20090660 Ver 1_Application_20090529

O
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATION
BEvi'RI.Y EAVES PERDUE
GOVGRV'UR
4
19
EUGENE A. CON'] 1. JR.
SR R171'.%R1"
May 21, 2009
Mr. Steve Lund 090660
USACE, Asheville Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
SUBJECT: Pipe Replacement on SR-1307 (Leatherman Road), Lincoln Count
Dear Mr. Lund:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation requests authorization to replace an existing pipe on
SR-1207 (Leatherman Road) in Lincoln County. NCDOT proposes to replace a deteriorating 80-foot
long, 30" CMP kith an 88-foot long, 36" RCP. The new pipe will be a longer pipe and will be placed
on a skew to better align with the downstream channel and move the outlet away from the existing high
eroded bank. Approximateh 30 feet of channel will be filled and the eroding bank sloped to the existing
contours. Twentv feet of stream channel will be reconstructed based upon upstream and downstream
channel dimensions. The streambanks of the reconstructed section will be stabilized using coir fiber
mattim_. The existing pipe and new, pipe is oil -3.5% slope: therefore. the pipe will be placed on grade to
prevent stream destabilization. Five feet of Class B riprap gill be used at the pipe inlet and outlet for
structure stabilization. A temporary cofferdam pumping system will be used to divert the stream around
the construction site as needed. Areas affected by temporary cofferdam system will be restored back to
pre-project conditions. Due to the existing site conditions, NCDOT requests a waiver from the
Regional Conditions 2(b) (e) permit depth specification for the construction of this project.
The total scope of the work will result in 20 feet of permanent impacts to an unnamed tributary to
Ho"ard's Creek, which is classified as Class C Waters by the Division of Water Qualitv.
This office has conducted a GIS and field survey for threatened and endangered species in the vicinity of
the project. Natural Heritage Program records document the nearest Michaux's sumac location
approximately 28 miles southeast (in Mecklenburg County) of the proposed project area. "['here are no
known sites of Michanx'S sumac in Lincoln Count),. The sumac is typically found in sand}' or rocky,
open woods and appears to survive best in areas with some disturbance, such as artificially or naturally
maintained clearings. There is little potential habitat within the proposed project area, and no species
were observed during the site visit. No impact on the species is anticipated. National Heritage Program
records document the nearest Dwarf [lowered heartleaf location approximately 2.4 miles northwest of the
proposed project area. "File heartleaf is usually found on dry to moist ravine slopes (usually north facing
and of the oak-hickory-pine forest type) and in boggy areas near springheads. There is no suitable habitat
within the proposed project area and no species were observed. NCDOT is recommending a finding of
..no effect" for T&E species.
i
Post Officc Box 47 Shelby. North Carolina 28151-0047
SR 1307. Leatherman Road
Page 2
Mav 21, 3009
The project area is not located within ''/- mile of any critical watershed area nor is SR-1207 a rural or
urban arterial; therefore, hazardous spill basins are not required. Enclosed is the hazardous spill basin
checklist. No sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places arc located in the vicinity of the
project nor did there appear to be any eligible structures. NCDOT is recommending a finding of "110
effect" for historic sites. There will be no effect on any historical structures.
I have enclosed a pre-construction notification for a NW#14. sketches of planned activities and location
maps relative to the project.
Project information for the 401 Automated Payment Procedure is as follows:
• Work order number: 150457-55 120005-12.2055 1 1-3126
• TIP#: NA
• Project Category: $340.00 Fee
If yon have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact me at [phone]. Thank you for
your time and consideration on this matter.
Respectfully yours.
M.L. Holder. P.E.
Division Engineer
Twelfth Division
B Y:
Trish Simon
Division 12 Environmental Supervisor
Enclosures .
cc:
Brian Wrenn, Division of Water Quality, Transportation Permitting Unit
Polly Lespinasse. Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office
Orl ??G
y r
r
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ®No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1U Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer th
below. ? Yes ® No
th. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: SR-1207 (Leatherman Road)
2b. County: Lincoln
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Vale
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no 12205511
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NC DOT Right of Way
31b. Deed Book and Page No. -
3c- Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page I of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name: Mike Holder
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
N.C. Department of Transportation, Division 12
4d. Street address: 1710 East Marion Street
4e. City, state, zip: Shelby, NC 28151
4f. Telephone no.: 704-480-9020
4g. Fax no.: 704-480-5401
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. AgenVConsultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Trish Simon
51b. Business name
(if applicable):
N.C. Department of Transportation, Division 12
5c. Street address: 1710 East Marion Street
5d. City, state, zip: Shelby, NC 28151
5e. Telephone no.: 704-480-9044
5f. Fax no.: 704-480-5401
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): NA
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.540152 Longitude: - 81.37957
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: <.01 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project: Unnamed tributary to Howard's Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C
2c. River basin: Catawba
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Existing 80' 30" CMP, landuse is mostly farmland and forested. Pipe is on paved secondary road.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
100 feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed work is to replace deteriorating pipe for the safety of the travelling public.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
NCDOT proposes to replace a deteriorating 80-foot long, 30" CMP with a 88-foot long, 36" RCP. The new pipe will be
skewed to better align with the downstream channel. NCDOT will reconstruct a short section of the downstream stream
channel to connect the pipe outlet and existing stream channel. Five feet of riprap will be used at the pipe inlet and outlet
for structural stabilization. A temporary cofferdam pumping system will be used to divert the stream around the
construction site as needed. The project will be constructed using typical heavy equipment (trackhoe, backhoe, etc.).
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
Comments: Jurisdictional stream determination made by
Division 12 DEC.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
f
? Preliminary ? Final
o
determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ® No
? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f

Wetland impact .
Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland
Permanent (P) or
if k Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Ar ea of impact
(
nown)
Tern ora T DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
W1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2e. Total wetland impacts -
21h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number -
Permanent (P) or (PER) or
i (Corps - 404, 10 stream length

Temporary (T) ntermittent
(INT)? DWQ - non-404, width (linear
other) (feet) feet)

S1 ®P ? T Riprap
stabilization at Ut to Howard's ? PER
® Corps
inlet/outlet Creek MINT ®DWQ 4 10
Loss of stream
S2 ®P ? T channel due to Ut to Howard's ? PER ® Corps
channel Creek ® INT ® DWQ 4 10
realignment
S3 ? P ®T Cofferdam bypass Ut to Howard's ? PER ®Corps
pumping Creek ® INT ® DWQ 4 15
S4 El P FE-1 T ? PER El Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ?Corps
? INT ?DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
35
3i. Comments: A total of 30 feet of stream channel will be filled, however, 20 feet of the stream will be reconstructed based
upon upstream and downstream reference dimensions.
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, t he Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.

Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
number f (acres)
o
pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian b uffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number- Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Str eam name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary T impact required?
B1 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B2 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Minimization of impacts by installing appropriate erosion control measures.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ® No
?b. If ycs, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank

? Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ? Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
61b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank
,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified

within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? ® El Yes No
1 b . If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.

omments
: ?

Yes E] No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a . What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 0 %
2b . Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ® No
2c . If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Com plies with NCDOT's individual
NPDES permit NCS000250.
2d . If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, na rrative description of the plan:
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? NA
? Phase II
31b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs El NSW
apply (check all that apply): ? USMP
? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties

4a.
Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? HOW
? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ? No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ® Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ® Yes ? No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
use of public (federal/state) land? ® Yes ? No
tb. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 28 .0200)?
21b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? ? Yes ® No
31b. If you answered 'yes' to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is a minimum criteria project which has low potential for cumulative/indirect impacts and will not result in
additional development which could impact water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater generated from project.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? yes No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
Sc. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. E] Raleigh
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage Program database.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ®No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No salt marches, oyster reefs or seagrass beds located in the vicinity of the project.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The State Historic Preservation office resources and the National Register of Historic Places were reviewed for historic
sites in the vicinity of the project; however, the pipe replacement project occurs within a previously impacted area
(NCDOT Right of Way).
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM panal number: 3710268600K
M.L Ho (dc,- May 21, 2009
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is rovided.)
Page 1 1 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
General Notes: 0
1. Streembed to be shortened approximately 10' by
proposed pipe realignment
2.Pumping system to be used to desert stream around
the construction site es needed. a
3
3.Silt fence to be placed around stock pile ere. if
one is required.
4. Selvage any and all steambed materiel from 'tree..
section to be abandoned for use in reconstructing the
relocated stream section.
5. Project to be stabilized using silt fence. seeding. mulching
and any other measures deemed necessary until such time
as project is complet.d and released upon final inspection.
Match existing Inlet elev.
and location. \
II
II
II
I
it
II
tt
I
II
I
Proposed 88' of
III
I I
II
II
II

TBM
Nail in PP
Assumed 500.00'
O
tim ? Boa
F 100
v" X
? ?aP
a
°
i i Existing 80' of 30' MCP
t
II
II @
pair. reshape and stabilize eroded
Brea of stream bank
stuct 'tree
to approx.
existing 9
Reconstruct stream channel and slope
to existing contours. Stabilize stream
banks with coir fiber matting.
Location: Approximately 0.22 mi.SY of the
intersection of SR's 1207 8 1208.
4' to ,
bons.
51000_IS_aln_border.dgn 05/19.f20090g:0103AM

6wb'L 9M1w'n
I?
d
A
O
D
3
pG ?
- " jR
a

b
i
'
s
a g

- -----------
9
-

u$ v ? a

O Oj
a O < N

m (D
(
-
o D (D
1
pO
o J
ao (D
Op--cp
u --mmD e o O

o a O O p
o? O
o D+o
?? 7 7 (D
a

u
u $
W
o u
n
O i
? w co ? d p

.1. b LIP
o
n (D
P

(D
O (D
_
n (D D
o (D
Y
0
g
? a
a

o
o s
=
r
m E
n o - 9

r m
= J T
a
7 mm
i a
0 V o D

n m
o #
z
m

0 w

° o
C
7 n r
O
n' o
ii
rt t
1
m T
m A
N N
m
Z
v 3
Z A ~
m
m z
J $$
K
N
O o, o ?
ti
N j
m p
m
1
I_
I?
I?
n
°o
°m
n
J
n
O
O
c
J
Z
n
<
m
O
b
m
C
V
_H
O
O
3
m
2
O
m
s
m
0
m
0
0
f
ut
'm
0
3
N
m
0
0
mm
a
ti
m
A ?
a m
z A
A M
O 0
n ?
o a
O
m
m
z
A
N
O
0
0
0
w
0
] O
O a
0
0
0 3
w 0
o n
„m
? N
D N
w 3
m ?
z
N }?
? D
n'
Q
N
o?
o °.
w w
00
DD
UD
D O
D D
D w
T",w
D O
a0
0 3
D P
'D
o a
3
D D
0 0
0
m]
x o
x <
O { II
{ m
o M
n
< CD N
0 (D O < {
Q J { ? O
n
o ° { O
J O O
{
n n
W CO CO Q
P O " O
O C0 {
O (D
O
O a
m
x
V)
H
Z
W
m
3
n

Z
N
A
O
0
J
O
O
0
c
?c
Z
n
fl4F'--R1Es? 6
d:?v-, R.pp.F£FjAE
CC ? P?'Ro
k b 've
9Y E 5 p ? .
?f t ? R R" f
0
0
r ?
m
n i
n m °
Z ? » 3
O
m u
v n ° m
m iv
D N
m ti 3
Z '
N ? N N
'A m E
V
O
r ni r
m n
m
fa
3yO
61
P
0
S
0
0
A
g
F
D
7
O
z
1<
3
ii
vs
i
i

ff
y_
Z
A
O
0
f
7
O
z
g?
s
s
s
Q
Y
3
e
1
a
SR 1207, Leatherman Road, Lincoln County

h f ?`
Area of downstream
channel realignment

Downstream
Outlet
Upstream
H-. i- l A` "1 A -I P/ A
'g\ V/Jrg r r
Feet (p:
' W E ?C
0 950 1,900 3 800
I L? '? I lt\-
`..-r s` i t c 1'.
a a _
%
{. r
Y/
f I( 1 l'.? r vim- t)'j r ) r T ter-
I
a ..`- \ r! ' `1 Pipe Replacement j i\ \ 1
11
ro ? I 1 i ! r
\ ? ? _ \.?d.9Al
u P ,
d4 \ 1 ' i\\ t IImo` 1 \\ `../
I\*!
i
J V+ ? l I \1 I \ ? - ? l ? \ \1 I 1
I ?.
?.u t ?? ? _ ? 11 .I t. I I 1rl v A
11,?e)?\
Y ,? c.C l- J
Vicinity Map
\ STATE OF NORTHCAROUNA Figure2
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SR-1207 Leatherman Road I Lincoln County
e W.F?.K.'? .?-X k"'r?`? ? ?w t ri ? ? - x ?r E: f^z' ?O 'k 9.., w '^e ? gyp(
r 'i re"??a5 ?l+ic 't o2 ..y ?z. 1f6 ? i£:?? 40?????? '?'?2"t'
F < # tl ?.."'?? b.? >* 7 t a^ x,uU<?aY'-tN °'Nax`R'9'c ° N,.t
s r - '?. t ?, n ?" ?u 9 ?'?4t"y?S, v HA ?° r??2-,s??R !?? :r?.w?',?y3?.r ? -:, dr`s}+' • '?' 3 a m eAry?".
i?'??C?
!o
? r, ',?rh.4?§z..?kc'`r*?L"li?e- -y'?_'?y' ?y + zi s{ ?:+£. - s?F,"?h, c?? ? ?.W,ym?''$+'-y.. ?++?? v ?•A ?+a=
11 N
000 U: 3nO?'
i'Y ?? 1?"k 4 Ka t'tl1_ P.t 6 kgx2 °`?e^>, ?'hi ° ?f 42 but ' e ai' ?'` Q? rs `--
N t PP^ x',r' x O
+ t.rtl'? +"0>.,?`'4"k£,t*rts t''1ci.9 '+'a`? t '+7'`- 'ts i ' PI r a?#..,?
?7'' # i !r ,a i-, tt. ?, A ?. av ,,,• g
4^
u s-,.x +'P1# ? .,?.. ? +r c"? ?' Y ?C '? y FS r in ! ? y ? x
a € ?e'ti a t?`?"h?z r o'f { r i? -a?71r??
10
4.1,
K 60}+ "xal cR t rwJtKt ?C?drer s?,?yda> LsJgC
??K? ?+-, FT.??' t•i'. ?#?4?t,t,',r'?*i?p? ? xf!?i?i ? 4F C??fo ipt a
t Sr! v K? s?- 9 id 6 Ala ,ti 3t ?- s"M? ?fb? -e ?Y `fir ?? v
,,4'a r a. < ? ra -' . .y.?„Sg t"? NSPLA7EAU a {"t ? e?'$a v n Gf'r
Hr> -1 S=. t + t. Ss?. k?Ar„ tr4 ?n?. (s?, to 'z''c? ^i''s' ?t t*n } t.
A Wy n ? Fs SF # c "` x"1 ? x, x ? ["e 9 .." q. ?Y ?A„??,n L sA`
b A {?.
?+ &'r"" +; b'?y x " *'?' ?.x J:yT3w,a ..,r•S rr
."i O"'s '-?yY #" r. +7 b'#}q ,?y1' _ rt; ?4 ? fix- C' r? `f t nr , + + - .
, At Y ?F .?b^R? tj ?e iX?r F?2. 2t1N ° "-2 Yd+'e, t? '?
b?3kva? '?'rn ?.a?GF "4 y? ,?:.. ?' '.?}?"f]. C a ???y9,:-=?; ?s` '? v-°,z ?frP a 1-t x:
Fd » a`+ ? ? P i t R 1? y t ? °?S? Ad+?-?iG -?yy?y y •5 jr` z?{r !? i ? ??" sS .rw ..
v^oFy
o? -
O¢3rv-
3Raa 3
o F3^ D
w n° - N> a z c n n n S
M> F
.. O n g .-. ,- m;U - R m g° m p D
qua;c m
xary <
^'^ og rt i??. m y °' Z m
?m ^` pm p v - _
>o ,z N ?ry3 z ? m Z
T a 3? ?? 0 o R n N Z r
a 3 n to a Q .ZI
36 &v£ ? wD 6zy y r r.i m m o
> m i
ao=° ° W ao `" D o
oo' o m YgE > T - G
o „» T..Z1 _ a o F x ? o
3$0°,.3 °e
- T O
m
? m
v c ? - 3 ~
y
O? n
A
NCDOT
HAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN CHECKLIST
Division: 11) County: Lincoln Project ID: 12.205511
River Basin: Catawba Bridge No: NA
Route: SR 1207 Stream: Ut to Howard's Creek
Water Quality Criteria:
Yes No
Stream Crossing Blue Line On USGS Wo F
ORW F P
WSI r P
WS 11,111 OR -IV, Crossing Within 0.5mi of W.S. Critical Area r r
Roadway Criteria:
Route Designation-
Arterial Urban
Arterial Rural
Additional Site Information:
Is a Hazardous Spill Basin Required?
Yes No
r r
F 1V
Yes No
r r
Criteria Based Upon NCDOT "Best Management Practices for the
Protection of Surface Waters" (March, 1997).