20090647 Ver 1_401 Application_20090609

0 ARCADIS
Infrastructure, environment, facl(ities
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Subject:
PCN Application - Notification Only
Moyock Wastewater System, Currituck County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Steffens:
i i
JUN , 210 C9
CENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
Please find attached a Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application for the above
referenced project. The PCN application is being provided for notification purposes.
The project consists of installation of 4" and 6" wastewater force mains. A majority of
the project area is located within the roadway right-of-way and the piping will be
installed in the same trench where feasible.
No impacts to jurisdictional areas will occur during installation of the force mains. All
crossings (Moyock Run, a perennial stream, and drainage ditches) will be made
within 15 degrees of perpendicular. All crossings will be performed using trenchless
pipe installation construction techniques if the crossing is within an area that is
jurisdictional. Several of the drainage ditch crossings will be performed in portions of
the ditches that are presently culverted. No temporary or permanent impacts to
jurisdictional wetlands are anticipated to occur during installation of the force mains.
If you have any questions, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
............
?iraela Diebolt
Senior Scienti?t
Copies:
File
Eric Weatherly, Currituck County Public Works Department
David Briley, ARCADIS Project Manager
?g-0647
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh
North Carolina 27607
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.arcadis-us.com
WATER RESOURCES
Date:
1 June 2009
Contact:
Linda Diebolt
Phone:
220
Email:
[e-mail]
Our ref:
NCCURR01.0008

O?, W A
TF9oG
O?
-09-0647
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing'
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
E] Section 404 Permit [J Section 10 Permit >
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
® Yes ? No For the record only for Corps Permit:

® Yes ? No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ® Yes ? No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Moyock Force Main
2b. County: Currituck
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Moyock
2d. Subdivision name: N/A L jJ
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: IUN `2,, 2009
3. Owner Information UENR-WATERQUALfn'
BR?NGi
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NCDOT WETLANUZ
3b. Deed Book and Page No. N/A
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): Eric T. Weatherly, P.E., County Engineer, Currituck County Public Works Department
3d. Street address: 153 Courthouse Road
3e. City, state, zip: Currituck, NC 27929
3f. Telephone no.: 252.232.2504
3g. Fax no.: 252.232.3551
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Linda Diebolt
5b. Business name
(if applicable): ARCADIS
5c. Street address: 801 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 300
5d. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27607
5e. Telephone no.: 919.854.1282
5f. Fax no.: 919.854.5448
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): N/A
Latitude: 36.524942 Longitude: -
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 76.178106
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 5.04 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Moyock Run
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C Sw
2c. River basin: Pasquotank
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project corridor is located within roadway right-of-ways that are comprised of maintained areas dominated by
grasses. Land use in the vicinity of the site consists of commercial and residential development, and undeveloped areas.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
<0.01
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
12 feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The proposed project will provide piping for wastewater and will allow existing septic tanks and drain fields to be
abandoned.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project consists of installation of approximately 14,140 feet of 4" wastewater force main along NC 168 from
the North Carolina / Virginia state line south to Moyock Commons Drive. The project also consists of installation of a 6"
wastewater force main that will parallel the aforementioned 4" line. Additionally, approximately 3,260 feet of 4"
wastewater force main will be constructed from the existing Newtown Sanitary District low pressure pipe (LPP) drain field
out to the previously mentioned force mains along NC 168. The existing onsite septic tank and LPP drain field which
currently serves the Newtown Sanitary District will be abandoned. All wastewater flow from the force mains will t
directed to the existing Moyock Commons Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). Approximately 905 feet of 4"
wastewater force main will be constructed from the two force mains on NC 168 down Moyock Commons Drive to the
Moyock Commons WWTP. The WWTP currently serves only tenants of the Moyock Commons shopping center; however,
the WWTP's wastewater permit will be modified to accept the additional off-site flow.
The wastewater pipes will be installed within existing maintained roadway rights-of-ways. Most of the wastewater lines will
be installed using an excavator to excavate a trench into which the lines will be installed. Upon completion of the line
installation, the trenches will be filled and the surface will be returned to original grade using a loader and/or grader and
seeded. The jurisdictional stream crossing at Moyock Run will be accomplished using trenchless pipe installation
techniques such as directional drilling or boring. Numerous stormwater drainage features that contain wetland vegetation
are located within and adjacent to the project corridor. Pipe installation will either be performed within an area in which the
stormwater drainage feature is presently culverted or the pipe will be installed using trenchless construction techniques.
Therefore, no impacts to jurisdictional streams or wetlands will occur in assocation with the proposed project.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
? Yes ®No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ? Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ® Yes ? No
6b. If yes, explain.
Phase 2 of the Moyock Sewer project will extend the 4" and 6" wastewater force mains that will be installed along NC 168
during Phase I to a new water reclamation facility that will eventually serve the entire Moyock Central Sewer District.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0
2h. Comments: Wetlands are present within several stormwater drainage features in the project corridor. The wastewater
pipes will either be installed in a portion of the stormwater ditch that is presently culverted or the jurisdictional area will be
traversed by using trenchless construction techniques. No impacts to jurisdictional wetlands are anticipated to occur relative to
the proposed project. However, if incidental impacts to wetlands occurs during construction activities, these impacts will be
less than 0.1 acre, the PCN threshold.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 0
3i. Comments: Moyock Run is the only perennial stream within the project corridor. There are no intermittent streams within
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
the project corridor. Moyock Run will be traversed using directional drill installation methods and no stream impacts will occur.
All other jurisdictional areas are drainage ditches that will be traversed with no temporary or permanent impacts.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number -
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T 4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable) 4c.

Type of impact 4d.

Waterbody type 4e.

Area of impact (acres)
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4L Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.

Pond ID 5b.

Proposed use or purpose 5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d.
Stream Impacts (feet) 5e.
Upland
(acres)
number of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5E Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary T impact required?
131 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B2 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Delineation of jurisdictional streams and wetlands was performed prior to design of the proposed project. During design of the
project, the piping locations were chosen to avoid impacts to jurisdictional areas to the extent feasible. Construction corridors
were pulled away from jurisdictional wetland areas to avoid impacts where feasible. Wetland crossings have been designed
such that the piping is either installed under existing culverts or the piping will be installed using trenchless construction
techniques to avoid impacts. Additionally, the crossing of Moyock Run has been designed to be directionally drilled, thereby
avoiding impact to jurisdictional areas.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
All piping will cross jurisdictional areas within 15 degress of perpendicular. Impacts to jurisdictional areas will be avoided by
either using trenchless construction techniques to traverse jurisdictional areas or by installing the piping under existing culverts
associated with stormwater drainage features. No impacts to jurisdictional streams or wetlands are anticipated from the
proposed project. Incidental impacts to jurisdictional areas are not anticipated to occur; however, if they do occur, these
impacts will be less than 0.1 acre, the PCN threshold. Best management practices, and sedimentation and erosion control
methods will be used during all construction activities. No equipment refueling or maintenance activities will occur adjacent to
Moyock Run or the stormwater drainage features. Wetland impacts during construction will be minimized to the extent that is
reasonably feasible. If any incidental impacts to jurisdictional areas occurs during construction activities, the areas will be
returned to their original configuration and stabilized and/or seeded in a timely manner.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ? Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps
? Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
? Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zo
ne 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a . Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b . If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a . What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 0%
2b . Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: The project will be subsurface and no
impervious surfaces will be generated relative to the proposed project. The project is a Low Density project.
2d . If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
? Certified Local Government
2e . Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties

4a.
Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? HQW
? ORW
(check all that apply):
? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ? No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ® Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
? Yes ® No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a . Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b . Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c . If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a . Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ® Yes ? No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b . If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project will have minimal impacts to existing land use. According to the Currituck County Land Use Map,
continued development is expected to occur within the project service area. The proposed project is designed to
coordinate with the County's Land Use Plan for the service area. Beneficial direct impacts to the service area will occur
from the proposed project. The proposed infrastructure system will eventually transfer wastewater from existing and
septic systems, to a new, state of the art regional Moyock Water Reclamation Facility capable of denitrification. The
project will also make available wastewater sewer service for future development, thereby reducing the potential for the
proliferation of privately owned wastewater package plants and septic systems.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No sewage will be generated from the proposed project. The proposed project entails construction of wastewater lines
that will transfer sewage from existing septic systems to an existing WWTP. The WWTP currently serves only tenants of the
Moyock Commons shopping center; however, the wastewater permit will be modified to accept the additional off-site flow.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
El Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Review of Natural Heritage Program data relative to known occurrences and populations of listed species was performed
via NC CGIA data and at the Natural Heritage Program office in Raleigh. Additionally, field surveys were performed in
August 2008 to determine if potential habitat for listed species was present within the project corridor. If potential habitat
was determined to be present in the project corridor, additional visual surveys were performed to determine if listed
species were present. No listed species were observed within the project corridor during field investigations.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Review of Essential Fish Habitat designations was performed via NC CGIA data.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Review was performed of listed historical and archeology sites at the State Historic Preservation Office.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ® Yes ? No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Upon completion of the installation of the wastewater line, the
project corridor will be returned to its previous grade; therefore, no decrease in floodplain capacity will occur from the
proposed project.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? 2008 FEMA mapping
Eric T. Weatherly, P.E. -) t-,) S l'z,) 0 9
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
x??xo
PROPOSED NC WELCOME CENTER
PUMP STATION
?? VIRGINIA ?? ?? lr?. - _ ---- - _ ----. - -
r °
_ 7 -?-
` NQRTH CAROLIN
---1? a
Moyock r^ `t i
----- -?---- f
__ 1 1
PROPOSED FORCE MAINS •- - -----' J.
?r, i ` lfi8 ,tiff. 1 /a,?
j ?
•W. ? -?" -iY- ? I} 11 ? ? - i ?? ? • •li ?, ¦ • •. ?\.` /' ' ?/+. ,, ' /F 1,
00,
PROPOSED NEWTOWN
e -_
PUMP STATION +;E T_.x' ?' '. • `•'r .
MOYOCK COMMONS '.• \ •
?- - - WWTP
` •
'y .
0 0.15 0.3 0.6 J' 1 ?? ; \ Jf i ti.` ?? ice//'' ?, j •?
Miles I !• ? ?.
1in-
- 0.3 miles
Prepared By Prepared For. SITE LOCATION MAP FIGURE
' t,
?? MOYOCK WASTEWATER SYSTEM
1
CARCADIS urr?fc?Jc CURRITUCK COUNTY, NC
....,.
Source: USGS Topographic Quadangle, Moyock, VA - Nc
Virginia
Wa
R North Carolina
w
Cu
Pt
PROPOSED Do w Cu
NC WELCOME CENTER
PUMP STATION
Pa Ds
Ds PROPOSED FORCE MAINS 4 At Ro
d Baxter Ln
aA At Cb
Do
Ro
Wa
Inventors Dr StA Do Wa
o` Cb
TO Winslow Rd
Winslow Rd Q?es' ?m Wa _ IN
PQ w
'Lloy J
0
At ct?,
<d2y ?a'
CoAaA
l (7 \U
Richard Shaw Rd a" }c Cb StA Cb Ro
gym` ?o
Ro Wa StA
Do Wa
PROPOSED NEWTOWN
PUMP STATION At AaA ti1ac?
o J? m ?o?P
j ON s,Qa
Cb - / Ro
° o r ABA
lY ? °
At ?° Oa Tulls Creek Rd
CnA ?a At
At AaA
ABA sae oaac O PC3- d 6y
AaA } Q s? 5? e ° sr CIO
TO South Mills Rd StA Cb C Fs! 0 `say AaA
StB MOYOCK COMMONS
a moo VW Vf P C?^ s
At rOO,?c ti`?y d At
Legend StA
AaA ?s o
?--? Proposed Forcemains
iy? Goy ?G
Stream, Canal To
o` N o o,s os os
?` Qc Miles
Road aA 1 inch = 0.3 mile
Prepared By, Prepared For SOILS MAP FIGURE
MOYOCK WASTEWATER SYSTEM
ARCADI$ currtiuck - ` 2
CURRITUCK COUNTY, NC
Legend
MOYOCK COMMONS
;.
Proposed Forcemains
Perennial or Intermittent Stream ! N
t x; r; 0 015 03 06
C Miles
Drainage Swale 1 inch = 0.3 mile ? ;.
Prepared By: Prepared For
JURISDICTIONAL IMPACTS FIGURE
MOYOCK WASTEWATER SYSTEM
orr. . Uuck
ARCADIS C >?} CURRITUCK COUNTY, NC 3
Source: Currituck County 2008