HomeMy WebLinkAboutWQ0016247_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20180716ROY COOPED
Govwnw
MICHAEL S. REGAN
54hT ary
LINDA CULPEPPER
lrrrerfrn &'rsa w
NORTH CAROLINA
Errirrr "Fh#1ttd� Qrtarrry
July 16, 2018
Mr. Nate Roth, Technical Services Manager via Email
Synagro Central, LLC
284 Boger Road
Mocksville, NC 27028
Subject: Non -Discharge Permit Inspection
Synagro Western Regional — Permit No.: WQ0016247
Land Application of Residuals
for the West Stanly WWTP source facility
Stanly County
Dear Mr. Roth:
Staff of the Mooresville Regional Office (MRO) conducted a compliance inspection on July 10tH
2018. Synagro is the permittee and West Stanly WWTP the source. Inspection included the
facility storage/loading areas, active application at field NC -ST -03-07 and a recent application at
field NC -ST -03-01.
Y -yes N -no NE -not evaluated NA -not applicable
Y
Permit on site during application
Y
Spill plan on site
Y
Buffers adequate
Y
Cover crop specified in permit
Y
Site condition adequate
N
Documented exceedances of PAN limits
N
Signs of runoff / ponding
Y
Rain gauge on site during application
Y
Signage posted
Y
Current Analytical data for PVAR, Metals, TCLP
Are there any limiting slopes on fields?
NA 10 % for surface application NA 18% for subsurface application
Odors present: No odors were detected.
Vectors present: No vectors were detected. Flying insects present appeared unrelated to the
residuals activity.
Complete permits (except for maps), Operation and Maintenance and Spill plans were viewed in
one of the transport vehicles during loading. Two additional transport vehicles were not examined.
451D_K�QP�
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 I Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704.663.1699
Complete application with maps, O&M & Spill plans were present in the technician's vehicle and
the spreader vehicle.
Field site NC -ST -03-07 was viewed for active application. Only a portion of the field was to be
land applied, as the remaining facility residuals volume was insufficient coverage for the whole
field. Flagging was placed for sufficient guidance on the portion of the field receiving application.
The equipment appeared well maintained and distributed liquid application evenly with no signs of
drift, odors or vectors at the time of inspection. Field site NC -ST -03-01 was also viewed for recent
application the previous week.
Residuals management at the facility and the field site(s) appeared to meet program requirements
at the time of inspection. This inspection does NOT cover additional facilities or sources included
in this regional permit.
The MRO would like to thank Adam Brigman (Synagro) and Don Zufall (WWTP ORC), for their
time during the inspection. Please contact Maria Schutte, by phone (704-235-2184) or email
(maria.schutte(a)ncdenr.gov) with questions.
Sincerely,
DocuSigned by:
11111F I,
A14CC681AF27425...
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
Attachment: WWQ0016247 BIMS Data Base Inspection Report —July 2018
CC: Adam Brigman, SYNAGRO Charlotte Office (email)
Donna Davis, Stanly County Utilities Director (email)
Don Zufall, West Stanly WWTP ORC (email)
David Ezzell, Stanly County Environmental Health Supervisor (email)
Permit: WQ0016247
SOC:
County: Alexander
Region: Mooresville
Contact Person: Erik Bruce
Directions to Facility:
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 11/17/17 Expiration: 10/31/22 owner: Synagro Central LLC
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Synagro Western Piedmont RLAP
284 Boger Rd
Mocksville NC 27028
Title: Phone: 336-703-8681
System Classifications: LA,
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
NC0020591 City of Statesville - Third Creek WWTP
NC0043532 Stanly County - West Stanly WWTP
NC0031836 City of Statesville - Fourth Creek WWTP
NC0021890 Town of Granite Falls - Granite Falls WWTP
NC0021369 Town of Columbus - Columbus WWTP
Inspection Date: 07/10/2018 Entry Time: 09:02AM
Primary Inspector: Maria Schutte
Secondary Inspector(s):
Exit Time: 12:40PM
Phone: 704-663-1699
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Land Application of Residual Solids (503)
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Miscellaneous Questions Record Keeping Treatment
Land Application Site Pathogen and Vector Attraction Storage
Transport
(See attachment summary)
DocuuASigned by: 7/16/2018
�i
A14CC681AF27425...
Page: 1
Permit: WQ0016247 Owner - Facility: Synagro Central LLC
Inspection Date: 07/10/2018 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Synagro is the permittee and the West Stanly WWTP the source. MRO staff met with Adam Brigman of Synagro and Don
Zufall, WWTP ORC with Stanly Co. This inspection only included the West Stanly WWTP and field sites NC -ST -03-07
(active application) and NC -ST -03-01 (recent application). It does NOT cover facilities or residuals from additional sources
included under this regional permit.
Field site NC -ST -03-07 was viewed for active application. The liquid application appeared to be distributed evenly with no
signs of drift, odors or vectors at the time of inspection.
Complete permits (except for maps), O&M and spill plans were viewed in one of the transport vehicles during loading. Two
additional transport vehicles were not examined. The complete application with maps, O&M & spill plans were present in
the techncian's vehicle and the spreader vehicle, at the time of inspection.
Page: 2
Permit: WQ0016247 Owner - Facility: Synagro Central LLC
Inspection Date: 07/10/2018 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Type
Yes No NA NE
Distribution and Marketing
❑
Land Application
Record Keeping
Yes No NA NE
Is GW monitoring being conducted, if required?
❑
❑ ❑
Are GW samples from all MWs sampled for all required parameters?
❑
❑ ❑
Are there any GW quality violations?
❑
❑ ❑
Is GW -59A certification form completed for facility?
❑
❑ ❑
Is a copy of current permit on-site?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are current metals and nutrient analysis available?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are nutrient and metal loading calculating most limiting parameters?
❑ ❑ ❑
a. TCLP analysis?
❑ ❑ ❑
b. SSFA (Standard Soil Fertility Analysis)?
❑
❑ ❑
Are PAN balances being maintained?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are PAN balances within permit limits?
❑ ❑ ❑
Has land application equipment been calibrated?
❑
❑ ❑
Are there pH records for alkaline stabilization?
❑
❑ ❑
Are there pH records for the land application site?
❑
❑ ❑
Are nutrient/crop removal practices in place?
❑ ❑ ❑
Do lab sheets support data reported on Residual Analysis Summary?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are hauling records available?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are hauling records maintained and up-to-date?
❑
❑ ❑
# Has permittee been free of public complaints in last 12 months?
❑
❑ ❑
Has application occurred during Seasonal Restriction window?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Soils, PAN, and hauling records were reviewed in the 2017AR,
but were not assessed during
this site visit.
Svnaaro is the Dermittee and the West Stanly WWTP the source - neither of these oraanizations
have been free from complaints over the past year, but those complaints are unrelated to this
permit. This site visit included the West Stanly WWTP and field sites NC -ST -03-07 for active
aDDlication and NC -ST -03-01 for recent aDDlication. It does NOT cover anv residuals from
additional sources under this regional permit.
Pathogen and Vector Attraction Yes No NA NE
a. Fecal coliform SM 9221 E (Class A or B) 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Class A, all test must be <1000 MPN/dry gram ❑
Geometric mean of 7 samples per monitoring period for class B<2.0*10E6 CFU/dry gram
Fecal coliform SM 9222 D (Class B only) ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Page: 3
Permit: WQ0016247 Owner - Facility: Synagro Central LLC
Inspection Date: 07/10/2018 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Geometric mean of 7 samples per monitoring period for class B<2.0*10E6 CFU/dry gram ❑
b. pH records for alkaline stabilization (Class A) ❑ ❑ ❑
c. pH records for alkaline stabilization (Class B) ❑ ❑ ❑
Temperature corrected ❑
d. Salmonella (Class A, all test must be < 3MPN/4 gram day) ❑ ❑ ❑
e. Time/Temp on: ❑ ❑ ❑
Digester (MCRT) ❑
Compost ❑
Class A lime stabilization ❑
f. Volatile Solids Calculations ❑ ❑ ❑
g. Bench -top Aerobic/Anaerobic digestion results 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: PVAR demonstrated by Fecal geometric mean and 30day bench. Sample collection bV Adam
Brigman (Synagro) was discussed, but not viewed.
Treatment
Yes No NA NE
Check all that apply
Aerobic Digestion
Anaerobic Digestion
❑
Alkaline Pasteurization (Class A)
❑
Alkaline Stabilization (Class B)
❑
Compost
❑
Drying Beds
❑
Other
❑
Comment:
Transport Yes No NA NE
Is a copy of the permit in the transport vehicle? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is a copy of the spill control plan in the vehicle? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the spill control plan satisfactory? ❑ ❑ ❑
Does transport vehicle appear to be maintained? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Land Application Site Yes No NA NE
Is a copy of the permit on-site during application events? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the application site in overall good condition? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of runoff/ponding? ❑ ❑ ❑
If present, is the application equipment in good operating condition? ❑ ❑ ❑
Are buffers being maintained? ❑ ❑ ❑
Are limiting slopes buffered?
Page: 4
Permit: WQ0016247 Owner - Facility: Synagro Central LLC
Inspection Date: 07/10/2018 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
10% for surface application
❑ ❑ ❑
18% for subsurface application
❑
❑ ❑
Are there access restrictions and/or signs?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the application site free of odors or vectors?
❑ ❑ ❑
Have performance requirements for application method been met?
For injection?
❑
❑ ❑
For incorporation?
❑
❑ ❑
Does permit require monitoring wells?
❑
❑ ❑
Have required MWs been installed?
❑
❑ ❑
Are MWs properly located w/ respect to RB and CB?
❑
❑ ❑
Are MWs properly constructed (including screened interval)?
❑
❑ ❑
Is the surrounding area served by public water?
❑ ❑ ❑
If Annual Report indicates overapplication of PAN, are wells nearby that may be impacted?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are soil types consistent w/ Soil Scientist report/evaluation?
❑
❑ ❑
Is the water table greater than 173' bls.
❑
❑ ❑
Is application occurring at the time of the inspection?
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Field site NC -ST -03-07 was viewed for active aaalication. Onlv a portion of the field was to be
LA, as the remaining facility residuals volume was insufficient coverage for the whole field.
Flagging was placed for sufficient guidance on the field portion applied only. The equipment
appeared to distribute liquid application evenly with no signs of drift, odors or vectors at the time
of inspection. Soil types and water levels are examined when fields are permitted, but not
typically re-examined during a LA event. Field site NC -ST -03-01 was also viewed for recent
application the previous week.
Page: 5