluation and no structures are identified on the NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service within 3/4 mile.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
County GIS database
Kevin C. Martin
-t�1
8/14/2018
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

Environmental Consultants,
$412 Fab of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Ralco, NC 27615 . Phone [phone] • Fax: [phone]
saadeccoaa
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION / AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Project Name/Description:
Date:
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attn: Andrew Williams Field Office; Raleigh
S&EC Project #
I, the undersigned, a duty authorized owner of record of the property/properties Identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps) and Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) staff, as my agent, to enter upon the
property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and issuing a
determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section
404 of the Clean Water- Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. This
document also authorizes S&EC, as my agent, to act on my behalf and take all actions
necessary for the processing, Issuance and acceptance of a permit or certification and any and
all associated standard and special conditions. This notification supersedes any previous
correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call
S&EC to arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the site.
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
Site Address:
City, County, State:
1845-29-7511
Tom Wright Road
Franklinton, NC 27525
$ Wow ne 60 e 103 /17Property Owner None (pleaA print) Date
Property Owner Signature
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.
S_

co GS -S
PARCEL ID: 006926 Tax Year: 2018
January 1 Owner(s): WRIGHT JULIANNA O
January 1 Owner(s): BAILEY R WAYNE
Parcel
PIN
1845-29-6497
Physical Address
TOM WRIGHT RD
Unit
Mailing Address
City
FRANKLINTON
Zip Code
27525 -
Neighborhood
B03
Class
Vacant
Land Use Code
00
Acres
116
Land Type
A
Frontage Width and Depth
- -
Zoning
A R
Street1 /Street2
Paved /
Topo1/Topo2/Topo3
Level / Rolling /
Util1/Util2/Util3
Electric//
Restrict1/Restrict2/Restrict3
Legal
Sub Name WATSON TR
Lot No. A
Township Franklinton
Tax Jurisdiction FRAF
Plat Book/Page PRF 3 / SL 168E
Deed Book/Page 2083/272
Current Owner Detalls
Owner 1
WRIGHT JULIANNA O
Owner 2
BAILEY R WAYNE
In Care Of
Mailing Address
10931 STRICKLAND RD STE 111
City/State/Zip
RALEIGH/NC/27615
Solid Waste Fee

Project Number: PJlap Title: N
13336.W1 0 1,000 2,000
Project Manager: Figure 1- USGS Map I I i I I i I I I
SB Tom Wright Subdivision Feet
Scale: Franklin County, NC
1" = 1000' ;
Source: NC USGS Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Date: xm fan/. of Teva. R-4 lett. IN. R-1,101 T.m
C"I-S• Cbr,9I9) R N V
BLII
10/06/2017 Grissom Quadrangle �� "m

1 _ f
F ilk'` ��'r ,i - '►l t i��i.�'�- j� d � --••� ` �i�! -•~
L „
C!.
At
�y
• YR -L f ' �I ' t..'k. 1 •
I
..moi'
fir L
y
•
P Jvfill
♦
p�l •,� ,J�;�•la.ir �ipr'l!�� .- +��Y��. ! is
-+ , • �, ,� } :fir. � T9y�`�+'y;; •�
� ' f�;l. � # .r �",,I'••iff. �+ '�+•' ' i � 1 �\ f �r ti� "r � j _ I�wyy
• '., � ., - '._. .rte ',�1 a �
�-f
..1+1.. ft..

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
September 25, 2017
Preston Royster c/o Coulter Jewell Thames, PA
I I I West Main Street
Durham, NC 27701
ROY COOPER
Governor
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
Subject: Buffer Determination Letter
NBRRO #17-277
Franklin County
Determination Type.,
Suffer
Intermittent/Perennial
� Neuse (15A NCAC 2S .0233)
A
RamQoo (ISA NCAC 2B ,0259)
Interrnittent/Perenniol Determination (where local buffer
ElTar
X X
ordinances apply)
Jordon (15A NCAC 2S .0267)
X thmu bout
(govemmental and/or intedurtsdictional
projects)
Project Name: Woodland Park
Address/Location: Tom Wright Road, Frankiinton
Stream(s), Middle Creek
Determination Date: September 21, 2017 Staff, Ray Milosh
Stream
E/l/P* Not Subject
Subject Start@
Stop@ Soil USGS
Survey To o
A
P
X throughout
X X
B
P
X thmu bout
X
"E/1/P = EphemeraillntermlttentIPerennia!
Explanation: The stream(s) listed above has been located on the most recent published NRCS Soil Survey and/or
the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale. Each stream that is checked "Not Subject"
has been determined to not be at least intermittent or is not present. Streams that are checked "Subject" have been
located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be at least an intermittent stream. There may be
other streams located on the property that do not show up on the maps referenced above but may be considered
jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers.
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by the Director. An
appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing. Ijsending via US Postal Service. c/o Karen Higgins,
Division of Water Resources, Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Operations Section http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/aps
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone: [phone]
Location: 3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax: [phone]

17-277: Woodland Park
CO
Stream
G/l/Px
Not Subject
Subject
Start@
Stop@
Soil
Survey
USGS
To o
A
P
X
throughout
X
X
B
P
X
throughout
X
X
Map provided by NCDEQ Division of Water Resources
:: Locations are approximate and are provided for reference only ::
ON

17-277: Woodland Park
�.,;,�-- Cllr, al�-:� i�•-'�y.��z `_ �t ,
L
ir
,a ..r
m
"9 r
Stream
E/UP*
Not Subject
Subject
Start@
Stop@
Soil
Survey
USGS
To o
A
P
X
throughout
X
X
B
P
X
throughout
X
Map provided by NCDEQ Division of Water Resources
:: Locations are approximate and are provided for reference only ::

'1nnr1r
AF o a o
El
/W*
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PA
CML, MUNICIPAL & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
May 7, 2018
Mr. Jason Rogers, Principal Planner
Franklin County Planning & Inspections
215 East Nash Street
Louisburg, NC 27549
Re: Woodland Park Subdivision
Preliminary Plat
Stormwater Management Review
PIN:
1845-29-6497
Site Area:
94.77 ac
Developer:
Wayne Bailey/ Julie Wright Land Company
Applicant
Coulter Jewell Thames, PA
BMPs/SCMs Proposed:
none
River Basin:
Tar -Pamlico
Dear Jason:
We have reviewed the revised preliminary plat package submitted for Woodland Park Subdivision in
accordance with the Franklin County Stormwater Ordinance and NCDEQ regulations for stormwater
development in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin, and offer the following comments.
1. Stormwater calculations submitted show that the overall impervious area is less than 15%, thus the
project is exempt from peak flow attenuation per Section 4.4.B of the Stormwater Ordinance.
2. Similarly, nutrient loading calculations show that the project does not exceed the allowable
thresholds for nutrient management. The project meets the requirements for nutrient loading per
Section 4.5 of the Stormwater Ordinance.
3. The Applicant is to note that the following items are required prior to Final Plat approval:
a. If the subdivision is to be constructed in phases, an overall phasing plan should be
provided with the Final Plat submittal. In addition, nutrient calculations will be required
to demonstrate how the site will remain in compliance at final build -out of the proposed
phase.
b. Provide drainage easements to convey stormwater from the proposed streets to the existing
stream and riparian buffers (ie, north end of Road C, etc).
c. NCDEQ Erosion and Sedimentation Control permit.
Post Office Box 7966 • Rocky Mount, NC 27804 • [phone] •[phone] (Fax)
www.appianengineers.com • [e-mail]

Franklin County Stormwater Page 2
d. COE wetland confirmation and authorization to disturb wetlands.
e. NCDEQ DWR confirmation and authorization to impact riparian buffers.
Based on the information presented, Appian recommends APPROVAL of the preliminary plat. Please let
us know if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Appian Consulting Engineers, P.A.
bj- C&4;(0
David C. Revoir, PE
cc: Preston Royster, PE

c')
IZ
00
N ~ L
Onyx
OovZF-
O
I,T a
a
ZS
Q)
o:
a �
O
2
1 1 I I m l \
MZ.
��J'�� R/W
DEDICATION
Ifi
S
�
ZONE: AR
ov \�\111
1�)>>11 v v
Efc( IMI
J I JULIA NA
J i111Jul 9 5 P/I
J
ZOHEWR-YRL.
I
L 1 PALE L EG UY
46-40-
L ZONE: AR
�� HENRY 0. DEGRUY
DED.ICATI DALE - DEGRUY
DS 819/878
MB 3/131
/ \ 1 I — \ J%-49-2336
/ T—
�\
\52/-769' I I _�.:: `.,'� \ n'I \ •� / // \- NANFER
\ \ M� 1999/-m5— �i� I� /Ih I \ D8 17.1
\� 8Yi5-D_ UA � II� / I I \ \\\\ \ �( � ,._..', is ` � / Mb 2
\Z 70;4E' NE
T M THY HENRY
N D 1881/61
1845-48-5
MOT
DB 188
\ \X- \ \\\ \ \ PRF
845
UWCAPRE WRE EE-
10 LAWRENCE \ 1
/� M 1997 7 _ �D 1084/808 1
/ I, I I $ / �/ '? •� \\\ 18 5-38- B�j �__-'�qP(!0 1997/7 /\ I / � 1
NE: 5-- -8672
✓ r
�Z-0/I
I/GUNNER M. STROUD
_ \ \ r// /
DONNSTROUD
A
1 / /I // PRF 2/SL 47
1845-48-3550
ZONE: AR
1 1 I ,-
ROB RPT��
Il
I I IDB T�l
PRF -3 SL �4
\ I 1 18 OI�1� R 3 11 �/ I i' r \ 8A
00
JOHN
845 37
1 -
1 E 0 D _ ZONE:
'SR-
K -
1272161
703 SBp
I � � \ I I �J l �I � ��\ •� 1 �� � \ �\ \ ��14
2b02 13
E.
FH. . WHITFIELD
((1 II _ `- — \ \ \F1B 0 8/32 3d 34
PHILI �T
SARAH BWH Tn� t7 D I�-7
-� `- � � � \ tZONE:S�4t32
MB 2011/3233.3 �\I \\
1845 5- 13 KOINNJEEE: I 1
_-

I I WETLAN I W W TOP OF BANK (TYP)
I W W I W W W S
/
20.0' ZONE2ITAR
STREAM B4_FER/l
/ / / / / / / JI W/
`/ l ,30.0' ZOIxE
EX1STlNG CONTOURS / Y l /\ l TAl?-FFPM
I (n'P) l I BTLIFFER
' \ I\/
I WETL� I D IMPACTS I
-_,� ZONE 1 �IMPA6TS1� �1 I
Y W W W W W� \ I I
/'"*r. / / ZONE 2 IMPACTS / / I i W W W W W �\ I I EIKISTI G �4" STORM P
/ D(�A IN PIPE TO BE PROPOSED RIP R4
x"""�/ :,�,�, / / / I i W W W W " W W W W W �� 17 AY EDI LINED DITCH I
— � / \ `_ �� '� /� / / / •/ � I I \�"^�� I.W W W W � `fie'^�/ \\ / /
WOO
PN
/ ZO E,2 MPAC
_ - -
���///
PROP OS'E / moi' �" �ji�-�-
RIX OF-W�4K(TYP.) / - �•.�)
ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACTS (TYP /N PI?Q ,£ EDGE OF
i
HATCHED AREA)., SEES / / / / // / // PAIiEMENT- - PROPOSED CON
TABLE.
/
1 (T,P ATEA. E�I�III 1�PROPOSED 367
ST?M �DRAW PIPES
y
L/M/TS OF -/A
DISTURBANCE (TYP.)
PROPOSED RIP RAP
APRON !
/ ® ftftft
*Aft* wftft
COULTER JEWELL THAMES, PA
111 WEST MAIN STREET
DURHAM, NC 27701
(919) 682-OJ68
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
WOODLAND PARK SUBDIVISION
JULY 30, 201
SCALE.• 1 "=3L
DRAWN BY P. ROYSTE

415
410
405
400
395
390
415
410
405
400
395
390
—0+50 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00
COULTER JEWELL THAMES, PA STREAM IMPACT PROFILE JULY 30, 2011
111 WEST MAIN STREET SCALE.- 1 "-40' (Horizonta)
DURHAM, NC 27701 WOODLAND PARK SUBDIVISION SCALE. 1"-4' (Vertica)
[phone] DRAWN BY. P. ROYSTEi
EX
GR, 4DE-
r �
I-ST
EA
CHkNN
L
CONC
RETHH
Of
DW
PI
L
)
I
R OVD
E INV DN
to1.
10
PRO POSi D 3
"
M DR,41A
INV UP 402.50
INV DN 398.00
PIPE
415
410
405
400
395
390
—0+50 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00
COULTER JEWELL THAMES, PA STREAM IMPACT PROFILE JULY 30, 2011
111 WEST MAIN STREET SCALE.- 1 "-40' (Horizonta)
DURHAM, NC 27701 WOODLAND PARK SUBDIVISION SCALE. 1"-4' (Vertica)
[phone] DRAWN BY. P. ROYSTEi