Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWQ0016247_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20180716ROY COOPED Govwnw MICHAEL S. REGAN 54hT ary LINDA CULPEPPER lrrrerfrn &'rsa w NORTH CAROLINA Errirrr "Fh#1ttd� Qrtarrry July 16, 2018 Mr. Nate Roth, Technical Services Manager via Email Synagro Central, LLC 284 Boger Road Mocksville, NC 27028 Subject: Non -Discharge Permit Inspection Synagro Western Regional — Permit No.: WQ0016247 Land Application of Residuals for the West Stanly WWTP source facility Stanly County Dear Mr. Roth: Staff of the Mooresville Regional Office (MRO) conducted a compliance inspection on July 10tH 2018. Synagro is the permittee and West Stanly WWTP the source. Inspection included the facility storage/loading areas, active application at field NC -ST -03-07 and a recent application at field NC -ST -03-01. Y -yes N -no NE -not evaluated NA -not applicable Y Permit on site during application Y Spill plan on site Y Buffers adequate Y Cover crop specified in permit Y Site condition adequate N Documented exceedances of PAN limits N Signs of runoff / ponding Y Rain gauge on site during application Y Signage posted Y Current Analytical data for PVAR, Metals, TCLP Are there any limiting slopes on fields? NA 10 % for surface application NA 18% for subsurface application Odors present: No odors were detected. Vectors present: No vectors were detected. Flying insects present appeared unrelated to the residuals activity. Complete permits (except for maps), Operation and Maintenance and Spill plans were viewed in one of the transport vehicles during loading. Two additional transport vehicles were not examined. 451D_K�QP� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 I Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 704.663.1699 Complete application with maps, O&M & Spill plans were present in the technician's vehicle and the spreader vehicle. Field site NC -ST -03-07 was viewed for active application. Only a portion of the field was to be land applied, as the remaining facility residuals volume was insufficient coverage for the whole field. Flagging was placed for sufficient guidance on the portion of the field receiving application. The equipment appeared well maintained and distributed liquid application evenly with no signs of drift, odors or vectors at the time of inspection. Field site NC -ST -03-01 was also viewed for recent application the previous week. Residuals management at the facility and the field site(s) appeared to meet program requirements at the time of inspection. This inspection does NOT cover additional facilities or sources included in this regional permit. The MRO would like to thank Adam Brigman (Synagro) and Don Zufall (WWTP ORC), for their time during the inspection. Please contact Maria Schutte, by phone (704-235-2184) or email (maria.schutte(a)ncdenr.gov) with questions. Sincerely, DocuSigned by: 11111F I, A14CC681AF27425... W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor Water Quality Regional Operations Section Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ Attachment: WWQ0016247 BIMS Data Base Inspection Report —July 2018 CC: Adam Brigman, SYNAGRO Charlotte Office (email) Donna Davis, Stanly County Utilities Director (email) Don Zufall, West Stanly WWTP ORC (email) David Ezzell, Stanly County Environmental Health Supervisor (email) Permit: WQ0016247 SOC: County: Alexander Region: Mooresville Contact Person: Erik Bruce Directions to Facility: Compliance Inspection Report Effective: 11/17/17 Expiration: 10/31/22 owner: Synagro Central LLC Effective: Expiration: Facility: Synagro Western Piedmont RLAP 284 Boger Rd Mocksville NC 27028 Title: Phone: 336-703-8681 System Classifications: LA, Primary ORC: Certification: Phone: Secondary ORC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Related Permits: NC0020591 City of Statesville - Third Creek WWTP NC0043532 Stanly County - West Stanly WWTP NC0031836 City of Statesville - Fourth Creek WWTP NC0021890 Town of Granite Falls - Granite Falls WWTP NC0021369 Town of Columbus - Columbus WWTP Inspection Date: 07/10/2018 Entry Time: 09:02AM Primary Inspector: Maria Schutte Secondary Inspector(s): Exit Time: 12:40PM Phone: 704-663-1699 Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit Inspection Type: Land Application of Residual Solids (503) Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Question Areas: Miscellaneous Questions Record Keeping Treatment Land Application Site Pathogen and Vector Attraction Storage Transport (See attachment summary) DocuuASigned by: 7/16/2018 �i A14CC681AF27425... Page: 1 Permit: WQ0016247 Owner - Facility: Synagro Central LLC Inspection Date: 07/10/2018 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Inspection Summary: Synagro is the permittee and the West Stanly WWTP the source. MRO staff met with Adam Brigman of Synagro and Don Zufall, WWTP ORC with Stanly Co. This inspection only included the West Stanly WWTP and field sites NC -ST -03-07 (active application) and NC -ST -03-01 (recent application). It does NOT cover facilities or residuals from additional sources included under this regional permit. Field site NC -ST -03-07 was viewed for active application. The liquid application appeared to be distributed evenly with no signs of drift, odors or vectors at the time of inspection. Complete permits (except for maps), O&M and spill plans were viewed in one of the transport vehicles during loading. Two additional transport vehicles were not examined. The complete application with maps, O&M & spill plans were present in the techncian's vehicle and the spreader vehicle, at the time of inspection. Page: 2 Permit: WQ0016247 Owner - Facility: Synagro Central LLC Inspection Date: 07/10/2018 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Type Yes No NA NE Distribution and Marketing ❑ Land Application Record Keeping Yes No NA NE Is GW monitoring being conducted, if required? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are GW samples from all MWs sampled for all required parameters? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are there any GW quality violations? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is GW -59A certification form completed for facility? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is a copy of current permit on-site? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are current metals and nutrient analysis available? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are nutrient and metal loading calculating most limiting parameters? ❑ ❑ ❑ a. TCLP analysis? ❑ ❑ ❑ b. SSFA (Standard Soil Fertility Analysis)? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are PAN balances being maintained? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are PAN balances within permit limits? ❑ ❑ ❑ Has land application equipment been calibrated? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are there pH records for alkaline stabilization? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are there pH records for the land application site? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are nutrient/crop removal practices in place? ❑ ❑ ❑ Do lab sheets support data reported on Residual Analysis Summary? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are hauling records available? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are hauling records maintained and up-to-date? ❑ ❑ ❑ # Has permittee been free of public complaints in last 12 months? ❑ ❑ ❑ Has application occurred during Seasonal Restriction window? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Soils, PAN, and hauling records were reviewed in the 2017AR, but were not assessed during this site visit. Svnaaro is the Dermittee and the West Stanly WWTP the source - neither of these oraanizations have been free from complaints over the past year, but those complaints are unrelated to this permit. This site visit included the West Stanly WWTP and field sites NC -ST -03-07 for active aDDlication and NC -ST -03-01 for recent aDDlication. It does NOT cover anv residuals from additional sources under this regional permit. Pathogen and Vector Attraction Yes No NA NE a. Fecal coliform SM 9221 E (Class A or B) 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Class A, all test must be <1000 MPN/dry gram ❑ Geometric mean of 7 samples per monitoring period for class B<2.0*10E6 CFU/dry gram Fecal coliform SM 9222 D (Class B only) ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Page: 3 Permit: WQ0016247 Owner - Facility: Synagro Central LLC Inspection Date: 07/10/2018 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Geometric mean of 7 samples per monitoring period for class B<2.0*10E6 CFU/dry gram ❑ b. pH records for alkaline stabilization (Class A) ❑ ❑ ❑ c. pH records for alkaline stabilization (Class B) ❑ ❑ ❑ Temperature corrected ❑ d. Salmonella (Class A, all test must be < 3MPN/4 gram day) ❑ ❑ ❑ e. Time/Temp on: ❑ ❑ ❑ Digester (MCRT) ❑ Compost ❑ Class A lime stabilization ❑ f. Volatile Solids Calculations ❑ ❑ ❑ g. Bench -top Aerobic/Anaerobic digestion results 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: PVAR demonstrated by Fecal geometric mean and 30day bench. Sample collection bV Adam Brigman (Synagro) was discussed, but not viewed. Treatment Yes No NA NE Check all that apply Aerobic Digestion Anaerobic Digestion ❑ Alkaline Pasteurization (Class A) ❑ Alkaline Stabilization (Class B) ❑ Compost ❑ Drying Beds ❑ Other ❑ Comment: Transport Yes No NA NE Is a copy of the permit in the transport vehicle? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is a copy of the spill control plan in the vehicle? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the spill control plan satisfactory? ❑ ❑ ❑ Does transport vehicle appear to be maintained? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Land Application Site Yes No NA NE Is a copy of the permit on-site during application events? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the application site in overall good condition? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the site free of runoff/ponding? ❑ ❑ ❑ If present, is the application equipment in good operating condition? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are buffers being maintained? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are limiting slopes buffered? Page: 4 Permit: WQ0016247 Owner - Facility: Synagro Central LLC Inspection Date: 07/10/2018 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine 10% for surface application ❑ ❑ ❑ 18% for subsurface application ❑ ❑ ❑ Are there access restrictions and/or signs? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the application site free of odors or vectors? ❑ ❑ ❑ Have performance requirements for application method been met? For injection? ❑ ❑ ❑ For incorporation? ❑ ❑ ❑ Does permit require monitoring wells? ❑ ❑ ❑ Have required MWs been installed? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are MWs properly located w/ respect to RB and CB? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are MWs properly constructed (including screened interval)? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the surrounding area served by public water? ❑ ❑ ❑ If Annual Report indicates overapplication of PAN, are wells nearby that may be impacted? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are soil types consistent w/ Soil Scientist report/evaluation? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the water table greater than 173' bls. ❑ ❑ ❑ Is application occurring at the time of the inspection? ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Field site NC -ST -03-07 was viewed for active aaalication. Onlv a portion of the field was to be LA, as the remaining facility residuals volume was insufficient coverage for the whole field. Flagging was placed for sufficient guidance on the field portion applied only. The equipment appeared to distribute liquid application evenly with no signs of drift, odors or vectors at the time of inspection. Soil types and water levels are examined when fields are permitted, but not typically re-examined during a LA event. Field site NC -ST -03-01 was also viewed for recent application the previous week. Page: 5