20181079 Ver 1_401 Application_20180818

O�OF v.1ATF9OG 2 0 ' 8 0 7 Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
o DWQ project no.
Form Ve n 1 1 8
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification PCN For
.r
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit F] Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 18 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
® Yes
❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Printworks Mill
2b.
County:
Guilford
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Greensboro
2d. Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
R -8c it
3.
Owner Information
r
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Printworks Ventures, LLC 3
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
007934/00231 Cgti
3c.
Party (for LLC if
Responsiapplicable):
Mr. Joseph Alexander PCRZ/q f
qft
3d.
Street address:
345 W. Washington Avenue, Suite 301
3e.
City, state, zip:
Madison Wi, 53703
3f.
Telephone no.:
608.268.8129
3g. Fax no.:
608.258-5599
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Bradley S. Luckey
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Pilot Environmental Inc.
5c. Street address:
PO Box 128
5d. City, state, zip:
Kemersville, NC 27285
5e. Telephone no.:
336.708.4997
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
7875261633
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.11014 Longitude: - 79.177163
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
25 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
North Buffalo Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -V, NSW
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is developed with an adbandoned textile mill, paved areas and wooded land. The site is located in a
residential/industrial area of Greensboro, North Carolina.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.04 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
perennial stream (North Buffalo Creek) _ —925 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to provide emergency personnel access to all sides of the existing buildings for
the proposed re -development of the site as a mixed use residential and commercial development.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project consists of the re -development of an existing vacant textile mill with a mixed use residential and
commercial development. Due to the site being re -developed, it is necessary to impact wetlands for construction of a fire
access lane to provide fire and emergency personnel access to all sides of the buildings. A portion of the proposed fire
access drive will have dual use as a greenway. To facilitate development of the site, graders, haulers and other heavy
equipment will be utilized.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
Comments: Sue Homewood (NCDWR) Site Visit on June 18,
2018
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Pilot Enviromental, Inc.
Name (if known): Michael Brame/David Brame
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
The project is not part of a phased project. Impacts to streamstwetlands, outside of those proposed in this application,
are not anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ❑ T
Road Fill
Basin
❑ Yes
® No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.04
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P [:IT
El Yes
El Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.04
2h. Comments: The proposed fire access lane will permanently impact 0.04 acres of wetlands associated with fill for the road
crossing. Temporary impacts to wetlands are not proposed. The area of proposed wetland impact has formed in a former
wastewater discharge basin associated with manufacturing activities of the former occupant. The wetland is sparsely
vegetated. Temporary impacts to wetlands are not proposed. Mitigation is not proposed for the unavoidable impact to
wetlands.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments: Stream impacts are not proposed.
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ❑ PEI T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4E Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: Open water impacts are not proposed.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then com tete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
K Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar -Pamlico ®Other. Jordan
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary
impact
re uired?
131 ❑PFIT
F1 Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T
EI Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑PFIT
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
r6i—Comments:
A Buffer Authorization Certificate dated July 11, 2018 has been obtained from the City of Greensboro for the
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

proposed project (attached).
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The applicant has designed the proposed re -development of the site to avoid impacts to North Buffalo Creek (-925LF) and
minimize impact to Lake Jordan Riparian Buffers that are present on the site. Portions of existing impervious surfaces
including former parking/paved areas are being removed from the designated floodplain and Lake Jordan Riparian Buffers.
The proposed project will have a net reduction of existing impervious surfaces by approximately 400 square feet. Given the
location of the existing buildings proximate to North Buffalo Creek, there are no other alternatives that avoid impact to the
wetland while providing safe emergency personnel access to the site as required by the City of Greensboro.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The construction disturbance limits will be surveyed and staked in the field. Use of temporary best management practices will
reduce the potential for adverse impact to North Buffalo Creek and other down -gradient waters.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
ElPayment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7of12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
Z Yes ❑ No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments: Buffer mitigation requirements have been satisfied for the project. Attached NCDMS Invoice & Mitigation
Receipt.
Page 8of12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ®No
Comments: Buffer Authorization has been obtained from local delgated municipality.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Net reduction of existing site BUA.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Greensboro
® Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
® NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
® Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HOW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered 'fres" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ® No
Comments: We are not aware of a NEPA or SEPA being required as part of this
project.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213 .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered 'fres" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We are not aware of additional development that will impact nearby downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The proposed project will connect to an existing municipal sanitary sewer line and will not require impacts to WoUS
associated with site disposal of wastewater.
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The USFWS List of Federally Protected Species, dated 6.27.18, identifies the bald eagle (BGPA) and small whorled
pogonia (T). Based on our field observations, suitable habitat is not located on the site. Therefore we have made the
determination that the proposed project will not disturb the bald eagle and will have no effect on small whorled pogonia.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
FEI Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Based on our knowledge of the site, the site is not located in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat. Best
management practices and the use of temporary sediment and erosion control devices will prevent sediment from entering
down -gradient waterbodies which may contain fish.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
According to the NC SHPO Historic Properties website (attached), the site is listed on the National Register (GF6574-
Proximity Print Works). The proposed re -development of the site will preserve and enhance the integrity of the listed
historic property. Therefore, the proposed project will not have an adverse affect on cultural or historic resources.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: The applicant has obtained a Floodplain Developent Permit from
the City of Greensboro dated July 23, 2018 (attached).
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM 3710884400k (Drawing 4)
Digitally signed by Bradley S. Luckey
DN: cn=Bradley S. Luckey, o=Pilot
-- Environmental, Inc, ou,
�
Bradley S. Luckey
/i email=[e-mail],c=US
8.2.18
Date: 2018.08.021592:34 -04'00'
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Proposal for Environmental Services
Pilot Proposal 2529.1
April 13, 2018
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
This form authorizes Pilot to act as our agent in stream/wetland matters including U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Resources field verification and
permitting.
Property Address: 1-700 S"c-t
2790!;
Owner Information: 1` v-" "+'* VOOO� \ tr A j res , L (–C -
Address: 3�S W.W4sti�ti�� . AJ2���5�i 30
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION REQUEST
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
,Jose h M. (�It.nd� s�en1 Ilt,�4er C� n ar o�l•�►w� �� ll�
Print Name
Capacity. X Owner —Authorized Agent
Signature
5

GIS Data Viewer x
Not secure gis.co.guilford.nc.us
Apps Favorites Vrgmia fp Mail - bluckeyZpi;
GIS 0 0 C)
Identify W, -7 Map C) Data Viewer Quick Search Identify Street View Community Info Map Themes Print
ANN
PRINTWORKS VENTURES
LLC
AW.
Zoom to
11,0111ft.•t7
1700 FAIRVIEW ST
Property CommunityinfoAm Ilk,
X2WN
Oblique PhotosV - .1 . A -4 I
AM Wa so - alma-
m� m , 011111111 - - 0
a a . ,
REID 0027498 CA
DIM 707526,l631
% :. I
,W
Ownership a r 11 1 t 1,i 3 ,I e
History
Owner
PRINTWORKS low —,4
VENTURES LLC
A
LCF
Mail Address 346 W
ram. r
WASHINGTON AVE
et;
301 --n M
Mail City MADISON
ig
Mail State WI •W
jo
Mail Zip 53703 f
Propey 1700 FAIRVIEW ST ImmA
rtp
Address
Legal Lot # 18.22 AC
Description PROXIMITY PRINT
WORKS PSI
?2"Iml
-47 s I lq-t
W. mj J x
0
Cther bookma,;Ks
10 1
'!--' Parcel l.pdf ^sho"v all x

W \
W \ \
I
Z PIN 1815163235 \
CONTROL CAR. PARCEL N0. 0021491
"= N 856,091.54 DB 6202 P6. 1186 1% ANNUAL G
E 1,111,655.41 ZONED: HI FLOOD HAZARD
EL.1bO.45
1% A*M GRANGE
- - - - - -FLOOD HAZARD
-n",
N01°43'49"1389.05'
69.26'
R=3019.19' L=9615
N00 ° 48'41'196.15'(ch J
BORUM,
GRID NORTH
NAD 83 / N5R5 2011 c 11
r�
\\ va
•ya
r
N00°IO'18'E 199.89' c
1919'L=1 .93' - 501 PLOW RIM (WILL&TOR STREET] r
99 \ _ FAIRVIEW_STREET L
1303 NO2°04'06'E 40.58' \ \ \ - FUTURE
NO1°05'02'E 103.11'(chJ \ \ E --1% AWAL CHANGE
R=3019.19' L-103.18' FLOOD HAZARD l
1102 FAIRAEN STREET
Nrr'6
PET1_AND COORDINATE TABLE \
- 72.07'
2t
\
�
= a
It ANWRIAGRA
EO
w
FLOOD HAZARD
j83245 SF
LA11
1911 AL.
V
/
1A3 N 85b92b.6414 E 1111804.6232 \
C
_
1% ANNUAL CHANGE
EX. 81-D6.
pQ1
FLOOD HAZARD
$ \ 4 5TORIES
WAb N 856848.4815 E 1111808.1001 (TIE POINT) \
\
1100 FA MEN 5TREET
\
tea^
2
EX. BLD6.
�
5„7W 5F WETLANL6-
1 5TORIE5
EX. 131-06.0.04
13716 AC.AREA : 18115F
\ 2 STORY
ares
A/6'50
f
-
E 174,
\
5
\
l
\
I hereby certify that the Survey prepared by me entitled WETLAND DELINEATION MAP - PRITWORK5 MILL
H05 actually mode upon the ground and that it and the information,coursesdi5talce5
Show octually exist. The purpose of this survey Is to show the delineated wetlonds as flogged
in the field by PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. All boundary information is taken from a
wetland Survey by 5orum, Wade aid As5ociote;i PA and dated JULY 25,201b.
Executed this 26th day of
Registration No. L-3131
Homer 5. Wade
621 Eugene Gt 5te.100
Greensboro, NC,
21420
�N CARO
�i
Ess r
Lola SEAL
L-3731
'•�0 SUR��
EX. BLDG.
2 5TORIE5
51TE DATA
TOTAL 51TE AREA: 18.211 AC,
PIN: 11515261633
DEED REFERENCE
PLAT REFERENCE:
CURRENT ZONING:
DB 10134 P6. 0231
PB 1011 P6, 132
PUD (Z-11-03-004)
WATERSHED: NORTH BUFFALO GREEK
015T. TO FLOODWAY: ON 51TE
NO. OF LOTS: 2 LOT5
CITY BLOCK 5HEET 29
D��\\ \� 0
�y \ 00'Y
\ yMITE OAK VENTURES, LLC,
4 KAI \ e ,PAR(EL NO. 0021632
WA2 \41A
PIN 1815289021
\A 0§ 8011 P6.1115
KAb9 WAIO WAII \4e ZONED: HI
WAl \ \O \
WAS 00 -YY \�,Q
FAIN STREET ',,7
75" 5F \
\ 1
EX. BLD6. \
/ 5 STORIES
Alexander
Company
345 W. Washington Ave.
Suite 301
Madison, WI 53703
Telephone:
608-258-5580
Fax: [phone]
IbTH GT
VICINITY MAP
5GALE: I" = 1000'
WETLAND AREA SUMMARY
WETLAND AREA - I,BII 5F - 0.04 AG.
GORP5 GERTIEIGAT ION
AN
w
d
THI5 GERTIFIE5 THAT TH15 COPY OF THI5 PLAT AGGURATELY DEPIGT5 THE
BOUNDARY OF THE JUR15DIGTION OF 5EGTION 404 THE GLEAN WATER AGT
A5 DETERMINED BY THE UNDER516NED ON THI5 DATE. UNLE55 THERE 15 A
GHAN6E IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THI5 DETERMINATION
OF SECTION 404 JURI50IGTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT
TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THI5 DATE. THI5 DETERMINATION WA5 MADE
UTILIZING THE APPROPRIATE RE61ONAL 5UPPLEMENT TO THE 1981 6ORP5
OF ENGINEERS WETLAND5 DELINEATION MANUAL.
- ----------------------------------------------------
DAVID E. BAILEY DATE
U5 ARMY GORP5 OF EN6INEER5
6RAPHIG 5GALE
0 50' 100' 200' 300' 400'
I" 100'
Frro.EGT:
PET1_AND COORDINATE TABLE \
\
�
= a
WAI N 856982.9135 E 1111191.2311
\
w
1A2 N 856956 3991 E 1111804.2155
1A3 N 85b92b.6414 E 1111804.6232 \
'
1A4 N 856819.6114 E Illll9b.8085 \
�
o�
1A5 N 85b865b109 E 1111191.8211 \
WAb N 856848.4815 E 1111808.1001 (TIE POINT) \
K
WAl N 8%blbb531 E 111181ID412 \
p J
O
1A8 N 85b910bi13 E 1111832.1248 \
�
�
1A9 N 8569286101 E 1111809.4902 \
N 1A10 N 856951.6164 E 1111811.6112 \
N KAII N 856983.4110 E 1111805.4036 \
0
-
>
a:
I hereby certify that the Survey prepared by me entitled WETLAND DELINEATION MAP - PRITWORK5 MILL
H05 actually mode upon the ground and that it and the information,coursesdi5talce5
Show octually exist. The purpose of this survey Is to show the delineated wetlonds as flogged
in the field by PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. All boundary information is taken from a
wetland Survey by 5orum, Wade aid As5ociote;i PA and dated JULY 25,201b.
Executed this 26th day of
Registration No. L-3131
Homer 5. Wade
621 Eugene Gt 5te.100
Greensboro, NC,
21420
�N CARO
�i
Ess r
Lola SEAL
L-3731
'•�0 SUR��
EX. BLDG.
2 5TORIE5
51TE DATA
TOTAL 51TE AREA: 18.211 AC,
PIN: 11515261633
DEED REFERENCE
PLAT REFERENCE:
CURRENT ZONING:
DB 10134 P6. 0231
PB 1011 P6, 132
PUD (Z-11-03-004)
WATERSHED: NORTH BUFFALO GREEK
015T. TO FLOODWAY: ON 51TE
NO. OF LOTS: 2 LOT5
CITY BLOCK 5HEET 29
D��\\ \� 0
�y \ 00'Y
\ yMITE OAK VENTURES, LLC,
4 KAI \ e ,PAR(EL NO. 0021632
WA2 \41A
PIN 1815289021
\A 0§ 8011 P6.1115
KAb9 WAIO WAII \4e ZONED: HI
WAl \ \O \
WAS 00 -YY \�,Q
FAIN STREET ',,7
75" 5F \
\ 1
EX. BLD6. \
/ 5 STORIES
Alexander
Company
345 W. Washington Ave.
Suite 301
Madison, WI 53703
Telephone:
608-258-5580
Fax: [phone]
IbTH GT
VICINITY MAP
5GALE: I" = 1000'
WETLAND AREA SUMMARY
WETLAND AREA - I,BII 5F - 0.04 AG.
GORP5 GERTIEIGAT ION
AN
w
d
THI5 GERTIFIE5 THAT TH15 COPY OF THI5 PLAT AGGURATELY DEPIGT5 THE
BOUNDARY OF THE JUR15DIGTION OF 5EGTION 404 THE GLEAN WATER AGT
A5 DETERMINED BY THE UNDER516NED ON THI5 DATE. UNLE55 THERE 15 A
GHAN6E IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THI5 DETERMINATION
OF SECTION 404 JURI50IGTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT
TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THI5 DATE. THI5 DETERMINATION WA5 MADE
UTILIZING THE APPROPRIATE RE61ONAL 5UPPLEMENT TO THE 1981 6ORP5
OF ENGINEERS WETLAND5 DELINEATION MANUAL.
- ----------------------------------------------------
DAVID E. BAILEY DATE
U5 ARMY GORP5 OF EN6INEER5
6RAPHIG 5GALE
0 50' 100' 200' 300' 400'
I" 100'
Frro.EGT:
345 M. K"N&TON AVE. - 57E. 3d
MADISON w 53103
(60D) 25D-5560
CONTACT -DAVE V05
DRAW BY, MRD
DATE JJLY 26, 2016
REV606
WET TITLE
WETLAND
DELINEATION
MM
FILE ND F V�Is.{gWrww#51rstNd-ny°rl
DO~ 5GALE r = Ica
FUN 51ETT NO
NL
-I
�
= a
w
_
v p
�
o�
K
p J
O
�
�
0
-
>
a:
o
Z
s oc
Q
; o
(�
U-
p `°
cL
o�=
O
OC W
W W
_
� o
345 M. K"N&TON AVE. - 57E. 3d
MADISON w 53103
(60D) 25D-5560
CONTACT -DAVE V05
DRAW BY, MRD
DATE JJLY 26, 2016
REV606
WET TITLE
WETLAND
DELINEATION
MM
FILE ND F V�Is.{gWrww#51rstNd-ny°rl
DO~ 5GALE r = Ica
FUN 51ETT NO
NL
-I

\ ... _._._ BORUA/
S �O
GRID NORTH s
_ NAD 83 / NSRS 2011 a
50' FLEW RM(GOI1FCiTOR 5TR&F
IRVI EN STREET °
- \ \ FUTURE
\ \ ♦ \ ` E
I G G
�E
FLOOD
ALAL
55
WHITE OAK VENTURE5 , LLG
PARCEL N0.0021632
I$ AMUAL CHANGE FUW Nll°.4q 711 pZ' 4 ` WAI \ \ ♦ PIN DB 5015 P& 1115
FLOOD HAZARD ) (TIE LINE) WA2
J \ ZONED: HI
1% ANRK GRANGE
FLOOD HAZARD LAID
♦ \
1100 EAIRAEW STRt T \ \ o
13 It AC,
WETLANDS 11YY \
AREA = 1811 SF P \ � TREET \ \
0.04 ACRES ` � ♦
AREA IMPAGTED \ \ 1 3 �\ \
1.1�
IJ31 31 C.
hE11AND COORDINATE TABLE 1 ,
WAI N 856982.9135 E 11111912311 L
WA2 N 856956.3991 E 1111804.2155
WA3 N 856926b414 E 1111804.6232 UTY REQUIRED
HIM N 856819.6114 E 1111196.8085 10' GREENWWi 1 1
WA5 N 856865.blOq E I1111gIb211 G O CITY REQUIRED \ Mb N 856848.4815 E 1111808.1001 (TIE POINT) 20' FIRE LANE
WAl N 856816.6531 E 1111811.0412 1
WA8 N 85bglO.bll3 E 1111832.1248
WAq N 856928b101 E 1111809.4902 1
WAIO N 85bg51.6164 E 1111811b112
WAII N 856983.4110 E 1111805.4036 EX. BLDG.
\ 2 STORIES
I hereby certify that the survey prepared by me entitled WETLAND IMPACT MAP - PRITWORK5 MILL 5 I T D T
was actually made upon the ground and that it and the Information,courses,di5twez
shown oc 119 exist. The purpose of this survey is to show the delineated wetlond5 os flagged
Alexander
in the field by PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. All boundary Information i5 taken from a TOTAL 51TE AREA: 18.211 AC.
wetland 5lavey by Borum, Wade and Associate , PA and dated JULY 25,2018. CompanyPIN: 1815261633 AR DEED REFERENCE: DB 1634 P6. 0231
Executed this 26th day of July 18 .�`' ''•,
CAR •'•
Registration No. L-3131 p��N•.....'�C�2•,; PLAT REFERENCE: PB IG1 P6. 132
Homer 5 Wode tune E 0ti ' • • y
621 Eugene Gt. Ste. IDO '' Quo °e CURRENT ZONING: PUD (Z -I1-03-004) 345 W. Washington Ave.
Cxeensboro, N.G
Green 7 zoc8 = SEAL Suite 301
Dote L-3731 = WATERSHED: NORTH BUFFALO GREEK Madison, UNI 53703
DIST. TO FLOODWAY: ON 51TE
Telephone:
N0. OF LOTS: 2 LOTS
608-258-5580
CITY BLOCK, SHEET. 2`1 Fax: [phone]
IbTH 5T II
IbiH V.
B��/�@//T
A
Pl ,00Tr.
14TH Si 4
EMD ASSp�, 7 � I
'e
12TH 5T. s N SEAS
CoRPON 5T.
(ITH sr.
MATER 5T. a
€ w
5 I T E PRO �T
9TH 5T.
At,
z
w
:5 U w W o -
8TH 5i. u RYAN 5T. �L
"--j TEXTILE LU o
VICINITY MAP-cv-
SCALE: 1" = 1000' z Q o
L]G U -
o m
x
WETLAND IMPACT SUMMARY Q
WETLAND AREA - 1811 5F - 0.04 AG. IMPACTED
arMEwDEwriOPER:
PRII(rl 5 VE NIUM,11.G
345 w wAy1N` ON AVE. - 5TE 3p
MADizoh, M 53703
(bw 250-5580
CZKALT. DAVE V05
DRAM BY= TRO
DATE: .aY 26.2018
REVIs10xs:
9*ET fmE
WETLAND
6RAPHIG 5GALE IMPACT
1 EM AP
LE W E Ws°-(.oVirl4�ksVw[4ad•deln
0 25' 50' 100 150' 200'
VRAWN6 SME 50.
F - - -----r------�
PLAM SIEET N7
I " = 50, - h L I

ncdcr.gov Guilford County Endangered 5 HPOWEB: NCHPO GIS Servi
File Edit Vie" Favorites Tools Help
:.* no" Office 365 Portal
memo
woomm
,&GF11 W WHI K4NE'WWk-'iAw;"— --jM-
0A TOWN HISTORIC is RICT 19
A,
Status MR
NRyear 2014
jo
Notes�
Location:
7$4(
A
GFeE74 At
4err"
CF01. Re,sUi:f• Ccttc,
t,111h 1984
jA.W
, at '.
mill T�Sijs 'e. I-N!Wrtf�
do
14
l090
d. i (L'. 11 D 6 2 3
yrs -

x s•
`
l r
AL
We
dth
IL
A�iite Oak
70
,
Q\ .o
Y
' • e
r
^ r
g 1 $ P
ij-
. i\
i r
. u s
-
$
J ,�, ` { a � � � 1 _ - t � .�11.�..: h tiff. _ �.-h - --. _-� .; -. ,t �,,•S �,>
/ r.'�f
r is
Me
a
M
<%- ``Lr� . � ` . � ' , ! � �: _ ` � � • ' ■ • .� - - fig. _ �d '' ��`
fat t.,poq-x l� . F - -_ .+ ? ; ' . • .:
{I}p A
YiI
Y� . r.
Drawing 1 ` USGS Topographic Map
USGS Topographic Map Approximate 25 acre Tract ".
Greensboro and McLeansville, Fairview Street
NC Quadrangles Greensboro, Guilford County, NC
Scale: 1" = 2,000' PEI Project 2529

r `
z r
r K''
i
a
't --r
,
�F ,
If
_
n
a
f
4,
Y'
r.
-
LEGEND
Site Boundary
Drawing 2 Web Soil Map
USDA Web Soil Survey of Approximate 25 acre Tract
Fairview Street
Guilford County NC
Scale: C Greensboro, Guilford County, NC
PEI Project 2529
i ^� _= _ t ecars-s iar c i --r rc.
r ti e IG' ItiFr� ,c rtc:c.aIS

i
N<t.iB j :!
Mu B .,
MUB
MlwFs
4 r
"oA
- M:
�►t Ur � 'r i'• � "41
MUH
Of
Ij
•
i
x .e `'
W h
LEGEND
Eu6 t U` Site Boundary
Drawing 2A , Published Soil Map
USDA Soil Survey of Guilford County, NC Approximate 25 acre Tract O
Published 1977, Sheet 22 Fairview Street
Not to Scale I ni& Greensboro, Guilford County, NC
PEI Project 2529
A— rye.
=-
W
"1 .
k
MlwFs
4 r
"oA
- M:
�►t Ur � 'r i'• � "41
MUH
Of
Ij
•
i
x .e `'
W h
LEGEND
Eu6 t U` Site Boundary
Drawing 2A , Published Soil Map
USDA Soil Survey of Guilford County, NC Approximate 25 acre Tract O
Published 1977, Sheet 22 Fairview Street
Not to Scale I ni& Greensboro, Guilford County, NC
PEI Project 2529
A— rye.
=-
W

Drawing 3
USFWS National Wetland
Inventory Mapper
Scale: 1" = 400'
LEGEND
Site Boundary
I
NWI Designations
� Freshwater Emergent
M
Freshwater ForeveGl�uhrUG
7i1 Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
® Fswanne and Marine
_ Freshwater Pond
- Lake
re I_Rrwnna
VA Am Other
NWI Map
Approximate 25 acre Tract
.f
Fairview Street
Greensboro, Guilford County, NC
4�"as
PEI Project 2529Pik
+rt IS
;era t -Ka
-ctrm tsn. t; gttetuicge. �ectye, tarins tar <cg
�g .- etrneFFir?g.'°Aercgri�.I 4,1 F s,atsstc _ _ ='"JS j

r.r r
4: ,
V.
1
d
i y
1
Jk.+✓*t# ✓'-'fit =�_..
[
".rdµ fr �, ,w "
`
v.
' t 'a`_ 1. F tM :$ ° ' ��•J
g
o
roft, All
C
LEGEND
Site Boundary
= ..
" l%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
■Regulatory Floodway
■Special Floodxary
Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard
0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
FLture Conditions 1%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
I�Area with Reduaed Rrsk Due to Lerve
e
Drawing 4
FEMA FIRM ��ta
National Flood Hazard Layer from FEMA Approximate 25 acre Tract
Web Mapping Service Fairview Street
Scale: 1 = 250
Greensboro, Guilford County, NC
PEI Project 2529
� °' �� y,r M.: ' � � ta $ a = :ri 14 R?I r _E. �ECt a^t®(1^=:.7f Cl �•Y' � ra.'•..iC.� rf�...= - - - _

North Buffalo Creek
Surveyor Locate
DP -1
OO
DP -2
WA 1-11
41
s
LEGEND _
FLAG NUMBERS/INFO Site Boundary
. ,. Perennial Stream
WETLAND FLAGS = qA�y ^. Wetlands
STREAM FLAGS =
Stream Flags = 3 ;:, sA 1-s Flag Number
WrTHELOCATIONS
ld Flags = 11
gs = 14 DP -1 Q Data Point
OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE PRELIMINARY. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE AND/OR
Q-DWR. THIS EXHIBIT INCLUDES GPS LOCATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES. DELINEATION CONDUCTED BY DAVID
D MICHAEL BRAME ON FEBRUARY 8, 2017.
Drawing 5
Aerial Imagery from ESRI
and PEI GPS Data
Scale: 1" = 250'
Date: 2.8.17
Wetland Map
Approximate 25 Acre Tract
Fairview Street
Greensboro, Guilford County, NC
PEI Project 2529 _
r�IJ"hili

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Fairview Street City/County: Greensboro/Guilford Sampling Date: 2.8.17
Applicant/Owner: State: North Carolina Sampling Point: DP -1
Investigator(s): Brame, PEI Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Drainage swale Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave
Slope (%): 1 Lat: 36.101996" Long: -79.772422° Datum: Wgs84
Soil Map Unit Name: Urban land NWI Classification: none
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology _significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Yes X No
etc.
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that apply) _
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (614) _
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
X High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
X Saturation (A3)
_ _
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (61)
_
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks) _
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_
Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_
Shallow Aquitard (133)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_
FAC -Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): surface
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): surface
_
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
(Plot size: 30' ) % Cover Species? Status
= Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Salix nigra 10 Y 0131-
2.
BL2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Sampling Point DP -1
Dominance Test
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 WB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of.
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
X2=
FAC species
X3=
FACU species
X4=
UPL species
X5=
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
7• Prevalence Index = B/A =
8. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
9. _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
10. X 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
10 = Total Cover 3 - Prevalence Test is 5 3 0'
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Carex intumescens
2. Juncus eff esus
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
40 Y FACW data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
10 FACW _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
50 = Total Cover
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm)
or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
regardless of height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 it tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type, Loc' Texture
0-12 10YR 4/1 95 7.5YR4/6 5 C RM L
Sampling Point: DP -1
Remarks
RM=Reduced Matrix. CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Linina. M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (s4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Suface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (176)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MI -RA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
y rologyHydropmust
disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Fairview Street City/County: Greensboro/Guilford Sampling Date: 2.8.17
Applicant/Owner: State: North Carolina Sampling Point: DP -2
Investigator(s): Brame, PEI Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Adjacent to high bank stream Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex
Slope (%): 1 Lat: 36.102167' Long: -79.772496° Datum: Wgs84
Soil Map Unit Name: Urban NWI Classification: none
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil _,or Hydrology _significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil _,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampiing point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
mvnani nry
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reguired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) _
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (614) _
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _
Drainage Patterns (B10)
_
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _
Moss Trim Lines (616)
_
Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_
Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks) _
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_
Iron Deposits (65)
_
Geomorphic Position (132)
_
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_
Shallow Aquitard (133)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_
Microtopographic Relief (134)
_
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_
FAC -Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
_
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point DP -2
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum
(Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5
Y FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
2.
3
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83% (A/B)
7.
8.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
5
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
(Plot size: 30' )
FACW species X2=
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5
Y FACW
FAC species X3=
2. Ligustrum sinense
5
Y FACU
species X4=
3FACU
4
UPL species X5=
5
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
7.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
8.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9•
10.
_ 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Test is 5 3.0'
10 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum
(Plot size: 10' )
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
1. Eulalia viminea
15
Y FAC
2. Lonicera japonica
5
Y FAC
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3. Smilax rotundifolia
3
FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
4. Ligustrum sinense
2
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5.
6.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm)
or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
8.
g
10
regardless of height.
11.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
12.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
25
= Total Cover
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine Stratum
(Plot size: 30' )
1. Vitis rotundifolia
5
Y FAC
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
2.
height.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5•
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No _
6.
5
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

SOIL Sampling Point: DP -2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loci Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR4/4 100 L
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (s4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix.
Remarks:
Auger refusal at 6 inches. Fill consisting of concrete rubble and pavement.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Indicators for Problematic Hydric S01183:
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Suface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Dark Surface (177)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
slndi vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils F19 MLRA 148
p ( ) ( )
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
wetland y rologyHydropmust
disturbed or problematic.
Remarks:
Auger refusal at 6 inches. Fill consisting of concrete rubble and pavement.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X

r City of Greensboro
696,J North Carolina
Determination of No Practical Alternatives
Authorization Certificate
July 11, 2018
Mr. Bradley S. Luckey, PWS
Project Manager
PO Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
Re: Determination of No Practical Alternative for Stream Buffer disturbance for Printworks Mill —
1700 Fairview Street
Dear Mr. Luckey:
In accordance with the State of North Carolina's Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0267 — Jordan Water Suvvly
Nutrient Strategy: Protection of Existing Riparian Buffers., any applicant that intends to disturb Zone 1
and Zone 2 of the stream buffer must show that there is "No Practical Alternative" than to impact the
stream buffer. The applicant submitted a "No Practical Alternative Request" on June 28, 2018 stating that
the permanent stream buffer disturbance in Zone 1 and Zone 2 was necessary for the installation of a
proposed road impact other than Crossing (Fire Lane) and temporary impact in Zone 2 for a sanitary
sewer line to the property referenced above.
The City of Greensboro determined that the permanent impact of approximately 136 sf in Zone 1 and
1,539 sf in Zone 2 of the Jordan Watersupply Watershed stream buffer was necessary to install the Fire
Lane and that there was no practical alternative to move the roadway outside of the stream buffer as the
Jordan Rules require.
The surface area impact information in square footage, including mitigation area is as follows:
Buffer
Zone 1 Impacts
Zone 2 Impacts
Area of to be
Net Mitigation Required
replanted
Zone 1 — Multiplier of 3
Zone 2 — Multiplier of 1.5
Total
136 sf of
1,539 of
Zone 1 - 1,631 sf
Zone 1 — 136sf x 3 = 408sf
mitigation
mitigation
Zone 2 - 2,671 sf
Zone 2 — 1,539sf x 1.5= 2308.5sf
Information submitted by the applicant explained how the impacts have been reduced to the maximum
extent practicable. Please be advised the applicant should secure any other required federal, state, and
local certifications before the project proceeds. Mitigation must be provided for the proposed impacts as
specified in the table above. The City has received an acceptance letter from the North Carolina
Mitigation Services to meet this mitigation requirement. Until the North Carolina Mitigation Services
receives and clears your payment, and proof of payment has been provided to this Office, no impacts
specified in this Authorization Certificate shall occur. For accounting purposes, this Authorization
Certificate authorizes payment to the North Carolina Mitigation Services to meet the compensatory
mitigation requirement shown on the table above.
P.O. Box 3136 • Greensboro, NC 27402-3136 • www.greensboro-nc.gov • (336) 373 -CITY (2489) • TTY # 333-6930

This approval is valid only for the purpose and design that was described in the application. If any
modifications are made to the project a written notification describing the changes, must be submitted to
the City of Greensboro Water Resources Department, Engineering Division (Stormwater Engineering
Section). If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the certification and approval
letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions.
This letter completes the review of The City of Greensboro, Water Resources Department, Engineering
Division (Stormwater Engineering Section) under the Determination of No Practical Alternative. If you
have any questions, please contact Jeremy L. McCall at 336-373-2527.
Sincerely,
r
J
Jeremy L. McCall, PE
Engineering Supervisor Stormwater
Cc: Sue Homewood, NCDEQ Winston Salem Regional Office
David E. Bailey, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office

Mitigation Services
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
INVOICE# INV -005190
July 12, 2018
Joseph Alexander
Printworks Ventures, LLC
345 W. Washington Ave., Suite 301
Madison, WI 53703
Project: Printworks Mill
County: Guilford
DMS ID#: MR -06948
Location: Cape Fear 03030002
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Serrelart:
Invoice expires: 9/10/2018
Please review this invoice carefully and report any discrepancies immediately to the contact listed below.
You have elected to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements of the applicable Section 401/404
permit(s) issued for the above referenced project through payment of a fee to the NCDEQ Division of
Mitigation Services (DMS) In -Lieu Fee Program. In accordance with 02R.0601, the amount due is based
upon the 2017-2018 Fee Schedule and has been calculated as follows:
Mitigation Type
Invoiced Amount
Rate
Fee
Riparian Buffer
2,716
$0.97
$2,634.52
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE if paid within 60 days: $2,634.52
This invoice expires in 60 days. Expired invoices are not eligible to be paid. Note that permit(s) may require
payment before this date. Invoice extensions may be requested by emailing the DMS In -Lieu Fee Program
Coordinator at [e-mail]. Extensions will be based on the fee schedule in effect on the date
they are issued. Please submit an ePayment at http://go.ncdenr.gov/epayment or send a check for the Total
Amount Due to the address below and enclose a copy of your unexpired invoice.
US Mail: Physical Address (for other delivery services):
NCDEQ NCDEQ
Division of Mitigation Services Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center 217 West Jones St., Suite 3000A
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 Raleigh, N.C. 27603
Call for an appointment if you need to hand -deliver a payment.
Third Dartv payments must be accompanied by written authorization from the permittee. All refund requests
must be submitted in accordance with the Division's refund policy at www.nceep.net. If you have questions
concerning this payment, please call Kelly Williams at [phone]. YOU MUST BE IN POSSESSION
OF THE PAYMENT RECEIPT FROM DMS PRIOR TO COMMENCING THE ACTIVITIES AUTHORIZED BY
THE DEPARTMENT OF ARMY 404 PERMIT, CAMA PERMIT AND/OR THE 401 WATER QUALITY
CERTIFICATION.
cc: Sheri Montalvo, NCDWR-Raleigh
Bradley Luckey, agent
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 1 217 W. Jones Street, Suite 3000
919 707 8976 T

Receipt
NC DEQ Division of Mitigation Services
ePayments
Payment Receipt
Merchant: NDENR-Div of Water Clilaility
Merchant City/State: Raleigh, North Carolina
Payment Status: Success
Payment Date: 07/12/2018
Posting Date: 07/12/2018
Confirmation Number. 18071264203876
Billing Address: Alexander Company Inc
345 W Washington Ave
Suite 301
Madison, WI 53703
[phone]
E -Mail Address: [e-mail]
Total Amount: 2634.52 USD
Account #,. x3605
Routing N: 075909945
Account Type: Checking
Reference Information: INV-005190,Printworks Ventures LLC,2634.52
Disclaimer. No convenience fee is changed for using the eCheck
payment method. However, a processing fee of
$25.00 or 10% of the amount of the eCheck,
whichever is greater, will be charged for an eCheck
returned due to insufficient funds. Payments are null
and void if payment is made with an eCheck that is
returned unpaid by the bank.
NC DEQ Division of Mitigation Sernces
1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
[phone] - FAX [phone]

City of Greensboro
FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (A/AE Zone)
Permit Number ZD l O —oo 5&suance Date —1 - ZS " 20 t16 PIN '-7 8-15"2 to tlo 3 �
I ccordance with the City of`Gr�eensboro Flood Da ge Prevention Ordinance, a Floodplain Development Permit is hereby granted to:
O_TLL
to conduct develo ment activities within the area of special flood hazard on property located at:
1,100 t IZ-\/ t. et A-5 SY.
recorded in Book -74134Page O Z3 ( , Registry of Guilford County
This Permit is issued to the aforementioned individual, firm, partnership, etc. for the purpose noted above and in accordance with the City
of Greensboro Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance, Floodplain Development Permit No.24;Pt$ • O (.545 and attachments thereto;
and is subject to the following modifications and/or performance reservations:
1. Permit issued for the following development only:
Excavation: Fill: ✓ Grading: w'e Utility Construction: _
Road Construction: Residential Constrt ction: Nonresidential Construction:
Addition: Renovation: ✓ Other (specify):
2. The lowest floor and all attendant utilities shall be at or above Z �bO• 3 feet Mean Sea Level (MSL) (NAVD 1988).
3. Pursuant to Section 30-3-6.4(A) of the City of Greensboro Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance, it shall be the duty of the permit
holder to submit to the Floodplain Administrator the Elevation/Floodproofing Certification within 7 calendar days after
establishment of the lowest floor.
4. Fill material shall not encroach into the floodway or non -encroachment area of .Ll( uU CiIF �YLt�F1 �.. lib'
5. Proper Erosion and Sediment control measures shall be installed and maintained in accordance with North Carolina State Standards
and Section 30-7-4 of the City of Greensboro Development Ordinance during fill operations.
6. Provide a minimum of two (2) openings in the foundation wall having a total area of not less than P( Ar square inches.
The bottom of the openings shall not be greater than one (1) foot above the ground elevation at the perimeter of the foundation wall.
The access area to the crawl space may be utilized to meet these criteria provided a mesh or screen door is used.
Note: Vent opening area requirement is calculated at 1 sq. in. per sq. ft of structures footprint below BFE.
7. Mobile/Manufactured home shall be installed in accordance with the City of Greensboro Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance
Section 30-7-5.6(B)(3). See copy attached to this permit..
8. Upon completion of foundation construction, contact the Floodplain Administrator's office for foundation inspection.
Failure to comply with the City of Greensboro Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance including any modifications and/or
performance reservations could result in assessment of civil penalties or initiation of civil or criminal court actions in
accordance with Section 30-8-5 of the City of Greensboro Development Ordinance.
Iss d this 23 day of Su Lu .20 t .
Floodplain Administrator for City A Greensboro