20160191 Ver 1_Buffer and/or Stream Determination_20070827

Daniel Brown
Commercial Site Design, PLLC
8312 Creedmoor Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
-�� i
Michael F. Easley, Govemor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
August 27, 2007
DWQ Project # 2007-1272
- Pitt County
Subject Property: 149 NC 102 West (Worthington property)
UT to Swift Creek, Neuse River Basin
On-Site Determination for Applicability #o the Neuse River Riparian Area Protection Rules (15A NCAC
2B .0233)
Deaz Mr. Brown:
At your request I conducted an on-site determination to review drainage features located on tke subject property
for applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233). The property is located on the north side of
NC HWY 102, approximately 0.2 miles west of the intersection of NC HWY 11 and NC HWY 102, in the town
of Ayden. The feaiure is labeled as "WaR0-07-1272" on the attached map initialed by me on August 27, 2007
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has determined that the portion of the feature that is highlighted
in pink on the attached map is Exem t from the Neuse Buffer Rules. This feature should be identified on
any future plans for this property. The owner (or future owners) should notify the DWQ (and other relevant
agencies) of this decision in any future conespondences concerning this property. This determination pertains to
the subject property only. This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. .
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority
that a surface water exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may request a determination by the Director. A
request for a determination by the Director sha11 be referred to the Director in writing clo Cyndi Karoly, DWQ
Wetlands/401 Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260. Individuals that dispute a determination by
the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority that "exempts" a surface water from the buffer rule may ask for an
adjudicatory hearirig. You must act within 6U days of the date that you receive this letter. Applicants are
hereby notified that the 60-day statutory appeal time does not start until the affected party (including
downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. DWQ recommends that the applicant
conduct fhis notification in order to be certain that third party appeals aze made in a timely manner.
To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This
determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing within 60 days.
North Cazolina Division of Water Quality Intemet h2o.enr.state.nc.us One �
943 Washington Square Mali Phone: [phone]
Washington, NC 27889 FAX [phone] . NO�C[�OIIIZGl
e,.�,.��.,in.,..,.a��,.�tidnu...,..a,,,, n,�:,.., o,.,.,�,..,... ,cnoi o,,,,,,,.i,.a�inoi o,.�.�r,.,.���.re.o��e. ,�atu.rallt�

L �
This letter only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity within the
buffers. Nor does this letter approve any activity within Waters of the United States or Waters of the State. If
you have any additional questions or require additional information please ca11 me at [phone].
Sincerely,
��.,:, �-�+.-��.�.q,'�
Chris Pullinger/Environmental Spec. II
DWQ/WaRO
Wetlands / 401 Unit
Enclosures: copy of 1:24,000 scale USGS topographic map, Ayden quadrangle
cc: DWQ WaRO file
401 Central Office file
Central Files
G. Johnson Rice, Jr.
Ralph C. Worthington; Jr.
Filename: 2007-1272
0
i

� � � � � ' - .:�..- � .� f �. �
7 /. i �'
,�, �.,r , , i � l.. t � � ■ '",y., �: ' � \�\
,J - .. . . ,. . , .. . . i L, '� tl���. �� 1
. '�. � f r - � � �f' " ' . . , 1 �/��� ' yy�y.�...,} `'`'•, � i ���
�~ _ '" .�.� ......�. , Z . F � / 11f;?,` .....�..
. . �
��.'
.
. ...._r ' � .. --'
. .. ( 0 �.... ^��. .......�.. a� ''y... ,., '\ `" �
- f ; � ���` ' ��� .0 i �= r. � �
..
� ' 'i
, s . _ ..._,..
c �� �O ' _ - . �
� . � �
. ` ' � "-•__._........_...__._. •
_.
, 1 .�. ..v � � t �i
� . ,._. _-_,_......,...^- �, �
� ...-l-._:_
' _.,--__.....+�....___ .:....._-'--_-_�:.�:`._ . ..,_.,,-._...�. . �
._ _ _� . . ; � i �i.,`., t � ...,f:
,�
__..
.. 1 z . Y�:
'.
.
. �� � , � i `''' • f `•'-- , ,,, �
• i --ti � _ .....,..
:'
4 ,�
., ._-- �.�f; .. � �j,.,.�;�. r..�
� ���.. �:�-�_ �.-
,�%�`` 20 . i ;.` -`'� `,.
� , !�/J
. ' _ � .. . � j �� j a, � i/
�r� �� l
�- North tCarolina. Environmenta! � � ' ' `
_.T- _,.�
ment Co�al�iis'sion :.., • ;.. '� ��
? .,. .. � �
° �' ' Of Water`Qiiality . s� o 'ti _ . � '� ` '� ' : � �
'� .... - q . ' � '' ;
. . a ��� r: � 1
�SSi. ' ' "�
�' iil�l ��t' �.` . ,: �,: : i ' : ' I r w"#"'�
:�;. . `ti , ;' ! ;���, :\ o
, � �� �c � � '� � � i�� : • ,ti �" r"""�'_.; `"..1-�
�,j:j �_ �� 0� � • � . �@ili:. � ' � '•...•.f �.- �; ; r: ,: �'�'=:�:r" ^�=t�,
' J!F � _►^: ,�,';
�{•� {�y�,�, ��� y�
(�/� /�� .
,, �Y ML 1Li�t �7^�" � �� • f . . • '�V
RBVie�W�edby► . .:.• . � .�.. �' _ ._._.�_.-::...._. - '-
, � , , ,
. . .
_ , .
_. . . __., . �. _ � � ;'
�_ �
�:.
..__ . ..___... , ,
� .. . ..
" ...f .�
_.. , .. ....,.,.. L., ' �J�+ t— ��-�. ij. , ' ,. s •�'� ,,'`� ._.___._.�- '' •^ �` � �', ��'� �
, � ,,� • . .$� � \..,
� . �'ti.: y ,�, ;.. i.• � `�. � , i:..:
`L\ � {� •w 'M `,`��-`4 , � ��� ,! :�.
?O �^� ,.'r�� �;... r �. ,r �i — ;l. ��:.,.;:':i
� f �] r, � �� �� } � . �
..i� rR � : _/.:•
_� i�� ,�, �'�,�'` : , �C$m .: . ' � { ,; �� ,'� ��t�iier
# ark
, �•� �� 1• } � ,
y' •r 1 f e�Y:�- . r, �
� � _ }: tj oJ• � � � � "'; :�...5: �
' { +,� � '1' a }� �.�.�,.�� .`.1�.,-...
• � � • ` / \ j
�1 ' .. ���.. ld, j� 1���� �.�i i.
���` - � • , ' ?�� /i ��r - e � `� ;�,i.,� " �
Y��S li ' � .+.
.,•` _:r �� �
. -__ - . I ��1��sf . . �!a2�• . ` � - At� e�l
.ry•�;1� � ' , iY.i � � i , r,".,-.f � '.� 5rr��' i� � ;i,.:..
t�.. . . A ,� • • ;- r �,4. � c,� S .� ��^'•'.
i
�" `. . �.. _,. ' . .. . � � .,.vi+�,�.,,�, n...�r. . .
� i r ,,—__'' . : ` �1C„��.IT�S ` � _.._...._.. _.. , ti yF,' �! � ,�
. : • . .....,.�..� _ . . .� ._�. � _ .
.
. a..... ... �.N' _..... �•... .. . . � � � / , . h. h - 1 r 5'e � .
4 � �� �
f • ' s � ,� r � ; ,t, , 'A �
� �. , � � u
10 � � ' • • ' � � `� ��` 4 Y� � �' �' s j '�
.' ,sM1:"y � � • � � 1 ° �r 4 �� r , �.�. �_�� ' i .
� � � l 4- Y
. O t i �'� Y. � ��iY.
• � f � � £�
4 � � ' t � 4 ¢ l ` � � ;+; ,k � , .
� ' � � .
' � " • • • , `r �t wl f ti y �Yp• 4� i� � � t'.
_ . ' � �. a�,. '� ` �: ;� ..�„
• h'• � .
j
; ' � - � % ''6 �S f,.
` • y� c �`.�X� � t R'� ?l+i ,f � a.
�� : `_• ' .. . r T� . t? `h,� "' p. �+; k,y. .
••_ � � -��-� • . f� ` + • :i . {' , �:�'.� � .
=.m�'',�pr'R��. . ~ r•,�,�.� _ �`_ f .� ' ..+, i A iG�. a� .�r�'� e +�' �
��!S �:i�i- , „�� ` _y, � r . � a
��.--.r'� �=y.�.l -'`�4 -yi' __`... =- -ti..�� � �l41?� ` � �r.� ` x � ��
_ _ _
__._ .--
... _ •- _
. .. ._
.. ._--
•• .. , ..,_...._ ; �..» :. � y r4� :
,. ,.� ,
. . __�.�
� � . ..
, _ .•..
.—
'V�.—, ti
,.
•,.. ,
,_ �. :
.
,. r ,,-:- , _ _ .• _� , 2a t ` � '" � '"
r
. : • . � ._..,.....
.�
�-t . . -� ._. �;._-�._ :• ._...._.. _ . -•�
,• ,• � �.__• � .. ,. .._..._�_ . -' - �� :
e
� , . �..
: . .. . :. --..... _ . . ..
"- ��..^`_—. . i . . -. . _ . _ _. _..._�.. - � � ;; i ;� � ��,�c
- _ � �� . ?V \�1 ��• n^�.. .ft lvY. :
�i' � � ' f ~ ~ 1' , � '� : i.^ �S i .' ; ••
�
j. f . � �I 1 ,. .
--. `_� . ; .. �". _'� j�G ,
l e '`� _ � ,
ey. r�.. � -- --- �' •
, , r.�.•
. ; '�>, , •
� ' S i ' '' / /� _��
� I ,I � :
4 i ! �/ � �... � � ",�� .

' L_
� . aFWarF�
<o� PG
� .��*��� r
> —I
O '�'
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Qualiry
- October 25, 2005 . �
Col'ista Freeman
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548 -
Subject: Improvements to NC 11 & US 264 Business, Greenville Southwest Bypass, Pitt County,
R-2250
Reviaed On-Site Determination for Applicability to the Clean Water Act and the Neuse Buffer Rules
Dear Ms. Freeman:
On August 30, 2005, Christiria Breen conducted an on-site determination to review streain features within
the study area for the referenced project for applicability-to the Clean Water Act and the Neuse Buffer
Rules (1�SA NCAC 2B .0233). �
The Division of Water Qualiry (DWQ) determinations for the features are presented in Table 1. Four of
the stream features were �determined to be intermittent or perennial and subject to the Clean Water:Act.
Three features were determined to be subject ta the Neuse Buffer Rules. 5tream feature 65A was
determi.ned to be perennial at point 646750.59 N, 2461509.25 W.
' ��Oj ��e 'C;aio11I1S
Transportation Permitting Unit � � � "'�rQ«�
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Plione: 919-733-1786 / FAX [phone] /, Intemet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc:us/ncwetlands
An Eaual O000rtunitv/Affirmative Action Emplover— 50% Recvcled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Ms. Freeman
October 19, 2005 = � ='
Page 2
HR 12 E hemeral Not Sub'ect
HR 13 E hemeral Not Subject .-
HR 14 E hemeral Not Sub'ect
HR 15 E hemeral Not Sub'ect
HR 17 � E hemeral Not Sub'ect
HR 18 E hemeral Not Subject
HR 19 E hemeral � Not Subject
HR 20 E hemeral Not Sub'ect
I�R 21 , � E hemeral Not Subject
HR 22 E hemeral Not Sub'ect
HR 23 � E hemeral Not Subject �
HR 24 E hemeral Not Sub'ect
HR 27 E hemeral Not Subject
HR 29 E hemeral Not Subject
� HIt 30 E hemeral Not Sub'ect
HR 31 E hemeral Not Sub'ect
HR 32 B hemeral Not Sub'ect
HR 33 E hemeral Not Sub'ect
HR 34 E hemeral Not Sub'ect �
HR 35 E hemeral Not Subject
HR 36 � E hemeral Not Sub'ect
HR 37 E hemeral Not Sub'ect
HR 38 E hemeral Not Subject
HR�39 E hemeral Not Sub'ect
HR 40 E hemeral .. Not Subject
HIZ 41 � E hemeral � Not Suli'ect
W 5 E hemeral Not Sub'ect
These on-site determinations shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowriers or �
affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated Loca1 Authority that a
surface water e�sts and that it is subject to ttie mitigation rules may request a determination by the
Director. A request for a determination by the Director sha11 be refened to the Director in writing c/o
John Hennessy, DWQ Weflands/401 Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650. �
Individuals that dispute a determination by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authoriry that "exempts" a
surface water from the mitigation rules ma.y ask for an adjudicatory hearing: You must act within 60 days
of the date that you receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified that the 60-day statutory appeal •
time does not start until the affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notif'ied of
this decision. DWQ recommends that the applicant conduct this notif'ication in order to be certain that
third party appeals are made in a timely manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, whicli
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General5tatutes to the Off'ice of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This determination is final and binding
unless you ask for a hearing within 60 days. �

Ms. Freeman
'�: - � = October 19, 2005
Page 2
This letter only addresses the applicability to the Clean Water Act and the Neuse Buffer Rule
requirements and does not approve any activity within Waters of the United States or Waters. of the State.
If you have any additional questions or require additional information please call Christina Breen at (919)
733-9604.
ncer ly,
_ �.
,���
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
cc: Heather Renninger/Eric Galamb, H.W. Lochner, 2840 Plaza Place, Suite 202, �2aleigh, NC 27612
Chris Underwood, NEU, 2728-168 Capital Blvd., Parker Lincoln Bldg., Raleigh, NC 27604
File Copy �
Central Files . �

>; "::�
CD�YQ Stre�m Ctassitication Form
rojcct Namc: [�rcrn.iYc SW 3.�po.ss RivcrBuin: N�� County: R}} Evalu�mr. JC, SS
WQProjcctNumbcr:R-1ZSo NavcstNamcdSlrc.vn:�.•h4ak La�itudc:35'16�+g"• Signaturc: .
ate: 9•i9�o1 USGSQUAD: Aydcn Longiwdc:if�u�6�� Lou�Uon/Dircctions: ���
PLEASE NOTE: If av[uutor m�dlm�dumier agrttfLat tluj«ure Lr a manwud<dtc/y rherc urt ajlL'ujum� is uM nececsary.
4n, if in Um Aa! p��Jarinttaljudgnumf ajtl�e nalnaror fLafcalnre is a mm�.nradc rG(ch andnof a moJfied na(nrol t(iemn--Il�is
�inp.ryWain alrou[J n�N bt nud" -
YIR191'V F10�(I Ifl(�IC:It01'S: R:irc(�OneNumde�P+rLI,mJ
� �, n,,.
-�nrv�i�n iert cc �eu or�hn..�„�urrirours��o,rr�raMsro..-a•i
0) I�s�Ordcr Or Grcatcr Cirvmd (As [ndiu�ted �� � .
n.. m...... se... d../M.In Fin1A� D.wmn�9 Vw.i'11 . Nn�(1
%t%1{fI�R}i
QC00(�ATV �''10�(� TIIf�ICflt01'S7 �ClrcbOn�NumbriPerGneJ
) Docs
CEOhfORPflO/.O CY IND/Gl TOR
I Nvdroloev Absent Wenk Modcr�h Strone
) Is'[Lis Ycar's (Or L�sPs) Lcalliticr ,,,,� .
) Is Wa�cr hi Cluvmcl And>43 Hrs. Sincc 0 . .5 1 . � U.
� IKnn�n�Rnin� ilch/nJleahJ/n19 nw4Y liSre AnJt dnw
) Is Tlurc Wnlcr In Cham�d During Dry 0 � .S 1
Qnd'��� �� n. ��� [:.o�✓��� Sc:isonl7 -
)
ECONDARYHYDROLOCYIND/G1 TOR POINTS: 5. S
Pl:vus G� SVuhmbcd7 SAV Mastly OBL
IFmnceO%A!!PlannlnSnmmbed I 1
yFAC blostlyFACU MmIIyUPL
.5 0 0
ECONDARYII/oLUCY�n�ic:Aivnrwmio: i.„ts /� �
��. 2S`PU�w.� _ �w�w�.qGYit!.1r� � . ..
.... ....... ....���..�n. _ . . . _ _ ._ ... . . _ " " ' . ... .
' f t

LOCHNER
H.W. LOCNNER, INC., 2840 Plaza Place, Suite 202, Raleigh, North Carolina 27612
September 28, 2005
Phone:(919�571-7111
Fax: [phone]
www.hwlochner.com
Ms. Christina Breen
North Carolina Division of Water Quality n f�%J I� ��1/Jj� D
Mail Service Center 1650 �;( LCi v L5 V L�
Raleigh, NC 27604 111�
SEP 2 9 2005
RE: Request tor Riparian Buffer VerificaHon
North Cazolina De artment of Trans ortarion, Division 2 DENR- WATER QUALITY
p p WETWJDSANDSTORMWATERBRANCH
Greenville Southwest Bypass Study
(Improvements to NC 11 & US 264 Business)
TIP No. R-2250
State Project No. 81221401
Federal Aid Project No. STP-11(1)
Pitt County, North Cazolina
Dear Ms. Breen:
H.W. Lochner, Inc., (Lochner) as a consultant to the North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDCi'P), requests a verificatien of streams under the State of North Cl�•�iina Riparian Buffer Ruies for
all azeas shown ir. white on the accompanying aerial mapping. Dwing a field verification meetin�; held
on August 30, 2005, several of these stream features were reviewed for the parpose of identifying their
buffer eligibiliry. .Also, several stream features were reviewed in the field by Mike T'homas (fom�erly of
NCD�'Q), however exemprion forms were never received by Lochner for these features.
The enclosed supportuig documentation includes:
1) Aerial mapping showing the locafion of each jurisdicrional stream (in blue), and each feature thr.t
should be exempt from the Neuse or Tar-Pamlico Riparian Buffer Rulzs (in white),
2) NCDWQ Stream Idenrification Version 3.1 Forms,
3) Meeting minutes from the May 18, 2005 field verification meeting with Mike "fhomas,
3) Meering minutes from the August 30, 2005 field verificarion meeting with you, and
4) Lochner Field notes.
Please call me or Eric Galamb at (919) �71-7111 if you need additional information or have quest:ons
about the enclosed informarion. We look forwazd to receiving your letter df veriticarion.
Sincerely,
.W. Lochner, c.
� � � ����
eather Renm ger
Environmental Biologist
cc: Jay Johnson, NCDOT-Division 2, without attxchments
Colista Freeman, PE, NCDOT-PD&EA, without attachments
Chris Underwood, NCDOT-ONE, without attachments
File, with attachments
PROVIDING EXCEPTIONAL CLIENT SERVICE SINCE �J44

DOCUMENTATION FORM
GREENVII�LE SOUTHWEST BYPASS
(Improvements to NC 11 and US 264 Business)
Pitt Couuty
NCDOT Project No.: 8.1221401
WBS Element: 3441I.1.2
TIP Project No. R-2250
Q�c����-: �
SEP 2 9 Z005
DENR - WATER �U/W1Y
WETUJIDS AND STOfiMWATER BRANCM
A field meeting was held on August 30, 2005 in Greenville, NC to verify wetland, stream,
and riparian buffer deternunation made by H. W. L,ochner Inc (Lochner). The following
people were in attendance:
Bill Biddlecome, United States Army Corps of Engineers (LTSACE)
Christina Breen, North Cazolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
Eric Galamb, Lochner
Heather Renninger, Lochner
Cindy Szwazckop, Lochner
The following is an account of the events of the day:
�
.
Wetland IiRA: the USACE claimed the excavated azeas that were delineated by
Lochner. Bill checked some areas adjacent to the excavated areas that contained
water stained leaves, but did not claim these as jurisdictional wetlands.
Wetland 18: This area was visited during the January verificarion meeting, and Bill
could not decide whether to claim it or not. At that time, the azea contained some
standing water. Heather and Emily Rackley (Lochner) explained that they visited that
azea two tunes in the past (once in the spring and once in the winter) and the site did
not meet wetland criteria. Furthermore, it did not contain any standing water. Bill
requested later that Lochner send him the rainfall data around the rime of the
verification. After extensive inspection of the site, Bill felt that there were enough
wetland chazacteristics present to claim the azea as a jurisdictional wetland. Eric
indicated that the azea would be added to the mapping.
Stream HR 3 was called an agriculture ditch by Christina (exempt from Neuse River
buffer rules). Bill stated the stream was intemuttent and unimportant along the length
of the stream that appears on the USDA soils mapping (from the comer of the field
edge and wooded azea). Bill and Christina noted that the water was stagnant, and
there was a moderate amount of leaf litter in the channel.
Both Bill and Christina agreed that the streams HR 1 and HR 2 aze not jurisdictional
and therefore buffer exempt. Very few features that would indicate a jurisdictional
stream were present.
Stream M40: Bill and Christina agreed the stream was not jurisdictional until �the
point where it crosses Forlines Road. The non jurisdictional section of streazn needs
to be removed from the WEX file and mapping. Stream M40A will remain as
inteimittent (unimportant). Riparian buffer rules and mirigation wili apply to stream
M40A.

The group broke for lunch, and Bill Biddlecome left the group for the remainder af the
day. For the remainder of the afternoon, the group reviewed sites to determine whether
they were exempt or subject to riparian buffer rules. The following determinations were
made:
• Christina agreed with Lochner's determinations that streams HR 29., HR 25, HR 26,
HR 50, HR 51, and HR 52 were all non jurisdictional ditches and exempt from
buffer rules. These features had varying amounts of vegetation, dryness, and Iack of
geomorphology. �
• Stream HR 28 was claimed as a jurisdictional intermittent stream. Riparian buffer
rules and mitigation rules apply. This stream flows into stream 6SA.
• HR 6SA was originally claimed as a perennial stream in 2002. Christina felt that the
Iack of water in the charinel on the day of the site visit warranted a change to an
intermittent status. She directed Lochner to change the forms for this stream to
indicate that it is intermittent for a portion of its length. The intermittent/perennial
transition point was located about 75 feet downstream from the confluence with HR
28 at the confluence with a non jurisdictional agriculture ditch. HR 6SA will require
buffer mitigation for its entire length. Lochner's mapping will be updated to show
this change.
� Stream HR 16: Christina determined this feature to be intermittent (and subject to
the Neuse riparian buffer rules) on the south side of Pocosin Road and ephemeral
(buffer exempt} on the north side of Pocosin Road.
� Stream HR 13: Christina determined this feature to be ephemeral and not subject to
riparian buffer rules. No water was present in the channel at the time of the site visit.
i�Vater-stained leaves were present in the bottom of the channel.
Lochner agreed to send an updated package to Bill and Christina, including a copy of the
meeting minutes. In addition, Lochner agreed to provide Christina with a copy of the field
mapping showing the sites reviewed for buffer detemunations, a copy of the pertinent data
sheets, and a copy of the field notes when the sites were first reviewed.
Prepared b.y Brian Dustin and Heather Renninger, August 31, 2005

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: �� a S�QS Project: ��9 �
Ot G
Evaluator: �.� �y�,,�.�d p � Site: .�.�-� � J?
_�.� ,-
Total Points: �
Stream is at leasf inte�mittent q C County: p ��
if > 19 or perennia! if >_ 30 1 y J
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal =� )
1a. Continuous bed and bank ,��
2. Sinuosity �
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
5. Active/relic floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Braided channei
8. Recent alluvial deposits
9 a Natural levees �j� (\ ��,�.G
10. Headcuts � '
11. Grade controls .
12. Natural valley or drainageway
13. Second or greater order channel on exi_ stina
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
a Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H drolo Subtotal =
14. Groundwater flow/discharge � �
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or rowin season
16. Leaflitter
17. Sediment on plants or debris
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present?
C. Biology (Subtotal = )
20°. Fibrous roots in channel
21°. Rooted plants in channel
L�]
1
1
1
1
1
1.
1
1
1
1
0.5
0.5
No �
0 (
0 1�
1.5 1
0 0.
0 0.5
No=O
3 2'
3 2
Latitude:
Longitude:
Other ��v�.��� �(,(�
e.g. Quad Name:
ay � ��� �
23. Bivalves �
24. Fish 0 0 5
25. Amphibians 5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton ' �
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0.5
29 b. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL
Items 2o and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants,�ltem 29 focuses on the presence of aqi
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
�CA� r vt�.,t�.,.��...�v2. �--�. �u� '�� u� �1.�
��`�.�,�,,,r� (,n�c,�� a� �l 3d �c�s
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1.5
1.5
Yes = 3
2 3
2 3
0.5 �(T
1 .5
1 1.5
Yes = 1
L� 0
1 0
1 1.5
2 3
1 1.5
1 1.5
1 1.5
2 • 3
1 1.5
5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
or wetland plants.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
n �--
�.-���4„� WlUI1C3 GIC IIVI IdICU� see aiscussions in manuai
B. H drolo Subtotal = / • �
14. Groundwaterflow/discharge ' p � 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, er � 0 1 �
Water in channel -- d or rowin season 3
16. Leaflitter 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 � 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0' 0. 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes = 1.
C. Biology (Subtotal = D ti S )
20e. Fibrous roots in channel 3 1 0
21b. Rooted plants in channel 3 1 0
22. Cra�sh 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivaives 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 , 1,
25. Amphibians 0 0:5 1 1.
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0. 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton ' 0 'l 2 • 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 1,5
29 °. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other �
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additiohal notes.) Sketch: � A I
1 �.J
1Cll-PXP�J �.tn�''" iU1Si{' �r�+1 �S'�' ��i r �� ~ C�4. C..Q Gt� �-�v t� � � �
� �C�v�CC� /�P��P� �a flf��`t�"i*�.,� � �
� .,,,,. ". .� ... _ � _ _ . ('1 I
.. ..,, -
' � ' ,n y
' �� �° l � � b`��s �'�''�
� \� ��6
��ti �
�EG w �
�
�
CY
�
� J

North. Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
man-maae aiicnes are not ratea; see aiscussions in manual
B. H drolo Subtotal = �� �
14. Groundwater flow/discharge �
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or rowin season
16. Leaflitter
17. Sediment on plants or debris
18: Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present?
0 1"
0 1
1.5 1%
No=O
0.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = ��5._)
20b. ribrous roois in cnannei � z �
21b. Rooted plants in channel 2 �
22. Crayfish 0.5 1
23. Bivalves 0 1 2
24. Fish 0.5 1
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 �1
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0. 1
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton � 0 1 2
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. . 0 0.5
29 b. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 :
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants,�ltem 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or w
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
Gtx���-i���1��%l�; ��:3�i1,� "� �
��������� .
0
.0
1.5
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
• 3
1.5
V = 2.0; Other = 0
and plants.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: �`��5� � s
�valuator: �
� �-Q;�rf1.��;
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if? 19 or perennial if>_ 30
Project: �,,
Site: 4 l,%
County: ��
l
Latitude:
Longitude:
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
�Y�q� �-�naua uucncs are noc ra�ea; see aiscussions in manuai
B. H drolo Subtotal = � �
14. Groundwater flow/discharge �
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, o�
Water in channel -- d or rowin season
16. Leaflitter
17. Sediment on plants or debris
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic featuresl �resent?
� 1C,.j 2 3
� � 2 � 3
1 0.5 0
0 0.5 1 1.5
Q�' � 0.5 1 1.5
No=O Yes=1.�,
C. Biology (Subtotal = ` , � ')
20°. r'ibrous roois in cnannei 3 2 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 1 0
22. Cra�sh 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves • 1 2 3
24. Fish � 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 1 1.5 �
26., Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 1.5
27. Filamentous aigae; periphyton � 1 2 �� 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 b. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = • OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants,�ltem 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additiohal notes.) Sketch:
1 � �
D .}1 ��1 � )11,�_ 4 1!` rS A � Jl r'1 �'� ,t � �/li-.. n �9 � t � • ``,��=" , n 2 �:
, �j
' �.
o�a, �� ���ua , c��. �.1 � � Jlll��..r�c�.�� �
l�c�s�G� �'r-�'��c�S1�.Q;C�,,,� C.�-�' �;�'1 �,�GC��.�' � r�=
���r ��r�u.�c�-�� C'h��; �� ���� �%�C.Ac�.��.�
8' �3G (t�
� ��,,,
v-

+��.� ..,� S !m • 'f_ ���� •�� a.� s � � � �� ��/����� ll�.
. . . ... .. . ,. .. . ..- > . .k'i..l, ..
��
� , ,_..5�?:�`...+..
. F f ,
�t ,x� A�",� ��.��^ ��,"�� x } �4 %^ � w A� �� F� .� 1 � � w � ; . i � r ! �-.. � _ .
�, � _ ;�r'���St�'�#�,� ;�,•xe�y ��` '�t'�v��.+[,�.��ie°, .. r a . . �T . s ;' it � �i ^�' t :
�`` ' t `� +Sfi �,a H�'� �A�e"�,u* kr ?�� �t i a�. �,1f t s y., :� �t ., X h f� s ; rr t'n"t r� ti , e�'.
,,� �a �+ �"'rrr�' a� S� -. i i i -t � t� . i. ti'. � a° �A "'"�a � s�'
c a ,
���k-���`,r �� Pr�^ftrwi a.° i* ,� 3 I { �y � �, r � 6 ii � � � k S��`f , �' jr �.s ti
'�r' e'�� �i���"ty�,sFf E��S� j'� � B i S � �� 4 � � y t �7} i r%u �' i
x� r{ �, � s C ` f 1
. .. _. E, . . ws � .�i��F7a���M,��.f�-a.�u . . �?',1 i. , v. _.� �r .. �,. . . ,r . y ...�:.r � _�. r . . . . ., �� S � ,... . -,... , ,.. _ `�1 � � > ...� ,. �.{. . ; :i't ,..F k . , .. .{ - �,'

..F � x .��� . ,� - r � � a r
,
«1 , � , ; 1 - .�, � � > r:
,
" - .n? "' + r. �;�, ..^?..tuf�:r.0 ..» e . .ti . ..� .��'„ ...�,. _: , ... �+.._. . . .,.,� �"'. . ...., � . __. , . .. .,r.... . # .:'. ..2 i. S.✓: �:?�."�.wf...�as... L., ..ro .2�,;a�:.
�.. . .. . � _� .��.a y...
0
�'�, . � . ' • S Y 1 "I ..Y ,� i ' . � ; .
l
, y 3 4 y ...4 } i X � . . + ' . �.n 5 ' • , . -, r p- �'Y s 1
.r'i,s+�j"t,y�w:� a'�,y��, }t4�.•t� ,w�.k,i y�{r _ ., ` ' �. , ...' i r,r=3 ttr �r� ,i j�L7-�.r
i � ,
.W •�4: � '4 ct��� "b:( x� :, f �., r a ` £ . , i`.. 3 �i Ni �`.lY f { . � rt
�{ � � � ,��.� ��- �"�a��'� �j'^�'„4;r,� l � �� i .:Y }�,�, S Y i ...� • .� j � )' " „ r � ;� h ( ' t< ' f �..�,r�� �� �
.,, . .. ... ... . , �t.n+.'�4�� .�.+a�,',��.�!'`,�,�.'��..�1t:�a"�'az�'.r a t�f'!�1 �i?.� �. .. . ... . . a... .... _ ., t. ,. - . f_... . . 6 i . ., ... . I � . . . P.. A.. ' . . � . , , i. . � . � Y... . . �:'� '. �
t'` i� ��.!„ � 1 ...1 ftt....

`� � + �� R��` ` �'I� � f �t +' t�'� s j � t '�r - ^ sfi� �
P�'�. wt,sa-ad�� .*�,,. ... �z a�,. o k_ t � .-� S '} w
,�'-\ . _ . . .. .. .. . .. ,. ._ . .:. „ .. , ..' . �? -, ^�r {• ,d/�1 . . .
I- �� �ysi��F �i���
�k �.t r , . .: � r'� . �r � #� �a i{�^. n �.�1. r i� �,� .
�i.�'�� - � � i 7 . 5.g � i� .:.z� s r�rdi TL y.�.M� ,y � � 3.�" zc��rt
�"`�yrt r .. � t 5^ - � y..ii r i , �y'� �'X i +k��tit1?,3�r1� vrxl � �i�.i"S. ..c�� v.
7�7b''f4 t"��.C''y.���� '�s r^�3� °,^�s y,43;.Y'Yi, f� �. �*r� ; i" 1 r . „w ` . � � ai, ua a'�,p y tty9� r"�'� �''•�t '''���" ii � �b���p. �$ `}tfie�+`fivwt"r�f����
�M'�i a���a nsi��t'� ,��"k ��rr f'�`4 '.� 1 4:: at i. 'h i�� r j � r a ` t w 1�� U�. {1 0 �"�a� nf t F t ay�� .
�`�� .�p'J�.�. �i �#� 7 '"a .rAr� fs .�A t t. u 6� r a'�s�; t 5 ��� �'�V 4b ! sn j s j .
(}, �'`'m.. ai Z a, � \, z _. ry�.�� i� �� ,7 . a � � �r+z H F t .�...A �. �. �� ' � a t i"`;� y� .
�'+,�.'a� �5� .t t � 7 . � yi f 4 � Y � .r R ��� � �� FSw w ��+
+� �'?,z.�.}-',. � . � ,. r . .. , ;�.�� � .�, .,�, . � . � _ � ����} 'r ,,. �.t , f ., ' t ty.`�''��. �.�rE r�� r �:,y�t�ei �
- ., . : . � . • - ..
, . .:`i'h. .. . "•;.. . �'..... �... ....-Y _ . - � .. � . � '.. .... .. . . _: .. . �: ' J..� . .. F ..1�.� ... . . ,_

. .
4. t .
�:: jf�!r � i� � ..> .�1.i.• . .
� � :
, t 5
r f 7 � i7 p
;ti E � ��h i � 7�,,. 7� ��� � t. � F� n "'.+ t s'-r � J ��
t rv _ � ' � ` ° " � ,:
� 35 a �
i.'� �.� }+y. °x� p � �. � � f:
� 5 �y r,
`� j t ' �� ���� �- r t i
W 7 'r � z t
� � r
i•�� 3� �� `��. � �L.� � . .�� t . .}� � i.:
i �� g ,
._.. . � � . _ ..,.�

�
_ i � � k Y � � f , � � -:� �' t �� � � �
j ° i�-<i �+�` . a �� �, jt 1 ,, +�' ` P �t sF a � � � �'` i
}�;..k e y�A�+,-� r ' [ . .rk t y.d 41 ns+��F �e' �� "�.
�"� a�t:fi�'�+A'w �-+i �� ��- J�' wr qf'�d� ��u n � :,. � � i 1 i 6t .'` �. G w��,$' r"fi� r 4 G�ar+,�W'� q# y� gs,t'�.it*�� �',S"`��`w}� wik�„"�
z�,�,7�Y aw»s- d e. 1 y . y� a,r.aY . p y m e t �� r, r �` '7`.n +a� G� '�� •+ � � �.1 F rw"e kt" r � 4�:
� •£ �.�T`�� l5 .�'j �3 �y��`c'u� y . •�, '� .+ ..e�...�.� t .,..i�..:zb;.e r ... . .'-� �cai. c... �;,�..i..sl�� ri_, �.,.a �;s;t:t `Tz ti
a,l'aa�n�:. .�..._�".'..f.:x..y...t ..i..r_-i_ .t__,�.r_,._ . _. . . ._.�,a.

.�
,
DOCUMENTATION FORM
SOUTHWEST GREENVILLE BYPASS (NC 11) STUDY
PITT COUNTY
Federal ProjectNo.: STP-11(1)
NCDOT Project No.: 8.1221401
TIP Pmject No. R-2250
A field meeting was held on May 18, 2004 to review sh�eam determinations for the Greenville
Southwest Bypass. Tlris meeting was arranged due to the fact that hydrology in the area had
changed significanUy since the field work was performed in summer of 2002, and stream
determination calls on many of the streams will likely be changed following another review. Mike
Thomas with NCDWQ and Heather Renninger and Emily Fentress with H.W. Lochner, Inc.
attended the meeting. A site-by-site visit was conducted on the following streams:
• CC2 — significant amount of vegetation in streambed; no flow; ephemeral
• CC9 — no flow; ditch through agricultural field
• Jolly 27 — contains fish; perennial
• WS (upper reach) — possible lineaz wetland; Mike Thomas will contact Mike Bell regazding the
determinarion on this segment of stream; Mike Thomas is inclined to call the entire segment non-
jurisdictional. FOLLOW-UP: Mike T'homas contacted Emily Fentress on July 6, 2004 and said
the entire upper reach of stream WS is non jurisdictional and should not be included on mapping.
• G-12 — does not contain water; ephemeral
• NCl 1-26 — begin jurisdiction at the fann road crossing on the east side of NC 11. 'The stream is
intemuttent unril the DWQ flag neaz the corner of the field on the west side of NC 11; it then
becomes perennial along the field edge and continues into the woods to Swift Creek.
• SSDI —perennial; redo forms (called intermittent on forms)
• RBR-23 — stream determination should remain intemuttent
• 3SD 1— perennial; redo forms (called intemrittent on forms)
• 3DS2 — perennial; redo forms (called intermittent on forms)
• Q20 — intemuttent until fazm road crossing in the curve of s�eam; then becomes perennial
• M40 — stream determinadon should remain intemuttent
• 4TTSD1 — due to the fact that this streazn contained fish, Mike Thomas called it perennial but
advised Lochner to get NCDOT to appeal the call
• 4SA — stream detemvnation should remain intemuttent
• 4X — intemuttent from Fmg Level Road to the west side of Ivy Chase Drive. After crossing Iry
Chase Drive, the stream becomes perennial.
• H18 — intermittent from the culvert crossing at Davenport Fazm Road
• K17 — ephemeral
• 3SD3 — left and middle fork aze perennial; right fork is ephemeral
• PCC-43 — perennial; redo form (called intemuttent on form)
• RBR-44A — siream determination should remain intetmittent
• TLR 38 — ditch thmugh upland/ephemeral
• GB48 — ditch through upland/ephemeral
• RS48 - perenniai

��
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
A. Geomor holo Subtotal = �. �
1a. Continuous bed and bank
2. Sinuosity
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
5. Active/relic floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches ��
7. Braided channel
8. Recent alluvial deposits �
9 a Natural levees
10. Headcuts
11. Grade controls
12. Natural valley or drainageway
13. Second or greater order channel on existina
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
a Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H drolo Subtotal = .
14. Groundwater flow/discharge �
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or •
Water in channel -- d or rowin season
16. Leaflitter
97. Sediment on plants or debris
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic featuresl �resent?
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.5
0.5
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1.5
1.5
�o� I Yes = 3
� 2 3
� 2 3
1.5 1 p
0.5 1 1.5
0:5 1 1.5
0=0 Yes=1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = . � / i )
2G . Fiurous Poo7s in cnannei 3
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3
22. Cra�sh �
23. Bivalves
24. Fish
25. Amphibians �
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton p
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus.
� 29 b. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FP
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
2 1 `
2 1
0.5 1 1.5
1 2 3
0.5 1 1.5
0.5 1 1.5 �
0.5 1 1.5
1 2 3
0.5 1 1.5
= 0. , OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
iresence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:

�� /�i7
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: b Project: �� ��'!� Latitude:
11
Evaluator: n ` Site: � Lo 't d•
�J
�^ I
Total Points: �
Stream is at feast infermittent ��� County: 9i��
if? 19 or.perennial if? 30 ► f
A. Geomor holo (Subtatal = ��'':%AEisent'::
1a. Continuous bed and bank p.
2. Sinuosity �
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
5. Active/relic floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Braided channel . D
8. Recent alluvial deposits
9 a Natural levees
10. Headcuts
11. Grade controls .
12. Natural valley or drainageway
13. Second or greater order channel on existina �
USGS or NRCS map or other documented �
evidence.
a Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H drolo Subtotal = �
14. Groundwater flow/discharge � p
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or �
Water in channel -- d or rowin season
16. Leaflitter 1.5
17. Sediment on plants or debris
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) p
19. Fiydric soils (redoximorphic features) present?' p
C. Biology (Subtotal = , /✓ )
2�°. �iurous �ao�s i� channei 3
21°. Rooted plants in channel 3
22. Cra�sh
23. Bivalves
24. Fish
25. Amphibians
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) .
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton ' "
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus.
29 °. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5;
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, •Ifem 29 focuses
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
�
1
0.5_
0.5
ngi u e.
Other
e.g. Quad Name: �
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
�
1 2
1 2
1 0.
0.5 1
0.5 1
=0
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1.5
1.5
Yes = 3
3
3
0
1.5
1.5
Yes = 1.5
�r.':���
r�
� �
� �
� �
0.5 1 1.5
�.7 , OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2,0; Other = 0
� ce of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:

9
' � �V � �
North Carolina Division of Water Qualiiy-.Stream ldentification Form; Version 3.1
Date: "J � -��
Evaluator: �,� i0. ��� �,�,
Total Points: nI � �
Stream is af least intermittent ,
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30
Prbject: � �o��
Site: .�.�
County: y�� ��-
�
A. Geomor holo (subtotai = o� . 1
1a. Continuous bed and bank
2. Sinuosity �
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
5. Active/relic floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7, Braided channel �
8. Recent alluvial deposits
9 a Natural levees
10. Headcuts
11. Grade controls
12. Natural valley or drainageway �
13. Second or greater order channel on existina
USGS or NRCS map or other documented �
evidence.
a Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussio�s in manual
B. H drolo Subtotal = • �
14. Groundwater flow/discharge
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or rowin season
16. Leaflitter
17. Sediment on plants or debris
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
19. Hydric soils (redoximorohic featuresl nrPSPnt�
Latitude:
Longitude:
Other� . �
e.g.,QuadName: �G��IIIL �
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
"--�' I
1 2
1 2
1 0.;
0.5 1
0.5 1
C. Biology (Subtotal = �)
2^v . �i�iii�uS iGOiS in c��ai�r�ei �
21b. Rooted plants in channel 3
22. Cra�sh p
23. Bivalves
24. Fish . p
25. Amphibians
26. Macrobenthos (note diversiry and abundance)
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. p
29 b. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; ?
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1.5�
1.5
Yes = 3
3
3
0
1.5
1.5
Yes = 1.5
2 1
2 1 0
0.5 1 1.5
.1 2 3
0.5 1 1.5
0.5 . 1 1.5
0.5. 1 1.5
1 2 3
0.5 1 1.5
= 0.7 OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
�resence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:

o�o� W AT �RQG
� �
�� > �
o �
Eric Galamb
H.W. Lochner, Inc.
2840 Plaza Place, Suite 202
Raleigh, NC 27612
Michael F. Easley, Governor.
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1VIarch 23, 2005
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Subject: Improvements to NC 11 and US 264 Business (Greenville Southwest Bypass) in Pitt
County, R-2250
On-Site Determination for Applicability to the Neuse and Tar-Pamlico Buffer Rules
Dear Mr. Galamb:
On March 2, 2005, Brian Wrenn conducted an on-site deternunation to review thirteen stream features .
within the study area for the referenced project for applicability to the Neuse and Tar-Pamlico Buffer
Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233 and .0259, respectively). The features are labeled on the attached maps :
initialed by Brian Wrenn on March 8, 2005.
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) determinations for the features are presented in Table 1. Four of
the thirteen stream features were deternuned to be intermittent or perennial and subject to the Neuse
buffer rules. Stream feature G was deternuned to be perennial and subject to the buffer rules from the
most upstream point at the logging road down to Frog Level Road (see Map 1). Stream feature E1 was
determined to be perennial and subject to the buffer rules from just downstream of Frog Level Road to the
confluence with Horsepen Swamp (see Map 2). Stream feature E2 was deternuned to be intemuttent and
subject to the buffer rules from the most upstream point at the outlet of the field drain tiles to a
downstream point where a distinct channel is lost in an adjacent wetland area of Horsepen Swamp (see
Map 2). Stream feature D was deternuned to be perennial and subject to the buffer rules from the most
upstream point where the channel begins in the agricultural field to the confluence with a UT to Horsepen
Swamp (see Map 3).
Table 1. — Stream deternvnations and buffer
Stream Feature ID
BS-A
B5-B
H
G
E1
E2
D
A
BD3
BD4
BD1
Stream Determination
Ephemeral
Not present
Ephemeral
Ephemeral
Perennial
Ephemeral
Perennial
Internuttent
Perennial
Transportation Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone]/ Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
for streams within the R-2250 corridors.
Buffer Applical
Not Subject
Not Subject
Not Subject
Not Subject
Subject
Not Subject
Subject
Subiect
Subject
Not Subject
Not Subject
Not Subject
Not Subiect

Mr. Galamb
Mazch 23, 2005
Page 2
These on-site determinations shall expire five (5) yeazs from the date of this letter. Landowners or
affected pazties that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority that a
surface water exists and that it is subject to the mitigation rules may request a deteraunation by the
Director. A request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the D'uector in writing c/o
7ohn Dorney, DWQ Wetlands/401 Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650. Individuals
that dispute a detemvnation by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority that "exempts" a surface water
from the mitigation rules may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date
that you receive tivs letter. Applicants aze hereby notified that the 60day statutory appeal time dces not
start until the affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision.
DWQ recommends that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be ceRain that third pazty
appeals are made in a timely manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699�i714. This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing within 60 days.
This letter only addresses the applicability to the Neuse and Taz-Pamlico Buffer Rule requirements and
dces not approve any activity within Waters of the United States or Waters of the State. If you have any
additional questions or require additional information please call Brian VJrenn at [phone].
nc ely,
._ ��
Alan R'. Klimek, . .
Attachments: Maps 1, 2, and 3
cc: Nicole Thomson, DWQ Transportation Permitting Unit, Cen[ral Office
File Copy
Central Files
�

� � . �����.i��:�����ya :` 4 t `. $'� • � '�`�� � � vxw.�x�w�;
�' � :r �� �t � .�� fs �� � r , ti � : x � ;�y.� �r `�����,'�'-,
` p �' � �� �,�r�.,� �� .� ^ . . � ,�
� �i - �s9� � ;,�� i�".��,�u��• - t ., � �, �' �x" � e � �z �� �; . - #-. ' ��
� � �ut �� + � ti r � ' d '�: h `k �3• �t} Y� �`����i
��� � ` � .'� "�. Cr � ;. � � � �� �+� �
� -� - � � ' �'�s,�,,�� x�.�—' � ,�'�' �g' a�.d � �.a„
'a , � ��� ���`x'4�`�., .�� ��.�x�� R r��., § ���'� "'�?
_4 M 7 ""�' }i e ,* �d°A �r }r i�..� �.
s��',a �, r,'�� � K .� �,�� ti�,� ��,�5 a� fi
L�,' � �y Ty�, � .t � � �I M e$�•• u-i
�'� 'f�`",t,'v 9� ! ' f. c..��if �: ?- 4 �d �'s �:
�. -ffi�.4`+���� '. �+� ,�� ` �#'� � f �� � �� ��`a q� �A� � jP .'y �+'
� t ��
~ �Y. e 4 ' - ' "�+� � �y '� �. i � ,7 �
, �r+�' p 1 �` ,y �.� . e � y� 'x .F�. a.a �^ _ � . F. � 7
• �a�+�'rY .«i � . . ��? Y xS , r � ,�sj- �_ ,
F`` , ry�.• � stf���_. f.`'r` -0 k.�, k�
i . �.�, � ° -ti �� ��:��i � y� a „r`w
6k, �_ f f f r�� �.� �{ zi: -X Y''
t � �� { �
� ��� S:4 • + � _ ` �; �� y �� �� �" ay�: ��i
3 �.' .,Y�''a `�z �. ' ° a t `� �.`i A } �'�:� p ri
��„� `� . .y_ . � . � _iA �
���� +� � �`,�`tt�,� . i '�. t L , r �., r r ,s4. e„�
r l - , � . � =� k
3�d� � � . r- , rl ' ���r��1 , ' f . �'�
�'� 9�-�r. s� . � - ���§�s��� � " t �
f ����. , � � ��d �
f''.
�� !� �� t . tl�r��p . L�, - �'I
� r
�' � . �`�� a'�'�z"� �.,� ' , r v ' �xt.; � � � � �,� .
" s� � i �.:�� u`�4-»Fg
6 i:�s:�'.�aN����r� �` ' t ��Y. ��.- ��+a°�. - - r
T"y{`�,ir���d� �,' _� �' _. ,."r s3 �`.' . } ,i.�,�°'1 i � .TFT.'�2 r ��Z��'2',� ..
� :i�,'k��� . .. � .tt r� .�yp � ��t.�. �.''- ,s ��"'. �, b ��,. h c r
'R -�"!'� 9 � F,�.�" �.`� f , ! ,i° :g '' � Af .r: ��' � � b� . ;� '7 {._ a
,� �
����e,P.��'"��' �ad��y.}�/:���}��,''*- ��*�}'� � ;«. a� . �} +~ . ` �
N� � � J" b�"�e% � � �kt "E,A�T�.,ljt 4 � .� � `� ,.: S ,Y.$ "S` t„
` �� �� � � � t I � �' a.. : � . �' s
�`:. � ���, s ya c�.. * _ti�." 3a,,"'` .- s f ` � 5 .�;�' � � y •
t ,•,x f , 'iur"� f�"�+ ': . . 'f ��. �,,,t, ,� i �, . j s �;
�,��,� � �+�^'�yx+�' �'�'i7`& � y•���s� C� fiw a �>y �� ?` � P>•, �- y}-:.
��" Y r , ,� � `�,.' `����-� T • �j,r4 � % :-� � ` �:
, f � �
f � . +
t� i, t,� � 9 r^�, ii
���� a'' 'Ae � � a'{��i,+�L �% � 4 srt�"r �'
3� , . �.� s 1 _i r e xt �.
r ' .i� r
�� 4 3 Z �
� �i
7, x ,!C ���x2
� T � +y , 4a'�Fa Y %�7 �T&�y' r�tj��tt`���h � . � � d y L 7Re � �i 3��^ � �',"
y. - 3. k.� .s- M T 2 �i-Yiz '� =?j"s' '�•.� �� � J � . h
f ,� ` r.�i,��� �..,��s� ����c - w ' ;'1i� ,� ���� �" r
'�',' � �.,.`� o"� .��.lk�� ��: �, ` ,. � �xic • �.v� �� ? , �
'�°¢ p �`r ,�, � 3� ... �; 9 � �a: { �'�j ��Y r`�f.t�:.S,PE-'
'`; . . _ .�r�^F ...3 �5.. i�+W i�i, x,.« ._.. . .._ � .� . n :F"�'� . a._'sy:�'�
�d�s�`��r � �� t�+ S --
Xy�r''�^��d'r
1 �L a��������� �
yt�� ���' x�
' 5��� � �. �h.
�`,
��. '�' �� �' » -
��� � � �
� �,��� , iy ��� � � �� � ,�� �� � -� , ��
��-�x �.'�� ; �'��������` � , ��� ,y� ,
� ,,�
;��.v .� '.�y��. ' �,tiir"�+�� � ,���,` " � a"� y r �� .�" ',,a: „ w � , . �;�
u. �� JNI�dr�.1Y ,'.�' �,.,� '.�i�-��
r},��+����,FF ��z����3yti������� � � �,.
- a �q�✓'�-�'.I �' x ,��, � i 3�"�,� � � �'�r k� a .� „ ..� '5�..
��tµ �.��� .s �y�5%��'�,�� � +.���n�5� w n��:z �
� ,� T�`�?'.`�',w.�,, �-.,s �'s-'�, y,� ��.:�F�� r,��!�
r ;:� i�u''�''�� � r t'�'{�+`t �sx 3 °�'� .y
�x����t�4`���'�'` ��'.. ���� ,
- � 'w''" ��e"�".r'��s,fi�` �,�t�r� r�z.� ��e
��� ��U. ��� ��„�.�y_ w¢'�
:v. � a �. 1�E4 ��t, . �, � . r .y�, t
�� ,�. _ �". � } w..�,.,..
m�+ .�z
�
T` , . .�
�:.
�'.
Y
[' f 'xF .t } /�, � '& } f . Y� .T P P !. '
St i �t. 4 fi� . l .. F . � '�4 � * � �
s �� ,-��� . 3 �k� � �yv e ,: �'' '
� s..� I = ;: r � t .
'� t`� �'�i z'�c.�`,c�! A t'� i�i t T'� � x 4 �
1 a`''.e�'� g� �; �� r y �,
�s'��" y�r j1 1� �' 1 6'� �*� � . �� � -���� "�� �L "� �ii �
}�-`,��� s4 rf'i'� ' . 4 ra i� +.' Ty } � � _' {, � ii
'`�� � ��+`,#z� �� ,a � � ��'� ; �- k` „����,'r,�azy� }+ y;� �' d :
� �l' i � � iM1 .. � x � l Y
Y y��
Y 'i� -YY l +.� �.�.f i C'� . .� ,s�' S} '�
4
4 g:s z t " "'f_ � ''a#e� = { � .
� � -t � ' ; �
r � '., S C ,� y �`
4 � 7 � M 5 �.. � .. 4 � � ,.
-rr r'� .. � i s� s � �... > ,� :'r ��.� ..'� b � .
•, S �:r t ,5 tw `afh ,e'
.t �
�, . .. �t �'�.;7 t ,� I �, � i.y� � �' ,� .� S pa ... � �.
} t�1'' � t-� Tij �N}�4 r4 hF� � ir'; ��� r�� °`� :w':
x .'£ . '. « �'. , . . _ � i � � # ++�'
���'�..�a�� Px��� + �, .c.t� J*�� �
i'ti .j. ,.,',�,+°1 �r �5"� r`' R y-n � F� ''.
y�t}R }'4•� }k..�f'yz����r �. '�, `� .,1 t iit�.
,r
dit 7 a� .r"�`��,.�`r °. �Si�N �,'P���`4�+x,s.};.�s,y�.tla
n
wl� ,�, r �t� `-y � - w�i�.,
�
� t ��.y�s,i�ji ��' ....� � ��' a �i ��, r a.'.
� �� �s�i � �r w- �' s a " , , Y
�-a r* �„ > � �
�r3' �r�ci.�� br�' 3=f e ni ' H
yY���"��y.+r Y'` � z � �' '? �"w'°
�s.�-e"t � f E'` � �.. c �`t �
u.�k.. . ��...�dAfi'��.���"`sd _�*w ..... ,. � �.. � . ,
e

Y
Eric Galamb
H.W. I.ochner, Inc.
2840 Plaza Place, Suite 202
Raleigh, NC 27612
Michael F. Easley, Grnemor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina DepertmeM ot Environment and Natural Resources
Mazch 23, 2005
fUan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division ot Weter Oualiry
Subject: Improvements to NC 11 and US 264 Business (Greenville Southwest Bypass) in Pitt
County, R-2250
On-Site Detemvnation for Applicability to the Neuse and Taz-Pamlico Buffer Rules
Deaz Mr. Galamb:
On March 2, 2005, Brian Wrenn conducted an on-site determination to review thirteen stream features
within the study area for the referenced project for applicability to the Neuse and Taz-Panilico Buffer
Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233 and .0259, respectively). The features aze labeled on the attached maps
initialed by Brian Wrenn on Mazch S, 2005.
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) deternilnations for the features aze presented in Table 1. Four of
the thirteen stream features were determined to be intermittent or perennial and subject to the Neuse
buffer rules. Stream feature G was determined to be perennial and subject to the buffer rules from the
most upstream point at the logging road down to Frog Level Road (see Map 1). Stream feature El was
determined to be perermial and subject to the buffer rules from just downstream of Frog Level Road to the
confluence with Horsepen Swamp (see Map 2). Stream feature E2 was determined to be inteanittent and
subject to the buffer rules from the most upstream point at the outlet of the field drain tiles to a
downstream point where a distinct channel is lost in an adjacent wetland azea of Horsepen Swamp (see
Map 2). Stream feature D was determined to be perennial and subject to the buffer rules from the most
upstream point where the channel begins in the agricultural field to the confluence with a LJT to Horsepen
Swamp (see Map 3).
— Sheam detemunations and buffer a licabilit for streams within the
�m Feature ID Stream DeterminaNno u.,tro.. s....
� � nemeral Not
BS-A Not nresent Not
BS-B Ephemeral Not
H
Not
B � Ephemeral Not
�l Intemuttent g�
D Perennial S�
A E hemeral Not
�D3 Ephemeral Not
BDl � Ephemeral Not
TransporteUon Permilting UnR
1650 Mail Service Center, Releiph, NOM Cerofine 27699�7650
2321 Crabtree Bouleverd, Suite 250, Raleigh, Nath Carolina 27804
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / IntemeC http://h2o enr state.nc us/ncwetlands
M Equal Oppartuniry/�rmetive ppion Empbyer- 50% qecyded/10% posl Consumer Paper

Mr. Galamb
Mazch 23, 2005
Page 2
These on-site determinations shall expire five (5) yeus from the date of this letter. Landowners or
affected parties that dispute a determinauon made by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority that a
surface water e�cists and that it is subject to the mitigation rules may request a deternvnation by tt�e
Director. A request for a determination by the D'uector shall be referred to the D'uector in writing c/o
John Dorney, DWQ Wetlands/401 Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650. Individuals
that dispute a deternvnation by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority that "exempts" a surface water
from the mitigation rules may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date
that you receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified that the 60day statutory appeal time dces not
start until the affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision.
DWQ recommends that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be cer[ain that third party
appeals are made in a timely manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to
Chapter 150B of the North Cazolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a
heazing within 60 days.
This letter only addresses the applicability to the Neuse and Taz-Pamlico Buffer Rule requirements and
dces not approve any activity within Waters of the United States or Waters of the State. If you have any
addiuonal questions or require additional information please call Brian Wrenn at [phone].
nc ely,
�v
Alan W. Klimek, . .
Attachinents: Maps 1, 2, and 3
cc: Nicole Thomson, DWQ Transportation Pernritting Unit, Central O�ce
File Copy
Central Files

�
'�:=,;'::���.
"h, h ..,�, 'e y. ` � k + { x t .. � � � �,� �, a ,� .. ' ..,� . i' �d,E' 4+�r�,y,roy, A
i y!
F �� � i�� � ++ rr {A � t�t� 3y'"R., � . F t � f1'k �'dv :+ �` � .
� �
y �� � � i �� � �i� M1 T n Y �'L `��,. �`"..! fR� .t' � ♦ ' .F�.�» 4 .,� � .� y4 �'� C`n �.t.z �f .��a� a- � .ny �
f z, rt +r ,..;�r
y '�'t� Y`#,,� ..�` 4 "`�7 ''� ..'3 aF +��' '�i'r � +� L '� �"Gf . �L ,.�`� w, . � r�' "� nL� �� ryw"
i w 7 ,� a � � P w � f s � i � a, � n - a � �, ��t'. � µ �,�,°v ..I k ,.t ,r ''_ +
� �� � M � �i .� . � tuA�+"4 `ti`' ; �,�'� . e�. 'a+ Ai„�
R r � � Y a 4�' . �. "Xa 'x i �,�.� �,. � # ,. �d +� �m � _ r:, � i�c -e �, �,^�°i �°x, y �,a;.
v +, F �' �'7` : a t �
` �;. � ` �" � r4 '� '� � ��.�d' "' .. ��`'� �s+'' � �'a" x '�s.a ffi x ��' s� i r :.
r , j.� ;� W .8� � �"�., i�ry � '��,� '��1' r,c�4� ��fi �" xe .
�,�+i�r•�•'y, i � e y �' 7 ` �.S i-"�x �' J� �� s^c�'`� * �-f� �„�� �� r r��,�� �.. �.�'{],"y,t �,'e 'x � M � :
" `� ,,, t �. r .�.t a^ F�'�yrr _�. �� R+t �y"'4 � < .i:�'.7"� Y , � �"jii �� xdd � f t
.��, ,* a � fs � ��
y n � ` i� �a. ��� ��°�. � 4 ��! '� A .w ��t�„y,�S",,Et� �� �� �^�wY,c
���et V�.:isCTt:��"�°.."�:r . �..� `" . �. . 3�`�`"a-R*,'.�.��e...�.:x,.N �...._ , .�W.'3p. #._�ti�f .'��.U.��.
+ t

R-2250 ICI addendum
Subject: R-2250 ICI addendum
From: Colin Mellor <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 12:38:13 -0500
To: David Wainwright <[e-mail]
David,
attached is the ICI addendum for Greenville bypass and the
tranamittal letter (paper copiee to follow). I think we've
addressed all your concerns but please let me know if there are
still queetiona.
Regarding an old question - the atream that I was questioning you
about (a month ago I think) is stream CC1, near the interaection
of NC 102 and NC 11 (-Y- 8 from the project). The draft FEIS
shows 116' of impact for thie ateam. As I had said earlier, a
local man indicated that the landowner had had the stream
declasaified to a ditch. He didnt know who the local DWQ rep.
was. I was wondering if you could find that out?
Colin Mellor
PDEA - Natural Environment Unit
N.C. Department of Tranaportation
919-715-1426
._._ ___ _....- ----..
Content-Type: application/pdf
�R-2250_DWQ_ICIadd_transmittaLpdf Content-Encoding• base64
— __ g•
R-2250_ICIAddendum.pdf Content-Type: application/pdf ;
Content-Encodin base64
tofl
�...,� /I/6 ti - �Of �o n,je..f'$
Ar/� yo�rC� (�Chc� rF � %np..� Q'.h�s^'-1
i
rw, .� �..�._,�
,.�-
�f -
�7' / %� �QiS/ �Q✓SL
1�,3 y�
ouioy R�►a,.d osy�,.
21 u6
a�3�a v�,�wy,�� �ry,.
Z5872 w..�+4,:s�..
�rsya
Gs'�s7
f/uf f
�-8o€z
��' 3S-`i % i �r cz
.-�7- 2 sy.,s
-�� �9 3�- ��1 o���yyr cv,�lG<;. 4„d, �
Go371 8 CI.•�,T�yw�
Jo�n�� --
�I r-""_
�1� �,f�7)2�2
���
Co,�l���e. �I�P�'��
12/10/2007 3:01 PM