20090656 Ver 1_Application_20090608

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION y
B13vERLY EAVES PERDUE
GovFmNOR
June 1, 2009
Mr. David Baker, NCDOT Regulatory Project Manager
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-2714
D
EUGENE A. CONTI JR.
SECRETARY
Subject: GP-31
Bridge Number 15 over Owl Creek, SR 1331
Cherokee County
State Project No. No. 14B.202014.2 (DWQ Minor Permit Fee $240.00)
Dear Mr. Baker,
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is proposing to replace Bridge
Number 15 on SR 1331, over Owl Creek in Cherokee County. The existing bridge is a
single span steel beam with concrete encasement on the beams and masonry abutment
structure (30 feet). It was determined that in the interest of public safety, that this bridge be
replaced because of deterioration due to age, insufficient width and accident history.
The proposed replacement will be a cored slab structure widened to 36 feet and lengthened
to 80 feet. Both end bents will be constructed away from the water; therefore, no in stream
work is anticipated except for removal of the existing structure. The bridge will remain open
for the duration of the project with the new structure being constructed downstream. If
needed, sandbag cofferdams will be used to ensure a clean, dry area, and to minimize
impacts to aquatic habitats and allow the existing stream gradients to remain as unchanged
as physically possible.
The North Carolina. Natural Heritage Database was checked for records of threatened or
endangered species. There are no records of threatened or endangered species for the bridge
site. Additionally, there are no records for the entire Owl Creek watershed. The impacts
within the water will consist of removal of the old bridge structure and will have very
minimal effect on the habitat within Owl Creek. For these reasons, we believe this project
will have "no effect" on threatened or endangered species.
Bridge 1331 2 June 1, 2009
The State Historical Office has reviewed this project and did not find any significant
historical structures that would be impacted. An archeological survey was performed at the
bridge site and no significant archaeological resources were found. Documents on historical
and archeological resources attached.
The best management practices will be used to minimize and control sedimentation and
erosion on this project. The construction foreman will review all erosion control measures
daily to ensure devices are functionng properly. If the devices are not functioning as
intended, they will be replaced immediately with better devices.
Impacts to Waters of the United States
Owl Creek (Class C) is shown on the USGS topographic map as a perennial stream. The
channel is approximately 24 feet in width and is composed primarily of cobble, gravel and
sand. The channel lacks vegetation. Owl Creek has sufficient flow to support fish and other
aquatic life. Owl Creek flows approximately 1.6 miles to Hanging Dog Creek. Hanging
Dog Creek then flows approximately 4.8 miles to the backwaters of Hiwassee Lake.
Hiwassee Lake meets the definition of a Traditional Navigable Water. For these reasons, we
believe that Owl Creek meets the definition of a Relatively Permanent Water and is under the
jurisdiction of the U. S, Army Corps of Engineers. In order to construct the project, it will
be necessary to impact waters of the United States in the Hiwassee River Basin.
Specifically, NCDOT is requesting to replace Cherokee County Bridge # 15 with a cored
slab spanning structure. Listed below is a summary of the proposed impacts.
Site No. Existing Condition Proposed Condition Net Impacts
Site I NW Free flowing stream 30' x 4' sandbag cofferdam to create 2
120 ft .
Abutment with masonry bents dry work area around abutment
Site 2 SE Free flowing stream 30' x 4' sandbag cofferdam to create 2
120 ft .
Abutment with masonry bents dry work area around abutment
Total Temporary Impact for Cofferdam 240 ft2
Total Permanent Impacts 0
Permits Requested
NCDOT is hereby requesting authorization under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act to
proceed with the construction project outlined above. By copy of this letter, I am asking
Mr. David McHenry, Mountain Region Coordinator, of the North Carolina Wildlife
Resources Commission (NCWRC) to comment directly to you concerning the 404 General
Permit request.
Also, by copy of this letter, I am requesting authorization under Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act from the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Bridge 1331
June 1, 2009
(DENR), Division of Water Quality (DWQ). In addition, I am requesting Mr. McHenry and
Mr. Ed Ingle, Roadside Environmental Field Operations Engineer (NCDOT), to comment
directly to me concerning this permit request.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (828) 497-
7953. Your early review and consideration will be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Chris Lee, P.E.
Division 14 Bridge Maintenance Engineer
cc: ,/Mr. Brian Wrenn, DWQ, Raleigh (4 copies)
Mr. Mike Parker, DWQ, Asheville Regional Office
Mr. Troy Wilson, Biologist USFWS Asheville
Mr. David McHenry, Mountain Region Coordinator, NCWRC, Waynesville
Mr. Joel Setzer, P.E., Division Engineer, NCDOT, Sylva
Mr. Mark Davis, Division Environmental Officer, NCDOT
Mr. E. L. Ingle, Roadside Environmental Field Operations Engineer, NCDOT
Q?0F W A r6,,,
O T
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification CN Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number: 31
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
If. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Bridge 13 on SR 1331, Hanging Dog Road
2b. Country: Cheorkee
2c. Nearest municipality/ town: Murphy
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: State Project No. 14B.202014.2
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. N/A
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): N/A
3d. Street address: N/A
3e. City, state, zip: N/A
3f. Telephone no.: N/A
3g. Fax no.: N/A
3h. Email address: NIA
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ® Other, specify: Bridge Maintenance Engineer
4b. Name: Chris D. Lee
4c. Business name
(if applicable): North Carolina Department of Transportation
4d. Street address: 178 Henry Bird Rd.
4e. City, state, zip: Whittier, NC 28789
4f. Telephone no.: 828-497-7953
4g. Fax no.: 828-497-6095
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: N/A
5b. Business name
(if applicable): N/A
5c. Street address: N/A
5d. City, state, zip: N/A
5e. Telephone no.: N/A
5f. Fax no.: N/A
5g. Email address: N/A
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): N/A
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.1404 Longitude: - -84.0459
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: N/A acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to

proposed project: Owl Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: Class C
2c. River basin: HiwasseeRiver
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Bridge 15 in Cherokee County is a single span timber floored bridge that we are proposing to rebuild using new materials.
The existing bridge will be removed and a 80-foot long concrete box beam structure will be erected. The general land use
in the area is rural residential and forested.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
N/A
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
N/A
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To replace the timber bridge with a new creek spanning bridge decreasing future maintenance, increasing hydraulic flow
and improving safety
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
TThe bridge will remain open with the new structure being placed upstream to maintain traffic until completion of the new
structure. Backhoe, trackhoe, crane, powertools, handtools, etc, will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
? Yes ®No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: N/A
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: N/A
Name (if known): N/A Other: NIA
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
N/A
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?

DID. If yes, explain in detail according to help file instructions.
N/A
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
N/A
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C_ Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ® Streams -tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number- Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary
W1 ? P ? T N/A N/A ? Yes
? No ? Corps
? DWQ N/A
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts N/A
2h. Comments: N/A
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ? P ®T Sandbag
Cofferdam Owl Creek ® PER
?INT ® Corps
® DWQ 24 120 sq_ ft.
S2 ? P ® T Sandbag
Cofferdam Owl Creek ® PER
? INT ® Corps
® DWQ 24 120 sq. ft.
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? PEI T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h Total stream and tributary impacts 0
3i. Comments: Total Temporary impacts are 240 sq ft for cofferdams
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ? P ? T N/A N/A N/A N/A
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts N/A
4g. Comments: N/A
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A WA
P2
5f. Total N/A N/A N/A NA N/A NA N/A
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): N/A
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): WA
5k. Method of construction: N/A
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary T impact required?
B1 ? P ? T N/A N/A 0 Nos N/A N/A
B2 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
133 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts NIA N/A
6i. Comments: N/A
Page 6of11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The structure was designed to span the entire creek and increase the hydraulic capacity over the current level.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Water will be diverted away from the work areas using sandbags. Erosion and sedimentation control measures according to
an approved plan will be installed prior to work on the project.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank

El Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: N/A
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type N/A Quantity N/A
3c. Comments: N/A
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ®cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): NIA square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: N/A acres
4h. Comments: N/A
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
N/A
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ? Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 NIA N/A 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required: N/A
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
N/A
6h. Comments: N/A
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ? No
Comments: N/A
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Project is Covered by Individual NPDES
Permit NCS000250
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
N/A
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
? HOW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
? Yes ? No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered 'yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213 .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): N/A
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered `yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The only work being proposed is the replacement of an existing bridge structure. The road is not being upgraded;
therefore, this project should not contribute to a change in development patterns.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. F1 Raleigh
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Database.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
There are no marine or estuarine communities within the Blue Ridge Province
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The State Historical Preservation Office reviewed the project for historical structures and found no structures of historical
significance. An archeological survey has been performed; no signficant resources identified were found.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? 70yes ? No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: The impacts to the floodplain were taken into consideration during
bridge design.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodplain Mapping
Chris D. Lee June 1, 2009
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Davis, Mark S
From: Halvorsen, Scott E
Sent: Thursday. May 28, 2009 7:26 AM
To: Davis, Mark S
Subject: Sr1331 Cherokee
Mark,
Not sure if Matt W. has touched base with you on this project, but the fieldwork was
completed the last two days (May 26-27) and I expect to have the report sent to SHPO by
next Friday at the very latest. By the way, no archaeological sites or resources were
identified within the APE. In order to complete the report, it would be great if I could
get a standard size design plan pdf (11x17 or 8xll)e-mailed to me. Thanks a bunch, Scott.
E-mail correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law
and may be disclosed to third parties.
r 4t?c ?;wf' ,1r 1, t ?':rL - €)i4ston 1:4 Pr-Djcct t1P# lk RS, 148.2020,14.2 Coumy: Cherokee
RECEj V
1AY 2'7
r' c,'i; G? a'rrrf3d?;'i#.' l ca€>titca Rrisi (' iVn.; l ait SR 1331 O'Verjffat? i,41. Dog Cri'elc
4'3rk i` I } ?t}i}'1 re{?rE: errtztti?'ev of
s tiniiina 1Xmiul,' tl m ofTv,n }a: miiiwt (NCDO T)
L? l f [1[.ral ilr h~ttt} ,?derntiltitrtilvtt (r'17iVh)
`tJ,InftUlsn[iiin_Stale Historic Prescf-vati)n il`k (1411C))
i?cll?a'
?.
f ItiT6;iCt aMiv?'FItGrEikj.'?l I"!.SttfYt'GCti pt7t1Y6?i•1€7tt1'.G`,v]@V61 4Ch{1(11VC?;'?Zt:111I??.lttSlS
Ail ravUm prcNevL gre^,d
r- '
Thafvar-(1a-p%)Der1iesOvurti#`tyvcai;r-vid%iih-inthenr,,juyi'Sar= ofpmntiale6e.cc:
€x4rc tre n.c? propci-i.ies Jc?i.i than l li't' years. old wht :h are uomidered to uteet.Criieria Considcmtion G'tiN ithin the
?? ;rf jc;??['? ?Irca o1`t?c}tcttt>,it ?•Fi?F?^CC?+.
?V T ilea c: re t rcpci t, ., n a e. fifty veZr,, old ?viLhin rfi Txi i ,4 [ c eVc-u orPntonw4f Effects (AYE), btit ba,ed o the
,
lii:-itfr[?7f 111f11r17i.4fIf7Ct'c7.,llid l? andd1 € liotctg'raphI al Li:.,.hpropit".rt.y, thc-prS)purEict tlienitifie as ? -
lr {?Osidfireil ror tJ1L`'ti a6clna[ r'wvi-,icr and no fjlnlic1 vahtation of thtm :ti nccus.s
3r r'.
Tl>s to ar ii[a NatiN.i2l €tt? i ccr-listed or Study Listed properties within Che project`s area of porend;51 efTcc -
+`.li,pr«p?Lti?? greater that. 50 ?c tir;.r}J a?;r, located in ills: APB 11,1ve been c:)nsi&red zt cgn-ulmlion, zmd h, tiCfl
Upon chi' ahartt el7[1cGrrcnCe. all colIT. liance roT liistori ardiiiecture Nvigi Sectior, 106 of the Naticfnia( Ristur;c
nr?rCrvation .^,et 111d G"+ 1-1-12(a) has fscm eat> OCtrd far this Project.
`1-FiLte :irc no lTi?taiic properties affecied by Eh.is priajt:ct- {4ttadr uri>; n'9tes. orCft7Ctt?rtrttLtiVS nee'd'ed)
1 H t?':1;;:li? Ekt [ ?i i?icrn>r ?irf,iriisrrµtor. or oilier r-edc.al .A?,,Cnu% Date.

S- f -
,S'Z[L r1i t<irr. l'r :ti. rtiat orl C?# t er
Date.
Ira >.ulve, i.iirii is ri^TwrtI, a riml rolzy (11! his rann ancb Ik c;tildmi.l 1151 will be iuelud,_J,
17
I \` ,-? \1I f 1 , L a II I \ \.`??\? `\ 7 f r 17 /j'J d C --
Un?
?'? =--
I X.,
?1 /
`11 ?r'v
?
?1
-^ • I ? ?? ? , ..?I : ? ? /t/ 1 'A
am.. '? Ir ?//fi yf 11 - ,?.
NY J1,71 Wgr
VA4
10I)
?L.?. ,??+/ ! ?? \ `? ?l ?r / ..f-' 'i?? r? ) /f r•.C`. ??.\ \11 ?? ?/` r \?\,, \',t li. ?II I,- ???,i
(61. ' ? --., III ! , / • % ! ? \. ' ? ?' r , rr ?f ?-; ? ., ' .,-
? _/ r _?,?? ? ? .`/"?'?r.lr 1/? l / / ' n, r ?I'` _y i??1'''? ? i r ` ? ? /i. j', )1?1 ?,!G _ __
?--
?? ? \',Ca ??a ?% / ;+ 1?._,, , y 4 f r `??51) ?'.. I?,l+f,r J` 2•"' ?/ \???`?rr
- ,
'N KE
i ?0!"
+`\i\ MIA N 1fx?'?/.H R
$
!7.1"1 / ( `J •\ - (??.I._ 1 ?- _ '` , +?/ y fr •/I
TON
I ' ri, J A J - pl
BM T.4
.787 /,? (?. _•` \ /! J "1.? y r/i 1 .l n%-:'.j '? /r'r'•
'mi`l r' `? 1 r1 \\ '/\ ? / rll ? r• ` r?; iJ ,1 ?l / '? ? ,\ ` ,? \,' II tif?./'-`•,
\V, ?-• ?'?' {t ?`/? ( ? ' ?',l i • \? I I? t?3 C? ? ? /_i ?i?J 't ' ? '? ? -1?'__i_:- ''`e ? y,,9. r ..
2 5
'?p,, ly?ye' -'?'1 \\ -p(1x _.,,1- .//, f ` \? ? ``???? _?/. •.i?! ! /10i / /? i ?L?_\, ? \
19M
??,i _ `-O f' ( _ 1 ? x?,• _.'t85? ??_`' Jim' e1.f?GaP- ?.\?' f .,GS' ? ??, /.'-. ?:
Copyright (C) 1998, Mapterh, Inc. J
N n\
N d?
Y? M o
CD/ I/
lit CN
LP
E
ell,
u4
e.
el I _I a 5P
32
t ?
-I ? M
ti
_I p T• I
1 -I ?I
m p J 1?
AI / ? A ¢ ?I \\ \` ? t? a? 1 11?\` r
Idt
J \ ? co ?? , r II I
co r
_ _cmr) r/
l

r?
In
v
rn
rn
0
0
cD
c
cn
b
N
t17
Q)
Y
O
N
L
U
Cherokee 15 pics
LOOKING NORTH
Bridge f 180015
C:OW1ly CHEROKEE Date. 05120/2008 Structure Photos
11PSTRFAM