19860264 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19860205

eDIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
Comments concerning an application for State Federal CAMA Permit(s) from,.
r
fF7l''`FtE'6Y.tl U Mr21/4_71,111
-
A. PERMIT:
This office cannot comment on this project until after the close of the Section
401 Certification Public Comments Period.
This office has no objection to the issuance of the permit(s) for the proposed
Nroject with the following conditions:

That the activity be conducted in such a manner as to prevent significant
increases in turbidity outside the area of construction or construction-
related discharge (increases of 25 NTU's or less are not considered
significant).
That the instream turbidity not be increased by more than 50 NTU's as a
result of the proposed activity af ter a rt:zs,:?aabie ojj., - `-- 'ilu-
tion and mixture. `
That turbidity levels in shall not be increased
by more than 10 NTU's as a result of the proposed activity after a reason-
able opportunity for dilution and, mixture.
B. CERTIFICATION STATUS:
Certification is not required
for this project.
Certification is required for
this project. Such action to.
process the certification has
been initiated. Proposed
Certification will be acted on
or after
The proposed project is certified
under'General Certification
A) No. 1179 issued on January 25 D) No. 1431 issued on October 16,
1977, for sewer line construction 1980, for boat ramp construction.
B) No. 1272 issued on November 10, E) No. 1664 issued on September 8,
1978, for bulkhead construction. 1983, for Rip-Rap Placement.
No. 1273 issued on November 10, F) No. 1665 issued on September 19,
1978, for discharges of liquid 1983, for incidental bridge
effluent from diked upland disposa construction.
areas..

DIV WATER QUALITY SECT ?-
ISION OF ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
Comments concernYng an. application for State Federal CAMA Permit(s) from
r
A. PERMIT:
This office cannot comment on this project until after the close of the Section
401 Certification Public Comments Period:
Y ?roject his office has no objection to the.issuance of.the permit(s) for the.proposed
with the following conditions;

That the activity be conducted in such a manner as to prevent significant
increases in turbidity outside the area of construction or construction-.
related discharge (increases.of .25 NTU's.or less are not considered'

That the instream turbidity not be increased by more than 50 NTU's as a
result .of ,,the proposed. activity :af ter a .reasonable opportunity for° dild_
tion and mixture.
That turbidity levels in shall not be increased
by more than 10 NTU's as a result of, the proposed activity, after a reason-
able opportunity for dilution and. mixture..
B. CERTIFICATION STATUS:
Certification is not required
for this project.
Certification is required for
this project. Such action to:
process the certification has
been initiated. Proposed
Certification will be acted on.
or after
_ The.... propos.ed_proj..ect is..c.er-tified
under'General Certification
A) No. 1179 issued on January 25 D) No. 1431 issued on October 16,
1977, for sewer line construction 1980, for boat ramp construction.
B) No. 1272 issued on November 10, E) No. 1664 issued on September 8,
1978, for bulkhead construction. 1983, for Rip-Rap Placement.
No. 1273 issued on-November 10, F) No. 1665 issued on September 19,
1978, for discharges of liquid 1983, for incidental bridge
effluent from diked upland disposa construction.
areas.
All
WATER„QUALITY SECT
99
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT
N
iWDATA DF/C:AMA/404 fti::V DATE 01 /28/86
ACTION > t:'.I••G FILE > D CAMr't40 i E'SWD > FORMAT > NRDFC:AMA NEXT RCD > 00005
NRT•70 ENTERED THIS DATA, RECORD IS NO 00004 FRD DATA
E'RO JO : (}t, C)0 F'RO J : MARINE:: CORPS CHERRY PT. COUNTY: CRAVEN REGION: 0*7
ASSIGNED TO : W..JM Qjn-x*'"- ..1 C i :r. N-r NOTICE: N
T'YI..?::: CERTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION DATE S Y,Tr'.rli-J
404 PN : Y 401 RI°:W :I:S,SUI:::: Y RECEIVED: 860'i i3
CA1°A ONLY: (:;-C:: tJf'i...AND DIKE:: DENY: INITIAL REPORT:
DF/CAMW GC: HOLD: FINAL REPORT: 860128
RECEIVING STREAM: HANi: OC:K C RV CLASS: SC"-SW BASIN: NE U
COMMENTS:
HYDRAUI...IC. DRI::.DGI::. EXISTING 1 430 X 100 X 9F.I.. CHANNEL; ALSO EXISTING
800 X 200 X 6FT BASIN
APPROX. 22,500 C U . YIDS . S:I:I...T&MUD
DISCHARGE FROM UP LAND DIKE:: TO NE::USE:: RIVER (SB }
COPIES: WAi-iO-C:I:::N7-RAr_.•'-•M:I:I_I_ i

RECEIVED
JAN 2 919986
WAIt1t QUALIty SECTION
OPERATIONS "MCH
6j.
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
SAWC086-N-025-0086
? E,?
A, 1-j
January 2, 1986
PUBLIC NOTICE
THE U. S. MARINE CORPS, AIR STATION, CHERRY POINT, Cherry Point, North
Carolina 28533, represented by COMMANDER K. H. BELL, OICC, has applied for a
Department of the Army permit TO MAINTAIN AND EXTEND AN ACCESS CHANNEL AND A
BASIN AREA IN HANCOCK CREEK OFF THE NEUSE RIVER, CHERRY POINT, Craven County,
North Carolina.
The following description of the work is taken from data provided by the
applicant and from observations made during an onsite visit by a
representative of the Corps of Engineers. Plans submitted with the
application show the proposed hydraulic dredging of an approximate 1,430-foot-
long, 100-foot-wide access channel to a depth of 9 feet, mean low water (MLW)
and an approximate 800-foot-long, 200-foot-wide basin to a depth of 6 feet,
mean low water (MLW). The access channel and basin support the existing
Marine Corps docking and marina facilities. The dredged material,
approximately 22,500 cubic yards of silt and mud, is to be pumped and retained
in an upland diked disposal area. The effluent is to be discharged through an
existing pipe into the Neuse River. The purpose of the work is to provide
adequate depths for continued safe navigation of military vessels entering and
exiting the Hancock Creek docking facilities. Plans showing the work are
included with this public notice.
The applicant has determined that the proposed work is consistent with
the North Carolina Coastal Zone Management Plan and has submitted this
determination to the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management for their
review and concurrence. This proposal shall be reviewed for the applicability
of other actions by North Carolina agencies such as:
a. The issuance of a Water Quality Certification under Section 401 of
the Clean Water Act by the North Carolina Division of Environmental
Management.
b. The issuance of an easement to fill or otherwise occupy State-owned
submerged land under North Carolina General Statute 143-341(4), 146-6, 146-11,
and 146-12 by the North Carolina Department of Administration and the North
Carolina Council of State.
c. The approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan by the Land
Quality Section, North Carolina Division of Land Resources, pursuant to the
State Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 (NC G.S. 113 A-50-66).
as
-2-
The requested Department of the Army permit will be denied if any
required State or local authorization and/or certification is denied. No
Department of the Army permit will be issued until a State coordinated
viewpoint is received and reviewed by this agency. Recipients of this notice
are encouraged to furnish comments on factors of concern represented by the
above agencies directly to the respective agency, with a copy furnished to the
Corps of Engineers.
Approval of this permit will give Federal authorization for maintenance
dredging for a period of time not to exceed 10 years from the date of permit
issuance. The permittee will be required to present plans to the District
Engineer a minimum of 2 weeks prior to commencement of such maintenance work.
All maintenance would be performed in accordance with Federal, State, and
local permits and regulations governing such activities at the time the
maintenance is undertaken.
This application is being considered pursuant to Section 10 of the River
and Harbor Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403). Any person may request, in writing
within the comment period specified in the notice, that a public hearing be
held to consider this application. Requests for public hearing shall state,
with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing.
The District Engineer has consulted the latest published version of the
National Register of Historic Places for the presence or absence of registered
properties, or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion therein, and
this worksite is not registered property or property listed as being eligible
for inclusion in the Register. Consultation of the National Register
constitutes the extent of cultural resource investigations by the District
Engineer, and he is otherwise unaware of the presence of such resources.
Presently, unknown archeological, scientific, prehistorical, or historical
data may be lost or destroyed by work under the requested permit.
The District Engineer has determined, based on a review of data furnished
by the applicant and onsite observations, that the activity will not affect
species, or their critical habitat, designated as endangered or threatened
pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973.
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of
the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity
and its intended use on the public interest. Evaluation of the probable
impacts which the proposed activity may have on the public interest requires a
careful weighing of all those factors which become relevant in each particular
case. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the
proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The
decision whether to authorize a proposal, and if so the conditions under which
it will be allowed to occur, are therefore determined by the outcome of the
general balancing process. That decision should reflect the national concern
,:? t 's '
-3-
for both protection and utilization of important resources. All factors which
may be relevant to the proposal must be considered including the cumulative
effects thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general
environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values,
flood hazards, flood plain values, land use, navigation, shore erosion and
accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy
needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of
property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For
activities involving the placement of dredged or fill materials in waters of
the United States, a permit will be denied if the discharge that would be
authorized by such permit would not comply with the Environmental Protection
Agencies' 404(b)(1) guidelines. Subject to the preceding sentence and any
other applicable guidelines or criteria, a permit will be granted unless the
District Engineer determines that it would be contrary to the public interest.
Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will
be received in this office, Attention: Mr. David Baker, until 4:15 p.m.,
February 3, 1986, or telephone [phone].
L. Warren Lieutenant Colonel,
Corps of Engineers
Deputy District Engineer

HANCOC
DREDGING
K CREEK
PROJECT
1. Index, General Notes
2. Location Map
.3. Location Map
4. Legend, BM. Location Plan
5. Dredging Plan
6. Dredging Plan
7. Dredging Plan
8. Dredging Plan
9. Dredging Plan
10. Dredging Plan
11. Spoil Area, Dike Cross-section
12.. Flashboard Riser Detail
General Notes:
1. Soundings expressed to the nearest tenth of a foot and refer to local
mean low water datum.
2. SF-E SHEE`C 4 FOR r3ENc?tl1ARK LCY-KnotAft ELEVA--rtaty.
3. Terminal end of the pipeline from the dredge into the spoil area will
be positioned at or greater than 50' from any part of the dike at a
maximum distance from the flashboard riser.
4. Spoil area effluent shall be contained by pipe to appoint at or below
the mean low water elevation.
SHexr / o?' !2
I

IT
KINSTON
TO
• VW`NEW BERN
• P1z0.1?G."r ??"GS,
LOCATION
HAVELOCK
5 17
70
56
JACKSONVIL
MOREH
YT-
L J UN A?LANTI C
R
.C.A.S."
HERRY POI
cE
LOCATION MAP
0 5 10 20 30
SCALE OF MILES
5hj5' 2 494:. /2
2

iANCOCK CREEK /
3ROJECT LOCATION /
I MOO o
c
0
W I BOO
Z Jacks n
w I r
Z GOLF
COURS
O
m
o?
/ M
gEEK
Magazine Area
-.40'ro !
MEMO
6A6at ion Map
GRAPHIC SCALE
1000' 0' 1000' 3000'
M14=tMPMC=%r"1 Be, ?

G
AIN
LATE
Slocum
Vil lage
.5yerr .9
Z
/ 4'.
LEGEND .
DRED41N4 LIMITS
EXISTING DEPTH OF WATER 5.3
OVILDIN45
CENTERLINE -? +
NUB AND rM-K •
MONUMENT o
EXI67I1,14 CONTOUR 'S.___.•-
15A5EUN E - -
MGAN LAW WATER ELEV. tALW

X4V
¢o
r A ?n
v ?
y
a
a
N

BM. LOCATION PLAN
N.T.S.
FH 34 ELEVATION 11.74114. L.W
PRDNZE DISK 5Er IN CONCRETE
MONVIrENT PROTWOW4 at'

4

? Z
O
0
NO w
SCP ?? X
0
N O t= ul n
s = ?o _ a
N ?
- O 9 0 ? q w t?'d ? W Q
W N C` N J N J y? J W p
? 0 ?u
Z 0 b J
J N r ,A A ?` ^P 9 U
al ? ? n d ? 9
O` N 1n N ,
f : r
r
cc o % o r
k M d o V'. J V 41?
N d O// ,
?t c! ° o 0 V` Zf r
N N d o Ir -U° p N
IA ° o '^ r
00
??v k a r` ° \? oho ° v T m
? S• O ?b ?`` ? ? eta .,? ?'° d ? m ,? •
N ?
m l o
to lo 4
o ? n1 „ ? J?Q o 1!1 rtS 1l? d' ? _
° _ rp r o 4 ah ?oOV? T a5 .3 0 P= ?oo;R ? rn N
Qf 1 In p °
° w r „ ao m
° 0 iJ
v ` y in T N m df df N .? ca ca ca
. ,` _ n In
m fi n1 fi T ca cc t4 °
°
o
N N o 0
--- _ "---- -- rn
o cq?o
rtl Rl Rl M N N N Pb IN
4 o
to ° -° S 4 P, r tc d e 1+
No Rp N fi N N N N r M N
O O
LA N O O
- U ° V` 0 r U` q d d d
fi a cv a r N N
Y F a a U _
J a
E'--'D O W I Acs ON .N .. N CN . N (? Ca ly lV
of
w W (n w
l
m
a J
? N
w
0
> J'

U
M
a
W
J
a
O
F
r
F-"
rr•'1
(V
7 I

5

4O
-1"
V • /4 3
146
11!3
? 9)
6
Nj 8
4.J
3IS

f%9
/b•5
f3.;?
76
4.7
?•8
1.6
/.3
}

_-Al' g Z?,
'tea
z.9 0 / 2.0 2.
8 5 3-r4c x
9
S. 156 1S3 1.3j/'1 ?5 5
G f2 3 (/.4 ? ? T 9
f?•4 17•S 18'2 1j.6 ,QZ >o . /? 8 ?S?'7. CTY ? N?aQ

3 14.3 14 b IS4

J •2
ifie f39
/4
g

> 8 9.

7 /:?

112
.1
92
?'/

9;4
g /g./
? lo.?? y
J3.
113 1?a
4 131
Z.
9 ?•3
1'
1 g.
,
4
/?43 6•
1 9
/ 14.3
131 3 13,2 12?? x
143 JL
Z
/Z
/'
3 3 p
9
•3
4•
3 12.3 12.4
4.3 2 J?.2 /3 13.5 13e, /T.
9 7

(} 3
I13.S T9 ?.D
122
0 122
13.1
/16 /2.4
4.1 12 Z
7•S
12
f
•
2

9
HANCOCK CREEK AND MARINA DREDGING
50 0 50 100
GRAPHIC SCALE: I' • 50'
TOLKHIEAD -,,
MEAN LOW WATER _
I6
DESIRABLE 1 DEPTH / J
I? ALLOWABLE OVERDEPf
3 I VARIES-SEE PLAN
TYPICAL DREDGING SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
S#6? 'PA- /h

c;a+c7)2, •'/1s -3Ni1"-Dlvw

,szs j
t4
r
$t d
N fi
O d? O
2
r- N
t0 ?
N b
4
K? ?
rs
d O?
li
O
rS
? J
Wg
vi

? 3?H?1tlW
u
4
m
$ 1-®

O
N ZSt I Z
N
o
r
??-?`?
d
.. tc
W
t
a

3Z4 07,
-51,

N O %r o . to Q

L '

... t? !? N N C? aN

0
? o B o a ? N a? ?r a ?

0

N q t O S cp O
u
w
z
r- r S
o
t-
kr
a
r
= d C:
0
U Q
N
i?
N

d ?, O
V
N
N
Q U;
N, Y
N,
G c1 A ?= N Q
O
N
d
L+?? .
' ? m
?
1S

W
Q
z

w
w
=
z
aI a W
w Zz

I m w ur
? K a N
w
V
O J Q

a y cn
w
U w
Q
?
J
U
o

U!
Z
J
1u
h
0
Z_
W
cr-
0
Q
Z
X
a
g
Q
YI
W
W
UI
Y
U
O
U
z
Q
T
8
O
8N'
w
J
a
o
U
a
a
2 lu 0
S'tacr- ? oa' /:2

N
..Q
V'
cQ
L
x
N
MEAN LOW WATER
9.
DESIRABLE DEPTH
ALLOWABLE OVERDEPTH V D
3
VARIES-SEE PLANS
TYPICAL ACCESS CHANNEL DREDGING SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
3.3
3•b 3.1
4.2
b•1
gO
3.1
3..y
3.9
q.6 c? .3 5 .'1
C .A
(o •0 30+00
? t 4 +--\rt +-
14, C) 1aZ 'p.0
10.5 \
\1.O 1p •9
10.9
jp•6 ACCESS CHANNEL 10.1
10.3 5
2 41.0
„ .? 2:1 1 2.1 3.1
2.1
pD.'( ribC??E
0

Z
J
10•Z•• ?
a

1a
10.0 d
ti
N
•3 ? r

yb
2.4
or?
Tf
iv1
io3
2.9
HANCOCK CREEK AND MARINA DREDGING
50 0 50 100
GRAPHIC SCALE: I" " 50'

R

N
N
Rl

MEAN LOW WATER
T
9'
DESIRABLE DEPTH
ALLOWABLE OVERDEPTH I' I
3
IVARIES-SEE PLANS
TYPICAL ACCESS CHANNEL DREDGING SEC110N
NOT TO SCALE
N
a Tq I
3.{ 33.E
y {
3'A
4•'f I
g? P g3 `.b
3.3 3{ 3.4 :
93' b'T

3•lo 33
b•'L
?.?
7.6
3.T 3.1 39 T 3
A-1
A-to 8 3
ON
,2. % 3 S+oo+_ 2

10•'' 9.3 9.3
cv '? p.q
,?

3 ?-f- {D 77

9 q
77
;
1
r'-
1t?3 V b•3 2
j0 10.0 9•7

10-1
?' n
?9 QGG E55
GNA { r J E 98

9.q 2
10'0 .O
8
q.(o

37 4'0 ?D A••?7 ?•2
v
3.2 4 3 IA•tl
o
w
2'S
4'{ b•'L
4 2
:?
z

i
v
r
a
HANCOCK CREEK AND MARINA DREDGING
50 0 50 100
GRAPHIC SCALE: I""50' SST (? r0? !h
9

N
q•9 I
}
MEAN LOW WATER
9'
DESIRABLE DEPTH
ALLOWABLE OVERDEPTHI" D
3
VARIES-SEE PLANS
TYPICAL ACCESS CHANNEL DREDGING SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
9.3
?q
ge 93
9.0
9•d

7.3 9•U q•1 9•5
L3 9 3

•b e.7 CO 9.1
1.5 q4
q•!o
7 4 8'7 q.1 9.2 92
B•2
g U
e.s
.9
q
q•9 9
O g
8•
9.1 9'L
9.9 W5 10.0
Q a•? ELtU?
?d5
4
O
i°° 9.0

* 98 9.0 10.1
q.$ + 4500

946
,
G
rt, «a?
8,
9.5 101
9q qS
0
8• q•S 10.
15
9
9.°f qa -
9

q.7 /
1 ao
8 .
7.0
9-,5
C?-15
91o
loo
cp9
G=- gmD D?t1G.
STA.. A
V 1 q.9 6A
c).8 9.8 1.6 9•` d•
1, 1 °l to C79 g.1 /I A,Y M D tZKER
.Z 9G t3 ?$ d
J S4/// Z-/1 eT
b.IO 5.b VA 7.8 O
8
5 •ti
8.1
HANCOCK CREEK AND MARINA DREDGING
50 0 50 100
Sf7' !!? off' ! 2
GRAPHIC SCALE: 1". 50'
1U
U
W
Z_
J
S
H
Q

'W4TCJ{ L` C
^0itEQ6lE IU FLOW F11'6
beF worn 3

5r___E. UorF-
L roF OF DIKE
TO+c of St.oFe
L5MYOM OF MUD
NogE: N
1• AI_t_rMLEVA"C1GKS fjw ? oK MLW 'ELEVATION .
SCALE: I" , 50'
-0.5T
ELEV. 20.0' -f

I 2
r \
-3
_ I Q
MAXIMUM WATER LEVEL
W
III
EXISTING DIKE
?
VARIES
- ELEV. 9.0'
VARIES 5' 33'
EXISTING
GROUND EXCAVATE EXISTING
'
GROUND DOWN TO 9
(3 )DIKE CR OSS-SECTION BOTTOM ELEVATION AND
USE MATERIAL TO CON-
CS CS NOT TO SCALE STRUCT DIKE.
11
>R ?
HANCOCK CREEK SPOIL AREA
•) f4,y ..
k
5sr Tor MLeveTto"
Op RISER AT
TOP or DIKE-1
L1vsKr, 5E$
PLa u5
? 30?GALV. G.M.P.
M' 5FMI-GIFLULAK
PIPE 5EC.TIOU. FED.
spaf-• WW-P-A05I5
? EtaLVAU1LEp Gt
Z"xa' bATTt FQ50ARD5
Togo 2 FPET•-1
f}DTC'EIR-
bOAKOS
elAAbtA&s
•2-3'x.2" 4?E
[.1-1At.1?.1ELS WCLOEp
TO firs CT`(rlc.AL)
3d'G.M.P
---311(P' $Tt;_l
FL-ATE
15OfrOM OF R"ER-
AL,H- ?meD iUTO SIDE VIEW FRONT VIEW
POTTOM OF S+vII-
aRE4 FLASHBOARD RISER DETAIL I
NOT TO SCALE CS C
C6
Ie to a,
1Z