20050688 Ver 2_Emails_20070109

Re: Request for additional information
Subject: Re: Request for additional information
From: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 13:45:00 -0500
To: Steve Whitt <[e-mail]>
CC: Ian McMillan <[e-mail]>
That's fine. Give it three weeks from your receipt of the letter, and we'll put
this note in the file.
Steve Whitt wrote:
We received your letter dated 12/21/06 requesting additional information related
to our Individual Permit Application for our East Alamance Quarry. Your letter
states that we have 3 weeks to respond to this letter which would be this
Thursday (1/11/07). Kimley-Horn is working on a response and we do plan to get
you this information by the deadline. Since this letter was received during the
Christmas/New Year holiday period we did not see the letter until January 2. If
we need an extra week to submit the information would that be acceptable?
I do not know if we need to time yet. I will be talking to Chad Evenhouse of
Kimley-Horn later this morning to see where they stand with the response. I just
want to cover our bases if the extra time is needed due to the timing of the
letter and the fact that we were all our of the office for more than a week.
1 of 1 1/9/2007 2:27 PM

Request for additional information
Subject: Request for additional information
From: "Steve Whitt" <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:35:37 -0500
To: <[e-mail]>
We received your letter dated 12/21/06 requesting additional information related to our Individual Permit
Application for our East Alamance Quarry. Your letter states that we have 3 weeks to respond to this letter
which would be this Thursday (1/11/07). Kimley-Horn is working on a response and we do plan to get you
this information by the deadline. Since this letter was received during the Christmas/New Year holiday
period we did not see the letter until January 2. If we need an extra week to submit the information would
that be acceptable?
I do not know if we need to time yet. I will be talking to Chad Evenhouse of Kimley-Horn later this morning
to see where they stand with the response. I just want to cover our bases if the extra time is needed due to
the timing of the letter and the fact that we were all our of the office for more than a week.
1 of 1 1/9/2007 1:45 PM